Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Spermidine inactivates proteasome activity and enhances ferroptosis in prostate cancer
收藏切换
PDF
Dan Fenga, Jian Zhangb, Huanmin Niub, Xiaoxue Zhengb, Mengqi Jiab, Qiqi Lub, Jing Wangb, Wenxue Guob, Qi Sunb, Huiqing Yuanb, *, Hongxiang Loua, c, *
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(4) : 2095 - 2113
Less
收藏切换
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(4): 2095-2113
• ORIGINAL ARTICLE •
Spermidine inactivates proteasome activity and enhances ferroptosis in prostate cancer
Full
Dan Fenga, Jian Zhangb, Huanmin Niub, Xiaoxue Zhengb, Mengqi Jiab, Qiqi Lub, Jing Wangb, Wenxue Guob, Qi Sunb, Huiqing Yuanb, *, Hongxiang Loua, c, *
Affiliations
  • aDepartment of Natural Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
  • bInstitute of Medical Sciences of the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, China
  • cDepartment of Natural Product Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China
About Author:

E-mail addresses: (Hongxiang Lou)

(Huiqing Yuan)

Author contributions

Dan Feng: Writing – original draft, Project administration, Formal analysis, Data curation. Jian Zhang: Software. Huanmin Niu: Methodology, Investigation. Xiaoxue Zheng: Methodology. Mengqi Jia: Supervision. Qiqi Lu: Validation. Jing Wang: Validation. Wenxue Guo: Visualization. Qi Sun: Visualization. Huiqing Yuan: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Hongxiang Lou: Resources, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.02.023
Outline
收藏切换

The elevated polyamines, amine-rich molecules with diverse functions in pathophysiology processes, are implicated in contributing to tumorigenesis and progression. Whether and how they affect the efficacy of chemotherapy is incompletely understood. Our screening assays reveal that the supplement with a low dose of spermidine (Spd), one of the polyamines, enhances ferroptosis in prostate cancer cells as evidenced by increased lipid peroxidation and intracellular Fe2+ levels in vitro. Combination treatment with Spd and a low dose of ferroptosis inducer erastin synergistically augments anti-tumor efficacy with undetectable toxicity in mice. Analysis of RNA-seq data indicates that heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1), an enzyme that catalyzes the cleavage of heme to release Fe2+, is significantly upregulated in response to Spd and erastin cotreatment. Spd mediated the hypusine modification of the eukaryotic initiation factor 5A (EIF5A) promotes the translation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), subsequently leading to elevation of HMOX1. Moreover, Spd and erastin significantly inhibit proteasome activity which results in a decrease in proteasomal degradation of NRF2, although many proteasome-related genes are induced either by Spd or Spd plus erastin. Thus, in addition to its pro-oncogenic activity, the supplement of Spd improves antitumor activity in combination with ferroptosis inducers and offers an optional approach to cancer treatment.

Spermidine  /  Proteasome  /  Ferroptosis  /  EIF5A  /  NRF2  /  Prostate cancer  /  Polyamines  /  HMOX1
Dan Feng, Jian Zhang, Huanmin Niu, Xiaoxue Zheng, Mengqi Jia, Qiqi Lu, Jing Wang, Wenxue Guo, Qi Sun, Huiqing Yuan, Hongxiang Lou. Spermidine inactivates proteasome activity and enhances ferroptosis in prostate cancer[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 2025 , 15 (4) : 2095 -2113 . DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.02.023
Full Text
Less
1.　Introduction
Less
Despite the great achievements made in cancer treatment, resistance to therapy, particularly to chemotherapy, remains a major contributor to cancer recurrence that eventually leads to failure in the successful treatment. Chemotherapy is a primary treatment for cancer, particularly for metastatic tumors, resistance to various chemotherapeutic drugs is inevitable and causes poor survival outcomes and complications in patients1-3. For example, the first line therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is docetaxel-based chemotherapy, almost all patients eventually develop resistance after one year of treatment, despite a good response and survival benefit observed initially. Few therapeutic approaches are available to CRPC patients progressing to docetaxel resistance4. Resistance to chemotherapy has been reported for almost all the drugs used clinically. Therefore, a number of studies have focused on the identification of novel therapeutics for reversing drug resistance or the development of optional approaches to enhance chemosensitivity.
Polyamines are amine-rich and positively charged molecules, including putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd), and spermine (Spm). They are natural mammalian polyamines and exert diverse functions in normal cells due to their specialty in structures that allow them to easily interact with negatively charged molecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids, and affect biological processes5. In addition to influencing protein/DNA interactions, polyamine-mediated protein modification is also unique in biological processes. It is demonstrated that Spd contributes to the hypusination of the eukaryotic translation factor 5A (EIF5A), which is essential for the synthesis of many proteins including transcriptional factors, oncogenic proteins, and epigenetic modifiers involved in the regulation of proliferation, senescence, inflammation, and immune system. Therefore, the dysfunctional metabolism of polyamines is closely correlated with the development of diseases. The elevated polyamines and their biosynthetic genes are frequently observed in various cancers and positively contribute to the severity of malignancy6,7. Therefore, Blockade of polyamine metabolism results in the suppression of tumor growth and provides an option for cancer therapy6,8. Several inhibitors of the polyamine biosynthesis enzymes and polyamine transporters have been identified. Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), an irreversible inhibitor of the rate-limiting enzyme of the polyamine biosynthesis named ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), is able to deplete Put and Spd accompanied by growth inhibition in cancer9. Moreover, the combination of DFMO combined with other agents, for example, with 5-azacytidine (a demethylating agent) also increases M1 macrophages in the tumor microenvironment, and increases anti-tumor efficacy in an ovarian cancer mouse model10. Recent investigations highlight an interesting role of polyamines in cancer immunotherapy. Spd supplementation enhances the antitumor activity of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in mice. The study defines that Spd directly binds to mitochondrial trifunctional protein (MTP) and activates fatty acid oxidation (FAO) in T cells11. This suggests that polyamines, besides their promoting effects on tumor growth, may control the inflammatory response to immunotherapies, and have complicated roles in balancing tumor malignancy and anti-tumor efficiency. Whether the antitumor effect of polyamines is specific in some types of cancers or ubiquitous in most cancers, and whether they affect the efficacy of various chemotherapeutics in cancer treatment remains to be elucidated.
In this study, we found that Put, Spd, and Spm had limited effects on the cytotoxic activity of chemotherapeutic reagents that are often clinically used in various cancer cells. However, Spd significantly sensitized erastin-induced ferroptosis in prostate cancer cells by increasing intracellular ferrous ions. This effect of Spd depended on the inhibition of proteasome activity and facilitating hypusine modification of EIF5A, which results in the accumulation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) and activation of heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1) to promote ferroptosis.
2.　Materials and methods
Less
2.1.　 Reagent
Docetaxel, Cisplatin, Adriamycin, and Gemcitabine were purchased from the Second Hospital of Shandong University (Jinan, China). Putrescine (Put), spermidine (Spd), spermine (Spm), glutathione (GSH), and difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) were obtained from Aladdin Biochemical Technology (Shanghai, China). Erastin, ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1), necrostatin-1 (Nec-1), acetylcysteine (NAC), and MG132 were obtained from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA). Deferoxamine (DFO), mitoquinone mesylate (MitoQ), RSL3, GC7 Sulfate (GC7), tetrathiomolybdate (TTM), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and cycloheximide (CHX) were purchased from MedChemExpress (Shanghai, China). Z-VAD-FMK was obtained from Beyotime (Shanghai, China).
2.2.　 Cell culture
PC3, A549, H1299, H292, K562, HepG2, EC109, HCT116, A2780, and A2780/CDDP (Cisplatin-resistant cell line derived from A2780) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). DU145, H460, H460/RT (paclitaxel-resistant cell line derived from H460), SW620, H1688, and H446 were purchased from the Shanghai Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). Human prostate cancer cells PC3, DU145, human lung carcinoma H460, H460/Tax, A549, H1688, H446, H292, H1299, human esophageal cancer EC019 cells, human ovary cancer A2780, A2780/CDDP cells and colon cancer LOVO and HCT116 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 media with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. Liver cancer HepG2 and Colon cancer SW620 cells were cultured in DMEM media with 10% FBS and antibiotics. All these cells were incubated at 37 ℃ in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator.
2.3.　 Cell viability
Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at an initial density of 1 × 104 cells/well and incubated at 37 ℃ overnight. Then the cells were treated with compounds or DMSO (served as the control) for 24 h. Cell viability was determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium (MTT, Olarbio Science & Technology, Beijing, China) assay performed at least 3 replicates for each concentration.
2.4.　 Measurement of lipid ROS
The level of lipid ROS was detected by C11-BODIPY 581/591 (Thermo Scientific, Shanghai, China). Cells were seeded at appropriate density in a six-well and exposed to the indicated treatments, then 5 μmol/L of C11-BODIPY 581/591 dye was added and incubated at 37 ℃ in the dark for 30 min. The fluorescence intensity was measured using flow cytometry.
2.5.　 Malondialdehyde (MDA) assay
The MDA levels in tumor cells or tissues were measured using a Lipid Peroxidation MDA Assay Kit (Nanjing Jiancheng, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were seeded in a 100 mm cell culture dish and treated with the indicated reagents for 12 h. Then the cells were divided into two equal parts after collection, in which one part was used for protein concentration determination and the other part was detected for intracellular MDA. The tissues were treated with 0.86% saline and homogenized by an ultrasonic cell disruptor. The 10% homogenate was centrifuged at a speed of 12,000 rpm using a centrifuge for 10 min, then the supernatant was collected for measuring MDA levels and protein concentration. MDA levels were normalized to the total amount of protein in cells or tissues.
2.6.　 Ferrous iron assay
The Fe2+ levels of cells were detected by FerroOrange dye (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Cells were exposed to the indicated treatments for 8 h. After treatment, FerroOrange was added to the cells incubated at 37 ℃ for 30 min. The Fe2+ levels of cells were acquired using flow cytometry. The Fe2+ levels of tissues were measured using the Ferrous Ion Content Assay Kit (Olarbio Science & Technology) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The 10% homogenate of tissue was centrifuged and the supernatant was collected for measuring Fe2+ levels. Fe2+ levels were normalized to the total amount of protein in tissues.
2.7.　 Glutathione (GSH) assay
Intracellular GSH levels were determined using a GSH Assay Kit (Nanjing Jiancheng). Cells were seeded in a 100 mm cell culture dish and treated with the indicated reagents for 12 h. Then, the subsequent procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The data were detected by a microplate reader.
2.8.　 Measurement of intracellular ROS
The levels of intracellular ROS were detected by a 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA) assay kit (Beyotime). The cells were seeded in 6-well plates and suspended in 1 mL of 10 μmol/L DCFH-DA for 20 min at 37 ℃ in the dark after being treated with the indicated reagents for 8 h. The cells were washed twice with PBS and the fluorescence intensity was detected by flow cytometry.
2.9.　 Measurement of mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and ATP
MMP was measured by a JC-1 assay kit (Beyotime) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with the indicated reagents. After treatment, the cells were stained with JC-1 for 20 min at 37 ℃, the results were observed by the fluorescence microscope and flow cytometry. MMP was analyzed by the ratio of red/green fluorescence intensity using FlowJo software. Intracellular ATP levels were determined using an Enhanced ATP Assay Kit (Beyotime) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After treatment with indicated reagents for 8 h, cells were washed and cell lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g at 4 ℃ for 5 min, the supernatant was collected to measure chemiluminescence with a luminometer plate reader. Intracellular ATP levels were normalized to the amount of protein in cells.
2.10.　 Real-time quantitative PCR analysis (RT-qPCR)
The total RNA was extracted from cultured cells and tissues using a TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa, Japan) following the manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcriptase reactions were performed using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (TOYOBO, Japan). RT-qPCR of cDNA was performed with SYBR Green reaction master mix (TOYOBO) on a QuantStudioTM 5 system (Thermo Fisher). Target gene mRNA expressions were normalized to the level of β-actin expression. Changes in transcript level were calculated using 2–ΔΔCt method. The primers are listed in Supporting Information Table S1.
2.11.　 Western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation
Cells and tissues were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and ice-cold RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors (Invitrogen). Protein concentrations were quantified by BCA protein assay (Beyotime). Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to NC membranes. After being blocked in 5% skim milk at room temperature for 1 h, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 ℃ with primary antibodies before being probed with the appropriate peroxide-conjugated secondary antibodies. The blots were visualized based on an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) method. For immunoprecipitation, cell lysates were pre-cleared with protein A/G Plus-Agarose beads (Santa Cruz), and then incubated with anti-Myc at 4 ℃ overnight. The immunocomplexes were captured by the addition of 20 μL protein A/G Plus-Agarose beads, and washed with RIPA buffer. The beads were heated at 95 ℃ for 5 min in loading buffer before immunoblotting assays. The detailed antibody information is included in Supporting Information Table S2. The relative protein expression analysis was performed using ImageJ software.
2.12.　 RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis
PC3 Cells were treated with indicated reagents for 8 h and three replicates for each group were collected. Total RNAs were extracted from cells using TRIzol reagent. RNA sequencing and data analysis were performed by Lc-bio Technologies (Hangzhou, China). Differentially expressed genes between groups were analyzed by R package edgeR according to the criteria with corrected P values of 0.05 and absolute fold-changes of 2.
2.13.　 Transient transfection of plasmids and siRNAs
For RNA interference, siRNA duplex oligonucleotides or scramble oligonucleotides were synthesized from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The plasmids containing pcDNA3.1-Myc-NRF2 and pcDNA3.1-HA-Ub were purchased from ViGene Biosciences (Jinan, China). PC3 Cells were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Small interference sequences of HMOX1 and NRF2 have been used and verified in other reports12. The siRNA sequences are provided in Supporting Information Table S3.
2.14.　 Proteasome activity assay
The proteasome trypsin-like (Try-L) activity was measured by the proteasome substrates Bz-VGR-AMC (Enzo Life Sciences, USA). The cells were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with the indicated reagents. Then the whole cell lysates were prepared with lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5% NP40, 2 mmol/L DTT) for 30 min. 20 μg of cell lysates were incubated with Bz-VGR-AMC for 30 min at 37 ℃ in the dark. The results were observed by the fluorescence microplate reader. The fresh tissues were collected and treated with proteasome activity assay lysis buffer, and then the 10% homogenate was centrifuged at a speed of 12,000 rpm using a centrifuge for 10 min at 4 ℃, the 30 μg of supernatant was collected for measuring proteasome activity.
2.15.　 Molecular docking analysis
To explore the binding site and the binding effect of Spd with proteasome subunits, AutoDock13, molecular modeling simulation software for protein-ligand docking, was used. The structures of the PSME3 (PDB ID: 7YQD14) and PSME4 (PDB ID: 6KWY15) were obtained from the Protein Data Bank16. We conducted docking studies with the flexible ligand (spermidine) and the rigid receptor (PSME3 and PSME4). The three-dimensional coordinates of the drug molecules were downloaded from the Drug Bank database17.
A Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA)18,19 was used for generating binding poses. The docking was initiated with 150 randomly positioned poses, a maximum of 2.7 × 107 generations, and a maximum number of 2.5 × 107 energy evaluations. The rate of gene mutation, rate of crossover, and elitism parameters were set as 0.02, 0.80, and 1, respectively. For each PSME3 or PSME4-spermidine docking, 30 docked poses were generated. The best binding energy conformation was selected to be analyzed further. The PyMOL package was used to visualize the binding interactions between these ligands and a 3D model of PSME3 or PSME4.
2.16.　 Tumor xenograft experiment
Male BALB/c nude mice (5 weeks of age) were obtained from Jiangsu Huachuang Xinuo Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd. (Taizhou, China). After a week of acclimatization, PC3 cells (5 × 106 cells) were suspended in 200 μL saline and injected subcutaneously in the right anterior flanks of the mice. Tumors were measured with calipers every other day. For antitumor efficiency of Spd and erastin combined therapy in vivo, when tumors reached 50–100 mm3, the mice were randomized into 7 groups (n = 6 for each group): 1) Placebo group (5% DMSO, 40% PEG 400, 5% Tween 80 and sterile water); 2) Spd group (10 mg/kg Spd dissolved in saline)20,21; 3) Put group (10 mg/kg Put dissolved in saline); 4) High-dose erastin group (15 mg/kg erastin dissolved in 5% DMSO, 40% PEG 400, 5% Tween 80 and sterile water); 5) Low-dose erastin group (5 mg/kg erastin); 6) Spd + erastin group (10 mg/kg Spd + 5 mg/kg erastin); 7) Put + erastin group (10 mg/kg Put+ 5 mg/kg erastin). For the effect of GC7 on the combination therapy in mouse tumor models, when tumors reached 50–100 mm3, the mice were assigned randomly into 4 treatment groups (n = 5 for each group): 1) Placebo group (5% DMSO, 40% PEG 400, 5% Tween 80 and sterile water); 2) GC7 group (2 mg/kg GC7 dissolved in saline)22; 3) Spd + erastin group (10 mg/kg Spd + 5 mg/kg erastin); 4) GC7 + Spd + erastin group (2 mg/kg GC7 + 10 mg/kg Spd + 5 mg/kg erastin). All the groups were administered by intraperitoneal injection daily. The mice's weight and tumor volume were measured every other day. Tumor volumes (mm3) were calculated according to Eq. (1):
Tumor volumes (mm3) = 0.5 × L × W2
where L is length and W is width. After 14 days of treatment, all mice were sacrificed and tumors were removed and weighed. All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of Shandong University (Jinan, China). The research was conducted following the National Institutes of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 8023, revised in 1978).
2.17.　 Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Xenograft tumor tissue was fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded with paraffin using an embedding machine (Sakura, Japan). Paraffin-embedded tumor specimens were sectioned at a 5 μm thickness for H&E staining and immunohistochemical analysis. H&E staining was performed using routine methods. For immunohistochemical analysis, the slides were stained with Ki67, HMOX1, and NRF2 overnight at 4 ℃. After antigen retrieval, the slides were stained with IgG-conjugated HRP and DAB (Vector Laboratories), and samples were counterstained with hematoxylin and subjected to capture images by Nanozoomer Digital Pathology scanner microscopy (NanoZoomer S60).
2.18.　 Measurement of polyamines
Polyamines from treated cells were isolated, benzoylated, and analyzed by HPLC as previously described23. Briefly, 107 cells were collected and resuspended the cells in 1 mL PBS. Polyamines from cells were extracted and protonated by adding 100 μL of 50% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid solution with 20 μL (20 nmol) of the 1,8-diaminooctane internal standard to each tube. 500 μL of TCA cell extract was added to 2 mL of 2 mol/L NaOH to benzoylation with 7 μL of benzoyl chloride solution at 40 ℃ for 20 min. Then the reaction was stopped by using 2 mL of saturated NaCl solution. The benzoylated polyamine derivatives were extracted with 2 mL ethyl acetate. The benzoylated polyamine derivatives were analyzed using an Agilent 1260 HPLC with an Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 column (5 μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm). Using the relative molar response derived from benzoylated polyamine derivatives and 1,8-diaminooctane standards, the amount of benzoylated polyamine derivatives was calculated and normalized to the total sample protein.
2.19.　 Statistical analysis
Experiments were replicated thrice. Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 9.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). Statistical analysis was performed with the t-test for two groups or one-way ANOVA for multiple groups. Values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance in all experiments was considered at P values < 0.05.
3.　Results
Less
3.1.　 Spd supplement facilitates ferroptosis in prostate cancer cells
We initially examined the polyamine levels to test whether they affect DFMO in a panel of cancer cells. The results showed that the levels of Spd and Spm were higher than that of Put in the cancer cells tested. It appeared that the IC50 values of DFMO were marginally associated with the polyamine amount (Supporting Information Fig. S1A and S1B). Cells were exposed to Put, Spd, and Spm with different concentrations to determine whether the supplement of polyamines has an impact on cell survival. The results indicated that polyamines at 1 μmol/L had no detectable effect on cell viability, but exerted inhibition on cell viability at higher concentrations (Fig. S1C). Therefore, we selected polyamines (1 μmol/L) to test whether polyamines influence the cytotoxic effect of chemotherapeutics used in the clinic. As shown in Fig. S1D, cell viability was not influenced when cells were exposed to low concentrations of the polyamines combined with docetaxel, cisplatin, adriamycin, and gemcitabine, however, cell survival was significantly suppressed when co-treatment of Spd with the ferroptosis inducer erastin, an inhibitor of solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11), in prostate cancer PC3, DU145, and the colorectal cancer SW620 cells, suggesting that polyamines may increase the sensitivity of these cells to ferroptosis induction.
To validate the influences of Spd in ferroptosis, we treated PC3 and DU145 cells with different combinations of erastin to monitor the change in cell viability. The results clearly showed that Spd significantly reduced cell viability when combined with erastin at low concentrations over 12 h (Fig. 1A–C, Fig. S1E and S1F). Analysis of ferroptosis parameters indicated that cotreatment with Spd and erastin predominantly increased intracellular malondialdehyde (MDA) levels and lipid ROS production (Fig. 1D and E), which are two classical features of ferroptosis. The production of lipid ROS induced by the combination treatment was significantly abolished in the presence of ferroptosis inhibitor ferrostatin-1 (Fer-1) (Fig. 1F), supporting the observations that Spd synergistically enhanced erastin-induced ferroptosis. Furthermore, the apoptosis inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK, the necroptosis inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1), the cuproptosis inhibitor tetrathiomolybdate (TTM), and the autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) had limited ability to restore the cell death by Spd and erastin, providing evidence that Spd exacerbated ferroptosis induced by erastin (Fig. 1G). The effect of Spd on ferroptosis was further confirmed using RSL3, another ferroptosis inducer targeting glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) (Supporting Information Fig. S2). Taken together, these results demonstrate that Spd significantly sensitized ferroptosis in prostate cancer cells.
3.2.　 Spd promotes anti-tumor efficacy of erastin in mice
To evaluate the anti-tumor potential of Spd, a xenograft model was established in nude mice for this purpose (Fig. 2A). Animals treated with placebo, Spd and Put alone, erastin with different doses (high, 15 mg/kg; low, 5 mg/kg), or Spd and Put plus erastin (5 mg/kg), respectively. The results revealed that Spd, but not Put, marginally increased tumor growth, although this increase in tumor volume and weight failed to be statistically significant (Fig. 2B–D). In the case of erastin, a high dose of erastin (H) drastically exerted inhibition on tumor growth, while erastin at a low concentration (L) combined with Spd led to a predominant decrease in tumor growth as indicated by the reduction in tumor volume/weight and Ki67 positive staining, which was not significantly displayed in mice exposed to Put combined with erastin (Fig. 2B–E and Supporting Information Fig. S3A). Further analysis indicated that MDA and Fe2+ levels significantly increased in the tumor samples from mice treated with erastin (H) alone or Spd combined with erastin (L), whereas Spd, Put, or Put plus erastin (L) had limited effect on these two parameters (Fig. 2F and G). As a downstream marker of ferroptosis, prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 (PTGS2) mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in mice treated with erastin (H), or Spd combined with erastin (L), but not in other groups (Fig. 2H). Moreover, combination treatment with Spd and erastin displayed no measurable toxicity as evidenced by the changes in animal body weight and the release of aspartate transaminase (AST) and glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT) in the blood, two indicators of liver damage (Fig. 2I and J). In a macroscopic analysis, The H&E staining of major organs showed that there were no appreciable abnormalities or noticeable organ damage in the combination group (Fig. S3B). Thus, Spd combined with erastin exerts a potential anti-tumor activity with little toxicity.
3.3.　 Spd-sensitized ferroptosis depends on ROS elevation and iron accumulation
Ferroptosis is an excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent form of cell death24, and Spd is closely related to ROS25, this prompted us to question the change of ROS in response to Spd or Spd plus erastin. Interestingly, Spd itself decreased the intracellular ROS, but promoted ROS production together with erastin (Fig. 3A). Put, the synthetic precursors of Spd, didn't show the effect on ROS production in the presence of erastin (Supporting Information Fig. S4A). Additionally, the promotion of ROS production by Spm, another polyamine derived from Spd, was weaker than that of Spd (Fig. S4A). To assess the role of the effect of ROS in ferroptosis induced by Spd combined erastin, cell viability was monitored with Spd and erastin in the presence of two ROS scavengers glutathione (GSH) and acetylcysteine (NAC). The results demonstrated that GSH and NAC completely suppressed ROS production induced by Spd plus erastin, associated with restoration of cell survival (Fig. 3A–C), highlighting the importance of ROS in Spd-stimulated ferroptosis. As GSH is indispensable to scavenge excessive ROS, the results displayed that Spd, to some extent, increased the intracellular GSH concentration but the intracellular GSH levels didn't increase during the co-treatment with Spd and erastin (Fig. 3D). Mitochondria and Fenton reaction are the major sources of intracellular ROS, we next examined the alteration in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and Fe2+ levels. JC-1 staining showed that the MMP did not have a significant change when cells were exposed to Spd and erastin (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, the content of ATP did not further reduce indicating that the combination treatment did not have an additional impact on mitochondrial function (Fig. S4B). Strikingly, Spd remarkedly increased the erastin-induced Fe2+ levels, and sustained the Fe2+ levels upon cotreatment (Fig. 3F). An iron chelator deferoxamine (DFO) and the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant mitoquinone mesylate (MitoQ) were employed to determine the major sources of intracellular ROS. As shown in Fig. 3G, the cell viability assay revealed that DFO was capable of preventing cell death following Spd and erastin cotreatment, whereas MitoQ was unable to save the cells exposed to cotreatment (Fig. 3G). These results imply that Spd sensitized ferroptosis through a ROS-dependent mechanism that is associated with the accumulation of iron.
3.4.　 Spd and erastin actives NRF2-HMOX1 signaling
To gain further insights into the Spd-facilitated ferroptosis in prostate cancer cells, we conducted RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis in PC3 cells treated with Spd alone or combined with erastin. There were 652 differentially expressed genes upon Spd treatment, and the number of 1379 genes were significantly upregulated while 1965 genes were downregulated in the Spd plus erastin treatment (Fig. 4A and Supporting Information Fig. S5A), suggesting the gene profile is dramatically altered upon treatments. The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) exhibited high enrichment of upregulated genes involved in proteasome and ferroptosis response to both Spd single and co-treatment (Fig. S5B). Analysis of the 58 genes clustered in the Venn diagram, which were upregulated in cells treated with either Spd or Spd combined with erastin, revealed that they were significantly enriched in the ferroptosis pathway (Fig. 4B–D). Among these genes verified by RT-qPCR assays, we found that the change of heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1) was most significant, it was predominantly upregulated by Spd, and became more robust when Spd combined with erastin (Fig. 4E). Western blot analysis confirmed the changing pattern of HMOX1 protein in PC3 and DU145 cells treated with Spd alone or Spd combined with erastin (Fig. 4F and Supporting Information Fig. S6A). The downregulation of the SLC7A11 and GPX4 could promote ferroptosis, but we noticed that SLC7A11 slightly increased, GPX4 remained unchanged in cells challenged with Spd or Spd plus erastin (Fig. 4F and Fig. S6A). Furthermore, elevated HMOX1 was also evidenced in the tumor samples after combination treatments compared to the control group (Fig. 4G–I and J, and Fig. S6B and S6C).
As HMOX1 is regulated by the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor2 (NRF2), which is a critical transcriptional factor that responds to oxidative stress to regulate diverse target genes including the heme, iron and GSH metabolism such as HMOX1, ferritin heavy chain (FTH1), ferritin light chain (FTL), glutamate-cysteine ligase regulatory (GCLM) and SLC7A1126. We hypothesize that Spd- and erastin-mediated alteration in HOMX1 may be ascribed to the regulatory effect of NRF2. It was displayed that NRF2 was marginally changed in response to Spd, and significantly upregulated upon co-treatment with Spd and erastin (Fig. 4H–J, Fig. S6B–S6D). We subsequently knocked down HMOX1 or NRF2 to examine whether HMOX1 and NRF2 are critical in Spd-mediated combination therapy. The results demonstrated that HMOX1 or NRF2 depletion failed to facilitate cell death induced by Spd combined erastin (Fig. 4K, L and Fig. S6E). Ferritinophagy is a crucial process responsible for regulating the level of Fe2+. Nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) recruits FTH1 to autophagosomes for lysosomal degradation and iron release, triggering ferroptosis27,28. We found that the proteins of NCOA4, FTH1 and FTL proteins involved in the regulation of ferritinophagy, were induced creased in the co-treatment (Fig. S6F). Solute carrier family 40 member 1 (SLC40A1/FPN1, a transmembrane exporter of non-heme iron) and transferrin receptor (TFRC, a dimeric glycoprotein receptor for iron-loaded transferrin at the surface of plasma) are the two main iron transporters29. However, there was no significant change in the protein levels of TFRC and FPN1 after combination treatment (Fig. S6F). Therefore, it suggested that Spd enhances ferroptosis depending on the up-regulation of NRF2/HMOX1 signaling.
3.5.　 Spd-mediated EIF5A hypusination promotes NRF2 translation
Given the importance of NRF2 in Spd-stimulated ferroptosis, we sought to explore the mechanism underlying the regulation of Spd on NRF2. One of the critical functions of Spd is to modify the hypusination of EIF5A (Hyp-EIF5A) that controls the synthesis of target proteins, particularly important for the efficient translation of the N-terminal or long internal polyproline motifs30 (Fig. 5A). As NRF2 has a triproline motif in its N-terminal end31,32 (Fig. 5B), we are encouraged to investigate whether EIF5A hypusination affects NRF2 synthesis and attributes to sensitize ferroptosis. The results showed that pretreatment with GC7 Sulfate (GC7), a specific inhibitor of deoxyhypusine synthase (DHPS) that reduces EIF5A hypusination, strongly reversed ferroptosis induced by Spd and erastin (Fig. 5C and D). Enhancement of Hyp-EIF5A by Spd plus erastin was markedly impaired by GC7 treatment, associated with a reduction in NRF2 and HMOX1 (Fig. 5E). Similarly, knockdown of EIF5A attenuated expressions of NRF2 and HMOX1 that were induced by Spd combined with erastin (Fig. 5F). Moreover, as a transcriptional factor, migration of NRF2 (phosphorylated form) into the nucleus was also decreased when EIF5A hypusination was suppressed by DHPS inhibitor GC7 treatment (Fig. 5G), highlighting the importance Spd-triggered EIF5A hypusination in activation of NRF2 expression and function. Additionally, the effects of the GC7 on the combination therapy in mouse tumor models were observed. It was found that treatment with GC7 to inhibit hypusination resulted in a slight reduction of average tumor volume and weight compared to the placebo group, consistent with previous reports (Fig. 5H and I)22,33-35. Importantly, GC7 notedly reduced the antitumor effect of combination treatment with Spd and erastin (Fig. 5H and I), supporting the importance of Spd-mediated EIF5A hypusination in ferroptosis induced by erastin. Moreover, Western blot analysis revealed that enhancement of Hyp-EIF5A by Spd plus erastin, accompanied by elevated NRF2, whereas this enhancement by cotreatment was significantly impaired in the presence of GC7 (Fig. 5J and K). These results highlight the regulatory ability of Spd in NRF2, which depends on EIF5A hypusination in vivo.
3.6.　 Spd and erastin suppresses the proteasome activity required for NRF2 degradation
It was noticed that Spd and erastin significantly upregulated the genes enriched in the proteasome system (Fig. S5B), we question whether enhanced proteasomal genes affect NRF2 protein abundance because proteasome-mediated NRF2 degradation is essential for the regulation of its level and function. To confirm the specific regulatory impact of the cotreatment on NRF2 protein, PC3 cells were treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) to determine the change of NRF2 protein in a time-dependent manner. A strong increase in the stability and half-life of NRF2 was observed when Spd and erastin were present (Fig. 6A). We then examined the change of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), which forms part of an E3 ligase response to the regulation of NRF2 ubiquitination by binding to NRF236. It was shown that KEAP1 remained unchanged in response to Spd and erastin treatment (Fig. 6B). However, bulk ubiquitination of proteins was significantly induced in cells exposed to Spd plus erastin (Fig. 6C), importantly, the polyubiquitinated NRF2 was noticeably elevated when Spd and erastin were supplemented (Fig. 6C). These results indicated that proteasomal activity was inhibited during the co-treatment. To further validate the proteasome activity in Spd-facilitated cell death, we measured cell survival in the presence of proteasome inhibitor MG132. As shown in Fig. 6D, erastin-induced cell death was further increased when combined with MG132, indicating that inactivation of proteasome augments the inhibitory effect of erastin on cell viability. Of note, MG132 exacerbated the cell death caused by cotreatment with Spd and erastin (Fig. 6D). These motivated us to further investigate the change of proteasome activity when incubated with Spd, erastin, or co-treatment. As shown in Fig. 6E and F, trypsin-like (Try-L) activity, one of the proteases in the proteasome was suppressed in cells and the tumor samples treated with Spd, erastin, or co-treatment (Fig. 6E and F). These observations supported that Spd and erastin had the ability to inhibit proteasome activity.
To elucidate the underlying mechanism(s) by which Spd or co-treatment exhibits suppression of proteasome activity, we validated the change of proteasome-related genes. Consistent with the results of RNA-seq analysis, the mRNA levels of some proteasomal subunits were induced in response to Spd or co-treatment (Fig. 6G and H). Protein abundance of 26S proteasome non-ATPase regulatory subunit 2 (PSMD2), proteasome activator complex subunit 3 (PSME3), 26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4 (PSMC1), and proteasome subunit beta type-7 (PSMB7) slightly increased in PC3 cells, and became more evident in tumor samples after treatments, particularly the co-treatment (Fig. 6I and J). These results suggested that the gene expressions of proteasomal subunits may be feedback-regulated due to proteasome activity being inhibited by Spd and erastin.
Spd is an aliphatic carbon chain including three amine groups, it acts as a polycation active molecule under a physiological environment. This leads us to propose that Spd may interact with proteasomal component(s) to exert inhibitory function rather than to suppress subunit gene expressions. To this end, molecular simulations were conducted and displayed that Spd appears to bind to PSME3 and PSME4, two proteasome activator subunits37,38. The docked model (Fig. 6K) showed that the amine group of Spd formed hydrogen bonds or salt bridge with the residues from PMSE3 (Asp54 (A), Glu211 (A), and Glu120 (B)), and the hydrophobic carbon chain of Spd also formed van der Waals forces (mainly hydrophobic interactions) with Leu55 (A), Thr56 (A), Glu120 (B), Lys123 (B), and Pro124 (B) in PSME3 (Fig. 6K–d). As for PSME4, the amine group of Spd formed the hydrogen bond or salt bridge with the residues from Asp1776 and Glu1819 in PSME4 (Fig. 6L). Similar to PSME3, Spd formed van der Waals forces with Glu438, Val1777, Glu1822, and Gln1823 in PSME4 (Fig. 6L–c). Therefore, Spd and erastin suppress proteasome activity, resulting in the accumulation of NRF2 to activate ferroptosis.
4.　Discussion
Less
This study demonstrates that Spd acts as a stimulator to enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of erastin in prostate cancer. Spd activates NRF2/HMOX1 signaling that results in Fe2+ accumulation and ferroptosis induced by erastin. Spd-mediated EIF5A hypusination promotes the translation of the transcription factor NRF2. Meanwhile, Spd and erastin suppress the activity of the proteasome required for NRF2 degradation (Fig. 7).
Polyamines are essential for cell proliferation and growth, the elevated level of polyamines is a defining signature of various types of cancers, thus, the rate-limiting enzyme ODC in the polyamine biosynthetic pathway acts as a therapeutical target in cancer treatment6. Interestingly, high levels of preoperative Spd were positively associated with the recurrence of colorectal cancer39, but supplementation with Spd could reduce the occurrence of colorectal cancer and chemically induced liver cancer40,41. The discrepancy between the anti-tumorigenic and tumor growth-promoting functions of Spd might be the role of cell-autonomous vs non-autonomous polyamine supply. Regarding the effect of dietary supplementation of Spd on tumor growth, it is believed to be associated with the immune environment and dosage. Our results found that supplementation with Spd (10 mg/kg, i.p., daily) for 14 days to immunodeficient nude mice promoted xenograft growth. Furthermore, a recent study has also observed that singly administered Spm (3 mmol/L, drinking water) for 24 days resulted in a modest enhancement of tumor growth in nude mice42. However, a supplement of Spd (2 mmol/L, 100 μL) around the tumor for 14 days could significantly inhibit the growth of colon cells CT-26 and MC38 in mice with normal immune systems43. Similarly, Spd did not directly affect tumor growth but enhanced the anti-tumor efficacy of PD-L1 monoclonal antibody and inhibited the tumor growth in mice harboring MC-38 or CT-26 cells, which was achieved intraperitoneally with Spd (2 and 4 mg/kg, respectively) for around 20 days11. Moreover, an observational epidemiological study revealed that individuals with a Spd-rich diet are characterized by lower overall mortality and reduced cancer mortality44. In this paper, we found that Spd significantly increased the sensitivity of ferroptosis inducers in prostate cancer. We noticed that ferroptosis played a crucial role in the immune response to enhance antitumor immunotherapy45,46, since chemotherapy of cancers usually allows a certain course of treatment in clinical, and for patients with an immune system, the supplementation with low doses of Spd may significantly enhance the tumor-suppressing capability of ferroptosis inducers in prostate cancer, exerting limited effect on tumor growth while simultaneously augmenting the anti-tumor immune response.
Ferroptosis is a unique form of regulated cell death characterized by redox system imbalance, the lethal accumulation of iron and lipid peroxides, and plays a pivotal role in tumor suppression47. System x–c–GSH–GPX4 axis is the major cellular system in suppressing ferroptosis and maintaining cell survival under oxidative stress conditions47. The heavy chain subunit solute carrier family 3 member 2 (SLC3A2), a subunit of system x–c, is a critical membrane transporter for polyamine uptake48,49, suggesting the relationship between polyamines and ferroptosis. 100 μmol/L of Spd can inhibit the proliferation and promote ferroptosis of prostate cancer cell lines by producing ROS via amine oxidase copper-containing 1 (AOC1)50. As a potent antioxidant, the administration of Spd acts as an anti-ferroptotic effect in many mice models of human disease including Alzheimer's disease, premature ovarian failure, rheumatoid arthritis, and diabetic cardiomyopathy51-54. Mechanistically, Spd increases the protein expression of NRF2 to upregulate the system x–c–GSH–GPX4 axis, inactivates NCOA4-mediated ferroptinophagy, and decreases p53 and SAT1 expression to attenuate ferroptosis51-54. Interestingly, we found that Spd (1 μmol/L) with no influence on the cell viability decreased the intracellular ROS, but promoted ROS production and ferroptosis when combined with erastin in prostate cancer cells. It is demonstrated that anti-ferroptosis proteins, such as SLC7A11 which is highly present in lung cancer A549 cells, contribute to resistance to erastin-induced ferroptosis55. However, Spd combined with erastin did not decrease proteins involved in the antioxidant defense system like SLC7A11, GPX4 and NRF2, to some extent, combined treatment resulted in an increase in SLC7A11 expression, and significantly facilitated NRF2 abundance, implicated that enhancement of ferroptosis by Spd plus erastin may be independent on the suppressive effect on SLC7A11 and GPX4. These results may explain why Spd was unable to sensitize A549 cells to erastin because of the highly expressed SLC7A1155. Thus, Spd amplifies the Fenton reaction and ROS production to enhance the effect of erastin on ferroptosis, rather than regulating SLC7A11 and GPX4 which are important in conferring erastin resistance. We noted that Spd and erastin significantly also inhibited the growth of colorectal cancer SW620 cells, further investigation is necessary to determine if the combination therapy is an option in colorectal cancer treatment.
It is unclear whether Spd increases NRF2 protein levels to alleviate ferroptosis. Spd is the only substrate of hypusine to promote the maturation of EIF5A, Which is essential for the translation of proteins including TFEB (a protein with one triproline motif), ATG3 (an autophagy-related protein with a tripeptide DDG motif) and MYC (a protein with five distinct pausing motifs)22,56,57. We demonstrated that the maturation of EIF5A (Hyp-EIF5A) was crucial for the translation of NRF2. The specific mRNA region that is essential for EIF5A to effectively regulate NRF2 translation requires further elucidation.
Under normal conditions, the binding of NRF2 and KEAP1 leads to the NRF2 degradation by the proteasome36. Recent studies have reported that oral administration of Spd stabilizes NRF2 in liver pathologies by activation of microtubule-associated protein 1S (MAP1S), which reduces KEAP1-mediated NRF2 degradation58. We found that KEAP1 protein levels remained unchanged in combination with Spd and erastin, but Spd inhibited proteasome activity, leading to an increase in NRF2 protein levels. As a polycation with amine groups, Spd may interact with the proteasomal components PSME3/4, two proteasome activator subunits37,38, through the formation of salt bonds and hydrophobic interactions. Future studies are required to uncover the structure insights of how Spd binds to PSME3/4.
As endogenous molecules, low doses of polyamines are suggested to have little toxicity as has been demonstrated by several investigations. Dietary supplementation with Spd could help promote healthspan and longevity, and reduce age-related pathologies like hypertension-induced congestive heart failure, cardiac aging, Alzheimer's disease, and female reproductive aging, and is safely tolerated21,54,59-61. Moreover, the results in clinical trials including a 3-month (NCT ID: NCT03094546) and a 12-month (NCT ID: NCT02755246) showed that Spd intervention has beneficial effects on inflammation and verbal memory displays excellent safety, tolerability and high compliance rates in Alzheimer's disease62,63. Our study also found that the combination of the low dose of Spd with erastin effectively inhibited tumor growth, but did not affect the body weight of mice and showed no significant toxicity in organs including heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney. Currently, ours and other studies reveal the safety of Spd either in diet or supplement in some disease conditions, suggesting a potential clinical application of Spd and erastin combination therapy in the future, but it requires further and detailed clinical investigations.
5.　Conclusions
Less
In conclusion, this work found that Spd promoted erastin-induced ferroptosis in prostate cancer, providing value for targeted polyamines in the treatment of tumors. Since Spd is a safe metabolite found throughout the cell, combining Spd with ferroptosis inducers might be a potentially feasible approach in the treatment of prostate cancer.
References
Less
1.
Vasan N, Baselga J, Hyman DM. A view on drug resistance in cancer. Nature 2019;575:299—309.
2.
Wang X, Zhang HY, Chen XZ. Drug resistance and combating drug resistance in cancer. Cancer Drug Resist 2019;2:141—60.
3.
Mao XM, Wu S, Huang DD, Li C. Complications and comorbidities associated with antineoplastic chemotherapy: rethinking drug design and delivery for anticancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B 2024;14:2901—26.
4.
Cai MP, Song XL, Li XA, Chen M, Guo J, Yang DH, et al. Current therapy and drug resistance in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Drug Resist Updat 2023;68:100962.
5.
Pegg AE. Functions of polyamines in mammals. J Biol Chem 2016;291:14904—12.
6.
Casero RA, Murray Stewart T, Pegg AE. Polyamine metabolism and cancer: treatments, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2018;18:681—95.
7.
Arruabarrena Aristorena A, Zabala Letona A, Carracedo A. Oil for the cancer engine: the cross-talk between oncogenic signaling and polyamine metabolism. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaar2606.
8.
Gerner EW, Bruckheimer E, Cohen A. Cancer pharmacoprevention: targeting polyamine metabolism to manage risk factors for colon cancer. J Biol Chem 2018;293:18770—8.
9.
Alexiou GA, Lianos GD, Ragos V, Galani V, Kyritsis AP. Difluoromethylornithine in cancer: new advances. Future Oncol 2017;13:809—19.
10.
Travers M, Brown SM, Dunworth M, Holbert CE, Wiehagen KR, Bachman KE, et al. DFMO and 5-azacytidine increase M1 macrophages in the tumor microenvironment of murine ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2019;79:3445—54.
11.
Al-Habsi M, Chamoto K, Matsumoto K, Nomura N, Zhang B, Sugiura Y, et al. Spermidine activates mitochondrial trifunctional protein and improves antitumor immunity in mice. Science 2022;378:eabj3510.
12.
Tang ZM, Ju YH, Dai XC, Ni N, Liu Y, Zhang D, et al. HO-1-mediated ferroptosis as a target for protection against retinal pigment epithelium degeneration. Redox Biol 2021;43:101971.
13.
Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 2009;30:2785—91.
14.
Chen DD, Hao J, Shen CH, Deng XM, Yun CH. Atomic resolution Cryo-EM structure of human proteasome activator PA28γ. Int J Biol Macromol 2022;219:500—7.
15.
Guan HX, Wang YW, Yu T, Huang YN, Li MH, Saeed A, et al. Cryo-EM structures of the human PA200 and PA200-20S complex reveal regulation of proteasome gate opening and two PA200 apertures. PLoS Biol 2020;18:e3000654.
16.
Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN, Bluhm WF, Bourne PE, Burkhardt K, et al. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;58:899—907.
17.
Knox C, Wilson M, Klinger CM, Franklin M, Oler E, Wilson A, et al. DrugBank 6.0: the drugbank knowledgebase for 2024. Nucleic Acids Res 2024;52:D1265-75.
18.
Fuhrmann J, Rurainski A, Lenhof HP, Neumann D. A new Lamarckian genetic algorithm for flexible ligand–receptor docking. J Comput Chem 2010;31:1911—8.
19.
Khezri A, Karimi A, Yazdian F, Jokar M, Mofradnia SR, Rashedi H, et al. Molecular dynamic of curcumin/chitosan interaction using a computational molecular approach: emphasis on biofilm reduction. Int J Biol Macromol 2018;114:972—8.
20.
Buque A, Bloy N, Perez-Lanzon M, Iribarren K, Humeau J, Pol JG, et al. Immunoprophylactic and immunotherapeutic control of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Nat Commun 2020;11:3819.
21.
Wang JY, Li SQ, Wang J, Wu FX, Chen YH, Zhang H, et al. Spermidine alleviates cardiac aging by improving mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12:650—71.
22.
Coni S, Serrao SM, Yurtsever ZN, Di Magno L, Bordone R, Bertani C, et al. Blockade of EIF5A hypusination limits colorectal cancer growth by inhibiting MYC elongation. Cell Death Dis 2020;11:1045.
23.
Morgan DM. Determination of polyamines as their benzoylated derivatives by HPLC. Methods Mol Biol 1998;79:111—8.
24.
Tang DL, Chen X, Kang R, Kroemer G. Ferroptosis: molecular mechanisms and health implications. Cell Res 2021;31:107—25.
25.
Kumar V, Mishra RK, Ghose D, Kalita A, Dhiman P, Prakash A, et al. Free spermidine evokes superoxide radicals that manifest toxicity. Elife 2022;11:e77704.
26.
Tonelli C, Chio IIC, Tuveson DA. Transcriptional regulation by Nrf2. Antioxid Redox Signal 2018;29:1727—45.
27.
Dowdle WE, Nyfeler B, Nagel J, Elling RA, Liu S, Triantafellow E, et al. Selective VPS34 inhibitor blocks autophagy and uncovers a role for NCOA4 in ferritin degradation and iron homeostasis in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 2014;16:1069—79.
28.
Mancias JD, Wang X, Gygi SP, Harper JW, Kimmelman AC. Quantitative proteomics identifies NCOA4 as the cargo receptor mediating ferritinophagy. Nature 2014;509:105—9.
29.
Chen X, Yu CH, Kang R, Tang DL. Iron metabolism in ferroptosis. Front Cel Dev Biol 2020;8:590226.
30.
Park MH, Wolff EC. Hypusine, a polyamine-derived amino acid critical for eukaryotic translation. J Biol Chem 2018;293:18710—8.
31.
Stewart D, Killeen E, Naquin R, Alam S, Alam J. Degradation of transcription factor Nrf2 via the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway and stabilization by cadmium. J Biol Chem 2003;278:2396—402.
32.
Nguyen T, Sherratt PJ, Huang HC, Yang CS, Pickett CB. Increased protein stability as a mechanism that enhances Nrf2-mediated transcriptional activation of the antioxidant response element. J Biol Chem 2003;278:4536—41.
33.
Zeng J, Ye Z, Shi S, Liang Y, Meng Q, Zhang Q, et al. Targeted inhibition of eIF5Ahpu suppresses tumor growth and polarization of M2-like tumor-associated macrophages in oral cancer. Cell Death Dis 2023;14:579.
34.
Kim HI, Schultz CR, Chandramouli GVR, Geerts D, Risinger JI, Bachmann AS. Pharmacological targeting of polyamine and hypusine biosynthesis reduces tumour activity of endometrial cancer. J Drug Target 2022;30:623—33.
35.
Fang L, Gao L, Xie L, Xiao GZ. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5A-2 involves in doxorubicin-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. J Cancer 2018;9:3479—88.
36.
Ulasov AV, Rosenkranz AA, Georgiev GP, Sobolev AS. Nrf2/Keap1/ARE signaling: towards specific regulation. Life Sci 2022;291:120111.
37.
Thomas TA, Smith DM. Proteasome activator 28γ (PA28γ) allosterically activates trypsin-like proteolysis by binding to the α-ring of the 20S proteasome. J Biol Chem 2022;298:102140.
38.
Yazgili AS, Ebstein F, Meiners S. The proteasome activator PA200/PSME4: an emerging new player in health and disease. Biomolecules 2022;12:1150.
39.
Montcusi B, Madrid-Gambin F, Marin S, Mayol X, Pascual M, Cascante M, et al. Circulating metabolic markers identify patients at risk for tumor recurrence: a prospective cohort study in colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2024;280:842—9.
40.
Huang CY, Fang YJ, Abulimiti A, Yang X, Li L, Liu KY, et al. Dietary polyamines intake and risk of colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Nutrients 2020;12:3575.
41.
Yue F, Li WJ, Zou J, Jiang XH, Xu GB, Huang H, et al. Spermidine prolongs lifespan and prevents liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma by activating MAP1S-mediated autophagy. Cancer Res 2017;77:2938—51.
42.
Bi GS, Liang JQ, Bian YY, Shan GY, Huang YW, Lu T, et al. Polyamine-mediated ferroptosis amplification acts as a targetable vulnerability in cancer. Nat Commun 2024;15:2461.
43.
Miao HM, Ou JJ, Peng Y, Zhang X, Chen YJ, Hao LJ, et al. Macrophage ABHD5 promotes colorectal cancer growth by suppressing spermidine production by SRM. Nat Commun 2016;7:11716.
44.
Kiechl S, Pechlaner R, Willeit P, Notdurfter M, Paulweber B, Willeit K, et al. Higher spermidine intake is linked to lower mortality: a prospective population-based study. Am J Clin Nutr 2018;108:371—80.
45.
Zhou XM, Zou LB, Liao HY, Luo JQ, Yang TW, Wu J, et al. Abrogation of HnRNP L enhances anti-PD-1 therapy efficacy via diminishing PD-L1 and promoting CD8+ T cell-mediated ferroptosis in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Acta Pharm Sin B 2022;12:692—707.
46.
Luo YL, Linghu MY, Luo XY, Li DD, Wang JL, Peng SJ, et al. Remodeling tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment through dual activation of immunogenic panoptosis and ferroptosis by H2S-amplified nanoformulation to enhance cancer immunotherapy. Acta Pharm Sin B 2025;15:1242—54.
47.
Lei G, Zhuang L, Gan BY. Targeting ferroptosis as a vulnerability in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2022;22:381—96.
48.
Gamble LD, Purgato S, Murray J, Xiao L, Yu DMT, Hanssen KM, et al. Inhibition of polyamine synthesis and uptake reduces tumor progression and prolongs survival in mouse models of neuroblastoma. Sci Transl Med 2019;11:eaau1099.
49.
Khan A, Gamble LD, Upton DH, Ung C, Yu DMT, Ehteda A, et al. Dual targeting of polyamine synthesis and uptake in diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Nat Commun 2021;12:971.
50.
Ding YH, Feng YK, Huang ZL, Zhang Y, Li X, Liu R, et al. SOX15 transcriptionally increases the function of AOC1 to modulate ferroptosis and progression in prostate cancer. Cell Death Dis 2022;13:673.
51.
Niu CY, Jiang DM, Guo YN, Wang ZL, Sun Q, Wang X, et al. Spermidine suppresses oxidative stress and ferroptosis by Nrf2/HO-1/GPX4 and Akt/FHC/ACSL4 pathway to alleviate ovarian damage. Life Sci 2023;332:122109.
52.
Cheng Q, Ni L, Liu A, Huang XX, Xiang P, Zhang Q, et al. Spermidine protects cartilage from IL-1β-mediated ferroptosis. Mol Cell Biochem 2024;479:2785—94.
53.
Sun J, Xu JY, Liu Y, Lin YT, Wang FG, Han Y, et al. Exogenous spermidine alleviates diabetic cardiomyopathy via suppressing reactive oxygen species, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and Pannexin-1-mediated ferroptosis. Biomol Biomed 2023;23:825—37.
54.
Youssef MAM, Mohamed TM, Bakry AA, El Keiy MM. Synergistic effect of spermidine and ciprofloxacin against Alzheimer’s disease in male rat via ferroptosis modulation. Int J Biol Macromol 2024;263:130387.
55.
Lee H, Zandkarimi F, Zhang Y, Meena JK, Kim J, Zhuang L, et al. Energy-stress-mediated AMPK activation inhibits ferroptosis. Nat Cell Biol 2020;22:225—34.
56.
Lubas M, Harder LM, Kumsta C, Tiessen I, Hansen M, Andersen JS, et al. eIF5A is required for autophagy by mediating ATG3 translation. EMBO Rep 2018;19:e46072.
57.
Zhang HL, Alsaleh G, Feltham J, Sun YZ, Napolitano G, Riffelmacher T, et al. Polyamines control eIF5A hypusination, TFEB translation, and autophagy to reverse B cell senescence. Mol Cell 2019;76:110—25.e9.
58.
Liu PF, de la Vega MR, Dodson M, Yue F, Shi BY, Fang D, et al. Spermidine confers liver protection by enhancing NRF2 signaling through a MAP1S-mediated noncanonical mechanism. Hepatology 2019;70:372—88.
59.
Eisenberg T, Abdellatif M, Schroeder S, Primessnig U, Stekovic S, Pendl T, et al. Cardioprotection and lifespan extension by the natural polyamine spermidine. Nat Med 2016;22:1428—38.
60.
Zhang Y, Bai J, Cui ZK, Li Y, Gao Q, Miao Y, et al. Polyamine metabolite spermidine rejuvenates oocyte quality by enhancing mitophagy during female reproductive aging. Nat Aging 2023;3:1372—86.
61.
Schwarz C, Stekovic S, Wirth M, Benson G, Royer P, Sigrist SJ, et al. Safety and tolerability of spermidine supplementation in mice and older adults with subjective cognitive decline. Aging (Albany NY) 2018;10:19—33.
62.
Wirth M, Benson G, Schwarz C, Kobe T, Grittner U, Schmitz D, et al. The effect of spermidine on memory performance in older adults at risk for dementia: a randomized controlled trial. Cortex 2018;109:181—8.
63.
Schwarz C, Benson GS, Horn N, Wurdack K, Grittner U, Schilling R, et al. Effects of spermidine supplementation on cognition and biomarkers in older adults with subjective cognitive decline: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2213875.
Appendix
Less
Year 2025 volume 15 Issue 4
PDF
8
6
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.02.023
  • Receive Date：2024-04-18
  • Online Date：2026-09-17
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2024-04-18
  • Revised：2024-09-26
  • Accepted：2024-12-20
Affiliations
    aDepartment of Natural Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmacy, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
    bInstitute of Medical Sciences of the Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250033, China
    cDepartment of Natural Product Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology of Ministry of Education, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China

Corresponding:

* Corresponding authors.
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/apsb/EN/10.1016/j.apsb.2025.02.023
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House