Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Ultrathin two-dimensional triptycence-based metal-organic framework for highly selective CO2 electroreduction to CO
收藏切换
PDF
Huan Xue1, Haolin Zhu1, Jiarun Huang, Peiqin Liao*, Xiaoming Chen
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2023, 34(1) : 107134
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2023, 34(1): 107134
• Communication •
Ultrathin two-dimensional triptycence-based metal-organic framework for highly selective CO2 electroreduction to CO
Full
Huan Xue1, Haolin Zhu1, Jiarun Huang, Peiqin Liao*, Xiaoming Chen
Affiliations
  • MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Published: 2023-01-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.027
Outline
收藏切换

Efficient CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) is one of the important topics in energy and environment field, but improving the electrochemical selectivity of specific product is a great challenge. Herein, we reported a unprecedented two-dimensional (2D) metal−organic framework with CuO4 unit (denoted as Cu-HHTT, HHTT = 9, 10-dihydro-9, 10-[1,2]benzenoanthracene-2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 15-hexaol) as the electrocatalyst for CO2RR. Cu-HHTT exhibits high performance for CO2RR to produce CO, namely Faradaic efficiency of 96.6% toward CO with a current density of 18 mA/cm2 at the potential of −0.6 V vs. RHE. Density function theory reveals that the desorption of CO species exhibits a lower energy barrier than that of hydrogenation of *CO intermediate, resulting in CO as the main product instead of alcohols or hydrocarbons.

Triptycence  /  Metal organic framework  /  Nanosheet  /  Electrochemical CO2 reduction  /  Carbon monoxide production
Huan Xue, Haolin Zhu, Jiarun Huang, Peiqin Liao, Xiaoming Chen. Ultrathin two-dimensional triptycence-based metal-organic framework for highly selective CO2 electroreduction to CO[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023 , 34 (1) : 107134 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.027
Full Text
Less
As a novel and effective way for yielding fuels, electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO2RR) attracts much attention because it is a promising method to kill two birds with one stone to solve environmental problems and energy crisis [1-9]. Beneficial from the designable frameworks and abundant active sites, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are regarded as a series of good candidate for electrochemical CO2RR [2]. However, the complexity of control conditions for the lattice planes and the insufficient exposure of metal sites of MOFs restrict their industrial and commercial application in electrochemical CO2RR. Since the first report of single-layer graphene, two-dimensional (2D) materials have been proved to have tunable exposed lattice planes and unique electronic states [10, 11]. Therefore, compared to those of the three-dimensional MOFs, the specific lattice planes and metal sites of 2D-MOFs are easier to be exposed through reasonable design, which endows 2D-MOFs with more potential for electrochemical CO2RR. Generally, two types of 2D-MOFs usually serve as electrocatalysts for CO2RR, namely hexahydroxy-aromatic MOFs and phthalocyanine-based MOFs [2, 6, 12, 13]. For example, 2D Cu-THQ [14] (THQ = tetrahydroxyquinone) and Cu2O@Cu-HHTP [15] (HHTP = 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11-hexahydroxytriphenylene) revealed a Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 91% toward CO and a FE of 73% toward CH4, respectively. Recently, we reported a Cu phthalocyanine-based MOF (PcCu-Cu-O) as an electrocatalyst producing C2H4 with a FE of 50% [2]. However, there are only a few reports on 2D-MOFs as electrocatalysts for CO2RR. More 2D-MOFs remain to be developed as electrocatalyst for CO2RR.
Currently, several types of products have been obtained through electrochemical CO2RR, including carbon monoxide (CO) [6, 14, 16, 17], hydrocarbons [2, 15, 18], carboxylic acid [19, 20] and alcohols [21]. Taking market prices of these products as well as the cost of electricity into account, CO and formic acid are the most promising products for industrial application [22]. According to previous reports, 2D MOFs with CuO4 secondary building units tend to exhibit high selectivity toward CO [14, 15].
Combining the advantages of 2D structures and CuO4 unit, herein, for the first time, we designed and synthesized a triphene-based MOF nanosheet, Cu3(HHTT)2 (Cu-HHTT, HHTT = 9, 10-dihydro-9, 10-[1,2]benzenoanthracene-2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 15-hexaol) via the solvothermal treatment (Fig. 1). Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern of the obtained Cu-HHTT commendably match the simulated one (Fig. S1 in Supporting information), indicative of the successful preparation of Cu-HHTT. Cu-HHTT exhibits an AAA inclined packing (Fig. 1b). The shortest distance between the oxygen atoms of CuO4 units and the aromatic hydrogen atoms is 3.14 Å, indicative of the existence of interlaminar hydrogen bonds (Fig. S2 in Supporting information), which assist to improve the framework stability. The disappearance of the hydroxyl peak in Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrum of Cu-HHTT in contrast to that of HHTT suggests the successful synthesis of Cu-HHTT (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). Thermogravimetric curve of Cu-HHTT indicates a thermal stability up to 160 ℃ (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra reveals a mixed-valence state of the as-synthesized Cu-HHTT (Fig. 2a). As is demonstrated by transmission electronic microscope (TEM) and atomic force microscope (AFM), Cu-HHTT exhibits morphology of the ultrathin nanosheet with the thickness of 2.90 ± 0.22 Å (Figs. 2b and c, Fig. S5 in Supporting information). As been demonstrated in our previous work that, in contrast to bulk MOFs, MOF nanosheets can exhibit enhanced electrochemical CO2RR performances [2]. Compared with the general hexahydroxy-aromatic MOFs and phthalocyanine-based MOFs, the Cu ions in Cu-HHTT are located on the channel wall, causing more exposure of the potential active sites to the environmental media, which might exhibit high performance of electrochemical CO2RR to CO.
In order to examine the affinity of Cu-HHTT to CO2, we performed CO2 adsorption measurements. The activated Cu-HHTT exhibits a saturation uptake of 136.39 cm3/g toward CO2 at 195 K and 1 bar (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). Since the CO2 uptake of most MOFs are 20–100 cm3/g, we anticipate that Cu-HHTT exhibits more affinity to CO2, indicative of a potential activity for electrochemical CO2RR. Electrochemical measurements of Cu-HHTT were subsequently performed. According to cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves, Cu-HHTT exhibits a higher current density in CO2-saturated solution than that in Ar-saturated solution (Fig. 3a), suggesting the existence of electrochemical CO2RR, which is also corroborated by the apparent positive shift of onset potential of the linear cyclic voltammetry (LSV) curve recorded in CO2-saturated electrolyte compared to that recorded in Ar-saturated electrolyte (Fig. 3b). An impressive Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 96.6% and a turnover frequency (TOF) of 7.3 s−1 toward CO with a current density of 18 mA/cm2 of Cu-HHTT at the potential of −0.6 V vs. RHE (Figs. 3a-d) were observed. No liquid product was observed in 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra before and after the electrocatalysis (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). The electrochemical performance of Cu-HHTT surpasses most MOF-based electrocatalysts (Table S1 in Supporting information) [6, 14, 16, 23-27]. Actually, to our best knowledge, it is the highest selectivity toward CO among all the Cu-MOF electrocatalysts.
For the evaluation the electrochemical durability, Cu-HHTT was applied with continuous potential of −0.6 V vs. RHE for at least 4 h. Almost no current attenuation was observed during the long-time durability evaluation (Fig. S8 in Supporting information), and after that, the FE value for CO product slightly decreased to 91.3%. The slight decrease in performance may be ascribed to the minor sloughing of the catalyst from the electrode. According to PXRD patterns and TEM images, no Cu, Cu2O, or CuO clusters were observed after electrochemical CO2RR (Figs. S9 and S10 in Supporting information). The XPS spectra of Cu-HHTT indicate that electrochemical CO2RR causes negligible changes of the electrocatalyst (Fig. 2a and Fig. S11 in Supporting information).
As is illustrated in the literatures, the mechanism of electroreduction of CO2 to CO generally involves the *COOH and *CO intermediates [22]. To capture the information of intermediates during CO2RR, the attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) measurements were carried out (Fig. 4a). As a result, the peak at 1222 cm−1 corresponds to the C−O stretching in *COOH [2]. The absorption peak at 1488 cm−1 can be attributed to the symmetric vibration of *COOH intermediate. To further determine the reaction pathway, density functional theory (DFT) was employed to determine the reaction free energy. The changes of free energy for the desorption of CO and hydrogenation of *CO intermediate are −0.33 and 0.81 eV, respectively (Fig. 4b). Therefore, the generation of CO takes precedence of alcohols and/or alkanes, which coincides perfectly with the high selectivity toward CO obtained in the electrochemical measurements.
In summary, a 2D MOF Cu-HHTT with CuO4 unit was successfully designed and synthesized for the first time. Its ultrathin nanosheet exhibits an impressive selectivity for electrochemical CO2RR for yielding CO. The exposed CuO4 sites and ultrathin nanosheet morphology play an important role in the excellent performance. This work proposes a new strategy to design 2D MOFs for the industrial conversion of CO2 into CO.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Nos. 21890380 and 21821003), Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (No. 2017BT01C161), Science and Technology Key Project of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2020B010188002), Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (No. 202002030291), and Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar (No. 2018B030306009).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.027.
References
Less
[1]
D.H. Nam, O.S. Bushuyev, J. Li, P. De Luna, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 11378–11386.
[2]
X.F. Qiu, H.L. Zhu, J.R. Huang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 7242–7246.
[3]
F. Yang, A. Chen, P.L. Deng, et al., Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 7975–7981.
[4]
X. Zhou, J. Dong, Y. Zhu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 6681–6690.
[5]
T. Chen, J.H. Dou, L. Yang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 12367–12373.
[6]
J.D. Yi, D.H. Si, R. Xie, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 17108–17114.
[7]
P. An, L. Wei, H. Li, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 8 (2020) 15936–15941.
[8]
K. Chen, M. Cao, Y. Lin, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021) 2111322.
[9]
Q. Wang, K. Liu, J. Fu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 25241–25245.
[10]
H. Jin, C. Guo, X. Liu, et al., Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 6337–6408.
[11]
J. Liu, C. Guo, A. Vasileff, S. Qiao, Small Methods 1 (2017) 1600006.
[12]
J. Liu, D. Yang, Y. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 14473–14479.
[13]
Y. Liu, S. Li, L. Dai, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 16409–16415.
[14]
L. Majidi, A. Ahmadiparidari, N. Shan, et al., Adv. Mater. 33 (2021) 2004393.
[15]
J.D. Yi, R. Xie, Z.L. Xie, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 23641–23648.
[16]
M.D. Zhang, D.H. Si, J.D. Yi, et al., Sci. China Chem. 64 (2021) 1332–1339.
[17]
H. Zhong, M. Ghorbani-Asl, K.H. Ly, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 1409.
[18]
Z. Meng, J. Luo, W. Li, K.A. Mirica, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 21656–21669.
[19]
X. Kang, L. Li, A. Sheveleva, et al., Nat. Commun. 11 (2020) 5464.
[20]
X. Kang, B. Wang, K. Hu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 17384–17392.
[21]
Y. Wu, Z. Jiang, X. Lu, Y. Liang, H. Wang, Nature 575 (2019) 639–642.
[22]
S. Jin, Z. Hao, K. Zhang, Z. Yan, J. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 20627–20648.
[23]
L. Ye, J. Liu, Y. Gao, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 4 (2016) 15320–15326.
[24]
Y. Guo, W. Shi, H. Yang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 17875–17883.
[25]
B.X. Dong, S.L. Qian, F.Y. Bu, et al., ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1 (2018) 4662–4669.
[26]
X. Jiang, H. Li, J. Xiao, et al., Nano Energy 52 (2018) 345–350.
[27]
N. Kornienko, Y. Zhao, C.S. Kley, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 14129–14135.
Appendix
Less
Year 2023 volume 34 Issue 1
PDF
42
22
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.027
  • Receive Date：2021-11-30
  • Online Date：2025-11-20
  • Published：2023-01-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-11-30
  • Revised：2022-01-03
  • Accepted：2022-01-10
Affiliations
    MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinorganic and Synthetic Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

Corresponding:

*E-mail address: (P. Liao).
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.027
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House