Article(id=1195814099293618322, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, issueId=1195814096831561845, articleNumber=1001-2494(2024)23-2226-15, orderNo=null, doi=10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004, pmid=null, cstr=null, oa=null, hot=null, price=null, onlineType=0, articleFormat=0, articleType=null, articleTypeStr=research-article, receivedDate=1715788800000, receivedDateStr=2024-05-16, revisedDate=null, revisedDateStr=null, acceptedDate=null, acceptedDateStr=null, onlineDate=1763033898423, onlineDateStr=2025-11-13, pubDate=1733587200000, pubDateStr=2024-12-08, doiRegisterDate=null, doiRegisterDateStr=null, onlineIssueDate=1763033898423, onlineIssueDateStr=2025-11-13, onlineJustAcceptDate=null, onlineJustAcceptDateStr=null, onlineFirstDate=null, onlineFirstDateStr=null, sourceXml=null, magXml=null, createTime=1763033898423, creator=13701087609, updateTime=1763033898423, updator=13701087609, issue=Issue{id=1195814096831561845, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, year='2024', volume='59', issue='23', pageStart='2199', pageEnd='2298', issueExtLink='null', onlineDate='null', pubDate='null', beforeIssueId=null, nextIssueId=null, price=null, status=1, issueComplete=1, articleOrder=1, issueType=-1, specialIssue=0, createTime=1763033897836, creator=13701087609, updateTime=1763034755097, updator=13701087609, preIssue=null, nextIssue=null, ext={EN=IssueExt(id=1195817692507718044, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, issueId=1195814096831561845, language=EN, specialIssueTitle=, coverIllustrator=null, specialIssueEditor=, specialIssueAbout=), CN=IssueExt(id=1195817692507718045, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, issueId=1195814096831561845, language=CN, specialIssueTitle=, coverIllustrator=null, specialIssueEditor=, specialIssueAbout=)}, issueFiles=null}, startPage=2226, endPage=2240, ext={EN=ArticleExt(id=1195814099524305048, articleId=1195814099293618322, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, language=EN, title=Quality Evaluation of Codonopsis pilosula in China, columnId=null, journalTitle=Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, columnName=null, runingTitle=null, highlight=null, articleAbstract=

OBJECTIVE To provide reference for reasonable protection, development and utilization of Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources. METHODS Variation analysis, correlation analysis, principal components analysis, cluster analysis, piecewise linear regression analysis, and stepwise multiple regression analysis were conducted on the main agronomic traits and representative components of 106 Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources. RESULTS The genetic variability of the 106 Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources was rich, with the coefficients of variation of the 106 Codonopsis pilosula trait indexes ranging from 9.331% to 86.948%, among which the coefficient of variation of the degree of variability of atractylenolide Ⅲ was the highest, 86.948%; the indexes of genetic diversity ranged from 1.587 to 2.039, with syringin 1.587, and root length, number of branches, and Codonopsis polysaccharide were 2.027,2.039 and 2.032, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that most of the 14 traits had significant or highly significant relationships with each other. The seven principal component factors available for principal component analysis could explain most of the information of the 14 indicators, with eigenvalues of 4.172, 2.427, 1.646, 1.196, 0.943, 0.872 and 0.75, respectively, and the cumulative contribution rate reached 85.760%. Using the DTOPSIS method to score the germplasm resources of Codonopsis pilosula, the top 15 were No.13, No.20, No.21, No.18, No.73, No.77, No.90, No.78, No.88, No.72, No.74, No.80, No.79, No.34 and No.14, respectively.Clustering analysis showed that 106 codonopsis germplasm could be classified into five taxa, among which the agronomic traits and quality indexes except syringin at a higher level in taxon Ⅰ. The overall performance was better, and it could be promoted for cultivation. stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that root length, luxia diameter, dry weight, drying rate, total amino acid, tryptophan, tangshenoside Ⅰ and atractylenolide Ⅲ had significant effects on fresh weight. Root length, total amino acid. Codonopsis polysaccharide, tryptophan, syringin, tangshenoside Ⅰ and atractylenolide Ⅲ had significant effects on extractum. Extractum had significant effects on codonopsis polysaccharide. Total amino acids, tryptophan and syringin had significant effects on lobetyolin. CONCLUSION The results of this study can serve as a reference for screening high-quality germplasm resources and cultivating varieties of Codonopsis pilosula.

, correspAuthors=Sha LIU, Faming WU, authorNote=null, correspAuthorsNote=null, copyrightStatement=null, copyrightOwner=null, extLink=null, articleAbsUrl=null, sourceXml=null, magXml=null, pdfUrl=null, pdf=null, pdfFileSize=null, pdfExtLink=null, richHtmlUrl=null, mobilePdfUrl=null, reviewReport=null, pdfFirstPage=null, abstractGraph=null, abstractGraphContent=null, abstractVideo=null, citation=null, cebUrl=null, magXmlContent=null, mapNumber=null, authorCompany=null, fund=null, authors=null, authorsList=Pan WANG, Fusong LIU, Delin ZHANG, Jie PENG, Sha LIU, Faming WU), CN=ArticleExt(id=1195814297755501082, articleId=1195814099293618322, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, language=CN, title=我国党参道地品质评价研究, columnId=1190352405612040510, journalTitle=中国药学杂志, columnName=论著, runingTitle=null, highlight=null, articleAbstract=

目的 为合理保护、开发和利用党参种质资源提供参考。方法 本研究对106份党参种质资源的主要农艺性状和代表性组分进行变异分析、遗传多样性分析、相关性分析、主成分分析、聚类分析、分段线性回归分析和逐步多元回归分析。结果 106份党参种质资源的遗传变异性丰富,106份党参性状指标的变异系数为9.331%~86.948%,其中以苍术内酯Ⅲ的变异程度系数最高,为86.948%;遗传多样性指数为1.587~2.039,其中丁香苷为1.587,根长、支根数和党参多糖分别为2.027、2.039和2.032。相关分析表明,14个性状指标间大多存在显著或极显著的关系。主成分分析可用7个主成分因子可以解释14个指标的大部分信息,其特征值分别为4.172、2.427、1.646、1.196、0.943、0.872和0.75,累计贡献率达到了85.760%。使用DTOPSIS法对党参种质资源进行评分,排名前15的分别是No.13、No.20、No.21、No.18、No.73、No.77、No.90、No.78、No.88、No.72、No.74、No.80、No.79、No.34和No.14。聚类分析结果表明,可将106份党参种质划分为5个类群,其中第Ⅰ类群中除了丁香苷以外,其他农艺性状和品质指标均处于较高,综合表现较好,可将其进行推广栽培。多元线性逐步回归分析表明,根长、芦下直径、干重、折干率、总氨基酸、色氨酸、党参苷Ⅰ和苍术内酯Ⅲ对鲜重影响显著;根长、总氨基酸、党参多糖、色氨酸、丁香苷、党参苷Ⅰ和苍术内酯Ⅲ对浸出物影响显著;浸出物对党参多糖影响显著;总氨基酸、色氨酸和丁香苷对党参炔苷影响显著。。结论 本研究结果可为党参优质种质资源筛选和品种培育提供参考依据。

, correspAuthors=刘莎, 吴发明, authorNote=null, correspAuthorsNote=
* 吴发明,男,博士,教授 研究方向:中药资源 Tel:(0851)28642516;
刘莎,女,博士,讲师 研究方向:中药资源 Tel:(0851)28642516
, copyrightStatement=null, copyrightOwner=null, extLink=null, articleAbsUrl=null, sourceXml=Tmr3MTiB2ZtyYOVksuq7Bg==, magXml=I2aEBuPFglcL96KF8YR0Cw==, pdfUrl=null, pdf=gxAKJpuNVoGF2Moq3e9EtA==, pdfFileSize=16524818, pdfExtLink=null, richHtmlUrl=null, mobilePdfUrl=null, reviewReport=null, pdfFirstPage=null, abstractGraph=8bXFsYoKW3ndn65qSyrm7w==, abstractGraphContent=null, abstractVideo=null, citation=null, cebUrl=null, magXmlContent=H6sOT9W4FFP9uerVchr08Q==, mapNumber=null, authorCompany=null, fund=null, authors=

王盼与刘付松为共同第一作者

王盼,男,博士,讲师 研究方向:中药资源;

刘付松,男,硕士 研究方向:中药资源。

, authorsList=王盼, 刘付松, 张德林, 彭杰, 刘莎, 吴发明)}, authors=[Author(id=1196079387641692973, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, orderNo=0, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1196079387721384752, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079387641692973, language=EN, stringName=Pan WANG, firstName=Pan, middleName=null, lastName=WANG, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=1, address=1 Gansu Health Vocational College, Lanzhou 730207, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1196079387809465137, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079387641692973, language=CN, stringName=王盼, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=1, address=1 甘肃卫生职业学院, 兰州 730207, bio={"content":"

王盼,男,博士,讲师 研究方向:中药资源;

"}, bioImg=null, bioContent=

王盼,男,博士,讲师 研究方向:中药资源;

, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1196079387444560677, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, xref=1, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387452949286, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387444560677, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=1 Gansu Health Vocational College, Lanzhou 730207, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387457143591, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387444560677, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=1 甘肃卫生职业学院, 兰州 730207)])]), Author(id=1196079387880768307, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, orderNo=1, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1196079387964654389, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079387880768307, language=EN, stringName=Fusong LIU, firstName=Fusong, middleName=null, lastName=LIU, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, address=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1196079388023374646, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079387880768307, language=CN, stringName=刘付松, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, address=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000, bio={"content":"

刘付松,男,硕士 研究方向:中药资源。

"}, bioImg=null, bioContent=

刘付松,男,硕士 研究方向:中药资源。

, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1196079387549418280, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, xref=2, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387557806889, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387566195498, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000)])]), Author(id=1196079388103066424, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, orderNo=2, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1196079388165980986, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079388103066424, language=EN, stringName=Delin ZHANG, firstName=Delin, middleName=null, lastName=ZHANG, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, address=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1196079388216312635, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079388103066424, language=CN, stringName=张德林, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, address=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1196079387549418280, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, xref=2, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387557806889, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387566195498, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000)])]), Author(id=1196079388287615805, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, orderNo=3, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1196079388354724671, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079388287615805, language=EN, stringName=Jie PENG, firstName=Jie, middleName=null, lastName=PENG, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, address=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1196079388409250624, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079388287615805, language=CN, stringName=彭杰, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, address=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1196079387549418280, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, xref=2, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387557806889, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387566195498, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000)])]), Author(id=1196079388484748098, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, orderNo=4, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=1, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1196079388551856964, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079388484748098, language=EN, stringName=Sha LIU, firstName=Sha, middleName=null, lastName=LIU, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, *, address=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1196079388715434821, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079388484748098, language=CN, stringName=刘莎, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, *, address=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1196079387549418280, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, xref=2, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387557806889, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387566195498, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000)])]), Author(id=1196079389793370951, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, orderNo=5, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=1, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1196079389906617161, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079389793370951, language=EN, stringName=Faming WU, firstName=Faming, middleName=null, lastName=WU, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, *, address=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1196079390045029194, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, authorId=1196079389793370951, language=CN, stringName=吴发明, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=2, *, address=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1196079387549418280, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, xref=2, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387557806889, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387566195498, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000)])])], keywords=[Keyword(id=1196079390250550091, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, orderNo=1, keyword=Codonopsis Radix), Keyword(id=1196079390305076044, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, orderNo=2, keyword=agronomic trait), Keyword(id=1196079390372184909, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, orderNo=3, keyword=representative component), Keyword(id=1196079390489625422, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, orderNo=4, keyword=principal components analysis), Keyword(id=1196079390565122895, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, orderNo=5, keyword=comprehensive evaluation), Keyword(id=1196079390644814672, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, orderNo=1, keyword=党参), Keyword(id=1196079390711923537, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, orderNo=2, keyword=农艺性状), Keyword(id=1196079390804198226, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, orderNo=3, keyword=代表性组分), Keyword(id=1196079390879695699, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, orderNo=4, keyword=主成分分析), Keyword(id=1196079391026496340, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, orderNo=5, keyword=综合评价)], refs=[Reference(id=1196079395686368123, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2020, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=293, pageEnd=294, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[1], rfOrder=0, authorNames=null, journalName=Ch.P(2020) VolⅠ(中国药典2020年版.一部 ), refType=null, unstructuredReference=Ch.P(2020) VolⅠ(中国药典2020年版.一部 )[S]. 2020:293-294., articleTitle=null, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079395761865596, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=55, issue=3, pageStart=978, pageEnd=988, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[2], rfOrder=1, authorNames=WANG H Y, CHEN Y, GUO F X, journalName=Chin Tradit Herb Drugs, refType=null, unstructuredReference=WANG H Y, CHEN Y, GUO F X, et al. Research progress on germplasm diversity and medicinal germplasm innovation of Codonopsis[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs (中草药), 2024, 55(3):978-988., articleTitle=Research progress on germplasm diversity and medicinal germplasm innovation of Codonopsis, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079395828974461, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2023, volume=48, issue=8, pageStart=2020, pageEnd=2040, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[3], rfOrder=2, authorNames=LAN X Y, ZHOU L, LI X, journalName=China J Chin Mater Med, refType=null, unstructuredReference=LAN X Y, ZHOU L, LI X, et al. Research progress and predictive analysis of quality markers of Codonopsis codonopsis[J]. China J Chin Mater Med (中国中药杂志), 2023, 48(8):2020-2040., articleTitle=Research progress and predictive analysis of quality markers of Codonopsis codonopsis, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079395904471934, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2015, volume=43, issue=33, pageStart=174, pageEnd=176, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[4], rfOrder=3, authorNames=SUN Z H, SHAO J, GUO M, journalName=J Anhui Agric Sci(安徽农业科学), refType=null, unstructuredReference=SUN Z H, SHAO J, GUO M. Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Codonopsis[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci(安徽农业科学), 2015, 43(33):174-176., articleTitle=Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Codonopsis, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079395971580799, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=1, pageEnd=7, url=https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/21.1543.r.20240418.1142.002.html, language=null, rfNumber=[5], rfOrder=4, authorNames=XIANG S, ZHANG W W, CHEN H, journalName=J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med(辽宁中医药大学学报), refType=null, unstructuredReference=XIANG S, ZHANG W W, CHEN H, et al. Research progress on pharmacological mechanism of codonopsis glycosides[J/OL]. J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med(辽宁中医药大学学报), 2024,1-7 [2024-09-28]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/21.1543.r.20240418.1142.002.html., articleTitle=Research progress on pharmacological mechanism of codonopsis glycosides, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396042883968, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2022, volume=57, issue=13, pageStart=1081, pageEnd=1088, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[6], rfOrder=5, authorNames=LIU F S, ZHANG K X, YAO Q Y, journalName=Chin Pharm J, refType=null, unstructuredReference=LIU F S, ZHANG K X, YAO Q Y, et al. Effects of rehydration after drought on agronomic traits, physiology, biochemistry and representative components of Codonopsis codonopsis[J]. Chin Pharm J (中国药学杂志), 2022, 57(13):1081-1088., articleTitle=Effects of rehydration after drought on agronomic traits, physiology, biochemistry and representative components of Codonopsis codonopsis, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396135158657, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2023, volume=54, issue=8, pageStart=2607, pageEnd=2617, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[7], rfOrder=6, authorNames=SU Y J, XI J Y, SHI Q, journalName=Chin Tradit Herb Drugs, refType=null, unstructuredReference=SU Y J, XI J Y, SHI Q, et al. Research progress of Codonopsis codonopsis, a traditional Chinese medicine with the same origin as medicine and food[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs (中草药), 2023, 54(8):2607-2617., articleTitle=Research progress of Codonopsis codonopsis, a traditional Chinese medicine with the same origin as medicine and food, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396206461826, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2021, volume=52, issue=13, pageStart=4055, pageEnd=4063, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[8], rfOrder=7, authorNames=YANG D D, CHEN Y, GUO F X, journalName=Chin Tradit Herb Drugs, refType=null, unstructuredReference=YANG D D, CHEN Y, GUO F X, et al. Study and application of above-ground parts of Codonopsis pilosula[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs (中草药), 2021, 52(13):4055-4063., articleTitle=Study and application of above-ground parts of Codonopsis pilosula, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396286153603, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2018, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=50, pageEnd=70, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[9], rfOrder=8, authorNames=GAO S M, LIU J S, WANG M, journalName=J Ethnopharmacol, refType=null, unstructuredReference=GAO S M, LIU J S, WANG M, et al. Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of Codonopsis: a review[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2018,219:50-70., articleTitle=Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of Codonopsis: a review, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396361651076, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2020, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=814, pageEnd=822, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[10], rfOrder=9, authorNames=GAO Z, ZHANG C, JING L, journalName=Int J Biol Macromol, refType=null, unstructuredReference=GAO Z, ZHANG C, JING L, et al. The structural characterization and immune modulation activitives comparison of Codonopsis pilosula polysaccharide (CPPS) and selenizing CPPS (sCPPS) on mouse in vitro and vivo[J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2020,160:814-822., articleTitle=The structural characterization and immune modulation activitives comparison of Codonopsis pilosula polysaccharide (CPPS) and selenizing CPPS (sCPPS) on mouse in vitro and vivo, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396441342853, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2018, volume=8, issue=7, pageStart=36, pageEnd=41, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[11], rfOrder=10, authorNames=LIU X, XU J, JIN Y, journalName=J Agric, refType=null, unstructuredReference=LIU X, XU J, JIN Y, et al. Germplasm resources and cultivar breeding of Codonopsis pilosula: research progress[J]. J Agric (农学学报), 2018, 8(7):36-41., articleTitle=Germplasm resources and cultivar breeding of Codonopsis pilosula: research progress, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396508451718, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2004, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=null, pageEnd=null, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[12], rfOrder=11, authorNames=ZHOU Y F, HUANG H K, journalName=Crop Variety Test and Statistical Analysis(作物品种试验与统计分析), refType=null, unstructuredReference=ZHOU Y F, HUANG H K. Crop Variety Test and Statistical Analysis(作物品种试验与统计分析)[M]. Fuzhou: Fujian Science and Technology Press, 2004., articleTitle=null, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396588143495, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=44, issue=7, pageStart=855, pageEnd=864, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[13], rfOrder=12, authorNames=LIU Y J, LI M, LI C, journalName=J Triticeae Crops(麦类作物学报), refType=null, unstructuredReference=LIU Y J, LI M, LI C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on quality traits of 75 highland barley germplasm[J]. J Triticeae Crops(麦类作物学报), 2024, 44 (7): 855-864., articleTitle=Comprehensive evaluation on quality traits of 75 highland barley germplasm, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396659446664, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=null, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=1, pageEnd=15, url=https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230307.1810.004.html, language=null, rfNumber=[14], rfOrder=13, authorNames=YANG D, XIONG Y, XIE Z S, journalName=Mol Plant Breed, refType=null, unstructuredReference=YANG D, XIONG Y, XIE Z S, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of excellent germplasm resources of upland cotton[J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 1-15[2024-09-29]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230307.1810.004.html., articleTitle=Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of excellent germplasm resources of upland cotton, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396734944137, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=45, issue=3, pageStart=514, pageEnd=523, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[15], rfOrder=14, authorNames=CHEN L J, WANG D, LI H W, journalName=Chin J Trop Crops, refType=null, unstructuredReference=CHEN L J, WANG D, LI H W, et al. Fruit quality analysis of different varieties (superior lines) of Chinese cherry[J]. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2024, 45(3):514-523., articleTitle=Fruit quality analysis of different varieties (superior lines) of Chinese cherry, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396810441610, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=32, issue=2, pageStart=599, pageEnd=609, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[16], rfOrder=15, authorNames=GAO S, YAN C M, WAN C, journalName=Acta Agrestia Sin(草地学报), refType=null, unstructuredReference=GAO S, YAN C M, WAN C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of Leymus chinensis based on grey correlation method and DTOPSIS method[J]. Acta Agrestia Sin(草地学报), 2024, 32(2):599-609., articleTitle=Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of Leymus chinensis based on grey correlation method and DTOPSIS method, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396919493515, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2023, volume=28, issue=11, pageStart=42, pageEnd=56, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[17], rfOrder=16, authorNames=SUN H, GUO Y, XIN L, journalName=J China Agric Univ(中国农业大学学报), refType=null, unstructuredReference=SUN H, GUO Y, XIN L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of millet varieties based on grey relational degree, DTOPSIS and grey situation decision method[J]. J China Agric Univ(中国农业大学学报), 2023, 28(11):42-56., articleTitle=Comprehensive evaluation of millet varieties based on grey relational degree, DTOPSIS and grey situation decision method, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079396990796684, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2023, volume=46, issue=16, pageStart=114, pageEnd=120, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[18], rfOrder=17, authorNames=ZHANG Z Z, ZHENG C Z, XU Z P, journalName=Feed Res(饲料研究), refType=null, unstructuredReference=ZHANG Z Z, ZHENG C Z, XU Z P, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of forage performance of different oat varieties based on entropy weighted DTOPSIS method[J]. Feed Res(饲料研究), 2023, 46(16):114-120., articleTitle=Comprehensive evaluation of forage performance of different oat varieties based on entropy weighted DTOPSIS method, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397083071373, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=null, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=1, pageEnd=24, url=https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20221102.1502.004.html, language=null, rfNumber=[19], rfOrder=18, authorNames=SANG T, ZHAO Y X, YANG D Y, journalName=Mol Plant Breed(分子植物育种), refType=null, unstructuredReference=SANG T, ZHAO Y X, YANG D Y, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of fresh Strawberry varieties based on AHP and DTOPSIS[J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed(分子植物育种), 1-24[2024-09-29]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20221102.1502.004.html., articleTitle=Comprehensive quality evaluation of fresh Strawberry varieties based on AHP and DTOPSIS, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397196317582, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=30, issue=14, pageStart=156, pageEnd=164, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[20], rfOrder=19, authorNames=LAN X Y, TIAN C F, ZHAN Z L, journalName=Chin J Exp Tradit Med Form, refType=null, unstructuredReference=LAN X Y, TIAN C F, ZHAN Z L, et al. Comparison of wild and cultivated Ludonopsis based on traditional quality evaluation[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Form (中国实验方剂学杂志), 2024, 30 (14): 156-164., articleTitle=Comparison of wild and cultivated Ludonopsis based on traditional quality evaluation, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397284397967, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=null, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=null, pageEnd=null, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[21], rfOrder=20, authorNames=QIAN P S, journalName=Flora of China(中国植物志), refType=null, unstructuredReference=QIAN P S. Flora of China(中国植物志)[M]. Beijing: Science Press,1963., articleTitle=null, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397347312528, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2015, volume=40, issue=6, pageStart=1027, pageEnd=1031, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[22], rfOrder=21, authorNames=JIANG H, GAO Y, YANG J M, journalName=China J Chin Mater Med, refType=null, unstructuredReference=JIANG H, GAO Y, YANG J M, et al. Summary of research on the quality evaluation methods of traditional Chinese medicine from the “holistic view”[J]. China J Chin Mater Med (中国中药杂志), 2015, 40(6):1027-1031., articleTitle=Summary of research on the quality evaluation methods of traditional Chinese medicine from the “holistic view”, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397418615697, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=null, volume=null, issue=null, pageStart=1, pageEnd=14, url=https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.s.20220216.1546.016.html, language=null, rfNumber=[23], rfOrder=22, authorNames=XU L J, LIANG H Z, YU Y L, journalName=Mol Plant Breed(分子植物育种), refType=null, unstructuredReference=XU L J, LIANG H Z, YU Y L, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality indexes of Chinese herbal medicine Safflower[J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed(分子植物育种), 1-14[2024-09-29]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.s.20220216.1546.016.html., articleTitle=Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality indexes of Chinese herbal medicine Safflower, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397498307474, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=50, issue=9, pageStart=2248, pageEnd=2266, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[24], rfOrder=23, authorNames=NIE B T, LIU D Q, CHEN J, journalName=Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), refType=null, unstructuredReference=NIE B T, LIU D Q, CHEN J, et al. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic and quality traits of spring Soybean varieties in North China[J]. Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2024, 50 (9): 2248-2266., articleTitle=Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic and quality traits of spring Soybean varieties in North China, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397577999251, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=33, issue=8, pageStart=98, pageEnd=111, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[25], rfOrder=24, authorNames=LU J Y, TIAN H, XIONG J B, journalName=Acta Prataculturae Sin(草业学报), refType=null, unstructuredReference=LU J Y, TIAN H, XIONG J B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of cold tolerance of 14 native Pennisetum seedlings[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin(草业学报), 2024, 33 (8): 98-111., articleTitle=Comprehensive evaluation of cold tolerance of 14 native Pennisetum seedlings, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397640913812, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2021, volume=22, issue=6, pageStart=1550, pageEnd=1558, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[26], rfOrder=25, authorNames=HUANG Y, XIONG X G, ZOU X Y, journalName=J Plant Gen Res(植物遗传资源学报), refType=null, unstructuredReference=HUANG Y, XIONG X G, ZOU X Y, et al. Analysis and evaluation of main agronomic traits of local Peanut germplasm resources in Jiangxi Province[J]. J Plant Gen Res(植物遗传资源学报), 2021, 22(6):1550-1558., articleTitle=Analysis and evaluation of main agronomic traits of local Peanut germplasm resources in Jiangxi Province, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079397708022677, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2024, volume=48, issue=4, pageStart=159, pageEnd=167, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[27], rfOrder=26, authorNames=BIAN L L, LIANG D H, FAN M L, journalName=J Nanjing Forest Univ Nat Sci Ed(南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)), refType=null, unstructuredReference=BIAN L L, LIANG D H, FAN M L, et al. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of nutrient content of different varieties of Jinfosan Square bamboo shoots[J]. J Nanjing Forest Univ Nat Sci Ed(南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)), 2024, 48 (4): 159-167., articleTitle=Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of nutrient content of different varieties of Jinfosan Square bamboo shoots, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079398769181590, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2021, volume=62, issue=2, pageStart=290, pageEnd=294, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[28], rfOrder=27, authorNames=XIAO S X, HOU Q W, CAI Z P, journalName=J Zhejiang Agric Sci(浙江农业科学), refType=null, unstructuredReference=XIAO S X, HOU Q W, CAI Z P, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of 20 kinds of Codonopsis[J]. J Zhejiang Agric Sci(浙江农业科学), 2021, 62(2):290-294., articleTitle=Comprehensive quality evaluation of 20 kinds of Codonopsis, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079398857261975, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2020, volume=21, issue=2, pageStart=369, pageEnd=376, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[29], rfOrder=28, authorNames=YANG H, YU E R, WEI Z F, journalName=J Plant Gen Res(植物遗传资源学报), refType=null, unstructuredReference=YANG H, YU E R, WEI Z F, et al. Analysis and evaluation of quality characters of local sesame germplasm resources in Guizhou Province[J]. J Plant Gen Res(植物遗传资源学报), 2020, 21(2):369-376., articleTitle=Analysis and evaluation of quality characters of local sesame germplasm resources in Guizhou Province, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079398924370840, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2021, volume=null, issue=1, pageStart=54, pageEnd=59, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[30], rfOrder=29, authorNames=BAI W, HU Y, YANG S M, journalName=Crops(作物杂志), refType=null, unstructuredReference=BAI W, HU Y, YANG S M, et al. Analysis on agronomic characters of local resources of anemone in northwest Hebei Province[J]. Crops(作物杂志), 2021(1):54-59., articleTitle=Analysis on agronomic characters of local resources of anemone in northwest Hebei Province, refAbstract=null), Reference(id=1196079398991479705, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, doi=null, pmid=null, pmcid=null, year=2017, volume=42, issue=15, pageStart=2946, pageEnd=2953, url=null, language=null, rfNumber=[31], rfOrder=30, authorNames=HU J D, MAO G, ZHANG Z W, journalName=China J Chin Mater Med, refType=null, unstructuredReference=HU J D, MAO G, ZHANG Z W, et al. Effects of different fertilization treatments on yield and secondary metabolite content of Codonopsis codonopsis[J]. China J Chin Mater Med (中国中药杂志), 2017, 42(15):2946-2953., articleTitle=Effects of different fertilization treatments on yield and secondary metabolite content of Codonopsis codonopsis, refAbstract=null)], funds=[Fund(id=1196079395359212408, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, awardId=82060687, language=CN, fundingSource=国家自然科学基金项目(82060687), fundOrder=null, country=null), Fund(id=1196079395438904185, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, awardId=81760679, language=CN, fundingSource=国家自然科学基金项目(81760679), fundOrder=null, country=null), Fund(id=1196079395518595962, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, awardId=null, language=CN, fundingSource=贵州省科技支撑计划项目资助[黔科合支撑(2021)一般248], fundOrder=null, country=null)], companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1196079387444560677, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, xref=1, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387452949286, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387444560677, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=1 Gansu Health Vocational College, Lanzhou 730207, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387457143591, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387444560677, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=1 甘肃卫生职业学院, 兰州 730207)]), AuthorCompany(id=1196079387549418280, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, xref=2, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387557806889, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1196079387566195498, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, companyId=1196079387549418280, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000)])], figs=[ArticleFig(id=1196079391315903318, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Fig.1, caption=UPLC chromatograms of secondary metabolites in mixed reference substance and test substance

A-mixed reference substance; B-Codonopsis test substance; 1-tryptophan; 2-syringin; 3-tangshenoside Ⅰ; 4-lobetyolin; 5-atractyloactone Ⅲ.

, figureFileSmall=MJqul/yN7s4wQQtCKKkCIA==, figureFileBig=oenBgcrVLLp1tA51f2HVBw==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079391383012183, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=图1, caption=混合对照品及党参供试品中5种次生代谢产物的超高效液相色谱(UPLC)图谱

A-混合对照品;B-党参供试品;1-色氨酸;2-丁香苷;3-党参苷Ⅰ;4-党参炔苷;5-苍术内酯Ⅲ。

, figureFileSmall=MJqul/yN7s4wQQtCKKkCIA==, figureFileBig=oenBgcrVLLp1tA51f2HVBw==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079391487869784, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Fig.2, caption=Correlation analysis between agronomic traits and representative components

Note:1)-is significantly correlated at the 0.05 level (bilateral); 2)-is significantly correlated at the 0.01 level (bilateral).

, figureFileSmall=GtN8Qya40Ac9KXCWsfRaCA==, figureFileBig=17eyiokQYFMCYy1euzSQfA==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079391567561561, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=图2, caption=农艺性状及代表性组分相关性分析

注:1)-在0.05水平(双侧)上显著相关;2)-在0.01水平(双侧)上显著相关。

, figureFileSmall=GtN8Qya40Ac9KXCWsfRaCA==, figureFileBig=17eyiokQYFMCYy1euzSQfA==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079391634670426, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Fig.3, caption=Cluster analysis of 106 Codonopsis germplasm resources based on 14 indicators, figureFileSmall=+10ucnJgu2MN3Zwhf+/iJA==, figureFileBig=b/HxJ+5FAib3nb9eC6W/1w==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079391714362203, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=图3, caption=106份党参种质资源基于14个指标进行的聚类分析, figureFileSmall=+10ucnJgu2MN3Zwhf+/iJA==, figureFileBig=b/HxJ+5FAib3nb9eC6W/1w==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079391802442588, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Fig.4, caption=Piecewise linear regression diagram between fresh weight and other indexes

A-fresh weight vs root length; B-fresh weight vs luxia diameter; C-fresh weight vs number of branches; D-fresh weight vs dry weight; E-fresh weight vs drying rate; F-fresh weight vs extractum; G-fresh weight vs total amino acid; H-fresh weight vs codonopsis polysaccharide; I-fresh weight vs tryptophan; J-fresh weight vs syringin; K-fresh weight vs tangshenoside Ⅰ; L-fresh weight vs lobetyolin; M-fresh weight vs atractyloactone Ⅲ.

, figureFileSmall=PIohLrVJZvPmSUSV0a0lcg==, figureFileBig=x9prAl7R9ScAL6++uwov4g==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079391898911581, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=图4, caption=鲜重与其他指标间分段线性回归图

A-鲜重与根长;B-鲜重与芦下直径;C-鲜重与支根数;D-鲜重与干重;E-鲜重与折干率;F-鲜重与浸出物;G-鲜重与总氨基酸;H-鲜重与党参多糖;I-鲜重与色氨酸;J-鲜重与丁香苷;K-鲜重与党参苷Ⅰ;L-鲜重与党参炔苷;M-鲜重与苍术内酯 Ⅲ。

, figureFileSmall=PIohLrVJZvPmSUSV0a0lcg==, figureFileBig=x9prAl7R9ScAL6++uwov4g==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079391970214750, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Fig.5, caption=Piecewise linear regression diagram between extractum and other indicators

A-extractum vs root length; B-extractum vs luxia diameter; C-extractum vs number of branches; D-extractum vs fresh weight; E-extractum vs dry weight; F-extractum vs drying rate; G-extractum vs total amino acid; H-extractum vs codonopsis polysaccharide; I-extractum vs tryptophan; J-extractum vs syringin; K-extractum vs tangshenoside Ⅰ; L-extractum vs lobetyolin; M-extractum vs atractyloactone Ⅲ.

, figureFileSmall=3mmuD53eaOUEBTID07kiyg==, figureFileBig=PLkiPbyAm91y3mf6qyyxig==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079392041517919, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=图5, caption=浸出物与其他指标间分段线性回归图

A-浸出物与根长;B-浸出物与芦下直径;C-浸出物与支根数;D-浸出物与鲜重;E-浸出物与干重;F-浸出物与折干率;G-浸出物与总氨基酸;H-浸出物与党参多糖;I-浸出物与色氨酸;J-浸出物与丁香苷;K-浸出物与党参苷Ⅰ;L-浸出物与党参炔苷;M-浸出物与苍术内酯 Ⅲ。

, figureFileSmall=3mmuD53eaOUEBTID07kiyg==, figureFileBig=PLkiPbyAm91y3mf6qyyxig==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079392117015392, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Fig.6, caption=Piecewise linear regression diagram between Codonopsis polysaccharide and other indexes

A-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs root length; B-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs luxia diameter; C-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs number of branches; D-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs fresh weight; E-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs dry weight; F-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs drying rate; G-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs extractum; H-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs total amino acid; I-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs tryptophan; J-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs syringin; K-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs tangshenoside Ⅰ; L-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs lobetyolin; M-Codonopsis polysaccharide vs atractyloactone Ⅲ.

, figureFileSmall=c0026hKVbGfcs26OPP++Fw==, figureFileBig=NDSt+yJYpg5rwEtLsklMrA==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079392205095777, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=图6, caption=党参多糖与其他指标间分段线性回归图

A-党参多糖与根长;B-党参多糖与芦下直径;C-党参多糖与支根数;D-党参多糖与鲜重;E-党参多糖与干重;F-党参多糖与折干率;G-党参多糖与浸出物;H-党参多糖与总氨基酸;I-党参多糖与色氨酸;J-党参多糖与丁香苷;K-党参多糖与党参苷Ⅰ;L-党参多糖与党参炔苷;M-党参多糖与苍术内酯 Ⅲ。

, figureFileSmall=c0026hKVbGfcs26OPP++Fw==, figureFileBig=NDSt+yJYpg5rwEtLsklMrA==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079392293176162, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Fig.7, caption=Piecewise linear regression diagram between lobetyolin and other indexes

A-lobetyolin vs root length; B-lobetyolin vs luxia diameter; C-lobetyolin vs number of branches; D-lobetyolin vs fresh weight; E-lobetyolin vs dry weight; F-lobetyolin vs drying rate; G-lobetyolin vs extractum; H-lobetyolin vs total amino acid; I-lobetyolin vs Codonopsis polysaccharide; J-lobetyolin vs tryptophan; K-lobetyolin vs syringin; L-lobetyolin vs tangshenoside Ⅰ; M-lobetyolin vs atractyloactone Ⅲ.

, figureFileSmall=VjcdU1GdbhmFG6UsHfKY/w==, figureFileBig=mlMC3raEOnxrAAsZ/BmBvw==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079392351896419, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=图7, caption=党参炔苷与其他指标间分段线性回归图

A-党参炔苷与根长;B-党参炔苷与芦下直径;C-党参炔苷与支根数;D-党参炔苷与鲜重;E-党参炔苷与干重;F-党参炔苷与折干率;G-党参炔苷与浸出物;H-党参炔苷与总氨基酸;I-党参炔苷与党参多糖;J-党参炔苷与色氨酸;K-党参炔苷与丁香苷;L-党参炔苷与党参苷I;M-党参炔苷与苍术内酯 Ⅲ。

, figureFileSmall=VjcdU1GdbhmFG6UsHfKY/w==, figureFileBig=mlMC3raEOnxrAAsZ/BmBvw==, tableContent=null), ArticleFig(id=1196079392414810980, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.1, caption=

Information of 106 Codonopsis samples from different sources

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
ID Source(in Chinese) Origin ID Source(in Chinese) Origin
No.1 Gansu Jingyuan(甘肃靖远) C. tangshen Oliv. No.54 Neimenggu Chifeng(内蒙古赤峰) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.2 Gansu Jingyuan(甘肃靖远) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.55 Ningxia Longde(宁夏隆德) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.3 Gansu Jingyuan(甘肃靖远) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.56 Ningxia Longde(宁夏隆德) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.4 Gansu Tanchang(甘肃宕昌) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.57 Ningxia Longde(宁夏隆德) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.5 Gansu Tanchang(甘肃宕昌) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.58 Qinghai Datong(青海大通) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.6 Gansu Tanchang(甘肃宕昌) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.59 Qinghai Datong(青海大通) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.7 Gansu Tanchang(甘肃宕昌) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.60 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou(四川九寨沟) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.8 Gansu Wenxian(甘肃文县) C. pilosula Nannf. var.
modesta(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.61 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou(四川九寨沟) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.9 Gansu Wenxian(甘肃文县) C. pilosula Nannf. var.
modesta(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.62 Sichuan Hongyuan(四川红原) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.10 Gansu Wenxian(甘肃文县) C. pilosula Nannf. var.
modesta(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.63 Sichuan Hongyuan(四川红原) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.11 Gansu Weiyuan(甘肃渭源) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.64 Sichuan Beichuan(四川北川) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.12 Gansu Weiyuan(甘肃渭源) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.65 Sichuan Beichuan(四川北川) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.13 Gansu Weiyuan(甘肃渭源) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.66 Sichuan Beichuan(四川北川) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.14 Gansu Lintao(甘肃临洮) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.67 Sichuan Beichuan(四川北川) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.15 Gansu Lintao(甘肃临洮) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.68 Sichuan Baoxing(四川宝兴) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.16 Gansu Lintao(甘肃临洮) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.69 Sichuan Baoxing(四川宝兴) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.17 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.70 Sichuan Baoxing(四川宝兴) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.18 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.71 Shanxi Liuba(陕西留坝) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.19 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.72 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.20 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.73 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.21 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.74 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.22 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.75 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.23 Gansu Minxian(甘肃岷县) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.76 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.24 Gansu Minxian(甘肃岷县) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.77 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.25 Gansu Minxian(甘肃岷县) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.78 Hubei Enshi(湖北恩施) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.26 Gansu Gangu(甘肃甘谷) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.79 Hubei Enshi(湖北恩施) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.27 Gansu Gangu(甘肃甘谷) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.80 Chongqing Wuxi(重庆巫溪) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.28 Gansu Gangu(甘肃甘谷) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.81 Chongqing Wuxi(重庆巫溪) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.29 Shanxi Lingchuan(山西陵川) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.82 Chongqing Wuxi(重庆巫溪) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.30 Shanxi Lingchuan(山西陵川) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.83 Chongqing Yunyang(重庆云阳) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.31 Shanxi Lingchuan(山西陵川) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.84 Chongqing Yunyang(重庆云阳) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.32 Shanxi Pingshun(山西平顺) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.85 Chongqing Wushan(重庆巫山) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.33 Shanxi Pingshun(山西平顺) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.86 Chongqing Wushan(重庆巫山) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.34 Shanxi Pingshun(山西平顺) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.87 Chongqing Wushan(重庆巫山) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.35 Shanxi Pingshun(山西平顺) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.88 Chongqing Wushan(重庆巫山) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.36 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.89 Chongqing Fengjie(重庆奉节) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.37 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.90 Chongqing Fengjie(重庆奉节) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.38 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.91 Guizhou Daozhen(贵州道真) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.39 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.92 Guizhou Daozhen(贵州道真) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.40 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.93 Guizhou Daozhen(贵州道真) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.41 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.94 Guizhou Weining(贵州威宁) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.42 Jilin Liuhe(吉林柳河) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.95 Guizhou Weining(贵州威宁) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.43 Jilin Liuhe(吉林柳河) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.96 Guizhou Weining(贵州威宁) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.44 Jilin Liuhe(吉林柳河) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.97 Guizhou Qixingguan(贵州七星关) Codonopsis tubulosa Kom.
No.45 Neimenggu Balinyouqi(内蒙古巴林右旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.98 Guizhou Nayong(贵州纳雍) C. tubulosa Kom.
No.46 Neimenggu Balinyouqi(内蒙古巴林右旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.99 Guizhou Zhijin(贵州织金) C. tubulosa Kom.
No.47 Neimenggu Balinyouqi(内蒙古巴林右旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.100 Yunnan Zhaoyang(云南昭阳) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.48 Neimenggu Wengniuteqi(内蒙古翁牛特旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.101 Yunnan Zhaoyang(云南昭阳) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.49 Neimenggu Wengniuteqi(内蒙古翁牛特旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.102 Yunnan Zhaoyang(云南昭阳) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.50 Neimenggu Wengniuteqi(内蒙古翁牛特旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.103 Yunnan Yongshan(云南永善) C. tubulosa Kom.
No.51 Neimenggu Alukeerqinqi(内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.104 Yunnan Yongshan(云南永善) C. tubulosa Kom.
No.52 Neimenggu Alukeerqinqi(内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.105 Liaoning Zhenan(辽宁振安) Codonopsis lanceolata (Siebold
& Zucc.) Trautv.
No.53 Neimenggu Alukeerqinqi(内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.106 Liaoning Zhenan(辽宁振安) C. lanceolata (Siebold
& Zucc.) Trautv.
), ArticleFig(id=1196079392511279973, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表1, caption=

106份不同来源的党参资源样品信息

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
ID Source(in Chinese) Origin ID Source(in Chinese) Origin
No.1 Gansu Jingyuan(甘肃靖远) C. tangshen Oliv. No.54 Neimenggu Chifeng(内蒙古赤峰) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.2 Gansu Jingyuan(甘肃靖远) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.55 Ningxia Longde(宁夏隆德) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.3 Gansu Jingyuan(甘肃靖远) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.56 Ningxia Longde(宁夏隆德) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.4 Gansu Tanchang(甘肃宕昌) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.57 Ningxia Longde(宁夏隆德) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.5 Gansu Tanchang(甘肃宕昌) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.58 Qinghai Datong(青海大通) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.6 Gansu Tanchang(甘肃宕昌) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.59 Qinghai Datong(青海大通) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.7 Gansu Tanchang(甘肃宕昌) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.60 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou(四川九寨沟) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.8 Gansu Wenxian(甘肃文县) C. pilosula Nannf. var.
modesta(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.61 Sichuan Jiuzhaigou(四川九寨沟) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.9 Gansu Wenxian(甘肃文县) C. pilosula Nannf. var.
modesta(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.62 Sichuan Hongyuan(四川红原) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.10 Gansu Wenxian(甘肃文县) C. pilosula Nannf. var.
modesta(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.63 Sichuan Hongyuan(四川红原) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.11 Gansu Weiyuan(甘肃渭源) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.64 Sichuan Beichuan(四川北川) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.12 Gansu Weiyuan(甘肃渭源) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.65 Sichuan Beichuan(四川北川) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.13 Gansu Weiyuan(甘肃渭源) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.66 Sichuan Beichuan(四川北川) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.14 Gansu Lintao(甘肃临洮) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.67 Sichuan Beichuan(四川北川) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.15 Gansu Lintao(甘肃临洮) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.68 Sichuan Baoxing(四川宝兴) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.16 Gansu Lintao(甘肃临洮) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.69 Sichuan Baoxing(四川宝兴) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.17 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.70 Sichuan Baoxing(四川宝兴) C. pilosula Nannf. var. modesta
(Nannf.) L. T. Shen
No.18 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.71 Shanxi Liuba(陕西留坝) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.19 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.72 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.20 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.73 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.21 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.74 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.22 Gansu Longxi(甘肃陇西) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.75 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.23 Gansu Minxian(甘肃岷县) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.76 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.24 Gansu Minxian(甘肃岷县) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.77 Hubei Lichuan(湖北利川) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.25 Gansu Minxian(甘肃岷县) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.78 Hubei Enshi(湖北恩施) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.26 Gansu Gangu(甘肃甘谷) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.79 Hubei Enshi(湖北恩施) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.27 Gansu Gangu(甘肃甘谷) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.80 Chongqing Wuxi(重庆巫溪) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.28 Gansu Gangu(甘肃甘谷) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.81 Chongqing Wuxi(重庆巫溪) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.29 Shanxi Lingchuan(山西陵川) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.82 Chongqing Wuxi(重庆巫溪) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.30 Shanxi Lingchuan(山西陵川) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.83 Chongqing Yunyang(重庆云阳) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.31 Shanxi Lingchuan(山西陵川) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.84 Chongqing Yunyang(重庆云阳) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.32 Shanxi Pingshun(山西平顺) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.85 Chongqing Wushan(重庆巫山) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.33 Shanxi Pingshun(山西平顺) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.86 Chongqing Wushan(重庆巫山) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.34 Shanxi Pingshun(山西平顺) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.87 Chongqing Wushan(重庆巫山) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.35 Shanxi Pingshun(山西平顺) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.88 Chongqing Wushan(重庆巫山) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.36 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.89 Chongqing Fengjie(重庆奉节) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.37 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.90 Chongqing Fengjie(重庆奉节) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.38 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.91 Guizhou Daozhen(贵州道真) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.39 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.92 Guizhou Daozhen(贵州道真) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.40 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.93 Guizhou Daozhen(贵州道真) C. tangshen Oliv.
No.41 Jilin Antu(吉林安图) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.94 Guizhou Weining(贵州威宁) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.42 Jilin Liuhe(吉林柳河) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.95 Guizhou Weining(贵州威宁) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.43 Jilin Liuhe(吉林柳河) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.96 Guizhou Weining(贵州威宁) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.44 Jilin Liuhe(吉林柳河) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.97 Guizhou Qixingguan(贵州七星关) Codonopsis tubulosa Kom.
No.45 Neimenggu Balinyouqi(内蒙古巴林右旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.98 Guizhou Nayong(贵州纳雍) C. tubulosa Kom.
No.46 Neimenggu Balinyouqi(内蒙古巴林右旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.99 Guizhou Zhijin(贵州织金) C. tubulosa Kom.
No.47 Neimenggu Balinyouqi(内蒙古巴林右旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.100 Yunnan Zhaoyang(云南昭阳) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.48 Neimenggu Wengniuteqi(内蒙古翁牛特旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.101 Yunnan Zhaoyang(云南昭阳) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.49 Neimenggu Wengniuteqi(内蒙古翁牛特旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.102 Yunnan Zhaoyang(云南昭阳) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.
No.50 Neimenggu Wengniuteqi(内蒙古翁牛特旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.103 Yunnan Yongshan(云南永善) C. tubulosa Kom.
No.51 Neimenggu Alukeerqinqi(内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.104 Yunnan Yongshan(云南永善) C. tubulosa Kom.
No.52 Neimenggu Alukeerqinqi(内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.105 Liaoning Zhenan(辽宁振安) Codonopsis lanceolata (Siebold
& Zucc.) Trautv.
No.53 Neimenggu Alukeerqinqi(内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗) C. pilosula (Franch.) Nannf. No.106 Liaoning Zhenan(辽宁振安) C. lanceolata (Siebold
& Zucc.) Trautv.
), ArticleFig(id=1196079392637109094, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.2, caption=

Statistical analysis of agronomic traits and representative components

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index Max Min Range AVG SD CV/% H'
Root length/cm 47.418 13.120 34.298 30.719 6.165 20.069 2.027
Luxia diameter/mm 25.408 4.608 20.800 12.349 3.413 27.641 2.003
Number of branches 7.800 0.000 7.800 3.280 1.663 50.707 2.039
Fresh weight/g 116.590 3.254 113.336 26.057 19.072 73.193 1.737
Dry weight/g 28.100 0.746 27.354 7.182 5.410 75.332 1.632
Drying rate/% 44.073 17.422 26.651 27.334 5.278 19.309 1.745
Extractum/% 70.661 46.556 24.105 60.959 5.688 9.331 2.012
Total amino acid/% 6.361 0.232 6.130 3.028 1.304 43.073 1.953
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% 48.542 12.434 36.108 32.733 7.442 22.736 2.032
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 697.471 30.123 667.349 232.166 104.213 44.887 1.952
Syringin/μg·g-1 283.978 8.785 275.193 47.277 38.242 80.889 1.587
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 4.100 0.128 3.972 0.960 0.772 80.406 1.792
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 5.080 0.094 4.987 1.196 0.766 64.004 1.828
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 289.337 0.000 289.337 55.935 48.634 86.948 1.901
), ArticleFig(id=1196079392700023655, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表2, caption=

农艺性状及代表性组分统计分析

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index Max Min Range AVG SD CV/% H'
Root length/cm 47.418 13.120 34.298 30.719 6.165 20.069 2.027
Luxia diameter/mm 25.408 4.608 20.800 12.349 3.413 27.641 2.003
Number of branches 7.800 0.000 7.800 3.280 1.663 50.707 2.039
Fresh weight/g 116.590 3.254 113.336 26.057 19.072 73.193 1.737
Dry weight/g 28.100 0.746 27.354 7.182 5.410 75.332 1.632
Drying rate/% 44.073 17.422 26.651 27.334 5.278 19.309 1.745
Extractum/% 70.661 46.556 24.105 60.959 5.688 9.331 2.012
Total amino acid/% 6.361 0.232 6.130 3.028 1.304 43.073 1.953
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% 48.542 12.434 36.108 32.733 7.442 22.736 2.032
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 697.471 30.123 667.349 232.166 104.213 44.887 1.952
Syringin/μg·g-1 283.978 8.785 275.193 47.277 38.242 80.889 1.587
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 4.100 0.128 3.972 0.960 0.772 80.406 1.792
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 5.080 0.094 4.987 1.196 0.766 64.004 1.828
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 289.337 0.000 289.337 55.935 48.634 86.948 1.901
), ArticleFig(id=1196079392788104040, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.3, caption=

Principal component analysis of agronomic traits and representative components of 106 Codonopsis pilosula resources

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index Principal component
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7
Root length/cm 0.708 0.064 0.252 0.355 -0.084 0.083 -0.028
Luxia diameter/mm 0.523 0.709 -0.084 -0.06 -0.306 0.120 0.068
Number of branches -0.560 -0.242 0.049 -0.118 -0.352 0.160 0.602
Fresh weight/g 0.760 0.599 0.026 0.050 0.025 0.045 0.145
Dry weight/g 0.838 0.430 -0.022 0.037 0.053 -0.007 0.203
Drying rate/% 0.390 -0.592 -0.216 -0.081 0.254 0.029 0.314
Extractum/% 0.651 -0.536 0.109 0.273 0.172 0.108 0.021
Total amino acid/% 0.250 -0.170 0.786 -0.102 0.134 -0.419 0.004
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% 0.444 -0.561 -0.139 0.223 -0.202 0.315 -0.328
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 -0.329 0.080 0.794 -0.011 -0.317 0.109 -0.119
Syringin/μg·g-1 -0.511 0.351 -0.235 0.466 0.226 -0.424 0.004
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 -0.328 0.136 0.421 0.407 0.441 0.378 0.240
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 -0.630 0.201 -0.101 0.556 -0.154 0.167 -0.050
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 -0.309 0.384 0.046 -0.464 0.439 0.416 -0.196
Eigenvalue 4.172 2.427 1.646 1.196 0.943 0.872 0.750
Contribution rate/% 29.798 17.334 11.760 8.544 6.737 6.231 5.356
Cumulative contribution rate/% 29.798 47.132 58.892 67.436 74.173 80.404 85.760
), ArticleFig(id=1196079392905544553, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表3, caption=

106份党参资源农艺和代表性组分主成分分析

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index Principal component
F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7
Root length/cm 0.708 0.064 0.252 0.355 -0.084 0.083 -0.028
Luxia diameter/mm 0.523 0.709 -0.084 -0.06 -0.306 0.120 0.068
Number of branches -0.560 -0.242 0.049 -0.118 -0.352 0.160 0.602
Fresh weight/g 0.760 0.599 0.026 0.050 0.025 0.045 0.145
Dry weight/g 0.838 0.430 -0.022 0.037 0.053 -0.007 0.203
Drying rate/% 0.390 -0.592 -0.216 -0.081 0.254 0.029 0.314
Extractum/% 0.651 -0.536 0.109 0.273 0.172 0.108 0.021
Total amino acid/% 0.250 -0.170 0.786 -0.102 0.134 -0.419 0.004
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% 0.444 -0.561 -0.139 0.223 -0.202 0.315 -0.328
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 -0.329 0.080 0.794 -0.011 -0.317 0.109 -0.119
Syringin/μg·g-1 -0.511 0.351 -0.235 0.466 0.226 -0.424 0.004
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 -0.328 0.136 0.421 0.407 0.441 0.378 0.240
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 -0.630 0.201 -0.101 0.556 -0.154 0.167 -0.050
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 -0.309 0.384 0.046 -0.464 0.439 0.416 -0.196
Eigenvalue 4.172 2.427 1.646 1.196 0.943 0.872 0.750
Contribution rate/% 29.798 17.334 11.760 8.544 6.737 6.231 5.356
Cumulative contribution rate/% 29.798 47.132 58.892 67.436 74.173 80.404 85.760
), ArticleFig(id=1196079392989430634, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.4, caption=

Principal components comprehensive evaluation and ranking of 106 Codonopsis pilosula resources

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
ID Comprehensive evaluation score(D) Ranking ID Comprehensive evaluation score(D) Ranking ID Comprehensive evaluation score(D) Ranking
No.13 0.735 1 No.66 0.604 37 No.19 0.496 72
No.20 0.704 2 No.17 0.603 38 No.24 0.487 73
No.21 0.694 3 No.91 0.602 39 No.49 0.485 74
No.18 0.694 4 No.61 0.600 40 No.47 0.483 75
No.73 0.688 5 No.2 0.600 41 No.52 0.482 76
No.77 0.688 6 No.86 0.596 42 No.96 0.481 77
No.90 0.679 7 No.76 0.595 43 No.6 0.479 78
No.78 0.675 8 No.89 0.588 44 No.3 0.476 79
No.88 0.669 9 No.65 0.583 45 No.41 0.474 80
No.72 0.668 10 No.30 0.581 46 No.94 0.467 81
No.74 0.666 11 No.69 0.578 47 No.51 0.465 82
No.80 0.666 12 No.84 0.572 48 No.50 0.464 83
No.79 0.664 13 No.55 0.569 49 No.101 0.461 84
No.34 0.662 14 No.5 0.567 50 No.42 0.457 85
No.14 0.659 15 No.75 0.567 51 No.32 0.455 86
No.28 0.654 16 No.83 0.554 52 No.67 0.455 87
No.9 0.652 17 No.10 0.550 53 No.38 0.454 88
No.63 0.650 18 No.53 0.546 54 No.35 0.452 89
No.31 0.649 19 No.57 0.543 55 No.100 0.448 90
No.22 0.648 20 No.43 0.541 56 No.102 0.444 91
No.70 0.645 21 No.62 0.537 57 No.46 0.443 92
No.26 0.645 22 No.93 0.536 58 No.68 0.435 93
No.7 0.635 23 No.87 0.535 59 No.71 0.433 94
No.97 0.633 24 No.54 0.533 60 No.23 0.428 95
No.11 0.632 25 No.95 0.533 61 No.37 0.417 96
No.25 0.625 26 No.45 0.533 62 No.33 0.414 97
No.27 0.623 27 No.36 0.531 63 No.1 0.386 98
No.12 0.623 28 No.92 0.526 64 No.81 0.384 99
No.105 0.614 29 No.58 0.519 65 No.104 0.379 100
No.85 0.613 30 No.48 0.519 66 No.39 0.378 101
No.56 0.613 31 No.98 0.518 67 No.106 0.367 102
No.60 0.612 32 No.4 0.514 68 No.82 0.317 103
No.29 0.611 33 No.44 0.512 69 No.99 0.300 104
No.8 0.609 34 No.40 0.504 70 No.103 0.277 105
No.64 0.605 35 No.59 0.502 71 No.15 0.276 106
No.16 0.604 36
), ArticleFig(id=1196079393077511019, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表4, caption=

106份党参资源主成分综合评价及排序

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
ID Comprehensive evaluation score(D) Ranking ID Comprehensive evaluation score(D) Ranking ID Comprehensive evaluation score(D) Ranking
No.13 0.735 1 No.66 0.604 37 No.19 0.496 72
No.20 0.704 2 No.17 0.603 38 No.24 0.487 73
No.21 0.694 3 No.91 0.602 39 No.49 0.485 74
No.18 0.694 4 No.61 0.600 40 No.47 0.483 75
No.73 0.688 5 No.2 0.600 41 No.52 0.482 76
No.77 0.688 6 No.86 0.596 42 No.96 0.481 77
No.90 0.679 7 No.76 0.595 43 No.6 0.479 78
No.78 0.675 8 No.89 0.588 44 No.3 0.476 79
No.88 0.669 9 No.65 0.583 45 No.41 0.474 80
No.72 0.668 10 No.30 0.581 46 No.94 0.467 81
No.74 0.666 11 No.69 0.578 47 No.51 0.465 82
No.80 0.666 12 No.84 0.572 48 No.50 0.464 83
No.79 0.664 13 No.55 0.569 49 No.101 0.461 84
No.34 0.662 14 No.5 0.567 50 No.42 0.457 85
No.14 0.659 15 No.75 0.567 51 No.32 0.455 86
No.28 0.654 16 No.83 0.554 52 No.67 0.455 87
No.9 0.652 17 No.10 0.550 53 No.38 0.454 88
No.63 0.650 18 No.53 0.546 54 No.35 0.452 89
No.31 0.649 19 No.57 0.543 55 No.100 0.448 90
No.22 0.648 20 No.43 0.541 56 No.102 0.444 91
No.70 0.645 21 No.62 0.537 57 No.46 0.443 92
No.26 0.645 22 No.93 0.536 58 No.68 0.435 93
No.7 0.635 23 No.87 0.535 59 No.71 0.433 94
No.97 0.633 24 No.54 0.533 60 No.23 0.428 95
No.11 0.632 25 No.95 0.533 61 No.37 0.417 96
No.25 0.625 26 No.45 0.533 62 No.33 0.414 97
No.27 0.623 27 No.36 0.531 63 No.1 0.386 98
No.12 0.623 28 No.92 0.526 64 No.81 0.384 99
No.105 0.614 29 No.58 0.519 65 No.104 0.379 100
No.85 0.613 30 No.48 0.519 66 No.39 0.378 101
No.56 0.613 31 No.98 0.518 67 No.106 0.367 102
No.60 0.612 32 No.4 0.514 68 No.82 0.317 103
No.29 0.611 33 No.44 0.512 69 No.99 0.300 104
No.8 0.609 34 No.40 0.504 70 No.103 0.277 105
No.64 0.605 35 No.59 0.502 71 No.15 0.276 106
No.16 0.604 36
), ArticleFig(id=1196079393190757228, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.5, caption=

Average values of agronomic traits and representative components of different groups of Codonopsis pilosula

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index Groups
Root length/cm 30.867 30.428 18.167 27.750 32.706
Luxia diameter/mm 12.590 11.987 17.333 18.000 9.180
Number of branches 2.938 3.368 4.333 2.500 3.200
Fresh weight/g 21.721 27.855 18.133 16.500 10.142
Dry weight/g 5.191 7.834 - - 2.302
Drying rate/g 23.670 28.090 - - 22.995
Extractum/% 57.774 62.305 61.626 56.079 57.867
Total amino acid/% 3.380 2.921 1.619 0.782 4.406
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% 30.067 33.983 37.650 15.075 30.254
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 352.090 181.620 157.044 104.596 697.471
Syringin/μg·g-1 42.370 44.912 100.959 283.978 74.233
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 1.125 0.849 1.305 1.995 2.978
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 1.563 1.039 1.447 1.047 2.129
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 66.914 47.037 289.337 193.539 24.953
), ArticleFig(id=1196079394323219309, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表5, caption=

不同类群党参农艺性状和代表性组分平均值

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index Groups
Root length/cm 30.867 30.428 18.167 27.750 32.706
Luxia diameter/mm 12.590 11.987 17.333 18.000 9.180
Number of branches 2.938 3.368 4.333 2.500 3.200
Fresh weight/g 21.721 27.855 18.133 16.500 10.142
Dry weight/g 5.191 7.834 - - 2.302
Drying rate/g 23.670 28.090 - - 22.995
Extractum/% 57.774 62.305 61.626 56.079 57.867
Total amino acid/% 3.380 2.921 1.619 0.782 4.406
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% 30.067 33.983 37.650 15.075 30.254
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 352.090 181.620 157.044 104.596 697.471
Syringin/μg·g-1 42.370 44.912 100.959 283.978 74.233
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 1.125 0.849 1.305 1.995 2.978
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 1.563 1.039 1.447 1.047 2.129
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 66.914 47.037 289.337 193.539 24.953
), ArticleFig(id=1196079394436465518, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.6, caption=

Piecewise linear regression analysis of each index and fresh weight of Codonopsis pilosula

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index First stage function Second stage function Demarcation point
Root length/cm y=0.636x+2.078 y=2.630x-58.197 30.220
Luxia diameter/mm y=3.064x-13.761 y=5.585x-44.432 12.168
Number of branches y=4.183x+12.093 y=8.495x-7.113 4.454
Dry weight/g - y=3.359x+2.346 1.205
Drying rate/% y=-2.163x+73.732 y=0.080x+23.317 22.477
Extractum/% y=0.595x-10.470 y=0.787x-21.813 59.251
Total amino acid/% y=6.463x+9.737 y=-0.124x+28.151 2.795
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% y=-0.660x+41.311 y=0.007x+26.364 22.404
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 y=-0.078x+42.564 y=-0.027x+31.593 2.154
Syringin/μg·g-1 y=-0.198x+33.855 y=-0.070x+28.035 45.366
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 y=-17.917x+36.694 y=2.890x+19.412 0.831
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 y=-15.507x+42.698 y=-7.011x+33.773 1.050
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 y=-0.066x+28.779 y=0.018x+24.497 50.628
), ArticleFig(id=1196079394511962991, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表6, caption=

党参各指标与鲜重进行分段线性回归分析

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index First stage function Second stage function Demarcation point
Root length/cm y=0.636x+2.078 y=2.630x-58.197 30.220
Luxia diameter/mm y=3.064x-13.761 y=5.585x-44.432 12.168
Number of branches y=4.183x+12.093 y=8.495x-7.113 4.454
Dry weight/g - y=3.359x+2.346 1.205
Drying rate/% y=-2.163x+73.732 y=0.080x+23.317 22.477
Extractum/% y=0.595x-10.470 y=0.787x-21.813 59.251
Total amino acid/% y=6.463x+9.737 y=-0.124x+28.151 2.795
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% y=-0.660x+41.311 y=0.007x+26.364 22.404
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 y=-0.078x+42.564 y=-0.027x+31.593 2.154
Syringin/μg·g-1 y=-0.198x+33.855 y=-0.070x+28.035 45.366
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 y=-17.917x+36.694 y=2.890x+19.412 0.831
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 y=-15.507x+42.698 y=-7.011x+33.773 1.050
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 y=-0.066x+28.779 y=0.018x+24.497 50.628
), ArticleFig(id=1196079394646180720, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.7, caption=

Piecewise linear regression analysis of each index and extractum of Codonopsis pilosula

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index First stage function Second stage function Demarcation point
Root length/cm y=0.651x+41.559 y=0.398x+48.825 28.683
Luxia diameter/mm y=-0.322x+64.119 y=-0.049x+61.293 10.333
Number of branches y=1.374x+56.915 y=0.553x+59.572 3.236
Fresh weight/g y=0.147x+57.573 - 108.766
Dry weight/g y=1.108x+55.426 y=-0.134x+66.375 8.819
Drying rate/% y=0.860x+38.367 y=0.420x+49.976 26.376
Total amino acid/% y=1.714x+55.936 y=1.092x+57.637 2.738
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% y=0.583x+42.367 y=0.341x+50.469 33.597
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 y=-0.003x+62.558 y=-0.016x+65.013 189.072
Syringin/μg·g-1 y=-0.181x+67.544 y=-0.061x+63.042 37.391
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 y=-1.544x+62.100 y=1.010x+58.840 1.276
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 y=-4.239x+65.872 y=-2.404x+63.422 1.335
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 y=-0.020x+63.562 y=-0.079x+66.268 46.104
), ArticleFig(id=1196079394717483889, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表7, caption=

党参各指标与浸出物进行分段线性回归分析

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index First stage function Second stage function Demarcation point
Root length/cm y=0.651x+41.559 y=0.398x+48.825 28.683
Luxia diameter/mm y=-0.322x+64.119 y=-0.049x+61.293 10.333
Number of branches y=1.374x+56.915 y=0.553x+59.572 3.236
Fresh weight/g y=0.147x+57.573 - 108.766
Dry weight/g y=1.108x+55.426 y=-0.134x+66.375 8.819
Drying rate/% y=0.860x+38.367 y=0.420x+49.976 26.376
Total amino acid/% y=1.714x+55.936 y=1.092x+57.637 2.738
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% y=0.583x+42.367 y=0.341x+50.469 33.597
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 y=-0.003x+62.558 y=-0.016x+65.013 189.072
Syringin/μg·g-1 y=-0.181x+67.544 y=-0.061x+63.042 37.391
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 y=-1.544x+62.100 y=1.010x+58.840 1.276
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 y=-4.239x+65.872 y=-2.404x+63.422 1.335
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 y=-0.020x+63.562 y=-0.079x+66.268 46.104
), ArticleFig(id=1196079394792981362, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.8, caption=

Piecewise linear regression analysis of each index and Codonopsis polysaccharide of Codonopsis pilosula

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index First stage function Second stage function Demarcation point
Root length/cm y=0.218x+25.792 y=0.435x+18.940 31.470
Luxia diameter/mm y=0.293x+30.177 y=-0.486x+39.480 11.941
Number of branches y=1.211x+29.383 y=0.594x+30.760 2.233
Fresh weight/g y=0.731x+28.111 y=-0.018x+34.124 11.120
Dry weight/g y=1.363x+28.986 y=-0.144x+36.769 5.164
Drying rate/% y=1.005x+7.206 y=0.263x+26.577 26.100
Extractum/% y=0.701x-10.150 y=0.928x-24.593 63.555
Total amino acid/% y=-0.353x+33.358 - 5.545
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 y=-0.011x+35.718 y=-0.016x+36.888 233.496
Syringin/μg·g-1 y=-0.267x+42.758 y=-0.059x+34.530 39.640
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 y=-5.117x+36.837 y=-0.670x+32.340 1.011
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 y=-3.882x+37.161 y=-1.544x+34.308 1.220
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 y=-0.079x+36.406 y=-0.046x+34.807 47.272
), ArticleFig(id=1196079394860090227, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表8, caption=

党参各指标与党参多糖进行分段线性回归分析

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index First stage function Second stage function Demarcation point
Root length/cm y=0.218x+25.792 y=0.435x+18.940 31.470
Luxia diameter/mm y=0.293x+30.177 y=-0.486x+39.480 11.941
Number of branches y=1.211x+29.383 y=0.594x+30.760 2.233
Fresh weight/g y=0.731x+28.111 y=-0.018x+34.124 11.120
Dry weight/g y=1.363x+28.986 y=-0.144x+36.769 5.164
Drying rate/% y=1.005x+7.206 y=0.263x+26.577 26.100
Extractum/% y=0.701x-10.150 y=0.928x-24.593 63.555
Total amino acid/% y=-0.353x+33.358 - 5.545
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 y=-0.011x+35.718 y=-0.016x+36.888 233.496
Syringin/μg·g-1 y=-0.267x+42.758 y=-0.059x+34.530 39.640
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 y=-5.117x+36.837 y=-0.670x+32.340 1.011
Lobetyolin/mg·g-1 y=-3.882x+37.161 y=-1.544x+34.308 1.220
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 y=-0.079x+36.406 y=-0.046x+34.807 47.272
), ArticleFig(id=1196079394935587700, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.9, caption=

Piecewise linear regression analysis of each index and lobetyolin of Codonopsis pilosula

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index First stage function Second stage function Demarcation point
Root length/cm y=-0.009x+1.553 y=-0.029x+2.052 25.362
Luxia diameter/mm y=-0.049x+1.783 y=-0.071x+2.162 17.041
Number of branches y=-0.153x+1.685 y=-0.072x+1.351 4.096
Fresh weight/g y=-0.020x+1.693 y=-0.005x+1.079 31.359
Dry weight/g y=-0.129x+1.956 y=-0.050x+1.521 5.510
Drying rate/% y=-0.078x+3.246 y=-0.038x+2.223 25.273
Extractum/% y=-0.042x+3.803 y=-0.087x+6.588 62.234
Total amino acid/% y=-0.514x+2.577 y=-0.086x+1.341 2.887
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% y=-0.003x+1.380 y=-0.054x+3.138 34.563
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 y=0.000 2x+1.030 y=0.002x+0.576 204.449
Syringin/μg·g-1 y=0.022x+0.355 y=0.013x+0.632 30.603
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 y=1.087x+0.518 y=0.083x+1.297 0.776
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 y=-0.004x+1.268 y=0.003x+0.986 37.794
), ArticleFig(id=1196079395015279477, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表9, caption=

党参各指标与党参炔苷进行分段线性回归分析

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Index First stage function Second stage function Demarcation point
Root length/cm y=-0.009x+1.553 y=-0.029x+2.052 25.362
Luxia diameter/mm y=-0.049x+1.783 y=-0.071x+2.162 17.041
Number of branches y=-0.153x+1.685 y=-0.072x+1.351 4.096
Fresh weight/g y=-0.020x+1.693 y=-0.005x+1.079 31.359
Dry weight/g y=-0.129x+1.956 y=-0.050x+1.521 5.510
Drying rate/% y=-0.078x+3.246 y=-0.038x+2.223 25.273
Extractum/% y=-0.042x+3.803 y=-0.087x+6.588 62.234
Total amino acid/% y=-0.514x+2.577 y=-0.086x+1.341 2.887
Codonopsis polysaccharide/% y=-0.003x+1.380 y=-0.054x+3.138 34.563
Tryptophan/μg·g-1 y=0.000 2x+1.030 y=0.002x+0.576 204.449
Syringin/μg·g-1 y=0.022x+0.355 y=0.013x+0.632 30.603
Tangshenoside Ⅰ/mg·g-1 y=1.087x+0.518 y=0.083x+1.297 0.776
Atractyloactone Ⅲ/μg·g-1 y=-0.004x+1.268 y=0.003x+0.986 37.794
), ArticleFig(id=1196079395103359862, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=EN, label=Tab.10, caption=

Stepwise regression analysis of fresh weight, extract, Codonopsis pilosula polysaccharide and lobetyolin with other indexes

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Model After the adjustment R2 F P
X4=3.781+0.190X1+1.117X2+2.835X5-0.597X6+1.025X8-0.020X10+1.914X12+0.023X14 0.969 245.235 0.000
X7=46.781+0.171X1+1.088X8+0.243X9-0.014X10-0.045X11+1.494X12-0.022X14 0.636 14.586 0.000
X9=0.672X7-0.229 0.382 5.792 0.000
X13=-0.205-0.307X8+0.004X10+0.014X11 0.571 11.342 0.000
), ArticleFig(id=1196079395220800375, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1190317699101192196, articleId=1195814099293618322, language=CN, label=表10, caption=

鲜重、浸出物、党参多糖和党参炔苷与其他指标间的逐步回归分析

, figureFileSmall=null, figureFileBig=null, tableContent=
Model After the adjustment R2 F P
X4=3.781+0.190X1+1.117X2+2.835X5-0.597X6+1.025X8-0.020X10+1.914X12+0.023X14 0.969 245.235 0.000
X7=46.781+0.171X1+1.088X8+0.243X9-0.014X10-0.045X11+1.494X12-0.022X14 0.636 14.586 0.000
X9=0.672X7-0.229 0.382 5.792 0.000
X13=-0.205-0.307X8+0.004X10+0.014X11 0.571 11.342 0.000
)], attaches=null, journal=Journal(id=1190317596361715715, delFlag=0, nameCn=中国药学杂志, nameEn=Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, nameHistory1=null, nameHistory2=null, issn=1001-2494, eissn=null, cn=11-2162/R, coden=null, periodic=3, language=CN, oaType=null, ccby=null, superviseOffice=null, ownerOffice=null, pubOffice=null, editorOffice=null, officeType=null, aims=null, clcCode=null, officeProv=null, officeCity=null, officeAddr=null, officeZip=null, officeEmail=null, officePhone=null, editDirector=null, officeDirector=null, officeDirectorPhone=null, officeStaffNum=null, officeEmpNum=null, coverPicUrl=hRN1R6HnoNwYkve/JRn0DA==, journalPrice=null, startedYear=null, abbrevIsoEn=null, journalRemark=null, publicationField=null, createdTime=1761723430007, updatedTime=1761735858241, createdBy=18614031015, updatedBy=13701087609, firstLetterCn=C, firstLetterEn=C, subjectCode=Life Sciences, subjectName=Life Sciences, subjectCodeEn=Life Sciences, subjectNameEn=null, picCn=hRN1R6HnoNwYkve/JRn0DA==, picEn=xSRntM4yOh2wVIE2w+OjYg==, jcr=null, cjcr=null, exts=[JournalExt(id=1190369724262355196, language=CN, name=中国药学杂志, nameHistory1=null, nameHistory2=null, managedBy=, sponsoredBy=, publishedBy=, editorOffice=, officeProv=null, officeCity=null, officeAddr=, officeZip=, editDirector=, officeDirector=null, officePhone=null, coverPicUrl=null, journalRemark=, submitArticleUrl=null, websiteUrl=, createdTime=1761735858264, updatedTime=1761735858264, createdBy=13701087609, updatedBy=13701087609, submissionGuidelinesUrl=, submissionAuthorUrl=https://zgyxzzauthor.manuscriptcloud.com/login, submissionEditorUrl=https://zgyxzzeditor.manuscriptcloud.com/login, submissionReviewUrl=https://zgyxzzauthor.manuscriptcloud.com/login, submissionCeEditorUrl=, submissionAeEditorUrl=, option={"copyright":""}), JournalExt(id=1190369724358824189, language=EN, name=Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, nameHistory1=null, nameHistory2=null, managedBy=, sponsoredBy=, publishedBy=, editorOffice=, officeProv=null, officeCity=null, officeAddr=, officeZip=, editDirector=, officeDirector=null, officePhone=null, coverPicUrl=null, journalRemark=, submitArticleUrl=null, websiteUrl=, createdTime=1761735858287, updatedTime=1761735858287, createdBy=13701087609, updatedBy=13701087609, submissionGuidelinesUrl=, submissionAuthorUrl=https://zgyxzzauthor.manuscriptcloud.com/login, submissionEditorUrl=https://zgyxzzeditor.manuscriptcloud.com/login, submissionReviewUrl=https://zgyxzzauthor.manuscriptcloud.com/login, submissionCeEditorUrl=, submissionAeEditorUrl=, option={"copyright":""})], databaseList=null, tenantJournalId=1190317699101192196, websiteList=[Website(id=1190317834875011552, webName=null, webTitle=null, webDomain=null, webCopyrigh=null, webIpcNo=null, seoTitle=null, seoKeywords=null, seoDescription=null, tenantJournalId=null, journalId=1190317699101192196, journalNameCn=null, journalNameEn=null, grayFlag=null, tenantId=1146029695717560320, platformId=null, journalGroupId=null, journalGroupNameCn=null, journalGroupNameEn=null, type=1, domain=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/CN, language=CN, createTime=1761723486870, createBy=18614031015, updateTime=1761723510130, updateBy=18614031015, name=中国药学杂志-中文, tplId=1146099689490845704, title=中国药学杂志, delFlag=0, indexPage=/home, props=[WebsiteProps(id=1190318144041353703, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=articleTextType, value=kx, createTime=1761723560581, updateTime=1761723560581, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144016187876, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=banner, value=null, createTime=1761723560575, updateTime=1761723560575, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144062325226, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=grayFlag, value=0, createTime=1761723560586, updateTime=1761723560586, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144007799267, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=logo, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/CN/file/pic?fileId=puyAm9wIHqZks7K8hj8APQ==, createTime=1761723560573, updateTime=1761723560573, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144074908140, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=minRunFlag, value=0, createTime=1761723560589, updateTime=1761723560589, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144032965094, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=picServerUrl, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/CN/file/pic, createTime=1761723560579, updateTime=1761723560579, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144070713835, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=silenceFlag, value=0, createTime=1761723560588, updateTime=1761723560588, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144024576485, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=staticResourcePath, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cast_kjdb_cn_619/, createTime=1761723560577, updateTime=1761723560577, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144049742312, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=themeColor, value=null, createTime=1761723560583, updateTime=1761723560583, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318144053936617, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834875011552, code=themeStyle, value=null, createTime=1761723560584, updateTime=1761723560584, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015)]), Website(id=1190317834937926113, webName=null, webTitle=null, webDomain=null, webCopyrigh=null, webIpcNo=null, seoTitle=null, seoKeywords=null, seoDescription=null, tenantJournalId=null, journalId=1190317699101192196, journalNameCn=null, journalNameEn=null, grayFlag=null, tenantId=1146029695717560320, platformId=null, journalGroupId=null, journalGroupNameCn=null, journalGroupNameEn=null, type=1, domain=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/EN, language=EN, createTime=1761723486885, createBy=18614031015, updateTime=1761723527689, updateBy=18614031015, name=中国药学杂志-英文, tplId=1146101810881728533, title=Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, delFlag=0, indexPage=/home, props=[WebsiteProps(id=1190318170478051825, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=articleTextType, value=kx, createTime=1761723566884, updateTime=1761723566884, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170461274606, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=banner, value=null, createTime=1761723566880, updateTime=1761723566880, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170494829044, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=grayFlag, value=0, createTime=1761723566888, updateTime=1761723566888, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170452885997, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=logo, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/EN/file/pic?fileId=puyAm9wIHqZks7K8hj8APQ==, createTime=1761723566878, updateTime=1761723566878, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170507411958, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=minRunFlag, value=0, createTime=1761723566891, updateTime=1761723566891, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170473857520, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=picServerUrl, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/EN/file/pic, createTime=1761723566883, updateTime=1761723566883, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170503217653, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=silenceFlag, value=0, createTime=1761723566890, updateTime=1761723566890, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170465468911, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=staticResourcePath, value=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cast_kjdb_en_623/, createTime=1761723566881, updateTime=1761723566881, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170482246130, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=themeColor, value=null, createTime=1761723566885, updateTime=1761723566885, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015), WebsiteProps(id=1190318170486440435, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=null, journalGroupId=null, siteId=1190317834937926113, code=themeStyle, value=null, createTime=1761723566886, updateTime=1761723566886, creator=18614031015, updator=18614031015)])], journalTitle=中国药学杂志, weixinUrl=null, journalUrl=http://www.zgyxzz.com.cn/, iacademicId=null, status=1, seqNo=null, journalTitleEn=Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, journalPhotoCn=hRN1R6HnoNwYkve/JRn0DA==, journalPhotoEn=xSRntM4yOh2wVIE2w+OjYg==, journalFirstLetter=C, journalRecommend=null, journalNew=null, journalCollection=null, jcrJf=null, cjcrJf=null, jcrJfStr=null, cjcrJfStr=null, submissionFirstDecision=null, sciSubjectClassification=null, casSubjectClassification=null, citeScore=null, totalCitationFrequency=null, icpCode=null, psCode=null, advertisingLicenseCode=null, copyrightInformation=null, country=null, option=, provinceCode=null, provinceName=null, collectFlag=false), detailUrlCn=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/CN/10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004, detailUrlEn=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/EN/10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004, pdfUrlCn=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/CN/PDF/10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004, pdfUrlEn=https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/EN/PDF/10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004, aliStartDate=null, aliEndDate=null, collectionFlag=false, citedCount=null, citedUrl=null, reference=null)
收藏切换
我国党参道地品质评价研究
收藏切换
PDF下载
王盼 1 , 刘付松 2 , 张德林 2 , 彭杰 2 , 刘莎 2, * , 吴发明 2, *
中国药学杂志 | 论著 2024,59(23): 2226-2240
收起
收藏切换
中国药学杂志 | 论著 2024, 59(23): 2226-2240
我国党参道地品质评价研究
全屏
王盼1, 刘付松2, 张德林2, 彭杰2, 刘莎2, *, 吴发明2, *
作者信息
  • 1 甘肃卫生职业学院, 兰州 730207
  • 2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000
  • 王盼,男,博士,讲师 研究方向:中药资源;

    刘付松,男,硕士 研究方向:中药资源。

通讯作者:

* 吴发明,男,博士,教授 研究方向:中药资源 Tel:(0851)28642516;
刘莎,女,博士,讲师 研究方向:中药资源 Tel:(0851)28642516
Quality Evaluation of Codonopsis pilosula in China
Pan WANG1, Fusong LIU2, Delin ZHANG2, Jie PENG2, Sha LIU2, *, Faming WU2, *
Affiliations
  • 1 Gansu Health Vocational College, Lanzhou 730207, China
  • 2 Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563000, China
出版时间: 2024-12-08 doi: 10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
文章导航
收藏切换

目的 为合理保护、开发和利用党参种质资源提供参考。方法 本研究对106份党参种质资源的主要农艺性状和代表性组分进行变异分析、遗传多样性分析、相关性分析、主成分分析、聚类分析、分段线性回归分析和逐步多元回归分析。结果 106份党参种质资源的遗传变异性丰富,106份党参性状指标的变异系数为9.331%~86.948%,其中以苍术内酯Ⅲ的变异程度系数最高,为86.948%;遗传多样性指数为1.587~2.039,其中丁香苷为1.587,根长、支根数和党参多糖分别为2.027、2.039和2.032。相关分析表明,14个性状指标间大多存在显著或极显著的关系。主成分分析可用7个主成分因子可以解释14个指标的大部分信息,其特征值分别为4.172、2.427、1.646、1.196、0.943、0.872和0.75,累计贡献率达到了85.760%。使用DTOPSIS法对党参种质资源进行评分,排名前15的分别是No.13、No.20、No.21、No.18、No.73、No.77、No.90、No.78、No.88、No.72、No.74、No.80、No.79、No.34和No.14。聚类分析结果表明,可将106份党参种质划分为5个类群,其中第Ⅰ类群中除了丁香苷以外,其他农艺性状和品质指标均处于较高,综合表现较好,可将其进行推广栽培。多元线性逐步回归分析表明,根长、芦下直径、干重、折干率、总氨基酸、色氨酸、党参苷Ⅰ和苍术内酯Ⅲ对鲜重影响显著;根长、总氨基酸、党参多糖、色氨酸、丁香苷、党参苷Ⅰ和苍术内酯Ⅲ对浸出物影响显著;浸出物对党参多糖影响显著;总氨基酸、色氨酸和丁香苷对党参炔苷影响显著。。结论 本研究结果可为党参优质种质资源筛选和品种培育提供参考依据。

党参  /  农艺性状  /  代表性组分  /  主成分分析  /  综合评价

OBJECTIVE To provide reference for reasonable protection, development and utilization of Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources. METHODS Variation analysis, correlation analysis, principal components analysis, cluster analysis, piecewise linear regression analysis, and stepwise multiple regression analysis were conducted on the main agronomic traits and representative components of 106 Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources. RESULTS The genetic variability of the 106 Codonopsis pilosula germplasm resources was rich, with the coefficients of variation of the 106 Codonopsis pilosula trait indexes ranging from 9.331% to 86.948%, among which the coefficient of variation of the degree of variability of atractylenolide Ⅲ was the highest, 86.948%; the indexes of genetic diversity ranged from 1.587 to 2.039, with syringin 1.587, and root length, number of branches, and Codonopsis polysaccharide were 2.027,2.039 and 2.032, respectively. Correlation analysis showed that most of the 14 traits had significant or highly significant relationships with each other. The seven principal component factors available for principal component analysis could explain most of the information of the 14 indicators, with eigenvalues of 4.172, 2.427, 1.646, 1.196, 0.943, 0.872 and 0.75, respectively, and the cumulative contribution rate reached 85.760%. Using the DTOPSIS method to score the germplasm resources of Codonopsis pilosula, the top 15 were No.13, No.20, No.21, No.18, No.73, No.77, No.90, No.78, No.88, No.72, No.74, No.80, No.79, No.34 and No.14, respectively.Clustering analysis showed that 106 codonopsis germplasm could be classified into five taxa, among which the agronomic traits and quality indexes except syringin at a higher level in taxon Ⅰ. The overall performance was better, and it could be promoted for cultivation. stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that root length, luxia diameter, dry weight, drying rate, total amino acid, tryptophan, tangshenoside Ⅰ and atractylenolide Ⅲ had significant effects on fresh weight. Root length, total amino acid. Codonopsis polysaccharide, tryptophan, syringin, tangshenoside Ⅰ and atractylenolide Ⅲ had significant effects on extractum. Extractum had significant effects on codonopsis polysaccharide. Total amino acids, tryptophan and syringin had significant effects on lobetyolin. CONCLUSION The results of this study can serve as a reference for screening high-quality germplasm resources and cultivating varieties of Codonopsis pilosula.

Codonopsis Radix  /  agronomic trait  /  representative component  /  principal components analysis  /  comprehensive evaluation
王盼, 刘付松, 张德林, 彭杰, 刘莎, 吴发明. 我国党参道地品质评价研究. 中国药学杂志, 2024 , 59 (23) : 2226 -2240 . DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
Pan WANG, Fusong LIU, Delin ZHANG, Jie PENG, Sha LIU, Faming WU. Quality Evaluation of Codonopsis pilosula in China[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2024 , 59 (23) : 2226 -2240 . DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
党参(Codonopsis Radix)来源于桔梗科植物党参[Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf.]、川党参(Codonopsis tangshen Oliv.)和素花党参[Codonopsis pilosula Nannf. var. modesta (Nannf.) L. T. Shen]的干燥根[1],主要含有糖类、半萜内酯类、聚炔类、苷类及萜类等[2-3]化学成分;其中党参多糖是党参的主要药效成分[4],聚炔类成分党参炔苷为党参的指标性成分[5],两者常用于评价党参质量[6];苷类成分丁香苷具有一定的体内外抗肿瘤活性,半萜内酯类成分苍术内酯Ⅰ~Ⅲ为党参的特征性成分,具有明显的抗炎活性[7]。因其具有独特的医疗和保健功能,被广泛应用于临床防病治病和日常健康饮食中,是我国产量和需求量最大的中药材品种之一[8-10]。近年来市场需求量的不断增大为党参产业的发展带来了良好的契机,为党参的基础研究和深度开发提供了众多机遇。但伴随着党参生产区域和种植规模的扩大,主产区的整体西移,也带来了前人未曾面对过的新难题,其中党参道地产区的高度分化,道地品质异化问题尤为突出,而党参道地品质问题则是关系到产值百亿经济规模中药产业重大问题。因此,针对我国栽培党参进行资源评价和优异种质挖掘,对培育优质高产党参品种具有重要意义。
前人对党参种质资源的综合分析与筛选的研究,多侧重于产量指标、品质指标或少数几个指标,且种质资源来源狭小,基于来源于全国种质资源采用多指标综合分析的方法研究较少,难以全面反映党参种质资源特性。目前,常用的综合评价方法主要有主成分分析、DTOPSIS法、隶属函数法、灰色关联度分析法和层次分析法等。主成分分析方法主要将多个指标转化为几个综合指标,在保证数据信息损失最少的情况下,达到降维简化的效果,从而在一定程度能避免人为主观因素干扰,是能在资源评价、品质分析中得到较客观结果的综合分析方法[11-12]。该方法在青稞、陆地棉、樱桃等多种农作物资源品质的综合评价都有所应用[13-15]。DTOPSIS 法的基本原理为与评价对象的最优解与最劣解的距离进行排序,是一种接近理想解的多决策目标分析方法,将各性状指标无量纲化处理,使原始数据转变为可比较的规范化数值后进行综合评价,可有效解决各指标间无统一的度量标准及最优解不统一的难题,DTOPSIS法在羊草、谷子、燕麦、草莓等多种作物种质资源的综合评价均有应用[16-19]。利用多种综合评价方法的联合应用分析,能进一步提高资源综合评价的准确性。
本实验通过多样性分析、相关性分析、主成分分析、DTOPSIS法、聚类分析、分段线性回归和逐步多元回归分析对我国106份栽培党参种质资源进行全面综合评价,分析影响党参产量和品质的主要因素,筛选适合种植的党参种质资源,为合理保护、开发和利用党参资源提供参考。
Waters ACQuity型超高效液相色谱仪(美国沃特世公司);FA2014N型万分之电子天平(上海菁海仪器有限公司);XPE-26型十万分之一电子分析天平(瑞士Mettler-Toledo公司);TGC-16C型高速台式离心机(上海安亭科学仪器厂)。
L-精氨酸[批号P2489825,阿达玛斯贝塔(上海)化学试剂有限公司]。葡萄糖,批号Wkq22111408;L-色氨酸,批号WP23031610;党参苷Ⅰ,批号WP23112011;党参炔苷,批号WP23030911(成都维克奇生物科技有限公司)。丁香苷,批号220315;苍术内酯Ⅲ,批号220324(成都植标化纯生物技术有限公司)。
实验选用的106份不同来源的党参资源,由课题组于2021年8月~2022年2月收集,种质主要来源为东经101.739 2°~128.421 2°,北纬26.428 3°~43.990 3°,海拔为218~3 473 m的地带。包括甘肃28份、山西7份、吉林9份、内蒙古10份、宁夏3份、青海2份、四川11份、陕西1份、湖北8份、重庆11份、贵州9份、云南5份和辽宁2份,见表1
党参样品收集后,每个产地随机选择大小一致、无病虫害、无损伤的5株党参,除去根上的泥土。用卷尺测量党参的根长;用游标卡尺量取芦下直径;采用计数法统计支根数;用电子秤称量根的鲜重和干重,并计算折干率。
醇溶性浸出物含量参考《中国药典》2020年版第四部通则中热浸法进行测定;总氨基酸和党参多糖含量采用紫外分光光度法进行测定;5种次生代谢产物含量的测定参考Lan等[20]建立的超高效液相色谱法(UPLC)。色谱图见图1
根据群体内各性状数据,以平均值(X)和标准差(δ)分为10类群,1类<X-2δ,10类≥X+2δ,中间每类相差0.5δ。用公式1来计算每一类群的分布频率。
Pi=ni/n
Pi表示第i种变异出现的频率,ni表示第i个变异类群的数量,n表示实验材料的总个数。各指标的遗传多样性采用多样性信息指数(H')(公式2)进行评价。
H'=-ΣPilnPi
式中,ln为自然对数。
使用DTOPSIS法对党参品质进行分析,计算见公式3。
Uij=(Fij- F i -)/( F i +- F i -),Uij∈[0,1]
F表示不同主成分分组; F i - F i +表示在第i个主成分分组中的最大值和最小值;Fij表示在第i组主成分标准数据中的第j个值;Uij表示在第i组中的第j个值。之后将主成分分析得到的各主成分贡献率代入综合评价得分公式中进行计算。
利用Microsoft Excel 2021软件进行数据整理和变异分析。利用SPSS 27软件对14个指标数据进行描述性统计分析、相关性分析、主成分分析和聚类分析。使用MATLAB分析分段线性回归并绘制散点图。
变异分析结果见表2。由表2可以看出,各指标的变异系数分布从9.331%~86.948%。变异系数超过40%的有支根数、鲜重、干重、总氨基酸、色氨酸、丁香苷、党参炔苷、党参苷Ⅰ和苍术内酯Ⅲ,其中苍术内酯Ⅲ变异系数最大,为86.948%;变异系数低于30%的有根长、芦下直径、折干率、浸出物和党参多糖,分别为20.069%、27.641%、19.309%、9.331%和22.736%。14个指标的多样性指数在1.587~2.039之间,其中丁香苷为1.587,浸出物、支根数和党参多糖分别为2.012、2.025和2.039。说明106份党参样本遗传多样性丰富,不同指标间与不同环境间差异明显,适合进行评价分析。
将14个指标进行相关性分析发现(图2),各性状间存在不同程度的相关性。根长与芦下直径、支根数、鲜重和浸出物呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与总氨基酸呈显著正相关(P<0.05),与苍术内酯Ⅲ呈极显著负相关(P<0.01);芦下直径与支根数和鲜重呈极显著正相关(P<0.01);支根数与鲜重和干重呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与浸出物呈显著正相关(P<0.05),与色氨酸呈极显著负相关(P<0.01);鲜重与干重、浸出物呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与党参炔苷和苍术内酯Ⅲ呈显著负相关(P<0.05);干重与浸出物呈显著正相关(P<0.05),与色氨酸和党参炔苷呈显著负相关(P<0.05);浸出物与总氨基酸和党参多糖呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与色氨酸、丁香苷、党参炔苷和苍术内酯Ⅲ呈极显著负相关(P<0.01);总氨基酸与色氨酸呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与党参炔苷呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),与党参苷Ⅰ和苍术内酯Ⅲ呈显著负相关(P<0.05);党参多糖与丁香苷、党参炔苷和苍术内酯Ⅲ呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),与党参苷Ⅰ呈显著负相关(P<0.05);色氨酸与党参炔苷呈极显著正相关(P<0.01),与党参苷Ⅰ呈显著正相关(P<0.05);丁香苷与党参苷Ⅰ、党参炔苷、苍术内酯Ⅲ呈极显著正相关(P<0.01);党参苷Ⅰ与党参炔苷呈极显著正相关(P<0.01)。
将14个指标进行主成分分析,消除不同指标间的相关性对党参评价的影响(表3)。14个特征值中, 共有7个特征值大于0.7,其特征值分别为4.172、2.427、1.646、1.196、0.943、0.872和0.750,累计贡献率达到了85.760%。说明这7个成分可以解释14个指标的大部分信息。第1主成分(F1)包括根长、鲜重、干重、浸出物和党参炔苷,其特征值分别为0.708、0.760、0.838、0.651和-0.630;第2主成分(F2)包括芦下直径、鲜重、折干率和党参多糖,特征值为0.709、0.599、-0.592和-0.561;第3主成分(F3)包括总氨基酸和色氨酸含量,特征值为0.786和0.794;第4主成分(F4)包括党参炔苷含量,特征值为0.556;第5主成分(F5)包括党参苷Ⅰ含量,特征值为0.441;第6主成分(F6)包括丁香苷,特征值为-0.424;第7主成分(F7)包括支根数,特征值为0.602。
将根长(X1)、芦下直径(X2)、支根数(X3)、鲜重(X4)、干重(X5)、折干率(X6)、浸出物(X7)、总氨基酸(X8)、党参多糖(X9)、色氨酸(X10)、丁香苷(X11)、党参苷(X12)、党参炔苷(X13)和苍术内酯(X14)标准化后的性状值代入上述7个主成分中,可得到7个主成分的得分公式(公式4~10):
F1=0.708X1+0.523X2-0.560X3+0.760X4+0.838X5+0.390X6+0.651X7+0.250X8+0.444X9-0.329X10-0.511X11-0.328X12-0.630X13-0.309X14;
F2=0.064X1+0.709X2-0.242X3+0.599X4+0.430X5-0.592X6-0.536X7-0.170X8-0.561X9+0.080X10+0.351X11+0.136X12+0.201X13+0.384X14;
F3=0.252X1-0.084X2+0.049X3+0.026X4-0.022X5-0.216X6+0.109X7+0.786X8-0.139X9+0.794X10-0.235X11+0.421X12-0.101X13+0.046X14;
F4=0.355X1-0.06X2-0.118X3+0.05X4+0.037X5-0.081X6+0.273X7-0.102X8+0.223X9-0.011X10+0.466X11+0.407X12+0.556X13-0.464X14;
F5=-0.084X1-0.306X2-0.352X3+0.025X4+0.053X5+0.254X6+0.172X7+0.134X8-0.202X9-0.317X10+0.226X11+0.441X12-0.154X13+0.439X14;
F6=0.083X1+0.120X2+0.160X3+0.045X4-0.007X5+0.029X6+0.108X7-0.419X8+0.315X9+0.109X10-0.424X11+0.378X12+0.167X13+0.416X14;
F7=-0.028X1+0.068X2+0.602X3+0.145X4+0.203X5+0.314X6+0.021X7+0.004X8-0.328X9-0.119X10+0.004X11+0.24X12-0.05X13-0.196X14;
根据F1F2F3F4F5F6F7的值和DTOPSIS法计算U1U2U3U4U5U6U7,并以各主成分贡献率权重,使用权重值构建出党参样品的主成分分析综合评价公式D(综合评价得分)=0.347U1+0.202U2+0.137U3+0.100U4+0.079U5+0.073U6+0.062U7。利用该模型计算出106份党参样品的得分值,结果见表4。D值越大,表示综合品质越好。106份党参资源的平均综合评价得分是0.545。排名前15的分别是No.13、No.20、No.21、No.18、No.73、No.77、No.90、No.78、No.88、No.72、No.74、No.80、No.79、No.34和No.14。
对14个主要指标进行聚类分析,采用系统聚类法进行分析(图3)。在欧式距离为10时,可将106份党参种质资源分为5个类群。各类群内14个指标的平均值见表5。第Ⅰ类群中,主要特征为丁香苷含量最低,其他13个指标均中等水平;第Ⅱ类群中,主要特征为鲜重、干重、折干率和浸出物含量最高,芦下直径、党参苷Ⅰ和党参炔苷含量最低;第Ⅲ类群中,支根数多、党参多糖和苍术内酯Ⅲ含量高;在第Ⅳ类群中,支根数少、浸出物、总氨基酸、党参多糖和色氨酸含量低;在第V类群中,主要特征是总氨基酸、色氨酸、党参苷Ⅰ和党参炔苷含量高。
将鲜重作为因变量,其余指标为自变量,构建分段线性回归方程,见表6图4。在分界点之前使用第1段公式进行分析,分界点后使用第2段公式进行分析。其中干重第1段内可用数据较少,无法得到有效方程。分析分界点前后方程发现,根长(30.220 cm)、芦下直径(12.168 mm)、支根数(4.454)和浸出物(59.251%)在第1段和第2段上升幅度产生变化,但都保持着增长的趋势;折干率(22.477%)、党参多糖(22.404%)、党参苷Ⅰ(0.831 mg·g-1)和苍术内酯Ⅲ(50.628 μg·g-1)是先降低后升高趋势,且大部分品种都集中在第2段;总氨基酸是先增加后降低,当都处于分界点左右时,有利于党参高产形成。
将浸出物作为因变量,其余指标为自变量,构建分段线性回归方程,结果见表7图5。其中,鲜重的第2段中可用数据较少,无法得到有效方程。分析分界点前后方程发现:根长(28.683 cm)、支根数(3.236)、折干率(26.376%)、总氨基酸(2.738%)和党参多糖(33.597%)都使浸出物含量表现出一直上升的趋势,但上升的幅度有所变化;党参苷Ⅰ(1.276 mg·g-1)呈先降低后增加,且大部分品种都集中在第1段;干重(8.819 g)是先增加后降低,当处于分界点左右时,有利于党参浸出物的形成。
将党参多糖作为因变量,其余指标为自变量,构建分段线性回归方程,结果见表8图6。其中,总氨基酸的第2段中可用数据较少,无法得到有效方程。分析分界点前后方程发现:根长(31.470 cm)、支根数(2.233)、折干率(26.100%)和浸出物(63.555%)在第1段和第2段上升幅度产生变化,但都保持着增长的趋势;芦下直径(11.941 mm)、鲜重(11.120 g)和干重(5.164 g)都表现为先上升后下降趋势,在分界点附近更易得到高党参多糖含量品种。
将党参炔苷作为因变量,其余指标为自变量,构建分段线性回归方程,结果见表9图7。分析分界点前后方程发现,根长(25.362 cm)、芦下直径(17.041 mm)、支根数(4.096)、鲜重(31.359 g)、干重(5.510 g)、折干率(25.273%)、浸出物(62.234%)、总氨基酸(2.887%)和党参多糖(34.563%)在第1段和第2段下降幅度产生变化,但都保持着降低的趋势;色氨酸(204.449 μg·g-1)、丁香苷(30.603 μg·g-1)和党参苷Ⅰ(0.776 mg·g-1)在第1段和第2段上升幅度产生变化,但都保持着增加的趋势;苍术内酯Ⅲ(37.794 μg·g-1)是先降低后升高趋势,且大部分品种都集中在第2段。
分别以鲜重(X4)、浸出物(X7)、党参多糖(X9)和党参炔苷(X13)为因变量,其他性状数据为自变量,结果见表10。根长(X1)、芦下直径(X2)、干重(X5)、折干率(X6)、总氨基酸(X8)、色氨酸(X10)、党参苷(X12)和苍术内酯(X14)组成了关于鲜重的回归方程,其调整后r2值为0.969,代表这7个变量可以解释96.90%的因变量。根长(X1)、总氨基酸(X8)、党参多糖(X9)、色氨酸(X10)、丁香苷(X11)、党参苷(X12)和苍术内酯(X14)组成了关于浸出物的回归方程,其调整后r2值为0.636,代表这5个变量可以解释63.60%的因变量。浸出物(X7)组成了关于党参多糖的回归方程,其调整后R2值为0.382。总氨基酸(X8)、色氨酸(X10)和丁香苷(X11)组成了关于党参炔苷的回归方程,其调整后r2值为0.571,代表这5个变量可以解释57.10%的因变量。其F值分别为245.235、14.586、5.792和11.342,4个回归方程显著性均达到极显著水平。表明这4个多元回归方程可分别作为党参鲜重、浸出物、党参多糖和党参炔苷的综合评价指标。
全世界有党参属植物40余种,我国有39种之多[21]。我国是世界党参的主要产区和分布中心,广布于全国各地,具有丰富的遗传资源,存在较大的变异和选择潜力。变异系数大小代表品种间变异程度的多少,遗传多样性指数反映出各性状的变异丰富度,对106份党参样本的农艺性状和代表性组分进行变异分析和遗传多样性分析。变异系数最大值为86.948%的苍术内酯Ⅲ,浸出物含量变异系数较低,其余性状变异系数为20.069%~80.889%。14个指标的多样性指数在1.587~2.039之间。结果表明,106份党参种质资源存在丰富的遗传多样性,不同品种性状间差异较大,合理利用这些党参种质资源,可以促进优质新品种的选育。由图1可以看出,总氨基酸和党参多糖与浸出物呈极显著正相关,丁香苷、党参炔苷和苍术内酯Ⅲ与浸出物和党参多糖呈极显著负相关。因此,用浸出物含量来评价党参品质的评价不够全面,也不能合理、准确地评价,应该采用一种综合的评价方法。同时,可利用控制党参的根长来调控浸出物、总氨基酸、党参多糖、丁香苷和苍术内酯Ⅲ的含量,在保持党参浸出物或党参多糖含量的基础上进一步提高产量。
《中国药典》2020年版以浸出物为指标性成分对党参的质量进行评价,对党参药材及饮片质量控制具有一定指导意义,但党参还含有党参多糖、党参炔苷和党参苷Ⅰ等成分,这些成分在食用和药用过程中同样发挥重要作用。因此,单以浸出物为指标来评价党参的质量并不全面。中药成分复杂,检测其中任何一种活性成分都不能代表中药的整体疗效,原始单一的中药质量评价方法制约了中药的发展[22]。利用主成分分析法对种质资源的品质进行综合评价,主要是通过降维的方法可以清晰地反映造成群体差异的主要原因,目前已经在多种作物中实现[23-27]。Xiao等[28]对20种党参种质资源品质进行主成分分析,其中贡献率最大的为第1主成分,方差贡献率是25.750%,其内特征向量主要是叶片形状、千粒重和浸出物。本实验对106份党参种质资源的14个指标进行主成分分析,结果发现前7个主成分的累计贡献率达85.760%,表明这7个综合指标可代表全部数据绝大部分的信息量,与Xu等[23]对红花的研究结果相似。
聚类分析是将种质资源按不同特征值组成不同类群,方便挖掘和利用含有特异性状的优良种质资源[29-30]。本实验中,将106份资源分成5个类群,第Ⅰ类群中除了丁香苷以外,其他农艺性状和品质指标均处于较高,可将其进行推广栽培。第Ⅱ类群为高产和高浸出物含量群体,可将其与其他优质资源进行杂交选育,从而获得高产、质优的新品种,以适应当地种植环境。
分别将鲜重、浸出物、党参多糖和党参炔苷与其他指标进行分段线性回归分析,以分析我国栽培党参的生长情况。当因变量是鲜重时,结合根长、芦下直径、干重、折干率、支根数、浸出物、总氨基酸和党参多糖变化趋势分析结果,发现这些成分与党参鲜重呈现相同变化趋势;而色氨酸、丁香苷、党参炔苷和苍术内酯Ⅲ含量随着鲜重的增加呈现降低的变化趋势,可能是这些成分含量随着生长时间的延长而减少[31]。党参苷Ⅰ对党参鲜重表现出先下降后上升的趋势,结合相关性分析中党参苷Ⅰ对鲜重负相关但不显著。因此,在成分含量达到药典要求的基础上,需要将产量与品质相联系起来,以确定最合理的采收期。
通过多元线性逐步回归分析,综合分析影响我国栽培党参鲜重、浸出物、党参多糖和党参炔苷含量的因素。以鲜重为因变量进行分析得到8个关键指标,分别根长、芦下直径、干重、折干率、总氨基酸、色氨酸、党参苷Ⅰ和苍术内酯Ⅲ,调整后的R2值为0.969;以浸出物为因变量进行分析得到7个关键指标,包含根长、总氨基酸、党参多糖、色氨酸、丁香苷、党参苷Ⅰ和苍术内酯Ⅲ,方程调整后的R2值为0.636;以党参多糖为因变量进行分析得到1个关键指标,为浸出物,方程调整后的R2值为0.382;以党参炔苷为因变量进行分析得到3个关键因子,分别为总氨基酸、色氨酸和丁香苷,方程调整后的R2值为0.571。总氨基酸和色氨酸含量对鲜重、浸出物和党参炔苷含量都有影响,这与分段线性回归分析结果相一致。因此,针对党参鲜重、浸出物、党参多糖和党参炔苷所得的回归方程可作为我国栽培党参种质性状综合评价的主要指标。
党参的农艺性状和代表性组分间存在不同程度的联系,共同影响党参种质资源的利用。本实验通过对106份我国栽培党参的6个农艺性状和8个代表性组分进行分析。利用主成分分析将14个指标分为7个主成分,并使用DTOPSIS法对106份党参种质资源进行评分;通过逐步回归分析发现关于党参鲜重、浸出物、党参多糖和党参炔苷的关键指标;采用分段线性回归方程分析分别以鲜重、浸出物、党参多糖和党参炔苷作为因变量对不同农艺及代表性组分间的生长变化趋势,并结合相关性分析和多元回归线性分析,描述我国的党参理想株型。
  • 国家自然科学基金项目(82060687)
  • 国家自然科学基金项目(81760679)
  • 贵州省科技支撑计划项目资助[黔科合支撑(2021)一般248]
参考文献 引证文献
排序方式:
[1]
Ch.P(2020) VolⅠ(中国药典2020年版.一部 )[S]. 2020:293-294.
[2]
WANG H Y, CHEN Y, GUO F X, et al. Research progress on germplasm diversity and medicinal germplasm innovation of Codonopsis[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs (中草药), 2024, 55(3):978-988.
[3]
LAN X Y, ZHOU L, LI X, et al. Research progress and predictive analysis of quality markers of Codonopsis codonopsis[J]. China J Chin Mater Med (中国中药杂志), 2023, 48(8):2020-2040.
[4]
SUN Z H, SHAO J, GUO M. Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological effects of Codonopsis[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci(安徽农业科学), 2015, 43(33):174-176.
[5]
XIANG S, ZHANG W W, CHEN H, et al. Research progress on pharmacological mechanism of codonopsis glycosides[J/OL]. J Liaoning Univ Tradit Chin Med(辽宁中医药大学学报), 2024,1-7 [2024-09-28]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/21.1543.r.20240418.1142.002.html. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/21.1543.r.20240418.1142.002.html
[6]
LIU F S, ZHANG K X, YAO Q Y, et al. Effects of rehydration after drought on agronomic traits, physiology, biochemistry and representative components of Codonopsis codonopsis[J]. Chin Pharm J (中国药学杂志), 2022, 57(13):1081-1088.
[7]
SU Y J, XI J Y, SHI Q, et al. Research progress of Codonopsis codonopsis, a traditional Chinese medicine with the same origin as medicine and food[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs (中草药), 2023, 54(8):2607-2617.
[8]
YANG D D, CHEN Y, GUO F X, et al. Study and application of above-ground parts of Codonopsis pilosula[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs (中草药), 2021, 52(13):4055-4063.
[9]
GAO S M, LIU J S, WANG M, et al. Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of Codonopsis: a review[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2018,219:50-70.
[10]
GAO Z, ZHANG C, JING L, et al. The structural characterization and immune modulation activitives comparison of Codonopsis pilosula polysaccharide (CPPS) and selenizing CPPS (sCPPS) on mouse in vitro and vivo[J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2020,160:814-822.
[11]
LIU X, XU J, JIN Y, et al. Germplasm resources and cultivar breeding of Codonopsis pilosula: research progress[J]. J Agric (农学学报), 2018, 8(7):36-41.
[12]
ZHOU Y F, HUANG H K. Crop Variety Test and Statistical Analysis(作物品种试验与统计分析)[M]. Fuzhou: Fujian Science and Technology Press, 2004.
[13]
LIU Y J, LI M, LI C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on quality traits of 75 highland barley germplasm[J]. J Triticeae Crops(麦类作物学报), 2024, 44 (7): 855-864.
[14]
YANG D, XIONG Y, XIE Z S, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of excellent germplasm resources of upland cotton[J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed (分子植物育种), 1-15[2024-09-29]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230307.1810.004.html. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230307.1810.004.html
[15]
CHEN L J, WANG D, LI H W, et al. Fruit quality analysis of different varieties (superior lines) of Chinese cherry[J]. Chin J Trop Crops (热带作物学报), 2024, 45(3):514-523.
[16]
GAO S, YAN C M, WAN C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of germplasm resources of Leymus chinensis based on grey correlation method and DTOPSIS method[J]. Acta Agrestia Sin(草地学报), 2024, 32(2):599-609.
[17]
SUN H, GUO Y, XIN L, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of millet varieties based on grey relational degree, DTOPSIS and grey situation decision method[J]. J China Agric Univ(中国农业大学学报), 2023, 28(11):42-56.
[18]
ZHANG Z Z, ZHENG C Z, XU Z P, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of forage performance of different oat varieties based on entropy weighted DTOPSIS method[J]. Feed Res(饲料研究), 2023, 46(16):114-120.
[19]
SANG T, ZHAO Y X, YANG D Y, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of fresh Strawberry varieties based on AHP and DTOPSIS[J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed(分子植物育种), 1-24[2024-09-29]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20221102.1502.004.html. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20221102.1502.004.html
[20]
LAN X Y, TIAN C F, ZHAN Z L, et al. Comparison of wild and cultivated Ludonopsis based on traditional quality evaluation[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Form (中国实验方剂学杂志), 2024, 30 (14): 156-164.
[21]
QIAN P S. Flora of China(中国植物志)[M]. Beijing: Science Press,1963.
[22]
JIANG H, GAO Y, YANG J M, et al. Summary of research on the quality evaluation methods of traditional Chinese medicine from the “holistic view”[J]. China J Chin Mater Med (中国中药杂志), 2015, 40(6):1027-1031.
[23]
XU L J, LIANG H Z, YU Y L, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality indexes of Chinese herbal medicine Safflower[J/OL]. Mol Plant Breed(分子植物育种), 1-14[2024-09-29]. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.s.20220216.1546.016.html. https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.gszy.edu.cn/kcms/detail/46.1068.s.20220216.1546.016.html
[24]
NIE B T, LIU D Q, CHEN J, et al. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic and quality traits of spring Soybean varieties in North China[J]. Acta Agron Sin(作物学报), 2024, 50 (9): 2248-2266.
[25]
LU J Y, TIAN H, XIONG J B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of cold tolerance of 14 native Pennisetum seedlings[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin(草业学报), 2024, 33 (8): 98-111.
[26]
HUANG Y, XIONG X G, ZOU X Y, et al. Analysis and evaluation of main agronomic traits of local Peanut germplasm resources in Jiangxi Province[J]. J Plant Gen Res(植物遗传资源学报), 2021, 22(6):1550-1558.
[27]
BIAN L L, LIANG D H, FAN M L, et al. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of nutrient content of different varieties of Jinfosan Square bamboo shoots[J]. J Nanjing Forest Univ Nat Sci Ed(南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)), 2024, 48 (4): 159-167.
[28]
XIAO S X, HOU Q W, CAI Z P, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of 20 kinds of Codonopsis[J]. J Zhejiang Agric Sci(浙江农业科学), 2021, 62(2):290-294.
[29]
YANG H, YU E R, WEI Z F, et al. Analysis and evaluation of quality characters of local sesame germplasm resources in Guizhou Province[J]. J Plant Gen Res(植物遗传资源学报), 2020, 21(2):369-376.
[30]
BAI W, HU Y, YANG S M, et al. Analysis on agronomic characters of local resources of anemone in northwest Hebei Province[J]. Crops(作物杂志), 2021(1):54-59.
[31]
HU J D, MAO G, ZHANG Z W, et al. Effects of different fertilization treatments on yield and secondary metabolite content of Codonopsis codonopsis[J]. China J Chin Mater Med (中国中药杂志), 2017, 42(15):2946-2953.
2024年第59卷第23期
PDF下载
114
51
引用本文
BibTeX
文章信息
doi: 10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
  • 接收时间:2024-05-16
  • 首发时间:2025-11-13
  • 出版时间:2024-12-08
补充材料
相关文章
文章信息
作者
出版历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-16
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(82060687)
国家自然科学基金项目(81760679)
贵州省科技支撑计划项目资助[黔科合支撑(2021)一般248]
作者信息
    1 甘肃卫生职业学院, 兰州 730207
    2 遵义医科大学, 贵州 遵义 563000

通讯作者:

* 吴发明,男,博士,教授 研究方向:中药资源 Tel:(0851)28642516;
刘莎,女,博士,讲师 研究方向:中药资源 Tel:(0851)28642516
参考文献
分享链接
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/zgyxzz/CN/10.11669/cpj.2024.23.004
分享至
全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文
BibTeX
本文的引用情况
2种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏