Article(id=1307376009649615516, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1149652312894775300, issueId=1307375999864304262, articleNumber=null, orderNo=null, doi=10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.01.010, pmid=null, cstr=null, oa=null, hot=0, price=null, onlineType=0, articleFormat=0, articleType=null, articleTypeStr=null, receivedDate=1651161600000, receivedDateStr=2022-04-29, revisedDate=null, revisedDateStr=null, acceptedDate=null, acceptedDateStr=null, onlineDate=1789632330572, onlineDateStr=2026-09-17, pubDate=null, pubDateStr=null, doiRegisterDate=null, doiRegisterDateStr=null, onlineIssueDate=1789632330572, onlineIssueDateStr=2026-09-17, onlineJustAcceptDate=null, onlineJustAcceptDateStr=null, onlineFirstDate=null, onlineFirstDateStr=null, sourceXml=null, magXml=null, createTime=1789632330572, creator=13701087609, updateTime=1789632330572, updator=13701087609, issue=Issue{id=1307375999864304262, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1149652312894775300, year='2023', volume='18', issue='1', pageStart='5', pageEnd='104', issueExtLink='null', onlineDate='null', pubDate='1676822400000', pubDateStr='2023-02-20', beforeIssueId=null, nextIssueId=null, price=null, status=1, issueComplete=1, articleOrder=1, issueType=-1, specialIssue=null, createTime=1789632328238, creator='13701087609', updateTime=1789636242781, updator='13701087609', preIssue=null, nextIssue=null, articleTotal=null, ext={EN=IssueExt(id=1307392418739937533, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1149652312894775300, issueId=1307375999864304262, language=EN, specialIssueTitle=, coverIllustrator=null, specialIssueEditor=, specialIssueAbout=), CN=IssueExt(id=1307392418739937534, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1149652312894775300, issueId=1307375999864304262, language=CN, specialIssueTitle=, coverIllustrator=null, specialIssueEditor=, specialIssueAbout=)}, issueFiles=null, downloadFileDto=null}, startPage=70, endPage=77, ext={EN=ArticleExt(id=1307376010018714270, articleId=1307376009649615516, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1149652312894775300, language=EN, title=The Analysis and Enlightenment for Satisfaction of the First Batch of Science Popularizers' Professional Title Evaluation, columnId=1215673775031501199, journalTitle=Studies on Science Popularization, columnName=Science Popularization Capacity, runingTitle=null, highlight=null, articleAbstract=Evaluation of science popularization professional title is the main symbol of the academic technical level and professional ability of science popularizers, which plays an important role in stabilizing the talent team and stimulating their enthusiasm. Taking the first batch of science popularizers who participated in the professional title evaluation of "Library Materials Series (Science Communication) " as the research objects, using questionnaires and semi-structured interviewing, this study analyzes the satisfaction of the participants and the hidden problems in this professional title evaluation from three aspects：evaluation index, evaluation process and evaluation service. The results show that there are still some problems. Although the professional title evaluation of science popularizers in the non-stated sector has been solved, the proportion of participants from these sectors is very small. And then, the propaganda channel is more traditional and does not fully conform to the current habit of obtaining information. Next, the participants' satisfaction with "evaluation standard" and "fair and justice sense" is not ideal. Once again, the evaluation method of representative works is not specified in detail, which is not conducive to the participants' grasp. Finally, there is room for improvement in the content and methods of expert questioning. In view of above problems, this study puts forward some countermeasures, such as increasing publicity to allow more science popularizers to participate in professional title evaluation, making evaluation standards closer to the reality of science popularization and reflecting differences, refining evaluation methods according to evaluation indexes, and optimizing defense process of "representative achievement", to ensure the diversification of participants, objectification and moderate transparency of indexes, diversification of evaluation methods, and realization of scientific scoring., authors=Shi Zhenzhen1 , Wang Xin1 , Mao Yaxin2 , Zhang Hong3 , Zhang Jian1 , authorsList=Shi Zhenzhen, Wang Xin, Mao Yaxin, Zhang Hong, Zhang Jian, authorCompany=1 School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192; 1 , 王欣1 , 毛雅欣2 , 张宏3 , 张健1 , 袁博, authorsList=史珍珍, 王欣, 毛雅欣, 张宏, 张健, 袁博, authorCompany=1 北京信息科技大学经济管理学院，北京 100192;
科普研究
|科普能力
2023
, 18
(1) :
70
-77
“有才者有位、有为者有位”——首批科普工作者职称评审满意度分析与启示
全屏
史珍珍1 , 王欣1 , 毛雅欣2 , 张宏3 , 张健1 , 袁博
作者信息
1 北京信息科技大学经济管理学院，北京 100192;
作者简介:
史珍珍，北京信息科技大学经济管理学院副教授，研究方向：人力资源管理、劳动力市场理论与政策，E-mail: shizhenzhen@bistu.edu.cn。
The Analysis and Enlightenment for Satisfaction of the First Batch of Science Popularizers' Professional Title Evaluation
Shi Zhenzhen1 , Wang Xin1 , Mao Yaxin2 , Zhang Hong3 , Zhang Jian1
Affiliations
1 School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192;
doi: 10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.01.010
文章导航
科普职称评价是科普工作者学术技术水平和专业能力的主要标志，对于稳定人才队伍、激发科普工作者的积极性具有重要作用。本文以首批参加“图书资料系列（科学传播）”职称评审的科普工作者为研究对象，采用问卷调查法和半结构化访谈法，从评审指标、评审流程和评审服务三个方面，分析科普工作者对此次职称评审工作的满意度及其存在的问题。结果表明，科普职称评审存在以下问题：“体制外”参评者占比很低；宣传渠道较为传统，不完全符合当今信息获取的习惯；对“评审标准”及“公平公正感”的满意度不十分理想；代表作评审方式未做详细规定；专家提问内容和方式尚有改进空间；等等。针对上述问题，提出加大宣传力度让更多的科普工作者参与职称评价、评审标准更加贴近科普工作实际且体现差异、依据评审指标细化评审方式、代表作答辩环节全方位优化的对策，以期保证参评主体多元化、指标客观化和适度透明化、评价方法多元化，实现科学评分的目的。
科学普及
/
科普工作者
/
职称评审
/
评审标准
/
评审服务
Evaluation of science popularization professional title is the main symbol of the academic technical level and professional ability of science popularizers, which plays an important role in stabilizing the talent team and stimulating their enthusiasm. Taking the first batch of science popularizers who participated in the professional title evaluation of "Library Materials Series (Science Communication) " as the research objects, using questionnaires and semi-structured interviewing, this study analyzes the satisfaction of the participants and the hidden problems in this professional title evaluation from three aspects：evaluation index, evaluation process and evaluation service. The results show that there are still some problems. Although the professional title evaluation of science popularizers in the non-stated sector has been solved, the proportion of participants from these sectors is very small. And then, the propaganda channel is more traditional and does not fully conform to the current habit of obtaining information. Next, the participants' satisfaction with "evaluation standard" and "fair and justice sense" is not ideal. Once again, the evaluation method of representative works is not specified in detail, which is not conducive to the participants' grasp. Finally, there is room for improvement in the content and methods of expert questioning. In view of above problems, this study puts forward some countermeasures, such as increasing publicity to allow more science popularizers to participate in professional title evaluation, making evaluation standards closer to the reality of science popularization and reflecting differences, refining evaluation methods according to evaluation indexes, and optimizing defense process of "representative achievement", to ensure the diversification of participants, objectification and moderate transparency of indexes, diversification of evaluation methods, and realization of scientific scoring.
science popularization
/
science popularizer
/
professional title evaluation
/
evaluation standard
/
evaluation service
史珍珍, 王欣, 毛雅欣, 张宏, 张健, 袁博.
“有才者有位、有为者有位”——首批科普工作者职称评审满意度分析与启示.
科普研究,
2023
, 18
(1)
: 70
-77
.
DOI: 10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.01.010
Shi Zhenzhen, Wang Xin, Mao Yaxin, Zhang Hong, Zhang Jian.
The Analysis and Enlightenment for Satisfaction of the First Batch of Science Popularizers' Professional Title Evaluation[J].
Studies on Science Popularization ,
2023
, 18
(1)
: 70
-77
.
DOI: 10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.01.010
2023年第18卷第1期
PDF下载
4
1
引用本文
BibTeX
文章信息
doi: 10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.01.010
接收时间：2022-04-29
首发时间：2026-09-17
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kpyj/CN/10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.01.010
引用本文
BibTeX
2种不同金属材料的力学参数
科 属数 种数 占总种数比例 属 种数 占总种数比例 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78 小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39 红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87 小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26 光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39 红菇属 Russula 17 8.13 栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT
PDF下载
全屏
4
1
关闭全屏
北京市海淀区学院南路86号
010-62199257（仅加盟咨询）
qkjq@cast.org.cn
