收藏切换
Effects of phytase and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol supplementation in broilers fed calcium-phosphorous deficient diets, with or without Eimeria challenge, on growth performance, body composition, bone development, and gut health
收藏切换
PDF
Hanyi Shi, Venkata S.R. Choppa, Deependra Paneru, Woo K. Kim*
Animal Nutrition | 2024, 19(1) : 411 - 428
Less
收藏切换
Animal Nutrition | 2024, 19(1): 411-428
Original Research Article
Effects of phytase and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol supplementation in broilers fed calcium-phosphorous deficient diets, with or without Eimeria challenge, on growth performance, body composition, bone development, and gut health
Full
Hanyi Shi, Venkata S.R. Choppa, Deependra Paneru, Woo K. Kim*
Affiliations
  • Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
Published: 2024-12-10 doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.07.006
Outline
收藏切换

The study evaluated the effects of nutritional strategies on broilers challenged with Eimeria from d 14 to 26. A total of 840 Cobb male broilers were fed five diets in a 2 × 5 factorial arrangement: 1) nutrient adequate diet (PC; 0.84% calcium [Ca], 0.42% available phosphorus [avP]); 2) Ca-P deficient diet (NC; 0.64% Ca, 0.22% avP); 3) NC + 1500 FTU/kg phytase of diet (NC + PHY); 4) NC + 5000 IU/kg 25-hydroxycholecalciferol of diet (NC + 25OHD); and 5) NC with both supplements (NC + PHY + 25OHD), with and without Eimeria challenge. All treatments had six replicate cages with 14 birds per cage. At 5 days post inoculation (DPI), the challenged birds exhibited higher serum fluorescein isothiocyanate-d (FITC-d) levels than the unchallenged birds (P < 0.001). The NC + PHY and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups exhibited lower FITC-d levels compared to the NC + 25OHD group (P = 0.012). Significant interaction effects between Eimeria challenge and dietary treatments were observed on various parameters. During 0 to 6 and 0 to 12 DPI, Eimeria challenge resulted in decreased the body weight gain (BWG) (P < 0.05) but had a negative effect on the feed conversion ratio (FCR) in birds compared to the unchallenged group (P < 0.05). Reducing Ca and avP levels in the diet (NC) did not adversely affect BWG, but negatively impacted FCR, bone ash weight, ash concentration, and femur bone microstructure parameters (P < 0.05). On 12 DPI, Eimeria challenge led to decreased tibia bone weight, bone volume, fat-free bone weight (FFBW), and ash weight of birds (P < 0.05). Supplementation with phytase alone or in combination with 25OHD improved growth performance, gut permeability, bone ash and bone microstructure parameters in birds (P < 0.05). However, the group fed 25OHD alone showed enhancements on growth performance, mineral apposition rate (MAR), bone ash concentration and ash percentage of the birds (P < 0.05). In conclusion, lowering Ca and avP levels in the diet negatively affected FCR and bone development but did not affect intestinal integrity in broilers. Dietary supplementation of phytase, 25OHD, or phytase in combination of 25OHD could enhance the growth performance and bone quality of broilers infected with Eimeria. Notably, the benefits of phytase supplementation were generally more pronounced than those associated with 25OHD supplementation; however, the combination of phytase and 25OHD could induce optimum effects.

Phytase  /  25-Hydroxycholecalciferol  /  Broiler  /  Coccidiosis  /  Bone development  /  Gut health
Hanyi Shi, Venkata S.R. Choppa, Deependra Paneru, Woo K. Kim. Effects of phytase and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol supplementation in broilers fed calcium-phosphorous deficient diets, with or without Eimeria challenge, on growth performance, body composition, bone development, and gut health[J]. Animal Nutrition, 2024 , 19 (1) : 411 -428 . DOI: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.07.006
Numerous strategies and additives are utilized to optimize performance, sustain animal health and welfare, all while managing costs effectively. However, the poultry industry has undergone significant changes, especially in response to the prohibition of antibiotic use (Powers and Angel, 2008). Coccidiosis stands out as a significant concern in poultry, leading to an estimated annual global economic loss of up to $14 billion (Blake et al., 2020). The disease is caused by protozoan parasites of the genus Eimeria (Fatoba and Adeleke, 2018). By targeting the intestinal tract of broiler chickens, Eimeria causes gastrointestinal damage, which can profoundly compromise gut integrity, impact nutrition digestion and absorption, and enhance inflammation, immune response, and oxidative stress, leading to inhibited growth performance and decreased overall flock health (Choi and Kim, 2022; Lopes et al., 2023; Sharma et al., 2024). Although the poultry industry has attained success in controlling coccidiosis by good management, anticoccidials and vaccination, emerging concerns revolve around the potential development of resistance among Eimeria species to anticoccidials as well as identified gaps in vaccination protocols, coupled with constraints on antibiotic use (Chapman and Jeffers, 2014; Chapman, 2018). These concerns are driving continued research endeavors and the adoption of alternative strategies to improve coccidiosis control in the poultry industry.
The predominant form of phosphorus (P) in a typical corn-soybean meal diet is phytate (Bedford, 2000). However, phytate P is largely indigestible to poultry due to limited phytase activity in the chicken gastrointestinal tract (Humer et al., 2015). This inefficiency in hydrolyzing dietary phytate P into inorganic phosphate results in substantial P excretion in manure, contributing to P wastage and environmental pollution (Humer et al., 2015). Furthermore, as a polyanionic molecule, phytate can chelate positively charged cations, with a particular affinity for calcium (Ca), iron, and zinc. Numerous studies have highlighted the potential benefits of incorporating exogenous phytase into poultry diets. By adding phytase, inorganic phosphate can be released from phytate, enhancing P availability, and subsequently reducing P excretion (Woyengo and Nyachoti, 2013; Wang et al., 2021). Beyond its impact on P utilization, phytase also plays a vital role in releasing other nutrients bound by phytic P. This includes improvements in the digestibility and retention of protein (Cowieson et al., 2006), amino acids (Cowieson et al., 2017), and Ca (Bedford and Rousseau, 2017). Furthermore, phytase has been shown to markedly enhance the availability of various trace minerals such as zinc, iron, magnesium, and copper (Lönnerdal, 2002; Rimbach et al., 2008; Moss et al., 2018). The utilization of phytase in poultry nutrition not only addresses P management but also contributes to overall nutrient efficiency and environmental sustainability. Currently, it is reported that about 90% of poultry and about 70% of pig diets include exogenous phytase (MarketsandMarkets, 2019).
Vitamin D, a fat-soluble nutrient, has long been recognized for its crucial role in preventing or treating rickets (Dittmer and Thompson, 2011). In both birds and mammals, vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) is the exclusive form of vitamin D synthesized through the conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol (provitamin D) in the skin exposed to ultraviolet irradiation (Fraser, 1980). Alternatively, it can be obtained through dietary sources and absorbed in the intestine (Świątkiewicz et al., 2017). In its initial form, cholecalciferol is biologically inactive in animal organisms. To become active, it undergoes a sequential process of hydroxylation, first transforming into 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25OHD) in the liver and then further converting to 1,25-dihydroxcholecalciferol [1,25(OH)2D3] in the kidney (DeLuca, 2004). Vitamin D3 is essential for promoting Ca absorption in the intestine and maintaining proper serum Ca and P levels, which are crucial for normal bone function. Additionally, it plays a key role in bone growth and remodeling (Ross et al., 2013). Supplementation of vitamin D3 and its metabolites in broiler diets has been shown to enhance growth performance (Han et al., 2017), increase maximum bone breaking strength and bone mineral content (Kim et al., 2011; Kheiri and Landy, 2019; Leyva-Jimenez et al., 2019b), and lower occurrence of bone pathologies, such as tibial dyschondroplasia (Khan et al., 2010), especially when Ca and P levels in diet are unbalanced (Zhang et al., 2020). Traditionally, the poultry industry has relied on vitamin D3 as a primary source of vitamin D. However, since 2006, 25OHD has been approved and extensively utilized as an alternative vitamin D source in poultry farming (Adhikari et al., 2020). Dietary 25OHD has demonstrated greater effectiveness than vitamin D3 in enhancing the overall performance of broilers (Yarger et al., 1995). Its use as a replacement or supplement to vitamin D3 proves effective in promoting performance, improving bone mineralization (Leyva-Jimenez et al., 2019a), and modifying avian immunity (Chou et al., 2009).
While previous studies have examined the effects of phytase and 25OHD separately, their combined impact on broilers fed a diet low in Ca and P while challenged with coccidiosis remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of phytase and 25OHD supplementation in broilers fed a Ca and P deficient diet under Eimeria challenge. The hypothesis of this research was that the dietary inclusion of phytase in combination of 25OHD could mitigate the adverse effects of coccidiosis, leading to positive interactions in terms of performance and overall health of broilers.
The study received approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Georgia (A2021 12–012), and was conducted at the Poultry Research Center of the University of Georgia.
A total of 840 male Cobb 500 broilers at 14 days of age were assigned to 10 treatments using a completely randomized design. These treatments were arranged in a 2 × 5 factorial design, with six replicated pens per treatment and 14 birds per pen. The main factors were Eimeria challenge and dietary treatments. The study lasted for 26 days, during which the chickens were housed in battery cages with free access to feed and water. The environmental conditions, including temperature and lighting, were managed according to the Cobb Broiler Management Guide (Cobb, 2021).
All birds received the same starter diet from d 0 to 13. From d 14 onwards, the birds were fed one of five experimental grower diets: 1) a positive control with a standard diet (PC; 0.84% Ca and 0.42% available phosphorus [avP]); 2) a negative control with a low Ca and P diet (NC; 0.64% Ca and 0.22% avP); 3) NC + 1500 FTU/kg of phytase (NC + PHY; Quantum Blue, AB Vista, Marlborough, UK); 4) NC + 5000 IU/kg of 25OHD (NC + 25OHD; BioD, Huvepharma, Sofia, Bulgaria); and 5) NC + 1500 FTU/kg of phytase + 5000 IU/kg of 25OHD (NC + PHY + 25OHD). The diets, which were primarily based on corn and soybean meal, were formulated to meet, or exceed the nutritional requirements of broilers for all nutrients, except for Ca and avP, as detailed in Table 1. Feed samples were sent to the Feed and Environmental Water Laboratory (Athens, GA, USA) to measure total Ca, total P (ICP-OES method, method 968.08; AOAC, 1996), crude fiber (Ankom 200, method 962.09; AOAC, 2005), and total N (Combustion technique, method 993.13; AOAC, 1996). The crude protein was calculated by total N × 6.25. The 25OHD concentrations were measured via LC-MS/MS method (Certificate Number 3969.01; ISO/IEC 17025:2017; Heartland Assays, Ames, LA, USA). On d 14, birds in the challenged groups were orally inoculated with a solution containing distilled water and 12,500 sporulated Eimeria maxima, 12,500 sporulated Eimeria tenella, and 62,500 sporulated Eimeria acervulina oocysts suspended in 1 mL amount. The challenge dose was established based on a prior study conducted in our lab, aiming to induce a mild coccidiosis infection (Teng et al., 2020). Birds in the unchallenged and Eimeria-challenged groups were housed in separate batteries within the same environmentally controlled room to prevent cross-contamination.
Body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were measured on d 14, 20, and 26 by weighing the birds and feed in each pen. Daily FI from d 14 to 26 (0 to 12 DPI) was also measured. Daily mortality was recorded and used for the calculation of corrected FCR. On 6 DPI (d 20), six birds from each pen were humanely euthanized through cervical dislocation for sample collection. Additionally, on 12 DPI (d 26), another four birds per pen were euthanized to collect further samples.
On 5 DPI (d 19), one bird per cage (six birds/treatment) was inoculated with 1 mL of a fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran (FITC-d; Sigma–Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) solution (2.2 mg/mL) to assess gut permeability, as described by Castro et al. (2020). Blood was collected and centrifuged to extract serum 2 h-post oral gavage. The serum concentration of FITC-d was measured using a microplate reader (Spectramax M5, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA), following the method outlined by Teng et al. (2020). On 6 DPI (d 20), intestinal lesion scores for E. maxima, E. tenella, and E. acervulina was conducted at the duodenum, jejunum, and ceca, which was according to Johnson and Reid (1970) and Choi et al. (2023).
The calcein injection method was used to measure MAR for bone formation. Calcein, a fluorescent dye, binds to newly mineralized bone and serves as a marker for mineral apposition, indicating the rate of bone formation between two calcein injection gaps (Chen et al., 2020; Sharma et al., 2023). One bird from each pen was injected with 20 mg/kg of calcein solution intraperitoneally (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) based on body weight on 4 DPI (d 18). On 8 DPI (d 22), the same birds received a second injection following the earlier protocol, and on 12 DPI (d 26), the right tibias of the injected birds were collected, cleared of all attached tissues, and preserved in 70% ethanol. For analysis, a 0.5 mm bone section was cut from the mid-diaphysis using a circular saw (Ryobi, Anderson, SC, USA). These sections were then observed under a compound microscope (BZ-X810, Keyence Corp., Itasca, IL, USA), and images were captured using a BZ-X810 All-in-one Fluorescence Microscope (Keyence Inc., Itasca, IL, USA). The MAR was determined by measuring the distance between two calcein labels using the BZ-X800 Analyzer (Keyence Corp., Itasca, IL, USA).
Bone ash was described by the methodologies by Zhang and Coon (1997) and Kim et al. (2004). Right tibias were collected from 2 birds per pen on both 6 DPI (d 20) and 12 DPI (d 26). The initial weight of tibia bones was measured after removing adhering muscles. The bone volume was measured by immersing the bones in water and weighing them, assuming a water specific gravity of 1 g/cm3 at room temperature. The bones were then dried for 24 h and subjected to a Soxhlet apparatus using hexane (Fisher Scientific International Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) to extract fat for 48 h. After fat removal, the bones were re-dried for another 24 h and re-weighed to obtain the fat-free bone weight (FFBW). The ash weight was determined by incinerating the fat-free bones in a furnace (600℃) overnight. The ash concentration and ash percentage were then calculated using the following formulas:
$\text { Ash concentration }\left(\mathrm{g} / \mathrm{cm}^{3}\right)=\text { ash weight }(\mathrm{g}) / \text { bone volume }\left(\mathrm{cm}^{3}\right) \text {; }$
$\text { Ash percentage }(\%)=100 \times \text { ash weight }(\mathrm{g}) / \mathrm{FFBW}(\mathrm{~g}) \text {. }$
At 6 DPI (d 20) and 12 DPI (d 26), the right femurs were collected from one bird per pen and scaned using the Skyscan 1275 X-ray Microtomograph (micro-CT; Bruker MicroCT, Billerica, MA, USA). The scanning protocol was based on the methodology described by Chen and Kim (2020), with the X-ray source at 70 kV, 142 μA for 6 DPI (d 20) and 80 kV, 125 μA for 12 DPI (d 26), using a 0.5-mm aluminum filter to reduce beam-hardening effects. The pixel size remained constant at 25 μm. Scanning was conducted over a 180° rotation with a rotation angle of 0.4°, and four images were captured per rotation. Images were reconstructed into 3D using N-Recon (Bruker MicroCT, Billerica, MA, USA), aligned to a vertical position using Data Viewer (Bruker MicroCT, Billerica, MA, USA), and transferred to CTAn program (Bruker MicroCT, Billerica, MA, USA) to select volume of interest (VOI). Bone mineral density (BMD) calibration was performed using two phantoms made from calcium hydroxyapatite with the densities of 0.25 and 0.75 g/cm3.
Morphometric analysis was focused on the metaphyseal region of bones, covering a total of 200 slides (5 mm). Subsequently, the 3D model underwent customized processing to separate the trabecular bone from the cortical bone, following the methodology of Chen and Kim (2020). Various parameters were analyzed and outlined in Table 2, adhering to the definitions provided by White et al. (2023) and Sharma et al. (2023). The bone mineral content (BMC; mg) was calculated by BMD (g/cm3) times tissue volume (TV; mm3).
Bird body composition was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). On 6 DPI (d 20) and 12 DPI (d 26), two randomly chosen birds from each pen were euthanized and scanned by a DEXA scanner (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with a small animal module by encore software (Lunar Prodigy from GE, version 12.20.023). BMD, BMC, total body fat, and muscle of the birds were calculated according to Castrol et al. (2019). Two birds were selected from each pen and considered as an experimental unit.
After collecting the junctions between jejunum and ileum, they were cleansed of digesta with 1× phosphate-buffered saline solution, then snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80℃ for subsequent analysis. Homogenization of the samples was performed using QiAzol lysis reagent (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and a bead beater (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, OK, USA), followed by total RNA extraction as per the manufacturer's instructions. The purity and concentration of RNA were determined using a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA concentrations were normalized, and cDNA synthesis was conducted using a high-capacity cDNA synthesis kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out on a Step One thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using SYBR Green on Master mix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) to quantify mRNA expression. The PCR conditions were set as follows: 95℃ for 10 min, followed by 95℃ for 15 s, annealing temperature for 20 s, and 72℃ for 15 s for 40 cycles, as established in our previous study (Tompkins et al., 2023a). Duplicate samples were processed and target gene expression was measured using the 2-△△Ct method, in accordance with the guidelines provided by Livak and Schmittgen (2001). The mean ΔCt of each marker gene from the control group was used to calculate the ΔΔCt value. The expression levels in the treatment groups were expressed as fold changes. Primer sequences for both housekeeping and target genes are listed in Table 3.
The experimental data are presented as the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) and were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with a general linear model (GLM) in SAS Studio (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The data were subjected to two-way ANOVA to obtain results for each factor (dietary treatments and Eimeria challenge) as well as their interactions. In the case of significant differences, the treatments were compared using Tukey's test. The level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05. The mathematical model is listed below:
$y_{i j}=\mu+\alpha_{i}+\beta_{j}+(\alpha \beta)_{i j}+\epsilon_{i j k}$
where μ is the grand mean, αi is the effect of Eimeria challenge, βj is the dietary treatment, (αβ)ij is the effect due to any interaction between the Eimeria challenge and the dietary treatment, and ɛijk is the random error.
The results of growth performance are presented in Table 4. The BWG showed a decrease in Eimeria-challenged groups compared to unchallenged groups (P < 0.001). In addition, an interaction effect of Eimeria challenge and diets was observed on BWG (P = 0.027) during 0 to 6 DPI (d 14 to 20). In unchallenged groups, the NC and NC + PHY+25OHD groups exhibited significantly lower BWG compared to the PC group (P = 0.027). However, in Eimeria-challenged groups, no significant difference was found on BWG between the NC and PC birds (P > 0.05), whereas the NC + PHY+25OHD group had higher BWG than the PC group (P = 0.027).
Eimeria challenge significantly suppressed FI, BWG and FCR of chickens (P < 0.05). During 0 to 6 DPI (d 14 to 20), Eimeria-challenged birds experienced decreased FI (P < 0.001) and increased FCR (P = 0.001) compared to non-challenged birds. In the 7 to 12 DPI (d 21 to 26) period, Eimeria-challenged birds had a higher FCR (P = 0.037). Over the entire period (0 to 12 DPI; d 14 to 26), Eimeria-challenged birds exhibited lower BWG and FI, as well as higher FCR (P < 0.05).
Furthermore, dietary treatments significantly influenced the growth performance of chickens. During 0 to 6 DPI (d 14 to 20), no significant difference was observed between the NC and PC groups on FCR (P > 0.05). However, the birds in the NC + 25OHD group displayed an elevated FCR compared to the NC + PHY group (1.48 vs. 1.40; P = 0.034). During 7 to 12 DPI (d 21 to 26), no significant difference on BWG was found between the NC and PC groups (P > 0.05), whereas the NC + PHY + 25OHD group had increased BWG (P = 0.009) compared to the NC group. For FCR, the birds in the NC group showed an increased FCR compared to the PC group (P < 0.001). During the entire period (0 to 12 DPI; d 14 to 26), no significant difference was observed between the NC and PC groups on BWG (P > 0.05), but the birds in the NC + PHY + 25OHD group showed higher BWG than the NC group (957 vs. 893 g; P = 0.007). For FCR, the birds in the NC group displayed an increased FCR compared to the PC group (P < 0.001).
Daily FI results are presented in Table 5. An interaction effect of Eimeria challenge and diets was observed only on 2 DPI (d 16; P = 0.005). Eimeria challenge significantly decreased the FI of the PC birds (78.17 vs. 81.37 g) but significantly increased the FI of NC + PHY + 25OHD birds (82.92 vs. 77.92 g; P = 0.005). For the main effect, Eimeria challenge significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the daily FI of birds on 4, 5, 6 and 7 DPI (d 18, 19, 20 and 21), while it significantly increased (P < 0.05) the daily FI of birds on 9 and 12 DPI (d 23 and 26). Additionally, dietary treatments significantly influenced the daily FI of chickens. On 1 DPI (d 15), the birds in the NC and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups showed significantly increased FI compared to birds in the PC group (P = 0.035). On 5 DPI (d 19), no significant difference between the NC and PC groups on FI was observed (P > 0.05), but the NC + 25OHD birds had higher FI than the NC and NC + PHY birds (P = 0.012). Moreover, on 10 DPI (d 24), the birds in the NC group exhibited decreased FI compared to the PC group (P = 0.013). The overall mortality in the current study was 0.36 %, with no difference among different treatments (P > 0.05).
The gut permeability results revealed that Eimeria challenge significantly increased (P < 0.001) the serum FITC-d level of birds on 5 DPI (d 19; Table 6). No significant difference was observed between the NC and PC groups (P > 0.05). However, the NC + 25OHD group exhibited a higher FITC-d level than the NC + PHY and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups (P = 0.012).
No significant interaction between Eimeria challenge and diets was observed on lesion scores of the duodenum, jejunum, or ceca of broilers on 6 DPI (d 20; P > 0.05). However, Eimeria-challenged birds had significantly higher duodenal, jejunal and cecal lesion scores compared to the unchallenged birds (P < 0.05), as shown in Table 6.
The results of MAR are presented in Table 6. An interaction effect between Eimeria challenge and diets was observed (P = 0.019). Eimeria challenge significantly decreased the MAR of the PC and NC + 25OHD birds (P = 0.019). In both unchallenged and Eimeria-challenged groups, reducing the levels of Ca and avP in the diet (NC groups) significantly decreased the MAR compared to the PC (unchallenged: 267.77 vs. 438.63 μm; Eimeria challenge: 174.74 vs. 297.68 μm; P < 0.001). However, the supplementation of phytase, 25OHD, or both, increased the MAR of birds to the same levels as the PC groups had (P < 0.001).
The results of bone ash parameters are detailed in Tables 7 and 8. On 6 DPI (d 20), no interaction effect between Eimeria challenge and diets was observed regarding bone ash parameters (P > 0.05; Table 7). For FFBW, no significant difference was found between the NC and PC groups (P > 0.05), whereas the NC + 25OHD group exhibited a lower FFBW compared to the NC + PHY group (P = 0.004). Additionally, birds in the NC group had significantly reduced ash weight and ash concentration compared to the PC birds; however, supplementing with phytase, or a combination of phytase and 25OHD to the NC diet improved ash weight and ash concentration to the levels equivalent to the PC group had (P < 0.05). For ash percentage, the birds in the NC group displayed significantly lower ash percentage compared to the birds in the PC group (43.67% vs. 48.10%; P < 0.001). Nonetheless, supplementing with phytase or 25OHD was effective in improving the ash percentage of birds. Moreover, when supplementing phytase and 25OHD together, the ash percentage of birds was elevated to the same level as PC birds (P < 0.001). Notably, Eimeria challenge did not show any impact on bone ash parameters on 6 DPI (d 20; P > 0.05).
On 12 DPI (d 26), an interaction effect between Eimeria challenge and diets was observed on ash percentage (Table 8; P = 0.024). Eimeria challenge significantly compromised the ash percentage of the PC and NC + 25OHD birds (P = 0.024). In both unchallenged and Eimeria-challenged groups, reducing the levels of Ca and avP in the diet (NC groups) significantly decreased the ash percentage of birds compared to the PC (unchallenged: 45.72% vs. 52.10%; Eimeria challenge: 46.66% vs. 50.88%; P < 0.001); however, supplementing with phytase, 25OHD, or both was able to improve the ash percentage of birds (P < 0.001). Importantly, phytase or a combination of phytase and 25OHD showed better improvement than 25OHD alone, achieving the same ash percentage (NC + PHY group) as the PC group had or higher levels (NC + PHY + 25OHD group) than the PC group (P < 0.001).
Eimeria challenge significantly suppressed bone ash parameters in chickens on 12 DPI (d 26; Table 8; P < 0.05). Eimeria-challenged birds experienced significantly decreased initial bone weight (13.91 vs. 14.95 g; P < 0.001), bone volume (11.69 vs. 12.53 cm3; P < 0.001), FFBW (4.96 vs. 5.37 g; P < 0.001), ash weight (2.47 vs. 2.70 g; P < 0.001), and ash percentage (49.59% vs. 50.20%; P = 0.013). In addition, dietary treatments significantly influenced the FFBW, ash weight, and ash concentration of chickens on 12 DPI (d 26; P < 0.05; Table 8). Reducing Ca and avP in the diet (NC group) significantly decreased the FFBW, ash weight, ash percentage, and ash concentration of birds compared to the PC (P < 0.05); however, supplementing with phytase or a combination of phytase and 25OHD was able to improve the FFBW, ash weight, ash percentage, and ash concentration to the same level as the PC group had (P < 0.05). In addition, 25OHD alone significantly increased ash concentration compared to the NC group (P < 0.001).
The impact of Eimeria challenge and dietary factors on microstructure changes within the total VOI of the femur on 6 DPI (d 20) and 12 DPI ( d 26) is shown in Tables 9 and 10. On 6 DPI (d 20), interaction effects between Eimeria challenge and diets were observed for bone surface/bone volume (BS/BV; P = 0.023) and BMD (P = 0.038; Table 9). In terms of BS/BV, Eimeria challenge led to a significant decrease in BS/BV for birds in the NC and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups, whereas it increased BS/BV for birds in the NC + PHY group (P = 0.023). Among the unchallenged groups, both NC and NC + 25OHD groups exhibited significantly higher BS/BV ratios compared to PC birds (P = 0.023). However, in Eimeria-challenged groups, no significant difference in BS/BV between the NC and PC groups was observed (P > 0.05). Interestingly, supplementing phytase to the NC diet in Eimeria-challenged birds resulted in a higher BS/BV ratio compared to the PC group (14.54 vs. 11.97 mm−1; P = 0.023). Regarding BMD, Eimeria challenge led to a significant decrease in BMD for birds in the PC and NC + 25OHD groups (P = 0.038). In unchallenged groups, the NC group showed a significantly lower BMD compared to PC birds (0.191 vs. 0.263 g/cm3; P = 0.038). However, supplementation with phytase (NC + PHY), 25OHD (NC + 25OHD), or both (NC + PHY + 25OHD) improved the BMD of birds in unchallenged groups (P = 0.038). Notably, the NC + 25OHD and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups achieved BMD levels similar to the PC group (P = 0.038). In Eimeria-challenged groups, no significant difference in BMD between the NC and PC groups was observed (P > 0.05). Nevertheless, supplementing with a combination of phytase and 25OHD to the NC diet (NC + PHY + 25OHD) in Eimeria-challenged groups resulted in higher BMD compared to the PC group (0.259 vs. 0.227 g/cm3; P = 0.038).
Additionally, Eimeria challenge exhibited a significant reduction only in bone volume as a fraction of tissue volume (BV/TV; 32.06% vs. 34.67%; P = 0.037) on 6 DPI (d 20). The dietary treatments had significant influence on bone volume (BV), BV/TV, BMD, and BMC in the microstructure of femurs on 6 DPI (d 20; Table 9; P < 0.05). Among the dietary groups, the NC birds displayed significantly lower BV, BV/TV, BMD, and BMC compared to PC birds (P < 0.05). However, supplementation with phytase alone (NC + PHY) or a combination of phytase and 25OHD (NC + PHY + 25OHD) resulted in increased levels of BV, BV/TV, BMD, and BMC, aligning closely with the values observed in the PC group (P < 0.05).
On 12 DPI (d 26), no significant interaction was noted between Eimeria challenge and diets concerning femoral microstructural architecture, as indicated in Table 10. The Eimeria challenge, however, had a significant suppressive effect on tissue volume (TV; P = 0.008) and tissue surface (TS) in birds (P = 0.012). Additionally, the dietary treatments exerted an influence on the microstructural architecture parameters of femur bones. Among the dietary groups, the NC birds exhibited significantly lower BV, BV/TV, BMD, and BMC compared to PC birds (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, supplementation with phytase alone (NC + PHY) or a combination of phytase and 25OHD (NC + PHY + 25OHD) led to increased levels of BV, BV/TV, BMD, and BMC, to similar levels of the values observed in the PC group (P < 0.05).
The effects of Eimeria challenge and diets on femoral microstructural architectural changes of the trabecular bone are shown in Tables 11 and 12. On 6 DPI (d 20), significant interaction effects between Eimeria challenge and diets were observed on BMD (P = 0.028) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp; P = 0.027; Table 11). Regarding BMD, the Eimeria-challenged PC and Eimeria-challenged NC groups exhibited lower BMD compared to the unchallenged NC + 25OHD and Eimeria-challenged NC + PHY + 25OHD groups (P = 0.028). In terms of Tb.Sp, Eimeria challenge increased Tb.Sp in the NC and NC + 25OHD groups (P = 0.027). No significant difference was found among unchallenged groups (P > 0.05). However, in Eimeria-challenged groups, the NC + PHY and NC + PHY + 25OHD birds showed lower Tb.Sp values compared to other Eimeria-challenged groups (P = 0.027).
Furthermore, the Eimeria challenge exhibited a significant increase in trabecular pattern factor (Tb.Pf; 16.02 vs. 14.83 mm−1; P = 0.044) on 6 DPI (d 20; Table 11). The dietary treatments had a significant influence on the structure model index (SMI) in the femoral microstructural architectural of trabecular bones on 6 DPI (d 20; P = 0.015; Table 11). Among the dietary groups, the NC birds displayed a significantly higher SMI compared to PC birds (2.58 vs. 2.44; P = 0.015). However, supplementation with a combination of phytase and 25OHD (NC + PHY+25OHD) resulted in a decreased SMI to a level similar to that of the PC group (P = 0.015).
On 12 DPI (d 26), no significant interaction was noted between Eimeria challenge and diets concerning femoral microstructural architecture, as detailed in Table 12. However, the Eimeria challenge exhibited a significant decrease on TV of birds (215.81 vs. 231.77 mm3; P = 0.049) on 12 DPI (d 26). Additionally, the dietary treatments exerted impact on the microstructural architecture parameters of femur bones on 12 DPI (d 26). Birds fed with a reduced Ca and avP diet (NC) displayed lower BMD compared to PC birds (0.080 vs. 0.117 g/cm3; P = 0.002), whereas supplementing phytase, or 25OHD, or both, improved BMD to same level as the PC group (P = 0.002). No significant difference was found between the NC and PC groups in trabecular thickness (Tb.Th; P > 0.05), but birds in the NC + PHY + 25OHD group showed higher Tb.Th than the birds from other groups (P = 0.002). The NC + PHY and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups showed significantly decreased Tb.Pf and SMI values compared to the NC and NC + 25OHD groups on 12 DPI (d 26; P < 0.05).
The impact of Eimeria challenge and dietary variations on femoral microstructure changes of the cortical bone is detailed in Tables 13 and 14. On 6 DPI (d 20), an interaction effect between Eimeria challenge and diets was observed regarding bone surface (BS; P = 0.009; Table 13). The unchallenged NC, Eimeria-challenged NC, and Eimeria-challenged NC + 25OHD groups exhibited lower BS compared to the unchallenged PC, unchallenged NC + PHY + 25OHD, and Eimeria-challenged NC + PHY + 25OHD groups (P < 0.05).
While no significant effect was observed from Eimeria challenge on the cortical bone microstructure on 6 DPI (d 20), the dietary treatments exhibited significant influence on TV, BV, BMC, volume of closed pores (Po.V(cl)), and surface of closed pores (Po.S(cl)) in the femoral microstructure of cortical bones on 6 DPI (d 20; P < 0.05; Table 13). Among the dietary groups, the NC birds displayed significantly decreased TV, BV, BMC, Po.V(cl), and Po.S(cl) compared to PC birds (P < 0.05). However, supplementation with phytase alone (NC + PHY), or a combination of phytase and 25OHD (NC + PHY + 25OHD) increased these parameters to values similar to those of the PC birds (P < 0.05).
On 12 DPI (d 26), no significant interaction was noted between Eimeria challenge and diets concerning femoral microstructure of cortical bones, as detailed in Table 14. However, the Eimeria challenge exhibited a significant decrease on TS of birds (456.91 vs. 475.16 mm2; P = 0.024) on 12 DPI (d 26). Additionally, the dietary treatments exerted impact on cortical bone parameters on 12 DPI (d 26). Birds fed with a reduced Ca and avP diet (NC) displayed lower TV, BV, BMC, Po.V(cl), Po.S(cl), and closed porosity percentage (Po(cl)) compared to PC birds (Table 14; P < 0.05), while supplementing phytase alone (NC + PHY) or a combination of phytase and 25OHD (NC + PHY + 25OHD) improved TV, BV, BMC, Po.V(cl), Po.S(cl), and Po(cl) to the same level as the PC group (P < 0.05). The birds in the NC + 25OHD group showed a decreased number of closed pores (Po.N(cl)) compared to the PC group (910 vs. 1153; P = 0.028).
The results of body composition are summarized in Tables 15 and 16. On 6 DPI (d 20), there was no significant interaction between Eimeria challenge and diets regarding broiler body composition, as detailed in Table 15. However, the Eimeria challenge resulted in a significant decrease in bone area (64.82 vs. 68.5 cm2; P = 0.045), fat percentage (11.93% vs. 12.85%; P = 0.041), total tissue (738.51 vs. 769.01 g; P = 0.040), and fat mass (88.38 vs. 99.09 g; P = 0.014) on 6 DPI (d 20). Additionally, the dietary treatments had an impact on body composition parameters on 6 DPI (d 20). Birds fed with a reduced Ca and avP diet (NC) exhibited lower BMD, BMC, and bone area compared to PC birds (P < 0.05; Table 15), whereas supplementing phytase alone (NC + PHY) or a combination of phytase and 25OHD (NC + PHY + 25OHD), but not supplementing 25OHD alone, improved BMD, BMC, and bone area to the same level as the PC group (P < 0.05).
On 12 DPI (d 26), an interaction effect between Eimeria challenge and diets was observed concerning fat percentage (P = 0.036; Table 16). The Eimeria challenge led to a decrease in fat percentage for the NC + PHY group birds (12.40% vs. 15.42%; P = 0.036). No significant difference in fat percentage was observed among the unchallenged groups (P > 0.05). However, in the Eimeria-challenged groups, the NC, NC + PHY, and NC + PHY + 25OHD groups showed significantly reduced fat percentage compared to the Eimeria-challenged PC group (P = 0.036). Additionally, Eimeria challenge and diets demonstrated main effects on 12 DPI (d 26). Eimeria-challenged broilers exhibited decreased BMD compared to unchallenged birds (0.145 vs. 0.15 g/cm2; P = 0.015). Like 6 DPI (d 20), on 12 DPI (d 26), birds fed with a reduced Ca and avP diet (NC) displayed lower BMD, BMC and bone area compared to PC birds (Table 16), whereas supplementing phytase alone (NC + PHY) or a combination of phytase and 25OHD (NC + PHY + 25OHD), but not supplementing 25OHD alone, improved BMD, BMC, and bone area to the same level as the PC group (P < 0.05).
The results of gene expression of duodenal-jejunal tight junction proteins on 6 DPI (d 20) are summarized in Table 17. Interaction effects between Eimeria challenge and diets were observed in junctional adhesion molecule 2 (JAM2; P = 0.020) and occludin (OCLN; P = 0.050). For JAM2 gene expression, Eimeria challenge upregulated the mRNA expression of JAM2 for the PC and NC + PHY groups (P = 0.020). There was no significant difference on JAM2 mRNA expression among unchallenged groups (P > 0.05). However, in Eimeria-challenged groups, the NC and NC + PHY+25OHD groups showed downregulated expression of JAM2 mRNA compared to the Eimeria-challenged PC group (P = 0.020). For OCLN mRNA expression, Eimeria challenge downregulated the mRNA expression of OCLN for the NC + PHY and NC + 25OHD groups (P = 0.050). In unchallenged groups, the NC + 25OHD group showed an upregulated mRNA expression of OCLN compared to the NC group (1.19-fold vs. 0.89-fold; P = 0.050). However, no significant difference on OCLN mRNA expression among Eimeria-challenged groups was observed (P > 0.05).
Additionally, Eimeria challenge and diets demonstrated main effects on 6 DPI (d 20). Eimeria-challenged birds showed an upregulated mRNA expression of claudin 1 (CLDN1; 2.05-fold vs. 1.1-fold; P < 0.001) and JAM2 (1.89-fold vs. 1.44-fold; P = 0.050), and a downregulated expression of OCLN (0.77-fold vs. 1.03-fold; P < 0.001) and mucin 2 (MUC2; 0.7-fold vs. 0.99-fold; P < 0.001). Birds in the NC + PHY group showed upregulated expression of MUC2 compared to the NC and NC + 25OHD groups (P = 0.003).
In commercial production, enhancing the utilization of P in feed proves to be an effective way for mitigating P pollution. Extensive research has investigated the impact of phytase or 25OHD supplementation in chickens. However, 25OHD used together with phytase in Eimeria-challenged broilers has not been previously reported. The findings from the current study reaffirm the detrimental effects of coccidiosis on broilers and offer insights into how supplementing phytase and 25OHD in a Ca/P-reduced diet, either individually or in combination, influences the growth performance, gut integrity, bone development, and body composition of Eimeria-challenged birds. Coccidiosis decreased BWG and FI from 0 to 6 DPI and 0 to 12 DPI. It also increased the FCR of birds from 7 to 12 DPI and 0 to 12 DPI. Additionally, it decreased the daily FI of birds from 4 to 7 DPI (acute phase) and started to recover from 8 DPI (recovery phase) as shown in Table 5. Numerous studies have summarized the detrimental impact of Eimeria challenge on the growth performance of broilers, especially in acute phase, due to severe gut damage, impaired nutrient absorption, and a strong immune response diverting resources from growth (Yadav et al., 2020; Choi et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2024; Lopes et al., 2024). In the current study, reducing Ca and avP levels in the diet did not affect the FI or BWG of birds during 0 to 12 DPI, but negatively affected the FCR of birds during 7 to 12 DPI and overall period 0 to 12 DPI. However, supplementing phytase or 25OHD, or both, could alleviate the adverse effects of Ca and P reduction on FCR of birds. Similar results were found in other studies reporting that reducing Ca and P in diet during the grower phase (after d 14 to 28) did not affect the FI or BWG but increased the FCR of birds during d 0 to 28 (Delezie et al., 2015; Dersjant-Li et al., 2018). However, supplementing phytase, or 25OHD, or both improved the FCR to similar level of the PC group in the current study; these findings are align with previous studies on chicken (Angel et al., 2005; Ahmed et al., 2015; Taheri and Mirisakhani, 2020; Yavaş et al., 2020; Kermani et al., 2023) or swine (Li et al., 1998; Zhao et al., 2022). The results of the current study demonstrated that although Ca and avP were reduced in the diet, it appears that there were no detrimental effects associated with these reductions on growth performance during the recovery phase (7 to 12 DPI) and overall period, except the FCR. Notably, birds fed diets supplemented with both phytase and 25OHD showed better BWG or FI compared to the NC birds during 7 to 12 DPI and overall period. In the current study, dietary phytase or combination of phytase and 25OHD reduced the FCR of birds compared to the NC group, suggesting that phytase is the main contributor for reducing the FCR, while combination of phytase and 25OHD had a superposition effect on growth performance.
During the acute phase (0 to 6 DPI), interaction effects were found in BWG in the present study. Reducing Ca and P in the diet (NC) had negative effects on BWG in unchallenged birds but not in Eimeria-challenged birds. But, supplementing phytase or 25OHD alone but not combination improved the BWG of unchallenged birds to same levels of unchallenged PC birds; however, in the Eimeria-challenged groups, the phytase and 25OHD combination group had higher BWG compared to Eimeria-challenged PC group. The results demonstrated that reducing dietary Ca and P levels had more impact in unchallenged birds compared with Eimeria-challenged birds, and supplementation of phytase and 25OHD combination had more benefit effect in Eimeria-challenged birds. This may be attributed to the compromised gut health and integrity caused by Eimeria challenge, evidenced by the elevated levels of FITC-d, heightened intestinal lesion scores, and upregulated gene expression of tight junction proteins (CLDN1 and JAM2 in the present study), leading to reduced absorption and utilization of nutrients, such as Ca and P. The supplementation of the phytase and 25OHD combination may help to mitigate these effects by promoting gut health and improving nutrient absorption efficiency, thereby providing more benefits in Eimeria-challenged birds compared to unchallenged birds.
In this study, we assessed the impact of phytase and 25OHD supplementation on intestinal integrity by evaluating gut permeability, intestinal lesion scores, and mRNA expressions of tight junction proteins. Our results indicated dietary treatments did not affect the intestinal lesion scores of broilers. However, the 25OHD group exhibited an elevated level of FITC-d compared to both the phytase and phytase + 25OHD groups, with most of the increase observed in the Eimeria-challenged 25OHD group (135 ng/mL). Providing a higher level of vitamin D was linked to increased parasite replication and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) damage was reported by a previous study (Sakkas et al., 2019a). In the current study, the gene expression of MUC2 was upregulated in the phytase group compared to the NC or 25OHD alone group, which was also reported by another study where the MUC2 expression was upregulated by 3000 FTU/kg of phytase supplementation to a reduced Ca and P diet (Ajuwon et al., 2020). MUC2, secreted by goblet cells, adheres to the surface of intestinal villi, and serves as the primary physical barrier of the intestine (Kim and Ho, 2010). Stimulating goblet cells to secrete mucin can enhance the protective mucin layer, protecting the intestinal tract against invasion of pathogenic bacteria (Kim and Ho, 2010). In the current study, supplementing phytase in the NC diet might prove beneficial for the proliferation of intestinal goblet cells and the inhibition of bacterial translocation in broilers (Klinsoda et al., 2020; Li et al., 2022). The finding on the expression of MUC2 are consistent with prior research that Eimeria challenge downregulates the expression of MUC2 (Forder et al., 2012; Kitessa et al., 2014). It is plausible that as the intestine health is suppressed, MUC2 expression decreases, potentially slowing the replenishment of the mucus layer.
The current study showed a significant upregulation in the gene expression of CLDN1 and JAM2 due to coccidiosis, which has been reported in other Eimeria challenge studies (Teng et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022). Additionally, interaction effects of Eimeria challenge and dietary treatments were found in JAM2 and OCLN gene expressions. The JAM2 gene expression was upregulated in the challenged PC and NC + PHY groups compared to the unchallenged PC group. However, it was downregulated in the challenged NC + PHY + 25OHD group to the same level as the unchallenged PC group. This result indicates that the combination of phytase and 25OHD in Eimeria-infected birds likely provides a protective effect on the intestinal barrier, reducing the need for the body's emergency response to maintain tight junction integrity. The Eimeria challenge resulted in downregulation of OCLN gene expression in the current study, a finding consistent with reports by Teng et al. (2021) and Leung et al. (2019). This downregulation indicates increased gut permeability, as the tight junction protein OCLN, along with claudins and cadherins, is essential for proper intestinal epithelial barrier function (Al-Sadi et al., 2011). This was further supported by the FITC-d results in this study. Decreased expression of OCLN has been noted in human patients with intestinal permeability disorders, particularly in relation to macromolecules (Al-Sadi et al., 2011). Changes in tight junction proteins can lead to defects in intestinal integrity and barrier dysfunction, aligning with observations of increased gut permeability due to Eimeria challenge.
As expected, our observations showed that coccidiosis compromised the tibial bone ash parameters of broilers at 12 DPI, with Eimeria-challenged birds, exhibiting significantly lower initial bone weight, bone volume, FFBW and bone ash weight compared to unchallenged birds. The bone formation, as indicated by the MAR, was reduced by coccidiosis during 4 to 8 DPI. Furthermore, the bone microstructure was compromised by coccidiosis at both 6 DPI and 12 DPI, as evidenced by decreased total bone BV/TV, TV, TS, trabecular bone TV, and cortical bone TS. Consistent with our findings, Oikeh et al. (2019) noted a decrease in tibia ash content and ash percentage due to Eimeria challenge, with a more pronounced effect observed on 12 DPI compared to 6 DPI. Similarly, other studies have reported a reduction in bone ash by coccidiosis on 6 DPI or/and 12 DPI (Sakkas et al., 2018), as well as a notable decrease in femur microstructure parameters in broilers and pullets (Sharma et al., 2023; Lopes et al., 2024), suggesting that Eimeria challenge suppresses long bone development during the post-infection stage, with affected birds unable to catch up with their unchallenged counterparts even during the recovery phase.
Ca and P are essential for multiple physiological functions in the chicken, including growth performance and skeletal system. When the diet lacks adequate or has imbalanced levels of Ca and P, it can lead to potential issues such as malabsorption of these minerals, hindered bone mineralization and growth, and increased leg problems (Matuszewski et al., 2020). In the current study, decrease on bone ash, MAR, and bone microstructure parameters of broilers due to reduced levels of Ca and avP in the diet was observed. Similarly, previous studies have reported that a reduction in dietary Ca and P levels led to suppressed bone ash parameters compared to birds fed a nutritionally adequate diet, with improvements observed upon supplementation of phytase by d 21 (Shi et al., 2022, 2023). However, a recent study observed no difference in bone ash parameters between the Ca and P-reduced group (NC) and the basal diet group (PC) on both 6 DPI and 9 DPI (Shi et al., 2024). Olukosi and Fru-Nji (2014) reported that reducing the Ca and NPP level, increasing the Ca/NPP ratio, or exclusion of phytase of the diet not only decreased bone ash percentage, but also decreased Ca and P concentration in tibia, therefore, the negative effect on bone ash is potentially extend to a reduction on the Ca and P content in the bone. The inconsistency may arise from the more pronounced reduction in Ca and P levels in this study compared to the previous one, resulting in significant differences between the NC and PC groups in bone ash parameters in the current study.
Interestingly, our investigation revealed that supplementing phytase alone or in combination with 25OHD, but not 25OHD supplementation alone, resulted in improvements in bone microstructure parameters comparable to those of the PC. This suggests that the primary enhancement of bone structural soundness stems from phytase supplementation rather than 25OHD. Ghasemi et al. (2019) reported a similar results that supplementation of 5 μg/kg of 1α–OH–D3 in a reduced Ca and NPP diet did not improve the Ca and P content in tibia. In this study, we observed improved bone ash parameters and bone microstructure, as indicated by tibia FFBW, bone ash weight, bone ash percentage, bone ash concentration, as well as femur BV, BV/TV, BMC, and BMD by feeding treatments. These findings suggest that supplementing phytase at 1500 FTU/kg, either alone or combined with 25OHD, positively influences the mineralization and quality of broiler bones. Similar results have been reported in our previous studies (Shi et al., 2022, 2023, 2024). Notably, the supplementation of 25OHD to the NC diet improved the BWG, and FCR of birds to levels comparable to those of birds fed the PC diet during 7 to 12 DPI and 0 to 12 DPI, as well as improved the MAR during 4 to 8 DPI, but not the bone mineralization or bone microstructure during the post-infection stages in the current study. Birds in the 25OHD group exhibited elevated FITC-d levels compared to other groups, indicating increased gut permeability. Analysis of vitamin D3 levels in each diet showed that the 25OHD group had the highest concentration (5752.6 IU/kg) among the dietary groups. The finding potentially explains the medium effect on bone development with 25OHD supplementation alone, as previous research has indicated that vitamin D3 levels exceeding 5000 IU/kg in the diet may not have a linear effect on tibia bone mineralization in broilers (Sakkas et al., 2019b). Researchers have cautioned against supplementing vitamin D above the maximum level recommended for commercial practice, which is 5000 IU/kg (Whitehead et al., 2004). Whitehead et al. (2024) reported that supplementation with vitamin D was found to enhance bone formation and bone mineralization, though the improvement on bone mineralization was not as effective as phytase. Vitamin D is essential for Ca and P absorption in the intestines and boosts the activity of osteoblasts, the cells responsible for bone formation (Jones et al., 1998; Chen et al., 2020). However, the absence of vitamin D impact on bone microstructure suggests that other factors may also be involved in bone microstructure development. Future research on bone resorption parameters might shed light on this finding because bone remodeling involves both bone formation and resorption, which together influence bone microstructure (Goltzman, 2018). Although vitamin D is important for providing Ca and P for bone mineralization, the process also relies on the availability of these minerals in the diet and bloodstream and the balance between osteoblast and osteoclast activity (Rowe et al., 2018). This may explain the less pronounced effects on bone mineralization observed in the group fed the diet supplemented with vitamin D.
Body composition is a critical parameter in broiler production, closely associated with both meat yield and meat quality (Choi et al., 2023). Eimeria challenge resulted in reduced bone area, fat percentage, total tissue, and fat mass of broilers on 6 DPI, along with a decrease in BMD on 12 DPI in this study. These findings align with previous studies on Eimeria challenge (Fetterer et al., 2013; Sharma et al., 2022), indicating the detrimental effect of coccidiosis on broilers. Furthermore, the body composition outcomes from dietary effect mirrored those observed for bone ash and bone microstructure. Specifically, reducing Ca and P in the diet compromised BMD, BMC, and bone area of birds on both 6 and 12 DPI, while supplementing phytase, either alone or in combination with 25OHD, but not 25OHD alone, improved these parameters.
In summary, our results indicated that supplementing phytase, either alone or in combination with 25OHD, to diets low in Ca and P may mitigate the adverse effects of Eimeria infection on intestinal health and bone development. This is demonstrated by improvements in intestinal permeability, bone mineralization, bone microstructure, and body composition. While 25OHD supplementation on its own had a less significant impact on bone development compared to phytase, it did show some positive effects on growth performance, bone mineral apposition rate, bone ash concentration and bone ash percentage. In this study, the benefits of phytase supplementation were generally more pronounced than those associated with 25OHD supplementation; however, the combination of both induced more optimal effects.
Adhikari R, White D, House J, Kim W. Effects of additional dosage of vitamin D3, vitamin D2, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on calcium and phosphorus utilization, egg quality and bone mineralization in laying hens. Poultry Sci 2020;99(1):364-73.
Ahmed S, Mehran M, Khalique A, Javed K, Rahman A, Umar S, Ullah S. Cumulative effect of phytase and vitamin D supplementation on performance and bone mineralization in broiler. Eurasian J. Vet. Sci. 2015;31(2):102-8.
Ajuwon KM, Sommerfeld V, Paul V, Däuber M, Schollenberger M, Kühn I, Adeola O, Rodehutscord M. Phytase dosing affects phytate degradation and Muc 2 transporter gene expression in broiler starters. Poultry Sci 2020;99(2):981-91.
Al-Sadi R, Khatib K, Guo S, Ye D, Youssef M, Ma T. Occludin regulates macromolecule flux across the intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2011;300(6):G1054-64.
Angel R, Saylor W, Dhandu A, Powers W, Applegate T. Effects of dietary phosphorus, phytase, and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance of broiler chickens grown in floor pens. Poultry Sci 2005;84(7):1031-44.
AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International; 1996.
Bedford M, Rousseau X. Recent findings regarding calcium and phytase in poultry nutrition. Anim Prod Sci 2017;57(11):2311-6.
Bedford MR. Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition-their current value and future benefits. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2000;86(1-2):1-13.
Blake DP, Knox J, Dehaeck B, Huntington B, Rathinam T, Ravipati V, Ayoade S, Gilbert W, Adebambo AO, Jatau ID. Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Vet Res 2020;51(1):1-14.
Castro F, Su S, Choi H, Koo E, Kim W. L-Arginine supplementation enhances growth performance, lean muscle, and bone density but not fat in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 2019;98(4):1716-22.
Castro FLS, Teng P-Y, Yadav S, Gould RL, Craig S, Pazdro R, Kim WK. The effects of L-Arginine supplementation on growth performance and intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria spp. Poultry Sci 2020;99(11):5844-57.
Chapman HD. Applied strategies for the control of coccidiosis in poultry. CABI Reviews 2018;2018:1-11.
Chapman HD, Jeffers TK. Vaccination of chickens against coccidiosis ameliorates drug resistance in commercial poultry production. Int J Parasitol: Drugs Drug Resist 2014;4(3):214-7.
Chen C, Kim W. The application of micro-CT in egg-laying hen bone analysis: introducing an automated bone separation algorithm. Poultry Sci 2020;99(11):5175-83.
Chen C, Turner B, Applegate T, Litta G, Kim W. Role of long-term supplementation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on laying hen bone 3-dimensional structural development. Poultry Sci 2020;99(11):5771-82.
Choi J, Goo D, Sharma MK, Ko H, Liu G, Paneru D, Choppa VSR, Lee J, Kim WK. Effects of different Eimeria inoculation doses on growth performance, daily feed intake, gut health, gut microbiota, foot pad dermatitis, and Eimeria gene expression in broilers raised in floor pens for 35 days. Animals 2023;13(13):2237.
Choi J, Kim W. Interactions of microbiota and mucosal immunity in the ceca of broiler chickens infected with Eimeria tenella. Vaccines 2022;10(11):1941.
Chou S, Chung T, Yu B. Effects of supplemental 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, and immune response of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 2009;88(11):2333-41.
Cobb. Cobb broiler management Guide. 2021. https://cobbgenetics.com/assets/Cobb-Files/Broiler-Guide_English-2021-min.pdf.
Cowieson A, Acamovic T, Bedford M. Phytic acid and phytase: implications for protein utilization by poultry. Poultry Sci 2006;85(5):878-85.
Cowieson A, Ruckebusch J-P, Sorbara J, Wilson J, Guggenbuhl P, Roos F. A systematic view on the effect of phytase on ileal amino acid digestibility in broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017;225:182-94.
DeLuca HF. Overview of general physiologic features and functions of vitamin D. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;80(6):1689S-96S.
Dittmer K, Thompson K. Vitamin D metabolism and rickets in domestic animals: a review. Vet Pathol 2011;48(2):389-407.
Fatoba AJ, Adeleke MA. Diagnosis and control of chicken coccidiosis: a recent update. J Parasit Dis 2018;42:483-93.
Fetterer RH, Miska KB, Mitchell AD, Jenkins MC. The use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to assess the impact of Eimeria infections in broiler chicks. Avian Dis 2013;57(2):199-204.
Forder R, Nattrass G, Geier M, Hughes R, Hynd P. Quantitative analyses of genes associated with mucin synthesis of broiler chickens with induced necrotic enteritis. Poultry Sci 2012;91(6):1335-41.
Fraser DR. Regulation of the metabolism of vitamin D. Physiol Rev 1980;60(2):551-613.
Ghasemi P, Toghyani M, Landy N. Effects of dietary 1 alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol in calcium and phosphorous-deficient diets on growth performance, tibia related indices and immune responses in broiler chickens. Anim. Nutri. 2019;5(2):134-9.
Goltzman D. Functions of vitamin D in bone. Histochem Cell Biol 2018;149(4):305-12.
Han J, Chen G, Zhang J, Wang J, Qu H, Yan Y, Yang X, Cheng Y. Relative biological value of 1α-hydroxycholecalciferol to 25-hydroxycholecalciferol in broiler chicken diets. Poultry Sci 2017;96(7):2330-5.
Humer E, Schwarz C, Schedle K. Phytate in pig and poultry nutrition. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2015;99(4):605-25.
Johnson J, Reid WM. Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp Parasitol 1970;28(1):30-6.
Jones G, Strugnell SA, DeLuca HF. Current understanding of the molecular actions of vitamin D. Physiol Rev 1998;78:1193-231.
Kermani ZA, Taheri H, Faridi A, Shahir M, Baradaran N. Interactive effects of calcium, vitamin D3, and exogenous phytase on phosphorus utilization in male broiler chickens from 1 to 21 days post-hatch: a meta-analysis approach. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2023;295:115525.
Khan S, Shahid R, Mian A, Sardar R, Anjum M. Effect of the level of cholecalciferol supplementation of broiler diets on the performance and tibial dyschondroplasia. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2010;94(5):584-93.
Kheiri F, Landy N. The effects of dietary 1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol individually or in combination with different levels of cholecalciferol on growth performance and tibia criteria in broiler chickens. Livest Sci 2019;221:172-6.
Kim W, Bloomfield S, Ricke S. Effects of age, vitamin D3, and fructooligosaccharides on bone growth and skeletal integrity of broiler chicks. Poultry Sci 2011;90(11):2425-32.
Kim W, Donalson L, Herrera P, Woodward C, Kubena L, Nisbet D, Ricke S. Research note: effects of different bone preparation methods (fresh, dry, and fat-free dry) on bone parameters and the correlations between bone breaking strength and the other bone parameters. Poultry Sci 2004;83(10):1663-6.
Kim YS, Ho SB. Intestinal goblet cells and mucins in health and disease: recent insights and progress. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2010;12:319-30.
Kitessa SM, Nattrass GS, Forder RE, McGrice HA, Wu S-B, Hughes RJ. Mucin gene mRNA levels in broilers challenged with Eimeria and/or Clostridium perfringens. Avian Dis 2014;58(3):408-14.
Klinsoda J, Vötterl J, Zebeli Q, Metzler-Zebeli BU. Alterations of the viable ileal microbiota of the gut mucosa-lymph node axis in pigs fed phytase and lactic acid-treated cereals. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020;86(4):e02128. -02119.
Leung H, Yitbarek A, Snyder R, Patterson R, Barta J, Karrow N, Kiarie E. Responses of broiler chickens to Eimeria challenge when fed a nucleotide-rich yeast extract. Poultry Sci 2019;98(4):1622-33.
Leyva-Jimenez H, Gardner K, Yansoon A-J, Padgett J, Bailey C. Partial replacement of dietary cholecalciferol with 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on broiler chickens subjected to a coccidiosis vaccine challenge. J Appl Poultry Res 2019a;28(3):743-54.
Leyva-Jimenez H, Khan M, Gardner K, Abdaljaleel RA, Yansoon A-J, Alsadwi AM, Bailey CA. Developing a novel oral vitamin D3 intake bioassay to re-evaluate the vitamin D3 requirement for modern broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 2019b;98(9):3770-6.
Li D, Che X, Wang Y, Hong C, Thacker P. Effect of microbial phytase, vitamin D3, and citric acid on growth performance and phosphorus, nitrogen and calcium digestibility in growing swine. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1998;73(1-2):173-86.
Li P, Liu C, Niu J, Zhang Y, Li C, Zhang Z, Guo S, Ding B. Effects of dietary supplementation with vitamin A on antioxidant and intestinal barrier function of broilers co-infected with coccidia and Clostridium perfringens. Animals 2022;12(23):3431.
Lin Y, Teng P-Y, Olukosi OA. The effects of xylo-oligosaccharides on regulating growth performance, nutrient utilization, gene expression of tight junctions, nutrient transporters, and cecal short chain fatty acids profile in Eimeria-challenged broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 2022;101(11):102125.
Liu G, Sharma MK, Tompkins YH, Teng P-Y, Kim WK. Impacts of varying methionine to cysteine supplementation ratios on growth performance, oxidative status, intestinal health, and gene expression of immune response and methionine metabolism in broilers under Eimeria spp. challenge. Poultry Sci 2024;103(2):103300.
Lönnerdal B. Phytic acid-trace element (Zn, Cu, Mn) interactions. Int J Food Sci Technol 2002;37(7):749-58.
Lopes T, Shi H, White D, Araújo I, Kim W. Effects of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol on performance, gut health, and bone quality of broilers fed with reduced calcium and phosphorus diet during Eimeria challenge. Poultry Sci 2024;103(2):103267.
Marketsand Markets. Feed enzymes market by type (phytase, carbohydrase, and protease), livestock (poultry, swine, ruminants, and aquatic animals), source (microorganism, plant, and animal), form (dry and liquid), and region - global forecast to 2025. https://www.asdreports.com/market-research-report-504416/feed-enzymes-market-type-phytase-carbohydrase-protease-livestock-poultry-swine; 2019.
Matuszewski A, Łukasiewicz M, Niemiec J. Calcium and phosphorus and their nanoparticle forms in poultry nutrition. World’s Poult Sci J 2020;76(2):328-45.
Moss AF, Chrystal PV, Dersjant-Li Y, Selle PH, Liu SY. Responses in digestibilities of macro-minerals, trace minerals and amino acids generated by exogenous phytase and xylanase in canola meal diets offered to broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2018;240:22-30.
Oikeh I, Sakkas P, Blake DP, Kyriazakis I. Interactions between dietary calcium and phosphorus level, and vitamin D source on bone mineralization, performance, and intestinal morphology of coccidia-infected broilers. Poultry Sci 2019;98(11):5679-90.
Olukosi OA, Fru-Nji F. The interplay of dietary nutrient specification and varying calcium to total phosphorus ratio on efficacy of a bacterial phytase: 1. Growth performance and tibia mineralization. Poultry Sci 2014;93(12):3037-43.
Powers W, Angel R. A review of the capacity for nutritional strategies to address environmental challenges in poultry production. Poultry Sci 2008;87(10):1929-38.
Rimbach G, Pallauf J, Moehring J, Kraemer K, Minihane AM. Effect of dietary phytate and microbial phytase on mineral and trace element bioavailability-a literature review. Curr Top Nutraceutical Res 2008;6(3):131-44.
Ross AC, Caballero BH, Cousins RJ, Tucker KL, Ziegler TR. Modern nutrition in health and disease. 11th ed. University Park: States News Service; 2013.
Rowe P, Koller A, Sharma S. Physiology, bone remodeling. 2018.
Sakkas P, Oikeh I, Blake DP, Nolan MJ, Bailey RA, Oxley A, Rychlik I, Lietz G, Kyriazakis I. Does selection for growth rate in broilers affect their resistance and tolerance to Eimeria maxima? Vet Parasitol 2018;258:88-98.
Sakkas P, Oikeh I, Blake DP, Smith S, Kyriazakis I. Dietary vitamin D improves performance and bone mineralisation, but increases parasite replication and compromises gut health in Eimeria-infected broilers. Br J Nutr 2019a;122(6):676-88.
Sakkas P, Smith S, Hill T, Kyriazakis I. A reassessment of the vitamin D requirements of modern broiler genotypes. Poultry Sci 2019b;98(1):330-40.
Sharma MK, Liu G, White DL, Kim WK. Graded levels of Eimeria infection linearly reduced the growth performance, altered the intestinal health, and delayed the onset of egg production of Hy-Line W-36 laying hens when infected at the prelay stage. Poultry Sci 2024;103(1):103174.
Sharma MK, Liu G, White DL, Tompkins YH, Kim WK. Effects of mixed Eimeria challenge on performance, body composition, intestinal health, and expression of nutrient transporter genes of Hy-Line W-36 pullets (0-6 wks of age). Poultry Sci 2022;101(11):102083.
Sharma MK, Liu G, White DL, Tompkins YH, Kim WK. Graded levels of Eimeria challenge altered the microstructural architecture and reduced the cortical bone growth of femur of Hy-Line W-36 pullets at early stage of growth (0-6 wks of age). Poultry Sci 2023;102(9):102888.
Shi H, Lopes T, Tompkins YH, Liu G, Choi J, Sharma MK, Kim WK. Effects of phytase supplementation on broilers fed with calcium and phosphorus-reduced diets, challenged with Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina: influence on growth performance, body composition, bone health, and intestinal integrity. Poultry Sci 2024;103(4):103511.
Shi H, Wang J, Teng P-Y, Tompkins YH, Jordan B, Kim WK. Effects of phytase and coccidial vaccine on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, bone mineralization, and intestinal gene expression of broilers. Poultry Sci 2022;101(11):102124.
Shi H, Wang J, White D, Martinez OJT, Kim WK. Impacts of phytase and coccidial vaccine on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, bone development, and intestinal gene expression of broilers fed a nutrient reduced diet. Poultry Sci 2023;102(11):103062.
Świątkiewicz S, Arczewska-Włosek A, Bederska-Lojewska D, Józefiak D. Efficacy of dietary vitamin D and its metabolites in poultry-review and implications of the recent studies. World’s Poult Sci J 2017;73(1):57-68.
Taheri H, Mirisakhani L. Effect of citric acid, vitamin D3, and high-dose phytase on performance of broiler chicken fed diet severely limited in non-phytate phosphorus. Livest Sci 2020;241:104223.
Teng P-Y, Choi J, Yadav S, Tompkins Y, Kim WK. Effects of low-crude protein diets supplemented with arginine, glutamine, threonine, and methionine on regulating nutrient absorption, intestinal health, and growth performance of Eimeria-infected chickens. Poultry Sci 2021;100(11):101427.
Teng P-Y, Yadav S, de Souza Castro FL, Tompkins YH, Fuller AL, Kim WK. Graded Eimeria challenge linearly regulated growth performance, dynamic change of gastrointestinal permeability, apparent ileal digestibility, intestinal morphology, and tight junctions of broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 2020;99(9):4203-16.
Wang J, Patterson R, Kim W. Effects of phytase and multicarbohydrase on growth performance, bone mineralization, and nutrient digestibility in broilers fed a nutritionally reduced diet. J Appl Poultry Res 2021;30(2):100146.
White D, Chen C, Kim WK. Effect of the combination of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and higher level of calcium and phosphorus in the diets on bone 3D structural development in pullets. Front Physiol 2023;14:1056481.
Whitehead C, McCormack H, McTeir L, Fleming R. High vitamin D3 requirements in broilers for bone quality and prevention of tibial dyschondroplasia and interactions with dietary calcium, available phosphorus and vitamin A. Br Poultry Sci 2004;45(3):425-36.
Woyengo T, Nyachoti C. Anti-nutritional effects of phytic acid in diets for pigs and poultry-current knowledge and directions for future research. Can J Anim Sci 2013;93(1):9-21.
Yarger J, Saunders C, McNaughton J, Quarles C, Hollis B, Gray R. Comparison of dietary 25-hydroxycholecalciferol and cholecalciferol in broiler chickens. Poultry Sci 1995;74(7):1159-67.
Yavaş İ, Çenesiz AA, Ceylan N. Effects of herbal vitamin D3 and phytase supplementation to broiler feed on performance, bone development and serum parameters of broilers. J Agric Sci 2020;26(2):212-9.
Zhang B, Coon CN. The relationship of various tibia bone measurements in hens. Poultry Sci 1997;76(12):1698-701.
Zhang H, Zeng Q, Bai S, Wang J, Ding X, Xuan Y, Su Z, Fraley GS, Yao B, Zhang K. Dietary supplementation of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol increases tibial mass by suppression bone resorption in meat ducks. Anim. Nutr. 2020;6(4):467-79.
Zhao Y, Wen X, Xiao H, Hou L, Wang X, Huang Y, Lin Y, Zheng C, Wang L, Jiang Z. Effects of phytase and 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 supplementation on growth performance and bone development in weaned piglets in Ca-and P-deficient dietary. J Sci Food Agric 2022;102(3):940-8.
Year 2024 volume 19 Issue 1
PDF
66
37
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.07.006
  • Receive Date:2024-04-15
  • Online Date:2026-01-28
  • Published:2024-12-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-04-15
  • Revised:2024-06-26
  • Accepted:2024-07-02
Affiliations
    Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA

Corresponding:

*

Corresponding author. E-mail address: (W.K. Kim).
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/aninu/EN/10.1016/j.aninu.2024.07.006
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT