A new species of the glass sponge genus <i>Walteria</i> (Hexactinellida: Lyssacinosida: Euplectellidae) from northwestern Pacific seamounts, providing a biogenic microhabitat in the deep sea

A new species of the glass sponge genus Walteria (Hexactinellida: Lyssacinosida: Euplectellidae) from northwestern Pacific seamounts, providing a biogenic microhabitat in the deep sea

PDF

Chengcheng Shen¹^,², Hong Cheng¹^,², Dongsheng Zhang¹^,²^,³, Bo Lu¹^,², Chunsheng Wang¹^,²^,³^,^*

Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2021, 40(12) : 39 - 49

Less

Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2021, 40(12): 39-49

• Environmental Study of Seamounts and Adjacent Waters in the Northwestern Pacific Ocean •

A new species of the glass sponge genus Walteria (Hexactinellida: Lyssacinosida: Euplectellidae) from northwestern Pacific seamounts, providing a biogenic microhabitat in the deep sea

Full

Chengcheng Shen¹^,², Hong Cheng¹^,², Dongsheng Zhang¹^,²^,³, Bo Lu¹^,², Chunsheng Wang¹^,²^,³^,^*

Affiliations

¹ Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China

² Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519000, China

³ School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Published: 2021-11-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1939-3

Outline

Abstract

Less

We report on a hexactinellid sponge new to science, Walteria demeterae sp. nov., which was collected from the northwestern Pacific seamounts at depths of 1 271–1 703 m. Its tubular and basiphytous body, extensive lateral processes, numerous oval lateral oscula which are irregularly situated in the body wall, the presence of microscleres with oxyoidal, discoidal and onychoidal outer ends, and the absence of anchorate discohexasters, indicate it belongs to the genus Walteria of family Euplectellidae, which is also supported by molecular phylogenetic evidence from 18S, 28S, 16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene sequences. The unique morphotype, which is structured by a thin and rigid framework of body wall and lateral processes consisting of diactins, characterizes it as a new species. Local aggregations of individuals of this new species coupled with their associated macrofauna in the Suda Seamount are reported, highlighting its functional significance in providing biogenic microhabitats in the deep sea.

Key words

Euplectellidae / Walteria / integrative taxonomy / northwestern Pacific Ocean / Porifera / sponge aggregations

Cite this Article

Chengcheng Shen, Hong Cheng, Dongsheng Zhang, Bo Lu, Chunsheng Wang. A new species of the glass sponge genus Walteria (Hexactinellida: Lyssacinosida: Euplectellidae) from northwestern Pacific seamounts, providing a biogenic microhabitat in the deep sea[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021 , 40 (12) : 39 -49 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-021-1939-3

Full Text

Less

1 Introduction

Less

Sponges are an important structure-forming component of the deep-sea benthic fauna, providing biogenic microhabitats to associated organisms and thereby increasing local habitat heterogeneity and supporting high biodiversity, especially when they occur in sponge aggregations (Bell, 2008; Hajdu et al., 2017). Due to the highly complex and exquisite frameworks, the functional significance of euplectellid sponges, well-known for the “Venus flower basket” form and its associated spongicolid shrimps, has been highlighted in enhancing biodiversity and abundance of associated organisms (Kou et al., 2018). Generally, the sponges of family Euplectellidae Gray, 1867 are tubular, cup-like or fungus-like, lophophytose, basiphytose or rhizophytose, and sometimes pedunculate (Shen et al., 2019; Tabachnick, 2002). Megascleres consist of dermal and atrial hexactins (sometimes pentactins or both), choanosomal stauractins, tauactins and diactins (sometimes as well as hexactins and pentactins), and basal anchorate spicules (rarely diactins). Microscleres vary in the outer ends including graphiocomes, floricomes, drepanocomes, and others. There are three subfamilies in this family: Euplectellinae Gray, 1867, Corbitellinae Gray, 1872, and Bolosominae Tabachnick, 2002 (but note that these taxa are likely not monophyletic; see Dohrmann et al., 2017; Dohrmann, 2019; Shen et al., 2019). The subfamily Corbitellinae, in which the typical “Venus flower basket” form is widespread, has 11 genera (4 of them are monotypic) and 39 valid species currently recognized (de Voogd et al., 2021).

The genus Walteria Schulze, 1886 currently consists of two species, W. flemmingii Schulze, 1886 and W. leuckarti Ijima, 1896. They occur in the western Pacific Ocean and eastern Indian Ocean at depths of 370–4 732 m (MacIntosh et al., 2018; Reiswig and Kelly, 2018; Tabachnick, 2002; Tabachnick et al., 2019). The type species W. flemmingii is known from the North Central Pacific Ocean off Hawaii, through the southwest Pacific islands of New Caledonia and New Zealand, extending south to Macquarie Ridge and west to the eastern Indian Ocean of the Perth Canyon in West Australia (MacIntosh et al., 2018; Reiswig and Kelly, 2018; Tabachnick, 2002; Tabachnick et al., 2019). Walteria leuckarti is known from the Sagami Bay, Japan, and Marianas Basin to the southwest Pacific islands around New Zealand (Reiswig and Kelly, 2018). Another indeterminate species of Walteria is known from off Hawaii and New Zealand from depths of 1 446–2 210 m (Reiswig and Kelly, 2018).

By taking W. flemmingii as type species, Schulze (1887) and Tabachnick (2002) described the general morphology and spiculation. Schulze (1887) did not recognize the lateral processes or onychohexaster microscleres, which were supplemented by Tabachnick (2002). However, Tabachnick (2002) made some statements on the existence of prostalia lateralia, large hexactins and pentactins to support the lateral processes, and discasters as some of the disc-bearing microscleres, which were refuted by Reiswig and Kelly (2018) after further collection and examination. Moreover, the existence of primary large stauractins and their importance in generating the rectangular lattice of wall strands were ignored by earlier descriptions, but later underlined by Reiswig and Kelly (2018) in detail. In addition, it was suggested that there were only graphiocomes and floricomes as stellate microscleres (Reiswig and Kelly, 2018). The intraspecific differences between the South Australian specimens having oxyhexasters and New Zealand and Hawaiian specimens having onychohexasters were illustrated (Reiswig and Kelly, 2018). For the valid species, W. leuckarti, which has a unique bottle-brush-like body form, Reiswig and Kelly (2018) indicated that the floricomes are rare and difficult to find; these authors therefore assigned the subspecies W. leuckarti longina Tabachnick, 1988 as a synonymised name so as to avoid subspecies designations within the Hexactinellida. Furthermore, another morphotype, with tubular body, extensive side processes, pointed apex and lattice-like body wall, was suggested to be a new species (Reiswig and Kelly, 2018). This morphotype was previously recorded from off Hawaii and displayed online by the Hawaiian Undersea Research Laboratory (HURL) Archive (http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/HURL/HURLarchive/guide.php). One specimen of dead, eroded framework and lack of loose spiculation (Walteria sp. indet.), coupled with seafloor images presumably identical to it but without collections, from New Zealand was described but not named (Reiswig and Kelly, 2018).

In this study, we describe a new species, the specimens of which were collected by remotely operated vehicle (ROV) at depths of 1 271–1 703 m from the northwestern Pacific seamounts. Local aggregations of this new sponge species and its associated organisms are reported from the Suda Seamount at depths of 1 295–1 320 m. Finally, we present molecular phylogenetic results supporting the placement of the new species in the family Euplectellidae, genus Walteria.

2 Materials and methods

Less

2.1 Sample and video data collection

Two specimens of Walteria demeterae sp. nov. were collected by ROV from the northwestern Pacific seamounts. The holotype (catalogue number: SIO-POR-244) was collected on September 20, 2018 by ROV Haima from the Weijia Seamount in the northwestern Pacific Ocean at dive ROV12 of cruise DY51/I (12.730 9°N, 156.539 7°E, depth of 1 703 m). The paratype (catalogue number: SIO-POR-099) was collected by ROV Hailong III from the Suda Seamount in the northwestern Pacific Ocean on August 19, 2018 at dive ROV07 of cruise DY48/I (22.010 0°N, 159.377 2°E, depth of 1 271 m). The specimens were preserved in 95% ethanol and deposited in the Sample Repository of Second Institute of Oceanography (SRSIO), Hangzhou, China. A benthic investigation at the Suda Seamount implemented by ROV Hailong III on August 20, 2018 at dive ROV08 of cruise DY48/I (starting point: 22.011 0°N, 159.389 4°E, 1 295 m deep; ending point: 22.012 0°N, 159.391 1°E, 1 307 m deep) recorded a frequent occurrence of a morphotype identical to the new sponge species. Video recordings and still images collected by this investigation, in total 3.0 h, from depths of 1 295–1 320 m, covering 550 m in distance, were examined to describe these local sponge aggregations and the presence of associated macrofauna.

2.2 Spicule and skeleton analysis

Spicules and frameworks were isolated by digesting small pieces of tissue from body wall and lateral processes, which were placed in different centrifuge tubes, in concentrated nitric acid using a metal bath maintained at about 80°C for one day until the tissues were completely dissolved. The spicules and frameworks were then rinsed twice in distilled water and later suspended in alcohol for light microscope (LM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation. Slides for LM were examined with ZEISS Imager A2. Spicules for SEM (TM-1 000 Tabletop Microscope) were pipetted from the solution onto silicon wafers, and skeletons were moved onto silicon wafers, all of which were subsequently coated with platinum. Photomicrographs were obtained by SEM, and measurements were made with the software ZEN pro 2012 1.1.2.0.

2.3 Molecular work

DNA was extracted from small pieces of tissue using a DNeasy Blood&Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA quality and concentration were detected with a Nanodrop 2000 and Qubit fluorometer. Then the whole genome was sequenced via the Illumina PE150 strategy on the HiSeq^TM X-Ten platform (Illumina, CA, USA) at Zhejiang Tianke High Technology Development Co., Ltd. The total of clean reads was assembled with the SPAdes genome assembler (Bankevich et al., 2012). The nuclear 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA, and mitochondrial 16S rDNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) genes were retrieved from the assembled contigs and used for phylogenetic analysis. The start and end of target sequences were checked by the reported universal PCR primer pairs (Dohrmann et al., 2008; Folmer et al., 1994). The 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, 16S rDNA, and COI gene sequences are deposited in GenBank with accession numbers of MW652662, MW652660, MW652655, and MW517848, respectively.

2.4 Phylogenetic analysis

The four sequences of 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, 16S rDNA, and COI plus reference data, were aligned using the ClustalW algorithm with default settings (15/6.66 as gap/gap length penalties) in Geneious prime (Biomatters Ltd., New Zealand). The alignments were performed separately, and then concatenated into one file after manually trimming unalignable regions on both flanks. The phylogenetic tree was inferred with maximum likelihood (ML) analysis using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al., 2015; Chernomor et al., 2016). The auto-selected best substitution model (-m MFP option) was used in IQ-TREE, with 1 000 bootstrap replicates (command line and input parameters: iqtree -s concatenated_alignments.phy -m MFP -p concatenated_alignments_partition.txt -bb 1 000 -alrt 1 000). The ultrafast bootstrap (UFBoot) was used to assess clade support by adding “-bb 1 000” (Hoang et al., 2018; Minh et al., 2013). An SH-aLRT test (Guindon et al., 2010) was also performed by adding “-alrt 1 000”. The tree was constructed based on the concatenated alignment file of Walteria demeterae sp. nov. and other 31 reference species of hexactinellids by taking three species of the genus Tretopleura as outgroups (detailed information of sequences is shown in Table 1). The ML tree was then visualized and edited in Figtree 1.4.2 (Rambaut, 2006).

3 Results

Less

3.1 Systematics of the new sponge species

Phylum Porifera Grant, 1836

Class Hexactinellida Schmidt, 1870

Subclass Hexasterophora Schulze, 1886

Order Lyssacinosida Zittel, 1877

Family Euplectellidae Gray, 1867

Subfamily Corbitellinae Gray, 1872

Genus Walteria Schulze, 1886

Type species.Walteria flemmingii Schulze, 1886

Walteria demeterae sp. nov.

(Figs 1-5, Table 2)

Material examined. Holotype (Fig. 1a): SIO-POR-244, SRSIO,Haima ROV DY51/I, dive ROV12, collected by Bo Lu, September 20, 2018, at Weijia Seamount in the northwestern Pacific Ocean (12.730 9°N, 156.539 7°E), depth of 1 703 m, stored in 95% ethanol. Paratype (Fig. 1b): SIO-POR-099, SRSIO, Hailong III ROV DY48/I, dive ROV07, collected by Dongsheng Zhang, August 19, 2018, at Suda Seamount in the northwestern Pacific Ocean (22.010 0°N, 159.377 2°E), depth of 1 271 m, stored in 95% ethanol.

Other locations (images only; Fig. 2). Suda Seamount in the northwestern Pacific Ocean: Hailong III ROV DY48/I, dive ROV08, 22.011 0°–22.012 0°N, 159.389 4°–159.391 1°E, depths of 1 295–1 320 m, August 20, 2018.

Description. The new species is presented by a tubular body with lateral oscula and processes (Fig. 1). The holotype has a tubular body with extensive side processes, pointed apex, lattice-like body wall and basiphytous attachment (Fig. 1a). Wall is thin and rigid with numerous oval lateral oscula in irregular arrangement. Distal lateral processes are simple or dichotomously branching outgrowths of the lateral wall. Color of the specimen in ethanol is transparent white.

Five segments are totally 919.8 mm in length and 46.1 mm in maximum diameter (Fig. 1a2). The pointed apex tapers to a very small terminal osculum but is damaged at the top (Fig. 1a3). A large number of lateral processes project about 85 mm from the nodes of the lateral outer surface, forming a crudely hairy aspect (Fig. 1a4). The numerous oval lateral oscula are 15 mm in maximum diameter. Spacing between lateral oscula is nearly adjacent or with maximum edge-to-edge distance of 25 mm. The basal end forms an attachment disc with a smaller diameter than the tubular body attached to hard substrate and supported by lateral struts (Fig. 1a5). The cylindrical body is slightly oblique, the external wall is relatively smooth while the internal wall shows numerous bulging circular strands. The lateral oscula are generally separated by these strands.

The paratype was collected as a long dead, eroded framework with broken lateral processes and lack of loose spiculation (Fig. 1b). Two segments of tubular body and pointed apex are totally 674.4 mm in length and 71.2 mm in maximum diameter (Fig. 1b2). The numerous oval lateral oscula are 20 mm in maximum diameter. Spacing between lateral oscula is nearly adjacent or with maximum edge-to-edge distance of 25 mm. The lateral processes were broken to project at most 48 mm. The pointed apex bends and tapers to a very small terminal osculum but is damaged at the top. Longitudinal, circular and oblique strands can be observed within the framework (Fig. 1b3). Color in ethanol is light brown.

Relevant seafloor images clearly present the unique morphotype characterized by a lattice-work, tubular body with numerous lateral processes, forming a crudely hairy aspect for living individuals or a hispid body wall in different densities and lengths for dead individuals (Fig. 2). The tubular body varies in degree of bending and the pointed apex tapers sharply or tenderly.

Skeleton. The principle skeleton mainly consists of fused diactins with sparsely attached small stauractins, pentactins and sometimes hexactins (Fig. 3). The main skeletal framework of the body wall is a dominant network of crossing longitudinal, transverse and oblique bundles of thick and smooth diactins closely fused by synapticula and therein an irregular framework formed by ray-to-ray fusion of relatively thin diactins at different angles in a plane (Figs 3a and b). Longitudinal bundles are always dermal (Fig. 3a3); transverse (circular) bundles are always the most atrial (Fig. 3b3); oblique bundles and the irregular framework are situated between the longitudinal and transverse bundles. Transverse bundles are strongest and apparent to the naked eye in the collected specimen; longitudinal and oblique bundles are also strong, and the former are much thicker near the base. The framework of lateral processes consists of several parallel diactins fused by synapticula (Fig. 3c). The principle skeleton of the body wall, especially close to the spicule bundles, is sparsely covered by attached small and smooth stauractins, pentactins and occasionally hexactins (Fig. 3d).

The ectosomal skeleton of the dermal surface is composed of a layer of mainly sword-shaped hexactins as dermalia with the short distal ray pointing outwards, covering the outer surface of the main body wall and all surfaces of the lateral processes. The inner surface of the body wall is covered by a layer of pentactins as atrialia, with the long proximal rays extending into the wall. Microscleres are dispersed among the proximal rays of dermalia and atrialia.

Spicules. Megascleres of the body are choanosomal diactins and stauractins, dermal hexactins, and atrial pentactins (Figs 4a-d; Table 2).

Choanosomal diactins (Fig. 4a) vary widely in size with 451.0–(1 071.4)–4 300.0 µm in length (some can be longer) and 8.0–(14.0)–27.5 µm in diameter (Table 2). They are straight or gently curved, subterminally rough or rarely smooth, with a generally inconspicuous or evident central swelling, rounded or conically pointed terminal ends, sometimes slightly inflated near the tips.

Choanosomal stauractins (Fig. 4b) are rarely observed and have lateral rays with rounded or blunt-pointed terminal ends which are rough and slightly inflated near the tips. The lateral rays of stauractins are generally unequal with the long ray 168.5–(265.9)–738.9 µm in length and the short ray 107.5–(157.6)–211.3 µm in length; the ray width is 8.8–(14.2)–18.5 µm (Table 2). There is a nearly undetectable swelling or sometimes a thin and very short fifth ray in the axial cross.

Dermalia (Fig. 4c) of the body wall and lateral processes are similar sword hexactins with proclined spines covering the terminal end of each ray. The distal ray is inflated lanceolate, sometimes oval or occasionally uninflated (or slightly inflated), 88.9–(172.0)–275.0 µm long in the lateral processes, longer than that in the body wall with 49.2–(136.2)–215.0 µm in length; tangential rays have rounded and often slightly inflated terminal ends, with a mean length of about 122 µm both in the body wall and lateral processes but varying more widely in size in the body wall than in the lateral processes; the proximal ray is 1.5–(4.2)–9.4 times longer than the tangential rays with conically pointed tips, which is 243.3–(506.6)–882.0 µm long and 11.3–(14.5)–17.3 µm thick in the lateralas processes, larger than that in the body wall with 114.0–(431.9)–686.7 µm in length and 6.4–(13.6)–18.7 µm in width (Table 2). Dermal sword hexactins are more common in the lateral processes but more variable in the body wall.

Atrialia are regular smooth pentactins (Fig. 4d), mainly present within the body wall, with a small or rarely spherical swelling; tangential rays are 111.5–(158.0)–225.0 µm long with tips smooth or slightly rough, rounded or bluntly pointed, rarely inflated; the proximal ray varies in length of 83.3–(310.2)–654.0 µm with slightly rough and blunt-pointed tips (Table 2).

Microscleres are common oxyhexactins and graphiocomes, a number of discohexasters, some onychohexasters, and rare floricomes (Figs 4e-i; Table 2).

Oxyhexactins (Fig. 4e) in the whole body wall and lateral processes are sparsely covered by fine spines over the entire surface or rarely smooth, both similar in size and shape with rougher and parabolic terminal ends (smooth-rough oxyhexactins; Fig. 4e1). In addition, there is another kind of oxyhexactin entirely covered by macrospines, 3.0–(7.1)–12.0 µm in maximum length, with sharply pointed tips (macrospined oxyhexactins; Fig. 4e2; Table 2), which are restricted to the basal part. Rays of the former are 115.0–(180.3)–265.0 µm long and 3.9–(8.0)–12.4 µm thick, larger than the macrospined ones with 71.5–(117.7)–195.3 µm in length and 2.3–(3.0)–4.0 µm in width (Table 2).

Graphiocomes (Fig. 4f) are typical for Euplectellidae with 22.7–(25.6)–29.7 µm in centre diameter; the primary rays are 6.3–(7.5)–10.0 µm long, ornamented with short smooth hemispheric knobs or rarely smooth; terminal rays (raphides) are very thin and 100.0–(158.9)–179.0 µm long, bearing sparse recurved spines (Table 2); each primary ray supports on its distal swelling about 60 bases of raphides.

Discohexasters (Fig. 4g) are spherical, 77.5–(88.9)–110.0 µm in diameter, with very short smooth primary rays 3.5–(5.8)–9.0 µm in length and rough straight terminal rays 30.0–(35.7)–46.1 µm in length (Table 2); they occur in either the more common dense form with more than 12 terminal rays per primary ray or rare sparse form with about 6 terminal rays on each primary ray; marginal teeth on terminal discs number 11–13.

Onychohexasters (Fig. 4h) are 70.0–(83.0)–100.0 µm in diameter, a little smaller than discohexasters; the primary rays are 2.5–(4.1)–6.7 µm long, with a bulge extending beyond the origins of the terminal rays; the terminal rays are 30.0–(37.0)–45.2 µm in length, covered by either fine or large recurved spines (Table 2); onychoid tips in individual spicules are often distinct with 1–5 claws.

Floricomes (Fig. 4i) were only observed thrice in the body wall, with a diameter of 84.7–(122.1)–184.0 µm; the primary rays are smooth and 3.8–(5.8)–8.3 µm long; terminal rays are 33.3–(53.5)–83.3 µm long and at about nine per primary ray with five terminal claws, of which the outer surfaces are sparsely covered by fine spines (Table 2).

Etymology. The new species name demeterae refers to the goddess of fertility and harvest in Greek mythology named Demeter, referring to the abundant organisms often associating with the new species as well as its attractive appearance in situ.

Remarks. The new species described here is tubular, basiphytous but not pedunculate, bearing choanosomal diactins and stauractins, dermal hexactins, atrial pentactins and various microscleres, and is therefore clearly attributed to the subfamily Corbitellinae of family Euplectellidae (Tabachnick, 2002). Its extensive lateral processes, numerous oval lateral oscula which are irregularly situated in the body wall, the presence of microscleres with oxyoidal (microhexactins and graphiocomes), discoidal and onychoidal outer ends, and the absence of anchorate discohexasters, suggest it belongs to the genus Walteria (Tabachnick, 2002), which is also confirmed by our molecular phylogenetic study (see Section 3.3 below).

The new species shares the form of a hollow body with lateral oscula and processes with the two valid species and their loose spiculation is highly similar in composition and form, but the new species is significantly differentiated in the framework of the body wall. Walteria flemmingii has a net-like, barrel-shaped body with a reticulate wall consisting of a sieve-like network of thin strands; the central elements of strands are primarily large stauractins and diactins generally fused by synapticula into a rigid network. The new species has a tubular body with thin wall and pointed apex similar to that of W. flemmingii but is distinguished by its principle skeleton consisting mostly of diactins (without substantial contribution of stauractins). For the loose spiculation, there are choanosomal tauactins, floricomes in variable abundance, and sometimes oxyhexasters occurring in W. flemmingii, but none of choanosomal tauactins or oxyhexasters was observed in the new species and only three floricomes were observed in the holotype.

Walteria leuckarti has a bottle-brush-like body with a slender, tubular main stem composed of diactins soldered together at contact points or connected by synapticula to form a thick stem wall with oval lateral oscula. The new species has primary spicules of the body wall framework as diactins and the oval lateral oscula similar to that of W. leuckarti but is distinguished by its much larger diameters of both cylindrical body and lateral oscula while much smaller thickness of the body wall. For the loose spiculation, there are choanosomal tauactins and sometimes oxyhexasters occurring in W. leuckarti, but none of these two types of spicules was observed in the new species.

In addition, the dead and eroded framework (Walteria sp. indet.) described by Reiswig and Kelly (2018) was a choanosomal skeleton consisting of a framework of fused diactins, suggesting a tubular body with oval lateral oscula but no evidence of lateral processes. Its lateral oscula are much more pronounced than in the paratype of the new species, which was also collected as an eroded framework; neither transverse or circular bundles are obvious, and nor do spicules attach to the longitudinal bundles, suggesting it is different from the new species described here. Furthermore, the related records of seafloor images from off Hawaii and New Zealand are almost identical to the appearance of the new specimens and in situ images from this study and can be allocated to the same morphotype rather than the eroded framework (Walteria sp. indet.) described by Reiswig and Kelly (2018). But whether they are the same species retains to be determined until a related living specimen from off Hawaii or New Zealand is collected.

3.2 Ecology of the new sponge species

Walteria demeterae sp. nov. is distributed in the northwestern Pacific seamounts (depths of 1 271–1 703 m; specimens and images). The bottom disc of the tubular body is attached to hard substrate. Local aggregations of Walteria demeterae sp. nov. were observed on the Suda Seamount in the northwestern Pacific Ocean at depths of 1 295–1 320 m (Fig. 2). At least 56 individuals characterized by the unique morphotype of the new sponge species were counted, representing 90% of the total individuals of sponges recorded in the track covering 550 m in distance. There were 33 individuals alive and others dead in different degrees of erosion.

Numerous ophiuroids (such as Ophioplinthaca defensor, Ophioleila elegans), crinoids (Comatulida), crustaceans (such as Spongicolidae, Paguridae, Cirripedia) and other taxa were often observed associating with both living and dead individuals of Walteria demeterae sp. nov. (Fig. 2). Echinoderms, in particular crinoids and ophiuroids, were often found in high abundances attached to the sponges, with ophiuroids on or inside the canals and several crinoids often on the upper portion (Beazley et al., 2013; Na et al., 2021). Spongicolid shrimps, which often take euplectellid sponges as their hosts (Kou et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2017), were observed on or inside the canals. Other crustaceans, such as hermit crabs and barnacles, were observed to prefer dead individuals of Walteria demeterae sp. nov. over living ones.

3.3 Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the new sponge species

The length of the 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA,16S rDNA, and COI gene fragments was confirmed by respective primers sequence (Dohrmann et al., 2008; Folmer et al., 1994), and the PCR primers of the four target fragments could be located in the correct position of the marker genes. The data set of 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, 16S rDNA partial sequence and COI complete sequence of Walteria demeterae sp. nov. (holotype; catalogue number: SIO-POR-244) contained 1 955 bp, 1 225 bp, 495 bp and 709 bp, respectively. The phylogeny confirms that the new species is closely related to W. leuckarti, supporting its systematic position within the family Euplectellidae, genus Walteria (Fig. 5).

4 Conclusions

Less

According to both morphological and molecular assessment, the hexactinellid specimens described here clearly belong to a species new to science and are attributed to the genus Walteria (family Euplectellidae). This new species, Walteria demeterae sp. nov., shows a unique morphotype characterized by a lattice-work, tubular body with numerous lateral processes. Its structural complexity plays a key role in providing biogenic microhabitats and accordingly increasing biodiversity and abundance of associated organisms in the deep sea. Due to the rare specimens but relatively common records in seafloor images of the morphotype of this new sponge species, new materials should be collected and analyzed to examine intraspecific differences.

The method we used here for searching marker genes in genome-level datasets of marine macrobenthos has proven effective when applied to sponges. It can also provide basic information to design or edit primers when amplification of the gene fragments of relevant species is needed.

Acknowledgements

Less

We thank all the scientists and crew on the R/V Haiyang 6 and Dayang Yihao and the ROV Haima and Hailong III teams, for their dedicated research work and collection of deep-sea specimens. We thank Dohrmann Martin for the constructive suggestions.

Funding

Less

The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41706149; the Foundation of China Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association under contract Nos DY135-E2-2-03 and DY135-E2-2-06; the Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, under contract No. JG1716.

References

Less

Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. Journal of Computational Biology, 19(5): 455–477, doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

Beazley L I, Kenchington E L, Murillo F J, et al. 2013. Deep-sea sponge grounds enhance diversity and abundance of epibenthic megafauna in the Northwest Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 70(7): 1471–1490, doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fst124

Bell J J. 2008. The functional roles of marine sponges. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 79(3): 341–353

Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh B Q. 2016. Terrace aware data structure for phylogenomic inference from supermatrices. Systematic Biology, 65(6): 997–1008, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syw037

de Voogd N J, Alvarez B, Boury-Esnault N, et al. 2021. World Porifera Database. Corbitellinae Gray, 1872. http://www.marinespecies.org/porifera/porifera.php?p=taxdetails&id=171848 [2021-10-27]

Dohrmann M, Janussen D, Reitner J, et al. 2008. Phylogeny and evolution of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Systematic Biology, 57(3): 388–405, doi: 10.1080/10635150802161088

Dohrmann M, Kelley C, Kelly M, et al. 2017. An integrative systematic framework helps to reconstruct skeletal evolution of glass sponges (Porifera, Hexactinellida). Frontiers in Zoology, 14: 18, doi: 10.1186/s12983-017-0191-3

Dohrmann M. 2019. Progress in glass sponge phylogenetics: a comment on Kersken et al. (2018). Hydrobiologia, 843: 51–59, doi: 10.1007/s10750-018-3708-7

Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, et al. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3(5): 294–299

Grant R E. 1836. Animal kingdom. In: Todd R B, ed. The Cyclopaedia of Anatomy and Physiology. Vol 1. London: Sherwood, Gilbert, and Piper, 107–118

Gray J E. 1867. Notes on the arrangement of sponges, with the descriptions of some new genera. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1867(2): 492–558, pls XXVII–XXVIII

Gray J E. 1872. XX. —On a new genus of hexaradiate and other sponges discovered in the Philippine Islands by Dr. A. B. Meyer. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 10(56): 134–139, doi: 10.1080/00222937208696659

Guindon S, Dufayard J F, Lefort V, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology, 59(3): 307–321, doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010

Hajdu E, Castello-Branco C, Lopes D A, et al. 2017. Deep-sea dives reveal an unexpected hexactinellid sponge garden on the Rio Grande Rise (SW Atlantic). A mimicking habitat?. Deep-Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 146: 93–100, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.11.009

Hoang D T, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, et al. 2018. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(2): 518–522, doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281

Ijima I. 1896. Notice of new Hexactinellida from Sagami Bay: II. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 19: 249–254

Kou Qi, Gong Lin, Li Xinzheng. 2018. A new species of the deep-sea spongicolid genus Spongicoloides (Crustacea, Decapoda, Stenopodidea) and a new species of the glass sponge genus Corbitella (Hexactinellida, Lyssacinosida, Euplectellidae) from a seamount near the Mariana Trench, with a novel commensal relationship between the two genera. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 135: 88–107, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2018.03.006

MacIntosh H, Althaus F, Williams A, et al. 2018. Invertebrate diversity in the deep Great Australian Bight (200–5 000m). Marine Biodiversity Records, 11: 23, doi: 10.1186/s41200-018-0158-x

Minh B Q, Nguyen M A T, von Haeseler A. 2013. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30(5): 1188–1195, doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst024

Na Jieying, Chen Wanying, Zhang Dongsheng, et al. 2021. Morphological description and population structure of an ophiuroid species from cobalt-rich crust seamounts in the Northwest Pacific: implications for marine protection under deep-sea mining. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 40(8): 1–11, doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1804-4

Nguyen L T, Schmidt H A, von Haeseler A, et al. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32(1): 268–274, doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300

Rambaut A. 2006. FigTree v1.4. 2. Computer software and manual. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree [2014-07-09/2021-09-01]

Reiswig H M, Kelly M. 2018. The marine fauna of New Zealand. Euplectellid glass sponges (Hexactinellida, Lyssacinosida, Euplectellidae). NIWA Biodiversity Memoir, 130: 1–170

Schmidt O. 1870. Grundzüge einer Spongien-Fauna des atlantischen Gebietes (in German). Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 1–88

Schulze F E. 1886. Über den Bau und das System der Hexactinelliden. Abhandlungen der Kö niglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin (Physikalisch-Mathematische Classe) (in German), 1–97

Schulze F E. 1887. Report on the Hexactinellida collected by H. M. S. ‘Challenger’ during the years 1873–76. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Zoology, 21(part 53): 1–514

Shen Chengcheng, Dohrmann M, Zhang Dongsheng, et al. 2019. A new glass sponge genus (Hexactinellida: Euplectellidae) from abyssal depth of the Yap Trench, northwestern Pacific Ocean. Zootaxa, 4567(2): 367–378, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4567.2.9

Tabachnick K, Fromont J, Ehrlich H, et al. 2019. Hexactinellida from the Perth Canyon, eastern Indian Ocean, with descriptions of five new species. Zootaxa, 4664(1): 47–82, doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4664.1.2

Tabachnick K R. 1988. Hexactinellid sponges from the mountains of the West Pacific. In: Shirshov P P, ed. Structural and Functional Researches of the Marine Benthos. Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 49–64

Tabachnick K R. 2002. Family Euplectellidae Gray, 1867. In: Hooper J N A, Van Soest R W M, Willenz P, eds. Systema Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges. Boston, MA: Springer, 1388–1434

Xu Peng, Zhou Yadong, Wang Chunsheng. 2017. A new species of deep-sea sponge-associated shrimp from the North-West Pacific (Decapoda, Stenopodidea, Spongicolidae). ZooKeys, 685: 1–14, doi: 10.3897/zookeys.685.11341

Zittel K A. 1877. Studien über fossile Spongien. In: Hexactinellidae. Abhandlungen der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Physikalisch Klasse (in German), 13(1): 1–63

Appendix

Less

Year 2021 volume 40 Issue 12

PDF

Cite this Article

BibTeX

Article Info

doi: 10.1007/s13131-021-1939-3

Receive Date：2021-01-30
Online Date：2026-03-06
Published：2021-11-25

Article Data

Affiliations

History

Received：2021-01-30
Accepted：2021-10-15

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41706149; the Foundation of China Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association under contract Nos DY135-E2-2-03 and DY135-E2-2-06; the Scientific Research Fund of the Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, under contract No. JG1716.

Affiliations

¹ Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Second Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Hangzhou 310012, China

² Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519000, China

³ School of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Corresponding:

*E-mail: wangsio@sio.org.cn; wang-sio@163.com

References

Share

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-021-1939-3

Share to

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article

BibTeX

Citations

表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Table 1. GenBank accession numbers of marker genes of the 32 species used in the molecular phylogenetic analysis

Order: family	Species	Voucher number	Accession number
Order: family	Species	Voucher number	18S rDNA	28S rDNA	16S rDNA	COI gene
Note: The symbol “” refers that the COI gene of Rossella nuda* was from the voucher SMF 11730.
Lyssacinosida: Euplectellidae	Walteria demeterae sp. nov. (holotype)	SIO-POR-244	MW652662	MW652660	MW652655	MW517848
	Walteria leuckarti	SMF 10522	AM886399	AM886373	AM886337	FR848939
	Docosaccus maculatus	GW5429	FM946116	FM946115	FM946105	FR848934
	Rhabdopectella tintinnus	HBOI 4-X-88-2-014	AM886402	AM886371	AM886332	FR848941
	Regadrella sp.	HBFH 8-VIII-09-2-001	/	FR848916	FR848917	/
	Rhizophyta yapensis	SIO-POR-083	MK463603	MK463607	MK458682	MK453399
	Acoelocalyx brucei	SMF 10530	AM886401	AM886370	AM886333	FR848938
	Malacosaccus coatsi	SMF 10521	AM886400	AM886369	AM886334	FR848937
	Euplectella sp. 1	HBOI 19-XI-86-1-001	AM886397	AM886368	AM886335	FR848935
	Euplectella sp. 2	HBOI 12-XI-86-1-054	AM886398	AM886367	AM886336	/
	Saccocalyx microhexactin	MBM179994	/	/	KM881702	/
	Saccocalyx pedunculatus	SMF 12082	MF740862	MF684009	MF683987	/
	Hertwigia sp.	USNM 1122181	FM946121	FM946120	FM946104	FR848940
	Bolosoma sp.	USNM 1097546	FM946118	FM946117	FM946102	FR848942
	Bolosominae n. gen. n. sp.	HURL P4-224-sp7	/	LT627534	LT627520	LT627552
	Atlantisella sp.	HBOI 22-X-95-1-7	LT627547	LT627533	LT627519	/
	Holascus euonyx	SMF12092	MF740859	/	MF683980	/
	Holascus taraxacum	SMF12059	/	MF684005	MF683982	/
	Hyalostylus microfloricomus	SMF12085	MF740860	MF684007	MF683984	/
	Hyalostylus schulzei	SMF11707	/	/	MF683985	/
Lyssacinosida: Rossellidae	Rossella nuda	SMF 10531	AM886384	AM886355	AM886343	HE580217*
	Nodastrella asconemaoida	ZMA POR18484	AM886386	AM886354	AM886344	FR848921
	Caulophacus arcticus	SMF 10520	AM886395	AM886360	AM886350	FR819684
	Caulophacella tenuis	SMF 10533	AM886392	AM886363	AM886351	FR848927
	Caulophacus valdiviae	SMF 10528	AM886394	AM886362	AM886348	FR848929
	Caulophacus weddelli	SMF 10527	AM886393	AM886361	AM886349	FR848928
	Crateromorpha meyeri	SMF 10525	AM886389	AM886359	AM886347	FR848923
	Bathydorus spinosus	SMF 10526	AM886390	AM886358	AM886341	FR848924
Lyssacinosida: Aulocalycidae	Euryplegma auriculare	NIWA 43457	/	LT627535	LT627518	LT627551
Sceptrulophora: Uncinateridae	Tretopleura weijica	SIO-POR-090	/	/	MT176124	MT178277
	Tretopleura sp. 1	HURL P4-229-sp10	/	LT627542	LT627529	LT627556
	Tretopleura sp. 2	HURL P5-701-sp4	/	LT627543	LT627530	LT627555

Table 2. Spicule dimensions of Walteria demeterae sp. nov., holotype

Spicule	Dimension	Mean	S.D.	Min	Max	N
Choanosomal diactin	length/µm	1 071.4	881.9	451.0	4 300.0	30
	width/µm	14.0	3.4	8.0	27.5	30
Choanosomal stauractin	long ray length/µm	265.9	164.7	168.5	738.9	11
	short ray length/µm	157.6	32.7	107.5	211.3	11
	ray width/µm	14.2	2.9	8.8	18.5	11
Dermal sword hexactin (lateral processes)	distal ray length/µm	172.0	44.8	88.9	275.0	30
	distal ray basal width/µm	15.2	2.1	11.1	20.0	30
	distal ray maximum width/µm	19.4	3.8	14.0	30.0	30
	tangential ray length/µm	122.3	24.6	72.2	186.0	30
	tangential ray width/µm	13.2	1.3	9.3	15.3	30
	proximal ray length/µm	506.6	140.2	243.3	882.0	30
	proximal ray width/µm	14.5	1.4	11.3	17.3	30
Dermal sword hexactin (body wall)	distal ray length/µm	136.2	53.0	49.2	215.0	14
	distal ray basal width/µm	15.1	3.8	7.4	22.7	14
	distal ray maximum width/µm	19.4	5.8	10.0	33.3	14
	tangential ray length/µm	121.7	46.5	64.3	215.3	14
	tangential ray width/µm	13.1	3.4	6.8	18.0	14
	proximal ray length/µm	431.9	181.2	114.0	686.7	14
	proximal ray width/µm	13.6	3.0	6.4	18.7	14
Atrial pentactin	tangential ray length/µm	158.0	30.7	111.5	225.0	30
	tangential ray width/µm	13.7	2.6	8.3	18.7	30
	proximal ray length/µm	310.2	137.2	83.3	654.0	30
	proximal ray width/µm	14.8	3.2	8.3	21.7	30
Oxyhexactin	ray length/µm	180.3	35.7	115.0	265.0	40
	ray width/µm	8.0	2.1	3.9	12.4	40
Oxyhexactin (base)	ray length/µm	117.7	29.8	71.5	195.3	30
	ray width/µm	3.0	0.5	2.3	4.0	30
	spine max. length/µm	7.1	2.3	3.0	12.0	30
Graphiocome	centre diameter/µm	25.6	1.8	22.7	29.7	30
	primary ray length/µm	7.5	0.8	6.3	10.0	30
	primary ray width/µm	2.1	0.2	1.8	2.5	30
	raphide length/µm	158.9	13.2	100.0	179.0	50
Discohexaster	diameter/µm	88.9	6.6	77.5	110.0	30
	primary ray length/µm	5.8	1.2	3.5	9.0	30
	secondary ray length/µm	35.7	2.8	30.0	46.1	30
Onychohexaster	diameter/µm	83.0	8.8	70.0	100.0	25
	primary ray length/µm	4.1	0.9	2.5	6.7	25
	secondary ray length/µm	37.0	3.9	30.0	45.2	25
Floricome	diameter/µm	122.1	54.0	84.7	184.0	3
	primary ray length/µm	5.8	2.3	3.8	8.3	3
	secondary ray length/µm	53.5	26.4	33.3	83.3	3

Fig. 1. Walteria demeterae sp. nov. specimens. Holotype: in situ images (a1), whole collected specimen including five segments (a2), close-up images of a slightly damaged apex (a3), middle body (a4), and basal part (a5); paratype: in situ image (b1), whole collected specimen including two segments (b2), and close-up image of middle body showing fused skeleton (b3).

Fig. 2. Walteria demeterae sp. nov., seafloor images of the same morphotype observed at dive ROV08 of cruise DY48/I from the Suda Seamount in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. a. Living individuals showing different shapes of tubular body with close-up images of small terminal osculum in the pointed apex, circular strands in the inner wall, and lateral processes projecting from the body wall; b. dead individuals showing different degrees of erosion with close-up images of pointed apex and basal part; c. concurrence of both living and dead individuals in one image; d. examples of invertebrates associated with living or dead individuals, including Comatulida, Spongicolidae, Ophioplinthaca defensor, Paguridae, Cirripedia and others (from top to bottom, then from left to right).

Fig. 3. Walteria demeterae sp. nov., surfaces of holotype. Dermal surface of body wall with lateral oscula (a1), close-up image of crossing longitudinal and transverse bundles (a2), and SEM of longitudinal bundles (a3); atrial surface of body wall with lateral oscula (b1), close-up image of crossing longitudinal and transverse bundles (b2), and SEM of transverse bundles (b3); lateral processes of dichotomously branching (c1) or simple (c2) outgrowths, the SEM of framework at junction of body wall and lateral process (c3) and its fused diactins (c4); attached stauractins (d1, d2), pentactins (d3, d4) and occasionally hexactins (d5).

Fig. 4. Walteria demeterae sp. nov., spicules. a. Choanosomal diactin, whole and enlargements of three types of rays and middle segments; b. choanosomal stauractin, whole and enlargements of axial centre and two types of rays; c. dermal sword hexactin, whole and enlargements of tangential, proximal and two types of distal rays; d. atrial pentactin, whole and enlargements of axial centre, proximal ray, and two types of tangential rays with a smooth or slightly rough tip; e. oxyhexactins, which are sparsely covered by fine spines (located all over the body, e1) or entirely covered by macrospines (restricted to the basal part, e2), whole and enlargements of centres and rays; f. graphiocome, primary centre and terminal ray at same scale, enlargements of primary centre and both the basal part and tip of terminal ray; g. discohexasters in common dense form or rare sparse form (corresponding to “discohexaster 1” and “discohexaster 2” described for W. flemmingii and W. leuckarti by Reiswig and Kelly, 2018), whole and enlargements of terminal ray and disc; h. onychohexaster, whole and enlargements of six types of onychoid tips with 1–5 claws; i. floricome, whole (not intact) and enlargements of terminal ray and tip.

Fig. 5. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of 32 species from four families of Class Hexactinellida (by taking three species of the genus Tretopleuraas as outgroups), showing the relationships of the species Walteria demeterae sp. nov. and related taxa. The tree was inferred from the concatenated alignments of 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, 16S rDNA and COI. Numbers at nodes are SH-aLRT/ UFBoot support values (all based on 1 000 replicates).

Articles: Latest Articles; Most Read; Collections

Updates: Events; News; Multimedia

About: About Us

Contact

No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing

100081

010-62199257

qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House