收藏切换
Overexpression and characterization of a thermostable β-agarase producing neoagarotetraose from a marine isolate Microbulbifer sp. AG1
收藏切换
PDF
Yanbing ZHU1, 2, 3, 4, He GAO1, Hebin LI5, Hui NI1, 2, 3, 4, Zedong JIANG1, 2, 3, 4, Lijun LI1, 2, 3, 4, Anfeng XIAO1, 2, 3, 4, *
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2019, 38(2) : 96 - 106
Less
收藏切换
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2019, 38(2): 96-106
Marine Biology
Overexpression and characterization of a thermostable β-agarase producing neoagarotetraose from a marine isolate Microbulbifer sp. AG1
Full
Yanbing ZHU1, 2, 3, 4, He GAO1, Hebin LI5, Hui NI1, 2, 3, 4, Zedong JIANG1, 2, 3, 4, Lijun LI1, 2, 3, 4, Anfeng XIAO1, 2, 3, 4, *
Affiliations
  • 1 College of Food and Biological Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China
  • 2 Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Enzyme Engineering, Xiamen 361021, China
  • 3 Research Center of Food Biotechnology of Xiamen City, Xiamen 361021, China
  • 4 Key Laboratory of Systemic Utilization and In-depth Processing of Economic Seaweed, Xiamen Southern Ocean Technology Center of China, Xiamen 361021, China
  • 5 Department of Pharmacy, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361023, China
Published: 2019-02-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1349-y
Outline
收藏切换

An agarase gene containing 1 302 bp was cloned from Microbulbifer sp. AG1. It encoded a mature protein of 413 amino acids plus a 20-residue signal peptide. The recombinant enzyme without the signal peptide was expressed and purified from Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). When agarose was used as a substrate, the optimal temperature and pH for the enzyme were 60°C and 7.5, respectively. The recombinant agarase showed excellent thermostability with 67% and 19% of residual activities after incubation at 50°C and 60°C for 1 h, respectively. Except SDS, the recombinant agarase had a relatively good resistance against the detected inhibitors, detergents and urea denaturant. Thin layer chromatography analysis and enzyme assay using p-nitrophenyl-α/β-D-galactopyranoside revealed that the recombinant agarase was a β-agarase that degraded agarose into neoagarotetraose as the main end product. The enzymatic hydrolysis products with different degree of polymerization exhibited the antioxidant activities.

thermostable  /  β-agarase  /  neoagarotetraose  /  Microbulbifer sp.
Yanbing ZHU, He GAO, Hebin LI, Hui NI, Zedong JIANG, Lijun LI, Anfeng XIAO. Overexpression and characterization of a thermostable β-agarase producing neoagarotetraose from a marine isolate Microbulbifer sp. AG1[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2019 , 38 (2) : 96 -106 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-019-1349-y
Agar, the main cell wall component of red algae, is a kind of polysaccharide which consists of agarose and agaropectin (Duckworth and Yaphe, 1971). Agarose is a linear chain composed of alternating residues of 3-O-linked β-D-galactopyranose and 4-O-linked 3,6-anhydro-α-L-galactose (Duckworth and Yaphe, 1971; Hamer et al., 1977). Agaropectin has the same basic disaccharide-repeating units as agarose, while some hydroxyl groups of 3,6-anhydro-α-L-galactose residues are substituted by sulfoxy or methoxy and pyruvate residues (Duckworth and Yaphe, 1971).
Agarases are specific glycoside hydrolases that can break down agar into oligosaccharides. They were classified into two groups by their cleaving mechanisms: α-agarases (EC 3.2.1.158), which cleave α-1,3 linkages to produce agaro-oligosaccharides, and β-agarases (EC 3.2.1.81), which cleave β-1,4 linkages to produce neoagaro-oligosaccharides (Fu and Kim, 2010). Based on the amino acid sequence similarity, agarases are classified into different families of glycoside hydrolases (GHs): Families GH96 and GH117 for α-agarases, and Families GH16, GH50, GH86 and GH118 for β-agarases (Chi et al., 2012). Among them, GH16 is the largest family which includes many characterized β-agarases. For some of these agarases, the catalytic mechanisms are comprehensively studied (Allouch et al., 2004; Hehemann et al., 2010; Takagi et al., 2015).
Agarases can be used to prepared oligosaccharides which exhibit many biological activities such as prebiotic effect (Hu et al., 2006), whitening effect (Lee et al., 2008), moisturizing effect (Kobayashi et al., 1997), and antioxidative effect (Chen and Yan, 2005). They have prospective applications in the food, pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries. In addition to preparation of oligosaccharides, agarases are also utilized as tools for recovery of DNA from agarose gels (Yu et al., 2008), preparation of seaweed protoplasts (Araki et al., 1998), and extraction of biological substances (Kim et al., 2013; Yun et al., 2011). To date, a number of agarases have been identified from various microorganisms. Among them, many agarases have been cloned and characterized from bacterial species (Fu et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2012; Tawara et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2013). Because the gelling temperature of agar is 43–45°C, it is desirable that agarases have good thermal stability. Agarases with excellent thermostability have great potential in industrial applications. In the past several years, only a few thermostabe agarases have been characterized (Chi et al., 2014b; Cui et al., 2014; Hou et al., 2015; Li et al., 2014; Minegishi et al., 2013; Ohta et al., 2004a, b).
Marine bacterium Microbulbifer sp. AG1 was isolated from a mangrove soil sample in Xiamen, China. Cloning, expression, purification and biochemical characterization of a thermostable β-agarase from that bacterium was described in this paper.
Mangrove soil sample (approximately 30 g) collected from Xiamen in China was suspended with 50 mL buffer A (NaCl 30.0 g/L, KNO3 5.0 g/L, MgSO4·7H2O 5.0 g/L, CaCl2 0.2 g/L, K2HPO4 0.1 g/L, FeSO4·7H2O 0.02 g/L, pH 7.5). The suspension was cultured on the selection solid medium (Buffer A containing 2% (w/v) agar) at 28°C for 48 h. Pits on agar plates were formed around the individual colonies of agarase-producing strains. The plates were dyed with Lugol’s iodine solution to confirm the agar-degrading ability at room temperature (Temuujin et al., 2012). Among them, isolate AG1 had the highest ratio of clear halo around colony to colony size and was selected for further studies.
Genomic DNA of Strain AG1 was isolated using the bacterial genomic DNA isolation kit (BBI, Canada) according to the manufacturer′s instructions. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified from this genomic DNA using primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) (Moreno et al., 2002). The PCR product was sequenced. Homology was analyzed in GenBank using the BLAST program (Altschul et al., 1997).
The agarase gene was amplified from Strain AG1 genomic DNA with a pair of degenerate primers F1 (5′-ATGAKRAAAAYMACY-3′) and R1 (5′-TTWCAGYTKCWCAAMG-3′), which were designed on the basis of the consensus sequences of Microbulbifer agarase genes available in the GenBank database. The PCR product was cloned into pMD-18T vector (TaKaRa, Japan) and then confirmed by sequencing.
The gene and amino acid sequence was analyzed using DNAMAN 5.1 software (Lynnon BioSoft, Canada). Homology search of the deduced amino acid sequence was performed using BLAST (Altschul et al., 1997) against GenBank database. Alignment of the protein sequences was generated with ClustalW program. A bootstrapped phylogenetic tree was built using the neighbor-joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) with MEGA 6.0 software (Tamura et al., 2013). The signal peptide sequence of the deduced protein sequence was predicted using SMART (Letunic et al., 2012). Domain search was performed using BLAST against NCBI’s conserved domain database (Marchler-Bauer et al., 2015).
To clone the agarase gene into pGEX-6p-1 expression vector (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA), the agarase gene without its signal peptide-coding sequence was amplified by PCR using the following primers F2 (5′-CGCGGATCCGCAGATTGGGATGGAGTT-3′) and R2 (5′-CCGCTCGAGCAGCTTCACAAAGCGGAT-3′) (Incorporated Bam HI and Xho I restriction sites are underlined). After the amplicon was digested with Bam HI and Xho I, it was inserted into the pGEX-6P-1 vector. The resulting construct was named pGEX-6p-aga. After confirmation by sequencing, the recombinant plasmid was transferred into E. coli BL21 (DE3). The transformants were grown in 300 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin at 37°C until the OD600 reached 0.8, and then the cells were induced with 0.075 mmol/L isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 22°C for 16 h. The induced cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6 500× g for 10 min.
Purification of the glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-tagged agarase was conducted using glutathione sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA) affinity chromatography at 4°C according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The above cell pellet was resuspended in 15 mL of PBS buffer (140 mmol/L NaCl, 2.7 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 1.8 mmol/L KH2PO4, pH 7.3). The cells were disrupted by sonication on ice for 10 min with pulsed mode of 10 s on and 10 s off, and the frequency of sonication was 25 kHz. After centrifugation at 13 000× g for 20 min, the resins were added to the cleared supernatant. After shaking at 4°C for 30 min, the lysate-resins mixture was loaded in a column. The resins were washed with PBS buffer. The binding protein was eluted off the column with elution buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 10 mmol/L reduced glutathione, 5 mmol/L DTT, pH 8.0). The eluted proteins were dialyzed in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) for 36 h. The protein concentration was determined by Bradford method (Bradford, 1976) with bovine serum albumin as the standard. The homogeneity of the purified enzyme and its molecular mass were determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) following the standard procedures (Laemmli, 1970).
Unless otherwise noted, the standard assay of agarase activity was determined by measuring the amount of released reducing sugar equivalent using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method (Miller, 1959). The reaction was initiated by adding 20 μL of the purified enzyme solution (0.2 mg/mL) to 580 μL of 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 0.5% (w/v) agarose (Amresco) and carried out at 60°C for 15 min. It was stopped by adding 900 μL of DNS reagent and heating at 100°C for 10 min. After cooling to room temperature, the release of reducing sugar was monitored at 540 nm using a Cary 50 spectrophotometer (Varian, USA). One unit of agarase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 μmol of the reducing sugar (D-galactose equivalent) from agarose per minute under the assay conditions.
Substrate specificity of the recombinant agarase was measured by using the artificial chromogenic substrates, p-nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside and p-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside. The assay was based on the method of Temuujin et al. (2012) with some minor modifications. The reaction was initiated by adding 200 μL of enzyme solution (0.2 mg/mL) to 500 μL of the corresponding substrate solution (2 mg/mL) and carried out at 60°C for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 500 μL of 1 mol/L Na2CO3 stop solution. The activity was measured spectrophotometrically at 420 nm using a Cary 50 spectrophotometer (Varian, USA) by determining the release of p-nitrophenol due to hydrolysis of the artificial chromogenic substrates.
In order to investigate the optimum temperature of the enzyme, reactions were performed at different temperatures (30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and 80°C) in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). The thermal stability of agarase was determined after incubating the enzyme at 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70°C over the period of 10–60 min, respectively. After the heat treatment, the samples were cooled on ice immediately. The residual enzyme activity was measured by the standard method as described above. The activity of the enzyme without the treatment was defined as 100%.
The optimum pH of agarase was examined by assaying enzyme activity at 60°C in the following buffers with different pH values: 50 mmol/L citrate phosphate buffer (pH 4.0–7.0), 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0–9.0), and 50 mmol/L glycine-NaOH buffer (pH 9.0–10.0). The pH stability assay of agarase was performed by measuring the residual activity after keeping the enzyme in buffers with different pH values (ranging from 4.0 to 10.0) at 25°C for 1 h. The activity of the enzyme without the treatment was defined as 100%.
The effects of metal ions on agarase activity were examined by using various metal salts (NaCl, KCl, LiCl, CaCl2, MgCl2, BaCl2, MnCl2, NiCl2, CoCl2, CuCl2, ZnCl2, FeCl2, AlCl3 and FeCl3) at final concentrations of 1 mmol/L or 10 mmol/L. The enzyme was incubated with each metal ion at 25°C for 30 min, respectively. Residual activity was measured by the standard method as described above. Reaction mixture without metal ion was used as a reference.
The effects of inhibitor, detergent and denaturant on agarase activity were investigated by using various reagents, including ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME), dithiothreitol (DTT), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) at final concentrations of 1 mmol/L or 10 mmol/L; sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Tween-20, Tween-80, Triton X-100, and 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propane sulfonate (Chaps) at final concentrations of 0.1% (w/v or v/v) or 1% (w/v or v/v); urea at final concentration of 1 mol/L. The enzyme was incubated with each reagent at 25°C for 30 min, respectively. Residual activity was measured by the standard assay as described above. Reaction mixture without additives was used as a control.
Enzyme activity was assayed with agarose concentration ranging from 0.5 to 8 mg/mL by the DNS method (Miller, 1959). Michaelis–Menten substrate affinity constant (Km) and maximum velocity (Vmax) values were calculated by linear regression analysis of Lineweaver-Burk double-reciprocal plot.
The recombinant agarase (20 U) was added to 10 mL of 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 0.5% (w/v) agarose, and the reaction was performed at 40°C for 96 h. Some of the reaction mixture was withdrawn at different incubation periods. The enzyme activity was stopped by heating the mixture in boiling water for 10 min and then cooling on ice for 5 min. After centrifugation at 12 000× g for 10 min at 4°C, the supernatant was harvested as the hydrolysis products. The samples were applied to a Silica Gel 60 thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plate (Puke, China), and developed using n-butanol-acetic acid-water solution (2:2:1, v/v/v) as a solvent system. The separated products were visualized by spraying with 10% (v/v) H2SO4 in ethanol and heated at 110°C for 10 min. Galactose and neoagaro-oligosaccharides (NA) (Shanghai ZZBIO Co., Ltd., China) were used as the standards. Neoagaro-oligosaccharides standards included neoagarotetraose (NA4), neoagarohexaose (NA6) and neoagarooctaose (NA8).
The samples of 40 min, 6 h and 96 h hydrolysis treatment were respectively applied on Millipore centrifugal filter 3 K devices (3 000 nominal molecular weight limit) (Millipore, USA). The filtrates were collected and further concentrated into powders by Labconco FreeZone 6 plus (ThermoFisher, USA), respectively. The prepared hydrolysis product powders were dissolved in distilled water yielding samples for the following antioxidant activity assays. The scavenging effect was determined by the half inhibitory concentration (IC50) value. The DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate) radical scavenging activity assay was conducted according to the modified method of Zhu et al. (2011). One hundred microliters of the hydrolysis product was mixed with 100 μL of 0.12 mmol/L DPPH radical (ethanol as solvent). After the mixture was incubated in the dark for 30 min at room temperature, the absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 517 nm. The DPPH radical scavenging capacity of the sample was calculated by the following formula:
Rs= (A0A1)/A0 × 100,
where Rs is scavenging rate (%), A0 is the absorbance of the control without sample, and A1 is the absorbance in the presence of the sample.
The ABTS (2, 2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) radical cation scavenging activity was assessed by the method according to a previously reported protocol (Zhou and Yu, 2004) with some modifications. A total of 7 mmol/L ABTS solution and 2.4 mmol/L potassium persulfate solution were mixed with equal volume, and then they were incubated at room temperature for 12–16 h in the dark to yield a dark colored solution containing ABTS radical cation. The working solution was prepared by diluting the above solution with distilled water until the absorbance was 0.700±0.02 at 734 nm. Five hundred microliters of the hydrolysis product was added into 1.5 mL of the working solution. After incubation at 37°C for 1 h, the absorbance of the solution was determined at 734 nm. The ABTS radical cation scavenging capacity of the sample was calculated by the formula above.
Reducing power of the hydrolysis products was assessed by the modified potassium ferricyanide reduction method of Ardestani and Yazdanparast (2007). Reaction solution consisted of 0.5 mL of 0.2 mol/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.6), 0.5 mL of 1% (w/v) potassium ferricyanide, and 0.2 mL of the hydrolysis product. The reaction was incubated at 50°C for 30 min and cooled at 4°C for 2 h. Then 0.5 mL of 10% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid was added to the reaction solution. After centrifugation at 7 000× g for 10 min, 0.5 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 0.5 mL of distilled water, and then 0.1 mL of 0.1% (w/v) ferric chloride was added to the mixture. The increased absorbance at 700 nm indicated the increased reducing power of the sample (Sahreen et al., 2010).
Thirteen agarase-producing strains were found to produce pits on the agar plates. After the iodine staining, the isolate AG1 had the high ratio of clear halo around colony to colony size (data not shown). The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Strain AG1 (GenBank accession number KU500639) showed 100% similarity with that of Microbulbifer thermotolerans Strain JAMB A94 (GenBank accession number NR_040989). Therefore, Strain AG1 was classified as genus Microbulbifer.
The agarase gene of 1 302 base pairs (GenBank accession number ALN70307) was amplified by PCR from genomic DNA of Microbulbifer sp. AG1. This DNA fragment contained an open reading frame encoding a protein of 433 amino acid residues of which the first 20 residues were predicted to be a signal peptide. The putative cleavage site of the signal peptide was located between Ala20 and Ala21. The theoretical molecular weight and pI value of the protein were 48.22 kDa and 5.42, respectively. The deduced protein sequence was compared with available agarase protein sequences from Non-redundant protein sequences database of NCBI. It shared 99% identity with an agarase (BAD29947) from Microbulbifer thermotolerans. Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of Microbulbifer sp. AG1 agarase with some agarase protein sequences suggested that Glu147 and Glu152 could be the putative catalytic residues (Fig. 1). Microbulbifer sp. AG1 agarase was predicted to contain a cellulose binding domain (CBD) Type IV located between 338 and 430 (Fig. 1). It was also predicted to be a β-agarase, member of glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 16, containing a carbohydrate binding module 6 (CBM6, 297–432).
In order to classify Strain AG1 agarase, a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2) was constructed by using 25 agarolytic enzymes representing the previously classified six agarase families (Chi et al., 2012). It formed a distinct group with a β-agarase from Microbulbifer thermotolerans JAMB-A94 (BAK08910), which was the representative member of GH family 16. The result suggested that Strain AG1 agarase was closely related to GH family 16.
The agarase gene was inserted into pGEX-6P-1 vector and expressed in E. coli as a GST-tagged fusion protein. The induced samples were analyzed on 12% SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue G250 (Fig. 3). A band with expected size of the fusion protein was observed in the induced E. coli containing pGEX-6p-aga (Fig. 3, Lane 4), whereas it was absent in the induced E. coli containing pGEX-6P-1 vector without DNA insert (Fig. 3, Lane 2). The fusion protein was purified using glutathione sepharose 4B affinity chromatography under the native conditions. A single band with the molecular mass between 70 and 85 kDa was detected on the SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3, Lane 5).
The optimal temperature of the recombinant agarase was determined at different temperatures. As shown in Fig. 4a, the enzyme exhibited the maximum activity at 60°C, and presented over 75% of relative activity in temperatures ranging from 40°C to 70°C. It had no activity at 80°C. The thermostability of agarase was investigated by measuring the residual activity after incubating the enzyme at 30°C, 40°C, 50°C, 60°C and 70°C for different times, respectively (Fig. 4b). The agarase was relatively stable at 30°C and 40°C. It retained 67% and 19% of residual activities after incubation at 50°C and 60°C for 1 h, respectively. The enzyme was not stable at 70°C. These results indicated that the recombinant agarase from Microbulbifer sp. AG1 had good thermal stability.
The optimal pH of agarase activity was determined at various pH values at 60°C. As shown in Fig. 5a, the agarase had the optimal pH at 7.5, and displayed over 50% of its maximal activity in the pH range of 6.0–9.5. There was nearly no detectable enzyme activity at pH 4.0. The enzyme still had 22% of relative activity at pH 10.0. The pH stability of agarase was determined by pre-incubating the enzyme in a series of buffers with different pH values (4.0–10.0) for 1 h and then measuring the residual activity (Fig. 5b). The results showed that the recombinant agarase from Microbulbifer sp. AG1 exhibited good stability in a broad pH range of 6.0–9.0, maintaining more than 80% of its original activity. It could also retain 35% of residual activity at pH 4.0.
The effects of metal ions on agarase activity were investigated by using various metal ions at final concentrations of 1 or 10 mmol/L (Table 1). The agarase was slightly inhibited by Ba2+, and was obviously inhibited by Mn2+, Ni2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe2+, Al3+ and Fe3+. No effects of K+ and Ca2+ were observed at both concentrations. Na+, Li+ and Mg2+ at 1 mmol/L had no influences on agarase activity, but showed negative effects at 10 mmol/L.
The effects of various inhibitors on agarase activity were determined by using EDTA, β-ME, DTT and PMSF (Table 2). The enzyme activity was inhibited by EDTA at 1 mmol/L and 10 mmol/L. With β-ME and DTT, the enzyme activity was stimulated at both concentrations tested. PMSF at 1 mmol/L had no influence on agarase activity, whereas at 10 mmol/L, its effect became negative. The influences of some detergents on the agarase activity were determined by using SDS, Tween 20, Tween 80, Triton X-100 and Chaps (Table 2). The recombinant agarase exhibited a good tolerance towards Tween 20, Tween 80, Triton X-100 and Chaps. When it was treated with 1% SDS, 30% of residual activity was maintained. The denaturant urea showed inhibitory effect on the enzyme activity at 1 mol/L, retaining about 83% of residual activity (Table 2).
The kinetic parameters of Strain AG1 recombinant agarase were determined using agarose as the substrate. The Km and Vmax values obtained by Lineweaver-Burk plot were 5.0 mg/mL and 84.7 U/mg, respectively.
The substrate specificity of the recombinant agarase was investigated using the artificial chromogenic substrates. The enzyme could actively hydrolyze p-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (OD420=0.624) but not p-nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (OD420=0.011), suggesting that it recognizes the β-linkage but not the α-linkage. These results indicated that this agarase was a β-agarase that could specifically hydrolyze the β-glycosidic bond, producing neoagaro-oligosaccharides from agarose as a substrate.
Primary structure comparison of thermostable β-agarase from Strain AG1 to a thermostable agarase from Pseudoalteromonas sp. AG4 (Oh et al., 2010) (GenBank accession number ADD60418) as well as two mesophilic agarases from Thalassomonas agarivorans (Liang et al., 2014) (GenBank accession number AGT98631) and Agarivorans gilvus WH0801 (Liu et al., 2014) (GenBank accession number AFP32918) was made with respect to various factors involved in the protein thermal stability (Table 3). In comparison to their counterparts from Thalassomonas agarivorans and Agarivorans gilvus WH0801, Microbulbifer sp. AG1 agarase and Pseudoalteromonas sp. AG4 agarase showed the presence of a high percentage of proline and aromatic residues (Table 3). Furthermore, Strain AG1 agarase possessed higher number of arginine and lower number of labile residues compared with the two mesophilic agarases (Table 3). However, other potential stabilizing factors, including high proportion of aliphatic, hydrophobic and charged residues as well as low percentage of glycine, were not found in agarase from Microbulbifer sp. AG1.
The hydrolysis products produced by the recombinant agarase were investigated by TLC. As shown in Fig. 6, the enzyme hydrolysed agarose to generate a series of neoagaro-oligosaccharides in the initial stage. At 40 min post hydrolysis, the main products were neoagaro-oligosaccharides larger than NA8, NA6 and NA4. As time went on, the amount of the oligosaccharides larger than tetramers decreased, whereas the amount of neoagarotetraose increased. When hydrolysis time reached 6 h, the main products included NA6 and NA4. After incubation for 96 h, the main enzymatic product was neoagarotetraose.
Assays of reducing power, scavenging DPPH and ABTS radicals were used to assess the antioxidant activity. The enzymatic hydrolysis products of different reaction time had the inhibitory effects on DPPH and ABTS radicals, and the scavenging activities increased with the concentration of the samples (Figs 7a and b). The IC50 values of scavenging DPPH radical were 5.12 mg/mL (40 min), 2.96 mg/mL (96 h) and 2.43 mg/mL (6 h), respectively. The IC50 values of scavenging ABTS radical cation were 0.67 mg/mL (96 h), 0.58 mg/mL (40 min) and 0.47 mg/mL (6 h), respectively. As is shown in Fig. 7c, the hydrolysis products showed increased ferric reducing power with the increased sample concentration. The samples of 96 h and 6 h had nearly the same effects. At the same concentration, they had better reducing power than the sample of 40 min. All these results indicated that the agarase hydrolysis products had the antioxidant activity, and the activity of the products did not correlate with the degree of polymerization regularly. The sample of 6 h which mainly contained neoagarohexaose and neoagarotetraose had good reducing power, scavenging effects of DPPH and ABTS radicals.
In this study, an agarase gene was cloned from Microbulbifer sp. AG1 isolated from marine mud. After expression in E. coli, this recombinant enzyme was biochemically characterized.
The optimum reaction temperature of Strain AG1 agarase was 60°C, which coincides with that for agarase from Catenovulum agarivorans YM01T (Cui et al., 2014). Comparisons of thermostability and pH stability between Strain AG1 agarase and other agarases were shown in Table 4. Although less stable than its counterparts from Catenovulum agarivorans YM01T and Flammeovirga pacifica WPAGA1, agarase form Microbulbifer sp. AG1 is substantially more stable than the agarases from Alteromonas sp. GNUM-1, Catenovulum sp. X3, Agarivorans sp. JA-1 and Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Like agarases from Catenovulum agarivorans YM01T, Flammeovirga pacifica WPAGA1 and Catenovulum sp. X3, Strain AG1 agarase also displayed good pH stability. In addition, the recombinant agarase in this study exhibited good resistance towards the tested inhibitors, detergents (except SDS), and urea denaturant. These properties convert Strain AG1 agarase into a very attractive enzyme in the food, cosmetic and medical industrial applications.
In comparison to the two mesophilic agarases from Thalassomonas agarivorans and Agarivorans gilvus WH0801, Strain AG1 agarase was found to have higher percentage of proline, arginine and aromatic residues, and lower percentage of labile residues in the primary structure. Proline and arginine may contribute to protein stability (Vieille and Zeikus, 2001). Aromatic residues have been reported to contribute to thermal stability as a result of the ring interaction that occurs in the protein core (Vieille and Zeikus, 2001). In conclusion, factors contributing to the thermostablility of Strain AG1 agarase might be due to high percentage of proline, arginine, and aromatic residues as well as low percentage of labile residues.
Agarase from Microbulbifer sp. AG1 degraded agarose into neoagarotetraose as the main end product, which is similar with some other known agarases (Lin et al., 2012; Oh et al., 2010). Agarases can be used to hydrolyze agar into oligosaccharides which have potentially economic values because of their physiological and biological activities (Chen and Yan, 2005; Lee et al., 2008). In this study, the hydrolysates produced by Strain AG1 agarase exhibited antioxidant activities by assays of reducing power, scavenging DPPH and ABTS radicals.
  • The Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China under contract No. 2016J01162; the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University, China under contract No. B15139.
Allouch J, Helbert W, Henrissat B, et al. 2004. Parallel substrate binding sites in a β-agarase suggest a novel mode of action on double-helical agarose. Structure, 12(4): 623–632, doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.02.020
Altschul S F, Madden T L, Schäffer A A, et al. 1997. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research, 25(17): 3389–3402, doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Araki T, Lu Z, Morishita T. 1998. Optimization of parameters for isolation of protoplasts from Gracilaria verrucosa (Rhodophyta). Journal of Marine Biotechnology, 6(3): 193–197
Ardestani A, Yazdanparast R. 2007. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging potential of Achillea santolina extracts. Food Chemistry, 104(1): 21–29, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.066
Bradford M M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72(1–2): 248–254
Chen Haimin, Yan Xiaojun. 2005. Antioxidant activities of agaro-oligosaccharides with different degrees of polymerization in cell-based system. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1722(1): 103–111, doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.11.016
Chi W J, Chang Y K, Hong S K. 2012. Agar degradation by microorganisms and agar-degrading enzymes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 94(4): 917–930, doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4023-2
Chi W J, Park J S, Kang D K, et al. 2014b. Production and characterization of a novel thermostable extracellular agarase from Pseudoalteromonas hodoensis newly isolated from the West Sea of South Korea. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 173(7): 1703–1716, doi: 10.1007/s12010-014-0958-3
Chi W J, Park da Y, Seo Y B, et al. 2014a. Cloning, expression, and biochemical characterization of a novel GH16 β-agarase AgaG1 from Alteromonas sp. GNUM-1. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(10): 4545–4555, doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5510-4
Cui Fangyuan, Dong Sujie, Shi Xiaocheng, et al. 2014. Overexpression and characterization of a novel thermostable β-agarase YM01-3, from marine bacterium Catenovulum agarivorans YM01T. Marine Drugs, 12(5): 2731–2747, doi: 10.3390/md12052731
Duckworth M, Yaphe W. 1971. The structure of agar: Part I. Fractionation of a complex mixture of polysaccharides. Carbohydrate Research, 16(1): 189–197, doi: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)86113-3
Fu Xiaoting, Kim S M. 2010. Agarase: review of major sources, categories, purification method, enzyme characteristics and applications. Marine Drugs, 8(1): 200–218, doi: 10.3390/md8010200
Fu Xiaoting, Pan C H, Lin Hong, et al. 2009. Gene cloning, expression, and characterization of a β-agarase, AgaB34, from Agarivorans albus YKW-34. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 19: 257–264
Hamer G K, Bhattacharjee S S, Yaphe W. 1977. Analysis of the enzymic hydrolysis products of agarose by 13C-n.m.r. spectroscopy. Carbohydrate Research, 54(1): C7–C10, doi: 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)80567-4
Hehemann J H, Michel G, Barbeyron T, et al. 2010. Expression, purification and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of the catalytic module of a β-agarase from the flavobacterium Zobellia galactanivorans. Acta Crystallographica, 66(4): 413–417
Hou Yanping, Chen Xinglin, Chan Zhuhua, et al. 2015. Expression and characterization of a thermostable and pH-stable β-agarase encoded by a new gene from Flammeovirga pacifica WPAGA1. Process Biochemistry, 50(7): 1068–1075, doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2015.04.005
Hu Bin, Gong Qianhong, Wang Ye, et al. 2006. Prebiotic effects of neoagaro-oligosaccharides prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis of agarose. Anaerobe, 12(5–6): 260–266
Kim H T, Yun E J, Wang Damao, et al. 2013. High temperature and low acid pretreatment and agarase treatment of agarose for the production of sugar and ethanol from red seaweed biomass. Bioresource Technology, 136: 582–587, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.038
Kobayashi R, Takisada M, Suzuki T, et al. 1997. Neoagarobiose as a novel moisturizer with whitening effect. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 61(1): 162–163, doi: 10.1271/bbb.61.162
Laemmli U K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227(5259): 680–685, doi: 10.1038/227680a0
Lee D G, Jang M K, Lee O H, et al. 2008. Over-production of a glycoside hydrolase family 50 β-agarase from Agarivorans sp. JA-1 in Bacillus subtilis and the whitening effect of its product. Biotechnology Letters, 30(5): 911–918, doi: 10.1007/s10529-008-9634-4
Lee D G, Jeon M J, Lee S H. 2012. Cloning, expression, and characterization of a glycoside hydrolase family 118 β-agarase from Agarivorans sp. JA-1. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 22(12): 1692–1697, doi: 10.4014/jmb
Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. 2012. SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(D1): D302–D305, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr931
Li Jiang, Sha Yujie, Seswita-Zilda D, et al. 2014. Purification and characterization of thermostable agarase from Bacillus sp. BI-3, a thermophilic bacterium isolated from hot spring. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24(1): 19–25, doi: 10.4014/jmb.1308.08055
Liang S S, Chen Y P, Chen Y H, et al. 2014. Characterization and overexpression of a novel β-agarase from Thalassomonas agarivorans. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 116(3): 563–572, doi: 10.1111/jam.2014.116.issue-3
Lin Bokun, Lu Guoyong, Zheng Yandan, et al. 2012. Gene cloning, expression and characterization of a neoagarotetraose-producing β-agarase from the marine bacterium Agarivorans sp. HZ105. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28(4): 1691–1697, doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0977-y
Liu Nan, Mao Xiangzhao, Yang Meng, et al. 2014. Gene cloning, expression and characterisation of a new β-agarase, AgWH50C, producing neoagarobiose from Agarivorans gilvus WH0801. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 30(6): 1691–1698, doi: 10.1007/s11274-013-1591-y
Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire M K, Gonzales N R, et al. 2015. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Research, 43(D1): D222–D226, doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1221
Miller G L. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3): 426–428, doi: 10.1021/ac60147a030
Minegishi H, Shimane Y, Echigo A, et al. 2013. Thermophilic and halophilic β-agarase from a halophilic archaeon Halococcus sp. 197A. Extremophiles, 17(6): 931–939, doi: 10.1007/s00792-013-0575-z
Moreno C, Romero J, Espejo R T. 2002. Polymorphism in repeated 16S rRNA genes is a common property of type strains and environmental isolates of the genus Vibrio. Microbiology, 148(4): 1233–1239, doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-4-1233
Oh C, Nikapitiya C, Lee Y, et al. 2010. Cloning, purification and biochemical characterization of beta agarase from the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. AG4. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 37(5): 483–494, doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0694-9
Ohta Y, Hatada Y, Nogi Y, et al. 2004a. Enzymatic properties and nucleotide and amino acid sequences of a thermostable β-agarase from a novel species of deep-sea Microbulbifer. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 64(4): 505–514, doi: 10.1007/s00253-004-1573-y
Ohta Y, Nogi Y, Miyazaki M, et al. 2004b. Enzymatic properties and nucleotide and amino acid sequences of a thermostable β-agarase from the novel marine isolate, JAMB-A94. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 68(5): 1073–1081, doi: 10.1271/bbb.68.1073
Sahreen S, Khan M R, Khan R A. 2010. Evaluation of antioxidant activities of various solvent extracts of Carissa opaca fruits. Food Chemistry, 122(4): 1205–1211, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.03.120
Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4(4): 406–425
Takagi E, Hatada Y, Akita M, et al. 2015. Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of a GH16 β-agarase from a deep-sea bacterium, Microbulbifer thermotolerans JAMB-A94. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 79(4): 625–632, doi: 10.1080/09168451.2014.988680
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, et al. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30(12): 2725–2729, doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197
Tawara M, Sakatoku A, Tiodjio R E, et al. 2015. Cloning and characterization of a novel agarase from a newly isolated bacterium Simiduia sp. strain TM-2 able to degrade various seaweeds. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 177(3): 610–623, doi: 10.1007/s12010-015-1765-1
Temuujin U, Chi W J, Chang Y K, et al. 2012. Identification and biochemical characterization of Sco3487 from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), an exo- and endo-type β-agarase-producing neoagarobiose. Journal of Bacteriology, 194(1): 142–149, doi: 10.1128/JB.05978-11
Temuujin U, Chi W J, Lee S Y, et al. 2011. Overexpression and biochemical characterization of DagA from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): an endo-type β-agarase producing neoagarotetraose and neoagarohexaose. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 92(4): 749–759, doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3347-7
Vieille C, Zeikus G J. 2001. Hyperthermophilic enzymes: sources, uses, and molecular mechanisms for thermostability. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 65(1): 1–43, doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.1.1-43.2001
Xie Wei, Lin Bokun, Zhou Zhengrong, et al. 2013. Characterization of a novel β-agarase from an agar-degrading bacterium Catenovulum sp. X3. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(11): 4907–4915, doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4385-5
Yu Ran, Graf J, Smets B F. 2008. An improved cell recovery method for iron oxidizing bacterial (IOB) enrichments. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 72(3): 235–240, doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.12.001
Yun E J, Shin M H, Yoon J J, et al. 2011. Production of 3,6-anhydro-L-galactose from agarose by agarolytic enzymes of Saccharophagus degradans 2-40. Process Biochem, 46(1): 88–93, doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.07.019
Zhou Kequan, Yu Liangli. 2004. Antioxidant properties of bran extracts from Trego wheat grown at different locations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52(5): 1112–1117, doi: 10.1021/jf030621m
Zhu Kexue, Lian Caixia, Guo Xiaona, et al. 2011. Antioxidant activities and total phenolic contents of various extracts from defatted wheat germ. Food Chemistry, 126(3): 1122–1126, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.11.144
Year 2019 volume 38 Issue 2
PDF
60
31
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1007/s13131-019-1349-y
  • Receive Date:2017-01-14
  • Online Date:2026-03-31
  • Published:2019-02-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2017-01-14
  • Accepted:2017-03-02
Funding
The Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China under contract No. 2016J01162; the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Fujian Province University, China under contract No. B15139.
Affiliations
    1 College of Food and Biological Engineering, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China
    2 Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Microbiology and Enzyme Engineering, Xiamen 361021, China
    3 Research Center of Food Biotechnology of Xiamen City, Xiamen 361021, China
    4 Key Laboratory of Systemic Utilization and In-depth Processing of Economic Seaweed, Xiamen Southern Ocean Technology Center of China, Xiamen 361021, China
    5 Department of Pharmacy, Xiamen Medical College, Xiamen 361023, China

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-019-1349-y
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT