Nanobelts, such as cyclacenes [
1–
8] and beltarenes [
9], along with their partially or fully hydrogenated analogs [
10–
14], have emerged as prominent subjects in both synthetic and supramolecular chemistry due to their intriguing molecular structure and promising applications in supramolecular containers, nanomaterials, and organic semiconductors [
15]. More importantly, nanobelts can also serve as template molecules for the bottom-up construction of nanotubes [
16,
17]. Despite the growing interest in this field, the development of nanobelts has been slow, primarily due to synthetic challenges. Specifically, inducing high tension in these ribbon-like structures can often leads to low synthetic yields, which significantly hinder further derivatization and broader application. Therefore, the development of nanobelts with diverse structures remains a significant challenge.
To address the strain issues associated with the synthesis of nanobelts, carbon atoms could be partially replaced by heteroatoms to create a hybrid belt structure. In addition to relieving ring strain through geometric adjustments, the incorporation of heteroatoms introduces new functionalities, ultimately yielding multifunctional macrocyclic materials with enhanced properties. Benefiting from such a structural design, significant progress has been made in the construction of those highly strained nanobelts [
18–
21]. For example, three
N-doped nanobelts have been successfully prepared by Miao [
22], Chen [
23], and Wu
et al. [
24], respectively. Tanaka
et al. demonstrated the successful construction of oxygen-embedded nanobelts by intra-molecular alkyne cyclotrimerization [
25]. Subsequently, oxygen-doped belt[8]arene and belt[12]arene were reported by Wang [
26] and Tiefenbacher
et al. [
27], respectively. More recently, sulfur-doped zigzag nanobelts consisted of phenoxathiin, a foldable building block bridged by oxygen and sulfur that favors a bent configuration, were also successfully accomplished (
Fig. 1) [
28]. The fusion of eight phenoxathiin units results in an octagonal bowl-shaped nanobelt, [8]cyclophenoxathiin (
[8]CP), which serves as an excellent molecular container for fullerene guests [
28,
29]. Following this, two
[8]CP analogues, incorporating naphthalene [
30] or thianthrene [
31] moieties, were successfully synthesized, further demonstrating the advantages of applying the foldable subunit in the construction of zigzag nanobelts. Despite the progress with
[8]CP, the synthesis of [
n]cyclophenoxathiins (
[n]CP) with a number of repeating oxathiin units (
n) greater or smaller than eight has not met success yet. Moreover, theoretical calculations demonstrate that synthesizing smaller belts is more challenging than constructing larger ones (
Fig. 1 and Table S2 in Supporting information) [
32]. In addtion, the synthesis of cyclophenoxathiins with odd numbers of repeating units poses an even greater challenge, as it usually requires a more tedious synthetic approach to yield the double-stranded nanobelts [
33]. Therefore, we report here the synthesis of a novel
C2-symmectric [7]cyclophenoxathiin (
[7]CP) and its host-guest chemistry towards three fullerenes.
As outlined in
Scheme 1, to obtain the
C2-symmetric belt skeleton composed of seven laterally fused phenoxathiin units, a multi-step synthesis was employed, involving the preparation of two key building blocks,
A and
B. Initialed from the 4-bromo-3-fluoro-methoxybenenze, the diphenolic
A can be obtained in 8 steps with a conbinded yield of 29%.
A features a phenoxathiin skeleton with two substituted
n-butyl groups, which serve not only to block the reaction sites between the methoxy and aryloxy groups but also to ensure the solubility of the final product. Treatment of the previously reported intermediate
10 [
28] with an excess amount of
11 affords the second building block
B in a moderate yield of 48%. Finally, a cyclization-followed-by-bridging approach was employed to construct
[7]CP. The '1+1′ cyclization between
A and
B,
via the Ullmann coupling reaction, generates the oxo-bridged macrocyclic intermediate
1, which serves as the precursor to
[7]CP in a 38% yield. The subsequent intramolecular Friedel-Crafts reaction on intermediate
1 completes the bridging step, yielding
[7]CP with an isolated yield of 18%. The correct structure of
[7]CP was confirmed through NMR, mass spectrometry, and single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.
The
1H NMR spectrum of
[7]CP exhibits six singlets in the aromatic region with an integration ratio of 2:1:2:2:2:1, confirming a
C2-symmetric structure (
Fig. 2a). The resonance peaks at 7.11, 7.08, 6.95, and 6.94 ppm were assigned to the upper-rim protons H
b, H
d, H
a, and H
c, respectively, while the signals at 6.90 and 6.87 ppm corresponded to the lower-rim protons H
f and H
e (Fig. S30 in Supporting information). MALDI-TOF-MS analysis showes a prominent peak at
m/
z of 1078.1284, further confirming the expected structure of
[7]CP (
Fig. 2b). Suitable single crystals of
[7]CP were obtained through vapor diffusion of ethanol into a nitrobenzene solution of
[7]CP. X-ray crystallography analysis revealed that
[7]CP adopts a hepta-cut bowl-shaped geometry, with a cavity diameter of 11.7 Å measured from the upper rim (
Fig. 3). This represents a decrease of 1.4 Å from the 13.1 Å cavity diameter observed for
[8]CP [
28]. The bending angles of the phenoxathiin units are approximately 130°, reduced by 7°, indicating a strained ring structure for
[7]CP compared to that of
[8]CP, consistent with theoretical studies (
Fig. 1 and Table S2). Interestingly, the crystal packing structure of
[7]CP shows a head-to-head dimeric capsule-like assembly, stabilized by C‒H···S hydrogen bonds between the upper rims. Two nitrobenzenes are encapsulated in the cavity of the supramolecular capsule, forming a 2:2 complex, which highlights the potential of
[7]CP as a molecular container.
Previously, we explored the host-guest chemistry between
[8]CP and fullerenes. Due to their excellent size complementarity, two
[8]CP units can bind one fullerene molecule, such as C
60 or C
70, to form a ternary complex with strong affinity through
π−
π and CH−
π interactions (
Fig. 4a) [
28,
29]. Building on this, it is straightforward to investigate the binding capabilities of the relatively smaller
[7]CP towards fullerene guests. To this end, the host-guest interactions between
[7]CP and three selected fullerenes (C
60, C
70, and PC
61BM) were evaluated using UV–vis absorption,
1H NMR, and X-ray crystallography analyses.
The UV–vis absorption analysis revealed a binding stoichiometry of 1:1 for all complexes formed between
[7]CP and C
60, C
70, or PC
61BM (Figs. S1, S3 and S5 in Supporting information). Subsequently,
1H NMR analysis of the equimolar mixture of
[7]CP with C
60, C
70, or PC
61BM was performed to further probe their complexation (
Figs. 4b and
c). The chemical shift of
[7]CP changes upon complexing fullerenes (
Table 1). All three complexes exhibit similar resonance shift trends, with the upper-rim protons H
a, H
b, H
c, and H
d shifting upfield, while the lower-rim protons H
e and H
f shift downfield. These results indicate a similar binding mode, with
π−
π interactions likely occurring between the phenylene moieties and C
60, consistent with the behavior observed for the complexation of a methylated
[8]CP with C
60 [
29]. A more pronounced chemical shift change was observed for the complexation of
[7]CP with C
70 compared to
[7]CP with C
60, suggesting a stronger binding affinity for the C
70@
[7]CP complex than for C
60@
[7]CP. Indeed, fitting the
1H NMR titration data in deuterated 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane afforded association constants (
Ka) of 1638 and 2534 L/mol for C
60@
[7]CP and C
70@
[7]CP, respectively (
Table 1 and Figs. S2 and S4 in Supporting information), confirming the inference from the NMR studies. The fullerene C
60 derivative PC
61BM retains the conjugated carbon sphere structure of C
60 but features a larger substituent attached to its surface (
Fig. 1). Therefore, it is expected to poess a similar binding hehavior for the complexation of PC
61BM by
[7]CP. A
Ka of 3682 L/mol was determined for the PC
61BM@
[7]CP complex in deuterated chloroform (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). Thus, all these
[7]CP complexes exhibit similar binding affinities, ranging from −4.3 to −4.8 kcal/mol, which are about two orders of magnitude lower than those of reported
[8]CP complexes [
28–
31]. This can be attributed to the reduced cavity size of
[7]CP, which prevents the formation of dimeric capsule-like complexes with fullerenes, as observed for
[8]CP. Nevertheless,
[7]CP has demonstrated its potential to function as a molecular container for fullerenes, exhibiting a 1:1 binding stoichiometry.
To further investigate the supramolecular chemistry of
[7]CP with fullerenes, single crystals of the C
60@
[7]CP and C
70@
[7]CP complexes were successfully prepared and analyzed by X-ray crystallography (Table S1 in Supporting information). As shown in
Fig. 5a, the crystal structure of C
60@
[7]CP unambiguously confirms the formation of a 1:1 complex, consistent with the results obtained from UV–vis absorption and
1H NMR analysis. Although
[7]CP is predicted to be unable to fully accommodate a C
60 molecule, partial insertion of the fullerene into the cavity of
[7]CP occurs due to their retained convex−concave geometric complementarity, as evidenced by
π−
π interactions with measured centroid-to-centroid distances of 3.8−4.1 Å. Multiple C−H···S hydrogen bonds (with CH···S distances of 2.7−3.6 Å) between adjacent nanobelts further stabilize the complex and extend the structure into a three- dimensional network. As revealed by
1H NMR analysis, the crystal structure of the
[7]CP and C
70 complex confirms identical binding behavior, forming a 1:1 complex (
Fig. 5b). C
70 partially resides within the cavity of
[7]CP, optimizing
π−
π interactions, with centroid-to-centroid distances ranging from 3.7 Å to 4.3 Å. In contrast to the spherical C
60, C
70 adopts an elongated, rugby ball shape, resulting in a more anisotropic electron density distribution. This curvature induces a slight polarization along its long axis, which leads to the shielding of the equatorial region and deshielding of the apical pentagons [
34]. As a result, the larger chemical shift changes observed for
[7]CP upon complexation with C
70 can be attributed to the structure of their complex, where the upper-rim protons are located near C
70's equatorial region, while the lower-rim protons are positioned closer to the deshielding apical pentagons. Such a complex structure likely contributes to the enhanced binding affinity of C
70 compared to C
60.
Since attempts to obtain single crystals of the PC
61BM@
[7]CP complex were unsuccessful, its structure was optimized using density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Fig. S7 in Supporting information) and compared with C
60@
[7]CP and C
70@
[7]CP. As shown in
Fig. 6a, the calculated structure of PC
61BM@
[7]CP exhibits a similar binding mode, with PC
61BM partially inserted into the cavity of
[7]CP. This interaction is primarily driven by convex−concave
π−
π interactions, with optimized centroid-to-centroid distances ranging from 3.6 Å to 4.0 Å, as confirmed by independent gradient model (IGM) analysis (
Fig. 6b) [
35].
In conclusion, we successfully synthesized [7]cyclophenoxathiin ([7]CP), a nanobelt with a heptagonal frustum-shaped structure, using a multi-step approach. Host-guest interactions with fullerenes (C60, C70, and PC61BM) revealed that [7]CP forms sTable 1:1 complexes. While the reduced cavity size prevents the formation of dimeric complexes seen with [8]CP, [7]CP still acts as an effective molecular container for fullerenes. This work enhances our understanding of smaller nanobelt host-guest chemistry and paves the way for multifunctional material design in organic electronics and nanotechnology. A comprehensive study of its host–guest chemistry towards small molecular guests and other physical properties is currently ongoing.
PDF
Full
68
39
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn
