收藏切换
Linkage of circadian rhythm disruptions with Alzheimer's disease and therapeutic interventions
收藏切换
PDF
Kishore Madamanchia, Jianhua Zhanga, b, Girish C. Melkania, b, *
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(6) : 2945 - 2965
Less
收藏切换
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(6): 2945-2965
REVIEW
Linkage of circadian rhythm disruptions with Alzheimer's disease and therapeutic interventions
Full
Kishore Madamanchia, Jianhua Zhanga, b, Girish C. Melkania, b, *
Affiliations
  • aDepartment of Pathology, Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
  • bUAB Nathan Shock Center, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.011
Outline
收藏切换

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive decline and pathological brain changes. While aging is the primary risk factor, circadian rhythm disruption (CRD) is increasingly recognized as a central driver of AD pathology. CRD exacerbates oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, and gut microbiome dysbiosis, impairing sleep-wake cycles, disrupting metabolic homeostasis, and promoting neuroinflammation, ultimately accelerating disease progression. Oxidative stress, a key factor in neuronal damage, is both a cause and consequence of circadian misalignment, while mitochondrial dysfunction further amplifies oxidative damage, impairing synaptic function and cognitive stability. Additionally, gut microbiome dysbiosis contributes to neuroinflammatory processes, worsening neurodegeneration. Given these complex interactions, this review aims to elucidate the role of CRD in AD pathology and explore potential therapeutic interventions targeting circadian dysfunction. Specifically, it examines the efficacy of time-restricted feeding (TRF), a dietary strategy that aligns food intake with circadian rhythms. TRF has shown promise in restoring circadian function, reducing oxidative stress, improving mitochondrial health, and promoting gut microbiome diversity. By addressing CRD, TRF may offer a novel approach to mitigating AD pathologies. This review also identifies current research gaps and future directions for developing circadian-based interventions in AD prevention and treatment.

Circadian rhythms  /  Gut–brain axis  /  Dysbiosis  /  Time restricted feeding  /  Oxidative stress  /  Neuroinflammation  /  Alzheimer's disease
Kishore Madamanchi, Jianhua Zhang, Girish C. Melkani. Linkage of circadian rhythm disruptions with Alzheimer's disease and therapeutic interventions[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 2025 , 15 (6) : 2945 -2965 . DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.011
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide, characterized by progressive cognitive decline and hallmark brain pathologies, including amyloid-beta (aβ) plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFT)1. The etiology of AD is complex, involving genetic, environmental, and behavioral factors. It is well known that circadian dysregulation aggregates AD pathology2. For example, studies in animal models and humans demonstrate that circadian disruptions increase the production and delay the clearance of aβ-42. Moreover, animal studies showed that circadian misalignment exacerbates tau phosphorylation known marker for AD pathology. Furthermore, circadian dysregulation triggers neuroinflammation and promotes dysbiosis and oxidative stress, suggesting the involvement of AD risk factors3. There is no direct evidence suggesting knock-out/mutation of core clock genes leads to AD; however, variants based on studies from animal models and human circadian genes have been implicated in AD risk based on GWAS data4,5. Furthermore, chronic sleep disorders in humans linked with circadian misalignment possess higher AD risks, including more accumulation of aβ-42 and phospho-Tau6,7. Circadian dysregulation, when combined with other risk factors for Alzheimer's disease, plays a significant role in driving the disease's pathology. However, there is no definitive evidence to suggest that it alone is enough to cause the disease, making its role more complex and contributing to the worsening of the disease's progression. The relationship between circadian rhythms and AD appears to be bidirectional; disruptions in circadian rhythms can worsen AD pathology, and AD can further disrupt circadian rhythms8. Circadian rhythms are driven by core clock genes like, Circadian Locomotor Output Cycles Kaput (Clock), Brain and Muscle ARNT-Like 1 (Bmal1), Period (Per), and Cryptochrome (Cry), which regulate several physiological processes, including sleep-wake cycles, feeding behavior, digestion, and gut motility, which in turn impact the composition and functionality of gut microbiota9, immune responses, and antioxidant defenses10. In AD, CRD misaligns the sleep-wake cycles and gut microbiome, worsens oxidative stress, and impairs aβ clearance, which creates a feedback loop and accelerates disease progression3. The relationship between circadian rhythms and gut microbiomes is also complex and bidirectional, often characterized as an “egg and chicken” paradigm, where both components regulate and are regulated by one another. More mechanistic-based studies are much need to establish this, and this review might be a triggering factor for conducting these studies.
Gut microbiomes show diurnal oscillations to optimize nutrient absorption, immune modulation, and metabolite production9. Recent studies highlight gut microbiota and circadian rhythm alterations in AD progression, but their exact relationship remains unexplored11. Evidence from the co-housing of wild-type mice with AD mice experiment showed dysbiosis and cognitive deficits after three months12. The gut microbiome is also highly sensitive to dietary changes and feeding times13. Firmicutes are higher during the fed state, and Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia peaked during fasting times14. This bidirectional regulation suggests that neither the gut microbiome nor the circadian rhythms can be considered strictly “primary”; instead, their relationship, through the gut–brain axis, forms a complex feedback loop that is critical for maintaining host metabolic and neuroimmune homeostasis. In AD, disruption of the gut–brain axis contributes to neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and metabolic dysregulation, further aggravating the disease15. The emerging interventions, including dietary changes and probiotics, offer the potential for reducing these pathological factors, suggesting that restoring gut health could slow AD progression16. For instance, Akkermansia muciniphila, a gut bacterium, plays a key role in modulating neuroinflammatory pathways central to AD17. This evidence supports the intricate relationship between circadian rhythms, gut microbiomes, and oxidative stress in AD pathology.
Recent findings have suggested that oxidative stress exacerbates AD progression, which is tightly linked to CRD and gut dysbiosis, with mitochondrial dysfunction18, increasing aβ and tau accumulation19. Oxidative stress occurs when an imbalance between antioxidant defenses and reactive oxygen species (ROS) changes, which can induce neuronal damage and dysfunction20. This leads to synaptic dysfunction, accelerating neuronal loss, and promoting cognitive decline21. Together, these interconnected pathways emphasize the pivotal role of oxidative stress in AD's pathophysiology. Therapeutic strategies to mitigate oxidative stress have shown promise in altering disease trajectories. Dietary polyphenols, known for their antioxidant properties, and compounds like nicotinamide mononucleotide have been explored for their neuroprotective effects, modulating disease pathways and improving neuronal survival22. Since oxidative stress is an effector and lacks a specific cause or targeted approach for the treatment, limited biomarkers and limitations like a blood–brain barrier (BBB) and the short half-life of the drug make it difficult to use for AD therapy. The melatonin hormone, beyond its well-known role in sleep regulation, has been shown to influence gut microbiome composition and reduce oxidative stress23, further illustrating the link between circadian health and gut microbiome. In experimental models, melatonin treatment increased beneficial bacterial populations, reduced systemic inflammation, and improved cognitive outcomes by enhancing gut health24. These findings suggest that circadian realignment and reshaping of gut microbiomes potentially mitigate key drivers of AD progression.
Interventions like time-restricted feeding/eating (TRF/E, known as TRE in humans), where food consumption is limited to a particular time in a day followed by fasting for the rest of clock time, have emerged as a promising intervention to restore circadian function25. Studies indicate that TRF not only reduces oxidative stress by enhancing mitochondrial function but also promotes a healthier gut microbiome by increasing microbial diversity and beneficial species such as A. muciniphila26. This helps reduce neuroinflammation by targeting key pathways, including the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like signaling pathway, which belongs to a family of intracellular pattern recognition receptors that combat neurodegeneration and age-related cognitive decline27.
While research has explored these factors individually, there is a lack of comprehensive understanding of how they are intricate and contribute collectively to the pathophysiology of AD. Particularly, there remains a need to synthesize the evidence on how these lifestyles and genetic factors are interrelated and how they may be targeted simultaneously to slow disease progression. By exploring these relationships, this review aims to provide a holistic understanding of the underlying mechanisms linking circadian rhythms, gut health, oxidative stress, and metabolic health to AD. This integrative approach may identify novel therapeutic strategies that address the multifaceted nature of AD, providing the way for additional personalized and comprehensive treatment options.
Circadian rhythms are governed by the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) found in the hypothalamus, which coordinates the release of melatonin and other neurohormonal signals that regulate sleep-wake cycles, metabolism, and cognitive functions28. At the molecular level, circadian rhythms are driven by a feedback loop involving core clock genes such as Bmal1, Clock, Per, and Cry (Fig. 1). These genes work in concert to regulate the expression of clock-controlled genes (CCGs) that influence various physiological processes, including sleep-wake cycles29. The positive regulators of CCGs, BMAL1, and CLOCK, form a transcriptional complex to induce the expression of their negative regulators, Per and Cry genes30. Once the PER and CRY accumulate, they move to the nucleus and repress their activity dose-dependently by inhibiting the BMAL1:CLOCK transcription complex30. BMAL1 and CLOCK proteins are stable or have a slow turnover rate to start a new cycle compared to PER and CRY, which undergo proteolytic degradation during the 24-h cycle31. Through this negative feedback loop of PER:CRY proteins BMAL1:CLOCK sustains a 24-h cycle of clock gene expression that governs the timing of sleep and wakefulness32. Events like irregular light exposure, shift work, or genetic mutations in core clock genes can lead to circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders33 (Fig. 1).
Disruptions in circadian rhythms and sleep-wake cycles, such as fragmented sleep and insomnia, are preceded by AD pathology, suggested as a potential early symptom or risk factor for AD6. Microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT), aβ, levels, and other metabolic by-products like lactate fluctuate diurnally in the brain, peaking during wakefulness and decreasing during sleep, this fluctuation is linked to the glymphatic system's efficiency7. Glymphatic system refers to the synergistic function of both astrocytes and lymphatic system, where astrocytic water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) supports the cerebrospinal fluid-interstitial fluid exchange in the brain and supports aβ clearance7. Chronic circadian misalignment leads to increased aβ production, which in turn promotes the degradation of clock proteins like BMAL1, CREB-binding protein (CBP), and PER1, thereby accelerating plaque formation and reducing clearance34. In AD patients, arrhythmic Bmal1methylation correlates with abnormal tau phosphorylation, night wakeup, and decreased cognitive functions35.
Meta-analysis and community-based, cohort longitudinal studies with many participants revealed that shift workers, particularly those working during the night times, were more prone to dementia and AD36,37. Recent research highlights a bidirectional relationship between the disruption of sleep and circadian rhythms to the pathogenesis and progression of AD. A 15-year longitudinal study with 1401 older adults (median age: 81.8 years, IQR: 76.3–85.7 years, both genders) revealed a bidirectional link between circadian dysregulation and Alzheimer's progression38. Familial Natural Short Sleepers are associated with mutations in DEC2 (P384R) and NPSR1 (Y206H), genes regulating sleep duration and circadian rhythms. These mutations promote efficient sleep with reduced duration and no cognitive decline. In Alzheimer's mouse models, DEC2-P384R; 5XFAD and female Npsr1-Y206H; 5XFAD mice exhibited reduced tau pathology in the hippocampus and significantly fewer amyloid plaques at six months, suggesting enhancing sleep quality may protect against neurodegeneration in AD39. Another FNSS mutation, Adrb1-A187V, alters β1-adrenergic receptor signaling in brain regions responsible for sleep regulation, reduces tau pathology, and improves random eye moment (REM) sleep in a mouse model of tauopathy40. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of trazodone (50 mg, administered daily at 10:00 P.M.) for improving sleep disturbances in 30 community-dwelling patients with AD. Over a 2-week treatment period, trazodone significantly enhanced sleep, with participants sleeping an additional 42.5 min per night and increasing nighttime sleep percentage by 8.5% compared to the placebo group41,42. This highlights the significance of circadian rhythms and the quality of sleep in AD pathology.
Disrupted sleep further amplifies oxidative stress by impairing the brain's antioxidant defense mechanisms43. ROS levels are normally regulated by circadian control of metabolic processes, including (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) NAD+ metabolism, which is involved in mitochondrial function and oxidative stress regulation44. Since the BMAL1/CLOCK complex controls the nicotinamide phosphoribosyl transferase (NAMPT)–NAD+/SIRT axis through histone acetyltransferase and transcription factor functions45, CRD further weakens mitochondrial efficiency and increases ROS production. The oxidative environment fosters tau hyperphosphorylation by activating kinases such as glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β)46, and cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK5)47, both of which play crucial roles in tau pathology and neurofibrillary tangle formation (Fig. 1). In addition to oxidative stress, NAD + deficiency contributes to mitochondrial damage by creating pseudohypoxia conditions48, and releases mtDNA into the cytosol. Cyclic GMP–AMP synthase (cGAS) binds to mtDNA and further activates an endoplasmic reticulum resident membrane protein, i.e., stimulator of interferon genes (STING) dependent pathway (Fig. 1) which contributes to neuroinflammation by activating type-1 interferon (IFN)49. Type 1 IFN induces NF-κB–TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β which further activates senescence-associated secretory phenotype protein (SASP) to induce cellular senescence in AD50.
Neuroinflammation and CRD are deeply intertwined in the pathogenesis of AD. A key molecular link between CRD and neuroinflammation is the NF-κB signaling pathway. Normally, core clock genes like Bmal1 and Clock suppress nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) activity through their regulation of HPA–CRH (hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal–corticotropin-releasing hormone)–ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone) release and glucocorticoid synthesis51. The CRD in AD leads to an over-activation of NF-κB, resulting in the chronic release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β, interleukin-6 (IL-1β, IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)52, which further accelerates aβ deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, and neuronal death. This creates a feedback loop that drives both neuroinflammation and AD progression. In addition, glucocorticoid synthesis regulates inflammation by inhibiting the NF-κB and activator protein-1 (AP-1)53. Glucocorticoid synthesis suppresses NF-κB and activating protein-1 (AP-1) by increasing the inhibitory-κB (IκB) and interfering with AP-1 binding to DNA53.
Glucocorticoids also control the expression of cyclooxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) enzymes involved in eicosanoid-like prostaglandins and leukotrienesbiosynthesis54. Enzymes like COX, LOX, leukotriene B4 receptor 1 (BLT1), and cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 (CysLT1)55, exhibit diurnal variations in their expression and activity56, leading to excessive activation of BLT1 and CysLT1 receptors, intensifying the inflammatory response, which further contributes to impaired aβ clearance in AD57. Other lipid mediators like ‘lipoxins’ and ‘resolvins’ are involved in resolving inflammation, tissue repair, and clearing of aβ by enhancing the phagocytic activity of microglia58. Lipoxin A4 (LXA4)–LOX pathway, follows circadian rhythms, with higher levels during the rest phase to counteract inflammatory processes and promote tissue healing59. Lipoxin receptors (ALX/FPR2) are also regulated by circadian genes, further aggravating AD pathology60. Circadian proteins PER/CRY1 promote the acetylation of glucocorticoid receptors (GR) at multiple lysine residues by facilitating the recruitment of CBP/p300 (a histone acetyltransferase) and preventing their binding to glucocorticoidresponse elements (GRE)51. Moreover, the circadian clock proteins BMAL1 and Reverse-Erb-α (REV-ERBα) play critical roles in modulating microglial activity by suppressing their activation during the rest period through suppressing NF-κB activity (Fig. 1), histone modification, and controlling the metabolic shift towards glycolysis (Warburg effect)61. CRD exacerbates oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and accumulation of aβ and tau proteins, thereby accelerating neurodegeneration, which in turn disturbs sleep and circadian rhythms9. Therapeutically, advanced treatments for circadian rhythms sleep-wake cycle disorders often involve light therapy, timed melatonin administration, and behavioral adjustments to realign the sleep-wake cycle with environmental cues62. This section delves into intricate molecular pathways linking circadian rhythms to AD, the limitations of the recent studies on CRD–AD relation and discusses emerging therapeutic strategies that help restore circadian alignment and mitigate disease progression.
Chronotherapy offers promising insights into circadian disruptions in AD. It involves aligning treatments with the body's circadian cycles to optimize drug efficacy and reduce side effects. Chronotherapies, such as TRF, light therapy, or pharmacological agents, could restore circadian synchronization and potentially mitigate the cognitive decline in AD. To examine the neuroprotective effects of verapamil (VRP) administered at different time points. 40 male albino mice (8–10 weeks old, 30–35 g) were treated with LPS and divided into four groups: normal control, LPS control, and VRP-treated (morning or evening administration). VRP improved behavior, restored brain architecture, reduced phospho tau, decreased neuroinflammation markers (CD11b, CD68, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β), and intracellular calcium ions and increased mitochondrial function, calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CAMKII) isoforms, protein kinase A (PKA), cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), with morning VRP showing superior results63 (Table 163-69).
In a sporadic AD, Sprague–Dawley rat model using intracerebroventricular aβ42 infusion and pinealectomy, chronic melatonin supplementation (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) over 40 days improved spatial memory and normalized aβ42 levels and γ-secretase activity (Table 1) in the brain64. Recent studies have demonstrated that melatonin directly binds to and inhibits the activity of death-associated protein kinase 1 (DAPK1) in AD, leading to reduced tau protein accumulation and phosphorylation while promoting synaptic growth and microtubule assembly65. This suggests that reduced melatonin levels in AD contribute to circadian misalignment and poor sleep quality much earlier than AD symptoms.
While models such as FNSS mutations (DEC2-P384R, NPSR1-Y206H, Adrb1-A187V) in mouse systems have provided valuable insights, they may not fully capture the complexity of human circadian physiology and AD pathology due to species-specific differences in metabolism, sleep architecture, and gene regulation. Moreover, many findings linking circadian disruption with AD biomarkers like aβ and tau accumulation are based on associative data, raising questions about whether circadian disturbances are a contributing factor or a consequence of disease progression. Human observational studies, while informative, cannot often fully control confounding variables such as medication use and comorbid conditions, making causal inference challenging. Therapeutic strategies, including light therapy and melatonin administration, have shown promise but remain limited by inconsistencies in treatment parameters such as duration, intensity, and individual chronotype variations, which affect reproducibility and standardization across studies. Mechanistically, while core clock genes (Bmal1, Clock, Per, and Cry) and pathways like NF-κB and the glymphatic system have been explored, their direct mechanistic roles in AD progression remain incompletely validated in both preclinical and clinical contexts. Additionally, the influence of biological sex and hormonal variations on circadian regulation and AD pathology has not been thoroughly examined, despite evidence suggesting sex-specific differences in circadian responses and disease susceptibility in some models.
The circadian clock and microbiome are intricately linked. When the clock is disrupted, gut bacteria lose their natural rhythms, leading to metabolic dysregulation, immune dysfunction, and potentially contributing to AD (Fig. 2) progression70. Emerging evidence shows the gut microbiome's influence on neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, aβ accumulation, and cognitive decline. The gut microbiome influences AD pathology by modulating the aβ aggregation and tau hyperphosphorylation through the gut–brain axis71. Certain bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella, produce amyloid-like proteins (e.g., Curli) which activate the gut–brain axis through toll-like receptors 2 (TLR2) in gut epithelium and vagus nerve stimulation through PGP 9.5, a neuroendocrine/enteroendocrine marker72. In 2022, Das et al. brought crucial evidence to support this hypothesis that they have discovered increased bacterial amyloid beta burden much before the development of aβ pathology in the brain using Tg2756 AD mouse model72. In contrast, in Caenorhabditis elegans AD model, Bacillus subtilis exhibited significant neuronal and behavioral protective effects. It showed delayed aging and neuronal decline in wild-type strain N2 compared to worms colonized with non-probiotic E. coli OP50. In transgenic strains (CL2120 and GMC101), B. subtilis alleviated aβ-induced paralysis and protected CL2355 worms from behavioral impairments and aging. These benefits were attributed to quorum-sensing peptide production and gut-associated biofilm formation73. In this study, they discovered bacterial csgA and csgB genes, which encode the major and minor subunits of curli amyloid fibrils in E. coli, significantly promoting neurodegeneration74. Further experiments demonstrated that curli fibrils can be cross-seed with host proteins, leading to protein aggregation and neuronal damage74. By exploring these findings, we have discussed the intricate molecular pathways linking gut dysbiosis to AD and evaluated the potential of microbiome-based therapies, including probiotics, prebiotics, and symbiotics in the context of AD.
The gut–brain axis is a complex, bidirectional communication network between the gastrointestinal tract (GI) and the CNS, involving neural, endocrine, immune, and metabolic pathways that connect the enteric nervous system (ENS) with the CNS75. Disruption of the gut–brain axis through dysbiosis amplifies neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, the two key drivers of AD progression76. The gut microbiome modulates the gut–brain axis by producing metabolites like serotonin, Gama amino butyric acid (GABA), and SCFAs (e.g., butyrate, acetate, propionate), produced by Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium77, suppress neuroinflammation by reducing IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α secretion and maintain BBB integrity by regulating CD14, upregulating low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1, and free fatty acid receptor 3 (FFAR3)78 in BBB endothelial cells, which prevents harmful molecules from entering the brain79. Dysbiosis results in a reduction of SCFA production from dietary fibers, impairing BBB integrity by limiting the expression of tight junction proteins such as occludin, claudin-5, and annexin A180 and triggering neuroinflammatory cascades through COX2, PGE2, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and nitric oxide81. LPS activates TLR4 and triggers neuroinflammatory responses by enhancing the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 (Fig. 2) through the NF-κB pathway82. This creates a pro-inflammatory environment that promotes neurodegeneration and AD pathology.
In AD patients, poor eating habits, aging, and CRD lead to an imbalance or disruption in the composition of gut microbiome and gut dysbiosis which increases intestinal permeability, often known as “leaky gut”, and allows bacterial components such as LPS and peptidoglycans (PGNs) to enter the systemic circulation and reach the brain83 (Fig. 2). LPS-induced activation of TLR4/NF-κB signaling triggers microglial activation and innate immune responses via the NOD-like receptor familypyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome. This activates caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis, releasing pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1β and IL-18, which damage surrounding cells and neuronal synapses, amplifying synaptic loss and dysfunction84.
The pro-inflammatory environment further activates kinases like GSK-3β and CDK5. These kinases drive the phosphorylation of tau, leading to the destabilization of microtubules and the formation of NFTs85. Conversely, a healthy gut microbiome promotes the production of neurotrophic factors, such as BDNF, through the serotonergic (5-HT1A) receptor-CREB-BDNF pathway, which is essential for neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive function (Fig. 2)78. Colonization of pathogenic bacteria, such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, in the gut produces ‘gingipains’, a cysteine protease that contributes to aβ accumulation and tau hyperphosphorylation and exacerbates neuroinflammation through activation of TLR2 and TLR986. Moreover, the increased prevalence of Enterobacteriaceae, Desulfovibrio, Anaerococcus, and Providencia contributes to the depletion of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, worsening chronic neuroinflammation and synaptic dysfunction in AD patients87,88. Intragastric administration of Clostridium butyricum for four weeks improved cognition in APP/PS1 mice by reducing aβ deposition, microglial activation, and proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β), restored gut microbiome balance and butyrate levels (Table 289-103). Butyrate also inhibits NF-κB/p65 phosphorylation in aβ-exposed BV2 microglia, reducing CD11b and COX-2 expression89.
The depletion of SCFA-producing bacteria like Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium compromises the production of essential antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1) in AD patients104. Pathogenic bacteria like Desulfovibrio produce H2S and cause damage to the intestinal barrier through decreasing thiosulphatesulfotransferase, which degrades H2S105, leads to intestinal mucosa damage (leaky gut), and releases the H2S and other toxins into systemic circulation106. H2S modulates the activity of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), angiogenin-1 (Ang-1) protein, and metalloproteinase-9 and increases the endothelial cell permeability107. Once H2S crosses the BBB it impairs mitochondrial respiration by inhibiting cytochrome c oxidase, thereby amplifying ROS production (Fig. 2) and exacerbating oxidative stress78. SCFAs, particularly butyrate, play a critical role in mitigating oxidative stress by enhancing mitochondrial bioenergetics and preventing the activation of ROS-producing pathways like c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK)92. This modulation of mitochondrial function reduces oxidative damage to neurons, preventing the aggregation of aβ and hyperphosphorylated tau proteins76. The gut microbiome increases SCFA production like butyrate, which enhances intestinal barrier function through AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling91, enhances antioxidant defenses92, and reduces inflammation by increasing IL-10, TGF-β, and reducing IL-2 (Table 2)90. In the 3 × Tg-AD mouse model, age-related decline in butyrate-producing gut bacteria was linked to AD progression. Reduced butyrate synthesis via the acetyl-CoA pathway decreased histone acetylation (H3K9/K14-Ac) in hippocampal neurons, leading to oxidative stress, tau hyperphosphorylation, memory deficits, and neuromuscular dysfunction. Early (at 6 months of age) oral tributyrin administration preserved gut bacteria, histone acetylation, and reduced oxidative stress associated with AD pathogenesis108.
Beyond its role in inflammation and oxidative stress, gut microbiota affects neurotransmitter synthesis, such as serotonin, dopamine, and GABA (Fig. 2). Neurotransmitters are vital for synaptic plasticity, memory, and cognitive resilience, and were found to be decreased in the postmortem AD patients109. The reduction of Lactobacillus also limits the production of tryptophan, a precursor for serotonin and dopamine, which leads to mood disorders and further contributes to cognitive deterioration110. Experiments with GC and CC Swiss Webster breeding mice were found to be resistant to restoring neurotransmitter balance through normal gut flora at later ages, exacerbating cognitive decline, and impairing neuronal communication111. Lifestyle changes, diet, exercise, and medication contribute to age-related decline in microbial diversity, further compounding these effects and adding a critical dimension to the understanding of AD pathogenesis.
Probiotics comes from the Greek word ‘probiotika’ which means for life, invented by Ferdinand Vergin in 1954112. Stillwell and Lilly, in 1965 described the probiotics as microbes that support the growth of other microbes113. Given the critical influence of gut microbiota on AD progression, microbiome-targeted therapies offer significant promise. Supplementation with Bifidobacterium breve MCC1274 in wild-type mice reduced Alzheimer's-related pathologies by decreasing soluble hippocampal aβ1–42, presenilin 1 protein, phosphorylated tau levels, and enhanced synaptic protein expression93. Oral treatment of Lactobacillus lactis engineered to deliver human p62 protein in a 3 × Tg-AD, 8-week mouse model for two months increased brain p62 expression, improved memory, reduced aβ, inflammation, and oxidative stress, and enhanced protein clearance via the ubiquitin–proteasome system and autophagy94. Bifidobacterium lactis Probio-M8 was administered for 45 days to a 4-month-old APP/PS1 transgenic B6C3F1 mice reduced brain aβ plaques, improved cognitive performance in Y-maze and novel object recognition tests, and alleviated gut dysbiosis by enhancing bacterial diversity and beneficial microbial composition (Table 2)95. A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with 90 patients (aged 50–90) with mild to moderate AD evaluated the effects of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus HA-114 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 (7.5 × 109 CFU/capsule). Both probiotics reduced oxidative stress markers (MDA, 8OHdG) and inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) while increasing GSH and IL-10 levels. Additionally, quality of life and physical activity improved, with no significant differences observed between the probiotic strains114. In a study on 6-month-old C57BL/6 and AppNL−G-F AD mice, an 8-week administration of the probiotic mixture VSL#3 (1.29 × 109 CFU/day) reduced aβ aggregation and brain damage while improving memory, cognitive function (c-Fos expression), and serum SCFA levels. These effects were observed after four months, highlighting the therapeutic potential of probiotics in AD models97. A 12-week randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial investigated the effects of a multi-strain probiotic supplement (B. longum subsp. infantis BLI-02, B. breve Bv-889, B. animalis subsp. lactis CP-9, B. bifidum VDD088, and Lactobacillus plantarum PL-02) on 40 AD patients aged 50–90 years. The treatment group received 1 × 1010 CFU/day, while the control group received 5 × 107 CFU/day. After 12 weeks, the probiotic group showed a 36% increase in serum BDNF, cognitive improvement, SOD levels, reduced IL-1β, and oxidative stress markers115 (Table 2).
Prebiotics are non-digestible/non-viable food components that confer health benefits on host-associated modulation of microbiota116, for example, inulin and fructooligosaccharides (FOS), fermented by Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species and release lactate and acetate, which were used as a substrate by Eubacterium hallii and Anaerostipes caccae in the gut and produce SCFAs like butyrate117. Through cross-feeding interaction, prebiotics support the growth of beneficial bacteria, enhancing antioxidant defenses to protect intestinal integrity and gut health118. Prebiotics through SCFA strengthen the gut barrier, butyrate is an energy source for colonocytes and helps intestinal integrity, reducing systemic inflammation and preventing the translocation of harmful bacterial metabolites into the bloodstream119. A study on a 92-year-old female Alzheimer's patient receiving long-term tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) treatment revealed significant gut microbiota changes using next-generation sequencing. TUDCA (Table 2) increased Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, reduced Bacteroidetes, decreased Enterobacteriaceae (22.93%–0.55%), and increased Ruminococcaceae (5.8%–13.73%). These changes were linked to increased bile acid influx96. A 12-week randomized, double-blind trial with 79 Alzheimer's patients assessed the effects of selenium and probiotic co-supplementation (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, and Bifidobacterium longum). The combination improved mini-mental status examination (MMSE) scores (+1.5) more than selenium alone (+0.5) or placebo (−0.2). Inflammation and oxidative stress markers decreased while metabolic health improved, including lower insulin, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, and LDL cholesterol. Pro-inflammatory TNF-α expression was downregulated, while PPAR-γ and LDLR expressions increased. These results suggest that selenium-probiotic supplementation enhances cognition, reduces inflammation, and improves metabolic health in AD patients98.
Synbiotics are a combination of probiotics that contain live microorganisms like Lactobacillus spp, Bifidobacterium spp, and Saccharomyces boulardii and prebiotics like Inulin, Fructooligosaccharides (FOS), Galactooligosaccharides (GOS), also known as non-digestible food fiber which offer a synergistic approach that optimizes gut microbial composition and provides comprehensive neuroprotection120. Early studies indicate that synbiotics can improve cognitive function121, administration of B. breve A1 (1 × 109 cells in 0.2 mL) and sodium acetate (150 mmol/L) in drinking water from 2 days before intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of aβ protein effectively reduced aβ accumulation, mitigated tau pathology, and suppressed neuroinflammation in 10-week-old male ddY (Deutschland, Denken, Yoken) AD mice after 6 days (Table 2). Cognitive improvements were observed, with significant restoration in Y-maze alternation behavior, and passive avoidance test latency times99. Supplementation of Triphala (a polyphenol-rich prebiotic) with probiotics Lactobacillus plantarum NCIMB 8826, Lactobacillus fermentum NCIMB 5221, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis NCIMB 702255 to humanized transgenic Drosophila melanogaster AD model over 30 days. The treatment significantly improved motility, restoring climbing ability to near-normal levels and increasing median survival by 75% compared to 40% in controls (Table 2). It also reduced aβ accumulation, lowered acetylcholinesterase activity, and mitigated oxidative stress100.
Advanced research is exploring fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and personalized microbiome-based therapies as potential treatments for AD. Studies support that co-housing wild-type mice with 5xFAD ADtransgenic mice for three months resulted in AD-exposed WT mice that developed cognitive impairments, increased hippocampal aβ40 and aβ42 levels, pTau at S202/T205 and S262, and gut microbiota dysbiosis. Gut microbiome analysis revealed a reduction in butyrate-producing bacteria, such as Faecalibaculum and Ruminiclostridium-1, and significantly lower fecal butyrate levels (Table 2)12. APP/PS1 transgenic mice treated with FMT from healthy mice for 4 weeks showed shorter escape latencies in the Morris water maze and higher discrimination indices in the object recognition test. FMT reduced aβ40, aβ42, and amyloid plaques in the cortex and hippocampus, decreased tau phosphorylation at threonine 231, and increased synaptic markers PSD-95 and synapsin I. It also reduced neuroinflammation markers COX-2 and CD11b, by modulating gut microbiota101. These findings (Table 2) underscore the transmissible nature of gut microbiome dysbiosis and its critical role in propagating Alzheimer's-like pathology and cognitive deficits via the gut–brain axis. Also, supporting gut microbiomes alone or in conjunction with CRD could contribute to AD pathology.
Despite growing evidence linking the gut microbiome, circadian rhythms, and AD, several limitations hinder their translation into effective therapies. Most studies rely on animal models, such as Tg2756 mice and Caenorhabditis elegans, which do not fully replicate human AD pathology due to species differences in gut microbiota composition and immune responses. Additionally, the gut microbiome is highly adapted, and influenced by genetics, diet, age, and medication, making it difficult to establish universal microbiome-based interventions. Variability in sequencing methods and microbiome classification systems further complicates data interpretation. Many studies establish correlations without demonstrating interconnection, leaving uncertainty about whether gut dysbiosis drives AD or results from disease progression. While probiotics, prebiotics, and symbiotics show promise, their effects vary based on strain selection, dosage, and duration, with inconsistent results in clinical trials due to small sample sizes and short intervention periods. FMT has potential, but safety concerns, donor variability, and long-term effects remain unresolved. The complexity of the gut–brain axis, involving immune, metabolic, and neurotransmitter pathways, adds further challenges. The influence of lifestyle factors like diet, sleep, and stress further confounds study outcomes. Standardized methodologies, large-scale longitudinal studies, and well-controlled clinical trials are needed to validate microbiome-targeted therapies and determine their role in slowing AD progression.
Oxidative stress is a pivotal driver of AD progression and is intricately involved in aβ accumulation, tau hyperphosphorylation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation122. One of the primary mechanisms by which oxidative stress contributes to AD is through its role in aβ pathology. Aggregates of aβ directly impair mitochondrial function by interacting with mitochondrial membranes and proteins, including cytochrome c oxidase123 and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP)124. This interaction leads to enhanced ROS production and reduced ATP synthesis, further compromising neuronal bioenergetics and perpetuating oxidative stress125. Moreover, ROS-induced oxidative modifications to lipids and proteins contribute to lipid peroxidation126 and protein nitration127, which worsen cellular dysfunction and reinforce aβ toxicity and Tau hyperphosphorylation128. These processes form a destructive feedback loop, where increased aβ leads to intensified oxidative damage, mitochondrial failure, and further aβ aggregation.
Oxidative stress also plays a central role in driving tau hyperphosphorylation. ROS activate several tau kinases, including GSK-3β through NADPH oxidase subunits p47 and p67129, CDK5, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) through protein kinase B (PKB)130 (Fig. 3), which phosphorylate tau at multiple sites, leading to its detachment from microtubules131. This detachment destabilizes microtubules, essential for intracellular transport, and promotes the formation of NFTs, a pathological hallmark of AD132. In addition to kinase activation, oxidative stress inhibits protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) (Fig. 3) through JNK, Erk1/2, p38 MAPK, and their upstream ASK1, MKK4,1/2 and 3/6 kinases133, a major tau-dephosphorylating enzyme, by oxidative modification, further promoting sustained tau phosphorylation and tangle formation. Advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which accumulate under oxidative stress conditions, also promote tau aggregation (Fig. 3) through ‘receptors for advanced glycation end products’ (RAGE)-mediated signaling, further aggravating tau pathology and neuronal toxicity134. Chronic neuroinflammation is another major consequence of oxidative stress in AD microglia, the brain's resident immune cells, which are activated in response to oxidative stress, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), NF-κB, p38 MAPK, and aβ deposition, a vicious cycle. Activated microglia release pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, which propagate neuroinflammation through NF-κB signaling135. This inflammatory response further increases ROS production, exacerbating oxidative damage. The NLRP3inflammasome, a critical component of innate immunity, is activated in microglia in response to thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) binding to NLRP3, a component of thioredoxin (TRX) dissociated due to mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS accumulation136. NLRP3 activation leads to the secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators like IL-18 and IL-1β, promoting a neurotoxic environment that accelerates synaptic dysfunction and neuronal death through pyroptosis137, an inflammatory form of programmed cell death (Fig. 3).
CRD further compounds mitochondrial stress and AD pathology. BMAL1/CLOCK heterodimer binds to E-box elements on the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-α (PGC-1α) promoter (Fig. 3), driving transcription138. PGC-1α is a master regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant defense by stimulating NRF2, SOD2, and GPx1139. Disruption of circadian rhythms, such as sleep deprivation, aging, or shift work, reduces BMAL1/CLOCK expression, impairing PGC-1α activity138. Secondary regulators such as REV-ERBα (repressor of Bmal1) and retinoic acid-related orphan receptor-α (RORα) (activator of Bmal1) also modulate BMAL1 levels, and circadian disruption often results in upregulation of REV-ERBα and downregulation of RORα, further suppressing PGC-1α expression140.
This reduction in PGC-1α diminishes mitochondrial antioxidant capacity, leading to ROS accumulation, oxidative damage to mtDNA, and impaired activity of complex IV (cytochrome c oxidase) within the electron transport chain (ETC). The resulting energy deficits and calcium imbalance caused the opening of the mPTP (Fig. 3), further increasing ROS and oxidative damage141. These mitochondrial stressors activate β-secretase (BACE1), enhancing the amyloidogenic cleavage of APP, while the ATP deficit limits aβ clearance by reducing both proteasomal degradation and lysosomal efficiency141. Accumulated aβ peptides translocate into mitochondria viaVDAC1 and TOM40, where they inhibit ETC activity and exacerbate ROS production, establishing a self-perpetuating cycle of mitochondrial dysfunction and aβ toxicity (Fig. 3)19. Excessive ROS and mitochondrial dysfunction also activate tau kinases (GSK-3β, CDK5), which hyperphosphorylate tau proteins46,47. Hyperphosphorylated tau detaches from microtubules, leading to cytoskeletal destabilization, axonal transport defects, and synaptic dysfunction. CRD also reduces the glymphatic clearance of aβ, worsening its accumulation and neurotoxicity over time142. Further, both aβ and pTau upregulate Drp1 (dynamin-related protein 1), promoting excessive mitochondrial fission and fragmentation143, compounding energy deficits, and synaptic failure.
Effective therapeutic strategies must target multiple points in this interconnected network to break the cycle of neurodegeneration. Potential interventions like Nrf2 activators such as dimethyl fumarate (DMF), Lanza et al144. In 2023 provided proof using Nrf2-RNAi, SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell lines under glucose excess or starvation conditions. They found Nrf2-RNAiabolishing the beneficial effects of DMF, but its benefits in AD condition need to be investigated. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of Sulforaphane (NCT04213391) evaluated the efficacy and safety in patients with prodromal to mild AD145, to enhance endogenous antioxidant defenses and reduce oxidative stress. They found significant upregulation of Nrf2 antioxidant defense. Mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants like MitoQ-treated mice showed improved memory retention compared to untreated 3 × Tg-AD mice as well as reduced brain oxidative stress and synapse loss146. Antioxidant SkQ1 showed the efficacy in reducing the signs of AD-like pathology (Table 3) in old OXYS rats by reversing mitochondrial deterioration147. At the same time, the antioxidant reduced hippocampal aβ40 and Аβ42 proteins to restore mitochondrial function and reduce ROS production147. NLRP3inflammasome inhibitors, such as CY-09, improve AD pathology and alleviate cognitive impairment in 3 × Tg-AD mice by inhibiting NLRP3inflammasome activation, reducing neuroinflammation, and protecting against neuronal damage associated with AD progression148 (Tables 3). MCC950 intervention improved spatial memory and brain histological morphology in SAMP8 mice while reducing amyloid-β deposition in the brain. Additionally, MCC950 inhibited the overexpression of NLRP3, caspase-1, and gasdermin D, key factors involved in pyroptosis, thereby protecting neuronal health149. OLT1177 improved the phenotype in APP/PS1 mice by rescuing spatial learning and memory in the Morris water maze test (Table 4). It reduced microglial activation, decreased cortical plaques, and normalized plasma AD metabolic markers, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic agent for AD150 also being investigated to reduce neuroinflammation and microglial-mediated damage in AD151.
The latest AD drug pipeline 2024152 reflects a reduction in new trials compared to 2023153, with fewer drugs and new chemical entities entering the pipeline 164 trials with 127 drugs active in 2024 compared to 187 trials with 141 drugs in 2023. Most trials focus on disease-modifying therapies targeting aβ, tau, and inflammation, with limited focus on circadian rhythms, gut microbiome, and oxidative stress (Table 4).
Oxidative stress plays a complex role in AD pathology, yet most antioxidant trials have failed due to multiple factors. Late intervention often reduces efficacy, as oxidative damage is already advanced when symptoms appear. Many antioxidants are not targeted specifically to the brain or mitochondria and face challenges crossing the BBB. AD involves multifactorial pathology, including amyloid-β, tau, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction, with oxidative stress often a downstream effect rather than a primary driver. Trials have also suffered from insufficient potency or duration, using suboptimal doses and short treatment periods that do not reflect AD's chronic nature. The selection of antioxidants has been another challenge, as compounds like vitamin E and vitamin C may lack the potency or specificity needed for AD. Biomarker challenges, including unreliable monitoring of oxidative stress reduction, further obscure results. Trial design issues, such as genetic variability, disease stage, comorbidities, dilute potential benefits, and a lack of stratification based on oxidative stress levels, have been consistent issues. Additionally, the body tightly regulated redox balance can lead to compensatory mechanisms, making excessive antioxidant use potentially harmful. Low levels of oxidative stress can also play physiological roles, making its complete suppression counterproductive.
Future research on antioxidants in AD should emphasize early intervention by targeting at-risk populations before oxidative damage becomes significant. Specificity is crucial, with a focus on developing antioxidants capable of penetrating the BBB and targeting mitochondria or other specific oxidative pathways in the brain. Combination therapies should be explored, integrating antioxidants with treatments targeting other pathological aspects such as amyloid-beta and tau accumulation and other approaches like circadian pathways, mitochondrial health, gut–brain axis therapies, TRF, and gut microbiome modulation. Biomarker-driven trials should play a central role, involving patient stratification and consistent monitoring of oxidative stress markers to assess treatment efficacy accurately. Exploring novel compounds, including next-generation antioxidants with catalytic and regenerative properties, could provide more effective solutions. Overall, a refined understanding of oxidative stress and its precise contributions to AD pathology is essential for designing successful therapeutic strategies.
Despite extensive research on oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and CRD in AD, several critical limitations persist. A major challenge is the bidirectional feedback between oxidative stress and CRD, making it difficult to determine whether these factors drive AD progression or arise as consequences of aβ and tau pathology. Mitochondrial dysfunction is well-recognized in AD, but its role as a primary trigger versus a downstream effect remains unclear. Tissue-specific variability in mitochondrial regulators, such as PGC-1α, BMAL1, and CLOCK, further complicates data interpretation, particularly in neurons versus astrocytes. Additionally, the link between CRD, mitochondrial impairment, and glymphatic clearance of aβ remains poorly defined, though disruptions in sleep-wake cycles may exacerbate neurodegeneration by impairing this clearance mechanism. While mitochondria-targeted antioxidants like MitoQ and Nrf2 activators have shown promise in preclinical models, their efficacy in human trials is limited due to bioavailability issues and poor blood–brain barrier penetration. Furthermore, short intervention durations, small sample sizes, and inconsistent biomarker assessments reduce reproducibility across studies. Given the complexity of AD, therapies targeting a single mechanism, such as oxidative stress or mitochondrial dysfunction, may be insufficient for clinical impact. Although CRD, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and the gut microbiome are promising therapeutic targets, the lack of large-scale, long-term clinical trials and mechanistic clarity limits their immediate translation into effective AD treatments. Future research should prioritize comprehensive validation, biomarker-driven approaches, and personalized interventions to enhance therapeutic efficacy.
TRF/TRE is a promising non-pharmacological intervention that aligns nutrient intake with the body's circadian rhythms, typically limiting food consumption to a 6- to 12-h window followed by fasting. Unlike traditional intermittent fasting, TRF does not involve caloric restriction, making it more sustainable and accessible for patients25. TRF has demonstrated substantial benefits for patients suffering from type 2 diabetes to cancers, in metabolic health, mitochondrial function, and autophagy, all of which are key in reducing oxidative stress and neuroinflammation154. By improving circadian alignment, glucose metabolism, and insulin sensitivity, TRF is emerging as a therapeutic strategy for AD by reducing aβ accumulation and cognitive decline155.
Circadian rhythms regulate key physiological processes such as sleep-wake cycles, hormone secretion, and metabolism, all of which were commonly disrupted in AD3. TRF helps to realign these rhythms by synchronizing eating patterns with the body's internal clocks156. TRF promotes circadian clock synchronization between central and peripheral clocks and enhances cognitive function by maintaining glucose metabolism and reducing aβ accumulation157. On a molecular level, TRF influences the BMAL1/CLOCK pathway, which governs the expression of CCG involved in glucose metabolism viainsulin secretion, glucose uptake158, cellular repair, and protein clearance159. BMAL1 and CLOCK proteins form a complex that regulates circadian rhythms by driving the expression of genes such as PER and CRY, which provide feedback to inhibit BMAL1/CLOCK activity, creating a 24-h cycle160. TRF helps maintain this feedback loop's balance, ensuring that circadian rhythms remain stable and aligned161. TRF (6:18 feeding and fasting) regimen in the APP23 transgenic AD mouse model for six months significantly improved cognitive performance, reduced amyloid plaque load, and decreased neuroinflammation markers such as TNF-α and IL-6. TRF also restored circadian rhythms by normalizing diurnal activity (Table 1) and gene expression patterns related to metabolism and inflammation67. TRF-induced activation of SIRT1 also plays a critical role in circadian regulation. SIRT1 interacts with and deacetylates BMAL1, enhancing the stability and function of the BMAL1/CLOCK complex during the fed state162. This deacetylation strengthens circadian rhythms by promoting the expression of PER and CRY and helps synchronize peripheral clocks with the central SCN-regulated clock163. SIRT1 also influences the rhythmic expression of metabolic and autophagic genes in the brain by activating Forkhead box O3 (FOXO3), a transcription factor that induces autophagy genes like Lc3, Bnip3164, improving the clearance of aβ and maintaining energy homeostasis, both crucial for neuronal health165. TRF also impacts the AMPK pathway, a key energy sensor linked to circadian regulation. Activated AMPK modulates the phosphorylation of clock protein CRY1 (Fig. 4), affecting its stability and interactions with other signaling molecules166. By destabilizing CRY, AMPK influences the negative feedback loop of the circadian clock, thereby resetting the molecular clock and synchronizing it with metabolic needs. The TRF's regulation of AMPK helps align the energy metabolism with the circadian cycle, reducing disruptions that can contribute to AD pathology. Furthermore, TRF increases REV-ERBα expression during fasting through AMPK-driven CRY degradation and BMAL1 activation (Fig. 4), followed by Per, Cry, and Rev-Erbα gene expression167 to ensure timely repression and activation of circadian genes like BMAL1, thereby maintaining the circadian cycle155. The interaction between REV-ERBα, SIRT1, and AMPK under TRF creates a tightly regulated feedback mechanism that optimizes circadian control of metabolic processes and effectively realigns circadian rhythms enhancing cellular repair, metabolic regulation, and neuronal function. This circadian realignment supports cognitive health and contributes to slowing AD progression.
TRF, limited to a 6-h feeding window during the active phase, and 18 h of fasting over 3 months significantly improved disruptions in total sleep, wakefulness, agitation, and sleep fragmentation, by enhancing sleep quality and reducing agitation and fragmentation in APP23 transgenic mouse model of AD. In addition to that, TRF also induced nutritional ketosis (β-hydroxybutyrate >0.5 mmol/L) and reduced blood glucose levels compared to ad libitum feeding (ALF) mice67. In male db/db mice, a diabetic model prone to AD, and wild type controls 8 weeks TRF regimen improved AD pathology. Mice were subjected to either normal (12:12) or disrupted (6:18) light/dark (LD) cycles, with food provided ad libitum (AL) or restricted to an 8-h window during the active (dark) phase in the TRF group. TRF significantly mitigated cognitive deficits caused by disrupted LD cycles and reduced hyperphosphorylation of tau protein at key sites (Ser396 and Thr231) in the hippocampus. TRF also restored disrupted circadian rhythms by normalizing the expression of key clock genes (e.g., Per2, Rev-erbα) and improved metabolic health by reducing body weight, lipid accumulation, and liver triglyceride levels. These findings demonstrate that TRF effectively protects against circadian disruption-aggravated AD pathology through circadian and metabolic regulation168.
TRF significantly influences gut microbiome composition such as Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, A. muciniphila, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii169. These beneficial bacteria produce bioactive metabolites, particularly SCFAs like acetate, propionate, and butyrate, which strengthen tight junctions in the gut epithelium, reduce intestinal permeability, and prevent the systemic translocation of harmful endotoxins such as LPS. By limiting the entry of LPS into the bloodstream and modulating the gut microbiome, TRF reduces systemic inflammation, which is linked to the progression of AD. In addition to promoting beneficial bacteria, TRF decreases the populations of harmful bacteria that produce neurotoxic metabolites, such as trimethylamine (TMA), which is converted into trimethylamineN-oxide (TMAO). High TMAO levels are associated with vascular inflammation and cognitive decline170, both of which exacerbate AD pathology (Fig. 4). By resetting gut health through beneficial bacteria, TRF reduces TMAO-producing harmful bacteria, TRF may decrease vascular inflammation and support overall brain function. TRF positively impacts pathways involving the vagus nerve and the HPA axis, which regulate stress responses and neuroinflammation by increasing autonomic response, cortisol, and ghrelin levels171.
Hence, improving gut flora under TRF directly modulates neuroinflammation and supports cognitive health in AD through these complex pathways. A study involving 10 growing pigs fitted with T-cannulas for proximal colon sampling compared two feeding regimens: Free access with unrestricted feeding and TRF limited to three 1-h slots daily. Over 15 days, colonic digesta samples were collected on Day 16 at 6-h intervals. TRF altered nutrient substrate oscillations (e.g., cellulose and starch), modulated gut microbial rhythmicity, and enhanced microbial interactions, gaining rhythmicity in families such as Pasteurellaceae. These results demonstrate TRF's potential to optimize gut health by regulating microbial dynamics and nutrient utilization172. A 12-week isocaloric-restricted feeding trial with 96 overweight or obese adults (mean age 36 years), followed by a 28-week follow-up, compared to a healthy low-carbohydrate diet (HLCD), TRE, and a control regimen. HLCD significantly reduced fat mass and altered the gut microbiome. Both interventions increased beneficial gut bacteria (Table 2), including Parabacteroides distasonis, Bacteroides intestinalis, and Parabacteroides goldsteinii103.
TRF offers significant neuroprotective benefits in AD by reducing oxidative stress through the activation of several interconnected molecular pathways. TRF was found to enhance mitochondrial function by upregulating mitochondrial unfolded protein response (mtUPR) and limiting mitochondrial fragmentation by reducing DRP17 and stimulating antioxidant defenses, primarily by activating the Nrf2/ARE pathway through AMPK activation and BHB production during fasting173, which neutralizes ROS, through the transcription of key antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, GPx, and heme oxygenase-1174. Recent studies provided substantial evidence for the role of TRF in activating the AMPK pathway175. TRF improves mitochondrial efficiency, reduces ROS production, enhances fatty acid oxidation, and promotes mitochondrial biogenesisvia PGC-1α176. TRF also inhibits the mTOR pathway during the non-fed state/fasting period in mice177, thereby promoting autophagy, a critical process for clearing damaged proteins, organelles, and aβ plaques67 further reducing oxidative stress. TRF also promotes mtUPR which activates the PI3K/Akt pathway and MAPK/ERK pathway (Fig. 4), ensuring the removal of damaged mitochondria, modulating insulin sensitivity, and cell survival and neuroprotection178. Altogether, TRF's ability to activate these interconnected pathways safeguard against ROS-induced oxidative stress, supporting mitochondrial health, and reduces inflammation, which enhances neuronal resilience against stress, making it a promising intervention in mitigating AD progression.
AD is often associated with disruptive feeding behaviors, including intake of non-nutritional foods or forgetting to eat altogether. These behaviors are common in mid-to-late-stage AD and are linked to cognitive decline and poor nutritional status179. As a result, weight loss and malnutrition become significant problems, further exacerbating the symptoms of AD and accelerating disease progression. A study on aged male Fisher 344 × Brown Norway F1 hybrid rats examined the effects of TRF with ketogenic or standard diets on cognition and gut microbiota. TRF, implemented as one meal per day from 8 to 21 months of age, significantly improved cognitive performance in biconditional association tasks compared to ad libitum feeding (Table 2)102. TRF also enhanced gut microbiome composition, increasing beneficial genera like Allobaculum, Intestinimonas, and Eubacterium ventriosum, with distinct beta diversity differences between feeding methods. The ketogenic TRF group showed a lower glucose-ketone index (GKI), indicating enhanced nutritional ketosis. TRF mitigated age-related cognitive decline, demonstrating its potential to improve metabolic and brain health during aging102. TRF reduces aβ accumulation and decreases hyperphosphorylated tau proteins through fasting-induced autophagy, also contributing to better memory and behavioral outcomes by reducing inflammation, promoting insulin sensitivity, and BDNF180. The study used an APP/PS1 transgenic mouse model of AD to investigate the effects of circadian rhythm restoration through TRF and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) treatment over an 8-week period (Table 1). Mice were divided into control, TRF, GLP-1, and combined TRF + GLP-1 groups, with TRF restricting food access to a 10-h window during the active phase. GLP-1 receptor agonistliraglutide was used alongside tools to analyze circadian rhythms, amyloid pathology, and metabolic homeostasis. The results showed that TRF and GLP-1 treatment, particularly in combination, improved circadian clock gene expression (Bmal1, Clock), reduced aβ deposition, enhanced glucose metabolism, and restored cognitive function, highlighting the therapeutic potential of circadian and metabolic interventions in AD68. At the molecular level, TRF activates the AMPK pathway, which enhances mitochondrial function through AMPK-regulated kinase navel (nua) kinase 1 (NUAK1) (regulates the mitochondria localization in neurons) and brain and retinal angiogenesis-related protein (BRAWNIN, promotes mitochondrial biogenesis) and promotes axon branching181. SIRT1, a crucial regulator of circadian rhythms and neuroprotection in the brain by inducing the CCGs through deacetylation, is also activated by TRF. The interplay between SIRT1 and AMPK in regulating autophagy and mitochondrial function provides a strong molecular basis for TRF's cognitive benefits182. TRF stimulates neurogenesis, in 8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice by activating neuronal precursor cells through BDNF and neurotropin 3 in the hippocampus, a region critically involved in learning and memory183. While human research on TRF and its cognitive benefits is still in the early stages, initial findings are promising. A 14-h TRF intervention conducted over 30 consecutive days in 14 healthy subjects reduced amyloid-β deposition and increased levels of BDNF in the brain and significantly69 (Table 2) essential for neuroplasticity, learning, and memory. However, larger, long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results and determine the broader applicability of TRF as a therapeutic intervention for cognitive decline in AD. Implementing a structured feeding schedule through TRF can help mitigate these maladaptive feeding behaviors by providing consistency and routine.
Many trials involved small sample sizes, such as the pilot study with 12 participants and the 14-subject TRF intervention, limiting statistical power and generalizability. Short study durations, often ranging from 8 to 12 weeks, make it challenging to assess long-term cognitive and metabolic outcomes. Variability in TRF protocols, including differences in feeding windows and timing (e.g., early vs. delayed TRF), further complicates direct comparisons between studies. Additionally, diverse study populations and models, including APP23 and C57BL/6J mice, human participants, and Drosophila, create challenges in translating results from animal models to human pathology. Many studies also lacked long-term follow-ups to determine whether observed benefits persisted over time and presented inconsistent use of biomarkers, with some trials focusing on cognitive assessments alone while others included inflammatory and oxidative stress markers like TNF-α and BDNF. Limited control for external factors such as physical activity, diet composition, and sleep patterns introduces potential confounders, while species differences between human and rodent models further limit translational relevance. Some human trials may also be influenced by the placebo effect, especially when using self-reported cognitive assessments without blinding. To strengthen the evidence, base for TRF in AD prevention, future research should involve larger, multi-center trials with standardized TRF protocols, extended intervention periods, comprehensive biomarker profiling, and better control of confounding lifestyle variables.
CRD can alter the gut microbiome composition and gut barrier integrity. Reduced BMAL1 activity weakens the expression of tight junction proteins (occludin and claudin-5), compromising gut permeability80. This allows endotoxins like LPS to enter circulation, activating TLR4/NF-κB signaling82, enhancing neuroinflammation, amplifying AD pathology, and modulating CRs. Beneficial bacteria such as A. muciniphila and F. prausnitzii produce SCFAs like butyrate and propionate, which activate BMAL1 expression and stabilize circadian phases by inhibiting HDACs163. Additionally, microbial metabolites like serotonin and melatonin influence central clock regulation in the SCN. CRD impairs mitochondrial antioxidant defense, contributing to oxidative stress. BMAL1 and CLOCK regulate the expression of PGC-1α, a key mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant gene138. PGC-1α promotes the expression of enzymes such as SOD2 and catalase139. Disrupted BMAL1 control reduces PGC-1α, impairing antioxidant capacity and leading to an excess ROS generation141. Elevated ROS activates kinases like GSK-3β and CDK546, promoting tau hyperphosphorylation while inhibiting PP2A, a tau phosphatase133. CRD further reduces mitochondrial efficiency by increasing DRP1 expression, mitochondrial fragmentation, and amplifying oxidative stress-driven neurodegeneration143.
Dysbiosis, characterized by an imbalance in microbial populations, promotes oxidative stress by increasing pathogenic bacteria like Desulfovibrio and E. coli. These bacteria produce LPS and H2S, both of which impair mitochondrial function and amplify ROS production78. LPS activates TLR4/NF-κB signaling, enhancing pro-inflammatory cytokine release (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) and promoting neuroinflammation82. Curli proteins from E. coli also cross-seed with aβ, accelerating its aggregation and oxidative damage52. Conversely, SCFA-producing bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium reduce oxidative stress by activating the Nrf2 pathway, which upregulates antioxidant enzymes including HO-1, SOD2, and catalase174. TRF improves circadian alignment by limiting food intake to a specific window and synchronizing the central (SCN) and peripheral clocks. TRF enhances BMAL1 stability by activating SIRT1, which deacetylates Bmal1 and stabilizes circadian gene expression162. TRF also modulates AMPK activity, which phosphorylates and destabilizes CRY1, resetting the circadian cycle166. By realigning circadian rhythms, TRF enhances glymphatic clearance of aβ and tau, reduces metabolic dysfunction, and improves sleep-wake cycles7.
TRF beneficially reshapes the gut microbiome by increasing SCFA-producing bacteria such as A. muciniphila, Bifidobacterium, and Lactobacillus87 while reducing pathogenic strains like Desulfovibrio88. The SCFAs enhance gut barrier integrity by regulating tight junction proteins and reducing systemic inflammation169. Butyrate also inhibits HDAC activity and prevents the over activation of NF-κB, reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine release51. Strengthened gut barrier integrity reduces LPS leakage, further decreasing systemic inflammation and oxidative stress. TRF reduces oxidative stress by activating the AMPK/Nrf2 pathway, which upregulates antioxidant enzymes (SOD2, GPx, and HO-1) and suppresses the mTOR pathway177. This increases autophagy and mitochondrial turnover and reduces ROS production. TRF also enhances mitochondrial health by activating PGC-1α, reducing the ROS production, NFTs and aβ accumulation, which promotes mitochondrial biogenesis and reduces DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation184.
CRD exacerbates gut dysbiosis by reducing BMAL1 and CLOCK activity, leading to the downregulation of tight junction proteins such as occludin and claudin-5, which increases gut permeability and allows endotoxins like LPS to enter circulation. This triggers TLR4/NF-κB signaling, promoting neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. CRD also disrupts mitochondrial antioxidant defenses by decreasing PGC-1α expression, impairing enzymes such as SOD2 and catalase, leading to ROS accumulation. Simultaneously, gut dysbiosis results in reduced SCFA production, weakening the gut barrier and amplifying inflammatory signaling through LPS and H2S release, which further activates the NF-κB pathway and oxidative damage. Oxidative stress drives further CRD by inhibiting BMAL1/CLOCK activity and promoting mitochondrial dysfunction through DRP1 overexpression and impairing mitophagy. TRF helps restore this disrupted balance by enhancing BMAL1 and SIRT1 expression, a key metabolic sensor and NAD+-dependent deacetylase, not only stabilizes circadian gene expression but also boosts Nrf2 activity, mitigating oxidative stress, promoting mitochondrial health, and reduces inflammation. TRF also improves gut health by promoting SCFA-producing bacteria, which strengthens the gut barrier and reduces systemic inflammation. Furthermore, TRF activates the AMPK/Nrf2 pathway, enhancing mitochondrial antioxidant defenses and reducing ROS accumulation while promoting mitochondrial biogenesis and autophagy, thus lowering oxidative stress and neurodegeneration. These interconnected feedback loops emphasize the importance of targeting circadian rhythms, gut microbiome, oxidative stress, and TRF simultaneously for AD prevention and therapy.
Despite significant advances in AD research, several critical gaps persist, particularly in understanding the interplay between CRD, oxidative stress, and gut microbiota dysbiosis. These factors are often studied in isolation, overlooking the feedback loops that exacerbate neurodegeneration. The molecular mechanisms linking circadian misalignment, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation remain poorly characterized. For example, the tissue-specific roles of circadian clock proteins (e.g., BMAL1, CLOCK, REV-ERBα) in peripheral organs and their contributions to AD pathology are unclear. Similarly, the diurnal dynamics of gut microbial metabolites, such as SCFA and bile acids, and their effects on central and peripheral clocks are insufficiently understood. Microbial-derived amyloids, LPS, and other bacterial neurotoxins may influence aβ and tau aggregation cross-seeding mechanisms, yet this area remains underexplored. Additionally, the role of the glymphatic system in circadian-regulated aβ clearance and its interactions with neuroinflammation require further investigation. While therapeutic interventions like TRF, probiotics, and melatonin show potential, they lack standardized trial designs, optimized dosages, and strain-specific evaluations, limiting their translational value. Preclinical models such as APP/PS1 mice fail to reflect the metabolic and genetic complexity of human AD, and clinical trials often lack diverse cohorts, extended follow-ups, and representation of underexplored populations. Furthermore, significant lifestyle factors such as sleep deprivation, shift work, and physical inactivity are frequently overlooked, despite their potential impact on circadian health and AD risk.
Addressing these gaps requires integrative approaches that examine the dynamic interplay among CRD, gut microbiome dysbiosis, and oxidative stress while leveraging advanced models, diverse cohorts, and multi-omics techniques. Such efforts will provide a comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms and pave the way for innovative therapeutic strategies to slow or prevent AD progression.
To address critical gaps in AD research, future studies must explore the complex interplay between CRD, oxidative stress, and gut microbiome dysbiosis as interconnected drivers of neurodegeneration. Investigating tissue-specific roles of circadian clock proteins (e.g., BMAL1, REV-ERBα, CLOCK) in the SCN, hippocampus, liver, and intestine is essential. The diurnal dynamics of gut microbial metabolites, such as SCFAs and bile acids, and their downstream effects on peripheral and central clocks require multi-omics profiling to uncover mechanisms linking gut–brain communication to aβ clearance and tau phosphorylation. Therapeutic approaches should include TRF protocols adapted to circadian phenotypes, age, and sex, combined with microbiome-targeted interventions like prebiotics (e.g., inulin, FOS) and probiotics (e.g., A. muciniphila, B. breve) to enhance microbial diversity, SCFA production, and vagus nerve signaling. Molecular mechanisms underlying microbial amyloid cross-seeding, LPS-induced neuroinflammation, and bacterial neurotoxins in exacerbating aβ and tau pathology must be evaluated using proteomics and gut microbiota transplants in transgenic AD models. Real-time imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET) tracers, should be employed to assess neuroinflammation and glymphatic clearance dynamics under CRD and gut microbiome-targeted therapies. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress remain central to AD pathology, necessitating the development of mitochondrial-targeted antioxidants (e.g., MitoQ) and Nrf2 activators (e.g., Sulforaphane, dimethyl fumarate) to address ROS production and restore mitochondrial homeostasis. Calcium channel blockers (e.g., verapamil) should be tested for their ability to regulate mitochondrial calcium overload and reduce oxidative damage. Neuroimmune modulation, including NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitors (e.g., MCC950) and lipid mediators (resolvins, lipoxins), represents a promising avenue to resolve chronic inflammation and enhance microglial-mediated aβ clearance. Integrated chronotherapy protocols combining TRF, light therapy (e.g., blue light ∼480 nm), and pharmacological agents should be developed and personalized using AI-driven tools analyzing real-time biomarker data, including circadian health markers (e.g., BMAL1 expression), gut microbiota metabolites (e.g., SCFA levels), and oxidative stress indicators (e.g., mtDNA damage). Biomarker discovery efforts should also focus on ApoE genotype-specific differences and longitudinal tracking of plasma biomarkers such as aβ42/40 ratios and neurofilament light chain (NfL). Preclinical models need to integrate circadian disruptions, gut microbiome alterations, and sex-specific hormonal influences on AD pathology, using systems like Drosophila, germ-free mice colonized with human microbiota, and non-human primates. Longitudinal human cohort studies stratified by sex, age, and circadian phenotypes can bridge translational gaps and enhance intervention precision.
Finally, lifestyle interventions combining plant-based diets, physical activity, and circadian alignment therapies should be systematically evaluated for their potential to synergize with pharmaceutical and gut microbiome-targeted therapies. Real-time multi-omics approaches, coupled with systems biology tools like weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and machine learning, can uncover predictive patterns linking CRD, gut microbiome dysbiosis, and oxidative stress to AD progression. By integrating these strategies, future research can generate innovative, personalized interventions that address critical mechanistic gaps and slow or prevent AD progression while improving patient outcomes.
Alzheimer's disease is an extraordinarily complex condition, demanding an equally multifaceted approach to its understanding and treatment. Addressing these critical gaps requires a paradigm shift toward a more integrative and multidisciplinary research framework. Future studies should prioritize simultaneous assessment of circadian rhythms, gut health, oxidative stress, and TRF in both preclinical and human cohorts. Incorporation of personalized interventions targeting multiple biological pathways will improve therapeutic outcomes. The development of non-invasive biomarkers to assess intervention efficacy is essential for tracking disease progression and therapeutic responses in AD without the need for invasive procedures. By expanding mechanistic insights and standardizing intervention protocols, researchers can pave the way for targeted therapies capable of modifying disease progression and improving the quality of life for those affected by AD.
1.
DeTure MA, Dickson DW. The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener 2019;14:32.
2.
Chen SJ, Deng YT, Li YZ, Zhang YR, Zhang W, Chen SD, et al. Association of circadian rhythms with brain disorder incidents: a prospective cohort study of 72242 participants. Transl Psychiatry 2022;12:514.
3.
Musiek ES, Holtzman DM. Mechanisms linking circadian clocks, sleep, and neurodegeneration. Science 2016;354:1004—8.
4.
Bacalini MG, Palombo F, Garagnani P, Giuliani C, Fiorini C, Caporali L, et al. Association of rs3027178 polymorphism in the circadian clock gene PER1 with susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease and longevity in an Italian population. Geroscience 2022;44:881—96.
5.
Janoski JR, Aiello I, Lundberg CW, Finkielstein CV. Circadian clock gene polymorphisms implicated in human pathologies. Trends Genet 2024;40:834—52.
6.
Ju YE, Lucey BP, Holtzman DM. Sleep and Alzheimer disease pathology—a bidirectional relationship. Nat Rev Neurol 2014;10:115—9.
7.
Lopes DM, Wells JA, Ma D, Wallis L, Park D, Llewellyn SK, et al. Glymphatic inhibition exacerbates tau propagation in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Alzheimers Res Ther 2024;16:71.
8.
Ahmad F, Sachdeva P, Sarkar J, Izhaar R. Circadian dysfunction and Alzheimer’s disease—an updated review. Aging Med (Milton) 2023;6:71—81.
9.
Shen Y, Lv QK, Xie WY, Gong SY, Zhuang S, Liu JY, et al. Circadian disruption and sleep disorders in neurodegeneration. Transl Neurodegener 2023;12:8.
10.
Tsao SP, Nurrahma BA, Kumar R, Wu CH, Yeh TH, Chiu CC, et al. Probiotic enhancement of antioxidant capacity and alterations of gut microbiota composition in 6-hydroxydopamin-induced Parkinson’s disease rats. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021;10:1823.
11.
Khezri MR, Ghasemnejad-Berenji M. Gut microbiota and circadian rhythm in Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology: a review and hypothesis on their association. NPJ Aging 2023;9:9.
12.
Zhang Y, Shen Y, Liufu N, Liu L, Li W, Shi Z, et al. Transmission of Alzheimer’s disease-associated microbiota dysbiosis and its impact on cognitive function: evidence from mouse models and human patients. Res Sq 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs2790988/v1.
13.
David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 2014;505:559—63.
14.
Zarrinpar A, Chaix A, Yooseph S, Panda S. Diet and feeding pattern affect the diurnal dynamics of the gut microbiome. Cell Metab 2014;20:1006—17.
15.
Loh JS, Mak WQ, Tan LKS, Ng CX, Chan HH, Yeow SH, et al. Microbiota—gut—brain axis and its therapeutic applications in neurodegenerative diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2024;9:37.
16.
Dhami M, Raj K, Singh S. Relevance of gut microbiota to Alzheimer’s disease (AD): potential effects of probiotic in management of AD. Aging and Health Research 2023;3:100128.
17.
Pellegrino A, Coppola G, Santopaolo F, Gasbarrini A, Ponziani FR. Role of Akkermansia in human diseases: from causation to therapeutic properties. Nutrients 2023;15:1815.
18.
Reiss AB, Gulkarov S, Jacob B, Srivastava A, Pinkhasov A, Gomolin IH, et al. Mitochondria in Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. Life (Basel) 2024;14:196.
19.
Manczak M, Reddy PH. Abnormal interaction of VDAC1 with amyloid beta and phosphorylated tau causes mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet 2012;21:5131—46.
20.
Butterfield DA, Halliwell B. Oxidative stress, dysfunctional glucose metabolism and Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2019;20:148—60.
21.
Swerdlow RH. Mitochondria and mitochondrial cascades in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2018;62:1403—16.
22.
Naomi R, Yazid MD, Teoh SH, Balan SS, Shariff H, Kumar J, et al. Dietary polyphenols as a protection against cognitive decline: evidence from animal experiments; mechanisms and limitations. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023;12:1054.
23.
Ahmadi S, Taghizadieh M, Mehdizadehfar E, Hasani A, Khalili Fard J, Feizi H, et al. Gut microbiota in neurological diseases: melatonin plays an important regulatory role. Biomed Pharmacother 2024;174:116487.
24.
Bonmati-Carrion MA, Rol MA. Melatonin as a mediator of the gut microbiota-host interaction: implications for health and disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023;13:34.
25.
Longo VD, Panda S. Fasting, Circadian rhythms, and time-restricted feeding in healthy lifespan. Cell Metab 2016;23:1048—59.
26.
Zeb F, Osaili T, Obaid RS, Naja F, Radwan H, Cheikh Ismail L, et al. Gut microbiota and time-restricted feeding/eating: a targeted biomarker and approach in precision nutrition. Nutrients 2023;15:259.
27.
Zhu X, Shen J, Feng S, Huang C, Wang H, Huo F, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila, which is enriched in the gut microbiota by metformin, improves cognitive function in aged mice by reducing the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6. Microbiome 2023;11:120.
28.
Van Drunen R, Eckel-Mahan K. Circadian rhythms of the hypothalamus: from function to physiology. Clocks Sleep 2021;3:189—226.
29.
Greco CM, Sassone-Corsi P. Circadian blueprint of metabolic pathways in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2019;20:71—82.
30.
Sahar S, Sassone-Corsi P. Regulation of metabolism: the circadian clock dictates the time. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2012;23:1—8.
31.
Buhr ED, Takahashi JS. Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2013:3—27.
32.
Takahashi JS. Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat Rev Genet 2017;18:164—79.
33.
Zeng Y, Guo Z, Wu M, Chen F, Chen L. Circadian rhythm regulates the function of immune cells and participates in the development of tumors. Cell Death Discov 2024;10:199.
34.
Insel PS, Mohlenhoff BS, Neylan TC, Krystal AD, Mackin RS. Association of sleep and beta-amyloid pathology among older cognitively unimpaired adults. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2117573.
35.
Colwell CS. Defining circadian disruption in neurodegenerative disorders. J Clin Investig 2021;131:e148288.
36.
Ling Y, Yuan S, Huang X, Tan S, Huang T, Xu A, et al. The association of night shift work with the risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study of 245,570 UK Biobank participants. J Neurol 2023;270:3499—510.
37.
Lee KW, Yang CC, Chen CH, Hung CH, Chuang HY. Shift work is significantly and positively associated with dementia: a meta-analysis study. Front Public Health 2023;11:998464.
38.
Li P, Gao L, Gaba A, Yu L, Cui L, Fan W, et al. Circadian disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease progression: a prospective observational cohort study of community-based older adults. Lancet Healthy Longev 2020;1:e96—105.
39.
Dong Q, Gentry NW, McMahon T, Yamazaki M, Benitez-Rivera L, Wang T, et al. Familial natural short sleep mutations reduce Alzheimer pathology in mice. iScience 2022;25:103964.
40.
Dong Q, Ptacek LJ, Fu YH. Mutant β1-adrenergic receptor improves REM sleep and ameliorates tau accumulation in a mouse model of tauopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023;120:e2221686120.
41.
Eyob E, Shaw JS, Bakker A, Munro C, Spira A, Wu M, et al. A randomized-controlled trial targeting cognition in early Alzheimer’s disease by improving sleep with trazodone (REST). J Alzheimers Dis 2024;101:S205—15.
42.
Camargos EF, Louzada LL, Quintas JL, Naves JO, Louzada FM, Nobrega OT. Trazodone improves sleep parameters in Alzheimer disease patients: a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatr 2014;22:1565—74.
43.
Davinelli S, Medoro A, Savino R, Scapagnini G. Sleep and oxidative stress: current perspectives on the role of NRF2. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2024;44:52.
44.
Mezhnina V, Ebeigbe OP, Poe A, Kondratov RV. Circadian control of mitochondria in reactive oxygen species homeostasis. Antioxidants Redox Signal 2022;37:647—63.
45.
Nakahata Y, Sahar S, Astarita G, Kaluzova M, Sassone-Corsi P. Circadian control of the NAD+ salvage pathway by CLOCK—SIRT1. Science 2009;324:654—7.
46.
Lee KY, Koh SH, Noh MY, Park KW, Lee YJ, Kim SH. Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta activity plays very important roles in determining the fate of oxidative stress-inflicted neuronal cells. Brain Res 2007;1129:89—99.
47.
Zambrano CA, Egana JT, Nunez MT, Maccioni RB, Gonzalez-Billault C. Oxidative stress promotes tau dephosphorylation in neuronal cells: the roles of cdk5 and PP1. Free Radic Biol Med 2004;36:1393—402.
48.
Gomes AP, Price NL, Ling AJ, Moslehi JJ, Montgomery MK, Rajman L, et al. Declining NAD+ induces a pseudohypoxic state disrupting nuclear-mitochondrial communication during aging. Cell 2013;155:1624—38.
49.
Ishikawa H, Ma Z, Barber GN. STING regulates intracellular DNA-mediated, type I interferon-dependent innate immunity. Nature 2009;461:788—92.
50.
Hou Y, Wei Y, Lautrup S, Yang B, Wang Y, Cordonnier S, et al. NAD+ supplementation reduces neuroinflammation and cell senescence in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease via cGAS—STING. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118:e2011226118.
51.
Srinivasan M, Walker C. Circadian clock, glucocorticoids and NF-κB signaling in neuroinflammation—implicating glucocorticoid induced leucine zipper as a molecular link. ASN Neuro 2022;14:17590914221120190.
52.
Wang XL, Li L. Circadian clock regulates inflammation and the development of neurodegeneration. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021;11:696554.
53.
De Bosscher K, Vanden Berghe W, Vermeulen L, Plaisance S, Boone E, Haegeman G. Glucocorticoids repress NF-κB-driven genes by disturbing the interaction of p65 with the basal transcription machinery, irrespective of coactivator levels in the cell. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:3919—24.
54.
Sebaldt RJ, Sheller JR, Oates JA, Roberts 2nd LJ, FitzGerald GA. Inhibition of eicosanoid biosynthesis by glucocorticoids in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:6974—8.
55.
Koller A, Preishuber-Pflugl J, Runge C, Ladek AM, Brunner SM, Aigner L, et al. Chronobiological activity of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 during basal and induced autophagy in the ARPE-19 retinal pigment epithelial cell line. Aging (Albany NY) 2021;13:25670—93.
56.
Chen WD, Yeh JK, Peng MT, Shie SS, Lin SL, Yang CH, et al. Circadian CLOCK mediates activation of transforming growth factor-β signaling and renal fibrosis through cyclooxygenase 2. Am J Pathol 2015;185:3152—63.
57.
Miao J, Ma H, Yang Y, Liao Y, Lin C, Zheng J, et al. Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease: pathogenesis, mechanisms, and therapeutic potentials. Front Aging Neurosci 2023;15:1201982.
58.
Li C, Wu X, Liu S, Shen D, Zhu J, Liu K. Role of resolvins in the inflammatory resolution of neurological diseases. Front Pharmacol 2020;11:612.
59.
Arreaza-Gil V, Avila-Roman J, Escobar-Martinez I, Muguerza B, Suarez M, Arola-Arnal A, et al. Photoperiod conditions modulate serum oxylipins levels in healthy and obese rats: impact of proanthocyanidins and gut microbiota. Nutrients 2023;15:707.
60.
Kasikara C, Doran AC, Cai B, Tabas I. The role of non-resolving inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Clin Investig 2018;128:2713—23.
61.
Kou L, Chi X, Sun Y, Han C, Wan F, Hu J, et al. The circadian clock protein Rev-erbalpha provides neuroprotection and attenuates neuroinflammation against Parkinson’s disease via the microglial NLRP3 inflammasome. J Neuroinflammation 2022;19:133.
62.
Sun SY, Chen GH. Treatment of circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorders. Curr Neuropharmacol 2022;20:1022—34.
63.
Mosalam EM, Elberri AI, Sallam AS, Salem HR, Metwally EM, Abdallah MS, et al. Chronotherapeutic neuroprotective effect of verapamil against lipopolysaccharide-induced neuroinflammation in mice through modulation of calcium-dependent genes. Mol Med 2022;28:139.
64.
Georgieva I, Tchekalarova J, Nenchovska Z, Kortenska L, Tzoneva R. Melatonin supplementation alleviates impaired spatial memory by influencing Aβ(1—42) metabolism via γ-secretase in the icvAβ(1—42) rat model with pinealectomy. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:10294.
65.
Chen D, Mei Y, Kim N, Lan G, Gan CL, Fan F, et al. Melatonin directly binds and inhibits death-associated protein kinase 1 function in Alzheimer’s disease. J Pineal Res 2020;69:e12665.
66.
Damara M, Misra N, Chambon P. A high-light therapy restores the circadian clock and corrects the pathological syndrome generated in restricted-fed mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024;121:e2403770121.
67.
Whittaker DS, Akhmetova L, Carlin D, Romero H, Welsh DK, Colwell CS, et al. Circadian modulation by time-restricted feeding rescues brain pathology and improves memory in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Metab 2023;35:1704—21.e6.
68.
Dong Y, Cheng L, Zhao Y. Resetting the circadian clock of Alzheimer’s mice via GLP-1 injection combined with time-restricted feeding. Front Physiol 2022;13:911437.
69.
Gudden J, Arias Vasquez A, Bloemendaal M. The effects of intermittent fasting on brain and cognitive function. Nutrients 2021;13:3166.
70.
Heddes M, Altaha B, Niu Y, Reitmeier S, Kleigrewe K, Haller D, et al. The intestinal clock drives the microbiome to maintain gastrointestinal homeostasis. Nat Commun 2022;13:6068.
71.
Giau VV, Wu SY, Jamerlan A, An SSA, Kim SY, Hulme J. Gut microbiota and their neuroinflammatory implications in Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrients 2018;10:1765.
72.
Das TK, Blasco-Conesa MP, Korf J, Honarpisheh P, Chapman MR, Ganesh BP. Bacterial Amyloid Curli associated gut epithelial neuroendocrine activation predominantly observed in Alzheimer’s disease mice with central amyloid-β pathology. J Alzheimers Dis 2022;88:191—205.
73.
Cogliati S, Clementi V, Francisco M, Crespo C, Arganaraz F, Grau R. Bacillus subtilis delays neurodegeneration and behavioral impairment in the Alzheimer’s disease model Caenorhabditis Elegans. J Alzheimers Dis 2020;73:1035—52.
74.
Wang C, Lau CY, Ma F, Zheng C. Genome-wide screen identifies curli amyloid fibril as a bacterial component promoting host neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118:e2116257118.
75.
Carabotti M, Scirocco A, Maselli MA, Severi C. The gut—brain axis: interactions between enteric microbiota, central and enteric nervous systems. Ann Gastroenterol 2015;28:203—9.
76.
Nakhal MM, Yassin LK, Alyaqoubi R, Saeed S, Alderei A, Alhammadi A, et al. The microbiota—gut—brain axis and neurological disorders: a comprehensive review. Life (Basel) 2024;14:1234.
77.
Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012;13:701—12.
78.
Silva YP, Bernardi A, Frozza RL. The role of short-chain fatty acids from gut microbiota in gut—brain communication. Front Endocrinol 2020;11:25.
79.
Fock E, Parnova R. Mechanisms of blood—brain barrier protection by microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids. Cells 2023;12:657.
80.
Hoyles L, Pontifex MG, Rodriguez-Ramiro I, Anis-Alavi MA, Jelane KS, Snelling T, et al. Regulation of blood—brain barrier integrity by microbiome-associated methylamines and cognition by trimethylamine N-oxide. Microbiome 2021;9:235.
81.
Cryan JF, O’Riordan KJ, Cowan CSM, Sandhu KV, Bastiaanssen TFS, Boehme M, et al. The microbiota—gut—brain axis. Physiol Rev 2019;99:1877—2013.
82.
Page MJ, Kell DB, Pretorius E. The role of lipopolysaccharide-induced cell signalling in chronic inflammation. Chronic Stress 2022;6:24705470221076390.
83.
Di Vincenzo F, Del Gaudio A, Petito V, Lopetuso LR, Scaldaferri F. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: a narrative review. Intern Emerg Med 2024;19:275—93.
84.
Liu Y, Pan R, Ouyang Y, Gu W, Xiao T, Yang H, et al. Pyroptosis in health and disease: mechanisms, regulation and clinical perspective. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2024;9:245.
85.
Liu S, Gao J, Zhu M, Liu K, Zhang HL. Gut microbiota and dysbiosis in Alzheimer’s disease: implications for pathogenesis and treatment. Mol Neurobiol 2020;57:5026—43.
86.
Dominy SS, Lynch C, Ermini F, Benedyk M, Marczyk A, Konradi A, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis in Alzheimer’s disease brains: evidence for disease causation and treatment with small-molecule inhibitors. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaau3333.
87.
Kowalski K, Mulak A. Brain—gut—microbiota axis in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019;25:48—60.
88.
Khatoon S, Kalam N, Rashid S, Bano G. Effects of gut microbiota on neurodegenerative diseases. Front Aging Neurosci 2023;15:1145241.
89.
Sun J, Xu J, Yang B, Chen K, Kong Y, Fang N, et al. Effect of Clostridium butyricum against microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease via regulating gut microbiota and metabolites butyrate. Mol Nutr Food Res 2020;64:e1900636.
90.
Hemarajata P, Versalovic J. Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: mechanisms of intestinal immunomodulation and neuromodulation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2013;6:39—51.
91.
Peng L, Li ZR, Green RS, Holzman IR, Lin J. Butyrate enhances the intestinal barrier by facilitating tight junction assembly via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase in Caco-2 cell monolayers. J Nutr 2009;139:1619—25.
92.
Qian XH, Xie RY, Liu XL, Chen SD, Tang HD. Mechanisms of short-chain fatty acids derived from gut microbiota in Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Dis 2022;13:1252—66.
93.
Abdelhamid M, Zhou C, Jung CG, Michikawa M. Probiotic Bifidobacterium breve MCC1274 mitigates Alzheimer’s disease-related pathologies in wild-type mice. Nutrients 2022;14:2543.
94.
Cecarini V, Bonfili L, Gogoi O, Lawrence S, Venanzi FM, Azevedo V, et al. Neuroprotective effects of p62(SQSTM1)-engineered lactic acid bacteria in Alzheimer’s disease: a pre-clinical study. Aging (Albany NY) 2020;12:15995—6020.
95.
Cao J, Amakye WK, Qi C, Liu X, Ma J, Ren J. Bifidobacterium lactis Probio-M8 regulates gut microbiota to alleviate Alzheimer’s disease in the APP/PS1 mouse model. Eur J Nutr 2021;60:3757—69.
96.
Francini E, Orlandoni P, Sparvoli D, Jukic Peladic N, Cardelli M, Recchioni R, et al. Possible role of tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) and antibiotic administration in modulating human gut microbiota in home enteral nutrition therapy for the elderly: a case report. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:7115.
97.
Kaur H, Nagamoto-Combs K, Golovko S, Golovko MY, Klug MG, Combs CK. Probiotics ameliorate intestinal pathophysiology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2020;92:114—34.
98.
Tamtaji OR, Heidari-Soureshjani R, Mirhosseini N, Kouchaki E, Bahmani F, Aghadavod E, et al. Probiotic and selenium co-supplementation, and the effects on clinical, metabolic and genetic status in Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Clin Nutr 2019;38:2569—75.
99.
Kobayashi Y, Kuhara T, Oki M, Xiao JZ. Effects of Bifidobacterium breve A1 on the cognitive function of older adults with memory complaints: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Benef Microbes 2019;10:511—20.
100.
Suganya K, Koo BS. Gut—brain axis: role of gut microbiota on neurological disorders and how probiotics/prebiotics beneficially modulate microbial and immune pathways to improve brain functions. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:7551.
101.
Sun J, Xu J, Ling Y, Wang F, Gong T, Yang C, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation alleviated Alzheimer’s disease-like pathogenesis in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Transl Psychiatry 2019;9:189.
102.
Hernandez AR, Watson C, Federico QP, Fletcher R, Brotgandel A, Buford TW, et al. Twelve months of time-restricted feeding improves cognition and alters microbiome composition independent of macronutrient composition. Nutrients 2022;14:3977.
103.
Li L, Li R, Tian Q, Luo Y, Li R, Lin X, et al. Effects of healthy low-carbohydrate diet and time-restricted eating on weight and gut microbiome in adults with overweight or obesity: feeding RCT. Cell Rep Med 2024;5:101801.
104.
Shandilya S, Kumar S, Kumar Jha N, Kumar Kesari K, Ruokolainen J. Interplay of gut microbiota and oxidative stress: perspective on neurodegeneration and neuroprotection. J Adv Res 2022;38:223—44.
105.
Stummer N, Feichtinger RG, Weghuber D, Kofler B, Schneider AM. Role of hydrogen sulfide in inflammatory bowel disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023;12:1570.
106.
Munteanu C, Galaction AI, Turnea M, Blendea CD, Rotariu M, Postaru M. Redox homeostasis, gut microbiota, and epigenetics in neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review. Antioxidants (Basel) 2024;13:1062.
107.
Geng Y, Li E, Mu Q, Zhang Y, Wei X, Li H, et al. Hydrogen sulfide inhalation decreases early blood—brain barrier permeability and brain edema induced by cardiac arrest and resuscitation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2015;35:494—500.
108.
Chilton PM, Ghare SS, Charpentier BT, Myers SA, Rao AV, Petrosino JF, et al. Age-associated temporal decline in butyrate-producing bacteria plays a key pathogenic role in the onset and progression of neuropathology and memory deficits in 3×Tg-AD mice. Gut Microbes 2024;16:2389319.
109.
Vermeiren Y, Van Dam D, Aerts T, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP. Monoaminergic neurotransmitter alterations in postmortem brain regions of depressed and aggressive patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 2014;35:2691—700.
110.
Gao K, Mu CL, Farzi A, Zhu WY. Tryptophan metabolism: a link between the gut microbiota and brain. Adv Nutr 2020;11:709—23.
111.
Miri S, Yeo J, Abubaker S, Hammami R. Neuromicrobiology, an emerging neurometabolic facet of the gut microbiome?. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1098412.
112.
Maftei NM, Raileanu CR, Balta AA, Ambrose L, Boev M, Marin DB, et al. The potential impact of probiotics on human health: an update on their health-promoting properties. Microorganisms 2024;12:234.
113.
Lilly DM, Stillwell RH. Probiotics: growth-promoting factors produced by microorganisms. Science 1965;147:747—8.
114.
Akhgarjand C, Vahabi Z, Shab-Bidar S, Anoushirvani A, Djafarian K. The effects of probiotic supplements on oxidative stress and inflammation in subjects with mild and moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Inflammopharmacology 2024;32:1413—20.
115.
Hsu YC, Huang YY, Tsai SY, Kuo YW, Lin JH, Ho HH, et al. Efficacy of probiotic supplements on brain-derived neurotrophic factor, inflammatory biomarkers, oxidative stress and cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer’s dementia: a 12-week randomized, double-blind active-controlled study. Nutrients 2023;16:16.
116.
Markowiak P, Slizewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients 2017;9:1021.
117.
Moens F, Verce M, De Vuyst L. Lactate- and acetate-based cross-feeding interactions between selected strains of lactobacilli, bifidobacteria and colon bacteria in the presence of inulin-type fructans. Int J Food Microbiol 2017;241:225—36.
118.
You S, Ma Y, Yan B, Pei W, Wu Q, Ding C, et al. The promotion mechanism of prebiotics for probiotics: a review. Front Nutr 2022;9:1000517.
119.
Ji J, Jin W, Liu SJ, Jiao Z, Li X. Probiotics, prebiotics, and postbiotics in health and disease. MedComm 2023;4:e420. 2020.
120.
Bonfili L, Cecarini V, Berardi S, Scarpona S, Suchodolski JS, Nasuti C, et al. Microbiota modulation counteracts Alzheimer’s disease progression influencing neuronal proteolysis and gut hormones plasma levels. Sci Rep 2017;7:2426.
121.
Archie SR, Al Shoyaib A, Cucullo L. Blood—brain barrier dysfunction in CNS disorders and putative therapeutic targets: an overview. Pharmaceutics 2021;13:1779.
122.
Ali J, Choe K, Park JS, Park HY, Kang H, Park TJ, et al. The interplay of protein aggregation, genetics, and oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease: role for natural antioxidants and immunotherapeutics. Antioxidants (Basel) 2024;13:862.
123.
Calvo-Rodriguez M, Hou SS, Snyder AC, Kharitonova EK, Russ AN, Das S, et al. Increased mitochondrial calcium levels associated with neuronal death in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun 2020;11:2146.
124.
Meng X, Song Q, Liu Z, Liu X, Wang Y, Liu J. Neurotoxic beta-amyloid oligomers cause mitochondrial dysfunction-the trigger for PANoptosis in neurons. Front Aging Neurosci 2024;16:1400544.
125.
Tadokoro K, Ohta Y, Inufusa H, Loon AFN, Abe K. Prevention of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease by novel antioxidative supplements. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:1974.
126.
Gamblin TC, King ME, Kuret J, Berry RW, Binder LI. Oxidative regulation of fatty acid-induced tau polymerization. Biochemistry 2000;39:14203—10.
127.
Guivernau B, Bonet J, Valls-Comamala V, Bosch-Morato M, Godoy JA, Inestrosa NC, et al. Amyloid-beta peptide nitrotyro-sination stabilizes oligomers and enhances NMDAR-mediated toxicity. J Neurosci 2016;36:11693—703.
128.
Jomova K, Raptova R, Alomar SY, Alwasel SH, Nepovimova E, Kuca K, et al. Reactive oxygen species, toxicity, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: chronic diseases and aging. Arch Toxicol 2023;97:2499—574.
129.
Wang CY, Yang TT, Chen CL, Lin WC, Lin CF. Reactive oxygen species-regulated glycogen synthase kinase-3beta activation contributes to all-trans retinoic acid-induced apoptosis in granulocyte-differentiated HL60 cells. Biochem Pharmacol 2014;88:86—94.
130.
Ruffels J, Griffin M, Dickenson JM. Activation of ERK1/2, JNK and PKB by hydrogen peroxide in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells: role of ERK1/2 in H2O2-induced cell death. Eur J Pharmacol 2004;483:163—73.
131.
Chen Y, Yu Y. Tau and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: interplay mechanisms and clinical translation. J Neuroinflammation 2023;20:165.
132.
Zhang H, Cao Y, Ma L, Wei Y, Li H. Possible mechanisms of Tau spread and toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:707268.
133.
Chen L, Liu L, Huang S. Cadmium activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway via induction of reactive oxygen species and inhibition of protein phosphatases 2A and 5. Free Radic Biol Med 2008;45:1035—44.
134.
Sharma A, Weber D, Raupbach J, Dakal TC, Fliessbach K, Ramirez A, et al. Advanced glycation end products and protein carbonyl levels in plasma reveal sex-specific differences in Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease. Redox Biol 2020;34:101546.
135.
Qin J, Ma Z, Chen X, Shu S. Microglia activation in central nervous system disorders: a review of recent mechanistic investigations and development efforts. Front Neurol 2023;14:1103416.
136.
Liddelow SA, Guttenplan KA, Clarke LE, Bennett FC, Bohlen CJ, Schirmer L, et al. Neurotoxic reactive astrocytes are induced by activated microglia. Nature 2017;541:481—7.
137.
Toldo S, Abbate A. The role of the NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis in cardiovascular diseases. Nat Rev Cardiol 2024;21:219—37.
138.
Guo M, Shen F, Guo X, Zhang J, Ma Y, Wu X, et al. BMAL1/PG-C1alpha4-FNDC5/irisin axis impacts distinct outcomes of time-of-day resistance exercise. J Sport Health Sci 2024;14:100968.
139.
Furlan A, Jacquier M, Woller A, Heliot L, Duez H, Staels B, et al. Mathematical models converge on PGC1alpha as the key metabolic integrator of SIRT1 and AMPK regulation of the circadian clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116:13171—2.
140.
de Goede P, Wefers J, Brombacher EC, Schrauwen P, Kalsbeek A. Circadian rhythms in mitochondrial respiration. J Mol Endocrinol 2018;60:R115—30.
141.
Bhatia S, Rawal R, Sharma P, Singh T, Singh M, Singh V. Mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: opportunities for drug development. Curr Neuropharmacol 2022;20:675—92.
142.
Ishida K, Yamada K, Nishiyama R, Hashimoto T, Nishida I, Abe Y, et al. Glymphatic system clears extracellular tau and protects from tau aggregation and neurodegeneration. J Exp Med 2022;219:e20211275.
143.
Reddy PH, Reddy TP, Manczak M, Calkins MJ, Shirendeb U, Mao P. Dynamin-related protein 1 and mitochondrial fragmentation in neurodegenerative diseases. Brain Res Rev 2011;67:103—18.
144.
Lanza M, Basilotta R, Cuzzocrea S, Bulzomi M, Oddo S, Casili G, et al. An RNAi-mediated reduction in transcription factor Nrf-2 blocks the positive effects of dimethyl fumarate on metabolic stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24:11303.
145.
Ribeiro M, Alvarenga L, Coutinho-Wolino KS, Nakao LS, Cardozo LF, Mafra D. Sulforaphane upregulates the mRNA expression of NRF2 and NQO1 in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Free Radic Biol Med 2024;221:181—7.
146.
Young ML, Franklin JL. The mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ inhibits memory loss, neuropathology, and extends lifespan in aged 3×Tg-AD mice. Mol Cell Neurosci 2019;101:103409.
147.
Kolosova NG, Tyumentsev MA, Muraleva NA, Kiseleva E, Vitovtov AO, Stefanova NA. Antioxidant SkQ1 alleviates signs of Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology in old OXYS rats by reversing mitochondrial deterioration. Curr Alzheimer Res 2017;14:1283—92.
148.
Han S, He Z, Hu X, Li X, Zheng K, Huang Y, et al. Inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation by CY-09 helps to restore cerebral glucose metabolism in 3×Tg-AD mice. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023;12:722.
149.
Li J, Zhuang L, Luo X, Liang J, Sun E, He Y. Protection of MCC950 against Alzheimer’s disease via inhibiting neuronal pyroptosis in SAMP8 mice. Exp Brain Res 2020;238:2603—14.
150.
Lonnemann N, Hosseini S, Marchetti C, Skouras DB, Stefanoni D, D’Alessandro A, et al. The NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor OLT1177 rescues cognitive impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020;117:32145—54.
151.
Han Q, Li W, Chen P, Wang L, Bao X, Huang R, et al. Microglial NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neuroinflammation and therapeutic strategies in depression. Neural Regen Res 2024;19:1890—8.
152.
Cummings J, Zhou Y, Lee G, Zhong K, Fonseca J, Cheng F. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2024. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2024;10:e12465.
153.
Cummings J, Zhou Y, Lee G, Zhong K, Fonseca J, Cheng F. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2023. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2023;9:e12385.
154.
Boyd P, O’Connor SG, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Sauter ER. Time-restricted feeding studies and possible human benefit. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022;6:pkac032.
155.
Chaix A, Lin T, Le HD, Chang MW, Panda S. Time-restricted feeding prevents obesity and metabolic syndrome in mice lacking a circadian clock. Cell Metab 2019;29:303—19.e4.
156.
Sunderram J, Sofou S, Kamisoglu K, Karantza V, Androulakis IP. Time-restricted feeding and the realignment of biological rhythms: translational opportunities and challenges. J Transl Med 2014;12:79.
157.
Chauhan R, Chen KF, Kent BA, Crowther DC. Central and peripheral circadian clocks and their role in Alzheimer’s disease. Dis Model Mech 2017;10:1187—99.
158.
Dyar KA, Ciciliot S, Wright LE, Bienso RS, Tagliazucchi GM, Patel VR, et al. Muscle insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism are controlled by the intrinsic muscle clock. Mol Metab 2014;3:29—41.
159.
Hepler C, Weidemann BJ, Waldeck NJ, Marcheva B, Cedernaes J, Thorne AK, et al. Time-restricted feeding mitigates obesity through adipocyte thermogenesis. Science 2022;378:276—84.
160.
Zhang W, Xiong Y, Tao R, Panayi AC, Mi B, Liu G. Emerging insight into the role of circadian clock gene BMAL1 in cellular senescence. Front Endocrinol 2022;13:915139.
161.
Fang Y, Jo SK, Park SJ, Yang J, Ko YS, Lee HY, et al. Role of the circadian clock and effect of time-restricted feeding in adenine-induced chronic kidney disease. Lab Invest 2023;103:100008.
162.
Chang HC, Guarente L. SIRT1 mediates central circadian control in the SCN by a mechanism that decays with aging. Cell 2013;153:1448—60.
163.
Ramkisoensing A, Meijer JH. Synchronization of biological clock neurons by light and peripheral feedback systems promotes circadian rhythms and health. Front Neurol 2015;6:128.
164.
Brunet A, Sweeney LB, Sturgill JF, Chua KF, Greer PL, Lin Y, et al. Stress-dependent regulation of FOXO transcription factors by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science 2004;303:2011—5.
165.
Xu J, Jackson CW, Khoury N, Escobar I, Perez-Pinzon MA. Brain SIRT1 mediates metabolic homeostasis and neuroprotection. Front Endocrinol 2018;9:702.
166.
Lee Y, Kim EK. AMP-activated protein kinase as a key molecular link between metabolism and clockwork. Exp Mol Med 2013;45:e33.
167.
Hatori M, Vollmers C, Zarrinpar A, DiTacchio L, Bushong EA, Gill S, et al. Time-restricted feeding without reducing caloric intake prevents metabolic diseases in mice fed a high-fat diet. Cell Metab 2012;15:848—60.
168.
Peng X, Fan R, Xie L, Shi X, Wang F, Xu W, et al. Time-restricted feeding rescues circadian disruption-aggravated progression of Alzheimer’s disease in diabetic mice. J Nutr Biochem 2022;110:109128.
169.
Rinninella E, Cintoni M, Raoul P, Ianiro G, Laterza L, Lopetuso LR, et al. Gut microbiota during dietary restrictions: new insights in non-communicable diseases. Microorganisms 2020;8:1140.
170.
Deng Y, Zou J, Hong Y, Peng Q, Fu X, Duan R, et al. Higher circulating trimethylamine N-oxide aggravates cognitive impairment probably via downregulating hippocampal SIRT1 in vascular dementia rats. Cells 2022;11:3650.
171.
Frank J, Gupta A, Osadchiy V, Mayer EA. Brain—gut—microbiome interactions and intermittent fasting in obesity. Nutrients 2021;13:584.
172.
Wang H, Li Q, Xu R, Su Y, Zhu W. Time-restricted feeding affects colonic nutrient substrates and modulates the diurnal fluctuation of microbiota in pigs. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1162482.
173.
Lettieri-Barbato D, Minopoli G, Caggiano R, Izzo R, Santillo M, Aquilano K, et al. Fasting drives Nrf2-related antioxidant response in skeletal muscle. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:7780.
174.
Dreger H, Westphal K, Weller A, Baumann G, Stangl V, Meiners S, et al. Nrf2-dependent upregulation of antioxidative enzymes: a novel pathway for proteasome inhibitor-mediated cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res 2009;83:354—61.
175.
Livelo C, Guo Y, Abou Daya F, Rajasekaran V, Varshney S, Le H, et al. Time-restricted feeding promotes muscle function through purine cycle and AMPK signaling in Drosophila obesity models. Nat Commun 2023;14:949.
176.
Bushman T, Lin TY, Chen X. Depot-dependent impact of time-restricted feeding on adipose tissue metabolism in high fat diet-induced obese male mice. Nutrients 2023;15:238.
177.
Regmi P, Heilbronn LK. Time-restricted eating: benefits, mechanisms, and challenges in translation. iScience 2020;23:101161.
178.
Tsitsou S, Zacharodimos N, Poulia KA, Karatzi K, Dimitriadis G, Papakonstantinou E. Effects of time-restricted feeding and ramadan fasting on body weight, body composition, glucose responses, and insulin resistance: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 2022;14:4778.
179.
Ellouze I, Sheffler J, Nagpal R, Arjmandi B. Dietary patterns and Alzheimer’s disease: an updated review linking nutrition to neuroscience. Nutrients 2023;15:3204.
180.
Gasmi M, Silvia Hardiany N, van der Merwe M, Martins IJ, Sharma A, Williams-Hooker R. The influence of time-restricted eating/feeding on Alzheimer’s biomarkers and gut microbiota. Nutr Neurosci 2025;28:156—70.
181.
Lanfranchi M, Yandiev S, Meyer-Dilhet G, Ellouze S, Kerkhofs M, Dos Reis R, et al. The AMPK-related kinase NUAK1 controls cortical axons branching by locally modulating mitochondrial metabolic functions. Nat Commun 2024;15:2487.
182.
Rodrigues LGF, de Araujo LD, Roa SLR, Bueno AC, Uchoa ET, Antunes-Rodrigues J, et al. Restricted feeding modulates peripheral clocks and nutrient sensing pathways in rats. Arch Endocrinol Metab 2021;65:549—61.
183.
Wells RG, Neilson LE, McHill AW, Hiller AL. Dietary fasting and time-restricted eating in Huntington’s disease: therapeutic potential and underlying mechanisms. Transl Neurodegener 2024;13:17.
184.
Rojas-Morales P, Leon-Contreras JC, Granados-Pineda J, Hernandez-Pando R, Gonzaga G, Sanchez-Lozada LG, et al. Protection against renal ischemia and reperfusion injury by short-term time-restricted feeding involves the mitochondrial unfolded protein response. Free Radic Biol Med 2020;154:75—83.
Year 2025 volume 15 Issue 6
PDF
39
24
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.011
  • Receive Date:2024-12-02
  • Online Date:2026-04-03
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-12-02
  • Revised:2025-02-05
  • Accepted:2025-03-21
Affiliations
    aDepartment of Pathology, Division of Molecular and Cellular Pathology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
    bUAB Nathan Shock Center, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA

Corresponding:

* Corresponding author.
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/apsb/EN/10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.011
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT