Fig. 2a shows the XRD pattern of MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs, which is in accordance with the MoO
3 phase (PDF#98–0314). The obvious diffraction peaks located at 23.3°, 25.7°, 27.3°, 46.2° and56.2° are assigned to the (110), (040), (021), (210), and (231) crystal planes. While no characteristic peaks related to POM are present in the composite, which may be attributed to the low content and formation of dispersive POM clusters, rather than aggregated large crystals [
34,
35]. Such similar result can also be observed for MoO
3-SiW
12O
40 HNSs (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy presented in Fig. S5 (Supporting information) offers extremely powerful evidence for the formation of hybrids since both the characteristic peaks of MoO
3 and POM present in the MoO
3-POM HNSs. The TGA data (Fig. S6 in Supporting information) demonstrates that the MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs can keep stable when temperature is lower than 600 ℃ and the estimated PW
12O
40 content in the composite is approximately 50.6 wt% [
36]. The elemental composition and valence states of MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs and MoO
3 are analyzed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The full XPS spectra demonstrate the existence of Mo and O elements in MoO
3, and Mo, O, W elements for MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). The high-resolution XPS spectra of Mo 3d demonstrate that both Mo
5+ and Mo
6+ species can be detected from MoO
3 (
Fig. 2b), two green-filled fitted peaks located at the binding energies of 232.9 eV and 236.1 eV are derived from Mo 3d
5/2 and Mo 3d
3/2 of Mo
5+, and the other two purple-filled fitted peaks located at the binding energies of 234.3 eV and 237.4 eV originate from Mo 3d
5/2 and Mo 3d
3/2 of Mo
6+, which demonstrates the generation of MoO
3 phase. Compared to MoO
3, the fitted peaks associated with Mo
5+ in MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs disappear, and the position of the Mo
6+ species is negatively shifted by 0.8 eV [
37]. The O 1s spectra is also provided as
Fig. 2c. The binding energies at 530.0 eV and 531.3 eV in MoO
3 are assigned to Mo-O and oxygen vacancy, respectively [
38]. The position of the Mo-O in MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs is also negatively shifted by 0.8 eV. The intrinsic charge differences can be resultant from the electron interactions between different species,
i.e. the electron transfer from POM to MoO
3 [
39]. In the W 4f spectrum (
Fig. 2d), the orange- and purple-filled fitted peaks located at the binding energies of 36.2 eV and 38.4 eV are attributed to the W 4f
7/2 and W 4f
5/2 of W
6+, respectively, confirming the existence of POM in the composite [
40]. Moreover, the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of MoO
3 and MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs were carried out. As demonstrated in
Fig. 2e, all the samples exhibited apparent characteristic signal at
g = 2.003, and the corresponding signals are significantly enhanced after forming MoO
3-POM hybrid superstructures, which corroborated the introduction of oxygen vacancies into the MoO
3 by introducing the POM into MoO
3 system and is consistent with the TEM result [
41]. We further synthesized two comparative samples (MoO
3@PW
12O
40 and MoO
3@SiW
12O
40) by adding corresponding POM into the pre-synthesized MoO
3 precursor system under the same experimental conditions (Fig. S8 in Supporting information). It is observed that the subsequent introduction of POM into the reaction system only led to the formation of aggregated bulks (Fig. S9 in Supporting information), which demonstrated that the formation of MoO
3-POM HNSs can only occur during the nucleation process of MoO
3. Immediately afterwards, N
2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were performed to measure the structural properties of prepared catalysts. As depicted in
Fig. 2f, both prepared samples exhibited type Ⅳ isotherms, proving the mesoporous properties [
42]. The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface area of MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs is 19.8 m
2/g, which is significantly higher than MoO
3@PW
12O
40 (6.9 m
2/g) and MoO
3 (3.4 m
2/g). Such larger surface area can offer more catalytic active sites for electrocatalytic reactions and facilitate the contact between the catalyst and electrolyte. Surface wettability of the catalyst has a considerable influence on HER performance. The droplet contacts angle (CA) tests (Fig. S10 in Supporting information) demonstrate that MoO
3-PW
12O
40 HNSs show a smaller CA of 9.76° than MoO
3@PW
12O
40 (28.9°) and MoO
3 (34.04°), proving its super-hydrophilic nature [
43]. To better elaborate the electrochemical performance, the Mott-Schottky curves were measured. Fig. S11 (Supporting information) shows that slopes of Mott-Schottky curves are positive, proving the electrons are main carriers. The conduction band of MoO
3-POM HNSs are more negative than MoO
3, which is beneficial to the electron transport during the electrochemical reaction [
44].