收藏切换
Velocity structure in the South Yellow Sea basin based on first-arrival tomography of wide-angle seismic data and its geological implications
收藏切换
PDF
Weina Zhao1, 2, 3, Zhiqiang Wu4, Fanghui Hou4, *, Xunhua Zhang4, *, Tianyao Hao5, Hanjoon Kim6, Yanpeng Zheng7, Shanshan Chen4, Huigang Wang8
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2023, 42(2) : 104 - 119
Less
收藏切换
Acta Oceanologica Sinica | 2023, 42(2): 104-119
Marine Geology
Velocity structure in the South Yellow Sea basin based on first-arrival tomography of wide-angle seismic data and its geological implications
Full
Weina Zhao1, 2, 3, Zhiqiang Wu4, Fanghui Hou4, *, Xunhua Zhang4, *, Tianyao Hao5, Hanjoon Kim6, Yanpeng Zheng7, Shanshan Chen4, Huigang Wang8
Affiliations
  • 1 Qingdao Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
  • 2 Hubei Key Laboratory of Marine Geological Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
  • 3 Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Natural Resources, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
  • 4 Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, Qingdao 266071, China
  • 5 Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • 6 Marine Active Fault Research Group, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan 49111, Republic of Korea
  • 7 Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Metallogeny, First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China
  • 8 School of Marine Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
Published: 2023-02-25 doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2028-y
Outline
收藏切换

The South Yellow Sea basin is filled with Mesozoic–Cenozoic continental sediments overlying pre-Palaeozoic and Mesozoic–Palaeozoic marine sediments. Conventional multi-channel seismic data cannot describe the velocity structure of the marine residual basin in detail, leading to the lack of a deeper understanding of the distribution and lithology owing to strong energy shielding on the top interface of marine sediments. In this study, we present seismic tomography data from ocean bottom seismographs that describe the NEE-trending velocity distributions of the basin. The results indicate that strong velocity variations occur at shallow crustal levels. Horizontal velocity bodies show good correlation with surface geological features, and multi-layer features exist in the vertical velocity framework (depth: 0–10 km). The analyses of the velocity model, gravity data, magnetic data, multi-channel seismic profiles, and drilling data showed that high-velocity anomalies (>6.5 km/s) of small (thickness: 1–2 km) and large (thickness: >5 km) scales were caused by igneous complexes in the multi-layer structure, which were active during the Palaeogene. Possible locations of good Mesozoic and Palaeozoic marine strata are limited to the Central Uplift and the western part of the Northern Depression along the wide-angle ocean bottom seismograph array. Following the Indosinian movement, a strong compression existed in the Northern Depression during the extensional phase that caused the formation of folds in the middle of the survey line. This study is useful for reconstructing the regional tectonic evolution and delineating the distribution of the marine residual basin in the South Yellow Sea basin.

ocean bottom seismograph  /  South Yellow Sea basin  /  strata velocity structure  /  wide-angle seismic data  /  CSDP-2
Weina Zhao, Zhiqiang Wu, Fanghui Hou, Xunhua Zhang, Tianyao Hao, Hanjoon Kim, Yanpeng Zheng, Shanshan Chen, Huigang Wang. Velocity structure in the South Yellow Sea basin based on first-arrival tomography of wide-angle seismic data and its geological implications[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2023 , 42 (2) : 104 -119 . DOI: 10.1007/s13131-022-2028-y
The South Yellow Sea basin, situated between the Shandong Peninsula and Korean Peninsula, is a component of the Yangtze Block (Fig. 1a). It is adjacent to the Southern China Orogen and is separated from the North China Block by the Sulu Orogen in the north. The sedimentary basin is filled with Mesozoic–Cenozoic continental sediments overlying the pre-Palaeozoic and Mesozoic–Palaeozoic marine sediments (Yao et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2013; Li et al., 2016; Yuan et al., 2018). Multi-stage tectonic activities and sedimentary events have resulted in the formation of complex structures in the South Yellow Sea basin (Hao et al., 2002, 2010; Huang et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2013; Li et al., 2017; Tao et al., 2018; Pang et al., 2019). Geophysical surveys have been conducted to uncover the structure of the basin.
The structure of the sedimentary basin is essential for the study of its tectonic background and evolutionary history. However, the detailed tectonic features and stratigraphic distribution of the South Yellow Sea basin could not be fully and accurately evaluated from the west to the east owing to the low resolution of gravity and magnetic data of the upper crustal structures (Hao et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2014), the lack of high-resolution seismic data, and unilateral studies on the South Yellow Sea basin between China and South Korea (Wang et al., 1999; Shinn et al., 2010; Hong and Choi, 2012; Wu et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2019; Qi et al., 2019). On the other hand, due to the large thickness and the strong basement reflection interface in the continental basin, the marine residual basin images are vaguely based on multi-channel seismic data, and there are uncertainties regarding the existence and age properties of marine residual strata in the South Yellow Sea basin (Hao et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2007) that urgently require the support of seismic data.
The use of seismic velocity provides a better understanding of the internal geotectonic setting and evolution of the sedimentary basin (He et al., 2016; Zou et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2019). In the South Yellow Sea basin, pre-existing seismic velocity values are provided by drilled wells, vertical seismic profiles (VSPs), and the stacking velocity spectrum of multi-channel seismic data (Wu, 2009; Liu et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019). However, a widespread variation between the velocity and depth can result in significant errors during the layer velocity calculation using the super-gather velocity spectrum (Yang et al., 2015). Additionally, the depth and sparse distributions of wells (Shinn et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2020) also limit the velocity applications in the entire South Yellow Sea basin. For regions with sea water, the use of velocity anomalies from tomography of seismic data (Weekly et al., 2014) can accurately interpret the geometry of the sedimentary basins. Based on the seismic signals obtained by the low-frequency air gun combined with ocean bottom seismographs (OBSs), previous studies have reported the velocity structure of the western part of the South Yellow Sea basin (Zhao et al., 2019a). The velocity field of the sedimentary basin also refers to the seismic velocity values in the Subei Basin (Wu, 2009), which has a similar tectonic evolution and residual sediments. A fine velocity structure can provide a better basis for the time-depth conversion and migration imaging for the exploration of sedimentary formation. Additionally, the fine velocity structure enables the accurate velocity imaging of the deeper structure, which is of great significance for studying the tectonic evolution and deciphering the relationship of the geological units between the surrounding areas.
This study describes a continuous NEE–trending P-wave–velocity model of the South Yellow Sea basin by using first-arrival-time tomography from a wide-angle OBS array (OBS2016, location is shown in Fig. 1). Based on the geological background, formation assemblage, and velocity structure measurements of well CSDP-2, we also discuss the structural velocity arrangement related to the sedimentary basin, identify the assemblage relationships of continental and marine sedimentary strata distribution along the survey line, and determine velocity indications for the local tectonic evolution of the upper crustal framework in the South Yellow Sea basin.
The South Yellow Sea basin spans an area between 121°–126°E, with a structural pattern of E–W zonation and S–N blocking located along the main body of the Lower Yangtze Block. The tectonic evolution (Zhang et al., 2013; Li et al., 2017; Lei et al., 2018a; Kim et al., 2019) of the South Yellow Sea basin is as follows: (1) from the Sinian to the middle and late Triassic, the South Yellow Sea basin assumed a sedimentary platform forming the marine Mesozoic–Palaeozoic basin. (2) Collision between the North China and the Yangtze blocks resulted in the uplift of the entire South Yellow Sea basin. The marine Mesozoic–Palaeozoic structure was folded, uplifted, and denuded, forming the basement of the later continental basins. (3) Since the late Cretaceous, the South Yellow Sea showed the characteristics of an extensional fault depression, thereby developing a continental fault depression basin. (4) During the Neogene and Quaternary, the tectonic movements tended to be calm and the basin experienced subsidence.
Various geophysical characteristics were formed as a result of multiple tectonic movements from the basement to the cover layer, and from the north to the south. Based on the distribution of the Cretaceous–Palaeogene strata, the South Yellow Sea basin comprises the Qianliyan Uplift (QU), Northern Depression (ND), Central Uplift (CU), Southern Depression (SD), and Wunansha Uplift (WU). The ND is a fault-controlled depression originating from the late Cretaceous period with an NEE orientation underlain by the Mesozoic–Palaeozoic residual basin (Huang et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2014). The CU is a nearly EW-trending structure where the Mesozoic–Palaeozoic marine strata are directly covered by the Neogene strata (Zhang et al., 2009). Regional geological surveys and drilled wells revealed that continental deposits (Zhang et al., 2013) in the South Yellow Sea basin mainly comprised sandstones, mudstones (P-wave velocity: 1.7–4.8 km/s), and conglomerate, wherein the thickness of the continental sedimentary formation was over 6 km (Zhao et al., 2019b). Carbonate rocks (5–6.6 km/s), sandstones (4.5–5.2 km/s), mudstones (3.6–4.7 km/s), and metamorphic rocks (>6.3 km/s) are widely distributed in the marine residual strata (Lei et al., 2018b; Wu et al., 2019). Overall, the Bouguer gravity anomaly (Hao et al., 2002) showed that the South Yellow Sea basin represents a positive anomaly with obvious zoning and belting characteristics. Moreover, the gravity values were larger in the uplift than those in the depression. The magnetic anomaly (Hao et al., 2002) of the South Yellow Sea is characterised by a wide and gentle block-shaped positive value on a calm negative field background. Additionally, the dense and disorderly positive anomalies extend over hundreds of kilometres in the NE direction, north and south of the basin.
Wide-angle seismic data from ocean bottom seismographs (OBS2016) were acquired across the South Yellow Sea basin along an NEE-trending transect by the Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, the Institute of Geology and Geophysics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology in 2016. In the survey, air gun arrays were combined with OBSs to acquire data over 405 km. A total of 4 502 air-gun shots, with 90-m spacing, were used with an inspiring volume of 6 640 in3 (1 in3=0.000 016 387 m3). The receivers consisted of 31 OBSs spaced at 13.5-km intervals that recorded signals at a sampling rate of 250 Hz or 100 Hz. Continuous and clear first-arrival waves were observed in 29 common receiver gathers (Zhao et al., 2020) after data processing and signal enhancement at a resampling rate of 250 Hz. OBSs YS1 to YS11 in Kim et al. (2019) are represented as OBSs C21 and K02 to K10 in this study. Based on the phase consistency of seismic waves and the maximisation of accuracy from the far offsets, the starting positions of the first-arrival waves were obtained from near to far offsets (parts are shown in Figs 26 and all positions are shown in Fig. 7; coloured lines). Notably, the time from far (>150 km) offsets with low signal-to-noise ratio were discarded in the inversion.
To constrain the sedimentary structure, we collected multi-channel seismic (MCS) data (Fig. 1a, AA', BB', and CC') acquired in 2007, 2019, and 2016 near the OBS2016 survey line.
Section AA' was acquired by the Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, and was recorded near the western portion of the OBS2016 (the intersection is at C09). Air-gun sources spaced at 37.5 m intervals were used with an inspiring volume of 2 940 in3 and a working pressure of 2 000 psi (1 psi=6 894.757 Pa). The cable receivers comprised a 456-channel streamer that provided a 76-fold coverage at 12.5 m intervals with a sampling time of 2 ms.
Section BB' was acquired by the Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, and was recorded along the middle of the OBS2016 survey line using a 600-channel streamer with a group interval of 12.5 m that provided a 150-fold coverage with a sampling time of 2 ms. Air-gun sources spaced at 25-m intervals were used with an inspiring volume of 5 110 in3 and a working pressure of 2 000 psi.
Section CC' was recorded along the eastern portion of the OBS2016 (Shinn et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2019). Air-gun sources spaced at 6 s intervals were used with an inspiring volume of 750 in3. The cable receivers comprised a 32-channel streamer that provided a 13-fold coverage at intervals of 6.25 m.
The processing of the MCS data included the geometry assignment, band-pass filtering, deconvolution, velocity analysis, common- and mid-point stacking, and migration. AA' and BB' were processed by Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology and CC' was processed by Kim et al. (2019).
Since computerised tomography (CT) was introduced into geoscience, it has been widely used in earthquake and seismic data imaging and improved the study of complex tectonic areas (Aki and Lee, 1976; Zelt and Barton, 1998). The P-wave–velocity model in this study was obtained using first-arrival seismic tomography (FAST, Zelt and Barton, 1998). The method is adapted to areas with interface fluctuations and large horizontal and vertical velocity variations as well as to those in the presence of high-velocity interlayers (Hou et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2014; Zou et al., 2016). To obtain the velocity using the first-arrival travel-time from the wide-angle seismic data, the underground region was divided into grids and the velocity distributions in the grid cells were used to simulate the complex underground structure. Furthermore, ray paths were calculated according to the travel-time field. Seismic velocity values in each cell were obtained by solving travel-time equations to achieve the underground structure.
In this study, velocity values of the initial model linearly increased from 2 km/s on the ocean floor to 7 km/s at a depth of 30 km (depths of 0–10 km are shown in Fig. 8b). The parameterised cells were 500 m and 200 m in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. After 20 iterations in the inversion, travel-time residuals converged quickly and tended to be stable at 0.13 s. Moreover, the travel-time residuals converge between −0.3 s and 0.2 s after the last iteration (Fig. 9).
P-wave velocity structures of the sedimentary basin were inferred by first-arrival tomography beneath the OBS2016, and are shown in Fig. 8c. In the image, the ray’s coverage (Fig. 8d) deteriorates at a depth of greater than 5 km owing to a decrease in the velocity gradient at depth and less travel-time picks for far offsets. Beneath the eastern part of the survey line, the ray’s depth is over 10 km. The dense distributions of the ray paths at depths shallower than 5 km provide inversion results with high reliability. Uneven rays in the horizontal and vertical directions reveal the complexity of the velocity structure. The velocity structures of the inversion model (Fig. 8c) within a depth of 5 km (local is within a depth of 10 km) are discussed considering the thickness of the superposed sedimentary basin and ray-paths.
To test the resolution, we conducted a checkerboard test using the same parameters as those in the real-data tomographic inversion. The checkerboard velocity model spaced high- and low-velocity perturbations (from −5% to 5%) shown in Fig. 10a was added regularly to the final seismic velocity model shown in Fig. 8c. The checkerboard sizes are 25 km and 2 km in the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively. The reconstructed checkerboard velocity model from the inversion shows that the locations of the velocity anomalies at depths shallower than 5 km were recovered reasonably well (Fig. 10b).
The sedimentary units are separated by two reflectors (T2 and T8) with moderate-to-high amplitudes in the migration time profiles. T2 is the bottom interface reflection of the Quaternary and Neogene (N+Q; constrained by the CSDP-2 well; Table 1) and it is relatively flat. T8, with dramatic crests and troughs, is the bottom interface reflection of the Mesozoic–Cenozoic continental sediments (constrained by the Kachi-1 well; Yi et al., 2003), which is a regional unconformity formed during the Indosinian movement in the South Yellow Sea basin. The marine strata before the Indosinian period are clearly imaged in the BB' profile (location is shown in Fig. 1a), but are not clearly distinguished in the AA' and CC' profiles (location is shown in Fig. 1a) owing to the small capacity of the air gun source and the small active section of the streamer. Disordered thrusting nappes appear between 1 s and 3 s in the AA' profile (Fig. 11b). According to the events, the shape characteristics of the material upwelling on the AA', BB', and CC' profiles are noteworthy with the destruction of T8. All upwellings are discussed in detail in Section 4.4.
The OBS2016 passes through the CU and ND in the South Yellow Sea basin (Fig. 1b). Strong velocity variations are easily identified at depths of 3–10 km. The velocity model shows characteristics of a multi-layer structure (Fig. 8c). The structure is characterised by low-velocity strata (<4.5 km/s), high-velocity anomalies (>6 km/s), and sub-high velocity strata (5–6 km/s) varying from shallow to deep. Subsequently, we discussed the velocity section in three parts in conjunction with other geophysical data.
In the west (0–165 km and C01–C13; Fig. 8c), along the survey line OBS2016, strata with a P-wave velocity lower than 4.5 km/s are relatively thin, reaching 5 km/s at a depth of 1–2 km. The thicknesses of these low-velocity anomalies slightly increase to the east, while the high-velocity interlayers (>6 km/s) with low thicknesses of approximately 1–2 km occur at depths of 2–5 km. The CSDP-2 well in CU indicates that the Mesozoic marine strata are distributed underneath the extremely thin Neogene and Quaternary (depth: 863 m, without seawater). Additionally, relatively low-velocity Palaeozoic sandstones and mudstones (3.6–5.2 km/s) underlie the Palaeozoic high-velocity carbonate rocks (5–6.6 km/s; Wu et al., 2019). Velocity in CU from the tomography inversion is consistent with the VSP velocity of the CSDP-2 well (Table 1). Special consideration was given to partial highvelocity anomalies (>6.5 km/s; ①, Figs 8c and 11). We compared our tomographic velocity model (between C06 and C11) with the seismic reflection data (Line AA'). The time-based seismic-reflection profile (Fig. 11a) was converted into depth using the root mean-square (RMS) velocity. For better comparison, we overlaid our velocity model (Fig. 11c) onto the multi-channel depth seismic-reflection profile shown in Fig. 11d. These are well preserved marine (N+Q, bottom interface: T2) strata. Beneath ①, the events of the low-velocity Neogene bottom interface (T2) are arching but not disconnected, and the bottom interface reflection events of the Mesozoic–Cenozoic continental sediments (T8) are broken (Fig. 11b). The strata below T2 are unconformable and not completely denuded. The observed anomalies (①) correspond to the location of material upwelling. The buried depth of anomalies is 2–4 km with a short-wavelength magnetic anomaly, which is not caused by the basement of the metamorphic fold (Yang, 2009). In the South Yellow Sea basin, the compaction of the sedimentary rock was not the main factor for the large velocity values at relatively shallow depths, and the dominant factor was the change of lithology. High gravity and magnetic anomalies occur in this position. The above geophysical data show that the igneous rocks intruded into the original strata together, forming high-velocity anomalies. After partial denudation, the high-velocity anomalies remained in the palaeo-geomorphic mountain, especially below C08, and had been buried since the Neogene. We suggest that these igneous activities predate the Neogene and intruded into the continental strata during the Palaeogene.
Low-velocity anomalies (<4.5 km/s) are clearly observed in the middle, that is, at depths of 165–270 km and between C14–C21, and along the survey line. The low velocity zone with a thickness of 3 km (local thickness is approximately 6 km) represents the Neogene–Quaternary marine and Mesozoic–Cenozoic continental deposits. Under low-velocity anomalies, some parts of the strata show high (>6 km/s) and sub-high (4–6 km/s) velocities in the horizontal direction. Large-scale block and high-velocity anomalies >6.5 km/s (②, Figs 8c and 12) exist with a thickness of over 5 km.
We compared our tomographic velocity model to seismic reflection data beneath line BB' (location is shown in Fig. 1a). The time-based seismic-reflection profile (Fig. 12a) was converted into depth using the RMS velocity. The location of the reflectors matched well with the drilling strata from Kachi-1 well (Figs 13b–d). For a better comparison, we overlaid our velocity model (Fig. 12c) onto the multi-channel depth seismic-reflection profile shown in Fig. 12d. The results indicate that the interfaces of high- and low-velocity anomalies (4.5 km/s) coincide with the location of strong reflection, which was interpreted as the basement (T8) of the Mesozoic–Cenozoic continental sediments in ND along line BB'.
In the low-velocity syncline (time: >5 s; depth: >10 km; Figs 12b, d; between C19 and C21), the events show good continuity and traceability. These are well preserved marine (N+Q, bottom interfaces: T2), continental (after the Indosinian; bottom interface: T8), and marine (before the Indosinian) strata. To the west (between C16 and C19), the events of low-velocity Neogene bottom interfaces (T2) are arching but not disconnected (Fig. 12b). Conversely, nether events in the high-velocity areas are characterised by disorder and poor continuity (Fig. 13a, blue line). Notably, they appear as though the continuous strata were destroyed. Further down, the events remained discontinuous, although they became relatively better ordered (Fig. 13a, red line). We suggest that a strong compression occurred during the evolution of the South Yellow Sea basin that caused the formation of folds in the middle of the OBS2016 after the Indosinian movement. Subsequently, the possible anticline (between C17 and C19) was denuded, and the strata were destroyed (Figs 12e and 13a). Additionally, faults existed between the syncline and anticline (Fig. 12b). As mentioned in Section 4.2, material upwellings (Fig. 12b; black lines with arrows) occur around this location. Kachi-1 well (Fig. 13c) is located near C17. Late Jurassic or early Cretaceous volcanic activities (aphanitic andesite and basalt) and rhyolite tuff were found at depths of 2 500 m and 2 362 m (Yi et al., 2003), which were destroyed by the nearby material upwellings (Fig. 12b; black lines with arrows). The arching T2, the broken T8, and the overlapped strata reveal that T2 is a flexural phenomenon resulting from formation compression, rather than an arch of material upwelling. Based on the high-velocity anomalies (>6.5 km/s, ②, Fig. 8c), damaged events, well data, larger positive gravity anomaly, and positive magnetic anomaly (Fig. 8a, Zhang et al., 2022), we suggest that the upwelling material was magma. From above, during the Palaeogene, igneous rocks intruded into the continental and marine strata over a wide range in this possible anticline and caused positive gravity and magnetic anomalies.
The high velocity to the right side (between C17 and C19) of the material upwelling position (between C16 and C17) is affected by igneous activities, which is not obvious to the left side (between C14 and C16; Fig. 12c). In the inversion model, the left area presents relatively lower velocities (4.5–5.3 km/s, Fig. 12c) compared with the surrounding structure. T2 and T8 are preserved in the time profile, but many other events have disappeared (Fig. 12b) between C15 and C16. The underlying formation is unconformable by T8. We suggest that the Mesozoic–Palaeozoic marine strata were compressed in the Indo-Chinese period and formed a broad and gentle anticline (black broken line; Fig. 12b) in this area. The anticline slipped along the reflector near 4 s in the time profile (yellow line; Fig. 12b), and the upper part of the marine strata was weathered, denuded, and finally buried by T2 and T8. Events between C14 and C15 become continuous and near parallel beneath T8 with a sub-high velocity (4.5–6 km/s, Fig. 12b). We speculate that they comprised the marine residual strata during the Mesozoic–Palaeozoic.
The thickness of the low-velocity anomalies (<4.5 km/s) is approximately 3 km in the east (270–400 km, C21–K10) along the survey line OBS2016 (Fig. 8c). These strata gradually thin from the west to east with a flat bottom interface and reach 1 km at the eastern end of OBS2016. The velocity is consistent with the information from the wells (IIH–1XA and IIC–1X, locations are shown in Fig. 1b) in the ND. The low-velocity bodies with a depth of more than 5 km in the east (beneath K06–K08) and west (beneath C20–K02) correspond to the syncline in the multi-channel seismic profile (Fig. 14a), which are the Mesozoic–Cenozoic continental deposits (depth is within 6 km). The high-velocity bodies are discontinuous with a maximum thickness of over 3 km and they become blurred in the east. Moreover, considering the parts of the high-velocity anomalies (>6.5 km/s), ③ (Figs 8c and 14) shows sudden events (T8), interruptions, and a blank reflection in the multi-channel seismic profile (Fig. 14b), with a disordered reflection around 1 s (beneath K04, Fig. 14d). The horizontal continuous events (above 2 s, Fig. 14b) and stable velocity (above 3 km, Fig. 14c) on the left (beneath K03) and right (beneath K05) sides reveal that the continental strata (after the Indosinian movement) on both sides were preserved. Based on the almost complete bottom interface of the Neogene, the pull-down events near 1 s, and damaged T8, we suggest that igneous activities probably occurred during the Palaeogene. Compared with those of the strata below C08, the gravity anomaly below K04 is similar, but the magnetic anomaly reduces (Fig. 4a). We infer that the igneous rocks below K04 are intermediate or/and acidic. Tomography of the OBS data in Kim et al. (2019) (Fig. 7) also shows the presence of a high-velocity body in eastern ND, which is consistent with Fig. 14c in this manuscript (K04 in this manuscript is YS5 in Kim et al. (2019)).
The South Yellow Sea basin has been sectionally surveyed and studied. In this study, the wide-angle and multi-channel seismic lines across the previously poorly-documented South Yellow Sea basin in the east-west direction further illustrate the pattern of the continental basin, the preservation of the marine residual strata, and the presence of upwelling igneous activities. Our interpretations of the geological and structural models enable the tectonic reconstruction of the South Yellow Sea basin.
The structures of CU show a recognisable difference with those of ND in the inversion model. The multi-layer structure within a depth of 5 km in CU is clearly observable, while it is locally distributed in ND. The high velocity bodies, both in the CU and ND, also have different properties. In CU, igneous and carbonate rocks coexist in the high velocity interlayers. We inferred that the Mesozoic and Upper Palaeozoic strata in CU were distributed above the high-velocity (>6 km/s) interlayers, and their depth of burial was approximately 1–2.5 km in the inversion model. Additionally, more complete preservation of the Mesozoic–Palaeozoic strata in ND are distributed below C14-C16 with a depth of 2.5–5 km and C19-C21 with a depth of 6–12 km. Igneous complexes identified from the high-velocity (>6.5 km/s) anomalies in the ND and CU, which were formed earlier than the Neogene and later than the Cretaceous, had destroyed the pre-Indosinian strata, resulting in poor preservation of the Mesozoic–Palaeozoic strata locally.
In addition, there are significant differences in the velocity models between the east and west in ND, and the average velocity in the east is higher within a depth of 10 km. Preservation of the residual marine strata before the Indosinian period was better in western ND than that in the east beneath the OBS2016 line.
In this study, the structures of the basin in the west are characterised by faults (Figs 12b, e) that are similar to the ones in the western South Yellow Sea basin (Zhao et al., 2019b). On the eastern side, the ND is not obviously controlled by faults, and the area affected by igneous activities is relatively large. According to previous research results (Zou et al., 2016), the strata in western ND are, as an analogy, characterised by a flower structure with broken events in the multi-channel seismic profile and relatively low-velocity anomalies in the velocity model that are indicative of strike-slip faults. In this study, the faults (orange lines beneath C18; Figs 12b, e) with similar characteristics are easily recognised in the basin, and do not cross T2. This provides evidence for the existence of the strike-slip fault in N–S–trending fault systems between the early Cretaceous and the Neogene.
Zhang et al. (2014) computed the buried depth of the crystal basement in the western part of the South Yellow Sea basin ranging from 4–12 km (average depth, 8 km) using magnetic inversion. The comprehensive interpretation profile of the VSP survey, regional stratigraphic distribution, and lithologic characteristics suggest that the buried depth of the crystalline basement was 8.3 km around the CSDP-2 well (Wu et al., 2019). However, the crystalline basement was not distinguished effectively using the velocity model derived from the wide-angle data presented in this study.
A simple igneous activity model and its related geological processes beneath the Northern Depression of the South Yellow Sea basin are shown in Fig. 15.
The South Yellow Sea basin is considered to have entered the extension stage that was followed by the overall subsidence after the Indosinian period. Shinn (2015) identified that the half-graben formed by the Cretaceous to Eocene extension subsequently underwent contraction in the western Gunsan basin. Our results support a similar contraction. Based on the interpretations in Section 4.4, we suggest that a strong compression occurred in ND during the evolution of the South Yellow Sea basin that caused the formation of folds in the middle of the OBS2016 after the Indosinian movement (Fig. 15b). Subsequently, the anticline was denuded, strata were destroyed, and the syncline underwent continuous sedimentation (Fig. 15c). Additionally, faults existed between the syncline and anticline, and the strata continued to undergo sedimentation (Fig. 15d) with scattered and multi-point igneous activities in the later stage (Fig. 15e). Finally, strata in the anticline showed discontinuity and disorder (Fig. 13a).
In terms of the geological processes, we suggest that the magmas had originated from the deep crust, while the faults formed a possible igneous migration pathway between the anticline and syncline.
After the Indosinian period, the structure beneath the eastern survey line was relatively simple, allowing igneous intrusion events in the horizontal layered strata, thereby forming igneous rocks (Fig. 15f).
Based on the velocity model proposed in this and previous studies, it is possible to support a tectonic evolution model for the South Yellow Sea basin.
(1) Marine craton basin evolution phase: from the Sinian to the Middle and Late Triassic, the South Yellow Sea basin assumed a sedimentary platform forming the marine Mesozoic–Palaeozoic basin above the metamorphic basement.
(2) Collision uplift and denudation phase: collision between the North China and the Yangtze blocks resulted in the uplift of the entire South Yellow Sea basin. The marine Mesozoic–Palaeozoic structure was folded, uplifted, and denuded, forming the basement of the subsequent continental basins. We observed strong Indosinian unconformity from the collision throughout the South Yellow Sea basin along the OBS2016 line. The extrusion anticline appeared in CU (Fig. 11b), with large scale thrust nappes, and in ND (Fig. 12b). Additionally, marine Mesozoic–Palaeozoic residual strata exist locally after the denudation.
(3) Extensional phase: since the Late Cretaceous, the South Yellow Sea showed activities of an extensional fault depression, thereby developing a continental fault depression basin. However, the presence of inversion stress was identified. A strong compression existed in ND during the evolution of the South Yellow Sea basin that caused the formation of folds (Figs 12a and 13a) in the middle of the OBS2016 line after the Indosinian movement. Subsequently, the anticline was denuded, strata were destroyed, and the syncline underwent continuous sedimentation. During this period, igneous activities existed in the ND and CU (Figs 11, 12 and 14).
(4) Subsidence phase: during the Neogene and Quaternary, the tectonic movements tended to be calm and the basin experienced the subsidence stage.
Based on the wide-angle seismic data obtained in 2016, we used the first-arrival tomography method to establish a P-wave velocity model of the South Yellow Sea basin for its interpretation from the west to the east. We conducted comprehensive analysis of the multi-layer velocity structure, gravity data, magnetic data, multi-channel seismic profiles, and drilled well data, and discussed the distributions of the sedimentary strata in the basin.
(1) The velocity model was heterogeneous in both the vertical and horizontal directions, and correlated well with known geological units. The transition from low velocity ~2–4.5 km/s (typical of continental sedimentary fill) to the high (~5–6 km/s) velocity of marine strata was used to assign the depth to the Mesozoic–Cenozoic bottom surface that was ~1 km beneath the Central Uplift, and ~3 km beneath the Northern Depression (local area, ~6 km).
(2) Multi-layer velocity characteristics with high-velocity bodies (>6 km/s) were clearly observed in the Central Uplift within a depth of 5 km, and were locally distributed in the Northern Depression. The igneous complexes formed the high-velocity anomalies (>6.5 km/s) and resulted in the poor preservation of Mesozoic and Palaeozoic marine strata. The possible locations of undamaged Mesozoic and Palaeozoic residual strata by igneous activities are distributed in the Central Uplift and in the western part of the Northern Depression beneath OBS2016.
(3) After the Indosinian movement, the strong compression that existed during the extensional phase caused the folds in the Northern Depression.
This study will be useful for the reconstruction of the regional tectonic evolution and the exploration of the Mesozoic and Palaeozoic marine residual strata in the South Yellow Sea basin.
The authors thank all the workers on the vessels M/V DISCOVER and R/V EARDO for their help and support during the experiment.
  • The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41806048; the Open Fund of the Hubei Key Laboratory of Marine Geological Resources under contract No. MGR202009; the Fund from the Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Natural Resource, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences under contract No. J1901-16; the Aoshan Science and Technology Innovation Project of Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao) under contract No. 2015ASKJ03-Seabed Resources; the Fund from the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST) under contract No. PE99741.
Aki K, Lee W H K. 1976. Determination of three-dimensional velocity anomalies under a seismic array using first P arrival times from local earthquakes: 1. A homogeneous initial model. Journal of Geophysical Research, 81(23): 4381–4399, doi: 10.1029/JB081i023p04381
Cai Laixing, Xiao Guolin, Guo Xingwei, et al. 2019. Assessment of Mesozoic and Upper Paleozoic source rocks in the South Yellow Sea Basin based on the continuous borehole CSDP-2. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 101: 30–42, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.11.028
Gao Xiaohui, Zhang Xunhua, Guo Xingwei, et al. 2020. Provenance and tectonic implications of Paleozoic strata in the South Yellow Sea Basin, China-revealed from the borehole CSDP-2. Journal of Ocean University of China, 19(3): 536–550, doi: 10.1007/s11802-020-4088-y
Hao Tianyao, Huang Song, Xu Ya, et al. 2010. Geophysical understandings on deep structure in Yellow Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 53(6): 1315–1326
Hao Tianyao, Suh M, Wang Qianshen, et al. 2002. A study on the extension of fault zones in Yellow Sea and its adjacent areas based on gravity data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 45(3): 385–397
He Enyuan, Zhao Minghui, Qiu Xuelin, et al. 2016. Crustal structure across the post-spreading magmatic ridge of the East Sub-basin in the South China Sea: tectonic significance. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 121: 139–152, doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.03.003
Hong T K, Choi H. 2012. Seismological constraints on the collision belt between the North and South China blocks in the Yellow Sea. Tectonophysics, 570–571: 102–113
Hou Hesheng, Gao Rui, Lu Zhanwu, et al. 2009. First arrival seismic tomographic imaging test of the near-surface velocity structure of central uplift in the Qiangtang Basin, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Geological Bulletin of China (in Chinese), 28(6): 738–745
Huang Song, Hao Tianyao, Xu Ya, et al. 2010. Study on macro distribution of residual basin of South Yellow Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 53(6): 1344–1353
Kim H J, Kim C H, Hao Tianyao, et al. 2019. Crustal structure of the Gunsan Basin in the SE Yellow Sea from ocean bottom seismometer (OBS) data and its linkage to the South China Block. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 180: 103881, doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.103881
Lei Baohua, Chen Jianwen, Liang Jie, et al. 2018a. Tectonic deformation and evolution of the South Yellow Sea basin since Indosinian movement. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology (in Chinese), 38(3): 45–54
Lei Baohua, Chen Jianwen, Wu Zhiqiang, et al. 2018b. Density and velocity analysis and seismic reflection model construction of marine Mesozoic-Paleozoic in the North Jiangsu-to-South Yellow Sea Basin. Oil Geophysical Prospecting (in Chinese), 53(3): 558–576
Li Sanzhong, Jahn B M, Zhao Shujuan, et al. 2017. Triassic southeastward subduction of North China Block to South China Block: insights from new geological, geophysical and geochemical data. Earth-Science Reviews, 166: 270–285, doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.01.009
Li Nan, Li Weiran, Long Haiyan, 2016. Tectonic evolution of the north depression of the South Yellow Sea basin since late Cretaceous. Journal of Ocean University of China, 15(6): 967–976
Liu Kai, Liu Huaishan, Wu Zhiqiang, et al. 2016. Seismic acquisition parameters analysis for deep weak reflectors in the South Yellow Sea. Journal of Ocean University of China, 15(5): 758–766, doi: 10.1007/s11802-016-2978-9
Pang Yumao, Guo Xingwei, Han Zuozhen, et al. 2019. Mesozoic–Cenozoic denudation and thermal history in the Central Uplift of the South Yellow Sea basin and the implications for hydrocarbon systems: constraints from the CSDP-2 borehole. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 99: 355–369, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.10.027
Qi Jianghao, Wu Zhiqiang, Guo Xingwei, et al. 2019. Application of large capacity air gun source in VSP data acquisition under marine high speed shielding layer in South Yellow Sea: illustrated by the example of well CSDP (Continental Shelf Drilling Program)-2. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 34(4): 1661–1670
Shinn Y J. 2015. Geological structures and controls on half-graben inversion in the western Gunsan Basin, Yellow Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 68: 480–491, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.09.013
Shinn Y J, Chough S K, Hwang I G. 2010. Structural development and tectonic evolution of Gunsan Basin (Cretaceous-Tertiary) in the central Yellow Sea. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 27(2): 500–514, doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.11.001
Tao Kai, Grand S P, Niu Fenglin. 2018. Seismic structure of the upper mantle beneath eastern asia from full waveform seismic tomography. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 19(8): 2732–2763,
Wang Wei, Chen Gao, Wang Jialin, et al. 1999. Analysis for regional structural characteristics of North Jiangsu-South Yellow Sea basin. Journal of Seismology (in Chinese), (1): 47–55
Wang Jian, Zhao Minghui, He Enyuan, et al. 2014. The selection of optimal inversion parameters for first-arrival seismic tomography: an application to 3D seismic data from the central sub-basin of the South China Sea. Journal of Tropical Oceanography (in Chinese), 33(5): 74–83
Weekly R T, Wilcock W S D, Toomey D R, et al. 2014. Upper crustal seismic structure of the Endeavour segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge from traveltime tomography: implications for oceanic crustal accretion. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(4): 1296–1315
Wu Zhiqiang. 2009. The seismic techniques for exploring marine facies stratigraphic hydrocarbon entrapped in the Middle Uplift of the South Yellow Sea (in Chinese)[dissertation]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China
Wu Zhiqiang, Liu Lihua, Xiao Guolin, et al. 2015. Progress and enlightenment of integrated geophysics exploration of marine residual basin in the South Yellow Sea. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 30(6): 2945–2954
Wu Zhiqiang, Qi Jianghao, Zhang Xunhua, et al. 2019. Vertical seismic profiling survey on the Well CSDP-2 of the “continental shelf drilling program”. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 62(9): 3492–3508
Yang Jinyu. 2009. Research on the tectonic relation between the South Yellow Sea basin and its adjacent area and distribution characteristic and tectonic evolution of the Mesozoic-Paleozoic marine strata (in Chinese)[dissertation]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University
Yang Yanqiu, Li Gang, Yi Chunyan. 2015. Characteristics of seismic reflection and geological ages of seismic sequences for marine strata in the South Yellow Sea basin. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University (in Chinese), 39(3): 50–59
Yao Yongjian, Feng Zhiqiang, Hao Tianyao, et al. 2008. A new understanding of the structural layers in the South Yellow Sea Basin and their hydrocarbon-bearing characteristics. Earth Science Frontiers, 15(6): 232–240
Yi S, Yi S, Batten D J, et al. 2003. Cretaceous and Cenozoic non-marine deposits of the northern South Yellow Sea Basin, offshore western Korea: palynostratigraphy and palaeoenvironments. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 191(1): 15–44
Yuan Yong, Chen Jianwen, Zhang Yinguo, et al. 2018. Sedimentary system characteristics and depositional filling model of Upper Permian–Lower Triassic in South Yellow Sea Basin. Journal of Central South University, 25(12): 2910–2928, doi: 10.1007/s11771-018-3962-x
Zelt C A, Barton P J. 1998. Three-dimensional seismic refraction tomography: a comparison of two methods applied to data from the Faeroe Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 103(B4): 7187–7210, doi: 10.1029/97JB03536
Zhang Haiqi, Chen Jianwen, Li Gang, et al. 2009. Discovery from seismic survey in Laoshan Uplift of the South Yellow Sea and the significance. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology (in Chinese), 29(3): 107–113
Zhang Xunhua, Wu Zhiqiang, Liu Lihua, et al. 2022. Submarine Seismic Exploration in the Eastern China Sea (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press
Zhang Minghua, Xu Deshu, Chen Jianwen. 2007. Geological structure of the Yellow Sea Area from regional gravity and magnetic interpretation. Applied Geophysics, 4(2): 75–83, doi: 10.1007/s11770-007-0011-1
Zhang Xunhua, Yang Jinyu, Li Gang, et al. 2014. Basement structure and distribution of Mesozoic-Paleozoic marine strata in the South Yellow Sea basin. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 57(12): 4041–4051
Zhang Xunhua, Zhang Zhixun, Lan Xianhong, et al. 2013. Regional Geology in South Yellow Sea (in Chinese). Beijing: China Ocean Press
Zhang Xiaohua, Zhang Xunhua, Wu Zhiqiang, et al. 2018. New understanding of Mesozoic-Paleozoic strata in the Central Uplift of the South Yellow Sea basin from the drilling of well CSDP-02 of the “Continental Shelf Drilling Program”. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 61(6): 2369–2379
Zhao Minghui, He Enyuan, Sibuet J C, et al. 2018. Postseafloor spreading volcanism in the central east South China Sea and its formation through an extremely thin oceanic crust. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 19(3): 621-641
Zhao Weina, Wang Huigang, Shi Hongcai, et al. 2019a. Crustal structure from onshore-offshore wide-angle seismic data: application to northern Sulu Orogen and its adjacent area. Tectonophysics, 770: 228220, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228220
Zhao Weina, Zhang Xunhua, Wang Huigang, et al. 2020. Characteristics and noise combination suppression of wide-angle Ocean Bottom Seismography (OBS) data in shallow water: a case study of profile OBS2016 in the South Yellow Sea. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 63(6): 2415–2433
Zhao Weina, Zhang Xunhua, Zou Zhihui, et al. 2019b. Velocity structure of sedimentary formation in the South Yellow Sea Basin based on OBS data. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 62(1): 183–196
Zou Zhihui, Liu Kai, Zhao Weina, et al. 2016. Upper crustal structure beneath the northern South Yellow Sea revealed by wide-angle seismic tomography and joint interpretation of geophysical data. Geological Journal, 51(S1): 108–122, doi: 10.1002/gj.2847
Year 2023 volume 42 Issue 2
PDF
136
81
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1007/s13131-022-2028-y
  • Receive Date:2021-02-16
  • Online Date:2025-11-21
  • Published:2023-02-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2021-02-16
  • Accepted:2022-04-24
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China under contract No. 41806048; the Open Fund of the Hubei Key Laboratory of Marine Geological Resources under contract No. MGR202009; the Fund from the Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Natural Resource, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences under contract No. J1901-16; the Aoshan Science and Technology Innovation Project of Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao) under contract No. 2015ASKJ03-Seabed Resources; the Fund from the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology (KIOST) under contract No. PE99741.
Affiliations
    1 Qingdao Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
    2 Hubei Key Laboratory of Marine Geological Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    3 Key Laboratory of Deep-Earth Dynamics of Ministry of Natural Resources, Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
    4 Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, China Geological Survey, Qingdao 266071, China
    5 Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
    6 Marine Active Fault Research Group, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan 49111, Republic of Korea
    7 Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Metallogeny, First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China
    8 School of Marine Science and Technology, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China

Corresponding:

* E-mail: ; xunhuazh611102@sina.com
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aos/EN/10.1007/s13131-022-2028-y
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT