中草药

竹根七属4种药用植物叶绿体基因组特征比较分析

PDF下载

林焰, 蔡丽滨, 林蓉, 吴建国, 杨成梓, 吴岩斌

中草药 | 药材与资源 2026,57(18): 7419-7430

收起

中草药 |药材与资源 2026 , 57 (18) : 7419 -7430

竹根七属4种药用植物叶绿体基因组特征比较分析

全屏

林焰, 蔡丽滨, 林蓉, 吴建国, 杨成梓, 吴岩斌

作者信息

通讯作者:

杨成梓

作者简介:

林焰: 林焰，硕士研究生，研究方向为中药资源与品质评价研究。E-mail:1601442173@qq.com

Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome characteristics in four medicinal disporopsis species

LIN Yan, CAI Libin, LIN Rong, WU Jianguo, YANG Chengzi, WU Yanbin

Affiliations

doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.18.028

文章导航

摘要

收起

目的解析散斑竹根七Disporopsis aspersa、竹根七D. fuscopicta、长叶竹根七D. longifolia、深裂竹根七D. pernyi 4种竹根七属药用植物的叶绿体基因组特征与系统发育关系，筛选属内潜在物种鉴别位点，为该属植物的物种鉴定、种质资源保护、药材质量控制及开发利用提供分子基础与理论支撑。方法以4种竹根七属药用植物的幼嫩叶片为材料进行高通量测序，完成叶绿体基因组的组装与注释，并运用生物信息学方法开展重复序列、IR区边界、密码子使用偏好、核苷酸多态性、选择压力及系统发育分析。结果 4种竹根七属药用植物的叶绿体基因组均呈典型的四分体环状结构，基因组全长为155 975～156 109 bp，总GC含量均为37.68%；均注释得到131个基因，包括85个蛋白编码基因、38个tRNA基因和8个rRNA基因。4个叶绿体基因组中的简单重复序列（simple sequence repeats，SSR）均以单核苷酸重复类型为主，长重复序列（long-sequence repeats，LSR）均以回文重复为主。4种植物的IR区边界整体较为保守，密码子使用模式基本一致，偏好使用以A或T结尾的密码子。核苷酸多态性分析表明，rrn23S和trnT-UGU在基因区域中具有较高的核苷酸多态性值（nucleotide diversity，Pi）值，rrn4.5S-rrn5S、ccsA-ndhD、rps11-rpl36和rps15-ycf1为变异程度较高的基因间区。选择压力分析显示，大多数蛋白编码基因的Ka/Ks值小于1，主要受到净化选择约束；ycf1、ycf4、psaI和cemA在部分物种组合中的Ka/Ks值大于1，可能存在与适应性进化相关的信号。系统发育分析显示，4种竹根七属植物聚集于同一分支，且节点支持率较高，并与黄精属构成姊妹群。结论 4种竹根七属植物叶绿体基因组结构与基因组成总体保守，但局部区域存在一定序列变异。筛选获得的候选高变区域可为竹根七属植物的物种鉴定和分子标记开发提供参考，系统发育结果为该属植物的分类及亲缘关系研究提供了叶绿体基因组证据。

关键词

竹根七属 / 散斑竹根七 / 竹根七 / 长叶竹根七 / 深裂竹根七 / 叶绿体基因组 / 种质资源 / 种间差异 / 选择压力 / 系统发育分析

Abstract

收起

Objective To characterize the chloroplast genomes and phylogenetic relationships of four medicinal species of Disporopsis, namely Disporopsis aspersa, D. fuscopicta, D. longifolia, and D. pernyi, and to identify potential regions for species discrimination, thereby providing a molecular and theoretical basis for species identification, germplasm resource conservation, quality control of medicinal materials, and resource development and utilization of this genus. Methods Young leaves of the four medicinal Disporopsis species were subjected to high-throughput sequencing. The chloroplast genomes were assembled and annotated, followed by bioinformatic analyses of repeat sequences, inverted repeat (IR) boundaries, codon usage bias, nucleotide diversity, selection pressure, and phylogenetic relationships. Results The chloroplast genomes of the four medicinal Disporopsis species exhibited a typical quadripartite circular structure, with genome sizes ranging from 155 975 to 156 109 bp and an overall GC content of 37.68%. A total of 131 genes were annotated in each genome, including 85 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were dominated by mononucleotide repeats, whereas long sequence repeats (LSRs) were dominated by palindromic repeats. The IR boundaries were generally conserved among the four species. Their codon usage patterns were highly similar, with a preference for codons ending in A or T. Nucleotide diversity analysis showed that rrn23S and trnT-UGU had relatively high Pi values among the genic regions, whereas rrn4.5S–rrn5S, ccsA–ndhD, rps11–rpl36, and rps15–ycf1 were highly variable intergenic regions. Selection pressure analysis showed that most protein-coding genes had Ka/Ks values below 1 and were predominantly constrained by purifying selection. However, ycf1, ycf4, psaI, and cemA had Ka/Ks values above 1 in some species comparisons, suggesting possible signals associated with adaptive evolution. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the four Disporopsis species clustered within the same well-supported branch and formed a sister group with Polygonatum. Conclusion The chloroplast genomes of the four Disporopsis species are generally conserved in genome structure and gene composition, although local sequence variation is present. The candidate highly variable regions identified in this study may provide useful references for species identification and molecular marker development in Disporopsis. The phylogenetic results also provide chloroplast genomic evidence for investigating the classification and relationships of this genus.

Key words

Disporopsis / Disporopsis aspersa (Hua) Engl. ex K. Krause / Disporopsis fuscopicta Hance / Disporopsis longifolia Craib / Disporopsis pernyi (Hua) Diels / chloroplast genome / germplasm resources / interspecific variation / selection pressure / phylogenetic analysis

引用本文

林焰, 蔡丽滨, 林蓉, 吴建国, 杨成梓, 吴岩斌. 竹根七属4种药用植物叶绿体基因组特征比较分析. 中草药, 2026 , 57 (18) : 7419 -7430 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.18.028

LIN Yan, CAI Libin, LIN Rong, WU Jianguo, YANG Chengzi, WU Yanbin. Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome characteristics in four medicinal disporopsis species[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2026 , 57 (18) : 7419 -7430 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.18.028

基金

收起

2023年福建省本科高校教育教学研究项目 (FBJY20230030)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

Flora of China Editorial Committee. Flora of China[M]. Beijing:Science Press&St. Louis:Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 2000:232-234.
中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志[M]. 北京:中国植物志科学出版社, 1978:80-86.
何顺志,徐文芬.贵州中草药资源研究[M]. 贵阳:贵州科技出版社, 2007:735.
国家中医药管理局《中华本草》编委会.中华本草-5[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 1999:5034.
黄泰康.现代本草纲目[M]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社, 2001:56.
汪毅.精编中草药图谱-4:便携本[M]. 第2版.贵阳:贵州科技出版社, 2012:85.
Zhu Z Y, Liu J, Tang S Y, et al. Sequencing, assembly, and comparative evolutionary analysis of the chloroplast genome of kenaf(Hibiscus cannabinus L.)[J]. Genes,2025, 16(12):1519.
Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Song M, et al. Species identification of dracaena using the complete chloroplast genome as a super-barcode[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2019, 10:1441.
Jin J J, Yu W B, Yang J B, et al. GetOrganelle:A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes[J]. Genome Biol, 2020, 21(1):241.
Shi L C, Chen H M, Jiang M, et al. CPGAVAS2, an integrated plastome sequence annotator and analyzer[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019, 47(W1):W65-W73.
Greiner S, Lehwark P, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW(OGDRAW)version 1.3.1:Expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019, 47(W1):W59-W64.
Kurtz S. REPuter:The manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2001,29(22):4633-4642.
Fuglsang A. Codon optimizer:A freeware tool for codon optimization[J]. Protein Expr Purif, 2003, 31(2):247-249.
Amiryousefi A, Hyvönen J, Poczai P. IRscope:An online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes[J]. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34(17):3030-3031.
Zhang D, Gao F L, Jakovlic'I, et al. PhyloSuite:An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies[J]. Mol Ecol Resour, 2020, 20(1):348-355.
Zhang Z. Ka Ks_Calculator 3.0:Calculating selective pressure on coding and non-coding sequences[J]. Genom Proteom Bioinform, 2022, 20(3):536-540.
Wang J, Qian J, Jiang Y, et al. Comparative analysis of chloroplast genome and new insights into phylogenetic relationships of Polygonatum and tribe polygonateae[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13:882189.
Katoh K, Standley D M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7:Improvements in performance and usability[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2013, 30(4):772-780.
Minh B Q, Schmidt H A, Chernomor O, et al. IQ-TREE 2:New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2020,37(5):1530-1534.
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, et al. MrBayes3.2:Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space[J]. Syst Biol, 2012,61(3):539-542.
Xie J, Chen Y, Cai G, et al. TreePlot:a web server for displaying, editing, and annotating phylogenetic trees[J]. Nucl Acids Res, 2023, 51(W1):W238-W242.
Weising K, Gardner R C. A set of conserved PCR primers for the analysis of simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in chloroplast genomes of dicotyledonous angiosperms[J]. Genome, 1999, 42(1):9-19.
Jia X B, Wei J Q, Chen Y W, et al. Codon usage patterns and genomic variation analysis of chloroplast genomes provides new insights into the evolution of Aroideae[J]. Sci Rep, 2025, 15:4333.
Li B Y, Huang K, Chen X L, et al. Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes from four species in Quercus section Cyclobalanopsis[J]. BMC Genom Data, 2024, 25(1):57.
Dong W P, Liu J, Yu J, et al. Highly variable chloroplast markers for evaluating plant phylogeny at low taxonomic levels and for DNA barcoding[J]. PLo S One, 2012, 7(4):e35071.
The angiosperm phylogeny group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants:APG IV[J]. Botan J Linnean Society, 181(1):1-20.
Maier U G, Zauner S, Woehle C, et al. Massively convergent evolution for ribosomal protein gene content in plastid and mitochondrial genomes[J]. Genome Biol Evol,2013, 5(12):2318-2329.
Yao J C, Zheng Z H, Xu T, et al. Chloroplast genome sequencing and comparative analysis of six medicinal plants of Polygonatum[J]. Ecol Evol, 2025, 15(1):e70831.
Yan M X, Dong S J, Gong Q Y, et al. Comparative chloroplast genome analysis of four Polygonatum species insights into DNA barcoding, evolution, and phylogeny[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13:16495.
Yao J C, Zheng Z H, Xu T, et al. Chloroplast genome sequencing and comparative analysis of six medicinal plants of Polygonatum[J]. Ecol Evol, 2025, 15(1):e70831.
Hu Y F, Wang S Q, Xu Z Z, et al. Chloroplast genome comparison and taxonomic reassessment of Polygonatum sensu Lato(Asparagaceae):Implications for molecular marker development in traditional medicinal plants[J]. BMC Genom, 2025, 26(1):796.

2026年第57卷第18期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.18.028

接收时间：2026-03-02
首发时间：2026-10-29

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2026-03-02

基金

作者信息

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zcy/CN/10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.18.028

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT