收藏切换
The ubiquitin–proteasome system: A potential target for the MASLD
收藏切换
PDF
Yue Liua, Meijia Qiana, b, Yonghao Lia, Xin Dongc, Yulian Wuc, Tao Yuana, Jian Mad, Bo Yanga, e, Hong Zhua, f, g, *, Qiaojun Hea, c, *
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(3) : 1268 - 1280
Less
收藏切换
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B | 2025, 15(3): 1268-1280
REVIEW
The ubiquitin–proteasome system: A potential target for the MASLD
Full
Yue Liua, Meijia Qiana, b, Yonghao Lia, Xin Dongc, Yulian Wuc, Tao Yuana, Jian Mad, Bo Yanga, e, Hong Zhua, f, g, *, Qiaojun Hea, c, *
Affiliations
  • aInstitute of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • bHangzhou Zhongmei Huadong Pharmaceut Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310011, China
  • cSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
  • dCenter for Drug Safety Evaluation and Research, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • eSchool of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China
  • fEngineering Research Center of Innovative Anticancer Drugs, Ministry of Education, Hangzhou 310058, China
  • gInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
About Author:

E-mail addresses: (Hong Zhu)

(Qiaojun He).

Author contributions

Yue Liu: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Conceptualization. Meijia Qian: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Investigation. Yonghao Li: Investigation. Xin Dong: Investigation. Yulian Wu: Writing – review & editing. Tao Yuan: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Jian Ma: Investigation. Bo Yang: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Hong Zhu: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Qiaojun He: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.01.010
Outline
收藏切换

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), the most prevalent chronic liver condition globally, lacks adequate and effective therapeutic remedies in clinical practice. Recent studies have increasingly highlighted the close connection between the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) and the progression of MASLD. This relationship is crucial for understanding the disease's underlying mechanism. As a sophisticated process, the UPS govern protein stability and function, maintaining protein homeostasis, thus influencing a multitude of elements and biological events of eukaryotic cells. It comprises four enzyme families, namely, ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2), ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3), and deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs). This review aims to delve into the array of pathways and therapeutic targets implicated in the ubiquitination within the pathogenesis of MASLD. Therefore, this review unveils the role of ubiquitination in MASLD while spotlighting potential therapeutic targets within the context of this disease.

MASLD  /  Ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS)  /  Ubiquitination  /  E3 ubiquitin ligase  /  Deubiquitinase (DUB)  /  SUMOylation  /  Neddylation  /  Therapeutic targets
Yue Liu, Meijia Qian, Yonghao Li, Xin Dong, Yulian Wu, Tao Yuan, Jian Ma, Bo Yang, Hong Zhu, Qiaojun He. The ubiquitin–proteasome system: A potential target for the MASLD[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, 2025 , 15 (3) : 1268 -1280 . DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.01.010
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is recognized as the predominant chronic liver condition globally, affecting approximately 38% of the population1,2. To reflect the pathology and etiology of these conditions more accurately, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) was put forward to replace the term NAFLD, defined by the cases with hepatic steatosis and at least one—and only one—of the five cardiometabolic risk factors3. MASLD encompasses a spectrum of liver diseases, including simple steatosis (NAFL) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (MASH), and MASLD is commonly associated with metabolic disorders including obesity, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome4,5. Given the complex pathogenesis of MASLD, substantial effort has been put into exploring novel therapeutic targets. Presently, the most promising targets include cellular mechanisms of death and metabolism, inflammatory processes, interaction between intestine and liver, and direct inhibition of fibroblast activation and extracellular matrix deposition6. Despite these efforts, limited therapeutic agents have been officially approved for MASLD treatment.
Accumulating evidence suggested that the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays a pivotal role in MASLD pathogenesis, serving as the primary mechanism for protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. It influences various cellular processes including DNA repair, stress response, and cell proliferation7. The system consists of ubiquitin, the 26S proteasome, and several enzymes such as E1, E2, E3, and deubiquitinases. The ubiquitin binding to the substrate is carried out through a multi-step cascade composed of E1, E2, and E3 enzymes. The UPS operates through a sequence of steps beginning with the attachment of ubiquitin's carboxyl group to the sulfhydryl group of the ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1), forming a thioester bond. This activated ubiquitin is then transferred to ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), and subsequently, ubiquitin ligase enzymes (E3s) collaborate with charged E2s to attach the ubiquitin to the substrate. The ubiquitinated substrates are eventually recognized by proteasomes and finally decomposed into short peptides or amino acids under the catalysis of proteases8-10. In addition, SUMOylation and NEDDylation modifications are two common ubiquitin-like modifications that generally affect protein function or stability and also play a regulatory role in MASLD progression (Fig. 1). As UPS plays a crucial role in the progression of chronic liver disease by regulating protein degradation, it may serve as a potential targeted therapeutic strategy for MASLD11,12 (Fig. 2).
Since E3 ligases are responsible for binding to substrates and determining the specificity of the ubiquitin system, there are a large number of E3 ligases in different organisms, but only a few E1 and E2 enzymes13,14. Based on their structure and function, E3 ligases can be classified into several types: Ring finger type, Homologous to E6AP C-terminus (HECT), and RING-between-RING (RBR) type (Table 1)14. Evidence suggests that the abnormal expression of E3 enzymes is associated to the pathogenesis of MASLD (Table 215-40).
The Ring finger type represents the most common form of ubiquitin ligase, characterized by a RING or U-box domain that facilitates the transfer of activated ubiquitin from the E2 enzyme to the substrate protein without directly binding to ubiquitin molecules41. The members of the tripartite motif (TRIM) and the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor (TRAF) family subfamilies are important members of the RING E3 family and there is ample evidence indicating that the two subfamilies, as well as other members, play significant roles in regulating the pathogenesis of MASLD.
TRIM family are distinguished by an N-terminal tripartite RBCC motif that includes one or two BBox domains, a coiled-coil (CC) domain, and a RING-finger domain. The human genome encodes over 70 TRIM family members in humans, which are categorized into 11 subgroups based on their domain architecture42.
TRIM16 has been shown to reduce lipid accumulation and inflammation in a MASH mouse model by degrading phosphorylated transforming growth factor-β activated kinase 1 (TAK1) and activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway15. Moreover, separate studies have demonstrated that TRIM31 reduces MASLD by promoting the proteasomal degradation of rhomboid 5 homolog 2 (RHBDF2) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7 (MAP3K7)16,17.
TRIM28 and TRIM37 are also noted for their protective effects in experimental MASH. Knockout of TRIM37 in mice results in mulibrey nanism, characterized by prenatal-onset growth failure, an increased risk for tumors, fatty liver, and type 2 diabetes19. Liver-specific KRAB-associated protein 1 (KAP1, also known as TRIM28), leads to sexually dimorphic phenotypic fatty acid synthase (FASN) shown that sorting nexin 8 (SNX8) could recruit TRIM28 to promote the ubiquitination and degradation of FASN, the rate-limiting enzyme in fatty acid synthesis18. Additionally, depletion of TRIM38 in mice exacerbates liver inflammation and fibrosis induced by a high-fat and high-cholesterol diet. Mechanistically, TRIM38 enhances the ubiquitination and degradation of transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 binding protein 2 (TAB2) and suppresses the MAPK signaling cascades20. TRIM26 also plays a role in preventing the progression of steatohepatitis by inhibiting the activation of C/EBPδ signaling21.
Conversely, there are also several studies showing that TRIM family members exacerbate the progression of MASLD. Specifically, TRIM67 protein levels are elevated in obese conditions, which enhances inflammation and facilitates the development of MASLD. This effect is linked to interactions with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma coactivator (PGC)-1alpha, a transcription coactivator crucial for regulating metabolic processes30. Additionally, TRIM59 has been shown to induce both ferroptosis and steatosis by interacting with glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and promoting its ubiquitination, highlighting a novel mechanism by which TRIM59 contributes to MASLD pathology31. Moreover, TRIM72 plays a pivotal role in insulin resistance, a key component of metabolic syndrome associated with MASLD. It mediates insulin resistance by accelerating the degradation of insulin receptor substrates (IRS and IRS1) in cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues, with its expression markedly increased in these conditions. Intriguingly, physical exercise has been found to enhance muscle insulin sensitivity through the TRIM72/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, offering a potential therapeutic avenue22.
The TRAF family includes seven characterized members, six of which, with the exception of TRAF1, possess a RING finger domain enabling their function as ubiquitin ligases. Notably, several TRAF family members have been implicated in the pathogenesis of MASLD, through their E3 ligase activities or involvement in inflammatory signaling pathways.
TRAF2 is instrumental in the activation of several downstream pathways, including the canonical and noncanonical nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) cascades. A study has shown that TRAF2 depletion in hepatocytes inhibits glucagon-mediated liver gluconeogenesis in high-fat diet (HFD) mice, although it does not affect insulin sensitivity43. This suggests that hepatic TRAF2 acts as a positive regulator of glucagon signaling and hepatic gluconeogenesis in states of overnutrition. Conversely, TRAF3 in hepatocytes enhances the activation of TAK1 through increased ubiquitination and phosphorylation, promoting liver steatosis and insulin resistance32. TRAF6 meanwhile, mediates Lys6-associated polyubiquitination of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1), activating ASK1 and facilitating the progression of MASH33. In contrast, TRAF5 serves as a negative regulator of hepatic steatosis and suppresses JNK1 activity, demonstrating its protective role against hepatic lipid accumulation23.
Ring finger protein 13 (RNF13) interacted with the stimulator of interferon genes protein (STING) and facilitated its proteasomal degradation, eventually inhibiting liver lipid accumulation24. Makorin ring finger protein 1 (MKRN1) promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and then promotes MASLD, insulin resistance, and obesity associated with HFD34. Grail regulates the lipid accumulation in hepatic steatosis via interacting with sirtuin type 1 (Sirt1)35. SH3 domain containing ring finger 2 (SH3RF2) can promote K48 ubiquitination modification of ATP citrate lyase and promote its ubiquitin-dependent degradation. Hepatocyte SH3RF2 deficiency would aggravate MASLD25. Both HMG-CoA reductase degradation 1 (HRD1) and RNF5 were endoplasmic reticulum localized in cells. HRD1 down-regulates the protein level of ATP citrate lyase (ACLY), a key enzyme regulating lipogenesis, thus alleviating MASLD in db/db mice27. RNF5 directly binds to HRD1 and promotes its K48 and K33-linked ubiquitination, then diminishes the palmitic acid and oleic acid (PAOA) lipid deposition26. Autocrine motility factor receptor (AMFR, also known as Gp78), a member of RING-H2 E3 ubiquitin ligases, has a Ring figure domain, CUE motif, and E2 binding site44. Studies have shown that Gp78 plays a protective role in MASLD and knockout of Gp78 up-regulates unfolded protein response and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP-1) to increase lipid accumulation28. Studies have shown that nutriment could affect the activity of certain E3 ubiquitin ligases, thus affecting the progression of MASLD. Leucine and isoleucine bind to ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component N-recognin 1 (UBR1) and induce its activation, and UBR1 promotes the degradation of perilipin 2 (PLIN2) to ameliorate hepatic steatosis29.
SCF (SKP1-CUL1-F-box protein) E3 ubiquitin ligase is the largest family of ubiquitin ligases. Among its members, F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 (FBXW7) and F-box and WD repeat domain containing 5 (FBXW5) have shown substantial relevance to MASLD. The role of FBXW7 in lipid metabolism remains ambiguous; however, its function in MASLD has garnered considerable attention due to its regulatory impact on several metabolic transcription factors, including SREBP1/2, the nuclear receptors nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D member 2 (REV-ERBα, also known as NR1D1), estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRα, also known as NR3B1), and the co-regulator proteins nuclear receptor coactivator 3 (NCOA3) and PGC-1α45-47. A recent study indicates that decreased expression of FBXW7 is a feature of advanced MASH; as FBXW7 regulates the transcription activity of the nutrient-sensing nuclear receptors peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) and ERRα, thus promoting the progress of MASH37. Additionally, FBXW7 ameliorates hepatic inflammation and insulin resistance by diminishing high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)-mediated innate immune signaling38. On the other hand, FBXW5 exacerbates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by facilitating the addition of Lys63-linked ubiquitin to ASK1, suggesting that drug candidates mimicking FBXW5(S1) or FBXW5(S3) might be viable therapeutic approaches for MASH36. Furthermore, CUL4B-DDB1 also plays a role in the development of MASLD. The pancreatic progenitor cell differentiation and proliferation factor (PPDPF) impedes the interaction between Raptor and its E3 ligase CUL4B-DDB1, thereby inhibiting the ubiquitination and activation of Raptor, which results in suppression of the mTORC1–S6K–SREBP1 signaling pathway48.
HECT E3s are classified into 3 groups: the Nedd4 family, the HERC family and others14. Within the NEDD4 family, smad ubiquitin regulatory factor 1 (SMURF1) promotes K63-linked polyubiquitination of PPARγ, thereby inhibiting its transcriptional activity and reducing the lipid accumulation in the liver49. However, another study has shown that SMURF1 might aggravate lipid accumulation in the liver by stabilizing SREBP-1c in an E3 activity-independent in the late phases of MASLD40. This highlights the diverse regulatory roles that HECT E3 ligases play in hepatic lipid metabolism and provides insights into potential therapeutic targets for treating liver diseases.
Ubiquitination represents a reversible post-translational modification process, where DUBs catalyze the removal of ubiquitin moieties from target proteins or polyubiquitin chains. This results in modifications to the function or stability of these targeted proteins50. Based on sequence and domain conservation, seven structurally distinct DUB families have been proposed: the ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs), the ovarian-tumor proteases (OTUs), the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases (UCHs), Machado–Joseph disease protein domain proteases (MJDs), JAMM/MPN domain-associated metallopeptidases (JAMMs), motif interacting with ubiquitin-containing novel DUB family proteases (MINDYs) and zinc finger-containing ubiquitin peptidase 1 (ZUP1)50-52. Amongst them, several DUBs have been pinpointed as exerting vital roles in the regulation of cell cycle control, cell signaling, and apoptosis. Some DUBs have also been reported to be involved in the regulation of MASLD. In the sections that follow, we will outline these DUBs and present examples illustrating their roles in the onset and progression of MASLD (Table 353-70).
The USP class constitutes the majority of the DUBs, due to a rapid diversification during evolution, possibly in concert with the diversification of E3 ligases51. These proteases comprise three subdomains, analogized to the fingers, thumb and palm of a right hand. Most USPs contain a core catalytic domain with insertions and terminal extensions bearing additional protein interaction domains8,71.
Several studies have shown that USPs play a protective role in MASLD. For example, cylindromatosis-associated DUB (CYLD) functions as a pivotal suppressor in MASLD and relates to metabolic disorders53. Mechanistically, hepatocyte CYLD directly interacts with and deubiquitinates TAK1 and suppresses the downstream NF-κB and JNK cascades. Hepatic steatosis was ameliorated in Hepatocyte-specific CYLD transgenic mice but worsened in hepatocyte-specific CYLD-KO mice53. Moreover, USP4 and USP18 also deubiquitinate TAK1 and inhibit TAK1 activation54,56. In addition to this, USP4 also deubiquitinates and stabilizes PPARα. Oxidized fish oil (OFO) induced the decline of USP4 protein expression, promoting oxidative stress and inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and lipotoxicity55.
Inactive rhomboid protein 2 (IRHOM2) was a crucial and positive regulator of inflammation-associated diseases and hepatocyte USP13 interacted with IRHOM2 and removed its K63-linked ubiquitination in response to metabolic stresses. When USP13 is knocked out in hepatocytes, liver metabolic homeostasis is disrupted, leading to carbohydrate metabolism disorder, lipid deposition, increased inflammation, and eventually promoting MASH development57.
Likewise, USP10 has been reported to play a protective role in the pathogenesis of MASLD through multiple mechanisms58,72,73. USP10 manages hepatic steatosis by interacting with Sirt6, a negative regulator of inflammation and lipid metabolism, thereby removing its ubiquitin chain and ultimately preventing its degradation58. The other study has indicated that USP10 could promote autophagy flux and activate the mTOR/Beclin1 signaling pathways in MCDD-fed mice, reducing histological steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis. Moreover, the autophagy inhibitors, chloroquine or 3-methyladenine, could reduce the suppressive effects of USP10 against steatosis. Thus, USP10 also alleviated hepatic steatosis in an autophagy-dependent manner72,73
Several other members of the USP family have been found to promote MASLD development. Both USP2 and USP14 interacted with and stabilized FASN, an essential enzyme for the conversion of dietary carbohydrates to fatty acids62,74. Therefore, USP2 and USP14 are regarded to contribute to MASLD progression. USP20 stabilizes HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR), the rate-limiting enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway, and USP20 was phosphorylated by mTORC1 at S132 and S13463. Genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of USP20 markedly decreased body weight, reduced lipid deposition in the liver, and improved insulin sensitivity63. USP15 deubiquitinates and stabilizes fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) and perilipins. FABPs are involved in the uptake of long-chain fatty acids and further metabolism, while perilipins are associated with the surface of lipid droplets and control lipid accumulation and inflammation64. Therefore, USP15 exerts both pro-inflammatory and pro-lipid accumulation functions in MASLD, indicating its potential as a target for MASLD treatment. Furthermore, Usp19-null mice displayed increased glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity with HFD fed5. This suggests therapeutic potential of USP19 for MASLD treatment. USP11 promoted kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) instability by deubiquitinating KLF4. Studies have shown that KLF4 level was down-regulated and USP11 level was up-regulated in free fatty acid (FFA)-treated cells. USP11 enhanced hepatic steatosis through KLF4 inhibition65.
The effect of USP22 on MASLD has been found to be contradictory66,67. High expression of USP22 has been associated with abnormal lipid metabolism, promoting lipid accumulation and tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells. This is thought to be due to USP22's role in increasing acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) and ACLY expression via the deubiquitination and stabilization of PPARγ67. However, a different study has shown that USP22 could reduce lipid accumulation in the liver by modifying mitochondrial respiration in the late phases of MASLD66. The Gα12-signaling pathway regulating SIRT1and PPARα appears to be responsible for these effects, as it stabilizes SIRT1 protein via the transcriptional induction of USP22 through increased hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha (HIF-1α)66. Further studies were required to elucidate the different mechanisms of USP22 on lipid synthesis.
Another important member of USPs, USP7, is also found to demonstrate the dual roles in MASLD. Under hypoxic conditions, PARP1-mediated poly ADP-ribosylation (PARylation) of HIF-1α is increased by spindle and kinetochore-associated complex subunit 3 (SKA3), leading to a greater association between HIF-1α and USP7 and hence preventing the degradation of HIF-1α and promoting fatty acid synthesis75. However, this work was studied for cholangiocarcinoma, and whether the findings are consistent in liver tissue still remains unknown. Zinc finger protein 638 (ZNF638) can increase the cleavage of SREBP1C, hence promoting de novo lipogenesis (DNL). USP7 was found to not only interact with and deubiquitylate ZNF638, but also to support the transcription of ZNF638 via the stabilization of cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB)68. USP7 inhibitor significantly inhibited lipid accumulation in fructose-induced hepatic steatosis68. However, on the other hand, USP7 has been showing that could deubiquitinate IRS1 and prevent its proteasomal degradation. Deleting phosphate inorganic transporter 1 (PiT1/SLC20A1) inhibited the disassociation of USP7/IRS1 upon insulin stimulation. Hepatocyte-specific Pit1-KO protects against obesity induced by a high-fat diet69. This study suggests that USP7 may inhibit the development of MASLD. Also, it was shown that USP7 suppressed the forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) transcriptional activity and negatively regulated SIRT7 deacetylase activity, thereby attenuating hepatic gluconeogenesis70,76. Further studies are required to elucidate these various, and at times contradicting actions of USP22 and USP7 on lipid synthesis and MASLD.
OTUs are a type of deubiquitinase enzyme family comprising 16 members. OTU deubiquitinase 3 (OTUD3) regulated a series of genes involved in glucose and lipid metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation by stabilizing PPARδ. It has been found that OTUD3 knockout mice are predisposed to obesity and metabolic diseases59. As for ovarian tumor associated proteinase B1 (OTUB1), the first identified member of OTUs, it has been found to play a suppressive role in MASH. This is thought to occur through its capacity to deubiquitinate TRAF6 thereby inhibiting the TRAF6-mediated ASK1 activation33. As such, targeting the OTUB1–TRAF6–ASK1 axis could be a promising therapeutic approach for MASH33. Another member of the OTUs family, tumor necrosis factor-α induced protein (TNFAIP, also known as A20), has been recognized to be a potent anti-inflammatory molecule that inhibits ASK1's polyubiquitination in hepatocytes, thus preventing the onset and progression of MASH60. OTU deubiquitinase with linear linkage specificity (OTULIN) was a deubiquitinase involved in the regulation of inflammation, a deficiency of OTULIN in liver parenchymal cells causes steatohepatitis in mice61. Further research is required to explore the roles played by the OTUs family in MASLD. Already numerous members have been identified to be involved in inflammatory processes77, yet much remains to be uncovered.
The small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) family is a newly discovered ubiquitin-like molecule78. Currently, at least six SUMO isoforms have been found, including SUMO1, SUMO2, SUMO3, SUMO4, SUMO5 and the newly discovered SUMO7. Among them, SUMO2 and SUMO3 have high homology, and they are often referred to as SUMO-2/3. SUMO2/3 and SUMO1 share only 45% homology. SUMO modification of proteins is very similar to ubiquitination modification, involving a total of three enzymatic reactions: The C-terminal of SUMO is activated ATP-dependent by the E1 activating enzyme (including SEA1 and SEA2) and subsequently transferred to the E2 binding enzyme UBC9 to form E2-SUMO thioester, which is eventually recruited by the SUMO E3 ligase to form complexes with substrates to increase specificity. However, the E2 enzyme also has the function of recognizing substrates in the absence of E3 ligase. SUMO/sentrin-specific proteases (SENPs) can catalyze the removal of SUMO from the target protein linked to SUMO and some members of this family also participate in the maturation and activation process of SUMO.
SUMOylation is a reversible post-translational modification, as a series of proteases can remove SUMO terminal glycine from the lysine residues of the target protein. These proteases can be classified into three families based on their different subcellular localizations and substrates. The first family includes SENP1 and SENP2, which act on all members of the SUMO family. The second family comprises SENP3 and SENP5, which exert more powerful regulation on SUMO2/3. Furthermore, SENP6 and SENP7 have a similar substrate bias to SENP3 and SENP5. Several studies have reported that the SENP family plays a vital role in the progression of MASLD (Table 479-81,83-86,89,90,93,94).
Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) is implicated in cell death and inflammation in the progression of MASH. SENP1 catalyzes the deSUMOylation of RIPK1, which inhibits its activation79. SENP1 is significantly down-regulated in the livers with MASLD or MASH; and liver specific knockout of SENP1 mice will spontaneously form MASH-related phenotypes including liver inflammation, lipid accumulation, liver damage, and fibrosis79. Mechanistically, in SENP1-deficient cells, RIPK1 is SUMOylated by protein inhibitor of activated STAT 1 (PIAS1) which alters its ubiquitination and promotes its activation. Additionally, SENP1 can de-SUMOylate Sharp-1, a repressor for PPARγ transcription and adipogenesis, thereby promoting adipocyte differentiation and enhancing adipogenesis80. SENP2 and lipid metabolism have been well reported. SENP2 was the most significantly increased SENP in HFD-induced fatty liver and SENP2 deficiency in the liver protects against HFD-induced metabolic disorders and hepatic steatosis81. Further research revealed that hepatic SENP2 governed the homeostasis of both liver and adipose tissues, implicating SENP2 in the regulatory cross-talk between these two metabolic tissues. SENP2 induces de-SUMOylation of PPARα which promotes its ubiquitylation and subsequent degradation, causing a significant downregulation of FGF21. SENP2 also exerts control over adipogenesis and adipose lipid storage in different manners81. Similarly, SENP3 was predominantly up-regulated in MASLD patients and HFD fed rats. Up-regulated lipid accumulation with FFA treatment was markedly ameliorated with SENP3-siRNA transfection and this conclusion should be further verified in animal models82.
Compromised SUMOylation of liver receptor homolog-1 (LRH-1) induced the expression of oxysterol binding protein-like 3 (OSBPL3), thus enhancing SREBP1 procession and promoting the development of MASLD83. In another case, SUMO2 modification of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) at K277 increased the interaction with NF-κB and decreased the binding of retinoid X receptor alpha (RXRα). FXR modified by SUMO2 repressed NF-κB target inflammatory genes but it didn't affect the FXR/RXRα target genes. In diet-induced obese mice, FXR was highly acetylated and inhibited SUMO2 modification, leading to the transactivation of inflammatory genes84. SUMO E3 ligase PIASy induced SREBP1c SUMOylation and increased its proteasome degradation, ultimately leading to a reduction in hepatic lipogenesis when fasting or nutritional deprivation85. Prospero homeobox 1 (PROX1), a key transcriptional regulator of lipid metabolism, is SUMOylated on lysine residue 556, thus affecting its ability to regulate cholesterol metabolism transcription. The hepatocyte-selective loss of SUMOylation on PROX1 reduces systemic cholesterol levels86.
Neddylation is a reversible post-translational modification process that involves attaching the ubiquitin-like protein, NEDD8, to a target protein. This process is catalyzed by a cascade of NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE), NEDD8 binding enzyme (UBE2M/UBC12 or UBE2F), and NEDD8 ligase87,88. Studies have found that serum NEDD8 levels were positively associated with the severity of MASLD in patients and pre-clinical mouse models. And MLN4924, a neddylation inhibitor, could boost fatty acid oxidation and reduce hepatic steatosis in pre-clinical mouse models. This suggested that neddylation is an effective intervention for MASLD89-91. Cullin-associated and neddylation-dissociated protein 1 (CAND1) also alleviated MASLD by reducing ubiquitinated degradation of acetyl-CoA acyltransferase 2 (ACAA2)92. Neddylation of multiple substrate proteins has been reported to influence disease progression in MASLD, such as serine-rich splicing factor 3 (SRSF3), SREBP1c and DEP-domain containing mTOR-interacting protein (DEPTOR). For instance, the neddylation of SRSF3 was found to be crucial for its proteasomal degradation, and inhibition of SRSF3 neddylation could inhibit the MASH progression93. Neddylation inhibition increased DEPTOR content and repressed the mTOR signaling, which resulted in enhanced fatty acid oxidation and reduced liver lipid accumulation89. Additionally, inhibition of Cullin neddylation was found to reduce IRS degradation, thereby enhancing hepatic insulin signaling and reducing hepatic glucose production94. And neddylation of SREBP1c has been reported to compete with ubiquitination, thereby stabilizing its protein level and promoting hepatic steatosis90. Existing evidence suggests that inhibition of neddylation is a potential treatment strategy for MASLD and this highlights the need for further research to fully elucidate the complex roles of neddylation in the pathogenesis and progression of MASLD (Table 4).
Inhibitors targeting the UPS have shown promising potential in the context of MASLD. There are two main mechanisms of action of these inhibitors: (1) targeting enzymes in the UPS system that function in MASLD and (2) promoting or inhibiting the proteasome degradation of specific proteins that either promote or inhibit the disease (Table 536,68,90,91,96-101). The N-terminus (S1) and C-terminus (S3) of FBXW5 respectively and competitively ablate the function of FBXW5, activating ASK1 and thus blocking ASK1-c-Jun/P38 MAPK signaling36. P22077, a selective USP7 inhibitor, inhibited pathological hepatic de novo lipogenesis by disturbing the USP7/ZNF638 axis68. USP1 inhibitor ML323 prevented adipogenesis and lipid accumulation by decreasing C/EBPβ protein stability and increasing its ubiquitination95. The regulatory particle non-ATPase 11 (RPN11) inhibitor capzimin inhibited the RPN11–METTL3–ACSS3 axis and downregulated lipid-related genes96. Neddylation inhibitor MLN4924 and SUMOylation inhibitor SP have also shown potential in inhibiting MASLD progression90,91,97. MLN4924 reduces excess lipid storage by stimulating fatty acid oxidation and lipid metabolites in liver mitochondria. SUMOylation inhibitors restore FXR signaling, and coadministration with FXR agonists drastically impeded MASH-induced fibrosis. 4-Azidophlorizin promoted the ubiquitin proteasome degradation of geranylgeranyl diphosphatesynthase (GGPPS), thus alleviating hepatic steatosis98. Similarly, thiolutin (THL), an inhibitor of the JAB1/MPN/Mov34 (JAMM) domain, could potently inhibit NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) deubiquitination and inflammasome activation in the model of diet-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease99. Corylinan, an HSP90β-selective inhibitor, inhibited de novo lipid synthesis by promoting mSREBPs ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation100. And PROTACI-d promoted the degradation of Keap1 to alleviate oxidative stress and MASLD101.
Ubiquitination modification of the P38 MAPK signal pathway has been extensively reported in MASLD (Fig. 3). P38 MAPK participates in the progression of MASLD. Oxidative stress and inflammation activate the hepatic P38 MAPK signal pathway, leading to insulin resistance and impairs lipid metabolism102. Both ASK1 and TAK1 are significant upstream kinases of P38 MAPK and their activity is largely regulated by ubiquitination. The activity of ASK1 is negatively regulated by deubiquitinases OTUB1 and TNFAIP3 while E3 ligases FBXW5 and TRAF6 promote ASK1 activation. Analogously, DUBs CYLD, USP14 and USP18 inactive TAK1 while E3 ligase TRAF3 actives TAK. Therefore, considering using the P38 MAPK signaling pathway as the therapeutic target for MASLD, inhibition of associated E3 ligase may be an effective strategy while the DUBs involved play a protective role in MASLD.
Additionally, the role of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications as either protective mechanisms or contributors to disease progression remains ambiguous due to the complexities of these post-translational modifications. Enzymes like FBXW7, Smurf1, USP7, and USP22 have been reported to have differing impacts on disease advancement within different contexts. This inconsistency is largely due to variations in the substrate proteins these enzymes interact with. For instance, USP22's contradictory role in MASLD progression is mainly due to the difference in the substrate: when interacting with PPARγ, it promotes disease progression, but when in connection with Sirt1, it has an inhibitory effect. In addition to this, tissue-specific expression of proteins contributes to the functional disparities.
The UPS systems members participating in MASLD development mentioned above were mostly researched in liver parenchymal cells. Only a few studies have shown that UPS systems play a role in regulating MASLD in other cell types, such as macrophages and adipose tissue. STIP1 homology and U-Box containing protein 1 (STUB1) in adipocytes promoted the degradation of nuclear receptor subfamily 2 group F member 2 (NR2F2) and the transcription of adiponectin (APN), thus alleviating liver steatosis and hepatic stellate cells activation103. USP19 also modulated adipogenesis and potentiated high-fat-diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance104. Macrophage USP2A significantly improved insulin sensitivity and prevented age- and/or adiposity-related chronic inflammation, although the mechanism is unclear105. Undeniably, macrophages, adipose tissue and hepatic stellate cells play an important role in the pathological process of MASLD, but the function of the USP system in these scenarios remains unclear. Therefore, the multi-omics approach is essential to fully elucidate the functions of ubiquitination and ubiquitin-like modifications in MASLD, these techniques can reveal new significant proteins that regulate disease progression and shed more light on the ubiquitination system's role in MASLD.
Along with the insight into the role of the ubiquitination system in various stages of liver disease has become a growing point of interest, increasing studies have found that the same protein plays opposite functions in different stages of liver disease. USP10 protects the liver from MASLD but promotes metastasis of HCC in advanced stages of the disease58,106. As MASLD is a progressive disease that will eventually progress to HCC, it seems contradictory to play different pathological roles in MASLD and HCC. The underlying reasons may be attributed to the complex pathogenesis of HCC and the substrate selectivity of E3 ligase and DUB under different pathological conditions, and this suggests that elucidating the role of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications in hepatic diseases remains challenging.
In this review, we proposed that ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifications play a crucial role in liver lipid metabolism and glucose metabolism and are deregulated significantly under pathological. We also summarized the expression levels of UPS-related proteins in MASLD patients compared to healthy controls (Fig. 4). Given that the regulators of these processes are mostly enzymes, which are more accessible to be targeted by small molecules with high specificity, targeting ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modification processes may be an effective therapeutic strategy for MASLD. However, several scientific challenges remain in the development of drugs targeting ubiquitin signaling for MASLD. First, the selectivity of these inhibitors remains to be improved, hampering their clinical application. Additionally, research is needed to accurately target the liver to avoid organ toxicity, as the tissue distribution of the target proteins lacks specificity. Furthermore, identifying appropriate biomarkers is critical to determine suitable application scenarios for these inhibitors. Considering that the liver is a key organ for metabolism and that this process heavily relies on mitochondria for energy, enhancing mitochondrial function presents an effective strategy for treating liver diseases. This underscores the importance and feasibility of targeting organelles. Moreover, the endoplasmic reticulum is an essential site for protein synthesis and the clearance of misfolded proteins, playing a crucial role in maintaining protein homeostasis. Therefore, focusing on protein homeostasis within the endoplasmic reticulum could provide more effective targeting strategies for the treatment of MASLD.
1.
Wong VW, Ekstedt M, Wong GL, Hagström H. Changing epidemiology, global trends and implications for outcomes of NAFLD. J Hepatol 2023;79:842—52.
2.
Zhu Y, Liu H, Zhang M, Guo GL. Fatty liver diseases, bile acids, and FXR. Acta Pharm Sin B 2016;6:409—12.
3.
Marchesini G, Vettor R, Pinzani M. MASLD emerging from the fog of fatty liver. J Hepatol 2024;80:178—80.
4.
Safari Z, Gérard P. The links between the gut microbiome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Cell Mol Life Sci 2019;76:1541—58.
5.
Coyne ES, Bédard N, Gong YJ, Faraj M, Tchernof A, Wing SS. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP19 modulates adipogenesis and potentiates high-fat-diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance in mice. Diabetologia 2019;62:136—46.
6.
Reimer KC, Wree A, Roderburg C, Tacke F. New drugs for NAFLD: lessons from basic models to the clinic. Hepatol Int 2020;14:8—23.
7.
Park J, Cho J, Song EJ. Ubiquitin—proteasome system (UPS) as a target for anticancer treatment. Arch Pharm Res (Seoul) 2020;43:1144—61.
8.
Yuan T, Yan F, Ying M, Cao J, He Q, Zhu H, et al. Inhibition of ubiquitin-specific proteases as a novel anticancer therapeutic strategy. Front Pharmacol 2018;9:1080.
9.
Eldridge AG, O’Brien T. Therapeutic strategies within the ubiquitin proteasome system. Cell Death Differ 2010;17:4—13.
10.
Jiang Y, Ni S, Xiao B, Jia L. Function, mechanism and drug discovery of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modification with multiomics profiling for cancer therapy. Acta Pharm Sin B 2023;13:4341—72.
11.
Park JS, Ma H, Roh YS. Ubiquitin pathways regulate the pathogenesis of chronic liver disease. Biochem Pharmacol 2021;193:114764.
12.
Xia SW, Wang ZM, Sun SM, Su Y, Li ZH, Shao JJ, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and protein degradation in chronic liver disease. Pharmacol Res 2020;161:105218.
13.
Yang Q, Zhao J, Chen D, Wang Y. E3 ubiquitin ligases: styles, structures and functions. Mol Biomed 2021;2:23.
14.
Rotin D, Kumar S. Physiological functions of the HECT family of ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009;10:398—409.
15.
Wang L, Zhang X, Lin ZB, Yang PJ, Xu H, Duan JL, et al. Tripartite motif 16 ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by promoting the degradation of phospho-TAK1. Cell Metab 2021;33:1372-88.e7.
16.
Xu MX, Tan J, Ge CX, Dong W, Zhang LT, Zhu LC, et al. Tripartite motif-containing protein 31 confers protection against nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by deactivating mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2023;77:124—43.
17.
Xu M, Tan J, Dong W, Zou B, Teng X, Zhu L, et al. The E3 ubiquitin—protein ligase Trim31 alleviates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by targeting Rhbdf2 in mouse hepatocytes. Nat Commun 2022;13:1052.
18.
Hu Y, He W, Huang Y, Xiang H, Guo J, Che Y, et al. Fatty acid synthase-suppressor screening identifies sorting Nexin 8 as a therapeutic target for NAFLD. Hepatology 2021;74:2508—25.
19.
Kettunen KM, Karikoski R, Hämäläinen RH, Toivonen TT, Antonenkov VD, Kulesskaya N, et al. Trim37-deficient mice recapitulate several features of the multi-organ disorder Mulibrey nanism. Biol Open 2016;5:584—95.
20.
Yao X, Dong R, Hu S, Liu Z, Cui J, Hu F, et al. Tripartite motif 38 alleviates the pathological process of NAFLD—NASH by promoting TAB2 degradation. J Lipid Res 2023;64:100382.
21.
Xu M, Tan J, Liu X, Han L, Ge C, Zhang Y, et al. Tripartite motif containing 26 prevents steatohepatitis progression by suppressing C/EBPδ signalling activation. Nat Commun 2023;14:6384.
22.
Yu Q, Xia Z, Liong EC, Tipoe GL. Chronic aerobic exercise improves insulin sensitivity and modulates Nrf2 and NF-κB/IκBα pathways in the skeletal muscle of rats fed with a high fat diet. Mol Med Rep 2019;20:4963—72.
23.
Gao L, Wang PX, Zhang Y, Yu CJ, Ji Y, Wang X, et al. Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 5 (Traf5) acts as an essential negative regulator of hepatic steatosis. J Hepatol 2016;65:125—36.
24.
Lin Z, Yang P, Hu Y, Xu H, Duan J, He F, et al. RING finger protein 13 protects against nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by targeting STING-relayed signaling pathways. Nat Commun 2023;14:6635.
25.
Yang X, Sun D, Xiang H, Wang S, Huang Y, Li L, et al. Hepatocyte SH3RF2 deficiency is a key aggravator for NAFLD. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2021;74:1319—38.
26.
Yang Q, Chen X, Zhang Y, Hu S, Hu F, Huang Y, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase ring finger protein 5 ameliorates NASH through ubiquitin-mediated degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase degradation protein 1. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2021;74:3018—36.
27.
Li K, Zhang K, Wang H, Wu Y, Chen N, Chen J, et al. Hrd1-mediated ACLY ubiquitination alleviate NAFLD in db/db mice. Metabolism 2021;114:154349.
28.
Zhang T, Kho DH, Wang Y, Harazono Y, Nakajima K, Xie Y, et al. Gp78, an E3 ubiquitin ligase acts as a gatekeeper suppressing nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and liver cancer. PLoS One 2015;10:e0118448.
29.
Zhang Y, Lin S, Peng J, Liang X, Yang Q, Bai X, et al. Amelioration of hepatic steatosis by dietary essential amino acid-induced ubiquitination. Mol Cell 2022;82:1528-42.e10.
30.
Huang C, Wei X, Luo Q, Xia Y, Pan T, He J, et al. Loss of TRIM67 attenuates the progress of obesity-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:7475.
31.
Zhang J, Xie H, Yao J, Jin W, Pan H, Pan Z, et al. TRIM59 promotes steatosis and ferroptosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease via enhancing GPX4 ubiquitination. Hum Cell 2023;36:209—22.
32.
Chen Z, Canet MJ, Sheng L, Jiang L, Xiong Y, Yin L, et al. Hepatocyte TRAF3 promotes insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes in mice with obesity. Mol Metab 2015;4:951—60.
33.
Zhang JL, Du BB, Zhang DH, Li H, Kong LY, Fan GJ, et al. OTUB1 alleviates NASH through inhibition of the TRAF6—ASK1 signaling pathways. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2022;75:1218—34.
34.
Lee MS, Han HJ, Han SY, Kim IY, Chae S, Lee CS, et al. Loss of the E3 ubiquitin ligase MKRN1 represses diet-induced metabolic syndrome through AMPK activation. Nat Commun 2018;9:3404.
35.
Liu PY, Chen CC, Chin CY, Liu TJ, Tsai WC, Chou JL, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase Grail promotes hepatic steatosis through Sirt1 inhibition. Cell Death Dis 2021;12:323.
36.
Bai L, Chen MM, Chen ZD, Zhang P, Tian S, Zhang Y, et al. F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 5 mediates the ubiquitination of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 and exacerbates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2019;70:1942—57.
37.
Xia H, Dufour CR, Medkour Y, Scholtes C, Chen Y, Guluzian C, et al. Hepatocyte FBXW7-dependent activity of nutrient-sensing nuclear receptors controls systemic energy homeostasis and NASH progression in male mice. Nat Commun 2023;14:6982.
38.
Zhang C, Chen F, Feng L, Shan Q, Zheng GH, Wang YJ, et al. FBXW7 suppresses HMGB1-mediated innate immune signaling to attenuate hepatic inflammation and insulin resistance in a mouse model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol Med 2019;25:29.
39.
Zhu K, Tang Y, Xu X, Dang H, Tang LY, Wang X, et al. Non-proteolytic ubiquitin modification of PPARγ by Smurf1 protects the liver from steatosis. PLoS Biol 2018;16:e3000091.
40.
Zhang X, Zhan Y, Lin W, Zhao F, Guo C, Chen Y, et al. Smurf1 aggravates non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by stabilizing SREBP-1c in an E3 activity-independent manner. FASEB J 2020;34:7631—43.
41.
Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 2009;78:399—434.
42.
Hatakeyama S. TRIM proteins and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2011;11:792—804.
43.
Chen Z, Sheng L, Shen H, Zhao Y, Wang S, Brink R, et al. Hepatic TRAF2 regulates glucose metabolism through enhancing glucagon responses. Diabetes 2012;61:566—73.
44.
Joshi V, Upadhyay A, Kumar A, Mishra A. Gp78 E3 ubiquitin ligase: essential functions and contributions in proteostasis. Front Cell Neurosci 2017;11:259.
45.
Sundqvist A, Bengoechea-Alonso MT, Ye X, Lukiyanchuk V, Jin J, Harper JW, et al. Control of lipid metabolism by phosphorylation-dependent degradation of the SREBP family of transcription factors by SCF(Fbw7). Cell Metab 2005;1:379—91.
46.
Zhao X, Hirota T, Han X, Cho H, Chong LW, Lamia K, et al. Circadian amplitude regulation via FBXW7-targeted REV-ERBα degradation. Cell 2016;165:1644—57.
47.
Park JH, Kang HJ, Lee YK, Kang H, Kim J, Chung JH, et al. Inactivation of EWS reduces PGC-1α protein stability and mitochondrial homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:6074—9.
48.
Ma N, Wang YK, Xu S, Ni QZ, Zheng QW, Zhu B, et al. PPDPF alleviates hepatic steatosis through inhibition of mTOR signaling. Nat Commun 2021;12:3059.
49.
Zhu K, Tang Y, Xu X, Dang H, Tang LY, Wang X, et al. Non-proteolytic ubiquitin modification of PPARγ by Smurf1 protects the liver from steatosis. PLoS Biol 2018;16:e3000091.
50.
Mevissen TET, Komander D. Mechanisms of deubiquitinase specificity and regulation. Annu Rev Biochem 2017;86:159—92.
51.
D’Arcy P, Wang X, Linder S. Deubiquitinase inhibition as a cancer therapeutic strategy. Pharmacol Ther 2015;147:32—54.
52.
Lange SM, Armstrong LA, Kulathu Y. Deubiquitinases: from mechanisms to their inhibition by small molecules. Mol Cell 2022;82:15—29.
53.
Ji YX, Huang Z, Yang X, Wang X, Zhao LP, Wang PX, et al. The deubiquitinating enzyme cylindromatosis mitigates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat Med 2018;24:213—23.
54.
Zhao Y, Wang F, Gao L, Xu L, Tong R, Lin N, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 4 is an endogenous negative regulator of metabolic dysfunctions in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in mice. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2018;68:897—917.
55.
Zhang DG, Kunz WS, Lei XJ, Zito E, Zhao T, Xu YC, et al. Selenium ameliorated oxidized fish oil-induced lipotoxicity via the inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative stress, remodeling of Usp4-mediated deubiquitination and stabilization of Pparα. Antioxid Redox Signal 2024;40:433—52.
56.
An S, Zhao LP, Shen LJ, Wang S, Zhang K, Qi Y, et al. USP18 protects against hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance through its deubiquitinating activity. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2017;66:1866—84.
57.
Xu M, Tan J, Zhu L, Ge C, Dong W, Dai X, et al. The deubiquitinating enzyme 13 retards non-alcoholic steatohepatitis via blocking inactive rhomboid protein 2-dependent pathway. Acta Pharm Sin B 2023;13:1071—92.
58.
Luo P, Qin C, Zhu L, Fang C, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al. Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10 (USP10) inhibits hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and inflammation through Sirt6. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2018;68:1786—803.
59.
Zhou N, Qi H, Liu J, Zhang G, Liu J, Liu N, et al. Deubiquitinase OTUD3 regulates metabolism homeostasis in response to nutritional stresses. Cell Metab 2022;34:1023-41.e8.
60.
Zhang P, Wang PX, Zhao LP, Zhang X, Ji YX, Zhang XJ, et al. The deubiquitinating enzyme TNFAIP3 mediates inactivation of hepatic ASK1 and ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat Med 2018;24:84—94.
61.
Verboom L, Martens A, Priem D, Hoste E, Sze M, Vikkula H, et al. OTULIN prevents liver inflammation and hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting FADD- and RIPK1 kinase-mediated hepatocyte apoptosis. Cell Rep 2020;30:2237-47.e6.
62.
Liu B, Jiang S, Li M, Xiong X, Zhu M, Li D, et al. Proteome-wide analysis of USP14 substrates revealed its role in hepatosteatosis via stabilization of FASN. Nat Commun 2018;9:4770.
63.
Lu XY, Shi XJ, Hu A, Wang JQ, Ding Y, Jiang W, et al. Feeding induces cholesterol biosynthesis via the mTORC1—USP20—HMGCR axis. Nature 2020;588:479—84.
64.
Baek JH, Kim MS, Jung HR, Hwang MS, Lee CH, Han DH, et al. Ablation of the deubiquitinase USP15 ameliorates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Exp Mol Med 2023;55:1520—30.
65.
Yang H, Park D, Ryu J, Park T. USP11 degrades KLF4 via its deubiquitinase activity in liver diseases. J Cell Mol Med 2021;25:6976—87.
66.
Kim TH, Yang YM, Han CY, Koo JH, Oh H, Kim SS, et al. Gα12 ablation exacerbates liver steatosis and obesity by suppressing USP22/SIRT1-regulated mitochondrial respiration. J Clin Invest 2018;128:5587—602.
67.
Ning Z, Guo X, Liu X, Lu C, Wang A, Wang X, et al. USP22 regulates lipidome accumulation by stabilizing PPARγ in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun 2022;13:2187.
68.
Ni W, Lin S, Bian S, Zheng W, Qu L, Fan Y, et al. USP7 mediates pathological hepatic de novo lipogenesis through promoting stabilization and transcription of ZNF638. Cell Death Dis 2020;11:843.
69.
Forand A, Koumakis E, Rousseau A, Sassier Y, Journe C, Merlin JF, et al. Disruption of the phosphate transporter Pit1 in hepatocytes improves glucose metabolism and insulin signaling by modulating the USP7/IRS1 interaction. Cell Rep 2016;16:2736—48.
70.
Jiang L, Xiong J, Zhan J, Yuan F, Tang M, Zhang C, et al. Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 7 (USP7)-mediated deubiquitination of the histone deacetylase SIRT7 regulates gluconeogenesis. J Biol Chem 2017;292:13296—311.
71.
Reyes-Turcu FE, Ventii KH, Wilkinson KD. Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 2009;78:363—97.
72.
Xin SL, Yu YY. Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 10 ameliorates hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis model by restoring autophagic activity. Dig Liver Dis 2022;54:1021—9.
73.
Xin SL, Pan XL, Xu XY, Yu YY. USP10 alleviates palmitic acid-induced steatosis through autophagy in HepG2 cells. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2023;11:45—57.
74.
Tao BB, He H, Shi XH, Wang CL, Li WQ, Li B, et al. Up-regulation of USP2a and FASN in gliomas correlates strongly with glioma grade. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:717—20.
75.
Chen Y, Xu X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhou T, Jiang W, et al. Hypoxia-induced SKA3 promoted cholangiocarcinoma progression and chemoresistance by enhancing fatty acid synthesis via the regulation of PAR-dependent HIF-1α deubiquitylation. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023;42:265.
76.
Hall JA, Tabata M, Rodgers JT, Puigserver P. USP7 attenuates hepatic gluconeogenesis through modulation of FoxO1 gene promoter occupancy. Mol Endocrinol 2014;28:912—24.
77.
Du J, Fu L, Sui Y, Zhang L. The function and regulation of OTU deubiquitinases. Front Med 2020;14:542—63.
78.
Xie M, Yu J, Ge S, Huang J, Fan X. SUMOylation homeostasis in tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett 2020;469:301—9.
79.
Yan L, Zhang T, Wang K, Chen Z, Yang Y, Shan B, et al. SENP1 prevents steatohepatitis by suppressing RIPK1-driven apoptosis and inflammation. Nat Commun 2022;13:7153.
80.
Liu B, Wang T, Mei W, Li D, Cai R, Zuo Y, et al. Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) protein-specific protease 1 de-SUMOylates Sharp-1 protein and controls adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem 2014;289:22358—64.
81.
Liu Y, Dou X, Zhou WY, Ding M, Liu L, Du RQ, et al. Hepatic small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-specific protease 2 controls systemic metabolism through SUMOylation-dependent regulation of liver-adipose tissue crosstalk. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md) 2021;74:1864—83.
82.
Liu Y, Yu F, Han Y, Li Q, Cao Z, Xiang X, et al. SUMO-specific protease 3 is a key regulator for hepatic lipid metabolism in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci Rep 2016;6:37351.
83.
Stein S, Lemos V, Xu P, Demagny H, Wang X, Ryu D, et al. Impaired SUMOylation of nuclear receptor LRH-1 promotes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Clin Invest 2017;127:583—92.
84.
Kim D-H, Xiao Z, Kwon S, Sun X, Ryerson D, Tkac D, et al. A dysregulated acetyl/SUMO switch of FXR promotes hepatic inflammation in obesity. EMBO J 2015;34:184—99.
85.
Lee GY, Jang H, Lee JH, Huh JY, Choi S, Chung J, et al. PIASy-mediated sumoylation of SREBP1c regulates hepatic lipid metabolism upon fasting signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2014;34:926—38.
86.
Alfaro AJ, Dittner C, Becker J, Loft A, Mhamane A, Maida A, et al. Fasting-sensitive SUMO-switch on Prox1 controls hepatic cholesterol metabolism. EMBO Rep 2023;24:e55981.
87.
Zhou L, Jiang Y, Luo Q, Li L, Jia L. Neddylation: a novel modulator of the tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer 2019;18:77.
88.
Enchev RI, Schulman BA, Peter M. Protein neddylation: beyond cullin-RING ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015;16:30—44.
89.
Serrano-Maciá M, Simón J, González-Rellan MJ, Azkargorta M, Goi-koetxea-Usandizaga N, Lopitz-Otsoa F, et al. Neddylation inhibition ameliorates steatosisin NAFLD by boosting hepatic fatty acid oxidation via the DEPTOR—mTOR axis. Mol Metab 2021;53:101275.
90.
Ju UI, Jeong DW, Seo J, Park JB, Park JW, Suh KS, et al. Neddylation of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c is a potential therapeutic target for nonalcoholic fatty liver treatment. Cell Death Dis 2020;11:283.
91.
Ge M, Huang L, Ma Y, Sun S, Wu L, Xu W, et al. MLN4924 treatment diminishes excessive lipid storage in high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) by stimulating hepatic mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation and lipid metabolites. Pharmaceutics 2022;14:2460.
92.
Huang X, Liu X, Li X, Zhang Y, Gao J, Yang Y, et al. Cullin-associated and neddylation-dissociated protein 1 (CAND1) alleviates NAFLD by reducing ubiquitinated degradation of ACAA2. Nat Commun 2023;14:4620.
93.
Kumar D, Das M, Sauceda C, Ellies LG, Kuo K, Parwal P, et al. Degradation of splicing factor SRSF3 contributes to progressive liver disease. J Clin Invest 2019;129:4477—91.
94.
Chen C, Gu L, Matye DJ, Clayton YD, Hasan MN, Wang Y, et al. Cullin neddylation inhibitor attenuates hyperglycemia by enhancing hepatic insulin signaling through insulin receptor substrate stabilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022;119:e2111737119.
95.
Kim MS, Baek JH, Lee J, Sivaraman A, Lee K, Chun KH. Deubiquitinase USP1 enhances CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPβ) stability and accelerates adipogenesis and lipid accumulation. Cell Death Dis 2023;14:776.
96.
Zhou B, Luo Y, Bi H, Zhang N, Ma M, Dong Z, et al. Amelioration of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by inhibiting the deubiquitylating enzyme RPN11. Cell Metab 2024;36:2228-44.e7.
97.
Zhou J, Cui S, He Q, Guo Y, Pan X, Zhang P, et al. SUMOylation inhibitors synergize with FXR agonists in combating liver fibrosis. Nat Commun 2020;11:240.
98.
Ye J, Qi Y, Chen J, Zhang S, Liu B, Zhao Y, et al. Alleviation of hepatic steatosis by 4-azidophlorizin via the degradation of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase by the ubiquitin—proteasome pathway in vivo and in vitro. Adv Biol 2023;7:e2200150.
99.
Ren GM, Li J, Zhang XC, Wang Y, Xiao Y, Zhang XY, et al. Pharmacological targeting of NLRP3 deubiquitination for treatment of NLRP3-associated inflammatory diseases. Sci Immunol 2021;6:eabe2933.
100.
Zheng ZG, Zhang X, Liu XX, Jin XX, Dai L, Cheng HM, et al. Inhibition of HSP90β improves lipid disorders by promoting mature SREBPs degradation via the ubiquitin—proteasome system. Theranostics 2019;9:5769—83.
101.
Qi M, Zhong H, Cheng Z, Chen S, Xiao H, Shang J, et al. Discovery of NAFLD-improving agents by promoting the degradation of Keap1. J Med Chem 2023;66:9184—200.
102.
Lawan A, Bennett AM. Mitogen-activated protein kinase regulation in hepatic metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2017;28:868—78.
103.
Mao Z, Zhao J, Cui F, Li Z, Cao J, Zhou J, et al. STUB1 increases adiponectin expression by inducing ubiquitination and degradation of NR2F2, thereby reducing hepatic stellate cell activation and alleviating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Tissue Cell 2024;88:102345.
104.
Coyne ES, Bédard N, Gong YJ, Faraj M, Tchernof A, Wing SS. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP19 modulates adipogenesis and potentiates high-fat-diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance in mice. Diabetologia 2019;62:136—46.
105.
Saito N, Kimura S, Miyamoto T, Fukushima S, Amagasa M, Shimamoto Y, et al. Macrophage ubiquitin-specific protease 2 modifies insulin sensitivity in obese mice. Biochem Biophys Rep 2017;9:322—9.
106.
Yuan T, Chen Z, Yan F, Qian M, Luo H, Ye S, et al. Deubiquitinating enzyme USP10 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through deubiquitinating and stabilizing Smad4 protein. Mol Oncol 2020;14:197—210.
Year 2025 volume 15 Issue 3
PDF
11
8
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.01.010
  • Receive Date:2024-06-14
  • Online Date:2026-09-18
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-06-14
  • Revised:2024-09-20
  • Accepted:2024-12-20
Affiliations
    aInstitute of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Anti-Cancer Drug Research, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    bHangzhou Zhongmei Huadong Pharmaceut Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310011, China
    cSecond Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
    dCenter for Drug Safety Evaluation and Research, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
    eSchool of Medicine, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou 310015, China
    fEngineering Research Center of Innovative Anticancer Drugs, Ministry of Education, Hangzhou 310058, China
    gInnovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Corresponding:

* Corresponding authors.
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/apsb/EN/10.1016/j.apsb.2025.01.010
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT