The photocatalytic overall water splitting performance was assessed in a catalysis system under simulated sunlight irradiation without sacrificial agents (
Fig. 3a). Initially, TiO
2 hollow nanoshells exhibited low gas production due to rapid charge recombination and high overpotential on the surface. However, when Pt or RuO
2 cocatalysts were integrated into the TiO
2 nanoshells, successful H
2 and O
2 evolution from pure water splitting was observed. Particularly, Pt@TiO
2@RuO
2 hollow nanoshells, featuring spatially-separated cocatalysts, demonstrated the most effective photocatalytic water splitting performance. This was evidenced by a stable H
2 generation rate of 50.1 µmol g
−1 h
−1 and O
2 evolution rate of 25.1 µmol g
−1 h
−1, maintaining a near stoichiometric ratio of 2:1. Results presented in Table S1 (Supporting information) show that these hollow nanoshells exhibit competitive photocatalytic activity for overall water splitting when compared to related samples in literature. The stability of Pt@TiO
2@RuO
2 hollow nanoshells was assessed through a cycle test of overall water splitting (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). The catalyst exhibited consistent H
2 and O
2 evolution under simulated sunlight in each cycle, and nearly 90% of the initial activity was maintained after 24 h, making Pt@TiO
2@RuO
2 hollow nanoshells a promising candidate for practical applications. The experiments highlighted the importance of cocatalysts in enhancing charge separation for water splitting, as well as the role of dielectric Mie resonance in hollow nanoshells for improved light trapping. Solar energy and seawater are abundant resources, making seawater an ideal industrial-grade resource for hydrogen and oxygen production through photocatalysis [
43]. However, the performance of photocatalytic seawater splitting can be affected by various factors such as solution pH, cations, anions, and competitive reactions due to the thermodynamic favorability of certain species over water molecules [
44]. This work focuses on photocatalytic pure water splitting and further research need to be conducted to clarify the influence of water quality on the photocatalytic water decomposition performance. Additionally, theoretical calculation based on Mie theory was used to analyze the optical properties and electric field distribution in hollow nanoshells. The simulation model depicted in
Fig. 3b illustrated the efficient capture of incident light by suspended nanoshells in water, leading to the generation of photo-induced charge carriers through dielectric Mie resonance. The refractive index of TiO
2, as shown in
Fig. 3c, considered the absorption properties in the ultraviolet region by incorporating the imaginary part of the refractive index.
Fig. 3d illustrated the simulated absorption, scattering and extinction cross-section of TiO
2 hollow nanoshells and nanoparticles (inset). TiO
2 hollow nanoshells exhibited significant absorption below 400 nm, with no absorption observed in the visible light region. The scattering spectrum of TiO
2 hollow nanoshells displayed two peaks at 359 nm and 393 nm, along with a broad scattering band from 400 nm to 800 nm. The extinction spectrum of TiO
2 hollow nanoshells was a combination of the absorption and scattering spectra. When compared to TiO
2 nanoshells, TiO
2 nanoparticles with a crystalline size of 7 nm showed absorption below 400 nm but weak scattering in the 300–800 nm range. The TiO
2 nanoparticles were actually derived from the structural fragmentation of TiO
2 hollow nanoshells through grinding in an agate mortar. The size of the TiO
2 nanoparticles was identical to that of TiO
2 hollow nanoshells. Based on the XRD results (
Fig. 2a), the crystalline size of the anatase TiO
2 nanoparticles was determined to be 7.0 nm using Scherrer’s equation. Consequently, the size of the TiO
2 nanoparticles was set at 7 nm for the simulated calculations. The scattered light within the absorption range of TiO
2 can excite nearby nanoparticles to generate charge carriers. In
Fig. 3e, the electric near-field distribution around the TiO
2 hollow nanoshells at a resonance wavelength of 359 nm was simulated using the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method. The incident light was directed along the z-axis above the nanoshell. The electric-field enhancement, defined as |
E|/|
E0| (where
E0 is the incident field amplitude), showed a significant increase in electric field intensity around the nanoshell, reaching a value of 2.0. This localized electric field within the nanoshell enhances light trapping efficiency, as absorbed power is proportional to the square of the electric field [
45,
46]. Given that anatase TiO
2 has a bandgap of 3.2 eV and strongly absorbs UV light below 387 nm, the enhanced electric field at 359 nm can further excite TiO
2 to generate more electrons from the valence band to the conduction band, resulting in stronger photoluminescence emission, higher photocurrent response, and better photocatalytic activity. Finally, a mechanism was proposed for photocatalytic overall water splitting using Pt@TiO
2@RuO
2 hollow nanoshells, considering dielectric Mie resonance, light utilization, and charge separation (
Fig. 3f). When exposed to simulated sunlight, electrons moved from the valence band to the conduction band of TiO
2. The confined nanoshells allowed incident light to travel around, enhancing the near electric field due to dielectric Mie resonance at 359 nm. This further excited the TiO
2 semiconductors, increasing the production of charge carriers and improving light utilization efficiency. Additionally, photo-induced electrons migrated to inner Pt sites for water reduction, while photo-induced holes transferred to RuO
2 sites for water oxidation, enhancing the hydrogen and oxygen evolution rate through spatial charge separation.