收藏切换
Projecting distributions of Argentine shortfin squid (Illex argentinus) in the Southwest Atlantic using a complex integrated model
收藏切换
PDF
Jintao WANG1, 5, Xinjun CHEN1, 2, 3, 4, *, Yong CHEN2, 5
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2018, 37(8) : 31 - 37
Less
收藏切换
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2018, 37(8): 31-37
Marine Biology
Projecting distributions of Argentine shortfin squid (Illex argentinus) in the Southwest Atlantic using a complex integrated model
Full
Jintao WANG1, 5, Xinjun CHEN1, 2, 3, 4, *, Yong CHEN2, 5
Affiliations
  • 1 College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
  • 2 Collaborative Innovation Center for Distant-water Fisheries, Shanghai 201306, China
  • 3 National Engineering Research Centre for Oceanic Fisheries, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
  • 4 Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
  • 5 School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA
Published: 2018-08-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-018-1231-3
Outline
收藏切换

We developed an approach that integrates generalized additive model (GAM) and neural network model (NNM) for projecting the distribution of Argentine shortfin squid (Illex argentinus). The data for this paper was based on commercial fishery data and relevant remote sensing environmental data including sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface height (SSH) and chlorophyll a (Chl a) from January to June during 2003 to 2011. The GAM was used to identify the significant oceanographic variables and establish their relationships with the fishery catch per unit effort (CPUE). The NNM with the GAM identified significant variables as input vectors was used for predicting spatial distribution of CPUE. The GAM was found to explain 53.8% variances for CPUE. The spatial variables (longitude and latitude) and environmental variables (SST, SSH and Chl a) were significant. The CPUE had nonlinear relationship with SST and SSH but a linear relationship with Chl a. The NNM was found to be effective and robust in the projection with low mean square errors (MSE) and average relative variances (ARV). The integrated approach can predict the spatial distribution and explain the migration pattern of Illex argentinus in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean.

Illex argentinus  /  abundance index  /  remote sensing environmental data  /  Southwest Atlantic Ocean
Jintao WANG, Xinjun CHEN, Yong CHEN. Projecting distributions of Argentine shortfin squid (Illex argentinus) in the Southwest Atlantic using a complex integrated model[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2018 , 37 (8) : 31 -37 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-018-1231-3
The Argentine shortfin squid, Illex argentinus, is a common neritic species occurring in waters off Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, and the Falkland/Malvinas Islands in the Southwest Atlantic (Haimovici et al., 1998). It is the most economically important cephalopod species for China and many other countries (Chen et al., 2008). Illex argentinus is an opportunistic feeder (Ivanovic and Brunetti, 1994; Brunetti et al., 1998a) growing rapidly with a short life cycle and a high degree of intra-population differentiation (Arkhipkin, 1993, 2000). Meanwhile I. argentinus is migratory species, and their concentrations are usually found at 45°–46°S in January or February, while growing rapidly this squid subsequently migrate southward towards the Falkland Islands. Peak concentrations are found around the Falkland Islands between March and May. Toward the end of this period, this squid starts to migrate northward, ultimately to spawn and die in the shelf and slope waters off northern Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil around July or August (Basson et al., 1996; Brunetti et al., 1998b). The population of I. argentinus has been separated into four stocks based on their lengths at maturity, areas and timing of spawning, and the distribution of early juveniles and adults life stages: South Patagonic Stock (SPS), Bonaerensis-Northpatogonic Stock (BNS), Summer Spawning Stock (SSS) and Southern Brazil Stock (SBS) (Hatanaka, 1986). Of the four stocks, the SPS is the dominant commercial stock and is mainly exploited by some areas in China’s mainland (Lu and Chen, 2012), Chinese Taipei (Chen and Chiu, 2009), and Falkland (Waluda et al., 1999).
The oceanographic environment for I. argentinus is mainly influenced by joint Brazil and Malvinas/Falkland Currents around 33°–39°S, causing an important thermohaline front that separates the subtropical waters from the subantarctic waters (Legeckis and Gordon, 1982; Olson et al., 1988; Gordon, 1989). Strong thermal and saline gradients can be observed in this convergence area, due to interactions of the two currents and the influence of the Patagonian Current and the discharge of the Río de la Plata, which provides nutrients for high levels of primary production (Haimovici et al., 1988).
Previous studies suggest that I. argentinus tends to be highly susceptible to environmental changes during all its life histroy. For example, Waluda et al. (2001) suggested that large-scale oceanographic variability in the location of the spawning/hatching grounds during the early life stage of I. argentinus was important in determining recruitment to the fishery. Bazzino et al. (2005) identified environmental associations (depth, bottom temperature and bottom salinity) of shortfin squid in the Northern Patagonian Shelf, and found that squid distribution showed significant associations mostly with depth and bottom temperature. Sacau et al. (2005) developed generalized additive models (GAMs) of squid abundance in relation to physical and environmental conditions including sea surface temperature (SST), latitude, longitude, month, average fishing depth and year to be applied to fishery forecasting, and predictors retained in the optimal model. However, other environmental variables, such as sea surface height (SSH) and chlorophyll a (Chl a) are also important indicators of physical oceanographic processes, and their impacts on the squid distributions received little attention (Chen et al., 2012).
In this study, we evaluated the influence of SST, SSH and Chl a on the spatial distribution of I. argentinus in the Southwest Atlantic, and developed a neural network model for forecasting spatial CPUE distribution. We then linked spatio-temporal variability in these oceanographic variables with the migration pattern of I. argentinus. The framework developed in the study provides an approach for forecasting spatial CPUE distribution and migration pattern of I. argentinus in the Southwest Atlantic, which can also be used for the other oceanic squid species.
Daily I. argentinus fishery data were obtained from the Chinese Squid-Jigging Technology Group of Shanghai Ocean University from January to June during 2003–2011. The Chinese squid-jigging vessels were all equipped with a main engine power of 120 kW×2, squid-attracting lamp power of 112 kW, and 16 squid-jigging machines. These vessels were similar in size and nighttime fishing operation and protocol. The data were digitized from fishing logbook of the Chinese commercial squid fishery operating on the fishing ground between 40°–50°S and 55°–70°W in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean. The catch in this area accounted for 90% in each year. The fishery data comprised fishing dates (year and month), fishing locations (latitude and longitude), daily catch (tonnes), and effort (days fished).
Most of the catches were from the South Patagonic stock of I. argentinus and there was no bycatch in the squid fishery (Chen et al., 2008). Fishing vessels and their operations were almost identical. Thus, the CPUE tends to be an approximate indicator of local stock abundance (Chen et al., 2008). In this study, we defined one unit of fishing area as 0.25° latitude by 0.25° longitude. The monthly nominal CPUE in one fishing unit of 0.25°×0.25° was calculated as follows:
$CPU{E_{ymi}} = \frac{{{C_{ymi}}}}{{{F_{ymi}}}}, $
where CPUEymi, Cymi and Fymi are the monthly nominal CPUE, the total catch for all the fishing vessels in a given fishing grid, and the days fished in a given fishing grid at grid i in month m and year y, respectively.
Monthly remotely sensed data, comprising SST, SSH and Chl a concentration for the fishing ground between 40°–50°S and 50°–70°W were downloaded from the Live Access Server of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Ocean Watch from 2003 to 2011 (http://oceanwatch.pifsc.noaa.gov/las/servlets/dataset). The method of converting spatial resolutions of remotely sensed data to those for the fishery data were discussed by Wang et al. (2015). Monthly fishery and oceanographic data were plotted allowing for overlaying and displaying of the distribution of I. argentinus from January to June during 2003–2011.
The generalized additive model (GAM) has been used for confirming the importance of oceanic environmental data and analysis its relationships with the I. argentinus distribution (Portela et al., 2005; Sacau et al., 2005). The GAMs were first proposed by Hastie and Tibshirani (1990). The model can deal with non-linear relationships between independent variable and response variable. We developed a GAM to quantify the relationship between the squid abundance (CPUE) and environmental variables. The variables built into the model include year, month, longitude, latitude, SST, SSH and Chl a. To deal with zero catches in log transformation, we added a constant of 10% of mean CPUE (Maunder and Punt, 2004). Thus, the GAM can be written as
$\begin{split}& { \rm ln}\left( {CPUE + mean\left( {CPUE} \right) \times 10\% } \right) = factor\left( {year} \right) +\\& \qquad factor\left( {month} \right) + s\left( {longitude} \right) + s\left( {latitude} \right) +\\& \qquad s\left( {SST} \right) + s\left( {SSH} \right) + s\left( {Chl \,\, a} \right) + \varepsilon,\end{split} $
where s is a spline smoother function, ε is the residual error, ε=σ2 and E(ε)=0.
We conducted a preliminary analysis to evaluate the significance of variables with no interaction terms being considered. Seven variables were included in the GAM by forward selection, and the most significant terms were selected based on correlation analysis, Chi-square statistical significance and AIC (α=0.05; Jensen et al., 2005; Chang et al., 2010).
After selecting significant variables in the GAM, we developed neural network models to predict the spatial distribution of squid abundance on the fishing ground of I. argentinus. The neural network models with functions of self-learning, good generalizations, and fault tolerance provides an approach to evaluate and predict complex non-linear relationships (Weigend et al., 1990). The neural network models are basically composed of input layer, hidden layer and output layer. Input and output layers consist of explanatory and response variables, respectively. In most cases, only one hidden layer is enough effective and satisfactory (Funahashi, 1989; Lek et al., 1996). However, how to confirm the number of nodes in the hidden layer is quite important and difficult. We utilized back-propagation algorithm in neural network models and added the number of nodes one by one in the hidden layer to search the optimal structure of model. For each different number of nodes in the hidden layer, 70% of data samples during 2003 to 2010 were randomly assigned to train, whereas the remaining 30% were used to validate the model, and the data samples in 2011 were used to test the model. We calculated mean square error (MSE) and average relative variance (ARV) (Nowlan and Hinton, 1992) to quantify the comparison results and confirm the best structure of neural network model. If ARV=1.0 implies that the model has come to a result of prediction average value, ARV=0.0 implies that the model achieves the desired result.
$MSE = \frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {{{\hat Y}_i} - {Y_i}} \right)}^2}} , $
$ARV = \frac{{{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {{{\widehat Y}_i} - {Y_i}} \right)} }^2}}}{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {{{\overline Y}_i} - {Y_i}} \right)}^2}} }}, $
where Yi is observed CPUE in fishery data, $ {\overline Y_i}$ is average CPUE in fishery data, and $\widehat Y_i $ is estimated CPUE in neural network models. The MSE value measures the accuracy of models. The ARV value reflects the stability of models; the smaller is the ARV values, the more robust is the model. We used R package including “mgcv”, “neuralnet” to select significant variables and establish neural network models respectively.
The monthly distributions of squid abundance index (CPUE) from January to June in 2003–2011 were plotted in Fig. 1. It is found that the high catch locations for I. argentinus occurred on the Patagonian Shelf of the north of 50°S during January to June with the peak values higher than 10 t/d mainly located within 42°–46°S and 50°S.
From the January to June, there was a clear “route” of high CPUE for Argentine shortfin squid (Fig. 1). High CPUEs are found at 46°S in January or February and then the vessels moved southward towards the Falkland Islands gradually. The peak concentrations were found around the Falkland Islands between March and May. At the end of this period, the vessels started migrating northward, and then the Chinese jigging fishing was stopped. In some years (such as 2003, 2009 and 2010) there was no fishing in June because of low CPUE in end of fishing season.
The final model included effects of year, month, latitude, longitude, SST, SSH and Chl a after significance tests. The GAM with the seven variables explained 54.8% variances for CPUE (Table 1). The GAM confirmed the non-linearity of the relationships between squid CPUE and variables (Fig. 2). Illex agrentinus CPUE appeared to decrease from shelf to the high sea (Fig. 2a), and the relationship between CPUE and latitude was a curve of “V” shape, with peak values at about 50°S and 42°S (Fig. 2b). The highest squid CPUEs were associated with a range of SST (10–16°C) (Fig. 2c), concentrating at the range of –60 to –20 cm of SSH (Fig. 2d). In the range of 0–2 mg/m3 of Chl a, the squid CPUE showed an increasing trend (Fig. 2e).
The neural network models were constructed using month, longitude, latitude, SST, SSH and Chl a, which were significant in the GAM, as the input vector and CPUE as the output vector. The MSE and ARV values showed that the model had higher accuracy and more robustness (Fig. 3) when the count of nodes in the hidden layer was equal to 9 (the structure of neural network model is 6:9:1, Fig. 4). In the best neural network model, the MSEs of training, validation and testing are 6.98, 7.77 and 7.79, respectively, the ARVs of training, validation and testing are 0.2, 0.4 and 0.45, respectively.
Based on the best neural network model, the predicted neural interpretation diagram also showed for complex relationships between the input variables and the squid CPUEs (Fig. 4). The weights of each node in the input and hidden layers showed the positive and negative impact synchronously on the squid abundances. The importance of the input variables including month, longitude, latitude, SST, SSH and Chl a in the prediction model was 5%, 9%, 27%, 26%, 15% and 18%, respectively. The latitude, SST and Chl a were the more important variables than month, longitude and SSH (Fig. 5).
The monthly CPUE gravities were calculated for the predicted CPUE and observed CPUE to show the gravity shifts from January to June for I. argentinus in 2005 (Fig. 6a) (The method of calculating CPUE gravities was stated by Wang et al. (2016)). The longitudinal change of CPUE gravity was more stable than latitudinal change of CPUE gravity, either forecasting gravity shift or observed gravity shift could better represent the “south-north” migration pattern of I. argentinus in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean.
Understanding and projecting how fish species react to climate change and variability in the regional/local oceanographic environmental is essential for the effective management of marine resources (Waluda et al., 2001). Illex argentinus abundance and distribution are found to be significantly influenced by surrounding environmental conditions (Waluda et al., 2001; Bazzino et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2012; Sacau et al., 2005). In this study, the integrated approach which using GAM to select significant variables and using NNM to establish relationships may overcome disadvantages associated with the use of sub-models alone. The GAM can interpret the relationships between results and factors, but its inference ability may be somewhat problematical, such as hypothesis test or obtaining confidence intervals for the fitted values caused by fitting process (Venables and Dichmont, 2004); neural network model is a “black box” model of obtaining a good understanding of the underlying mechanisms difficultly, but has strong ability of fitting non-linear relationships (Paruelo and Tomasel, 1997). The aim of combining the GAM and the ANN is to obtain more accurate prediction with better explanatory between independent and dependent variables, though the ANN is more capable in dealing with nonlinear relationships than GAM.
In the GAM analysis, all the environmental variables (SST, SSH and Chl a) had significant impacts on squid abundance (Table 1). The highest CPUE was found in temperature between 10–16°C, this was similar to the conclusion obtained by different methods based on different fishery data in other studies (e.g., Sacau et al., 2005). The other two environmental variables (SSH and Chl a) are rarely utilized for analyzing the distribution of I. argentinus, but have been used to other species, such as neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii in the Northwest Pacific Ocean (Wang et al., 2015). The Chl a concentration maybe a good indicator of the food availability for squid with high Chl a concentration yielding good feeding environments (Nishikawa et al., 2014). The relationship between Chl a concentration and squid abundance is possibly linear in the GAM. The SSH filed may be effective for predicting a water mass front, which is a potential aggregation mechanism for planktons as well as their predators, such as squid (Polito et al., 2000). The relationship between SSH and squid abundance demonstrated non-linearity being the highest CPUE found at SSH between –60 and –20 cm.
For the NNM, one of the greatest advantages is predictive ability. Though there are some methods to try to interpret model mechanism (Özesmi and Özesmi, 1999), it is insufficiently specific in our research. For example, we just knew the relationship between squid abundance and environmental variables is non-linear in neural interpretation diagram, but did not know the exact form of non-linear. Thus, we just took full advantage of NNM to predict spatial CPUE of I. argentinus. In fact, we also did try to predict spatial CPUE distribution using GAM model fitted on the same data samples, it was found that the outcomes were not better than NNM’s. Additionally, the relationships between squid and environmental variables may be varied among different life-history stages. However, the current neural networks developed in this paper were general models those mixed the effect of environmental gradients (spatial effects) with life-history changes (temporal effects), it tends to be risky.
In this study, the annual maps of monthly CPUE distribution (Fig. 1), especially in monthly CPUE gravities shift (Fig. 6a), exhibit the migration pattern of I. argentinus during January to June. The results were consistent with the conclusion reported by Sacau et al. (2005) and Waluda et al. (2001). Previous work suggests that the life-cycle of I. argentinus is associated with the subtropical confluence of the Brazil and Falkland Currents during reproduction and the early life stages (Brunetti and Ivanovic, 1992; Hatanaka, 1988) and with the Falkland Current over the Southern Patagonian shelf during maturation, feeding and growth (Rodhouse et al., 1995). In order to evaluate this mechanism with environmental variables, we plotted maps of monthly catch distribution in 2005 overlapped it with SST, SSH and Chl a concentration, because the catch in 2005 was relatively steady (Figs 6, 7 and 8). From the maps, the catch locations were basically distributed in warm-cold (Brazil-Falkland) confluence in the SST map (Fig. 6), between high and low surface layer especially along low surface layer (about –80 cm) in the SSH map (Fig. 7), on the road of high Chl a concentration that interweaved with dark environment where almost no Chl a concentration in the Chl a concentration map (Fig. 8). The south-north migration pattern for I. argentinus was consistent with the change of warm-cold (Brazil-Falkland) confluence from January to June. However, the migration pattern was not obvious in SSH and Chl a maps, because the catch locations were looked like constant in a fixed environmental surrounding. This suggested that I. argentinus lives in special habitat from SSH and Chl a concentration perspective.
In summary, the integrated model was well developed for representing and predicting the spatial distribution of I. argentinus squid with approximately 82% average accuracy, the model could be further used for spatial habitat reconstructing. But more work should be done in further. For example, if the neural network models of I. aregentinus were developed by monthly or other environmental variables, such as sea surface salinity and sea depth temperature (Yu et al., 2015), can be obtained, the better model would be developed.
The authors thank the Chinese Squid-Jigging Technology Group of Shanghai Ocean University for providing the catch data and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for providing the environmental data.
  • The Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean under contract No. 20155014; the National Natural Science Fundation of China under contract No. NSFC31702343.
Arkhipkin A. 1993. Age, growth, stock structure and migratory rate of pre-spawning short-finned squid Illex argentinus based on statolith ageing investigations. Fisheries Research, 16(4): 313–338
Arkhipkin A I. 2000. Intrapopulation structure of winter-spawned Argentine shortfin squid, Illex argentinus (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae), during its feeding period over the Patagonian Shelf. Fisheries Bulltine, 98: 1–13
Basson M, Beddington J R, Crombie J A, et al. 1996. Assessment and management techniques for migratory annual squid stocks: the Illex argentinus fishery in the Southwest Atlantic as an example. Fisheries Research, 28(1): 3–27
Bazzino G, Quiñones R A, Norbis W. 2005. Environmental associations of shortfin squid Illex argentinus (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in the Northern Patagonian Shelf. Fisheries Research, 76(3): 401–416
Brunetti N E, Elena B, Rossi G R, et al. 1998a. Summer distribution, abundance and population structure of Illex argentinus on the Argentine shelf in relation to environmental features. South African Journal of Marine Science, 20(1): 175–186
Brunetti N E, Ivanovic M L. 1992. Distribution and abundance of early life stages of squid (Illex argentinus) in the south-west Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 49(2): 175–183
Brunetti N E, Ivanovic M L, Rossi G, et al. 1998b. Fishery biology and life history of Illex argentinus. In: Okutani T, ed. Contributed papers to International Symposium on Large Pelagic Squids. Tokyo: Japan Marine Fishery Resources Research Center, 217–231
Chang J H, Chen Yong, Holland D, et al. 2010. Estimating spatial distribution of American lobster Homarus americanus using habitat variables. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 420: 145–156
Chen C S, Chiu T S. 2009. Standardising the CPUE for the Illex argentinus fishery in the Southwest Atlantic. Fisheries Science, 75(2): 265–272
Chen Xinjun, Liu Bilin, Chen Yong. 2008. A review of the development of Chinese distant-water squid jigging fisheries. Fisheries Research, 89(3): 211–221
Chen Xinjun, Lu Huajie, Liu Bilin, et al. 2012. Forecasting fishing ground of Illex argentinus by using habitat suitability model in the southwest Atlantic. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University (in Chinese), 21(3): 431–438
Funahashi K I. 1989. On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks. Neural Networks, 2(3): 183–192
Gordon A L. 1989. Brazil-malvinas confluence-1984. Deep Sea Research Part A: Oceanographic Research Papers, 36(3): 359–384
Haimovici M, Brunetti N E, Rodhouse P G, et al. 1998. Illex argentinus. In: Rodhouse P G, Dave E G, O’Dor P K, eds. Squid Recruitment Dynamics. The Genus Illex as a Model. The Commercial Illex species. Influences on Variability, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 376. Rome: FAO, 27–58
Hastie T J, Tibshirani R J. 1990. Generalized additive models. In: Cox D R, Hinkley D V, Rubin D, et al., eds. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. London: Chapman and Hall, 136–173
Hatanaka H. 1986. Growth and life span of short-finned spuid Illex argentinus in the waters off argentina. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 52(1): 11–17
Hatanaka H. 1988. Feeding migration of short-finned squid Illex argentinus in the waters off argentina. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 54(8): 1343–1349
Ivanovic M L, Brunetti N E. 1994. Food and feeding of Illex argentinus. Antarctic Science, 6(2): 185–193
Jensen O P, Seppelt R, Miller T J, et al. 2005. Winter distribution of blue crab Callinectes sapidus in Chesapeake Bay: application and cross-validation of a two-stage generalized additive model. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 299: 239–255
Legeckis R, Gordon A L. 1982. Satellite observations of the Brazil and Falkland currents—1975 1976 and 1978. Deep Sea Research Part A: Oceanographic Research Papers, 29(3): 375–401
Lek S, Delacoste M, Baran P, et al. 1996. Application of neural networks to modelling nonlinear relationships in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 90(1): 39–52
Lu Huajie, Chen Xinjun. 2012. Age, growth and population structure of Illex argentinus based on statolith microstructure in Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Journal of Fisheries of China (in Chinese), 36(7): 1049–1056
Maunder M N, Punt A E. 2004. Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fisheries Research, 70(2–3): 141–159
Nishikawa H, Igarashi H, Ishikawa Y, et al. 2014. Impact of paralarvae– and juveniles feeding environment on the neon flying squid (Ommastrephes bartramii) winter-spring cohort stock. Fisheries Oceanography, 23(4): 289–303
Nowlan S J, Hinton G E. 1992. Simplifying neural networks by soft weight-sharing. Neural Computation, 4(4): 473–493
Olson D B, Podestá G P, Evans R H, et al. 1988. Temporal variations in the separation of Brazil and Malvinas Currents. Deep Sea Research Part A: Oceanographic Research Papers, 35(12): 1971–1990
Özesmi S L, Özesmi U. 1999. An artificial neural network approach to spatial habitat modelling with interspecific interaction. Ecological Modelling, 116(1): 15–31
Paruelo J, Tomasel F. 1997. Prediction of functional characteristics of ecosystems: a comparison of artificial neural networks and regression models. Ecological Modelling, 98(2–3): 173–186
Polito P S, Sato O T, Liu W T. 2000. Characterization and validation of the heat storage variability from TOPEX/Poseidon at four oceanographic sites. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 105(C7): 16911–16921
Portela J, Sacau M, Wang J, et al. 2005. Analysis of the variability in the abundance of shortfin squid Illex argentinus in the Southwest Atlantic fisheries during the period 1999–2004. ICES CM 2005/O: 16
Rodhouse P G, Barton J, Hatifield E M C, et al. 1995. Illex argentinus: life cycle, population structure, and fishery. ICES Marine Science, 199: 425–432
Sacau M M, Pierce G J, Wang Jianjun, et al. 2005. The spatio-temporal pattern of Argentine shortfin squid Illex argentinus abundance in the southwest Atlantic. Aquatic Living Resources, 18(4): 361–372
Venables W N, Dichmont C M. 2004. GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research. Fisheries Research, 70(2–3): 319–337
Waluda C M, Rodhouse P G, Trathan P N, et al. 2001. Remotely sensed mesoscale oceanography and the distribution of Illex argentinus in the South Atlantic. Fisheries Oceanography, 10(2): 207–216
Waluda C M, Trathan P N, Rodhouse P G. 1999. Influence of oceanographic variability on recruitment in the Illex argentinus (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) fishery in the South Atlantic. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 183: 159–167
Wang Jintao, Chen Xinjun, Chen Yong. 2016. Spatio-temporal distribution of skipjack in relation to oceanographic conditions in the west-central Pacific Ocean. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 37(24): 6149–6164
Wang Jintao, Yu Wei, Chen Xinjun, et al. 2015. Detection of potential fishing zones for neon flying squid based on remote-sensing data in the Northwest Pacific Ocean using an artificial neural network. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36(13): 3317–3330
Weigend A S, Huberman B A, Rumelhart D E. 1990. Predicting the future: a connectionist approach. International Journal of Neural Systems, 1(3): 193–209
Yu Wei, Chen Xinjun, Yi Qian, et al. 2015. Variability of suitable habitat of western winter-spring cohort for neon flying squid in the Northwest Pacific under anomalous environments. PLoS One, 10(4): e0122997
Year 2018 volume 37 Issue 8
PDF
28
15
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1007/s13131-018-1231-3
  • Receive Date:2018-03-07
  • Online Date:2026-04-14
  • Published:2018-08-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2018-03-07
  • Accepted:2018-04-24
Funding
The Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean under contract No. 20155014; the National Natural Science Fundation of China under contract No. NSFC31702343.
Affiliations
    1 College of Marine Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
    2 Collaborative Innovation Center for Distant-water Fisheries, Shanghai 201306, China
    3 National Engineering Research Centre for Oceanic Fisheries, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
    4 Key Laboratory of Sustainable Exploitation of Oceanic Fisheries Resources of Ministry of Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
    5 School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-018-1231-3
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT