Amino acids shape the metabolic and immunologic landscape in the tumor immune microenvironment: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies

Amino acids shape the metabolic and immunologic landscape in the tumor immune microenvironment: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies

PDF

Ziyou Lin¹^,², Chang Chang¹^,², Shuyu Zhao¹^,², Lan Fang¹, Ping Wang¹

Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2025, 22(7) : 726 - 746

Less

Cancer Biology & Medicine | 2025, 22(7): 726-746

• Review •

Amino acids shape the metabolic and immunologic landscape in the tumor immune microenvironment: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies

Full

Ziyou Lin¹^,², Chang Chang¹^,², Shuyu Zhao¹^,², Lan Fang¹, Ping Wang¹

Affiliations

¹Tongji University Cancer Center, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China

²School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China

About Author:

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the analysis: Lan Fang, Ping Wang.

Wrote the paper: Ziyou Lin, Chang Chang, Shuyu Zhao.

Figure preparation: Ziyou Lin, Chang Chang.

Published: 2025-07-15 doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0115

Outline

Abstract

Less

The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) represents a complex battlefield where metabolic competition and immune evasion mechanisms converge to drive cancer progression. Amino acids, with their multifaceted biological roles, have emerged as pivotal regulators of tumor cell proliferation and immune cell functionality. The sensing mechanisms by which amino acids within the tumor microenvironment influence cellular growth, survival, and immune function are systematically explored in this review; the latest advances in understanding amino acid metabolism in tumor biology are also reviewed. In addition, the multifaceted roles of key amino acids in shaping the TIME with particular emphasis on tumor immunity and malignant growth were investigated. Finally, emerging therapeutic strategies targeting amino acid metabolism to reprogram the TIME are discussed, highlighting promising approaches, such as CAR-T cell therapy and engineered bacterial interventions. Through this comprehensive analysis, critical insights into future research directions and potential clinical translation of amino acid-targeted interventions are provided.

Key words

Tumor microenvironment (TME) / amino acid sensing / amino acid metabolism / metabolic reprogramming / immunotherapy

Cite this Article

Ziyou Lin, Chang Chang, Shuyu Zhao, Lan Fang, Ping Wang. Amino acids shape the metabolic and immunologic landscape in the tumor immune microenvironment: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies[J]. Cancer Biology & Medicine, 2025 , 22 (7) : 726 -746 . DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0115

Full Text

Less

Introduction

Less

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a complex and dynamic ecosystem where the interactions between cancer cells, immune cells, and various molecular signals determine the trajectory of cancer progression and the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions¹. Within this intricate network, amino acids serve multiple essential roles, ranging from nutrient supply and metabolic regulation to signal transduction and immune modulation². These functions position amino acids as key elements in tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis.

In addition to serving as building blocks for protein synthesis, amino acids are deeply involved in metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming within tumors. The influence of amino acids extends to shaping the immune landscape of the TME, making amino acids crucial for understanding cancer biology³. Tumor cells meet the heightened demands of rapid proliferation and adjust to the often nutrient-depleted conditions of the TME by reprogramming metabolic pathways. While amino acids are traditionally recognized for metabolic roles, the ability of amino acids to modulate immune responses within the TME has gained increasing attention. Recent studies have illuminated how amino acids affect immune cell function, alter tumor progression, and even serve as targets for innovative cancer therapies. Mechanisms that sense and respond to amino acid levels, such as the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and amino acid transporters, act as central hubs that integrate metabolic and immunologic signals⁴. These sensing pathways enable cells within the TME to adapt to nutrient-scarce conditions, ultimately influencing survival, growth, and immune cell behavior.

Traditional strategies, such as dietary modulation of amino acids or direct inhibition of amino acid metabolic enzymes, have shown some clinical efficacy. However, these approaches often face obstacles, such as variable response rates and insufficient specificity⁵. Recent advances have focused on more sophisticated interventions to overcome these challenges. Emerging strategies now aim to exploit the reliance of tumor cells on some amino acids and metabolic pathways^6,7. These approaches seek to disrupt tumor metabolic adaptations, boost anti-tumor immunity, or achieve both simultaneously by targeting amino acid transport, metabolism, or sensing mechanisms.

A comprehensive overview of the latest findings on amino acid sensing and the roles of amino acid sensing in the TME is provided in this review. How these molecules influence tumor cell survival and immune cell function are explored, offering insights into the dual contributions to tumor growth and immune suppression. In addition, the most recent clinical research efforts aimed at targeting amino acid metabolism to enhance anti-tumor immunity are highlighted. Finally, the challenges facing amino acid-based cancer therapies are discussed, potential solutions are proposed, and future directions for research and clinical application are suggested. By integrating these findings, we hope to illuminate new therapeutic avenues and guide the development of combination treatments that harness the power of amino acid targeting to improve cancer outcomes.

Amino acid sensing in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME)

Less

Amino acids serve as metabolic substrates and function as key signaling molecules that influence tumor cell behavior and the surrounding immune microenvironment. Understanding the interplay between amino acid sensing and signaling pathways holds promise for unraveling novel therapeutic targets and strategies in cancer immunotherapy and metabolic modulation.

Amino acid metabolism is regulated by several intricate signaling pathways that have a crucial role in tumor progression, immune modulation, and metabolic reprogramming. These pathways ensure that tumor cells adapt to fluctuating nutrient levels and hostile microenvironments, while also influencing immune responses in the TME. The roles of the mTOR pathway, HIF-1α, and MYC in amino acid sensing and the impact on tumor metabolism and immune evasion were therefore explored.

mTOR pathway and amino acid sensing

The mTOR pathway is a central regulator of cell growth, metabolism, and survival, integrating signals from nutrients, growth factors, and cellular energy status. Among the two distinct complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2), mTORC1 has the more prominent role in sensing amino acids. Amino acids, particularly leucine, methionine, threonine and arginine, are key signals for mTORC1 activation, which enables tumor cells to adjust metabolism according to nutrient availability. The sensing of these amino acids involves complex mechanisms, which enable mTORC1 to respond to fluctuations in amino acid levels and modulate various cellular processes, including protein synthesis, autophagy, and cell growth (Figure 1).

mTORC1 is primarily regulated by Rag GTPases, which mediate the detection of leucine, methionine, and threonine, and by CASTOR proteins, which sense arginine⁸. Leucine is detected by leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LRS), Sestrin2, and SAR1B, which interact with GATOR2, relieving GATOR1-mediated inhibition of mTORC1^9–11. Methionine availability is linked to SAMTOR, which regulates mTORC1 via S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) levels¹². Under low arginine conditions, CASTOR proteins interact with the GATOR1 complex, leading to inhibition of mTORC1⁸. Conversely, high arginine levels disrupt CASTOR-GATOR1 interactions, allowing mTORC1 activation¹³. Additionally, the lysosomal transporter, SLC38A9, which is responsible for the uptake of amino acids (e.g., arginine and glutamine) and directly regulates mTORC1 by interacting with Rag GTPases^13,14. When arginine levels rise in the lysosome, SLC38A9 activates mTORC1 via Rag GTPase signaling, facilitating cell growth and metabolic reprogramming. TM4SF5, which was discovered in 2019, binds free L-arginine in the lysosome and interacts with mTOR, forming a complex with SLC38A9 to activate mTOR/S6K1 signaling. Cells lacking TM4SF5 fail to phosphorylate ribosomal protein S6 kinase beta-1 (S6K1) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1)¹⁵. Both S6K1 and 4EBP1 are classical downstream targets of mTORC1 that regulate mRNA translation, protein synthesis, and cell proliferation. High TM4SF5 expression in liver cancer suggests a role in mTOR/S6K1 activation during cancer progression or recurrence¹⁶. Leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LARS) has been identified as a leucine sensor mediating the mTORC1 pathway. Recent studies have identified mitochondrial seryl-tRNA synthetase 2 (TARS2) as a novel threonine sensor. When bound to threonine, TARS2 interacts with inactive Rag GTPases (especially GTP-RagC), which promotes GTP loading of RagA and subsequent mTORC1 activation. TARS2 regulates cell proliferation and mRNA translation in a threonine-dependent manner through this mechanism¹⁷. This intricate regulation of mTORC1 through amino acid sensing ensures that tumor cells maintain optimal metabolic conditions for survival and proliferation, linking nutrient availability to tumor progression.

The MYC family of oncogenes (c-Myc, N-Myc, and L-Myc) has a pivotal role in driving tumor growth by reprogramming cellular metabolism, especially amino acid metabolism. MYC enhances the expression of multiple amino acid transporters and metabolic enzymes, ensuring a sufficient supply of nutrients to meet the demands of rapidly proliferating tumor cells. Notably, MYC-induced upregulation of transporters, such as SLC7A5, increases the uptake of large neutral amino acids (e.g., leucine), which in turn activates the mTORC1 pathway and promotes protein synthesis. This metabolic adaptation supports sustained tumor cell growth and survival under nutrient-limited conditions¹⁸. This metabolic adaptation creates a feed-forward loop because increased amino acid influx further activates mTORC1 signaling. Additionally, MYC regulates glutamine metabolism by enhancing glutaminase (GLS) activity, which provides essential metabolic intermediates for the TCA cycle¹⁹. Understanding the interplay between mTOR and MYC in amino acid sensing reveals therapeutic opportunities to disrupt tumor metabolism and boost anti-tumor immunity, offering novel strategies for cancer treatment.

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and cystine sensing

Cysteine exists primarily as cystine, a disulfide-bonded dipeptide, in the oxidizing extracellular environment. The cystine/glutamate antiporter, xCT, mediates cystine uptake in exchange for intracellular glutamate with cystine undergoing rapid reduction to cysteine by NADPH inside the cell²⁰. Several key proteins regulate xCT expression, including mutant KRAS, p53, and BAP1, highlighting the crucial role of cysteine in tumorigenesis^21–23.

CARS, a tRNA synthetase, has been identified as a cysteine sensor that directly influences AMPK activation. CARS interacts with AMPKγ2 when cysteine levels drop, facilitating AMPK activation through upstream kinases, like CaMKK2. This activation helps cells adapt to cysteine deprivation by promoting catabolic processes that generate energy and suppressing anabolic processes that require cysteine. In nutrient-stressed conditions, such as exist in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells, AMPK activation by CARS supports cell survival. By linking amino acid sensing to energy balance and metabolic reprogramming, the CARS-AMPK axis provides a crucial adaptive mechanism for cancer cells under cysteine-limited conditions²⁴. Additionally, EglN1 functions as another cysteine sensor, modulating HIF activity in response to cysteine levels. When intracellular cysteine levels drop, EglN1 undergoes oxidative self-inactivation, which prevents normal functioning of prolyl-hydroxylating HIF1α²⁵.

Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs) and SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP)

SREBPs are transcription factors best known for a role in lipid metabolism but SREBPs are also influenced by amino acid availability, especially glutamine. SCAP acts as a sensor that monitors intracellular glutamine levels. SCAP facilitates the activation of SREBPs when glutamine levels are sufficient, which promotes the transcription of genes involved in lipid synthesis. This connection between glutamine and lipid metabolism is especially important in cancer cells, where increased glutamine metabolism supports bioenergetic needs and membrane synthesis for rapidly proliferating cells. By coupling amino acid sensing to lipid biosynthesis, the SCAP-SREBP axis highlights a unique metabolic adaptation strategy in tumor cells²⁶.

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)

AhR functions as a receptor and sensor for tryptophan-derived metabolites, such as kynurenine (Kyn). AhR translocates to the nucleus upon binding to these metabolites, where AhR influences gene expression patterns that modulate immune responses²⁷. Tryptophan catabolism via the Kyn pathway generates metabolites that engage AhR in the TME, which promotes regulatory T cell (Treg) differentiation and the expression of immunosuppressive cytokines²⁸. This sensing mechanism effectively helps tumors evade immune surveillance by reshaping the immune landscape. AhR also regulates genes involved in oxidative stress responses, cellular metabolism, and even vascularization, making AhR a multifaceted sensor that integrates metabolic cues with immune and environmental signals²⁹.

Lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase (LCK)

LCK is a novel amino acid sensor in the tumor immune microenvironment. LCK, primarily known for its role in T-cell receptor signaling, has emerged as a direct sensor for arginine, establishing a previously unknown link between amino acid availability and immune cell activation. This kinase undergoes specific conformational changes upon arginine binding, leading to distinct phosphorylation patterns at Tyr394 and Tyr505 residues. The resulting enhanced LCK activity amplifies TCR signaling cascade, thereby modulating T-cell responses in the TME¹⁹.

Human histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)

HDAC6 is a unique member of the HDAC family, primarily regulating non-histone protein deacetylation with key roles in cellular stress responses, cytoskeletal dynamics, and protein homeostasis. Unlike nuclear HDACs, HDAC6 mainly functions in the cytoplasm but the localization and activity are dynamically regulated by environmental cues³⁰. Recent studies identify HDAC6 as a valine sensor, linking amino acid availability to epigenetic regulation and DNA damage responses. HDAC6 directly binds valine through its SE14 repeat domain unlike traditional amino acid sensors (e.g., mTORC1 and GCN2), regulating nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling. HDAC6 accumulates in the nucleus under valine deprivation, where HDAC6 deacetylates TET2, promoting DNA demethylation and damage via thymine DNA glycosylase. Functionally, dietary valine restriction suppresses tumor growth in xenograft models and enhances PARP inhibitor efficacy³¹.

General control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) pathway

GCN2 is a serine/threonine-protein kinase that has a pivotal role in cellular adaptation to amino acid deprivation³². When amino acids are scarce, uncharged tRNAs accumulate and bind to the GCN2 HisRS-like domain, triggering activation. Once active, GCN2 phosphorylates eIF2α and reduces global protein translation to conserve resources, while selectively enhancing the expression of stress response genes. This translational control allows cells to maintain homeostasis and survive periods of nutrient stress. Beyond translation inhibition, GCN2 modulates metabolic pathways, autophagy, and even immune responses, making GCN2 a central sensor that integrates amino acid availability with broader cellular adaptive programs³³.

Sensor-unknown amino acids inducing signal transduction in TIME

While the sensing mechanisms of amino acids, such as arginine, leucine, and methionine, in activating the mTORC1 pathway are well-established, emerging evidence suggests that several other amino acids, the specific sensors of which remain unidentified, also have critical roles in regulating signaling within the TIME. These amino acids may modulate cellular metabolism, transcriptional networks, and immune cell interactions through as-yet undefined signaling pathways.

Proline

Proline has been implicated in tumor cell signal transduction, especially under metabolic stress conditions. Proline biosynthesis is primarily regulated by the enzyme, pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase 1 (PYCR1), the expression of which is upregulated in response to proline precursor deprivation. PYCR1 is frequently overexpressed in invasive breast carcinoma and other aggressive tumors, supporting cancer cell proliferation and redox balance. Knockdown of PYCR1 significantly suppresses tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, indicating that proline metabolism may act as a critical regulator of oncogenic signaling under stress conditions^34–36.

Serine

Similarly, serine deprivation has been shown to exert profound effects on tumor cell signaling. In addition to metabolic functions, limiting serine availability has been shown to enhance cancer treatment efficacy when combined with dietary serine and glycine restriction³⁷. Moreover, serine deprivation increases the antitumor activity of biguanides through specific signaling mechanisms, while also inducing cellular stress responses and activating p53-dependent pathways, ultimately leading to metabolic reprogramming^38,39. Serine deprivation triggers p53-mediated activation of the p21 axis in tumor cells, shifting metabolic flux from nucleotide biosynthesis to glutathione production, thereby enhancing antioxidant capacity. p53 can limit non-specific CD4⁺ T cell proliferation in T cells and modulate immune responses under metabolic stress, suggesting that serine metabolism is tightly linked to immune cell function beyond tumor-intrinsic effects⁴⁰. Although much of the existing research on serine depletion has focused on metabolic consequences, further investigation is needed to uncover direct roles in tumor cell signaling.

Other amino acids, such as histidine, have been proposed to influence immune or tumor cell behavior in the TIME, although the sensing mechanisms and downstream signaling have not been established⁴¹. Preliminary studies suggest that these amino acids may regulate redox state, metabolic flux, or epigenetic remodeling⁴². Identifying the molecular sensors and signaling networks of these underexplored amino acids is critical. Uncovering how these amino acids mediate immune regulation, tumor progression, and therapy response may provide novel targets for metabolic intervention in cancer.

Amino acids shape the tumor metabolic landscape

Less

Amino acids, in addition to traditional roles as building blocks of proteins, have a central role in shaping the molecular landscape of tumor cells. Metabolism of amino acids is closely linked to epigenetic modifications, transcriptional regulation, redox balance, and adaptive stress responses. By influencing key regulatory pathways, amino acids enable cancer cells to survive in nutrient-deprived environments, evade immune surveillance, and maintain rapid proliferation.

Epigenetic and transcriptional regulation in tumor cells

Amino acid metabolism (especially methionine metabolism) has a key role in shaping the epigenetic and transcriptional landscape of tumor cells. Methionine-derived SAM serves as a methyl donor for DNA and histone methylation. Elevated MAT2A activity boosts SAM levels, which promotes oncogene activation and silences tumor suppressors. Inhibiting methionine cycling reduces histone methylation, which leads to cell cycle arrest and senescence⁴³.

Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) also influence epigenetic regulation. Overexpression of BCAT1 in cancers, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and gliomas, lowers α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), which impairs dioxygenase activity and leads to hypermethylation of DNA and histones. This epigenetic modulation supports tumor growth. In IDH-mutant glioblastomas, BCAT1 promoter hypermethylation suppresses transcription, whereas hypomethylation in hepatocellular carcinoma upregulates transcription⁴⁴.

Serine and threonine also connect amino acid metabolism to epigenetic and transcriptional regulation. Serine supports one-carbon metabolism and nucleotide biosynthesis with ATF4 driving serine synthesis pathway (SSP) gene expression under stress conditions⁴⁵. ATF3, induced by ATF4, amplifies this transcriptional response, enabling tumor growth under nutrient deprivation⁴⁵. Threonine metabolism modifies N⁶-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (t⁶A) tRNA via YRDC, which enhances oncogenic transcript translation and maintains the transcriptional landscape needed for proliferation⁴⁶.

Phenylalanine serves as a precursor to tyrosine and has been implicated in cancer metabolism⁴⁷. Recent studies have revealed that genetic alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma GSTZ1 lead to succinylacetone accumulation, a byproduct of phenylalanine/tyrosine metabolism. This process activates the NRF2/IGF1R axis and inhibits tumor cell apoptosis⁴⁸. Cancer cells adopt a W > F codon switch under tryptophan depletion by substituting phenylalanine for tryptophan. These substitutions are enriched across cancers and linked to elevated IDO1 expression, oncogenic signaling, and immune microenvironment remodeling⁴⁹.

In addition to these epigenetic effects, amino acid metabolism is tightly regulated at the transcriptional level. Transcription factors, such as hypoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIFs), c-Myc, and activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), coordinate cellular responses to metabolic stress. HIF-1α and HIF-2α upregulates amino acid transporters and metabolic enzymes under hypoxia, securing a steady nutrient supply⁵⁰. In addition, ATF4 activates genes related to amino acid biosynthesis and stress responses during nutrient deprivation, which enhances cellular resilience⁵¹. These epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms highlight how amino acid metabolism drives tumor growth, survival, and immune evasion by reprogramming chromatin, altering methylation, and shaping gene expression networks.

Antioxidant defense and stress response by amino acids

Amino acids have a pivotal role in maintaining redox balance and responding to cellular stress. Methionine acts as an endogenous antioxidant, effectively scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitigating oxidative stress⁵². Similarly, cysteine contributes to glutathione (GSH) synthesis, supporting cellular redox stability and protecting against oxidative damage⁵³. The cystine/glutamate antiporter, SLC7A11, facilitates cysteine import for GSH biosynthesis, although SLC7A11 expression can be downregulated by interferon-gamma (IFNγ) from CD8+ T cells, leading to lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in tumor cells⁵⁴. Additionally, tryptophan metabolites, such as serotonin (5-HT) and 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid (3-HA), function as radical-trapping antioxidants (RTAs), eliminating lipid peroxidation and preventing cellular ferroptosis⁵⁵. The cysteine–GSH–GPX4–ferroptosis axis is vital for redox balance and ferroptosis regulation in the TIME. Cysteine supports GSH synthesis, which sustains GPX4 activity to prevent lipid peroxidation. Cysteine depletion or GPX4 inhibition induces ferroptosis, especially in tumors dependent on SLC7A11-mediated cystine uptake for survival^56,57.

Proline, another key amino acid, has been increasingly recognized for a role in cancer metabolism and stress adaptation. Proline biosynthesis enzymes sense environmental stresses and participate in metabolic signaling. Hypoxia can drive phosphorylation of pyrroline-5-carpoxylate reductase-1 (PYCR1) by insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) in the nucleus, helping cells avoid growth arrest⁵⁸. Proline degradation, catalyzed by proline dehydrogenase (PRODH), generates ROS that upregulate inflammatory genes, such as CXCL1, LCN2, and IL17C, and causes DNA damage⁵⁹. This ROS-mediated signaling, supported by the LSH-p53-PRODH axis, contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), inflammatory signaling, and tumor progression in non-small cell lung cancer⁶⁰.

In summary, these amino acids support tumor growth through common mechanisms, including metabolic reprogramming, regulation of key signaling pathways, epigenetic modifications, immune modulation, antioxidant defense, stress response, and genetic adaptation. These processes underscore the critical roles in cancer metabolism and highlight potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Metabolic tug-of-war: amino acids in the TIME

Less

The TIME is comprised of tumor cells, immune cells, and stromal components that form a network crucial for tumor progression and immunotherapy response⁶¹. Amino acids serve essential metabolic functions and regulate immune responses within this environment. Competition for amino acids between tumor and immune cells significantly drives immune evasion⁶². Tumor cells often outcompete immune cells for uptake of critical amino acids, leading to nutrient depletion in the TME. This depletion hinders the function of immune cells, particularly effector T cells (Teffs) and antigen-presenting cells (APCs), thereby contributing to immune suppression and tumor progression⁶³. The availability and metabolism of specific amino acids in the TME influence tumor growth, immune modulation, and immune escape mechanisms (Figure 2). To provide a structured overview of how key amino acids influence T cell metabolism and function within the TIME, the corresponding transporters and downstream signaling pathways are summarized in Table 1. This summary serves as a foundation for the detailed discussion below, in which the roles of several key amino acids in shaping the TIME and the impact on tumor and immune cell functions are explored.

Glutamine and glutamate

Glutamine is one of the most abundant amino acids in the body and has a critical role in cellular metabolism. Glutamine metabolism is extensively reprogrammed to support rapid cell division and tumor growth in the TME. To meet high metabolic demands, tumor cells upregulate glutamine transporters, such as SLC1A5, facilitating increased glutamine uptake⁶⁵. This process ensures a constant intracellular supply of glutamine, which is essential for biosynthetic pathways and maintaining oxidative stress resistance.

Glutamine is converted to glutamate by glutaminase (GLS), which fuels the TCA cycle, supports protein synthesis, and maintains redox balance via glutathione (GSH) production. Tumor cells rely on glutamine-derived glutamate to sustain anaplerosis and rapid proliferation⁶⁶. Although glutamine also supports T cell function, inhibiting glutamine metabolism can paradoxically enhance T cell antitumor activity⁶⁷. This finding may stem from a tumor cell glutamine addiction, making tumors more vulnerable to glutamine deprivation. Differential MAPK/ERK pathway activation in tumors and T cells likely influences glutamine dependence^68,69. Notably, the glutamine transporter inhibitor, V-9302, selectively blocks glutamine uptake in TNBC cells without affecting CD8⁺ T cells, thereby boosting GSH synthesis and effector function. These findings support tumor-selective glutamine metabolism inhibition as a promising strategy for TNBC immunotherapy⁶⁷.

In addition a role in fueling the TCA cycle, glutamate also has a critical role in immune regulation. Tumor cells exploit the glutamine axis to regulate glutamate levels in the TME, thereby limiting the availability of glutamate for immune cells⁷⁰. T cells depend on glutamine metabolism for optimal activation and effector function; glutamine scarcity weakens the ability to mount an effective anti-tumor response⁷¹. This reduction in glutamate disrupts the redox balance in these cells, impairing the ability to generate ROS. Glutamate signaling has a dual role in immune regulation, as follows: glutamate enhances T cell activation and proliferation via glutamate receptors; and reduces the immunosuppressive function of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)⁷².

Glutamine metabolism influences immune checkpoint expression on tumor cells. Glutamine deprivation activates the EGFR/ERK/c-Jun and NF-κB pathways, upregulating PD-L1 expression⁷³. Interestingly, another study revealed that limiting glutamine consumption by tumor cells increases tumor PD-L1 expression, a process linked to reduced intracellular GSH levels. Because glutamine is a key precursor for GSH synthesis, glutamine restriction leads to lower GSH levels, which in turn inhibits the activity of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺-ATPase (SERCA) and activates the NF-κB signaling pathway. This cascade of events triggers PD-L1 induction, ultimately suppressing T cell function. Notably, combining glutamine inhibition with anti-PD-L1 therapy enhances antitumor immunity in mouse models⁷⁴.

Arginine

Arginine is a key amino acid that shapes the TME and regulates antitumor immunity. The TME is often arginine-deficient, impairing immune cell function. While tumor cells adapt by expressing arginine succinate synthetase (ASS) to synthesize arginine from citrulline, T cells lack this capability and are more susceptible to arginine deprivation^75,76. Tregs, which also express arginase-2 (ARG2), contribute to depletion of arginine in the TME, further suppressing Teff activity⁷⁷.

Regulation of arginine metabolism in the TME involves complex interactions between multiple cell types and enzymatic pathways. Two primary metabolic routes dominate: the arginine/arginase (ARG)/ornithine decarboxylase (ODC)/polyamine pathway; and the arginine/inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)/NO pathway⁷⁸. These pathways are differentially utilized by various cell types within the TME, leading to distinct functional outcomes. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and MDSCs express arginase-1 (ARG1), which depletes extracellular arginine and creates an immunosuppressive environment^79,80.

The impact of arginine metabolism on immune cell function is especially evident in T cells. Arginine enhances T cell oxidative metabolism, promoting vitality, persistence, and antitumor activity⁸¹. Under arginine starvation, ASS1 transcription is induced by activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (CEBPb) binding to an enhancer within the ASS1 gene. T cells fail to induce ASS1, despite active ATF4 and CEBPb, due to repression of the gene. Arginine deprivation drives chromatin compaction and repressive histone methylation, disrupting ATF4/CEBPb binding and impairing gene transcription. Consequently, T cell activation is impaired with significant metabolic disturbances linked to incomplete chromatin remodeling and misregulation of key genes⁸². Additionally, low arginine conditions trigger adaptive responses, including upregulation of SLC7A11 and CGN2 expression, and enhanced glutathione synthesis to maintain redox balance⁸³.

The role of TAMs in tumor progression is particularly noteworthy and evolves with tumor development. Initially, TAMs exhibit pro-inflammatory (M1-like) effects that suppress tumor growth⁸⁴. However, as tumors progress, Th2 cells drive TAMs toward an M2-like phenotype, transforming TAMs into tumor-supportive cells. This phenotypic switch is accompanied by distinct patterns of arginine metabolism; specifically, M1-like macrophages generate NO, while M2-like macrophages utilize ARG1 to support tumor growth and suppress immune responses^85,86. The hypoxic tumor environment elevates HIF1α and HIF2α expression in macrophages. These factors drive TAM-mediated immunosuppression by upregulating ARG1 and iNOS, which modulate arginine and NO levels in the TIME⁸⁶. NO produced by TAMs and MDSCs inhibit T cell activation, while promoting tumor progression⁸⁷.

Recent therapeutic advances have focused on manipulating arginine metabolism to enhance antitumor immunity. Modifying ASS or ornithine transcarbamylase (OTC) enzymes during chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has shown promise in enhancing CAR-T cell proliferation without compromising cytotoxicity, leading to improved tumor clearance⁸⁸. Metabolic intervention strategies, such as using methotrexate to increase NO levels while reducing polyamine synthesis, have demonstrated potential in reprogramming M2-like TAMs toward an immunostimulatory M1-like phenotype⁸⁹.

Tryptophan

Tryptophan is an essential amino acid involved in the synthesis of proteins, neurotransmitters, and various bioactive metabolites. Tryptophan metabolism is primarily regulated in the TME by the enzyme, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which catalyzes the first step in the Kyn pathway⁹⁰. IDO expression is often upregulated in tumor cells and immune cells, such as dendritic cells and macrophages, as a mechanism of immune suppression. By degrading tryptophan into Kyn, IDO limits the availability of tryptophan for immune cells (especially T cells)⁹¹. Kyn acts on the AhR to induce production of immunosuppressive cytokines, such as IL-10, and to inhibit the expression of co-stimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86), as well as upregulate PD-1 expression on T cells, further dampening T cell activation⁹². Depletion of tryptophan and accumulation of Kyn in the TME lead to immune suppression, especially in CD8+ T cells and Th1 cells. Tumor cells utilize tryptophan-degrading enzymes to generate Kyn, which acts as a mechanism of immune evasion by promoting T cell exhaustion and preventing effective anti-tumor responses⁹³.

Recent research revealed that the Kyn-AhR axis affects T cell function and has a crucial role in shaping the immunosuppressive landscape of the TME through an impact on TAMs. Tryptophan-derived microbial metabolites, especially indoles produced by gut microbiota, activate AhR in TAMs within pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), promoting an immunosuppressive phenotype marked by elevated IL-10. AhR deletion or inhibition reprograms TAMs, reduces tumor growth, and improves response to immune checkpoint blockade, highlighting the role of microbiota–AhR signaling in shaping the immunosuppressive TME^29,94.

Serine

Serine metabolism is closely linked to T cell activation, proliferation, and differentiation. Serine is crucial for supporting the metabolic needs of immune cells in the TME, especially T cells and macrophages. During T cell activation, serine provides the building blocks for nucleotide synthesis and supports the generation of ATP through a one-carbon metabolism pathway⁹⁵. Serine is also essential for maintaining redox balance in immune cells by contributing to the synthesis of GSH. Serine deficiency impairs T cell activation and proliferation, leading to reduced immune responses in the TME. In addition, serine availability regulates macrophage polarization. Macrophages tend to adopt an immunosuppressive M(IL-4)-like phenotype under serine-sufficient conditions. In contrast, serine deprivation or inhibition of the serine biosynthesis pathway promotes pro-inflammatory M(IFN-γ) polarization. Mechanistically, serine deficiency reduces SAM levels, leading to decreased H3K27me3 enrichment at the LGF1 gene promoter. The resulting upregulation of IGF1 expression activates the p38-dependent JAK–STAT1 signaling pathway, which drives M1-like polarization⁹⁶. Thus, serine metabolism orchestrates epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of macrophage fate, shaping the immune landscape in the TME.

Asparagine

Asparagine restriction has stage-specific effects on T cells. Asparagine suppresses early activation and cell cycle entry but enhances CD8⁺ T cell proliferation and function during differentiation via NRF2-mediated stress responses. Metabolically, Asn deprivation reduces glucose and glutamine use, while increasing nucleotide availability. Tumor cells upregulate ASNS to compete for Asn in the TME, potentially impairing immune responses. Asparagine also promotes tumor growth and metastasis by acting as an amino acid exchange factor that regulates mTORC1 activity, serine metabolism, and nucleotide synthesis, thereby supporting anabolic metabolism and proliferation⁹⁷. These findings highlight the potential of asparagine as a therapeutic target, although further studies are needed to clarify the dual role in tumor progression and immunity⁹⁸.

Methionine

Methionine is an essential amino acid that serves as the precursor of SAM, the principal methyl group donor involved in epigenetic regulation and nucleotide synthesis. Methionine availability critically influences tumor and immune cell behavior in the TIME. Tumor cells competitively uptake methionine by overexpressing the methionine transporter, SLC43A2, leading to methionine deprivation in T cells, which subsequently impairs survival and function⁹⁹.

In contrast to tumor cells, T cells lack compensatory mechanisms to acquire or retain methionine under competitive conditions. Methionine restriction in T cells results in reduced levels of the histone, H3K79me2, a marker associated with active gene transcription that ultimately leads to defective T cell activation and immune dysfunction¹⁰⁰. Although methionine deprivation impairs T cell function, emerging evidence suggests that methionine also enhances antitumor immunity through epigenetic reprogramming. Specifically, methionine restriction induces chromatin demethylation and cGAS activation, which promotes cytosolic DNA sensing and immune activation in tumor and APCs. This dual effect reflects a context-dependent metabolic checkpoint, where tumor cells are more susceptible to methionine starvation and appropriate metabolic modulation may selectively rewire the TIME in favor of immune activation¹⁰¹.

The TIME is a battleground where tumors and immune cells compete for critical amino acids and shape the balance between tumor progression and antitumor immunity. Glutamine, tryptophan, serine, and arginine have pivotal roles in this metabolic tug-of-war (Figure 3). Tumors often gain the upper hand by monopolizing these nutrients, leading to immunosuppression and immune evasion. However, by strategically manipulating amino acid pathways and combining these approaches with immunotherapy, the scales may be tipped in favor of immune activation and enhanced therapeutic outcomes. Deciphering the intricate metabolic networks within the TIME will pave the way for novel precision therapies. To facilitate a clearer understanding of how specific amino acids orchestrate the immunologic dynamics within the TIME, the respective roles of tumor and immune cells with potential therapeutic strategies are summarized in Table 2.

Amino acid therapy in tumor targeting: clinical insights

Less

The treatment of cancer initially involved resection and radiation therapy relying on X-rays. The first tumor chemotherapy drug was nitrogen mustard, which was developed by Goodman and Gilman at Yale University^102,103. Although some progress was made, there were still two bottlenecks (imprecise killing and insufficient intensity) and there was no progress for a long time. However, in recent years the development of new technologies, such as reprogramming of amino acid metabolism and the development of small molecule amino acid carrier drugs, have largely compensated for the previous shortcomings. The following will provide a detailed introduction to tumor-targeted amino acid therapy in recent years (Table 3).

Targeting amino acid metabolic enzymes

IDO 1 inhibitors

Tryptophan is essential for T cell-mediated immunity. High IDO1 expression is associated with a poor prognosis in a range of cancers. Therefore, IDO1 inhibition is the goal of anticancer therapy. Currently, the combined application of IDO and TDO inhibitors, as well as IDO/TDO dual-target inhibitors, mainly focuses on IDO, TDO, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, and has made important progress in the treatment of melanoma, and lung, liver, and colorectal cancers (CRCs), demonstrating promising prospects. However, complete blockade of tryptophan metabolism may lead to a series of adverse reactions, including a significant increase in tryptophan concentration, and a reduction in downstream metabolites of Kyn, including compounds that have neuroprotective and tumor growth-inhibiting effects, which may in turn promote the occurrence and development of tumors. This strategy still faces many challenges^104,105.

Arginase inhibition

In a mouse model of osteosarcoma, arginine administration synergistically acts against PD-L1. CB-1158 is a potent Arg1 small molecule inhibitor that attenuates MDSC-mediated T cell inhibition in vitro, increases the number and function of CD8+ T cells in the TME, and inhibits tumor growth in multiple tumor models. CB-1158 treatment synergistically enhances the antitumor effects of checkpoint blockade in a mouse model. This approach is being tested in a clinical study (NCT02903914) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Therefore, arginine depletion (e.g., ADI-PEG20) and arginine supplementation may have clinical benefits for R-depleting and non-auxotrophic tumors, respectively¹⁰⁶. Arg2-deficient T cells exhibit a 20% increase in baseline intracellular L-arginine levels and an extended survival duration in vitro. Activation in the presence of the arginase inhibitor, norNOHA, elevates the survival rate of wild-type T cells without affecting Arg2-null T cells³.

Glutamine metabolic enzyme inhibition

The quest for targeting glutamine metabolism, despite initial setbacks due to toxicities, has been revitalized with the development of compounds, such as JHU-083⁷. This prodrug, activated within the TME, signifies a targeted approach to glutamine blockade, showcasing the efficacy in multiple cancer models through a CD8⁺ T cell-dependent mechanism. This strategy exemplifies the nuanced understanding.

Serine synthetases inhibition

Targeting 3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (PHGDH) disrupts serine synthesis, a critical pathway in the metastatic potential of various cancer types. Inhibition of PHGDH, which is pivotal in glucose-derived serine biosynthesis, attenuates brain metastasis without impeding extracranial tumor growth, delineating a targeted approach to disrupt metabolic dependencies of tumor cells and enhancing survival outcomes in animal models¹⁰⁷.

Amino acid combination microflora

Emerging research underscores the potential of Lactobacillus reuteri (Lr) in melanoma treatment through probiotic intervention. Lr facilitates tumor immunity by translocating to, colonizing within, and enduring in the melanoma microenvironment. This process involves probiotic’ degradation of dietary tryptophan into indole-3-aldehyde (I3A), subsequently activating the AhR. This activation spearheads the local amplification of IFN-γ-producing CD8⁺ T cells, bolstering tumor immunity and enhancing melanoma’ responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)¹⁰⁸. Furthermore, the production of I3A by Lr is necessary and sufficient to drive antitumor immunity, an effect enhanced by a tryptophan-rich diet via AhR signaling in CD8⁺ T cells. Additionally, an engineered attenuated Salmonella strain overexpressing methioninase effectively targets tumors and depletes intratumoral methionine, exploiting cancer cell methionine dependence, while sparing systemic levels. This approach significantly inhibited tumor growth and metastasis in prostate, breast, and liver cancer models in nude mice¹⁰⁹. Salmonella-induced methionine depletion activates the immune system and enhances the effectiveness of ICI therapy in melanoma¹¹⁰.

Small-molecule amino acid carrier medications

Innovations in multivesicular liposome technology have led to the continuous supply of alkaline l-arginine (l-arg), modifying the acidic and l-arg-deficient TME. This strategy not only facilitates tumor cell access to l-arg from the microenvironment but also ensures immune cell provision with l-arg. Selective inhibition of the CAT-2 transporter protein concurrently maintains tumor l-arg deprivation and enriches tumor-killing immune cells within the TME. This dual action promotes CD8⁺ T cell infiltration and activation, elevates M1 macrophage ratios, and suppresses melanoma growth, thereby extending survival. When combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies, this approach reverses the low response of tumors to immune checkpoint blockade therapy, manifesting a synergistic antitumor effect¹¹¹.

Immunosurveillance activation nanomedicine (MRIAN) represents a novel approach to T-ALL therapy by targeting MDSCs in the bone marrow. T-ALL cells and MDSCs show elevated uptake of L-phenylalanine and MRIANs, which in combination with doxorubicin (MRIAN-Dox), selectively eliminate leukemic cells while sparing normal hematopoietic cells and reducing cardiotoxicity. Mechanistically, MRIANs decompose into L-phenylalanine, inhibiting PKM2 and reducing ROS in MDSCs, thus impairing the suppressive function and promoting differentiation¹¹². Biodegradable L-phenylalanine polymer (8P6) encapsulating venetoclax forms nanoparticles (Vene@8P6) with high drug loading capacity and stability. This nano-delivery system precisely targets AML cells in leukemic mouse bone marrow, effectively damaging tumor cell DNA and ROS clusters, inducing cell death¹¹³.

Diet-related treatment

Some studies have demonstrated that B cells in CRC have an addiction for leucine, which promote in vitro induction of leucine-tRNA-synthase-2 (LARS2) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) expression. The generation of LARS2-expressing B cells is enhanced in vivo when applying a L-rich diet to mouse models of CRC, which was shown to be associated with an increased tumor burden¹¹⁴. Restricting dietary methionine induces a sulfur deficiency, attenuating tumor immunogenicity within the TME. Conversely, methionine supplementation in diets boosts antitumor immunity in immunocompetent mice and inhibits tumor progression. Investigations reveal that reduced methionine or protein intake diminishes T cell prevalence in such mice, undermining the efficacy of antitumor immunotherapy. This effect correlates with a decrease in hydrogen sulfide production by the gut microbiota, impairing antitumor immunity, fostering colon cancer advancement, and suppressing antitumor immune responses through microbial interactions¹¹⁵.

Immune cell modification

Blood and solid cancers catabolize the semi-essential amino acid, arginine, to drive cell proliferation. However, the resulting hypoarginine microenvironment can also impair CAR-T cell proliferation, limiting efficacy in clinical trials targeting hematologic and solid malignancies. T cells are sensitive to the low arginine microenvironment due to low expression of the arginine resynthetases [arginine succinate synthase (ASS) and OTC]. T cells can be redesigned to express functional ASS or OTC enzymes in conjunction with different CARs. Enzymatic modifications increase CAR-T cell proliferation without losing CAR cytotoxicity or increasing depletion. Enzyme-modified CAR-T cells enhance clearance of leukemia or solid tumor burden in vivo, providing the first metabolic modification for enhanced CAR-T cell therapy¹¹⁶.

Reprogramming of the amino acid metabolism

The lysosome-nuclear signaling axis, which is pivotal in sensing lysosomal cysteine, presents a novel therapeutic avenue through modulation of the AhR. Interventions targeting lysosomal cysteine efflux have been shown to sensitize cancer cells to ferroptosis¹¹⁷. CysRx, a synthetic mRNA therapeutic, exemplifies this therapeutic potential by strategically converting cytosolic cysteine to lysosomal cystine, thereby reprogramming intracellular nutrient distribution. This targeted metabolic intervention demonstrates that it is possible to selectively kill cancer cells while maintaining normal systemic functions in healthy tissues, providing a more selective approach to cancer treatment¹¹⁷.

Cysteine ligandability varies significantly across different cancer contexts, with particular relevance for previously “undruggable” transcription factors that comprise 19% of all oncogenes. Specific probes targeting critical transcription factors were developed through cysteine-directed chemical screening, including NF-κB1 at C61 using SH-7346 and SOX10 using SH-0029, effectively disrupting DNA-binding and transcriptional activity in melanoma. This chemical proteomics approach establishes general principles governing tumor cysteine ligandability, providing promising avenues for expanding small-molecule therapeutics beyond the current 10% of targetable oncogenic drivers, particularly into the previously inaccessible realm of transcription factor inhibition¹¹⁸.

Others

SLC7A5 (LAT1) is a key transporter of BCAAs and Kyn. Monoclonal antibodies against SLC7A5 have shown strong antitumor activity in colorectal and breast cancer xenograft models by inhibiting nutrient uptake and suppressing tumor proliferation. Beyond blocking BCAA and Kyn transport, these antibodies also induce antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), further enhancing the therapeutic potential¹¹⁹. Kyn mediates T cell dysfunction by activating AHR signaling. By preventing Kyn uptake, anti-SLC7A5 can block the uptake of Kyn by T cells and enhance the immunity of antitumor T cells¹²⁰.

Recent advances in nanomedicine have facilitated the development of delivery systems that improve the tumor specificity of metabolic inhibitors, including delivery systems targeting amino acid transporters. pH-responsive nanoparticles, for example, are designed to release therapeutic payloads specifically within the acidic TME, thereby reducing off-target toxicity and enhancing treatment efficacy¹²¹. Some studies have reported the use of lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles to deliver inhibitors of amino acid transporters, such as SLC7A11, which has a critical role in glutathione biosynthesis and ferroptosis resistance¹²². Targeting SLC7A11 using nanoparticle-based systems has shown promise in promoting ferroptotic cell death in preclinical models¹²³. In addition, bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) offer a promising approach to simultaneously target immune checkpoints and metabolic pathways. Emerging BsAbs aim to co-target molecules, such as PD-1 or CTLA-4, alongside amino acid transporters, like LAT1 (SLC7A5) or xCT (SLC7A11), potentially restoring T cell function while disrupting tumor nutrient acquisition for synergistic antitumor effects¹²⁴.

ASNase can serve as a chemotherapeutic agent targeting free asparagine, has been approved for cancer treatment, and has demonstrated success in the clinical treatment of leukemia patients¹²⁵. Currently, many modified asparaginases have emerged. For example, recombinant L-asparaginase from the Anoxybacillus genus exhibits good thermal stability but lacks glutaminase activity¹²⁶. L-ASNase GRASPA® encapsulated in red blood cells demonstrates good tolerability, reducing the occurrence of allergic reactions and coagulation disorders. However, most studies involving ASNase have focused on leukemia cells. Further in vitro and in vivo research may be needed to evaluate the actual efficacy against other solid tumors if considered for treatment.

These strategies remain under preclinical or early clinical investigation. Further research is required to optimize delivery efficiency, minimize immunogenicity, and evaluate the safety and efficacy across diverse tumor types.

Conclusions and future perspectives

Less

Amino acids are no longer viewed as mere building blocks of proteins. The profound roles of amino acids in regulating the TME and influencing cancer progression have been thoroughly elucidated. This review has highlighted how amino acids, acting both as nutrients and signaling molecules, shape tumor growth, immune cell function, and therapeutic responses. By deepening our understanding of the complex interplay between amino acid metabolism and cancer biology we open new doors to targeted therapies that may revolutionize cancer treatment paradigms.

Strategies targeting key metabolic enzymes, such as IDO1, TDO2, and glutamine metabolism enzymes, are moving from concept to clinical trials. These approaches not only aim to starve tumor cells of critical nutrients but also to restore immune cell functionality, enhance antigen presentation, and reduce immune checkpoint expression. Additionally, novel methods involving engineered microbiota to modulate amino acid profiles, small-molecule amino acid mimetics, and innovative dietary interventions offer promising complementary avenues¹²⁷.

Despite these advances, numerous challenges remain. Tumor heterogeneity limits the universal applicability of amino acid-targeted therapies. In light of the metabolic plasticity of tumor cells, which often drives resistance to amino acid-targeted therapies, real-time monitoring of metabolic biomarkers, such as circulating amino acid levels or pathway-specific metabolites, may enable early detection of adaptive changes¹²⁸. In parallel, dual targeting strategies have shown enhanced efficacy in preclinical models. By dynamically adjusting therapeutic strategies in response to these metabolic changes, clinicians can maintain treatment pressure on tumor cells and delay the onset of resistance.

Another key concern is systemic toxicity. Systemic depletion of amino acids can lead to off-target effects, including neurologic symptoms, immune suppression, or gut microbiota imbalance¹²⁹. To mitigate these risks, precision delivery approaches, such as engineered bacteria and pH-sensitive nanocarriers, are being developed to restrict therapeutic activity to the tumor site while sparing normal tissues. These strategies are expected to enhance safety and tolerability in clinical applications.

Future research should continue to integrate emerging knowledge from systems biology, single-cell metabolomics, and spatial transcriptomics to map amino acid fluxes in the TME and identify context-specific metabolic vulnerabilities. Clinical trials should evaluate the efficacy and safety of amino acid-targeted therapies across a broader spectrum of cancer types and stages. Importantly, new biomarkers that reflect metabolic states and treatment responses will be essential to guide patient selection, monitor therapy, and detect resistance early.

In conclusion, amino acid metabolism represents a cornerstone of cancer biology and a fertile ground for therapeutic innovation. By building on our expanding understanding of these metabolic networks, we can develop more precise, effective, and personalized approaches that improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Funding

Less

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3401500 to P.W.; Grant No. 2021YFA1302200 to L.F.) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82341028 and 31920103007 to P.W.; Grant Nos. 82472815 and U24A20727 to L.F.).

References

Less

de Visser KE,Joyce JA.The evolving tumor microenvironment: from cancer initiation to metastatic outgrowth.Cancer Cell. 2023; 41: 374–403.

Chen J,Cui L,Lu S,Xu S.Amino acid metabolism in tumor biology and therapy.Cell Death Dis. 2024; 15: 42.

Yang L,Chu Z,Liu M,Zou Q,Li J,Liu Q, et al.Amino acid metabolism in immune cells: essential regulators of the effector functions, and promising opportunities to enhance cancer immunotherapy.J Hematol Oncol. 2023; 16: 59.

Goberdhan DC,Wilson C,Harris AL.Amino acid sensing by mTORC1: intracellular transporters mark the spot.Cell Metab. 2016; 23: 580–9.

Ananieva E.Targeting amino acid metabolism in cancer growth and anti-tumor immune response.World J Biol Chem. 2015; 6: 281–9.

Endicott M,Jones M,Hull J.Amino acid metabolism as a therapeutic target in cancer: a review.Amino Acids. 2021; 53: 1169–79.

Leone RD,Zhao L,Englert JM,Sun IM,Oh MH,Sun IH, et al.Glutamine blockade induces divergent metabolic programs to overcome tumor immune evasion.Science. 2019; 366: 1013–21.

Chantranupong L,Scaria SM,Saxton RA,Gygi MP,Shen K,Wyant GA, et al.The CASTOR proteins are arginine sensors for the mTORC1 pathway.Cell. 2016; 165: 153–64.

Wolfson RL,Chantranupong L,Saxton RA,Shen K,Scaria SM,Cantor JR, et al.Sestrin2 is a leucine sensor for the mTORC1 pathway.Science. 2016; 351: 43–8.

10.

Chen J,Ou Y,Luo R,Wang J,Wang D,Guan J, et al.SAR1B senses leucine levels to regulate mTORC1 signalling.Nature. 2021; 596: 281–4.

11.

Han JM,Jeong SJ,Park MC,Kim G,Kwon NH,Kim HK, et al.Leucyl-tRNA synthetase is an intracellular leucine sensor for the mTORC1-signaling pathway.Cell. 2012; 149: 410–24.

12.

Jiang C,Liu J,He S,Xu W,Huang R,Pan W, et al.PRMT1 orchestrates with SAMTOR to govern mTORC1 methionine sensing via Arg-methylation of NPRL2.Cell Metab. 2023; 35: 2183–99.e7.

13.

Rebsamen M,Superti-Furga G.SLC38A9: a lysosomal amino acid transporter at the core of the amino acid-sensing machinery that controls MTORC1.Autophagy. 2016; 12: 1061–2.

14.

Wang S,Tsun ZY,Wolfson RL,Shen K,Wyant GA,Plovanich ME, et al.Metabolism. Lysosomal amino acid transporter SLC38A9 signals arginine sufficiency to mTORC1.Science. 2015; 347: 188–94.

15.

Jung JW,Macalino SJY,Cui M,Kim JE,Kim HJ,Song DG, et al.Transmembrane 4 L six family member 5 senses arginine for mTORC1 signaling.Cell Metab. 2019; 29: 1306–19.e7.

16.

Lee D,Na J,Ryu J,Kim HJ,Nam SH,Kang M, et al.Interaction of tetraspan(in) TM4SF5 with CD44 promotes self-renewal and circulating capacities of hepatocarcinoma cells.Hepatology. 2015; 61: 1978–97.

17.

Kim SH,Choi JH,Wang P,Go CD,Hesketh GG,Gingras AC, et al.Mitochondrial threonyl-tRNA synthetase TARS2 is required for threonine-sensitive mTORC1 activation.Mol Cell. 2021; 81: 398–407.e4.

18.

Stine ZE,Walton ZE,Altman BJ,Hsieh AL,Dang CV.MYC, metabolism, and cancer.Cancer Discov. 2015; 5: 1024–39.

19.

Yoo HC,Yu YC,Sung Y,Han JM.Glutamine reliance in cell metabolism.Exp Mol Med. 2020; 52: 1496–516.

20.

Liu X,Olszewski K,Zhang Y,Lim EW,Shi J,Zhang X, et al.Cystine transporter regulation of pentose phosphate pathway dependency and disulfide stress exposes a targetable metabolic vulnerability in cancer.Nat Cell Biol. 2020; 22: 476–86.

21.

Zhang Y,Shi J,Liu X,Feng L,Gong Z,Koppula P, et al.BAP1 links metabolic regulation of ferroptosis to tumour suppression.Nate Cell Biol. 2018; 20: 1181–92.

22.

Jiang L,Kon N,Li T,Wang SJ,Su T,Hibshoosh H, et al.Ferroptosis as a p53-mediated activity during tumour suppression.Nature. 2015; 520: 57–62.

23.

Lim JKM,Delaidelli A,Minaker SW,Zhang HF,Colovic M,Yang H, et al.Cystine/glutamate antiporter xCT (SLC7A11) facilitates oncogenic RAS transformation by preserving intracellular redox balance.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116: 9433–42.

24.

Yuan M,Yan R,Zhang Y,Qiu Y,Jiang Z,Liu H, et al.CARS senses cysteine deprivation to activate AMPK for cell survival.EMBO J. 2021; 40: e108028.

25.

Briggs KJ,Koivunen P,Cao S,Backus KM,Olenchock BA,Patel H, et al.Paracrine induction of HIF by glutamate in breast cancer: EglN1 senses cysteine.Cell. 2016; 166: 126–39.

26.

Cheng C,Geng F,Li Z,Zhong Y,Wang H,Cheng X, et al.Ammonia stimulates SCAP/Insig dissociation and SREBP-1 activation to promote lipogenesis and tumour growth.Nat Metab. 2022; 4: 575–88.

27.

Kawasaki H,Chang HW,Tseng HC,Hsu SC,Yang SJ,Hung CH, et al.A tryptophan metabolite, kynurenine, promotes mast cell activation through aryl hydrocarbon receptor.Allergy. 2014; 69: 445–52.

28.

Mezrich JD,Fechner JH,Zhang X,Johnson BP,Burlingham WJ,Bradfield CA.An interaction between kynurenine and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor can generate regulatory T cells.J Immunol. 2010; 185: 3190–8.

29.

Hezaveh K,Shinde RS,Klötgen A,Halaby MJ,Lamorte S,Ciudad MT, et al.Tryptophan-derived microbial metabolites activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in tumor-associated macrophages to suppress anti-tumor immunity.Immunity. 2022; 55: 324–40.e8.

30.

Li T,Zhang C,Hassan S,Liu X,Song F,Chen K, et al.Histone deacetylase 6 in cancer.J Hematol Oncol. 2018; 11: 111.

31.

Jin J,Meng T,Yu Y,Wu S,Jiao C-C,Song S, et al.Human HDAC6 senses valine abundancy to regulate DNA damage.Nature. 2025; 637: 215–23.

32.

Pakos-Zebrucka K,Koryga I,Mnich K,Ljujic M,Samali A,Gorman AM.The integrated stress response.EMBO Rep. 2016; 17: 1374–95.

33.

Jin H-O,Hong S-E,Kim J-Y,Jang S-K,Park I-C.Amino acid deprivation induces AKT activation by inducing GCN2/ATF4/REDD1 axis.Cell Death Dis. 2021; 12: 1127.

34.

Loayza-Puch F,Rooijers K,Buil LC,Zijlstra J,Oude Vrielink JF,Lopes R, et al.Tumour-specific proline vulnerability uncovered by differential ribosome codon reading.Nature. 2016; 530: 490–4.

35.

Ding Z,Ericksen RE,Escande-Beillard N,Lee QY,Loh A,Denil S, et al.Metabolic pathway analyses identify proline biosynthesis pathway as a promoter of liver tumorigenesis.J Hepatol. 2020; 72: 725–35.

36.

Xu Y,Zuo W,Wang X,Zhang Q,Gan X,Tan N, et al.Deciphering the effects of PYCR1 on cell function and its associated mechanism in hepatocellular carcinoma.Int J Biol Sci. 2021; 17: 2223–39.

37.

Tajan M,Hennequart M,Cheung EC,Zani F,Hock AK,Legrave N, et al.Serine synthesis pathway inhibition cooperates with dietary serine and glycine limitation for cancer therapy.Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 366.

38.

Gravel SP,Hulea L,Toban N,Birman E,Blouin MJ,Zakikhani M, et al.Serine deprivation enhances antineoplastic activity of biguanides.Cancer Res. 2014; 74: 7521–33.

39.

Maddocks OD,Berkers CR,Mason SM,Zheng L,Blyth K,Gottlieb E, et al.Serine starvation induces stress and p53-dependent metabolic remodelling in cancer cells.Nature. 2013; 493: 542–6.

40.

Liu Y,Su Z,Tavana O,Gu W.Understanding the complexity of p53 in a new era of tumor suppression.Cancer Cell. 2024; 42: 946–67.

41.

Kanarek N,Keys HR,Cantor JR,Lewis CA,Chan SH,Kunchok T, et al.Histidine catabolism is a major determinant of methotrexate sensitivity.Nature. 2018; 559: 632–6.

42.

Liu P,Huang F,Lin P,Liu J,Zhou P,Wang J, et al.Histidine metabolism drives liver cancer progression via immune microenvironment modulation through metabolic reprogramming.J Transl Med. 2025; 23: 262.

43.

Parkhitko AA,Jouandin P,Mohr SE,Perrimon N.Methionine metabolism and methyltransferases in the regulation of aging and lifespan extension across species.Aging Cell. 2019; 18: e13034.

44.

Tönjes M,Barbus S,Park YJ,Wang W,Schlotter M,Lindroth AM, et al.BCAT1 promotes cell proliferation through amino acid catabolism in gliomas carrying wild-type IDH1.Nat Med. 2013; 19: 901–8.

45.

Li X,Gracilla D,Cai L,Zhang M,Yu X,Chen X, et al.ATF3 promotes the serine synthesis pathway and tumor growth under dietary serine restriction.Cell Rep. 2021; 36: 109706.

46.

Threonine fuels brain tumor growth through a conserved tRNA modification.Nat Cancer. 2024; 5: 962–3.

47.

Zhao S,Zhu Y,Schultz RD,Li N,He Z,Zhang Z, et al.Partial leptin reduction as an insulin sensitization and weight loss strategy.Cell Metab. 2019; 30: 706–19.e6.

48.

Yang F,Li J,Deng H,Wang Y,Lei C,Wang Q, et al.GSTZ1-1 deficiency activates NRF2/IGF1R axis in HCC via accumulation of oncometabolite succinylacetone.EMBO J. 2019; 38: e101964.

49.

Pataskar A,Champagne J,Nagel R,Kenski J,Laos M,Michaux J, et al.Tryptophan depletion results in tryptophan-to-phenylalanine substitutants.Nature. 2022; 603: 721–7.

50.

Bouthelier A,Aragonés J.Role of the HIF oxygen sensing pathway in cell defense and proliferation through the control of amino acid metabolism.Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2020; 1867: 118733.

51.

Siu F,Bain PJ,LeBlanc-Chaffin R,Chen H,Kilberg MS.ATF4 is a mediator of the nutrient-sensing response pathway that activates the human asparagine synthetase gene.J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 24120–7.

52.

Luo S,Levine RL.Methionine in proteins defends against oxidative stress.FASEB J. 2009; 23: 464–72.

53.

Park SY,Kim KY,Gwak DS,Shin SY,Jun DY,Kim YH.L-cysteine mitigates ROS-induced apoptosis and neurocognitive deficits by protecting against endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in mouse neuronal cells.Biomed Pharmacother. 2024; 180: 117538.

54.

Jyotsana N,Ta KT,DelGiorno KE.The role of cystine/glutamate antiporter SLC7A11/xCT in the pathophysiology of cancer.Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 858462.

55.

Liu D,Liang CH,Huang B,Zhuang X,Cui W,Yang L, et al.Tryptophan metabolism acts as a new anti-ferroptotic pathway to mediate tumor growth.Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023; 10: e2204006.

56.

Zhang Y,Swanda RV,Nie L,Liu X,Wang C,Lee H, et al.mTORC1 couples cyst(e)ine availability with GPX4 protein synthesis and ferroptosis regulation.Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 1589.

57.

Shi Z,Naowarojna N,Pan Z,Zou Y.Multifaceted mechanisms mediating cystine starvation-induced ferroptosis.Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 4792.

58.

Zheng K,Sha N,Hou G,Leng Z,Zhao Q,Zhang L, et al.IGF1R-phosphorylated PYCR1 facilitates ELK4 transcriptional activity and sustains tumor growth under hypoxia.Nat Commun. 2023; 14: 6117.

59.

Nagano T,Nakashima A,Onishi K,Kawai K,Awai Y,Kinugasa M, et al.Proline dehydrogenase promotes senescence through the generation of reactive oxygen species.J Cell Sci. 2017; 130: 1413–20.

60.

Liu Y,Mao C,Wang M,Liu N,Ouyang L,Liu S, et al.Cancer progression is mediated by proline catabolism in non-small cell lung cancer.Oncogene. 2020; 39: 1–19.

61.

Elhanani O,Ben-Uri R,Keren L.Spatial profiling technologies illuminate the tumor microenvironment.Cancer Cell. 2023; 41: 404–20.

62.

Yu M,Zhang S.Influenced tumor microenvironment and tumor immunity by amino acids.Front Immunol. 2023; 14: 1118448.

63.

Labani-Motlagh A,Ashja-Mahdavi M,Loskog A.The tumor microenvironment: a milieu hindering and obstructing antitumor immune responses.Front Immunol. 2020; 11: 940.

64.

Hong CS,Graham NA,Gu W,Espindola Camacho C,Mah V,Maresh EL, et al.MCT1 modulates cancer cell pyruvate export and growth of tumors that co-express mct1 and MCT4.Cell Rep. 2016; 14: 1590–601.

65.

Yoo HC,Park SJ,Nam M,Kang J,Kim K,Yeo JH, et al.A variant of SLC1A5 is a mitochondrial glutamine transporter for metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells.Cell Metab. 2020; 31: 267–83.e12.

66.

Fan Y,Xue H,Li Z,Huo M,Gao H,Guan X.Exploiting the Achilles’ heel of cancer: disrupting glutamine metabolism for effective cancer treatment.Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15: 1345522.

67.

Edwards DN,Ngwa VM,Raybuck AL,Wang S,Hwang Y,Kim LC, et al.Selective glutamine metabolism inhibition in tumor cells improves antitumor T lymphocyte activity in triple-negative breast cancer.J Clin Invest. 2021; 131: e140100.

68.

Carr EL,Kelman A,Wu GS,Gopaul R,Senkevitch E,Aghvanyan A, et al.Glutamine uptake and metabolism are coordinately regulated by ERK/MAPK during T lymphocyte activation.J Immunol. 2010; 185: 1037–44.

69.

Yang R,Li X,Wu Y,Zhang G,Liu X,Li Y, et al.EGFR activates GDH1 transcription to promote glutamine metabolism through MEK/ERK/ELK1 pathway in glioblastoma.Oncogene. 2020; 39: 2975–86.

70.

Wang B,Pei J,Xu S,Liu J,Yu J.A glutamine tug-of-war between cancer and immune cells: recent advances in unraveling the ongoing battle.J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43: 74.

71.

Ma G,Zhang Z,Li P,Zhang Z,Zeng M,Liang Z, et al.Reprogramming of glutamine metabolism and its impact on immune response in the tumor microenvironment.Cell Commun Signal. 2022; 20: 114.

72.

Koda S,Hu J,Ju X,Sun G,Shao S,Tang RX, et al.The role of glutamate receptors in the regulation of the tumor microenvironment.Front Immunol. 2023; 14: 1123841.

73.

Ma G,Liang Y,Chen Y,Wang L,Li D,Liang Z, et al.Glutamine deprivation induces PD-L1 expression via activation of EGFR/ERK/c-Jun signaling in renal cancer.Mol Cancer Res. 2020; 18: 324–39.

74.

Byun JK,Park M,Lee S,Yun JW,Lee J,Kim JS, et al.Inhibition of glutamine utilization synergizes with immune checkpoint inhibitor to promote antitumor immunity.Mol Cell. 2020; 80: 592–606.e8.

75.

Patil MD,Bhaumik J,Babykutty S,Banerjee UC,Fukumura D.Arginine dependence of tumor cells: targeting a chink in cancer’s armor.Oncogene. 2016; 35: 4957–72.

76.

Tabe Y,Lorenzi PL,Konopleva M.Amino acid metabolism in hematologic malignancies and the era of targeted therapy.Blood. 2019; 134: 1014–23.

77.

Weis-Banke SE,Lisle TL,Perez-Penco M,Schina A,Hübbe ML,Siersbæk M, et al.Arginase-2-specific cytotoxic T cells specifically recognize functional regulatory T cells.J Immunother Cancer. 2022; 10: e005326.

78.

Rath M,Müller I,Kropf P,Closs EI,Munder M.Metabolism via arginase or nitric oxide synthase: two competing arginine pathways in macrophages.Front Immunol. 2014; 5: 532.

79.

Ren W,Zhang X,Li W,Feng Q,Feng H,Tong Y, et al.Circulating and tumor-infiltrating arginase 1-expressing cells in gastric adenocarcinoma patients were mainly immature and monocytic Myeloid-derived suppressor cells.Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 8056.

80.

Arlauckas SP,Garren SB,Garris CS,Kohler RH,Oh J,Pittet MJ, et al.Arg1 expression defines immunosuppressive subsets of tumor-associated macrophages.Theranostics. 2018; 8: 5842–54.

81.

Geiger R,Rieckmann JC,Wolf T,Basso C,Feng Y,Fuhrer T, et al.L-arginine modulates T cell metabolism and enhances survival and anti-tumor activity.Cell. 2016; 167: 829–42.e13.

82.

Crump NT,Hadjinicolaou AV,Xia M,Walsby-Tickle J,Gileadi U,Chen JL, et al.Chromatin accessibility governs the differential response of cancer and T cells to arginine starvation.Cell Rep. 2021; 35: 109101.

83.

Wang D,Chu WK,Yam JCS,Pang CP,Leung YC,Shum ASW, et al.GCN2-SLC7A11 axis coordinates autophagy, cell cycle and apoptosis and regulates cell growth in retinoblastoma upon arginine deprivation.Cancer Metab. 2024; 12: 31.

84.

Huang R,Kang T,Chen S.The role of tumor-associated macrophages in tumor immune evasion.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024; 150: 238.

85.

Rodriguez PC,Quiceno DG,Zabaleta J,Ortiz B,Zea AH,Piazuelo MB, et al.Arginase I production in the tumor microenvironment by mature myeloid cells inhibits T-cell receptor expression and antigen-specific T-cell responses.Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 5839–49.

86.

Noman MZ,Janji B,Berchem G,Mami-Chouaib F,Chouaib S.Hypoxia-induced autophagy: a new player in cancer immunotherapy? Autophagy. 2012; 8: 704–6.

87.

Fukumura D,Kashiwagi S,Jain RK.The role of nitric oxide in tumour progression.Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6: 521–34.

88.

Van der Vreken A,Vanderkerken K,De Bruyne E,De Veirman K,Breckpot K,Menu E.Fueling CARs: metabolic strategies to enhance CAR T-cell therapy.Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024; 13: 66.

89.

Basak U,Sarkar T,Mukherjee S,Chakraborty S,Dutta A,Dutta S, et al.Tumor-associated macrophages: an effective player of the tumor microenvironment.Front Immunol. 2023; 14: 1295257.

90.

Tsuji A,Ikeda Y,Yoshikawa S,Taniguchi K,Sawamura H,Morikawa S, et al.The tryptophan and kynurenine pathway involved in the development of immune-related diseases.Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24: 5742.

91.

Meireson A,Devos M,Brochez L.IDO expression in cancer: different compartment, different functionality? Front Immunol. 2020; 11: 531491.

92.

Shadboorestan A,Koual M,Dairou J,Coumoul X.The role of the kynurenine/AhR pathway in diseases related to metabolism and cancer.Int J Tryptophan Res. 2023; 16: 11786469231185102.

93.

Basson C,Serem JC,Hlophe YN,Bipath P.The tryptophan-kynurenine pathway in immunomodulation and cancer metastasis.Cancer Med. 2023; 12: 18691–701.

94.

Microbial metabolism activates immune-suppressive tumor macrophages.Cancer Discov. 2022; 12: 883.

95.

Ma EH,Bantug G,Griss T,Condotta S,Johnson RM,Samborska B, et al.Serine is an essential metabolite for effector T cell expansion.Cell Metab. 2017; 25: 345–57.

96.

Shan X,Hu P,Ni L,Shen L,Zhang Y,Ji Z, et al.Serine metabolism orchestrates macrophage polarization by regulating the IGF1-p38 axis.Cell Mol Immunol. 2022; 19: 1263–78.

97.

Krall AS,Xu S,Graeber TG,Braas D,Christofk HR.Asparagine promotes cancer cell proliferation through use as an amino acid exchange factor.Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 11457.

98.

Wang X,Gong W,Xiong X,Jia X,Xu J.Asparagine: a key metabolic junction in targeted tumor therapy.Pharmacol Res. 2024; 206: 107292.

99.

Bian Y,Li W,Kremer DM,Sajjakulnukit P,Li S,Crespo J, et al.Cancer SLC43A2 alters T cell methionine metabolism and histone methylation.Nature. 2020; 585: 277–82.

100.

Roy DG,Chen J,Mamane V,Ma EH,Muhire BM,Sheldon RD, et al.Methionine metabolism shapes T helper cell responses through regulation of epigenetic reprogramming.Cell Metab. 2020; 31: 250–66.e9.

101.

Fang L,Hao Y,Yu H,Gu X,Peng Q,Zhuo H, et al.Methionine restriction promotes cGAS activation and chromatin untethering through demethylation to enhance antitumor immunity.Cancer Cell. 2023; 41: 1118–33.e12.

102.

Gilman A.The initial clinical trial of nitrogen mustard.Am J Surg.1963; 105: 574–8.

103.

Goodman LS,Wintrobe MM,Dameshek W,Goodman MJ,Gilman A,McLennan MT.Nitrogen mustard therapy; use of methyl-bis (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride and tris (beta-chloroethyl) amine hydrochloride for Hodgkin’s disease, lymphosarcoma, leukemia and certain allied and miscellaneous disorders.JAMA. 1946; 132(3): 126–32.

104.

Feng X,Liao D,Liu D,Ping A,Li Z,Bian J.Development of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 inhibitors for cancer therapy and beyond: a recent perspective.J Med Chem. 2020; 63: 15115–39.

105.

Röhrig UF,Reynaud A,Majjigapu SR,Vogel P,Pojer F,Zoete V.Inhibition mechanisms of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1).J Med Chem. 2019; 62: 8784–95.

106.

Failla M,Molaro MC,Schiano ME,Serafini M,Tiburtini GA,Gianquinto E, et al.Opportunities and challenges of arginase inhibitors in cancer: a medicinal chemistry perspective.J Med Chem. 2024; 67: 19988–20021.

107.

Banh RS,Biancur DE,Yamamoto K,Sohn ASW,Walters B,Kuljanin M, et al.Neurons release serine to support mRFNA translation in pancreatic cancer.Cell. 2020; 183: 1202–18.e25.

108.

Bender MJ,McPherson AC,Phelps CM,Pandey SP,Laughlin CR,Shapira JH, et al.Dietary tryptophan metabolite released by intratumoral Lactobacillus reuteri facilitates immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.Cell. 2023; 186: 1846–62.e26.

109.

Zhou S,Lin Y,Zhao Z,Lai Y,Lu M,Shao Z, et al.Targeted deprivation of methionine with engineered salmonella leads to oncolysis and suppression of metastasis in broad types of animal tumor models.Cell Rep Med. 2023; 4: 101070.

110.

Zhou S,Zhang S,Zheng K,Li Z,Hu E,Mu Y, et al.Salmonella-mediated methionine deprivation drives immune activation and enhances immune checkpoint blockade therapy in melanoma.J Immunother Cancer. 2024; 12: e008238.

111.

Zhang J,Wang S,Guo X,Lu Y,Liu X,Jiang M, et al.Arginine supplementation targeting tumor-killing immune cells reconstructs the tumor microenvironment and enhances the antitumor immune response.ACS Nano. 2022; 16: 12964–78.

112.

Li C,You X,Xu X,Wu B,Liu Y,Tong T, et al.A metabolic reprogramming amino acid polymer as an immunosurveillance activator and leukemia targeting drug carrier for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022; 9: e2104134.

113.

Zhang L,Lei L,Zhao Z,Yang G,Wang K,Wang L, et al.Enhanced venetoclax delivery using L-phenylalanine nanocarriers in acute myeloid leukemia treatment.Chin Chem Lett. 2024; 36: 110316.

114.

Wang Z,Lu Z,Lin S,Xia J,Zhong Z,Xie Z, et al.Leucine-tRNA-synthase-2-expressing B cells contribute to colorectal cancer immunoevasion.Immunity. 2022; 55: 1067–81.e8.

115.

Ji M,Xu X,Xu Q,Hsiao Y-C,Martin C,Ukraintseva S, et al.Methionine restriction-induced sulfur deficiency impairs antitumour immunity partially through gut microbiota.Nat Metab. 2023; 5: 1526–43.

116.

Fultang L,Booth S,Yogev O,Martins da Costa B,Tubb V,Panetti S, et al.Metabolic engineering against the arginine microenvironment enhances CAR-T cell proliferation and therapeutic activity.Blood. 2020; 136: 1155–60.

117.

Swanda RV,Ji Q,Wu X,Yan J,Dong L,Mao Y, et al.Lysosomal cystine governs ferroptosis sensitivity in cancer via cysteine stress response.Mol Cell. 2023; 83: 3347–59.e9.

118.

Takahashi M,Chong HB,Zhang S,Yang T-Y,Lazarov MJ,Harry S, et al.DrugMap: a quantitative pan-cancer analysis of cysteine ligandability.Cell. 2024; 187: 2536–56.e30.

119.

Ueda S,Hayashi H,Miyamoto T,Abe S,Hirai K,Matsukura K, et al.Anti-tumor effects of mAb against L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) bound to human and monkey LAT1 with dual avidity modes.Cancer Sci. 2019; 110: 674–85.

120.

Sinclair LV,Neyens D,Ramsay G,Taylor PM,Cantrell DA.Single cell analysis of kynurenine and system L amino acid transport in T cells.Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 1981.

121.

Palanikumar L,Al-Hosani S,Kalmouni M,Nguyen VP,Ali L,Pasricha R, et al.pH-responsive high stability polymeric nanoparticles for targeted delivery of anticancer therapeutics.Commun Biol. 2020; 3: 95.

122.

Koppula P,Zhuang L,Gan B.Cystine transporter SLC7A11/xCT in cancer: ferroptosis, nutrient dependency, and cancer therapy.Protein Cell. 2021; 12: 599–620.

123.

Dhas N,Kudarha R,Tiwari R,Tiwari G,Garg N,Kumar P, et al.Recent advancements in nanomaterial-mediated ferroptosis-induced cancer therapy: importance of molecular dynamics and novel strategies.Life Sci. 2024; 346: 122629.

124.

Zhang T,Lin Y,Gao Q.Bispecific antibodies targeting immunomodulatory checkpoints for cancer therapy.Cancer Biol Med. 2023; 20: 181–95.

125.

Butler M,van der Meer LT,van Leeuwen FN.Amino acid depletion therapies: starving cancer cells to death.Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 32: 367–81.

126.

Safary A,Moniri R,Hamzeh-Mivehroud M,Dastmalchi S.Highly efficient novel recombinant L-asparaginase with no glutaminase activity from a new halo-thermotolerant Bacillus strain.Bioimpacts. 2019; 9: 15–23.

127.

Zalatan JG,Petrini L,Geiger R.Engineering bacteria for cancer immunotherapy.Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2024; 85: 103061.

128.

Stine ZE,Schug ZT,Salvino JM,Dang CV.Targeting cancer metabolism in the era of precision oncology.Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022; 21: 141–62.

129.

Sittipo P,Choi J,Lee S,Lee YK.The function of gut microbiota in immune-related neurological disorders: a review.J Neuroinflammation. 2022; 19: 154.

Appendix

Less

Year 2025 volume 22 Issue 7

PDF

Cite this Article

BibTeX

Article Info

doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0115

Receive Date：2025-03-08
Online Date：2026-11-07
Published：2025-07-15

Article Data

Affiliations

History

Received：2025-03-08
Accepted：2025-05-29

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3401500 to P.W.; Grant No. 2021YFA1302200 to L.F.) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 82341028 and 31920103007 to P.W.; Grant Nos. 82472815 and U24A20727 to L.F.).

Affiliations

¹Tongji University Cancer Center, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China

²School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China

Corresponding:

Correspondence to: Lan Fang and Ping Wang, E-mail: lanfang@tongji.edu.cn and wangp@tongji.edu.cn

References

Share

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cbm/EN/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2025.0115

Share to

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article

BibTeX

Citations

表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Table 1 Structure-functional relationships of amino acids and their associated transporters

Amino acid	Transporter	Function and downstream pathway
Glutamine	SLC1A5 SLC38A1/2	Glutamine fuels the TCA cycle, supports biosynthesis and redox balance via glutathione production, and activates mTORC1 signaling to promote T cell survival and antitumor activity.
Arginine	SLC7A1 SLC6A2	Arginine supports mTORC1 signaling, nitric oxide (NO) production, and T cell effector functions. Arginine is critical for T cell proliferation and metabolic fitness in the tumor microenvironment.
Asparagine	SLC1A5	Asparagine enhances T cell activation and memory T cell function by supporting amino acid exchange and metabolic reprogramming under stress conditions.
Leucine	SLC7A5	Leucine activates mTORC1 and c-Myc pathways, promoting protein synthesis and effector T cell differentiation during immune responses.
Alanine	SLC6A19 SLC38A1	Alanine is utilized for protein synthesis and contributes to energy production via entry into glycolysis, regulated by mTOR signaling in activated T cells.
Methionine	SLC43A2	Methionine is a precursor for SAM, a universal methyl donor. Methionine regulates epigenetic modification and transcriptional programming via histone/DNA methylation.
Cysteine	SLC7A11	Cysteine is imported for glutathione (GSH) synthesis via xCT, maintaining redox homeostasis. GSH protects T cells from oxidative stress and ferroptosis.
Tryptophan	SLC7A8	Tryptophan is catabolized by IDO1 to Kyn, which activates AhR and upregulates PD-1 on T cells, leading to T cell exhaustion and immune suppression.
GABA	SLC6A13	GABA inhibits T cell activation and proliferation via GABAergic signaling, representing a negative regulatory mechanism in T cell function.

Table 2 Comparative overview of key amino acids in tumor vs. immune cells and therapeutic implications

Amino acid	Role in tumor cells	Role in immune cells	Therapeutic strategy
Glutamine	Supports proliferation, TCA cycle fueling, and redox balance via GSH synthesis	Required for T cell activation, proliferation, and redox homeostasis	GLS inhibitors (e.g., CB-839); glutamine transporter inhibitors (e.g., V-9302); combined with ICIs
Arginine	Tumors express ASS1 for de novo synthesis; used for polyamine and NO synthesis	Essential for T cell function and memory; T cells cannot synthesize it de novo	Arginase inhibitors; ASS1/OTC-modified CAR-T cells; methotrexate-induced NO boost
Tryptophan	Degraded via IDO to Kyn to promote immune evasion via AhR pathway	Required for T cell proliferation and activation	IDO inhibitors; AhR blockers; modulation of microbial-derived indoles
Serine	Promotes nucleotide biosynthesis, redox balance, and tumor growth	Essential for T cell and macrophage activation and differentiation	Targeting PHGDH/serine synthesis pathway; modulation of macrophage polarization
Asparagine	Promotes tumor survival and metastasis via ASNS upregulation	Dual role: depletion impairs early activation but enhances effector function via NRF2	Asparaginase treatment; dietary asparagine restriction; ASNS inhibition
Methionine	Enhances histone methylation and immune evasion via SAM synthesis	Required for T cell epigenetic activation and cytokine production	Methionine restriction; SLC43A2 inhibition; combination with cGAS-STING activation and ICIs

Table 3 Summary of amino acid-targeting approaches in cancer therapy

Targeting	Methods	Mechanisms
Targeting amino acid metabolic enzymes	IDO 1 inhibitors	Therapy mainly focuses on IDO, TDO, and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase.
	Arginase inhibition	Arginine administration synergistically acts against PD-L1.
	Glutamine metabolic enzyme inhibition	Some compounds like JHU-083 have solved the toxicity problem of targeted glutamine blockade methods.
	Serine synthetases inhibition	PHGDH plays a key role in the biosynthesis of serine from glucose sources.
Amino acid combination microflora		Probiotics degrade dietary tryptophan into dialdehyde-3-aldehyde (I3A), which then activates aromatic hydrocarbon receptors (AhR). This activation leads to local expansion of CD8⁺ T cells that produce interferon-γ, enhancing tumor immunity and increasing melanoma responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Small-molecule amino acid carrier medications		Innovations in multivesicular liposome technology have led to the continuous supply of alkaline l-arginine (l-arg), modifying the acidic and l-arg-deficient tumor microenvironment (TME).
Diet-related treatment		Leucine can activate the mTOR signaling pathway. Restricting dietary methionine induces a sulfur deficiency, attenuating tumor immunogenicity within the TME.
Immune cell modification		T cells can be redesigned to express functional ASS or OTC enzymes together with different chimeric antigen receptors.
Reprogramming of the amino acid metabolism		PEG bound cysteine enzymes can induce selective cancer cell death, while addressing pharmacokinetic limitations.
Others		Anti-SLC7A5 can block the uptake of Gyn by T cells and enhance the immunity of anti-tumor T cells. L-ASNase GRASPA^® encapsulated in red blood cells demonstrates good tolerability, reducing the occurrence of allergic reactions and coagulation disorders.

Figure 1 Regulation of mTORC1 signaling by amino acid sensors and the GATOR complex. This schematic depicts how amino acid availability regulates mTORC1 through a network of cytosolic and lysosomal sensors. Leucine (L) is sensed by two distinct proteins: ① Sestrin2 [a leucine-binding GTPase involved in mTORC1 inhibition (Kd ≈ 20 μM)]; and ② SAR1B [a stress-responsive regulator of cell viability with high leucine affinity (Kd ≈ 2 μM)]. Upon binding leucine, both sensors undergo conformational changes and dissociate from the GATOR2 complex (SAR1B from MIOS; Sestrin2 from SEH1L), which relieves GATOR1 inhibition. GATOR1 acts as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for RagA/B, promoting the conversion to the GDP-bound (inactive) state. The inactive RagA/B–GDP:RagC/D–GTP heterodimer is unable to recruit mTORC1 to the lysosomal membrane. When amino acids are sufficient, GATOR2 inhibits GATOR1, thereby relieving GAP activity. This situation enables formation of the active RagA/B–GTP:RagC/D–GDP heterodimer, which facilitates recruitment and activation of mTORC1. Methionine (M) is detected via SAMTOR, which binds SAM and modulates GATOR1 activity, acting in parallel to the leucine pathway. Threonine (T) activates mTORC1 via TARS2. Upon threonine binding, TARS2 preferentially associates with GTP-bound RagC, which promotes RagA GTP-loading and facilitates mTORC1 recruitment. Arginine (R) is monitored by three spatially distinct sensors: ③ CASTOR1, a cytosolic sensor that interacts with GATOR2 to regulate mTORC1 in response to cytoplasmic arginine; ④ SLC38A9, a lysosomal arginine transporter that interacts with inactive Rag dimers and promotes activation in response to luminal arginine; and ⑤ TM4SF5, a lysosomal lumen sensor that binds free arginine and cooperates with SLC38A9 and mTOR to activate the mTOR/S6K1 signaling axis. The figure was created with BioRender.com. CASTOR1, cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 regulation; GDP, guanosine diphosphate; GTP, guanosine triphosphate; Kd, dissociation constant; mTORC1, mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; SAMTOR, SAM sensor regulating mTORC1 via GATOR1; SLC, solute carrier; TARS2, threonyl-tRNA synthetase 2; TM4SF5, transmembrane 4 L six family member 5.

Figure 2 The metabolic tug-of-war for amino acids between cancer cells and immune cells. Within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), cancer cells upregulate various solute carriers (SLCs) to enhance amino acid uptake and amino acid-derived metabolite transport, which supports proliferation, immune evasion, and metastasis. SLCs are functionally categorized and labeled, as follows: SLC① (e.g., SLC1A5 and SLC7A5) mediates amino acid import and is commonly upregulated in tumor cells to meet biosynthetic and energetic demands. SLC② (e.g., SLC7A5 and MCT1) exports tumor metabolites, such as Kyn and lactate, and is frequently upregulated⁶⁴, while SLC③ mediates amino acid uptake by immune cells with stable expression. In contrast, immune cells also rely on amino acids for proliferation, differentiation, and effective anti-tumor responses. Competition for amino acids and amino acid derivatives within the TIME impairs immune cell function and promotes tumor progression. PD-L1 and PD-1 are upregulated in response to metabolic stress. Blue and yellow dots represent amino acids and amino acid-derived metabolites, respectively. The figure was created with BioRender.com. AAs, amino acids; Kyn, kynurenine; MCT, monocarboxylate transporter; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; SLC, solute carrier; TIME, tumor immune microenvironment.

Figure 3 Amino acid metabolism in the TIME. The TIME is shaped by metabolic competition between tumor and immune cells. Amino acids have key roles in modulating immune responses and tumor progression. (A) Glutamine: tumor cells upregulate the glutamine transporter, SLC1A5, increasing glutamine uptake to fuel the TCA cycle and promote PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 on tumor cells interacts with PD-1 receptors on CD8⁺ T cells, inhibiting TCR signaling initiated by MHC I–TCR antigen presentation and thereby suppressing T cell activation and inducing exhaustion. Excessive glutamine uptake by tumor cells reduces glutamine availability in the microenvironment, thereby limiting TCA cycle activity and metabolic fitness in T cells. (B) Tryptophan: tumor cells overconsume tryptophan and convert tryptophan into kynurenine via IDO. Kynurenine activates AhR signaling in T cells, which leads to downregulation of co-stimulatory molecules (e.g., CD80/CD86) and upregulation of PD-1, thereby suppressing T cell activation and fostering an immunosuppressive microenvironment. (C) Serine: tumor cells excessively uptake serine to fuel SGOC metabolism via ATF4, supporting nucleotide biosynthesis and proliferation. In contrast, serine deprivation promotes M1 macrophage polarization by upregulating IGF1 and activating STAT1 signaling. (D) Arginine: TAMs and MDSCs express ARG1 to deplete extracellular arginine and produce NO, both contributing to immune suppression. Tregs secrete IL-10 and TGF-β, further reinforcing immunosuppression and shaping the TIME. The figure was created with BioRender.com. AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; ARG1, arginase-1; ATF4, activating transcription factor 4; CD80, cluster of differentiation 80; CD86, cluster of differentiation 86; IDO, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; IGF1, insulin-like growth factor 1; IL-10, interleukin-10; Kyn, kynurenine; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cell; NO, nitric oxide; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; SGOC, serine–glycine–one-carbon; SLC, solute carrier; STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; TAM, tumor-associated macrophage; TCR, T cell receptor; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta; TIME, tumor immune microenvironment; Treg, regulatory T cell.

Articles: Latest Articles; Most Read; Collections

Updates: Events; News; Multimedia

About: About Us

Contact

No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing

100081

010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)

qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House