Article(id=1256536355811746124, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, issueId=1256536349243523385, articleNumber=null, orderNo=null, doi=10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020, pmid=null, cstr=null, oa=null, hot=null, price=null, onlineType=0, articleFormat=0, articleType=null, articleTypeStr=research-article, receivedDate=1736092800000, receivedDateStr=2025-01-06, revisedDate=1741708800000, revisedDateStr=2025-03-12, acceptedDate=null, acceptedDateStr=null, onlineDate=1777511212542, onlineDateStr=2026-04-30, pubDate=1776182400000, pubDateStr=2026-04-15, doiRegisterDate=null, doiRegisterDateStr=null, onlineIssueDate=1777511212542, onlineIssueDateStr=2026-04-30, onlineJustAcceptDate=null, onlineJustAcceptDateStr=null, onlineFirstDate=null, onlineFirstDateStr=null, sourceXml=null, magXml=null, createTime=1777511212542, creator=13701087609, updateTime=1777511212542, updator=13701087609, issue=Issue{id=1256536349243523385, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, year='2026', volume='42', issue='2', pageStart='1', pageEnd='264', issueExtLink='null', onlineDate='null', pubDate='null', beforeIssueId=null, nextIssueId=null, price=null, status=1, issueComplete=1, articleOrder=1, issueType=1, specialIssue=0, createTime=1777511210976, creator=13701087609, updateTime=1777511532015, updator=13701087609, preIssue=null, nextIssue=null, ext={EN=IssueExt(id=1256537695891874281, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, issueId=1256536349243523385, language=EN, specialIssueTitle=, coverIllustrator=null, specialIssueEditor=, specialIssueAbout=), CN=IssueExt(id=1256537695891874282, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, issueId=1256536349243523385, language=CN, specialIssueTitle=, coverIllustrator=null, specialIssueEditor=, specialIssueAbout=)}, issueFiles=null}, startPage=160, endPage=171, ext={EN=ArticleExt(id=1256536357430747484, articleId=1256536355811746124, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, language=EN, title=Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and N-P-K Ratio on Source-Sink Characteristics of Small-Seed Hybrid Rice, columnId=null, journalTitle=Crops, columnName=null, runingTitle=null, highlight=null, articleAbstract=

To elucidate the effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on the source-sink characteristics of small-seed hybrid rice, a field experiment was conducted using the small-seed hybrid rice variety Zhuoliangyou 0985 as material. The experiment involved four nitrogen application levels [120 (N1), 150 (N2), 180 (N3), and 210 kg/ha (N4)] and three NPK ratios [1.0:0.5:0.8 (F1), 1.0:0.5:1.0 (F2), and 1.0:1.0:1.0 (F3)]. The results showed that leaf area index (LAI), high-efficiency LAI, relative content of chlorophyll (SPAD values), and dry matter accumulation increased with increasing nitrogen application rate. There were no significant differences between N3 and N4 treatments, but both were significantly higher than the N1 treatment. Among different N-P-K ratios, the F3 treatment generally resulted in higher values, though the differences were not significant. Total spikelets and total sink capacity increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate, and the available filled ratio of sink capacity followed the order of N1 > N3 > N2 > N4. Under different N-P-K ratios, the effective filling degree of sink capacity was generally the highest in F2, though the difference was not significant. Effective panicles increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate, while the number of grains per panicle initially increased and then decreased. Both seed-setting rate and 1000-grain weight decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate, but these differences did not reach a significant level. Yield showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of nitrogen application, with the N3 treatment producing the highest yield. Among the interaction treatments, N3F2 achieved the highest yield, followed by N3F1. Correlation analysis indicated that LAI, high-efficiency LAI, leaf SPAD value, dry matter accumulation, total spikelets, total sink capacity, and effective panicles were extremely significantly and positively correlated with yield. The available filled ratio of sink capacity and seed-setting rate were negatively correlated with yield, while the number of grains per panicle was significantly and positively correlated with yield. No significant correlations were found between 1000-grain weight, grain-leaf ratio, and yield. Under the conditions of this experiment, N3F1 was considered the optimal treatment for Zhuoliangyou 0985. It had a relatively large leaf area, a high number of grains per panicle, a large sink capacity, and a high available filled ratio of sink capacity, with a moderate grain-leaf ratio, which coordinated source-sink relationship and achieved the dual effects of fertilizer saving and yield increase.

, correspAuthors=null, authorNote=null, correspAuthorsNote=null, copyrightStatement=null, copyrightOwner=null, extLink=null, articleAbsUrl=null, sourceXml=null, magXml=null, pdfUrl=null, pdf=null, pdfFileSize=null, pdfExtLink=null, richHtmlUrl=null, mobilePdfUrl=null, reviewReport=null, pdfFirstPage=null, abstractGraph=null, abstractGraphContent=null, abstractVideo=null, citation=null, cebUrl=null, magXmlContent=null, mapNumber=null, authorCompany=null, fund=null, authors=null, authorsList=Qunxiao Pan, Chao Long, Le Zhuo, Chao Yin, Min Xiao, Wenxin Zhou, Zhenxie Yi), CN=ArticleExt(id=1256536360354177394, articleId=1256536355811746124, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, language=CN, title=施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻源库特性的影响, columnId=1256536352674427254, journalTitle=作物杂志, columnName=生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作, runingTitle=null, highlight=null, articleAbstract=

为明确施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻源库特性的影响,以小粒型杂交稻卓两优0985为材料,在120(N1)、150(N2)、180(N3)和210 kg/hm2(N4)4个施氮量水平与1.0:0.5:0.8(F1)、1.0:0.5:1.0(F2)和1.0:1.0:1.0(F3)3个氮磷钾配比条件下开展大田试验。结果表明,叶面积指数(LAI)、高效叶面积指数、叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值)与干物质积累量随施氮量增大而提高,N3与N4处理差异不显著,但均显著高于N1处理;不同氮磷钾配比处理间,一般以F3处理较高,但无显著差异。总颖花数与总库容量随施氮量增加而增大,库容有效充实度表现为N1>N3>N2>N4,不同氮磷钾配比处理下库容有效充实度一般以F2最大,但差异不显著。有效穗数随施氮量增大而增加,穗粒数随施氮量增大呈先增后降趋势,结实率与千粒重均随施氮量增加而下降,但差异不显著。产量随施氮量增加呈先增后降趋势,以N3处理产量最高,互作处理间以N3F2处理产量最高,N3F1处理次之。相关分析表明,LAI、高效LAI、叶片SPAD值、干物质积累量、总颖花数、总库容量、有效穗数与产量呈极显著正相关,库容有效充实度、结实率与产量呈负相关,穗粒数与产量呈显著正相关,千粒重、粒叶比与产量相关性不显著。本试验条件下,卓两优0985以N3F1处理为最佳,其叶面积较大、穗粒数较多、库容量较大且库容有效充实度较高,粒叶比适中,源库关系较为协调的同时达到节肥增产的效果。

, correspAuthors=null, authorNote=null, correspAuthorsNote=
周文新,主要从事作物高产高效栽培研究,E-mail:
易镇邪为共同通信作者,主要从事作物高产抗逆栽培与资源高效利用研究,E-mail:
, copyrightStatement=null, copyrightOwner=null, extLink=null, articleAbsUrl=null, sourceXml=WkIfF630049NNA9wKdRKlQ==, magXml=cQ6FBMacDOkf5kBiPMQ9SQ==, pdfUrl=null, pdf=+UICysS31ONDMaxwJwL/4g==, pdfFileSize=524419, pdfExtLink=null, richHtmlUrl=null, mobilePdfUrl=null, reviewReport=null, pdfFirstPage=null, abstractGraph=null, abstractGraphContent=null, abstractVideo=null, citation=null, cebUrl=null, magXmlContent=zhSmbvr/bMGxeRFCwBWJRw==, mapNumber=null, authorCompany=null, fund=null, authors=

潘群肖,主要从事作物高产高效栽培理论与技术研究,E-mail:

, authorsList=潘群肖, 龙超, 卓乐, 殷超, 肖敏, 周文新, 易镇邪)}, authors=[Author(id=1256536362937868696, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, orderNo=0, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=2823525797@qq.com, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1256536363361493407, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536362937868696, language=EN, stringName=Qunxiao Pan, firstName=Qunxiao, middleName=null, lastName=Pan, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1256536363713814949, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536362937868696, language=CN, stringName=潘群肖, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙, bio={"content":"

潘群肖,主要从事作物高产高效栽培理论与技术研究,E-mail:

"}, bioImg=null, bioContent=

潘群肖,主要从事作物高产高效栽培理论与技术研究,E-mail:

, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1256536362459718029, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362489078159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362518438289, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙)])]), Author(id=1256536365450256820, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, orderNo=1, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1256536366041653695, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536365450256820, language=EN, stringName=Chao Long, firstName=Chao, middleName=null, lastName=Long, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1256536366846960077, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536365450256820, language=CN, stringName=龙超, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1256536362459718029, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362489078159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362518438289, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙)])]), Author(id=1256536367589351900, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, orderNo=2, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1256536368331743717, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536367589351900, language=EN, stringName=Le Zhuo, firstName=Le, middleName=null, lastName=Zhuo, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1256536370391146998, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536367589351900, language=CN, stringName=卓乐, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1256536362459718029, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362489078159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362518438289, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙)])]), Author(id=1256536371280339460, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, orderNo=3, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1256536371758490130, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536371280339460, language=EN, stringName=Chao Yin, firstName=Chao, middleName=null, lastName=Yin, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1256536372165337624, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536371280339460, language=CN, stringName=殷超, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1256536362459718029, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362489078159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362518438289, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙)])]), Author(id=1256536373931139625, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, orderNo=4, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1256536375839547969, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536373931139625, language=EN, stringName=Min Xiao, firstName=Min, middleName=null, lastName=Xiao, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1256536376737129036, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536373931139625, language=CN, stringName=肖敏, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1256536362459718029, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362489078159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362518438289, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙)])]), Author(id=1256536377685041755, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, orderNo=5, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=zwxok@hunau.net, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1256536379866079854, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536377685041755, language=EN, stringName=Wenxin Zhou, firstName=Wenxin, middleName=null, lastName=Zhou, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1256536381015319171, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536377685041755, language=CN, stringName=周文新, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1256536362459718029, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362489078159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362518438289, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙)])]), Author(id=1256536382542045845, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, orderNo=6, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=yizhenxie@126.com, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1256536384647586471, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536382542045845, language=EN, stringName=Zhenxie Yi, firstName=Zhenxie, middleName=null, lastName=Yi, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1256536386384028344, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, authorId=1256536382542045845, language=CN, stringName=易镇邪, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1256536362459718029, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362489078159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362518438289, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙)])])], keywords=[Keyword(id=1256536389252932299, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, orderNo=1, keyword=Small-seed hybrid rice), Keyword(id=1256536389760443091, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, orderNo=2, keyword=Nitrogen application rate), Keyword(id=1256536391085843168, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, orderNo=3, keyword=N-P-K ratio), Keyword(id=1256536393518539505, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, orderNo=4, keyword=Yield), Keyword(id=1256536394713916159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, orderNo=5, keyword=Source-sink characteristics), Keyword(id=1256536395787657993, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, orderNo=1, keyword=小粒型杂交稻), Keyword(id=1256536400162317099, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, orderNo=2, keyword=施氮量), Keyword(id=1256536401953284915, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, orderNo=3, keyword=氮磷钾配比), Keyword(id=1256536402771174205, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, orderNo=4, keyword=产量), Keyword(id=1256536404402758474, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, orderNo=5, keyword=源库特性)], refs=[Reference(id=1256536435579019306, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2023, volume=29, issue=2, pageStart=1, pageEnd=4, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[1], rfOrder=0, authorNames=徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, journalName=中国稻米, refType=null, unstructuredReference=徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, . 2022年我国水稻产业发展分析及2023年展望. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(2):1-4., articleTitle=2022年我国水稻产业发展分析及2023年展望, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536437508399153, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2021, volume=35, issue=4, pageStart=396, pageEnd=406, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[2], rfOrder=1, authorNames=乔胜锋, 邓亚萍, 瞿寒冰, journalName=中国水稻科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=乔胜锋, 邓亚萍, 瞿寒冰, . 不同籼稻品种对低磷响应的差异及其农艺生理性状. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(4):396-406., articleTitle=不同籼稻品种对低磷响应的差异及其农艺生理性状, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536437919440950, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2020, volume=null, issue=1, pageStart=173, pageEnd=178, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[3], rfOrder=2, authorNames=李波, 宫亮, 曲航, journalName=作物杂志, refType=null, unstructuredReference=李波, 宫亮, 曲航, . 辽河三角洲稻区施氮水平对水稻生长发育及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2020(1):173-178., articleTitle=辽河三角洲稻区施氮水平对水稻生长发育及产量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536438791856191, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=50, issue=8, pageStart=2025, pageEnd=2038, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[4], rfOrder=3, authorNames=宋志文, 赵蕾, 毕俊国, journalName=作物学报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=宋志文, 赵蕾, 毕俊国, . 滴灌条件下施氮量对不同氮效率水稻品种物质积累及养分吸收的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8):2025-2038., articleTitle=滴灌条件下施氮量对不同氮效率水稻品种物质积累及养分吸收的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536439160954952, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=1993, volume=26, issue=6, pageStart=1, pageEnd=11, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[5], rfOrder=4, authorNames=凌启鸿, 张洪程, 蔡建中, journalName=中国农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=凌启鸿, 张洪程, 蔡建中, . 水稻高产群体质量及其优化控制探讨. 中国农业科学, 1993, 26(6):1-11., articleTitle=水稻高产群体质量及其优化控制探讨, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536439748157517, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=1999, volume=25, issue=6, pageStart=6, pageEnd=12, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[6], rfOrder=5, authorNames=屠乃美, 官春云, journalName=湖南农业大学学报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=屠乃美, 官春云. 水稻幼穗分化期间减源对源库关系的影响. 湖南农业大学学报, 1999, 25(6):6-12., articleTitle=水稻幼穗分化期间减源对源库关系的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536439999815764, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=1997, volume=30, issue=3, pageStart=52, pageEnd=59, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[7], rfOrder=6, authorNames=朱庆森, 张祖建, 杨建昌, journalName=中国农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=朱庆森, 张祖建, 杨建昌, . 亚种间杂交稻产量源库特征. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(3):52-59., articleTitle=亚种间杂交稻产量源库特征, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536441815949404, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2014, volume=5, issue=null, pageStart=516, pageEnd=null, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[8], rfOrder=7, authorNames=Osorio S, Ruan Y L, Fernie A R, journalName=Frontiers in Plant Science, refType=null, unstructuredReference=Osorio S, Ruan Y L, Fernie A R. An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5:516., articleTitle=An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536442138910818, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=1993, volume=16, issue=9, pageStart=1027, pageEnd=1028, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[9], rfOrder=8, authorNames=Doehlert D C, journalName=Plant,Cell & Environment, refType=null, unstructuredReference=Doehlert D C. Sink strength: dynamic with source strength. Plant,Cell & Environment, 1993, 16(9):1027-1028., articleTitle=Sink strength: dynamic with source strength, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536442541564008, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=null, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=null, pageEnd=null, url=http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202209/247eb0527ec44176a19afe15f6a27da0.shtml, language=null, rfNumber=[10], rfOrder=9, authorNames=俞慧友, journalName=中国科技网, refType=null, unstructuredReference=俞慧友. 云南个旧杂交中稻超高产攻关亩产突破1200公斤. 中国科技网. (2022-09-15)[2025-01-06]. http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202209/247eb0527ec44176a19afe15f6a27da0.shtml., articleTitle=云南个旧杂交中稻超高产攻关亩产突破1200公斤, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536442847748205, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2023, volume=38, issue=5, pageStart=108, pageEnd=114, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[11], rfOrder=10, authorNames=郭浪, 肖敏, 崔璨, journalName=杂交水稻, refType=null, unstructuredReference=郭浪, 肖敏, 崔璨, . 施氮量对小粒型杂交稻产量与氮素利用效率的影响. 杂交水稻, 2023, 38(5):108-114., articleTitle=施氮量对小粒型杂交稻产量与氮素利用效率的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536443028103283, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=38, issue=4, pageStart=422, pageEnd=436, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[12], rfOrder=11, authorNames=吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, journalName=中国水稻科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, . 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4):422-436., articleTitle=施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536443380424831, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=1997, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=null, pageEnd=null, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[13], rfOrder=12, authorNames=Tadahiko M, journalName=Plant Nutrition for Sustainable Food Production and Environment, refType=null, unstructuredReference=Tadahiko M. Plant Nutrition for Sustainable Food Production and Environment. Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media, 1997., articleTitle=null, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536443942461576, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2018, volume=null, issue=4, pageStart=1, pageEnd=3, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[14], rfOrder=13, authorNames=许桂玲, 王玲莉, 叶勇, journalName=耕作与栽培, refType=null, unstructuredReference=许桂玲, 王玲莉, 叶勇, . 不同施氮量对机插杂交籼稻群体质量及产量的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2018(4):1-3., articleTitle=不同施氮量对机插杂交籼稻群体质量及产量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536446035419280, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2014, volume=40, issue=8, pageStart=1412, pageEnd=1423, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[15], rfOrder=14, authorNames=陈露, 张伟杨, 王志琴, journalName=作物学报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=陈露, 张伟杨, 王志琴, . 施氮量对江苏不同年代中粳稻品种产量与群体质量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(8):1412-1423., articleTitle=施氮量对江苏不同年代中粳稻品种产量与群体质量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536446366769304, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2019, volume=34, issue=4, pageStart=39, pageEnd=43, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[16], rfOrder=15, authorNames=宋晓华, 柳楷婧, 彭波, journalName=杂交水稻, refType=null, unstructuredReference=宋晓华, 柳楷婧, 彭波, . 施氮水平对豫南地区杂交粳稻群体质量和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2019, 34(4):39-43., articleTitle=施氮水平对豫南地区杂交粳稻群体质量和产量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536446496792736, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=1992, volume=25, issue=4, pageStart=7, pageEnd=14, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[17], rfOrder=16, authorNames=杨建昌, 朱庆森, 曹显祖, journalName=中国农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=杨建昌, 朱庆森, 曹显祖. 水稻群体冠层结构与光合特性对产量形成作用的研究. 中国农业科学, 1992, 25(4):7-14., articleTitle=水稻群体冠层结构与光合特性对产量形成作用的研究, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536446635204774, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=1994, volume=27, issue=4, pageStart=23, pageEnd=30, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[18], rfOrder=17, authorNames=苏祖芳, 郭宏文, 李永丰, journalName=中国农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=苏祖芳, 郭宏文, 李永丰, . 水稻群体叶面积动态类型的研究. 中国农业科学, 1994, 27(4):23-30., articleTitle=水稻群体叶面积动态类型的研究, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536446886863023, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2014, volume=null, issue=12, pageStart=4, pageEnd=7, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[19], rfOrder=18, authorNames=王杰, 张武汉, 孙平勇, journalName=湖南农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=王杰, 张武汉, 孙平勇, . 3个杂交稻新组合源库特性与产量形成研究. 湖南农业科学, 2014(12):4-7., articleTitle=3个杂交稻新组合源库特性与产量形成研究, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536447071412408, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2022, volume=58, issue=1, pageStart=173, pageEnd=185, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[20], rfOrder=19, authorNames=刘光明, 赵灿, 蒋岩, journalName=植物生理学报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=刘光明, 赵灿, 蒋岩, . 施氮量对水稻源库协同衰老特征的影响. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58(1):173-185., articleTitle=施氮量对水稻源库协同衰老特征的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536447218213055, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2003, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=null, pageEnd=null, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[21], rfOrder=20, authorNames=王素兰, journalName=水稻籽粒灌浆期间茎鞘非结构性同化物积累及其调节, refType=null, unstructuredReference=王素兰. 水稻籽粒灌浆期间茎鞘非结构性同化物积累及其调节. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2003., articleTitle=null, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536447566340295, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=1987, volume=2, issue=null, pageStart=125, pageEnd=null, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[22], rfOrder=21, authorNames=Venkateswarlu B, VisperasR M, journalName=Agricultural and Food Sciences,Biology, refType=null, unstructuredReference=Venkateswarlu B, VisperasR M. Source-sink relationships in crop plants. Agricultural and Food Sciences,Biology, 1987, 2:125., articleTitle=Source-sink relationships in crop plants, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536447943827659, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2011, volume=44, issue=19, pageStart=3970, pageEnd=3980, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[23], rfOrder=22, authorNames=熊洁, 耿春苗, 丁艳锋, journalName=中国农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=熊洁, 耿春苗, 丁艳锋, . 不同库容类型杂交早籼稻品种源库结构对垩白的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(19):3970-3980., articleTitle=不同库容类型杂交早籼稻品种源库结构对垩白的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536448027713743, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2019, volume=54, issue=1, pageStart=1, pageEnd=10, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[24], rfOrder=23, authorNames=陈年来, journalName=甘肃农业大学学报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=陈年来. 作物库源关系研究进展. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(1):1-10., articleTitle=作物库源关系研究进展, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536448501670103, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2022, volume=59, issue=12, pageStart=2969, pageEnd=2978, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[25], rfOrder=24, authorNames=王振洋, 王冀川, 袁杰, journalName=新疆农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=王振洋, 王冀川, 袁杰, . 不同施氮量与栽插密度对水稻群体生长及产量构成的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12):2969-2978., articleTitle=不同施氮量与栽插密度对水稻群体生长及产量构成的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536448761716960, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2021, volume=null, issue=11, pageStart=107, pageEnd=110, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[26], rfOrder=25, authorNames=黄梅燕, 潘文兴, 农永前, journalName=农业科技通讯, refType=null, unstructuredReference=黄梅燕, 潘文兴, 农永前, . 不同施氮量和种植密度对水稻葛68优9938产量的影响. 农业科技通讯, 2021(11):107-110., articleTitle=不同施氮量和种植密度对水稻葛68优9938产量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536450527518950, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2015, volume=40, issue=3, pageStart=37, pageEnd=41, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[27], rfOrder=26, authorNames=李前, 侯云鹏, 高军, journalName=吉林农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=李前, 侯云鹏, 高军, . 不同供磷水平对水稻干物质累积、磷素吸收分配及产量的影响. 吉林农业科学, 2015, 40(3):37-41., articleTitle=不同供磷水平对水稻干物质累积、磷素吸收分配及产量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536450686902506, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2020, volume=50, issue=4, pageStart=20, pageEnd=23, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[28], rfOrder=27, authorNames=樊禄芹, 樊禄栋, journalName=北方水稻, refType=null, unstructuredReference=樊禄芹, 樊禄栋. 施用磷肥对水稻产量结构及经济效益的影响. 北方水稻, 2020, 50(4):20-23., articleTitle=施用磷肥对水稻产量结构及经济效益的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536450858868975, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2011, volume=25, issue=4, pageStart=447, pageEnd=451, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[29], rfOrder=28, authorNames=龚金龙, 张洪程, 李杰, journalName=中国水稻科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=龚金龙, 张洪程, 李杰, . 施磷量对超级稻南粳44产量和质量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(4):447-451., articleTitle=施磷量对超级稻南粳44产量和质量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536451198607604, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2011, volume=23, issue=5, pageStart=1, pageEnd=5, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[30], rfOrder=29, authorNames=才硕, 潘晓华, 吴建富, journalName=江西农业学报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=才硕, 潘晓华, 吴建富, . 施钾量对超高产早稻品种产量和稻米质量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(5):1-5,9., articleTitle=施钾量对超高产早稻品种产量和稻米质量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536451722895613, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=30, issue=4, pageStart=105, pageEnd=107, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[31], rfOrder=30, authorNames=李建武, 辛业芸, 李文友, journalName=中国稻米, refType=null, unstructuredReference=李建武, 辛业芸, 李文友, . 杂交水稻新组合卓两优1126百亩片单产17.79 t/hm2超高产栽培技术. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(4):105-107,112., articleTitle=杂交水稻新组合卓两优1126百亩片单产17.79 t/hm2超高产栽培技术, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536452016496901, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=38, issue=2, pageStart=160, pageEnd=171, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[32], rfOrder=31, authorNames=刘慧敏, 周杰强, 胡远艺, journalName=中国水稻科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=刘慧敏, 周杰强, 胡远艺, . 水稻小粒不育系新组合卓两优1126的高产特征. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2):160-171., articleTitle=水稻小粒不育系新组合卓两优1126的高产特征, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536452402372879, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2016, volume=49, issue=24, pageStart=4745, pageEnd=4756, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[33], rfOrder=32, authorNames=孙永健, 孙园园, 蒋明金, journalName=中国农业科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=孙永健, 孙园园, 蒋明金, . 施肥水平对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(24):4745-4756., articleTitle=施肥水平对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536452544979221, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=39, issue=3, pageStart=117, pageEnd=126, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[34], rfOrder=33, authorNames=刘风, 石爱龙, 祝海竣, journalName=杂交水稻, refType=null, unstructuredReference=刘风, 石爱龙, 祝海竣, . 施氮量与肥料配比对水稻群体生长和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2024, 39(3):117-126., articleTitle=施氮量与肥料配比对水稻群体生长和产量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536452641448217, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2016, volume=24, issue=5, pageStart=553, pageEnd=558, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[35], rfOrder=34, authorNames=林诚, 李清华, 王飞, journalName=热带亚热带植物学报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=林诚, 李清华, 王飞, . 不同施磷水平对冷浸田水稻磷含量、光合特性及产量的影响. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2016, 24(5):553-558., articleTitle=不同施磷水平对冷浸田水稻磷含量、光合特性及产量的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536452830191902, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2010, volume=26, issue=15, pageStart=252, pageEnd=256, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[36], rfOrder=35, authorNames=冯跃华, 潘剑, 何腾兵, journalName=中国农学通报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=冯跃华, 潘剑, 何腾兵, . 不同施氮水平对超级稻源库特性的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(15):252-256., articleTitle=不同施氮水平对超级稻源库特性的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536452951826722, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=44, issue=2, pageStart=206, pageEnd=213, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[37], rfOrder=36, authorNames=张宇, 赵宝平, 柳妍娣, journalName=麦类作物学报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=张宇, 赵宝平, 柳妍娣, . 施氮量对裸燕麦源库生理特性和茎鞘NSC积累与转运的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2024, 44(2):206-213., articleTitle=施氮量对裸燕麦源库生理特性和茎鞘NSC积累与转运的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536453073461541, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2003, volume=18, issue=1, pageStart=47, pageEnd=51, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[38], rfOrder=37, authorNames=唐启源, 邹应斌, 米湘成, journalName=杂交水稻, refType=null, unstructuredReference=唐启源, 邹应斌, 米湘成, . 不同施氮条件下超级杂交稻的产量形成特点与氮肥利用. 杂交水稻, 2003, 18(1):47-51., articleTitle=不同施氮条件下超级杂交稻的产量形成特点与氮肥利用, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536453333508394, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2014, volume=30, issue=9, pageStart=82, pageEnd=87, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[39], rfOrder=38, authorNames=杨玲娟, 张卫星, 张伟贵, journalName=中国农学通报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=杨玲娟, 张卫星, 张伟贵, . 不同施氮水平对杂交水稻保持系源库特征的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(9):82-87., articleTitle=不同施氮水平对杂交水稻保持系源库特征的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536455220945198, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2011, volume=25, issue=6, pageStart=645, pageEnd=653, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[40], rfOrder=39, authorNames=王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 何予卿, journalName=中国水稻科学, refType=null, unstructuredReference=王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 何予卿, . 氮、磷、钾肥对水稻产量、质量及养分吸收利用的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(6):645-653., articleTitle=氮、磷、钾肥对水稻产量、质量及养分吸收利用的影响, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1256536455762010417, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2010, volume=26, issue=14, pageStart=218, pageEnd=221, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[41], rfOrder=40, authorNames=卜容燕, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍, journalName=中国农学通报, refType=null, unstructuredReference=卜容燕, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍, . 中稻氮磷钾肥的施肥效果及推荐用量. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(14):218-221., articleTitle=中稻氮磷钾肥的施肥效果及推荐用量, refAbstract=null)], funds=[Fund(id=1256536433708359698, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, awardId=2023YFD2301402, language=CN, fundingSource=国家重点研发计划(2023YFD2301402), fundOrder=null, country=null), Fund(id=1256536434547220505, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, awardId=湘农办发〔2023〕38号, language=CN, fundingSource=湖南省农业农村厅项目(湘农办发〔2023〕38号), fundOrder=null, country=null), Fund(id=1256536435067314211, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, awardId=湘农办发〔2024〕27号, language=CN, fundingSource=湖南省农业农村厅项目(湘农办发〔2024〕27号), fundOrder=null, country=null)], companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1256536362459718029, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362489078159, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1256536362518438289, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, companyId=1256536362459718029, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙)])], figs=[ArticleFig(id=1256536409863742315, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 1, caption=

Basic fertility of soil tested

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
年份
Year
全氮
Total nitrogen
(g/kg)
全磷
Total phosphorus
(g/kg)
全钾
Total potassium
(g/kg)
碱解氮
Alkali-hydrolyzed
nitrogen (mg/kg)
有效磷
Available
phosphorus (mg/kg)
速效钾
Available
potassium (mg/kg)
有机质
Organic matter
(g/kg)
pH
2023 1.64 0.89 15.72 184.78 13.67 238.19 29.86 7.19
2024 1.83 0.97 13.95 193.11 15.41 246.32 34.45 7.24
), ArticleFig(id=1256536410656465775, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表1, caption=

供试土壤基础肥力

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
年份
Year
全氮
Total nitrogen
(g/kg)
全磷
Total phosphorus
(g/kg)
全钾
Total potassium
(g/kg)
碱解氮
Alkali-hydrolyzed
nitrogen (mg/kg)
有效磷
Available
phosphorus (mg/kg)
速效钾
Available
potassium (mg/kg)
有机质
Organic matter
(g/kg)
pH
2023 1.64 0.89 15.72 184.78 13.67 238.19 29.86 7.19
2024 1.83 0.97 13.95 193.11 15.41 246.32 34.45 7.24
), ArticleFig(id=1256536412741034879, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 2, caption=

Effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on LAI of small-seed hybrid rice

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
分蘖期
Tillering stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
分蘖期
Tillering stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
N1 3.37c 6.61c 5.94c 5.00c 3.57c 6.80c 6.22c 5.09c
N2 3.75b 7.52b 6.77b 5.72b 3.86b 7.49b 6.84b 5.73b
N3 4.16a 7.88ab 7.07ab 5.98ab 4.38a 7.87ab 7.19ab 5.98ab
N4 4.36a 8.26a 7.35a 6.25a 4.57a 8.00a 7.33a 6.00a
F1 3.87a 7.51a 6.74a 5.67a 4.04a 7.46a 6.85a 5.63a
F2 3.91a 7.48a 6.80a 5.71a 4.09a 7.53a 6.89a 5.72a
F3 3.95a 7.72a 6.80a 5.84a 4.16a 7.64a 6.94a 5.75a
N1F1 3.26d 6.47d 5.81c 4.84c 3.52d 6.75c 6.13c 4.92c
N1F2 3.39d 6.51d 5.96c 5.03c 3.58d 6.78c 6.17c 5.12c
N1F3 3.46d 6.86d 6.05c 5.12c 3.61d 6.86c 6.35c 5.24c
N2F1 3.75c 7.52c 6.78b 5.67b 3.81c 7.41b 6.74b 5.71b
N2F2 3.87c 7.47c 6.81b 5.71b 3.79c 7.45b 6.87b 5.69b
N2F3 3.64c 7.56bc 6.73b 5.78b 3.98c 7.62b 6.91b 5.78b
N3F1 4.14b 7.88b 7.01b 5.91b 4.32b 7.77ab 7.19ab 5.92ab
N3F2 4.12b 7.71bc 7.03b 5.94b 4.39ab 7.84ab 7.24a 5.96ab
N3F3 4.22b 8.06ab 7.16ab 6.09ab 4.43ab 8.01ab 7.13ab 6.05a
N4F1 4.33ab 8.15ab 7.37a 6.24a 4.49ab 7.91ab 7.34a 5.98ab
N4F2 4.26b 8.23a 7.41a 6.16ab 4.59a 8.03a 7.26ab 6.09a
N4F3 4.49a 8.39a 7.27ab 6.36a 4.62a 8.05a 7.38a 5.94ab
N ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
F ns ** ns ** ** ** ** **
N×F ** * * ns ns ns ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536414003520387, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表2, caption=

施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒杂交稻LAI的影响

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
分蘖期
Tillering stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
分蘖期
Tillering stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
N1 3.37c 6.61c 5.94c 5.00c 3.57c 6.80c 6.22c 5.09c
N2 3.75b 7.52b 6.77b 5.72b 3.86b 7.49b 6.84b 5.73b
N3 4.16a 7.88ab 7.07ab 5.98ab 4.38a 7.87ab 7.19ab 5.98ab
N4 4.36a 8.26a 7.35a 6.25a 4.57a 8.00a 7.33a 6.00a
F1 3.87a 7.51a 6.74a 5.67a 4.04a 7.46a 6.85a 5.63a
F2 3.91a 7.48a 6.80a 5.71a 4.09a 7.53a 6.89a 5.72a
F3 3.95a 7.72a 6.80a 5.84a 4.16a 7.64a 6.94a 5.75a
N1F1 3.26d 6.47d 5.81c 4.84c 3.52d 6.75c 6.13c 4.92c
N1F2 3.39d 6.51d 5.96c 5.03c 3.58d 6.78c 6.17c 5.12c
N1F3 3.46d 6.86d 6.05c 5.12c 3.61d 6.86c 6.35c 5.24c
N2F1 3.75c 7.52c 6.78b 5.67b 3.81c 7.41b 6.74b 5.71b
N2F2 3.87c 7.47c 6.81b 5.71b 3.79c 7.45b 6.87b 5.69b
N2F3 3.64c 7.56bc 6.73b 5.78b 3.98c 7.62b 6.91b 5.78b
N3F1 4.14b 7.88b 7.01b 5.91b 4.32b 7.77ab 7.19ab 5.92ab
N3F2 4.12b 7.71bc 7.03b 5.94b 4.39ab 7.84ab 7.24a 5.96ab
N3F3 4.22b 8.06ab 7.16ab 6.09ab 4.43ab 8.01ab 7.13ab 6.05a
N4F1 4.33ab 8.15ab 7.37a 6.24a 4.49ab 7.91ab 7.34a 5.98ab
N4F2 4.26b 8.23a 7.41a 6.16ab 4.59a 8.03a 7.26ab 6.09a
N4F3 4.49a 8.39a 7.27ab 6.36a 4.62a 8.05a 7.38a 5.94ab
N ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
F ns ** ns ** ** ** ** **
N×F ** * * ns ns ns ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536416092283790, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 3, caption=

Effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on high-efficiency LAI at full heading stage of small-seed hybrid rice

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
剑叶
Flag leaf
倒二叶
Penultimate leaf
倒三叶
Antepenultimate leaf
合计
Total
剑叶
Flag leaf
倒二叶
Penultimate leaf
倒三叶
Antepenultimate leaf
合计
Total
N1 1.40 1.50 1.48 4.38c 1.42 1.51 1.45 4.38c
N2 1.51 1.69 1.65 4.85b 1.49 1.60 1.66 4.75b
N3 1.65 1.75 1.78 5.18a 1.61 1.71 1.75 5.07a
N4 1.67 1.79 1.78 5.24a 1.62 1.76 1.75 5.13a
F1 1.56 1.69 1.65 4.90a 1.54 1.63 1.63 4.80a
F2 1.55 1.68 1.68 4.91a 1.52 1.66 1.64 4.82a
F3 1.56 1.69 1.69 4.94a 1.54 1.64 1.69 4.87a
N1F1 1.39 1.50 1.43 4.32c 1.43 1.48 1.41 4.32c
N1F2 1.39 1.52 1.45 4.36c 1.41 1.49 1.46 4.36c
N1F3 1.41 1.49 1.54 4.44c 1.42 1.55 1.49 4.46c
N2F1 1.50 1.71 1.64 4.85b 1.51 1.57 1.63 4.71b
N2F2 1.51 1.62 1.68 4.81b 1.47 1.61 1.67 4.75b
N2F3 1.53 1.75 1.64 4.92b 1.49 1.62 1.68 4.79b
N3F1 1.66 1.73 1.77 5.16a 1.60 1.68 1.78 5.06a
N3F2 1.65 1.75 1.79 5.19a 1.63 1.76 1.67 5.06a
N3F3 1.63 1.76 1.80 5.19a 1.60 1.68 1.79 5.07a
N4F1 1.69 1.80 1.76 5.25a 1.63 1.77 1.72 5.12a
N4F2 1.67 1.82 1.78 5.27a 1.58 1.79 1.74 5.11a
N4F3 1.64 1.75 1.81 5.20a 1.65 1.72 1.79 5.16a
N ** **
F ns **
N×F ns ns
), ArticleFig(id=1256536417426072470, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表3, caption=

施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒杂交稻齐穗期高效LAI的影响

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
剑叶
Flag leaf
倒二叶
Penultimate leaf
倒三叶
Antepenultimate leaf
合计
Total
剑叶
Flag leaf
倒二叶
Penultimate leaf
倒三叶
Antepenultimate leaf
合计
Total
N1 1.40 1.50 1.48 4.38c 1.42 1.51 1.45 4.38c
N2 1.51 1.69 1.65 4.85b 1.49 1.60 1.66 4.75b
N3 1.65 1.75 1.78 5.18a 1.61 1.71 1.75 5.07a
N4 1.67 1.79 1.78 5.24a 1.62 1.76 1.75 5.13a
F1 1.56 1.69 1.65 4.90a 1.54 1.63 1.63 4.80a
F2 1.55 1.68 1.68 4.91a 1.52 1.66 1.64 4.82a
F3 1.56 1.69 1.69 4.94a 1.54 1.64 1.69 4.87a
N1F1 1.39 1.50 1.43 4.32c 1.43 1.48 1.41 4.32c
N1F2 1.39 1.52 1.45 4.36c 1.41 1.49 1.46 4.36c
N1F3 1.41 1.49 1.54 4.44c 1.42 1.55 1.49 4.46c
N2F1 1.50 1.71 1.64 4.85b 1.51 1.57 1.63 4.71b
N2F2 1.51 1.62 1.68 4.81b 1.47 1.61 1.67 4.75b
N2F3 1.53 1.75 1.64 4.92b 1.49 1.62 1.68 4.79b
N3F1 1.66 1.73 1.77 5.16a 1.60 1.68 1.78 5.06a
N3F2 1.65 1.75 1.79 5.19a 1.63 1.76 1.67 5.06a
N3F3 1.63 1.76 1.80 5.19a 1.60 1.68 1.79 5.07a
N4F1 1.69 1.80 1.76 5.25a 1.63 1.77 1.72 5.12a
N4F2 1.67 1.82 1.78 5.27a 1.58 1.79 1.74 5.11a
N4F3 1.64 1.75 1.81 5.20a 1.65 1.72 1.79 5.16a
N ** **
F ns **
N×F ns ns
), ArticleFig(id=1256536419451921310, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 4, caption=

Effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on SPAD value of small-seed hybrid rice

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
分蘖期
Tillering stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
分蘖期
Tillering stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
N1 39.46c 42.57b 42.22b 38.20b 39.92b 43.14b 41.45b 38.29b
N2 41.91b 44.68ab 43.64ab 39.03b 41.34b 43.53b 42.35b 39.58b
N3 42.40ab 45.30a 44.40a 40.61ab 42.08ab 45.53ab 44.41ab 41.53ab
N4 44.33a 46.37a 45.11a 41.14a 43.50a 46.23a 45.35a 42.40a
F1 41.86a 44.46a 43.73a 39.53a 41.67a 44.41a 43.18a 40.24a
F2 42.04a 44.68a 43.96a 39.81a 41.50a 44.46a 43.51a 40.53a
F3 42.18a 45.05a 43.84a 39.90a 41.97a 44.79a 43.48a 40.58a
N1F1 39.13c 41.67b 41.63b 37.43b 39.83b 42.89b 40.85b 37.45c
N1F2 39.43c 42.83b 42.47b 38.80b 39.87b 43.03b 41.56b 38.46bc
N1F3 39.83c 43.20b 42.57b 38.37b 40.07b 43.51b 41.95b 38.95bc
N2F1 41.77bc 44.63ab 43.71ab 38.80b 41.53ab 43.37b 42.12b 39.34b
N2F2 41.93b 44.43ab 43.43ab 38.47b 40.73b 43.24b 42.39b 39.61b
N2F3 42.03b 44.97ab 43.77ab 39.83ab 41.77ab 43.98b 42.54b 39.79b
N3F1 42.37ab 45.21a 44.53ab 40.43ab 42.10a 44.81ab 44.02ab 41.23ab
N3F2 42.41ab 45.17ab 44.77a 40.78ab 41.72ab 45.34ab 44.53ab 41.62ab
N3F3 42.43ab 45.53a 43.90ab 40.63ab 42.43a 45.78ab 44.67a 41.73ab
N4F1 44.17ab 46.33a 45.03a 41.47a 43.23a 46.57a 45.74a 42.93a
N4F2 44.39a 46.27a 45.17a 41.17a 43.67a 46.23a 45.57a 42.43a
N4F3 44.43a 46.51a 45.13a 40.78ab 43.60a 45.89ab 44.74a 41.84ab
N ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
F ns * ns ns ns ns ns ns
N×F ns ** ns * ns ns * ns
), ArticleFig(id=1256536420294976428, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表4, caption=

施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒杂交稻叶片SPAD值的影响

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
分蘖期
Tillering stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
分蘖期
Tillering stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
N1 39.46c 42.57b 42.22b 38.20b 39.92b 43.14b 41.45b 38.29b
N2 41.91b 44.68ab 43.64ab 39.03b 41.34b 43.53b 42.35b 39.58b
N3 42.40ab 45.30a 44.40a 40.61ab 42.08ab 45.53ab 44.41ab 41.53ab
N4 44.33a 46.37a 45.11a 41.14a 43.50a 46.23a 45.35a 42.40a
F1 41.86a 44.46a 43.73a 39.53a 41.67a 44.41a 43.18a 40.24a
F2 42.04a 44.68a 43.96a 39.81a 41.50a 44.46a 43.51a 40.53a
F3 42.18a 45.05a 43.84a 39.90a 41.97a 44.79a 43.48a 40.58a
N1F1 39.13c 41.67b 41.63b 37.43b 39.83b 42.89b 40.85b 37.45c
N1F2 39.43c 42.83b 42.47b 38.80b 39.87b 43.03b 41.56b 38.46bc
N1F3 39.83c 43.20b 42.57b 38.37b 40.07b 43.51b 41.95b 38.95bc
N2F1 41.77bc 44.63ab 43.71ab 38.80b 41.53ab 43.37b 42.12b 39.34b
N2F2 41.93b 44.43ab 43.43ab 38.47b 40.73b 43.24b 42.39b 39.61b
N2F3 42.03b 44.97ab 43.77ab 39.83ab 41.77ab 43.98b 42.54b 39.79b
N3F1 42.37ab 45.21a 44.53ab 40.43ab 42.10a 44.81ab 44.02ab 41.23ab
N3F2 42.41ab 45.17ab 44.77a 40.78ab 41.72ab 45.34ab 44.53ab 41.62ab
N3F3 42.43ab 45.53a 43.90ab 40.63ab 42.43a 45.78ab 44.67a 41.73ab
N4F1 44.17ab 46.33a 45.03a 41.47a 43.23a 46.57a 45.74a 42.93a
N4F2 44.39a 46.27a 45.17a 41.17a 43.67a 46.23a 45.57a 42.43a
N4F3 44.43a 46.51a 45.13a 40.78ab 43.60a 45.89ab 44.74a 41.84ab
N ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
F ns * ns ns ns ns ns ns
N×F ns ** ns * ns ns * ns
), ArticleFig(id=1256536421159003059, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 5, caption=

Effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on dry matter accumulation in small-seed hybrid rice

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
成熟期
Maturity stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
成熟期
Maturity stage
N1 6.46c 10.25c 13.38c 15.32c 7.24c 10.64b 12.58b 14.55c
N2 7.77b 11.17b 14.32b 16.35b 7.82b 11.35a 13.81a 15.89b
N3 8.20a 11.81a 15.25a 17.23a 8.14ab 11.58a 14.20a 16.50a
N4 8.29a 11.46ab 14.61ab 16.85ab 8.30a 11.64a 14.09a 16.27ab
F1 7.63a 11.09a 14.35a 16.40a 7.80a 11.26a 13.60a 15.75a
F2 7.67a 11.20a 14.46a 16.51a 7.83a 11.33a 13.72a 15.88a
F3 7.74a 11.23a 14.36a 16.41a 7.99a 11.34a 13.70a 15.79a
N1F1 6.37c 10.12c 13.28c 15.25c 7.12c 10.51b 12.38b 14.33c
N1F2 6.42c 10.28c 13.35c 15.30c 7.16c 10.63b 12.57b 14.58c
N1F3 6.58c 10.35c 13.51c 15.41c 7.44bc 10.79b 12.78b 14.75c
N2F1 7.71b 11.13b 14.21b 16.19bc 7.73b 11.21ab 13.67a 15.81b
N2F2 7.78b 11.18b 14.39b 16.32b 7.79b 11.34a 13.85a 15.88b
N2F3 7.82b 11.20b 14.37b 16.55ab 7.95ab 11.50a 13.92a 15.97ab
N3F1 8.18ab 11.67ab 15.26a 17.24a 8.05ab 11.57a 14.23a 16.58a
N3F2 8.19ab 11.89a 15.34a 17.36a 8.12ab 11.64a 14.29a 16.69a
N3F3 8.22ab 11.86a 15.14ab 17.09ab 8.24a 11.54a 14.08a 16.24ab
N4F1 8.25a 11.43ab 14.66ab 16.92ab 8.31a 11.73a 14.11a 16.29ab
N4F2 8.29a 11.45ab 14.75ab 17.05ab 8.25a 11.69a 14.15a 16.35ab
N4F3 8.34a 11.50ab 14.43b 16.57ab 8.34a 11.51a 14.02a 16.18ab
N ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
F ** ** ** ** ** * ** **
N×F ns ns ** ** ** ** ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536421964309431, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表5, caption=

施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒杂交稻干物质积累量的影响

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
成熟期
Maturity stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
成熟期
Maturity stage
N1 6.46c 10.25c 13.38c 15.32c 7.24c 10.64b 12.58b 14.55c
N2 7.77b 11.17b 14.32b 16.35b 7.82b 11.35a 13.81a 15.89b
N3 8.20a 11.81a 15.25a 17.23a 8.14ab 11.58a 14.20a 16.50a
N4 8.29a 11.46ab 14.61ab 16.85ab 8.30a 11.64a 14.09a 16.27ab
F1 7.63a 11.09a 14.35a 16.40a 7.80a 11.26a 13.60a 15.75a
F2 7.67a 11.20a 14.46a 16.51a 7.83a 11.33a 13.72a 15.88a
F3 7.74a 11.23a 14.36a 16.41a 7.99a 11.34a 13.70a 15.79a
N1F1 6.37c 10.12c 13.28c 15.25c 7.12c 10.51b 12.38b 14.33c
N1F2 6.42c 10.28c 13.35c 15.30c 7.16c 10.63b 12.57b 14.58c
N1F3 6.58c 10.35c 13.51c 15.41c 7.44bc 10.79b 12.78b 14.75c
N2F1 7.71b 11.13b 14.21b 16.19bc 7.73b 11.21ab 13.67a 15.81b
N2F2 7.78b 11.18b 14.39b 16.32b 7.79b 11.34a 13.85a 15.88b
N2F3 7.82b 11.20b 14.37b 16.55ab 7.95ab 11.50a 13.92a 15.97ab
N3F1 8.18ab 11.67ab 15.26a 17.24a 8.05ab 11.57a 14.23a 16.58a
N3F2 8.19ab 11.89a 15.34a 17.36a 8.12ab 11.64a 14.29a 16.69a
N3F3 8.22ab 11.86a 15.14ab 17.09ab 8.24a 11.54a 14.08a 16.24ab
N4F1 8.25a 11.43ab 14.66ab 16.92ab 8.31a 11.73a 14.11a 16.29ab
N4F2 8.29a 11.45ab 14.75ab 17.05ab 8.25a 11.69a 14.15a 16.35ab
N4F3 8.34a 11.50ab 14.43b 16.57ab 8.34a 11.51a 14.02a 16.18ab
N ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
F ** ** ** ** ** * ** **
N×F ns ns ** ** ** ** ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536424141153215, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 6, caption=

Effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on the total sink capacity of small-seed hybrid rice

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
总颖花数
Total spikelets
(×104/hm2)
总库容量
Total sink capacity
(kg/hm2)
库容有效充实度
Available filled ratio
of sink capacity (%)
总颖花数
Total spikelets
(×104/hm2)
总库容量
Total sink capacity
(kg/hm2)
库容有效充实度
Available filled ratio
of sink capacity (%)
N1 53 282.68c 11 828.75c 78.79a 53 158.74c 11 806.56c 79.70a
N2 60 559.64b 13 426.07b 75.75ab 59 180.27b 13 132.10b 75.16b
N3 63 445.88ab 14 059.61ab 77.74a 61 982.94ab 13 741.62ab 76.05ab
N4 65 399.58a 14 479.47a 73.97b 62 086.44a 13 758.35a 74.35b
F1 59 770.46a 13 263.07a 76.91a 58 912.90a 13 072.77a 76.19a
F2 60 360.91a 13 400.12a 77.46a 59 055.88a 13 116.31a 76.70a
F3 61 716.03a 13 651.59a 75.16a 59 262.49a 13 126.64a 75.80a
N1F1 52 195.82c 11 556.15d 79.78a 52 444.16c 11 616.38c 80.23a
N1F2 52 912.89c 11 778.41d 79.04a 53 215.45c 11 840.44c 79.30a
N1F3 54 752.35c 12 160.50d 77.46ab 53 819.76c 11 969.51c 79.54a
N2F1 59 179.52b 13 120.10c 75.53b 58 667.68b 13 030.09b 74.90b
N2F2 60 316.12b 13 402.24bc 77.38ab 59 077.35b 13 132.90b 75.23b
N2F3 62 206.98b 13 760.18b 74.42b 59 799.76ab 13 233.69b 75.34b
N3F1 62 449.25ab 13 851.24ab 78.98ab 62 011.98ab 13 741.86ab 76.12ab
N3F2 63 189.11ab 13 990.07ab 78.56ab 62 310.02a 13 820.36a 76.63ab
N3F3 64 688.43ab 14 328.49ab 75.72b 61 620.99ab 13 661.37ab 75.32b
N4F1 65 566.65a 14 595.14a 73.52b 62 680.58a 13 940.16a 73.96b
N4F2 65 281.60a 14 485.99a 74.97b 61 735.37ab 13 692.91ab 75.73b
N4F3 65 334.08a 14 360.43ab 73.33b 61 848.37ab 13 637.57ab 73.47b
N ** ** ** ** ** **
F ** ** ** ns ns *
N×F * ** ** ** ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536425000985545, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表6, caption=

施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒杂交稻总库容量的影响

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
总颖花数
Total spikelets
(×104/hm2)
总库容量
Total sink capacity
(kg/hm2)
库容有效充实度
Available filled ratio
of sink capacity (%)
总颖花数
Total spikelets
(×104/hm2)
总库容量
Total sink capacity
(kg/hm2)
库容有效充实度
Available filled ratio
of sink capacity (%)
N1 53 282.68c 11 828.75c 78.79a 53 158.74c 11 806.56c 79.70a
N2 60 559.64b 13 426.07b 75.75ab 59 180.27b 13 132.10b 75.16b
N3 63 445.88ab 14 059.61ab 77.74a 61 982.94ab 13 741.62ab 76.05ab
N4 65 399.58a 14 479.47a 73.97b 62 086.44a 13 758.35a 74.35b
F1 59 770.46a 13 263.07a 76.91a 58 912.90a 13 072.77a 76.19a
F2 60 360.91a 13 400.12a 77.46a 59 055.88a 13 116.31a 76.70a
F3 61 716.03a 13 651.59a 75.16a 59 262.49a 13 126.64a 75.80a
N1F1 52 195.82c 11 556.15d 79.78a 52 444.16c 11 616.38c 80.23a
N1F2 52 912.89c 11 778.41d 79.04a 53 215.45c 11 840.44c 79.30a
N1F3 54 752.35c 12 160.50d 77.46ab 53 819.76c 11 969.51c 79.54a
N2F1 59 179.52b 13 120.10c 75.53b 58 667.68b 13 030.09b 74.90b
N2F2 60 316.12b 13 402.24bc 77.38ab 59 077.35b 13 132.90b 75.23b
N2F3 62 206.98b 13 760.18b 74.42b 59 799.76ab 13 233.69b 75.34b
N3F1 62 449.25ab 13 851.24ab 78.98ab 62 011.98ab 13 741.86ab 76.12ab
N3F2 63 189.11ab 13 990.07ab 78.56ab 62 310.02a 13 820.36a 76.63ab
N3F3 64 688.43ab 14 328.49ab 75.72b 61 620.99ab 13 661.37ab 75.32b
N4F1 65 566.65a 14 595.14a 73.52b 62 680.58a 13 940.16a 73.96b
N4F2 65 281.60a 14 485.99a 74.97b 61 735.37ab 13 692.91ab 75.73b
N4F3 65 334.08a 14 360.43ab 73.33b 61 848.37ab 13 637.57ab 73.47b
N ** ** ** ** ** **
F ** ** ** ns ns *
N×F * ** ** ** ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536425399444429, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 7, caption=

Effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on rice yield and its components of small-seed hybrid rice in 2023

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
有效穗数
Effective panicle number
(×104/hm2)
穗粒数
Grains per
panicle
结实率
Seed-setting
rate (%)
千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
理论产量
Theoretical
yield (t/hm2)
实际产量
Actual yield
(t/hm2)
N1 228.25c 233.44b 81.45a 22.20a 9.64c 9.32c
N2 241.62b 250.64a 78.27ab 22.17a 10.51b 10.17b
N3 251.47ab 252.30a 79.50ab 22.16a 11.17a 10.93a
N4 266.35a 245.54ab 76.18b 22.14a 11.03ab 10.71a
F1 244.56a 244.40a 79.26a 22.19a 10.51a 10.20a
F2 245.23a 246.14a 79.47a 22.20a 10.64a 10.38a
F3 250.97a 245.91a 77.83a 22.12a 10.61a 10.26a
N1F1 225.78c 231.18c 81.47a 22.14a 9.41c 9.22c
N1F2 226.87c 233.23c 82.04a 22.26a 9.66c 9.31c
N1F3 232.09c 235.91bc 80.85ab 22.21a 9.83c 9.42c
N2F1 238.31bc 248.33ab 78.62ab 22.17a 10.32bc 9.91bc
N2F2 241.39bc 249.87ab 78.49ab 22.22a 10.52b 10.37b
N2F3 245.17b 253.73a 77.70b 22.12a 10.69b 10.24b
N3F1 249.03b 250.77ab 80.96ab 22.18a 11.21a 10.94a
N3F2 248.18b 254.61a 80.47ab 22.14a 11.26a 10.99a
N3F3 257.19ab 251.52ab 77.07b 22.15a 11.04ab 10.85ab
N4F1 265.13a 247.30ab 75.98b 22.26a 11.09ab 10.73ab
N4F2 264.48a 246.83ab 76.88b 22.19a 11.14ab 10.86ab
N4F3 269.43a 242.49b 75.68b 21.98a 10.87ab 10.53ab
N ** ** ** ns ** **
F * ns ns ** ** **
N×F ns ns ns ** ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536426234110931, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表7, caption=

2023年施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻产量及其构成因素的影响

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
有效穗数
Effective panicle number
(×104/hm2)
穗粒数
Grains per
panicle
结实率
Seed-setting
rate (%)
千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
理论产量
Theoretical
yield (t/hm2)
实际产量
Actual yield
(t/hm2)
N1 228.25c 233.44b 81.45a 22.20a 9.64c 9.32c
N2 241.62b 250.64a 78.27ab 22.17a 10.51b 10.17b
N3 251.47ab 252.30a 79.50ab 22.16a 11.17a 10.93a
N4 266.35a 245.54ab 76.18b 22.14a 11.03ab 10.71a
F1 244.56a 244.40a 79.26a 22.19a 10.51a 10.20a
F2 245.23a 246.14a 79.47a 22.20a 10.64a 10.38a
F3 250.97a 245.91a 77.83a 22.12a 10.61a 10.26a
N1F1 225.78c 231.18c 81.47a 22.14a 9.41c 9.22c
N1F2 226.87c 233.23c 82.04a 22.26a 9.66c 9.31c
N1F3 232.09c 235.91bc 80.85ab 22.21a 9.83c 9.42c
N2F1 238.31bc 248.33ab 78.62ab 22.17a 10.32bc 9.91bc
N2F2 241.39bc 249.87ab 78.49ab 22.22a 10.52b 10.37b
N2F3 245.17b 253.73a 77.70b 22.12a 10.69b 10.24b
N3F1 249.03b 250.77ab 80.96ab 22.18a 11.21a 10.94a
N3F2 248.18b 254.61a 80.47ab 22.14a 11.26a 10.99a
N3F3 257.19ab 251.52ab 77.07b 22.15a 11.04ab 10.85ab
N4F1 265.13a 247.30ab 75.98b 22.26a 11.09ab 10.73ab
N4F2 264.48a 246.83ab 76.88b 22.19a 11.14ab 10.86ab
N4F3 269.43a 242.49b 75.68b 21.98a 10.87ab 10.53ab
N ** ** ** ns ** **
F * ns ns ** ** **
N×F ns ns ns ** ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536428331262942, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 8, caption=

Effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on rice yield and its components of small-seed hybrid rice in 2024

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
有效穗数
Effective panicle number
(×104/hm2)
穗粒数
Grains per
panicle
结实率
Seed-setting
rate (%)
千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
理论产量
Theoretical
yield (t/hm2)
实际产量
Actual yield
(t/hm2)
N1 237.39b 223.93b 82.00a 22.21a 9.68c 9.41c
N2 243.43b 243.11a 78.17ab 22.19a 10.27b 9.87b
N3 258.51a 239.77a 78.65ab 22.17a 10.81a 10.45a
N4 265.69a 233.68ab 76.39b 22.16a 10.51ab 10.23ab
F1 250.48a 235.20a 78.76a 22.19a 10.29a 9.96a
F2 251.43a 234.88a 79.10a 22.21a 10.37a 10.06a
F3 251.87a 235.29a 78.54a 22.15a 10.29a 9.95a
N1F1 236.64b 221.62b 81.87a 22.15a 9.51c 9.32c
N1F2 237.41b 224.15b 81.75a 22.25a 9.68c 9.39c
N1F3 238.13b 226.01b 82.37a 22.24a 9.86bc 9.52bc
N2F1 241.56b 242.87a 77.94b 22.21a 10.16b 9.76bc
N2F2 243.96b 242.16a 77.82b 22.23a 10.22b 9.88b
N2F3 244.77b 244.31a 78.76ab 22.13a 10.42ab 9.97b
N3F1 257.45a 240.87ab 79.21ab 22.16a 10.88a 10.46a
N3F2 259.95a 239.70ab 79.11ab 22.18a 10.93a 10.59a
N3F3 258.12a 238.73ab 77.63b 22.17a 10.61ab 10.29ab
N4F1 266.25a 235.42ab 76.03b 22.24a 10.60ab 10.31ab
N4F2 264.38a 233.51ab 77.72b 22.18a 10.64ab 10.37ab
N4F3 266.45a 232.12b 75.41b 22.05a 10.28b 10.02b
N ** ** ** ns ** **
F ns ns ns * ns **
N×F ns ns ns * ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536428700361702, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表8, caption=

2024年施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻产量及其构成因素的影响

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
有效穗数
Effective panicle number
(×104/hm2)
穗粒数
Grains per
panicle
结实率
Seed-setting
rate (%)
千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
理论产量
Theoretical
yield (t/hm2)
实际产量
Actual yield
(t/hm2)
N1 237.39b 223.93b 82.00a 22.21a 9.68c 9.41c
N2 243.43b 243.11a 78.17ab 22.19a 10.27b 9.87b
N3 258.51a 239.77a 78.65ab 22.17a 10.81a 10.45a
N4 265.69a 233.68ab 76.39b 22.16a 10.51ab 10.23ab
F1 250.48a 235.20a 78.76a 22.19a 10.29a 9.96a
F2 251.43a 234.88a 79.10a 22.21a 10.37a 10.06a
F3 251.87a 235.29a 78.54a 22.15a 10.29a 9.95a
N1F1 236.64b 221.62b 81.87a 22.15a 9.51c 9.32c
N1F2 237.41b 224.15b 81.75a 22.25a 9.68c 9.39c
N1F3 238.13b 226.01b 82.37a 22.24a 9.86bc 9.52bc
N2F1 241.56b 242.87a 77.94b 22.21a 10.16b 9.76bc
N2F2 243.96b 242.16a 77.82b 22.23a 10.22b 9.88b
N2F3 244.77b 244.31a 78.76ab 22.13a 10.42ab 9.97b
N3F1 257.45a 240.87ab 79.21ab 22.16a 10.88a 10.46a
N3F2 259.95a 239.70ab 79.11ab 22.18a 10.93a 10.59a
N3F3 258.12a 238.73ab 77.63b 22.17a 10.61ab 10.29ab
N4F1 266.25a 235.42ab 76.03b 22.24a 10.60ab 10.31ab
N4F2 264.38a 233.51ab 77.72b 22.18a 10.64ab 10.37ab
N4F3 266.45a 232.12b 75.41b 22.05a 10.28b 10.02b
N ** ** ** ns ** **
F ns ns ns * ns **
N×F ns ns ns * ** **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536429174318063, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 9, caption=

Effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on grain-leaf ratio of small-seed hybrid rice at different growing stages

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
N1 0.806a 0.897a 1.067a 0.782a 0.855a 1.050a
N2 0.806a 0.894a 1.059ab 0.790a 0.865a 1.033a
N3 0.805a 0.898a 1.061ab 0.787a 0.862a 1.037a
N4 0.792a 0.890a 1.046b 0.777a 0.847a 1.034a
F1 0.798a 0.888a 1.057a 0.790a 0.861a 1.047a
F2 0.808a 0.888a 1.058a 0.785a 0.858a 1.034a
F3 0.801a 0.908a 1.059a 0.777a 0.854a 1.030a
N1F1 0.807a 0.898ab 1.078a 0.777a 0.856ab 1.066a
N1F2 0.813a 0.888ab 1.052ab 0.785a 0.862ab 1.039ab
N1F3 0.798a 0.905ab 1.069a 0.785a 0.848ab 1.027ab
N2F1 0.787a 0.873b 1.044ab 0.792a 0.870a 1.027ab
N2F2 0.807a 0.886ab 1.056ab 0.793a 0.860ab 1.038ab
N2F3 0.823a 0.924a 1.076a 0.785a 0.865a 1.035ab
N3F1 0.793a 0.891ab 1.057ab 0.798a 0.862ab 1.047ab
N3F2 0.820a 0.899ab 1.064ab 0.795a 0.861ab 1.045ab
N3F3 0.803a 0.903ab 1.062ab 0.769a 0.864ab 1.019b
N4F1 0.804a 0.890ab 1.051a 0.792a 0.854ab 1.048ab
N4F2 0.793a 0.881ab 1.060ab 0.769a 0.850ab 1.014b
N4F3 0.779a 0.899ab 1.027b 0.768a 0.838b 1.041ab
N ** ns ** ** ** **
F * ** ns ** * **
N×F ** ** ** ** * **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536429979624437, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表9, caption=

施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒杂交稻叶片不同时期粒叶比的影响

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
处理
Treatment
2023 2024
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
孕穗期
Booting stage
齐穗期
Full heading stage
灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage
N1 0.806a 0.897a 1.067a 0.782a 0.855a 1.050a
N2 0.806a 0.894a 1.059ab 0.790a 0.865a 1.033a
N3 0.805a 0.898a 1.061ab 0.787a 0.862a 1.037a
N4 0.792a 0.890a 1.046b 0.777a 0.847a 1.034a
F1 0.798a 0.888a 1.057a 0.790a 0.861a 1.047a
F2 0.808a 0.888a 1.058a 0.785a 0.858a 1.034a
F3 0.801a 0.908a 1.059a 0.777a 0.854a 1.030a
N1F1 0.807a 0.898ab 1.078a 0.777a 0.856ab 1.066a
N1F2 0.813a 0.888ab 1.052ab 0.785a 0.862ab 1.039ab
N1F3 0.798a 0.905ab 1.069a 0.785a 0.848ab 1.027ab
N2F1 0.787a 0.873b 1.044ab 0.792a 0.870a 1.027ab
N2F2 0.807a 0.886ab 1.056ab 0.793a 0.860ab 1.038ab
N2F3 0.823a 0.924a 1.076a 0.785a 0.865a 1.035ab
N3F1 0.793a 0.891ab 1.057ab 0.798a 0.862ab 1.047ab
N3F2 0.820a 0.899ab 1.064ab 0.795a 0.861ab 1.045ab
N3F3 0.803a 0.903ab 1.062ab 0.769a 0.864ab 1.019b
N4F1 0.804a 0.890ab 1.051a 0.792a 0.854ab 1.048ab
N4F2 0.793a 0.881ab 1.060ab 0.769a 0.850ab 1.014b
N4F3 0.779a 0.899ab 1.027b 0.768a 0.838b 1.041ab
N ** ns ** ** ** **
F * ** ns ** * **
N×F ** ** ** ** * **
), ArticleFig(id=1256536430789125118, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=EN, label=Table 10, caption=

Correlation between source-sink traits and yield of small-seed hybrid rice

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
源性状
Source trait
实际产量Actual yield 库性状
Sink trait
实际产量Actual yield
2023 2024 2023 2024
LAI 分蘖期 0.898** 0.878** 总颖花数Total spikelets 0.935** 0.938**
孕穗期 0.897** 0.898** 总库容量Total sink capacity 0.938** 0.942**
齐穗期 0.929** 0.916** 库容有效充实度Available filled ratio of sink capacity -0.401 -0.646*
灌浆中期 0.907** 0.918** 有效穗数Effective panicle number 0.827** 0.855**
剑叶 0.962** 0.879** 穗粒数Grains per panicle 0.834** 0.634*
倒二叶 0.889** 0.921** 结实率Seed-setting rate -0.565 -0.627*
倒三叶 0.962** 0.852** 千粒重1000-grain weight -0.193 -0.217
高效LAI 0.964** 0.926** 理论产量Theoretical yield 0.989** 0.988**
SPAD值
SPAD value
分蘖期 0.848** 0.765** 孕穗期粒叶比Grain to leaf ratio at booting stage -0.214 0.178
孕穗期 0.876** 0.814** 齐穗期粒叶比Grain to leaf ratio at full heading stage -0.039 -0.132
齐穗期 0.896** 0.876** 灌浆中期粒叶比Grain to leaf ratio at mid-filling stage -0.239 -0.221
灌浆中期 0.870** 0.894**
干物质积累量
Dry matter accumulation
孕穗期 0.953** 0.888**
齐穗期 0.970** 0.934**
灌浆中期 0.972** 0.932**
成熟期 0.988** 0.956**
), ArticleFig(id=1256536432567508999, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1256314692575182859, articleId=1256536355811746124, language=CN, label=表10, caption=

小粒杂交稻源库性状与产量的相关性

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
源性状
Source trait
实际产量Actual yield 库性状
Sink trait
实际产量Actual yield
2023 2024 2023 2024
LAI 分蘖期 0.898** 0.878** 总颖花数Total spikelets 0.935** 0.938**
孕穗期 0.897** 0.898** 总库容量Total sink capacity 0.938** 0.942**
齐穗期 0.929** 0.916** 库容有效充实度Available filled ratio of sink capacity -0.401 -0.646*
灌浆中期 0.907** 0.918** 有效穗数Effective panicle number 0.827** 0.855**
剑叶 0.962** 0.879** 穗粒数Grains per panicle 0.834** 0.634*
倒二叶 0.889** 0.921** 结实率Seed-setting rate -0.565 -0.627*
倒三叶 0.962** 0.852** 千粒重1000-grain weight -0.193 -0.217
高效LAI 0.964** 0.926** 理论产量Theoretical yield 0.989** 0.988**
SPAD值
SPAD value
分蘖期 0.848** 0.765** 孕穗期粒叶比Grain to leaf ratio at booting stage -0.214 0.178
孕穗期 0.876** 0.814** 齐穗期粒叶比Grain to leaf ratio at full heading stage -0.039 -0.132
齐穗期 0.896** 0.876** 灌浆中期粒叶比Grain to leaf ratio at mid-filling stage -0.239 -0.221
灌浆中期 0.870** 0.894**
干物质积累量
Dry matter accumulation
孕穗期 0.953** 0.888**
齐穗期 0.970** 0.934**
灌浆中期 0.972** 0.932**
成熟期 0.988** 0.956**
)], attaches=null, journal=Journal(id=1256314564611162122, delFlag=0, nameCn=作物杂志, nameEn=Crops, nameHistory1=null, nameHistory2=null, issn=1001-7283, eissn=null, cn=11-1808/S, coden=null, periodic=1, language=CN, oaType=null, ccby=null, superviseOffice=null, ownerOffice=null, pubOffice=null, editorOffice=null, officeType=null, aims=null, clcCode=null, officeProv=null, officeCity=null, officeAddr=null, officeZip=null, officeEmail=null, officePhone=null, editDirector=null, officeDirector=null, officeDirectorPhone=null, officeStaffNum=null, officeEmpNum=null, coverPicUrl=Gp4OSVa9OtcYppZDigdHsg==, journalPrice=null, startedYear=null, abbrevIsoEn=Crops, journalRemark=null, publicationField=null, createdTime=1777458333402, updatedTime=1777458525100, createdBy=18614031015, updatedBy=13701087609, firstLetterCn=null, firstLetterEn=null, subjectCode=Life Sciences, subjectName=null, subjectCodeEn=Life Sciences, subjectNameEn=null, picCn=Gp4OSVa9OtcYppZDigdHsg==, picEn=JXkKWcC2lZ3KFKF94fcKMA==, jcr=null, cjcr=null, exts=[JournalExt(id=1256315368734339842, language=CN, name=作物杂志, nameHistory1=null, nameHistory2=null, managedBy=, sponsoredBy=, publishedBy=, editorOffice=, officeProv=null, officeCity=null, officeAddr=, officeZip=, editDirector=, officeDirector=null, officePhone=null, coverPicUrl=null, journalRemark=, submitArticleUrl=null, websiteUrl=, createdTime=1777458525117, updatedTime=1777458525117, createdBy=13701087609, updatedBy=13701087609, submissionGuidelinesUrl=, submissionAuthorUrl=https://zwzz.cbpt.cnki.net/EditorB3N/index.aspx?t=1, submissionEditorUrl=https://zwzz.cbpt.cnki.net/EditorB3N/index.aspx?t=3, submissionReviewUrl=https://zwzz.cbpt.cnki.net/EditorB3N/index.aspx?t=2, submissionCeEditorUrl=, submissionAeEditorUrl=, option={"copyright":""}), JournalExt(id=1256315368830808835, language=EN, name=Crops, nameHistory1=null, nameHistory2=null, managedBy=, sponsoredBy=, publishedBy=, editorOffice=, officeProv=null, officeCity=null, officeAddr=, officeZip=, editDirector=, officeDirector=null, officePhone=null, coverPicUrl=null, journalRemark=, submitArticleUrl=null, websiteUrl=, createdTime=1777458525140, updatedTime=1777458525140, createdBy=13701087609, updatedBy=13701087609, submissionGuidelinesUrl=, submissionAuthorUrl=https://zwzz.cbpt.cnki.net/EditorB3N/index.aspx?t=1, submissionEditorUrl=https://zwzz.cbpt.cnki.net/EditorB3N/index.aspx?t=3, submissionReviewUrl=https://zwzz.cbpt.cnki.net/EditorB3N/index.aspx?t=2, submissionCeEditorUrl=, submissionAeEditorUrl=, option={"copyright":""})], databaseList=null, tenantJournalId=1256314692575182859, websiteList=[Website(id=1256315495188411145, webName=null, webTitle=null, webDomain=null, webCopyrigh=null, webIpcNo=null, seoTitle=null, seoKeywords=null, seoDescription=null, tenantJournalId=null, journalId=1256314692575182859, journalNameCn=null, journalNameEn=null, grayFlag=null, tenantId=1146029695717560320, platformId=null, journalGroupId=null, journalGroupNameCn=null, journalGroupNameEn=null, type=1, domain=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/CN, language=CN, createTime=1777458555266, createBy=18614031015, updateTime=1777458588578, updateBy=18614031015, name=作物杂志-中文, tplId=1146099689490845704, title=作物杂志, delFlag=0, indexPage=/home, props=[WebsiteProps(id=1256315744678196006, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=articleTextType, value=kx, createTime=1777458614749, updateTime=1777458614749, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744644641571, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=banner, value=null, createTime=1777458614741, updateTime=1777458614741, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744703361833, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=grayFlag, value=0, createTime=1777458614755, updateTime=1777458614755, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744636252962, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=logo, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/CN/file/pic?fileId=yzTpBcSQtdPxVXZTsEAtOQ==, createTime=1777458614739, updateTime=1777458614739, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744715944747, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=minRunFlag, value=0, createTime=1777458614758, updateTime=1777458614758, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744665613093, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=picServerUrl, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/CN/file/pic, createTime=1777458614746, updateTime=1777458614746, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744707556138, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=silenceFlag, value=0, createTime=1777458614756, updateTime=1777458614756, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744653030180, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=staticResourcePath, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cast_kjdb_cn_619/, createTime=1777458614743, updateTime=1777458614743, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744686584615, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=themeColor, value=null, createTime=1777458614751, updateTime=1777458614751, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315744694973224, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495188411145, code=themeStyle, value=null, createTime=1777458614753, updateTime=1777458614753, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015)]), Website(id=1256315495259714314, webName=null, webTitle=null, webDomain=null, webCopyrigh=null, webIpcNo=null, seoTitle=null, seoKeywords=null, seoDescription=null, tenantJournalId=null, journalId=1256314692575182859, journalNameCn=null, journalNameEn=null, grayFlag=null, tenantId=1146029695717560320, platformId=null, journalGroupId=null, journalGroupNameCn=null, journalGroupNameEn=null, type=1, domain=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/EN, language=EN, createTime=1777458555283, createBy=18614031015, updateTime=1777458583531, updateBy=18614031015, name=作物杂志-英文, tplId=1146101810881728533, title=Crops, delFlag=0, indexPage=/home, props=[WebsiteProps(id=1256315779528667952, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=articleTextType, value=kx, createTime=1777458623058, updateTime=1777458623058, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779440587565, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=banner, value=null, createTime=1777458623037, updateTime=1777458623037, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779667079987, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=grayFlag, value=0, createTime=1777458623091, updateTime=1777458623091, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779407033132, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=logo, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/EN/file/pic?fileId=yzTpBcSQtdPxVXZTsEAtOQ==, createTime=1777458623029, updateTime=1777458623029, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779696440117, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=minRunFlag, value=0, createTime=1777458623098, updateTime=1777458623098, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779511890735, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=picServerUrl, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/EN/file/pic, createTime=1777458623054, updateTime=1777458623054, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779683857204, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=silenceFlag, value=0, createTime=1777458623095, updateTime=1777458623095, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779490919214, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=staticResourcePath, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cast_kjdb_en_623/, createTime=1777458623049, updateTime=1777458623049, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779604165425, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=themeColor, value=null, createTime=1777458623076, updateTime=1777458623076, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1256315779646108466, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1256315495259714314, code=themeStyle, value=null, createTime=1777458623086, updateTime=1777458623086, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015)])], journalTitle=作物杂志, weixinUrl=null, journalUrl=http://zwzz.chinacrops.org/, iacademicId=null, status=1, seqNo=null, journalTitleEn=Crops, journalPhotoCn=Gp4OSVa9OtcYppZDigdHsg==, journalPhotoEn=JXkKWcC2lZ3KFKF94fcKMA==, journalFirstLetter=null, journalRecommend=null, journalNew=null, journalCollection=null, jcrJf=null, cjcrJf=null, jcrJfStr=null, cjcrJfStr=null, submissionFirstDecision=null, sciSubjectClassification=null, casSubjectClassification=null, citeScore=null, totalCitationFrequency=null, icpCode=null, psCode=null, advertisingLicenseCode=null, copyrightInformation=null, country=null, option=, provinceCode=null, provinceName=null, collectFlag=false), detailUrlCn=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/CN/10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020, detailUrlEn=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/EN/10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020, pdfUrlCn=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/CN/PDF/10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020, pdfUrlEn=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/EN/PDF/10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020, aliStartDate=null, aliEndDate=null, collectionFlag=false, citedCount=null, citedUrl=null, reference=null)
收藏切换
施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻源库特性的影响
收藏切换
PDF下载
潘群肖 , 龙超 , 卓乐 , 殷超 , 肖敏 , 周文新 , 易镇邪
作物杂志 | 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 2026,42(2): 160-171
收起
收藏切换
作物杂志 | 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 2026, 42(2): 160-171
施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻源库特性的影响
全屏
潘群肖 , 龙超, 卓乐, 殷超, 肖敏, 周文新 , 易镇邪
作者信息
  • 湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙
  • 潘群肖,主要从事作物高产高效栽培理论与技术研究,E-mail:

通讯作者:

周文新,主要从事作物高产高效栽培研究,E-mail:
易镇邪为共同通信作者,主要从事作物高产抗逆栽培与资源高效利用研究,E-mail:
Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and N-P-K Ratio on Source-Sink Characteristics of Small-Seed Hybrid Rice
Qunxiao Pan , Chao Long, Le Zhuo, Chao Yin, Min Xiao, Wenxin Zhou , Zhenxie Yi
Affiliations
  • College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
出版时间: 2026-04-15 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020
文章导航
收藏切换

为明确施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻源库特性的影响,以小粒型杂交稻卓两优0985为材料,在120(N1)、150(N2)、180(N3)和210 kg/hm2(N4)4个施氮量水平与1.0:0.5:0.8(F1)、1.0:0.5:1.0(F2)和1.0:1.0:1.0(F3)3个氮磷钾配比条件下开展大田试验。结果表明,叶面积指数(LAI)、高效叶面积指数、叶绿素相对含量(SPAD值)与干物质积累量随施氮量增大而提高,N3与N4处理差异不显著,但均显著高于N1处理;不同氮磷钾配比处理间,一般以F3处理较高,但无显著差异。总颖花数与总库容量随施氮量增加而增大,库容有效充实度表现为N1>N3>N2>N4,不同氮磷钾配比处理下库容有效充实度一般以F2最大,但差异不显著。有效穗数随施氮量增大而增加,穗粒数随施氮量增大呈先增后降趋势,结实率与千粒重均随施氮量增加而下降,但差异不显著。产量随施氮量增加呈先增后降趋势,以N3处理产量最高,互作处理间以N3F2处理产量最高,N3F1处理次之。相关分析表明,LAI、高效LAI、叶片SPAD值、干物质积累量、总颖花数、总库容量、有效穗数与产量呈极显著正相关,库容有效充实度、结实率与产量呈负相关,穗粒数与产量呈显著正相关,千粒重、粒叶比与产量相关性不显著。本试验条件下,卓两优0985以N3F1处理为最佳,其叶面积较大、穗粒数较多、库容量较大且库容有效充实度较高,粒叶比适中,源库关系较为协调的同时达到节肥增产的效果。

小粒型杂交稻  /  施氮量  /  氮磷钾配比  /  产量  /  源库特性

To elucidate the effects of nitrogen application rate and N-P-K ratio on the source-sink characteristics of small-seed hybrid rice, a field experiment was conducted using the small-seed hybrid rice variety Zhuoliangyou 0985 as material. The experiment involved four nitrogen application levels [120 (N1), 150 (N2), 180 (N3), and 210 kg/ha (N4)] and three NPK ratios [1.0:0.5:0.8 (F1), 1.0:0.5:1.0 (F2), and 1.0:1.0:1.0 (F3)]. The results showed that leaf area index (LAI), high-efficiency LAI, relative content of chlorophyll (SPAD values), and dry matter accumulation increased with increasing nitrogen application rate. There were no significant differences between N3 and N4 treatments, but both were significantly higher than the N1 treatment. Among different N-P-K ratios, the F3 treatment generally resulted in higher values, though the differences were not significant. Total spikelets and total sink capacity increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate, and the available filled ratio of sink capacity followed the order of N1 > N3 > N2 > N4. Under different N-P-K ratios, the effective filling degree of sink capacity was generally the highest in F2, though the difference was not significant. Effective panicles increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate, while the number of grains per panicle initially increased and then decreased. Both seed-setting rate and 1000-grain weight decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate, but these differences did not reach a significant level. Yield showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase of nitrogen application, with the N3 treatment producing the highest yield. Among the interaction treatments, N3F2 achieved the highest yield, followed by N3F1. Correlation analysis indicated that LAI, high-efficiency LAI, leaf SPAD value, dry matter accumulation, total spikelets, total sink capacity, and effective panicles were extremely significantly and positively correlated with yield. The available filled ratio of sink capacity and seed-setting rate were negatively correlated with yield, while the number of grains per panicle was significantly and positively correlated with yield. No significant correlations were found between 1000-grain weight, grain-leaf ratio, and yield. Under the conditions of this experiment, N3F1 was considered the optimal treatment for Zhuoliangyou 0985. It had a relatively large leaf area, a high number of grains per panicle, a large sink capacity, and a high available filled ratio of sink capacity, with a moderate grain-leaf ratio, which coordinated source-sink relationship and achieved the dual effects of fertilizer saving and yield increase.

Small-seed hybrid rice  /  Nitrogen application rate  /  N-P-K ratio  /  Yield  /  Source-sink characteristics
潘群肖, 龙超, 卓乐, 殷超, 肖敏, 周文新, 易镇邪. 施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻源库特性的影响. 作物杂志, 2026 , 42 (2) : 160 -171 . DOI: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020
Qunxiao Pan, Chao Long, Le Zhuo, Chao Yin, Min Xiao, Wenxin Zhou, Zhenxie Yi. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and N-P-K Ratio on Source-Sink Characteristics of Small-Seed Hybrid Rice[J]. Crops, 2026 , 42 (2) : 160 -171 . DOI: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020
水稻作为我国最重要的粮食作物之一,其稳产高产对保障国家粮食安全和促进经济社会平稳发展意义重大[1]。氮、磷和钾是水稻生长发育过程中所必需的三大元素,是决定水稻产量的关键[2]。合理施用氮肥能优化作物群体质量指标,提高作物的光合能力和同化物积累[3];而过量施用氮肥会导致氮素流失加剧,反而不利于水稻健康生长及最终产量的形成[4],同时,磷肥与钾肥之间的平衡也对水稻生长发育至关重要。不同比例的氮、磷、钾肥料组合不仅会影响植株的整体长势,还会作用于水稻“源―库”关系。产量形成的本质是源向库转化的过程,促进源库协调一直是水稻栽培研究的重点[5-6]。朱庆森等[7]分析了水稻源库关系,并将水稻分为源库互作型、库限制型和源限制型。“源”是作物进行光合作用合成并输出碳水化合物的部位,“库”是指吸收和贮藏同化物的部位或器官,库源关系协调是实现水稻高产优质的生理基础[8-9]
近年来,为解决杂交水稻制种机械化困难与机插水稻用种量大的问题,湖南农业大学开展了小粒型杂交水稻研究,其中小粒型杂交稻卓两优1126创造了18.17 t/hm2的高产潜力[10],其种子虽小,却拥有较大的产量潜力,且非常适合机械化播种与收割,展现出广泛的应用前景。目前,小粒型杂交稻的施肥研究较少,郭浪等[11]初步明确了小粒型杂交稻适宜施氮量为180 kg/hm2,在此施氮量下小粒型杂交稻可实现高产;吕宙等[12]研究了小粒型杂交稻卓两优0985相较普通杂交稻的产量形成特点为穗粒数较多、库源较大以及灌浆中后期光合优势明显。目前,小粒型杂交稻在不同施氮量与氮磷钾配比下的源库特性尚不明确。因此,本研究以小粒型杂交稻卓两优0985为材料,在湖南省衡阳县西渡镇梅花村开展大田试验,探究不同施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒型杂交稻源库特性的影响,以期为制定湘南地区小粒型杂交稻高产高效养分管理策略提供科学依据。
试验于2023-2024年在湖南省衡阳县西渡镇梅花村(28°9′ N,111°47′ E)进行。2年间0~20 cm耕层土壤样本基础理化性质如表1所示。
供试水稻品种为小粒型杂交稻卓两优0985,全生育期为134 d。供试氮、磷和钾肥分别为尿素(N 46%)、过磷酸钙(P2O5 12%)和氯化钾(K2O 60%)。
本试验为施氮量与氮磷钾配比双因素试验,采取裂区试验设计,以施氮量(N)为主区,氮磷钾配比(F)为副区。施氮量设置120(N1)、150(N2)、180(N3)和210 kg/hm2(N4)4个水平;氮磷钾配比设1.0:0.5:0.8(F1)、1.0:0.5:1.0(F2)和1.0:1.0:1.0(F3)3个水平,共计12个处理。小区面积15 m2,各小区之间用田埂隔开并覆薄膜,两侧压至犁底层,以防止水分与肥料窜流,田埂宽25 cm。各处理氮肥的基肥、分蘖肥和穗肥施用比例为6:3:1,磷肥全部作基肥,钾肥分基肥与穗肥各一半施用。移栽前施基肥,移栽返青后早施分蘖肥,幼穗分化3期追施穗肥。2023年5月20日播种,6月15日移栽,2024年5月15日播种,6月10日移栽,均采用人工移栽,栽插密度为20 cm×20 cm,每穴双本插植。全生育期实施严格的病虫害及杂草监测与防治措施,其余田间管理操作与常规大田管理保持一致。
分别在分蘖期、孕穗期、齐穗期和灌浆中期每个小区随机调查10穴分蘖数,求出每穴平均分蘖数,根据每穴平均分蘖数在每个小区取样3株,逐叶测定长度与宽度,叶面积=叶长×叶宽×0.75,LAI=(单株叶面积×M)/(10 000×10 000),式中,M为各移栽密度1 hm2的穴数。齐穗期高效LAI是指水稻齐穗期植株上3叶的LAI。
于水稻分蘖期、孕穗期、齐穗期和灌浆中期用SPAD-502叶绿素测定仪(柯尼卡美能达,日本)测定每个小区30片主茎叶的SPAD值(每片叶测上、中、下3点),计算平均值表示为该小区叶片SPAD值。
于水稻孕穗期、齐穗期、灌浆中期和成熟期每小区根据单穴平均茎蘖数(穗数)取样株3株,分茎、叶和穗等装袋,烘箱105 ℃条件下杀青30 min后调至80 ℃下烘至恒重,最后称重。
总库容量=每公顷颖花数×单粒质量;库容有效充实度(%)=(实际产量/库容)×100。
于水稻成熟期调查有效穗数(80穴/小区),根据单穴平均有效穗数每小区取样5穴,考察穗粒数、千粒重和结实率,计算理论产量;每小区割80穴测实际产量,最终产量按13.5%含水量折算。
以各小区成熟期考种所得每株总粒数(总颖花数)与孕穗期、齐穗期、灌浆中期单株绿叶面积计算各时期的粒叶比。粒叶比=每株总粒数/单株绿叶面积(cm2)。
采用Microsoft Excel 2019软件进行数据分析,用SPSS 22.0统计软件进行显著性和相关性分析。
表2所示,小粒杂交稻LAI均在孕穗期达到最高,之后随着生育期呈下降趋势。不同施氮量下,LAI与施氮量呈正相关,各处理LAI均表现为N4>N3>N2>N1,N3与N4处理差异不显著,2年规律一致。氮磷钾配比对LAI无显著差异,2年各处理基本表现为F3>F2>F1;在到达齐穗期之前,等氮条件下均以F3处理最高,说明F3处理在分蘖期至齐穗期能促进水稻对氮肥的吸收,从而提高叶面积。2年分蘖期与孕穗期LAI均以N4F3处理为最高,2023年齐穗期与灌浆中期分别以N4F2、N4F3处理最高;2024年齐穗期与灌浆中期分别以N4F3、N4F2处理最高。
表3可知,在相同氮磷钾配比下,高效LAI随着施氮量增加呈增大趋势。总体看,高效LAI随着施氮量增加而增大,但到N3处理增幅不明显,N3和N4处理差异不显著。N4处理的剑叶、倒二叶和倒三叶叶面积均最大。不同氮磷钾配比差异不显著,但F3均大于F1与F2处理。在施氮量与氮磷钾配比上看,2年分别以N4F2、N4F3处理的高效LAI最高,分别比其他处理高出0.38%~21.99%和0.78%~19.44%。
表4可知,叶片SPAD值在孕穗期达到最大值,之后逐渐降低,但降幅不大,在灌浆中期仍保持较高水平,具有明显的叶片SPAD值优势。叶片SPAD值各时期与施氮量呈正比,N4与N3处理差异不显著,且在施氮量180 kg/hm2时增幅降低;不同氮磷钾配比处理下,处理间差异不显著,F1处理SPAD值均低于F2与F3处理。2年灌浆中期均以N4F1处理SPAD值最高,可见不同施氮量与氮磷钾配比对小粒杂交稻叶片SPAD值有显著差异,且受施氮量影响较大,受氮磷钾配比影响比较小,N3和N4处理则有利于SPAD值在生育中后期维持较高水平。
表5可知,干物质积累量随着生育期推进不断增加,在成熟期达到最大值。各个时期干物质积累量表现为N4、N3和N2处理显著大于N1处理,N4与N3处理差异不显著,且2年表现一致。氮磷钾配比对干物质积累量有影响,总体上差异不显著,但F2和F3处理均大于F1处理,尤其在灌浆中期与成熟期F2优势更为显著。施氮量与氮磷钾配比互作对干物质积累量有显著影响,整体上高施氮水平且在适宜氮磷钾配比条件下干物质积累量最大,2年干物质积累量成熟期均以N3F2处理最高,2023和2024年干物质积累量分别比其他处理高出0.70%~13.84%和0.66%~ 16.47%。综上所述,施氮量能提高小粒型杂交稻各个时期的干物质积累量,灌浆中期与成熟期均以N3处理干物质积累量最大,F2处理较为适宜提升干物质积累量。
表6可知,随着施氮量增加,总颖花量与总库容量逐渐增加,各处理间存在一定显著差异,N3与N4处理显著高于N1处理,N3与N4处理差异不显著,N1与N2处理间差异显著。比较不同氮磷钾配比对总颖花数及总库容量的影响,以F3处理总颖花量和总库容量最大,各氮磷钾配比处理间差异不显著。互作处理中,总颖花数与总库容量均以N4F1处理最大,总颖花数与总库容量呈正相关,且两者与施氮量也呈正相关,但施氮量到达N3时,增幅并不明显。库容有效充实度随施氮量增加而降低,N4处理库容最大,库容有效充实度最低,N3处理在大库容下拥有较大库容有效充实度。不同氮磷钾配比中,F3处理总库容量最大,但库容有效充实度最低,差异不显著。互作处理中,库容有效充实度以N1F1处理最高,N4F3处理最低。
表7表8所示,各处理下有效穗数均随着施氮量增加而增加,在不同氮磷钾配比下差异不显著,但F3处理有效穗数均大于F2与F1处理;2023年随着施氮量增加穗粒数增多,施氮量达到180 kg/hm2穗粒数开始减少,2024年穗粒数在施氮量达到150 kg/hm2时达到最大值。结实率与千粒重均随施氮量增加而呈下降趋势,以N1处理最高,在施氮量与氮磷钾处理间均以F2处理最大,但差异不显著。产量随着施氮量增大而提高,在施氮量达到180 kg/hm2时达到最大值后开始降低,产量在不同氮磷钾配比处理下以F2处理较高,但差异不显著。N3处理2年产量均较高归因于有效穗数与穗粒数较多。互作处理方面,产量均以N3F1与N3F2最大,有效穗数均以N4F3处理最大,穗粒数分别以N3F2和N2F3最大,结实率分别以N1F2与N1F3处理最大,千粒重无显著差异,均以N1F2处理最大。可见施氮量对小粒型杂交稻有明显增产作用,N3处理最佳,氮磷钾配比处理差异不显著,但F2处理总体上表现优于F1与F3处理。卓两优0985产量构成特性为千粒重小和穗粒数多,因此,选择适宜的施氮量与氮磷钾配比来增加有效穗数可以明显提高产量优势。
表9可知,2023年粒叶比均大于2024年,且2年均表现为灌浆中期>齐穗期>孕穗期。随着施氮量的增加,各时期粒叶比均有下降趋势,但处理间差异不显著。不同氮磷钾配比处理对各时期粒叶比也无显著差异。从施氮量与氮磷钾配比互作看,2年粒叶比在孕穗期分别以N2F3与N3F1处理处于较高水平,N4F3处理处于较低水平,各处理间差异不显著;齐穗期分别以N2F3与N2F1处理处于较高水平,N4F2与N47F3处理处于较低水平;灌浆中期以N1F1处理最高,N4F3与N4F2处于较低水平。
表10可知,LAI、高效LAI、叶片SPAD值、干物质积累量、总颖花数、总库容量、有效穗数与产量呈极显著正相关,库容有效充实度、结实率与产量呈负相关,且2024年表现为显著负相关,穗粒数与产量呈极显著或显著正相关,千粒重、粒叶比与产量相关性不显著。
水稻“源”通常指生产与输出同化物的器官或组织,叶片是源的主体部分[13]。研究[14-16]表明,增施氮肥可以增加水稻LAI和SPAD值。前人[17-18]认为水稻上三叶长度应适中,以确保在最大叶面积的前提下适当增加水稻上三叶的叶面积比例,这有利于实现冠层结构的最佳配置。王杰等[19]认为,生育后期维持较高的高效LAI对于提高最终产量至关重要。本研究表明,水稻高效LAI与产量呈显著正相关,与上述结果一致。本研究发现,随施氮量的增加,水稻LAI、高效LAI和叶片SPAD值显著提高,能在灌浆期保持较高的叶绿素含量,且叶绿素含量降低速率较慢,叶片功能期较长,促进花后光合物质积累,从而提高产量,这与刘光明等[20]的研究结果一致。但本研究同时发现,氮磷钾配比处理间差异均不显著,LAI与高效LAI均以F3处理最大,F2与F3处理SPAD值与干物质积累量均大于F1处理,可知F2与F3处理源特性强于F1处理。通常情况下,合理的氮磷钾配比能够促进作物拥有更大的叶面积、更高的叶片SPAD值以及更强的光合作用能力,进而延长高光效持续时间,有利于更多的干物质积累。
干物质积累与分配是作物器官分化和产量形成的关键前提条件,通过提高干物质量可以达到增强“源”的目的[21]。本试验结果显示,不同施氮量下,干物质积累量表现为N4、N3和N2处理显著高于N1处理,而N4与N3处理之间差异不显著,且2年试验结果一致。关于氮磷钾配比的影响,尽管总体差异不显著,但F2和F3处理下的干物质积累量均高于F1处理,特别是在灌浆中期和成熟期,F2处理的优势较为明显。
“库”是指利用或贮藏同化物的器官或组织,穗部籽粒是库的主体部分[22]。作物产量是一个受多种因素综合影响的过程,由植株早期生长发育和后期物质积累转运共同决定。单位面积总颖花数、饱粒千粒重、总颖花数×饱粒千粒重分别反映了库的数量、质量和总库容量[23]。陈年来[24]研究认为,库容量大有利于提高叶片同化物向库器官的分配比例,促进产量提升。本试验结果表明,随着施氮量增加,总颖花量和总库容量逐渐增加,其中N1与N2处理之间差异显著,N3和N4处理差异不显著,但均显著高于N1处理。比较不同氮磷钾配比对总颖花数及总库容量的影响,以F3处理总颖花量和总库容量最大,各氮磷钾配比处理间差异不显著;库容有效充实度随施氮量增加而降低,N4处理总库容量最大,库容有效充实度最低,N3处理在较大总库容量的同时拥有较大库容有效充实度。
郭浪等[11]以小粒不育系卓234S系列杂交稻组合为材料开展研究,发现施氮量显著影响小粒型杂交稻产量,有效穗数随施氮量增加而增加,每穗总粒数随施氮量增加呈先升后降趋势,结实率和千粒重随施氮量增加呈下降趋势,小粒型杂交稻在施氮180 kg/hm2条件下可实现高产,本研究结果与其基本一致。但也有研究[25-26]表明,随着施氮量的增加,群体有效穗数、每穗粒数、结实率和产量呈先增高后降低的趋势。研究结果有所差异,其原因可能是品种与施氮水平不一致。适量施用磷肥可以增加水稻有效穗数和每穗粒数,使籽粒更为饱满,从而提高产量[27],过量施用磷肥则会抑制水稻生长发育,增加无效分蘖和空粒数,降低成穗率和结实率,影响千粒重提高,导致减产[28],产量随着施磷量的增加先增加后减少[29]。才硕等[30]研究表明,施钾能够显著提高水稻有效穗数、每穗粒数和产量,增加生物产量,促进茎鞘物质运转,提高颖花伤流量,降低抽穗后的根系活力衰退值。2023年,小粒型杂交稻卓两优1126在云南蒙自市取得了单产17.79 t/hm2的高产,创造了当地水稻百亩片的最高产量纪录[31],卓两优1126产量的提高主要得益于在保持千粒重和结实率稳定的基础上,通过平衡有效穗数与每穗粒数使群体总颖花数显著提升[32]。卓两优0985的千粒重和结实率与其差异不显著,同样也可通过调整有效穗数与每穗粒数实现超高产。
孙永健等[33]研究表明,氮磷钾配施能够提高水稻对氮素的吸收,当氮磷钾配比为1.0:0.5:1.0时,中氮(180 kg/hm2)水平能提高水稻产量,当氮肥过量时,会增加茎鞘与叶片的氮滞留量,使水稻茎叶徒长,没有高效流向穗部,产量无明显提高;刘风等[34]研究表明,当氮磷钾比例均为1.0:0.5:1.0时,中氮水平处理的产量显著高于低氮水平处理,与高氮水平处理差异不显著。本研究与上述研究结果较为一致,N3F2(180 kg/hm2,1.0:0.5:1.0)处理的产量高于其他处理,N3F1处理次之,但从节肥增产方面考虑,N3F1处理为最佳处理。N4处理总库容量比N3处理高,但其产量比N3低,这主要是因为N4处理的结实率比N2处理低。在施氮量同为180 kg/hm2条件下,F2处理产量高于F3处理,其原因可能是施磷量过大,影响其产量,这与林诚等[35]研究一致。
作物“源”的生长发育直接决定了光合产物的生产与运转能力,进而影响“库”的容量;而“库”的生长发育又会反馈调节“源”的光合产物合成和运输,从而调节“源”的强度,二者关系的建立、发展和平衡将决定作物的产量。源库关系的协调对作物产量影响显著,粒叶比是衡量群体源库协调程度的常用指标[5]。冯跃华等[36]研究表明,随施氮量的增加,颖花粒叶比、实粒粒叶比和粒重粒叶比均降低,特别是过多施用氮肥,单位叶面积所承载的颖花数、实粒数和粒重减少,源库关系失调,直接导致产量降低。吕宙等[12]研究了小粒型杂交稻卓两优0985的产量形成特性,发现其粒叶比和施氮条件下营养器官物质输出率均高于对照品种丰两优4号,卓两优0985高产主要得益于穗粒数多和花后物质积累量大,且低氮条件下也表现出较高产量,具有较小的叶面积、较多的穗粒数、较大的库源比、明显的灌浆中后期光合优势以及较高的经济系数。本研究结果表明,粒叶比与产量相关性不显著,N1处理粒叶比较高,但N1处理的叶面积和穗粒数均最低,单位叶面积上担负的籽粒数和籽粒质量高,整体产量低;N2处理穗粒数较高,叶面积较低,粒叶比较高,但产量处于中等水平;N3处理穗粒数较多,叶面积较大,产量最高,粒叶比合理,源库关系协调;N4处理叶面积大,粒叶比最低,说明其叶面积过大,影响冠层光合速率,降低籽粒质量。N3处理源库生理优势较强,源器官和库器官同步增长,光合产物积累多,营养物质转运较快,能及时满足发育所需,主要体现在有较多的穗粒数,施氮不仅增强了源的生产能力,还增大了库容量,有利于籽粒产量提高。
张宇等[37]认为,粒叶比增大,可以增强库对源物质的“拉动”,促进可溶性碳水化合物从茎鞘向籽粒的转运。综合互作处理分析发现,N3F2处理源库关系合理,产量较高,属于源库协调型。本研究发现,随着施氮量增加,粒叶比表现下降趋势,尤其施氮过多的处理,单位叶面积所承载的颖花数、实粒数和粒重减少,粒叶比最低,源库关系失调,导致产量降低,这一点与唐启源等[38]的研究结果一致。不同施氮水平下,杂交稻保持系叶片源和籽粒库均受到施氮量的较大影响,各时期单株绿叶面积以及粒叶比随着施氮量增加而变化的趋势存在差异[39]
综上所述,施氮量与氮磷钾配比显著影响水稻的源库特性。本试验表明,在源特性方面,卓两优0985在N3处理下具有较高的叶面积与SPAD值,水稻具有充足的“源”,使叶片后期的光合作用更强;在库特性方面,卓两优0985在N3处理下提高有效穗数与穗粒数,增大库容,产量高于其他处理。且在N3处理下粒叶比适中,表明适宜的施氮量处理能较好地协调源库关系。本试验中各数据在氮磷钾配比处理间差异并不显著,可能是由于试验田土壤中的碱解氮与速效钾处于高水平,土壤条件肥力较高,各种养分含量丰富且比例协调,能够基本满足水稻生长对氮磷钾的需求,设置不同的氮磷钾配比,水稻可能表现不出明显差异;也有可能是由于钾肥的用量差距较小,不同氮磷钾配比之间的差异难以体现,关于氮磷钾配比处理的差异有待进一步研究证实。王伟妮等[40]研究显示,氮、磷和钾肥的施用均可以显著提高水稻产量,且3种肥料配施的增产效果明显优于2种肥料配施,当肥料用量处于低中水平时,氮、磷和钾肥互作效应均表现为协同促进作用,但当肥料用量超过一定水平后则表现为拮抗作用。卜容燕等[41]研究从肥料投入经济效益角度出发,指出氮肥和钾肥不合理施用会导致负的经济效益,而磷肥则不明显。合理的氮磷钾配比能够使3种元素发挥协同作用,满足水稻不同生长阶段对各种养分的需求,促进水稻生长发育和产量形成。此外,卓两优0985在中高氮水平后再增施氮肥对产量有限,在氮磷钾配比处理下差异不显著,应根据当地的土壤和小粒型品种的特性,选择能最大发挥水稻产能的施氮量,再搭配适当比例的磷肥和钾肥,有助于小粒型杂交稻产量的进一步提高。
小粒型杂交稻在施氮量180 kg/hm2处理下LAI与高效LAI较大,灌浆中期SPAD值较高,有明显的光合优势,干物质积累量较多,穗粒数较多,源库关系较为协调,因而产量较高;小粒型杂交稻源库特性在不同氮磷钾配比下差异不显著,综合考虑增产效果与经济效益,小粒型杂交稻卓两优0985在N3F1(180 kg/hm2,1.0:0.5:0.8)处理下效益最佳,源库关系较为协调的同时,达到节肥增产的效果。
  • 国家重点研发计划(2023YFD2301402)
  • 湖南省农业农村厅项目(湘农办发〔2023〕38号)
  • 湖南省农业农村厅项目(湘农办发〔2024〕27号)
参考文献 引证文献
排序方式:
[1]
徐春春, 纪龙, 陈中督, . 2022年我国水稻产业发展分析及2023年展望. 中国稻米, 2023, 29(2):1-4.
[2]
乔胜锋, 邓亚萍, 瞿寒冰, . 不同籼稻品种对低磷响应的差异及其农艺生理性状. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(4):396-406.
[3]
李波, 宫亮, 曲航, . 辽河三角洲稻区施氮水平对水稻生长发育及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2020(1):173-178.
[4]
宋志文, 赵蕾, 毕俊国, . 滴灌条件下施氮量对不同氮效率水稻品种物质积累及养分吸收的影响. 作物学报, 2024, 50(8):2025-2038.
[5]
凌启鸿, 张洪程, 蔡建中, . 水稻高产群体质量及其优化控制探讨. 中国农业科学, 1993, 26(6):1-11.
[6]
屠乃美, 官春云. 水稻幼穗分化期间减源对源库关系的影响. 湖南农业大学学报, 1999, 25(6):6-12.
[7]
朱庆森, 张祖建, 杨建昌, . 亚种间杂交稻产量源库特征. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(3):52-59.
[8]
Osorio S, Ruan Y L, Fernie A R. An update on source-to-sink carbon partitioning in tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5:516.
[9]
Doehlert D C. Sink strength: dynamic with source strength. Plant,Cell & Environment, 1993, 16(9):1027-1028.
[10]
俞慧友. 云南个旧杂交中稻超高产攻关亩产突破1200公斤. 中国科技网. (2022-09-15)[2025-01-06]. http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202209/247eb0527ec44176a19afe15f6a27da0.shtml. http://www.stdaily.com/index/kejixinwen/202209/247eb0527ec44176a19afe15f6a27da0.shtml
[11]
郭浪, 肖敏, 崔璨, . 施氮量对小粒型杂交稻产量与氮素利用效率的影响. 杂交水稻, 2023, 38(5):108-114.
[12]
吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, . 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4):422-436.
[13]
Tadahiko M. Plant Nutrition for Sustainable Food Production and Environment. Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media, 1997.
[14]
许桂玲, 王玲莉, 叶勇, . 不同施氮量对机插杂交籼稻群体质量及产量的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2018(4):1-3.
[15]
陈露, 张伟杨, 王志琴, . 施氮量对江苏不同年代中粳稻品种产量与群体质量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(8):1412-1423.
[16]
宋晓华, 柳楷婧, 彭波, . 施氮水平对豫南地区杂交粳稻群体质量和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2019, 34(4):39-43.
[17]
杨建昌, 朱庆森, 曹显祖. 水稻群体冠层结构与光合特性对产量形成作用的研究. 中国农业科学, 1992, 25(4):7-14.
[18]
苏祖芳, 郭宏文, 李永丰, . 水稻群体叶面积动态类型的研究. 中国农业科学, 1994, 27(4):23-30.
[19]
王杰, 张武汉, 孙平勇, . 3个杂交稻新组合源库特性与产量形成研究. 湖南农业科学, 2014(12):4-7.
[20]
刘光明, 赵灿, 蒋岩, . 施氮量对水稻源库协同衰老特征的影响. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58(1):173-185.
[21]
王素兰. 水稻籽粒灌浆期间茎鞘非结构性同化物积累及其调节. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2003.
[22]
Venkateswarlu B, VisperasR M. Source-sink relationships in crop plants. Agricultural and Food Sciences,Biology, 1987, 2:125.
[23]
熊洁, 耿春苗, 丁艳锋, . 不同库容类型杂交早籼稻品种源库结构对垩白的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(19):3970-3980.
[24]
陈年来. 作物库源关系研究进展. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(1):1-10.
[25]
王振洋, 王冀川, 袁杰, . 不同施氮量与栽插密度对水稻群体生长及产量构成的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12):2969-2978.
[26]
黄梅燕, 潘文兴, 农永前, . 不同施氮量和种植密度对水稻葛68优9938产量的影响. 农业科技通讯, 2021(11):107-110.
[27]
李前, 侯云鹏, 高军, . 不同供磷水平对水稻干物质累积、磷素吸收分配及产量的影响. 吉林农业科学, 2015, 40(3):37-41.
[28]
樊禄芹, 樊禄栋. 施用磷肥对水稻产量结构及经济效益的影响. 北方水稻, 2020, 50(4):20-23.
[29]
龚金龙, 张洪程, 李杰, . 施磷量对超级稻南粳44产量和质量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(4):447-451.
[30]
才硕, 潘晓华, 吴建富, . 施钾量对超高产早稻品种产量和稻米质量的影响. 江西农业学报, 2011, 23(5):1-5,9.
[31]
李建武, 辛业芸, 李文友, . 杂交水稻新组合卓两优1126百亩片单产17.79 t/hm2超高产栽培技术. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(4):105-107,112.
[32]
刘慧敏, 周杰强, 胡远艺, . 水稻小粒不育系新组合卓两优1126的高产特征. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2):160-171.
[33]
孙永健, 孙园园, 蒋明金, . 施肥水平对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(24):4745-4756.
[34]
刘风, 石爱龙, 祝海竣, . 施氮量与肥料配比对水稻群体生长和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2024, 39(3):117-126.
[35]
林诚, 李清华, 王飞, . 不同施磷水平对冷浸田水稻磷含量、光合特性及产量的影响. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2016, 24(5):553-558.
[36]
冯跃华, 潘剑, 何腾兵, . 不同施氮水平对超级稻源库特性的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(15):252-256.
[37]
张宇, 赵宝平, 柳妍娣, . 施氮量对裸燕麦源库生理特性和茎鞘NSC积累与转运的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2024, 44(2):206-213.
[38]
唐启源, 邹应斌, 米湘成, . 不同施氮条件下超级杂交稻的产量形成特点与氮肥利用. 杂交水稻, 2003, 18(1):47-51.
[39]
杨玲娟, 张卫星, 张伟贵, . 不同施氮水平对杂交水稻保持系源库特征的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(9):82-87.
[40]
王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 何予卿, . 氮、磷、钾肥对水稻产量、质量及养分吸收利用的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(6):645-653.
[41]
卜容燕, 李小坤, 鲁剑巍, . 中稻氮磷钾肥的施肥效果及推荐用量. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(14):218-221.
2026年第42卷第2期
PDF下载
110
48
引用本文
BibTeX
文章信息
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020
  • 接收时间:2025-01-06
  • 首发时间:2026-04-30
  • 出版时间:2026-04-15
补充材料
相关文章
文章信息
作者
出版历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-06
  • 修回日期:2025-03-12
基金
国家重点研发计划(2023YFD2301402)
湖南省农业农村厅项目(湘农办发〔2023〕38号)
湖南省农业农村厅项目(湘农办发〔2024〕27号)
作者信息
    湖南农业大学农学院, 410128, 湖南长沙

通讯作者:

周文新,主要从事作物高产高效栽培研究,E-mail:
易镇邪为共同通信作者,主要从事作物高产抗逆栽培与资源高效利用研究,E-mail:
参考文献
分享链接
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zwzz/CN/10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.02.020
分享至
全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文
BibTeX
本文的引用情况
2种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏