收藏切换
RBM14 enhances transcriptional activity of p23 regulating CXCL1 expression to induce lung cancer metastasis
收藏切换
PDF
Wen Zhanga, b, c, Yulin Pengb, Meirong Zhoua, c, Lei Qiand, Yilin Chea, Junlin Chena, Wenhao Zhanga, Chengjian Hea, Minghang Qic, Xiaohong Shuc, Manman Tiana, Xiangge Tiana, Yan Tianc, Sa Dengc, Yan Wangb, Xiaokui Huoa, *, Zhenlong Yuc, *, Xiaochi Maa, b, *
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(6) : 3059 - 3072
Less
收藏切换
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(6): 3059-3072
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
RBM14 enhances transcriptional activity of p23 regulating CXCL1 expression to induce lung cancer metastasis
Full
Wen Zhanga, b, c, Yulin Pengb, Meirong Zhoua, c, Lei Qiand, Yilin Chea, Junlin Chena, Wenhao Zhanga, Chengjian Hea, Minghang Qic, Xiaohong Shuc, Manman Tiana, Xiangge Tiana, Yan Tianc, Sa Dengc, Yan Wangb, Xiaokui Huoa, *, Zhenlong Yuc, *, Xiaochi Maa, b, *
Affiliations
  • aSecond Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116000, China
  • bDalian Key Laboratory of Metabolic Target Characterization and Traditional Chinese Medicine Intervention, College (Institute) of Integrative Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
  • cCollege of Pharmacy, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
  • dAdvanced Institute for Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.048
Outline
收藏切换

Metastasis serves as an indicator of malignancy and is a biological characteristic of carcinomas. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) plays a key role in the promotion of tumor invasion and metastasis and in the enhancement of tumor cell aggressiveness. Prostaglandin E synthase 3 (p23) is a cochaperone for heat shock protein 90 (HSP90). Our previous study showed that p23 is an HSP90-independent transcription factor in cancer-associated inflammation. The effect and mechanism of action of p23 on lung cancer metastasis are tested in this study. By utilizing cell models in vitro and mouse tail vein metastasis models in vivo, the results provide solid evidence that p23 is critical for promoting lung cancer metastases by regulating downstream CXCL1 expression. Rather than acting independently, p23 forms a complex with RNA-binding motif protein 14 (RBM14) to facilitate EMT progression in lung cancer. Therefore, our study provides evidence for the potential role of the RBM14–p23–CXCL1–EMT axis in the metastasis of lung cancer.

Lung cancer  /  Epithelial–mesenchymal transition  /  Invasion and metastasis  /  RNA-binding motif protein 14  /  Prostaglandin E synthase 3  /  CXCL1  /  Transcriptional regulation  /  Protein–protein interaction
Wen Zhang, Yulin Peng, Meirong Zhou, Lei Qian, Yilin Che, Junlin Chen, Wenhao Zhang, Chengjian He, Minghang Qi, Xiaohong Shu, Manman Tian, Xiangge Tian, Yan Tian, Sa Deng, Yan Wang, Xiaokui Huo, Zhenlong Yu, Xiaochi Ma. RBM14 enhances transcriptional activity of p23 regulating CXCL1 expression to induce lung cancer metastasis[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 2025 , 15 (6) : 3059 -3072 . DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.048
Lung cancer has become a prominent contributor to global mortality rates associated with malignancies and is a major global public health burden1-3. Despite advancements in diagnosis, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy over the past decade4-6, the mortality rate of lung cancer remains alarmingly high, with a mere 15% 5-year survival rate, primarily due to the widespread metastasis of lung cancer7,8. The efficacy of targeted therapy in tumor treatment is promising. However, the intricate interactions between the tumor and its stroma greatly impede the development of targeted therapies for tumor metastasis. Therefore, it is imperative to investigate novel molecular mechanisms and targets of lung cancer metastasis to establish a theoretical foundation for developing innovative treatment strategies or therapeutic agents and ultimately enhance the quality of life for patients with lung cancer.
The process of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in tumor cells is characterized by the loss of intercellular adhesion among epithelial tumor cells and the acquisition of migration and invasion properties of mesenchymal cells, thereby promoting the metastasis and development of various cancers9. The acquisition of metastatic properties by tumor cells increased aggressiveness, bringing substantial challenges to clinical management and patient survival10. Therefore, there is an urgent need to investigate the molecular targets and pathways involved in EMT in tumor cells, which will not only establish a theoretical foundation for preventing EMT but also facilitate the identification of potential therapeutic agents. In the present study, we focus on the EMT marker, CXCL1, to reveal a new mechanism for the regulation of its expression.
CXCL1, a chemokine of the CXC family, is implicated in the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases and plays a crucial role in physiology and cancer progression, particularly in EMT11-13. Elevated CXCL1 expression in tumor tissues and serum has been associated with tumor metastasis and poor prognosis in ovarian cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, colorectal cancer, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma14-18. A previous study reported that CXCL1 is positively correlated with the migration and invasive activity of osteosarcoma cell lines19 and has become a key indicator of lung metastasis in osteosarcoma through paracrine release. Therefore, it was proposed that the targeted inhibition of CXCL1 could exert a profound inhibitory effect on tumor growth and metastasis.
Prostaglandin E synthase 3 (p23) is a highly conserved protein encoded by the PTGES3 gene20,21, which is often overexpressed in various cancers, including prostate cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer22-27. The current understanding of p23 mainly focuses on its role as a co-partner of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90)28,29. It can stabilize the complex formed by HSP90 and its client proteins, including the estrogen receptor30, androgen receptor31, and telomerase32. However, p23 can also perform some functions independent of HSP90, such as enhancing the transcription factor activity of p5333 and protecting human aryl hydrocarbon receptors from degradation34. Our previous study redefined p23 as an HSP90-independent transcription factor of prostaglandin G/H synthase 2 (COX-2) that promotes tumor growth35. This highlights the diversity and complexity of p23 functionality and emphasizes the importance of further studies on its functional characteristics. Currently, there are few studies on p23 expression and tumor metastasis. Therefore, it is important to explore the role of p23 in tumor migration and its underlying molecular mechanisms.
RNA-binding motif protein 14 (RBM14) is an RNA-binding protein with a low-complexity domain that is divided into 2 subtypes. Among them, subtype I acts as a nuclear receptor coactivator, enhancing transcription through other coactivators, such as NCOA6 and CITED1, whereas subtype II acts as a transcription inhibitor, regulating the transcriptional activity of coactivators, including subtype I RBM14, NCOA6, and CITED136. It has been reported37 that the depletion of RBM14 in human cells induces the ectopic formation of acentrosomal protein complexes by affecting the function of the STIL/CPAP complex, and this abnormal structure may lead to genomic instability and tumorigenesis. In terms of tumor metastasis, it is reported in the literature38 that RBM14 can stimulate the phenotypic polarization of liver macrophages (M2), thus promoting the malignant invasion of liver cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Another study39 reported that SLC35F2 (a member of the solute carrier family) regulates the invasion, metastasis, and cisplatin resistance of pancreatic cancer cells by regulating the expression of RBM14. In addition, RBM14 plays an important role in DNA double-stranded break repair40,41. However, the mechanism of action of RBM14 and its interacting proteins in the process of tumor metastasis remains unclear and requires further study.
In this study, we discovered a novel function of p23 as a transcription factor that promotes EMT in lung cancer, and we revealed its specific mechanism. Its activation of the CXCL1 promoter is not achieved directly but requires the assistance of the cofactor RBM14 during EMT progression.
CXCL1 was purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA) with >98% purity. It was dissolved in water containing 5% bovine serum albumin, and the concentration of the stock solution was 25 mmol/L, which was stored at −80 ℃. Purified p23 and RBM14 were obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Anti-HA tag antibodies were procured from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Primary antibodies against p23, Flag, RPS3, vimentin, HNRNPU, β-actin, DDX5, and secondary antibodies were all purchased from Proteintech Group (Chicago, IL, USA). AbClonal Technologies (Wuhan, China) provided the primary antibodies against CXCL1 and RBM14. Jingjie PTM BioLab (Hangzhou, China) provided primary antibodies against E-cadherin and N-cadherin. Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), Dulbecco’s modified Eagles’ medium (DMEM), RPMI 1640, trypsin and were purchased from HyClone Laboratories (Logan, UT, USA). The other chemicals were all obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).
The cell lines from human lung cancer (A549, H1299, H322, H460, and HCC827), HLF, and HEK-293T cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) or the Procell Life Science & Technology Co. (Wuhan, China) and were maintained in our laboratory. The cells were cultivated in F12K, DMEM, or 1640 medium, which were enriched with 10% FBS, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 100 μg/mL penicillin at 37 ℃ within a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
The migration of cells was measured using CIM plates, with 1 × 105 cells per well. The cells were cultivated at 37 ℃ in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Migration curves of cells were recorded using the xCELLigence system (Roche Applied Sciences, Basel, Switzerland) all the time.
We used a second-generation packaging system to produce lentivirus in 293T cells. This system contains plasmids psPAX2 (Addgene, MA, USA) and pMD2.G (Addgene). For transfection, a 100 mm culture dish containing 4 × 106 293T cells was used with 7.5 μg psPAX2 and 7.5 μg pMD2.G using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). After transfection for 48 h, the supernatant was collected and then concentrated with PEG-8000, and virus titers were determined by serial dilution. Infection multiplicities during transfection were five.
The target sequences of p23 siRNAs (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) are as follows:
1. 5′-CCAAAUGAUUCCAAGCAUATT-3′
2. 5′-GGCUUAGUGUCGACUUCAATT-3′
3. 5′-GUCAGUGUUCCAGGUGUAUTT-3′
The target sequences of RBM14 siRNAs (Sangon, Shanghai, China) were as follows:
1. 5′-CGCGUUUGUUCACAUGGAGAATT-3′
2. 5′-CCCAAGCAUCAAUGGGCCUUUTT-3′
Samples of cancer tissue in tissue microarray were obtained from Shanghai Outdo Biotech Company (Ethical No. SHYJS-CP-1701003), and written informed consents were obtained from all participants. Briefly, paraffin sections of 4–6 μm were deparaffinized and rehydrated with xylol and a descending series of alcohol solutions. A 3% hydrogen peroxide solution was used to stop the body’s natural peroxidase activity for 20 min. The sections were then retrieved using 10 mmol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0) in a microwave for 20 min. Sections were subsequently incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 ℃ in a humidified box. The next day, the samples were left with the right biotinylated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated using a series of increasing concentrations of alcohol and xylene, and sealed with coverslips. Images were taken under a light microscope (20 × magnification).
Cells were resuspended in 100 μL of serum-free medium and seeded in the upper chamber of the Transwell chamber plates (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA). The bottom well contained 15% FBS. After 48 h of growth at 37 ℃, the cells that had moved through the holes in the Transwell were fixed and stained with crystal violet.
Cells were seeded in 6-well plates and formed confluent monolayers overnight. Then, the wounds were created by scratching lines across the surface using a 10 μL plastic pipette tip. The wounds were recorded by a microscope after 0 and 48 h.
Total RNA was extracted from the cells using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The preparation of the cDNA was done by Quantscript RT Kits (MonAmp, Wuhan, China) with oligo(dT) or random primers. For transcript quantification using specific primers, a SYBR RT-PCR kit (MonAmp) was used. The 2–ΔΔCt method was employed to quantify expression levels. The primers that were used are enumerated in Supporting Information Table S1. For cancer tissues detection, the samples were obtained from Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (Ethical No. KY2022-173), and written informed consents were obtained from all participants.
The collected cell precipitate was resuspended in reagent buffer A (containing 0.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L KCl, 25 mmol/L HEPES, protease inhibitor) and lysed on ice for 30 min. The supernatant, which contained cytoplasmic proteins, was then centrifuged at 4 ℃ for 10 min. For the extraction of nuclear proteins, reagent buffer B (containing 25 mmol/L HEPES, glucose powder, 400 mmol/L NaCl, protease inhibitor) was added to the precipitate obtained in the previous step. The supernatant contained the nuclear proteins after centrifugation.
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer, and supernatants were collected at 12,000×g for 10 min at 4 ℃ by centrifugation. The BCA detection kit was used to determine protein levels. Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed after boiling. Proteins were separated by molecular weight and were transferred to a 0.45 μm PVDF membrane. Corresponding antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 ℃ in a refrigerator after blocking with 5% milk. Secondary antibodies were incubated at room temperature for 1 h and were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence or the ODYSSEY CLX system (Licor, Lincoln, NE, USA).
RNA was separated and purified according to the type of RNA detected after total RNA was extracted from the samples. RNA was fragmented to the length required by the sequencing platform (or fragmented after reverse transcription). Sequencing linkers were then added. PCR amplification was carried out to achieve a certain level of abundance, and sequencing was carried out until a sufficient number of sequences had been obtained. To generate a genome-wide transcription profile, the sequences were compared to the reference genome or assembled de novo. The differentially expressed genes were identified as potential target genes of p23 by comparing three groups of A549 cell lines with p23 knockdown and blank A549 cells.
A 541 bp biotin-labeled double-stranded probe corresponding to the sequence of the CXCL1 promoter (−541 to +38 bp) was synthesized. Briefly, 500 μg protein, 4 μg DNA probe, 40 μL streptavidin-conjugated agarose beads, and 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer with 1 mmol/L DTT and 1 mmol/L EDTA were incubated at 25 ℃ for 6 h on a rotary plate. Beads were resuspended in a loading buffer and boiled at 100 ℃ after washing with PBS buffer. Then, a Western blot analysis of the supernatant was performed.
The luciferase activity was measured using a dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Cells in the 6-orifice plate were collected and lysed. Subsequently, 10 μL of lysate was transferred into a black 96-well plate (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). Cell lysates from each well were assayed sequentially for firefly and Renilla luciferase activity.
BGI Genomics (Beijing, China) provided biotin-labelled CXCL1 promoter probes. For the EMSA assay, 4 μg of protein and 1 μg of the biotin-labelled DNA probe were mixed in binding buffer and incubated for 20 min at 25 ℃. DNA–protein complexes were separated on 6.5% acrylamide-native PAGE gels at 4 ℃. Specific bands were detected using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and enhanced chemiluminescence.
In total, 800 μg of protein was used, and the volume was made up to 500 μL with binding buffer. Subsequently, 2 μg of Flag antibody was included in the experimental group, and 2 μg of IgG antibody was included in the blank group. The samples were vortexed for 1 h. After the vortex, 15 μL magnetic beads were added and vortexed overnight at 4 ℃. Magnetic separation was performed the next day, adding a suitable amount of binding buffer for washing the magnetic beads three times after discarding the supernatant. 50 μL of 2 × loading buffer was added to the beads and allowed to boil for 10 min. The supernatant was collected for Western blot analysis after magnetic separation.
Five-week-old male NYG mice were bought from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) and maintained at the SPF Laboratory Animal Facility of Dalian Medical University (Ethical No. AEE19048). Animals were given sterilized water and food. They were acclimated for 10 days and randomly divided before the experiments. The specified tumor cells (1 × 106 in 100 μL PBS) were injected into the tail vein of each mouse. Four weeks after injection, the lungs were excised, and the number of pulmonary metastatic nodules was counted. Sections of pulmonary metastatic tissue were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). All procedures were carried out according to the recommendations of the Animal Care and Ethical Committee of Dalian Medical University (Dalian, China).
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad 8.0. Kaplan–Meier method was used for survival analysis. The results were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Correlations between histochemical markers were assessed using Pearson’s correlation test. The unpaired Student’s t-test was used for the evaluation of differences between two groups. Any differences where P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
To evaluate the potential involvement of p23 in the metastasis of lung cancer, we queried the Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) and found that p23 expression was markedly up-regulated in metastatic lung cancer compared to primary lung cancer (Fig. 1A), which was further confirmed in clinical samples by immunohistochemical staining (Fig. 1B), qPCR assays (Fig. 1C), and Western blot (Fig. 1D). We investigated p23 expression and prognostic significance in 93 patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Elevated p23 expression promoted metastatic spread of lung cancer (Fig. 1E) and decreased overall survival of patients with metastatic lung cancer (Fig. 1F). These results suggest that increased p23 expression may be associated with metastasis and may predict poor clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic lung cancer.
To identify the potential mechanisms underlying the role of p23 in metastasis, we first investigated the expression of p23 in different cell lines, as shown in Supporting Information Fig. S1A. Then we constructed p23 stable knockdown cells using three different p23 knockdown sequences in the A549 cell line (Fig. S1B), and evaluated their impacts on the migratory and invasive capabilities of lung cancer cells. Real-time analysis using the xCELLigence system provided compelling evidence that the migratory ability of A549 lung cancer cells was impaired by depletion of endogenous p23 (Fig. 1G). Similar results were obtained in the scratch assay (Fig. 1H, Fig. S1C), Transwell invasion assays (Fig. 1I, Fig. S1D), and migration assays (Fig. 1J, Fig. S1E). In addition, several proteins involved in EMT were also evaluated using Western blot (Fig. 1K) and qPCR analysis (Fig. 1L), which demonstrated that the knockdown of p23 (shp23) markedly reduced the protein levels of N-cadherin and vimentin, while concurrently leading to an increase in E-cadherin. By contrast, stable p23 overexpression (H1299/OEp23) promoted metastasis in H1299 lung cancer cells (Fig. S1F–S1I). Furthermore, a mouse model of lung cancer metastasis was established. Tumor cells were injected intravenously into the tail vein to evaluate the effect of p23 on metastasis in vivo. Consistent with in vitro observations, shp23 dramatically decreased the number of metastatic lung nodules (Fig. 1M–O). These data suggest an oncogenic role for p23 in the promotion of lung cancer metastasis.
To determine the molecular pathways involved in p23-driven lung cancer metastasis. Transcriptome sequencing on the three p23 knockdown groups was performed to explore potential target genes related to p23 (Fig. 2A). The 3 p23 knockdown groups shared a total of 94 differentially expressed genes (Fig. 2B). These 94 candidates differentially expressed genes were selected for KEGG pathway enrichment analysis (Fig. 2C). The analysis revealed enrichment in signaling pathways, such as IL-17, TGF-β, and NF-κB, marked by genes, including CXCL1, CXCL8, S100A9 and so on, suggesting a correlation between p23 knockdown and EMT. Analysis of typical lung cancer EMT marker genes from the EMT database (www.EMTome.org) (Fig. 2D) highlighted 6 genes (CXCL1, CXCL8, FST, PLIN2, S100A9, and PRODH) within KEGG signaling pathways. These genes were subsequently confirmed by qPCR (Fig. 2E), which also confirmed the findings of the RNA-seq analysis. Moreover, we observed that proteins, such as S100A9 and PRODH, showed higher differential expression between the control and p23 knockdown groups, however, their absolute expression levels were relatively low in A549 cells (Fig. 2F). Considering the fold changes and absolute expression levels, CXCL1 was selected as a potential downstream factor of p23.
CXCL1 is a vital chemokine driver that promotes tumor metastasis14,19,42. We propose that p23 is involved in lung cancer metastasis, at least in part, by regulating CXCL1 expression. Importantly, both p23 and CXCL1 expression were found to be significantly upregulated in metastatic lung cancer tissues compared to non-metastatic counterparts at both mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 2G and H). In addition, CXCL1 expression was significantly downregulated by p23 depletion and upregulated by p23 overexpression at both the mRNA and protein levels in lung cancer cells (Fig. 2I–L), suggesting that p23 regulates CXCL1 expression in lung cancer cells.
In order to test whether p23 achieves its metastatic regulatory functions in a way that depends on the presence of CXCL1, we generated H1299/shCXCL1 lung cancer cells stably overexpressing p23 (H1299/shCXCL1+OEp23) to detect alterations in EMT. As shown in Supporting Information Fig. S2A and S2B. CXCL1 knockdown largely diminished lung cancer cell invasion and migration in vitro, and p23 overexpression rescued the lung cancer metastasis reduction induced by CXCL1 knockdown. In addition, several proteins involved in EMT were evaluated using Western blot (Fig. S2C).
We also generated A549/shp23 lung cancer cells that stably overexpressed CXCL1 (A549/shp23+OECXCL1). As shown in Fig. 3A–C, CXCL1 significantly reversed the migration inhibition caused by p23 knockdown, as well as the changes in the expression of proteins related to EMT (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and vimentin) (Fig. 3D). Moreover, similar results were observed in vivo. p23 knockdown significantly reduced the number of lung metastatic nodules in NYG mice, and this reduction was completely reversed by CXCL1 overexpression (Fig. 3E–H). These results indicate that p23 promotes the metastasis of lung cancer through the expression of CXCL1.
To further assess the function of p23 in CXCL1 expression, we examined the effect of p23 on CXCL1 mRNA stability. Although p23 depletion or overexpression positively regulated the basal mRNA levels of endogenous CXCL1, the half-life of CXCL1 mRNA was not affected by the changes made to p23 (Supporting Information Fig. S3A and S3B), indicating that p23 upregulates CXCL1 expression at the transcriptional level, rather than affecting mRNA stability. Furthermore, luciferase reporter plasmids containing the CXCL1 promoter region (−874 to +38) were constructed. Indeed, p23 expression dramatically increased CXCL1 luciferase activity (Fig. 4A). Through generating truncated variants of the CXCL1 promoter, we observed that p23 has an obvious activation effect in the −744 to +38 region of the CXCL1 promoter (Fig. 4B), which indicated that the binding sites for p23 are located in this region. Thus, a biotin-labeled probe, in accordance with the optimum CXCL1 promoter (−744 to +38), was used to evaluate p23 binding, with the CXCL1 promoter (−549 to +38) as a negative control. As expected, pulldown of the CXCL1 promoter region −744 to +38 from A549 cell nuclear extract visualized p23 protein, whereas no signal was detected in the negative control region (Fig. 4C).
Then the region (−549 to −744 bp) was truncated into 5 fragments to further confirm the binding motif of p23 in the CXCL1 promoter, including P1 (probe 1): −744 to −703, P2 (probe 2): −707 to −663, P3 (probe 3): −667 to −621, P4 (probe 4): −625 to −579, and P5 (probe 5): −583 to −537. The nucleotide sequences of the CXCL1–EMSA probes are listed in Supporting Information Table S2. The interaction between p23 and the probe was analyzed by EMSA assay with HEK293T cell lysates overexpressing p23. We found that p23 had binding affinities for P1, P2, and P3 (Fig. 4D), indicating that these 3 fragments contained p23 binding motifs. This observation was further validated using an anti-p23 antibody to competitively block binding between p23 and CXCL1 (Fig. 4E). Further Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) analysis revealed a 6 bp p23-binding motif from 3 fragments with conserved locations at nucleotides 1C, 2A, 3C, 4T, 5G/T, and 6A (Fig. 4F). Mutation of these motifs completely abolished p23-induced CXCL1 reporter activity (Fig. 4G). These results further confirm the transcriptional regulatory effect of p23 on CXCL1 expression. To further investigate the direct binding of p23 to the CXCL1 promoter, we conducted an EMSA assay using purified p23 protein. Surprisingly, purified p23 exhibited no binding affinity towards the CXCL1 promoter (Fig. 4H), suggesting that p23’s transcriptional regulation of CXCL1 may not be solely dependent on its direct interaction with the promoter, but rather requires the involvement of other protein factors.
To investigate the participants involved in the regulation of CXCL1 by p23, 34 proteins interacting with p23 were identified through Co-IP combined with mass spectrometry, four of which were selected because of their transcriptional function (Fig. 5A). Co-IP assays further verified their interaction with p23 (Fig. 5B, Supporting Information Fig. S4A), demonstrating the accuracy of the identification results by mass spectrometry. However, only RBM14 was pulled down using a CXCL1 promoter probe (Fig. 5C, Fig. S4B) and significantly promoted the reporter activity of the optimal CXCL1 promoter enhanced by p23 (Fig. 5D). A similar result was obtained from Western blot analysis (Fig. 5E). Furthermore, we conducted an EMSA to investigate the binding activity of purified p23 and RBM14 proteins to the CXCL1 promoter. As expected, pure p23 or RBM14 proteins individually did not directly bind to the CXCL1 promoter; however, their complexes demonstrated binding activity (Fig. 5F). These results suggest that the interaction between p23 and RBM14 played a crucial role in the regulation of CXCL1 expression.
We explored the mechanisms underlying the role of the p23/RBM14 protein complex in the transcriptional regulation of CXCL1. No reciprocal influence was observed between p23 and RBM14 on protein and mRNA expression levels (Fig. S4C–S4F). Subsequently, we modulated intracellular complex production to elucidate the regulation of the p23–RBM14 complex on CXCL1. As shown in Fig. 5G, the overexpression of the RBM14 protein with an HA tag in the A549 cell line was used for IP experiments. After p23 was knocked down or overexpressed, the amount of RBM14 detected by IP decreased or increased, respectively. When p23 was knocked down and then supplemented, the amount of RBM14 caught by IP returned to the same level as that of the control group. Similarly, in the A549 cell line overexpressing p23 with a Flag tag, knocking down or overexpressing RBM14 also decreased or increased the amount of p23 obtained by IP, and when RBM14 was knocked down and replenished, the p23 detected by IP returned to control group levels (Fig. 5H). Similarly, the binding activity of p23 and RBM14 to the CXCL1 promoter probe was significantly affected by the disruption of the p23/RBM14 complex. To achieve this, we constructed cell lines in which either p23 or RBM14 was knocked down. As shown in Fig. 5I, the third lane shows that RBM14 overexpression activated CXCL1 transcription compared with the first lane. This is likely because RBM14, a known transcriptional coactivator, can assist not only p23, but also other transcription factors in regulating CXCL1 transcription. As shown in the second and fourth lanes, regardless of RBM14 overexpression, p23 knockdown weakened CXCL1 activation. Similarly, Fig. 5J shows that compared to the first lane, p23 overexpression in the third lane leads to CXCL1 transcriptional activation. However, further RBM14 knockdown weakened CXCL1 activation regardless of whether p23 was overexpressed. These results illustrate the impact of disrupting the p23–RBM14 complex on CXCL1 transcription at the p23 binding site in the CXCL1 promoter region (−744 to +38 bp). This is consistent with the dual-luciferase reporter assay results for the −874 to +38 bp region (Fig. S4M and S4Q). However, when p23 did not bind to the −159 to +38 bp, −354 to +38 bp, or −549 to +38 bp regions of the CXCL1 promoter, RBM14 overexpression slightly activated CXCL1 transcription. By contrast, p23 knockdown did not affect transcriptional activation in these cases (Fig. S4J–S4L). Conversely, while p23 overexpression did not activate CXCL1 transcription, RBM14 knockdown partially affected transcriptional activation (Fig. S4N–S4P). In summary, when the p23–RBM14 complex is disrupted by the knockdown of either protein, CXCL1 transcriptional regulation is weakened. These results suggest that the interaction between p23 and RBM14 played a critical role in regulating CXCL1 expression. The DNA pulldown assay using a CXCL1 probe in A549 cells further demonstrated that the knockdown of either p23 or RBM14 resulted in a corresponding reduction in the amount of the other protein being captured by the CXCL1 probe (Fig. 5K and L).
Since p23 is known as a classical chaperone protein of HSP90, we also examined HSP90’s effect on the p23-mediated transcriptional regulation of CXCL1. As shown in Fig. S4G, the luciferase assay results indicated that HSP90 alone could not regulate CXCL1 nor could it enhance p23’s regulation of CXCL1 when overexpressed with p23. Additionally, we tested whether p23’s transcriptional regulation of CXCL1 depends on HSP90. Using a p23 plasmid with a mutation at the interaction site between p23 and HSP90 (W106A/D108A) in HEK293T cells, luciferase results showed that the mutated p23 retained its transcriptional activity on CXCL1 (Fig. S4H and S4I). Therefore, p23’s transcriptional regulation of CXCL1 is independent of HSP90 expression. In conclusion, these results demonstrate that the formation of the p23/RBM14 protein complex plays a pivotal role in mediating p23-induced CXCL1 expression.
To explore whether the EMT induced by p23 was RBM14-dependent, we constructed 4 stable cell lines using a lentivirus infection system: A549/shc, A549/OERBM14, A549/shp23, and A549/shp23+OERBM14. In vitro, the xCELLigence assay was used to monitor cell migration in real time (Fig. 6A). This result suggests that RBM14 could promote the EMT phenotype, but when p23 was knocked down simultaneously, the EMT phenotype was slightly reduced. Furthermore, wound healing (Fig. 6B), invasion (Fig. 6C), and migration (Fig. 6D) experiments were carried out and similar conclusions were reached. Changes in N-cadherin, E-cadherin, and vimentin protein levels were evaluated using Western blot (Fig. 6E), which also showed that p23 promoted the EMT phenotype in an RBM14-dependent manner. In vivo, the quantity of pulmonary metastatic nodules (Fig. 6F and G) and H&E staining of pulmonary metastatic nodules (Fig. 6H) were assessed by tail vein injection of four stably transfected cell lines, A549/shc, A549/shp23, A549/OERBM14 and A549/shp23+OERBM14. From these results, we can conclude that EMT induced by p23 is partially dependent on RBM14.
Lung cancer is the most common and deadly malignant tumor in China even around the world, and the outcomes of treatment are poor43. The metastasis of lung cancer represents a malignant manifestation and biological characteristic and serves as the primary cause of mortality in patients with this disease44. The metastatic nature of cancer leads tumor cells to spread from the primary site through the blood and lymphatic system to distant tissues beyond the lungs45, resulting in a substantial reduction in the efficacy of conventional therapies. Consequently, impeding lung cancer metastasis is of paramount importance for extending patient survival, improving overall prognosis, enhancing quality of life, and ameliorating treatment outcomes46. Metastasis of lung cancer is a multifaceted and complex process involving a large number of stages, steps, genes, and factors. Therefore, a major area of research in the effort to overcome lung cancer has been to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying lung cancer invasion and metastasis and to identify molecular targets to reverse or prevent these processes. In this study, we identified a novel pathway that regulates lung cancer metastasis, that is RBM14 assists p23 in enhancing the transcription activity of CXCL1, thereby promoting tumor metastasis. We provide a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of lung cancer and for the screening of potential anti-metastatic agents from the perspective of inhibiting lung cancer invasion and metastasis.
PTGES3 (p23) is a molecular chaperone protein and potential oncogene22-24. Previous studies23 showed that p23 is highly expressed in lung adenocarcinoma, and its overexpression is associated with short overall survival and poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer. The relation between PTGES3 and EMT was first reported to indicate that p23 can promote the metastasis of lung cancer47. It is not yet known how it works. Our results indicate that p23 is important in the promotion of EMT in human lung cancer, both in vivo and in vitro. Our study demonstrated that the primary mechanism through which p23 promotes EMT is its regulation of CXCL1 expression via binding to the promoter region of CXCL1.
As critical regulators of biological processes48, the functions of proteins are often manifested through their interactions with other proteins49. In order to understand and prevent disease, target the treatment of polygenic disorders, and elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying complex biological phenomena, the study of protein–protein interactions is of immense importance50,51. In this study, we showed that p23 acts as a transcription factor that binds indirectly to the promoter region of CXCL1, suggesting the involvement of potential cofactors that facilitate p23-mediated transcription. We identified RBM14 as this cofactor using mass spectrometry combined with Co-IP and DNA pulldown experiments.
RBM14 functions as a transcriptional coactivator, also known as CoActivator Activator (CoAA). RBM14 shows widespread expression in embryonic tissues and plays a critical role in regulating early embryonic development52,53. RBM14 is significantly upregulated in tumors, promoting tumor proliferation and migration38,54. However, the precise molecular mechanism remains unclear. It has been demonstrated that RBM14 enhances transcription through the action of other coactivators, such as NCOA6 and CITED141. RBM14 may also act as a transcription coactivator for other transcription factors to regulate CXCL1, thus activating CXCL1 transcription in the promoter region fragment where p23 is not bound to CXCL1. This is undeniable and requires further exploration. Our experiment is the first to demonstrate that RBM14, as a transcriptional coactivator of p23, assists p23 in the transcriptional regulation of CXCL1 and underscores that both must form a complex to function effectively, making both indispensable. In the presence of RBM14, the transcriptional regulation of p23 on CXCL1 was greatly enhanced.
While our previous study reported that p23 regulates COX-2 expression35, we found that p23 affected lung cancer metastasis, even after COX-2 knockout. This suggests that p23 influences tumor metastasis through additional pathways. In the present study, we demonstrated that the regulation of CXCL1 and the induction of lung cancer cell metastasis by the p23–RBM14 complex are independent of COX-2. First, we examined the expression of COX-2, CXCL1, and p23 in human lung fibroblasts and various lung cancer cell lines, with the results presented in Supporting Information Fig. S5A. Furthermore, the expression levels of RBM14, and COX-2 were significantly higher in lung cancer that had spread than in those that had not (Fig. S5B), with CXCL1 showing the most pronounced increase (Fig. 2H). To further explore the relation between COX-2 and the effect of p23 on lung cancer cell migration and invasion, we generated a COX-2 knockout cell line (A549/KOCOX-2) (Fig. S5C). The migration and invasion abilities of A549/KOCOX-2 cells were further reduced following p23 knockout (Fig. S5D–S5G). Scratch assays demonstrated that the loss of endogenous p23 inhibited the migration of A549 lung cancer cells, even in COX-2 knockout tumor cells (Fig. S5D). Similar results were observed in the Transwell invasion (Fig. S5E) and migration assays (Fig. S5F). In addition, proteins associated with EMT, including N-cadherin, E-cadherin, and vimentin, exhibited corresponding changes following the p23 knockout (Fig. S5G). Additionally, we investigated whether the mechanism of CXCL1 expression regulation after p23 and RBM14 form a complex is influenced by COX-2. As shown in Fig. S5H and S5I, in the A549/KOCOX-2 cell line, the CXCL1 promoter region can bind to p23 and RBM14, respectively. However, when one of them is knocked down, the ability of the CXCL1 promoter region to bind to other proteins is weakened. These findings further support the notion that the p23/RBM14 axis regulates EMT in lung cancer independent of COX-2.
In this study, we discovered that RBM14 forms a complex with p23, thereby augmenting the transcriptional regulation of p23 on CXCL1 expression. When there is a decrease or absence of expression of either component, the formation of the complex is reduced, resulting in the inhibition of CXCL1 transcriptional expression, which subsequently weakens cellular invasion and migration abilities. Our findings suggest that RBM14 serves as a coactivator of p23 to promote EMT in lung cancer.
1.
Thai AA, Solomon BJ, Sequist LV, Gainor JF, Heist RS. Lung cancer. Lancet 2021;398:535—54.
2.
Schabath MB, Cote ML. Cancer progress and priorities: lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019;28:1563—79.
3.
Nasim F, Sabath BF, Eapen GA. Lung cancer. Med Clin 2019;103:463—73.
4.
Hirsch FR, Scagliotti GV, Mulshine JL, Kwon R, Curran WJ, Wu YL, et al. Lung cancer: current therapies and new targeted treatments. Lancet 2017;389:299—311.
5.
Wu SG, Shih JY. Management of acquired resistance to EGFR TKI-targeted therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer 2018;17:38.
6.
Zeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Ji JS, Zou X, et al. Changing cancer survival in China during 2003—15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Global Health 2018;6:e555—67.
7.
Robert J. Biology of cancer metastasis. Bulletin Du Cancer 2013;100:333—42.
8.
Fares J, Fares MY, Khachfe HH, Salhab HA, Fares Y. Molecular principles of metastasis: a hallmark of cancer revisited. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther 2020;5:28.
9.
Pan G, Liu Y, Shang L, Zhou F, Yang S. EMT-associated microRNAs and their roles in cancer stemness and drug resistance. Cancer Commun 2021;41:199—217.
10.
Suarez-Carmona M, Lesage J, Cataldo D, Gilles C. EMT and inflammation: inseparable actors of cancer progression. Mol Oncol 2017;11:805—23.
11.
Korbecki J, Barczak K, Gutowska I, Chlubek D, Baranowska-Bosiacka I. CXCL1: gene, promoter, regulation of expression, mRNA stability, regulation of activity in the intercellular space. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:792.
12.
Korbecki J, Gąssowska-Dobrowolska M, Wójcik J, Szatkowska I, Barczak K, Chlubek M, et al. The importance of CXCL1 in physiology and noncancerous diseases of bone, bone marrow, muscle and the nervous system. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:4205.
13.
Wang N, Liu W, Zheng Y, Wang S, Yang B, Li M, et al. CXCL1 derived from tumor-associated macrophages promotes breast cancer metastasis via activating NF-κB/SOX4 signaling. Cell Death Dis 2018;9:880.
14.
Taki M, Abiko K, Baba T, Hamanishi J, Yamaguchi K, Murakami R, et al. Snail promotes ovarian cancer progression by recruiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells via CXCR2 ligand upregulation. Nat Commun 2018;9:1685.
15.
Saintigny P, Massarelli E, Lin S, Ahn YH, Chen Y, Goswami S, et al. CXCR2 expression in tumor cells is a poor prognostic factor and promotes invasion and metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 2013;73:571—82.
16.
Zhao J, Ou B, Feng H, Wang P, Yin S, Zhu C, et al. Overexpression of CXCR2 predicts poor prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8:28442—54.
17.
Chen L, Fan J, Chen H, Meng Z, Chen Z, Wang P, et al. The IL-8/CXCR1 axis is associated with cancer stem cell-like properties and correlates with clinical prognosis in human pancreatic cancer cases. Sci Rep 2014;4:5911.
18.
Sanford DE, Belt BA, Panni RZ, Mayer A, Deshpande AD, Carpenter D, et al. Inflammatory monocyte mobilization decreases patient survival in pancreatic cancer: a role for targeting the CCL2/CCR2 axis. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:3404—15.
19.
Lee CW, Chiang YC, Yu PA, Peng KT, Chi MC, Lee MH, et al. A role of CXCL1 drives osteosarcoma lung metastasis via VCAM-1 production. Front Oncol 2021;11:735277.
20.
Cha JY, Ermawati N, Jung MH, Su’udi M, Kim KY, Kim JY, et al. Characterization of orchardgrass p23, a flowering plant Hsp90 cohort protein. Cell Stress Chaperones 2009;14:233—43.
21.
Zhang Z, Sullivan W, Felts SJ, Prasad BD, Toft DO, Krishna P. Characterization of plant p23-like proteins for their co-chaperone activities. Cell Stress Chaperones 2010;15:703—15.
22.
Adekeye A, Agarwal D, Nayak A, Tchou J. PTGES3 is a putative prognostic marker in breast cancer. J Surg Res 2022;271:154—62.
23.
Gao P, Zou K, Xiao L, Zhou H, Xu X, Zeng Z, et al. High expression of PTGES3 is an independent predictive poor prognostic biomarker and correlates with immune infiltrates in lung adenocarcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol 2022;110:108954.
24.
He Y, Peng S, Wang J, Chen H, Cong X, Chen A, et al. Ailanthone targets p23 to overcome MDV3100 resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nat Commun 2016;7:13122.
25.
Elmore LW, Forsythe R, Forsythe H, Bright AT, Nasim S, Endo K, et al. Overexpression of telomerase-associated chaperone proteins in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinomas. Oncol Rep 2008;20:613—7.
26.
Reebye V, Querol Cano L, Lavery DN, Brooke GN, Powell SM, Chotai D, et al. Role of the HSP90-associated cochaperone p23 in enhancing activity of the androgen receptor and significance for prostate cancer. Mol Endocrinol 2012;26:1694—706.
27.
Simpson NE, Lambert WM, Watkins R, Giashuddin S, Huang SJ, Oxelmark E, et al. High levels of Hsp90 cochaperone p23 promote tumor progression and poor prognosis in breast cancer by increasing lymph node metastases and drug resistance. Cancer Res 2010;70:8446—56.
28.
Fang Y, Fliss AE, Rao J, Caplan AJ. SBA1 encodes a yeast hsp90 cochaperone that is homologous to vertebrate p23 proteins. Mol Cell Biol 1998;18:3727—34.
29.
Sullivan W, Stensgard B, Caucutt G, Bartha B, McMahon N, Alnemri ES, et al. Nucleotides and two functional states of hsp90. J Biol Chem 1997;272:8007—12.
30.
Knoblauch R, Garabedian MJ. Role for Hsp90-associated cochaperone p23 in estrogen receptor signal transduction. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:3748—59.
31.
Thomas M, Harrell JM, Morishima Y, Peng H-M, Pratt WB, Lieberman AP. Pharmacologic and genetic inhibition of hsp90-dependent trafficking reduces aggregation and promotes degradation of the expanded glutamine androgen receptor without stress protein induction. Hum Mol Genet 2006;15:1876—83.
32.
Holt SE, Aisner DL, Baur J, Tesmer VM, Dy M, Ouellette M, et al. Functional requirement of p23 and Hsp90 in telomerase complexes. Genes Dev 1999;13:817—26.
33.
Wu H, Hyun J, Martinez-Yamout MA, Park SJ, Dyson HJ. Characterization of an Hsp90-independent interaction between co-chaperone p23 and transcription factor p53. Biochemistry 2018;57:935—44.
34.
Pappas B, Yang Y, Wang Y, Kim K, Chung HJ, Cheung M, et al. p23 protects the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor from degradation via a heat shock protein 90-independent mechanism. Biochem Pharmacol 2018;152:34—44.
35.
Gao ZYYPJ. The p23 co-chaperone is a succinate-activated COX-2. Sci Adv 2023;9:eade0387.
36.
Iwasaki T, Chin WW, Ko L. Identification and characterization of RRM-containing coactivator activator (CoAA) as TRBP-interacting protein, and its splice variant as a coactivator modulator (CoAM). J Biol Chem 2001;276:33375—83.
37.
Shiratsuchi G, Takaoka K, Ashikawa T, Hamada H, Kitagawa D. RBM14 prevents assembly of centriolar protein complexes and maintains mitotic spindle integrity. EMBO J 2015;34:97—114.
38.
Hu J, Yang L, Peng X, Mao M, Liu X, Song J, et al. METTL3 promotes m6A hypermethylation of RBM14 via YTHDF1 leading to the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Cell 2022;35:1838—55.
39.
Zhang S, Li Q, Yuan H, Ren L, Liang X, Li S, et al. Solute carrier family 35 member F2 regulates cisplatin resistance and promotes malignant progression of pancreatic cancer by regulating RNA binding motif protein 14. JAMA Oncol 2022;2022:5091154.
40.
Kai M. Roles of RNA-binding proteins in DNA damage response. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:310.
41.
Simon NE, Yuan M, Kai M. RNA-binding protein RBM14 regulates dissociation and association of non-homologous end joining proteins. Cell Cycle 2017;16:1175—80.
42.
Najjar YG, Rayman P, Jia X, Pavicic PG, Rini BI, Tannenbaum C, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cell subset accumulation in renal cell carcinoma parenchyma is associated with intratumoral expression of IL1β, IL8, CXCL5, and Mip-1α. Clin Cancer Res 2017;23:2346—55.
43.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209—49.
44.
Xia HW, Zhang ZQ, Yuan J, Niu QL. Human RECQL5 promotes metastasis and resistance to cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer. Life Sci 2021;265:118768.
45.
Chaffer CL, Weinberg RA. A perspective on cancer cell metastasis. Science 2011;331:1559—64.
46.
Bakir B, Chiarella AM, Pitarresi JR, Rustgi AK. EMT, MET, plasticity, and tumor metastasis. Trends Cell Biol 2020;30:764—76.
47.
Fu Q, Wang W, Zhou T, Yang Y. Emerging roles of NudC family: from molecular regulation to clinical implications. Sci China Life Sci 2016;59:455—62.
48.
Mazmanian K, Sargsyan K, Lim C. How the local environment of functional sites regulates protein function. J Am Chem Soc 2020;142:9861—71.
49.
Wang T, Yang N, Liang C, Xu H, An Y, Xiao S, et al. Detecting protein—protein interaction based on protein fragment complementation Assay. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2020;21:598—610.
50.
Athanasios A, Charalampos V, Vasileios T, Ashraf GM. Protein—protein interaction (PPI) network: recent advances in drug discovery. Curr Drug Metabol 2017;18:5—10.
51.
Hu X, Feng C, Ling T, Chen M. Deep learning frameworks for protein-protein interaction prediction. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022;20:3223—33.
52.
Yang Z, Sui Y, Xiong S, Liour SS, Phillips AC, Ko L. Switched alternative splicing of oncogene CoAA during embryonal carcinoma stem cell differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:1919—32.
53.
Brooks YS, Wang G, Yang Z, Smith KK, Bieberich E, Ko L. Functional pre- mRNA trans-splicing of coactivator CoAA and corepressor RBM4 during stem/progenitor cell differentiation. J Biol Chem 2009;284:18033—46.
54.
Sui Y, Yang Z, Xiong S, Zhang L, Blanchard KL, Peiper SC, et al. Gene amplification and associated loss of 5' regulatory sequences of CoAA in human cancers. Oncogene 2006;26:822—35.
Year 2025 volume 15 Issue 6
PDF
33
20
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.048
  • Receive Date:2024-10-25
  • Online Date:2026-04-03
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-10-25
  • Revised:2025-01-25
  • Accepted:2025-03-03
Affiliations
    aSecond Affiliated Hospital, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116000, China
    bDalian Key Laboratory of Metabolic Target Characterization and Traditional Chinese Medicine Intervention, College (Institute) of Integrative Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
    cCollege of Pharmacy, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
    dAdvanced Institute for Medical Sciences, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China

Corresponding:

* Corresponding authors.
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/apsb/EN/10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.048
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT