Encouraged by the above characterizations, the catalytic activity of CN/MoO
2Cl
2-Bpy was evaluated as a heterogeneous catalyst. For this purpose, model reaction between 1-chloro-4-nitrobenzene and phenylboronic acid was chosen for this amination reaction and selected results are listed in
Table 1. As expected, target product
3a was successfully obtained in 92% yield using CN/MoO
2Cl
2-Bpy as a catalyst, PPh
3 as reductant in ethyl acetate (EA) at room temperature for 18 h (
Table 1, entry 1). Various conditions were examined with respect to solvent, reductant, the amount of catalyst, and reaction time. First, a series of solvents were investigated in this reaction, and it was found that the solvent had a great influence on the reaction. Only a small amount of product
3a was observed when the model reaction was carried out in MeOH, EtOH, 1,4-dioxane, DMF, DMSO, ethyl lactate (EL), and
γ-valerolactone (GVL). When the reaction was carried out in toluene, cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME), 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-Me-THF), CH
3CN, and dichloromethane (DCM),
3a was obtained in 28%−88% yield (
Table 1, entries 2–13). Dimethyl carbonate (DMC) was found out to be the optimal solvent and produced
3a was obtained in 90% yield (entry 14). Considering the reaction yield, availability, cost and environmental factors, ethyl acetate (EA) was selected as an optimal solvent. Next, some reductants were also screened and it was found that more conventional reductants such as Cu, Zn, NaBH
4, FeCl
2, SnCl
2, Na
2SO
3, Na
2S, triethylsilane, phenylsilane and hydrazine hydrate are ineffective for the reaction (entries 15–24). The replacement of PPh
3 with tributylphosphine (P
tBu
3), diethyl phosphite, and diphenyl phosphite as the reducing agent led to a dramatic decrease of yield (entries 25–27). The amount of PPh
3 played an important role in this reaction. Only 65% of the desired product was obtained when 1.0 equiv. of PPh
3 was used (entry 28). Reducing the amount of PPh
3 to 2.0 equiv. decreased the yield of
3a to 84% (entry 29). In addition, increasing PPh
3 from 2.4 equiv. to 3.0 equiv. did not further increase the yield (entry 30). Further screening of other reaction parameters such as the amount of catalyst and the ratio of the reactants as well as reaction time failed to improve the yield of
3a.