Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Interfacial interactions of Cu/MnOOH enhance ammonia synthesis from electrochemical nitrate reduction
收藏切换
PDF
Hong-Rui Li, Xia Kang, Rui Gao, Miao-Miao Shi*, Bo Bi, Ze-Yu Chen, Jun-Min Yan*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2025, 36(2) : 109958
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2025, 36(2): 109958
• Communication •
Interfacial interactions of Cu/MnOOH enhance ammonia synthesis from electrochemical nitrate reduction
Full
Hong-Rui Li, Xia Kang, Rui Gao, Miao-Miao Shi*, Bo Bi, Ze-Yu Chen, Jun-Min Yan*
Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
Published: 2025-02-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109958
Outline
收藏切换

In this work, an effective catalyst of Cu/MnOOH has been successfully constructed for electrochemical nitrate reduction reaction (eNO3RR) for synthesis of ammonia (NH3) under ambient conditions. The substrate of MnOOH plays an important role on the size and electronic structure of Cu nanoparticles, where Cu has the ultrafine size of 2.2 nm and positive shift of its valence states, which in turn causes the increased number of Cu active sites and enhanced intrinsic activity of every active site. As a result, this catalyst realizes an excellent catalytic performance on eNO3RR with the maximal NH3 Faraday efficiency (FE) (96.8%) and the highest yield rate (55.51 mg h−1 cm−2) at a large NH3 partial current density of 700 mA/cm2, which could help to promote the industrialization of NH3 production under ambient conditions.

Ammonia  /  Nitrate reduction reaction  /  Adsorption  /  Electrocatalysis  /  Interfacial interactions
Hong-Rui Li, Xia Kang, Rui Gao, Miao-Miao Shi, Bo Bi, Ze-Yu Chen, Jun-Min Yan. Interfacial interactions of Cu/MnOOH enhance ammonia synthesis from electrochemical nitrate reduction[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025 , 36 (2) : 109958 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109958
Full Text
Less
Ammonia (NH3), serving as industrial chemicals and energy carrier, exhibits great potential in agriculture and industry [1,2]. Nowadays, the production of NH3 is heavily dependent on the energy-intensive Haber-Bosch approach, which is conducted at high temperature and pressure along with massive carbon dioxide (CO2) emission [3,4]. As an alternative, the electrochemical pathway for NH3 synthesis which is derived from nitrogen (N2) and water (H2O) under ambient conditions attracts much interest [5-9]. But the low NH3 yield rate (<0.3 mg h−1 mgcat.−1) and poor Faraday efficiency (FE) (<71%) critically restrict its widespread application [10-12].
Compared with the inert N≡N bond, the N═O bond possessing relatively low dissociation energy displays much better reaction kinetics for electrochemical NH3 production [13-16]. Therefore, nitrate (NO3−) can serve as an appropriate species for NH3 synthesis. Besides, NO3− is the majority source of N-containing pollutants in industrial wastewater with high solubility [17,18]. Hence, the electrochemical NO3− reduction reaction (eNO3RR) not only realizes renewable NH3 synthesis but also accelerates the transformation of the nitrogen cycle.
The application of Cu, Ni, and Ru based catalysts in eNO3RR has been reported; however, most of these catalysts display the limited current density and NH3 yield rate [19-23]. Meanwhile, eNO3RR is a reaction which involves multiple electrons and intermediates, and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is a competition reaction during eNO3RR, and thus the NH3 FE faces significant challenges [19,24-26]. Previous studies have proposed various strategies to improve the performance of eNO3RR [27,28]. Thereinto, surfaces with positive charge can accumulate anions due to the electrostatic attraction effect [29-32]. Therefore, atoms with positive charge might realize enhanced NO3− adsorption ability. It is worth noting that the introduction of substrate is one of the most effective strategies to tailor the electronic structure of catalysts, and then modulate the adsorption energy of the reactants and intermediates [33,34]. In addition, the anchoring and dispersing effects of the substrate can create more active sites towards NH3 synthesis. Therefore, finding a suitable substrate to modulate the active center, such as Cu, may improve its catalytic performance for eNO3RR.
Herein, we develop an effective eNO3RR catalyst by anchoring Cu nanoparticles (NPs) on hydroxymanganese oxide (Cu/MnOOH) via a convenient reduction method. Due to the dispersion effect of MnOOH substrate, Cu NPs have a small average size of 2.2 nm, which leads to abundant active sites. In addition, the presence of MnOOH enables the charge of Cu a little positive shift, and the adsorption experiment shows that Cu/MnOOH exhibits much better adsorption capacity for NO3− as expected. Benefiting from the numerous active sites and enhanced adsorption capacity, Cu/MnOOH displays a high catalytic activity, which can achieve a maximal FE of 96.8%, and yield rate of 55.51 mg h−1 cm−2 at a large NH3 partial current density of 700 mA/cm2 for NH3 synthesis. At the same time, during the 20 h of long-term electrolysis, the eNO3RR performance does not decline over Cu/MnOOH catalyst.
Cu/MnOOH is synthesized via a two-step reaction involving hydrothermal treatment and reduction procedure (Fig. 1a). The loading mass of Cu on Cu/MnOOH is ~13.66 wt%, which is determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image reveals that the Cu/MnOOH and pure MnOOH exhibit a similar lamellar structure (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). However, some NPs can be observed through the transmission electron microscope (TEM) image in comparison with pure MnOOH (Fig. 1b and Fig. S2 in Supporting information), demonstrating the formation of Cu NPs on MnOOH. The average Cu particle size is 2.2 nm (Fig. 1c). In contrast, XC-72 carbon is also used as the substrate to disperse Cu NPs (Cu/C) through the same method (Fig. S3 in Supporting information), where the average particle size of Cu is 2.3 nm (Fig. S4 in Supporting information), which is similar to that of Cu/MnOOH. Fig. 1d shows the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of Cu/MnOOH and the Cu (111) plane with a lattice spacing of 0.207 nm and MnOOH (111) plane with a lattice spacing of 0.338 nm can be observed. The lattice spacing of MnOOH (111) plane for Cu/MnOOH is consistent with that of pure MnOOH (Fig. S5 in Supporting information), suggesting the loading of Cu does not affect the crystal structure of the substrate.
As can be seen from the X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern of Cu/MnOOH (Fig. 2a), there are obvious diffraction peaks located at 43.4°, 50.5°, and 74.2°, corresponding to (111), (200), and (220) crystal planes of metallic Cu (JCPDS No. 04-0836), respectively [35]. And the other peaks can be attributed to the crystallized MnOOH (JCPDS No. 41-1379) [36]. The Raman spectrum of Cu/MnOOH (Fig. 2b) exhibits bands in the range of 200–800 cm−1 that are consistent with MnOOH [37,38].
In general, the electronic state of the loading metal could be modified by the support, especially the particles in small size [39,40]. Therefore, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) characterizations are carried out to analyse the valence states and chemical compositions of Cu/MnOOH, pure MnOOH, and Cu/C catalysts. As shown in Fig. 2c, for Cu/C, the two prominent binding energies of Cu 2p are centered at 932.60 (Cu 2p3/2) and 952.41 eV (Cu 2p1/2), and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) spectra of Cu LMM for Cu/C is located at 569.88 eV (Fig. S6 in Supporting information), confirming the presence of Cu0 [35,41]. However, the binding energies of Cu 2p for Cu/MnOOH exhibit a positive shift compared to those for Cu/C, which are located at 932.74 and 952.55 eV, and Cu LMM AES spectra for Cu/MnOOH also have positive shift compared to Cu/C (570.01 eV, Fig. S6). Namely, MnOOH can modulate the electronic structure and valence states of metals (or metal oxides) through interfacial interactions as expected. This interaction between Cu and MnOOH positively regulates the valence shift of Cu NPs [42-44]. The Mn 2p spectra of pure MnOOH and Cu/MnOOH are shown in Fig. 2d. For pure MnOOH, the binding energies are centered at 641.95 (Mn 2p3/2) and 653.60 eV (Mn 2p1/2) [45]. The spin-orbit splitting value of Mn 2p binding energies (ΔE) is 11.65 eV, illustrating the possible existence of Mn3+ [46-48]. Owing to the formation of Mn3+, considerable empty orbits might induce the electronic interactions between the Cu NPs and MnOOH substrate, leading to the positive shift of Cu binding energies [49]. On the other hand, the Mn 2p binding energies of Cu/MnOOH exhibit a negative shift relative to the pure MnOOH, with peaks observed at 641.80 and 653.45 eV. Both considering the binding-energy shift between Cu and Mn, the electron transfer does occur from Cu to Mn, which leads to the surface of Cu with a positive charge. And this positive charge may help to enhance its NO3− adsorption ability and thus increase the catalytic activity for eNO3RR (vide infra).
To investigate the effect between Cu and MnOOH, pure MnOOH and Cu/C are also tested as control samples. The catalysts are all evaluated under identical conditions, employing carbon cloth as the current collector. Initially, linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) measurements are performed in (KOH, 1.0 mol/L) electrolyte solution with or without the presence of NO3− (0.5 mol/L). The presence of NO3− leads to an enhanced current density for all samples, while Cu/MnOOH exhibits the highest current density at the same potential, indicating its superior catalytic performance towards eNO3RR (Fig. 3a). Chronoamperometry (CA) tests at various potentials are conducted to evaluate the NH3 yield rates and FEs, and the produced NH3 is quantified by the indophenol blue method (Fig. S7 in Supporting information) [19]. Fig. 3b presents the current density of Cu/MnOOH at different potentials in KOH (1.0 mol/L) and NO3− (0.5 mol/L). The current density exhibits an increase with the negative shift of potentials within the potential range of −0.4 V to −0.8 V, and the NH3 partial current density can reach a maximum value of 700 mA/cm2 at −0.8 V. After electrolysis for 2 h, the NH3 production is tested by ultraviolet-visible (UV–vis) spectrophotometry (Fig. S8 in Supporting information). The results demonstrate that all FEs achieved with the catalyst of Cu/MnOOH at the given potentials exceed 90%, with the highest value reaching an impressive 96.8% at −0.7 V (Fig. 3c). Additionally, the NH3 yield rate reaches a remarkable value of 55.51 mg h−1 cm−2 at −0.8 V, outperforming the majority of the reported ones, and the energy consumption is comparable to other reported ones (Table S1 in Supporting information). In contrast, at −0.8 V, pure MnOOH exhibits its optimum NH3 yield rate (36.85 mg h−1 cm−2) and FE (85.3%), which are comparatively inferior to those of Cu/MnOOH, and the beneficial influence of Cu NPs is thus emphasized. In addition, Cu/C exhibits the lower eNO3RR performance with the optimum NH3 yield rate of 41.93 mg h−1 cm−2 and FE of 73.4% at −0.8 V, demonstrating that MnOOH substrate could efficiently promote the activity and selectivity for NH3 synthesis from eNO3RR. It should be noted that the possible gaseous NH3 is also collected by acid absorbent (0.1 mol/L HCl), and the results demonstrated that the leakage of the gaseous NH3 is proved to be negligible (Table S2 in Supporting information). Therefore, all eNO3RR processes are conducted in a sealed cathode chamber.
Besides NH3, the possible by-product of NO2− is also detected which is derived from the desorption of adsorbed nitrite (NO2*) intermediate. And the determination of produced NO2− is used the N-(1-naphthyl)ethylenediamine dihydrochloride coloration method (Fig. S9 in Supporting information). Notably, the FEs of eNO3RR to the products of NH3 and NO2− are nearly 100% in the potential range of −0.4  ~ −0.8 V, suggesting that eNO3RR can surpass the competing HER (Fig. S10 in Supporting information), further demonstrating the enhanced selectivity of Cu/MnOOH towards NO3−. To prevent the impact of pollutants on results, the electrolyte with NO3− before electrolysis and the electrolyte without NO3− after electrolysis is also tested. Fig. S11 (Supporting information) displays that only the electrolyte with NO3− after electrolysis can detect NH3 product, suggesting the produced NH3 is derived from NO3−.
To confirm the accuracy of the generated NH3, the NH3 yield is also detected by 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). As shown in Fig. 3d, three peaks with the coupling constant of J14N−1H = 52.1 Hz (J is determined by the product of the difference between the chemical shifts of two neighbouring peaks and the strength of the instrumental magnetic field) corresponding to 14NH4+ are observed obviously with NO3− (0.5 mol/L) after 2 h electrolysis at −0.8 V, which is consistent with the standard 14NH4+ solution [50,51]. According to the calibration curves of 1H NMR in Fig. S12 (Supporting information), the NH3 yield rate is 56.06 mg h−1 cm−2 (Fig. S13 in Supporting information). Remarkably, this result agrees well with that obtained through UV–vis spectroscopy. Additionally, the isotopic labeled 15NO3− is further used for eNO3RR [52], and two peaks with the coupling constant of J15N−1H = 73.5 Hz corresponded to 15NH4+ are also observed (Fig. 3d) [50], confirming that the generated ammonia is originated from the added NO3− but not from air or other sources of N.
Durability is an important property of a catalyst, and thus a long-term experiment is conducted to demonstrate the excellent stability of Cu/MnOOH at −0.7 V. Considering that the NO3− would be consumed gradually during the eNO3RR process, fresh electrolyte (0.5 mol/L NO3− and 1.0 mol/L KOH solution) is replaced every two hours. As a result, the NH3 yield rates and FEs could maintain stable for 10 cycles (20 h) (Fig. 3e), and further characterizations demonstrate that Cu/MnOOH possess good structural stability (Fig. S14 in Supporting information). This might be due to the anchoring effect of MnOOH which prevents the growth and agglomeration of Cu NPs. Additionally, it should be noted that the pH of the electrolyte can maintain stable before (13.84) and after (13.92) reaction (Table S3 in Supporting information), which is beneficial to the stability of the catalyst.
To further investigate the good performance of Cu/MnOOH, a series of experiments are carried out. Through the results of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (Fig. 4a), Cu/MnOOH shows a much lower charge transfer resistance than those of pure MnOOH and Cu/C, and this means that Cu/MnOOH has a good electron-transfer capability during eNO3RR, leading to the higher activity of Cu/MnOOH for NH3 synthesis. The eNO3RR process involves multiple steps, including adsorption of NO3−, hydrogenation, electron transfer. The adsorption ability of Cu/MnOOH, pure MnOOH, and Cu/C to NO3− are determined by comparing the concentration difference of NO3− in the solution before and after soaking treatment, and the experimental details are provided in Supporting information [53]. The concentration of NO3− is tested by UV–vis spectrophotometer (Fig. S15 in Supporting information). The adsorption results (Fig. 4b) demonstrate that Cu/MnOOH has the highest adsorption capacity towards NO3−, and the quantity of adsorbed NO3− (qe) in NO3− solution (0.5 mol/L, 25 mL) for 2 h can reach 200.27 mmol/gcat., which is much better than that of Cu/C (98.37 mmol/gcat.) and pure MnOOH (80.83 mmol/gcat.). This proves our above hypothesis that the positive shift of binding energy of Cu could enhance the adsorption of anions (NO3−). Moreover, in comparison with Cu/C, MnOOH, and Cu/MnOOH exhibit more positive onset potentials, thereby MnOOH can facilitate the dissociation of water and provide active hydrogen (H*) for eNO3RR (Fig. S16 in Supporting information) [54]. Therefore, based on the above results, the present impressive activity of Cu/MnOOH is attributed to the synergistic effect between Cu NPs and MnOOH substrate, in which Cu enhances the adsorption of NO3− and MnOOH accelerates the hydrogenation process.
Moreover, to further explore the effect of water dissociation on eNO3RR, H*-quenching tests are applied in the presence of tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) with or without NO3−, and the detailed experimental procedure has been provided in Supporting Information [55]. As shown in Fig. S17 (Supporting information), NH3 yield rates decrease obviously after the addition of TBA reagent for the three catalysts, demonstrating the significant contribution of H* during eNO3RR. Furthermore, to explore the catalytic mechanism of the catalysts, KOH (1.0 mol/L) electrolyte with NO2− (0.5 mol/L) is also applied to NH3 synthesis. Fig. 4c indicates that the FEs of pure MnOOH and Cu/C catalysts increase obviously during eNO2RR for NH3 synthesis compared with those of eNO3RR. This phenomenon is consistent with the previous conclusion that the reduction of adsorbed nitrate (NO3*) to NO2* is the main barrier for eNO3RR [56-58]. Therefore, the synthesis of NH3 from NO3− is more difficult than that from NO2−, which usually leads to the lower NH3 FE for eNO3RR than for eNO2RR. Nevertheless, the FEs of NH3 synthesis from eNO3RR and eNO2RR over Cu/MnOOH are similar, and all of them are higher than 90% in the range of −0.4  ~ −0.8 V, suggesting that NH3 synthesis activity of Cu/MnOOH could overcome the rate limiting step of NO3* to NO2* [59-61], which may also result from the enhanced adsorption ability of Cu/MnOOH to NO3−.
Based on the above experiments and analyses, the superior activity of Cu/MnOOH catalyst can be deduced by the following factors (Fig. 4d). Firstly, MnOOH substrate can disperse Cu NPs efficiently with ultrafine sizes, creating lots of active sites. Secondly, the electronic structure of Cu can be regulated by MnOOH substrate with a positive shift of Cu valence state, improving the adsorption ability of Cu active sites to NO3−. Finally, Cu/MnOOH could overcome the barrier in the step of reducing NO3* to NO2*. As a result, Cu/MnOOH could realize excellent eNO3RR activity.
In summary, this work provides an efficient strategy to optimize the activity of Cu by MnOOH substrate to improve its performance of eNO3RR. Various characterizations demonstrate the introduction of MnOOH substrate can regulate the valence states of Cu, which is positively shifted compared with the Cu/C catalyst. Adsorption experiments prove that Cu/MnOOH can enhance the adsorption capacity of NO3−. Additionally, electrochemical tests demonstrate that Cu/MnOOH catalyst could overcome the barrier in the step of reducing NO3* to NO2* efficiently. Benefiting from these factors, Cu/MnOOH achieves outstanding NH3 synthesis performance with a superior NH3 yield rate (55.51 mg h−1 cm−2), high FE (96.8%), and large NH3 partial current density (700 mA/cm2) under ambient conditions. In addition, during long-term electrolysis, the Cu/MnOOH catalyst realizes a good stability within 20 h. The present findings highlight the potentiality of eNO3RR as an appealing method for synthesizing NH3 under ambient conditions, and offer a promising prospect for its application in industrial-scale production.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Less
Hong-Rui Li: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – original draft. Xia Kang: Writing – review & editing. Rui Gao: Writing – review & editing. Miao-Miao Shi: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. Bo Bi: Writing – review & editing. Ze-Yu Chen: Writing – review & editing. Jun-Min Yan: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work is supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51925102) and National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFA1504101).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109958.
References
Less
[1]
S. Licht, B. Cui, B. Wang, et al., Science 345 (2014) 637–640.
[2]
K.A. Brown, D.F. Harris, M.B. Wilker, et al., Science 352 (2016) 448–450.
[3]
C.J. Van der Ham, M.T. Koper, D.G. Hetterscheid, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 5183–5191.
[4]
R. Michalsky, A.M. Avram, B.A. Peterson, et al., Chem. Sci. 6 (2015) 3965–3974.
[5]
D. Bao, Q. Zhang, F.L. Meng, et al., Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1604799.
[6]
M.M. Shi, D. Bao, B.R. Wulan, et al., Adv. Mater. 29 (2017) 1606550.
[7]
X. Cui, C. Tang, Q. Zhang, Adv. Energy Mater. 8 (2018) 1800369.
[8]
Z. Geng, Y. Liu, X. Kong, et al., Adv. Mater. 30 (2018) 1870301.
[9]
M. Wang, S. Liu, T. Qian, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 341.
[10]
Y.C. Hao, Y. Guo, L.W. Chen, et al., Nat. Catal. 2 (2019) 448–456.
[11]
S. Liu, T. Qian, M. Wang, et al., Nat. Catal. 4 (2021) 322–331.
[12]
M. Wang, S. Liu, H. Ji, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 3198.
[13]
M. Ghazouani, H. Akrout, L. Bousselmi, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (2017) 9895–9906.
[14]
L. Su, K. Li, H. Zhang, et al., Water Res. 120 (2017) 1–11.
[15]
P. Gayen, J. Spataro, S. Avasarala, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 (2018) 9370–9379.
[16]
J.M. McEnaney, S.J. Blair, A.C. Nielander, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020) 2672–2681.
[17]
I. Katsounaros, M. Dortsiou, G. Kyriacou, J. Hazard Mater. 171 (2009) 323–327.
[18]
M. Blarasin, A. Cabrera, I. Matiatos, et al., Sci. Total Environ. 741 (2020) 140374.
[19]
G.F. Chen, Y. Yuan, H. Jiang, et al., Nat. Energy 5 (2020) 605–613.
[20]
J. Li, G. Zhan, J. Yang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 7036–7046.
[21]
L. Mattarozzi, S. Cattarin, N. Comisso, et al., Electrochim. Acta 89 (2013) 488–496.
[22]
Y. Wang, A. Xu, Z. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 5702–5708.
[23]
Z.Y. Wu, M. Karamad, X. Yong, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 2870.
[24]
R. Jia, Y. Wang, C. Wang, et al., ACS Catal. 10 (2020) 3533–3540.
[25]
X. Fu, X. Zhao, X. Hu, et al., Appl. Mater. Today 19 (2020) 100620.
[26]
M. Dortsiou, G. Kyriacou, J. Electroanal. Chem. 630 (2009) 69–74.
[27]
K. Chen, Z.Y. Ma, X.C. Li, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (2023) 2209890.
[28]
G. Zhang, X. Li, K. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202300054.
[29]
X. Huang, L. Huang, S.R. Babu Arulmani, et al., Environ. Res. 204 (2022) 112381.
[30]
A. Kheradmand, M. Negarestani, S. Kazemi, et al., Sci. Rep. 12 (2022) 14623.
[31]
Y. Xu, Y. Wen, T. Ren, et al., Appl. Catal. B 320 (2023) 121981.
[32]
J. Zhao, X. Ren, X. Liu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 452 (2023) 139533.
[33]
J.X. Yao, Y.T. Zhou, J.M. Yan, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2003701.
[34]
X. Zheng, Y. Yan, X. Li, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 446 (2023) 130679.
[35]
Z. Lyu, S. Zhu, M. Xie, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 1909–1915.
[36]
L. Lan, Q. Li, G. Gu, et al., J. Alloys Compd. 644 (2015) 430–437.
[37]
C. Revathi, R.T.R. Kumar, Electroanalysis 29 (2017) 1481–1489.
[38]
T. Gao, F. Krumeich, R. Nesper, et al., Inorg. Chem. 48 (2009) 6242–6250.
[39]
Y. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Qian, et al., ACS Catal. 12 (2022) 1268–1287.
[40]
T.W. van Deelen, C. Hernández Mejía, K.P. de Jong, Nat. Catal. 2 (2019) 955–970.
[41]
Z. Liu, F. Shen, L. Shi, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 57 (2023) 10117–10126.
[42]
S.B. Wang, Y.S. Xia, Z.F. Xin, et al., Catal. Commun. 173 (2023) 106564.
[43]
M. Cui, H. Zhao, X. Dai, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 (2019) 13015–13022.
[44]
G.P. Kim, D. Lim, I. Park, et al., J. Power Sources 324 (2016) 687–693.
[45]
S. Yang, X. Song, P. Zhang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015) 6136–6145.
[46]
W. Sun, A. Hsu, R. Chen, J. Power Sources 196 (2011) 627–635.
[47]
S. Sun, S. Wang, T. Xia, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015) 20944–20951.
[48]
Y. Zhang, X. Dong, H. Li, et al., CrystEngComm. 23 (2021) 2376–2383.
[49]
H. Mizoguchi, A.W. Sleight, M.A. Subramanian, Inorg. Chem. 50 (2010) 10–12.
[50]
Y. Wang, M.M. Shi, D. Bao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 9464–9469.
[51]
A.C. Nielander, J.M. McEnaney, J.A. Schwalbe, et al., ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 5797–5802.
[52]
G. Jiang, M. Peng, L. Hu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 435 (2022) 134853.
[53]
Z. Song, Y. Liu, Y. Zhong, et al., Adv. Mater. 34 (2022) e2204306.
[54]
Z. Lou, Y. Li, J. Zhou, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 362 (2019) 148–159.
[55]
J. Ding, W. Li, Q. Chen, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 5762–5771.
[56]
G.E. Dima, A.C.A. de Vooys, M.T.M. Koper, J. Electroanal. Chem. 554–555 (2003) 15–23.
[57]
Y. Arikawa, Y. Otsubo, H. Fujino, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 842–847.
[58]
S. Garcia-Segura, M. Lanzarini-Lopes, K. Hristovski, et al., Appl. Catal. B 236 (2018) 546–568.
[59]
D. He, Y. Li, H. Ooka, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 2012–2015.
[60]
Z. Niu, S. Fan, X. Li, et al., Appl. Catal. B 322 (2023) 122090.
[61]
X. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Liu, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 403 (2021) 126269.
Appendix
Less
Year 2025 volume 36 Issue 2
PDF
88
46
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109958
  • Receive Date：2023-11-27
  • Online Date：2025-11-12
  • Published：2025-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-11-27
  • Revised：2024-04-05
  • Accepted：2024-04-30
Affiliations
    Key Laboratory of Automobile Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109958
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House