Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Gut microecology empowers cancer immunotherapy: commensal microbiota-mediated mechanisms and translational prospects of PD-1/PD-L1 therapy
收藏切换
PDF
Sifan Li, Chang Che, Yelu Zhou, Daiming Fan, Xue Bai, Yuanyuan Lu, Xiaodi Zhao
Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2026, 23(1) : 60 - 77
Less
收藏切换
Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2026, 23(1): 60-77
• Review •
Gut microecology empowers cancer immunotherapy: commensal microbiota-mediated mechanisms and translational prospects of PD-1/PD-L1 therapy
Full
Sifan Li, Chang Che, Yelu Zhou, Daiming Fan, Xue Bai, Yuanyuan Lu, Xiaodi Zhao
Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China
About Author:

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: Daiming Fan, Xue Bai, Yuanyuan Lu, Xiaodi Zhao.

Collected the data: Sifan Li, Chang Che, Yelu Zhou.

Contributed data or analysis tools: Daiming Fan, Xue Bai, Xiaodi Zhao.

Performed the analysis: Sifan Li, Chang Che, Xue Bai, Yuanyuan Lu, Xiaodi Zhao.

Wrote the paper: Sifan Li, Xue Bai.

Published: 2026-01-15 doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0347
Outline
收藏切换

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) are immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that have revolutionized cancer therapy. However, the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 is limited by resistance and inter-individual variability. In recent years increasing evidence has highlighted the pivotal role of the gut microbiota in modulating the response to PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Extensive preclinical studies have demonstrated that commensal microbes can increase the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade through multiple mechanisms, including the production of metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), tryptophan derivatives, and extracellular polysaccharides that remodel the tumor microenvironment, as well as the activation of immune pathways involving dendritic cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and M1 macrophages to increase antitumor immunity. Moreover, clinical studies have shown that fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and targeted probiotic interventions show promise for improving the response to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, while reducing the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This review systematically explores the multifaceted regulatory roles of the commensal microbiota in PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and examines the preclinical prospects of microbiota-based personalized immunotherapeutic strategies. The integration of multiomics technologies, synthetic biology, and precise microbiota interventions may further optimize PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy and offer novel insights into antitumor immune modulation.

Keywords  /  Gut microbiota  /  immune checkpoint inhibitors  /  commensal microbiota  /  PD-1/PD-L1  /  fecal microbiota transplantation
Sifan Li, Chang Che, Yelu Zhou, Daiming Fan, Xue Bai, Yuanyuan Lu, Xiaodi Zhao. Gut microecology empowers cancer immunotherapy: commensal microbiota-mediated mechanisms and translational prospects of PD-1/PD-L1 therapy[J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2026 , 23 (1) : 60 -77 . DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0347
Full Text
Less
Introduction
Less
In recent years the rise in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has reshaped the landscape of cancer therapy, bringing unprecedented hope for patients with various cancers. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody therapies, which block immune-inhibitory signals in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and reactivate the antitumor functions of T cells, have shown remarkable efficacy in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as well as other solid tumors such as renal cell carcinoma (RCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and notably, tumors with high microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency (MSI-H/dMMR). The clinical development of PD-1 inhibitors began with the KEYNOTE-001 trial (2011), which investigated pembrolizumab. The clinical prognosis of various malignancies, such as melanoma and NSCLC, has significantly improved since the approval of the first PD-1 inhibitor in 2014 with some patients even achieving long-term survival1,2. However, in clinical practice, approximately one-half of patients are unresponsive or quickly develop resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and some are forced to discontinue treatment because of immune-related adverse events (irAEs)3. These limitations highlight the complexity of tumor immune evasion mechanisms and the profound impact of the host’s endogenous regulatory network on treatment outcomes. Current research focuses on understanding the biological basis of heterogeneous responses to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Resistance is closely related to the immune-evasive phenotypes of tumor cells, the dynamic evolution of the immunosuppressive microenvironment, and the imbalance in the systemic immune status of the host. Moreover, traditional biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression or tumor mutation burden, have significant predictive limitations, suggesting that systemic regulatory factors from host–environment interactions may play a key role in determining patient response to immunotherapy. In this context, leveraging the gut microbiota, a core hub connecting host metabolism, immunity, and the external environment, has emerged as a breakthrough for improving immunotherapy4.
The gut microbiota modulates systemic immune homeostasis through metabolites, immune signaling, and microbial‒host coevolution. Emerging evidence has shown that specific commensal bacteria can increase antigen presentation, promote effector T-cell infiltration, and inhibit checkpoint-mediated exhaustion, thereby increasing PD-1/PD-L1 therapy sensitivity. In 2015 Sivan et al.5 reported that Bifidobacterium colonization in melanoma mouse models significantly increased PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy, reducing the tumor volume by 80%. This finding highlights gut microbiota modulation as a new target for improving immunotherapy efficacy. Subsequent clinical cohort studies revealed that patients responsive to PD-1 inhibitors have gut microbiota rich in Akkermansia muciniphila (Akk) (A. muciniphila), Bifidobacterium longum (B. longum), and Ruminococcaceae, whereas resistant patients often have Enterobacteriaceae6. Notably, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) of “responder microbiota” into resistant patients can restore PD-1 inhibitor sensitivity in approximately 30% of advanced melanoma patients7. These findings highlight the systemic regulatory role of the gut microbiota in tumor immunotherapy and provide a foundation for developing microbiota-targeted interventions, such as probiotics, microbiota transplantation, or metabolic modulation. Recent studies have shown that gut microbiota and their metabolites not only influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors but also regulate the effectiveness and toxicity of targeted therapies by modulating signaling pathways, such as EGFR and VEGF. Specific microbial metabolites, such as butyrate and ursodeoxycholic acid, exhibit anti-tumor effects8. As a systemic regulatory hub, the gut microecosystem impacts cancer immunotherapy and targeted therapy, offering novel strategies for enhancing treatment outcomes and overcoming drug resistance through modulation of the intestinal microenvironment. This article comprehensively discusses the molecular mechanisms underlying gut microbiota modulation by PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and explores clinical translational paths to optimize cancer immunotherapy.
Gut microbiota and immune system
Less
The gut microbiota constitutes a complex ecosystem comprising bacteria, viruses, fungi, and archaea with a biomass reaching 1014, which far exceeds the total number of host cells colonizing the intestinal mucosal surface to form a dynamically balanced “microbial organ”9. Within this vast community, the gut symbiotic microbiota, as mutualistic entities, have co-evolved with the host through long-term co-evolution, transcending the biological definition of a mere microbial assemblage. The gut symbiotic microbiota fundamentally represents a “metabolic–immune functional unit” that is jointly shaped through host–microbe co-evolution. These microbial communities establish highly structured biogeographical distributions along the intestinal mucosa through genome-encoded ecological adaptation mechanisms (e.g., carbohydrate-active enzyme systems and bile acid transformation enzymes). Strictly anaerobic Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes dominate in the oxygen gradient spanning from the intestinal lumen-to-the crypts, forming stable nutritional networks through metabolic cross-feeding. These networks convert host-indigestible dietary components into immunomodulatory metabolites10. This metabolic transformation exhibits marked ecologic niche specificity, in which mucosa-adherent symbionts preferentially degrade mucin glycoproteins, whereas luminal planktonic microbiota primarily ferment dietary fibres. The resulting metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and tryptophan derivatives, establish spatially graded concentration profiles that generate differential immune-regulatory signals.
SCFAs bidirectionally regulate regulatory T-cell (Treg) differentiation and effector T-cell function through histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition and G protein-coupled receptor (e.g., GPR43) activation. Moreover, tryptophan metabolites dynamically balance T helper 17 (Th17)/Treg polarization via aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) signaling, creating a precise regulatory interface between immune tolerance and activation11. This spatiotemporal dynamic of the metabolic–immune axis is particularly critical in anti-PD-1 therapy. The symbiotic microbiota increases dendritic cell antigen presentation efficiency through metabolic reprogramming, promotes CD8+ T-cell mitochondrial metabolism while delaying exhaustion phenotypes, and concurrently suppresses excessive expression of immune checkpoint molecules (e.g., PD-L1)12. Clinical evidence has demonstrated that dysbiosis-induced metabolite imbalance (e.g., reduced SCFAs and accumulated secondary bile acids) significantly reduces PD-1 inhibitor efficacy, whereas specific microbial signatures restore T-cell anti-tumor activity through epigenetic remodeling of the TME13. This ecologic plasticity of the microbiota–immune network provides a theoretical foundation for the development of microbiota-directed intervention strategies (Figure 1).
Preclinical evidence for commensal bacteria increasing PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy
Less
Akk: a key microbe in gut mucosal homeostasis and cancer immunotherapy
Akk, a member of the Verrucomicrobia phylum, is a core symbiont in the gut mucus layer. Akk promotes gut barrier integrity by degrading mucin and modulating the host immune system through metabolites14,15. Live Akk activates MHC-II-dependent plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) pathways, thereby increasing antitumor T-cell responses and downregulates PD-L1 in tumor cells to counteract immune checkpoint inhibition16. Akk with Lactobacillus johnsonii increased anti-PD-L1 therapy sensitivity by promoting Th1 responses and increasing the number of tumor-infiltrating T cells in a colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CRC) model17. Routy et al.18 demonstrated that Akk supplementation drives CCR9+CXCR3+CD4+ T-cell homing to tumors through IL-12-dependent signals via FMT, restoring anti-PD-1 therapy efficacy in resistant CRC models.
Studies across cancer types have revealed both common and distinct mechanisms by which Akk modulates PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Vancomycin-enriched Akk enhances CD8+ T-cell function via glycerophospholipid metabolism in microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRC models, sustaining PD-1 antibody efficacy19. Zhu et al.20 reported that live Akk blocks the CXCL3-PD-L1 axis in CRC by downregulating CXCL3 in Bgn+Dcn+ CAFs, reversing T-cell exhaustion. Akk reduces serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and pro-carcinogenic bile acids in metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) mice with HCC, decreasing myeloid-derived suppressor cell (m-MDSC) and M2 macrophage infiltration21. Lan et al.16 reported that Akk-induced bile acid reprogramming elevates serum tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDCA), increasing PD-1 antibody efficacy in HCC by antagonizing immune suppression and downregulating tumor PD-L1. Akk maintains gut barrier function through mucin degradation and mucus layer renewal, preventing pathogen and pro-carcinogenic substance leakage. Akk repairs epithelial tight junctions in MAFLD-HCC models, lowering serum LPS and inhibiting hepatic inflammation and immunosuppressive cell recruitment21. Akk with Lactobacillus johnsonii synergistically reduces gut inflammation and inhibits macrophage hyperactivation in colitis-associated CRC models, maintaining barrier homeostasis and blocking the inflammation‒cancer transition17. Overall, Akk enhances PD-1 therapy responses by modulating immune cells and the microbe–metabolite–immune axis and protecting mucosal barriers.
Bifidobacterium: a key genus in the gut microbiota with anticancer potential
Gut microbiota, particularly Bifidobacterium from Actino-bacteria, ferment carbohydrates to produce lactic acid and SCFAs, maintaining gut acidity, inhibiting pathogens, and promoting vitamin synthesis, mineral absorption, and immune regulation22.
Different Bifidobacterium strains have distinct roles in cancer immunotherapy. B. longum 420 with anti-PD-1 increases Lactobacillus (Lacto.) levels in RCC models, delivers wild type 1 (WT1) tumor antigen, activates antitumor immunity, and improves survival in mice23. B. longum RAPO with anti-PD-1 increases the number of tumor-infiltrating NK cells and CD8+/CD4+ T cells in breast cancer models, inhibits M2 macrophage polarization, and reduces the tumor burden24. Bifidobacterium infantis modulates PD-L1 to enhance Treg function via the PI3K–Akt–mTOR pathway25. Bifidobacterium colonization directly activates antitumor T cells through antigen cross-reactivity and the SVY epitope of Bifidobacterium breve cross-reacts with the tumor neoantigen, SIY, promoting melanoma recognition and extending survival26. Responders have B. longum-rich gut microbiota in metastatic melanoma patients and FMT in germ-free mice increases anti-PD-L1 efficacy and enhances T-cell responses, confirming the role of the symbiotic microbiota in human antitumor immunity27. These studies showed that Bifidobacterium enhances PD-1 therapy through microbiota modulation and direct immune cell interactions.
The microbiota–metabolite–immune network provides a mechanistic basis for the therapeutic efficacy of Bifidobacterium in modulating antitumor immunity. Bifidobacterium pseudolongum-derived inosine activates T cells via the adenosine A2A receptor, systemically translocates post-immunotherapy-induced gut barrier permeability, and improves PD-1 responses in melanoma and CRC models28. Bifidobacterium bifidum increases interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) signaling, synergizing with anti-PD-1 therapy or oxaliplatin in NSCLC29. These metabolite-driven pathways underpin personalized microbiota interventions. B. longum RAPO increases beneficial Bifidobacterium and Clostridium, reduces pathogenic Mucispirillum, maintains barrier integrity, and increases anti-PD-1 efficacy in triple-negative breast cancer24. High-salt diets increase Bifidobacterium abundance and gut permeability, promoting bacterial migration to the TME and activating NK cell-mediated immunity30. This microbiota–barrier–immune regulatory network supports the use of FMT or specific probiotics to repair mucosal damage and optimize immunotherapy responses.
Lactobacillus: gut commensals with antitumor and immunotherapeutic potential in CRC
Recent studies have shown that Lactobacillus (Firmicutes) in the gut microbiota significantly increases the efficacy of PD-1 immunotherapy through metabolite–immune regulatory networks. Key species, such as L. johnsonii, L. gasseri, and L. rhamnosus, activate immune responses via metabolites or cellular components. This bacterial genus lowers the gut pH to inhibit pathogens, strengthens the gut barrier through epithelial adhesion, and offers multidimensional immune regulation via strain-specific mechanisms31.
Lactobacillus reshapes the tumor immune microenvironment. L. johnsonii increases CD8+ T-cell infiltration in CRC models32. L. rhamnosus LR-DNA upregulates PD-L1 in enterocytes, inducing Th2 cell apoptosis and reducing Th2-related cytokines by 40%33. L. casei increases IFN-γ and granzyme B expression in tumors, increasing CRC CD8+ T-cell infiltration 1.5-fold34. Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW18 elevates Akk and Prevotellaceae, achieving a 66.16% anti-PD-1 response in melanoma35. Paracasei sh2020 increases anti-PD-1 sensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer by recruiting CD8+ T cells via CXCL10 upregulation36.
Different strains of commensal bacteria influence specific immune cells through metabolic networks. L. johnsonii and Clostridium sporogenes-derived indole-3-propionic acid (IPA) increase Tcf7 acetylation in CD8+ T cells in CRC, promoting Tpex cell formation and increasing the anti-PD-1 response rate by 57%37. Indole-3-lactic acid (ILA) from L. gasseri induces CRC cell apoptosis38. Indole-3-carboxylic acid (ICA) from L. gasseri blocks the IDO1/Kyn/AHR axis, preventing Treg differentiation and increasing anti-PD-1 efficacy 3.2- and 2.8-fold in MC38 and CT26 models, respectively39. Indole-3-aldehyde (I3A) from L. reuteri activates CD8+ T-cell AHR signaling in melanoma, increasing IFN-γ secretion. The objective response rate increases from 35%–62% in combination with PD-1 antibodies40. EPS-R1 from L. delbrueckii induces CCR6+ CD8+ T-cell infiltration in Peyer’s patches, doubling tumor regression rates in anti-PD-1 combination therapy41. L. rhamnosus Probio-M9 increases α-ketoglutarate and pyridoxine levels, activating CTLs and suppressing Tregs, shrinking tumors by 48% and enhancing anti-PD-1 responses across CRC, melanoma, and breast cancer42. Tryptophan metabolites from L. reuteri reprogram CD4+ T cells into DP IELs via AHR signaling, supporting mucosal immunity in CRC and melanoma43. L. rhamnosus GG induces DC type I IFN production through the cGAS/STING pathway, improving CD8+ T-cell cross-presentation efficiency by 60% in CRC and melanoma44.
Mucosal barrier protection is crucial. ILA from L. gasseri restores tight junction proteins, reducing pathogenic bacteria by 68% in CRC models38. L. rhamnosus Probio-M9 restores antibiotic-damaged microbial α diversity to 80% while increasing α-ketoglutarate and pyridoxine levels, which enhances anti-PD-1 responses in CRC and breast cancer42,45. This synergy between barrier repair and immune metabolism paves the way for personalized microbiota-based immunotherapy strategies.
Other bacteria
The gut microbiota modulates the efficacy of ICIs, such as PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies, via specific taxa and metabolites with significant effects on CRC and other solid tumors. Key bacteria include Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) (F. nucleatum), Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (F. prausnitzii), Lachnospiraceae (Lachno.) members (e.g., Ruminococcus and Blautia), and Roseburia intestinalis (R. intestinalis), which directly or indirectly influence CD8+ T-cell function. However, some bacterial species, such as Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), can metabolize phenylalanine to produce phenylacetylglutamine (PAGln), which inhibits the secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α in CD8+ T cells, promotes T cell exhaustion, and thereby significantly undermines the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy46.
F. prausnitzii colonization mitigates gut toxicity and enhances antitumor effects in ICI-induced colitis models by inhibiting myeloid cell infiltration and inflammation47. Clostridium strains, such as F. prausnitzii, can directly activate tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in CRC and melanoma models, independent of PD-1 antibodies, indicating superiority over anti-PD-1 monotherapy48. These findings suggest that the microbiota can overcome PD-1 resistance by remodeling the immune microenvironment.
The microbiota‒metabolite‒immune axis has diverse yet convergent mechanisms across cancer types. Intratumoral enrichment of Fn causes butyrate accumulation in MSS CRCs, inhibiting CD8+ T-cell HDAC3/8 and inducing Tbx21 promoter H3K27 acetylation, reversing T-cell exhaustion and enhancing effector function49. R. intestinalis-derived butyrate activates NF-κB signaling in microsatellite instability (MSI)-high CRC and MC38 models among CD8+ T cells via TLR5, promoting granzyme B, IFN-γ, and TNF-α secretion and improving anti-PD-1 sensitivity in MSI-low CRC50. Lachnospiraceae members degrade lysophosphatidylcholine in the TME to relieve CD8+ T-cell activation inhibition, suppressing CRC progression in immune-competent mice51. The anti-inflammatory effects of F. prausnitzii, which are mediated by SCFAs, inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6 and TNF-α) and balance Th17/Treg cells, reducing ICI-related colitis and increasing antitumor immunity47. These metabolic interventions focus on CD8+ T-cell reshaping, indicating that microbiota metabolites may form synergistic networks via epigenetic modification, receptor signaling, or microenvironment remodeling.
Mucosal barrier protection is crucial for increasing PD-1 efficacy. R. intestinalis improves gut permeability by increasing tight junction protein (e.g., occludin and ZO-1) expression and R. intestinalis metabolite butyrate activates CD8+ T cells and maintains epithelial integrity to prevent bacterial translocation, inhibiting tumorigenesis in ApcMin/+ and AOM-induced CRC models50. F. prausnitzii increases gut microbial α diversity, increasing beneficial bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus) and reducing pathogens (e.g., Enterococcus), repairing the intestinal mucosa in NSG mouse humanized models and alleviating ICI-related gut toxicity47. Overall, the microbiota enhances immunotherapy through dual metabolic–immune and mucosal barrier mechanisms, offering multitarget strategies for optimizing cancer treatment.
Emerging players: YB328, Alistipes, and fungal consortia
With recent research advances emerging roles of the microbiota are continuously being discovered and studied, particularly demonstrating remarkable potential in cancer immunotherapy. The gut microbiota, including both bacteria and fungi, has been confirmed to regulate the host immune system through multiple mechanisms, influencing the efficacy of ICIs. The gut microbiota are involved in the activation and migration of dendritic cells and the recruitment and functional regulation of T cells but also shapes the TME through metabolites, offering new strategies to overcome immunotherapy resistance. Three representative microorganisms will be introduced below to systematically elaborate specific mechanisms in enhancing PD-1 therapy efficacy.
Alistipes finegoldii, a gram-negative anaerobic bacterium, has been shown to be significantly enriched in the gut of responders to immunotherapy across multiple studies. This bacterium secretes the lipoprotein, LIPOAF, which binds to Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), activating the NF-κB signaling pathway and thereby enhancing the expression of CXCL16 in CCR7+ conventional dendritic cells. Subsequently, CXCL16 acts as a key chemokine to effectively recruit CXCR6-expressing CD8+ T cells into the TME, significantly improving the sensitivity to anti-PD-1 therapy and inhibiting tumor growth52. In contrast, the newly identified strain Hominenteromicrobium mulieris YB328 (belonging to the Clostridiaceae family) also demonstrates promising immunomodulatory potential. This bacterium promotes the maturation and migration of CD103+CD11b− conventional dendritic cells through the TLR7/9–MYD88–mTOR–STAT3 signaling axis. These activated dendritic cells further migrate to tumor-draining lymph nodes and the TME, facilitating the activation of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and upregulating PD-1 expression, ultimately leading to a 3-fold improvement in anti-PD-1 efficacy in NSCLC and gastric cancer (GC)53. In addition, the composition of the fungal community has also been shown to be closely associated with the immunotherapy response. Recent studies have classified patients into “favorable-type” and “unfavorable-type” enterotypes based on the gut mycobiome with a high Basidiomycota ratio correlated with a better treatment response. This enterotype not only exhibits higher microbial α diversity but is also enriched with butyrate-producing bacteria and displays active butyric acid and sugar metabolism pathways. Further research has indicated that this enterotype promotes CD8+ T cell infiltration in tumors and the potential to enhance anti-PD-1 therapy sensitivity has been validated through FMT experiments54. These emerging gut microbiota, including Alistipes finegoldii, Hominenteromicrobium mulieris YB328, and specific fungal enterotypes, significantly enhances the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy through distinct immune and metabolic mechanisms. These mechanisms involve the activation and migration of dendritic cells, the recruitment and functional regulation of CD8+ T cells, and the immunomodulatory effects of microbial metabolites, such as butyrate. These findings not only deepen the understanding of microbe-immune interactions but also provide a critical foundation for developing microbiota-based adjuvant strategies, such as using specific bacterial strains or fungal enterotypes for patient stratification or combination interventions, thereby expanding the population benefiting from immunotherapy (Table 1, Figure 2).
Commensal bacteria for increased PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy: clinical studies
Less
The correlation between the gut microbiota and response to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy
The link between the gut microbiota and the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has been verified in multiple cancer clinical studies. Responding patients have gut microbiota with high α diversity at the microbial composition level, including Akk21,55, which repairs the gut barrier, reduces serum LPS and m-MDSC infiltration, and significantly increases anti-PD-1 efficacy, prolonging progression-free survival18,21. Campylobacter jejuni inhibits CD4+ Tem cell recruitment in colon cancer mucosa, accelerating immune evasion and increasing disease progression risk56. Cross-cohort analyses have shown that Lachnospiraceae/Ruminococcaceae in Firmicutes produce SCFAs to activate dendritic cells, enhance CD8+ T-cell function, and improve 1-year survival rates57. The abundance of TANB77 phylotype pilin-encoding genes is directly related to PD-1 treatment response58. Metabolomic evidence has indicated that PAGln weakens PD-1 efficacy by interfering with T-cell activation pathways46. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium modulate bile acid metabolism to inhibit immunosuppressive factors, such as IL-10, increasing disease control rates to 80%59,60. Dynamic monitoring has shown that the baseline Ruminococcaceae abundance is positively correlated with 12-month progression-free survival with persistence extending the median survival to 14.8 months61. Cancer-specific studies further revealed that high Lactobacillus abundance in gastric cancer doubles the objective response rate to anti-PD-1 therapy60. Elevated serum galactonic acid levels predict better immune therapy responses in HCC (AUC = 0.793)62. Amino acid metabolism-related microbial patterns increase clinical remission rates in ovarian cancer by promoting T/B-cell clonal expansion63. Machine learning integrating strain-specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (e.g., the Ala168Val variant in Phocaeicola dorei) and metabolomics data distinguishes baseline responders for predictive models with > 90% accuracy64. Overall, the gut microbiota dynamically shapes PD-1 treatment outcomes through metabolic reprogramming and immune cell regulation, offering new paradigms for precision immunotherapy as a biomarker and modulatory target. Indeed, the microbiome can serve as a biomarker for personalized immunotherapy.
The microbiome as a biomarker for personalized immunotherapy
Recent studies have established the core role of the gut microbiota in predicting the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Zhu et al.46 identified microbial and metabolic features linked to treatment response in 165 patients using multiomics analysis and reported that the metabolite, PAGln, significantly suppressed PD-1 efficacy. Similarly, a species co-abundance network was constructed using metagenomic data from NSCLC patients and a TOPOSCORE system that combines resistance-related microbiota (SIG1) and sensitive microbiota (SIG2) was proposed. The predictive power of this system has been validated across multiple cancer cohorts65. Recently, the TOPOSCORE system has been further enhanced by incorporating strain-specific SNP information (e.g., Phocaeicola dorei Ala168Val) and metabolomics data, achieving a prediction accuracy of 89% in a pan-cancer cohort. This improvement has been supported by a clinical trial (NCT03686202), a randomized study evaluating MET4, which is a microbial ecosystem therapy based on responsive bacterial consortia in combination with PD-1 inhibitors. Interim analysis of this trial indicated that MET4 treatment exhibited a favorable safety profile with only a small number of patients experiencing low-grade adverse events. Patients in the MET4 group showed significantly higher relative abundance and colonization levels of relevant bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium, Collinsella, and Enterococcus, compared to the control group with a reduced risk of microbial diversity loss. These findings suggest that targeted microbial interventions can safely and effectively enhance the predictive and regulatory functions of microbial biomarkers66. Notably, the abundance of Akk, a key symbiotic bacterium, has been consistently associated with treatment efficacy across various cancers. Reduced Akk is linked to PD-1 resistance in MAFLD-HCC patients, while supplementation can restore gut barriers and reduce the number of immunosuppressive cells, such as monocytic m-MDSCs21. Derosa et al.67 and Yin et al.68 confirmed baseline enrichment of Akk or a significant correlation of the Verrucomicrobiaceae family with the objective response and survival rates independent of PD-L1 expression in NSCLC and thoracic tumor patients. It is noteworthy that the gut microbiota influences the response to immunotherapy in CRC and is closely associated with molecular subtypes of the tumor. For example, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies exhibit significant efficacy in MSI-H/dMMR CRC but perform poorly in MSS/pMMR patients, highlighting the importance of the microbiota as a predictive biomarker and potential therapeutic target69. These studies suggest that single strains, such as Akk, and multispecies interaction networks serve as dynamic biomarkers for clinical stratification.
Further research highlights the significant impact of microbial functional heterogeneity and cross-domain interactions on immunotherapy responses. A cross-cancer cohort analysis revealed that microbial features, including bacteria (Faecalibacterium prausnitzii), fungi (Nemania serpens), and viruses, are associated with ICI responses. A random forest model built on these features performed well for melanoma, NSCLC, and RCC [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) = 72.27%–89.58%]70. Furthermore, the mycobiotic enterotype has been proposed as a novel classification method for selecting FMT donors. Donors with a “favourable” mycobiotic profile were associated with a 65% increase in the response rate to immunotherapy among melanoma patients54. Macandog et al.71 reported that complete responders have more stable gut microbial functions and identified flagellin-related peptides from Lachnospiraceae through longitudinal studies that activate CD8+ T cells, suggesting that antigen mimicry from microbes may increase anti-tumor immunity. Strain-level analysis improves prediction accuracy with strain-specific functional features (rather than species abundance), which significantly improve the prediction of ICI responses in rare cancers. However, cross-cohort validity depends on consistent treatment regimens, implying that microbial diagnostics should be optimized in conjunction with treatment strategies72. In addition, Zhang et al.73 reported that the abundance of specific gut genera in mesothelioma is positively correlated with CD8+ T-cell infiltration but negatively correlated with tumor genomic instability, indicating that the microbiota can increase treatment sensitivity by modulating the TME.
In terms of clinical translation, microbial biomarkers are transitioning from basic research to application. TOPOSCORE has been converted into a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) scoring system based on 21 bacterial probes and validated for generalizability in CRC and melanoma65. It is also noteworthy that a study based on the NCT03686202 trial revealed that patients who developed irAEs exhibited higher pre-treatment IgG reactivity to autoantigens and steroid treatment reduced the IgG levels. This finding implied a close relationship between microbiome-immune interactions and the mechanisms underlying irAEs74. Usyk et al.75 reported that the gut microbiota predict the risk of irAEs in melanoma patients based on metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses with a nearly 7-fold increase in the risk of irAEs associated with high-risk microbiota, such as Bacteroides dorei. Attention must be paid to the establishment of standardized donor screening protocols, which is crucial for controlling irAE risk. Proactively excluding carriers of high-risk microorganisms, such as Bacteroides dorei, through prospective microbial detection can significantly enhance treatment safety and the applicability of interventional strategies. However, challenges remain. Combining PD-L1 expression with TME stratification [e.g., tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) status] requires integrated microbial features to increase the prediction accuracy76. Treatment regimen dependence may limit the generalizability of microbial biomarkers72. Currently, donor screening still lacks unified standards and the sensitivity and specificity of detection methods require further optimization. Overall, the gut microbiota influences PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy through multidimensional mechanisms, including species abundance, metabolites, functional pathways, and cross-domain interactions. The potential of the gut microbiota as a dynamic biomarker is well-established, but heterogeneity, complex host‒microbe interactions, and treatment specificity require further exploration for precise intervention.
Probiotic intervention in clinical studies
The critical role of the gut microbiota in modulating anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy efficacy is underscored by clinical evidence demonstrating that antibiotic-induced disruption of commensal microbial communities impairs therapeutic outcomes. For example, vancomycin pre-treatment in melanoma patients receiving anti-PD-1 therapy not only depleted gut microbial diversity but also compromised systemic immune activation, leading to suboptimal responses despite subsequent administration of a spore-based probiotic77. This phenomenon aligns with broader observations that broad-spectrum antibiotics diminish the abundance of immunostimulatory taxa, such as Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacterium, which are essential for priming cytotoxic T-cell responses and sustaining antitumor immunity. In contrast, FMT has emerged as a clinically viable strategy to reconstitute a favourable microbial ecosystem and reverse resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy. A pivotal study in 13 PD-1-refractory advanced solid tumor patients demonstrated that FMT from PD-1 responder donors combined with anti-PD-1 rechallenge induced durable microbial shifts in 46.2% of cases, accompanied by clinical benefits, including partial response (7.7%) and disease stabilization (38.5%)78. Longitudinal analyses revealed that responders presented increased systemic levels of cytotoxic T cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines compared to non-responders with TME remodeling characterized by increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration and reduced immunosuppressive myeloid subsets. These findings were mechanistically validated by isolating Prevotella merdae Immunoactis from responder-derived FMT, which directly stimulated T-cell activity and suppressed tumor growth in murine models. Similarly, first-line FMT from healthy donors combined with nivolumab or pembrolizumab in treatment-naive advanced melanoma patients achieved an objective response rate of 65%, including 20% with a complete response, with FMT-driven enrichment of immunogenic species (Faecalibacterium and Bifidobacterium) and depletion of pathobionts (Escherichia and Streptococcus) correlating with improved survival79. Notably, microbial engraftment efficiency and sustained donor-recipient similarity were significantly greater in responders than in non-responders, suggesting that FMT success hinges on ecologic compatibility and persistent colonization. Refractory patients achieved 83% symptom resolution following FMT, even in severe immune-mediated colitis induced by PD-1 inhibitors, with restored microbial diversity marked by increased Collinsella and Bifidobacterium abundance, paralleled by reduced colonic CD8+ T-cell infiltration and mucosal healing80. Controlled dietary interventions further corroborate the therapeutic potential of microbiota modulation because high-fibre diets enriched with Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae enhanced anti-PD-1 responses in melanoma patients by promoting SCFA production and CD8+ T-cell activation81. Collectively, these clinical trials illuminate the multifaceted mechanisms through which FMT reshapes host‒microbe interactions, reinvigorating antitumor immunity via metabolic reprogramming, epithelial barrier restoration, and direct immunomodulation, while highlighting the importance of donor selection, microbial strain specificity, and intervention timing in optimizing therapeutic outcome (Table 2, Figure 3).
Safety-first engineering: kill switches and autologous strains
Current FMT-based therapies show promise but face challenges due to complex composition and potential ecologic risks. Synthetic biology offers safer solutions through “safety-first” engineered bacteria. A key strategy involves suicide switches. Traditional kill switches often cause cytotoxicity and evolutionary pressure, leading to escape mutants82. Non-lethal CRISPR-based systems were developed to degrade engineered genes without killing cells. For example, a cellobiose-regulated circuit in E. coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) enabled complete elimination of engineered functions within 2 d after signal withdrawal without compromising host fitness83. Further advances include dual-input CRISPR-Cas9 kill switches (CRISPRks) responsive to chemicals (e.g., aTc) and temperature changes. These switches prevent environmental spread and exhibit high stability over 28 d of culture, achieving near-total clearance in mice82.
A more promising approach is autologous strain therapy, in which native commensal bacteria (e.g., E. coli or Lactobacillus) are isolated from the patient, engineered to express immunomodulators, and reintroduced. These strains achieve lifelong colonization in conventionally raised hosts, continuously expressing therapeutic genes (e.g., BSH or IL-10) to modulate host physiology and avoid immune rejection84.
Future work should focus on rigorous preclinical evaluation of these engineered live bacterial therapeutics (LBTs), especially in combination with ICIs, to advance programmable microbiome-assisted immunotherapy.
Challenges and future
Less
The gut microbiota can increase the efficacy of PD-1-based cancer therapy, which has been robustly validated in preclinical experiments and clinical trials. Current clinical interventions involve probiotic supplementation or FMT, which artificially modulates microbial abundance to amplify the therapeutic effects of PD-1 while ensuring safety. However, three core challenges persist after FMT treatment.
First, there is a colonization issue. Significant uncertainty exists regarding whether the transplanted microbiota can successfully colonize the gut or tumor microenvironment. For example, Fn requires intratumoral colonization to exert antitumor effects49, whereas systemic colonization may trigger pro-inflammatory responses. Kennedy et al.86 concluded that dietary resource environments are decisive factors for microbial colonization. Specific dietary components (e.g., fibre) shape microbial metabolic networks to foster symbiotic relationships between colonizing bacteria and the host. This finding suggests that future strategies could employ dynamic nutritional intervention systems to adjust dietary regimens in real time on the basis of individual metabolic profiles, thereby increasing the precision and stability of microbial colonization86. Second, there are ecologic perturbation risks. Greater than 60% of FMT-transplanted microbiota consists of unculturable, unknown species, leaving functional mechanisms and an ecologic impact on the recipient microbiota unclear. Rozera et al.87 proposed a multiomics artificial intelligence (AI) platform that deciphers the metabolic pathways and immunomodulatory potential of unknown microbiota via machine learning, enabling predictions of adaptability to host ecologic niches. This innovation could be used to establish novel criteria for FMT donor screening. Third, there is a lack of microbial synergy. Current interventions predominantly focus on single-strain effects but synthetic metabolic interactions (e.g., cross-feeding) among microbiota are critical for ecologic stability. Future solutions may involve synthetic biology to reconstruct functional microbial consortia. For example, engineering bacterial combinations that mutually supply essential metabolites (e.g., SCFAs or tryptophan derivatives) to amplify immunomodulatory effects88.
The engineered Salmonella vector, DB1, which was developed by Liu et al.89 at the Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China), to address the challenges of intratumoral colonization, achieved tumor-specific proliferation but carried the risk of bacteremia due to intravenous administration. Alternative approaches, such as hypoxia-activated Bacteroides, can be considered to mitigate this issue. The innate anaerobic characteristics significantly reduce systemic infection risks, while genetic engineering enables specific activation and therapeutic protein expression within the hypoxic TME. Future breakthroughs may focus on autologous commensal-based delivery systems. Engineered gut commensals equipped with a “hypoxia-activated immune escape” dual-circuit system could proliferate exclusively in hypoxic TMEs to secrete immunomodulators while undergoing self-lysis in normal tissues. This design could be optimized for personalized autologous strain engineering to mitigate safety risks from heterologous strains. Oral nanodelivery systems (LR-S-CD/CpG@LNP) offer another avenue. Nanocarrier surface-modified with microbiota-specific adhesion molecules (e.g., glycan-binding proteins) can direct commensals to tumors expressing specific surface markers85. Coupled with GlycoCaging technology, future systems may enable TME-specific drug release via activation by distinct microbial metabolic enzymes, avoiding interference with the native microbiota90. By integrating photoacoustic imaging for real-time monitoring, such systems could achieve closed-loop control over therapeutic dosing and spatiotemporal distribution, maximizing intratumoral microbial efficacy while minimizing systemic exposure.
Personalized treatment response prediction remains another critical challenge. Rozera et al.87 developed a multiomics AI model that identifies 12 core microbial signatures that are quantitatively linked to PD-1 antibody efficacy by integrating metagenomic, metabolomic, and tumor immune microenvironment data from 3000 patients (89% prediction accuracy). The next steps involve dynamic prediction systems. Benjamin et al.91 reported that single-cell spatial transcriptomics can resolve real-time 3D distribution gradients of microbial metabolites in tumors, whereas the Kennedy86 dynamic metabolic network models quantify microbiota‒host nutrient competition and T-cell metabolic reprogramming interactions. Cutting-edge approaches include integrating wearable device data (e.g., gut pH and oxygen tension) with engineered bacterial biosensor outputs into AI systems92, creating a “microbiota–immune–metabolism” digital twin to enable minute-level therapeutic optimization. This technologic convergence could revolutionize clinical practice by transitioning from static FMT to real-time feedback-controlled “living therapeutic ecosystems.”
The gut microbiota, through multidimensional metabolic–immune–barrier regulation, serves as an “ecologic lever” to optimize PD-1/PD-L1 efficacy. Despite lingering challenges in clinical standardization and safety, synthetic biology-driven engineering of autologous commensals, AI-powered personalized microbiota prediction models, and spatiotemporally precise delivery technologies are synergistically advancing microbiota-directed therapies from empirical interventions towards programmable, predictable precision medicine. This interdisciplinary integration not only offers new hope for “cold tumor” patients but also may reshape the entire landscape of cancer immunotherapy (Figure 4).
Conclusions
Less
The commensal gut microbiota has been proven to be a key “ecologic lever” regulating the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Despite transforming cancer therapy, ICI effectiveness is often limited by low response rates, drug resistance, and adverse reactions. This review has clarified how specific gut microbiota reshape the TME via multidimensional metabolic, immune, and barrier mechanisms, enhancing immunotherapy responses and reducing toxicity. Preclinical and clinical studies have confirmed the synergistic effects of key commensal species and the translational potential of FMT and probiotic interventions. Although microbiota-based strategies face challenges, such as standardization, safety, and individual heterogeneity, the integration of synthetic biology, AI, and multiomics technologies promises to enable precise interventions targeting the gut microbiota. This could be used to overcome current hurdles and optimize immunotherapy.
Funding
Less
  • This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82222058, 82425046, and 82273142).
References
Less
1.
Topalian SL,Hodi FS,Brahmer JR,Gettinger SN,Smith DC,McDermott DF, et al.Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer.N Engl J Med.2012; 366: 2443–54.
2.
Gunturi A,McDermott DF.Nivolumab for the treatment of cancer.Expert Opin Investig Drugs.2015; 24: 253–60.
3.
Cheng Y,Ling F,Li J,Chen Y,Xu M,Li S, et al.An updated review of gastrointestinal toxicity induced by PD-1 inhibitors: from mechanisms to management.Front Immunol.2023; 14: 1190850.
4.
Sharma P,Siddiqui BA,Anandhan S,Yadav SS,Subudhi SK,Gao J, et al.The next decade of immune checkpoint therapy.Cancer Discov.2021; 11: 838–57.
5.
Sivan A,Corrales L,Hubert N,Williams JB,Aquino-Michaels K,Earley ZM, et al.Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy.Science.2015; 350: 1084–9.
6.
Gopalakrishnan V,Spencer CN,Nezi L,Reuben A,Andrews MC,Karpinets TV, et al.Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients.Science.2018; 359: 97–103.
7.
Davar D,Dzutsev AK,McCulloch JA,Rodrigues RR,Chauvin J-M,Morrison RM, et al.Fecal microbiota transplant overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients.Science.2021; 371: 595–602.
8.
Gong L,Yang S,Huang J,Li Y.Modulation of gut microbiota in targeted cancer therapy: insights on the EGFR/VEGF/KRAS pathways.Cancer Biol Med.2024; 21: 1141–55.
9.
Mann ER,Lam YK,Uhlig HH.Short-chain fatty acids: linking diet, the microbiome and immunity.Nat Rev Immunol.2024; 24: 577–95.
10.
Rooks MG,Garrett WS.Gut microbiota, metabolites and host immunity.Nat Rev Immunol.2016; 16: 341–52.
11.
Xia L,Zhu X,Wang Y,Lu S.The gut microbiota improves the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy against tumors: from association to cause and effect.Cancer Lett.2024; 598: 217123.
12.
Gopalakrishnan V,Helmink BA,Spencer CN,Reuben A,Wargo JA.The influence of the gut microbiome on cancer, immunity, and cancer immunotherapy.Cancer Cell.2018; 33: 570–80.
13.
Jiang Y,Jia D,Sun Y,Ding N,Wang L.Microbiota: a key factor affecting and regulating the efficacy of immunotherapy.Clin Transl Med.2023; 13: e1508.
14.
Mruk-Mazurkiewicz H,Kulaszyńska M,Czarnecka W,Podkówka A,Ekstedt N,Zawodny P, et al.Insights into the mechanisms of action of Akkermansia muciniphila in the treatment of non-communicable diseases.Nutrients.2024; 16: 1695.
15.
Rodrigues VF,Elias-Oliveira J,Pereira ÍS,Pereira JA,Barbosa SC,Machado MSG, et al.Akkermansia muciniphila and gut immune system: a good friendship that attenuates inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, and diabetes.Front Immunol.2022; 13: 934695.
16.
Lan X,Ma J,Huang Z,Xu Y,Hu Y.Akkermansia muciniphila might improve anti-PD-1 therapy against HCC by changing host bile acid metabolism.J Gene Med.2024; 26: e3639.
17.
Hua D,Yang Q,Li X,Zhou X,Kang Y,Zhao Y, et al.The combination of Clostridium butyricum and Akkermansia muciniphila mitigates DSS-induced colitis and attenuates colitis-associated tumorigenesis by modulating gut microbiota and reducing CD8+ T cells in mice.mSystems.2025; 10: e0156724.
18.
Routy B,Le Chatelier E,Derosa L,Duong CPM,Alou MT,Daillère R, et al.Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors.Science.2018; 359: 91–7.
19.
Xu X,Lv J,Guo F,Li J,Jia Y,Jiang D, et al.Gut microbiome influences the efficacy of PD-1 antibody immunotherapy on MSS-type colorectal cancer via metabolic pathway.Front Microbiol.2020; 11: 814.
20.
Zhu Z,Huang J,Zhang Y,Hou W,Chen F,Mo Y-Y, et al.Landscape of tumoral ecosystem for enhanced anti-PD-1 immunotherapy by gut Akkermansia muciniphila.Cell Rep.2024; 43: 114306.
21.
Wu XQ,Ying F,Chung KPS,Leung CON,Leung RWH,So KKH, et al.Intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila complements the efficacy of PD1 therapy in MAFLD-related hepatocellular carcinoma.Cell Rep Med.2025; 6: 101900.
22.
Sharma M,Wasan A,Sharma RK.Recent developments in probiotics: an emphasis on Bifidobacterium.Food Biosci.2021; 41: 100993.
23.
Ueki H,Kitagawa K,Kato M,Yanase S,Okamura Y,Bando Y, et al.An oral cancer vaccine using Bifidobacterium vector augments combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies in mouse renal cell carcinoma model.Sci Rep.2023; 13: 9994.
24.
Kim H,Oh R,Park S,Ji GE,Park MS,Kim S.Combination therapy of Bifidobacterium longum RAPO with anti-PD-1 treatment enhances anti-tumor immune response in association with gut microbiota modulation.Curr Dev Nutr.2021; 5: 1131.
25.
Zhou L,Xie Y,Li Y.Bifidobacterium infantis promotes Foxp3 expression in colon cells via PD-L1-mediated inhibition of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway.Front Immunol.2022; 13: 871705.
26.
Bessell CA,Isser A,Havel JJ,Lee S,Bell DR,Hickey JW, et al.Commensal bacteria stimulate antitumor responses via T cell cross-reactivity.JCI Insight.2020; 5: e135597.
27.
Matson V,Fessler J,Bao R,Chongsuwat T,Zha Y,Alegre M-L, et al.The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients.Science.2018; 359: 104–8.
28.
Mager LF,Burkhard R,Pett N,Cooke NCA,Brown K,Ramay H, et al.Microbiome-derived inosine modulates response to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy.Science.2020; 369: 1481–9.
29.
Lee S-H,Cho S-Y,Yoon Y,Park C,Sohn J,Jeong J-J, et al.Bifidobacterium bifidum strains synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors to reduce tumour burden in mice.Nat Microbiol.2021; 6: 277–88.
30.
Rizvi ZA,Dalal R,Sadhu S,Kumar Y,Kumar S,Gupta SK, et al.High-salt diet mediates interplay between NK cells and gut microbiota to induce potent tumor immunity.Sci Adv.2021; 7: eabg5016.
31.
Sarita B,Samadhan D,Hassan MZ,Kovaleva EG.A comprehensive review of probiotics and human health-current prospective and applications.Front Microbiol.2025; 15: 1487641.
32.
Luo M,Wang Q,Sun Y,Jiang Y,Wang Q,Gu Y, et al.Fasting-mimicking diet remodels gut microbiota and suppresses colorectal cancer progression.NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes.2024; 10: 53.
33.
Song S,Zhang H,Liu L,Li M,Wang X,Zeng H, et al.Probiotic DNA regulates intestinal Th2 polarization by inducing epithelial cells to produce PD-L1.Apoptosis.2025; 30: 239–49.
34.
Aindelis G,Tiptiri-Kourpeti A,Lampri E,Spyridopoulou K,Lamprianidou E,Kotsianidis I, et al.Immune responses raised in an experimental colon carcinoma model following oral administration of Lactobacillus casei.Cancers (Basel).2020; 12: 368.
35.
Zhao J,Wang Y,Wang J,Lv M,Zhou C,Jia L, et al.Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW18 from Kefir enhances the anti-tumor effect of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immunotherapy by modulating the gut microbiota.Food Funct.2022; 13: 10023–33.
36.
Zhang S-L,Han B,Mao Y-Q,Zhang Z-Y,Li Z-M,Kong C-Y, et al.Lacticaseibacillus paracasei sh2020 induced antitumor immunity and synergized with anti-programmed cell death 1 to reduce tumor burden in mice.Gut Microbes.2022; 14: 2046246.
37.
Jia D,Wang Q,Qi Y,Jiang Y,He J,Lin Y, et al.Microbial metabolite enhances immunotherapy efficacy by modulating T cell stemness in pan-cancer.Cell.2024; 187: 1651–65.e21.
38.
Sugimura N,Li Q,Chu ESH,Lau HCH,Fong W,Liu W, et al.Lactobacillus gallinarum modulates the gut microbiota and produces anti-cancer metabolites to protect against colorectal tumourigenesis.Gut.2021; 71: 2011–21.
39.
Fong W,Li Q,Ji F,Liang W,Lau HCH,Kang X, et al.Lactobacillus gallinarum-derived metabolites boost anti-PD1 efficacy in colorectal cancer by inhibiting regulatory T cells through modulating IDO1/Kyn/AHR axis.Gut.2023; 72: 2272–85.
40.
Bender MJ,McPherson AC,Phelps CM,Pandey SP,Laughlin CR,Shapira JH, et al.Dietary tryptophan metabolite released by intratumoral Lactobacillus reuteri facilitates immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.Cell.2023; 186: 1846–62.e26.
41.
Kawanabe-Matsuda H,Takeda K,Nakamura M,Makino S,Karasaki T,Kakimi K, et al.Dietary Lactobacillus-derived exopolysaccharide enhances immune-checkpoint blockade therapy.Cancer Discov.2022; 12: 1336–55.
42.
Gao G,Shen S,Zhang T,Zhang J,Huang S,Sun Z, et al.Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus Probio-M9 enhanced the antitumor response to anti-PD-1 therapy by modulating intestinal metabolites.EBioMedicine.2023; 91: 104533.
43.
Cervantes-Barragan L,Chai JN,Tianero MD,Di Luccia B,Ahern PP,Merriman J, et al.Lactobacillus reuteri induces gut intraepithelial CD4+CD8αα+ T cells.Science.2017; 357: 806–10.
44.
Si W,Liang H,Bugno J,Xu Q,Ding X,Yang K, et al.Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG induces cGAS/STING-dependent type I interferon and improves response to immune checkpoint blockade.Gut.2022; 71: 521–33.
45.
Gao G,Ma T,Zhang T,Jin H,Li Y,Kwok L-Y, et al.Adjunctive probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus Probio-M9 administration enhances the effect of anti-PD-1 antitumor therapy via restoring antibiotic-disrupted gut microbiota.Front Immunol.2021; 12: 772532.
46.
Zhu X,Hu M,Huang X,Li L,Lin X,Shao X, et al.Interplay between gut microbial communities and metabolites modulates pan-cancer immunotherapy responses.Cell Metab.2025; 37: 806–23.e6.
47.
Gao Y,Xu P,Sun D,Jiang Y,Lin X-L,Han T, et al.Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abrogates intestinal toxicity and promotes tumor immunity to increase the efficacy of dual CTLA4 and PD-1 checkpoint blockade.Cancer Res.2023; 83: 3710–25.
48.
Montalban-Arques A,Katkeviciute E,Busenhart P,Bircher A,Wirbel J,Zeller G, et al.Commensal Clostridiales strains mediate effective anti-cancer immune response against solid tumors.Cell Host Microbe.2021; 29: 1573–88.e7.
49.
Wang X,Fang Y,Liang W,Wong CC,Qin H,Gao Y, et al.Fusobacterium nucleatum facilitates anti-PD-1 therapy in micro-satellite stable colorectal cancer.Cancer Cell.2024; 42: 1729–46.e8.
50.
Kang X,Liu C,Ding Y,Ni Y,Ji F,Lau HCH, et al.Roseburia intestinalis generated butyrate boosts anti-PD-1 efficacy in colorectal cancer by activating cytotoxic CD8+ T cells.Gut.2023; 72: 2112–22.
51.
Zhang X,Yu D,Wu D,Gao X,Shao F,Zhao M, et al.Tissue-resident Lachnospiraceae family bacteria protect against colorectal carcinogenesis by promoting tumor immune surveillance.Cell Host Microbe.2023; 31: 418–32.e8.
52.
Wu Z-Y,Wu Q-W,Han Y,Xiang S-J,Wang Y-N,Wu W-W, et al.Alistipes finegoldii augments the efficacy of immunotherapy against solid tumors.Cancer Cell.2025; 43: 1714–30.e12.
53.
Lin NY-T,Fukuoka S,Koyama S,Motooka D,Tourlousse DM,Shigeno Y, et al.Microbiota-driven antitumour immunity mediated by dendritic cell migration.Nature.2025; 644: 1058–68.
54.
Hu M,Zhu X,Huang X,Hua L,Lin X,Zhang H, et al.Optimizing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy efficacy and fecal microbiota transplantation donor selection through gut mycobiome-based enterotype.Cell Rep.2025; 44: 115589.
55.
Jin Y,Dong H,Xia L,Yang Y,Zhu Y,Shen Y, et al.The diversity of gut microbiome is associated with favorable responses to anti-programmed death 1 immunotherapy in Chinese patients with NSCLC.J Thorac Oncol.2019; 14: 1378–89.
56.
Qin Y,Wang Q,Lin Q,Liu F,Pan X,Wei C, et al.Multi-omics analysis reveals associations between gut microbiota and host transcriptome in colon cancer patients.mSystems.2025; 10: e0080524.
57.
McCulloch JA,Davar D,Rodrigues RR,Badger JH,Fang JR,Cole AM, et al.Intestinal microbiota signatures of clinical response and immune-related adverse events in melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1.Nat Med.2022; 28: 545–56.
58.
Kim CY,Park DJ,Ahn BC,Baek S,Hong MH,Nguyen LT, et al.A conserved pilin from uncultured gut bacterial clade TANB77 enhances cancer immunotherapy.Nat Commun.2024; 15: 10726.
59.
Cheng M,Jin M,Yang S,Zhao L,Yu D,Lin Z, et al.Effect of radiotherapy exposure on fruquintinib plus sintilimab treatment in refractory microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective observation study.J Immunother Cancer.2025; 13: e009415.
60.
Han Z,Cheng S,Dai D,Kou Y,Zhang X,Li F, et al.The gut microbiome affects response of treatments in HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer.Clin Transl Med.2023; 13: e1312.
61.
Björk JR,Bolte LA,Maltez Thomas A,Lee KA,Rossi N,Wind TT, et al.Longitudinal gut microbiome changes in immune checkpoint blockade-treated advanced melanoma.Nat Med.2024; 30: 785–96.
62.
Wu H,Zheng X,Pan T,Yang X,Chen X,Zhang B, et al.Dynamic microbiome and metabolome analyses reveal the interaction between gut microbiota and anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.Int J Cancer.2022; 151: 1321–34.
63.
Rosario SR,Long MD,Chilakapati S,Gomez EC,Battaglia S,Singh PK, et al.Integrative multi-omics analysis uncovers tumor-immune-gut axis influencing immunotherapy outcomes in ovarian cancer.Nat Commun.2024; 15: 10609.
64.
Raziq MF,Khan N,Manzoor H,Tariq HMA,Rafiq M,Rasool S, et al.Prioritizing gut microbial SNPs linked to immunotherapy outcomes in NSCLC patients by integrative bioinformatics analysis.J Transl Med.2025; 23: 343.
65.
Derosa L,Iebba V,Silva CAC,Piccinno G,Wu G,Lordello L, et al.Custom scoring based on ecological topology of gut microbiota associated with cancer immunotherapy outcome.Cell.2024; 187: 3373–89.e16.
66.
Ctv.veeva.com.Feasibility study of MET-4: evaluating fecal microbiome effects in immunotherapy patients.Available from: https://ctv.veeva.com/study/feasibility-study-of-microbial-ecosystem-therapeutics-met-4-to-evaluate-effects-of-fecal-microbiom.(Cited: September 7, 2025).
67.
Derosa L,Routy B,Thomas AM,Iebba V,Zalcman G,Friard S, et al.Intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.Nat Med.2022; 28: 315–24.
68.
Yin H,Yang L,Peng G,Yang K,Mi Y,Hu X, et al.The commensal consortium of the gut microbiome is associated with favorable responses to anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy in thoracic neoplasms.Cancer Biol Med.2021; 18: 1040–52.
69.
Wang S,Xu B,Zhang Y,Chen G,Zhao P,Gao Q, et al.The role of intestinal flora on tumorigenesis, progression, and the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in colorectal cancer.Cancer Biol Med.2023; 21: 65–82.
70.
Lin Y,Xie M,Lau HC-H,Zeng R,Zhang R,Wang L, et al.Effects of gut microbiota on immune checkpoint inhibitors in multi-cancer and as microbial biomarkers for predicting therapeutic response.Med.2025; 6: 100530.
71.
Macandog ADG,Catozzi C,Capone M,Nabinejad A,Nanaware PP,Liu S, et al.Longitudinal analysis of the gut microbiota during anti-PD-1 therapy reveals stable microbial features of response in melanoma patients.Cell Host Microbe.2024; 32: 2004–18.e9.
72.
Gunjur A,Shao Y,Rozday T,Klein O,Mu A,Haak BW, et al.A gut microbial signature for combination immune checkpoint blockade across cancer types.Nat Med.2024; 30: 797–809.
73.
Zhang M,Bzura A,Baitei EY,Zhou Z,Spicer JB,Poile C, et al.A gut microbiota rheostat forecasts responsiveness to PD-L1 and VEGF blockade in mesothelioma.Nat Commun.2024; 15: 7187.
74.
Genta S,Lajkosz K,Yee NR,Spiliopoulou P,Heirali A,Hansen AR, et al.Autoimmune PaneLs as PrEdictors of toxicity in patients TReated with immune checkpoint InhibiTors (ALERT).J Exp Clin Cancer Res.2023; 42: 276.
75.
Usyk M,Pandey A,Hayes RB,Moran U,Pavlick A,Osman I, et al.Bacteroides vulgatus and Bacteroides dorei predict immune-related adverse events in immune checkpoint blockade treatment of metastatic melanoma.Genome Med.2021; 13: 160.
76.
Shirasawa M,Yoshida T,Shimoda Y,Takayanagi D,Shiraishi K,Kubo T, et al.Differential immune-related microenvironment determines programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1 blockade efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC.J Thorac Oncol.2021; 16: 2078–90.
77.
Glitza IC,Seo YD,Spencer CN,Wortman JR,Burton EM,Alayli FA, et al.Randomized placebo-controlled, biomarker-stratified phase Ib microbiome modulation in melanoma: impact of antibiotic preconditioning on microbiome and immunity.Cancer Discov.2024; 14: 1161–75.
78.
Kim Y,Kim G,Kim S,Cho B,Kim S-Y,Do E-J, et al.Fecal microbiota transplantation improves anti-PD-1 inhibitor efficacy in unresectable or metastatic solid cancers refractory to anti-PD-1 inhibitor.Cell Host Microbe.2024; 32: 1380–93.e9.
79.
Routy B,Lenehan JG,Miller WH Jr,Jamal R,Messaoudene M,Daisley BA, et al.Fecal microbiota transplantation plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a phase I trial.Nat Med.2023; 29: 2121–32.
80.
Halsey TM,Thomas AS,Hayase T,Ma W,Abu-Sbeih H,Sun B, et al.Microbiome alteration via fecal microbiota transplantation is effective for refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis.Sci Transl Med.2023; 15: eabq4006.
81.
Farias RM,Jiang Y,Levy EJ,Hwang C,Wang J,Burton EM, et al.Diet and Immune Effects Trial (DIET) – a randomized, double-blinded dietary intervention study in patients with melanoma receiving immunotherapy.BMC Cancer.2024; 24: 1493.
82.
Rottinghaus AG,Ferreiro A,Fishbein SRS,Dantas G,Moon TS.Genetically stable CRISPR-based kill switches for engineered microbes.Nat Commun.2022; 13: 672.
83.
Nguyen N,Wang M,Li L,Chan CTY.A genetic safeguard for eliminating target genes in synthetic probiotics in a gut environment.iScience.2025; 28: 113027.
84.
Russell BJ,Brown SD,Siguenza N,Mai I,Saran AR,Lingaraju A, et al.Intestinal transgene delivery with native E. coli chassis allows persistent physiological changes.Cell.2022; 185: 3263–77.e15.
85.
Xu H,Wang Y,Liu G,Zhu Z,Shahbazi M-A,Reis RL, et al.Nano-armed Limosilactobacillus reuteri for enhanced photo-immunotherapy and microbiota tryptophan metabolism against colorectal cancer.Adv Sci (Weinh).2025; 12: e2410011.
86.
Kennedy MS,Freiburger A,Cooper M,Beilsmith K,St George ML,Kalski M, et al.Diet outperforms microbial transplant to drive microbiome recovery in mice.Nature.2025; 642: 747–55.
87.
Rozera T,Pasolli E,Segata N,Ianiro G.Machine learning and artificial intelligence in the multi-omics approach to gut microbiota.Gastroenterology.2025; 169: 487–501.
88.
Gurbatri CR,Arpaia N,Danino T.Engineering bacteria as interactive cancer therapies.Science.2022; 378: 858–64.
89.
Chang Z,Guo X,Li X,Wang Y,Zang Z,Pei S, et al.Bacterial immunotherapy leveraging IL-10R hysteresis for both phagocytosis evasion and tumor immunity revitalization.Cell.2025; 188: 1842–57.e20.
90.
Ma WJ,Wang C,Kothandapani J,Luzentales-Simpson M,Menzies SC,Bescucci DM, et al.Bespoke plant glycoconjugates for gut microbiota-mediated drug targeting.Science.2025; 388: 1410–6.
91.
Benjamin K,Bhandari A,Kepple JD,Qi R,Shang Z,Xing Y, et al.Multiscale topology classifies cells in subcellular spatial transcriptomics.Nature.2024; 630: 943–9.
92.
Redenti A,Im J,Redenti B,Li F,Rouanne M,Sheng Z, et al.Probiotic neoantigen delivery vectors for precision cancer immunotherapy.Nature.2024; 635: 453–61.
Appendix
Less
Year 2026 volume 23 Issue 1
PDF
4
2
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0347
  • Receive Date：2025-07-15
  • Online Date：2026-11-07
  • Published：2026-01-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2025-07-15
  • Accepted：2025-11-04
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82222058, 82425046, and 82273142).
Affiliations
    1State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, China

Corresponding:

Correspondence to: Xue Bai, Yuanyuan Lu and Xiaodi Zhao, E-mail: , and
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cbm/EN/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0347
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House