中草药

基于HPLC法结合多维度判别的不同产地夏枯草各部位潜在质量标志物研究

PDF下载

中草药 | 药材与资源 2026,57(5): 1864-1876

收起

中草药 |药材与资源 2026 , 57 (5) : 1864 -1876

基于HPLC法结合多维度判别的不同产地夏枯草各部位潜在质量标志物研究

全屏

李媛媛¹, 李天娇^1,2,3, 王帅^1,2,3, 包永睿^1,2,3, 张铁军^4,5, 许海玉¹, 孟宪生^1,2,3

作者信息

通讯作者:

孟宪生

作者简介:

李媛媛: 李媛媛,女,博士研究生,研究方向为生药药效物质组学及作用机制整合研究。E-mail:1377589967@qq.com

Research on quality markers of Prunella vulgaris from different origins and parts by HPLC and multi-dimensional discrimination methods

LI Yuanyuan, LI Tianjiao, WANG Shuai, BAO Yongrui, ZHANG Tiejun, XU Haiyu, MENG Xiansheng

Affiliations

doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.05.023

文章导航

摘要

收起

目的基于指纹图谱、网络药理学及分子对接技术初步分析夏枯草Prunella vulgaris 4个部位（穗、茎、叶、根）的潜在质量标志物（quality Markers，Q-Marker）并测定其含量。方法建立8个产地夏枯草的穗、茎、叶和根的指纹图谱，标定不同部位指纹图谱的共有峰和非共有峰；采用相似度分析、主成分分析（principal component analysis，PCA）、TOPSIS分析和正交偏最小二乘法判别分析（orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis，OPLS-DA），运用网络药理学预测夏枯草Q-Marker，同时进行定量分析，对夏枯草品质进行综合评价。结果 8批夏枯草穗、茎、叶和根分别标定共有峰17、22、21和16个。指认出5、11、12、13、14、16和20号峰分别为咖啡酸、芦丁、金丝桃苷、异槲皮苷、异迷迭香酸苷、迷迭香酸和木犀草素。其中咖啡酸、迷迭香酸为4个部位的共有成分，同一药用部位相似度均大于0.97，不同药用部位指纹图谱有明显差异。网络药理学筛选得到包括PTGS2、EGFR等在内的14个核心靶点，对以上靶点进行基因本体（gene ontology，GO）和京都基因与基因组百科全书（Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes，KEGG）功能分析可知涉及癌症中的蛋白多糖、新冠肺炎、脂质和动脉粥样硬化等通路，最后构建“成分-靶点-通路”网络图，选取14个核心靶点与2个成分进行分子对接，结果显示，成分与蛋白之间具有较好的结合性能。结论所建立的指纹图谱方法准确、可靠，同时结合网络药理学和分子对接技术预测了夏枯草4个部位中2个潜在Q-Marker的活性，为综合评价夏枯草的品质和开发研究提供相关理论基础。

关键词

夏枯草 / 指纹图谱 / 咖啡酸 / 芦丁 / 金丝桃苷 / 异槲皮苷 / 异迷迭香酸苷 / 迷迭香酸 / 木犀草素 / 主成分分析 / TOPSIS分析 / 品质评价

Abstract

收起

Objective To initially analyze and determine the levels of potential quality Markers (Q-Markers) in four medicinal parts (spikes, stems, leaves, and roots) of Prunella vulgaris based on fingerprinting, network pharmacology, and molecular docking techniques.Methods Fingerprint profiles of the spikes, stems, leaves, and roots of P. vulgaris were established for eight different origins. The common and non-common peaks in the fingerprints of different parts were identified. To predict Q-Markers of P. vulgaris, similarity analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), TOPSIS analysis, and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were employed, utilizing network pharmacology. Additionally, quantitative analysis was conducted to provide a comprehensive quality evaluation. Results A total of 17 common peaks were identified in the spikes of eight batches of P. vulgaris, 22 in the stems, 21 in the leaves, and 16 in the roots. Peaks 5, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 20 were identified as caffeic acid, rutin, hyperoside, isoquercitrin, salviaflaside, rosmarinic acid, and luteolin, respectively. Caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid were present in all four parts, with similarity values exceeding 0.97 within the same medicinal part, while the fingerprints of different medicinal parts showed significant differences. Network pharmacology screening identified 14 core targets, including PTGS2 and EGFR. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis revealed involvement in protein polysaccharides in cancer, COVID-19, lipid metabolism, and atherosclerosis. A “component-target-pathway” network diagram was developed. For molecular docking, 14 core targets and two components were chosen. The results indicated that the components exhibited strong binding properties with the proteins. Conclusion The established fingerprinting method is both accurate and reliable. Combined with network pharmacology and molecular docking technology, it predicted the activity of two potential Q-Markers in the four medicinal parts of P. vulgaris. This study provides a theoretical foundation for the comprehensive quality evaluation of P. vulgaris and the exploration of new medicinal parts.

Key words

Prunella vulgaris L. / fingerprinting / caffeic acid / rutin / hyperoside / isoquercitrin / salviaflaside / rosmarinic acid / luteolin / principal component analysis / TOPSIS / quality evaluation

引用本文

李媛媛, 李天娇, 王帅, 包永睿, 张铁军, 许海玉, 孟宪生. 基于HPLC法结合多维度判别的不同产地夏枯草各部位潜在质量标志物研究. 中草药, 2026 , 57 (5) : 1864 -1876 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.05.023

LI Yuanyuan, LI Tianjiao, WANG Shuai, BAO Yongrui, ZHANG Tiejun, XU Haiyu, MENG Xiansheng. Research on quality markers of Prunella vulgaris from different origins and parts by HPLC and multi-dimensional discrimination methods[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2026 , 57 (5) : 1864 -1876 . DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.05.023

基金

收起

辽宁省科技厅博士科研启动项目 (2023-BS-138)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

中国药典[S]. 一部. 2025: 300.
皮胜玲, 郭小兰, 刘密, 等. 野生与栽培夏枯草不同生长期3种酚酸成分含量动态研究[J]. 中南药学, 2021, 19(1): 100-104.
王巧琼, 杨冬梅, 陈临江, 等. 中药夏枯草化学成分及药理作用研究概述[J]. 广东化工, 2021, 48(24): 6-7.
Mir R H, Bhat M F, Sawhney G, et al. Prunella vulgaris L: Critical pharmacological, expository traditional uses and extensive phytochemistry: A review[J]. Curr Drug Discov Technol, 2022, 19(1): e140122191102.
王颖, 王一硕, 杜紫薇, 等. 夏枯草不同部位化学成分、药理作用研究进展及质量标志物的预测分析[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2024, 42(6): 199-210.
Aloglu A K, de B Harrington P, Sahin S, et al. Prediction of total antioxidant activity of Prunella L. species by automatic partial least square regression applied to 2-way liquid chromatographic UV spectral images[J]. Talanta, 2016, 161: 503-510.
李梦琦, 石玉, 杨诗宇, 等. 夏枯草抗肿瘤活性成分及其作用机制研究进展[J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2024, 41(5): 716-726.
汤蕊, 高庆军, 杨慧芳, 等. 夏枯草口服液HPLC指纹图谱的建立及5种成分的含量测定[J]. 贵州医科大学学报, 2022, 47(6): 646-653.
Feng L, Jia X B, Zhu M M, et al. Antioxidant activities of total phenols of Prunella vulgaris L. In vitro and in tumor-bearing mice[J]. Molecules, 2010, 15(12): 9145-9156.
陈明龙, 覃桂, 张兴明, 等. 基于文献计量学的夏枯草植物学特性、种植管理及药理作用研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2025, 56(16): 6017-6029.
刘昌孝, 陈士林, 肖小河, 等. 中药质量标志物(Q-Marker): 中药产品质量控制的新概念[J]. 中草药, 2016, 47(9): 1443-1457.
李天娇, 王帅, 杨欣欣, 等. 益血生胶囊多波长等基线融差指纹图谱的建立及质量控制方法研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2025, 36(3): 474-477.
罗佳星, 文检, 何昊奇, 等. 基于HPLC指纹图谱和化学计量学的翼首草不同药用部位差异性标志物研究[J]. 中药材, 2025, 48(1): 129-133.
王梦蝶, 卓越, 邹丽娜, 等. 基于HPLC指纹图谱及多成分定量的金钱草质量评价[J]. 中草药, 2025, 56(3): 998-1007.
缪翼翔, 常源, 董珂旭, 等. UPLC指纹图谱结合化学计量学和加权TOPSIS法评价木通与川木通的差异[J]. 中成药, 2025, 47(4): 1188-1194.
曾昭君, 余欣彤, 邓成程, 等. 基于化学模式识别和熵权TOPSIS法分析木棉花不同部位的差异[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2022, 34(9): 1557-1564.
钟海蓉, 张绍山, 肖芳, 等. 基于UPLC法测定指标成分结合指纹图谱评价不同产地川赤芍不同部位的质量[J]. 中草药, 2021, 52(7): 2062-2071.
张金华, 邱俊娜, 王路, 等. 夏枯草化学成分及药理作用研究进展[J]. 中草药, 2018, 49(14): 3432-3440.
Popovics P, Awadallah W N, Kohrt S E, et al. Prostatic osteopontin expression is associated with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia[J]. Prostate, 2020, 80(10): 731-741.
Huang H. Matrix metalloproteinase-9(MMP-9) as a cancer bioMarker and MMP-9 biosensors: Recent advances[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(10): 3249.
Zhu J, Li Y L, Wu X A, et al. In vivo PET imaging of EGFR expression: An overview of radiolabeled EGFR TKIs[J]. Curr Top Med Chem, 2022, 22(28): 2329-2342.

2026年第57卷第5期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.05.023

接收时间：2025-10-03
首发时间：2026-09-09

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-10-03

基金

作者信息

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zcy/CN/10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670.2026.05.023

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT