收藏切换
Family-level diversity of extracellular proteases of sedimentary bacteria from the South China Sea
收藏切换
PDF
Jinyu Yang1, 4, Yangyang Feng1, Xiulan Chen1, Binbin Xie1, Yuzhong Zhang1, 2, 3, Mei Shi1, Xiying Zhang1, *
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2019, 38(12) : 73 - 83
Less
收藏切换
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2019, 38(12): 73-83
Marine Biology
Family-level diversity of extracellular proteases of sedimentary bacteria from the South China Sea
Full
Jinyu Yang1, 4, Yangyang Feng1, Xiulan Chen1, Binbin Xie1, Yuzhong Zhang1, 2, 3, Mei Shi1, Xiying Zhang1, *
Affiliations
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Marine Biotechnology Research Center, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
  • 2 Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
  • 3 College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
  • 4 Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing Technology of Shandong Province/Key Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Jinan 250100, China
Published: 2019-12-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1391-9
Outline
收藏切换

Protease-producing bacteria and their extracellular proteases are key players in degrading organic nitrogen to drive marine nitrogen cycling and yet knowledge on both of them is still very limited. This study screened protease-producing bacteria from the South China Sea sediments and analyzed the diversity of their extracellular proteases at the family level through N-terminal amino acid sequencing. Results of the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis showed that all screened protease-producing bacteria belonged to the class Gammaproteobacteria and most of them were affiliated with different genera within the orders Alteromonadales and Vibrionales. The N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis for fourteen extracellular proteases from fourteen screened bacterial strains revealed that all these proteases belonged to the M4 family of metalloproteases or the S8 family of serine proteases. This study presents new details on taxa of marine sedimentary protease-producing bacteria and types of their extracellular proteases, which will help to comprehensively understand the process and mechanism of the microbial enzymatic degradation of marine sedimentary organic nitrogen.

protease-producing bacteria  /  diversity  /  extracellular proteases  /  protease families  /  N-terminal amino acid sequencing  /  South China Sea
Jinyu Yang, Yangyang Feng, Xiulan Chen, Binbin Xie, Yuzhong Zhang, Mei Shi, Xiying Zhang. Family-level diversity of extracellular proteases of sedimentary bacteria from the South China Sea[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2019 , 38 (12) : 73 -83 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-019-1391-9
Microbial degradation of organic matter is a crucial process for the element and nutrient cycling in marine environments. Microbial extracellular enzymes play pivotal roles in this process by effectively catalyzing the decomposition of high molecular weight organic matter into smaller and assimilable units and thereby initiating the mineralization of organic matter (Arnosti, 2011; Arnosti et al., 2014; Azam and Malfatti, 2007; Boetius and Lochte, 1994; Fabiano and Danovaro, 1998; Patel et al., 2001; Poremba, 1995; Talbot and Bianchi, 1997; Zimmerman et al., 2013). Proteins constitute large portions of marine organic matters (Bridoux et al., 2015; Lloyd et al., 2013; Moore et al., 2014; Nelson and Baldock, 2005), protease-producing bacteria and the proteases they secrete are therefore usually considered to act as important players in the microbial degradation process of marine organic nitrogen, especially high molecular weight organic nitrogen (Chen et al., 2009; Herbert, 1999; Qin et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2008, 2012; Zhou et al., 2009). Knowing the taxa of protease-producing bacteria and the types of the extracellular proteases they produce is a major requisite for the full and accurate understanding of the process and its ecological significance (Arnosti, 2011; Chen et al., 2009; Jørgensen and Boetius, 2007; Lloyd et al., 2013; Tsuboi et al., 2014). However, to date, there are only a few studies addressing the issue and knowledge on the above two aspects in most sea areas is still lacking.
Investigation of the diversity of marine protease-producing bacteria began with a work on the sub-Antarctic coastal areas (Isla de Los Estados, Argentina) in 2007, in which nineteen protease-producing bacteria were isolated from sub-Antarctic marine sediments and were found to belong to the genera Pseudoalteromonas, Shewanella, Colwellia and Planococcus and the family Flavobacteriaceae, with Pseudoalteromonas and Shewanella being the predominant ones (Olivera et al., 2007). Later, the diversities of the cultivable protease-producing bacteria in the sediments from several other marine areas have been successively reported, showing that the sedimentary protease-producing bacteria communities and the predominant groups of them were quite different among different sea areas. For examples, seventy-eight protease-producing bacterial strains screened from sediments of the tropical South China Sea were mainly affiliated with the genera Pseudoalteromonas, Alteromonas, Marinobacter, Idiomarina, Halomonas, Vibrio, Shewanella, Pseudomonas and Rheinheimera within the class Gammaproteobacteria and dominated by Alteromonas and Pseudoalteromonas (Zhou et al., 2009); while one hundred and twenty-four protease-producing strains screened from sediments of a temperate bay (Laizhou Bay, China) were mainly affiliated with the genera Bacillus, Jeotgalibacillus, Halobacillus, Planococcus, Oceanobacillus, Pseudoalteromonas, Photobacterium, Halomonas, Rheinheimera, Alcanivorax, Celeribacter, Sulfitobacter, Marinobacter and Ruegeria within the phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria with Bacillus, Pseudoalteromonas and Photobacterium being the preponderant ones (Li et al., 2017).
In addition to the diversity of protease-producing bacteria, the diversity of the extracellular proteases produced by bacteria from marine sediments was also revealed through inhibitor analysis. Surprisingly, although the structural compositions of the sedimentary protease-producing bacteria communities and the predominant groups varied considerably in different sea areas, the principle types of the extracellular proteases of sedimentary protease-producing bacteria from different sea areas are consistent: being serine proteases and metalloproteases (Li et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2009, 2013). Proteases are divided into nine types based on their catalytic types, and proteases in each type are further classified into clans and then families. A family is sets of homologous proteases with a significant similarity in amino acid sequence and proteases are now divided into two hundred and sixty-seven families (Rawlings et al., 2018). Although the extracellular proteases from sedimentary bacteria have been shown to be serine proteases and metalloproteases, there are hitherto no reports investigating the diversity, at a more fine level (e.g., at the family level), of extracellular proteases from sedimentary protease-producing bacteria. Thus, it is unknown what kinds of serine proteases and metalloproteases are secreted by sedimentary bacteria. In this study, we investigated the family-level diversity of the extracellular proteases from marine sedimentary bacteria. Protease-producing bacteria were screened from sediment samples of the South China Sea, their extracellular proteases were further purified and the N-terminal sequences of the purified extracellular proteases were determined to reveal the family-level diversity of marine sedimentary bacterial proteases.
Sediment samples were collected from seventeen stations of the South China Sea during August to September, 2008. These stations are distributed in different regions of the northern part of the South China Sea and in different water depths (35–1 320 m) (Fig. 1). The sediment samples were stored at 4°C before their use as sources to isolate bacteria. Screening of protease-producing bacteria from these sediment samples were performed with the conventional dilution-plate technique using a selective medium containing 0.2% yeast extract, 0.3% casein, 0.5% gelatin, 1.5% agar and artificial sea water (prepared with Sigma sea salts) (pH 8.0) at 15°C, as described in Zhou et al. (2009). Colonies showing hydrolysis zone on the selective plates were picked up and purified by repeated streaking on the selective medium. Strains purified were cultured in TYS broth (0.5% tryptone, 0.1% yeast extract and artificial seawater) at 15°C and stored at –80°C in TYS broth containing 15% (v/v) glycerol.
For phylogenetic identification of these protease-producing bacterial strains screened, chromosomal DNAs used as the templates were extracted with a bacterial genomic DNA isolation kit (BioTeke, China) and their 16S rRNA genes were PCR-amplified using the primers 27F and 1492R. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were sequenced using an ABI 3 730 automatic DNA sequencer. The obtained 16S rRNA gene sequences were subjected to BLAST searches against the GenBank database to determine the phylogenetic affiliation to different bacterial genera of strains screened. Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis were conducted using MEGA Version 5 (Tamura et al., 2011). Phylogenetic trees were generated using the Neighbour-Joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) with evolutionary distances being calculated according to the Kimura two-parameter model (Kimura, 1980) and bootstrap analysis being based on 1 000 replicates.
The screened protease-producing bacterial strains were, respectively, streaked onto two solid media (containing 0.5% casein or 0.5% gelatin, 0.2% yeast extract, 1.5% agar and artificial sea water) and incubated at 15°C for 3–10 d. The hydrolytic zone diameter and colony diameter of every strain on each of the two solid media were, respectively, measured. The ratio of hydrolytic zone diameter to colony diameter (H/C) was then calculated to reflect the hydrolysis ability of the extracellular proteases of each strain towards casein or gelatin. The average H/C value of three colonies of each strain was taken.
Protease-producing strains were cultivated in medium containing 0.2% yeast extract, 0.5% gelatin, 0.5% casein and artificial sea water at 15°C at the speed of 200 r/min for 3 d, then the fermentation broth containing the extracellular proteases was collected by centrifugation. Protease activity was determined as described previously (Chen et al., 2003). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μg of tyrosine from casein per minute.
Protease-producing strains were cultured in the fermentation medium containing 0.5% casein, 0.5% gelatin, 0.2% yeast extract and artificial seawater at 15°C until the protease activity reached maximum. The fermentation broth of each strain was centrifuged (10 000× g, 10 min) at 4°C and the supernatant was precipitated by adding ammonium sulfate at an appropriate concentration. The resultant precipitate was gathered by centrifugation (10 000× g, 10 min) and dissolved in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.5). The solution obtained was dialyzed against 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) to remove excess ammonium sulfate. The dialyzed solution was then loaded onto a DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow column (Amersham Biosciences, USA) pre-equilibrated with 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and was subsequently eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl from 0 to 1.0 mol/L. Fractions with protease activity were collected and subjected to the following sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis.
SDS-PAGE was performed onto 12.5% running gels for the purity examination and molecular weight determination of the target proteases in the active fractions. After electrophoresis, the gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 to visualize protein bands.
Gelatin zymography analysis for the extracellular proteases partially purified was performed as described previously (He et al., 2012) with slight modification. In the analysis, proteases were firstly separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels containing 0.2% gelatin. The gels were subsequently immersed in the Triton X-100 solution (2.5%, v/v) for 45 min to remove SDS and further soaked into 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer at 37°C for 2 h to allow proteases to perform their activities to gelatin. The gels were finally stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 and de-stained. The clear and white bands on the gels against the blue background represented protease bands.
After the protease sample was separated in SDS-polyacrylamide gels by electrophoresis, the sample was transferred to the Sequi-Blot polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad) at a constant current of 200 mA in a CAPS buffer system for 2 h. Then the membrane was stained by Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 and de-stained. The N-terminal amino acid sequences of target proteases were determined using the Edman degradation method on a PROCISE 491 protein sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA) at Peking University (China).
The N-terminal amino acid sequences obtained were BLAST searched against the GenBank non-redundant protein database to find homologues of the target proteases. The nearest homologue to each target protease found was searched for conserved domains in its full-length amino acid sequence through NCBI CD-Search service (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) to identify the protease family it belongs to and the target protease was then assigned to the same family. Sequence alignment was performed with ClustalW (Chenna et al., 2003) and edited with ESPript (Robert and Gouet, 2014).
The 16S rRNA gene sequences for the strains screened in this study were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers from MF975547 to MF975636.
A total of ninety protease-producing bacterial strains were screened from sediments samples collected from seventeen stations of the South China Sea (Fig. 1). Taxonomic belongingness to different bacterial genera of these new isolates was subsequently determined by comparatively analyzing their nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences. The results showed that all strains screened belonged to nine genera in the class Gammaproteobacteria of the phylum Proteobacteria, i.e., Pseudoalteromonas, Photobacterium, Vibrio, Shewanella, Alteromonas, Idiomarina, Pseudomonas, Oceanospirilum and Psychrobacter. On the whole, Pseudoalteromonas (44.4%), Photobacterium (20.0%), Vibrio (12.2%), Shewanella (10.0%) and Alteromonas (6.6%), were the preponderant groups, while Idiomarina (2.2%), Pseudomonas (2.2%), Oceanospirilum (1.1%) and Psychrobacter (1.1%), all containing only one or two strains, occupied very few proportions of the total bacteria screened. Meanwhile, Pseudoalteromonas (forty strains) was found to be present in fourteen sediments and to be dominant in nine samples (CF9, CF10, CF11, E425, E503, E512, E704, E707 and E709) (Fig. 2), having a much wider distribution in different stations and greater quantity than other groups and hence representing the most frequently recovered and abundant group of the cultivable protease-producing bacteria in the South China Sea sediments studied. In addition, protease-producing bacteria from CF10 and E525 samples belonged to five genera, in a striking contrast to those from CF11, E503, E704 samples all belonging to only one genus (Pseudoalteromonas), constituting the two most diverse communities of the cultivable protease-producing bacteria among the seventeen stations.
Phylogenetic relationships of all the protease-producing strains to different genera were depicted in the neighbor-joining tree constructed based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (Fig. 3). Some Pseudoalteromonas and Photobacterium strains showing closely phylogenetic relationships to each other clustered into two branches in Fig. 3: Branch 1 (Fig. 4a) consisting of thirty-seven Pseudoalteromonas strains, all being closely related to Pseudoalteromonas shioyasakiensis (AB720724) isolated from a Pacific Ocean sediment (Matsuyama et al., 2014) and Branch 2 (Fig. 4b) consisting of seven Photobacterium strains, all being closely related to Photobacterium lutimaris (DQ534014) isolated from a tidal flat sediment in Korea (Jung et al., 2007).
The extracellular proteases diversity of the protease-producing bacteria screened from the South China Sea sediments was firstly preliminarily characterized by measuring the H/C ratios of colonies on the plates containing gelatin or casein. Judged from each strain’s H/C ratios on plates containing casein or gelatin (Table 1), extracellular proteases from eighty-one strains (90% of the total strains) could hydrolyze casein, those from fifty-one strains (56.7% of the total strains) could hydrolyze gelatin and those from forty-six strains (51.1% of the total strains) could hydrolyze both the substrates. In particular, the extracellular proteases from five Photobacterium strains (CF1-1, CF1-3, CF1-8, CF1-9 and E512-5) show very high gelatinolytic activity with the H/C ratios more than 5 and those from three Pseudoalteromonas strains (CF2-12, E512-3 and E707-8), three Alteromonas strains (E522-9, E522-12 and E709-2), five Photobacterium strains (CF1-5, E525-10, E703-4, E703-12 and E703-13), three Shewanella strains (CF10-3, E518-1 and E525-6), five Vibrio strains (CF2-6, CF2-9, E517-4, E517-9 and E525-9) and one Pseudomonas strain (CF10-6) showed relatively high gelatinolytic activity with the H/C ratios more than 3. In the meantime, extracellular proteases from one Alteromonas strain (E709-2) and one Photobacterium strain (E703-4) showed very high caseinolytic activity with the H/C ratios more than 5, and those from twelve Pseudoalteromonas strains (CF1-10, CF2-5, CF2-13, CF9-2, E503-8, E512-3, E704-4, E704-6, E707-6, E707-8, E707-9 and E709-10), one Alteromonas strain (E522-12), one Photobacterium strain (E512-5) and one Oceanospirillum strain (CF10-4), three Shewanella strains (CF10-5, E518-1 and E518-2) and nine Vibrio strains (CF2-6, CF2-8, CF2-9, E425-4, E425-5, E517-4, E517-7, E517-9 and E525-9) showed relatively high caseinolytic activity with the H/C ratios more than 3. Moreover, the extracellular proteases from twelve strains (including strains E512-3 and E707-8 of Pseudoalteromonas, E518-1 of Shewanella, E522-12 and E709-2 of Alteromonas, E512-5 and E703-4 of Photobacterium and CF2-6, CF2-9, E517-4, E517-9 and E525-9 of Vibrio) showed relatively high activity towards both gelatin and casein because their H/C ratios on the two kinds of plates containing gelatin or casein were both greater than 3 (Table 1). Altogether, differences in the hydrolysis ability towards gelatin and casein of the extracellular proteases from the screened strains reflect the difference in kinds or in substrate specificity of these proteases and their diversity and complexity.
To identify their types at the family level, the extracellular proteases secreted by the protease-producing bacteria screened from the South China Sea sediments were purified and their N-terminal amino acid sequences were determined. When cultivated in the fermentation medium, the amount of extracellular protease secreted by each strain was determined by protease activity assay. Finally, we found that the amount of secreted extracellular proteases of only fourteen strains affiliated with the genera Pseudoalteromonas (eight), Photobacterium (two), Vibrio (three) and Idiomarina (one) was enough to be purified for the subsequent N-terminal amino acid sequencing. Then, the extracellular proteases of these strains were purified by ion exchange chromatography. The different fractions from ion exchange chromatography were analyzed by protease activity assay and the fractions with protease activity were collected for zymography analysis to confirm the gelatin hydrolysis activity (Fig. 5). Then the N-terminal amino acid sequences of the purified proteases were determined and BLAST searched. According to the results of the blast searching of the N-terminal amino acid sequences and the conserved domains searching of their homologues, all the sequenced extracellular proteases of the fourteen strains could be assigned to the M4 family of metalloproteases or the S8 family of serine proteases (Table 2), which was in good consistence with previous observations that metalloproteases and/or serine proteases were the principle extracellular proteases of the sedimentary protease-producing bacteria (Li et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2009). The alignments between the 14 N-terminal amino acid sequences and the previously experimental validated proteases in the same family were shown in Fig. 6. More specifically, thirteen extracellular proteases (of the total fourteen proteases to be N-terminally determined) from thirteen strains including seven Pseudoalteromonas strains (CF9-2, CF10-8, CF11-8, E704-4, E503-4, E522-8 and E512-3), two Photobacterium strains (CF1-1 and CF1-3), three Vibrio strains (CF2-6, E525-2 and E425-5) and one Idiomarina strain (E525-7) belonged to the M4 family and one protease from the Pseudoalteromonas strain CF2-5 belonged to the S8 family (Table 2), which indicated that the M4 and S8 proteases are probably the main types of the extracellular proteases of the screened strains.
The major groups of the cultivable protease-producing bacteria recovered from the South China Sea in this study, including Pseudoalteromonas, Photobacterium, Vibrio, Shewanella and Alteromonas, all are members of the orders Alteromonadales and Vibrionales of the class Gammaproteobacteria. These groups (or at least some of them) and some other groups in the two orders were also found prevalent and predominant in the cultivable protease-producing bacteria communities from other sediment samples (Li et al., 2017; Olivera et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2009), indicating that Gammaproteobacteria belonging to the orders Alteromonadales and Vibrionales seem to be the major groups of the cultivable protease-producing bacteria in marine sedimentary environments. Intriguingly, members of the orders Alteromonadales and Vibrionales were also reported to be prolific producers of antagonistic materials (Long and Azam, 2001), and hence the extracellular proteases they secrete maybe represent one type of the inhibitory agents to other strains in view of the fact that some bacterial proteases, such as staphylolysin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Kessler et al., 1993) and lysostaphin from Staphylococcus simulansare (Schindler and Schuhardt, 1964), have been reported to have lytic activities toward cells of certain bacterial species.
Metalloproteases and serine proteases are both greatly diverse, including seventy-five and fifty-three families, respectively, to date, and each family contains one or more different proteases (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/merops/). Although it has been found that marine sedimentary bacteria mainly secrete metalloproteases and serine proteases (Li et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2009, 2013), the diversity of extracellular proteases from marine sedimentary bacteria at family level or even more fine level has not yet been revealed. In this study, through N-terminal amino acid sequencing, extracellular proteases of fourteen sedimentary strains screened were found belonging to the M4 family of metalloproteases or the S8 family of serine proteases. Most proteases of these two families are secreted enzymes able to degrade extracellular proteins and peptides to support the bacterial growth (Rawlings et al., 2018), meaning that they may act as key forces in decomposing nitrogenous organic matters to drive the nitrogen cycling in marine sedimentary environments. Moreover, a number of M4 and S8 proteases from marine sedimentary bacteria have been identified and characterized, such as the M4 metalloproteases MCP-02 and HSPA, and the S8 serine proteases myroicolsin, deseasin MCP-01, MCP-03, P57, Sep1 and a Planomicrobium sp. 547 protease, which display particular structural and catalytic properties to efficiently decompose proteinaceous substrates (Chen et al., 2003, 2007; Gao et al., 2010; Geng et al., 2016; Li et al., 2016; Ran et al., 2013, 2014; Yan et al., 2009; Yang et al., 2011, 2013; Zhao et al., 2008), exemplifying the wide distribution of the M4 and S8 proteases in marine sedimentary bacteria and meanwhile highlighting their ecological roles in marine nitrogenous organic matters degradation. In addition, by applying the metaproteomic technique, deseasin MCP-01 (the S8 family) and metalloprotease MCP-02 (the M4 family) were directly detected in marine particulate organic matter (POM) samples obtained by filtering large volumes of oligotrophic seawater (≥ 600 L) collected at different depths (300 and 500 m) of the Sargasso Sea (Bridoux et al., 2015), further demonstrating the prevalence of the M4 and S8 family proteases in marine environments and also supporting our findings in this study that the M4 metalloproteases and S8 serine proteases are the main types of the extracellular proteases of marine sedimentary strains.
To sum up, this study analyzed the diversity of cultivable protease-producing sedimentary bacteria from the South China Sea based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences analysis and their extracellular proteases at the family level through N-terminal amino acid sequencing. It was found that the protease-producing bacterial strains screened were mostly affiliated with different genera belonging to the orders Alteromonadales and Vibrionales of the class Gammaproteobacteria and their extracellular proteases mainly belonged to the M4 family of metalloproteases and the S8 family of serine proteases. These findings provide new details on taxa of cultivable protease-producing sedimentary bacteria and types of their extracellular proteases, which broaden our understanding to protease-producing bacteria and their extracellular proteases in marine environments and are helpful in accurately and completely elucidating the mechanism underlying sedimentary organic nitrogen degradation. In addition, it is worth mentioning that, it still remains a great technological challenge to purify all the bacterial extracellular proteases for N-terminal amino acid sequencing because the amount of some extracellular proteases was too small in our cultural condition to be purified. Therefore, new techniques are urgently required to more effectively and accurately reveal the diversity of marine bacterial extracellular proteases.
  • The AoShan Talents Cultivation Program supported by Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology under contract No. 2017ASTCP-OS14; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 31670063, 31670497 and 31870052; the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province under contract No. 2009TS079; the Science and Technology Basic Resources Investigation Program of China under contract No. 2017FY100804.
Arnosti C. 2011. Microbial extracellular enzymes and the marine carbon cycle. Annual Review of Marine Science, 3: 401–425, doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120709-142731
Arnosti C, Bell C, Moorhead D L, et al. 2014. Extracellular enzymes in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments: perspectives on system variability and common research needs. Biogeochemistry, 117(1): 5–21, doi: 10.1007/s10533-013-9906-5
Azam F, Malfatti F. 2007. Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(10): 782–791, doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1747
Boetius A, Lochte K. 1994. Regulation of microbial enzymatic degradation of OM in deep-sea sediments. Marine Ecology Progress, 104: 299–307, doi: 10.3354/meps104299
Bridoux M C, Neibauer J, Ingalls A E, et al. 2015. Suspended marine particulate proteins in coastal and oligotrophic waters. Journal of Marine Systems, 143: 39–48, doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.10.014
Chen Xiulan, Xie Binbin, Bian Fei, et al. 2009. Ecological function of myroilysin, a novel bacterial M12 metalloprotease with elastinolytic activity and a synergistic role in collagen hydrolysis, in biodegradation of deep-sea high-molecular-weight organic nitrogen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(7): 1838–1844, doi: 10.1128/AEM.02285-08
Chen Xiulan, Xie Binbin, Lu Jingtao, et al. 2007. A novel type of subtilase from the psychrotolerant bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913: catalytic and structural properties of deseasin MCP-01. Microbiology, 153(7): 2116–2125, doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006056-0
Chen Xiulan, Zhang Yuzhong, Gao Peiji, et al. 2003. Two different proteases produced by a deep-sea psychrotrophic bacterial strain, Pseudoaltermonas sp. SM9913. Marine Biology, 143(5): 989–993, doi: 10.1007/s00227-003-1128-2
Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, et al. 2003. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(13): 3497–3500, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg500
Fabiano M, Danovaro R. 1998. Enzymatic activity, bacterial distribution, and organic matter composition in sediments of the ross sea (Antarctica). Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 64(10): 3838–3845
Gao Xiang, Wang Jue, Yu Daqi, et al. 2010. Structural basis for the autoprocessing of zinc metalloproteases in the thermolysin family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(41): 17569–17574, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005681107
Geng Ce, Nie Xiangtao, Tang Zhichao, et al. 2016. A novel serine protease, Sep1, from Bacillus firmus DS-1 has nematicidal activity and degrades multiple intestinal-associated nematode proteins. Scientific Reports, 6: 25012, doi: 10.1038/srep25012
He Hailun, Guo Jun, Chen Xiulan, et al. 2012. Structural and functional characterization of mature forms of metalloprotease E495 from Arctic sea-ice bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM495. PLoS One, 7(4): e35442, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035442
Herbert R A. 1999. Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 23(5): 563–590, doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1999.tb00414.x
Jørgensen B B, Boetius A. 2007. Feast and famine-microbial life in the deep-sea bed. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(10): 770–781, doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1745
Jung S Y, Jung Y T, Oh T K, et al. 2007. Photobacterium lutimaris sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat sediment in Korea. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 57(2): 332–336, doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64580-0
Kessler E, Safrin M, Olson J C, et al. 1993. Secreted LasA of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a staphylolytic protease. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268(10): 7503–7508
Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16(2): 111–120, doi: 10.1007/BF01731581
Li Huijuan, Tang Bailu, Shao Xuan, et al. 2016. Characterization of a new S8 serine protease from marine sedimentary Photobacterium sp. A5-7 and the function of its protease-associated domain. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7: 2016, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02016
Li Yan, Wu Chaoya, Zhou Mingyang, et al. 2017. Diversity of cultivable protease-producing bacteria in Laizhou Bay sediments, Bohai Sea, China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8: 405, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00405
Lloyd K G, Schreiber L, Petersen D G, et al. 2013. Predominant archaea in marine sediments degrade detrital proteins. Nature, 496(7444): 215–218, doi: 10.1038/nature12033
Long R A, Azam F. 2001. Antagonistic interactions among marine pelagic bacteria. Applied and Environmental Mircobiology, 67(11): 4975–4983, doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.11.4975-4983.2001
Matsuyama H, Sawazaki K, Minami H, et al. 2014. Pseudoalteromonas shioyasakiensis sp. nov., a marine polysaccharide-producing bacterium. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 64(1): 101–106, doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.055558-0
Moore E K, Harvey H R, Faux J F, et al. 2014. Electrophoretic extraction and proteomic characterization of proteins buried in marine sediments. Chromatography, 1(4): 176–193, doi: 10.3390/chromatography1040176
Nelson P N, Baldock J A. 2005. Estimating the molecular composition of a diverse range of natural organic materials from solid-state 13C NMR and elemental analyses. Biogeochemistry, 72(1): 1–34, doi: 10.1007/s10533-004-0076-3
Olivera N L, Sequeiros C, Nievas M L. 2007. Diversity and enzyme properties of protease-producing bacteria isolated from sub-Antarctic sediments of Isla de Los Estados, Argentina. Extremophiles, 11(3): 517–526, doi: 10.1007/s00792-007-0064-3
Patel A B, Fukami K, Nishijima T. 2001. Extracellular proteolytic activity in the surface sediment of a eutrophic inlet. Microbes and Environments, 16(1): 25–35, doi: 10.1264/jsme2.2001.25
Poremba K. 1995. Hydrolytic enzymatic activity in deep-sea sediments. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 16(3): 213–221, doi: 10.1111/fem.1995.16.issue-3
Qin Qilong, Zhang Xiying, Wang Xumin, et al. 2010. The complete genome of Zunongwangia profunda SM-A87 reveals its adaptation to the deep-sea environment and ecological role in sedimentary organic nitrogen degradation. BMC Genomics, 11: 247, doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-247
Ran Liyuan, Su Hainan, Zhao Guoyan, et al. 2013. Structural and mechanistic insights into collagen degradation by a bacterial collagenolytic serine protease in the subtilisin family. Molecular Microbiology, 90(5): 997–1010, doi: 10.1111/mmi.12412
Ran Liyuan, Su Hainan, Zhou Mingyang, et al. 2014. Characterization of a novel subtilisin-like protease myroicolsin from deep sea bacterium Myroides profundi D25 and molecular insight into its collagenolytic mechanism. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289(9): 6041–6053, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.513861
Rawlings N D, Barrett A J, Thomas P D, et al. 2018. The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(D1): D624–D632, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1134
Robert X, Gouet P. 2014. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Research, 42(Web server issue): W320–W324, doi: 10.1093/nar/gku316
Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4(4): 406–425, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
Schindler C A, Schuhardt V T. 1964. Lysostaphin: A new bacteriolytic agent for the Staphylococcus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 51(3): 414–421, doi: 10.1073/pnas.51.3.414
Talbot V, Bianchi M. 1997. Bacterial proteolytic activity in sediments of the Subantarctic Indian Ocean sector. Deep Sea Research Part Ⅱ: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 44(5): 1069–1084, doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(96)00107-5
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28(10): 2731–2739, doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121
Tsuboi S, Yamamura S, Imai A, et al. 2014. Linking temporal changes in bacterial community structures with the detection and phylogenetic analysis of neutral metalloprotease genes in the sediments of a hypereutrophic lake. Microbes and Environments, 29(3): 314–321, doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me14064
Yan Bingqiang, Chen Xiulan, Hou Xiaoyan, et al. 2009. Molecular analysis of the gene encoding a cold-adapted halophilic subtilase from deep-sea psychrotolerant bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913: cloning, expression, characterization and function analysis of the C-terminal PPC domains. Extremophiles, 13(4): 725–733, doi: 10.1007/s00792-009-0263-1
Yang Xiangsheng, Chen Xinglin, Xu Xianzhong, et al. 2011. Cold-adaptive alkaline protease from the psychrophilic Planomicrobium sp. 547: enzyme characterization and gene cloning. Advances in Polar Science, 22(1): 49–54, doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1085.2011.00049
Yang Jian, Li Jie, Mai Zhimao, et al. 2013. Purification, characterization, and gene cloning of a cold-adapted thermolysin-like protease from Halobacillus sp. SCSIO 20089. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 115(6): 628–632, doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.12.013
Zhang Xiying, Han Xiaoxu, Chen Xiulan, et al. 2015. Diversity of cultivable protease-producing bacteria in sediments of Jiaozhou Bay, China. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6: 1021, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01021
Zhao Huilin, Chen Xiulan, Xie Binbin, et al. 2012. Elastolytic mechanism of a novel M23 metalloprotease pseudoalterin from deep-sea Pseudoalteromonas sp. CF6-2: cleaving not only glycyl bonds in the hydrophobic regions but also peptide bonds in the hydrophilic regions involved in cross-linking. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(47): 39710–39720, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.405076
Zhao Guoyan, Chen Xiulan, Zhao Huilin, et al. 2008. Hydrolysis of insoluble collagen by deseasin MCP-01 from deep-sea Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913: collagenolytic characters, collagen-binding ability of C-terminal polycystic kidney disease domain, and implication for its novel role in deep-sea sedimentary particulate organic nitrogen degradation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283(52): 36100–36107, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804438200
Zhou Mingyang, Chen Xiulan, Zhao Huilin, et al. 2009. Diversity of both the cultivable protease-producing bacteria and their extracellular proteases in the sediments of the South China sea. Microbial Ecology, 58(3): 582–590, doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9506-z
Zhou Mingyang, Wang Guanglong, Li Dan, et al. 2013. Diversity of both the cultivable protease-producing bacteria and bacterial extracellular proteases in the coastal sediments of King George Island, Antarctica. PLoS One, 8(11): e79668, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079668
Zimmerman A E, Martiny A C, Allison S D. 2013. Microdiversity of extracellular enzyme genes among sequenced prokaryotic genomes. The ISME Journal, 7(6): 1187–1199, doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.176
Year 2019 volume 38 Issue 12
PDF
46
25
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1391-9
  • Receive Date:2018-12-07
  • Online Date:2026-04-01
  • Published:2019-12-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2018-12-07
  • Accepted:2019-02-12
Funding
The AoShan Talents Cultivation Program supported by Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology under contract No. 2017ASTCP-OS14; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract Nos 31670063, 31670497 and 31870052; the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province under contract No. 2009TS079; the Science and Technology Basic Resources Investigation Program of China under contract No. 2017FY100804.
Affiliations
    1 State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Marine Biotechnology Research Center, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
    2 Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
    3 College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
    4 Institute of Agro-Food Science and Technology, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Processing Technology of Shandong Province/Key Laboratory of Novel Food Resources Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Jinan 250100, China

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-019-1391-9
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT