收藏切换
Targeting stem-property and vasculogenic mimicry for sensitizing paclitaxel therapy of triple-negative breast cancer by biomimetic codelivery
收藏切换
PDF
Siqi Wua, b, Qing Tangc, Weifeng Fangd, Zhe Suna, Meng Zhange, Ergang Liub, Yang Caoa, *, Yongzhuo Huanga, b, d, f, *
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(6) : 3226 - 3242
Less
收藏切换
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(6): 3226-3242
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Targeting stem-property and vasculogenic mimicry for sensitizing paclitaxel therapy of triple-negative breast cancer by biomimetic codelivery
Full
Siqi Wua, b, Qing Tangc, Weifeng Fangd, Zhe Suna, Meng Zhange, Ergang Liub, Yang Caoa, *, Yongzhuo Huanga, b, d, f, *
Affiliations
  • aDepartment of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital and the First Clinical School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • bZhongshan Institute for Drug Discovery, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongshan 528400, China
  • cState Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Clinical and Basic Research Team of TCM Prevention and Treatment of NSCLC, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China
  • dSchool of Chinese Materia Medica, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
  • eDepartment of Pharmacy, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China
  • fState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.006
Outline
收藏切换

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is aggressive, with high recurrence rates and poor prognosis. Paclitaxel (PTX) remains a key chemotherapeutic agent for TNBC, but its efficacy diminishes due to the emergence of drug resistance, largely driven by cancer stem-like cells (CSCs), vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation and tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment (TIME). Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is highly expressed in TNBC, and is a potential target for TNBC treatment. In this study, we developed a biomimetic codelivery system using albumin nanoparticles (termed S/P NP) to co-encapsulate PTX and shikonin (SHK), a natural inhibitor of PKM2. By inhibiting PKM2, SHK suppressed β-Catenin signaling, thereby reversing CSC stemness and preventing VM formation. The S/P NP system exhibited tumor-targeting delivery effect and significantly inhibited TNBC growth and lung metastasis. Mechanistically, the treatment reversed epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stem-like properties of TNBC cells, suppressed VM formation, and remodeled the TIME. It reduced immunosuppressive cells (M2 macrophages, MDSCs) while promoting anti-tumor immunity (M1 macrophages, dendritic cells, cytotoxic T cells, and memory T cells). This dual-action strategy holds promise for improving TNBC therapy by targeting CSCs, VM, and the immune microenvironment, and for overcoming PTX resistance and reducing metastasis.

Shikonin  /  Paclitaxel  /  Triple-negative breast cancer  /  Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2)  /  Cancer stem-like cells  /  Vasculogenic mimicry  /  Tumor microenvironment  /  Albumin
Siqi Wu, Qing Tang, Weifeng Fang, Zhe Sun, Meng Zhang, Ergang Liu, Yang Cao, Yongzhuo Huang. Targeting stem-property and vasculogenic mimicry for sensitizing paclitaxel therapy of triple-negative breast cancer by biomimetic codelivery[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 2025 , 15 (6) : 3226 -3242 . DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.006
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by high invasiveness, proneness to relapse, and poor prognosis1,2. Paclitaxel (PTX) is a mainstay of TNBC treatment. However, a wealth of clinical and experimental evidence indicates that PTX alone is insufficiently effective against TNBC, with significantly decreased efficacy after repeated administration3,4. Consequently, the conventional and classic TNBC treatment usually combines PTX with other chemotherapeutic drugs5, immune checkpoint blockade6, or anti-angiogenic therapies7. To sensitize PTX treatment and to seek an efficient and affordable combination therapy are important for improving TNBC treatment.
Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) have been identified as a major factor in the poor response to PTX therapy and cancer recurrence in breast cancer (BC)8, which is attributed to their capacity for self-renewal and production of heterogeneous cell lineages9,10. CSCs, characterized as a typical undifferentiated cancer cell phenotype, are rich in poorly differentiated tumors, which are linked to high-grade malignancy and poor prognosis compared to well-differentiated tumors11,12. Vasculogenic mimicry (VM) is a specific type of vasculature formation characterized by endothelial-like tumor cells themselves constituting the tubular structures that acts as pseudo blood vessels; VM is an important mechanism for poor response to PTX therapy13,14. VM is an alternative means to transport oxygen and nutrients to tumor cells15, which is linked to poor overall survival (OS) in patients, thus being a viable therapy target16-18. Notably, CSCs and VM are closely associated with each other. CSCs lose some epithelial properties and gain endothelial-like cell characteristics that contribute to VM formation19. Specifically, CSCs inside TNBC can form VM, serving as its source20. On the other hand, the process of VM can maintain stemness characteristics of cancer cells21. Importantly, factors such as hypoxia can upregulate the genes associated with both CSC properties and VM, creating a feedback loop to promote tumor aggressiveness22. It is a widely-accepted paradigm that there is a close link between CSCs, VM and tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment (TIME).
Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is a crucial target involved in the stem-property of cancer cells23, VM formation24 and TIME25. The tetramer of PKM2 is a crucial enzyme that controls glycolysis rate26. By contrast, the dimeric PKM2 performs its nonmetabolic functions via translocation into nucleus, where PKM2 binds with β-Catenin, leading to the activation of β-Catenin signaling pathway27. Notably, this pathway plays a vital role in maintaining the stem property of CSCs by promoting their renewal, proliferation, and differentiation28. It, in turn, makes the cancer cell resistant to PTX and other chemotherapeutic drugs29. Therefore, the inhibition of PKM2 is expected to decrease the stem-property of cancer cells and the formation of VM, and remodel TIME, leading to re-sensitization of PTX therapy.
Herein, we proposed a PKM2 inhibition strategy for simultaneously blocking the cytoplasmic tetramer PKM2 to inhibit lactate production, as well as the nuclear ectopic of dimeric PKM2 to deactivate β-Catenin. By this way, it is expected that the stem-property of cancer cells and the formation of VM could be reversed, and TIME remodeled, leading to re-sensitization of PTX therapy. Shikonin (SHK), a naturally sourced naphthoquinone compound, is a classic PKM2 inhibitor with potent anticancer activity30. In our study, an albumin-based nanoparticulate system was developed for codelivery of SHK and PTX (S/P NP) for synergistic therapy. Albumin is a main nutritional source for tumors, which primarily targets the albumin-binding proteins (such as SPARC) that are overexpressed in tumor cells and tumor vasculature, thus serving as an ideal drug carrier31-34.
Shikonin (SHK) was purchased from Woge Dongfang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Paclitaxel (PTX) was purchased from Shaoyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Lecithin was purchased from Yuanye Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was purchased from Aladdin Bio-chem technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). RPMI-1640 medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) was purchased from GLPBIO (Montclair, USA). Cy5.5 was purchased from MedChemExpress LLC (NJ, USA). Collagenase IV and hyaluronidase were purchased from Biosharp (Beijing, China). The Total RNA Isolation Kit was purchased from FOREGENE (Chengdu, China). PKM2 antibody, SOX2 antibody, OCT4 antibody, vimentin antibody, E-cadherin antibody, β-tubulin antibody, CDH5 antibody were purchased from Abmart (Shanghai, China). β-Catenin antibody, GAPDH antibody were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). VEGFA antibody was purchased from Abclonal (Wuhan, China). Calreticulin monoclonal antibody (Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate), Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody, HRP-conjugated Affinipure goat anti-mouse IgG, HRP-conjugated Affinipure goat anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Proteintech (Wuhan, China). Recombinant murine macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and interleukin-4 (IL-4) were obtained from Peprotech (NJ, USA). cDNA synthesis SuperMix kit, qPCR SYBR® Green Master Mix, Matrigel Basement Membrane Matrix were purchased from Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Mouse HMGB-1 ELISA Kit was purchased from Chenglin Huihuang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). ATP Assay Kit was purchased from Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). CD45 antibody, CD11b antibody, Ly6G antibody, Ly6C antibody, CD3e antibody, CD8a antibody, CD62L antibody, CD86 antibody, CD11c antibody, F4/80 antibody, CD80 antibody, CD4 antibody, CD25 antibody, Granzyme B antibody, IFN-γ antibody were purchased from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA). MHC II antibody, CD206 antibody, CD44 antibody, CD24 antibody were purchased from Elabscience (Wuhan, China).
The murine breast cancer cells (4T1) and the human breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) were obtained from The Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. 4T1 cells and MDA-MB-231 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Dalian Meilun Biotechnology, Dalian, China). All cells were cultured at 37 ℃ in a humidified incubator (Thermo Scientific, 3111, Waltham, USA) with 5% CO2.
All the animal experimental procedures were complied with the institutional ethical guidelines and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Zhongshan Institute for Drug Discovery. Female BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old) were purchased from the Zhuhai BesTest Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. (Zhuhai, China). Animals were kept in a facility that was pathogen-free, had free access to food and water, and maintained a 12-h light/dark cycle.
The abdomens of the mice were shaved. The mice were anesthetized by isoflurane. Approximately 1 × 106 4T1 cells in 100 μL of PBS were injected orthotopically into BALB/c mouse mammary fat pad through insulin needle, and a cotton swab was then applied to the injection site to prevent leakage of tumor cells.
When the orthotopic tumor volume reached about 50 mm3, approximately 5 × 104 4T1 cells in 100 μL of PBS were intravenously injected into each mouse to develop a lung metastasis model.
Based on various databases, the bioinformatics analysis was carried out. Differential expression of PKM and β-Catenin in normal tissues and breast cancer tumor samples were analyzed based on Breast Cancer Gene-Expression Miner (https://bcgenex.ico.unicancer.fr/BC-GEM/GEM-Chronologie.php), TIMER2.0 database (http://timer.cistrome.org/) and GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/) database. Based on BEST database (https://rookieutopia.com/app_direct/BEST/) and Kaplan–Meier Plotter database (https://kmplot.com/analysis/), the relationship between PKM and β-Catenin expression and prognosis in breast cancer (BRCA) was analyzed. PKM and β-Catenin expression in various cell types of tumor tissues was analyzed based on the TISCH database (http://tisch.comp-genomics.org/), specifically in EMTAB8107, GSE110686, GSE114727, GSE148673, GSE161529, and GSE138536 subsets. The correlation of PKM and β-Catenin expression in BRCA with macrophages was analyzed based on the TIMER2.0 database. Analysis of PKM and β-Catenin expression and immune infiltration in the immune microenvironment of BRCA was performed based on the TCGA database (https://www.cancer.gov/ccg/research/genome-sequencing/tcga).
BALB/c female mice were euthanized and the femur and tibia were then collected, with the muscle removed from the bones. The bones were subsequently immersed in 75% alcohol solution for 10 min and then washed twice with pre-cooled PBS for 5 min each time. The epiphyses were cut at both ends, followed by aspiration of PBS with a syringe to flush the marrow from the bone cavity. The bone marrow cell suspension was transferred to a 15-mL tube and then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min using a centrifuge (Xiangyi centrifuge Co., Ltd., Hunan, China). Two mililiters of erythrocyte lysate were added to the bone marrow cell precipitate, followed by incubation at room temperature for 5 min, and then centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min using a centrifuge (Xiangyi Centrifuge Co., Ltd.). The bone marrow cells were resuspended in DMEM medium (20% FBS) and cultured for 5 days, with the addition of 20 ng/mL M-CSF to stimulate BMDM differentiation. After that, the medium was changed to 40 ng/mL IL-4-containing DMEM complete media for the induction of BMDM polarization towards M2 by 24-h incubation. To induce BMDM polarization towards M1, 100 ng/mL LPS and 20 ng/mL IFN-γ were added to DMEM complete media and incubated for 24 h. To induce BMDC differentiation, the bone marrow cells were resuspended in DMEM medium (20% FBS) for 4 days, with the addition of 20 ng/mL GM-CSF and 10 ng/mL IL-4. During this period, the semi-adherent cell population was retained by half-exchanging the medium every 48 h.
The optimal drug combination ratio was established by performing CCK8 assay. 4T1 cells were seeded to a 96-well plate (5 × 103 cells/well) and placed in incubator for incubation for 12 h. Then treated with SHK and PTX free or in a series of molar ratios for 24 h. Following the addition of 100 μL of serum-free media containing 10% CCK8 at 37 ℃ for another 2 h, each well's absorbance (450 nm wavelength) was measured using a microplate reader. Graphpad Prism 8.0.1 (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to determine the IC50 values. The combination index (CI) of SHK&PTX was calculated by CompuSyn (CA, USA) software.
Proportions were screened for CI values < 1 at each combined dose. The screened ratios were subsequently administered to mice with orthotopic breast cancer. Briefly, the established orthotopic breast cancer mice were randomly divided into five groups (3 mice per group), and received saline (control), SHK (5 mg/kg), PTX (10 mg/kg), SHK + PTX (5 mg/kg+ 1 mg/kg, equivalent to at a molar ratio of 1:0.2), SHK + PTX (5 mg/kg + 10 mg/kg, equivalent to at a molar ratio of 1:2), via intratumoral injection (q.o.d., 5 times). Tumor volume was closely monitored to evaluate therapeutic efficacy. Mice were deemed dead in accordance with animal welfare regulations, and euthanasia occurred in one of the following situations. Animals were extremely lethargic, with a weight loss of more than 20% compared to the control, or with a tumor size reached 2000 mm3, or with severe ulceration.
The hybrid NPs were created using the high-speed dispersion emulsification-homogenization technique. Briefly, PTX and lecithin were dissolved in absolute ethanol, and SHK was dissolved in DMSO to form the oil phase. Albumin was dissolved in water to constitute the aqueous phase. Once the two phases were combined, the high-speed dispersion machine (IKA, T 25 Digital, Staufen, Germany) was used to generate the primary emulsion. Subsequently, after homogenizing the primary emulsion for ten cycles at a pressure of 12,000 psi, the BSA nanoparticle suspension was prepared using a high-pressure homogenizer (Avestin Inc., EmulsiFlex-B15, Ottawa, Canada). The NPs were purified by a Sephadex™ G-50 (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., S8151, Beijing, China) column.
The dynamic light scattering device (Malvern, Zetasizer Pro, Malvern City, UK) was used to detect the particle size and zeta potential. The particle size change in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 10% neonatal bovine serum and in water at 4 ℃ was used to gauge the stability of the NPs. HPLC (Agilent, 1260 Infinity II, Santa Clara, USA) was used to assess the drug-loading capacity and encapsulation efficiency, and calculated by the formulas as shown in Eqs. (1) and (2):
The HPLC mobile phase of SHK was composed of methanol (65%) and ultra-pure water (35%), and the HPLC mobile phase of PTX was composed of acetonitrile (40%), methanol (25%), and ultra-pure water (35%). Both of them were at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. SHK and PTX were isocratic elution by a C18 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, FLM Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd., Guangzhou, China) at room temperature. The wavelength was 227 nm for PTX and 216 nm for SHK. A traditional dialysis membrane (MWCO 14 kDa) method was used to assess the in vitro drug release in PBS (pH 7.4) after 0.5% (w/v) SDS was added and the mixture was shaken at 37 ℃ by a thermostatic shaker (Shanghai HerryTech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Released drugs were also measured employing HPLC (Agilent), as previously mentioned, and the cumulative release was computed.
4T1 cells were seeded to a 12-well plate (1 × 105 cells/well) and placed in incubator to continue incubation for 12 h. The cells were then co-cultured with coumarin 6-labeled nanoparticles. After 2-h co-incubation the fluorescent images were obtained by a fluorescence microscope (Keyence Co., Ltd. BZ-X800LE, Osaka, Japan) and the intracellular fluorescence was detected by a flow cytometer (NovoCyte Quanteon VBYR, Agilent, California, USA).
The cytotoxicity of the free drugs and S/P NP was conducted by the CCK8 method according to the previous description (section 2.8). SHK, PTX, SHK&PTX, and S/P NP were applied to the 4T1 cells in a series of concentration gradients, respectively. Graphpad Prism 8.0.1 was employed to estimate the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50).
The 4T1 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate for 12 h and then treated with PBS, SHK (1.0 μmol/L), PTX (0.2 μmol/L), SHK&PTX (0.5 μmol/L+0.1 μmol/L), or S/P NP (equal dose with the combination therapy) for 10 h. The supernatant was collected by ELISA kit for HMGB1 detection according to the manufacturer instruction (Chenglin, Beijing, China). The 4T1 cells were collected and co-incubated with calreticulin (CRT) antibody-Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate and corallite 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) for flow cytometry analysis, and the ICD-cells were characterized by FITC positive cells. To quantify ATP level in 4T1 cells, the cells were processed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). A lactic acid assay kit was utilized to determine the concentrations of lactate in the 4T1 cell culture medium (Jiancheng Bioengineering Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China).
The BMDC cells were induced differentiation as described above. 4T1 cells were seeded in a 12-well plate for 12 h and then treated with PBS, SHK (1.0 μmol/L), PTX (0.2 μmol/L), SHK&PTX (0.5 μmol/L+0.1 μmol/L), or S/P NP (equal dose with the combination therapy) for 10 h. The BMDC cells were co-cultured with the drug-treated 4T1 cells (also its supernatant) in a Transwell device (an aperture of 0.4 μm, Corning, USA) for 24 h. LPS (200 ng/mL) treatment was added as the positive control. CD11c, MHC II, CD80, and CD86 were applied to characterize the mature BMDC through flow cytometry analysis.
The bone marrow cells were collected, cultured, and induced as mentioned above. After 24-h stimulation, the M2-type BMDM cells were treated with PBS, SHK (1.0 μmol/L), PTX (0.2 μmol/L), SHK&PTX (0.5 μmol/L+0.1 μmol/L), or S/P NP (equal dose with the combination therapy) for 24 h. M1-type BMDM cells were used as a control group. F4/80, CD86, and CD206 were applied to characterize the phenotype of BMDM through flow cytometry analysis.
The 4T1 cells were seeded in a 12-well plate with 8 × 105 cells/well for 12 h and scratched with a 200 μL pipette tip. The cells were then washed with sterile PBS and treated with PBS, SHK (1.0 μmol/L), PTX (0.2 μmol/L), SHK&PTX (0.5 μmol/L+0.1 μmol/L), or S/P NP (equal dose with the combination therapy) for 24 h in the serum-free 1640 medium. The same site was selected and photographed using a microscope (Olympus, IX73P1F, Tokyo, Japan) at 0 and 24 h after drug administration, respectively.
The matrigel invasion assay was evaluated using a Transwell device (an aperture of 8.0 μm, Corning, USA). Firstly, the upper chamber in a Transwell plate was coated with 100 μL matrigel (matrigel:serum-free 1640 medium 1:8), and then the plate was incubated in a 37 ℃ incubator for 1 h. After that, 75 μL 4T1 cells (4 × 105 cells/well) with 75 μL drugs (PBS, terminal concentration SHK 1.0 μmol/L, PTX 0.2 μmol/L, SHK&PTX 0.5 μmol/L+0.1 μmol/L, or S/P NP equal dose with the combination therapy) and with 5% FBS were seeded into the upper chamber. The lower chamber was filled with 600 µL 1640 medium containing 20% FBS. After 24 h, the upper chamber was washed twice with PBS, followed by formaldehyde fixation for 30 min. The invasion cells in the bottom of the upper chamber were dyed with 0.5% purple crystal and washed with PBS. The image figures were obtained by an inverted microscope.
The anti-angiogenesis was evaluated with lactate addition. Briefly, 100 μL of matrigel per well was added to a pre-cooled 96-well plate, and then the plate was incubated in a 37 ℃ incubator for 1 h. After that, 40 μL 4T1 cells (3 × 104 cells/well) were seeded into the plate containing 10 μL lactate (final concentration of 10 mmol/L), and 50 μL drug (PBS, terminal concentration SHK 1.0 μmol/L, PTX 0.2 μmol/L, SHK&PTX 0.5 μmol/L+0.1 μmol/L, or S/P NP equal dose with the combination therapy). The 4T1 cell tube formation was observed by a microscope in the bright field.
The 4T1 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate for 12 h and then treated with PBS, SHK (1.0 μmol/L), PTX (0.2 μmol/L), SHK&PTX (0.5 μmol/L+0.1 μmol/L), or S/P NP (equal dose with the combination therapy) for 24 h. The serum-free suspension culture was utilized to foster the tumorsphere of 4T1 cells. After trypsinization, the drug-treated adherent cells were cultivated in DMEM/F12 media with the addition of B27 supplement (1 ×), insulin (5 μg/mL), epidermal growth factor (20 ng/mL), basic fibroblast growth factor (20 ng/mL) and then seeded in the 6-well ultra-low attachment plate at 37 ℃ in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2, respectively. After 8–12 days, the growth of tumorspheres was observed under a microscope and photographed, and the diameter larger than 50 μm was counted and the average diameter was calculated.
The cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then harvested using 0.05% trypsin/0.025% EDTA. The detached cells were resuspended in 1% BSA at a concentration of 106 cells/100 μL. Combinations of CD44 and CD24 antibodies were added to the cell suspension at the concentrations recommended by the manufacturer's instructions and incubated at 4 ℃ in the dark for 40 min. The labeled cells were then washed with PBS and analyzed using a flow cytometer.
The free Cy5.5 and Cy5.5-labeled S/P NP were intravenously administered into the established mice bearing orthotopic breast tumors, and the IVIS imaging system (PerkinElmer Instruments Co., Ltd., Spectrum, MA, USA) was utilized to monitor the biodistribution of free Cy5.5 and Cy5.5-labeled S/P NP. The mice were humanely euthanized 24 h after injection, and the tumor, heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney were collected for ex vivo imaging. The distribution of Cy5.5 in tumor tissues was measured by a flow cytometer.
The 4T1 orthotopic tumor mice were randomly assigned into three groups (6 mice per group). The mice were treated with saline (control), SHK&PTX (2 mg/kg+1.25 mg/kg, equal to SHK:PTX = 5:1, mol/mol), or S/P NP (equivalent to a dose of free drug) via tail vein injection (a treatment every 4 days, 4 times). The body weight and the tumor growth were monitored every 3 days throughout the experiment. The tumor volume was calculated according to the formula as shown in Eq. (3):
All the mice were humanely euthanized to collect the tumor tissues and were weighted to calculate the tumor inhibition ratio (%) according to the formula as shown in Eq. (4):
W is the tumor weight of the free drug and S/P NP-treated group. W0 is the tumor weight of the saline-treated group. In order to prepare the single-cell solution, the tumor tissues were physically cut and processed using collagenase IV and hyaluronidase. After incubation with antibodies (CD45 antibody, CD11b antibody, Ly6G antibody, Ly6C antibody, CD3e antibody, CD8a antibody, CD62L antibody, CD86 antibody, CD11c antibody, F4/80 antibody, CD80 antibody, CD4 antibody, CD25 antibody, Granzyme B antibody, IFN-γ antibody, MHC II antibody, CD206 antibody, CD44 antibody), the immune cell subsets in the tumor tissues were analyzed by a flow cytometer.
The 4T1 orthotopic tumor mice were randomly assigned into three groups (6 mice per group). The mice were treated with saline (control), SHK&PTX (2 mg/kg+1.25 mg/kg, equal to SHK:PTX = 5:1, mol/mol), or S/P NP (equivalent to a dose of free drug) via tail vein injection (a treatment every 4 days, 6 times). The body weight and the tumor growth were monitored throughout the experiment. The tumor volume was calculated as described above. The blood samples were collected from the animals and plasma was isolated via centrifugation for biochemical analysis of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine (CRE). All the mice were euthanized to collect the tumor tissues and the major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney). In order to further evaluate the system toxicities and visualize the number of pulmonary metastatic nodules, the organs were preserved with 4% paraformaldehyde for histological examination. The tumor tissues were homogenized. The expression levels of the target proteins were determined by Western blot. The PAS/CD31 staining was conducted to estimate the VM.
All data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD, n ≥ 3) with statistical analysis. The semi-quantitative analysis of Western blot bands was conducted by ImageJ software (NIH, USA). Statistical significance was performed by Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001).
The anti-proliferative effects on the 4T1 cells and the MDA-MB-231 cells were measured to optimize the combination ratio of SHK and PTX. The combination index (CI) of SHK and PTX was utilized to evaluate the combination therapy efficacy, and CI < 1 indicates the synergistic effect35. The synergistic ratio of SHK and PTX in the 4T1 cells was 1:0.2 and 1:2 (mol/mol), with CIs <1 at all doses and the lowest CI was up to 0.21 (SHK:PTX = 1:0.2) and 0.22 (SHK:PTX = 1:2), respectively (Fig. 1A, Supporting Information Fig. S1). Moreover, the most effective synergistic ratio of SHK and PTX in the MDA-MB-231 cells was 1:0.2 (mol/mol) with the lowest CI was up to 0.18 (Supporting Information Fig. S2). Furthermore, in an orthotopic 4T1 BC model, both synergistic ratio treatments achieved a significantly higher tumor inhibition ability compared to the SHK or PTX alone groups (Fig. 1B and C). However, the body weight declined remarkably in the group (SHK:PTX = 1:2) (Supporting Information Fig. S3), suggesting the potential side toxicity. By contrast, the animals maintained their body weight during the treatment of SHK:PTX = 1:0.2, indicating the biosafety. Therefore, a synergistic ratio of 1:0.2 (SHK:PTX) was selected for further studies.
PKM2 is highly expressed in various cancers and closely associated with reduced efficacy of chemotherapeutics36. Therefore, via suppression of PKM2, we hypothesized that SHK could enhance PTX efficacy. First of all, we performed a bioinformatics analysis, which demonstrated that PKM2 expression is higher in the breast tumors and TNBC than in the normal areas (Fig. 1D, Supporting Information Figs. S4 and S5) and overall survival (OS) is much longer in cases of low PKM2 than in patients with high PKM2 both in BC and TNBC patients (Fig. 1E, Supporting Information Fig. S6). Recurrence free survival (RFS) is negatively correlative to PKM2 expression in BC patients, too (Supporting Information Fig. S7). Furthermore, by examining the results of scRNA-seq in multiple datasets, PKM2 was found to be expressed in several immune cells, with macrophages exhibiting the highest levels of PKM2 in BC patients (Supporting Information Fig. S8). Moreover, intratumoral PKM2 expression was positively connected with the increased infiltration of macrophages in both BC and TNBC tumor microenvironment (TME) and it also increased with the purity of the tumor cells in the tumors (Fig. 1F and G, Supporting Information Fig. S9). In addition, PKM2 expression was positively related to the increased infiltration of Tregs in BC patients (Fig. 1G).
Notably, PKM2 plays a dual role, serving as a glycolytic enzyme in cytoplasm in a tetramer form and as a non-metabolizing enzyme via entering the nucleus in a dimer form and triggering the transcription factors27. As a case in point, the dimer PKM2 triggers β-Catenin transactivation (Fig. 1H), which subsequently promotes the stemness of cancer cells37, VM formation38, and poor chemotherapy efficacy39. The qPCR and WB results verified that SHK effectively inhibited the mRNA and protein expression of PKM2 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1I‒K). Similarly, we also conducted a bioinformatics analysis of β-Catenin, which was higher both in the BC and TNBC tissues than that in normal tissues (Supporting Information Figs. S10 and S11) and negatively correlative to OS (Supporting Information Figs. S12 and S13). Moreover, β-Catenin was also expressed on the intratumoral macrophages, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts (Supporting Information Fig. S14). Furthermore, β-Catenin high expression was positively correlated with infiltration of naïve B cells, M2 macrophages, and resting DCs and memory CD4+ T cells in TME (Supporting Information Fig. S15).
More importantly, the wet experiment also demonstrated that SHK significantly suppressed β-Catenin in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1J, L and M). Taken together, PKM2/β-Catenin might be a crucial signaling pathway for SHK in enhancing the anticancer effect of PTX in BC and TNBC.
SHK and PTX were successfully encapsulated in albumin nanoparticles (S/P NP). The S/P NP showed a spherical morphology and the particle size was about 133 nm (PDI<0.20) (Fig. 2A, Supporting Information Table S1). The S/P NP displayed a negative zeta potential about −26 mV (Fig. 2B and Table S1). The SHK- or PTX-loading capacity was 1.39% and 0.89%, respectively, at a drug loading ratio was about 5:1 (SHK:PTX, mol/mol, equal to SHK:PTX 1.6:1, mg/mg) (Table S1). The S/P NP remained stable at 4 ℃ (Supporting Information Fig. S16) with only a slight increase in size when placed in serum-containing medium, likely due to interactions with blood proteins that form protein coronas (Fig. 2C). The S/P NP showed a drug release pattern at a ratio around 5:1 (SHK:PTX, mol/mol) (Fig. 2D and E).
The combination of SHK/PTX (5:1, mol/mol) displayed a synergistic effect with an IC50 of 0.70 μmol/L (indicated by SHK), compared to 2.18 μmol/L for SHK, while the 4T1 cells showed substantial resistance to PTX (Fig. 1A). The S/P NP showed the strongest inhibitory effect with an IC50 of 0.11 μmol/L (Fig. 2F).
The Coumarin-6-labeled S/P NP exhibited an efficient internalization in 4T1 cells with a 1.8-fold higher efficiency than the free dye (Fig. 2G‒I). Following the approach used in other studies, we chose the Cy5.5 fluorescent dye to assess the targeting ability of the S/P NP32,40-42. In vivo imaging results showed that the Cy5.5-labeled NPs efficiently accumulated in the tumor after 6 h and reached a maximum at 8 h (Fig. 2J, Supporting Information Fig. S17). The ex vivo imaging showed that intratumor accumulation of the NP group was 3-fold higher than the free dye group (Fig. 2K and L), while these two groups showed a similar distribution in the normal organs (Fig. 2L, Supporting Information Fig. S18). Flow cytometric assay also revealed that the intracellular fluorescence intensity was also higher in the NP group (Fig. 2M and N).
The stemness of tumor cells is an important indicator for assessing the characteristics of self-renewal, differentiation, and proliferation of CSCs43. Our results showed that the S/P NP had the highest inhibition rates against invasion and migration of 4T1 cells (Fig. 3A‒C). The S/P NP efficiently suppressed the formation of tumor spheroids (Fig. 3D‒F). The inhibitory effect of S/P NP on tumor stemness is due to the effects of SHK (Fig. 3G). Moreover, the S/P NP-treated 4T1 cells showed downregulation in the expression of the typical stem-property associated transcription factors including OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2 (Fig. 3H‒J). The flow cytometry revealed that after S/P NP treatment, the proportion of high stem-property cell (CD44+/CD24) decreased (Fig. 3K and L). Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an index to evaluate the stem-property of cancer cells44. Our results showed that the S/P NP treatment led to upregulation of E-Cadherin and downregulation of Vimentin in 4T1 cells, demonstrating the strong ability to reverse EMT (Fig. 3H‒J). These results suggested that the S/P NP significantly reduced the stem-property of 4T1 cells. Furthermore, we also detected the protein and mRNA expression of PKM2 and β-Catenin, the S/P NP exhibited the remarkable down-regulation of PKM2 and β-Catenin (Fig. 3H‒J).
Distinct from tumor angiogenesis, VM refers to a vasculature network formed by aggressive, plastic tumor cells independent of endothelial cells, and provides a blood supply for tumor cells16. CSCs have a higher potential for developing into VM because of their propensity for self-renewal and multidirectional differentiation22. Our results revealed that the S/P NP treatment significantly inhibited the tube formation of 4T1 cells (Supporting Information Fig. S19). Lactate is a primary end product of glycolysis, contributing to the acidic TME45. Lactate can facilitate the survival of tumor cells by acting as an energy source, while also promoting the formation of vasculature network by tumor cells46. After adding lactate, tube formation rate was effectively upregulated (up to 1.3-fold of non-lactate added group), because lactate is a potent angiogenesis inducer. The S/P NP significantly weakened the ability of tube formation in 4T1 cells (Fig. 4A‒C). It was attributed to the suppression of lactate production (Fig. 4D and E). Notably, the S/P NP downregulated the mRNA and protein of VM-associated transcription factors including CDH5 and VEGFA (Fig. 4F‒J). Taken together, these results indicated that the S/P NP efficiently inhibited the formation of vasculature network of the tumor cells via blocking the CDH5/VEGFA pathway and reducing lactate production, thus yielding anti-VM effect.
The ICD effect triggers DAMPs that are characterized by calreticulin (CRT) eversion, the release of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB-1) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)47. Our results demonstrated the ICD effect induced by the S/P NP, showing CRT eversion by flow cytometry (Fig. 5A and B), HMGB-1 and ATP release to supernatant in the 4T1 cells (Fig. 5C and D).
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are a promising target for BC therapy48. The S/P NP dramatically reduced the proportion of CD206+ MΦ (protumor M2-like subset) (Fig. 5E and F). DCs connect innate immunity and adaptive immunity by presenting antigens to naïve T cells and thereby triggering T cell immunity49. In a co-culture system (Fig. 5G), Our results showed that the S/P NP-treated 4T1 cells promoted the maturation of BMDCs, with the upregulation of co-stimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86), indicating the induction of ICD effect in 4T1 cells (Fig. 5H and I).
In an orthotopic 4T1 mouse model (Fig. 6A), the S/P NP effectively arrested tumor growth with an inhibition rate of 80%, compared to 45% of free SHK/PTX (Fig. 6B‒D, Supporting Information Fig. S20). The body weight change of the S/P NP group was no significantly different from the control group (Fig. 6E and F).
To profile the remodeled TME, the intratumoral immune cells were detected after treatment. The S/P NP treatment significantly increased the proportion of anti-cancer M1Φ but reducing protumor M2Φ (Fig. 6G and H, Supporting Information Fig. S21). Besides, the percentage of matured DCs was highest in the S/P NP group (Fig. 6I, Supporting Information Fig. S22), while the population of protumoral PMN-MDSCs in the S/P NP group decreased to about 47% of the saline group (Fig. 6J, Supporting Information Fig. S23). These results indicated that the S/P NP treatment effectively relieved the immunosuppression of TME by reprogramming macrophages, promoting DCs maturation, and suppressing PMN-MDSCs. Moreover, the S/P NP treatment significantly promoted memory T cells (CD62L+ CD44+) (Fig. 6K, Supporting Information Fig. S24), suggesting the induction of long-term immune responses. The infiltration of CD8+ T cells was increased (Fig. 6L, Supporting Information Figs. S25A and S25B), and the IFN-γ+/Granzyme B+ CD8+ T cell subsets were also significantly expanded (Fig. 6M and N, Fig. S25C and S25D). In addition, we detected the percentage of Treg cells, however, there was no statistical difference among the groups (Supporting Information Fig. S26). The discrepancy could be due to the difference between animal model and human, but further investigation should be carried out for better understanding this. These results confirmed that the S/P NP treatment effectively relieved the immunosuppression of TME and activated T cells immunity against breast tumor.
There are common cases of lung metastasis of advanced BC. The therapeutic efficacy of the S/P NP was evaluated in a lung metastasis mouse model bearing orthotopic 4T1 (Fig. 7A). The S/P NP not only successfully inhibited the progression of primary breast tumor (Fig. 7B and C), but also effectively minimized the lung metastasis nodules with an inhibition rate of 86%, compared to 50% of the free SHK/PTX group (Fig. 7D‒F, Supporting Information Fig. S27). The S/P NP significantly downregulated the expression levels of PKM2, β-Catenin, the stem-property markers SOX2, OCT4, NANOG, VM formation related biotargets CDH5, VEGFA and EMT associated marker Vimentin, while upregulated EMT associated marker E-cadherin (Fig. 7G). Crucially, the PAS/CD31 staining results showed that the S/P NP exhibited a potent inhibitory capacity against VM formation, with the remarkably reduced proportion of CD31/PAS+ (Fig. 7H). These results suggested the regulation of the crosstalk among stem-property and VM contributed to the remission of lung metastasis.
The S/P NP treatment showed a good biosafety in terms of body weight change (Supporting Information Fig. S28). There were also no obvious lesions observed in the H&E staining sections of the organs (Supporting Information Fig. S29). Moreover, no statistically significant difference in ALT, AST, and CRE levels was found among the groups (Supporting Information Fig. S30).
TNBC patients suffer from poor prognosis, with a median survival time of approximately 4.2 years after diagnosis50. PTX is ready to develop drug resistance in TNBC treatment. Hence its combination with other drugs has emerged as a recommended option6,7. SHK, one of the main components of Lithospermum. erythrorhizon, has been widely investigated in cancer therapy as a PKM2 inhibitor51. In our previous report, the glycolysis inhibition effect of SHK was demonstrated, including the down-regulation of PKM2, as well as reduction of ATP and lactate42,52,53. Co-delivery systems are commonly employed to overcome the poor efficacy of chemotherapy and improve the in vivo delivery of hydrophobic drugs. For example, a co-delivery system of quercetin and doxorubicin, modified with the KC26 peptide, facilitates deep penetration into tumors and strongly inhibits breast tumor growth54. In this work, we developed an albumin delivery system (S/P NP) to co-load SHK and PTX in an optimized ratio of 5:1, aiming to enhance the anti-tumor effect of PTX in TNBC.
PKM2 is associated with poor prognosis for patients with cancers and is highly expressed in various malignancies55, which is in agreement with our results of bioinformatics analysis. PKM2 expression levels were significantly higher in PTX-resistant cancer cells. The upregulated PKM2 contributed to drug resistance by regulating cellular energy metabolism and influencing the stress response of tumor cells56. Moreover, PKM2 can affect cellular sensitivity to PTX by modulating mitochondrial function and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production57. Therefore, this SHK-based therapeutic strategy can take a dual action for simultaneously inhibiting both glycolysis and β-Catenin signaling pathway, thus synergizing PTX treatment against TNBC by decreasing the stem-property and VM formation, remodeling the TME.
One of the major culprits for unsatisfied outcomes of PTX accounts for the stem-property of TNBC cells which is regulated by the activation of β-Catenin8. Meanwhile, the stemness-associated EMT not only causes drug resistance but also promotes tumor metastasis58,59. Another mechanism for the ineffectiveness of PTX therapy is VM. There is a correlation between VM and CSCs, and some tumor vessels may originate from the tumor cells through vasculogenesis60, in which CSCs may act as progenitors of tumor stromal components like tumor vasculogenic stem cells61. Furthermore, in the perivascular environment, CSCs primordially grow in VM niches62, where they transdifferentiate into endothelial-like cells in VM formation. Our results demonstrated that the S/P NP successfully reversed the stem-property and EMT, as well as suppressed VM formation. As a result, the S/P NP significantly enhanced the treatment efficacy of PTX against TNBC and lung metastasis.
TNBC is a typical “cold tumor” with a strong immunosuppressive microenvironment63. CSCs are preferentially dispersed in niches with typical TME characteristics64. The interaction between CSCs and immune cells in TME often leads to unproductive therapy outcomes65. Therefore, targeting CSCs and VM can remodel the tumor immune microenvironment. Our results showed that the S/P NP treatment decreased M2Φ and MDSCs, but promoted M1Φ, matured DCs, CTLs, and memory T cells.
In this work, we developed a therapeutic strategy using the S/P NP for targeting the stem-property and VM formation by inhibiting PKM2. This codelivery system enhanced the tumor drug accumulation. Such treatment efficiently arrested the primary tumor growth of TNBC and suppressed lung metastasis.
1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mrtality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209—49.
2.
Leon-Ferre RA, Goetz MP. Advances in systemic therapies for triple negative breast cancer. BMJ 2023;381:e071674.
3.
Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, Schneeweiss A, Barrios CH, Iwata H, et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2108—21.
4.
Liao L, Zhang YL, Deng L, Chen C, Ma XY, Andriani L, et al. Protein phosphatase 1 subunit PPP1R14B stabilizes STMN1 to promote progression and paclitaxel resistance in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res 2023;83:471—84.
5.
Yu KD, Ye FG, He M, Fan L, Ma D, Mo M, et al. Effect of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin on survival in women with triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2020;6:1390—6.
6.
Emens LA, Adams S, Barrios CH, Diéras V, Iwata H, Loi S, et al. First-line atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: IMpassion130 final overall survival analysis. Ann Oncol 2021;32:983—93.
7.
Fan L, Wang ZH, Ma LX, Wu SY, Wu J, Yu KD, et al. Optimising first-line subtyping-based therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (FUTURE-SUPER): a multi-cohort, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2024;25:184—97.
8.
Luo F, Zhang M, Sun B, Xu C, Yang Y, Zhang Y, et al. LINC00115 promotes chemoresistant breast cancer stem-like cell stemness and metastasis through SETDB1/PLK3/HIF1α signaling. Mol Cancer 2024;23:60.
9.
Mai Y, Su J, Yang C, Xia C, Fu L. The strategies to cure cancer patients by eradicating cancer stem-like cells. Mol Cancer 2023;22:171.
10.
Massagué J, Ganesh K. Metastasis-initiating cells and ecosystems. Cancer Discov 2021;11:971—94.
11.
Guo W, Sun YF, Shen MN, Ma XL, Wu J, Zhang CY, et al. Circulating tumor cells with stem-like phenotypes for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response evaluation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2018;24:2203—13.
12.
Vipparthi K, Hari K, Chakraborty P, Ghosh S, Patel AK, Ghosh A, et al. Emergence of hybrid states of stem-like cancer cells correlates with poor prognosis in oral cancer. iScience 2022;25:104317.
13.
Treps L, Faure S, Clere N. Vasculogenic mimicry, a complex and devious process favoring tumorigenesis—interest in making it a therapeutic target. Pharmacol Ther 2021;223:107805.
14.
Li XY, Zhao Y, Sun MG, Shi JF, Ju RJ, Zhang CX, et al. Multifunctional liposomes loaded with paclitaxel and artemether for treatment of invasive brain glioma. Biomaterials 2014;35:5591—604.
15.
Maddison K, Bowden NA, Graves MC, Tooney PA. Characteristics of vasculogenic mimicry and tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation in human glioblastoma: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2023;23:185.
16.
Luo Q, Wang J, Zhao W, Peng Z, Liu X, Li B, et al. Vasculogenic mimicry in carcinogenesis and clinical applications. J Hematol Oncol 2020;13:19.
17.
Morales-Guadarrama G, García-Becerra R, Méndez-Pérez EA, García-Quiroz J, Avila E, Díaz L. Vasculogenic mimicry in breast cancer: clinical relevance and drivers. Cells 2021;10:1758.
18.
Hujanen R, Almahmoudi R, Karinen S, Nwaru BI, Salo T, Salem A. Vasculogenic mimicry: a promising prognosticator in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and esophageal cancer?. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cells 2020;9:507.
19.
Yao XH, Ping YF, Bian XW. Contribution of cancer stem cells to tumor vasculogenic mimicry. Protein Cell 2011;2:266—72.
20.
Liu TJ, Sun BC, Zhao XL, Zhao XM, Sun T, Gu Q, et al. CD133+ cells with cancer stem cell characteristics associates with vasculogenic mimicry in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2013;32:544—53.
21.
Chen J, Chen S, Zhuo L, Zhu Y, Zheng H. Regulation of cancer stem cell properties, angiogenesis, and vasculogenic mimicry by miR-450a-5p/SOX2 axis in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Dis 2020;11:173.
22.
Wei X, Chen Y, Jiang X, Peng M, Liu Y, Mo Y, et al. Mechanisms of vasculogenic mimicry in hypoxic tumor microenvironments. Mol Cancer 2021;20:7.
23.
Dong C, Yuan T, Wu Y, Wang Y, Fan TW, Miriyala S, et al. Loss of FBP1 by Snail-mediated repression provides metabolic advantages in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2013;23:316—31.
24.
Zhang J, Ouyang F, Gao A, Zeng T, Li M, Li H, et al. ESM1 enhances fatty acid synthesis and vascular mimicry in ovarian cancer by utilizing the PKM2-dependent Warburg effect within the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer 2024;23:94.
25.
Hou PP, Luo LJ, Chen HZ, Chen QT, Bian XL, Wu SF, et al. Ectosomal PKM2 promotes HCC by inducing macrophage differentiation and remodeling the tumor microenvironment. Mol Cell 2020;78:1192—206.e10.
26.
Zhu S, Guo Y, Zhang X, Liu H, Yin M, Chen X, et al. Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) in cancer and cancer therapeutics. Cancer Lett 2021;503:240—8.
27.
Yang W, Xia Y, Ji H, Zheng Y, Liang J, Huang W, et al. Nuclear PKM2 regulates β-catenin transactivation upon EGFR activation. Nature 2011;480:118—22.
28.
Zhang Y, Wang X. Targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2020;13:165.
29.
Liu S, Sun Y, Hou Y, Yang L, Wan X, Qin Y, et al. A novel lncRNA ROPM-mediated lipid metabolism governs breast cancer stem cell properties. J Hematol Oncol 2021;14:178.
30.
Ni M, Zhou J, Zhu Z, Xu Q, Yin Z, Wang Y, et al. Shikonin and cisplatin synergistically overcome cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer by inducing ferroptosis via upregulation of HMOX1 to promote Fe2+ accumulation. Phytomedicine 2023;112:154701.
31.
Zhao P, Wang Y, Wu A, Rao Y, Huang Y. Roles of albumin-binding proteins in cancer progression and biomimetic targeted drug delivery. Chembiochem 2018;19:1796—805.
32.
Zhao P, Wang Y, Kang X, Wu A, Yin W, Tang Y, et al. Dual-targeting biomimetic delivery for anti-glioma activity via remodeling the tumor microenvironment and directing macrophage-mediated immunotherapy. Chem Sci 2018;9:2674—89.
33.
Zhao P, Yin W, Wu A, Tang Y, Wang J, Pan Z, et al. Dual-targeting to cancer cells and M2 macrophages via biomimetic delivery of mannosylated albumin nanoparticles for drug-resistant cancer therapy. Adv Funct Mater 2017;27:1700403.
34.
Lin T, Zhao P, Jiang Y, Tang Y, Jin H, Pan Z, et al. Blood—brain-barrier-penetrating albumin nanoparticles for biomimetic drug delivery via albumin-binding protein pathways for antiglioma therapy. ACS Nano 2016;10:9999—10012.
35.
Zhao P, Zhang J, Wu A, Zhang M, Zhao Y, Tang Y, et al. Biomimetic codelivery overcomes osimertinib-resistant NSCLC and brain metastasis via macrophage-mediated innate immunity. J Control Release 2021;329:1249—61.
36.
Qian C, Zhou Y, Zhang T, Dong G, Song M, Tang Y, et al. Targeting PKM2 signaling cascade with salvianic acid A normalizes tumor blood vessels to facilitate chemotherapeutic drug delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B 2024;14:2077—96.
37.
Huang Q, Liu L, Xiao D, Huang Z, Wang W, Zhai K, et al. CD44+ lung cancer stem cell-derived pericyte-like cells cause brain metastases through GPR124-enhanced trans-endothelial migration. Cancer Cell 2023;41:1621—36.e8.
38.
Delgado-Bellido D, Zamudio-Martínez E, Fernández-Cortés M, Herrera-Campos AB, Olmedo-Pelayo J, Perez CJ, et al. VE-CADHERIN modulates β- catenin/TCF-4 to enhance vasculogenic mimicry. Cell Death Dis 2023;14:135.
39.
Xu X, Yu Y, Zhang W, Ma W, He C, Qiu G, et al. SHP-1 inhibition targets leukaemia stem cells to restore immunosurveillance and enhance chemosensitivity by metabolic reprogramming. Nat Cell Biol 2024;26:464—77.
40.
Yu Y, Li J, Song B, Ma Z, Zhang Y, Sun H, et al. Polymeric PD-L1 blockade nanoparticles for cancer photothermal-immunotherapy. Biomaterials 2022;280:121312.
41.
Cheng Y, Xu M, Wu J, Qian K, Yang P, Zhou L, et al. Carcinoma-astrocyte gap junction interruption by a dual-targeted biomimetic liposomal system to attenuate chemoresistance and treat brain metastasis. ACS Nano 2024;18:34107—25.
42.
Wang H, Tang Y, Fang Y, Zhang M, Wang H, He Z, et al. Reprogramming tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and metabolism via biomimetic targeting codelivery of shikonin/JQ1. Nano Lett 2019;19:2935—44.
43.
Espinosa-Sánchez A, Suárez-Martínez E, Sánchez-Díaz L, Carnero A. Therapeutic targeting of signaling pathways related to cancer stemness. Front Oncol 2020;10:1533.
44.
Romano S, Tufano M, D’Arrigo P, Vigorito V, Russo S, Romano MF. Cell stemness, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, and immunoevasion: intertwined aspects in cancer metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol 2020;60:181—90.
45.
Hayes C, Donohoe CL, Davern M, Donlon NE. The oncogenic and clinical implications of lactate induced immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment. Cancer Lett 2021;500:75—86.
46.
Chen Y, Wu J, Zhai L, Zhang T, Yin H, Gao H, et al. Metabolic regulation of homologous recombination repair by MRE11 lactylation. Cell 2024;187:294—311.e21.
47.
Kroemer G, Galassi C, Zitvogel L, Galluzzi L. Immunogenic cell stress and death. Nat Immunol 2022;23:487—500.
48.
Xiang X, Wang J, Lu D, Xu X. Targeting tumor-associated macrophages to synergize tumor immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2021;6:75.
49.
Cabeza-Cabrerizo M, Cardoso A, Minutti CM, Pereira da Costa M, Reis e, Sousa C. Dendritic cells revisited. Annu Rev Immunol 2021;39:131—66.
50.
Garmpis N, Damaskos C, Garmpi A, Nikolettos K, Dimitroulis D, Diamantis E, et al. Molecular classification and future therapeutic challenges of triple-negative breast cancer. In Vivo (Athens) 2020;34:1715—27.
51.
Boulos JC, Rahama M, Hegazy MF, Efferth T. Shikonin derivatives for cancer prevention and therapy. Cancer Lett 2019;459:248—67.
52.
Long L, Xiong W, Lin F, Hou J, Chen G, Peng T, et al. Regulating lactate-related immunometabolism and EMT reversal for colorectal cancer liver metastases using shikonin targeted delivery. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023;42:117.
53.
Zhu J, Wang R, Yang C, Shao X, Zhang Y, Hou J, et al. Blocking tumor-platelet crosstalk to prevent tumor metastasis via reprograming glycolysis using biomimetic membrane-hybridized liposomes. J Control Release 2024;366:328—41.
54.
Zhao P, Wang S, Jiang J, Gao Y, Wang Y, Zhao Y, et al. Targeting lactate metabolism and immune interaction in breast tumor via protease-triggered delivery. J Control Release 2023;358:706—17.
55.
Li T, Han J, Jia L, Hu X, Chen L, Wang Y. PKM2 coordinates glycolysis with mitochondrial fusion and oxidative phosphorylation. Protein Cell 2019;10:583—94.
56.
Samec M, Liskova A, Koklesova L, Samuel SM, Zhai K, Buhrmann C, et al. Flavonoids against the Warburg phenotype-concepts of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine to cut the Gordian knot of cancer cell metabolism. EPMA J 2020;11:377—98.
57.
Wang Z, Yin J, Li M, Shen J, Xiao Z, Zhao Y, et al. Combination of shikonin with paclitaxel overcomes multidrug resistance in human ovarian carcinoma cells in a P-gp-independent manner through enhanced ROS generation. Chin Med 2019;14:7.
58.
Jin H, He Y, Zhao P, Hu Y, Tao J, Chen J, et al. Targeting lipid metabolism to overcome EMT-associated drug resistance via integrin beta3/FAK pathway and tumor-associated macrophage repolarization using legumain-activatable delivery. Theranostics 2019;9:265—78.
59.
Grasset EM, Dunworth M, Sharma G, Loth M, Tandurella J, Cimino-Mathews A, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer metastasis involves complex epithelial-mesenchymal transition dynamics and requires vimentin. Sci Transl Med 2022;14:eabn7571.
60.
Pezzolo A, Parodi F, Corrias MV, Cinti R, Gambini C, Pistoia V. Tumor origin of endothelial cells in human neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:376—83.
61.
Gao JX. Cancer stem cells: the lessons from pre-cancerous stem cells. J Cell Mol Med 2008;12:67—96.
62.
Lizárraga-Verdugo E, Avendaño-Félix M, Bermúdez M, Ramos-Payán R, Pérez-Plasencia C, Aguilar-Medina M. Cancer stem cells and its role in angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry in gastrointestinal cancers. Front Oncol 2020;10:413.
63.
Yi M, Li T, Niu M, Mei Q, Zhao B, Chu Q, et al. Exploiting innate immunity for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer 2023;22:187.
64.
Wu B, Shi X, Jiang M, Liu H. Cross-talk between cancer stem cells and immune cells: potential therapeutic targets in the tumor immune microenvironment. Mol Cancer 2023;22:38.
65.
Maccalli C, Rasul KI, Elawad M, Ferrone S. The role of cancer stem cells in the modulation of anti-tumor immune responses. Semin Cancer Biol 2018;53:189—200.
Year 2025 volume 15 Issue 6
PDF
45
27
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.006
  • Receive Date:2024-12-15
  • Online Date:2026-04-03
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-12-15
  • Revised:2025-02-20
  • Accepted:2025-02-22
Affiliations
    aDepartment of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital and the First Clinical School of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China
    bZhongshan Institute for Drug Discovery, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongshan 528400, China
    cState Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, Clinical and Basic Research Team of TCM Prevention and Treatment of NSCLC, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, the Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China
    dSchool of Chinese Materia Medica, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
    eDepartment of Pharmacy, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China
    fState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China

Corresponding:

* Corresponding authors.
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/apsb/EN/10.1016/j.apsb.2025.04.006
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT