We further investigated the response of the powdered samples towards 2-PEA vapour after our evaluation of their chemical nature. Additionally, the QCM sensor was installed into a testing chamber, which was kept at a constant temperature of 298 K and relative humidity of 45%–55%. The frequency response of the QCM sensors at 50 ppm 2-PEA vapour, as shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting information). Also, the stability of the QCM sensors coated with the FDU-15-CHO was evident. Regarding the increase of aldehyde group, the sensor cannot be restored, because the surface area and pore volume of the material decrease with the increase of aldehyde group. In the presence of 50 ppm 2-PEA vapour,
Fig. 3A shows how the FDU-15-CHO-2-based QCM sensor has a frequency response that is time-dependant. Within 100 s, the frequency shift was less than 650 Hz, which the highly sensitive behaviour of the QCM sensor coated with aldehyde-functionalized FDU-15 to 2-PEA. As a comparison, the other FDU-15-based sensors were also studied for 50 ppm 2-PEA. In this case, the sensor's frequency shift is much smaller than that of the FDU-15-CHO-2-based QCM sensor, which is attributed to the aldehyde groups of FDU-15. Additionally, the FDU-15-CHO to 2-PEA response time is approximately 10 s, while the recovery time is approximately 11 s. For 45 days, we exposed the sensor to air for the purpose of testing the sensor's long-term stability. After a series of continuous tests for 45 days, all of the responses showed a slight decrease, as demonstrated in
Fig. 3B. This indicates that all of the sensors had notable stability. The typical sensor response to 2-PEA vapour at a concentration of 1–100 ppm is exhibited in
Fig. 3C. Evidence that supports how the 2-PEA sensor's detection limit can reach 1 ppm is presented by the frequency shift higher than 10 Hz at 1 ppm. Then, we measured the frequency response values for the FDU-15-CHO-2-based QCM sensor under varying relative humidity conditions upon exposure to 50 ppm 2-PEA gas. The temperature is maintained at 298 K in all of the experiments.
Fig. 3D presents the exposure of the QCM sensor to 50 ppm 2-PEA, and the maximum frequency response values at relativity humidity levels of 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 48%, 53%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 93%, 95% and 98% RH are 500 Hz, 510 Hz, 525 Hz, 530 Hz, 538 Hz, 545 Hz, 551 Hz, 558 Hz, 565 Hz, 577 Hz, 590 Hz, 608 Hz, 620 Hz, 638 Hz, 645 Hz, 668 Hz, 672 Hz and 680 Hz, respectively. Under dry air, the frequencies are 400 Hz, 414 Hz, 435 Hz, 438 Hz, 448 Hz, 455 Hz, 463 Hz, 471 Hz, 488 Hz, 510 Hz, 534 Hz, 543 Hz, 558 Hz, 567 Hz, 578 Hz, 586 Hz, 593 Hz and 630 Hz, respectively, which indicates that at the same concentration, the frequency response towards 2-PEA increases by a small amount with increasing relative humidity. The aldehyde group produces satisfactory humidity resistance results. Our material's gas sensing mechanism towards 2-PEA can be assigned to a multistage Schiff base mechanism. The comparison of the individual frequency responses in other interfering gases supported the investigation of selectivity. These gases are 2-PEA, acetone, H
2S, CO
2, NO
2, CO and CH
4. The concentration of all of the gases is 50 ppm. The individual responses of the FDU15-CHO based sensor towards these gases are shown in Fig. S9 (Supporting information). The response to 2-PEA is much higher than that for other gases, which is evidently attributed to the definite interactions occurring between the functional group and the –NH
2 group of 2-PEA vapour. The 50 ppm 2-PEA reaches a response at 680 Hz. The largest response to 50 ppm acetone vapour reaches approximately 182 Hz for all seven interfering gases. However, at the same concentration, it is significantly less than that of 2-PEA. This result demonstrates the reasonable selectivity of the FDU-15-CHO-based QCM sensor for 2-PEA. As discussed above, it can be concluded that a good candidate for sensing 2-PEA vapour is the well-defined aldehyde-functionalized FDU-15. We believe that the sensing performance depends on two factors: one is the provision of the mesoporous FDU-15 structure with numerous active sites, which is understood to assist in gas adsorption. The second is known as the presentation of aldehyde groups, which works in combination with the textural properties of the inorganic host matrix (FDU-15). In the context of 2-PEA, this allows improvements in selectivity. In mesoporous structures, the visible existence of –CHO donors lead to advancements in the sensor capabilities of 2-PEA. We consider that the main reason for 2-PEA sensing in our system is the Schiff base mechanism [
16].