The solvation structure of the above-mentioned electrolytes was investigated by Raman spectroscopy to clarify the mechanism of the performance improvement (
Fig. 2a). The free anion (FA) ratio in base WSE (19.6%) is much lower than that in 2M-LiFSI-DME (60.1%) (
Fig. 2b), confirming that the solvating power of THP is weaker than DME. With the addition of TTE in base WSE, the peak area ratios assigned to AGG-Ⅰ (one FSI
− coordinates two Li
+) and AGG-Ⅱ (one FSI
− coordinates more than two Li
+) increase from 21.9% to 27.1%, 7.4% to 10.5%, respectively (
Fig. 2b), indicating that the introduction of diluent can strengthen the interaction between Li
+ and FSI
−. The increased ratio of AGGs in diluent modified WSE induced slightly lower ionic conductivity due to the low diffusion rates of AGGs (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). The enhanced Li
+−FSI
− interactions in diluent modified WSE was further confirmed by molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, with representative snapshots shown in Fig. S5 (Supporting information). Radial distribution functions (RDFs) and coordination numbers (CN) were calculated for Li
+−FSI
− (
Fig. 2c) and Li
+−solvent (Fig. S6 in Supporting information), respectively. 2M-LiFSI-DME displays lower CN of Li
+−FSI
− (3.195) and higher CN of solvents (2.587). By contrast, in the base WSE, one Li
+ is solvated by 3.947 FSI
− and 0.04 THP solvents on average, confirming the weakly solvating power of THP. Moreover, diluent modified WSE shows the highest CN of Li
+−FSI
− (3.976) and the lowest CN of solvents (0.022), indicating the further enhanced Li
+−FSI
− interactions. It is speculated that there exists an interaction between TTE and THP, which further promotes the engagement of FSI
− in the Li
+ solvation structures. To verify this speculation, we performed Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) absorption spectra analysis of THP, TTE, and diluent modified WSE. In the presence of TTE, the absorption peaks around 813 cm
−1 and 1098 cm
−1, assigned to the —C—O—C— symmetric stretching vibration (
νs) and asymmetric stretching vibration (
νas) of THP respectively, shift to lower frequency (
Fig. 2d), which reflects the interaction between TTE and THP. The intermolecular interaction was further verified by
1H NMR spectra [
42-
44]. The chemical shifts of H in TTE and THP move to the opposite direction, which is possibly related to the formation of weak hydrogen bond between TTE and THP, with −CF
2H group in TTE and O in THP acting as hydrogen bond donor and acceptor, respectively (
Fig. 2e) [
45,
46]. Concretely, the formation of hydrogen bond induces a shielding effect on the H in THP and a de-shielding effect on the H in TTE, thus the chemical shift of H in TTE increases while that of H in THP decreases. When adding 2.0 mol/L LiFSI in the mixture of THP and TTE, the chemical shifts of H in TTE decrease slightly, suggesting that the effect of hydrogen bond is slightly weakened by the coordination of THP with Li
+. In other words, the interaction between TTE and THP is expected to weaken the coordination of THP with Li
+ and result in the formation of a relatively loose solvation structure. As expected, diluent modified WSE demonstrated a much lower Li
+ de-solvation energy (48.73 kJ/mol) than 2M-LiFSI-DME (56.39 kJ/mol) and base WSE (51.18 kJ/mol) (
Fig. 2f and Fig. S7 in Supporting information), confirming the formation of a relatively loose solvation structure in diluent modified WSE. Besides, a slightly improved Li
+ transference number was also observed in diluent modified WSE (Fig. S8 in Supporting information). Schematics are provided to demonstrate interaction between TTE and THP and its effect on the solvation structure (
Fig. 2g).