收藏切换
Seasonal size composition and abundance distribution of Euphausia pacifica in relation to environmental factors in the southern Yellow Sea
收藏切换
PDF
Tao Zuo1, 2, *, Hui Liu3
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2019, 38(2) : 70 - 77
Less
收藏切换
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2019, 38(2): 70-77
Marine Biology
Seasonal size composition and abundance distribution of Euphausia pacifica in relation to environmental factors in the southern Yellow Sea
Full
Tao Zuo1, 2, *, Hui Liu3
Affiliations
  • 1 Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
  • 2 Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
  • 3 Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77553, USA
Published: 2019-02-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1358-x
Outline
收藏切换

The seasonal size structure and spatial abundance distributions of Euphausia pacifica populations were investigated in the central part of southern Yellow Sea from August 2009 to May 2010. The abundance and biomass of E. pacifica were higher in spring and summer, and lower in autumn and winter. The mean abundance and biomass (calculated by carbon) were 74.94 ind./m3 and 8.23 mg/m3, respectively. Females with total length (TL) ranging between 10 and 19 mm in summer had a substantial contribution to the population biomass, whereas larvae of TL of 3–7 mm in spring were the main contributor to the population abundance. The sex ratio (female:male) showed a female bias in four seasons. Its value peaked in summer, and then decreased in autumn, spring, and winter successively. Cohort analysis revealed that the length-frequency distribution of E. pacifica could be characterized as one group with large animals (mean TL>12 mm) accompanied by one or two subgroups of small individuals (mean TL<7 mm). Regarding the spatial distribution, juveniles and adults of E. pacifica tend to concentrate in relatively deep water with low temperature (~11°C) and high salinity (>32), whereas its larvae showed more abundance in inshore water with rich chlorophyll a, low salinity (<32), and warm temperature (>11°C), especially in summer and autumn. Associations changed seasonally between stage-specific abundance and environmental factors.

spatial distribution  /  size composition  /  biomass  /  Euphausia pacifica  /  Yellow Sea
Tao Zuo, Hui Liu. Seasonal size composition and abundance distribution of Euphausia pacifica in relation to environmental factors in the southern Yellow Sea[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2019 , 38 (2) : 70 -77 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-019-1358-x
Within the North Pacific Ocean, Euphausia pacifica Hanson is a predominant and widely distributed temperate species of euphausiid krill (Boden et al., 1955; Brinton et al., 2000). It is not only the primary phytoplankton grazer (Ohman, 1984), but also a key trophic link between primary production and top predators. An interesting feature of the species population is flexible seasonality, such as, the species have spawning durations that range from one single season in February or May in the Toyama Bay of Japan (Iguchi et al., 1993), to two or more continuous seasons extending from March-September off the Oregon coast (Feinberg and Peterson, 2003), May through August in the Gulf of Alaska (Pinchuk et al., 2008), or April-May and August-September in the Oyashio region (Kim et al., 2009) to year-round off of the southern California (Brinton, 1976). In addition, the longevity of E. pacifica varies from 6 months in southern California to 2 years in the North Pacific (Siegel and Nicol, 2000). Moreover, the biomass of the species varies from 38 mg/m3 in Baja California to 2 025 mg/m3 off the Saanich Island, Canada as compiled by Taki (2006).
The Yellow Sea, surrounded by the Chinese Mainland and Korean Peninsula, is a highly active marine ecosystem, but it has been intensively altered by human activities. In the central part of the region, E. pacifica is the only dominant species of euphausiid throughout the year (Cai, 1986; Wang et al., 2003; Yoon et al., 2006). It is not only the key second producer accounting for over 60% of the total biomass of large crustacean zooplankton (Sun et al., 2011), but also one of the major prey items for upper trophic level fishes (Xue et al., 2004; Zhang, 2007). Thus, there have been numerous studies of E. pacifica in the Yellow Sea, including studies of seasonal spatial distributions (Yoon et al., 2000, 2006; Wang et al., 2003), population structure and reproduction (Sun et al., 2011; Feinberg et al., 2013), and vertical distribution and diurnal vertical migration (Wang and Zuo, 2004; Liu and Sun, 2010). Some unique characteristics of E. pacifica in the Yellow Sea have been clarified, such as having the largest brood size and smallest total length of females (Feinberg et al., 2013), and two spawning seasons from March to late June and early August of summer (Sun et al., 2011). Despite the importance of E. pacifica in the Yellow Sea, comprehensive information on its body size data is absent, even though it is essential to appreciate its lifecycle (Taki, 2004, 2006; Kim et al., 2009, 2010). In this study, we performed a more concerted analysis on the seasonal size variations of E. pacifica in the southern Yellow Sea, based on recent field data of four consecutive seasons from August 2009 to May of 2010. First, we examined the seasonal patterns of stage-specific abundance in relation to environmental variables and characterized the population structure of the species. Second, we explored the seasonal size distribution of E. pacifica based on length-frequency cohort analysis, which might be helpful in the further research of the euphausiid lifecycle in the Yellow Sea.
Four cruises were conducted separately during late summer (August 21 to September 3, 2009), mid-autumn (October 11 to 24, 2009), mid-winter (January 5 to 20, 2010), and late spring (May 17 to 27, 2010) onboard the R/V Beidou in the central part of the Yellow Sea. Water depth of sampled stations ranged mostly between 50 m and 80 m, with a mean value of 63 m. The samplings were continuous along zigzag-cruising survey transects illustrated at more than thirty stations (Fig. 1). The sampling time interval between adjacent stations was 4–6 h. At each station, the euphausiid samples were towed vertically from 2 m above the bottom to the surface mainly with a conical plankton net of 500 μm mesh size and 80 cm mouth diameter. Considering the net efficiency, data of small specimens (body length<2 mm) were supplemented from samples collected using a 160 μm mesh size conical plankton net (50 cm mouth diameter). Collections of euphausiids were preserved in 5% buffered formalin seawater immediately after coming on deck. Temperature and salinity were obtained with a Seabird 19-plus CTD profiler. The chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentration of surface seawater at each station was measured fluorometrically (Turner Designs AU-10) using standard technique (Strickland and Parsons, 1972).
Euphausia pacifica samples were sorted, measured, and staged under 20× Nikon stereoscopic microscopes in the lab. When a given stage was abundant, the samples were divided with aliquots splitter until the last subsample contained at least 30 individuals of each given stage. Nauplius, calyptopis, and furcilia of larval stages were identified, and their total length (TL, mm) was measured according to Suh et al. (1993). Adult were distinguished from juveniles regardless of the presence of a thelycum in female or a petsma in male. No eggs were observed due to technical difficulties. The TL of juveniles and adults was defined as the lateral distance from the tip of the rostrum to the distal end of the telson (excluding spines) to the nearest 0.1 mm. Abundance was presented as the number per cubic meter of water (ind./m2). The individual biomass (carbon content, C) of E. pacifica was estimated from the empirical equation between length and dry weight (DW, mg): DW=9.954×10–4 TL3.156 (Iguchi and Ikeda, 1995), and the carbon content conversion factor of 0.375–0.432 (Iguchi and Ikeda, 1998).
Due to uneven spatial distribution of stage-specific data, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to test the differences of stage-specific abundance among seasons, locations, and sampling time.
For the cohort analysis of size distribution, the “Mixdist” package in the R statistical software (http://cran.r-project.org) was applied by fitting finite mixture distribution models (Macdonald and Green, 1988). The range of TL from 0.5 to 25.3 mm was binned into 1–26 size classes by 1 mm increments. No separation of data into stages or sex was made when fitting the normal distribution curve. The original abundance data (as frequency data) were averaged over stations for each survey, then root transformed to acquire the most optimal model fit with p>0.5 in analysis of variance of the fitting model.
Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was conducted using CANOCO 5.0 (Ter Braak et al., 2012) to determine the best explanatory environmental variables for the stage-specific abundance of E. pacifica. For valid matrics, only stations where at least two developmental stages of E. pacifica, or only developmental stages that occurred in at least two stations in any month, were included in the analysis. The environment variables included sampling time (day/night), surface seawater temperature (SST), bottom seawater temperature (BST), and surface seawater salinity (SSS), bottom seawater salinity (BSS), and Chl a concentration.
During late spring to autumn, there was pronounced stratification in the survey area, as a result of warm (>10°C) and low saline (<32) surface seawater, and cold (<10°C) and high saline (>33) bottom seawater (Fig. 2). In winter, there was little difference intemperature and salinity between the surface and bottom water. Very high saline sea water (>34) was confined to stations in the southeastern corner of the survey area. The Chl a concentration was lower (<0.7 mg/m3) in the central part, while it was relatively higher (>2.5 mg/m3) in the northern part area in spring and the southern part in summer.
The stage-specific abundances of E. pacifica had no significant differences between the sampling times (Kruskal-Wallis, p>0.05). Thus, all the data were pooled in the following analysis. The mean value of E. pacifica total abundance over four seasons was (74.94±189.35) ind./m3. The seasonal mean abundance varied significantly (ANOVA, p<0.001). It peaked in spring, then dropped in summer, autumn and winter successively (Table 1). The estimated biomass of E. pacifica was higher in summer and lower in autumn, with a mean of (8.23±17.41) mg/m3 over four seasons.
Sex ratios (female:male) of E. pacifica were female-biased with a mean of 1:0.21 throughout the four seasons. It was 1:0.09 in summer, 1:0.58 in autumn, 1:0.76 in spring and 1:0.95 in winter. The differences in sex ratios among the four seasons were significant (ANOVA, p<0.001).
Maximum E. pacifica sizes were found to be 22.05 mm for males in autumn and 25.03 mm for females in summer. The euphausiid size width of 3–19 mm in winter was relatively narrow with the lowest size upper limit over the study period. The TL of males occupied smaller size classes of 8–19 mm, whereas females were distributed mostly over a larger TL size width of 17–24 mm. As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 3a, furcilia and calyptopis of larvae with TL of 3–7 mm were the main contributors to the total abundance in spring. Adults with TL>10 mm were over 85% of the total abundance from summer to winter. Notably, females in summer accounted for 72% of the season’s total abundance. Similar to total abundance, females with TL>10 mm in summer and furcilia of larvae with TL<7 mm in spring were the main contributors to the total biomass (Fig. 3b).
Cohort analysis results (Figs 3a and 4) revealed a bimodal fitted pattern for E. pacifica size distributions, with one large size (mean length>12 mm) mature group (Cohort I) and a small size (<6 mm) immature group (Cohort II) in summer, autumn and winter. However, in spring, the immature group Cohort II can be divided further into two subgroups, Cohort II-a and II-b. According to the mode means illustrated in Fig. 4, the individuals from similar cohorts were larger in spring and winter, and smaller in summer and autumn. The TL of stage-specific E. pacifica changed seasonally. Of the stages, females showed a sharp TL fluctuation, with the largest in spring and the smallest in summer.
The stage-specific abundance of E. pacifica varied seasonally and geographically (Fig. 5). In spring, furcilia and calyptopis of larvae were abundant in the north of the area, especially at Sta. D4, adults were most dense in the center part of the area. In summer juveniles and female concentrated in the central of study area, while larvae were more abundant at Stas F1, G2, G3, and H2. In autumn and winter, the density center of E. pacifica moved to the southern part of the area, which was mainly contributed to by females and juveniles.
Associations between stage-specific abundance and environmental factors changed with the season in regard to CCA results (Fig. 6). From the vector distances on the plots (Fig. 6), BST showed the highest variance and was very close to larvae in summer and autumn. Chl a had noticeable loadings only in spring and winter. The relative vector distributions of adults and larvae had slight relevance between them. Significant correlations (Table 2) included the abundance of the larva (including furcilia, calyptopis and nauplius) correlated with Chl a and BSS positively, and with BSS and SSS negatively in summer. The abundance of females and males correlated positively with both water temperature and salinity in winter, while it only correlated positively with BSS in autumn. Additionally, males were negatively correlated with Chl a in winter. There was also a positive correlation between juvenile abundance and BSS in spring.
Euphausiids conduct strong vertical migration in pelagic waters (Liu and Sun, 2010). We note the existing biases by the sampling time and the potential impacts on abundance estimates for E. pacifica (Yoon et al., 2000; Taki, 2008, 2010). Thus, variance analysis among sampling times was performed before the spatial abundance and size distribution analysis. The sampling time may not present obvious influences on the results for the following two reasons. First, our samples being randomly collected over a broad study region during the day and at night may blur the day/night patterns in contrast to frequent sampling at fixed sites. Second, our sampling of the whole water column covering most water layers of E. pacifica distribution is likely to mitigate the potential variance from vertical diurnal migration.
In the southern Yellow Sea, the population recruitment of E. pacifica usually occurs intensely and extensively in spring, as the species’ spawning season begins as early as March and ends between June and early August (Sun et al., 2011). From our results, in May of late spring, the abundance of E. paciifca peaked, female individuals in our samples were often observed to be gravid and larger compared to other seasons. Also, there was relatively high proportion of adult males, which could benefit reproduction. In addition, calyptopis and furcilia of larvae were abundant throughout the study area, and were the major components of the population. The median developmental time from egg to calyptopis is less than 18 d (Ross, 1981; Feinberg et al., 2006), and that from egg hatching to the late furcilia stage is about 38–43 d at 8°C or 10.5°C (Ross, 1981; Feinberg et al., 2006). Considering the above, May of late spring in this study could be in the season of later spawning and rapid population recruitment of E. pacifica, consistent with Sun et al. (2011). The remarkable female-biased sex ratio in summer may result from high mortality of males after the end of reproduction season (Taki, 2010).
In contrast, from summer to winter, E. pacifica was far lower in abundance than those in spring (Table 1), and its adults were smaller than those in spring (Cohort I in Fig. 4). The small adults may be due to seasonal growth stagnation and slow development, which has also been observed in the Japanese Sea and Yellow Sea (Iguchi et al., 1993; Yoon et al., 2000; Taki, 2004). The long period of slow development has been suggested to be advantageous for individuals to overwinter and reach the adult stage at a larger size for reproduction in the following year (Feinberg et al., 2006). In addition, most of the late furcilia from summer to winter in Cohort II were unlikely to have originated from eggs hatched during the concurrent month, given the 38–43 d of development needed (Ross, 1981; Feinberg et al., 2006). Thus, it seems that the period from summer to winter cannot be rapid growing period for the E. pacifica population in the southern Yellow Sea.
Even if cohort analysis provides a synoptic depiction of the population structure, the limitations on determining the age and growth rate exist given the long and uneven sampling intervals (2–4 months) in this study. A single size bin may contain individuals that differ in age by several months and perhaps even longer. Overlapping could increase with extension of the spawning time (Yoon et al., 2000). Therefore, more frequent sampling or alternative biochemical aging techniques like lipofuscin (Harvey et al., 2010) may be needed for further research on the E. pacifica lifespan in the Yellow Sea.
The biomass of E. pacifica has been evaluated in many regions (Iguchi and Ikeda, 1999; Siegel and Nicol, 2000; Taki, 2006; Kim et al., 2009). Our estimated mean biomass of E. pacifica in the central part of the Yellow Sea was higher than that off of northeastern Japan and the downstream California Current, but lower than that near the Saanich Island, Toyama Bay, off of Oregon in the upstream California Current (Taki, 2006), and the Oyashio region (Kim et al., 2009). Moreover, it was approximately 1.5 times greater than value estimated by Sun et al. (2010) for the same region. Our higher value may be due to individuals with TL<5mm in May and August not being included in Sun et al. (2010). Our results indicate that E. pacifica could contribute up to 50% of the total zooplankton biomass in the southern Yellow Sea as estimated by Huo et al. (2012). The high biomass percentage of E. pacifica as a secondary producer indicates the importance of the species for higher trophic predators in the Yellow Sea marine ecosystem.
Associations changed seasonally between stage-specific abundance and environmental factors. In the Yellow Sea, temperature and salinity have been suggested to be the primary factors influencing spatial patterns of E. pacifica (Yoon et al., 2000; Sun et al., 2011). Our results showed that juveniles and adults tend to aggregate in the central part of the study region, and correlated negatively with BST and positively with BSS in summer and autumn. The distribution pattern was consistent with previous observations (Yoon et al., 2000, 2006; Wang et al., 2003; Wang and Zuo, 2004), which have been explained as a strategy for E. pacifica to avoid thermal damage of the surface water (Iguchi et al., 1993; Sun et al., 2011). But in winter and spring, adults tended to distribute in relatively warm (9–14°C) waters of the study area. Similarly, E. pacifica adults have been reported to limit their extension to <8°C of the northern water in February (Yoon et al., 2006). Unlike adults, the furcilia and calyptopis of larvae were more abundant in warmer (>11°C), less saline (<32) water, verifying their inclination to be in the upper water layer (Liu and Sun, 2010). Surface water conditions have remarkable influence on the juvenile distribution in spring. Moreover, the Chl a concentration had some impact on the E. pacifica distribution. As shown in Figs 5 and 2, high abundance of E. pacifica larvae often occurred in Chl a-rich waters, similar to the findings by Yoon et al. (2000) and Sun et al. (2011), and especially in summer, larvae had a remarkably positive correlation with Chl a.
Euphausia pacifica is a major contributor to the total zooplankton biomass in the Yellow Sea pelagic ecosystem, and showed seasonal variations in regard to size structure and stage composition. A female-biased sex ratio remained throughout the study period. Larvae in spring and adults in summer became the largest contributors to population abundance and biomass, respectively. In E. pacifica population, larger individuals presented in winter and spring, and smaller in summer and autumn.
We are grateful to the crew of R/V Beidou for field assistance and the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea Scientific Observation and Experiment Station for Fishery Resources and Environment (SOEFRE), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China. The completion of the paper was partially supported by the Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Marine Biology of Texas A&M University and China Scholarship Council.
  • The NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers under contract No. U1606404; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 40976103; the Ministry of Science and Technology of China under contract No. 2011CB403604.
Boden B P, Johnson M W, Brinton E. 1955. The Euphausiacea (Crustacea) of the North Pacific. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 6: 287–400
Brinton E. 1976. Population biology of Euphausia pacifica off southern California. Fishery Bulletin, 74(4): 733–762
Brinton E, Ohman M D, Townsend A W, et al. 2000. Euphausiids of the World Ocean. Series: World Biodiversity Database CD-ROM Series. Windows Version 1.0. Expert Center for Taxonomic Identification. Amsterdam, Netherlands; Springer Verlag, New York
Cai B J. 1986. The distribution of the Euphausiacea in the Huanghai Sea and East China Sea. Symposium of Chinese Crustacean Society (in Chinese), 1: 140–146
Feinberg L R, Peterson W T. 2003. Variability in duration and intensity of euphausiid spawning off central Oregon, 1996–2001. Progress in Oceanography, 57(3–4): 363–379
Feinberg L R, Shaw C T, Peterson W T. 2006. Larval development of Euphausia pacifica in the laboratory: variability in developmental pathways. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 316: 127–137, doi: 10.3354/meps316127
Feinberg L R, Shaw C T, Peterson W T, et al. 2013. Euphausia pacifica brood sizes: a North Pacific synthesis. Journal of Plankton Research, 35(6): 1192–1206, doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbt064
Harvey H R, Ju S J, Son S K, et al. 2010. The biochemical estimation of age in Euphausiids: Laboratory calibration and field comparisons. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 57(7–8): 663–671
Huo Yuanzi, Sun Song, Zhang Fang, et al. 2012. Biomass and estimated production properties of size-fractionated zooplankton in the Yellow Sea, China. Journal of Marine Systems, 94: 1–8, doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2011.09.013
Iguchi N, Ikeda T. 1995. Growth, metabolism and growth efficiency of a euphausiid crustacean Euphausia pacifica in the southern Japan Sea, as influenced by temperature. Journal of Plankton Research, 17(9): 1757–1769, doi: 10.1093/plankt/17.9.1757
Iguchi N, Ikeda T. 1999. Production, metabolism and P: B ratio of Euphausia pacifica (Crustacea: Euphausiacea) in Toyama Bay, southern Japan Sea. Plankton Biology & Ecology, 46(1): 68–74
Iguchi N, Ikeda T. 1998. Elemental composition (C, H, N) of the euphausiid Euphausia pacifica in Toyama Bay, southern Japan Sea. Plankton Biology & Ecology, 45(1): 79–84
Iguchi N, Ikeda T, Imamura A. 1993. Growth and life cycle of a euphausiid crustacean (Euphausia pacifica Hansen) in Toyama Bay, southern Japan Sea. Bulletin of the Japan Sea National Fisheries Research Institute (in Japanese), 43: 69–81
Kim H S, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda T. 2009. Abundance, biomass and life cycle patterns of euphausiids (Euphausia pacifica, Thysanoessa inspinata and T. longipes) in the Oyashio region, western subarctic Pacific. Plankton & Benthos Research, 4(2): 43–52
Kim H S, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda T. 2010. Population dynamics of the euphausiids Euphausia pacifica and Thysanoessa inspinata in the Oyashio region during the 2007 spring phytoplankton bloom. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 57(17–18): 1727–1732
Liu Huilian, Sun Song. 2010. Diel vertical distribution and migration of a euphausiid Euphausia pacifica in the Southern Yellow Sea. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 57(7–8): 594–605
Macdonald P D M, Green P E J. 1988. User’s Guide to Program MIX: an Interactive Program for Fitting Mixtures of Distributions. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Ichthus Data Systems
Ohman M D. 1984. Omnivory by Euphausia pacifica: the role of copepod prey. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 19: 125–131, doi: 10.3354/meps019125
Pinchuk A I, Coyle K O, Hopcroft R R. 2008. Climate-related variability in abundance and reproduction of euphausiids in the northern Gulf of Alaska in 1998–2003. Progress in Oceanography, 77(2–3): 203–216
Ross R M. 1981. Laboratory culture and development of Euphausia pacifica. Limnology and Oceanography, 26(2): 235–246, doi: 10.4319/lo.1981.26.2.0235
Siegel V, Nicol S. 2000. Population parameters. In: Everson I, ed. Krill: Biology, Ecology and Fisheries. Cambridge: Blackwell Science, 110
Strickland J D H, Parsons T R A. 1972. A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. 2nd ed. Ottowa: Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 311
Suh H L, Soh H Y, Hong S Y. 1993. Larval development of the euphausiid Euphausia pacifica in the Yellow Sea. Marine Biology, 115(4): 625–633, doi: 10.1007/BF00349370
Sun Song, Huo Yuanzi, Yang Bo. 2010. Zooplankton functional groups on the continental shelf of the Yellow Sea. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 57(11–12): 1006–1016
Sun Song, Tao Zhencheng, Li Chaolun, et al. 2011. Spatial distribution and population structure of Euphausia pacifica in the Yellow Sea (2006–2007). Journal of Plankton Research, 33(6): 873–889, doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbq160
Taki K. 2004. Distribution and life history of Euphausia pacifica off northeastern Japan. Fisheries Oceanography, 13(S1): 34–43, doi: 10.1111/fog.2004.13.issue-s1
Taki K. 2006. Biomass and production of the euphausiid Euphausia pacifica along the coastal waters off north-eastern Japan. Fisheries Science, 72(2): 221–232, doi: 10.1111/fis.2006.72.issue-2
Taki K. 2008. Vertical distribution and diel migration of euphausiids from Oyashio Current to Kuroshio area off northeastern Japan. Plankton & Benthos Research, 3(1): 27–35
Taki K. 2010. Population structure of Euphausia pacifica in the Kuroshio–Oyashio transitional waters off northeastern Japan. Journal of Plankton Research, 32(6): 761–771, doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbq027
Ter Braak C J F, Šmilauer P. 2012. Canoco Reference Manual and User's Guide: Software for Ordination, Version 5.0. Ithaca, USA: Microcomputer Power, 496
Wang Rong, Chen Yaqu, Zuo Tao, et al. 2003. Quantitative distribution of euphausiids in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea in spring and autumn in relation to the hydrographic conditions. Journal of Fisheries of China (in Chinese), 27(S1): 31–38
Wang Rong, Zuo Tao. 2004. The Yellow Sea warm current and the Yellow Sea Cold Bottom Water, their impact on the distribution of zooplankton in the southern Yellow Sea. Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography, 39(1): 1–13
Xue Ying, Jin Xianshi, Zhang Bo, et al. 2004. Diet composition and seasonal variation in feeding habits of small yellow croaker Pseudosciaena polyactis Bleeker in the central Yellow Sea. Journal of Fishery Sciences of China (in Chinese), 11(3): 237–243
Yoon W D, Cho S H, Lim D, et al. 2000. Spatial distribution of Euphausia pacifica (Euphausiacea: Crustacea) in the Yellow Sea. Journal of Plankton Research, 22(1): 939–949
Yoon W D, Yang J Y, Lim D, et al. 2006. Species composition and spatial distribution of Euphausiids of the Yellow Sea and relationships with environmental factors. Ocean Science Journal, 41(1): 11–29, doi: 10.1007/BF03022402
Zhang Bo. 2007. Diet composition and ontogenetic variation in feeding habits of Cleithenes herzensteini in central Yellow Sea. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (in Chinese), 18(8): 1849–1854
Year 2019 volume 38 Issue 2
PDF
75
40
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1358-x
  • Receive Date:2018-05-12
  • Online Date:2026-03-31
  • Published:2019-02-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2018-05-12
  • Accepted:2018-07-18
Funding
The NSFC-Shandong Joint Fund for Marine Science Research Centers under contract No. U1606404; the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 40976103; the Ministry of Science and Technology of China under contract No. 2011CB403604.
Affiliations
    1 Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
    2 Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
    3 Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77553, USA

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-019-1358-x
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT