Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Ophiuroid fauna of cobalt-rich crust seamounts in the Northwest Pacific Ocean
收藏切换
PDF
Wanying Chen1, Jieying Na1, 2, Chengcheng Shen1, Ruiyan Zhang1, 2, Bo Lu1, Hong Cheng1, Chunsheng Wang1, 2, 3, 4, Dongsheng Zhang1, 2, 3, *
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2021, 40(12) : 55 - 78
Less
收藏切换
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2021, 40(12): 55-78
• Environmental Study of Seamounts and Adjacent Waters in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean •
Ophiuroid fauna of cobalt-rich crust seamounts in the Northwest Pacific Ocean
Full
Wanying Chen1, Jieying Na1, 2, Chengcheng Shen1, Ruiyan Zhang1, 2, Bo Lu1, Hong Cheng1, Chunsheng Wang1, 2, 3, 4, Dongsheng Zhang1, 2, 3, *
Affiliations
  • 1 Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China
  • 2 School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 3 Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China
  • 4 State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China
Published: 2021-11-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1887-y
Outline
收藏切换

Seamounts are vulnerable ecosystems in the deep sea and can be heavily impacted by human activities, such as bottom fishing and deep-sea mining. The species composition and distribution patterns of benthic fauna is key information for the designation of marine protected areas and environmental management plans. Three contracts for cobalt-rich crust exploration have been granted to China, Japan and Korea in the Northwest Pacific Ocean by the International Seabed Authority. However, our knowledge of benthic biodiversity in this area is extremely insufficient. During 2013–2020, eight Chinese Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association (COMRA) cruises were conducted to investigate the benthic assemblages of nine seamounts in this region. In this study, 191 ophiuroids collected from seamounts in the Northwest Pacific were identified into 29 species in 11 families. Ophiacanthidae and Euryalidae were the two most dominant families with 12 and 6 species, respectively. Ophiotomidae and Ophiopyrgidae were represented by two species each, while seven families were represented by only one species. Four species were widely distributed among 4–5 seamounts, and 17 species were found only at a single site. An integrated regional taxonomic dataset of Ophiuroidea was generated and analyzed. A total of 23 and 14 species were obtained from the Magellan Seamount Chain (MSC) and the Marcus-Wake seamounts (MWS), respectively, with 8 species shared between the two seamount groups. The individual-based rarefaction curves did not reach an asymptote, suggesting that the sampling effort was inadequate for either the entire region or each single seamount. Most species distributed in a narrow depth range, and the species composition was different between water depths above and below 2 000 m. Our results greatly improve the understanding of megafaunal biodiversity from seamounts in the Northwest Pacific Ocean, and highlight the necessity of further surveys to provide more robust information for environmental protection and management in this region.

Ophiuroidea  /  taxonomy  /  community  /  seamount  /  Northwest Pacific
Wanying Chen, Jieying Na, Chengcheng Shen, Ruiyan Zhang, Bo Lu, Hong Cheng, Chunsheng Wang, Dongsheng Zhang. Ophiuroid fauna of cobalt-rich crust seamounts in the Northwest Pacific Ocean[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021 , 40 (12) : 55 -78 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-021-1887-y
Full Text
Less
1 Introduction
Less
Seamounts are typical vulnerable deep-sea marine ecosystems (Watling and Auster, 2017). Owing to their raised topography, seamounts alter the flow of ocean currents, providing suitable habitats, with enhanced food particles and hard-rock substrates, for sessile suspension-feeding invertebrates such as corals, sponges, and crinoids (Clark et al., 2012; McClain et al., 2010; Samedi et al., 2007; Schlacher et al., 2014). These sessile organisms are highly vulnerable to deep-sea fishing and mining activities (Clark et al., 2016), and have limited recovery capacity because of their exceptional longevity, slow growth rates, and low fecundity (Andrews et al., 2009; Carreiro-Silva et al., 2013; Roark et al., 2009; Samedi et al., 2007). Bottom trawling not only removes these biogenic species, but also has been implicated in changing community structures (Althaus et al., 2009; Koslow et al., 2001), especially for associated species such as fishes, echinoderms, and crustaceans (Atkinson et al., 2011; Clark et al., 2016; Mangano et al., 2013).
Ophiuroidea, with more than 2 000 known species, is the largest class of Echinodermata (Stöhr et al., 2012) and its biodiversity in deep-sea environments has been considerably underestimated (Christodoulou et al., 2019). As common associates of key biogenic species, such as corals and sponges (Cho and Shank, 2010), which show high density and diversity within seamount fauna (Clark and Bowden, 2015; Koslow et al., 2001; O’Hara and Tittensor, 2010; Ordines et al., 2019), ophiuroids have emerged as a key taxonomic group in understanding the patterns of seamount biodiversity and ecology (O’Hara, 2007). Although the relationships between ophiuroids and their hosts is more likely physical than biological (Fujita and Ohta, 1988; O’Hara et al., 2008), these associations may be beneficial to the recovery of corals from catastrophic events such as landslides or oil spills (Girard et al., 2016; Grange, 1991). However, ophiuroids can also be damaged by fishing trawling, and they are recognized as indicators of “vulnerable marine ecosystems” (Thompson et al., 2017).
The northwest Pacific holds the largest number of seamounts worldwide (Yesson et al., 2011), and many of these are covered by cobalt-rich crusts (CRC), a valuable mineral. Recently, the International Seabed Authority (ISA) granted four contracts for CRC exploration (Fig. 1), and the marine benthos from CRC seamounts are likely to be disturbed by potential mining activities. To protect marine biodiversity and seamount ecosystems, an international workshop was jointly convened by the ISA and the Chinese Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association (COMRA) in 2018, to develop a Regional Environmental Management Plan for the CRC in the “Triangle Area” in the Northwest Pacific Ocean (ISA Technology Study No. 23). To date, however, only a few studies have focused on megafauna from CRC seamounts (Morgan et al., 2015; Schlacher et al., 2014). Our knowledge gap regarding the benthic biodiversity in this area impedes the scientifically driven designation of areas of particular environmental interest. Seamounts in the “Triangle Area” are mostly composed of two seamount groups, the Marcus-Wake seamounts (MWS) and the Magellan Seamount Chain (MSC) located in the northern and southern parts of this area, respectively. During the 1970’s and 1980’s, benthic fauna was reported from the MWS (Pasternak et al., 1981). Recently, several cruises have been conducted by COMRA, surveying seamounts from both the MWS and MSC. A few benthic species have also been reported from other seamounts in the “Triangle Area” (Dong et al., 2017; Na et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2016, 2017; Zhang et al., 2018, 2019, 2020). However, these studies are so sporadic that a comprehensive dataset is needed to provide useful biodiversity information for the development of the regional environmental management plan.
In this study, we present an integrated regional taxonomic dataset for Ophiuroidea from CRC seamounts in the “Triangle Area”. By analyzing this dataset, we aimed to (1) provide a checklist of ophiuroid fauna from seamounts in this area, and (2) reveal the spatial distribution and community structure of ophiuroid fauna. These data should be able to be input into the designation of areas of particular environmental interest in the Northwest Pacific in the future.
2 Materials and methods
Less
2.1 Study area and sampling sites
The study area locates in the northwest Pacific, in the east of the Mariana Trench. During 2013 to 2020, several cruises were conducted to investigate biodiversity, connectivity and megafauna of seamounts in this area. The Human Occupied Vehicles (HOV, Jiaolong) and two Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROV, Haima and Hailong-III) were used to collect benthic animals using manipulator and suction pump. In the earlier curises in 2013 and 2014, our main object was to understand the species diversity, thus, operators were trying to collect different animals which never been collected. Since 2017, to evaluate the connectivity between seamounts in this area, small echinoderms such as ophiuroids and crinoids became the prioritized targets, collected individuals per dive increased distinctly (Table 1). Detailed sampling information is presented in Table 1 and Fig. 1 (the codes of RA–RE were temporally used to represent these seamounts which are un-named). Among the nine seamounts, five were located in the northern part of the study area (north of 19°N). The Batiza, Suda, and RE seamounts belong to the MWS, and the RA and RB seamounts, together with another seamount, form a small vertical seamount chain located in the northwest of the study area, which plays a role in connecting the MWS and MSC. Four seamounts were located in the southern part of the study area (south of 19°N). The Caiwei and Weijia seamounts belong to the MSC and are the two seamounts within China’s contract area. The RC Seamount in the southeastern part of the study area belongs to the Marshall Seamount area, and the RD Seamount in the southwest part is isolated from the other seamounts by a deep-sea basin.
2.2 Taxonomy identification
Specimens were generally identified based on morphological characteristics. Specimens used for morphological identification were examined and photographed using a dissection microscope (AXIO Zoom V16, Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) equipped with a camera (Axiocam 506 color, Zeiss). The taxonomy identification was conducted follow the latest taxonomic system (O’Hara et al., 2018), the main references for morphological identification were Paterson (1985), O’Hara and Stӧhr (2006), Stӧhr et al. (2012) and O’Hara et al. (2018), and the major references for endoskeleton characteristics were Martynov (2010) and Thuy and Stӧhr (2011, 2016).
2.3 Community structure and vertical distribution analysis
To evaluate the adequacy of the sampling effort, the “rarecurve” function of the Vegan package in R version 4.0.2 was used to compute individual-based rarefaction curves, based on three datasets: the ALL dataset including all nine seamounts, the MWS dataset including five northern seamounts (the RA, RB, RE, Suda, and Batiza seamounts), and the MSC dataset including four southern seamounts (the Caiwei, Weijia, RC, and RD seamounts). The MWS and MSC datasets represented the northern and southern seamounts in the study area. Individual-based rarefaction curves were also computed using the same method mentioned above to assess the sampling effort for the Caiwei and Weijia seamounts, which were the two most adequately sampled seamounts, with seven and 10 ROV dives, respectively. Additionally, the 6 epibenthic species (Table 2) were removed from the dataset, the rarefaction analysis was repeated using the exclusive epizoic species dataset. A vertical distribution plot of ophiuroid species was prepared using GraphPad Prism v7.0.
3 Results
Less
3.1 Taxonomic check list
A total of 191 ophiuroid specimens were identified into 29 species belonging to 11 families and 14 genera.
Class Ophiuroidea Gray, 1840
Order Ophiacanthida O’Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017
Suborder Ophiacanthina O’Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017
Family Ophiacanthidae Ljungman, 1867
Genus Ophioplinthaca Verrill, 1899
Ophioplinthaca defensor Koehler, 1930
Ophioplinthaca defensor Koehler, 1930: 84–86, pl. 9, Figs 1 and 2
Non Ophioplinthaca vicina—Litvinova, 1981: 126–127, Figs 3, 5, and 6 = Ophioplinthaca defensor Koehler, 1930.
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV01, 8 specimens (RSIO41002–RSIO41009); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV04, 4 specimens (RSIO41017, RSIO41021, RSIO41022, RSIO41025); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV05, 1 specimen (RSIO41031); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV06, 16 specimens (RSIO41033–RSIO41048); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV12, 8 specimens (RSIO61072–RSIO61074, RSIO61079, RSIO61080, RSIO61082–RSIO61084); Batiza seamount, St. BG-ROV04, 1 specimen (RSIO56008); RC seamount, St. RC-ROV06, 3 specimens (RSIO56015, RSIO56016, RSIO56056); RC seamount, St. RC-ROV07, 1 specimen (RSIO56020); Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV81, 1 specimen (RSIO35010); RE seamount, St. RE-ROV04, 14 specimens (RSIO61019, RSIO61021–RSIO61033). The vouch numbers have been changed recently, and the corresponding vouch number between this study and those used in Na et al. (2021) were listed in Table A1.
This species was described by Na et al. (2021). In this study, more specimens from other seamounts are included, suggesting a wide distribution in the Northwest Pacific.
Habitat: Associated with various deep-sea sponge species.
Diagnosis: Disc incised interradially to almost 1/2 d.d.; disc spines spherical or conical, smooth or with a few tiny thorns at the apex; radial shields large, triangular, covering a large proportion of the disc, mostly contiguous; jaw as long as wide, with 1 apical and 4 oral papillae, cylindrical to capitate, 1–2 times as long as wide; 1 oval tentacle scale, shorter than ventral arm plate.
Remark: The specimens reported by Litvinova (1981) as O. vicina from the Marcus-Necker Seamounts in the NW Pacific also have large disc spines and contiguous radial shields, which are more similar to O. defensor and may belong to this species (O’Hara and Stöhr, 2006).
Distribution: Indonesia (385 m), Australia (1 024–1 816 m), New Zealand (1 876–1 853 m), Marcus-Necker seamounts (1 700–2 300 m), Weijia guyot (1 571–1 935 m), Caiwei guyot (1 660 m), Batiza seamount (1 678 m), RC seamount (1 245–1 257 m), RE seamount (2 345 m).
Ophioplinthaca grandisquama Chen, Na & Zhang, 2021
Material examined: RC seamount, St. RC-ROV05, 3 specimens (RSIO56013, RSIO56014, RSIO56060).
Habitat: All three specimens were attached to an octocoral (Calyptrophora sp.).
Disc incised interradially >1/5 d.d.; disc spines stout, capitate with typically elongate to flaring head bearing numerous distinct thorns; radial shields roughly triangular, >1/5 d.d. in length, contiguous distally; jaw wider than long with 3–4 lateral oral papillae and 1–2 apical papilla, conical; 1 oral tentacle scale situated between slit of jaws, slightly larger than oral papillae; 1 tentacle scale, elongated and stout.
Distribution: RC seamount (1 049 m).
Ophioplinthaca semele (A. H. Clark, 1949)
Ophiomitra semele A. H. Clark, 1949: 20–23, Figs 8a and b
Material examined: RC seamount, St. RC-ROV08, 1 specimen (RSIO56057).
Habitat: Fine gray sand, mud and rocks (Clark, 1949); attached to a blade-like glass sponge with a sea lily.
Diagnosis: Disc slightly incised interradially to 1/3 d.d.; disc stumps cylindrical and swollen, up to 0.5 mm high, upper half covered in obvious thorns; radial shields triangular, ~1/3 d.d. in length, contiguous for 1/3–1/2 of length; jaw as long as wide with 2–3 thin apical papillae and 4–5 lateral oral papillae, pointed, ≤ 3 times longer than wide, distal 2 oral papillae slightly broadened and leaf-shaped, standing vertically; 1 tentacle scale, leaf-like.
Distribution: Hawaii (101–1 251 m), RC seamount (1 042 m).
Ophioplinthaca sp.1
Material examined: RC seamount, St. RC-ROV08, 1 specimen (RSIO56058).
Habitat: Attached to an octocoral (Narella sp.).
Diagnosis: Disc incised interradially 1/3 d.d.; disc spines cylindrical to capitate with a terminal crown of thorns; radial shields twice as long as wide, 1/4 d.d. in length, contiguous for most of length; jaw wider than long with 1 blunt apical papilla and 3 small lateral oral papillae on each side, gradually decreasing from inside to outside; 1 tentacle scale, leaf-like, thorny.
Ophioplinthaca athena A. H. Clark, 1949 (Figs 2a–c and 3)
Ophioplinthaca athena Clark, 1949: 23–24, Fig. 9.
Material examined: RC seamount, St. RC-ROV09, 9 specimens (RSIO56022–RSIO56026, RSIO56028, RSIO56029, RSIO56031, RSIO56032); RD seamount, St. RC-ROV10, 3 specimens (RSIO56035–RSIO56037); Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV76, 3 specimens (RSIO35003–RSIO35005); Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV80, 6 specimens (RSIO35001, RSIO35006–RSIO35009, RSIO35020); Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV70, 2 specimens (RSIO31002, RSIO31003); RB seamount, St. RB-ROV01, 6 specimens (RSIO61001–RSIO61004, RSIO61008, RSIO61009).
Habitat: Gray sand, mud and rocks (Clark, 1949); attached to various deep-sea sponges and coral species, or rocks (present study, Fig. 3).
Diagnosis: Disc incised interradially >1/3 d.d.; disc center bears numerous granules, conical to cylindrical with a few minute flaring thorns, 0.2–0.3 mm high; granules present at margin of radial shields and extending down to base of arms with higher density than disc center; radial shields triangular, 3–3.5 times as long as wide, contiguous distally; 1 oval to leaf-shaped tentacle scale, almost as long as ventral arm plate.
Distribution: Hawaii (1 866–2 157 m), Caiwei guyot (2 273–2 785 m), RB seamount (2 771 m), RC seamount (2 624–2 629 m), RD seamount (2 692 m).
Ophioplinthaca cf. clothilde (Figs 2d–f and 3)
Material examined: RC seamount, St. RC-ROV09, 3 specimens (RSIO56030, RSIO56033, RSIO56059); RD seamount, St. RC-ROV12; 11 specimens (RSIO56044, RSIO56046–RSIO56055).
Habitat: Attached to various deep-sea sponges or coral species (present study).
Diagnosis: Disc slightly incised interradially to ~1/5 d.d.; disc stumps smooth conical to cylindrical; radial shields ~1/4 d.d. in length, scarcely depressed, contiguous distally; dorsal and ventral arm plates separated; jaw triangular, wider than long with 4–5 lateral oral papillae and 1–2 apical oral papilla, conical and pointed; ≥2 tentacle scales on the first pore, then decreased to 1 leaf-like and slightly pointed scale until near end of arm.
Distribution: Hawaiian Islands (757–1 342 m), RC seamount (2 624–2 629 m), RD seamount (2 058 m).
Ophioplinthaca sp. 2 (Figs 2g–i)
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV06, 1 specimen (RSIO41049).
Habitat: Attached to a sponge (Farrea occa).
Diagnosis: Disc incised interradially 1/5 d.d.; disc spines conical and smooth, ≤0.4 mm high; piriform radial shields slightly sunken, contiguous distally; dorsal arm plates separated except first 3 which are contiguous and armed with a few granules; jaw as long as wide with 1 apical papilla and 3–4 lateral oral papillae; 1 tentacle scale, thick and elongate with pointed end.
Distribution: Weijia guyot (1 935 m).
Remark: Ophioplinthaca sp. 2 is similar to the Atlantic species O. abyssalis Cherbonnier and Sibuet, 1972 by having the continuous first three dorsal arm plates with conical disc spine, and the thick and long tentacle scales. However, due to Ophioplinthaca with high variable characteristic (O’Hara and Stöhr, 2006), as well as the difference in the geographical distribution, to formally name this specimen would require a major taxonomic review which is beyond the scope of the present work. Three species, Ophioplinthaca sp. nov., Ophioplinthaca semele, and Ophioplinthaca sp. 1, were the specifically studied in another paper (Chen et al., 2021), with detailed descriptions of their morphological characteristics. In this study, only basic information (sampling site, number of specimens, and diagnostic characteristics) are provided for further analysis of ophiuroid fauna.
Genus Ophiacantha Müller & Troschel, 1842
Ophiacantha richeri O’Hara & Stöhr, 2006 (Figs 4a, b and 5e)
Ophiacantha richeri O’Hara & Stöhr, 2006: 48–49, Fig. 3F–H.
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV04, 1 specimen (RSIO41026); Suda seamount, St. HLIII-Dive011, 2 specimens (RSIO48002, RSIO48004).
Habitat: Attached to deep-sea sponge or coral species, usually together with Ophioleila elegans (present study).
Diagnosis: Disc petaloid, incised interradially, covered by dense spines; disc spines small with slender pedicel that branches at >1/2 spine height into 3 terminal thorns, thorns bifurcated near tip; oral shields rhomboid, twice as wide as long, larger than adoral shields; adoral shields with distal extensions that extend around lateral angle of oral shields; 3 lateral oral papillae, outer distal oral papillae leaf-shaped; arms moniliform, arm spines thorny, ≤6; 1 oval tentacle scale with thorny end.
Distribution: New Caledonia (750–1 740 m), Weijia guyot (1 571 m), Suda seamount (2 294 m).
Ophiacantha sp. 1 (Figs 4c and d)
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV02, 1 specimen (RSIO41015); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-Dive105, 2 specimens (RSIO37001, RSIO37002); Batiza seamount, St. BG-ROV04, 1 specimen (RSIO56011); RC seamount, St. RC-ROV09, 1 specimen (RSIO56027); RD seamount, St. RC-ROV10, 6 specimens (RSIO56034, RSIO56038–RSIO56042); RB seamount, St. RB-ROV01, 3 specimens (RSIO61005–RSIO61007).
Habitat: Attached to deep-sea sponge or coral species.
Diagnosis: Disc round, covered in thin overlapping plates bearing a single spine; spine a small stump (0.2 mm high) with angular stem and expanded convex apex bearing 8–12 divergent short thorns; oral shields rhombic to triangular, wider than long; adoral shields long, separating oral shield from arm plate; 3 lateral oral papillae; arm moniliform, dorsal and ventral arm plates widely separate, ≤6 arm spines, thorny, the uppermost longest, 1 long leaf-like tentacle scale with thorny tip.
Ophiacantha sp. 2 (Figs 4e and f)
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV04, 2 specimens (RSIO41016 and RSIO41027); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV12, 1 specimen (RSIO61075); RA seamount, St. RA-ROV01, 1 specimen (RSIO56005).
Habitat: Attached to deep-sea sponge or coral species.
Diagnosis: Disc round, covered by dense spines; Spines elongate stumps (0.2 mm high) with angular stem and 2–6, usually 3, long fine terminal thorns; distal tips of radial shields exposed, widely separate; oral shields triangular, wider than long; adoral shields short, not separating oral shield from arm plate; 3 lateral oral papillae, distal one enlarged and rectangular; arm slightly moniliform, dorsal and ventral arm plates separate, ≤7 arm spines, nearly smooth, the uppermost longest; 1 small oval tentacle scale.
Ophiacantha sp. 3 (Figs 5a, b and f)
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV01, 1 specimen (RSIO41011); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV12, 1 specimen (RSIO61081); Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV81, 1 specimen (RSIO35018).
Habitat: Attached to corals or crinoids.
Diagnosis: Disc covered by dense spines; 2 types of spines; first typically delicate with long slender pedicel and 2–6 long fine curved terminal thorns, 0.2–0.4 mm long, diminishing in size on margin and ventral surface of disc; second long and slender, 0.5–0.7 mm long, >7 times as long as wide, sometimes in combination with thorny spines; oral shields wider than long, adoral shields short, not separating oral shield from arm plate; 3 lateral oral papillae, distal one irregular and not enlarged; arm slightly moniliform, arm spines relatively smooth, almost meeting on dorsal midline, ≤6 arm spines, 1 leaf-shaped thorny tentacle scale.
Remark: Ophiacantha is one of the largest genera and ill-defined, containing several groups of species that probably deserve their own genus and many other species that are difficult to place taxonomically (O’Hara and Stöhr, 2006). Though there are a number of characters which appear to be unique and undescribed in these specimens, we prefer not to attach name to those specimens.
Ophiacanthidae sp. (Figs 5c and d)
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV05, 2 specimens (RSIO41032, RSIO41050).
Habitat: Attached to deep-sea sponges.
Diagnosis: Disc round, covered by dense elongate spines (0.2 mm high) with slender stem and expanded convex apex bearing 8–12 long divergent thorns; distal tips of radial shields exposed, widely separated; oral shields rhombic with a truncate distal lobe, longer than wide; adoral shields long, separating oral shield from arm plate; 1 dental papillae and 5 lateral oral papillae, distal ones not enlarged and leaf-shaped; ≤12 arm spines, thorny, meeting above arm, the lowest hook-like; 1 tentacle scale, small and oval.
Family Ophiocamacidae O’Hara, Stöhr, Hugall, Thuy, Martynov, 2018
Genus Ophiocamax Lyman, 1878
Ophiocamax cf. drygalskii Hertz, 1927 (Figs 6a–c)
Ophiocamax drygalskii Hertz, 1927: 41–42, pl. 9, Figs 3–5.
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV01, 1 specimen (RSIO41013); Batiza seamount, St. BG-ROV04, 1 specimen (RSIO56009); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV12, 2 specimens (RSIO61071, RSIO61078); RE seamount, St. RE-ROV04, 6 specimens (RSIO61014–RSIO61018, RSIO61020).
Habitat: All specimens were found attached to pieces of ore, sometimes together with Ophiopristis sp. 1 (present study, Fig. 6c).
Diagnosis: Disc round, bearing short thorny spines; spines generally more pointed in disc center; radial shields exposed, 1/4–1/5 d.d. in length, broadly contiguous; oral shield hour-glass-shaped, varied from longer than wide with very elongated proximal part to wider than long with round proximal angle, bearing short tubercle-like papillae; jaw as long as wide bearing 1–2 apical papillae and numerous smooth spiniform lateral papillae, generally clustered around oral tentacle pore; ≤6 arm spines, thorny; cluster of 3–4 elongate smooth tentacle scales projecting upward around basal pores, 1 scale distally, basal papillae perfectly resemble oral papillae, the latter rapidly adapt their size and become pointed.
Distribution: Antarctica (2 450 m), Weijia guyot (1 670–1 839 m), RE seamount (2 345 m), Batiza seamount (1 653 m).
Remark: From the geographically closest species O. vitrea Lyman, 1878 (the common Indo-West Pacific species which was recently shown as being very polymorphic) (O’Hara and Stöhr, 2006), our materials differ in the following characters: radial shields are relatively small (about 1/4 of the disk diameter in our materials and usually 1/3 in O. vitrea); the number of arm spines are relatively small (≤6 arm spines in our materials and usually up to 10 in O. vitrea). The water depth distribution of O. vitrea is usually above 1000 m, while our materials were collected at depths of 1670–2345 m. The other Indo-West Pacific species O. nominata can be distinguished from our materials by the short wide radial shields, the stout disc spines with two tiers of thorns, the thorny oral papillae and spines in the oral shield. Ophiocamax applicatus Koehler, 1922 described off Tasmania, Australia differs in having small radial shield covered by pointed spines, relatively small and triangular oral shield, thorny oral papilla, proximally contiguous triangular dorsal and ventral arm plates. Our materials are consistent with Ophiocamax drygalskii Hertz, 1927 (first described off Southern Ocean), having numerous short disc spines with few denticles at the top or along their sides, exposed radial shields about 1/4–1/5 d.d. in length, smooth oral papillae, oral shield hour-glass-shaped and ≤7 arm spines. Due to the differences in geographic distribution, we tentatively designate this species as O. cf. drygalskii to avoid biases caused by cryptic species or intraspecies variation.
Family Ophiotomidae Paterson, 1985
Genus Ophiopristis Verrill, 1899
Ophiopristis sp. 1 (Figs 6d–f)
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV05, 1 specimen (RSIO41030).
Habitat: This specimen was found attached to a piece of ore together with Ophiocamax cf. drygalskii.
Diagnosis: Disc spines rugose with pointed spine; radial shields exposed, triangular, 1/6 d.d. in length; jaws longer than broad with 2 apical papillae and 3–4 pointed oral papillae; second oral tentacle pore emerges superficially onto oral surface; 2 leaf-like tentacle scales associated with pores; arm spines flattened, carry a row of sharp points along each edge; proximal tentacle pores armed with 2–3 sub-equal tentacle scales, scales reduce to 1 large leaf-like scale further along arm.
Distribution: Weijia guyot (1 841–1 955 m).
Ophiopristis sp. 2 (Figs 6g–i)
Material examined: RE seamount, St. RE-ROV03, 1 specimen (RSIO61011).
Habitat: Attached to a piece of ore.
Diagnosis: Disc round, covered with thin plates bearing long spines and conical granules, rugose with pointed spire; radial shields exposed, triangular, 1/7 d.d. in length; adoral shield long and narrow, separating oral shield from first lateral arm plate; jaws longer than broad with 2 apical papillae and 3 pointed oral papillae; second oral tentacle pore emerges superficially onto oral surface, 2–3 rounded tentacle scales associated with pores; arm spines flattened, carry a row of sharp points along each edge; ventral arm plates pentagonal, distal edge concave in the middle, separated from each other; proximal tentacle pores armed with 2–3 sub-equal tentacle scales, scales reduce to 1 large leaf-like scale further along arm.
Distribution: RE seamount (1 188 m)
Remark: The two species share with the genus Ophiopristis the flattened and rugose arm spines, separated oral and second tentacle papillae. However, the emergent radial shields, thorny disc spines, the arrangement of the oral papillae and second oral tentacle scales are unusual. Since only one specimen was collected for each of them, we have not formally classified them.
Order Euryalida Lamarck, 1816
Family Euryalidae Gray, 1840
Genus Asteroschema Örstedt in Lütken, 1856
Asteroschema horridum Lyman, 1879 (Figs 7a–c and 8a)
Asteroschema horridum Lyman 1879: 66, pl. 17, Figs 458–461.
Material examined: RA seamount, St. RA-ROV01, 2 specimens (RSIO56001, RSIO56002); RC seamount, St. RC-ROV07, 1 specimen (RSIO56019); RE seamount, St. RE-ROV03, 3 specimens (RSIO61010, RSIO61012, RSIO61013).
Habitat: Associated with octocoral (Calyptrophora sp.) (present study, Fig. 8a).
Diagnosis: Disc and arms covered by skin with small, dense, distinctly conical epidermal ossicles on aboral side and minute hemispherical granular ossicles on oral side; conical ossicles bearing terminal thorns at tips; radial shields narrow elongated paired structures at base of arm, appearing to converge but not meeting centrally; first tentacle pore without arm spines, single spine present in second arm segments, 2 arm spines from sixth arm segment; inner spine large, twice the length of arm segment in middle of arm and bearing distinct thorny projections in the last 1/5 of distal end.
Distribution: New Zealand (643–1 165 m), New Caledonia (1 140 m), RA seamount (1 084–1 086 m), RC seamount (1 257 m), RE seamount (2 345 m).
Asteroschema sublaeve Lütken & Mortensen, 1899 (Figs 7d–f and 8b)
Asteroschema sublaeve Lütken & Mortensen, 1899: 187–188, pl. 22, Figs 13 and 14.
Material examined: Batiza seamount, St. BG-ROV04, 1 specimen (RSIO56007).
Habitat: Associated with octocoral (Victorgorgia sp.) (present study, Fig. 8b).
Diagnosis: Disc and arms covered by skin with small, dense, granule-shaped epidermal ossicles on aboral side and plate-shaped ossicles on oral side; granule ossicles slightly rounded and convex at center; plate-shaped dermal ossicles flat and thick; radial shields narrow elongated paired structures at base of arm, converge and almost meet centrally; first tentacle pore without arm spines, single spine present in second arm segments, 2 arm spines from the 13th or 17th arm segment; inner spine large, twice the length of arm segment in middle of arm and bearing distinct thorny projections on the top 1/2–2/3.
Distribution: East Pacific (605–1 271 m), Batiza seamount (1 660 m).
Asteroschema ajax A. H. Clark, 1949 (Figs 7g–i and 8c)
Asteroschema ajax A. H. Clark, 1949: 11–13, Fig. 3b.
Material examined: Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV81, 1 specimen (RSIO35016); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV09, 1 specimen (RSIO51001).
Habitat: Associated with octocoral (Plexauridae sp.) (present study, Fig. 8c).
Diagnosis: Disc and arms covered by skin with small, dense, granule-shaped epidermal ossicles on aboral side and plate-shaped ossicles on oral side; granule ossicles slightly rounded and convex at center, bearing divergent thorns; plate-shaped dermal ossicles flat and thick; radial shields narrow elongate paired structures at base of arm, converge and almost meet centrally; the first 10 or 12 arm segments expanded; first tentacle pore without arm spines, single spine present in second arm segments, 2 arm spines from third arm segment; inner spine large, twice length of arm segment in middle of arm, bears short thorny projections in the top 1/2–2/3.
Distribution: New Zealand (1 664–1 920 m), Australia (763 m), Hawaii (49–966 m), Caiwei guyot (1 660 m), Weijia guyot (1 740 m).
Asteroschema cf. intectum Lyman, 1878 (Figs 7j–l and 8d)
Asteroschema intectum Lyman 1878: 235, pl. 3, figs 59–61.
Material examined: Suda seamount, St. HLIII-Dive011, 1 specimen (RSIO48001).
Habitat: Associated with octocoral (Paragorgia sp.) (present study, Fig. 8d).
Diagnosis: Disc and arms covered by skin with small, dense, granule-shaped epidermal ossicles on aboral side and plate-shaped ossicles on oral side; granule ossicles slightly rounded and convex at center; plate-shaped dermal ossicles flat and thick; radial shields narrow elongated paired structures at base of arm, converge and meet centrally; first and second tentacle pores without arm spines, single spine present in third arm segments, 2 arm spines from the 18th arm segment; inner spine large, one and a half times length of arm segment in middle of arm, bears long divergent thorny projections in the top 1/2.
Distribution: Gulf of Mexico (55–2 195 m), Japan (728 m), Suda seamount (2 294 m).
Remark: Astroschema intectum Lyman, 1878 firstly described off Moscow Bay is defined by the long and slender arm, granulated above, but naked on the sides and under surface. Later this species was also reported in Japan, but no specific morphological description (Okanishi and fujita, 2013). We examined the specimen in this study and found that the shape of the radial shield and the distribution of granule ossicles were in line with the A. intectum. However, due to the differences in geographic distribution and insufficient description in early literature, we tentatively designate this species as A. cf. intectum for supplementary research in the future.
Asteroschema sp. (Figs 8e and 9a–c)
Material examined: BG seamount, St. BG-ROV04, 1 specimen (RSIO56006).
Habitat: Associated with octocoral (Victrogorgia sp.) (present study, Fig. 8e).
Diagnosis: Disc and arms covered by skin with small, dense, granule-shaped epidermal ossicles on aboral side and plate-shaped ossicles on oral side; granule ossicles slightly rounded and convex at center; plate-shaped dermal ossicles flat and thick; radial shields narrow elongated paired structures at base of arm, converge but not meet centrally; first tentacle pore without arm spines, single spine present in second arm segments, 2 arm spines from 13th or 17th arm segment; inner spine thick, as long as arm segment in middle of arm, bears distinct thorny projections in the top 1/2.
Remark: This specimen is consistent with most characteristics of Asteroschema intectum, but still can be distinguished by the shape of radial shields and the number of arm spines. In the original literature, the author only described the external morphological characteristic but not the internal skeleton and arm spines.
Genus Ophiocreas Lyman, 1879
Ophiocreas oedipus Lyman, 1879 (Figs 8f and 9d–f)
Ophiocreas oedipus Lyman, 1879: 65–66, pl. 16, Figs 443–446.
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV01, 1 specimen (RSIO41001); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV12, 1 specimen (RSIO61070); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV12, 1 specimen (RSIO51004).
Habitat: Obligately associated with an octocoral (Metallogorgia melanotrichos) (Cho, 2008; Mosher and Watling, 2009; present study, Fig. 8f).
Diagnosis: Disc and arms covered with thick skin without external ossicles; arms not branched, about 20 times dd, slender except at base, base heavily swollen for first 6–7 arm segments.
Distribution: New Zealand (551–1 644 m), North Atlantic (1 968–2 228 m), southeast Atlantic (1200 m), Australia (805–1 169 m), New Caledonia (350–1 600 m), New Zealand (617–1 771 m), Weijia guyot (1 670–1 703 m).
Family Asteronychidae Ljungman, 1867
Genus Astrodia Verrill, 1899
Astrodia sp. (Figs 9g–i)
Material examined: Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV83, 4 specimens (RSIO35002, RSIO35012–RSIO35014); Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV72, 1 specimen (RSIO31004).
Habitat: Attached to sponges.
Diagnosis: Disc pentagonal with slightly notched interradial edges; external ossicles plate-shaped, in contact with aboral disc and separated on periphery; lateral interradial disc surface covered by naked skin, several granules scattered on periphery, short genital slits on lateral disc, approximately 1/3–1/4 height of disc; lateral arm plates oblong, do not project from arm surface on middle to distal portion of arms.
Remark: Astrodia is currently composed of four species, A. abyssicola (Lyman, 1879), A. excavata (Lütken & Mortensen, 1899), A. plana (Lütken & Mortensen, 1899) and A. tenuispina (Verrill, 1884). This specimen can be distinguished from the four species by external ossicles plate-shaped and short genital slits.
Order Ophioscolecida O’Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017
Ophioscolecida sp. (Figs 9j–i)
Material examined: RD seamount, St. RC-ROV12, 1 specimen (RSIO56045).
Habitat: Attached to a sponge.
Diagnosis: Dorsal disc and arms with thickened skin, thin glassy disc scales, scattered dense conical granules; radial shields narrow, concealed by disc scales; oral plates tumid proximally, with 1 apical papilla and 4 lateral oral papillae, lie flattened in distal direction; arms moniliform; arm spines glassy and long.
Remark: This specimen is possibly a juvenile, which is difficult to identify. Through the inspection of the families Ophiohelidae and Ophioscolecidae, our specimen is different from the existing species, so it was classified into order level, more studies are needed to identify it to lower taxonomic level.
Order Amphilepidida O’Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017
Suborder Gnathophiurina Matsumoto, 1915
Superfamily Ophiactoidea Ljungman, 1867
Family Ophiothamnidae O’Hara, Stöhr, Hugall, Thuy, Martynov, 2018
Genus Ophioleila A. H. Clark, 1949
Ophioleila elegans A. H. Clark, 1949
Ophioleila elegans A. H. Clark, 1949: Figs 2a–f and 3a–j.
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV01, 1 specimen (RSIO41012); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV04, 7 specimens (RSIO41018–RSIO41020, RSIO41023, RSIO41024, RSIO41028, RSIO41029); Batiza seamount, St. BG-ROV04, 1 specimen (RSIO56010); RC seamount, St. RC-ROV08, 2 specimens (RSIO56021, RSIO56043); Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV81, 4 specimens (RSIO35011, RSIO35015, RSIO35017, RSIO35019); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV12, 1 specimen (RSIO51002); Suda seamount, St. HLIII-Dive011, 2 specimens (RSIO48006–RSIO48007); Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV12, 2 specimens (RSIO61076, RSIO61077).
Habitat: Associated with glass sponges and might be epizoic at depths of 1 300–1 800 m (Zhang et al., 2018).
Diagnosis: Ten enlarged swollen lobes, sack-shaped, longer than wide, curve around disc edge, covering most of the disc; lobes covered by imbricated scales bearing cylindrical or conical granules with terminal crown of thorns; adoral shields enlarged, separate oral shields from first lateral arm plates, bear 2 cylindrical or subconical oral papillae along proximal side, distal one protects external oral tentacle pore; jaw as long as wide with cluster of 3–5 oral or tooth papilla; ≤7 arm spines, short and thorny.
Distribution: Hawaii (748–1 342 m), Weijia guyot (1 571–1 703 m), Caiwei guyot (1 660 m), Batiza seamount (1 660 m), RC seamount (1 146 m), Suda seamount (2 294 m).
Superfamily Amphiuroidea Ljungman, 1867
Family Amphiuridae Ljungman, 1867
Genus Amphiura Forbes, 1843
Amphiura cf. grandisquama Lyman, 1869 (Figs 10a and b)
Amphiura grandisquama Lyman, 1869: 334–336.
Material examined: Weijia guyot, St. WJ-ROV02, 1 specimen (RSIO41014).
Habitat: dwelling in a dead sponge.
Diagnosis: Disc pentagonal with slightly notched interradial edges, ~11 scales from center to interradial margin; radial shields 2.5 times as long as wide, proximally divergent, separated by a row of plates; adoral shields narrow and long, separating oral shields from first lateral arm plates; 2 infradental papillae on the top and two lateral oral papillae on each sides, inner papilla conical and small, outer ones large, rounded or triangular, flattened on adoral plate; dorsal and ventral arm plates just contiguous; ≤5 arm spines basally, cylindrical with blunt rounded tip, the lowest longest and thickest; 1 round and large tentacle scale.
Distribution: West Atlantic (450–1 174 m), Philippines (452–686 m), Australia (494 m), Gulf of Mexico (20–1 635 m), East Atlantic (494–690 m), Gulf of Guinea (410–478 m), Weijia guyot (1 995 m).
Suborder Ophionereidina O’Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017
Superfamily Ophiolepidoidea Ljungman, 1867
Family Hemieuryalidae Verrill, 1899
Genus Ophiozonella Matsumoto, 1915
Ophiozonella sp. (Figs 10c and d)
Material examined: RA seamount, St. RA-ROV01, 1 specimen (RSIO56003).
Habitat: Attached to a sponge.
Diagnosis: Disc flat, covered by plates, neither granules nor spines, primaries slightly larger than other plates, approximately 5 scales from center to interradial margin; radial shields triangular, slightly longer than wide, distally contiguous; ventral interradii covered by 4 large plates and 1 enlarged oral shield; genital slits short, approximately 1/3 height of disc; jaws small with 4 quadrilateral oral papillae on each side; arm moniliform, with dorsal and ventral plates widely separated; 2 short arm spines on the ventral side of LAPs, 1 oval tentacle scale.
Remark: This specimen is consistent with most characteristics of Ophiozonella media Koehler, 1904, but still can be distinguished by the position of radial shields and the number of oral papillae.
Order Ophiurida Müller & Troschel, 1840 sensu O’Hara et al., 2017
Suborder Ophiomusina O’Hara, Hugall, Thuy, Stöhr & Martynov, 2017
Family Ophiomusaidae O’Hara, Stöhr, Hugall, Thuy & Martynov, 2018
Genus Ophiomusa Hertz, 1927
Ophiomusa sp. (Figs 10e and f)
Material examined: RA seamount, St. RA-ROV01, 1 specimen (RSIO56004); Suda seamount, St. HLIII-Dive011, 1 specimen (RSIO48005).
Habitat: Fine-grained muddy sediments.
Diagnosis: Disc flat, covered by plates, neither granules nor spines, primaries a little larger than other plates, ~5 scales from center to interradial margin; radial shields small, broadly contiguous, but at the distal end separated by a small triangular plate; oral shields with straight distal side, up to 7 plates between them and disc margin; arm moniliform, dorsal arm plate minute, triangular very widely separated; only two ventral arm plates; 3 arm spines; 2 visible proximal pairs of tentacle pores.
Remark: This specimen has the appearance of a juvenile Ophiomusa, with two visible proximal pairs of tentacle pores. It has 7 plates between the oral shield and disc margin, which is different from most species of Ophiomusa.
Suborder Ophiurina Müller & Troschel, 1840 sensu O’Hara et al., 2017
Family Ophiopyrgidae Perrier, 1893
Genus Ophiuroglypha Hertz, 1927
Ophiuroglypha irrorata (Lyman, 1878) (Figs 11a and b)
Ophioglypha irrorate Lyman, 1878: 73–74, pl. 9, Figs 106–108.
Material examined: Caiwei guyot, St. CW-DV71, 1 specimen (RSIO31001).
Habitat: Fine-grained muddy sediments.
Diagnosis: Disc flat and pentagonal, primaries a little larger than other plates, ~8 scales from center to interradial margin; radial shields triangular, longer than wide, separated; papillae of arm-comb close-set, flat, with rounded ends; genital slits long, without distinct genital papillae; jaw longer than wide with 1 apical papilla and 5–6 quadrilateral oral papillae on each side; second tentacle pore opening outside of mouth slit, bears several scales; the adradial tentacle scale on basal arm segments slightly expanded, look like small supplementary ventral arm plates on either side of the main plate; 3 very short, small, sharp arm spines, situated low on the edge of the side arm-plate; distal arm spines slightly hooked.
Genus Amphiophiura Matsumoto, 1915
Amphiophiura sp. (Figs 11c and d)
Material examined: RC seamount, St. RC-ROV06, 1 specimen (RSIO56017).
Habitat: Fine-grained muddy sediments.
Diagnosis: Disc round and raised, covered by large pentagonal centro-dorsal plate and 5 equal-sized heptagonal radial plates in the center, all plates bearing some resemblance of small grains; radial shield pentagonal, about 1/6 d,d. continuous distally; ventral interradii occupied by a thick plate and enlarged radial shields; radial shields much longer than wide, and two plates from oral shield to primary interradial; genital slits long, with a series of small genital papillae arranged continuously in distal-wards forming the arm comb; dorsal and ventral arm plates decreasing in size along arm; ≤5 arm spines, tube-foot-shaped; tentacle pores enlarged, partly covered by 1–2 scales.
Remark: The shape of this animal is reminiscent of Amphiophiura bakeri McKnight, 2003 and Amphiophiura fisheri A. H. Clark, 1949. Our material differs from the two species by having a single large plate between oral shield and dorsal margin, 2 plates from oral shield to primary interradial.
3.2 Species composition and community structure
A total of 191 ophiuroid specimens were identified in 29 species belonging to 11 families (Table 2). Ophiacanthidae was the dominant family, represented by two genera, Ophiacantha and Ophioplinthaca, with 4 and 7 species, respectively. Euryalidae is the second most diverse family, with 6 species identified. Additionally, two species belonging to Ophiopyrgidae and two species belonging to Ophiotomidae were identified. Six families (Amphiuridae, Hemieuryalidae, Ophiocamacidae, Ophiomusaidae, Ophiothamnidae, and Asteronychidae) and one order (Ophioscolecida) were represented by only one species. Four species, including Ophiacantha sp. 1, Ophioplinthaca defensor, Ophioplinthaca athena, and Ophioleila elegans, were widely distributed and identified from four or five seamounts. Asteroschema horridum and Ophiocamax cf. drygalskii were identified from three seamounts, while Ophiacantha richeri, Ophiacantha sp. 2, Ophiacantha sp. 4, Ophioplinthaca cf. clothilde, Ophiomusa sp., and Asteroschema ajax were each identified from two seamounts. The remaining 17 species were identified from only one seamount. Several species are potentially new to science. Three species, Ophioplinthaca grandisquama n. sp., Ophioplinthaca semele, and Ophioplinthaca sp.1, were specifically studied with detailed morphological descriptions in another paper (Chen et al., 2021).
Twenty-three species were identified from the four southern seamounts (Caiwei, Weijia, RC, and RD), 14 species were identified from the five northern seamounts (RA, RB, RE, Batiza, and Suda). Among the 4 southern seaounts, thirteen species belong to 6 families were identified from the Weijia Seamount, with 6 species only identified from the Weijia Seamount. Ophioplinthaca defensor and Ophioleila elegans were the dominant species. Five species, including Amphiura cf. grandisquama, Ophiacantha sp. 3, Ophioplinthaca sp. 2, Ophiopristis sp. 1, and Ophiocreas oedipus, were only identified from the Weijia Seamount. Seven species were identified from the Caiwei Seamount, which was dominated by Ophioplinthaca athena, Astrodia sp. and Ophiuroglypha irrorata were only identified from the Caiwei Seamount. Ten species were identified from the RC Seamount, dominated by six species from the genus Ophioplinthaca, three of which were only discovered at this seamount. Four species were identified from the RD seamount, three of which were also discovered at other southern seamounts, Amphiophiura sp. was only discovered in this seamount. Among the 5 northern seamounts, the RA and RB seamounts are close together (Fig. 1); four and two species were identified from them, respectively, however, without common species discovered between them, which is probably due to inadequate sampling efforts. Regarding the other three northern seamounts, four species were identified from the RE seamount, six from the Batiza seamount, and four from the Suda Seamount. Overall, eight common species, most of which belong to the Ophiacanthidae, were discovered between the northern and southern seamounts.
To evaluate the sampling effort, individual-based species rarefaction analyses were conducted based on the geographical locations of the seamounts. The individual-based rarefaction curves of the whole study area and two separate divisions all failed to reach an asymptote, suggesting that the sampling effort was inadequate (Fig. 12a). This signifies the potential to accumulate additional species with increased sampling effort. Comparison of the MSC and MWS curves suggests that the estimated numbers of species from the north and south seamounts was similar. The individual-based curves of the two most intensively sampled seamounts (the Weijia and Caiwei seamounts) showed similar trends (Fig. 12b) to the curves of the whole study area and the two separate divisions (Fig. 13a).
3.3 Vertical distribution
The 29 species of ophiuroid were distributed across depths of 1 024–2 785 m. To evaluate the vertical distribution of ophiuroid fauna, the water depth was divided into two zones: the upper depths (1 000–2 000 m) and the lower depths (2 000–3 000 m). The two zones were further divided into two sub-zones as follows: the upper depths 1 (1 000–1 500 m) and the upper depths 2 (1 500–2 000 m), and the lower depths 1 (2 000–2 500 m) and the lower depths 2 (2 500–3 000 m). Twenty-six species were collected from the upper depths, 10 species were collected from the lower depths, and only four species were collected from both the upper and lower depths (Fig. 13). Among the 24 species from the upper depths, 11 species were collected from the upper depths 1, while 16 species were collected from the upper depths 2, with only three species in common. All 10 species from the lower depths were collected from the lower depths 1, four of which were also collected from the lower depths 2. Among the 29 species, 15 species were collected from only one sampling site, whereas the other 14 species were collected from multiple sampling sites, most of them were distributed in a narrow depth range (average depth range: 584.4 m). Ophiacantha sp. 1 and Ophiomusa sp. were the only two species with a wide depth range of more than 1 000 m. Ophiacanthidae was the family with the largest vertical distribution range and included species collected from both the shallowest and deepest water depths. Five of the six species belonging to the family Euryalidae were distributed in the upper depths, suggesting that euryalids or their hosts may prefer to live in shallower waters.
4 Discussion
Less
This study aims to provide a taxonomic list of ophiuroid fauna from seamounts in the northwest Pacific Ocean, and make a preliminary analysis of species composition and community structure. Seamount is a special ecosystem with rough seafloor, making sampling very difficult. Different types of dredges and trawls were widely used for physical samples collecting from seamount (Koslow et al., 2001; de Forges et al., 2000). On the other hand, HOV and ROV were useful sophisticated platforms, which are capable of collecting both physical specimens and video/image-derived data. Generally, collections of HOV/ROV are majorly composed of corals and sponges which are easily targeted, while ophiuroids are normally byproducts. In this study, the main object was to understand the species diversity in the earlier cruises in 2013 and 2014, thus, operators were trying to collect different animals which never been collected. However, since 2017, to evaluate the connectivity between seamounts in this area, small echinoderms such as ophiuroids and crinoids became the prioritized targets, collected individuals per dive increased distinctly (Table 1). Nonetheless, the accessibility of HOV/ROV to benthos is limited by the complex topography, which may also result in biases of our collections. Therefore, the species composition and distribution were interpreted with caution.
4.1 Species richness and composition
It has been suggested that seamounts are hotspots of biodiversity in the deep sea (Shank, 2010). De Forges et al. (2000) reported that 29%–34% of the macro- and megafaunal species on seamounts in the Southwest Pacific Ocean are potential seamount endemics. However, this hypothesis of high seamount fauna endemism was challenged by many later studies. All 62 galatheid shrimps reported from northern Norfolk seamounts have subsequently been found elsewhere (Samadi et al., 2006). O’Hara (2007) found that only 15 of 318 species were endemic to a single seamount, which was probably due to under sampling rather than endemism. Additionally, several studies, including the northwest Pacific Ocean, have provided evidence that ophiuroids are highly able to disperse between seamounts, even hundred kilometers apart (Cho and Shank, 2010; Na et al., 2021; O’Hara et al., 2014).
In this study, 17 of the 29 species were found at a single seamount, and many species may be new to science. This may be caused by the inadequate sampling effort in this area. Only 191 specimens were collected through 29 HOV/ROV dives, the dataset is too small to make a conclusion on the endemism in the study area. Nonetheless, 14 species were identified into species level, among which five species (Ophioplinthaca semele, O. athena, O. clothilde, Asteroschema ajax and Ophioleila elegans) were originally reported from the Hawaiian Islands (Clark, 1949), of the five Hawaiian species, Ophioleila elegans and Asteroschema ajax had been reported in western Pacific (Okanishi et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2018). Ophioplinthaca defensor, Ophiacantha richeri and Asteroschema horridum were as well distributed in the western Pacific (Baker, 1980; Na et al., 2021; O’Hara and Stöhr, 2006). These Pacific species suggested that the Northwest Pacific may share similar ophiuroid fauna with the Southwest Pacific and the middle Pacific. Three cosmopolitan species were also discovered in the study area, as well as the other two species from Antarctic and Atlantic. Probably, these widely distributed species may contain cryptic species within them (Sponer and Roy, 2002; Stöhr et al., 2020), and require DNA analysis and detailed morphological description. With fifteen species seemed to be undescribed, our results emphasized the potentially high species richness in the deep-sea. Recently, a greatly increased number of ophiuroid species in the abyssal basin was recovered in the eastern Pacific, and the majority of species (44.2%) was present only in one sampling area (Christodoulou et al., 2020). Therefore, further sampling effort is necessary for the evaluation of deep-sea biodiversity and endemism.
4.2 Spatial distribution of ophiuroids
The latitudinal distribution pattern of marine fauna is widely accepted for various biological groups, such as plankton, benthos, and fish (O’Hara et al., 2019; Salinas et al., 2015; Siqueira et al., 2016), and geographical scales (Morgan et al., 2015; O’Hara et al., 2011), which are mainly affected by environmental factors, including oxygen and energy availability, etc (Levin et al., 2003; Woolley et al., 2016). In the Northwest Pacific, both particulate organic carbon (POC) flux and zooplankton have latitudinal gradients (Buesseler et al., 2020; Sun and Wang, 2017). Therefore, we originally expected a latitudinal distribution pattern of ophiuroid fauna from seamounts in the study area. Comparison of ophiuroid fauna between MWS and MSC showed that only eight species were shared by the two seamount groups, 15 species were only discovered in the MSC while 6 species were only discovered in the MWS. It is possible that the difference of ophiuroid fauna between the two seamount groups was attributed to the environmental gradient. However, due to the inadequate sampling effort and biases of ROV collections, we refrain to make any conclusion on this point. Recent studies have suggested that ophiuroids lacked genetic structure among seamounts, highlighting their ability for long-distance dispersal (Hunter and Halanych, 2008; O’Hara et al., 2014). The strong dispersal ability of ophiuroids may facilitate the dispersal of ophiuroids around the study area. Therefore, further extensively study on diversity and connectivity are necessary to analyze the biogeography pattern of seamount fauna in the Northwest Pacific.
Depth plays an important role in structuring faunal composition (Clark et al., 2010; Victorero et al., 2018). O’Hara et al. (2014) suggested a bathymetric break of approximately 1700 m for Ophiactis abyssicola complex in the Southwest Pacific. Cho and Shank (2010) found significant differences among 100–250 m depth intervals for different species of ophiuroids. This study suggests that the species compositions between depths (1 000–1 500 m vs. 1 500–2 000 m and 1 000–2 000 m vs. 2 000–3 000 m) were distinct. However, these depth differences may be as well the result of inadequate sampling. For example, two species were collected from two depths more than 1 000 m apart, Ophiomusa sp. from 1 084 m to 2 294 m and Ophiacantha richeri from 1 571 m to 2 200 m. The lack of these two species between these depths may be an artifactual sampling bias. In the North Atlantic, several species from the genera Ophioplinthaca, Asteroschema, and Ophiocreas were consecutively distributed between 1 300 m and 2 300 m (Cho and Shank, 2010), and no narrow-ranged species were found on the seamounts in the Southwest Pacific Ocean (O’Hara, 2007). Therefore, further sampling effort is needed to assess the depth zonation of ophiuroid fauna.
5 Conclusions
Less
Although the importance of megafauna from seamounts in the NW Pacific has been recognized because of the high possibility of human activities (ISA Study Tech No. 23), knowledge of their biodiversity and distribution in this area is extremely lacking, with insufficient sampling effort (Menegotto and Rangel, 2018). This study provides the first comprehensive description of ophiuroid fauna from nine seamounts in this area, with 29 species from 11 families dominated by Ophiacanthidae. To date, this is the largest available data and distinctly improve our understanding of megafaunal biodiversity from seamounts in the Northwest Pacific. Further surveys are necessary to provide more robust information for environmental protection and management of cobalt-rich curst seamounts in the Northwest Pacific.
Acknowledgements
Less
We thank all crew for their help with the field investigations. We appreciate the Jiaolong team from the National Deep Sea Center, the Haima team from the Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, the Hailong III team from the National Deep Sea Center and Shanghai Jiao Tong University for their wonderful assistance during sample collection. We also thank Xiaogu Wang for his help with specimen processing on board, storage and management.
Funding
Less
  • The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 42076135; the China Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association under contract Nos DY135-E2-2-03 and DY135-E2-2-06; the Project of State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, under contract No. SOEDZZ2002; the Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources under contract No. JG1528.
References
Less
Althaus F, Williams A, Schlacher T A, et al. 2009. Impacts of bottom trawling on deep-coral ecosystems of seamounts are long-lasting. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 397: 279–294, doi: 10.3354/meps08248
Andrews A H, Stone R P, Lundstrom C C, et al. 2009. Growth rate and age determination of bamboo corals from the northeastern Pacific Ocean using refined 210Pb dating. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 397: 173–185, doi: 10.3354/meps08193
Atkinson L J, Field J G, Hutchings L. 2011. Effects of demersal trawling along the west coast of southern Africa: multivariate analysis of benthic assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 430: 241–255, doi: 10.3354/meps08956
Baker A N. 1980. Euryalinid Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) from Australia, New Zealand, and the south-west Pacific Ocean. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 7(1): 11–83, doi: 10.1080/03014223.1980.10423763
Buesseler K O, Boyd P W, Black E E, et al. 2020. Metrics that matter for assessing the ocean biological carbon pump. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(18): 9679–9687, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918114117
Carreiro-Silva M, Andrews A H, Braga-Henriques A, et al. 2013. Variability in growth rates of long-lived black coral leiopathes sp. from the Azores. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 473: 189–199, doi: 10.3354/meps10052
Chen Wanying, Na Jieying, Zhang Dongsheng. 2021. Description of three species of ophioplinthacids, including a new species, from a deep seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean. PeerJ, 9: e11566, doi: 10.7717/peerj.11566
Cherbonnier G, Sibuet M. 1972. Resultats Scientifique de la compagne Noratlante: Asterides et Ophiures. Bulletin du Museum National d’Histoire Naturell Paris 3e serie Zoologie, 102(76): 1333–1394
Cho W, Shank T M. 2010. Incongruent patterns of genetic connectivity among four ophiuroid species with differing coral host specificity on North Atlantic seamounts. Marine Ecology, 31: 121–143, doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2010.00395.x
Cho W W. 2008. Faunal biogeography community structure and genetic connectivity of North Atlantic seamounts [dissertation]. Cambridge: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Christodoulou M, O’Hara T D, Hugall A F, et al. 2019. Dark ophiuroid biodiversity in a prospective abyssal mine field. Current Biology, 29(22): 3909–3912.e3, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.012
Christodoulou M, O’Hara T D, Hugall A F, et al. 2020. Unexpected high abyssal ophiuroid diversity in polymetallic nodule fields of the Northeast Pacific Ocean and implications for conservation. Biogeosciences, 17(7): 1845–1876, doi: 10.5194/bg-17-1845-2020
Clark A H. 1949. Ophiuroidea of the Hawaiian Islands. Bulletin of the Bernice P. Bishop Museum, 195: 3–133
Clark M R, Rowden A A, Schlacher T, et al. 2010. The ecology of seamounts: structure, function, and human impacts. Annual Review of Marine Science, 2: 253–278, doi: 10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081109
Clark M R, Schlacher T A, Rowden A A, et al. 2012. Science priorities for seamounts: research links to conservation and management. PLoS One, 7(1): e29232, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029232
Clark M R, Bowden D A. 2015. Seamount biodiversity: high variability both within and between seamounts in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica. Hydrobiologia, 761(1): 161–180, doi: 10.1007/s10750-015-2327-9
Clark M R, Althaus F, Schlacher T A, et al. 2016. The impacts of deep-sea fisheries on benthic communities: a review. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(S1): i51–i69
De Forges B R, Koslow J A, Poore G C B. 2000. Diversity and endemism of the benthic seamount fauna in the Southwest Pacific. Nature, 405(6789): 944–947, doi: 10.1038/35016066
Dong Dong, Li Xinzheng, Lu Bo, et al. 2017. Three squat lobsters (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura) from tropical West Pacific seamounts, with description of a new species of Uroptychus Henderson, 1888. Zootaxa, 4311(3): 389–398, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.3.4
Forbes E. 1843. XVIII. On the radiata of the eastern Mediterranean. Part I., Ophiuridæ. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 19(2): 143–153, doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1842.tb00360.x
Fujita T, Ohta S. 1988. Photographic observations of the life style of a deep-sea ophiuroid Asteronyx loveni (Echinodermata). Deep Sea Research Part A. Oceanographic Research Papers, 35(12): 2029–2043
Girard F, Fu B, Fisher C R. 2016. Mutualistic symbiosis with ophiuroids limited the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on deep-sea octocorals. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 549: 89–98, doi: 10.3354/meps11697
Grange K R. 1991. Mutualism between the antipatharian Antipathes fiordensis and the ophiuroid Astrobrachion constrictum in New Zealand fjords. Hydrobiologia, 216(1): 297–303
Gray J E. 1840. Synopsis of the contents of the British Museum. 42nd ed. London: Woodfall, 57–65
Hertz M. 1927. Die Ophiuroiden der Deutschen Südpolar-Expedition. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 1901–1903. Berlin: Walter De Gryter Inc, 1–54
Hunter R L, Halanych K M. 2008. Evaluating connectivity in the brooding brittle star Astrotoma agassizii across the Drake Passage in the Southern Ocean. Journal of Heredity, 99(2): 137–148, doi: 10.1093/jhered/esm119
Koehler R. 1904. Ophiures de l’expédition du Siboga, Part 1. Ophiures de mer profonde. In: Siboga Expeditie. Leiden: Boekhandel en Drukkerij voorheen Brill E J, 1–176
Koehler R. 1922. Ophiurans of the Philippine Seas and adjacent waters. Smithsonian Institution, (5): 1–486
Koehler R. 1930. Ophiures recueillies par le Docteur Th. Mortensen dans les Mers d’Australie et dans l’Archipel Malais. Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen’s Pacific Expedition 1914-16. LIV. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk naturhistorisk Forening, 89: 1–295
Koslow J A, Gowlett-Holmes K, Lowry J K, et al. 2001. Seamount benthic macrofauna off southern Tasmania: community structure and impacts of trawling. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 213: 111–125, doi: 10.3354/meps213111
Lütken C F. 1856. Bidrag til kundskab om Slangestjernerne: II. Oversigt over de vestindiske Ophiurer. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Förening i Kjøbenhavn 1856, 8: 1–19
Lütken C F, Mortensen T. 1899. Reports on an exploration off the west coasts of Mexico, Central and Southern America and off the Galapagos Islands. Vol XXV. The Ophiuridae. Cambridge, USA: Marshall McDonald and Georgr M Bowers, 97–208
Lamarck J B. 1981. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux Sans Vertèbres: Vol 1. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 568
Levin L A, Ziebis W, Mendoza G F, et al. 2003. Spatial heterogeneity of macrofauna at northern California methane seeps: influence of sulfide concentration and fluid flow. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 265: 123–139, doi: 10.3354/meps265123
Litvinova N M. 1981. Brittle-stars (Ophiuroidea). Moscow: Institute of Oceanology P P Shirshov oh the Russian Academy of Science, 113–131
Ljungman A V. 1867. Ophiuroidea viventia huc usque cognita. Ö fversigt af Kungliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Fö rhandlingar, 1866, 23: 303–336
Lyman T. 1869. Preliminary report on the Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae dredged in deep water between Cuba and Florida Reef. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 1: 309–354
Lyman T. 1878. Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae of the Challenger expedition. In: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, Vol V. Cambridge, Mass, USA: Kraus Reprint Corporation, 65–108
Lyman T. 1879. Ophiuridae and Astrophytidae of the exploring voyage of H. M. S. ‘Challenger ’ under Prof. Sir Wyville Thomson, F. R. S. Part II. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 6: 17–83
Müller J P, Troschel F H. 1842. System der Asteriden. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, 134
Mangano M C, Kaiser M J, Porporato E M D, et al. 2013. Effects of trawling impacts on mega-epibenthic communities from heavy exploited to undisturbed areas in a Mediterranean fishing ground (Central Mediterranean Sea). In: Proceeding of ICES Annual Science Conference 2013. Reykjavik: ICES
Martynov A. 2010. Reassessment of the classification of the Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata), based on morphological characters. I. General character evaluation and delineation of the families Ophiomyxidae and Ophiacanthidae. Zootaxa, 2697: 1–154
Matsumoto H. 1915. A new classification of the Ophiuroidea: with descriptions of new genera and species. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 67: 43–92
McClain C R, Lundsten L, Barry J, et al. 2010. Assemblage structure, but not diversity or density, change with depth on a northeast Pacific seamount. Marine Ecology, 31: 14–25, doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2010.00367.x
McKnight D G. 2003. New brittle-stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from New Zealand waters. Zootaxa, 352(1): 1–36, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.352.1.1
Menegotto A, Rangel T F. 2018. Mapping knowledge gaps in marine diversity reveals a latitudinal gradient of missing species richness. Nature Communications, 9: 4713, doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07217-7
Morgan N B, Cairns S, Reiswig H, et al. 2015. Benthic megafaunal community structure of cobalt-rich manganese crusts on Necker Ridge. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 104: 92–105, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2015.07.003
Mosher C V, Watling L. 2009. Partners for life: a brittle star and its octocoral host. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 397: 81–88, doi: 10.3354/meps08113
Na Jieying, Chen Wanying, Zhang Dongsheng, et al. 2021. Morphological description and population structure of a ophiuroid species from cobalt-rich crust seamounts in the northwest Pacific: implications for marine protection under deep-sea mining. Acta Oceanological Sinica, 40(8):1−11,
O’Hara T D, Stöhr S. 2006. Deep water ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) of new Caledonia: ophiacanthidae and hemieuryalidae. In: De Forges R B, ed. Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos 24. Mémoires du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Paris: Publications Scientifiques du Muséum, 193: 33–141
O’Hara T D. 2007. Seamounts: centres of endemism or species richness for ophiuroids?. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(6): 720–732
O’Hara T D, Rowden A A, Williams A. 2008. Cold-water coral habitats on seamounts: do they have a specialist fauna?. Diversity and Distributions, 14(6): 925–934, doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00495.x
O’Hara T D, Tittensor D P. 2010. Environmental drivers of ophiuroid species richness on seamounts. Marine Ecology, 31(S1): 26–38
O’Hara T D, England P R, Gunasekera R M, et al. 2014. Limited phylogeographic structure for five bathyal ophiuroids at continental scales. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 84: 18–28, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2013.09.009
O’Hara T D, Hugall A F, Thuy B, et al. 2017. Restructuring higher taxonomy using broad-scale phylogenomics: The living Ophiuroidea. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 107: 415–430, doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.006
O’Hara T D, Stöhr S, Hugall A F, et al. 2018. Morphological diagnoses of higher taxa in Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) in support of a new classification. European Journal of Taxonomy, 416: 1–35
O’Hara T D, Hugall A F, Woolley S N C, et al. 2019. Contrasting processes drive ophiuroid phylodiversity across shallow and deep seafloors. Nature, 565(7741): 636–639, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0886-z
O’Hara T D, Rowden A A, Bax N J. 2011. A southern hemisphere bathyal fauna is distributed in latitudinal bands. Current Biology, 21(3): 226–230, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.002
Okanishi M, Fujita T. 2013. Molecular phylogeny based on increased number of species and genes revealed more robust family-level systematics of the order Euryalida (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 69(3): 566–580, doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.021
Okanishi M, O’Hara T D, Fujita T. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of the order Euryalida (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), based on mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 61(2): 392–399
Ordines F, Ramírez-Amaro S, Fernandez-Arcaya U, et al. 2019. First occurrence of an Ophiohelidae species in the Mediterranean: the high abundances of Ophiomyces grandis from the Mallorca Channel seamounts. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 99(8): 1817–1823, doi: 10.1017/S0025315419000808
Pasternak F A. 1981. Alcyonacea and Gorgonacea. In: Kuznetsov A P, Mironov A N, eds. Benthos of the Submarine Mountains Marcus-Necker and Adjacent Pacific Regions. Moscow: Akademiya Nauk, 40–55
Paterson G L J. 1985. The deep-sea Ophiuroidea of the North Atlantic Ocean. The Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), 49: 1–162, doi: 10.5962/bhl.part.6511
Perrier E. 1893. Echinodermes. Traité de Zoologie, Ophiures. Paris: Smithsonian Libraries, 781–864
Roark E B, Guilderson T P, Dunbar R B, et al. 2009. Extreme longevity in proteinaceous deep-sea corals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(13): 5204–5208, doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810875106
Salinas H F O, Alder V A, Puig A, et al. 2015. Latitudinal diversity patterns of diatoms in the Southwestern Atlantic and Antarctic waters. Journal of Plankton Research, 37(4): 659–665, doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbv042
Samadi S, Bottan L, Macpherson E, et al. 2006. Seamount endemism questioned by the geographic distribution and population genetic structure of marine invertebrates. Marine Biology, 149(6): 1463–1475, doi: 10.1007/s00227-006-0306-4
Samedi S, Schlacher T A, Richer de Forges B. 2007. Seamount benthos. In: Pitcher T J, Morato T, Hart P J B, et al. eds. Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries and Conservation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, 119–140
Schlacher T A, Baco A R, Rowden A A, et al. 2014. Seamount benthos in a cobalt-rich crust region of the central Pacific: conservation challenges for future seabed mining. Diversity and distributions, 20(5): 491–502, doi: 10.1111/ddi.12142
Shank T M. 2010. Seamounts: deep-ocean laboratories of fauna connectivity, evolution, and endemism. Oceanography, 23(1): 108–122, doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2010.65
Shen Chengcheng, Zhang Dongsheng, Lu Bo, et al. 2020. A new species of glass sponge (Hexactinellida: Sceptrulophora: Uncinateridae) from the Weijia Seamount in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Zootaxa, 4878(2): 322–334, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.2.6
Siqueira A C, Oliveira-Santos L G R, Cowman P F, et al. 2016. Evolutionary processes underlying latitudinal differences in reef fish biodiversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25(12): 1466–1476, doi: 10.1111/geb.12506
Sponer R, Roy M S. 2002. Phylogeographic analysis of the brooding brittle star Amphipholis squamata (Echinodermata) along the coast of New Zealand reveals high cryptic genetic variation and cryptic dispersal potential. Evolution, 56(10): 1954–1967, doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00121.x
Stöhr S, Weber A A T, Boissin E, et al. 2020. Resolving the Ophioderma longicauda (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) cryptic species complex: five sisters, three of them new. European Journal of Taxonomy, 607: 1–2
Stöhr S, O’Hara T D, Thuy B. 2012. Global diversity of brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea). PLoS One, 7(3): e31940, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031940
Sun Dong, Wang Chunsheng. 2017. Latitudinal distribution of zooplankton communities in the Western Pacific along 160°E during summer 2014. Journal of Marine Systems, 169: 52–60, doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.01.011
Thompson A, Sanders J, Tandstad M, et al. 2017. Vulnerable marine ecosystems: processes and practices in the high seas. Rome, Italy: Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper (FAO)
Thuy B, Stöhr S. 2011. Lateral arm plate morphology in brittle stars (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea): New perspectives for ophiuroid micropalaeontology and classification. Zootaxa, 3013(1): 1–47, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3013.1.1
Thuy B, Stöhr S. 2016. A new morphological phylogeny of the Ophiuroidea (Echinodermata) accords with molecular evidence and renders microfossils accessible for cladistics. PLoS One, 11(5): e0156140, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156140
Verrill A E. 1884. Notice of the remarkable marine fauna occupying the outer banks off the southern coast of New England; No. 9, Brief contributions to zoology from the Museum of Yale College; No. LV. American Journal of Science, s3-28(165): 213–220, doi: 10.2475/ajs.s3-28.165.213
Verrill A E. 1899. North American Ophiuroidea: I. Revision of certain families and genera of West Indian Ophiurans. II. A faunal catalogue of the knows species of West Indian Ophiurans. Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Science, 10: 301–386
Victorero L, Robert K, Robinson L F, et al. 2018. Species replacement dominates megabenthos beta diversity in a remote seamount setting. Scientific Reports, 8: 4152, doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22296-8
Wang Dexiang, Wang Chunsheng, Zhang Yuan, et al. 2016. Three new species of glass sponges Pheronematidae (Porifera: Hexactinellida) from the deep-sea of the northwestern Pacific Ocean. Zootaxa, 4171(3): 562–574, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4171.3.10
Watling L, Auster P J. 2017. Seamounts on the high seas should be managed as vulnerable marine ecosystems. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4: 14
Woolley S N C, Tittensor D P, Dunstan P K, et al. 2016. Deep-sea diversity patterns are shaped by energy availability. Nature, 533(7603): 393–396, doi: 10.1038/nature17937
Xu Peng, Liu Feng, Ding Zhongjun, et al. 2016. A new species of the thorid genus Paralebbeus Bruce & Chace, 1986 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea) from the deep sea of the Northwestern Pacific Ocean. Zootaxa, 4085(1): 119–126, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4085.1.5
Xu Peng, Zhou Yadong, Wang Chunsheng. 2017. A new species of deep-sea sponge-associated shrimp from the North-West Pacific (Decapoda, Stenopodidea, Spongicolidae). Zookeys, 685: 1–14, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.685.11341
Yesson C, Clark M R, Taylor M L, et al. 2011. The global distribution of seamounts based on 30 arc seconds bathymetry data. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 58(4): 442–453, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2011.02.004
Zhang Dongsheng, Lu Bo, Wang Chunsheng, et al. 2018. The first record of Ophioleila elegans (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) from a deep-sea seamount in the Northwest Pacific Ocean. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 37(10): 180–184, doi: 10.1007/s13131-018-1323-0
Zhang Ruiyan, Wang Chunsheng, Zhou Yadong, et al. 2019. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of two new species in genus Freyastera (Asteroidea: Brisingida: Freyellidae), with a revised key to close species and ecological remarks. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 154: 103163, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2019.103163
Zhang Ruiyan, Zhou Yadong, Xiao Ning, et al. 2020. A new sponge-associated starfish, Astrolirus patricki sp. nov. (Asteroidea: Brisingida: Brisingidae), from the northwestern Pacific seamounts. PeerJ, 8(26): e9071, doi: 10.7717/peerj.9071
Appendix
Less
Year 2021 volume 40 Issue 12
PDF
68
36
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1887-y
  • Receive Date：2021-04-22
  • Online Date：2026-03-06
  • Published：2021-11-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-04-22
  • Accepted：2021-06-21
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 42076135; the China Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association under contract Nos DY135-E2-2-03 and DY135-E2-2-06; the Project of State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, under contract No. SOEDZZ2002; the Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources under contract No. JG1528.
Affiliations
    1 Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China
    2 School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    3 Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China
    4 State Key Laboratory of Satellite Ocean Environment Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China

Corresponding:

References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-021-1887-y
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House