收藏切换
Research on navigation path recognition method for wheat combine harvester
收藏切换
Jianian LI, Kunshu WU, Kunyi LI, Shaomin CHEN
Journal of Intelligent Agricultural Mechanization | 2026, 7(1) : 8 - 18
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Intelligent Agricultural Mechanization | 2026, 7(1): 8-18
Research on navigation path recognition method for wheat combine harvester
Full
Jianian LI, Kunshu WU, Kunyi LI, Shaomin CHEN
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
  • LI Jianian, E-mail:

About Author:

LI Jianian, E-mail:

Published: 2026-02-15 doi: 10.12398/j.issn.2096-7217.2026.01.002
Outline
收藏切换

To address the challenges in balancing accuracy and real-time performance for navigation path recognition methods of wheat harvesters, this study introduces a lightweight design based on the DeepLabv3+ model. Specifically, the original backbone network is replaced with MobileNetV3-Large, and the ReLU activation function is substituted with Leaky_ReLU. To further reduce computational load, the three dilated convolutions with different dilation rates within the atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP) module are replaced with depthwise separable convolution (DSC) employing identical dilation rates. To ensure the generalizability of the wheat harvester navigation path recognition research, images of wheat harvest areas were captured under six typical environmental conditions: strong light, low light, back lighting, front lighting, shadows, and field edges. The road information within the collected images was annotated by the Labelme tool, thereby constructing a wheat harvest region data set. In the path extraction stage, key points were acquired from the segmentation mask maps using the horizontal scanning method, and the navigation path was fitted utilizing a piece wise cubic B-spline algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that the improved DeepLabv3+ model achieved a segmentation accuracy of 98.04% and intersection over union (IoU) ratio of 95.20%, respectively, with a video image processing frame rate of 7.5 frames per second. The average pixel error and average distance error for navigation path recognition were 7.4 pixels and 37 mm, respectively. The wheat harvester operated at a travel speed of approximately 1.5 m/s, and the path recognition time per single frame was only 0.15 seconds. This performance effectively meets the real-time and accuracy requirements for wheat harvester operation. This research provides a theoretical foundation and technical support for enhancing the autonomous navigation capabilities of wheat harvesters.

DeepLabv3+  /  semantic segmentation  /  navigation path  /  wheat harvester  /  path recognition  /  transfer learning
李加念, 吴坤澍, 李坤依, 陈绍民. 小麦联合收获机导航路径识别方法研究. 智能化农业装备学报(中英文), 2026 , 7 (1) : 8 -18 . DOI: 10.12398/j.issn.2096-7217.2026.01.002
Jianian LI, Kunshu WU, Kunyi LI, Shaomin CHEN. Research on navigation path recognition method for wheat combine harvester[J]. Journal of Intelligent Agricultural Mechanization, 2026 , 7 (1) : 8 -18 . DOI: 10.12398/j.issn.2096-7217.2026.01.002
  • Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program(KKRD202223052)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(52069008)
Year 2026 volume 7 Issue 1
24
7
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12398/j.issn.2096-7217.2026.01.002
  • Receive Date:2025-07-09
  • Online Date:2026-11-03
  • Published:2026-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-07-09
  • Revised:2025-09-27
Funding
Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program(KKRD202223052)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52069008)
Affiliations
    Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China

Corresponding:

* CHEN Shaomin, E-mail:
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/znhnyzbxb/EN/10.12398/j.issn.2096-7217.2026.01.002
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT