中草药

基于UPLC-Q-TOF-MS技术结合质量综合评价优选天麻趁鲜切制工艺

PDF下载

周清素, 付艳, 许清清, 徐娇, 周涛, 康传志, 肖承鸿

中草药 | 药剂与工艺 2026,57(14): 5501-5510

收起

中草药 |药剂与工艺 2026 , 57 (14) : 5501 -5510

基于UPLC-Q-TOF-MS技术结合质量综合评价优选天麻趁鲜切制工艺

全屏

周清素, 付艳, 许清清, 徐娇, 周涛, 康传志, 肖承鸿

作者信息

通讯作者:

肖承鸿

作者简介:

周清素: 周清素（2001—），女，硕士研究生，研究方向为中药及民族药资源分类鉴定与质量控制。E-mail:2557570840@qq.com

Optimization of fresh-cut processing technology of Gastrodiae Rhizoma by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS combined with comprehensive quality evaluation

ZHOU Qingsu, FU Yan, XU Qingqing, XU Jiao, ZHOU Tao, KANG Chuangzhi, XIAO Chenghong

Affiliations

doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.013

文章导航

摘要

收起

目的利用质量综合评价对天麻Gastrodiae Rhizoma趁鲜切制工艺饮片进行比较分析，筛选天麻趁鲜切制的最优工艺。方法采用切片后蒸制烘干方法，设置不同蒸制时间（0、5、10、20 min）和烘干温度（30、45、60、75 ℃），共16种趁鲜切制工艺参数（Q1～Q16）；采用UPLC-Q-TOF-MS技术分析不同趁鲜切制饮片的差异成分，以天麻素、对羟基苯甲醇、巴利森苷类、多糖、蛋白质、醇溶性浸出物为质量参数，采用熵权法与逼近理想解排序法（technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution，TOPSIS）综合筛选趁鲜切制最优工艺。结果 UPLC-Q-TOF-MS技术共分析鉴定出27种化合物，以变量重要性投影（variable importance projection，VIP）＞1.0为条件，筛选不同趁鲜切制饮片的差异成分有丁香酸葡萄糖苷、尿嘧啶、岩白菜素-8-O-α-L-鼠李糖苷、腺苷、巴利森苷B、巴利森苷K、巴利森苷F，差异成分聚类显示，蒸制0 min的饮片聚为一类，与其他蒸制时间差异成分存在显著差异；不同趁鲜切制工艺对天麻素、对羟基苯甲醇及多糖含量影响显著；熵权法与TOPSIS法综合评价分析发现，Q6组（蒸制5 min、45 ℃烘干）综合评分位列第1，且雷达图面积占比最大。结论蒸制是影响天麻趁鲜切制饮片质量的关键工艺；新鲜天麻切制5 mm厚、蒸制5 min、45 ℃烘干时综合质量较高，可为药用天麻趁鲜切制工艺标准研制提供参考。

关键词

天麻 / UPLC-Q-TOF-MS技术 / 含量检测 / 熵权法 / TOPSIS法 / 趁鲜切制工艺 / 丁香酸葡萄糖苷 / 尿嘧啶 / 岩白菜素-8-O-α-L-鼠李糖苷 / 腺苷 / 巴利森苷B / 巴利森苷K / 巴利森苷F

Abstract

收起

Objective To compare and analyze the fresh-cut processing slices of Tianma (Gastrodiae Rhizoma, GR) by comprehensive quality evaluation, and to screen the optimal process of fresh-cut processing of GR. Methods Different steaming time (0, 5, 10, 20 min) and drying temperature (30, 45, 60, 75 ℃) were set, and a total of 16 kinds of fresh-cut process parameters (Q1—Q16) were set. UPLC-Q-TOF-MS technology was used to analyze the different components of different fresh-cut decoction pieces. Gastrodin, p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, parishins, polysaccharide, protein and alcohol-soluble extract were used as quality parameters. Entropy weight method and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method were used to comprehensively screen the optimal process of fresh-cut decoction pieces. Results A total of 27 compounds were identified by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS technology. Using variable importance projection (VIP) > 1.0 as a condition, the differential components of different fresh-cut decoction pieces were screened as syringic acid glucoside, uracil, bergenin-8-O-α-L-rhamnoside, adenosine, parishin B, parishin K, parishin F. The clustering of differential components showed that the decoction pieces steamed for 0 min were clustered into one group, and there were significant differences in the differential components between steamed for 0 min and other steamed time. Different fresh-cutting processes had significant effects on the contents of gastrodin, p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol and polysaccharides. The comprehensive evaluation and analysis of entropy weight method and TOPSIS method showed that the comprehensive score of Q6 group (steaming for 5 min and drying at 45 ℃) ranked first, and the radar map area accounted for the largest proportion. Conclusion Steaming is the key process affecting the quality of fresh-cut GR. The comprehensive quality of fresh GR is high when it is cut into 5 mm thick, steamed for 5 min and dried at 45 ℃, which can provide reference for the development of fresh cutting process standard of GR.

Key words

Gastrodiae Rhizoma / UPLC-Q-TOF-MS technology / content detection / entropy weight method / TOPSIS method / fresh cutting process / syringic acid glucoside / uracil / bergenin-8-O-α-L-rhamnoside / adenosine / parishin B / parishin K / parishin F

引用本文

周清素, 付艳, 许清清, 徐娇, 周涛, 康传志, 肖承鸿. 基于UPLC-Q-TOF-MS技术结合质量综合评价优选天麻趁鲜切制工艺. 中草药, 2026 , 57 (14) : 5501 -5510 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.013

ZHOU Qingsu, FU Yan, XU Qingqing, XU Jiao, ZHOU Tao, KANG Chuangzhi, XIAO Chenghong. Optimization of fresh-cut processing technology of Gastrodiae Rhizoma by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS combined with comprehensive quality evaluation[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2026 , 57 (14) : 5501 -5510 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.013

基金

收起

国家重点研发计划 (2023YFC3503803); 中国中医科学院科技创新工程项目 (CI2024E003)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

中国药典[S]. 一部. 2025: 61-62.
范殊琮, 刘东雪, 陈琛. 基于文献计量的天麻研究发展态势和热点分析[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2021, 38(21): 2754-2762.
Han Y J, Je J H, Kim S H, et al. Gastrodia elata shows neuroprotective effects via activation of PI3K signaling against oxidative glutamate toxicity in HT22 cells [J]. Am J Chin Med, 2014, 42(4): 1007-1019.
杜伟锋, 陈琳, 丛晓东, 等. 天麻化学成分及质量控制研究进展[J]. 中成药, 2011, 33(10): 1785-1787.
陈岗, 李红, 王勇德, 等. 炮制加工对天麻化学成分影响的研究进展[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2023, 35(3): 539-549.
肖佳佳. “天麻饮片”的质量评价及加工工艺研究[D]. 成都: 成都中医药大学, 2017.
付艳, 周涛, 许清清, 等. 基于熵权法和层次分析法优选天麻趁鲜切制方法[J]. 中草药, 2024, 55(5): 1493-1501.
杨成翠, 包刘媛, 李春燕, 等. 不同加工工艺对昭通天麻主要成分含量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2023(12): 51-56.
Fu Y, Xu Q Q, Zhang J Q, et al. Identifying the quality markers and optimizing the processing of Gastrodiae Rhizoma to treat brain diseases [J]. Front Pharmacol, 2024, 15: 1396825.
张玥, 周雪, 王彩云, 等. 毕节天麻质量评价[J]. 中成药, 2022, 44(4): 1079-1085.
Ji N, Liu P, Zhang N, et al. Comparison on bioactivities and characteristics of polysaccharides from four varieties of Gastrodia elata Blume [J]. Front Chem, 2022, 10: 956724.
王金灿. GB5009.5-2016《食品安全国家标准食品中蛋白质的测定》之5.1凯氏定氮法具体操作疑难解析[J]. 食品安全导刊, 2018(30): 54-55.
戴力新, 肖莺, 戚湧. 长三角地区技术转移与成果转化能力评价及影响因素研究: 基于熵权-TOPSIS和分位数回归分析[J]. 中国科技资源导刊, 2024, 56(1): 82-91.
Li Y, Liu X Q, Liu S S, et al. Transformation mechanisms of chemical ingredients in steaming process of Gastrodia elata Blume [J]. Molecules, 2019, 24(17): 3159.
Li S, He X H, Zhang X C, et al. Integration of volatile and non-volatile metabolite profile, and in vitro digestion reveals the differences between different preparation methods on physico-chemical and biological properties of Gastrodia elata [J]. Food Chem, 2025, 463: 141177.
熊汝琴, 王锐, 陈顺芳, 等. 不同产地红天麻挥发性成分分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53(17): 4167-4169.
Xie Y K, Li X Y, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of high-humidity hot air impingement steaming on Gastrodia elata: Steaming degree, weight loss, texture, drying kinetics, microstructure and active components [J]. Food Bioprod Process, 2021, 127: 255-265.
Wu Z, Gao R P, Li H, et al. How steaming and drying processes affect the active compounds and antioxidant types of Gastrodia elata Bl. f. glauca S. Chow [J]. Food Res Int, 2022, 157: 111277.
杨肖衣, 唐成林, 符凌玮, 等. 贵州不同区域乌、红天麻质量差异分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2024, 45(17): 241-251.
陈芳, 倪丽, 缪兴龙, 等. 趁鲜切制和传统切制金荞麦饮片糖类组分比较研究[J]. 中草药, 2023, 54(9): 2776-2784.
董宁, 陈酉, 李旭博, 等. 基于颜色-多糖-抗氧化活性关联分析探究黄精九蒸九制质量变化[J]. 中草药, 2025, 56(2): 476-486.
岳珠珠, 王志成, 姜明瑞, 等. 多花黄精酒蒸过程中色泽与化学成分含量的相关性研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2023, 34(2): 356-359.
戴振庭, 周惠敏, 殷泽生, 等. 蒸制过程中鲣鱼背肉的品质及风味变化[J]. 食品工业科技, 2022, 43(23): 301-309.
杨志城, 孙彩虹, 叶冠. 基于多糖及熵权-TOPSIS的灵芝孢子粉药材质量评价[J]. 中医药导报, 2024, 30(10): 65-70.
亓国锋, 侯迎迎, 李刚刚, 等. HPLC多成分定量及化学计量学、熵权TOPSIS模型在大株红景天质量综合评价中的应用[J]. 南开大学学报: 自然科学版, 2024, 57(3): 51-57.

2026年第57卷第14期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.013

接收时间：2026-01-31
首发时间：2026-09-10

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2026-01-31

基金

作者信息

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zcy/CN/10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.14.013

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT