Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Fluorine-functionalized zirconium-organic cages for efficient photocatalytic oxidation of thioanisole
收藏切换
PDF
Jia-Ru Lia, b, Ning Lib, *, Li-Ling Heb, Jun Hea, *
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2025, 36(1) : 109934
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2025, 36(1): 109934
• Communication •
Fluorine-functionalized zirconium-organic cages for efficient photocatalytic oxidation of thioanisole
Full
Jia-Ru Lia, b, Ning Lib, *, Li-Ling Heb, Jun Hea, *
Affiliations
  • a School of Chemical Engineering and Light Industry, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • b School of Chemistry, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
Published: 2025-01-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109934
Outline
收藏切换

Zirconium-based metal-organic cages (Zr-MOCs) typically exhibit high stability, but their structural and application reports are scarce due to stringent crystallization conditions. We have successfully fluorinated the classical Zr-MOCs (ZrT-3) for the first time, obtaining the fluorinated MOCs (ZrT-3-F). Notably, ZrT-3-F not only inherits the high stability of its parent structure, but also acts as a catalyst for the effective oxidation of benzyl thioether for the first time. The reaction can reach a conversion rate of 99% in 6 h, and the selectivity reaches 95%, which far exceeds the non-fluorinated ZrT-3. This work proves that the specific functionalization of the classical Zr-MOCs can further expand their application potential, such as catalysis.

Ultraviolet light  /  Fluorine  /  Zirconium-based metal-organic cages  /  Sulfide oxidation  /  Multiphase photocatalysis
Jia-Ru Li, Ning Li, Li-Ling He, Jun He. Fluorine-functionalized zirconium-organic cages for efficient photocatalytic oxidation of thioanisole[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025 , 36 (1) : 109934 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109934
Full Text
Less
Metal-organic cages (MOCs) are individual supramolecular units created from metal nodes and organic connectors. Despite their assembly and structure being similar to metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), the MOCs, structured at the nanoscale level, exhibit unique attributes in terms of size, topology, solubility, characterization, and stability [1]. So far, a variety of MOCs have been documented, including those derived from rhodium (Rh), iron (Fe), cobalt (Co), titanium (Ti), and zirconium (Zr) [2-6]. The high bond energies of metal-oxygen bonds impart considerable structural stability to these MOCs. In particular, the Zr-O bond, with its energy of 766.1 ± 10.6 kJ/mol, results in Zr-MOCs exhibiting greater stability compared to MOCs based on other metals. Nevertheless, there have been few reported instances of Zr-MOCs, with research into their application performances also being greatly limited [7,8]. During the synthesis of Zr-MOCs, the susceptibility of Zr to oxidation poses a challenge. Zr being a reactive transition metal, readily reacts with oxygen to form oxides, especially under conditions of elevated temperature, humidity, or exposure to air. This tendency contributes to the scarcity of reported Zr-MOCs structures, thereby limiting their applications in performance.
To expand the performance research of Zr-MOCs, functionalizing modifications of the ligands of MOCs can be employed. Numerous studies have shown that incorporating functional groups into the organic ligands of MOCs can enhance their applications in various aspects [1,9-11]. Introducing Lewis basic functional groups (such as hydroxyl, amino, carboxyl, cyano, carbonyl, and fluorine) can enhance the selectivity and catalytic efficiency of specific organic reactions. Fluorine-functionalized MOCs exhibit characteristics such as fluorophilicity, electrostatic interactions, and anion-π stacking. Moreover, due to the high electronegativity of fluorine, the C-F bond possesses high bond energy (110 kJ/mol), leading to the high chemical stability of C-F bonds [12-17]. Furthermore, the high electronegativity of fluorine results in greater electron density toward the fluorine side in covalent bonds. This induces a shift in the electron energy levels within the molecular orbitals (MOs), elevating energy levels for atoms connected to fluorine and lowering energy levels for fluorine atoms. This facilitates redox reactions, making MOCs more widely applicable. Among the reported Zr-MOCs, the most classic are ZrT-1, 2, 3, 4 reported by Yuan in 2013 [18]. Over the past decade, various research groups have conducted numerous functionalization modifications on the cages reported by Yuan [18]. For example, Su’s group reported amino modifications on ligands, enabling their application in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reactions [19]. However, their application in photocatalytic organic reactions is relatively limited.
Building upon the achievements of Yuan in 2013 [18], where the classical ZrT-3 was employed, we fluorinated the organic ligands to synthesize H2bpdc-8F as a fluorine-rich linker (Fig. 1). Using solvent-thermal synthesis, we then combined H2bpdc-8F with Zirconocene dichloride (Cp2ZrCl2) to produce a tetrahedral-shaped Zr-MOCs: ZrT-3-F, with a molecular formula of {[Cp3Zr3μ3-O(μ2-OH)3]4(bpdc8F)6}·4Cl·nS (where S = noncoordinated solvent molecule). It is noteworthy that the fluorinated cage exhibited higher stability and enhanced light absorption capabilities. Utilizing these advancements, we applied the fluorinated cage for the first time in the oxidation of benzyl sulfide to the sulfoxide reaction. In photocatalytic reaction experiments, we observed that the fluorinated cage demonstrated a selectivity and conversion rate of over 95% for sulfoxide, significantly surpassing the performance of the non-fluorinated cage.
The compound ZrT-3-F is produced via a solvent-thermal procedure, combining Cp2ZrCl2 and H2bpdc-8F in a mixed solvent environment of dimethylacetamide (DMA), trichloromethane (CHCl3), and H2O. The exact synthesis route can be found in the supplementary materials provided. Utilizing X-ray single crystal diffraction analysis, we determined that ZrT-3-F crystallizes in the cubic Fm-3 m space group. The compound forms a distinctive V4E6 type cage, as previously documented by Yuan. The structure of ZrT-3-F consists of four secondary building units (SBUs), namely Cp3Zr3μ3-O(μ2-OH)3, and six H2bpdc-8F linkers. The Cp3Zr3μ3-O(μ2-OH)3 unit acts as the vertex (V), while H2bpdc-8F functions as the edges (E) of the tetrahedron. Due to the high symmetry of ZrT-3-F, the linking ligands exhibit significant disorder. The interspace between two SBUs measures 15.387 Å, resulting in an approximate internal volume of the cage of 139.2 Å3, as derived from calculations.
To evaluate the high photocatalytic activity potential of ZrT-3-F, a thorough investigation into its optical and electronic properties was conducted. Additionally, a comparative analysis between ZrT-3-F and ZrT-3 was carried out to elucidate key disparities in band structure and charge carrier behavior. UV/visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) measurements indicated that ZrT-3-F exhibited nearly full-spectrum absorbance, including visible light absorption between 400 nm and 480 nm, unlike ZrT-3 which primarily absorbed in the UV region (Fig. 2a). Bandgap energies were computed using the Kubelka-Munk function equation: αhv = A(hv – Eg)1/2. The direct bandgap energies of ZrT-3-F and ZrT-3 were estimated to be 2.41 and 3.32 eV, respectively, based on transformed differential spectra (Fig. 2b). Electronic band structures were determined by estimating conduction band (CB) potentials via Mott-Schottky (M-S) plots at frequencies of 1000, 1500, and 2000 Hz in the dark. Both ZrT-3-F and ZrT-3 M-S plots exhibited positive slopes across all frequencies, consistent with n-type semiconductor characteristics (Figs. S9 and S10 in Supporting information) [20]. Flat band potentials (VFB) were extrapolated to be –0.757 and –0.886 V vs. Ag/AgCl for ZrT-3-F and ZrT-3, respectively. Consequently, the CB potentials for ZrT-3-F and ZrT-3 were –0.557 and –0.686 V, respectively. Using the formula ECB = EVB – Eg [21], VB positions for ZrT-3-F and ZrT-3 were calculated as 1.853 and 2.634 V, respectively, corresponding to the band structure arrangement (Fig. 2c). Furthermore, photocurrent response tests revealed a substantial increase in current under light irradiation compared to dark conditions. Notably, the photocurrent of ZrT-3-F consistently exceeded that of ZrT-3, irrespective of light exposure (Fig. 2d).
The process of converting sulfides into sulfoxides via aerobic oxidation finds extensive usage in sectors such as fossil fuel desulfurization, medicinal synthesis, and wastewater management [22,23]. In conventional synthesis methods, the elevated oxidation potentials of sulfides may induce over-oxidation reactions, generating undesired by-products [24-26]. Consequently, an efficacious photocatalyst is required for the successful aerobic oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides [27,28].
An investigation on the photocatalytic performance of ZrT-3-F was carried out, utilizing the aerobic oxidation of sulfides to sulfoxides reaction. To determine the type of reaction products, a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was employed and quantification was conducted using a 50-bit ALS gas chromatograph. Since the main light absorption of ZrT-3-F lies in the ultraviolet region, UV light was adopted as the light source for the catalytic reaction. Initially, the choice of the best solvent was required, using oxygen as the oxidant. The selected solvents: N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF), methanol (CH3OH), isopropanol (IPA), and acetonitrile (CH3CN) were put under consideration. The conversion and selectivity of CH3OH and CH3CN are the highest with the catalyst being homogeneous and heterogeneous in CH3OH and CH3CN respectively. From the standpoint of recyclability, the heterogeneous catalyst is more appropriate and hence CH3CN was selected as the reaction solvent. Subsequently, it was necessary to elect the right oxidant: even though O2, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) all achieved conversion rates up to 99%, O2 proved to be the most optimal oxidant regarding product selectivity. Upon conducting experiments with varying masses of the catalyst, the results indicate that the optimal catalyst loading is 10 mg.
The optimal experimental conditions are as follows: 0.1 mmol of substrate, 3 mL of CH3CN, and 10 mg of catalyst are added into a 10-mL quartz tube. The photocatalytic reaction is then performed for 6 h under 1 atm of oxygen and ultraviolet light irradiation. When ZrT-3-F is used as the catalyst, the conversion rate reaches up to 99.51% and selectivity up to 95.16%. In contrast, when ZrT-3 is used as the catalyst in the experiment, the conversion rate of benzyl sulfide is only 21.44%, and the selectivity is only 66.7%. When the organic ligand H2bpdc-8F is used, the conversion rate is 52.67%, and the selectivity is 96.67%. When Cp2ZrCl2 is used as the catalyst, the conversion rate is 51.48%, and the selectivity is 58.29%. In summary, in this experimental system, the catalyst ZrT-3-F has the highest value (Table 1).
Next, the wide-ranging suitability of ZrT-3-F as a heterogeneous photocatalyst was put under scrutiny, assessing the transformation rates and selectivity amongst various sulfides. As shown in the table, all the chosen sulfides demonstrated over 90% selectivity and conversion to sulfoxides. Table 2 shows a marked drop in the conversion performance when the para-position on the sulfur is electron-absorbing, confirming that electron-donating para-substituents are more conducive to the photocatalytic oxidation of thioanisole to its corresponding sulfoxide under aerobic conditions.
The photostability of ZrT-3-F was evaluated through several centrifugations processed and washed with CH3CN. Upon conducting three repeated experiments with ZrT-3-F (Fig. 3a), it was found that the reactive capacity of the catalyst did not decrease significantly. The catalyst harvested after the cycle was put through Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Fig. S16 in Supporting information), with the spectral results demonstrating negligible differences between the pre-reaction and post-reaction spectrums. This indicates that the structure remained unaffected. According to these findings, ZrT-3-F demonstrates exceptional stability as a heterogeneous photocatalyst.
To delve into the fundamental reaction mechanism responsible for the photocatalytic oxidation of thioanisole into sulfoxide under aerobic conditions, a sequence of radical quenching experiments was performed (Fig. 3b). Utilizing 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol (BHT) as a radical quenching agent, the production of reaction outputs was inhibited to a significant extent. This finding denotes the involvement of free radicals in this reaction. The subsequent introduction of copper sulfate (CuSO4), acting as an electron inhibitor, caused a noticeable reduction in catalytic conversion efficiency. The implementation of potassium iodide (KI) as a hole inhibitor induced a state wherein the substrate underwent nearly no conversion, attesting to the occurrence of a photo-induced electron-hole (e‾-h+) separation process in the reaction [29,30]. To detect the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during the reaction, tert-butyl alcohol was added to quench any potential hydroxyl radicals (•OH). The lack of any conspicuous effect on conversion rates post its addition provided the evidence that •OH radicals are not produced within this reaction framework. When p-benzoquinone and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl (TEMPO) were incorporated for trapping superoxide anion radical (•O2‾) and singlet oxygen (1O2) respectively, a sharp decline in conversion rates was observed. This observation conclusively established that the ROS involved in this reaction are •O2‾ and 1O2 [30,31].
To further validate the existence of ROS in the reaction, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experiments were implemented. The spin trap agent selected for the •O2‾ was 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO), while 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) was utilized for trapping singlet oxygen 1O2. As depicted in the accompanying Figs. 3c and d, both •O2‾ and 1O2 demonstrated a significant response under photonic exposure, while no noticeable response was registered in dark conditions.
In conclusion, the conceivable mechanism for the photolytic conversion of phenyl methyl sulfide to sulfoxide (Fig. 4) involves UV light irradiation on ZrT-3-F, instigating the production of photo-generated electrons and holes. These photo-generated electrons swiftly disperse towards the surface of the catalyst and into the conduits where O2 is reduced by the photoelectrons, resulting in •O2‾. Neutral exciton-forming entities possessing robust Coulomb interactions undergo a transition from the singlet excited state (S1) to the low-energy triplet state (T1) via inter-system crossing (ISC) [32]. In this scenario, the energy is ceded to the attached O2 molecules, leading to the production of 1O2 and phosphorescence. Upon acquisition of a proton, the sulfide transforms into the free radical cation CH3SC6H5H+. •O2‾ and CH3SC6H5H+ then initiate a nucleophilic reaction [33,34]. Concurrently, 1O2 instigates an electrophilic reaction with the sulfide to create a sulfur peroxide intermediate. The reaction of the sulfide with the sulfur peroxide intermediate paves the way for the synthesis of sulfoxides. Notably, the end product of both mechanisms is sulfoxide [35].
Fluorination of the classical Zr-MOCs, such as ZrT-3, results in enhanced light absorption compared to the non-fluorinated cages. The fluorinated ZrT-3 exhibits a stronger photocurrent response, thereby presenting advantages in photocatalytic reactions. Therefore, we employed ZrT-3-F for the oxidation of benzyl sulfide to sulfoxide. In photocatalytic reactions, ZrT-3-F serves as a heterogeneous catalyst under aerobic conditions, and achieves conversion rates and selectivity in oxidizing benzyl sulfide to sulfoxide. The conversion rate and selectivity are significantly higher compared to the performance of ZrT-3 in catalytic reactions, demonstrating the excellent versatility and chemical stability of the catalyst throughout the reaction process. Importantly, this work demonstrates the applicability of fluorinated Zr-MOCs in organic catalysis.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Less
Jia-Ru Li: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Ning Li: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. Li-Ling He: Formal analysis, Validation. Jun He: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22201046, 22371054), Local Innovation Research Team Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talent Plan (No. 2017BT01Z032).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109934.
References
Less
[1]
E.M. El-Sayed, Y.D. Yuan, D. Zhao, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 55 (2022) 1546–1560.
[2]
S. Furukawa, N. Horike, M. Kondo, et al., Inorg. Chem. 55 (2016) 10843–10846.
[3]
I. Papadaki, C.D. Malliakas, T. Bakas, et al., Inorg. Chem. 48 (2009) 9968–9970.
[4]
S.T. Wang, X.H. Gao, X.X. Hang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 16236–16239.
[5]
Y.P. He, L.B. Yuan, G.H. Chen, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 16845–16851.
[6]
Z.F. Ju, G.L. Liu, Y.S. Chen, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 23 (2017) 4774–4777.
[7]
M.G. Sullivan, H.K. Welgama, M.R. Crawley, et al., Chem. Mat. 36 (2024) 567–574.
[8]
B.X. Jiang, H. Wang, Y.T. Zhang, et al., Polyhedron 243 (2023) 116569.
[9]
H.Y. Lin, Z.F. Xiao, K.N. Le, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202214055.
[10]
J.J. Jiao, C.X. Tan, Z.J. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 2251–2259.
[11]
W.H. Xing, H.Y. Li, X.Y. Dong, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 7724–7730.
[12]
S. Lee, H. Jeong, D. Nam, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (2021) 528–555.
[13]
Q. Tian, S. Chen, M. Shi, et al., Sens. Actuator. B: Chem. 404 (2024) 135309.
[14]
H.T. Chen, T. Zhang, S.R. Liu, et al., Inorg. Chem. 61 (2022) 11949–11958.
[15]
Z.A. Qiao, S.S. Brown, J. Adcock, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 2888–2893.
[16]
D.K. Dogutan, R. McGuire, D.G. Nocera, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 9178–9180.
[17]
S.S. Wang, L. Wang, M. Dakovic, et al., ACS Catal. 2 (2012) 230–237.
[18]
G.L. Liu, Z.F. Ju, D.Q. Yuan, et al., Inorg. Chem. 52 (2013) 13815–13817.
[19]
M. Sun, Q.Q. Wang, C. Qin, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 25 (2019) 2824–2830.
[20]
H.F. Ye, R. Shi, X. Yang, Y. Chen, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 233 (2018) 70–79.
[21]
X. Li, Y. Qi, G.Z. Yue, et al., Green Chem. 21 (2019) 649–657.
[22]
Y.M. Li, M. Wang, X.F. Jiang, ACS Catal. 7 (2017) 7587–7592.
[23]
A.K. Clarke, A. Parkin, R.J.K. Taylor, et al., ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 5814–5820.
[24]
Q. Li, X.W. Lan, G.Y. An, et al., ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 6664–6675.
[25]
X.Y. Wang, M.H. Liu, Y.X. Liu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 26900–26907.
[26]
X. Liang, Z.F. Guo, H.X. Wei, et al., Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 13002–13005.
[27]
M. Forchetta, F. Sabuzi, L. Stella, et al., J. Org. Chem. 87 (2022) 14016–14025.
[28]
X.N. Zou, D.S. Zhang, T.X. Luan, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 20137–20144.
[29]
H.X. Wei, Z.F. Guo, X. Liang, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11 (2019) 3016–3023.
[30]
C.L. Su, R. Tandiana, B.B. Tian, J. Su, K.P. Loh, et al., ACS Catal. 6 (2016) 3594–3599.
[31]
X.Y. Gu, X. Li, Y.H. Chai, et al., Green Chem 15 (2013) 357–361.
[32]
Q.Q. Li, P.H. Pan, H. Liu, et al., Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 17182–17190.
[33]
J. Jiang, R.C. Luo, X.T. Zhou, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 360 (2018) 4402–4411.
[34]
H.D. She, H. Zhou, L.S. Li, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 11939–11948.
[35]
Q.S. Zhu, H.Y. An, T.Q. Xu, et al., Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 662 (2023) 119283.
Appendix
Less
Year 2025 volume 36 Issue 1
PDF
47
25
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109934
  • Receive Date：2024-03-13
  • Online Date：2025-11-12
  • Published：2025-01-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2024-03-13
  • Revised：2024-04-04
  • Accepted：2024-04-28
Affiliations
    a School of Chemical Engineering and Light Industry, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
    b School of Chemistry, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109934
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House