药学学报

Therapeutic endpoint	Dose/mg·m^-2	Number of cases/total number of cases	Percentage/%	Median survival time/d
Completely dissolution	700	1/46	2.2%	-
Partial dissolution	420, 650	2/46	4.3%	-
Disease stable	≥ 420	8/27	29.6%	51

Therapeutic endpoint	Dose/mg·m^-2	Number of cases/total number of cases	Percentage/%	Median survival time/d
Completely dissolution	700	1/46	2.2%	-
Partial dissolution	420, 650	2/46	4.3%	-
Disease stable	≥ 420	8/27	29.6%	51

Group	ORR/%	PFS/%	OS/month
Arm 1	13.3	33.3	26.7	13.3	13.4
Arm 2	0	0	0	0	5.8
Arm 3	3.6	35.7	35.7	26.8	18.2

Group	ORR/%	PFS/%	OS/month
Arm 1	13.3	33.3	26.7	13.3	13.4
Arm 2	0	0	0	0	5.8
Arm 3	3.6	35.7	35.7	26.8	18.2

Carrier type	Receptor	Ligand	Drug	Innovative point	Main efficacy point	Ref.
Liposomes	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, TLyP-1	VEGF siRNA, DTX	Dual ligand modification can enhance BBB penetration and tumor targeting	Apoptosis index ↑ 8.5 times; tumor suppression rate ↑ 72%	[46]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DiD, DiO	It was first demonstrated that long-chain PEG can prolong circulation time and promote BBB penetration	Brain tumor fluorescence intensity ↑ 50%; phagocytosis efficiency ↑ 3 times	[47]
SLNs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DTX	Overcoming P-gp efflux to increase drug loading capacity	Median survival time was 39 days; drug load ↑ 2.3 times	[50]
NLCs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	CDDP, TMZ	Co-loading chemotherapy drugs, synergistic enhancement	BBB permeability ↑ 10 times; tumor uptake and accumulation ↑ 3 times	[52]
PEG polymer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	PTX	It systematically verified the biocompatibility of the drug delivery system for the first time	Tumor volume ↓ 35.2%; inhibition rate 65.6%; median survival time ↑ 48%	[58]
	LRP-1, MMP-2	Angiopep-2, ACP	DTX, coumarin-6, DiR	Addressing issues such as insufficient permeability of traditional delivery systems by increasing MMP-2 response	Median survival time extended to 32 days; an increase of 1.68 times; IC₅₀ 1.03 µg·mL^-1	[37]
PLGA polymer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX siRNA	Gene-chemotherapy co-delivery	Apoptosis rate 38.4%; brain concentration ↑ 30%; median survival time 47.8 days	[59]
	LRP-1, LAT-1	Angiopep-2	DTX	Acid-triggered drug release could enhance targeting of the tumor microenvironment	Cell uptake rate ↑ 12 times; brain accumulation ↑ 3 times; long-term survival rate ↑ 50%	[63]
PMs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Dbait	Acid-responsive micelles could enhance permeability	Cell uptake ↑ 164.9%; apoptosis rate 15.72%	[69]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, MAN	DOX, PD-L1 siRNA	Chemotherapy-immunotherapy combination therapy	Median survival extended to 36 days	[70]
AuNPs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX	pH-responsive drug release and photothermal therapy	Drug release rate ↑ 3.75 times, median survival time 55 days	[75]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	/	Achieving integrated diagnosis and treatment of glioma through LRP-1 targeting, magnetothermal therapy, and MRI imaging	Tumor cell survival rate ↓ to 5%; tumor volume ↓ 4 times	[76]
MSNs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX, PTX	Full-chain research on material design, targeted modification, and mechanism verification	Therapeutic efficacy ↑ 30 times - 50 times; cancer cell mortality rate 89.94%	[82]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, PEG2000	ATO	Combining environmentally responsive drug delivery and pharmacokinetic monitoring	Tumor volume ↓ 75.8%; median survival time 49.5 days	[83]
MNPs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Nutlin-3a	Receptor-targeted, magnetothermal, and chemotherapy triple synergistic treatment	Cell uptake rate ↑ 20 times; penetration rate ↑ 16.7 times	[88]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	/	Integration of receptor targeting, AMF responsiveness, heat generation, and dual-mode MRI functional synergistic enhancement	C6 cell killing rate 82%; tumor volume ↓ 99%	[89]
Viral vector	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	SAP	Combining the advantages of protein toxins' low off-target toxicity and high cytotoxicity (limited to intracellular activation) with the targeting properties of nanocarriers	Tumor suppression rate 84%; median survival time extended by 95% (43 days)	[36]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX	Dual peptide-modified sEVs could achieve efficient BBB penetration and tumor targeting	Cell uptake rate ↑ 6 times; median survival time ↑ 2 times (52 days); tumor growth inhibition rate ↑ 2 times - 6 times	[98]
Non-viral vector	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	pORF-TRAIL	Significantly improve the efficacy of GBM treatment through the dual-targeting and selective killing effects of the TRAIL gene	Median survival time was 67 days; and the nanoparticles maintained a 50% cell survival rate at a concentration of 300 µg·mL^-1	[101]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	pEGFP-hRRAIL PTX	Synergistic effects of Angiopep-2, hTRAIL, and PTX	Median survival time 69.5 days; apoptosis rate 81.99%	[102]
Photosensitizer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Ce6	Under the synergistic action of photodynamic therapy, NLCs, and chlorine e6, targeting can be significantly improved and side effects reduced	Cell survival rate ↓ 44%; oxidative stress expression ↑ 2.4 times	[108]
LRP-1	Angiopep-2, macrophage membrane	SN38, ICG	Using near-infrared light-triggered chemotherapy-photothermal synergistic therapy for GBM	Cell uptake rate ↑ 45%; tumor penetration depth ↑ 2 times; tumor volume ↓ 60%	[109]
Immune checkpoint inhibitors	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, macrophage membrane	CXCL10, aPD-L1	Their biomimetic design addressed the dual challenges of BBB penetration and immune microenvironment modulation in GBM treatment	Intratumoral antibody accumulation increased by 19.75-fold; and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration increased by 3.85-fold	[112]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	aCTLA-4, aPD-1	For the first time, efficient delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors to brain tumors and reshaping of the immune microenvironment have been achieved	CD8⁺ T cell infiltration ↑ 3.5 times; median survival ↑ 40%	[113]

Carrier type	Receptor	Ligand	Drug	Innovative point	Main efficacy point	Ref.
Liposomes	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, TLyP-1	VEGF siRNA, DTX	Dual ligand modification can enhance BBB penetration and tumor targeting	Apoptosis index ↑ 8.5 times; tumor suppression rate ↑ 72%	[46]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DiD, DiO	It was first demonstrated that long-chain PEG can prolong circulation time and promote BBB penetration	Brain tumor fluorescence intensity ↑ 50%; phagocytosis efficiency ↑ 3 times	[47]
SLNs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DTX	Overcoming P-gp efflux to increase drug loading capacity	Median survival time was 39 days; drug load ↑ 2.3 times	[50]
NLCs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	CDDP, TMZ	Co-loading chemotherapy drugs, synergistic enhancement	BBB permeability ↑ 10 times; tumor uptake and accumulation ↑ 3 times	[52]
PEG polymer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	PTX	It systematically verified the biocompatibility of the drug delivery system for the first time	Tumor volume ↓ 35.2%; inhibition rate 65.6%; median survival time ↑ 48%	[58]
	LRP-1, MMP-2	Angiopep-2, ACP	DTX, coumarin-6, DiR	Addressing issues such as insufficient permeability of traditional delivery systems by increasing MMP-2 response	Median survival time extended to 32 days; an increase of 1.68 times; IC₅₀ 1.03 µg·mL^-1	[37]
PLGA polymer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX siRNA	Gene-chemotherapy co-delivery	Apoptosis rate 38.4%; brain concentration ↑ 30%; median survival time 47.8 days	[59]
	LRP-1, LAT-1	Angiopep-2	DTX	Acid-triggered drug release could enhance targeting of the tumor microenvironment	Cell uptake rate ↑ 12 times; brain accumulation ↑ 3 times; long-term survival rate ↑ 50%	[63]
PMs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Dbait	Acid-responsive micelles could enhance permeability	Cell uptake ↑ 164.9%; apoptosis rate 15.72%	[69]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, MAN	DOX, PD-L1 siRNA	Chemotherapy-immunotherapy combination therapy	Median survival extended to 36 days	[70]
AuNPs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX	pH-responsive drug release and photothermal therapy	Drug release rate ↑ 3.75 times, median survival time 55 days	[75]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	/	Achieving integrated diagnosis and treatment of glioma through LRP-1 targeting, magnetothermal therapy, and MRI imaging	Tumor cell survival rate ↓ to 5%; tumor volume ↓ 4 times	[76]
MSNs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX, PTX	Full-chain research on material design, targeted modification, and mechanism verification	Therapeutic efficacy ↑ 30 times - 50 times; cancer cell mortality rate 89.94%	[82]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, PEG2000	ATO	Combining environmentally responsive drug delivery and pharmacokinetic monitoring	Tumor volume ↓ 75.8%; median survival time 49.5 days	[83]
MNPs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Nutlin-3a	Receptor-targeted, magnetothermal, and chemotherapy triple synergistic treatment	Cell uptake rate ↑ 20 times; penetration rate ↑ 16.7 times	[88]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	/	Integration of receptor targeting, AMF responsiveness, heat generation, and dual-mode MRI functional synergistic enhancement	C6 cell killing rate 82%; tumor volume ↓ 99%	[89]
Viral vector	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	SAP	Combining the advantages of protein toxins' low off-target toxicity and high cytotoxicity (limited to intracellular activation) with the targeting properties of nanocarriers	Tumor suppression rate 84%; median survival time extended by 95% (43 days)	[36]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX	Dual peptide-modified sEVs could achieve efficient BBB penetration and tumor targeting	Cell uptake rate ↑ 6 times; median survival time ↑ 2 times (52 days); tumor growth inhibition rate ↑ 2 times - 6 times	[98]
Non-viral vector	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	pORF-TRAIL	Significantly improve the efficacy of GBM treatment through the dual-targeting and selective killing effects of the TRAIL gene	Median survival time was 67 days; and the nanoparticles maintained a 50% cell survival rate at a concentration of 300 µg·mL^-1	[101]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	pEGFP-hRRAIL PTX	Synergistic effects of Angiopep-2, hTRAIL, and PTX	Median survival time 69.5 days; apoptosis rate 81.99%	[102]
Photosensitizer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Ce6	Under the synergistic action of photodynamic therapy, NLCs, and chlorine e6, targeting can be significantly improved and side effects reduced	Cell survival rate ↓ 44%; oxidative stress expression ↑ 2.4 times	[108]
LRP-1	Angiopep-2, macrophage membrane	SN38, ICG	Using near-infrared light-triggered chemotherapy-photothermal synergistic therapy for GBM	Cell uptake rate ↑ 45%; tumor penetration depth ↑ 2 times; tumor volume ↓ 60%	[109]
Immune checkpoint inhibitors	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, macrophage membrane	CXCL10, aPD-L1	Their biomimetic design addressed the dual challenges of BBB penetration and immune microenvironment modulation in GBM treatment	Intratumoral antibody accumulation increased by 19.75-fold; and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration increased by 3.85-fold	[112]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	aCTLA-4, aPD-1	For the first time, efficient delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors to brain tumors and reshaping of the immune microenvironment have been achieved	CD8⁺ T cell infiltration ↑ 3.5 times; median survival ↑ 40%	[113]

基于Angiopep-2/LRP-1治疗神经胶质瘤的研究进展

PDF下载

李雪燕 ¹ , 王晓芬 ¹ , 罗平 ¹ , 杨明 ²^,^* , 王芳 ¹^,²^,^*

药学学报 | 综述 2026,61(6): 2075-2088

收起

药学学报 |综述 2026 , 61 (6) : 2075 -2088

基于Angiopep-2/LRP-1治疗神经胶质瘤的研究进展

全屏

李雪燕¹, 王晓芬¹, 罗平¹, 杨明²^,^*, 王芳¹^,²^,^*

作者信息

¹江西中医药大学癌症研究中心, 江西南昌 330004

²江西中医药大学经典名方现代中药创制全国重点实验室, 江西南昌 330004

通讯作者:

杨明, E-mail: yangming16@126.com

王芳, E-mail: wangfang@jxutcm.edu.cn

作者简介:

共同第一作者.

作者贡献:

李雪燕负责文章撰写与修改; 王晓芬与王芳负责文章指导修改与完善; 罗平负责文章逻辑结构优化; 杨明负责文章最终审阅。

Research progress on Angiopep-2/LRP-1 therapy for glioma

Xue-yan LI¹, Xiao-fen WANG¹, Ping LUO¹, Ming YANG²^,^*, Fang WANG¹^,²^,^*

Affiliations

¹Cancer Research Center, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330004, China

²National Key Laboratory for Modern Chinese Medicine Innovation Based on Classic Formulas, Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanchang 330004, China

出版时间: 2026-06-12 doi: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2025-1153

文章导航

摘要

收起

神经胶质瘤的治疗效果长期受限于血脑屏障导致的药物递送低效的困境。Angiopep-2肽能主动靶向低密度脂蛋白受体相关蛋白1, 并借助该受体介导的转胞吞作用高效穿越血脑屏障, 可实现药物向肿瘤细胞的精准高效递送, 为神经胶质瘤的治疗提供了新策略。目前, Angiopep-2已被广泛修饰于多种载体表面, 并显著提高了药物在脑肿瘤部位的富集, 彰显了其在构建跨越血脑屏障平台中巨大的潜力, 极大地推动了脑靶向递送系统的研究。本文主要介绍了基于Angiopep-2/LRP-1的修饰制剂在神经胶质瘤中的应用, 按照不同载体总结了其在神经胶质瘤中的研究进展, 为后续研究提供参考。

关键词

Angiopep-2 / 低密度脂蛋白受体相关蛋白1 / 血脑屏障 / 神经胶质瘤 / 靶向递送系统

Abstract

收起

The therapeutic efficacy of glioma treatment has long been constrained by the inefficiency of drug delivery due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Angiopep-2 peptide actively targets LDL receptor-related protein 1 and efficiently crosses the BBB via LRP1-mediated endocytosis, enabling precise and efficient drug delivery to tumor cells. This offers a novel therapeutic strategy for glioma treatment. Currently, Angiopep-2 has been extensively modified onto various carrier surfaces, significantly enhancing drug accumulation at brain tumor sites. This demonstrates its immense potential in constructing BBB-crossing platforms and has greatly advanced research on brain-targeted delivery systems. This paper primarily reviews the application of Angiopep-2/LRP-1-based modified formulations in glioma treatment. It summarizes research progress across different carriers in glioma, providing a reference for future studies.

Key words

Angiopep-2 / low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 / blood-brain barrier / glioma / targeting drug delivery system

引用本文

李雪燕, 王晓芬, 罗平, 杨明, 王芳. 基于Angiopep-2/LRP-1治疗神经胶质瘤的研究进展. 药学学报, 2026 , 61 (6) : 2075 -2088 . DOI: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2025-1153

Xue-yan LI, Xiao-fen WANG, Ping LUO, Ming YANG, Fang WANG. Research progress on Angiopep-2/LRP-1 therapy for glioma[J]. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica, 2026 , 61 (6) : 2075 -2088 . DOI: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2025-1153

正文

收起

神经胶质瘤是中枢神经系统最常见的原发性恶性脑肿瘤^[1], 全球流行病学数据显示, 年新增约2.3万例, 年死亡超1.5万例^[2]。患者确诊前常出现睡眠障碍、精神疲倦、头痛等非特异性前驱症状, 确诊后多表现为恶心、癫痫发作及认知功能障碍等^{[3, 4]}。根据世界卫生组织(World Health Organization, WHO) 分级标准, 胶质瘤恶性程度分为Ⅰ~Ⅳ级, 其中Ⅳ级胶质母细胞瘤(glioblastoma, GBM) 侵袭性强且预后极差^[5]。其发病机制涉及表皮生长因子基因突变^{[6, 7]}、磷酸酶基因缺失或突变^{[8, 9]}、肿瘤区域缺氧^[10]、p53和Rb通路失调^[11]、癌症干细胞异常^[12]等。当前接受常规疗法(手术联合化、放疗) 的患者中位生存期仍不足2年, 存在预后较差、高复发率、高死亡率的临床困境^{[13, 14]}。

血脑屏障(blood-brain barrier, BBB) 及血脑肿瘤屏障(blood brain tumor barrier, BBTB) 是阻碍胶质瘤药物递送的关键障碍^{[15, 16]}。BBB由紧密连接的脑微血管内皮细胞(brain microvascular endothelial cells, BMEC) 构成, 其低囊泡转运活性和外排转运蛋白, 如P-糖蛋白(P-glycoprotein, P-gp) 共同限制了药物渗透进入脑组织^{[17, 18]}。前有研究^{[19, 20]}表明血管肽Angiopep-2与低密度脂蛋白受体相关蛋白1 (low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1, LRP-1) 具有高亲和力和脑渗透性, 二者结合可高效穿透BBB并靶向肿瘤组织, 使其成为理想的脑靶向工具。因此, 开发高效跨越BBB并精准靶向肿瘤组织的递送系统, 已成为突破胶质瘤治疗瓶颈的核心研究方向。本文系统综述了经Angiopep-2修饰的不同类型载体的研究进展, 为后续研究提供参考。Angiopep-2修饰制剂发展历程整合见图1^{[19, 21-26]}。

1　Angiopep-2靶向肽特性研究

收起

1.1　Angiopep-2的设计

Demeule等^[27]首次发现抑肽酶具有高效BBB穿透能力(转铁蛋白的10倍), 其C端kunitz结构域与低密度脂蛋白受体相关蛋白家族(low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, LRP) 受体配体存在同源性。研究人员通过将Angiopep-1第7位的半胱氨酸替换为丝氨酸, 消除二硫键干扰并保留LRP受体结合能力, 成功开发出19肽Angiopep-2 (TFFYGGSRGKRNNFKTEEY), 其BBB穿透效率较抑肽酶提升7倍, 且呈现时间依赖性线性摄取^{[27, 28]}。

1.2　Angiopep-2与LRP-1受体结合途径

受体介导内吞(receptor-mediated endocytosis, RME) 是药物跨越BBB的核心机制^[29]。LRP-1在BBB内皮细胞及肿瘤细胞中高表达, 是跨越BBB转运的关键受体^[25]。Angiopep-2通过其C端与LRP-1的簇Ⅱ结构域结合后引发受体聚集, 诱导网格蛋白介导的转胞吞过程, 形成内体后部分受体再体循环至膜表面, 而纳米颗粒可通过内体逃逸释放药物, 最终实现跨BBB递送至肿瘤细胞^{[30, 31]}。在2022年Di Polidoro等^[32]通过分子对接首次揭示Angiopep-2与LRP-1相互作用的分子机制。该机制为脑靶向递送系统设计提供了重要的理论依据(图2)。

1.3　Angiopep-2改性策略

Angiopep-2作为线性多肽链, 其天然L-氨基酸结构易被体内蛋白酶识别降解, 影响其靶向效果^[33]。Wei等^[34]将其改造为D-氨基酸逆序异构体, 可避免蛋白酶识别。此外, L-氨基酸在溶酶体中可被快速降解, 而D-氨基酸保持稳定, 显著提升了跨BBB递送效率, 并在肿瘤早晚期均实现高效药物递送^[35]。

1.4　Angiopep-2修饰的靶向部位及其优化

Angiopep‑2通过特异性识别并结合在血脑屏障内皮细胞及胶质瘤细胞表面高表达的LRP‑1, 实现跨越BBB并靶向肿瘤的双重靶向功能。优化Angiopep‑2在递送系统中的修饰方式, 可显著增强其与LRP‑1受体的结合效率与靶向特异性, 从而提高药物在脑肿瘤部位的富集。

1.4.1　配体修饰密度的优化

Angiopep‑2在载体表面的修饰密度直接影响LRP‑1介导的内吞效率。Jiang等^[36]研究显示, 当Angiopep-2在纳米颗粒表面的修饰密度为20%时, U-87 MG细胞的摄取量较10%修饰密度组提升2倍以上, 且该摄取可被游离Angiopep-2竞争性抑制, 证实其摄取依赖于LRP‑1受体介导的内吞作用。这表明通过合理调控配体密度, 可显著增强Angiopep‑2修饰系统的靶向效率。

1.4.2　配体空间构型与暴露策略

为保障Angiopep‑2与LRP‑1受体的充分结合, 其空间取向与可及性至关重要。研究采用不对称嵌段共聚物, 将Angiopep-2连接于长链聚乙二醇(polyethylene glycol, PEG) 末端, 利用PEG链的伸展性使配体充分暴露, 从而增强与LRP-1的识别与结合同时, PEG链的空间屏蔽作用可减少非特异性吸附, 降低系统清除率, 延长循环时间^[36]。该策略在维持靶向功能的同时, 提升了递送系统的稳定性和生物相容性。

1.4.3　与其他靶向/穿透策略的协同

为进一步提升脑内递送效率, Angiopep‑2修饰常与其他靶向或微环境响应单元联用, 形成层次化靶向策略。例如, Gao等^[37]构建了Angiopep-2与基质金属蛋白酶-2 (matrix metalloproteinase-2, MMP-2) 响应性可激活细胞穿透肽(activatable cell-penetrating peptide, ACP) 共修饰的系统, Angiopep‑2负责跨越BBB, 而在肿瘤部位高表达的MMP‑2可激活ACP, 增强瘤内穿透与细胞摄取。此类多级靶向设计可弥补单一配体在复杂生理环境中可能出现的受体饱和或竞争抑制问题, 提升靶向精准性与治疗效率。

综上, Angiopep‑2修饰的靶向效率不仅取决于其与LRP‑1的固有亲和力, 亦可通过配体密度调控、空间构型优化及与其他靶向/响应元件协同等多种策略进行系统提升, 从而为构建高效、精准的脑胶质瘤靶向递送系统奠定基础。

2　ANG1005 (GRN1005) 的临床进展

收起

2.1　ANG1005的理化性质

Régina团队^[38]开发了一种Angiopep-2-紫杉醇(paclitaxel, PTX) 偶联物ANG1005, 其结构为3分子PTX通过可裂解的琥珀酸酯键连接至1分子Angiopep-2, 分子质量为5 109.14, 其合成通过PTX活化后与Angiopep-2的氨基端及赖氨酸残基反应完成。

制剂配制主要是将ANG1005粉末加入预热的非离子型表面活性剂Solutol HS15 (65 ℃) 中, 涡旋混合。加入预热的Ringer's HEPES缓冲液(65 ℃), 加热至完全溶解。通过HPLC验证该制剂的纯度和稳定性, HPLC分析表明ANG1005保留时间(RT = 7.2 min) 与标准品一致, 未见明显降解。

2.2　ANG1005细胞、动物实验

Régina等^[38]通过细胞实验证实ANG1005对GBM U-87 MG细胞表现出与PTX相似的细胞毒性, IC₅₀值为2.7×10^-9~8.3×10^-9 mol·L^-1。其通过免疫荧光实验证实, ANG1005与紫杉醇类似, 能诱导β-微管蛋白聚合形成稳定的微管束; 流式细胞术显示, ANG1005处理U-87 MG细胞24 h后, 52%细胞停滞于G2/M期(对照组19%, 紫杉醇组68%), 表明其通过干扰微管动力学阻断有丝分裂。此外, MDCK-MDR1细胞模型显示ANG1005在P-gp过表达细胞中的积累不受P-gp抑制剂环孢素A影响, 证明其可绕过P-gp介导的外排。在小鼠原位脑灌注实验中, ANG1005在CD-1小鼠脑中的摄取量比游离PTX高4.5倍, 且65%以上分布于脑实质中。在MDR1A缺陷小鼠中, 紫杉醇组小鼠脑摄取增加2.2倍, 而ANG1005摄取量与正常小鼠无差异, 证实其不依赖P-gp转运。皮下胶质瘤U-87 MG模型中, 40 mg·kg^-1腹腔注射ANG1005组的肿瘤生长抑制率(tumor growth inhibition, TGI) 为107%, 且在原位脑肿瘤模型中延长中位生存期15%。

Thomas等^[39]通过大鼠原位脑灌注测试其BBB穿透效率实验中显示, ANG1005的脑摄取速率较游离PTX高86倍, 且70%以上分布于脑实质。在乳腺癌脑转移模型中, 正常脑组织和转移灶中ANG1005的浓度较PTX浓度分别增长54和4倍。

以上结果表明, ANG1005在体内外模型中均表现出较强的抗肿瘤活性。二者研究均缺乏灵长类评估、未分析长期毒性、疗效及药物蓄积效应及免疫缺陷小鼠模型微环境失真等问题, 可能影响临床转化预测的准确性等。

2.3　Ⅰ期临床进展

Drappatz等^[40]设计了一种通过化学偶联技术将Angiopep-2-PTX制成的冻干粉针剂——GRN1005。临床使用时以无菌注射用水或生理盐水复溶, 静脉输注1 h。其优点在于冻干制剂便于保存, 可避免液态下药物降解。此外, 在临床以体表面积计算剂量(mg·m^-2), 可确保血药浓度可控。本期临床纳入63例复发性恶性胶质瘤患者进行Ⅰ期临床试验研究, 其中有效患者数为46例(接受至少2次治疗并至少有一次治疗后MRI评估)。Ⅰ期临床试验主要目的为评估其安全性, 因此入组患者均为重度预处理的复发性高级别胶质瘤患者(68%为WHO 4级, 29%为WHO 3级)。通过剂量递增30~700 mg·m^-2静脉注射(每3周一次), 结果表明700 mg·m^-2剂量组出现剂量限制性毒性(3级黏膜炎1例、4级中性粒细胞减少1例), 这也成为650 mg·m^-2剂量组为最大耐受剂量(maximal tolerance dose, MTD) 的关键依据^{[41, 42]} (表1)。

该试验结果表明, 在安全剂量下, ANG1005对恶性GBM具有一定的治疗效果, 并且耐受性良好。但对于重度预处理人群的客观溶解率(objective response rate, ORR) 较低, 仅4.8%且剂量在≥ 420 mg·m^-2的27例患者中, 仅8例达到疾病稳定, 其原因可能为试验人群多为重度预处理患者(54%接受≥ 3线化疗、35%接受贝伐珠单抗治疗), 这可能导致肿瘤异质性增加、改变BBB通透性和LRP-1受体表达等影响疗效评估。此外, 该临床试验存在血液系统毒性, 表现为中性粒细胞减少78%、白细胞减少89%, 以及疲劳44%等不良反应^[21]。

2.4　Ⅱ期临床进展

Dmello等^[21]开展了关于ANG1005治疗高级别胶质瘤的Ⅱ期临床转化研究, 基于Ⅰ期临床试验, 研究将剂量调整至600 mg·m^-2以平衡疗效与耐受性。该试验采用三臂设计: Arm 1纳入24例未接受过贝伐珠单抗治疗的复发性GBM患者; Arm 2纳入16例贝伐珠单抗耐药的复发性GBM患者; Arm 3纳入33例未使用贝伐珠单抗的WHO 3级渐变性胶质瘤患者。研究主要以ORR、无进展生存期(progression free survival, PFS)、总生存期(overall survival, OS) 为主要疗效终点(表2)。

Arm 1和Arm 3的数据表明, ANG1005在未接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的复发性胶质瘤患者中具有疾病控制作用, 但ORR较低, 提示药物可能主要通过稳定疾病而非显著缩瘤发挥疗效。Arm 2疗效受限归因于: ①耐药GBM侵袭性强伴随血管异常和药物外排机制增强, 导致化疗药物难以有效蓄积; ② LRP-1受体可能因血管异常而下调或功能受损, 影响药物递送效率; ③缺乏耐药后分子标志物分析, 无法排除分子亚型对疗效的影响。

该研究存在研究样本量小, 可能导致统计效力不足和选择偏倚; 患者在入组前已接受多种治疗, 可能影响药物反应评估; 缺乏长期随访数据限制了疗效的持续性判断; 未直接验证药物浓度与疗效关系, 无法直接验证其穿透效率与疗效的关系等局限性, 未来研究应扩大样本量同时整合分子分型以探索潜在人群。

3　Angiopep-2修饰制剂的类型及应用

收起

3.1　纳米药物递送系统

3.1.1　脂质体

脂质体由两亲性磷脂分子自组装形成双分子层囊泡, 其载药效率取决于脂质组成、粒径及制备工艺, 可同时包载亲水性及疏水性药物兼具良好的生物相容性、可降解性和低毒性等^{[22, 43-45]}。Yang等^[46]开发Angiopep-2/TLyP-1双肽修饰脂质体共载VEGF siRNA与多西他塞(docetaxel, DTX), 肿瘤体积缩小50%, 凋亡指数提升8.5倍, 但在载药优化和体内稳定性方面仍需改进; Du等^[47]通过调控PEG链长(10 kDa) 延长循环时间与内化效率, 并促进BBB穿透。这些研究体现从单一靶向到多元调控、从化疗单用到联合治疗的演进思路, 为后续多机制协同的纳米载体设计提供了重要参考, 但如何平衡靶向性与系统毒性仍是未来研究的重点。未来研究可探索刺激响应性配体暴露或可脱落PEG修饰以平衡长循环与高效靶向。

3.1.2　固体脂质纳米粒

固体脂质纳米粒(solid lipid nanoparticles, SLNs) 是由固体脂质构成的10~1 000 nm颗粒, 其紧密晶体结构可能导致药物泄漏, 是优化载药时需考虑的理化特性^{[48, 49]}。Kadari等^[50]构建Angiopep-2-SLN负载DTX, 克服P-gp外排限制, 实现高效脑靶向递送, 细胞凋亡率45.9%, 生存期延长至39天; Ak等^[51]研究负载卡莫司汀和替莫唑胺的SLNs通过靶向单羧酸转运蛋白1 (monocarboxylate transporter 1, MCT1) 实现GBM靶向递送, 肿瘤凋亡率提升26.3倍。二者分别通过LRP-1及MCT1靶向通路提供互补策略。Kadari等^[50]的LRP-1递送系统实现了BBB的跨越和肿瘤的靶向, 而他们的MCT-1靶向系统虽在体外效果显著, 但尚需进一步的体内验证。这两项研究为克服BBB和增强肿瘤靶向提供了互补性的解决方法, 未来研究可探索二者的协同应用, 例如开发双靶向系统。

3.1.3　纳米结构脂质载体

纳米结构脂质载体(nanostructured lipid carriers, NLCs) 由固/液态脂质混合形成非晶态基质, 可增加药物容纳空间, 显著提高负载效率、减少药物逃逸, 并能通过表面修饰实现肿瘤主动靶向。Cai等^[52]通过Angiopep-2偶联至液晶纳米粒载体表面, 共载顺铂(cisplatin, CDDP)/替莫唑胺(temozolomide, TMZ), BBB穿透率提升10%, 脑蓄积量增加3倍。Basso等^[53]采用“质量源于设计”框架优化匹伐他汀- NLCs, 包封率达97.5%且稳定性长达6个月。在治疗GBM上, 二者分别代表了被动优化与主动靶向的策略差异。Cai等^[52]的研究在靶向性和穿透性上更具优势, 但Basso等^[53]研究工艺成熟度、成本及稳定性方面更突出, 对于转化意义重大。未来研究可通过QbD优化靶向载体, 并利用微流控器官芯片加速临床前评估。

3.1.4　PEG

聚合物PEG是一种生物相容性良好的线性聚合物, 低免疫原性和优异的水溶性能有效降低药物载体的免疫反应和毒性^{[54, 55]}。其亲水特性可在药物载体表面形成保护层, 减少非特异性吸附, 延长体内循环时间^[56]。但PEG在体内易受pH和酶活性影响而降解, 导致细胞摄取减少, 称为“PEG困境”^[57]。因此, 在利用PEG延长循环时间的同时, 如何克服其对细胞摄取的负面影响, 是PEG化递送系统设计中的一个关键考量。在此背景下, Angiopep-2与PEG的结合提供了一种有效的解决思路。Xin等^[58]开发的Angiopep-2修饰纳米粒(ANG-PEG-NP) 显著穿透BBB, 使胶质瘤体积减少至35.2%, 肿瘤富集量提高3倍且中位生存期延长15天。验证了该PEG化靶向系统的治疗潜力。为实现跨越血脑屏障后的瘤内深度渗透。Gao等^[37]开发了更先进的双功能系统, 同步修饰了Angiopep-2和MMP-2响应型细胞穿透肽。该设计使纳米粒在肿瘤微环境中被激活, 穿透肽暴露, 从而极大促进了在C6胶质瘤细胞中的摄取(在MMP-2存在下提升约2.3倍)。在体内, 此智能系统显著抑制肿瘤生长, 将小鼠中位生存期从19天延长至32天, 疗效优于单靶向组, 体现了从基础靶向向“环境触发-级联穿透”的演进。

3.1.5　PLGA

纳米粒PLGA是一种FDA批准的可降解聚合物, 具有良好的生物相容性、可降解性和表面修饰灵活性, 可通过代谢途径安全排出体外^{[59, 60]}。但其疏水性导致载药效率较低, 需通过PEG化等表面修饰增强亲水性以延长循环时间^[61]。此外, 结合肿瘤微环境特征(如弱酸性) 设计pH响应型释药系统(如使用腙键), 可实现药物的靶向控制释放^[62]。Wang等^[59]开发了Angiopep-2修饰的PLGA递送系统(ANG/PLGA/DOX/siRNA) 可抑制胶质瘤细胞的增殖, 脑部浓度提高30%, 使小鼠中位生存期延长47.8天。Martins等^[63]首次整合酸响应性释药与双阶段靶向, 使细胞摄取率提高12倍, 脑部积累提高3倍, 小鼠中位生存期延长至54天, 长期存活率提高50%。二者均通过Angiopep-2修饰PLGA NPs改进GBM的治疗, 但Martins等在靶向层次化和微环境响应性设计上更先进, 而Wang等在共同递送策略为联合基因治疗提供了早期范式。Martins等的研究弥补了Wang等缺乏酸响应性或肿瘤微环境靶向设计的不足, 未来研究可结合二者优势。

3.1.6　聚合物胶束

聚合物胶束(polymer micelles, PM) 是由两亲性嵌段共聚物(疏水核心和亲水外壳) 自组装成的纳米颗粒^[64], 兼具提高难溶性药物的溶解度、抑制P-gp外排增强靶向性、载药方式灵活及利用增强渗透与滞留效应(enhanced permeability and retention effect, EPR) 被动靶向肿瘤组织等优势^[65]。但存在载药量较低、体内易解离导致药物提前释放等问题^{[66, 67]}。同时, 纳米载体可借助肿瘤组织的EPR效应实现被动靶向积累^[68]。Jiao等^[69]开发了双靶向及微环境响应性胶束系统, 用于递送基因治疗药物Dbait以增强GBM对放疗的敏感性, 细胞摄取量增加164.9%, 细胞凋亡率15.72%且无明显毒性。Jiang等^[70]设计了一种基于组织蛋白酶B (cathepsin B, CTSB) 响应的胶束系统(D & R-HM-MCA), 用于GBM的化疗-免疫联合治疗, 使瘤区荧光信号增强4.95倍, 生存期延至36天。前者MMP-2触发R8穿透肽暴露, 实现“被动蓄积-主动穿透”的创新性层级递送。后者展示了微环境重编程, 凸显了Angiopep-2修饰制剂从单一靶向到“BBB穿透-微环境触发-多靶点协同”治疗的智能递送技术演变。

3.1.7　金纳米颗粒

金纳米颗粒(gold nanoparticles, AuNPs) 是由金原子构成的纳米材料(1~100 nm)^[71]。兼具高生物相容性与低毒性, 因其惰性化学性质而稳定性高^[72], 表面易修饰(如PEG化) 以延长循环时间, 同时兼具光热治疗和光学成像功能^{[72, 73]}。但长期蓄积于肝脾网状内皮系统可引发慢性炎症, 且在生理环境中随pH的变化导致的聚集可能加剧其毒性^[74]。Ruan等^[75]成功构建了一种基于Angiopep-2/AuNPs的pH响应性纳米递送系统(AN-PEG-DOX-AuNPs)。肿瘤靶向率较未修饰组提高2倍, 酸性条件下DOX释放速率是生理pH的4倍(82%∶21.9%), 中位生存期达55天, 延长2.89倍。Hsu等^[76]研究开发了一种多功能纳米平台(Ang-Fe-Au NPs), 主要通过LRP-1靶向、磁热疗和MRI成像实现胶质瘤的诊疗一体化, 兼具高特异性和低不良反应, 细胞存活率降至5%, 肿瘤体积进一步缩小至72.1 mm³, 较对照组减少了约75.9%, 中位生存期延长至33天, 正常细胞存活率 > 90%。前者主要创新在于pH响应性递送药物, 然后者突破性地将磁热疗与靶向成像结合, 避免了传统化疗的不良反应。

3.1.8　介孔硅纳米颗粒

介孔硅纳米颗粒(mesoporous silica nanoparticles, MSNs) 2001年, 研究人员首次将介孔硅纳米颗粒应用于药物递送系统^[77]。MSNs具有有序的孔道结构和高比表面积, 这为其实现高载药量提供了理想平台。其载药效率受粒径、孔径及表面化学性质的显著调控, 例如, 小粒径(如20 nm) MSNs因更高的比表面积而表现出更优的载药能力^{[24, 78-81]}。Heggannavar等^[82]构建了一种MSNs负载DOX, PLGA负载PTX的双载药系统(ANG-PTX-DOX-MSNs), 双药协同使疗效提升30~50倍, IC₅₀为0.026 5 µg·mL^-1, 96 h后癌细胞死亡率89.94%。Tao等^[83]开发的pH响应释药系统(ANG-LP-PAA-MSN@ATO) 使48 h释药率达77.3%, 肿瘤体积缩小75.8%, 中位生存期延长至49.5天。二者研究均通过Angiopep-2提升靶向性, 前者的双药策略需进一步优化释放动力学与体内靶向验证, 较侧重药物组合的协同效应; 然而后者在释放控制、技术方法和体内验证上更系统, 突出了环境响应性释药和药代动力学监测的创新性, 未来可结合研究并引入多模态成像进行验证。

3.1.9　磁性纳米颗粒

磁性纳米颗粒(magnetic nanoparticles, MNPs) 是由磁性核心(如铁、氧化铁等) 与功能性涂层(如聚合物、二氧化硅等) 组成, 涂层可赋予其生物相容性、稳定性、表面可修饰性等特性^[84]。可通过吸附、包埋或共价连接负载药物^[85]。未经修饰易被肝脾等RES快速清除, 导致血液循环时间短, 靶向效率低, 难以有效穿透BBB^{[86, 87]}。Pucci等^[88]开发了一种通过溶酶体膜通透性和化疗药物联合作用的纳米递送系统, 可针对GBM的选择性杀伤, 72 h细胞存活率降至0.2%。Thirumurugan等^[89]制备了金包裹的铁肽核壳结构药物递送系统(FeTi@Au-ANG NPs)。其通过Angiopep-2介导的靶向递送和磁热疗协同作用, 使原位胶质瘤体积缩减99%。前者存在药物负载率低、封装效率低及溶酶体膜透化机制不明确等不足, 磁热疗诱导的溶酶体膜透化虽能增强化疗效果, 但长期效应不明。后者递送系统可升温至55 ℃, 但局部温度控制的精准性不足, 可能会损伤正常脑组织, 仍存在临床转化挑战。图3整合了Angiopep-2修饰制剂的药物递送载体类型。

3.2　基因递送系统

3.2.1　病毒载体

病毒载体是经基因工程改造的病毒颗粒, 保留感染机制但删除致病基因, 失去复制能力, 兼具安全性和高效递送特性^[90]。其优势包括: 高效递送能力^{[91, 92]}; 组织靶向性^[93]; 长期基因表达^[94]。但存在免疫原性可能引发免疫反应^[95]、生产工艺复杂^[96], 以及随机整合宿主基因组致突变风险等局限性^[97]。Jiang等^[36]基于Angiopep-2与天然蛋白毒素——皂草素(saponin, SAP) 研发了一种病毒模拟聚合物囊泡(ANG-PS-SAP), 由于游离SAP无法有效进入细胞, 而经Angiopep-2修饰囊泡其IC₅₀ > 30.2×10^-9 mol·L^-1, 显著抑制肿瘤细胞迁徙, 中位生存期延长至43天且系统毒性低, 经Angiopep-2修饰解决了蛋白毒素体内递送的关键技术瓶颈。但未进行长期毒性的评估及实验中仅使用免疫缺陷小鼠模型, 未验证免疫系统影响, 临床转化存在局限性。Zhu等^[98]研发了一种双功能修饰递送系统(Ang/TAT-sEVs-DOX), 其克服了单一靶向肽的受体饱和问题, 细胞摄取率提高6倍, 中位生存期延长至52天, 生物发光成像显示肿瘤荧光强度约减少83.3%, 但该递送系统体内实验对肝脏有显著的截留作用, 增加肝毒性的风险, 且未分析长期免疫原性或重复给药可能引发的免疫原性, 因此存在临床转化障碍等不足。

3.2.2　非病毒载体

非病毒载体是一类不依赖病毒结构, 通过物理或化学方法将基因、药物、RNA导入靶细胞^[99]。具有低免疫原性、易生产、负载灵活等优势, 但转染率较低, 且需克服细胞摄取及内体逃逸等障碍^[100]。Huang等^[101]研究了一种以聚酰胺胺树状大分子为载体的递送系统(PAMAM-PEG-Angiopep/pORF-TRAIL NPs), 中位生存期延长至61天, 在300 µg·mL^-1浓度下细胞存活率仍达50%。Sun等^[102]构建了一种以阳离子脂质体为载体的递送系统(ANG-CLP/PTX/pEGFP-hTRAIL), 中位生存期延长至69.5天, U-87 MG细胞凋亡率达81.99%, 低细胞毒性允许多次给药。该研究通过基因疗法与化疗药物的协同作用克服了单药耐药性问题。二者均在肝脏明显蓄积, 可能引发肝毒性的风险, 缺乏长期安全性验证。后者虽证实PTX与TRAIL具有协同效率, 但未明确两者最佳剂量比例及未检测长期治疗中肿瘤耐药性变化。

3.3　其他治疗剂

3.3.1　光敏剂

光敏剂(photosensitizer, PS) 是一类能吸收光能并转化为活性氧(reactive oxygen species, ROS), 从而选择性杀伤病变组织的分子^[103]。其兼具非侵入性^[104]与高肿瘤选择性^[105], 但也存在疏水性强、易聚集导致ROS产率降低^[106], 可能引发皮肤光过敏^[55]及依赖氧气^[107]等局限。Pucci等^[108]构建了Angiopep-2修饰的NLCs光动力系统(Ang-Ce6-NLCs)。该系统可有效保护Ce6的光学性质并在生理环境中稳定释放。低功率LED照射后肿瘤细胞存活率降至(1.7 ± 0.9)%, 氧化应激表达增加2.4倍。但该系统在酸性环境中Ce6释放效率低且荧光强度随时间下降, 存在长期稳定性不足等问题。Li等^[109]开发了一种仿生纳米平台(AM-NP), 通过Angiopep-2修饰的巨噬细胞膜包裹吲哚菁绿(indocyanine green, ICG) 及化疗药物SN38与近红外激活技术的结合实现GBM的双靶向协同治疗。在Angiopep-2修饰下, 纳米颗粒穿透BBB能力提升2倍, 较未修饰组的肿瘤细胞摄取量提高45%。ICG在808 nm激光照射下产生光热效应, 同时触发SN38在酸性肿瘤微环境中的累积释放64.7%, 使肿瘤体积缩减60%且未造成主要器官损伤, 并延长中位生存期7天, 这一设计突破了BBB的限制, 实现了化疗-光热协同治疗。研究虽未明确损伤阈值, 但48.6 ℃的高热可能损伤正常脑组织, 且未评估长期免疫效应, 肿瘤异质性响应及联合策略仍需进一步探索。

3.3.2　免疫检查点抑制剂

由于GBM的高免疫抑制肿瘤微环境和BBTB限制了抗程序性死亡配体1 (anti-programmed death-ligand 1, aPD-L1) 等免疫检查点抑制剂的疗效^{[110, 111]}。Xu等^[112]开发一种经Angiopep-2修饰的巨噬细胞膜仿生纳米囊泡(A2-MPC) 联合递送CXCL10和aPD-L1以增强GBM的免疫治疗。二者协同使肿瘤区域aPD-L1累积提升19.75倍, CD8⁺ T细胞浸润增加3.85倍, 体外模型中转运效率提高2.45倍, 显著抑制肿瘤生长。Galstyan等^[113]开发的Angiopep-2/LRP-1纳米免疫偶联物可高效递送aCTLA-4和aPD-1抗体至脑瘤, 瘤内荧光信号强度超游离组10倍以上; 诱导CD8⁺ T细胞浸润增加3.5倍, 中位生存期延长40%且未造成器官损伤。前者长期免疫效应评估虽可持续45天, 但仍存在未开展大规模动物实验验证其临床转化潜力及载药率等问题。后者尽管通过抗组胺和PAF拮抗剂减轻了过敏反应, 但重复给药仍可能引发免疫相关不良反应, 需进一步评估长期毒性。

表3整合了Angiopep-2修饰的载体类型及应用, 按照载体类型分类, 列举了其配体、受体、载药及主要创新点和相关数据等关键信息。

4　优势与挑战

收起

Angiopep-2修饰制剂的核心优势在于: ①通过靶向LRP-1受体, 可同时实现高效穿透BBB和特异性富集肿瘤组织的双重靶向能力。研究证实, ANG1005在脑组织的摄取量是游离紫杉醇的4.5倍, 并超过65%分布于脑实质^[38]。②高靶向性, 研究发现, 经Angiopep-2修饰的递送系统在小鼠脑肿瘤中荧光信号较未修饰组提高9.1倍, 细胞凋亡率提高100%^[114]。③ Angiopep-2具有良好的载体适配性, 可灵活修饰脂质体^[115]、多种聚合物等^[116]纳米递送系统, 不仅为化疗药物, 也为基因递送和免疫治疗等新策略拓展了应用前景。

然而, 在实际应用中仍面临一些关键挑战。① LRP-1受体存在竞争性抑制问题, 这将影响Angiopep-2的靶向效率。针对这一问题, 研究人员设计了Angiopep-2/CD133抗体双靶向系统, 通过多靶点协同机制可以有效规避受体竞争问题^[117]; 或通过优化配体比例, 将Angiopep-2与纳米颗粒以1∶3摩尔比结合, 也可降低竞争性抑制风险^[118]。②纳米颗粒进入体内后可能会形成“蛋白冠”, 使靶向配体被物理屏蔽, 导致BBB穿透效率出现个体差异^[119-121]。研究通过采用添加卵磷脂涂层^[122]或设计pH/酶响应性材料^[120]是有效缓解蛋白管形成的手段。③ Angiopep-2作为多肽的一种, 可能存在潜在的免疫原性^[123], 可通过PEG化减弱免疫原性^[102]、序列优化, 剔除非必要片段^[20]及临床监测降低风险。

5　总结及展望

收起

Angiopep-2作为靶向LRP-1的功能性肽段, 为解决胶质瘤治疗中BBB和BBTB的核心递送障碍提供了有效策略。其基于LRP-1受体介导的转胞吞作用机制, 显著提升了治疗药物在脑肿瘤组织的靶向递送效率与蓄积浓度, 已成为胶质瘤靶向治疗研究的重要工具。在临床转化方面, ANG1005的Ⅰ/Ⅱ期临床试验证实了该策略的初步安全性与耐受性。值得注意的是, 其在未接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的复发性GBM患者中显示出疾病稳定作用。然而, Ⅱ期临床试验结果也凸显了挑战, 特别是在Arm 2中疗效有限。这提示肿瘤微环境的病理改变及既往高强度治疗累积的毒性, 可能显著影响药物的有效递送。

目前, 国内学者研究中药有效成分对于GBM的治疗也提供了不同的治疗思路。Chen等^[124]通过微流控芯片技术筛选出半枝莲中6种黄酮类活性成分, 证实其可通过抑制细胞增殖、迁移并诱导凋亡发挥抗GBM作用, 其中柚皮素、芹菜素和木犀草素与替莫唑胺展现出协同疗效; Wang等^[125]总结了中药挥发油可通过调控肿瘤微环境、诱导细胞凋亡等机制治疗GBM的潜力等。

基于以上国内外的研究, 未来研究应聚焦于以下方向: ①智能化递送系统: 开发整合多重肿瘤微环境信号(如蛋白酶、氧化还原梯度、局部温度等) 的智能响应系统, 优化时空精准释药(如MMP-2响应型ACP^[37]、CTSB响应胶束^[70]); ②协同治疗与免疫微环境重塑: 深入拓展Angiopep-2在免疫调节剂(如CXCL10、aPD-L1抗体^[112])、肿瘤抗原或溶瘤病毒递送中的应用, 联合放化疗、抗血管生成等疗法形成协同增效; ③克服治疗抵抗, 针对贝伐珠单抗耐药等临床难点(如Ⅱ期Arm 2), 探索Angiopep-2与其他靶向分子联用的双靶向/多靶向系统或病理血管适应性载体(如酸响应设计增强肿瘤滞留^[63]); ④推动精准医学与转化研究: 建立LRP-1表达水平、肿瘤分子特征等生物标志物与疗效的关联性, 推动个体化用药, 并着重优化耐药人群的治疗策略。未来应优化临床试验设计, 扩大样本量并采用更贴近人体的临床前模型; ⑤长期安全性评价: 因其潜在免疫原性问题故需长期监测免疫原性风险, 系统评估载体材料的生物安全性、内在降解动力学及器官特异性蓄积、潜在慢性毒性等问题, 为安全、可持续的临床转化提供充分依据。

综上所述, Angiopep-2修饰的靶向递送系统为突破胶质瘤治疗的BBB壁垒提供了关键技术支持。通过持续创新载体设计(智能化、多功能化、克服耐药)、拓展治疗模态(协同免疫治疗)、践行精准医疗理念(生物标志物指导) 并夯实长期安全性基础, 该策略有望引领胶质瘤靶向治疗迈向新的高度。

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

Zhao B, Yao L, Hatami M, et al. Vaccine-based immunotherapy and related preclinical models for glioma [J]. Trends Mol Med, 2024, 30: 965-981.

Miller DM, Yadanapudi K, Rai V, et al. Untangling the web of glioblastoma treatment resistance using a multi-omic and multidisciplinary approach [J]. Am J Med Sci, 2023, 366: 185-198.

McKinnon C, Nandhabalan M, Murray SA, et al. Glioblastoma: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management [J]. BMJ, 2021, 374: n1560.

Peeters MCM, Dirven L, Koekkoek JAF, et al. Prediagnostic symptoms and signs of adult glioma: The patients′ view [J]. J Neurooncol, 2020, 146: 293-301.

Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary [J]. Neuro Oncol, 2021, 23: 1231-1251.

Sjöström S, Andersson U, Liu YH, et al. Genetic variations in EGF and EGFR and glioblastoma outcome [J]. Neuro Oncol, 2010, 12: 815-821.

Liu F, Hon GC, Villa GR, et al. EGFR mutation promotes glioblastoma through epigenome and transcription factor network remodeling [J]. Mol Cell, 2015, 60: 307-318.

Wang SI, Puc J, Li J, et al. Somatic mutations of PTEN in glioblastoma multiforme [J]. Cancer Res, 1997, 57: 4183-4186.

Sai Krishna AVS, Sinha S, Rao MRS, et al. The impact of PTEN status on glioblastoma multiforme: A glial cell type-specific study identifies unique prognostic markers [J]. Comput Biol Med, 2025, 184: 109395.

Womeldorff M, Gillespie D, Jensen RL. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 and associated upstream and downstream proteins in the pathophysiology and management of glioblastoma [J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2014, 37: E8.

Chow LM, Endersby R, Zhu XY, et al. Cooperativity within and among Pten, p53, and Rb pathways induces high-grade astrocytoma in adult brain [J]. Cancer Cell, 2011, 19: 305-316.

Lathia JD, Mack SC, Mulkearns-Hubert EE, et al. Cancer stem cells in glioblastoma [J]. Genes Dev, 2015, 29: 1203-1217.

Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase Ⅲ study: 5-Year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2009, 10: 459-466.

Lü YQ, Chen YX, Wei CX, et al. Recent advances in immunotherapy for glioblastoma [J]. Acta Pharm Sin (药学学报), 2019, 54: 1792-1801.

Pardridge WM. Blood-brain barrier delivery [J]. Drug Discov Today, 2007, 12: 54-61.

Eramo A, Ricci-Vitiani L, Zeuner A, et al. Chemotherapy resistance of glioblastoma stem cells [J]. Cell Death Differ, 2006, 13: 1238-1241.

Cardoso FL, Brites D, Brito MA. Looking at the blood-brain barrier: Molecular anatomy and possible investigation approaches [J]. Brain Res Rev, 2010, 64: 328-363.

Luo H, Shusta EV. Blood-brain barrier modulation to improve glioma drug delivery [J]. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12: 1085.

Xiao G, Gan LS. Receptor‐mediated endocytosis and brain delivery of therapeutic biologics [J]. Int J Cell Biol, 2013, 2013: 703545.

Demeule M, Currie JC, Bertrand Y, et al. Involvement of the low‐density lipoprotein receptor‐related protein in the transcytosis of the brain delivery vector Angiopep‐2 [J]. J Neurochem, 2008, 106: 1534-1544.

Dmello C, Brenner A, Piccioni D, et al. Phase Ⅱ trial of blood-brain barrier permeable peptide-paclitaxel conjugate ANG1005 in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma [J]. Neurooncol Adv, 2024, 6: vdae186.

Wei XL, Gao J, Zhan CY, et al. Liposome-based glioma targeted drug delivery enabled by stable peptide ligands [J]. J Control Release, 2015, 218: 13-21.

Zhang ZT, Li JX, Wang YL, et al. Angiopep-2 conjugated biomimetic nano-delivery system loaded with resveratrol for the treatment of methamphetamine addiction [J]. Int J Pharm, 2024, 663: 124552.

Mo JB, He LZ, Ma B, et al. Tailoring particle size of mesoporous silica nanosystem to antagonize glioblastoma and overcome blood-brain barrier [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2016, 23: 6811-6825.

Guo Q, Zhu QN, Miao TT, et al. LRP1-upregulated nanoparticles for efficiently conquering the blood-brain barrier and targetedly suppressing multifocal and infiltrative brain metastases [J]. J Control Release, 2019, 303: 117-129.

Chen GJ, Su YZ, Hsu C, et al. Angiopep-Pluronic F127-conjugated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as nanotheranostic agents for BBB targeting [J]. J Mater Chem B, 2014, 2: 5666-5675.

Demeule M, Régina A, Ché C, et al. Identification and design of peptides as a new drug delivery system for the brain [J]. J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2008, 324: 1064-1072.

Habib S, Singh M. Angiopep-2-modified nanoparticles for brain-directed delivery of therapeutics: A review [J]. Polymers (Basel), 2022, 14: 712.

Gao JQ, Lv Q, Li LM, et al. Glioma targeting and blood-brain barrier penetration by dual-targeting doxorubincin liposomes [J]. Biomaterials, 2013, 34: 5628-5639.

Vetter VC, Wagner E. Targeting nucleic acid-based therapeutics to tumors: Challenges and strategies for polyplexes [J]. J Control Release, 2022, 346: 110-135.

Tang S, Han EL, Mitchell MJ. Peptide-functionalized nanoparticles for brain-targeted therapeutics [J]. Drug Deliv Transl Res, 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s13346-025-01840-w.

Di Polidoro AC, Cafarchio A, Vecchione D, et al. Revealing Angiopep-2/LRP1 molecular interaction for optimal delivery to glioblastoma (GBM) [J]. Molecules, 2022, 27: 6696.

Xie RX, Wu ZJ, Zeng FX, et al. Retro-enantio isomer of Angiopep-2 assists nanoprobes across the blood-brain barrier for targeted magnetic resonance/fluorescence imaging of glioblastoma [J]. Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2021, 6: 309.

Wei XL, Zhan CY, Chen XS, et al. Retro-inverso isomer of Angiopep-2: A stable D-peptide ligand inspires brain-targeted drug delivery [J]. Mol Pharm, 2014, 11: 3261-3268.

Zhan CY, Lu WY. The blood-brain/tumor barriers: Challenges and chances for malignant gliomas targeted drug delivery [J]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2012, 13: 2380-2387.

Jiang Y, Yang WJ, Zhang J, et al. Protein toxin chaperoned by LRP‐1‐targeted virus‐mimicking vesicles induces high‐efficiency glioblastoma therapy in vivo [J]. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: e1800316.

Gao HL, Zhang S, Cao SJ, et al. Angiopep-2 and activatable cell-penetrating peptide dual-functionalized nanoparticles for systemic glioma-targeting delivery [J]. Mol Pharm, 2014, 11: 2755-2763.

Régina A, Demeule M, Ché C, et al. Antitumour activity of ANG1005, a conjugate between paclitaxel and the new brain delivery vector Angiopep‐2 [J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2008, 155: 185-197.

Thomas FC, Taskar K, Rudraraju V, et al. Uptake of ANG1005, a novel paclitaxel derivative, through the blood-brain barrier into brain and experimental brain metastases of breast cancer [J]. Pharm Res, 2009, 26: 2486-2494.

Drappatz J, Brenner A, Rosenfeld S, et al. ANG1005: Results of a phase Ⅰ study in patients with recurrent malignant glioma [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2010, 28: 2009.

Wen PY, Drappatz J, Brenner A, et al. Abstract b49: GRN1005 phase Ⅰ studies: Final results [J]. Mol Cancer Ther, 2011, 10: B49.

Drappatz J, Brenner A, Wong ET, et al. Phase Ⅰ study of GRN1005 in recurrent malignant glioma [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2013, 19: 1567-1576.

Bangham AD, Standish MM, Watkins JC. Diffusion of univalent ions across the lamellae of swollen phospholipids [J]. J Mol Biol, 1965, 13: 238-252.

Piwowarczyk L, Mlynarczyk DT, Krajka-Kuźniak V, et al. Natural compounds in liposomal nanoformulations of potential clinical application in glioblastoma [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14: 6222.

Guimarães D, Cavaco-Paulo A, Nogueira E. Design of liposomes as drug delivery system for therapeutic applications [J]. Int J Pharm, 2021, 601: 120571.

Yang ZZ, Li JQ, Wang ZZ, et al. Tumor-targeting dual peptides-modified cationic liposomes for delivery of siRNA and docetaxel to gliomas [J]. Biomaterials, 2014, 35: 5226-5239.

Du QL, Liu Y, Fan MY, et al. PEG length effect of peptide-functional liposome for blood brain barrier (BBB) penetration and brain targeting [J]. J Control Release, 2024, 372: 85-94.

Jnaidi R, Almeida AJ, Gonçalves LMJP. Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers as smart drug delivery systems in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme [J]. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 12: 860.

Tapeinos C, Battaglini M, Ciofani G. Advances in the design of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers for targeting brain diseases [J]. J Control Release, 2017, 264: 306-332.

Kadari A, Pooja D, Gora RH, et al. Design of multifunctional peptide collaborated and docetaxel loaded lipid nanoparticles for antiglioma therapy [J]. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 2018, 132: 168-179.

Ak G, Ünal A, Karakayalı T, et al. Brain-targeted, drug-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles against glioblastoma cells in culture [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2021, 206: 111946.

Cai XD, Refaat A, Gan PY, et al. Angiopep-2-functionalized lipid cubosomes for blood-brain barrier crossing and glioblastoma treatment [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2024, 16: 12161-12174.

Basso J, Fortuna A, Vitorino R, et al. Old drugs, new tricks: Delivering pitavastatin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for glioblastoma treatment [J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2025, 245: 114253.

D′souza AA, Shegokar R. Polyethylene glycol (PEG): A versatile polymer for pharmaceutical applications [J]. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2016, 13: 1257-1275.

Chatterjee DK, Fong LS, Zhang Y. Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy: An emerging paradigm [J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2008, 60: 1627-1637.

Rabanel JM, Hildgen P, Banquy X. Assessment of PEG on polymeric particles surface, a key step in drug carrier translation [J]. J Control Release, 2014, 185: 71-87.

Wang T, Upponi JR, Torchilin VP. Design of multifunctional non-viral gene vectors to overcome physiological barriers: Dilemmas and strategies [J]. Int J Pharm, 2012, 427: 3-20.

Xin HL, Sha XY, Jiang XY, et al. Anti-glioblastoma efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-loading Angiopep-conjugated dual targeting PEG-PCL nanoparticles [J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33: 8167-8176.

Wang L, Hao YW, Li HX, et al. Co-delivery of doxorubicin and siRNA for glioma therapy by a brain targeting system: Angiopep-2-modified poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles [J]. J Drug Target, 2015, 23: 832-846.

Yoo J, Won Y. Phenomenology of the initial burst release of drugs from PLGA microparticles [J]. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2020, 6: 6053-6062.

Owens DE 3rd, Peppas NA. Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles [J]. Int J Pharm, 2006, 307: 93-102.

Xiong XB, Lavasanifar A. Traceable multifunctional micellar nanocarriers for cancer-targeted co-delivery of MDR-1 siRNA and doxorubicin [J]. ACS Nano, 2011, 5: 5202-5213.

Martins C, Araújo M, Malfanti A, et al. Stimuli‐responsive multifunctional nanomedicine for enhanced glioblastoma chemotherapy augments multistage blood‐to‐brain trafficking and tumor targeting [J]. Small, 2023, 19: 2300029.

Kataoka K, Harada A, Nagasaki Y. Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: Design, characterization and biological significance [J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2001, 47: 113-131.

Gong J, Chen MW, Zheng Y, et al. Polymeric micelles drug delivery system in oncology [J]. J Control Release, 2012, 159: 312-323.

Hrubý M, Koňák Č, Ulbrich K. Polymeric micellar pH-sensitive drug delivery system for doxorubicin [J]. J Control Release, 2005, 103: 137-148.

Kazunori K, Masayuki Y, Teruo O, et al. Block copolymer micelles as vehicles for drug delivery [J]. J Control Release, 1993, 24: 119-132.

Matsumura Y, Maeda HJCR. A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: Mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs [J]. Cancer Res, 1986, 46: 6387-6392.

Jiao XX, Yu Y, Meng JX, et al. Dual-targeting and microenvironment-responsive micelles as a gene delivery system to improve the sensitivity of glioma to radiotherapy [J]. Acta Pharm Sin B, 2019, 9: 381-396.

Jiang SP, Li WP, Yang J, et al. Cathepsin B-responsive programmed brain targeted delivery system for chemo-immunotherapy combination therapy of glioblastoma [J]. ACS Nano, 2024, 18: 6445-6462.

Pooja D, Panyaram S, Kulhari H, et al. Natural polysaccharide functionalized gold nanoparticles as biocompatible drug delivery carrier [J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2015, 80: 48-56.

Fadeel B, Garcia Bennett AE. Better safe than sorry: Understanding the toxicological properties of inorganic nanoparticles manufactured for biomedical applications [J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2010, 62: 362-374.

Amina SJ, Guo B. A review on the synthesis and functionalization of gold nanoparticles as a drug delivery vehicle [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2020, 15: 9823-9857.

Nabi SU, Ali SI, Rather MA, et al. Organoids: A new approach in toxicity testing of nanotherapeutics [J]. J Appl Toxicol, 2022, 42: 52-72.

Ruan SB, Yuan MQ, Zhang L, et al. Tumor microenvironment sensitive doxorubicin delivery and release to glioma using Angiopep-2 decorated gold nanoparticles [J]. Biomaterials, 2015, 37: 425-435.

Hsu SP, Dhawan U, Tseng YY, et al. Glioma-sensitive delivery of Angiopep-2 conjugated iron gold alloy nanoparticles ensuring simultaneous tumor imaging and hyperthermia mediated cancer theranostics [J]. Appl Mater Today, 2020, 18: 100510.

Vallet-Regi M, Rámila A, Del Real R, et al. A new property of MCM-41: Drug delivery system [J]. Chem Mater, 2001, 13: 308-311.

Vallet‐Regí M, Balas F, Arcos D. Mesoporous materials for drug delivery [J]. Angew Chew Int Ed Engl, 2007, 46: 7548-7558.

Doadrio JC, Sousa EM, Izquierdo Barba I, et al. Functionalization of mesoporous materials with long alkyl chains as a strategy for controlling drug delivery pattern [J]. J Mater Chem, 2006, 16: 462-466.

Lu J, Liong M, Li ZX, et al. Biocompatibility, biodistribution, and drug‐delivery efficiency of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy in animals [J]. Small, 2010, 6: 1794-1805.

Li ZX, Barnes JC, Bosoy A, et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in biomedical applications [J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41: 2590-2605.

Heggannavar GB, Vijeth S, Kariduraganavar MY, et al. Development of dual drug loaded PLGA based mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their conjugation with Angiopep-2 to treat glioma [J]. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 2019, 53: 101157.

Tao JY, Fei WD, Tang HX, et al. Angiopep-2-conjugated "core-shell" hybrid nanovehicles for targeted and pH-triggered delivery of arsenic trioxide into glioma [J]. Mol Pharm, 2019, 16: 786-797.

Arruebo M, Fernández-Pacheco R, Ibarra MR, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles for drug delivery [J]. Nano Today, 2007, 2: 22-32.

Arruebo M, Galán M, Navascués N, et al. Development of magnetic nanostructured silica-based materials as potential vectors for drug-delivery applications [J]. Chem Mater, 2006, 18: 1911-1919.

Sun C, Lee JSH, Zhang MQ. Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery [J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2008, 60: 1252-1265.

Chomoucka J, Drbohlavova J, Huska D, et al. Magnetic nanoparticles and targeted drug delivering [J]. Pharmacol Res, 2010, 62: 144-149.

Pucci C, De Pasquale D, Marino A, et al. Hybrid magnetic nanovectors promote selective glioblastoma cell death through a combined effect of lysosomal membrane permeabilization and chemotherapy [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12: 29037-29055.

Thirumurugan S, Dash P, Liu XR, et al. Angiopep-2-conjugated FeTi@ Au core-shell nanoparticles for tumor targeted dual-mode magnetic resonance imaging and hyperthermic glioma therapy [J]. Nanomedicine, 2023, 50: 102673.

Ingusci S, Hall BL, Goins WF, et al. Viral vectors for gene delivery to the nervous system [J]. Handb Clin Neurol, 2024, 205: 59-81.

Li XD, Le Y, Zhang ZG, et al. Viral vector-based gene therapy [J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24: 7736.

Hajebi S, Yousefiasl S, Rahimmanesh I, et al. Genetically engineered viral vectors and organic‐based non‐viral nanocarriers for drug delivery applications [J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2022, 11: e2201583.

Kumar SR, Markusic DM, Biswas M, et al. Clinical development of gene therapy: Results and lessons from recent successes [J]. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev, 2016, 3: 16034.

Dogbey DM, Torres VES, Fajemisin E, et al. Technological advances in the use of viral and non-viral vectors for delivering genetic and non-genetic cargos for cancer therapy [J]. Drug Deliv Transl Res, 2023, 13: 2719-2738.

Lee CS, Bishop ES, Zhang RY, et al. Adenovirus-mediated gene delivery: Potential applications for gene and cell-based therapies in the new era of personalized medicine [J]. Genes Dis, 2017, 4: 43-63.

Wu N, Ataai MM. Production of viral vectors for gene therapy applications [J]. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2000, 11: 205-208.

Milone MC, O′doherty U. Clinical use of lentiviral vectors [J]. Leukemia, 2018, 32: 1529-1541.

Zhu ZC, Zhai YX, Hao Y, et al. Specific anti‐glioma targeted‐delivery strategy of engineered small extracellular vesicles dual‐functionalised by Angiopep‐2 and TAT peptides [J]. J Extracell Vesicles, 2022, 11: e12255.

Kaneda Y. Update on non-viral delivery methods for cancer therapy: Possibilities of a drug delivery system with anticancer activities beyond delivery as a new therapeutic tool [J]. Expert Opin Drug Deliv, 2010, 7: 1079-1093.

100

Kaneda Y, Tabata Y. Non‐viral vectors for cancer therapy [J]. Cancer Sci, 2006, 97: 348-354.

101

Huang SX, Li JF, Han L, et al. Dual targeting effect of Angiopep-2-modified, DNA-loaded nanoparticles for glioma [J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32: 6832-6838.

102

Sun XY, Pang ZQ, Ye HX, et al. Co-delivery of pEGFP-hTRAIL and paclitaxel to brain glioma mediated by an angiopep-conjugated liposome [J]. Biomaterials, 2012, 33: 916-924.

103

Lim CK, Heo J, Shin S, et al. Nanophotosensitizers toward advanced photodynamic therapy of cancer [J]. Cancer Lett, 2013, 334: 176-187.

104

Chen DP, Xu Q, Wang WJ, et al. Type Ⅰ photosensitizers revitalizing photodynamic oncotherapy [J]. Small, 2021, 17: 2006742.

105

Lucky SS, Soo KC, Zhang Y. Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy [J]. Chem Rev, 2015, 115: 1990-2042.

106

Zhuang Z, Li J, Shen P, et al. Exploring and leveraging aggregation effects on reactive oxygen species generation in photodynamic therapy [J]. Aggregate, 2024, 5: e540.

107

Zhao XZ, Long SR, Li ML, et al. Oxygen-dependent regulation of excited-state deactivation process of rational photosensitizer for smart phototherapy [J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2020, 142: 1510-1517.

108

Pucci C, De Pasquale D, Degl'Innocenti A, et al. Chlorin e6-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers targeted by Angiopep-2: Advancing photodynamic therapy in glioblastoma [J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2025, 14: e2402823.

109

Li M, Zhang XR, Zhou YJ, et al. Near infrared-activatable biomimetic nanoplatform for tumor-specific drug release, penetration and chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy of orthotopic glioblastoma [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2024, 19: 6999-7014.

110

Lim M, Xia YX, Bettegowda C, et al. Current state of immunotherapy for glioblastoma [J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2018, 15: 422.

111

Dang MA, Zhao YX, Wang YY, et al. Study on the inhibitory effects of dual anti-tumor antibody therapy targeting PD-L1/TGF-β in a mouse model of human glioblastoma in situ [J]. Acta Pharm Sin (药学学报), 2025, 60: 739-746.

112

Xu XX, Zhang ZQ, Du JW, et al. Recruiting T‐cells toward the brain for enhanced glioblastoma immunotherapeutic efficacy by co‐delivery of cytokines and immune checkpoint antibodies with macrophage‐membrane‐camouflaged nanovesicles [J]. Adv Mater, 2023, 35: e2209785.

113

Galstyan A, Markman JL, Shatalova ES, et al. Blood-brain barrier permeable nano immunoconjugates induce local immune responses for glioma therapy [J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 3850.

114

Zhang W, Refaat A, Li H, et al. Optimizing Angiopep‐2 density on polymeric nanoparticles for enhanced blood-brain barrier penetration and glioblastoma targeting: Insights from in vitro and in vivo experiments [J]. Adv Funct Mater, 2025, 35: 2425165.

115

Mitusova K, Peltek OO, Karpov TE, et al. Overcoming the blood-brain barrier for the therapy of malignant brain tumor: Current status and prospects of drug delivery approaches [J]. J Nanobiotechnol, 2022, 20: 412.

116

Beach MA, Nayanathara U, Gao YT, et al. Polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery [J]. Chem Rev, 2024, 124: 5505-5616.

117

Kim JS, Shin DH, Kim JS. Dual-targeting immunoliposomes using Angiopep-2 and CD133 antibody for glioblastoma stem cells [J]. J Control Release, 2018, 269: 245-257.

118

Xin HL, Jiang XY, Gu JJ, et al. Angiopep-conjugated poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(ε-caprolactone) nanoparticles as dual-targeting drug delivery system for brain glioma [J]. Biomaterials, 2011, 32: 4293-4305.

119

Tang W, Fan WP, Lau J, et al. Emerging blood-brain-barrier-crossing nanotechnology for brain cancer theranostics [J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2019, 48: 2967-3014.

120

Salvati A, Pitek AS, Monopoli MP, et al. Transferrin-functionalized nanoparticles lose their targeting capabilities when a biomolecule corona adsorbs on the surface [J]. Nat Nanotechnol, 2013, 8: 137-143.

121

Jiang Y, Zhang J, Meng FH, et al. Apolipoprotein E peptide-directed chimeric polymersomes mediate an ultrahigh-efficiency targeted protein therapy for glioblastoma [J]. ACS Nano, 2018, 12: 11070-11079.

122

Wünsch A, Mulac D, Langer K. Lecithin coating as universal stabilization and functionalization strategy for nanosized drug carriers to overcome the blood-brain barrier [J]. Int J Pharm, 2021, 593: 120146.

123

Zhao L, Ren TH, Wang DD. Clinical pharmacology considerations in biologics development [J]. Acta Pharm Sin (药学学报), 2012, 33: 1339-1347.

124

Chen L, You PX, Wang H, et al. Screening of active components in Chinese herbal medicine Scutellaria barbata for anti-glioblastoma activity using a microfluidic chip-based cell model [J]. Acta Pharm Sin (药学学报), 2025, 60: 1861-1872.

125

Wang JH, Wang LF, Ke G, et al. Mechanism of action of volatile oils from traditional Chinese medicine in treating gliomas and research progress on their nanoparticle formulations [J]. Acta Pharm Sin (药学学报), 2025, 60: 929-938.

2026年第61卷第6期

PDF下载

218

105

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.16438/j.0513-4870.2025-1153

接收时间：2025-09-26
首发时间：2026-09-21
出版时间：2026-06-12

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-09-26
修回日期：2025-12-18

基金

作者信息

¹江西中医药大学癌症研究中心, 江西南昌 330004

²江西中医药大学经典名方现代中药创制全国重点实验室, 江西南昌 330004

通讯作者:

杨明, E-mail: yangming16@126.com

王芳, E-mail: wangfang@jxutcm.edu.cn

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/yxxb/CN/10.16438/j.0513-4870.2025-1153

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Therapeutic endpoint	Dose/mg·m^-2	Number of cases/total number of cases	Percentage/%	Median survival time/d
Completely dissolution	700	1/46	2.2%	-
Partial dissolution	420, 650	2/46	4.3%	-
Disease stable	≥ 420	8/27	29.6%	51

Therapeutic endpoint

Dose/mg·m^-2

Number of cases/total number of cases

Percentage/%

Median survival time/d

Completely dissolution

700

1/46

2.2%

Partial dissolution

420, 650

2/46

4.3%

Disease stable

≥ 420

8/27

29.6%

Group	ORR/%	PFS/%	OS/month
Arm 1	13.3	33.3	26.7	13.3	13.4
Arm 2	0	0	0	0	5.8
Arm 3	3.6	35.7	35.7	26.8	18.2

Group

ORR/%

PFS/%

OS/month

3 months

6 months

12 months

Arm 1

13.3

33.3

26.7

13.3

13.4

Arm 2

5.8

Arm 3

3.6

35.7

26.8

18.2

Carrier type	Receptor	Ligand	Drug	Innovative point	Main efficacy point	Ref.
Liposomes	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, TLyP-1	VEGF siRNA, DTX	Dual ligand modification can enhance BBB penetration and tumor targeting	Apoptosis index ↑ 8.5 times; tumor suppression rate ↑ 72%	[46]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DiD, DiO	It was first demonstrated that long-chain PEG can prolong circulation time and promote BBB penetration	Brain tumor fluorescence intensity ↑ 50%; phagocytosis efficiency ↑ 3 times	[47]
SLNs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DTX	Overcoming P-gp efflux to increase drug loading capacity	Median survival time was 39 days; drug load ↑ 2.3 times	[50]
NLCs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	CDDP, TMZ	Co-loading chemotherapy drugs, synergistic enhancement	BBB permeability ↑ 10 times; tumor uptake and accumulation ↑ 3 times	[52]
PEG polymer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	PTX	It systematically verified the biocompatibility of the drug delivery system for the first time	Tumor volume ↓ 35.2%; inhibition rate 65.6%; median survival time ↑ 48%	[58]
	LRP-1, MMP-2	Angiopep-2, ACP	DTX, coumarin-6, DiR	Addressing issues such as insufficient permeability of traditional delivery systems by increasing MMP-2 response	Median survival time extended to 32 days; an increase of 1.68 times; IC₅₀ 1.03 µg·mL^-1	[37]
PLGA polymer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX siRNA	Gene-chemotherapy co-delivery	Apoptosis rate 38.4%; brain concentration ↑ 30%; median survival time 47.8 days	[59]
	LRP-1, LAT-1	Angiopep-2	DTX	Acid-triggered drug release could enhance targeting of the tumor microenvironment	Cell uptake rate ↑ 12 times; brain accumulation ↑ 3 times; long-term survival rate ↑ 50%	[63]
PMs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Dbait	Acid-responsive micelles could enhance permeability	Cell uptake ↑ 164.9%; apoptosis rate 15.72%	[69]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, MAN	DOX, PD-L1 siRNA	Chemotherapy-immunotherapy combination therapy	Median survival extended to 36 days	[70]
AuNPs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX	pH-responsive drug release and photothermal therapy	Drug release rate ↑ 3.75 times, median survival time 55 days	[75]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	/	Achieving integrated diagnosis and treatment of glioma through LRP-1 targeting, magnetothermal therapy, and MRI imaging	Tumor cell survival rate ↓ to 5%; tumor volume ↓ 4 times	[76]
MSNs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX, PTX	Full-chain research on material design, targeted modification, and mechanism verification	Therapeutic efficacy ↑ 30 times - 50 times; cancer cell mortality rate 89.94%	[82]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, PEG2000	ATO	Combining environmentally responsive drug delivery and pharmacokinetic monitoring	Tumor volume ↓ 75.8%; median survival time 49.5 days	[83]
MNPs	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Nutlin-3a	Receptor-targeted, magnetothermal, and chemotherapy triple synergistic treatment	Cell uptake rate ↑ 20 times; penetration rate ↑ 16.7 times	[88]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	/	Integration of receptor targeting, AMF responsiveness, heat generation, and dual-mode MRI functional synergistic enhancement	C6 cell killing rate 82%; tumor volume ↓ 99%	[89]
Viral vector	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	SAP	Combining the advantages of protein toxins' low off-target toxicity and high cytotoxicity (limited to intracellular activation) with the targeting properties of nanocarriers	Tumor suppression rate 84%; median survival time extended by 95% (43 days)	[36]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	DOX	Dual peptide-modified sEVs could achieve efficient BBB penetration and tumor targeting	Cell uptake rate ↑ 6 times; median survival time ↑ 2 times (52 days); tumor growth inhibition rate ↑ 2 times - 6 times	[98]
Non-viral vector	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	pORF-TRAIL	Significantly improve the efficacy of GBM treatment through the dual-targeting and selective killing effects of the TRAIL gene	Median survival time was 67 days; and the nanoparticles maintained a 50% cell survival rate at a concentration of 300 µg·mL^-1	[101]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	pEGFP-hRRAIL PTX	Synergistic effects of Angiopep-2, hTRAIL, and PTX	Median survival time 69.5 days; apoptosis rate 81.99%	[102]
Photosensitizer	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	Ce6	Under the synergistic action of photodynamic therapy, NLCs, and chlorine e6, targeting can be significantly improved and side effects reduced	Cell survival rate ↓ 44%; oxidative stress expression ↑ 2.4 times	[108]
LRP-1	Angiopep-2, macrophage membrane	SN38, ICG	Using near-infrared light-triggered chemotherapy-photothermal synergistic therapy for GBM	Cell uptake rate ↑ 45%; tumor penetration depth ↑ 2 times; tumor volume ↓ 60%	[109]
Immune checkpoint inhibitors	LRP-1	Angiopep-2, macrophage membrane	CXCL10, aPD-L1	Their biomimetic design addressed the dual challenges of BBB penetration and immune microenvironment modulation in GBM treatment	Intratumoral antibody accumulation increased by 19.75-fold; and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration increased by 3.85-fold	[112]
	LRP-1	Angiopep-2	aCTLA-4, aPD-1	For the first time, efficient delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors to brain tumors and reshaping of the immune microenvironment have been achieved	CD8⁺ T cell infiltration ↑ 3.5 times; median survival ↑ 40%	[113]

Carrier type

Receptor

Ligand

Drug

Innovative point

Main efficacy point

Ref.

Liposomes

LRP-1

Angiopep-2, TLyP-1

VEGF siRNA, DTX

Dual ligand modification can enhance BBB penetration and tumor targeting

Apoptosis index ↑ 8.5 times; tumor suppression rate ↑ 72%

[46]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

DiD, DiO

It was first demonstrated that long-chain PEG can prolong circulation time and promote BBB penetration

Brain tumor fluorescence intensity ↑ 50%; phagocytosis efficiency ↑ 3 times

[47]

SLNs

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

DTX

Overcoming P-gp efflux to increase drug loading capacity

Median survival time was 39 days; drug load ↑ 2.3 times

[50]

NLCs

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

CDDP, TMZ

Co-loading chemotherapy drugs, synergistic enhancement

BBB permeability ↑ 10 times; tumor uptake and accumulation ↑ 3 times

[52]

PEG polymer

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

PTX

It systematically verified the biocompatibility of the drug delivery system for the first time

Tumor volume ↓ 35.2%; inhibition rate 65.6%; median survival time ↑ 48%

[58]

LRP-1, MMP-2

Angiopep-2, ACP

DTX, coumarin-6, DiR

Addressing issues such as insufficient permeability of traditional delivery systems by increasing MMP-2 response

Median survival time extended to 32 days; an increase of 1.68 times; IC₅₀ 1.03 µg·mL^-1

[37]

PLGA polymer

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

DOX siRNA

Gene-chemotherapy co-delivery

Apoptosis rate 38.4%; brain concentration ↑ 30%; median survival time 47.8 days

[59]

LRP-1, LAT-1

Angiopep-2

DTX

Acid-triggered drug release could enhance targeting of the tumor microenvironment

Cell uptake rate ↑ 12 times; brain accumulation ↑ 3 times; long-term survival rate ↑ 50%

[63]

PMs

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

Dbait

Acid-responsive micelles could enhance permeability

Cell uptake ↑ 164.9%; apoptosis rate 15.72%

[69]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2, MAN

DOX, PD-L1 siRNA

Chemotherapy-immunotherapy combination therapy

Median survival extended to 36 days

[70]

AuNPs

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

DOX

pH-responsive drug release and photothermal therapy

Drug release rate ↑ 3.75 times, median survival time 55 days

[75]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

Achieving integrated diagnosis and treatment of glioma through LRP-1 targeting, magnetothermal therapy, and MRI imaging

Tumor cell survival rate ↓ to 5%; tumor volume ↓ 4 times

[76]

MSNs

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

DOX, PTX

Full-chain research on material design, targeted modification, and mechanism verification

Therapeutic efficacy ↑ 30 times - 50 times; cancer cell mortality rate 89.94%

[82]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2, PEG2000

ATO

Combining environmentally responsive drug delivery and pharmacokinetic monitoring

Tumor volume ↓ 75.8%; median survival time 49.5 days

[83]

MNPs

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

Nutlin-3a

Receptor-targeted, magnetothermal, and chemotherapy triple synergistic treatment

Cell uptake rate ↑ 20 times; penetration rate ↑ 16.7 times

[88]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

Integration of receptor targeting, AMF responsiveness, heat generation, and dual-mode MRI functional synergistic enhancement

C6 cell killing rate 82%; tumor volume ↓ 99%

[89]

Viral vector

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

SAP

Combining the advantages of protein toxins' low off-target toxicity and high cytotoxicity (limited to intracellular activation) with the targeting properties of nanocarriers

Tumor suppression rate 84%; median survival time extended by 95% (43 days)

[36]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

DOX

Dual peptide-modified sEVs could achieve efficient BBB penetration and tumor targeting

Cell uptake rate ↑ 6 times; median survival time ↑ 2 times (52 days); tumor growth inhibition rate ↑ 2 times - 6 times

[98]

Non-viral vector

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

pORF-TRAIL

Significantly improve the efficacy of GBM treatment through the dual-targeting and selective killing effects of the TRAIL gene

Median survival time was 67 days; and the nanoparticles maintained a 50% cell survival rate at a concentration of 300 µg·mL^-1

[101]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

pEGFP-hRRAIL PTX

Synergistic effects of Angiopep-2, hTRAIL, and PTX

Median survival time 69.5 days; apoptosis rate 81.99%

[102]

Photosensitizer

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

Ce6

Under the synergistic action of photodynamic therapy, NLCs, and chlorine e6, targeting can be significantly improved and side effects reduced

Cell survival rate ↓ 44%; oxidative stress expression ↑ 2.4 times

[108]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2, macrophage membrane

SN38, ICG

Using near-infrared light-triggered chemotherapy-photothermal synergistic therapy for GBM

Cell uptake rate ↑ 45%; tumor penetration depth ↑ 2 times; tumor volume ↓ 60%

[109]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors

LRP-1

Angiopep-2, macrophage membrane

CXCL10, aPD-L1

Their biomimetic design addressed the dual challenges of BBB penetration and immune microenvironment modulation in GBM treatment

Intratumoral antibody accumulation increased by 19.75-fold; and CD8⁺ T cell infiltration increased by 3.85-fold

[112]

LRP-1

Angiopep-2

aCTLA-4, aPD-1

For the first time, efficient delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors to brain tumors and reshaping of the immune microenvironment have been achieved

CD8⁺ T cell infiltration ↑ 3.5 times; median survival ↑ 40%

[113]