Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Chiral supramolecular catalysts of helical nanoribbon: More twist, higher enantioselectivity
收藏切换
PDF
Cong Gao, Zijian Zhu, Siwei Li, Zheng Xi*, Qingqing Sun*, Jie Han*, Rong Guo
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2025, 36(3) : 109968
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2025, 36(3): 109968
• Communication •
Chiral supramolecular catalysts of helical nanoribbon: More twist, higher enantioselectivity
Full
Cong Gao, Zijian Zhu, Siwei Li, Zheng Xi*, Qingqing Sun*, Jie Han*, Rong Guo
Affiliations
  • School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
Published: 2025-03-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109968
Outline
收藏切换

Rational tuning of chiral nanostructures of supramolecular assemblies as catalysts and investigating their chiral morphology-enantioselectivity dependence is rarely reported. Herein, we report a series of supramolecular M/P-helical nanoribbons (HNs) assembled from the chiral L/D-glutamate-based amphiphiles (L/D-GluC16) and Cu(Ⅱ) ions, with their helical screw pitches adjusted from 217 nm to 104 nm through the facile regulation of their water/organic solvent assembly environment. They were then used as ideal models to reveal the chiral morphology-enantioselectivity relationship by catalyzing the asymmetric Diels-Alder reaction. Better enantioselectivity was achieved with more twist morphology. Experimental evidences of stronger chiral transfer effect from the supramolecular HNs with more twist to the aza-chalcone as reactant were obtained to understand such dependence. Our study demonstrates a new perspective for designing supramolecular catalysts with higher enantioselectivity.

Chiral supramolecular catalyst  /  Helical nanoribbon  /  Screw pitch  /  Enantioselectivity  /  Diels-Alder reaction
Cong Gao, Zijian Zhu, Siwei Li, Zheng Xi, Qingqing Sun, Jie Han, Rong Guo. Chiral supramolecular catalysts of helical nanoribbon: More twist, higher enantioselectivity[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2025 , 36 (3) : 109968 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109968
Full Text
Less
Developing an efficient catalyst with high enantioselectivity for organic asymmetric reactions is an overarching yet challenging goal for wide applications in the field of pharmaceutics, agricultural and food science, manufacturing industry and so on [1-7]. Compared with the small chiral molecular catalysts with limited stereoselective adjustability, the supramolecular catalysts based on chiral organic scaffolds have demonstrated greater promise, mainly due to their flexible tunability from both the chiral building blocks of organic units and chiral microenvironments of overall structures [8-12]. Understanding of the relationship between the chiral morphology and catalysis will advisably contribute to utilizing the stereochemical control and chiral amplification effect to maximize the enantioselectivity in asymmetric reactions [13]. Though some supramolecular structures such as helical bands [14,15], nanotubes [16,17] and nanofibers [18,19] formed by self-assembly of amphiphiles in solvents have been reported for capably catalyzing certain enantioselective reactions, the detailed study of the dependence between the chiral morphology control and enantioselective catalysis has rarely been achieved [20]. This dilemma is largely caused by lacking the efficient method to systematically accomplish the rational tuning of chiral morphology of the supramolecular catalysts.
Herein, we report a facile strategy to achieve the rational control of the chiral morphology of supramolecular helical nanoribbons (HNs) assembled from the L/D-glutamate-based amphiphiles (L/D-GluC16) and Cu(Ⅱ) ions. Specifically, the left or right-handedness (M/P) of the HNs was dependent on the chiral assembled units of L/D-GluC16, respectively. More importantly, their helical screw pitch length can be easily adjusted through merely changing the kind of initial organic solvents they assembled in. By loading them with the same ratio of the Cu(Ⅱ) ions as catalytic centers for asymmetrically catalyzing Diels-Alder (D-A) reaction, we demonstrate their enantioselectivity displays 4.5-fold enhancement as the screw pitch reduces from 217 nm to 104 nm, yet the unassembled L/D-GluC16 amphiphiles alone show no enantioselectivity at all. Experimental evidences of stronger chiral transfer effect from the supramolecular HNs with more twist (smaller pitch length and larger tilt angle) to the aza-chalcone as reactant were obtained to help understand such chiral morphology-enantioselectivity dependence, which could provide guidance for designing chiral supramolecular catalysts with higher enantioselectivity.
To prepare the supramolecular M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ), the pre-synthesized l-GluC16 chiral amphiphiles (4 × 10−5 mol, characterized by 1H and 13C NMR spectra and mass spectrometry in Figs. S1 and S2 in Supporting information) were first dissolved in various organic solvent (1 mL), followed by the addition of water (9 mL) to initiate the self-assembly processes. After 15 min, M-HN were formed, with the following addition of 1 mol% of Cu(Ⅱ) loaded onto the supramolecular HNs as the catalytic centers (Scheme 1 and details in Supporting information). The supramolecular M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) with different screw pitches were then just simply obtained from the self-assembly of the l-GluC16 amphiphiles in the mixture of water and various organic solvents with fixed volume ratio. By defining the screw pitch l and tilt angle θ (illustrated in Fig. 1A), we can visually characterize and compare their different twist levels. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images (Figs. 1B-F) exhibit the same left-handed morphology of one typical HN assembled in the water miscible mixture with acetone, methanol, ethanol, acetonitrile and tetrahydrofuran, respectively. Specifically, the M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) formed in the acetone/H2O has a pitch of about 217 nm. However, when we changed acetone to other organic solvents while keeping the same ratio of organic solvent/water, the pitch of the M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) gradually reduced to 194 nm (methanol), 154 (ethanol), 121 nm (acetonitrile) and 104 nm (tetrahydrofuran). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images with their corresponding height scan analyses demonstrate the five HNs all have the same assembly thickness of about 27 nm (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). Among the five samples, the HNs assembled from tetrahydrofuran (Fig. 1F) have the average shortest screw pitch length of 104 nm and largest tilt angle of 34° (Figs. 1G and H, Fig. S4 in Supporting information), demonstrating the most obvious extent of twist. The different helical twist level may be caused by the different extent of molecular interactions between the l-GluC16 amphiphiles and each organic solvent, as proved by their -NH- peak shifts tested from the 1H NMR spectra (Fig. S5 in Supporting information) [21,22]. Moreover, the P-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) with the same screw pitch length and tilt angle can also be obtained from the self-assembly of d-GluC16 amphiphiles (Figs. S6 and S7 in Supporting information) in the mixture of water and tetrahydrofuran (Fig. S8 in Supporting information).
To further confirm the Cu(Ⅱ) ion loading onto M-HN, the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was obtained (Fig. 2A). The intensity of the vibration band for the carboxyl groups at 1731 and 1596 cm−1 is decreased and increased respectively upon the Cu(Ⅱ) addition, suggesting the successful metal ion coordination between the carboxyl groups and Cu(Ⅱ) [23,24]. The inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) confirmed the added Cu(Ⅱ) ions in solution were all successfully loaded on the five M-HNs with the similar loading amount of ~1 mol% (Fig. 2B). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) and M-HN with 104 nm pitch length are similar, indicating the metal coordination of Cu(Ⅱ) had negligible influence on the arrangement of the molecular assembly (Fig. 2C). The sharp peak at 2.64° is assigned to the distance spacing of 3.32 nm, indicating the formation of a bilayer assembled structure [25,26]. With the increase of the screw pitch length from 104 nm to 217 nm, such bilayer distance spacing also expands from 3.32 nm to 3.36 nm (Fig. 2D and Fig. S9 in Supporting information), indicating the larger twist extent will aid to the tighter atomic distance and thus stronger molecular interactions [27].
We then investigated the dependence between the chiral morphology of different screw pitches and the enantioselectivity by catalyzing the D-A reaction of aza-chalcone and cyclopentadiene, since Cu(Ⅱ) is a well-known catalyst to obtain the racemic products from the two reactants, and the endo products are energetically more favored over the exo products (Figs. S10-S12 and Table S1 in Supporting information) [28]. As shown in Table 1 (entries 1–5), all the five M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) samples have a high yield to produce the endo product. Moreover, the enantiomeric excess (ee) of the S-endo product determined by the chiral high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is increased from 11% to 50% with the screw pitch reduced from 217 nm to 104 nm (Fig. S13, Table S2 in Supporting information). Such dramatic 4.5-fold increase of the ee value must originate from the chiral twist level of the assembled HNs, since the single l-GluC16 amphiphiles with Cu(Ⅱ) ions dissolved in each corresponding organic solvent did not demonstrate any enantioselectivity towards this reaction (Table 1, entries 7–11, Fig. S14 and Table S3 in Supporting information). The blank control experiments of d-A reaction catalyzed by Cu(Ⅱ) ions alone show no catalytic enantioselectivity (0% ee, Fig. S15 and Table S4 in Supporting information), and the M-HN(121) host alone yield no catalytic reaction products at all (Table S4). These control experiments confirm that the formation of M-HN(121)-Cu(Ⅱ) is the key to the increase of yield and ee value. Moreover, the dosage of catalyst mainly affects the yield of D-A reaction, less dosage leads to smaller yield, but has little effect on the catalytic enantioselectivity (Fig. S16, Tables S5 and S6 in Supporting information). Also, the P-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) with 104 nm screw pitch length gave the similar yield and ee value of the R-endo product (Table 1, entry 6, Fig. S17 and Table S7 in Supporting information), displaying the chiral morphology-enantioselectivity dependence of our supramolecular catalysts in this asymmetric reaction.
To understand such chiral morphology-enantioselectivity relationship (Fig. 3A), we monitored the signal changes from both the FTIR and circular dichroic (CD) spectra for the samples of M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) with aza-chalcone adsorbed on their surfaces. First, from the FTIR spectra of the free aza-chalcone compared with the coupled M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ)-aza-chalcone (Fig. S18 in Supporting information), the obvious peak shifts of the carbonyl groups vibration (1668–1674 cm−1) and aromatic rings vibration (1601–1596 cm−1) assigned for aza-chalcone demonstrated its successful adsorption on M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ). Second, free aza-chalcone is an achiral molecule without CD signals. However, once aza-chalcone was adsorbed onto the M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) surface, the chiral transfer effect can occur from the M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) to aza-chalcone molecules, making the appearance of the negative (~325 nm) and positive (~315 nm) CD signal peaks assigned to aza-chalcone (Fig. 3B). It is noteworthy that since the M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) did not show CD signal peaks within that wavelength range [29], neither did the single mixture of l-GluC16—Cu(Ⅱ) monomers with aza-chalcones in the corresponding five organic solvents (Fig. S19 in Supporting information), such chiral transfer effect can only happen from the supramolecular assemblies to the aza-chalcones. As shown in Figs. 3B-D for the aza-chalcone adsorbed M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) samples with different screw pitch length, with the decrease of the screw pitch length from 217 nm to 104 nm, the intensity of the negative CD peaks of the adsorbed aza-chalcone increased from 1.5 mdeg to 14.9 mdeg and the peak position also shifted from 329 nm to 321 nm, indicating the stronger chiral transfer effect and weaker π-π interaction between the aza-chalcone molecules. Moreover, the larger binding constant Ka (obtained from the ultraviolet-titration, Fig. S20 in Supporting information) between the aza-chalcone and M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) was measured for the smaller screw pitch length, further confirming the stronger interactions exist between the more twisted M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) and the reactants.
From all the experimental results above-mentioned, the morphology-enantioselectivity relationship in our system can be understood as follows (Fig. 3E): the water/organic solvent regulated self-assembly of l-GluC16 amphiphiles and Cu(Ⅱ) ions give a series of M-HN—Cu(Ⅱ) samples with different twist extent, with the smaller screw pitch one having tighter atomic distance and stronger monomeric intermolecular interactions. During the D-A reaction, the aza-chalcone as reactant can bind to Cu(Ⅱ) as catalytic center through the coordination of O and N atoms [17]. Meanwhile, the aza-chalcone can also be influenced by the amphiphile units, and the interaction between them is stronger with the tighter atomic arrangement of the amphiphiles, which is reflected by the more obvious chiral transfer effect. Thus, when the second reactant of cyclopentadiene was added, the reaction can demonstrate different enantioselectivity with the ones having different screw pitches.
In conclusion, a series of supramolecular M/P-HNs assembled from the chiral L/D-GluC16 amphiphiles and Cu(Ⅱ) ions were facilely obtained, with their helical screw pitches adjusted from 217 nm to 104 nm through the regulation of their water/organic solvent assembly environment. They were then used as ideal models to investigate the chiral morphology-enantioselectivity dependent relationship by catalyzing the asymmetric D-A reaction to obtain the endo-product with different ee values. Experimental results reveal the chiral supramolecular HNs with more twisted extent (smaller screw pitch length and larger tilt angle) tend to have higher enantioselectivity during the D-A reaction, which is caused by the stronger interactions between the reactants and the supramolecular HNs, leading to the stronger chiral transfer effect. Our study provides a new aspect to rationally control the supramolecular assemblies as catalysts and supplies guidance for designing chiral supramolecular catalysts with higher enantioselectivity.
Declaration of competing interests
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Less
Cong Gao: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation. Zijian Zhu: Writing – original draft, Data curation. Siwei Li: Data curation. Zheng Xi: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Formal analysis. Qingqing Sun: Writing – review & editing. Jie Han: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Rong Guo: Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
Less
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of this research by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22202171, 21922202, and 22272146), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Basic Research Program (No. BK20220559), the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province (No. 22KJD150009), and the Jiangsu SpeciallyAppointed Professor Plan (Z. Xi) from the Jiangsu Education Department.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109968.
References
Less
[1]
M. Liu, L. Zhang, T. Wang, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 7304–7397.
[2]
J. Dong, Y. Liu, Y. Cui, Acc. Chem. Res. 54 (2021) 194–206.
[3]
Y. Sang, M. Liu, Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 633–656.
[4]
J. Li, Y. Tang, Q. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 18522–18525.
[5]
L. Xu, L. Zhou, Y.X. Li, et al., Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 7287.
[6]
C. Wang, G. Yuan, C. Wang, et al., Small Struct. 4 (2023) 2200405.
[7]
G. Yuan, Z. Xi, C. Wang, et al., Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 39 (2023) 2212061.
[8]
W. Xuan, M. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z. Chen, Y. Cui, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 6904–6907.
[9]
C.G. Claessens, T. Torres, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 14522–14523.
[10]
Y. Sun, Y. Meng, J. Jiang, H. Sun, T. Li, Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 966–968.
[11]
K. Chen, Z. He, W. Xiong, C.J. Wang, X. Zhou, Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 1701–1704.
[12]
Z. Wu, H. Qian, X. Li, T. Xiao, L. Wang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108829.
[13]
A. Desmarchelier, X. Caumes, M. Raynal, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 4908–4916.
[14]
S. Wang, H. Jiang, L. Zhang, J. Jiang, M. Liu, ChemPlusChem 83 (2018) 1038–1043.
[15]
Z. Shen, Y. Sang, T. Wang, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 3976.
[16]
K.S. Lee, J.R. Parquette, Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 15653–15656.
[17]
J. Jiang, Y. Meng, L. Zhang, M. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 15629–15635.
[18]
F. Rodríguez-Llansola, J.F. Miravet, B. Escuder, Chem. Commun. (2009) 7303–7305.
[19]
S. Bhowmick, L. Zhang, G. Ouyang, M. Liu, ACS Omega 3 (2018) 8329–8336.
[20]
X. Wu, M. Liu, C. Zheng, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107590.
[21]
F. Wang, M. Qin, T. Peng, et al., Langmuir 34 (2018) 7869–7876.
[22]
J.G. Jia, C.C. Zhao, Y.F. Wei, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 23948–23962.
[23]
Q. Jin, L. Zhang, H. Cao, et al., Langmuir 27 (2011) 13847–13853.
[24]
F. Wang, C. Feng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 130 (2018) 5757–5761.
[25]
X. Zha, Y. Chen, H. Fan, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 7759–7769.
[26]
G. Das, R. Thirumalai, B. Vedhanarayanan, V.K. Praveen, A. Ajayaghosh, Adv. Opt. Mater. 8 (2020) 2000173.
[27]
Q. Jin, L. Zhang, X. Zhu, P. Duan, M. Liu, Chem. Eur. J. 18 (2012) 4916–4922.
[28]
D.X. Zhao, Z.Z. Xu, Z.Z. Yang, Chin. Chem. Lett. 19 (2008) 1135–1138.
[29]
C. Gao, S. Li, C. Zhao, et al., Small 20 (2024) 2310234.
Appendix
Less
Year 2025 volume 36 Issue 3
PDF
51
28
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109968
  • Receive Date：2024-03-14
  • Online Date：2025-11-07
  • Published：2025-03-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2024-03-14
  • Revised：2024-04-16
  • Accepted：2024-05-05
Affiliations
    School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2024.109968
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House