The morphology and composition of all the samples were characterized by TEM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). DMONs had a large open pore morphology with the size of about 200 nm (
Fig. 1A). Compared to DMONs, nanoparticle accumulation (indicated by arrows in
Fig. 1B) was found on the surface of DCCM, resulting in a relatively rough surface. CeCo-MOF generally grew in large pores and was extruded to the outer surface. Because of the environment in which nucleation growth occurred, the particle size was constrained. SEM (
Fig. 1C) was further conducted to characterize DCCM. Small particle accumulations were observed on the surface of DCCM, and the initial open pores were reduced accordingly. This phenomenon was also observed in the TEM results. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) elemental mapping images (
Fig. 1D) demonstrated even distribution of Si, Co and Ce elements in DCCM nanocomposites, indicating the coexistence of multiple elements. The average particle size of DCCM in an ethanol solution was measured using a laser particle size analyzer, and the results indicated an average size of approximately 300 nm (Fig. S1A in Supporting information). The zeta potential changes of the synthesized samples also demonstrated the successful preparation of DCCM nanocomposites (Fig. S1B in Supporting information). The measured potential of CeCo-MOF in water was positive (+22 mV), which was the same as that of Co-MOF aqueous solution. In contrast, the potential changed from negative charge of DMONs (−16 mV) to positive charge of DCCM (+2 mV), proving the successful growth of CeCo-MOF. The XRD patterns of the prepared precursor (Fig. S1C in Supporting information) agreed well with previous results [
25], indicating that the addition of cerium ions did not impact the crystal structure of Co-MOF. In contrast to the crystalline framework of CeCo-MOF, the XRD pattern of DMONs showed amorphous state and did not show any obvious crystalline characteristic peaks. DCCM exhibited typical peaks that can be indexed to 011, 002, 112, 022, 013 and 222 diffractions of CeCo-MOF, although the intensity of the diffraction peaks was significantly reduced (
Fig. 1E). Additionally, to confirm the successful construction of DCCM nanocomposites, various samples underwent X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (
Fig. 1F). Figs. S2A and B (Supporting information) showed that the peaks of O 1s and Si 2p appeared on the surface of DMONs, indicating that the basic composition of its skeleton structure is silica. The peak near 164 eV can be attributed to S 2p, which may originate from the disulfide bonds of DMONs. Subsequently, the main peak at 398.48 eV in the deconvoluted N 1s spectrum could be corresponded to N of the 2-methylimidazole ligand [
26]. The Co 2p spectrum (Fig. S2E in Supporting information) was resolved into four intense main peaks (780.78, 782.61, 796.28 and 797.26 eV) and two weak satellite peaks (787.06 and 803.29 eV) [
27]. it could be determined that the peaks of 782.61 and 797.26 eV represented Co
3+, and the peaks of 780.78 and 796.28 eV represented Co
2+ [
28,
29]. As shown in Fig. S2F (Supporting information), the Ce 3d signal can be separated into eight peaks. Among them, the peaks of 903.78 and 885.28 eV corresponded to Ce
3+, whereas the other peaks were ascribed to Ce
4+ [
30,
31]. We observed Co 2p, Ce 3d, and N 1s peaks emerging in DCCM compared with DMONs, confirming the successful loading of CeCo-MOF. In addition, to comprehend the impact of organosilica on the formation of DCCM, we prepared inorganic dendritic mesoporous silica nanoparticles (DMSNs) as a control. CeCo-MOF (Figs. S3A and B in Supporting information) had a rough surface, exhibited a rhombohedral dodecahedral morphology with an average grain size of about 500 nm. Figs. S3C and D (Supporting information) showed that CeCo-MOF nucleated and grew independently, with only a small fraction being loaded onto the surface of DMSNs. The presence of disulfide bonds in DMONs is deemed crucial for preparing CeCo-MOF and DMONs composites.
Fig. 1G displayed the measurement results of N
2 adsorption isotherms for various samples. After the
in-situ growth of CeCo-MOF, the specific surface area of DCCM was up to 527.2 m
2/g, which was higher compared with specific surface area of DMONs (367.5 m
2/g). However, the specific surface area of CeCo-MOF was approximately 967 m
2/g, the modest increased in the specific surface area of DCCM may be attributed to the comparatively low weight ratio of CeCo-MOF inside DMONs. The pore diameter and pore volume decreased after CCM modification (Fig. S1D in Supporting information), indicating the CCM partially occupied the mesopores of DMONs. Moreover, it can be seen from Figs. S1E and F (Supporting information) that the residue of DCCM at 700 ℃ in air was SiO
2, and the actual residue was 50.1%. The weights of cerium ions and cobalt ions in DCCM are 16.86% and 7.49% (Fig. S4 in Supporting information), respectively. Therefore, all results indicated the successful construction of DCCM nanocomposites.