收藏切换
Assessment of the consecutive harmful dinoflagellate blooms during 2015 in the Izmit Bay (the Marmara Sea)
收藏切换
PDF
Halim Aytekin ERGÜL1, *, Serdar AKSAN1, Merve İPŞİROĞLU1
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2018, 37(8) : 91 - 101
Less
收藏切换
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2018, 37(8): 91-101
Marine Biology
Assessment of the consecutive harmful dinoflagellate blooms during 2015 in the Izmit Bay (the Marmara Sea)
Full
Halim Aytekin ERGÜL1, *, Serdar AKSAN1, Merve İPŞİROĞLU1
Affiliations
  • 1 Department of Biology, Science and Arts Faculty, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41380, Turkey
Published: 2018-08-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-018-1191-7
Outline
收藏切换

A series of red tides were observed during 2015 in the Izmit Bay (the Marmara Sea) which is located in the most industrialized and populated region of Turkey. Six samplings were carried out in this area following the red tides. Nitrite-N, nitrate-N, ammonia, silica and orthophosphate concentrations were analyzed spectrophotometrically. Physicochemical conditions were measured by CTD probe. Plankton quantification was performed using counting chambers under microscopes. Prorocentrum micans was the most abundant species, except on May 14, 2015, when Noctiluca scintillans was dominant. The abundance of P. micans reached average 18×106 ind./L on May 3, 2015 in the Karamürsel station, simultaneously with elevated levels of NH3 and o-PO43–. The sample was also abundant in dead amphipods ((72±12) ind./L) that had been covered by mucilage aggregates produced by P. micans. The highest biomass (calculated by carbon) was recorded as (268±26.0) mg/L on May 14 in the Hereke station. Beside the anthropogenic wastewater discharges, unknown sources and resuspensions caused increases in nutrient levels. After long term northeaster gusts (35 km/h for 5 d) an upwelling occurred on November 6, 2015 after wind-induced sediment resuspension. Although nutrient discharges remarkably decreased over 30 years through established wastewater treatment plants, harmful phytoplankton blooms still occur. Comparing the present results with other studies in nearby Mediterranean seas reveals that the most intense harmful dinoflagellate bloom in recent years occurred in the Izmit Bay. Therefore, additional protection measures necessary for a cleaner Izmit Bay. These incidents also demonstrate that contaminants, accumulated in sediment, may have long-lasting effects on enclosed marine ecosystems.

red tide  /  harmful algal bloom  /  phytoplankton  /  dinoflagellate  /  Izmit Bay  /  Marmara Sea  /  mucilage
Halim Aytekin ERGÜL, Serdar AKSAN, Merve İPŞİROĞLU. Assessment of the consecutive harmful dinoflagellate blooms during 2015 in the Izmit Bay (the Marmara Sea)[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2018 , 37 (8) : 91 -101 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-018-1191-7
Marine phytoplankton generates approximately half of the global primary production and affects the fate of sea life, with respect to fishery yields and sustainable marine ecosystems (Boyce et al., 2010). Domestic and industrial discharges cause nutrient enrichment and consequently, alterations of phytoplankton composition in terms of biodiversity and abundance in many coastal areas (Smith et al., 1999). Annual nitrogen and phosphorus input to ecosystems has more than doubled globally during the last fifty years (Falkowski et al., 2000; Smil, 2000). Since the availability of nutrients, necessary for growth and reproduction of phytoplankton, is often lower than the biological demand, additional nutrient supply is necessary for phytoplankton growth (Corbett, 2010). Therefore, in addition to common sources (e.g., terrestrial inflows, airborne particulates) anthropogenic discharges (e.g., industrial and domestic effluents, agricultural runoffs) and sediment resuspensions affect nutrient enrichment, leading to an increase in phytoplankton abundance. Under favorable oceanographic conditions (e.g., temperature and salinity), sufficient nutrient levels may cause excessive phytoplankton reproduction and harmful algal blooms may occur (Heisler et al., 2008). These enrichments mostly happen in coasts near urbanized and industrialized settlements (Ferreira et al., 2011; Heisler et al., 2008). However, biogeochemical structure and environmental pressures may vary for a coastal marine ecosystem and exact mechanisms of algal bloom occurrences remain unknown, as in the Izmit Bay.
The Izmit Bay, one of the most polluted marine ecosystems of Turkey, contains a wide range of contaminants including organic and inorganic compounds such as heavy metals, radionuclides, POPs, and nutrients (Balkis et al., 2007; Ergül et al., 2013a, b; Karademir et al., 2013; Tolun et al., 2006). The bay is located to the northeast of the Marmara Sea (Turkey) and a permanent pycnocline and a two-layered stratification are observed throughout year. Upper layer salinity is generally less than 24.0, and this reaches 36.0 below the halocline layer (Ergül, 2016). There are around 2 million inhabitants living in Kocaeli Province surrounding the Izmit Bay. Population and industrial activities have been increasing rapidly since the 1980s, and the bay receives a considerable amount of domestic and industrial discharge from its drainage basin. Since the 1960s, more than 400 large industrial plants have been built around the bay, including the largest shipyards, metallurgy, paper mill, fertilizer, and petrochemical facilities of Turkey. In addition to 70 shipyards, there are 40 ports located along the coast of the bay. In 2015, the bay received approximately 400 and 80 tonnes of total nitrogen (TN) and phosphorus (TP) discharges from wastewater treatment plants, respectively. Moreover, almost all effluents were discharged without treatment before 2000, and 41.0% of domestic and industrial discharge has remained untreated until 2010 (ECR, 2013; ISU, 2016). At the current time, there are no available data for untreated TN and TP discharges from other sources (i.e., untreated sewage discharges, agricultural runoffs, etc.) in the Izmit Bay. Eutrophication is also a serious problem (Morkoç et al., 2001; Okay et al., 2001) and phytoplankton blooms were recently reported in the bay (Ergül et al., 2014, 2010).
Phytoplankton blooms, causing brownish-red surface water with bad odor and mucilage formation, drew public attention to domestic and industrial discharges as potential triggering elements. Moreover, meteorological factors likely have an effect on algal bloom occurrence. Therefore, investigation into mechanisms of algal blooms and their harmful effects on the ecosystem will be crucial for evaluating effective environmental factors and solving future problems in an enclosed marine ecosystem, close to a populated and industrialized city, such as the Izmit Bay.
This study evaluated (1) serial phytoplankton blooms with mucilage formation, (2) accompanied physicochemical and meteorological conditions in 2015, (3) evaluation of possible reasons for harmful algal blooms in the Izmit Bay, and (4) a comparison between the present results and remarkable diatom and dinoflagellate blooms around nearby Mediterranean seas.
The Izmit Bay is a semi-enclosed coastal ecosystem located in the most industrialized area of the Marmara region (Turkey). The 49 km long bay with an area of 300 km2 has three basins connected by shallow and narrow passages. The eastern basin, the smallest component of the system, is approximately 5.0 km wide, 13 km long, 47.0 km2 in surface area and relatively shallow with a maximum depth of 40.0 m. The central basin, which is the largest component of the system, is approximately 9.5 km wide, 22 km long, 165 km2 in surface area and the depth increases up to 208 m in the southern section (Kuşçu et al., 2002). A narrow and shallow area (i.e., 55 m depth) at Dil Creek shore separates the central and western basins which are approximately 8.5 km wide, 14 km long and 47.0 km2 in surface area. The bottom topography of the western basin slopes downward toward the Marmara Sea and increases to a depth of approximately 100 m near its opening (Fig. 1). Stratification in the water column occurs throughout the year because of salinity differences. Saltier water originates from the Mediterranean Sea in the lower layer, whereas less saline water originates from the Black Sea in the upper layer (Morkoc et al., 1996). Vertical mixing between the two layers is restricted over the Marmara Basin and plays a key role in the principal physicochemical characteristics of the bay (Algan et al., 1999).
Six surveys were carried out when red tides occurred to sample surface water for quantitative analysis of nitrite-N (NO2-N), nitrate-N (NO3-N), ammonia (NH3), silica (SiO2) and orthophosphate (o-PO43–) and phytoplankton identification in the Izmit Bay. These were carried out on April 12, April 30, May 3, May 14, July 11, and November 6, 2015 at Ulaşlı, Sekapark, Karamürsel, Hereke, Marina and Marina stations, respectively in the Izmit Bay (Fig. 1). Temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity, pH and chlorophyll a (Chl a) levels were measured in the water for each samplings. Although phytoplankton blooms were observed throughout the bay, marine water samples were taken at the locations densest in phytoplankton abundance during bloom times.
Composite surface water samples were taken with a Nansen bottle (3 L) twice hanging from the edge of a landing dock approximately 50 m away from the coast at all sites, these were put into amber glass bottles and kept cool for immediate transportation to the laboratory. The first Nansen bottle samples was filtered with a 0.45 μm, 47 mm Whatman filter paper and used for NO2-N, NO3-N, NH3, o-PO43– and SiO2 analysis via spectrophotometric methods (Bendschneider and Robinson, 1952; Mullin and Riley, 1955; Murphy and Riley, 1962), while the other Nansen bottle sample (3 L) was used for phytoplankton identification and quantification. A 10 mL tubular plankton chamber was used for pre-identification under an inverted microscope while plankters were alive. Then samples were fixed using 4.00% formaldehyde solution for better identification and quantifying. Before the counting procedure, the samples were kept in a dark room in tubular glass for precipitation. Then phytoplankters were identified and quantified via a Nageotte counting chamber under a light microscope. Counting procedures were repeated at least three times. Results were given as individual per liter.
To estimate the biomass of phytoplankton, dimensions of each taxa were measured under a light microscope equipped with a camera (Olympus BX51). Measured dimensions were used to calculate cell volumes according to calculated values for each species’ similar dimensions in a previous study by Olenina et al. (2006) in the Baltic Sea. To calculate cell biomass in terms of organic carbon content as pg C/cell, equations by Menden-Deuer and Lessard (2000), given below, were used:
$\begin{split}{\text {cell }}\,\,{\text {biomass}}= 0.288 \times \text{biovolum}{\text{e}^{0.811}}\\ {\text{for}}\;{\text{Bacillariophycea}}\;({\text{diatoms}}), \end{split}$
$\begin{split}{\text {cell }}\,\,{\text {biomass}} = 0.216 \times \text{biovolum}{\text{e}^{0.939}}\\{\text{for}}\;{\text{taxons}}\;{\text{other}}\;{\text{than diatoms}}.\end{split}$
The carbon content for each species was multiplied by individual number to calculate the organic carbon mass for each species group. Results were given as mg/L (calculated by carbon) in the text.
A data sonde (Hydrolab DS-5) was used to measure temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO), turbidity, pH and Chl a, in the water (Fig. 1). The device was calibrated before each deployment, waiting at least two minutes for warm up and then it was submerged at a constant speed (i.e., 0.2 m/s) where the water column had enough depth. At least thirty results of measurements were used to calculate average value. The Chl a and DO data were tested using a classical acetone extraction and Winkler methods, respectively. Differences between concentrations in classical methods and probe measurements were less than 5.00%. Standard deviations were calculated for statistical sufficiency. Meteorological records were obtained from Turkish State Meteorological Service stations located in Izmit.
Trophic index (TRIX) values were calculated in order to quantify eutrophic state and water quality. To calculate TRIX, concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (c(DIN), i.e., NO2-N + NO3-N + NH3-N), o-PO43– (c(P), μg/L), DO deviation from saturation (d(DO), %) and Chl a concentration (c(Chl a), mg/L) were used in the equation below (Vollenweider et al., 1998):
$TRIX = \frac{{\left[ {{\rm {log}}_{10}\left( {c\left( {{\text{Chl}}\,\,a } \right) \times d\left( {{\text{DO}}} \right) \times c\left( {{\text{DIN}}} \right) \times c\left( {\text{P}} \right)} \right) + 1.5} \right]}}{{1.2}}.$
Pearson correlation coefficients (two-tailed) were calculated among variables to better explain the relationship between parameters and these are used in the text where necessary.
On March 19, 2015, the Izmit Bay which is located at the eastern end of the Marmara Sea, was covered by phytoplankton and a light red appearance was observed over almost all the bay’s surface (Fig. 2a). This appearance was disappeared after approximately two days. On April 12, phytoplankton abundance, which was dominated by Prorocentrum micans Ehrenberg, 1834, increased, surface water partly reached a brownish-red appearance, and mucilage formation was observed (Fig. 2b).
Six different phytoplankton species (Achnantes brevipes C. Agardh, 1824, Cerataulina pelagica (Cleve) Hendey, 1937, Dictyocha speculum Ehrenberg, 1834, Melosira sp., Navicula sp., and Prorocentrum micans), which belong to three different groups (four Bacillariophyceae, one Dictyochophyceae, and one Dinophyceae) were observed intermittently in the samples on April 12, April 30 and May 3, 2015 with average surface water temperatures of (14±1.0)°C, and salinity of 21±3.0. Regarding abundance, dinoflagellates were dominant with rates of over 99.0% and P. micans, which is known as a potential high biomass-forming dinoflagellate (Jeong et al., 2005) was the most abundant species in those three blooms (average 1.10×106, 5.40×106 and 17.9×106 ind./L, respectively; Table 1, Fig. 3a). Mucilage formations occurred in these blooms and a milky light-brown flocculated layer was observed on the sea surface. After the blooms, red appearances and mucilage layers disappeared within a few days from surface waters. In the microscopy slides, mucus aggregates were also observed amongst P. micans clusters (Fig. 2c). Therefore, formation of mucilage should be excreted by P. micans after their excessive proliferation (Figs 2c, d). On May 3, the mucilage layer was very intense, and dead amphipods, which were coated with amorphous mucus pellets, were observed in the samples in Karamürsel ((72±12) ind./L, Fig. 2d) with the highest surface water turbidity ((287±46.0) NTU) and Chl a concentrations ((180±15.0) μg/L, Fig. 4b). Although several phytoplankton blooms have been reported from the Izmit Bay since 1986 (Taş et al., 2016), to our knowledge, this incident was the most intense. Moreover, the presence of dead amphipods after a phytoplankton bloom was reported for the first time in the present study. Mortis causa of the amphipods was not clear, and there are no (open) scientific literature regarding marine mucilage-dependent amphipod mortality. However, Bruno et al. (1989) reported that farmed and wild fish may also be killed by the smothering of gills due to phytoplankton mucus production. Therefore, given its appearance under stereomicroscope, it is reasonable that mucilage aggregates probably blocked amphipod gills and thus respiration was prevented, leading to their death (Fig. 2d). Also, oxygen concentration decrease may be considered as another reason of amphipod mortality. However we have no simultaneous dissolved oxygen data to prove this claim. Amphipod and copepods are known predators of dinoflagellates including bloom causative species (i.e., P. micans), therefore high amphipod abundance in the samples are most likely connected to their feeding behavior (Yi et al., 2017). It should be noted that phytoplankton abundance as well as nutrient concentrations were approximately three fold higher near the shore because of conglomeration after drifting via waves and those values were excluded from further assessment in the present study.
In the bloom conditions on May 3, 2015, nutrient levels remarkably increased, and raised inorganic nitrogen, and excessive o-PO43– concentrations were measured (Figs 3c, d). On that day, most intense dinoflagellate bloom occurred concurrently with the highest concentrations of DIN and o-PO43– ever recorded during the study. Therefore, the existence of elevated levels of nutrients should have triggered excessive dinoflagellate (i.e., P. micans) proliferation and caused excretion (i.e., mucilage formation) from P. micans cells, under the favorable meteorological conditions. It should be noted that, very calm weather and light winds were recorded for two days immediately before the bloom on May 3. Therefore, increased nutrients, which are most likely derived from undesirable or illegal discharges, could not be dispersed by winds, currents, precipitations, etc. from the surface water and finally were consumed by phytoplankton. In fact, the Izmit Bay’s renewal capacity is known to be insufficient because of a relatively long residence time of the water masses (Morkoç et al., 2001) and in this incident, light winds, and accordingly weak currents, allowed nutrients accumulation in surface waters. Thus, appropriate conditions occurred for excessive P. micans proliferation.
Following phytoplankton increases, which occurred on May 14, July 11 and November 6, 2015 and unlike other blooms, biodiversity reached 10, 14, and 10 species, respectively, during these incidents in the Izmit Bay. During the study, 17 taxa which have not bloom formation were also recorded in different classes (Bacillariophyceae, Dinophyceae, Euglenophyceae, and Oligotrichea) in addition to six bloom taxa (Table 1, Fig. 3a).
On May 14, both DIN and o-PO43– concentration decreased compared to May 3 and in this event biodiversity reached ten species (Figs 3a, c, d). The dominant species at this time was Noctiluca scintillans (Macartney) Kofoid & Swezy, 1921 (Figs 3a, d) with surface water temperatures of 15.0°C and salinity of 25.9 in the Hereke station, which was the highest salinity level recorded during the study (Fig. 4). Corresponding to individual number, Bacillariophyceae (diatom) was dominant in the second order at a rate of 16.6%, following Dinophyceae (dinoflagellate) (75.5%). Euglenophyceae and Oligotrichea species were also observed in this red tide with rates of 7.70% and <1.00%, respectively. On that day, although the lowest phytoplankton abundance was found (54.0×103 ind./L), the highest phytoplankton biomass ((268±26.0) mg/L) was recorded, because of the presence of N. scintillans (34.0×103 ind./L), which is known for its large cell volume (Figs 3a, b). During the red tide, the N. scintillans bloom was also reported from the Marmara Sea on May 17 (NASA, 2015). This organism is not known as toxin producer, but it is, however, able to accumulate toxic levels of ammonia and can thus cause massive mortality to marine organisms because of ammonia excretion into the ambient waters (Faust and Gulledge, 2002; Okaichi and Nishio, 1976). In fact, the highest NH3 concentration in second order was measured on May 14; however, its concentration was 12 fold higher than the sum of NO2-N and NO3-N and was the highest rate during the study (Fig. 3c). Therefore, it is reasonable that NO3-N and NO2-N were indirectly used by N. scintillans, and elevated levels of NH3 were connected with their metabolic activities during the bloom. In addition, phytoplankton abundances and ammonia concentrations remarkably decreased with increased depth in the same station, considering the relationship between decrease in N. scintillas abundance and accordingly ammonia excretion (Fig. 3f). In previous studies, N. scintillans increase were reported following a P. micans bloom in late spring in the Izmit Bay as well as from the Marmara Sea (Aktan et al., 2005; Artüz and Baykut, 1987; Ergül et al., 2014) and those results coincide with the present study.
After late spring, N. scintillans was observed in other samplings; however, the following red tides were dominated by P. micans in 2015. On July 11, phytoplankton abundance increased again (average 480×103 ind./L) and a light red appearance was observed on the sea surface without mucilage formation, while surface water temperatures of 25.0°C and salinity of 21.4 were recorded at Marina station in the Izmit Bay. With respect to individual count, Dinophyceae was the dominant group, with rates of 86.8%. Bacillariophyceae and Oligotrichea species were also observed with rates of 12.9% and <1.00%, respectively. In this red tide, the highest phytoplankton diversity, with 14 species (eight Dinophyceae, four Bacillariophyceae and two Oligotrichea) were observed simultaneously with the second highest DIN:P ratio as 0.5 (Fig. 3a). Thus, different phytoplankton species found an opportunity to proliferate. Although the highest DIN:P ratio was determined on May 14, as was discussed above, this rate was related to the elevated level of ammonia, which possibly derived from N. scintillans excretion. Regarding the increased diatom abundance, the lowest silica concentration ((0.22±0.01) mg/L) was determined on July 11, because of the silica usage in the cell wall of diatoms. On that day, one of the most common diatom species, Skletonema costatum reached 60.0×103 ind./L which was the highest abundance determined among diatom species throughout the study.
After July 2015, a significant phytoplankton increase was not observed until late autumn in the Izmit Bay. On November 6, a new bloom which was dominated by P. micans was observed again, without mucilage formation. Although the incident remained limited and almost no red appearance was observed in the central and western basins, phytoplankton abundance reached 1.10×106 ind./L and its diversity reached ten species (eight Dinophyceae and two Bacillariophyceae) in the Marina station located in the eastern basin of the bay. Interestingly, this bloom occurred a few days after a relatively long term strong wind blew. During that time, northeastern gusts, with an average speed of 35 km/h (ranged from 33 to 41 km/h) blew around the Izmit Bay for 5 d between 28 October and 2 November (Fig. 4a-right panel). Over the following days, the wind speed gradually decreased, and on November 6, the last phytoplankton bloom was observed in 2015, when average wind speed was 12 km/h, surface water temperatures were 15°C, and salinity was 22.0 (Fig. 4a). It is well known that the Izmit Bay has been exposed to treated and/or untreated wastewater discharges since the 1960s. Hence, an elevated level of organic and inorganic contaminants including nutrients accumulated in the surface sediment of the bay, is present (Aktan et al., 2005; Ergül et al., 2013a; Karademir et al., 2013; Morkoç et al., 2001). Beside the unknown amount of land based effluents from several sources (e.g., agricultural runoffs, untreated anthropogenic wastewater, underground water), ~400 t total nitrogen and ~100 t total phosphorus were routinely discharged from wastewater treatment plants located around the Izmit Bay in 2015 (Fig. 5). The northern and southern sides of the bay are surrounded by hills, while the eastern and western edges are open from either side. Due to this geographical structure, a corridor occurs in the east-west direction. Therefore, following the ~35 km/h northeastern gusts for 5 d, wind induced sediment resuspensions occurred in the east, the shallowest basin of the Izmit Bay, and ambient water was contaminated with nutrients that were used by phytoplankton for their reproduction. Unlike other cases, NO3-N concentration ((0.040±0.003) mg/L) was slightly higher than the NH3 level ((0.030±0.005) mg/L) in this bloom. This high rate of nitrate may be related to oxidation of resuspended ammonia after nitrification processes in the surface sediment (Fig. 3c). In terms of numbers of individuals, dinoflagellates were dominant with rates of over 99.0%, as in the first three blooms. Therefore, on November 6, 2015, silica content was remained relatively high ((0.76±0.02) mg/L) due to low usage by diatoms (Fig. 3d).
Since DIN:Si ratios ranged between 0.08 and 0.56 (i.e., <1), and DIN:P ratios ranged between 0.03 to 3.11 (i.e., below 16:1) in all samplings, nitrogen was the limiting factor during bloom conditions. It is known that N broadly limits phytoplankton growth in coastal marine ecosystems (Nixon, 1986) and N limitations have been reported from the Izmit Bay during bloom conditions (Aktan and Dede, 2008; Aktan et al., 2005), and other parts of the Marmara Sea (Turkoglu, 2013, 2016; Balkis et al., 2010) as in the present study.
According to previous studies (Morkoç et al., 2001) and Kocaeli Metropolitan Municipality records (ISU, 2016), discharges of total suspended matter (TSM), biological oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) into the Izmit Bay gradually decreased 40, 40, 14 and 20 fold, respectively, since 1984, owing to established wastewater treatment plants (Fig. 5). Currently, it is estimated that more than 80.0% of discharge from the wastewater treatment plants has domestic origin, whereas the remaining discharge is from industrial sources. Nevertheless, the present results show that, despite precautions in place to decrease nutrient inputs via these plants, algal blooms still occur, with harmful effects including mucilage presence and invertebrate deaths.
The trophic index (TRIX), which was developed by Vollenweider et al. (1998) to determine the trophic state and quality of coastal marine ecosystems, ranged from 6.1 to 10 (6.9, 10, 6.3, 6.1, and 6.8 for April 30, May 3, May 14, July 11, and November 6, 2015, respectively). Therefore, based on TRIX values, the eutrophication status of the Izmit Bay was classified as degraded and there was a very high trophic level during the bloom conditions. It should be noted that the eutrophic state of the surface waters of the Izmit Bay fluctuated during the study and in some periods reached good quality and low trophic levels. On the other hand, because of the low current regime and the relatively long residence time of the water masses in the Izmit Bay (Morkoç et al., 2001), nutrient accumulation over certain periods of the year caused deterioration of the trophic state. Also, consecutive high TRIX values may be an important sign for future environmental problems for the bay. In fact, significant correlations between TRIX and total phytoplankton abundance (TPpA) (r=0.98, p<0.01, n=5) indicate that contents of the water encouraged the bloom conditions and following that the water quality of the bay was highly affected by the blooms. Positive significant correlations between o-PO43– and TPpA (r=0.96, p<0.01, n=6) and between NO3-N and TPpA (r=0.86, p<0.05, n=6) revealed that variations of total phytoplankton density were linked to the nutrient concentrations. Also, a positive significant correlation between total phytoplankton biomass and the DIN:P ratio (r=0.98, p<0.01, n=6) indicates nitrogen limitation. Consequently, despite the improvement work over the last few decades by the municipality of the city around the Izmit Bay, based on adopted legislation in the frame of European Union directives, harmful algal blooms still occur with the abovementioned harmful effects.
In fact, the marine eutrophication issue and phytoplankton blooms, encountered in coastal marine ecosystems of Mediterranean seas, has been addressed in a number of studies since the 1960s (Karydis and Kitsiou, 2012). Through regulation and prevention, based on the Barcelona convention and the directives regarding the European Union policy on eutrophication the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (EC, 2000), Mediterranean countries have modeled their legislation to reduce nutrient inputs to the marine ecosystems (Karydis and Kitsiou, 2012; Saliba, 1995). Nevertheless, despite the precautions, numerous intense phytoplankton blooms have been observed in Mediterranean coastal waters. Hence, we have listed recent intense dinoflagellate and diatom blooms (i.e., >106 ind./L) with temperature, salinity and nutrient data in the adjacent seas (i.e., the Marmara and Black Seas) and near Mediterranean coastal waters (i.e., the Aegean, Ionian and Adriatic Seas), in order to evaluate recent cases since 2000 and to compare them with the present results from the Izmit Bay (Table 2).
Temporal distribution of intense diatom and dinoflagellate blooms spread predominantly over three seasons: spring, summer and winter, in the Mediterranean coastal surface waters since 2000. In terms of frequency, the bloom conditions occurred mostly in spring (five diatom and five dinoflagellate blooms) followed by summer (four diatom and two dinoflagellate blooms) and winter (two diatom and three dinoflagellate blooms), whereas intense autumn blooms were recorded less frequently (two diatom and one dinoflagellate blooms). Typically, dinoflagellate blooms occurred in spring and early summer, while diatom blooms occured in winter and early spring. However, in some cases, dinoflagellate blooms were reported in winter (Scrippsiella. trochoidea (Stein) Loeblich III, 1976, and Prorocentrum redfeldii Bursa, 1959 from Trabzon Shore and Thermaikos Bay, respectively) whereas diatom blooms were reported in summer seasons (Pseudo-nitzschia Pungens (Grunow ex Cleve) G. R. Hasle, 1993, Thalassionema nitzschioides Schiller in Hustedt, 1930, Leptocylindrus minimus Gran, 1915 and Chaetoceros vixvisibilis Schiller in Hustedt, 1930 from the Çanakkale Stratit, Constanta Bay, Kastela Bay and Rovinj coasts, respectively; Table 2).
Phytoplankton blooms may occur in a wide range of temperatures and salinity (8.00–27.0°C and 11.0–36.0, respectively) and species-specific characters seem to be determined in bloom formations. Nutrient values also had diversified levels (<0.01–0.56, 0.01–0.55, 0.01–42.0 and 0.12–3.42 for NO2-N + NO3-N, NH3, PO43– and SiO2 or SiO4, respectively) and in almost all blooms, the ratios of nitrogen to phosphorus were remarkably different from the classical Redfield ratio (i.e., 16:1; Table 2). Consequently, these data suggest that a combination of nutrients is more important than its levels for diatom and dinoflagellate bloom formations, and termination of proliferation is determined by limiting nutrients. In addition, the blooms are predominantly influenced by temperature and salinity while sufficient light intensity and favorable amounts of nutrients exist in the water.
The spatial distribution of these blooms revealed that dense incidents mainly arose in the coastal waters of the northern parts of the Mediterranean. Although bloom cases have been reported, the abundance of diatoms and dinoflagellates did not exceed 106 ind./L in the Levantine Sea. Extreme proliferations of both groups were reported from the Black, Marmara, Aegean and Ionian Seas. However, despite the remarkable dinoflagellate abundance, incidents that exceeded 106 ind./L were reported merely for diatoms from the Adriatic Sea since 2000 (Table 2). Because the northern parts of the Mediterranean are richer in nutrients than the southern parts (Ignatiades, 2005), denser phytoplankton blooms are expected in the northern regions. In fact, the densest dinoflagellate bloom (70×106 ind./L) was reported from the Golden Horn Estuary, adjacent to the Istanbul Strait as well as the Black and Marmara Seas, in summer 2001 (Taş and Okuş, 2011). Besides being a semi-enclosed basin, the Golden Horn Estuary was known for its polluted water with foul odor because of untreated industrial and domestic discharges. However, the estuary was rehabilitated in the mid-2000s and bloom conditions have not been reported since 2010. Another dense bloom (40×106 ind./L) due to proliferation of diatoms was recorded in Pesaro coast in the north Adriatic in autumn 2000. Beside local land-based sources, the Po River was considered as the responsible nutrient carrier for this bloom (Penna et al., 2004). Like abovementioned blooms, most cases occurred under the land based anthropogenic inputs around the northern Mediterranean. However, legislations, based on EU directives, were set up to prevent further deterioration, and the decreasing bloom densities can be considered possible improvements in many Mediterranean coasts.
A comparison with blooms from nearby coastal surface waters of the Mediterranean seas showed that dinoflagellate blooms in the Izmit Bay were the densest consecutive blooms ever reported in recent years (Table 2). Like other incidents, domestic and industrial inputs were effective in those blooms. Additionally, unlike other incidents, wind-induced sediment resuspension caused a dinoflagellate bloom in the Izmit Bay, and this case indicates that accumulated contaminants in the surface sediment can be a potential nutrient source. This represents long term effects of untreated discharges on an elongated coastal marine ecosystem.
Beside low-speed water mass movement and routinely discharged nutrients via wastewater treatment plants from a populated city, various reasons might have contributed to the occurrence of the algal bloom conditions in the Izmit Bay, such as the inadequacy of advanced treatment technology, untreated and/or illegal domestic and industrial discharges, agricultural runoffs, and wind-induced resuspensions. Therefore, the results of the present study suggest that there is a need for increased action to prevent harmful algal blooms, in accordance with the environmental deterioration in the Izmit Bay. This can be achived by improvements to wastewater treatment technology, including nutrient removal capability, prevention of untreated discharges, illegal bilge bailing and controlling agricultural fertilizer usage. Finally, the removal of the upper layer of the eastern basin’s surface sediment should be considered to prevent undesirable effects of wind induced resuspensions.
  • The Kocaeli University Scientific Researches Unit under contract No. 2009/040.
Aktan Y, Dede A, Ciftci P S. 2008. Mucilage event associated with diatoms and dinoflagellates in Sea of Marmara, Turkey. Harmful Algae News, 36
Aktan Y, Tüfekçi V, Tüfekçi H, et al. 2005. Distribution patterns, biomass estimates and diversity of phytoplankton in İzmit Bay (Turkey). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 64(2–3): 372–384
Algan O, Altıok H, Yüce H. 1999. Seasonal variation of suspended particulate matter in two-layered İzmit Bay, Turkey. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 49(2): 235–250
Artüz I, Baykut F. 1987. Hydrography of the Marmara Sea and Scientific Examination Regarding to Water Pollution (in Turkish). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Çevre Sorunları Araştırma Merkezi
Balkis N, Atabay H, Türetgen I, et al. 2010. Role of single-celled organisms in mucilage formation on the shores of Buyukada Island (the Marmara Sea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 91(4): 771–781
Balkis N, Şenol E, Aksu A. 2007. Trace metal distributions in water column and surface sediments of Izmit Bay (Turkey) after Marmara (Izmit) earthquake. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 16(8): 910–916
Bendschneider K, Robinson R J. 1952. A New Spectrophotometric method for the determination of nitrite in sea water. Journal of Marine Research, 11: 87–96
Bosak S, Godrijan J, Šilović T. 2016. Dynamics of the marine planktonic diatom family Chaetocerotaceae in a Mediterranean coastal zone. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 180: 69–81
Boyce D G, Lewis M R, Worm B. 2010. Global phytoplankton decline over the past century. Nature, 466(7306): 591–596
Bruno D W, Dear G, Seaton D D. 1989. Mortality associated with phytoplankton blooms among farmed Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. in Scotland. Aquaculture, 78(3–4): 217–222
Bužančić M, Glada Ž N, Marasović I, et al. 2016. Eutrophication influence on phytoplankton community composition in three bays on the eastern Adriatic coast. Oceanologia, 58(4): 302–316
Cabrini M, Fornasaro D, Cossarini G, et al. 2012. Phytoplankton temporal changes in a coastal northern Adriatic site during the last 25 years. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 115: 113–124
Corbett D R. 2010. Resuspension and estuarine nutrient cycling: insights from the Neuse River Estuary. Biogeosciences, 7(10): 3289–3300
Deniz N, Taş S. 2009. Seasonal variations in the phytoplankton community in the north-eastern Sea of Marmara and a species list. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 89(2): 269–276
EC. 2000. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council 2000/60/EC Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities, European Commission, 1–72
ECR. 2013. 2012 Environmental Case Report of Kocaeli Province (in Turkish), Environmental Case Report. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning, 195
Ergül H A. 2016. Evaluation of seasonal physicochemical conditions and chlorophyll-a concentrations in Izmit Bay, Marmara Sea. Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, 22(3): 201–217
Ergül H A, Aksan S, Ipsiroglu M, et al. 2014. Assessment of consecutive plankton blooms on march and April 2014 in Izmit Bay (the Marmara Sea). In: 1st International Congress of Applied Ichthyology & Aquatic Environment. Volos, Greece: University of Thessaly
Ergül H A, Belivermiş M, Kılıç Ö, et al. 2013a. Natural and artificial radionuclide activity concentrations in surface sediments of Izmit Bay, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 126: 125–132
Ergül H A, Küçük A, Terzi M. 2010. A study on the red tide of Izmit Bay—June 2010. In: Ozturk B, ed. Marmara Denizi 2010. Istanbul: TUDAV Press, 464–468
Ergül H A, Varol T, Ay Ü. 2013b. Investigation of heavy metal pollutants at various depths in the Gulf of Izmit. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 73(1): 389–393
Falkowski P, Scholes R J, Boyle E, et al. 2000. The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of earth as a system. Science, 290(5490): 291–296
Faust M A, Gulledge R A. 2002. Identifying Harmful Marine Dinoflagellates. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History
Ferreira J G, Andersen J H, Borja A, et al. 2011. Overview of eutrophication indicators to assess environmental status within the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Science, 93(2): 117–131
Feyzioğlu A M, Seyhan K. 2007. Phytoplankton composition of south east Black Sea coast. Journal of the Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, 13: 61–71
Heisler J, Glibert P M, Burkholder J M, et al. 2008. Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: a scientific consensus. Harmful Algae, 8(1): 3–13
Ignatiades L. 2005. Scaling the trophic status of the Aegean Sea, eastern Mediterranean. Journal of Sea Research, 54(1): 51–57
ISU. 2016. Average annual discharges to Izmit Bay from wastewater treatment plants (in Turkish). In: Facilities D O T, ed. Kocaeli Metropolitan Municipality. Kocaeli: Municipality Press
Jeong H J, Park J Y, Nho J H, et al. 2005. Feeding by red-tide dinoflagellates on the cyanobacterium Synechococcus. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 41(2): 131–143
Karademir A, Ergül H A, Telli B, et al. 2013. Evaluation of PCDD/F pollution in surface sediments of Izmit Bay. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20(9): 6611–6619
Karydis M, Kitsiou D. 2012. Eutrophication and environmental policy in the Mediterranean Sea: a review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(8): 4931–4984
Kopuz U, Feyzioglu A M, Valente A. 2014. An unusual red-tide event of noctiluca scintillans (Macartney) in the southeastern black sea. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14: 261–268
Koukaras K, Nikolaidis G. 2004. Dinophysis blooms in Greek coastal waters (Thermaikos Gulf, NW Aegean Sea). Journal of Plankton Research, 26(4): 445–457
Kuşçu I, Okamura M, Matsuoka H, et al. 2002. Active faults in the Gulf of Izmit on the North Anatolian Fault, NW Turkey: a high-resolution shallow seismic study. Marine Geology, 190(1-2): 421–443
Menden-Deuer S, Lessard E J. 2000. Carbon to volume relationships for dinoflagellates, diatoms, and other protist plankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 45(3): 569–579
Mihailov M E S, Buga L, Malciu V, et al. 2013. Characteristics of up-welling algal bloom and hypoxia events in the western black sea in 2010. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 22(10): 2981–2990
Morkoc E, Okay O, Geveci A. 1996. Towards a clean Izmit bay (in Turkish). Project No: 15.1.005. Gebze Kocaeli, Turkey: Tubitak Press
Morkoç E, Okay O S, Tolun L, et al. 2001. Towards a clean İzmit Bay. Environment International, 26(3): 157–161
Mullin J B, Riley J P. 1955. The colorimetric determination of silicate with special reference to sea and natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 12: 162–176
Murphy J, Riley J P. 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural-waters. Analytica Chimica Acta, 27: 31–36
NASA. 2015. Blooms in the Sea of Marmara. https://visibleearth. nasa.gov/view.php?id=85947 [2015-05-28/2015-06-08]
Nikolaidis G, Koukaras K, Aligizaki K, et al. 2005. Harmful microalgal episodes in Greek coastal waters. Journal of Biological Research, 3: 77–85
Nixon S W. 1986. Nutrient dynamics and the productivity of marine coastal waters. In: Halwagy R, Clayton D, Behbehani M, eds. Coastal Eutrophication. Oxford, UK: The Alden Press, 97–115
Okaichi T, Nishio S. 1976. Identification of ammonia as the toxic principle of red tide of Noctiluca miliaris. Bull Plankton Soc Jpn, 23: 75–80
Okay O S, Tolun L, Tellı-Karakoç F, et al. 2001. İzmit Bay (Turkey) ecosystem after Marmara earthquake and subsequent refinery fire: the long-term data. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42(5): 361–369
Olenina I, Hajdu S, Edler L, et al. 2006. Biovolumes and size-classes of phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No. 106. Helsinki: Helsinki Commission, Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, 144
Penna N, Capellacci S, Ricci F. 2004. The influence of the Po River discharge on phytoplankton bloom dynamics along the coastline of Pesaro (Italy) in the Adriatic Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48(3–4): 321–326
Saliba L J. 1995. Development of regional coastal water quality standards in the Mediterranean. Water Science and Technology, 32(9–10): 17–24
Smil V. 2000. Phosphorus in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25: 53–88
Smith V H, Tilman G D, Nekola J C. 1999. Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 100(1–3): 179–196
Spatharis S, Danielidis D B, Tsirtsis G. 2007. Recurrent Pseudo-nitzschia calliantha (Bacillariophyceae) and Alexandrium insuetum (Dinophyceae) winter blooms induced by agricultural runoff. Harmful Algae, 6(6): 811–822
Taş S, Ergül H A, Balkis N. 2016. Harmful algal blooms (HABs) and mucilage formations in the Sea of Marmara. In: Özsoy E, Çağatay M N, Balkıs N, et al., eds. The Sea of Marmara, Marine Biodiversity, Fisheries, Conservation and Governance. İstanbul, Turkey: Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV), 768–786
Taş S, Okuş E. 2011. A review on the bloom dynamics of a harmful dinoflagellate prorocentrum minimum in the Golden Horn Estuary. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 11(4): 673–681
Tas S, Yilmaz I N. 2015. Potentially harmful microalgae and algal blooms in a eutrophic estuary in the Sea of Marmara (Turkey). Mediterranean Marine Science, 16(2): 432–443
Tolun L, Martens D, Okay O S, et al. 2006. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination in coastal sediments of the Izmit Bay (Marmara Sea): case studies before and after the Izmit Earthquake. Environment International, 32(6): 758–765
Turk V, Hagström Å, Kovač N, et al. 2010. Composition and function of mucilage macroaggregates in the northern Adriatic. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 61(3): 279–289
Turkoglu M. 2013. Red tides of the dinoflagellate Noctiluca scintillans associated with eutrophication in the Sea of Marmara (the Dardanelles, Turkey). Oceanologia, 55(3): 709–732
Turkoglu M. 2016. First harmful algal bloom record of tycoplanktonic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima (Ehrenberg) F. Stein, 1878 in the Dardanelles (Turkish Straits System, Turkey). Journal of Coastal Life Medicine, 4(10): 765–774
Türkoğlu M. 2008. Synchronous blooms of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi and three dinoflagellates in the Dardanelles (Turkish Straits System). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK, 88(3): 433–441
Türkoğlu M. 2010. Temporal variations of surface phytoplankton, nutrients and chlorophyll a in the Dardanelles (Turkish Straits System): a coastal station sample in weekly time intervals. Turkish Journal of Biology, 34(3): 319–333
Vollenweider R, Giovanardi F, Montanari G, et al. 1998. Characterization of the trophic conditions of marine coastal waters with special reference to the NW Adriatic Sea: proposal for a trophic scale, turbidity and generalized water quality index. Environmetrics, 9(3): 329–357
Yi Xiaoyan, Huang Yousong, Zhuang Yunyun, et al. 2017. In situ diet of the copepod Calanus sinicus in coastal waters of the South Yellow Sea and the Bohai Sea. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 36(6): 68–79
Year 2018 volume 37 Issue 8
PDF
30
16
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1007/s13131-018-1191-7
  • Receive Date:2017-08-08
  • Online Date:2026-04-14
  • Published:2018-08-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2017-08-08
  • Accepted:2017-12-11
Funding
The Kocaeli University Scientific Researches Unit under contract No. 2009/040.
Affiliations
    1 Department of Biology, Science and Arts Faculty, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41380, Turkey

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-018-1191-7
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT