Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Mechanisms underlying prostate cancer sensitivity to reactive oxygen species: overcoming radiotherapy resistance and recent clinical advances
收藏切换
PDF
Meidan Wang1, Rui Xing2, Liqun Wang1, Mingyue Pan3, Ruoyun Zhang4, Ting Li5, Weiqiang Sun6, Jing Zhou7
Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2025, 22(7) : 747 - 761
Less
收藏切换
Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2025, 22(7): 747-761
• Review •
Mechanisms underlying prostate cancer sensitivity to reactive oxygen species: overcoming radiotherapy resistance and recent clinical advances
Full
Meidan Wang1, Rui Xing2, Liqun Wang1, Mingyue Pan3, Ruoyun Zhang4, Ting Li5, Weiqiang Sun6, Jing Zhou7
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany
  • 2Department of Hematology, Dongyang Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang People’s Hospital, Dongyang 322100, China
  • 3Faculty of Law, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79085, Germany
  • 4School of Chinese Language and Literature, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan 063000, China
  • 5Department of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
  • 6Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General Surgery, Jinan Third People’s Hospital, Jinan 250031, China
  • 7Department of Chemoradiotherapy, Ningbo NO. 2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, China
About Author:

Author contributions

Conceptualization and writing: Meidan Wang, Rui Xing, Liqun Wang, Jing Zhou.

Software: Meidan Wang, Rui Xing, Liqun Wang, Ting Li, Weiqiang Sun.

Review and editing: Meidan Wang, Rui Xing, Liqun Wang, Mingyue Pan, Ruoyun Zhang.

Supervision: Jing Zhou.

Published: 2025-07-15 doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0584
Outline
收藏切换

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among men. Radiotherapy is the cornerstone of PCa treatment. However, a major limitation of radiotherapy is the development of resistance, which compromises treatment efficacy. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are generated by radiation, have a dual role in PCa by inducing DNA damage and apoptosis, while also promoting tumor progression and radioresistance. Elevated ROS levels enhance metabolic reprogramming, activate oncogenic pathways, and influence the tumor microenvironment by modulating immune responses and promoting the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Key molecular mechanisms, including the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling axis, Bcl-2 mutations, and Speckle-type POZ protein alterations, contribute to radioresistance by enhancing antioxidant defenses and DNA repair capacity. Additionally, the interplay between hypoxia, androgen receptor variants (AR-Vs), and ferroptosis regulators further influence radiotherapy outcomes. Understanding these resistance mechanisms is crucial for developing targeted strategies to enhance radiosensitivity and improve therapeutic outcomes in PCa patients.

Prostate cancer (PCa)  /  radiation therapy (RT)  /  reactive oxygen species (ROS)  /  radiotherapy resistance  /  antioxidants
Meidan Wang, Rui Xing, Liqun Wang, Mingyue Pan, Ruoyun Zhang, Ting Li, Weiqiang Sun, Jing Zhou. Mechanisms underlying prostate cancer sensitivity to reactive oxygen species: overcoming radiotherapy resistance and recent clinical advances[J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2025 , 22 (7) : 747 -761 . DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0584
Full Text
Less
Introduction
Less
Prostate cancer (PCa) detection and management have improved since the introduction of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in the early 1990s. Nevertheless, PCa remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in men in the United States with an estimated 299,010 new cases and 35,250 deaths projected in 20241. Racial disparities persist because Black patients have nearly twice the lifetime risk of PCa-related deaths compared to non-Hispanic White patients, in part due to differences in access to care and disease biology2.
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the cornerstone of PCa treatment, particularly in combination with radiotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk localized PCa3,4. However, challenges remain, including uncertainty regarding the optimal use and duration of ADT following radical prostatectomy5. In addition, combination therapies increase toxicity and raise concerns about the development of drug resistance with prolonged use, underscoring the need for continued monitoring and novel strategies to mitigate resistance6.
Radiation therapy is a critical component of cancer treatment and is used in greater than one-half of all cancer patients as the first-line approach. Radiation therapy induces reactive oxygen species (ROS) and DNA damage, which leads to tumor cell apoptosis and cell death, and ultimately increases patient survival3,7–9. Advances in radiation therapies, including external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), which remains the most widely used method for targeting early-stage prostate tumors, have improved patient survival10. Emerging techniques [e.g., proton beam therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)] offer improved precision, while minimizing exposure to adjacent structures11–13. SBRT uses advanced image-guidance for precise radiation delivery, which makes SBRT particularly beneficial for isolated bone metastases, while IMRT modulates beam modulation to reduce exposure to nearby healthy tissues, reducing treat-associated side effects14–17.
Brachytherapy, an internal radiation technique, involves implanting radioactive sources directly into tumors. Brachytherapy has demonstrated high efficacy in PCa with > 80% achieving a 10-year overall survival and < 10% incidence of distant metastases for patients receiving low- or high-dose brachytherapy (LDBT or HDBT, respectively)18. However, radiation resistance remains a challenge, resulting in disease relapse several months after treatment19,20. PCa develops mechanisms to resist radiation-induced apoptosis and promote tumor proliferation. One key strategy for tumor survival is developing antioxidant defenses following radiation exposure, which enables escape from radiation-induced cell death9,17. Understanding resistance mechanisms and developing targeted strategies to overcome resistance mechanisms will be crucial in further optimizing radiotherapy for PCa3,15. In this review the mechanisms underlying the radioresistance mechanism is explored with a focus on antioxidant material development, pathway mutations, and immune environment regulation that contribute to radioresistance after radiation. Moreover, the clinical trials targeting these mutation or pathways are summarized, highlighting the potential to overcome radioresistance. This review provides insights into future drug development targets and emphasizes the importance of addressing these mechanisms to enhance therapeutic efficacy in PCa.
Dual role of ROS in tumor biology and mechanisms underlying tumor resistance to oxidative stress
Less
Radiation exposure induces rapid production of ROS in < 1 s, including superoxide anion (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (OH), and singlet oxygen (O2). These ROS contribute to DNA damage, such as frequent double-strand break (DSB) damage and single-strand breaks (SSBs), leading to intracellular damage at tumor sites. However, ROS have dual effects in tumorigenesis and antitumor effects21.
PCa cells exploit ROS production to support tumor progression and survival. Elevated intracellular ROS levels have been reported in PCa cell lines (DU145, PC3, and LNCaP) compared to normal prostate epithelial cells, which contribute to malignant transformation22. ROS accumulation induces chromosomal abnormalities, including rearrangements, amplifications of tumor promoter genes, and deletions of key tumor suppressor genes, such as PTEN, TP53, and RB1, which promote tumor progression23. The tumor suppressor protein, p53, has a pivotal role in regulating apoptosis. Upon activation, p53 induces the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins, including B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) associated X protein (BAX) and p53 upregulated modulator of apoptosis (PUMA). BAX facilitates apoptosis by permeabilizing the mitochondrial outer membrane, leading to the release of cytochrome c and the subsequent activation of caspases that execute cell death. However, moderately elevated ROS levels can inhibit p53, thereby suppressing apoptosis21,24. Additionally, ROS dysregulation disrupts mitochondrial function, leading to metabolic reprogramming. Dysfunctional mitochondria shift cancer cells towards glycolysis, supporting tumor survival. Inhibiting ROS production reduces matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) activity, mitochondrial dysfunction, and PCa cell invasion, thereby enhancing cell death. Moreover, NAD(P)H oxidase (Nox) inhibitors, such as diphenyliodonium, impair tumor proliferation by modulating key survival pathways, including ERK1/2, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and AKT, and induce G₂/M cell cycle arrest24,25 (Figure 1).
ROS also influence the tumor microenvironment (TME) by activating the immune cells and stimulating pro-inflammatory cytokine release, such as TNF-α and IL-6, to create a tumor-supportive environment in tumorgenesis4,8 (Figure 1). In addition, ROS stimulate angiogenesis and activate oncogenic pathways, including MAPK and nuclear factor (NF)-κB, further driving signaling pathways26. MEKK3 and MEKK6 are upstream MAP3Ks that regulate MAPK signaling (JNK and p38). ROS upregulation induce TNF-α expression, which subsequently activates RIP and MEKK3/6 signaling. This pathway has a critical role in cancer progression, therapy resistance, and immune responses27. Conversely, ROS-mediated DNA damage has a key role in radiation therapy-induced tumor cell death. Tumor cells utilize adaptive mechanisms to counteract ROS-induced damage, primarily through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) repair pathways, allowing tumor cells to acquire mutations that enhance survival. NHEJ, the dominant repair mechanism in G1-phase tumor cells, contributes to mutational burden, conferring resistance to radiotherapy28.
Androgen receptor splice variants, particularly AR-V7, contribute to radiotherapy resistance by enhancing the DNA damage response (DDR) and promoting HR and NHEJ repair mechanisms. AR-V7 upregulation post-radiation reduces the synthetic lethality response to PARP-1 inhibitors and interacts with DNA-PKcs to enhance DNA repair efficiency, fostering resistance in PCa cells29. Mutations in tumor suppressor genes, such as TP53 and PTEN, further disrupt ROS regulation. PTEN loss alters intracellular signaling, while TP53 mutations impair antioxidant responses, facilitating redox homeostasis and treatment resistance30 (Figure 1).
Notably, high glucose levels induce p53 phosphorylation at Thr55 via TAF1 kinase, enhancing ROS generation and radiation resistance. Inhibiting TAF1 or p53 Thr55 phosphorylation suppresses ROS generation and restores radiosensitivity21,31–33.
In summary, the intricate interplay between ROS, DNA repair mechanisms, and metabolic reprogramming has a crucial role in PCa progression and treatment resistance. Targeting ROS regulatory pathways and metabolic adaptations presents a promising strategy to overcome radiotherapy resistance and improve therapeutic outcomes in PCa.
Role of ROS and ROS involvement during radiotherapy in PCa patients
Less
ROS have a dual role in PCa progression and treatment. Without radiation, ROS accumulation promotes tumorigenesis by activating oncogenic pathways, shifting the TME into a pro-inflammatory state, releasing tumor promoting cytokines, and altering mitochondrial respiration15,34. ROS accumulation within tumor cells enhances treatment efficacy by inducing direct oxidative damage and ROS-mediated cell death35.
Water radiolysis rapidly generates free radicals within fractions of a second upon radiation exposure, leading to substantial DNA damage. This initial genomic injury triggers a cascade of biological responses that sustains ROS production for several hours and ultimately promoting tumor cell degradation35,36.
Radiation induces ROS production through direct effects or ROS-mediated cells death. For direct ROS effects, radiation energy interacts with DNA, proteins, and lipids, causing immediate damage. Additionally, radiation induces mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage and upregulates NADPH oxidase (NOX) enzymes, leading to elevated intracellular ROS levels and oxidative stress, ultimately resulting in cell death37. For ROS-mediated cell death, increased ROS levels directly damage DNA strands, triggering cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, particularly during the G2/M phase38.
Genetic mutations significantly influence how PCa cells respond to ROS-induced DNA damage and radiation therapy. BRCA1 and BRCA2, critical genes for HR repair, have a key role in repairing ROS-induced DNA damage during the S and G2 phases. Between 1% and 2% of PCa patients harbor BRCA1/2 mutations, leading to defective DNA repair, increased radiosensitivity, and heightened susceptibility to ROS-induced cell death39,40.
Notably, studies have shown that combining ADT with radiotherapy significantly improves 5-y survival rates in BRCA2-mutant PCa patients, demonstrating the synergistic effect of hormone therapy and radiotherapy39. Several factors influence the ROS-mediated radiation response in PCa, with ADT having a key role in enhancing the sensitivity of AR-positive cells to oxidative stress29. Research has indicated that ADT induces a radiation response by modulating ROS levels. Specifically, testosterone increases basal ROS levels in a dose-dependent manner, leading to the activation of phospho-p38 and pAKT, as well as upregulation of clustering, catalase, and manganese superoxide dismutase17,21.
ROS accumulation by radiation attacks lipid membranes, generating lipid peroxides, which can induce ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of cell death. PCa cells, characterized by high iron levels, are particularly vulnerable to ferroptosis induction. Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4) has a crucial role in regulating arachidonic acid and eicosatetraenoic acid metabolism, leading to ferroptosis41.
Recent evidence suggested that ionizing radiation enhances ACSL4 expression, thereby increasing radiosensitivity42. Furthermore, RB1-deficient prostate tumors are particularly susceptible to ferroptosis through the E2F/ACSL4 axis, highlighting the potential of targeting ferroptosis pathways to improve radiotherapy outcomes43.
Radiotherapy is particularly notable for its targeted delivery of high-energy particles to tumor sites, effectively inhibiting carcinogenesis, inducing cytotoxic responses, and modulating the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME)15,44,45. Although ROS accumulation primarily regulates molecular and metabolic processes, ROS accumulation also has a crucial role in immune activation. ROS induce damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), making PCa cells more recognizable to the immune system. The increased expression and release of MHC-I in the immune microenvironment enhance antigen presentation to T cells, thereby promoting cytotoxic T cell-mediated tumor killing7,46. Moreover, radiation transforms prostate tumors into an “in situ vaccine,” increasing responsiveness to immunotherapy by upregulating PD-L1 and enhancing immune responses. However, studies have indicated that radiotherapy-induced ROS production by neutrophils may disrupt antitumor immunity. Excessive ROS infiltrating the TME can impair immune responses against the tumor15,47. Additionally, some PCa cells develop resistance to radiation-induced ROS. Prostate tumors are often hypoxic, which reduces ROS production from radiation and stabilizes HIF-1α, and promotes survival pathways. This finding highlights the importance of combining radiation with hypoxia modifiers to enhance ROS-mediated tumor cell killing48,49.
Thus, understanding the mechanisms underlying ROS-induced radiosensitivity and ROS resistance is of great importance for optimizing radiotherapy outcomes.
ROS removal-associated radiotherapy resistance in PCa
Less
While radiotherapy is an effective treatment for various cancers and can slow PCa progression, the development of radiotherapy resistance limits the overall efficacy50,51. A significant portion of radiation-induced DNA damage stems from ROS accumulation, which destabilizes the genome and induces oxidative DNA damage. Oxidative stress, resulting from an imbalance between ROS and antioxidants, disrupts physiologic and pathologic processes by oxidizing proteins, lipids, and DNA44,52.
Key ROS species include O2−), H2O2, OH, and O2, with ·OH being particularly reactive and capable of inflicting direct cellular damage. The success of radiotherapy largely depends on ROS levels because elevated concentrations enhance antitumor effects. However, ROS scavengers within tumors counteract oxidative stress, reducing radiosensitivity and promoting mechanisms of radioresistance53.
In this review several key molecular mechanisms and processes that regulate ROS production and contribute to radiation resistance are discussed.
Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) complex degradation and its role in radiation resistance
Nrf2 is a pivotal regulator of ROS homeostasis and is closely linked to tumor progression and therapeutic resistance54. This 605-amino-acid transcription factor, containing a leucine zipper domain, has a crucial role in maintaining cellular redox balance by regulating antioxidant defenses55. Under normal conditions Nrf2 is sequestered in the cytoplasm through an interaction with Keap1, which serves as an adaptor for Cul3-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase, thereby promoting Nrf2 ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. However, oncogenic mutations, such as K-RasG12D, B-RafV619E, and MycERT2, elevate basal Nrf2 transcription, reducing intracellular ROS levels and fostering a more reduced intracellular environment, thereby promoting tumor survival54. The Keap1-Nrf2 complex is disrupted upon exposure to radiation-induced ROS, allowing Nrf2 to translocate into the nucleus, where Nrf2 activates the transcription of antioxidant response element (ARE)-dependent genes that protect against oxidative damage. While this mechanism is essential for normal cellular defense, tumors exploit Nrf2 activation to enhance radiotherapy resistance by counteracting ROS-induced cytotoxicity56,57 (Figure 2).
PCa cells have developed multiple strategies to manipulate the Keap1-Nrf2 axis, leading to enhanced ROS detoxification and resistance to radiotherapy-induced oxidative stress. Hu et al.58 demonstrated that the inhibitor of apoptosis-stimulating protein of p53 (iASPP), a known binding partner and transcriptional repressor of NF-κB/p65, exerts anti-ROS effects independent of p53 by stabilizing Nrf2. iASPP competitively binds to Keap1 via a DLT motif, preventing Keap1-mediated Nrf2 degradation and promoting resistance to radiotherapy55. Glucose also induces Keap1-Nrf2 stabilization. Elevated glucose levels further enhance tumor resistance to oxidative stress by stabilizing the Keap1-Nrf2 complex and repressing the Nrf2/ARE pathway. This metabolic adaptation is accompanied by an increase in IL-6 and a decrease in IL-10, fostering a pro-inflammatory microenvironment that supports tumor survival59,60.
Speckle-type POZ (SPOP) protein mutation induces radiation sensitivity
SPOP functions as an adaptor for the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex and has a critical role in cellular ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. SPOP regulates various physiologic and pathologic processes through interactions with histone-associated proteins. Among key genetic alterations in PCa, the SPOP mutation is one of the most frequently observed, making SPOP a potential biomarker for personalized treatment strategies61. SPOP mutations contribute significantly to PCa progression, occurring in 4%–28.6% of cases62,63. Previous studies have shown that patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring SPOP mutations often have a concurrent CHD1 deletion, which has been linked to increased sensitivity to abiraterone treatment64,65. Additionally, silencing SPOP using siRNA in PCa cells enhances sensitivity to radiation therapy by impairing ROS-activated DDR pathways. This dysregulation compromises DDR by downregulating RAD51 and CHK1, two key factors in HR, leading to increased radiosensitivity62. Beyond DDR, SPOP mutations also influence the TME. A subset of treatment-refractory CRPC patients with SPOP mutations exhibit upregulation of a 29-gene non-canonical STING (NC-STING) signature7,9,16,66. Recent preclinical studies demonstrated that SPOP normally targets and destabilizes STING1 protein but SPOP mutations lead to upregulated NC-STING-NF-κB signaling, promoting macrophage-driven TME remodeling and tumor growth. SPOP mutations are also linked to genomic instability. Among these SPOP mutation, the S119N mutation (serine 119 to asparagine) is associated with radiosensitivity. PCa cells carrying this mutation exhibit hypersensitivity to radiation, loss of the IR-induced G2/M checkpoint, and persistent γ-H2AX accumulation, indicating impaired DDR and increased genomic instability67 (Figure 3).
Preclinical models further support the association between SPOP mutations and higher tumor burden, as well as enhanced sensitivity to radiation therapy. Given the diverse functions of SPOP mutations across different models, further research is needed to clarify the role in ROS regulation, DDR impairment, and therapeutic resistance. These findings are further supported by preclinical PCa models, in which SPOP mutations are associated with higher tumor burden and increased sensitivity to radiation therapy63. Given the varied functions of SPOP observed across different research models and results, further exploration of SPOP functions is needed to clarify its roles. The current clinical trials aiming to overcome the radiation resistance in PCa are summarized in Table 1.
NCT05689021
NCT05689021 is a phase II clinical trial involving patients with CRPC harboring SPOP gene mutations. The study is evaluating the efficacy of a fixed-dose combination of abiraterone acetate and niraparib (CJNJ-67652000) in combination with prednisone. The primary objective is to assess radiologic progression-free survival (PFS), while a secondary objective is to determine the time to PSA progression. The trial includes 30 participants and aims to investigate whether CJNJ-67652000 with prednisone enhances tumor cell eradication in metastatic PCa compared to administration of these drugs separately68. This clinical trial is still ongoing.
Bcl-2 overexpression alters radiation sensitivity
The Bcl-2 family of pro-survival proteins regulates the intrinsic apoptotic pathway by modulating mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), leading to the release of intermembrane space proteins, caspase activation, and apoptosis59,69,70.
Elevated Bcl-2 levels can serve as a prognostic marker for PCa that is resistant to radiotherapy because Bcl-2 is often higher in tumors that progress after radiation compared to tumors treated with radical prostatectomy. Assessing Bcl-2 expression with pre-treatment PSA levels may help identify HRPC patients who are more likely to benefit from taxane-based chemotherapy9,70,71. Notably, Bcl-2-positive patients have longer cause-specific survival than Bcl-2-negative patients but overexpression of Bcl-2, which is often driven by the PI3K/NF-κB pathway, is associated with PCa progression58.
Studies have explored Bcl-2 inhibition as a strategy to overcome radioresistance. In a preclinical model of enzalutamide (Enz)-resistant PCa, increased Bcl-2 expression was targeted using the Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT263, enhancing sensitivity to Enz in Enz-sensitive and -resistant cells. This effect was achieved by inducing ROS production and inhibiting USP26 activity, leading to the degradation of AR and ARv7 proteins72.
Bcl-2 overexpression also drives aggressive behavior and resistance in PCa cells but treatment with the Bcl-2 inhibitor, HA14-1, can sensitize these cells to gamma radiation73. Sequential treatment with HA14-1 and radiation synergistically induces cell death by enhancing ROS production, JNK activation, and apoptotic pathways. This combination significantly increases apoptosis in radioresistant cells, indicating that ROS and JNK are key mediators in caspase-dependent and -independent cell death74 (Figure 4).
NCT00085228
NCT00085228 is a randomized phase II clinical trial evaluates the efficacy of combining docetaxel with oblimersen compared to docetaxel alone in the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate adenocarcinoma. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with PSA progression and testosterone levels ≤ 0.5 ng/mL were assigned to receive docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1) or oblimersen (7 mg/kg/day) via continuous intravenous infusion on days 1–7 with docetaxel (75 mg/m2) administered on day 5 every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles75.
The results indicated a confirmed PSA response in 46% of patients receiving docetaxel alone (n = 57) and 37% of patients receiving the docetaxel–oblimersen combination (n = 54). A partial response, as defined by RECIST criteria, was observed in 18% and 24% of patients in the respective groups. However, the addition of oblimersen was associated with an increased incidence of grade ≥ 3 fatigue, mucositis, and thrombocytopenia. Severe adverse events were reported in 22.8% of patients receiving docetaxel alone and 40.7% of patients receiving combination therapy75.
The identification of patients who would benefit most from oblimersen in clinical settings remains undetermined. Given that apoptotic failure may result from molecular mechanisms beyond Bcl-2 overexpression, the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from oblimersen therapy are patients in whom chemoresistance is specifically linked to Bcl-2 overexpression75. Although this trial included a total of only 11 patients, future studies with larger cohorts are necessary to validate these findings. Additionally, strategies to mitigate the increased toxicity of the combination regimen should be explored to enhance clinical applicability75.
NCT00666666
NCT00666666 is a phase II clinical trial that enrolled 55 patients with a median age of 61 years who were initiating ADT for metastatic PCa. Patients received ADT with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist and bicalutamide, initiated 6 weeks prior to the administration of oral AT-101 (20 mg/day for 21 d per 28-d cycle). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with confocal microscopy was performed in a subset of patients to assess treatment efficacy and CHD1 association. Computed tomography (CT) scans were conducted within 28 d of starting AT-101 and repeated every 12 weeks76.
A total of 10 patients (18%) discontinued treatment due to toxicity, while 12 patients (22%) experienced serious adverse events (SAEs), including 7 (13%) who had multiple SAEs. The study hypothesized that overcoming a key resistance mechanism to apoptosis would increase the proportion of patients achieving undetectable PSA from 48% to 68%. However, the combination of AT-101 and ADT failed to achieve this target. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 31% of patients attained undetectable PSA levels, while an additional 25% normalized the PSA levels to < 4 ng/mL76.
The study population included Caucasian and African American patients, allowing for a more diverse representation of clinical outcomes across racial groups. However, the high toxicity of AT-101 remains a significant limitation with 33% of patients developing neuropathy, leading to early termination of the trial for some participants. Future research should focus on optimizing AT-101 dosing or exploring alternative formulations to reduce toxicity, thereby improving patient adherence and the overall therapeutic potential of this combination strategy76.
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and radiation resistance
EMT is a process in which epithelial cells lose polarity and intercellular adhesion, gaining migratory and invasive properties. This transformation gives cells mesenchymal stem-like qualities, enabling differentiation into various lineages. Alterations in the EMT phenotype are associated with radiotherapy resistance and tumor recurrence in PCa77. EMT is regulated by signaling pathways, such as Wnt, TGF-β, and MAPK, which activate transcription factors that influence EMT and contribute to cancer stem cell (CSC) formation78. There is an inverse relationship between CSC stemness and intracellular ROS levels. Reducing ROS scavengers within CSCs increases ROS concentrations, which enhances cellular radiosensitivity52. The interplay between EMT, CSC characteristics, and ROS regulation highlights the critical role of oxidative signaling in cellular plasticity and treatment response79.
CD44, a glycoprotein involved in adhesion and migration, is a key marker for CSCs. Overexpression of CD44v6 induces radiotherapy resistance, making CD44v6 a potential therapeutic target to enhance radiosensitivity through ROS upregulation80,81. Targeting CD44 with agents (e.g., salinomycin or siRNA) inhibits EMT and reduces PCa invasiveness, suggesting that CD44+CSCs drive EMT via TGFβ1-CD44 signaling. Inhibition of CD44 also decreases glucose consumption, increases ROS levels in PC-3 cells and sensitizes PC-3 cells to docetaxel82.
Key genes in EMT, like aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), contribute to radiotherapy resistance by enhancing DNA repair and activating the WNT/β-catenin pathway. Studies have shown that inhibiting WNT/β-catenin with XAV939 or β-catenin knockdown sensitizes PCa cells to radiation83.
Clinical trials targeting EMT and circulating tumor cells in different cancers are ongoing, assessing the potential therapeutic efficacy.
NCT04021394
NCT04021394 is an observational clinical trial designed to evaluate whether the existing methods for measuring CTCs are feasible and whether CTCs accurately reflect prognosis. Epithelial tumor cells can downregulate epithelial markers (e.g., E-cadherin) and upregulate mesenchymal markers (e.g., N-cadherin, vimentin, and MMPs) during the EMT, enhancing the ability of epithelial and mesenchymal markers to intravasate into the bloodstream as CTCs. As a result, CTCs serve as crucial biomarkers in PCa, strongly correlating with metastatic disease and poor outcomes, driving by the EMT. However, the standard CellSearch® assay fails to detect CTCs in approximately 35% of patients with mCRPC. This detection failure may result from the true absence of CTCs or phenotypic changes, such as the EMT, enabling cancer cells to evade detection84.
Studies have indicated that EMT is associated with ADT and castration resistance, resulting in a more aggressive cancer phenotype. It has also been shown that mesenchymal CTCs, particularly hybrid epithelial-mesenchymal forms, are often undetectable by standard assays. However, the presence of mesenchymal CTCs is linked to poorer outcomes. Preclinical models suggest that mesenchymal tumors shed more CTCs with higher metastatic potential than epithelial tumors5.
These findings underscore the limitations of current CTC detection methods and emphasize the need for improved technologies capable of capturing a broader range of CTC phenotypes. Enhanced detection methods could provide better prognostic and therapeutic insights for PCa management85.
NCT02022904
NCT02022904 is an interventional clinical trial that aims to evaluate novel CTC detection technologies. The primary objective of the pilot phase is to assess the effectiveness of capturing CTCs using mesenchymal-marker-based near infrared-emissive polymersomes (NIR-EPs), prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based NIR-EPs, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-based NIR-EPs. The EMT suppresses epithelial markers, such as EpCAM, E-cadherin, and cytokeratins. Transcription factors, like SNAIL, SLUG, ZEB1, and TWIST, repress EpCAM expression, limiting the sensitivity of conventional EpCAM-based detection methods. If these novel approaches demonstrate effectiveness, the novel methods will be further evaluated in a larger comparative study86.
NCT02025413
NCT02025413 is an interventional clinical trial involving 46 patients with metastatic progressive breast cancer and mCRPC. The primary objective of the preliminary lead-in phase is to determine whether CTCs in patients with mCRPC or metastatic progressive breast cancer can be effectively captured using a novel mesenchymal-marker-based ferrofluid targeting N- or O-cadherin. In the subsequent comparative phase with a focus on PCa, the primary goal is to evaluate and compare the CTC non-detection rate between conventional methods and these novel detection technologies87.
Conclusions
Less
Radiation therapy remains a cornerstone of PCa treatment with approximately one-half of patients receiving radiotherapy as the initial therapy. This modality leads to curative outcomes in approximately 40% of cases due to advances in treatment techniques1. However, despite these improvements, many patients still have radiotherapy resistance, resulting in late-stage tumor relapse and metastasis88. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance is essential for identifying new therapeutic targets for PCa51. This review highlights the pivotal role of ROS in driving both tumor progression and the development of radiotherapy resistance21. Key molecular elements are described herein, including the Nrf2/Keap1 complex, which regulates ROS levels and contributes to cellular redox homeostasis and the importance of Bcl-2 overexpression in promoting radiotherapy resistance by modulating mitochondrial function70. Additionally, the EMT process, which enhances ROS resistance and supports the formation of CSCs, was shown to further contribute to treatment failure55,58. Recent advances in targeting Keap1 degradation and inhibiting EMT offer promising strategies to overcome radiotherapy resistance and hinder disease progression89. For example, dimethyl fumarate, an oral agent, activates the Nrf2 pathway and induces cell death by inhibiting Keap1 degradation60. Other compounds, such as 2-cyano-3,12-dioxooleana-1,9(11)-dien-28-oic acid (CDDO) and sulforaphane, have shown potential in clinical trials for promoting Nrf2 activation and combating resistance. Furthermore, pro-oxidants, like imerxon, PEITC, and B2G, have demonstrated efficacy in overcoming ROS-resistant pathways55,60.
By targeting ROS-related signaling pathways, these promising strategies, combined with ongoing research into novel inhibitors, have the potential to significantly improve radiotherapy outcomes and patient survival in PCa89,90.
For example, dimethyl fumarate, an orally agent, has shown efficacy in clinical settings by activating the Nrf2 pathway and inducing cell death through inhibition of Keap1 degradation91. Other Keap1 degradation inhibitors, such as CDDO, a synthetic triterpenoid, have also shown potential in recent clinical trials. Looking ahead, future clinical strategies should focus on a balanced modulation of ROS to maximize the therapeutic benefits while minimizing potential resistance mechanisms89. Given the dual role of ROS in both promoting and suppressing cancer, a combination approach that integrates ROS-enhancing pro-oxidants (e.g., imerxon, PEITC, and B2G) with selective ROS-scavenging agents may provide a more refined therapeutic strategy. Additionally, while Nrf2 pathway activation has shown promise in overcoming resistance, it is crucial to determine which subsets of PCa patients would benefit most from such interventions because excessive Nrf2 activation may inadvertently support tumor survival92.
From a translational perspective, prioritizing ROS-modulating pathways that target CSCs and EMT may yield the most clinically relevant breakthroughs. Furthermore, future clinical trials should explore optimal sequencing strategies, such as integrating ROS-targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors or metabolic reprogramming approaches, to enhance treatment efficacy52,82. These advances, combined with ongoing research and the mechanism-based discovery of novel inhibitors, hold significant potential for overcoming radiotherapy resistance and improving PCa therapy outcomes.
Funding
Less
  • This study was supported by grants from Ningbo Yongjiang Talent programme-Project for Innovative Talents (Grant No. 20240340), Jinhua Science and Technology Bureau (Grant No. 2022-4-258), and 2022 Shandong Medical Association Clinical Research Special Fund for Dynamic Monitoring of Lymphocyte Subpopulations by Flow Cytometry (Grant No. YXH2022ZX03227).
References
Less
1.
Siegel RL,Giaquinto AN,Jemal A.Cancer statistics, 2024.CA Cancer J Clin. 2024; 74: 12–49.
2.
Hoge C,Sidana A.Multidisciplinary clinics: a possible means to help to eliminate racial disparities in prostate cancer.Cancer. 2020; 126: 2938–9.
3.
Baskar R,Lee KA,Yeo R,Yeoh K-W.Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions.Int J Med Sci. 2012; 9: 193–9.
4.
Hu M,Wang L,Su D,Yuan Q,Xiao C,Guo L, et al.Evaluation of mycotoxins, mycobiota and toxigenic fungi in the traditional medicine Radix Dipsaci.Front Microbiol. 2024; 15: 1454683.
5.
Parker CC,Kynaston H,Cook AD,Clarke NW,Catton CN,Cross WR, et al.Duration of androgen deprivation therapy with postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of long-course versus short-course androgen deprivation therapy in the RADICALS-HD randomised trial.Lancet. 2024; 403: 2416–25.
6.
Habib TN,Altonsy MO,Ghanem SA,Salama MS,Hosny MA.Optimizing combination therapy in prostate cancer: mechanistic insights into the synergistic effects of Paclitaxel and sulforaphane-induced apoptosis.BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2024; 25: 5.
7.
Wang L,Luo R,Onyshchenko K,Rao X,Wang M,Menz B, et al.Adding liposomal doxorubicin enhances the abscopal effect induced by radiation/αPD1 therapy depending on tumor cell mitochondrial DNA and cGAS/STING.J Immunother Cancer. 2023; 11: e006235.
8.
Rao X,Onyshchenko K,Wang L,Wang M,Niedermann G.Comparison of two triple therapy regimens for enhancing the abscopal effect in mice.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023; 117: e256.
9.
Wang M,Rao X,Gaedicke S,Wang L,Menz B,Multhoff G, et al.Adding a PPARα agonist enhances T cell-mediated effects of RT in combination with anti-PD-1.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024; 120: e409–10.
10.
Koka K,Verma A,Dwarakanath BS,Papineni RV.Technological advancements in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT): an indispensable tool for cancer treatment.Cancer Manag Res. 2022; 14: 1421–9.
11.
Taylor A,Powell ME.Intensity-modulated radiotherapy – what is it? Cancer Imaging. 2004; 4: 68–73.
12.
Correa RJM,Loblaw A.Stereotactic body radiotherapy: hitting harder, faster, and smarter in high-risk prostate cancer.Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 889132.
13.
Tsang DS,Patel S.Proton beam therapy for cancer.CMAJ. 2019; 191: E664–6.
14.
Matsumoto Y,Fukumitsu N,Ishikawa H,Nakai K,Sakurai H.A critical review of radiation therapy: from particle beam therapy (proton, carbon, and BNCT) to beyond.J Pers Med. 2021; 11: 825.
15.
Hu J,Pan M,Wang Y,Zhu Y,Wang M.Functional plasticity of neutrophils after low- or high-dose irradiation in cancer treatment – a mini review.Front Immunol. 2023; 14: 1169670.
16.
Xing R,Wang M,Wang L,Pan M,Wang Y,Zhou H.Clinical updates of B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) and relapsed/refractory MM (Review).Int J Mol Med. 2024; 55: 27.
17.
Rui X,Meidan W,Gongqiang W,Longyi Z,Xiaoxia W,Wei C, et al.Chemotherapy-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis in a patient with multiple myeloma, a case report and literature review.Front Oncol. 2023; 13: 1227448.
18.
Chargari C,Deutsch E,Blanchard P,Gouy S,Martelli H,Guérin F, et al.Brachytherapy: an overview for clinicians.CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69: 386–401.
19.
Donovan JL,Hamdy FC,Lane JA,Mason M,Metcalfe C,Walsh E, et al.Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer.N Engl J Med. 2016; 375: 1425–37.
20.
Zaorsky NG,Davis BJ,Nguyen PL,Showalter TN,Hoskin PJ,Yoshioka Y, et al.The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.Nat Rev Urol. 2017; 14: 415–39.
21.
Perillo B,Di Donato M,Pezone A,Di Zazzo E,Giovannelli P,Galasso G, et al.ROS in cancer therapy: the bright side of the moon.Exp Mol Med. 2020; 52: 192–203.
22.
Nogueira V,Patra KC,Hay N.Selective eradication of cancer displaying hyperactive Akt by exploiting the metabolic consequences of Akt activation.ELife. 2018; 7: e32213.
23.
Hamid AA,Gray KP,Shaw G,MacConaill LE,Evan C,Bernard B, et al.Compound genomic alterations of TP53, PTEN, and RB1 tumor suppressors in localized and metastatic prostate cancer.Eur Urol. 2019; 76: 89–97.
24.
Gong Y,Chippada-Venkata U,Oh W.Roles of matrix metalloproteinases and their natural inhibitors in prostate cancer progression.Cancers (Basel). 2014; 6: 1298–327.
25.
Kumar B,Koul S,Khandrika L,Meacham RB,Koul HK.Oxidative stress is inherent in prostate cancer cells and is required for aggressive phenotype.Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 1777–85.
26.
Arfin S,Jha NK,Jha SK,Kesari KK,Ruokolainen J,Roychoudhury S, et al.Oxidative stress in cancer cell metabolism.Antioxidants. 2021; 10: 642.
27.
Nakano H,Nakajima A,Sakon-Komazawa S,Piao JH,Xue X,Okumura K.Reactive oxygen species mediate crosstalk between NF-kappaB and JNK.Cell Death Differ. 2006; 13: 730–7.
28.
Woodbine L,Brunton H,Goodarzi AA,Shibata A,Jeggo PA.Endogenously induced DNA double strand breaks arise in heterochromatic DNA regions and require ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Artemis for their repair.Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39: 6986–97.
29.
Luo H,Liu Y,Li Y,Zhang C,Yu B,Shao C.Androgen receptor splicing variant 7 (ARv7) promotes DNA damage response in prostate cancer cells.FASEB J. 2022; 36: e22495.
30.
Lyu F,Shang SY,Gao XS,Ma MW,Xie M,Ren XY, et al.Uncovering the secrets of prostate cancer’s radiotherapy resistance: advances in mechanism research.Biomedicines. 2023; 11: 1628.
31.
Rivlin N,Brosh R,Oren M,Rotter V.Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: important milestones at the various steps of tumorigenesis.Genes Cancer. 2011; 2: 466–74.
32.
Jamaspishvili T,Berman DM,Ross AE,Scher HI,De Marzo AM,Squire JA, et al.Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer.Nat Rev Urol. 2018; 15: 222–34.
33.
Liu X,Fan L,Lu C,Yin S,Hu H.Functional role of p53 in the regulation of chemical-induced oxidative stress.Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020; 2020: 6039769.
34.
Shah R,Ibis B,Kashyap M,Boussiotis VA.The role of ROS in tumor infiltrating immune cells and cancer immunotherapy.Metabolism. 2024; 151: 155747.
35.
An X,Yu W,Liu J,Tang D,Yang L,Chen X.Oxidative cell death in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.Cell Death Dis. 2024; 15: 556.
36.
Liu R,Bian Y,Liu L,Liu L,Liu X,Ma S.Molecular pathways associated with oxidative stress and their potential applications in radiotherapy.Int J Mol Med. 2022; 49: 65.
37.
Huang R,Chen H,Liang J,Li Y,Yang J,Luo C, et al.Dual role of reactive oxygen species and their application in cancer therapy.J Cancer. 2021; 12: 5543–61.
38.
Zhao Z,Liu P,Zhang H,Wang M,Liu Y,Wang L, et al.Gastrodin prevents stress-induced synaptic plasticity impairment and behavioral dysfunction via cAMP/PKA/CREB signaling pathway.Phytomedicine. 2025; 141: 156661.
39.
Nyberg T,Frost D,Barrowdale D,Evans DG,Bancroft E,Adlard J, et al.Prostate cancer risks for male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective cohort study.Eur Urol. 2020; 77: 24–35.
40.
Fiorentino M,Judson G,Penney K,Flavin R,Stark J,Fiore C, et al.Immunohistochemical expression of BRCA1 and lethal prostate cancer.Cancer Res. 2010; 70: 3136–9.
41.
Kung Y-A,Chiang HJ,Li ML,Gong YN,Chiu HP,Hung CT, et al.Acyl-coenzyme a synthetase long-Chain family member 4 is involved in viral replication organelle formation and facilitates virus replication via ferroptosis.mBio. 2022; 13: e02717–21.
42.
Chen H,Lyu F,Gao X.Advances in ferroptosis for castration-resistant prostate cancer treatment: novel drug targets and combination therapy strategies.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024.
43.
Wang M-E,Chen J,Lu Y,Bawcom AR,Wu J,Ou J, et al.RB1-deficient prostate tumor growth and metastasis are vulnerable to ferroptosis induction via the E2F/ACSL4 axis.J Clin Invest. 2023; 133: e166647.
44.
Han C,Wang Z,Xu Y,Chen S,Han Y,Li L, et al.Roles of reactive oxygen species in biological behaviors of prostate cancer.BioMed Res Int. 2020; 2020: 1269624.
45.
Yamamori T,Yasui H,Yamazumi M,Wada Y,Nakamura Y,Nakamura H, et al.Ionizing radiation induces mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production accompanied by upregulation of mitochondrial electron transport chain function and mitochondrial content under control of the cell cycle checkpoint.Free Radic Biol Med. 2012; 53: 260–70.
46.
Westhaver LP,Nersesian S,Nelson A,MacLean LK,Carter EB,Rowter D, et al.Mitochondrial damage-associated molecular patterns trigger arginase-dependent lymphocyte immunoregulation.Cell Rep. 2022; 39: 110847.
47.
Raymakers L,Demmers TJ,Meijer GJ,Molenaar IQ,van Santvoort HC,Intven MPW, et al.The effect of radiation treatment of solid tumors on neutrophil infiltration and function: a systematic review.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024; 120: 845–61.
48.
Bae T,Hallis SP,Kwak M-K.Hypoxia, oxidative stress, and the interplay of HIFs and NRF2 signaling in cancer.Exp Mol Med. 2024; 56: 501–14.
49.
Mohamed OAA,Tesen HS,Hany M,Sherif A,Abdelwahab MM,Elnaggar MH.The role of hypoxia on prostate cancer progression and metastasis.Mol Biol Rep. 2023; 50: 3873–84.
50.
Valikhani M,Rahimian E,Ahmadi SE,Chegeni R,Safa M.Involvement of classic and alternative non-homologous end joining pathways in hematologic malignancies: targeting strategies for treatment.Exp Hematol Oncol. 2021; 10: 51.
51.
Stangelberger A,Waldert M,Djavan B.Prostate cancer in elderly men.Rev Urol. 2008; 10: 111–9.
52.
Diehn M,Cho RW,Lobo NA,Kalisky T,Dorie MJ,Kulp AN, et al.Association of reactive oxygen species levels and radioresistance in cancer stem cells.Nature. 2009; 458: 780–3.
53.
Xu Y,Fang F,St Clair DK,St Clair WH.Inverse relationship between PSA and IL-8 in prostate cancer: an insight into a NF-κB-mediated mechanism.PLoS One. 2012; 7: e32905.
54.
DeNicola GM,Karreth FA,Humpton TJ,Gopinathan A,Wei C,Frese K, et al.Oncogene-induced Nrf2 transcription promotes ROS detoxification and tumorigenesis.Nature. 2011; 475: 106–9.
55.
Bellezza I,Scarpelli P,Pizzo SV,Grottelli S,Costanzi E,Minelli A.ROS-independent Nrf2 activation in prostate cancer.Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 67506–18.
56.
Smolková K,Mikó E,Kovács T,Leguina-Ruzzi A,Sipos A,Bai P.Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 in regulating cancer metabolism.Antioxid Redox Signal. 2020; 33: 966–97.
57.
Zhang P,Singh A,Yegnasubramanian S,Esopi D,Kombairaju P,Bodas M, et al.Loss of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 function in prostate cancer cells causes chemoresistance and radioresistance and promotes tumor growth.Mol Cancer Ther. 2010; 9: 336–46.
58.
Ge W,Zhao K,Wang X,Li H,Yu M,He M, et al.iASPP is an antioxidative factor and drives cancer growth and drug resistance by competing with Nrf2 for Keap1 binding.Cancer Cell. 2017; 32: 561–73.e6.
59.
Chen JY,Wang FB,Xu H,Xu LF,Chen D,Liu WH, et al.High glucose promotes prostate cancer cells apoptosis via Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019; 23: 192–200.
60.
Lin L,Wu Q,Lu F,Lei J,Zhou Y,Liu Y, et al.Nrf2 signaling pathway: current status and potential therapeutic targetable role in human cancers. Front.Oncol. 2023; 13: 1184079.
61.
Lin J,Zhang G,Lou B,Sun Y,Jia X,Wang M, et al.Identification of copper metabolism-related markers in Parkinson’s disease.Ann Med. 2024; 56: 2425064.
62.
El Bezawy R,Tripari M,Percio S,Cicchetti A,Tortoreto M,Stucchi C, et al.SPOP deregulation improves the radiation response of prostate cancer models by impairing DNA damage repair.Cancers. 2020; 12: 1462.
63.
Clark A,Burleson M.SPOP and cancer: a systematic review.Am J Cancer Res. 2020; 10: 704–26.
64.
Hernández-Llodrà S,Segalés L,Juanpere N,Marta Lorenzo T,Salido M,Nonell L, et al.SPOP and CHD1 alterations in prostate cancer: relationship with PTEN loss, tumor grade, perineural infiltration, and PSA recurrence.Prostate. 2021; 81: 1267–77.
65.
Rahmy S,Cheng X,Wang M,Feng H,Qiu W,Zhao R, et al.Organ-specific regulation of CHD1 by acute PTEN and p53 loss in mice.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020; 525: 614–9.
66.
Geng C,Zhang MC,Manyam GC,Vykoukal JV,Fahrmann JF,Peng S, et al.SPOP mutations target STING1 signaling in prostate cancer and create therapeutic vulnerabilities to PARP inhibitor–induced growth suppression.Clin Cancer Res. 2023; 29: 4464–78.
67.
Xiao M,Fried JS,Ma J,Su Y,Boohaker RJ,Zeng Q, et al.A disease-relevant mutation of SPOP highlights functional significance of ATM-mediated DNA damage response.Sig Transduct Target Ther. 2021; 6: 17.
68.
Piombino C,Pipitone S,Tonni E,Mastrodomenico L,Oltrecolli M,Tchawa C, et al.Homologous recombination repair deficiency in metastatic prostate cancer: new therapeutic opportunities.Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25: 4624.
69.
Kalkavan H,Green DR.MOMP, cell suicide as a BCL-2 family business.Cell Death Differ. 2018; 25: 46–55.
70.
Kale J,Osterlund EJ,Andrews DW.BCL-2 family proteins: changing partners in the dance towards death.Cell Death Differ. 2018; 25: 65–80.
71.
Liu P,Zhao Z,Zhang H,Xiao C,Wang M,Yang C, et al.A comprehensive pharmacology study reveals the molecular mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of Gastrodiae Rhizoma.Phytomedicine. 2025; 142: 156761.
72.
Xu H,Sun Y,Huang CP,You B,Ye D,Chang C.Preclinical study using ABT263 to increase enzalutamide sensitivity to suppress prostate cancer progression via targeting BCL2/ROS/USP26 axis through altering ARv7 protein degradation.Cancers. 2020; 12: 831.
73.
Zeitlin BD,Zeitlin IJ,Nör JE.Expanding circle of inhibition: small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 as anticancer cell and antiangiogenic agents.J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 4180–8.
74.
An J,Chervin AS,Nie A,Ducoff HS,Huang Z.Overcoming the radioresistance of prostate cancer cells with a novel Bcl-2 inhibitor.Oncogene. 2007; 26: 652–61.
75.
Sternberg CN,Dumez H,Van Poppel H,Skoneczna I,Sella A,Daugaard G, et al.Docetaxel plus oblimersen sodium (Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide): an EORTC multicenter, randomized phase II study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.Ann Oncol. 2009; 20: 1264–9.
76.
Stein MN,Hussain M,Stadler WM,Liu G,Tereshchenko IV,Goodin S, et al.A phase II study of AT-101 to overcome Bcl-2–mediated resistance to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016; 14: 22–7.
77.
Xu Z,Zhang Y,Dai H,Han B.Epithelial-mesenchymal transition-mediated tumor therapeutic resistance.Molecules. 2022; 27: 4750.
78.
Pastushenko I,Blanpain C.EMT transition states during tumor progression and metastasis.Trends Cell Biol. 2019; 29: 212–26.
79.
Papanikolaou S,Vourda A,Syggelos S,Gyftopoulos K.Cell plasticity and prostate cancer: the role of epithelial–mesenchymal transition in tumor progression, invasion, metastasis and cancer therapy resistance.Cancers. 2021; 13: 2795.
80.
Iczkowski KA.Cell adhesion molecule CD44: its functional roles in prostate cancer.Am J Transl Res. 2010; 3: 1–7.
81.
Smith BN,Odero-Marah VA.The role of Snail in prostate cancer.Cell Adh Migr. 2012; 6: 433–41.
82.
Shang Z,Cai Q,Zhang M,Zhu S,Ma Y,Sun L, et al.A switch from CD44+ cell to EMT cell drives the metastasis of prostate cancer.Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 1202–16.
83.
Stakheev D,Taborska P,Strizova Z,Podrazil M,Bartunkova J,Smrz D.The WNT/β-catenin signaling inhibitor XAV939 enhances the elimination of LNCaP and PC-3 prostate cancer cells by prostate cancer patient lymphocytes in vitro.Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 4761.
84.
Jannu M,Jinka R.Liquid biopsy: a non-invasive tool to detect cancer at an early stage.Int J Adv Res. 2023; 11: 234–50.
85.
Gogola S,Rejzer M,Bahmad HF,Abou-Kheir W,Omarzai Y,Poppiti R.Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-related markers in prostate cancer: from bench to bedside.Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15: 2309.
86.
Martín-Contreras M,Navarro-Marchal SA,Peula-García JM,Jódar-Reyes AB.Progress and hurdles of therapeutic nanosystems against cancer.Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14: 388.
87.
Castle J,Shaker H,Morris K,Tugwood JD,Kirwan CC.The significance of circulating tumour cells in breast cancer: a review.Breast. 2014; 23: 552–60.
88.
Mulvey A,Muggeo-Bertin E,Berthold DR,Herrera FG.Overcoming immune resistance with radiation therapy in prostate cancer.Front Immunol. 2022; 13: 859785.
89.
Lo U-G,Lee C-F,Lee M-S,Hsieh J-T.The role and mechanism of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer progression.Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18: 2079.
90.
Zhang H,Zhao Z,Liu P,Wang M,Liu Y,He H, et al.Gastrodin enhances stress resilience through promoting Wnt/β-Catenin-dependent neurogenesis.J Adv Res. 2025.
91.
Borella R,Forti L,Gibellini L,De Gaetano A,De Biasi S,Nasi M, et al.Synthesis and anticancer activity of CDDO and CDDO-Me, two derivatives of natural triterpenoids.Molecules. 2019; 24: 4097.
92.
Zhang C,Su ZY,Khor TO,Shu L,Kong AN.Sulforaphane enhances Nrf2 expression in prostate cancer TRAMP C1 cells through epigenetic regulation.Biochem Pharmacol. 2013; 85: 1398–404.
Appendix
Less
Year 2025 volume 22 Issue 7
PDF
4
2
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0584
  • Receive Date：2024-12-12
  • Online Date：2026-11-07
  • Published：2025-07-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2024-12-12
  • Accepted：2025-05-26
Funding
This study was supported by grants from Ningbo Yongjiang Talent programme-Project for Innovative Talents (Grant No. 20240340), Jinhua Science and Technology Bureau (Grant No. 2022-4-258), and 2022 Shandong Medical Association Clinical Research Special Fund for Dynamic Monitoring of Lymphocyte Subpopulations by Flow Cytometry (Grant No. YXH2022ZX03227).
Affiliations
    1Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany
    2Department of Hematology, Dongyang Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang People’s Hospital, Dongyang 322100, China
    3Faculty of Law, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79085, Germany
    4School of Chinese Language and Literature, Tangshan Normal University, Tangshan 063000, China
    5Department of Oncology, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
    6Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General Surgery, Jinan Third People’s Hospital, Jinan 250031, China
    7Department of Chemoradiotherapy, Ningbo NO. 2 Hospital, Ningbo 315010, China

Corresponding:

Correspondence to: Jing Zhou, E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cbm/EN/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0584
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House