The preparation scheme of HA@PC@Pita NPs was presented in
Fig. 1A. Firstly, we synthesized PC NPs, Supporting Information Fig. S1A visually showed the homogenous PC solution and colloid PC solution after adding glycine and formaldehyde, the result of which reflected the formation of PC NPs through self-assembly. The minimal particle size of PC NPs (size = 217.6 nm) was obtained at the presence of 10 mg/mL glycine and 10 μL of 37% formaldehyde (Fig. S1B). Meanwhile, the minimal polydispersity index of PC NPs (PDI = 0.146) was obtained at 800 rpm (Fig. S1C). UV–Vis spectra indicated that the absorption peak of sole PC at 278 nm bathochromically shifted to 280 nm for PC NPs (Fig. S1D) due to the
π‒
π stacking of resorcinol in the forming process and molecular length extension of polyphenol oligomers
19. FT-IR revealed the absorption peak at 1234 cm
−1 due to the asymmetric stretching vibration of C–O–C in the oxazine ring, the absorption peak at 1323 cm
−1 due to the rocking vibration of CH
2 in the oxazine ring, while the absorption peak observed at 1736 cm
−1 due to the stretching vibration of the ester carbonyl CO in the PC NPs, and the signal peaks of O–H and N–H asymmetric stretching vibrations on the polyether skeleton appeared at 928 cm
−1 (Fig. S1E). Then, we investigated the effect of solvents on the solubility of PC NPs in order to achieve the ideal loading efficiency of Pita. Fig. S1F indicated that PC NPs efficiently dissolved in DMSO. Taking the above characteristic, PC NPs achieved efficient loading of Pita through solvent conversion. Next, we investigated the effect of PC NPs/Pita ratio and time on the NPs formation and found that PC@Pita NPs with the smallest particle size was obtained for 2 h reassembly with the mass ratio of PC NPs:Pita for 3:0.2 (Fig. S1G and S1H). By combining the standard curve of absorption value of Pita V (Fig. S1I) and the absorption peak (Fig. S1I), the EE and LE of PC NPs loaded with Pita were calculated to be 97.12% and 6.45% respectively (
Fig. 1B). In addition, HA modification increased the size of PC@Pita NPs. And the smallest size (146 nm) of HA@PC@Pita NPs was obtained at the NPs/HA ratio of 60: 1 (Fig. S1J). DLS analysis indicated the size and the ζ-potential of HA@PC@Pita NPs for 146 ± 20 nm and −24.2 ± 1.5 mV, respectively (
Fig. 1C and D). EDS spectra demonstrated the uniform distributions of C, O, and F in PC and PC@Pita NPs (
Fig. 1E), indicating the successful preparation of PC@Pita NPs. The TEM images exhibited the uniformly dispersed spherical shape of all NPs. Among them, PC NPs showed a core–shell structure, while PC@Pita NPs showed spherical shape after filling Pita in the core of PC NPs. Moreover, HA was found in the outside of HA@PC@Pita NPs (
Fig. 1F). To further verify the core–shell structure of HA@PC@Pita NPs, fluorophores of Dil and DiO were applied to label PC NPs and pita, respectively. Then, the double fluorophores-labeled PC NPs were co-incubated with macrophages and activated macrophages, as previously reported
24. The fluorescence images showed the overlapping of red signal (representing the shell of HA@PC NPs) with green signal (representing the core of Pita), indicating a complete “core shell” structure even after internalization into cells (Supporting Information Fig. S2A). Moreover, by comparing the release behavior of HA@PC@Pita NPs under different pH conditions, we found that the release rate at pH 5.4 (slightly acid environment) was faster than that of pH 7.4 (neutral environment) (
Fig. 1G). Meanwhile, the produced fragments confirmed the depolymerization of NPs caused by drug release (
Fig. 1H). In addition,
Fig. 1I demonstrates homogeneous stability as the investigated NPs maintained particle size at 146 ± 26.2 nm for up to 7 days in PBS and 10% FBS solution at 37 ℃ and pH 7.4. These results provide the possibility for the practical application of HA@PC@Pita NPs.