Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: advances and prospects
收藏切换
PDF
Zhiqiang Shi1, 2, Yongjin Lu1, 3, Qiuchen Zhao4, Yongsheng Wang1, Pengfei Qiu1
Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2025, 22(2) : 83 - 92
Less
收藏切换
Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2025, 22(2): 83-92
• Perspective •
Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: advances and prospects
Full
Zhiqiang Shi1, 2, Yongjin Lu1, 3, Qiuchen Zhao4, Yongsheng Wang1, Pengfei Qiu1
Affiliations
  • 1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
  • 2Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300202, China
  • 3Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan 271016, China
  • 4Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre PhD Programme, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
About Author:

*These authors contributed equally to this work.

Author contributions

Wrote the paper: Zhiqiang Shi.

Literature review and synthesis: Yongjin Lu.

Polished the article: Qiuchen Zhao.

Designed the method: Yongsheng Wang.

Conceived the article: Pengfei Qiu.

Published: 2025-02-15 doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0486
Outline
收藏切换
Zhiqiang Shi, Yongjin Lu, Qiuchen Zhao, Yongsheng Wang, Pengfei Qiu. Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: advances and prospects[J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2025 , 22 (2) : 83 -92 . DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0486
Full Text
Less
The “Global Cancer Statistics Report 2022” estimates that there were approximately 20 million new cancer cases worldwide, including 9.7 million in females, of which 2.31 million were breast cancer cases1. Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in women and one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. Breast cancer treatment primarily involves surgery, often in combination with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapies. Despite continuous advances in these treatments, significant limitations remain. Traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy are effective but lack specificity. While endocrine and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapies are highly effective in some breast cancer subtypes, targeted therapies offer limited benefit to patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have shown great promise in overcoming these challenges.
ADCs are a class of immunoconjugates consisting of a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxic payload via a specialized connector. The monoclonal antibody and the cytotoxic payload are the key components driving the anti-tumor effect, while the characteristics of the connector can significantly influence the efficacy of the ADC. The development of ADCs has progressed through several phases2,3, as detailed in Table 1. The rationale and mechanisms underlying third-generation ADCs are detailed in Figure 1. This article reviews current clinical evidence and recent research progress in the development of ADCs for breast cancer treatment.
Advances in ADC therapy
Less
Despite significant advances in treatment, advanced breast cancer remains incurable. The primary breast cancer treatment goals focus on prolonging survival, alleviating symptoms, and enhancing the quality of life to achieve long-term disease management. Although early-stage breast cancer has a relatively high cure rate, there remains a considerable risk of recurrence and metastasis, underscoring the need for new therapeutic strategies to further improve patient outcomes.
Advanced breast cancer
T-DM1 was the first ADC approved for breast cancer based on reported superiority over lapatinib plus capecitabine in the EMILIA study4. T-DM1 has been globally recognized as the standard second-line treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer since 2013. However, data from the recent DESTINY-Breast03 study have demonstrated remarkable results with T-DXd. Specifically, the median overall survival (OS) was 52.6 months for the T-DXd group compared to 42.7 months for the T-DM1 group5. Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 29.0 months for T-DXd and 7.2 months for T-DM1. Given the superior performance in the DESTINY-Breast03 study, T-DXd is now the preferred option for second-line treatment of HER2+ advanced breast cancer.
The DESTINY-Breast11 study included approximately 500 HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who had previously received up to 2 lines of treatment and > 50% of the patients had brain metastases (BM) at baseline6. The results showed that the median PFS in the BM cohort reached 17.3 months with a 12-month PFS rate of 61.6%. The objective response rate (ORR) in the non-BM cohort was 62.7% and the 12-month OS rate was also high in both cohorts (approximately 90%). The results of the DESTINY-Breast11 study are interesting and significant and are expected to change existing guidelines and clinical practice.
Additionally, the results of the TROPiCS-027 and ASCENT studies8 demonstrated that the sacituzumab govitecan (SG) group had significantly improved median PFS and OS compared to the treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) group. The EVER-132-0029 and EVER-132-001 studies10 confirmed this conclusion. Therefore, SG has emerged as a valuable option for later-line treatment in advanced HR+/HER2− and TNBC.
Early-stage breast cancer
Within the realm of adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer the KATHERINE study11 demonstrated that patients who do not achieve a non-pathologic complete response (non-pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) containing trastuzumab, T-DM1 significantly improves invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) compared to trastuzumab. This finding has established T-DM1 as the standard adjuvant reinforcement therapy in this setting. The ongoing head-to-head DESTINY-Breast05 study12 seeks to compare the clinical benefits of T-DXd vs. T-DM1 as adjuvant therapy for HER2+ breast cancer.
Combining trastuzumab and pertuzumab has consistently improved pCR rates in NAT for HER2+ early-stage breast cancer13, solidifying the role of trastuzumab and pertuzumab combination therapy as the standard approach. Achieving a pCR is a critical prognostic factor for early-stage breast cancer and ADCs may offer further potential for improvement. The DESTINY-Breast11 study14 is the first clinical trial to evaluate the application of T-DXd in NAT for patients with HER2+ early-stage, high-risk breast cancer. The DESTINY-Breast11 study uses a standard NAT regimen consisting of anthracycline-containing chemotherapy followed by Taxotere-Herceptin-Perjeta (THP) as the control compared to regimens in which T-DXd replaced anthracycline-containing chemotherapy followed by THP and T-DXd monotherapy. If successful, the DESTINY-Breast11 study may introduce a more effective and less toxic “anthracycline-free” and even “chemotherapy-free” anti-HER2 NAT regimen for clinical use.
The NeoSTAR study15 was the first clinical trial to evaluate ADCs as neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage TNBC. The pCR rate was 30% in the single-agent SG treatment cohort. This finding confirms that single-agent SG has good clinical efficacy in NAT for TNBC. Future studies are needed to determine the optimal combination strategies with SG and the ideal duration of therapy.
The use of ADCs have progressively advanced from late-stage palliative care to adjuvant and even NAT, offering the potential to transform the diagnosis and treatment status of advanced and early-stage breast cancer.
ADCs contribute to the precise classification of breast cancer
Less
Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous malignancy at the molecular level. Precision classification based on molecular typing has become the standard for diagnosing and treating breast cancer. Traditional molecular subtypes include luminal A, luminal B, HER2+, and TNBC. In recent years the rapid development of ADCs has not only advanced the treatment of HER2+ and TNBC but also introduced new treatment options for patients with HER2-low- and ultra-low-expressing breast cancer, which has led to an update of standards for determining HER2 expression status.
As the first phase III clinical trial to yield positive results in HER2-low-expressing breast cancer, the DESTINY-Breast04 study16 showed that patients with HR+ and HER2-low-expressing breast cancer treated with T-DXd had significantly improved median PFS (10.1 months vs. 5.4 months) and median OS (23.9 months vs. 17.5 months) compared to the treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) group. In addition, HR- and HER2-low-expressing patients treated with T-DXd also experienced better outcomes with a median PFS of 8.5 months compared to 2.9 months in the TPC group and a median OS of 18.2 months in the T-DXd group compared to 8.3 months in the TPC group16. These benefits of T-DXd in the HR− population were consistent with the overall population, indicating that the benefits of the overall population were not solely driven by the HR+ group. Therefore, T-DXd benefits HR+ or HR– patients with HER2-low-expressing breast cancer. This revolutionary ushering of traditional anti-HER2 treatment into the “trichotomy” era defines a new treatment category (HER2-low-expressing) and promotes the innovation of precision treatment for breast cancer. Based on the above results the FDA updated the prescribing information for T-DXd, further adding an indication for treating patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low-expressing breast cancer and expanding on the previous approval for HER2-positive disease.
Building on the success of the DESTINY-Breast04 study, the pivotal phase III clinical trial DESTINY-Breast06 aimed to advance HER2-low-expressing treatment to the frontline and further expand the population benefiting from anti-HER2 therapy17. The DESTINY-Breast06 study reported that the median PFS in the T-DXd group was 13.2 months in the HER2-low-expressing population, a 5.1-month extension compared to the TPC group with a 38% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.51–0.74). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the median PFS in the T-DXd group was 13.2 months, a 5.1-month extension compared to the TPC group with a 37% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.53–0.75). An exploratory analysis further showed that patients with HER2 ultra-low expression benefited from T-DXd to the same extent as patients with HER2-low expression. The results provide robust evidence-based medical support for the application of T-DXd in the treatment of advanced breast cancer with HR+ and HER2-low expression and HER2 ultra-low expression. Moreover, the DESTINY-Breast06 trial adopted the administration of T-DXd to patients who had not received chemotherapy and had advanced endocrine therapy. This finding means that T-DXd provides a more effective follow-up treatment option for patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
The remarkable performance of T-DXd in patients with HER2-low-expressing breast cancer has sparked interest in HER2-low expression as an independent molecular subtype. The current definition of HER2 low expression is rooted in clinical practice even though HER2 low expression has significant value in guiding the use of ADCs. Nevertheless, researchers have not formed a consensus on whether there are differences between HER2 non-expressing breast cancer and HER2 low-expressing breast cancer in terms of patient prognosis and tumor biological characteristics18–21. As a result, whether HER2 low expression can serve as an independent molecular subtype still requires additional evidence. The updated 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Breast Cancer HER2 Testing Guideline recognizes that it is premature to create new categories, such as HER2 low expression and HER2 ultra-low expression. However, the distinction between immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of 0 and 1+ remains clinically significant, indicating that while HER2-low expression may not be a molecular subtype, HER2-low expression can serve as a valuable clinical subgroup for treatment decisions22.
Biological mechanism underlying resistance to ADCs
Less
Although ADCs have demonstrated potent activity in antitumor treatment and have clear advantages in improving targeting and reducing side effects, ADCs still face the issue of treatment resistance. A thorough understanding of the mechanisms underlying resistance to ADCs can guide the formulation of subsequent treatment strategies, which is of great clinical significance.
Heterogeneity of antigen expression
Long-term exposure to treatment may lead to a decrease in HER2 receptor expression or structural changes, thereby affecting the efficacy of ADCs. For example, the KRISTINE trial reported that patients with HER2 expression heterogeneity had a lower pCR rate when treated with T-DM123.
Antigen dimerization
Dimerization of antigens with another cell surface receptor may mediate resistance to ADCs. NRG-1β, a ligand that can induce HER2/HER3 heterodimerization, inhibits the cytotoxic activity of T-DM1 in a subpopulation of HER2-amplified breast cancer cell lines. This resistance can be overcome by adding pertuzumab, a monoclonal HER2 antibody that blocks HER2/HER3 dimerization and downstream signal transduction, which has a synergistic effect with T-DM124.
Downregulation of antigen expression
ADCs rely heavily on antigen expression to exert targeted cytotoxic effects. Therefore, downregulation of target antigen expression in cancer cells after long-term drug exposure may be one of the reasons for ADC resistance. The SePHER study showed that in breast cancer cell lines and patient tissue samples the combination of trastuzumab and pertuzumab as first-line treatment reduced HER2 expression, thereby affecting the efficacy of T-DM1 in second-line treatment25. The DAISY study also showed that in HER2-positive breast cancer patients who progressed after T-DXd treatment, HER2 expression decreased in 65% of patients26.
Disruption of ADC internalization and recycling
Cancer cells may also develop resistance through disruption of the internalization and transport of ADCs to lysosomes. Endocytosis followed by lysosomal degradation is the main pathway for processing ADCs. Researchers assessing T-DM1 resistance found that ADCs were internalized into caveolin-1 (CAV-1)-positive spots in resistant cells, which altered ADC transport to lysosomes. After internalization into CAV-1-positive spots, proper enzymatic processing of the T-DM1 non-cleavable linker could not be carried out. Moreover, due to the neutral pH of these CAV-1-positive compartments, the charged payload could not penetrate the membrane to act on adjacent cells, thereby reducing the bystander activity of the ADCs27.
Payload resistance
The payload is the main component of ADCs responsible for antitumor activity. Resistance to the payload can lead to acquired resistance to ADCs. Studies have shown that T-DXd-resistant cells exhibit reduced sensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitors, suggesting that loss of sensitivity to the ADC payload may be a cause of acquired resistance to T-DXd28. Tumor cells can also avoid cytotoxic effects by altering the payload targets. The TOP1 E418K missense mutation can cause the SG SN-38 payload to lose the target site in triple-negative breast cancer. Moreover, in subclones carrying the TOP1 E418K missense mutation, TOP1-related frameshift mutations have also occurred, which may further enhance cancer cell secondary resistance to SG29.
ADC combination therapy
Less
Although ADC monotherapy has demonstrated significant survival benefits in cancer treatment, unmet needs remain. Maximizing the anti-tumor effects of ADCs is crucial but addressing resistance to ADC monotherapy presents a challenge. As a result, ADC combination therapy has become a key area of exploration. Previous research30,31 indicated that combining ADCs with chemotherapy is not satisfactory, therefore it is still necessary to explore other combined treatment plans.
ADCs combined with monoclonal antibodies
ADCs combined with monoclonal antibodies may be more effective than ADCs alone and may overcome resistance by inducing effective internalization and degradation of HER2, but previous studies have shown different results. Previous clinical studies, such as KAITLIN, KRISTINE, and MARIANNE, which investigated T-DM1 combined with pertuzumab, did not yield positive outcomes32–34. However, an interim analysis of the DESTINY-Breast07 study presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) conference had promising data from the expanded dose phase of T-DXd monotherapy or T-DXd combined with pertuzumab as a first-line treatment plan for patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer35. The ORR for the T-DXd monotherapy and combination groups was 76.0% and 84.0%, respectively, and the 12-month PFS rate for both groups was 80.8% and 89.4%, respectively. Currently, the DESTINY-Breast0936 is further exploring the efficacy of this combination strategy in HER2+ patients in the first-line setting.
ADCs combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)
Dual HER2 blocking is more effective than monotherapy and small molecule TKIs bind to HER intracellular domains. TKIs combined with ADCs improve receptor internalization, increase uptake of ADCs payloads, and overcome drug resistance associated with reduced HER2 expression. The HER2CLIMB-02 study, a randomized double-blind phase III clinical trial, revealed the therapeutic potential of combining ADCs with small molecule TKIs in HER2+ advanced breast cancer patients at the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium37. The HER2CLIMB-02 study showed that in patients who had previously received trastuzumab and taxane treatments, as well as patients with a history of brain metastasis at the locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer stage, the combination of T-DM1 and tucatinib significantly prolonged the median PFS compared to T-DM1 alone [9.5 months vs. 7.4 months (HR = 0.76)]. Among patients with brain metastases, which accounted for 40% of the study population, the median PFS was also notably improved [median PFS: 7.8 months vs. 5.7 months (HR = 0.64)]. Importantly, no new safety risks associated with combination therapy were observed compared to T-DM1 monotherapy.
The Annals of Oncology published the results of cohort 4 from the TBCRC 022 study in July 202438, which evaluated the efficacy of combining neratinib with T-DM1 in patients with HER2+ brain metastases. The TBCRC 022 study reported that the T-DM1 and neratinib combination showed clear efficacy (approximately one-third of the patients achieved partial remission in the central nervous system and 38.1%–50.0% of the cohort patients achieved stable disease or remission lasting at least 6 months) whether or not the patients had undergone radiotherapy, extensive pre-treatment, or prior T-DM1 therapy.
ADCs combined with immune therapy
ADCs promote dendritic cell maturation in the process of killing tumor cells, which migrate to the lymph nodes and activate immature T cells, then recognize and kill tumor cells. In addition, ADCs activate the immune system through antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis, and complement-dependent cytotoxicity effects. The combined regimen has the potential to exhibit a synergistic role in overcoming or preventing drug resistance in conjunction with the mechanism underlying immune checkpoint inhibitors. The first phase II KATE2 study exploring ADCs combined with immunotherapy showed39 no significant median PFS difference between the T-DM1 combined with atezolizumab and control groups (8.2 months vs. 6.8 months; P = 0.33). However, the median PFS for both groups was 8.5 months and 4.1 months, respectively, in the PD-L1 positive subgroup. Although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.099), the T-DM1 plus atezolizumab group reduced the risk of disease progression by 60%, incentivizing further exploration. Consequently, the phase III KATE3 study involving T-DM1 combined with atezolizumab40 is currently underway.
The SACI-IO clinical study, which was presented at the 2024 ASCO conference, examined ADCs combined with immunotherapy41. The results showed that SG combined with pembrolizumab did not significantly improve efficacy compared to SG alone. A subgroup analysis indicated a beneficial trend in PFS and OS in the PD-L1-positive population but without statistical significance. The OS data are still immature, requiring longer follow-up. The safety profile of SG combined with pembrolizumab in the SACI-IO study was consistent with the expected safety of both drugs and no new safety signals were observed. There may be intrinsic subtypes of HR+ and HER2− advanced breast cancer that benefit from immunotherapy but further exploration is needed to identify predictive factors for the effectiveness of ADCs combined with immunotherapy in this population.
Additionally, the NAT results of Dato-DXd monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab (Durva) in the I-SPY2.2 study42,43 showed that among 103 patients in the Dato-DXd monotherapy cohort, 33 (32%) underwent early surgery, while 35 (33%) of 106 patients in the Dato-DXd + Durva cohort also underwent early surgery. In the NAT with Dato-DXd + Durva, the pCR rate in patients with positive immune markers reached 43% (20/47) and the model pCR rate was as high as 65%, both exceeding the threshold (40%). These findings suggest that in populations with predicted residual cancer burden and positive immune markers, Dato-DXd + Durva significantly improves efficacy. The question remains whether ADCs combined with immunotherapy will eventually replace preoperative immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. The upcoming results from the phase III TROPION-Breast04 study44, which compares Dato-DXd + Durva to paclitaxel + carboplatin + pembrolizumab as a preoperative treatment, will be crucial in answering this question.
Maximizing the therapeutic potential of ADCs is a hot topic, with key research directions including expansion of the eligible patient population, overcoming resistance, and identifying the best combination strategies. The latter direction in particular is attracting significant attention. However, the success of ADC combination strategies to date has been limited, which can lead to the non-specific expression of targets leading to adverse reactions in normal tissues, overlapping toxic reactions, and newly emerging resistance mechanisms. Therefore, future efforts must focus on identifying optimal partners for ADCs, gaining a deeper understanding of the pharmacology, and integrating predictive biomarkers to enhance treatment efficacy.
New ADCs
Less
Following the approval of the first ADC in the early 21st century, the pace of developing ADCs has accelerated significantly. Today, more than 15 ADCs have been approved and > 100 ADCs are in clinical development. The design and development of new ADCs are expected to further refine precision, enhance therapeutic efficacy, and reduce adverse effects.
HER2 ADCs
The results of another exploratory study (ACE-Breast-02) on ARX788, a new type of HER2-targeting ADC, was announced at the 2024 ASCO conference45. The ACE-Breast-02 study included advanced-stage patients who had received two or fewer lines of anticancer therapy. The median PFS in the ARX788 group was 11.33 months, extending the duration by 3.08 months compared to the lapatinib combined with capecitabine group with a 36% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. Although the OS data is not mature, preliminary analysis suggests a trend favoring the ARX788 group. There was no significant difference in treatment-related adverse events between the two groups. In addition, several new HER2-targeting ADCs, such as SHR-A1811, MRG002, and DP303c, are also undergoing clinical trials, the results of which are eagerly awaited.
TROP2 ADCs
TROP2 has emerged as a promising target for ADCs, second only to HER2 in importance. Currently, TROP2 ADCs have also made remarkable progress in the field of breast cancer. One of the representative drugs, Dato-DXd, has achieved statistically and clinically significant PFS results in the phase III TROPION-Breast01 study46. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dato-DXd vs. TPC in patients with HR+ and HER2− inoperable or metastatic breast cancer, offering a potential new treatment option for patients who have developed treatment resistance. Additional safety analysis from the TROPION-Breast01 study was announced at the 2024 European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) BC conference47, showing that the median treatment duration in the Dato-DXd group was longer than the TPC group (6.7 months vs. 4.1 months). Furthermore, the grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event rates, treatment discontinuation due to adverse events, and the overall discontinuation rate were lower than the TPC group, confirming the good safety of Dato-DXd, which is generally controllable in clinical practice. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from the TROPION-Breast01 study, which were disclosed at the 2024 ASCO conference48, showed that the time-to-deterioration of all secondary endpoints was delayed in the Dato-DXd group compared to the TPC group. These data confirmed that Dato-DXd has a potential advantage in improving the quality of life for patients, providing additional references for application in HR-positive and -negative advanced breast cancer.
Sacituzumab tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870) is a new type of TROP2 ADC. The specific data from the phase III OptiTROP-Breast01 study of this drug were reported at the 2024 ASCO conference49. The OptiTROP-Breast01 study assessed the efficacy of SKB264 in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic TNBC who had previously received treatment. The results showed a median PFS of 5.7 months for the SKB264 group compared to 2.3 months for the TPC group. The OS in the SKB264 group was significantly better than the TPC group (HR = 0.53; P = 0.0005) in the first planned interim OS analysis on 30 November 2023. SKB264 may provide a promising new option for second-line treatment of advanced TNBC patients.
HER3 ADCs
HER3-DXd is a HER3-targeting ADC consisting of an anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody (patritumab) and a topoisomerase I inhibitor. HER3-DXd monotherapy in patients with HR+ and HER2− breast cancer with high HER3 expression achieved an ORR of 30.1% and a PFS of 7.4 months in the U31402-A-J101 study50. The ORR was 22.6% with a median PFS of 5.5 months in TNBC, while the ORR reached 42.9% and the median PFS was 11.0 months in HER2+ breast cancer. The data suggest that HER3-DXd demonstrates preliminary anti-tumor efficacy in breast cancer with a low correlation to HER3 expression.
The ICARUS Breast01 study51 presented the efficacy of HER3-DXd in patients with HR+ and HER2− advanced breast cancer after CDK4/6 inhibitor and first-line chemotherapy at the 2024 ESMO conference. The ICARUS Breast01 study reported an ORR of 53.0% and a median PFS of 9.4 months, demonstrating clinically meaningful activity and manageable safety in this population after ≥ 2 lines of therapy.
Nectin-4 ADCs
Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an ADC targeting Nectin-4. The results of the EV-202 study52, which were presented at the 2024 ASCO conference. The EV-202 study evaluated the efficacy of EV monotherapy in the HR+ and HER2− and TNBC breast cancer populations. The confirmed ORRs for the HR+/HER2− and TNBC cohorts were 15.6% and 19.0%, respectively, although these ORRs did not meet the pre-specified ORR thresholds. However, the disease control rates and median PFS for the HR+/HER2− and TNBC breast cancer cohorts were 51.1% and 57.1%, and 5.4 months and 3.5 months, respectively. The overall safety profile of EV was manageable.
Bispecific ADCs
Bispecific ADCs are designed to simultaneously target two different epitopes or molecules, which enables more precise tumor targeting. Data from the phase I JSKN003 clinical study53, a bispecific ADC targeting two HER2 epitopes for the treatment of HER2-expressing solid tumors, was presented at the 2024 ASCO conference. The ORR was 51.1% with a disease control rate was 93.3% among the 45 evaluable subjects. Specifically, the ORR was 73.3% (11/15) in patients with HER2+ breast cancer, while the ORR was 33.3% (3/9) in those with HER2-low-expressing breast cancer. Additionally, bispecific ADCs, such as BL-B01D1, TQB2102, and KM501, are also conducting related clinical trials, the results of which are eagerly anticipated. Bispecific ADCs hold substantial therapeutic potential, especially in overcoming resistance to traditional ADCs, and are expected to have a critical role in future treatment strategies.
Summary
Less
The continuous development and evolution of ADCs are offering increasingly diverse options for the comprehensive treatment of breast cancer, significantly reshaping the current treatment landscape. As an innovative therapy, ADCs have shown immense potential in overcoming the limitations of traditional treatments. ADCs have not only achieved breakthroughs in the management of advanced breast cancer but are also gradually being integrated into the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy. In addition, the precise targeting capabilities of ADCs have driven an update of standards for determining HER2 expression status, providing new treatment options for patients with HER2-low-expressing breast cancer. Although ADCs have shown efficacy as monotherapies, ongoing research is exploring combinations with other treatments, such as large molecule monoclonal antibodies, TKIs, and immunotherapy, to improve treatment outcomes and address drug resistance issues. Moreover, new types of ADCs are being developed that aim to further enhance both efficacy and safety. In summary, the development of ADCs provides new strategies for the treatment of breast cancer, promising to improve patient prognosis and quality of life.
Funding
Less
  • This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81672638).
References
Less
1.
Bray F,Laversanne M,Sung H,Ferlay J,Siegel RL,Soerjomataram I, et al.Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.CA Cancer J Clin.2024; 74: 229–63.
2.
Joubert N,Beck A,Dumontet C,Denevault-Sabourin C.Antibody-drug conjugates: the last decade.Pharmaceuticals (Basel).2020; 13: 245.
3.
Schlam I,Moges R,Morganti S,Tolaney SM,Tarantino P.Next-generation antibody-drug conjugates for breast cancer: moving beyond HER2 and TROP2.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol.2023; 190: 104090.
4.
Verma S,Miles D,Gianni L,Krop IE,Welslau M,Baselga J, et al.Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer.N Engl J Med.2012; 367: 1783–9.
5.
Hurvitz SA,Hegg R,Chung WP,Im SA,Jacot W,Ganju V, et al.Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet.2023; 401: 105–17.
6.
Harbeck N,Ciruelos E,Jerusalem G,Müller V,Niikura N,Viale G, et al.Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with or without brain metastases: a phase 3b/4 trial.Nat Med.2024; 30: 3717–27.
7.
Rugo HS,Bardia A,Marmé F,Cortés J,Schmid P,Loirat D, et al.Overall survival with sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TROPiCS-02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.Lancet.2023; 402: 1423–33.
8.
Bardia A,Rugo HS,Tolaney SM,Loirat D,Punie K,Oliveira M, et al.Final results from the randomized phase III ASCENT clinical trial in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and association of outcomes by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 expression.J Clin Oncol.2024; 42: 1738–44.
9.
Xu B,Wang S,Yan M,Sohn J,Li W,Tang J, et al.Sacituzumab govitecan in HR+HER2− metastatic breast cancer: the randomized phase 3 EVER-132-002 trial.Nat Med.2024; 30: 3709–16.
10.
Xu B,Ma F,Wang T,Wang S,Tong Z,Li W, et al.A phase IIb, single arm, multicenter trial of sacituzumab govitecan in Chinese patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who received at least two prior treatments.Int J Cancer.2023; 152: 2134–44.
11.
von Minckwitz G,Huang CS,Mano MS,Loibl S,Mamounas EP,Untch M, et al.Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer.N Engl J Med.2019; 380: 617–28.
12.
Daiichi Sankyo.A study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in high-risk HER2-positive participants with residual invasive breast cancer following neoadjuvant therapy (DESTINY-Breast05) [ClinicalTrials.gov ID].Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04622319, 2024.
13.
Gianni L,Pienkowski T,Im YH,Tseng LM,Liu MC,Lluch A, et al.5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial.Lancet Oncol.2016; 17: 791–800.
14.
AstraZeneca.Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) alone or in sequence with THP, versus standard treatment (ddAC-THP), in HER2-positive early breast cancer [ClinicalTrials.gov ID].Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05113251, 2024.
15.
Spring LM,Tolaney SM,Fell G,Bossuyt V,Abelman RO,Wu B, et al.Response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan for localized triple-negative breast cancer: results from the NeoSTAR trial.Ann Oncol.2024; 35: 293–301.
16.
Modi S,Jacot W,Yamashita T,Sohn J,Vidal M,Tokunaga E, et al.Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer.N Engl J Med.2022; 387: 9–20.
17.
Bardia A,Hu X,Dent R,Yonemori K,Barrios CH,O’Shaughnessy JA, et al.Trastuzumab deruxtecan after endocrine therapy in metastatic breast cancer.N Engl J Med.2024; 391: 2110–22.
18.
Dieci MV,Miglietta F,Griguolo G,Guarneri V.Biomarkers for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: beyond hormone receptors.Cancer Treat Rev.2020; 88: 102064.
19.
Koyama K,Ishikawa H,Abe M,Shiose Y,Ueno S,Qiu Y, et al.Patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd), a novel HER3 directed antibody drug conjugate, exhibits in vitro activity against breast cancer cells expressing HER3 mutations with and without HER2 overexpression.PLoS One.2022; 17: e0267027.
20.
Alves FR,Gil L,Vasconcelos de Matos L,Baleiras A,Vasques C,Neves MT, et al.Impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low status in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.Cureu.2022; 14: e22330.
21.
Tarantino P,Jin Q,Tayob N,Jeselsohn RM,Schnitt SJ,Vincuilla J, et al.Prognostic and biologic significance of ERBB2-low expression in early-stage breast cancer.JAMA Oncol.2022; 8: 1177–83.
22.
Cherifi F,Da Silva A,Johnson A,Blanc-Fournier C,Abramovici O,Broyelle A, et al.HELENA: HER2-Low as a prEdictive factor of response to Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eArly breast cancer.BMC Cancer.2022; 22: 1081.
23.
Filho OM,Viale G,Stein S,Trippa L,Yardley DA,Mayer IA, et al.Impact of HER2 heterogeneity on treatment response of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: phase II neoadjuvant clinical trial of T-DM1 combined with pertuzumab.Cancer Discov.2021; 11: 2474–87.
24.
Phillips GD,Fields CT,Li G,Dowbenko D,Schaefer G,Miller K, et al.Dual targeting of HER2-positive cancer with trastuzumab emtansine and pertuzumab: critical role for neuregulin blockade in antitumor response to combination therapy.Clin Cancer Res.2014; 20: 456–68.
25.
Bon G,Pizzuti L,Laquintana V,Loria R,Porru M,Marchiò C, et al.Loss of HER2 and decreased T-DM1 efficacy in HER2 positive advanced breast cancer treated with dual HER2 blockade: the SePHER study.J Exp Clin Cancer Res.2020; 39: 279.
26.
Mosele F,Deluche E,Lusque A,Le Bescond L,Filleron T,Pradat Y, et al.Trastuzumab deruxtecan in metastatic breast cancer with variable HER2 expression: the phase 2 DAISY trial.Nat Med.2023; 29: 2110–20.
27.
Sung M,Tan X,Lu B,Golas J,Hosselet C,Wang F, et al.Caveolae-mediated endocytosis as a novel mechanism of resistance to trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).Mol Cancer Ther.2018; 17: 243–53.
28.
Nilsson MB,Poteete A,Udagawa H,Yu XX,He JQ,Le XN, et al.Trastuzumab deruxtecan resistance is associated with reduced responsiveness to topoisomerase inhibitors (payload resistance) but no reduction in sensitivity to HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors. 2023 AACR.Cancer Res. 2023; 83: Abstract 383.
29.
Coates JT,Sun S,Leshchiner I,Thimmiah N,Martin EE,McLoughlin D, et al.Parallel genomic alterations of antigen and payload targets mediate polyclonal acquired clinical resistance to sacituzumab govitecan in triple-negative breast cancer.Cancer Discov.2021; 11: 2436–45.
30.
López-Miranda E,Pérez-García JM,Di Cosimo S,Brain E,Ravnik M,Escrivá-de-Romaní S, et al.Trastuzumab emtansine plus non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (Thelma): a single-arm, multicenter, phase Ib trial.Cancers (Basel).2020; 12: 3509.
31.
Krop IE,Modi S,LoRusso PM,Pegram M,Guardino E,Althaus B, et al.Phase 1b/2a study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), paclitaxel, and pertuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res.2016; 18: 34.
32.
Krop IE,Im SA,Barrios C,Bonnefoi H,Gralow J,Toi M, et al.Trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab versus taxane plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab after anthracycline for high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive early breast cancer: the phase Ⅲ KAITLIN study.J Clin Oncol.2022; 40: 438–48.
33.
Hurvitz SA,Martin M,Jung KH,Huang CS,Harbeck N,Valero V, et al.Neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine and pertuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: three-year outcomes from the phase III KRISTINE study.J Clin Oncol.2019; 37: 2206–16.
34.
Perez EA,Barrios C,Eiermann W,Toi M,Im YH,Conte P, et al.Trastuzumab emtansine with or without pertuzumab versus trastuzumab with taxane for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: final results from MARIANNE.Cancer.2019; 125: 3974–84.
35.
Andre F,Hamilton EP,Loi S,Anders CK,Schmid P,Stroyakovskiy D, et al.DESTINY-Breast07: dose-expansion interim analysis of T-DXd monotherapy and T-DXd + pertuzumab in patients with previously untreated HER2+ mBC. 2024 ASCO.J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42: Abstract 1009.
36.
AstraZeneca.Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with or without pertuzumab versus taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (DESTINY-Breast09) [ClinicalTrials.gov ID].Available https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04784715, 2024.
37.
Hurvitz S,Loi S,O’shaughnessy J,Okines A,Tolaney S,Sohn JH, et al.HER2CLIMB-02: randomized, double-blind phase 3 trial of tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine for previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.2024; 84: SABCS GS01-10.
38.
Freedman RA,Heiling HM,Li T,Trapani D,Tayob N,Smith KL, et al.Neratinib and ado-trastuzumab-emtansine for pre-treated and untreated HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases: Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium Trial 022.Ann Oncol.2024; 35: 993–1002.
39.
Emens LA,Esteva FJ,Beresford M,Saura C,De Laurentiis M,Kim SB, et al.Trastuzumab emtansine plus atezolizumab versus trastuzumab emtansine plus placebo in previously treated, HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (KATE2): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial.Lancet Oncol.2020; 21: 1283–95.
40.
Roche HL.A study of trastuzumab emtansine in combination with atezolizumab or placebo as a treatment for participants with human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive locally advanced (LABC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (KATE3) [ClinicalTrials.gov ID].Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04740918, 2024.
41.
Garido-Castrot AC,Kim SE,Desrosiers J,Nanda R,Carey LA,Clark AS, et al.SACI-0 HR+: a randomized phase II trial of sacituzumab govitecan with or without pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. 2024 ASCO.J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42: Abstract LBA1004.
42.
Khoury K,Meisel JL,Yau C,Rugo HS,Nanda R,Davidian M, et al.Datopotamab-deruxtecan in early-stage breast cancer: the sequential multiple assignment randomized I-SPY2.2 phase 2 trial.Nat Med.2024; 30: 3728–36.
43.
Shatsky RA,Trivedi MS,Yau C,Nanda R,Rugo HS,Davidian M, et al.Datopotamab-deruxtecan plus durvalumab in early-stage breast cancer: the sequential multiple assignment randomized I-SPY2.2 phase 2 trial.Nat Med.2024; 30: 3737–47.
44.
AstraZeneca.A phase III randomised study to evaluate Dato-DXd and durvalumab for neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment of triple-negative or hormone receptor-low/HER2-negative breast cancer [ClinicalTrials.gov ID].Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06112379, 2024.
45.
Hu XC,Wang LP,Zhang J,Zhang QY,Ouyang QC,Wang XJ, et al.ACE-Breast-02: a pivotal phase II/III trial of ARX788, a novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), versus lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC). 2024 ASCO.J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42: Abstract 1020.
46.
Bardia A,Jhaveri K,Im SA,Pernas S,De Laurentiis M,Wang S, et al.Datopotamab deruxtecan versus chemotherapy in previously treated inoperable/metastatic hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer: primary results from TROPION-Breast01.J Clin Oncol.2025; 43: 285–96.
47.
Jhaveri K,Bardia A,Im S,Simon SP,Laurentiis MD,Wang S, et al.LBA2 – Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs chemotherapy (CT) in pretreated, inoperable/metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer (BC): additional safety analysis from TROPION-Breast01. 2024 ESMO BC.Ann Oncol.2024; 9: 1–47.
48.
Pernas S,Im S,Hattori M,Xu BH,Wang SS,Lu YS, et al.Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs chemotherapy in previously treated inoperable or metastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from theTROPION-Breast01 study. 2024 ASCO.J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42: Abstract 1006.
49.
Xu BH,Yin YM,Fan Y,Ouyang QC,Song LH,Wang XJ, et al.Sacituzumab tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870) in patients (pts) with previously treated locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): results from the phase III OptiTROP-Breast01 study. 2024 ASCO.J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42: Abstract 104.
50.
Krop IE,Masuda N,Mukohara T,Takahashi S,Nakayama T,Inoue K, et al.Patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd), a human epidermal growth factor receptor 3-directed antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with previously treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 3-expressing metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, phase I/II trial.J Clin Oncol.2023; 41: 5550–60.
51.
Pistilli B,Ibrahimi N,Lacroix-Triki M,Vicier C,Frenel JS,D’Hondt V, et al.340O – Efficacy, safety and biomarker analysis of ICARUS-BREAST01: a phase 2 study of patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC). 2024 ESMO.Ann Oncol.2024; 35: S357–405.
52.
Giordano A,Awan AA,Bruce JY,Rugo HS,Diamond JR,Novik Y, et al.Enfortumab vedotin in the HR+/HER2− and triple-negative breast cancer cohorts of EV-202. 2024 ASCO.J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42: Abstract 1005.
53.
Liu XJ,Zhang J,Shen L,Liu JQ,Huang J,Zhuang ZX, et al.Evaluation of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of JSKN003 in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I/II clinical study. 2024 ASCO.J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42: Abstract 3031.
Appendix
Less
Year 2025 volume 22 Issue 2
PDF
4
2
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0486
  • Receive Date：2024-11-01
  • Online Date：2026-11-06
  • Published：2025-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2024-11-01
  • Accepted：2025-01-17
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81672638).
Affiliations
    1Breast Cancer Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
    2Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300202, China
    3Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan 271016, China
    4Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre PhD Programme, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK

Corresponding:

Correspondence to: Pengfei Qiu, E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cbm/EN/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0486
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House