现代仪器与医疗

非侵入式脑机接口在脑卒中手功能康复中的临床应用进展：预测、评估、干预

PDF下载

哈丽米热·斯提瓦力地 ¹^,² , 陈树耿 ¹^,^* , 贾杰 ¹^,³^,⁴

现代仪器与医疗 | 探索脑机接口与神经调控技术的应用 2026,32(4): 36-44

收起

现代仪器与医疗 |探索脑机接口与神经调控技术的应用 2026 , 32 (4) : 36 -44

非侵入式脑机接口在脑卒中手功能康复中的临床应用进展：预测、评估、干预

全屏

哈丽米热·斯提瓦力地¹^,², 陈树耿¹^,^*, 贾杰¹^,³^,⁴

作者信息

^1.复旦大学附属华山医院康复医学科，上海　200040

^2.上海中医药大学康复医学院，上海　201203

^3.国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心，上海　200040

^4.国家神经疾病医学中心，上海　200040

通讯作者:

陈树耿，男，博士研究生，主管治疗师，研究方向：脑机接口与神经康复

作者简介:

哈丽米热·斯提瓦力地，女，本科，研究方向：脑机接口与神经康复

Clinical applications of non-invasive brain-computer interfaces in hand function rehabilitation after stroke: prediction, assessment, and intervention

Halimire Sitiwalidi¹^,², Shugeng Chen¹^,^*, Jie Jia¹^,³^,⁴

Affiliations

^1.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

^2.School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China

^3.National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Shanghai 200040, China

^4.National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai 200040, China

出版时间: 2026-08-10 doi: 10.11876/mimt202604005

文章导航

摘要

收起

脑卒中可引发患者的肢体运动功能异常，其后遗症中手功能障碍发生率高且恢复难度大，严重影响患者的日常生活质量。近年来，脑机接口技术逐渐被应用于脑卒中康复，其中非侵入式脑机接口（non-invasive brain-computer interface，NBCI）因安全便捷、无需手术植入等优势，已广泛应用于脑卒中手功能康复研究领域。本文围绕NBCI在脑卒中手功能康复中的临床应用，系统综述其在预后预测、功能评估和康复干预方面的研究进展，梳理以上3个方向的核心内容与发展现状，总结当前研究的优势与不足，以期为深化NBCI在脑卒中手功能康复领域的临床应用、多中心验证及居家康复推广提供参考。

关键词

非侵入式脑机接口 / 脑卒中 / 手功能 / 预测 / 评估 / 干预

Abstract

收起

Stroke can cause motor dysfunction of the limbs, and hand dysfunction is highly prevalent and difficult to recover from, severely affecting patients' quality of daily life. In recent years, brain-computer interface technologies have been gradually applied in stroke rehabilitation, among which non-invasive brain-computer interface (NBCI), owing to its advantages of safety, convenience, and no need for surgical implantation, has been widely used in research on hand function rehabilitation after stroke. This paper focuses on the clinical application of NBCI in hand function rehabilitation after stroke and systematically reviews the research progress in prognosis prediction, functional assessment, and rehabilitation intervention. It summarizes the core content and current developmental status of these three directions, highlights the strengths and limitations of existing studies, and aims to provide references for deepening the clinical application of NBCI in hand function rehabilitation after stroke, multi-center verification, and promotion of home-based rehabilitation.

Key words

Non-invasive brain-computer interface / Stroke / Hand function / Prediction / Assessment / Intervention

引用本文

哈丽米热·斯提瓦力地, 陈树耿, 贾杰. 非侵入式脑机接口在脑卒中手功能康复中的临床应用进展：预测、评估、干预. 现代仪器与医疗, 2026 , 32 (4) : 36 -44 . DOI: 10.11876/mimt202604005

Halimire Sitiwalidi, Shugeng Chen, Jie Jia. Clinical applications of non-invasive brain-computer interfaces in hand function rehabilitation after stroke: prediction, assessment, and intervention[J]. Modern Instruments & Medical Treatment, 2026 , 32 (4) : 36 -44 . DOI: 10.11876/mimt202604005

基金

收起

上海市养老科技专项(24YL1900202)
国家自然科学基金资助项目(82202798)
上海扬帆专项(22YF1404200)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

Feigin V L, Brainin M, Norrving B, et al. World Stroke Organization: Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2025[J]. International Journal of Stroke, 2025, 20(2): 132-144.

[2]

Ma Q, Li R, Wang L, et al. Temporal trend and attributable risk factors of stroke burden in China, 1990–2019: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. The Lancet Public Health, 2021, 6(12): e897-e906.

[3]

Baniqued P D E, Stanyer E C, Awais M, et al. Brain–computer interface robotics for hand rehabilitation after stroke: a systematic review[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2021, 18: 15.

[4]

Brunner I, Lundquist C B, Pedersen A R, et al. Brain computer interface training with motor imagery and functional electrical stimulation for patients with severe upper limb paresis after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2024, 21: 10.

[5]

陈琼漩, 李鑫. 非侵入性脑机接口在脑卒中手功能康复中的应用现状[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(11): 1566-1571.

[6]

Sun Y, Chen X, Liu B, et al. Signal acquisition of brain–computer interfaces: a medical-engineering crossover perspective review[J]. Fundamental Research, 2025, 5(1): 3-16.

[7]

Liu X Y, Wang W L, Liu M, et al. Recent applications of EEG-based brain-computer-interface in the medical field[J]. Military Medical Research, 2025, 12: 14.

[8]

Daly J J, Wolpaw J R. Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation[J]. The Lancet Neurology, 2008, 7(11): 1032-1043.

[9]

Pichiorri F, Morone G, Petti M, et al. Brain–computer interface boosts motor imagery practice during stroke recovery[J]. Annals of Neurology, 2015, 77(5): 851-865.

[10]

Buch E R, Modir Shanechi A, Fourkas A D, et al. Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke[J]. Brain, 2012, 135(2): 596-614.

[11]

Rathee D, Chowdhury A, Meena Y K, et al. Brain–machine interface-driven post-stroke upper-limb functional recovery correlates with beta-band mediated cortical networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2019, 27(5): 1020-1031.

[12]

Carino-Escobar R I, Carrillo-Mora P, Valdés-Cristerna R, et al. Longitudinal analysis of stroke patients' brain rhythms during an intervention with a brain-computer interface[J]. Neural Plasticity, 2019, 2019: 7084618.

[13]

Mane R, Chew E, Phua K S, et al. Prognostic and monitory EEG-biomarkers for BCI upper-limb stroke rehabilitation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2019, 27(8): 1654-1664.

[14]

Lin P J, Jia T, Li C, et al. CNN-based prognosis of BCI rehabilitation using EEG from first session BCI training[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2021, 29: 1936-1943.

[15]

Carino-Escobar R I, Valdés-Cristerna R, Carrillo-Mora P, et al. Prognosis of stroke upper limb recovery with physiological variables using regression tree ensembles[J]. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 046057.

[16]

Ma Z Z, Wu J J, Cao Z, et al. Motor imagery-based brain–computer interface rehabilitation programs enhance upper extremity performance and cortical activation in stroke patients[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2024, 21: 91.

[17]

Lu R, Pang Z, Gao T, et al. Multisensory BCI promotes motor recovery via high-order network-mediated interhemispheric integration in chronic stroke[J]. BMC Medicine, 2025, 23: 380.

[18]

Chen S, Xie N, Tang Y, et al. Long-term brain-computer interface functional electrical stimulation enhances neuroplasticity and functional recovery in elderly stroke: a 4.5-year longitudinal study integrating electroencephalography biomarkers and clinical assessments[J]. Research, 2025, 8: 0984.

[19]

Ji X, Lu X, Xu Y, et al. Effects and neural mechanisms of a brain–computer interface-controlled soft robotic glove on upper limb function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled fNIRS study[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2025, 22: 171.

[20]

中国康复医学会脑机接口与康复专业委员会, 吴文, 王祥龙, 等. 脑机接口康复评估临床应用专家共识[J]. 康复学报, 2026, 36(6): 381-397, 404.

[21]

陈树耿, 束小康, 贾杰. 基于闭环脑机接口的脑卒中患者的手功能康复研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2016, 31(11): 1189-1194.

[22]

杨延辉, 王浩冲, 董媛媛, 等. 视觉运动诱导的脑机接口技术应用于脑卒中患者上肢运动功能和认知功能的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2023, 29(4): 472-478.

[23]

He J, Yuan Z, Quan L, et al. Multimodal assessment of a BCI system for stroke rehabilitation integrating motor imagery and motor attempts: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2025, 22: 185.

[24]

Pichiorri F, Toppi J, de Seta V, et al. Exploring high-density corticomuscular networks after stroke to enable a hybrid Brain-Computer Interface for hand motor rehabilitation[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2023, 20: 5.

[25]

Barios J A, Vales Y, Catalán J M, et al. Post-movement beta rebound for longitudinal monitoring of motor rehabilitation in stroke patients using an exoskeleton-assisted paradigm[J]. International Journal of Neural Systems, 2025, 35(9): 2550044.

[26]

Lv S, Ran X, Xia M, et al. Classification of left and right-hand motor imagery in acute stroke patients using EEG microstate[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2025, 22: 137.

[27]

Tan F, Qing W, Ip W C, et al. Guided corticomuscular neuroplasticity for restoration of wrist–hand function post-stroke[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2026, 23: 105.

[28]

Bundy D T, Souders L, Baranyai K, et al. Contralesional brain–computer interface control of a powered exoskeleton for motor recovery in chronic stroke survivors[J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(7): 1908-1915.

[29]

Cheng N, Phua K S, Lai H S, et al. Brain-computer interface-based soft robotic glove rehabilitation for stroke[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 67(12): 3339-3351.

[30]

Guo N, Wang X, Duanmu D, et al. SSVEP-based brain computer interface controlled soft robotic glove for post-stroke hand function rehabilitation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 2022, 30: 1737-1744.

[31]

胡义茜, 高天昊, 白玉龙, 等. 脑机接口联合多模态感知反馈训练对脑卒中后上肢功能恢复的探索性研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(11): 1457-1462.

[32]

Wang A, Tian X, Jiang D, et al. Rehabilitation with brain-computer interface and upper limb motor function in ischemic stroke: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Med, 2024, 5(6): 559-569.e4.

[33]

Kim M S, Park H, Kwon I, et al. Efficacy of brain-computer interface training with motor imagery-contingent feedback in improving upper limb function and neuroplasticity among persons with chronic stroke: a double-blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2025, 22: 1.

[34]

Takasaki K, Iwama S, Liu F, et al. Rapid functional reorganization of the targeted contralesional hemisphere induced by one week of noninvasive closed-loop neurofeedback guides motor recovery in post-stroke patients with chronic motor impairment: a phase I trial[J]. Communications Medicine, 2026, 6: 163.

[35]

Colucci A, Vermehren M, Angerhöfer C, et al. Hybrid brain/neural exoskeleton enables bimanual ADL training in routine stroke rehabilitation[J]. Stroke, 2026, 57(2): 505-510.

[36]

Tang Y, Wang Y, Zhang W, et al. Magnetic NeuroRing: a portable adaptive brain-computer interface for real-time transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-stroke motor rehabilitation[J]. npj Biomedical Innovations, 2026, 3: 4.

[37]

Sellers E W, Ryan D B, Hauser C K. Noninvasive brain-computer interface enables communication after brainstem stroke[J]. Science Translational Medicine, 2014, 6(257): 257re7.

[38]

中国康复医学会脑机接口与康复专业委员会, 马骏, 张晶晶, 等. 非侵入式脑机接口在神经康复临床应用中的专家共识[J/OL]. 康复学报, 2026-02-24. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/35.1329.R.20260224.1500.002.

[39]

Chen H, Yun G. Efficacy of brain-computer interface therapy for upper limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2026, 28: e79132.

[40]

Li D, Li R, Song Y, et al. Effects of brain-computer interface based training on post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation: a meta-analysis[J]. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2025, 22: 44.

[41]

Mahmood M, Kim N, Mahmood M, et al. VR-enabled portable brain-computer interfaces via wireless soft bioelectronics[J]. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2022, 210: 114333.

[42]

中国康复医学会手功能康复专业委员会, 中国康复医学会社区康复工作委员会, 贾杰. 便携式外骨骼脑机接口应用于社区居家卒中患者上肢康复专家共识(2025年版)[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2025, 20(10): 1210-1221, 1209.

2026年第32卷第4期

PDF下载

129

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.11876/mimt202604005

首发时间：2026-10-23
出版时间：2026-08-10

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

基金

上海市养老科技专项(24YL1900202)

国家自然科学基金资助项目(82202798)

上海扬帆专项(22YF1404200)

作者信息

^1.复旦大学附属华山医院康复医学科，上海　200040

^2.上海中医药大学康复医学院，上海　201203

^3.国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心，上海　200040

^4.国家神经疾病医学中心，上海　200040

通讯作者:

陈树耿，男，博士研究生，主管治疗师，研究方向：脑机接口与神经康复

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/xdyqyyl/CN/10.11876/mimt202604005

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT