To explore the processes of HSW intrusion, we plotted the time evolution of sea level anomaly (SLA) and geostrophic currents from September 28 to October 14, 2019 with a 2-d interval (
Fig. 7). According to the types of Kuroshio intrusion identified by
Nan et al. (2011), the Kuroshio leaped the Luzon Strait before typhoon MITAG. The eastern side of the trajectories of glider corresponded to the Kuroshio main axis, while the western side was the center of a cyclonic eddy. The convex-upward isopycnal in the cyclonic eddy resulted in a decrease in surface temperature, consistent with observations by glider (
Figs 3a,
b, and
c). Meanwhile, the surface water with high temperature (>28.5℃) and low salinity (<34) appeared to originate from the anti-cyclonic eddy south of the observation area (
Figs 3a,
b, and
7a). Following the typhoon, significant changes were observed in the Kuroshio main axis and the eddies east of the Luzon Strait. In
Fig 6a, we defined the Kuroshio main axis location as the longitude with the maximum v-component velocities within the green rectangular area (20.125°–21.875°N, 120.125°–121.875°E) (
Kuo et al., 2018) and denoted the cyclonic and anti-cyclonic eddies as “CE” and “AE” (
Fig. 7a).
Figure 8 depicts the variations in the Kuroshio main axis and related eddies (CE, AE) before and after the typhoon. Prior to the typhoon, the Kuroshio main axis near 21°N was positioned around 121.125°E (
Fig. 8a), with a northward velocity of about 0.5 m/s (
Fig. 8b). During the typhoon, the Kuroshio current weakened by about 0.1 m/s but remained in the same position. After the typhoon, the main axis shifted westward by about 0.5° and its velocity decreased to about 0.25 m/s. It wasn’t until Octorber 6 that the main axis returned to its original position, although its velocity did not recover to the initial level (
Figs 8a and
b). Additionlly, we extracted the velocity magnitude of the Kuroshio upstream (near 18.5°N) during the study period. It exhibited a decrease after the typhoon but rebounded to it initial level after the typhoon on October 6 (
Fig. 8c). Therefore, we concluded that the influence of typhoon on the Kuroshio persisted for approximately 7 d, from October 2 to October 9, which aligned with the observations by glider, indicating a deeper MLD (
Fig. 3d) and the appearance of HSW (
Fig. 3b) during this period eddies in the upper ocean can be influenced by typhoons and may not fully recover in the short term, as noted in previous studies (
Sun et al., 2009;
Hu et al., 2012;
Hsu et al., 2018;
Zhang et al., 2023). The variations in SLA and geostrophic currents (
Fig. 7), coupled with the increase of total relative vorticity and the decrease of SLA east of the Luzon Strait (blue box in
Fig. 7a;
Figs 8d and
e), suggested that CE was strengthened while AE was weakened after the typhoon. The rise of the pycnocline following the typhoon, as observed from the Argo dataset, might be partially attributed to the weakening of AE (
Fig. 6). These changes in the eddies also resulted in a reduction in the velocity of the Kuroshio current. As the Kuroshio flows northward through the Luzon Strait, the
β effect and potential vorticity conservation cause it to bend lead clockwise (anti-cyclonic), promoting Kuroshio intrusion. The decrease in Kuroshio velocity renders its main axis more susceptible to this clockwise bending, further facilitating Kuroshio intrusion (
Yaremchuk and Qu, 2004;
Nan et al., 2015;
Gao et al., 2022).