现代仪器与医疗

三维电子内窥镜与二维内窥镜在胸腹腔手术中的临床疗效Meta分析

PDF下载

孙晋红 ¹ , 涂锦霟 ² , 王静怡 ² , 张威鹏 ¹

现代仪器与医疗 | 综述 2025,31(1): 96-104

收起

现代仪器与医疗 |综述 2025 , 31 (1) : 96 -104

三维电子内窥镜与二维内窥镜在胸腹腔手术中的临床疗效Meta分析

全屏

孙晋红¹, 涂锦霟², 王静怡², 张威鹏¹

作者信息

^1.深圳市市场监督管理局许可审查中心，深圳　518000

^2.深圳迈瑞生物医疗电子股份有限公司，深圳　518000

作者简介:

孙晋红，女，硕士研究生，工程师，研究方向：医疗器械注册技术审评

A meta-analysis of clinical efficacy about 3D video and 2D endoscope in thoracoabdominal surgery

JinHong Sun¹, Jinhong Tu², Jingyi Wang², Weipeng Zhang¹

Affiliations

^1.Licensing Review Center, Shenzhen Administration For Market Regulation, Shenzhen 518000, China

^2.Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518000, China

出版时间: 2025-02-10 doi: 10.11876/mimt202501017

文章导航

摘要

收起

目的

系统评价三维电子内窥镜和传统二维内窥镜在胸腹腔手术中的临床安全及有效性。

方法

计算机检索PubMed、EMBASE和CNKI数据库。收集近十年发表的关于三维电子内窥镜和二维内窥镜在胸腹腔应用的安全性及有效性文献。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表（Newcastle-Ottawa Scale，NOS）量表对纳入的研究进行质量评价，借助RevMan 5.4软件实施Meta分析。

结果

最终纳入66篇文献，涵盖6867例患者。Meta分析结果表明，三维电子内窥镜可用于胸腹腔部位成像及手术操作。与传统二维内窥镜相比，三维电子内窥镜能显著缩短手术时间[MD=-12.70，95%CI（-17.13～-8.27）]，减少出血量[MD=-10.87，95%CI（-5.48～-6.25）]，缩短住院时间[MD=-0.39，95%CI（-0.55～-0.24）]，并有效减少并发症发生率[OR=0.76，95%CI（0.66～0.87）]。

结论

三维电子内窥镜融合了三维成像和电子内窥镜技术，可有效缩短胸腹腔镜手术时间、减少出血量和住院时间，降低术后并发症发生风险，为胸腹腔手术提供了更优的技术选择。

关键词

电子内窥镜 / 三维技术 / 胸腔镜 / 腹腔镜 / Meta分析

Abstract

收起

Objective

To evaluate the clinical safety and effecacy of 3D video endoscope and traditional 2D endoscope in thoracoabdominal surgery.

Methods

Relevant literatures were retrieved from databases, including PubMed, EMBASE and CNKI. The safety and efficacy of 3D video and 2D endoscopy in the thoracoabdominal cavity were collected. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

66 articles were included, covering 6867 patients. The results of meta-analysis indicate that 3D video endoscope can be used for imaging and operation of thoracic and abdominal surgery. Compared with the traditional 2D endoscope, 3D video endoscope can significantly shorten the operation time [MD=-12.70, 95%CI(-17.13～-8.27)], reduce blood loss [MD=-10.87, 95%CI(-5.48～-6.25)], and shorten the length of hospital stay [MD=-0.39, 95%CI(--0.55～-0.24)]. It also significantly reduced the incidence of complications [OR=0.76, 95%CI(0.66-0.87)].

Conclusion

3D video endoscopy, which combines 3D imaging and electronic endoscopy technology, can effectively shorten the time of thoracic laparoscopic surgery, reduce blood loss and hospital stay, reduce the risk of postoperative complications, and provide a better technical choice for thoracoabdominal surgery.

Key words

Video endoscope / Three-dimensional technology / Thoracoscope / Laparoscope / Meta-analysis

引用本文

孙晋红, 涂锦霟, 王静怡, 张威鹏. 三维电子内窥镜与二维内窥镜在胸腹腔手术中的临床疗效Meta分析. 现代仪器与医疗, 2025 , 31 (1) : 96 -104 . DOI: 10.11876/mimt202501017

JinHong Sun, Jinhong Tu, Jingyi Wang, Weipeng Zhang. A meta-analysis of clinical efficacy about 3D video and 2D endoscope in thoracoabdominal surgery[J]. Modern Instruments & Medical Treatment, 2025 , 31 (1) : 96 -104 . DOI: 10.11876/mimt202501017

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

Fujishima Y, Takata R, Tsuyukubo T, et al. Third-generation three-dimensional display system for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy reduced surgical complications compared to a two-dimensional display system[J]. J Clin Urol, 2022, 15(5): 397-403.

[2]

Martínez-Ubieto F, Aragón-Benedí C, Barranco-Dominguez I, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in 3D improves results and surgeon convenience in sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(8): 3333-3340.

[3]

Abbassi O, Patel K, Jayanthi NV. Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional completely minimally invasive 2-stage esophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis for esophageal cancer: Comparison of intra-and postoperative outcomes[J]. Surg Innov, 2021, 28(5): 582-589.

[4]

Agrusa A, Di Buono G, Chianetta D, et al. Three-dimensional (3D) versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A case-control study[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 28: S114-S117.

[5]

Ajao MO, Larsen CR, Manoucheri E, et al. Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(3): 1237-1243.

[6]

Au KP, Chan MY, Chu KW, et al. Impact of three-dimensional (3D) visualization on laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2022, 29(11): 6731-6744.

[7]

Bagan P, De Dominicis F, Hernigou J, et al. Complete thoracoscopic lobectomy for cancer: comparative study of three-dimensional high-definition with two-dimensional high-definition video systems[J]. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2015, 20(6): 820-823.

[8]

Botteri E, Ortenzi M, Alemanno G, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy performed by junior SUrgeonS: impact of 3D visualization on surgical outcome. Randomized multicentre clinical trial. (LAPSUS TRIAL)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(2): 710-717.

[9]

Bove P, Iacovelli V, Celestino F, et al. 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: Comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: A single cohort study[J]. BMC Urology, 2015, 15(1): 12.

[10]

Currò G, Cogliandolo A, Bartolotta M, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2016, 26(3): 213-217.

[11]

Currò G, La Malfa G, Caizzone A, et al. Three-dimensional (3d) versus two-dimensional (2d) laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A single-surgeon prospective randomized comparative study[J]. Obes Surg, 2015, 25(11): 2120-2124.

[12]

Currò G, La Malfa G, Lazzara S, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is surgeon experience relevant?[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2015, 25(7): 566-570.

[13]

Curtis N J, Conti J A, Dalton R, et al. 2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(10): 3370-3383.

[14]

Dunstan M, Smith R, Schwab K, et al. Is 3D faster and safer than 4K laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A randomised-controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(4): 1729-1735.

[15]

Hu M, Guan C, Xu H, et al. Comparison of 3-dimensional laparoscopy and conventional laparoscopy in the treatment of complex renal tumor with partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matching analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019, 98(40): e17435.

[16]

Jiao P, Wu QJ, Sun YG, et al. Comparative study of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic two-port lobectomy[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2017, 8(1): 3-7.

[17]

Kanaji S, Suzuki S, Harada H, et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional display for performance of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017, 402(3): 493-500.

[18]

Kanaji S, Yamazaki Y, Kudo T, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic gastrectomy with 3-D/HD and 2-D/4 K camera system for gastric cancer: A prospective randomized control study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(1): 105-112.

[19]

Kang SH, Won Y, Lee K, et al. Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2021, 406(2): 473-478.

[20]

Kinoshita H, Nakagawa K, Usui Y, et al. High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(8): 2203-2209.

[21]

Koppatz H, Harju J, Sirén J, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(11): 3725-3731.

[22]

Koppatz HE, Harju JI, Sirén JE, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(11): 4857-4865.

[23]

Lara-Domínguez MD, López-Jiménez A, Grabowski JP, et al. Prospective observational study comparing traditional laparoscopy and three-dimensional laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2017, 136(3): 320-324.

[24]

Leon P, Rivellini R, Giudici F, et al. 3D vision provides shorter operative time and more accurate intraoperative surgical performance in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair compared with 2D vision[J]. Surg Innov, 2017, 24(2): 155-1561.

[25]

Liu ZY, Chen QY, Zhong Q, et al. Is three-dimensional laparoscopic spleen preserving splenic hilar lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer better than that of two-dimensional? Analysis of a prospective clinical research study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(10): 3425-3435.

[26]

Lu J, Zheng CH, Zheng HL, et al. Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: An interim report[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(7): 2939-2945.

[27]

Mimura T, Kagimoto A, Miyamoto T, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using a three-dimensional thoracoscopic system as an educational tool for surgical trainees in general thoracic surgery[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2021, 69(3): 511-515.

[28]

Pardolesi A, Rolli L, Scanagatta P, et al. Comparison of clinical and oncologic effectiveness between flexible 3-dimensional and bidimensional video-thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer[J]. Tumori, 2021, 107(3): 261-266.

[29]

Portale G, Pedon S, Benacchio L, et al. Two-dimensional (2-D) vs. three-dimensional (3-D) laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: comparison of short-term results[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(9): 5279-5286.

[30]

Rodríguez-Hermosa JI, Ranea A, Delisau O, et al. Three-dimensional (3D) system versus two-dimensional (2D) system for laparoscopic resection of adrenal tumors: a case-control study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2020, 405(8): 1163-1173.

[31]

Ruan Y, Wang XH, Wang K, et al. Clinical evaluation and technical features of three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective segmental artery clamping[J]. World J Urol, 2016, 34(5): 679-685.

[32]

Schwab KE, Curtis NJ, Whyte MB, et al. 3D laparoscopy does not reduce operative duration or errors in day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(4): 1745-1753.

[33]

Shaikh AR, Shaikh AA. Short term outcomes of three dimensional versustwo-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2020, 37(1): 1-5.

[34]

She XW, Gu YB, Xu C, et al. Three-dimensional (3D)-computed tomography bronchography and angiography combined with 3D-video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus conventional 2D-VATS anatomic pulmonary segmentectomy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2018, 9(2): 305-309.

[35]

Song T, Kang DY. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic myomectomy: A randomized controlled trial[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2021, 264: 271-275.

[36]

Song T, Kang DY. A randomized, controlled trial comparing the clinical outcomes of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic hysterectomy[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2022, 17(1): 127-133.

[37]

Tang FJ, Qi L, Jiang HC, et al. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of 3D and 2D imaging systems for laparoscopic radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection[J]. J Int Med Res, 2016, 44(3): 613-619.

[38]

Tey HTV, Foo SMJ, Fong SS, et al. Short term postoperative and oncological outcomes of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(12): 1350-1353.

[39]

Wang Y, Chen W, Xia S, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic-assisted transanal pull-through for hirschsprung's disease in children: Preliminary results of a prospective cohort study in a tertiary hospital[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(4): 557-563.

[40]

Wang Z, Liang J, Chen J, et al. Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2020, 21(10): 2883-2887.

[41]

Zeng Q, Lei F, Gao Z, et al. Case-matched study of short-term effects of 3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer[J]. World J Surg Oncol, 2017, 15(1): 178.

[42]

Zhuansun D, Jiao C, Meng X, et al. A study of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic surgery in resection of congenital choledochal cyst of children and jejunum roux-en-y anastomosis[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2020, 30(3): 344-349.

[43]

石维超, 闫磊. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜在老年急性上消化道穿孔治疗中的应用效果比较[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2022, 7(36): 60-64.

[44]

高杨. 腹腔镜胃癌根治或2D、3D腹腔镜胃癌根治术的临床疗效观察[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2020, 26(8): 36-37.

[45]

黄建峰, 刘寒, 刘厚宝. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜手术治疗胆总管结石的效果比较[J]. 安徽卫生职业技术学院学报, 2018, 17(4): 41-42+4.

[46]

唐开强, 庞诗语, 包继明, 等. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜在前列腺癌根治术中的对比: 回顾性队列研究(英文)[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2017, 37(1): 1-5.

[47]

吉振帅, 谢程, 张鹏程, 等. 3D腹腔镜与传统2D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术的疗效比较[J]. 微创医学, 2023, 18(1): 92-94+127.

[48]

史斌, 代洪, 臧青山, 等. 3D腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜行肾部分切除术的效果比较[J]. 西南国防医药, 2018, 28(11): 1118-1120.

[49]

吴国刚, 刘吉盛, 冷梅, 等. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 303-305.

[50]

辛海洋, 曾兵, 蔡灿锋, 等. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜在乙状结肠癌根治术中应用的近期疗效对比分析[J]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(2): 99-102.

[51]

何围, 齐琳, 李源, 等. 3D腹腔镜与传统2D腹腔镜在保留性神经根治性膀胱切除手术中的比较研究[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2016, 31(5): 398-401.

[52]

黎东伟, 李君久, 熊秋华, 等. 3D与2D腹腔镜在甲状腺切除术中的对比研究[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2018, 18(1): 29-32.

[53]

余有声, 黄诚, 潘晓飞, 等. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜辅助在胃癌根治术中的应用效果比较[J]. 安徽医学, 2018, 39(9): 1136-1138.

[54]

郑逸锋, 李威, 王怀明, 等. 3D腹腔镜与2D腹腔镜胃癌根治术短期临床疗效对比研究[J]. 消化肿瘤杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(1): 31-34.

[55]

李志澄, 彭翔, 计勇, 等. 比较3D腹腔镜和2D腹腔镜下直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌对患者术后并发症影响[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2017, 11(15): 42-43.

[56]

白雪莹, 刘正华. 3D与2D单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术的疗效比较[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2023, 52(3): 277-281.

[57]

沈正海, 胡早秀, 杨璋, 等. 2D与3D胸腔镜模式下肺癌手术的对比研究[J]. 云南医药, 2017, 38(4): 325-328.

[58]

李朝平, 王光军. Flex-3D胸腔镜、2D胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗原发性肺癌疗效对比[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2021, 49(10): 1203-1206.

[59]

耿国军, 于修义, 姜杰, 等. 胸腔镜手术3D与2D模式下治疗孤立性肺结节的病例对照研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2015, 22(7): 664-667.

[60]

袁伟, 刘娜, 王宇琛. Flex-3D胸腔镜与2D胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗原发性肺癌的效果及预后[J]. 中国临床研究, 2020, 33(4): 461-464.

[61]

梁建伟, 曹兵, 王晨, 等. 传统2D胸腔镜和Flex-3D胸腔镜在非小细胞肺癌患者肺叶切除术中的应用效果研究[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志, 2024, 32(2): 34-38.

[62]

严会志, 张军, 林称意, 等. 3D与2D模式下电视胸腔镜食管癌根治术的近期疗效比较[J]. 内蒙古医科大学学报, 2018, 40(6): 635-638.

[63]

耿国军, 于修义, 田津泽, 等. 电视胸腔镜3D与2D模式下食管癌胸部手术的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(2): 108-110+16.

[64]

莫俊贤, 谢坚, 杨钧铭, 等. 3D胸腔镜与2D胸腔镜在早期肺癌中的手术疗效对比研究[J]. 医学信息, 2023, 36(11): 102-105.

[65]

黄可南, 丁新宇, 陈子豪, 等. 3D胸腔镜与2D胸腔镜在单孔肺叶切除术中的临床对比研究[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2020, 27(7): 770-774.

[66]

蔡杰飞, 赵维彩, 魏云炜, 等. 3D和2D高清胸腔镜肺叶切除手术的应用比较[J]. 河北医药, 2018, 40(18): 2790-2793.

2025年第31卷第1期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.11876/mimt202501017

首发时间：2026-10-23
出版时间：2025-02-10

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

基金

作者信息

^1.深圳市市场监督管理局许可审查中心，深圳　518000

^2.深圳迈瑞生物医疗电子股份有限公司，深圳　518000

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyqyyl/CN/10.11876/mimt202501017

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT