微生物学报

Strain (dose)	Object	Intervention cycle (d)	Number of subjects	Experimental design	Effect	References
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (5.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	56	Placebo group (n=25) Probiotic group (n=25)	Randomized controlled trial	The relative abundance of butyric acid producing bacteria↑, IBS-SSS and IBS-QOL scores↓	[36]
Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 (2.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	42	Placebo group (n=22) Probiotic group (n=22)	Randomized controlled trial	The levels of methylamine and aromatic amino acid metabolites in the urine of patients in the probiotic group↓	[37]
Weizmannia coagulans MTCC5856 (2.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	Adult	90	Placebo group (n=20) Probiotic group (n=20)	Randomized controlled trial	Serum myeloperoxidase content and depression score↓	[38]
Bifidobacterium adolescentis PRL2019 (2.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	4–18 years old	84	Placebo group (n=36) Probiotic group (n=36)	Randomized controlled trial	The frequency of constipation, the intensity of abdominal pain, and the frequency of abdominal pain in children with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation↓	[39]
Lactobacillus GG (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	6–20 years old	42	Placebo group (n=25) Probiotic group (n=25)	Randomized controlled trial	Frequency of abdominal distension↓	[40]
Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABla-12 (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	Adult	42	Placebo group (n=107) DDS-1 group (n=107) UABla-12 group (n=105)	Randomized controlled trial	Frequency of abdominal pain↓ Frequency of normalization of stool shape↑	[33]
Lacticaseibacillus casei Zhang (3.00×10⁹ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis V9 (4.00×10⁹ CFU/g) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P-8 (3.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	28	Placebo group (n=21) Probiotic group (n=24)	Randomized controlled trial	The levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the serum↓ The bacterial genera associated with the deterioration of IBS, such as Bacteroides, Escherichia, and Citrobacter↓	[41]
Lactobacillus paracasei (1.00×10⁸ CFU/g) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (4.00×10⁸ CFU/g) Ligilactobacillus salivarius (5.00×10⁸ CFU/g)	Adult	28	Placebo group (n=26) Probiotic group (n=24)	Randomized controlled trial	The abdominal pain symptoms of the patients in the probiotic group were significantly relieved	[42]
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (2.94×10⁹ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium longum (2.94×10⁸ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium bifidum (2.94 × 10⁸ CFU/g) Lactobacillus rhamnosus (9.80×10⁸ CFU/g) Lactobacillus acidophilus (4.90×10⁸CFU/g)	Adult	56	Placebo group (n=33) Probiotic group (n=35)	Randomized controlled trial	The observation results showed that the patient’s incomplete defecation, bloating, pain, fecal pressure, and diarrhea symptoms all showed significant improvement	[43]

Strain (dose)	Object	Intervention cycle (d)	Number of subjects	Experimental design	Effect	References
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (5.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	56	Placebo group (n=25) Probiotic group (n=25)	Randomized controlled trial	The relative abundance of butyric acid producing bacteria↑, IBS-SSS and IBS-QOL scores↓	[36]
Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 (2.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	42	Placebo group (n=22) Probiotic group (n=22)	Randomized controlled trial	The levels of methylamine and aromatic amino acid metabolites in the urine of patients in the probiotic group↓	[37]
Weizmannia coagulans MTCC5856 (2.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	Adult	90	Placebo group (n=20) Probiotic group (n=20)	Randomized controlled trial	Serum myeloperoxidase content and depression score↓	[38]
Bifidobacterium adolescentis PRL2019 (2.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	4–18 years old	84	Placebo group (n=36) Probiotic group (n=36)	Randomized controlled trial	The frequency of constipation, the intensity of abdominal pain, and the frequency of abdominal pain in children with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation↓	[39]
Lactobacillus GG (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	6–20 years old	42	Placebo group (n=25) Probiotic group (n=25)	Randomized controlled trial	Frequency of abdominal distension↓	[40]
Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABla-12 (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	Adult	42	Placebo group (n=107) DDS-1 group (n=107) UABla-12 group (n=105)	Randomized controlled trial	Frequency of abdominal pain↓ Frequency of normalization of stool shape↑	[33]
Lacticaseibacillus casei Zhang (3.00×10⁹ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis V9 (4.00×10⁹ CFU/g) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P-8 (3.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	28	Placebo group (n=21) Probiotic group (n=24)	Randomized controlled trial	The levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the serum↓ The bacterial genera associated with the deterioration of IBS, such as Bacteroides, Escherichia, and Citrobacter↓	[41]
Lactobacillus paracasei (1.00×10⁸ CFU/g) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (4.00×10⁸ CFU/g) Ligilactobacillus salivarius (5.00×10⁸ CFU/g)	Adult	28	Placebo group (n=26) Probiotic group (n=24)	Randomized controlled trial	The abdominal pain symptoms of the patients in the probiotic group were significantly relieved	[42]
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (2.94×10⁹ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium longum (2.94×10⁸ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium bifidum (2.94 × 10⁸ CFU/g) Lactobacillus rhamnosus (9.80×10⁸ CFU/g) Lactobacillus acidophilus (4.90×10⁸CFU/g)	Adult	56	Placebo group (n=33) Probiotic group (n=35)	Randomized controlled trial	The observation results showed that the patient’s incomplete defecation, bloating, pain, fecal pressure, and diarrhea symptoms all showed significant improvement	[43]

益生菌缓解肠易激综合征症状的研究进展

PDF下载

李泽龙 ¹^,²^,³ , 刘彦芳 ¹^,²^,³ , 孙志宏 ¹^,²^,³^,^*

微生物学报 | 综述 2026,66(1): 61-74

收起

微生物学报 | 综述 2026, 66(1): 61-74

益生菌缓解肠易激综合征症状的研究进展

全屏

李泽龙¹^,²^,³, 刘彦芳¹^,²^,³, 孙志宏¹^,²^,³^,^*

作者信息

^1.内蒙古农业大学，乳品生物技术与工程教育部重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特

^2.农业农村部奶制品加工重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特

^3.内蒙古自治区乳品生物技术与工程重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特

Research progress in probiotics for alleviating irritable bowel syndrome symptoms

Zelong LI¹^,²^,³, Yanfang LIU¹^,²^,³, Zhihong SUN¹^,²^,³^,^*

Affiliations

^1.Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China

^2.Key Laboratory of Dairy Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China

^3.Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dairy Biotechnology and Engineering, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China

出版时间: 2026-01-04 doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250529

文章导航

摘要

收起

肠易激综合征(irritable bowel syndrome, IBS)是一种以腹痛、腹胀及排便异常为特征的功能性胃肠疾病，其发病机制涉及肠道菌群失衡、免疫激活、肠-脑轴功能障碍等多因素交互作用。传统疗法虽能短期缓解症状，但存在药物副作用、疗效持续性不足等局限性，促使微生物靶向疗法成为研究热点。益生菌是活的微生物，已被证实对人体健康有益。现有研究表明，益生菌可通过定殖竞争抑制致病菌黏附，调节免疫应答，还能借助代谢产物修复肠屏障功能，改善肠道动力与渗透压平衡。本综述探讨了益生菌对IBS患者便秘、腹泻、腹痛腹胀及精神症状的具体作用效果和潜在作用途径。然而，益生菌临床应用仍面临挑战，包括菌株异质性、宿主个体差异以及缺乏标准化治疗方案等。未来需结合多组学技术筛选生物标志物，开发个体化干预策略，并通过动态监测优化疗效，为IBS治疗提供更精准的微生物靶向疗法。

关键词

肠易激综合征 / 益生菌 / 肠道菌群 / 肠-脑轴

Abstract

收起

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and abnormal bowel movements. Its pathogenesis involves multiple factors such as imbalance of gut microbiota, immune activation, and dysfunction of the gut-brain axis. Although conventional therapies can alleviate symptoms temporarily, the limitations such as drug side effects and insufficient efficacy persistence have made microbial-targeted therapy a research hotspot. Probiotics are live microorganisms and have been proven to be beneficial to human health. Studies have shown that probiotics inhibit pathogen adhesion through competitive colonization, regulate immune responses, and repair the intestinal barrier function through metabolic products, thereby improving intestinal motility and osmotic balance. This review discusses the specific effects and potential pathways of probiotics on constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain and distension, and mental symptoms in IBS patients. However, the clinical application of probiotics still faces challenges, including strain heterogeneity, host individual differences, and the lack of standardized treatment plans. In the future, it is necessary to combine multi-omics technologies to screen biomarkers, develop individualized intervention strategies, and optimize efficacy through dynamic monitoring, which are expected to provide more precise microbial-targeted therapy for the treatment of IBS.

Key words

irritable bowel syndrome / probiotics / gut microbiota / gut-brain axis

引用本文

李泽龙, 刘彦芳, 孙志宏. 益生菌缓解肠易激综合征症状的研究进展. 微生物学报, 2026 , 66 (1) : 61 -74 . DOI: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250529

Zelong LI, Yanfang LIU, Zhihong SUN. Research progress in probiotics for alleviating irritable bowel syndrome symptoms[J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2026 , 66 (1) : 61 -74 . DOI: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250529

正文

收起

肠易激综合征(irritable bowel syndrome, IBS)是一种常见的功能性胃肠疾病，显著影响患者的生活质量，其主要表现为腹痛、腹胀及排便异常，因个体差异存在腹泻型、便秘型等不同亚型。益生菌作为对人体健康有益的活微生物，具有调节肠道菌群、修复肠屏障、调节免疫应答及改善肠-脑轴(gut-brain axis, GBA)功能等作用，被视为缓解IBS症状的潜在方案。本文综述了益生菌在改善IBS患者便秘、腹泻、腹痛腹胀及精神症状方面的效果，探讨了其缓解IBS症状的潜力，以期为该病的治疗提供新见解。

1 肠易激综合征概述

收起

1.1 肠易激综合征的定义与临床特征

肠易激综合征是一种常见的肠-脑相互作用障碍，属于功能性肠道疾病，其复杂的临床特征和发病机制引起了医学界的广泛关注^[1-2]。根据罗马IV诊断标准，IBS的诊断需在反复腹痛(过去3个月内平均每周至少发作1次)的基础上，并结合以下2项或2项以上的临床症状：(1) 排便后腹痛或腹部不适缓解；(2) 发作时排便频率的变化以及粪便形态的改变^[3]。IBS作为功能性胃肠疾病的典型代表，其临床症状具有显著特异性。根据罗马Ⅳ诊断标准，该疾病可分为4种亚型：腹泻型(irritable bowel syndrome with predominant diarrhea, IBS-D)患者以反复腹泻为主要特征，粪便呈松散或水样，常伴有急迫排便感；便秘型(irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation, IBS-C)主要表现为排便困难、粪便干硬及排便频率减少；混合型(irritable bowel syndrome with mixed bowel habits, IBS-M)患者在同一日内可能交替出现腹泻与便秘，粪便形状差异显著；未定型(irritable bowel syndrome unclassified, IBS-U)则指患者症状波动幅度较大，但不符合上述3种类型的分类标准；所有类型均伴随腹痛或腹胀，且症状反复发作、病程迁延，对患者的生活质量造成显著影响^[4]。流行病学数据显示，全球IBS患病率约11.2%，其中亚洲地区发病率显著上升，且存在明显的性别差异，女性患病风险高于男性，这可能与雌激素对内脏敏感性的调控作用有关^[5-6]。

1.2 IBS的发病机制

在发病机制层面，IBS已超越传统认知的单一肠道功能障碍，涉及遗传因素、部分饮食不耐受、胃肠道微生物体系失衡、肠道免疫激活、肠道通透性改变以及GBA功能异常等多个方面^[7]。研究表明IBS患者的肠道菌群多样性和稳定性显著下降，患者粪便中肠杆菌科细菌数量较健康人群比例增加，而双歧杆菌等有益菌显著减少，这种失衡导致短链脂肪酸(short-chain fatty acids, SCFAs) (如乙酸、丙酸)代谢异常，与患者腹胀、腹痛等症状直接相关^[8]。此外，芽孢杆菌门/拟杆菌门(Bacillota/Bacteroidota)比例异常会加剧肠道通透性改变^[9]。IBS患者的黏膜免疫系统呈现持续性低度炎症状态，肥大细胞密度、T淋巴细胞(CD4⁺和CD8⁺)的数量和活性在IBS患者结肠黏膜中显著增加，肥大细胞释放的组胺和蛋白酶直接刺激肠道神经元，导致内脏高敏感性^[10]。T细胞的异常激活导致肠道局部的免疫反应失调，释放的细胞因子干扰素-γ (interferon-gamma, IFN-γ)、肿瘤坏死因子-α (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, TNF-α)、白细胞介素(interleukin, IL)-17及IL-6失衡可能破坏肠黏膜屏障，增加肠道通透性，进而形成“代谢性肠漏”的恶性循环^[11]。最新研究揭示，肠道菌群代谢产物(如吲哚丙酸)可通过迷走神经影响中枢神经系统，吲哚丙酸可激活肠道黏膜下的迷走神经传入纤维，直接抑制γ-氨基丁酸(gamma-aminobutyric acid, GABA)能神经元活性。当GABA能神经元活性降低时前额叶皮质对边缘系统的抑制作用减弱，导致焦虑相关神经环路过度活跃，形成焦虑-肠道症状的恶性循环^[12]。这些因素相互交织，共同造成肠道功能紊乱，引发IBS一系列症状。

2 益生菌与IBS

收起

目前，IBS的治疗主要以缓解症状为目标。传统疗法，如解痉药(匹维溴铵)和止泻药(洛哌丁胺)虽能在短期内缓解症状，但效果通常不尽如人意，还可能导致便秘加重、药物依赖等副作用，患者满意度较低^[13]。这一情况促使医学界探索多靶点干预策略，其中益生菌治疗展现出独特优势^[14]。

2.1 益生菌的发展历程及在胃肠道疾病中的干预价值

益生菌是一类具有生理调节功能的活性微生物，其对健康的促进作用已成为现代微生物学和临床医学的研究重点。益生菌的发展可追溯至19世纪中期，1857年巴斯德发现乳酸菌，开启了人类对益生菌的认知之旅^[15]。1899年蒂赛分离出双歧杆菌，1908年梅契尼科夫提出“酸奶长寿”理论并被誉为“益生菌之父”^[16]。1953年“益生菌”一词首次被使用，2002年联合国粮农组织(Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO)和世界卫生组织(World Health Organization, WHO)明确了其现代定义，即益生菌是指“当摄入足够数量时能够对宿主健康产生有益作用的活性微生物”^[17-18]。经过半个多世纪的发展，全球已确认多种具有明确功能的益生菌菌株，其中乳杆菌属(Lactobacillus)、双歧杆菌属(Bifidobacterium)和芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus)构成了三大核心菌群^[19]。益生菌在多种胃肠道疾病的干预中展现出独特的调节作用，其机制涉及肠道菌群平衡重建、代谢调控及免疫调节等多个方面^[20-21]。在腹泻性疾病方面，多项随机对照试验证实益生菌干预可有效降低抗生素相关性腹泻和艰难拟梭菌(Clostridioides difficile)感染性腹泻的发病率^[22-23]。其中，鼠李糖乳酪杆菌(Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus) GG株可有效降低儿童腹泻发病率，并减少腹泻持续时间^[24]。Szajewska等^[25]的研究进一步证实，益生菌对轮状病毒性腹泻具有显著疗效。此外，植物乳植杆菌(Lactiplantibacillus plantarum) CCFM1143在改善慢性腹泻患者症状方面效果显著，可显著降低排便频率并改善布里斯托尔大便评分^[26]。在便秘治疗领域，益生菌显示出多方面的调节作用。临床研究显示，植物乳植杆菌P9能有效缓解成人慢性便秘症状，并显著改善患者生活质量^[27]。最新随机对照试验(randomized controlled trial, RCT)研究(n=103)证实，两歧双歧杆菌(Bifidobacterium bifidum) CCFM16可增加慢性便秘患者每周自发性排便(spontaneous bowel movements, SBM)次数并改善大便性状^[28]。Koebnick等^[29]证实干酪乳酪杆菌(Lacticaseibacillus casei) Shirota对便秘症状改善率达89%，并显著提高排便频率。同时，Sabaté等^[30]发现长双歧杆菌(Bifidobacterium longum) 35624在治疗期间使IBS-U患者的粪便性状恢复正常。另一项针对儿童便秘的研究表明，干酪乳酪杆菌Lcr35 (8×10⁸CFU/d)治疗4周后排便频率明显改善且硬便减少，其疗效与氧化镁相当^[31]。益生菌在腹胀腹痛相关胃肠道疾病中的作用同样得到了广泛关注。动物双歧杆菌乳亚种(Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis) DN-173010的发酵乳制品可有效缓解IBS-C患者的腹胀症状，并加速肠道传输；此外，该制剂还能改善肠易激综合征相关核心症状^[32]。临床研究显示，嗜酸乳杆菌(Lactobacillus acidophilus) DDS-1和动物双歧杆菌乳亚种UABla-12可显著降低腹痛严重程度^[33]。植物乳植杆菌在4周干预后明显改善胃肠胀气症状，而唾液宿主关联乳杆菌(Ligilactobacillus salivarius)治疗8周后则显著降低腹痛频率和严重程度评分^[34-35]。由此可见，益生菌在胃肠道疾病中展现出显著的调节作用和治疗效果，从理论机制和临床实践的双重角度来看，益生菌具有成为肠易激综合征(IBS)安全有效辅助治疗选择的巨大潜力(表1)。

2.2 益生菌缓解IBS的作用机制

在治疗策略探索中益生菌的潜在应用价值受到持续关注。研究发现益生菌通过多种生物学机制发挥有益作用，主要包括与病原体的定殖竞争、调节机体免疫功能和产生细菌素等代谢物^[44](图1)。在定殖竞争过程中，Lactobacillus和Bifidobacterium等常见益生菌通过占据肠道上皮细胞黏附位点形成生物膜屏障^[45]。例如，嗜酸乳杆菌AD125通过其表面蛋白特异性识别肠道上皮细胞表面受体，并借助分子模拟机制与致病菌(如大肠埃希氏菌O157:H7)竞争结合位点，从而降低致病菌的黏附率^[46]。在免疫调节过程中，益生菌通过调控树突状细胞和调节性T细胞(regulatory T cells, Treg)的分化平衡Th1/Th2免疫应答，增加肠道免疫球蛋白A (immunoglobulin A, Ig A)分泌量，降低IL-6等促炎因子表达^[47-48]。在细菌毒素抑制方面，乳酸菌通过分泌细菌素(如nisin)、短链脂肪酸和过氧化氢等物质发挥广谱抗菌作用，降低宿主感染风险^[49-50]。典型例证包括布拉氏酵母菌(Saccharomyces boulardii, SB)可通过分泌54 kDa蛋白酶分解艰难拟梭菌毒素A/B的受体结合域，降低毒素活性，从而降低腹泻频率^[51]。同时，研究发现除乳酸菌外，几乎所有细菌的必需营养素都含有铁，德氏乳杆菌(Lactobacillus delbrueckii)通过将氢氧化铁结合到其细胞表面，使其他微生物无法利用它，进而缓解IBS症状^[52]。此外，近年来研究还揭示了益生菌对肠-脑轴的双向调节作用。Pinto-Sanchez等^[37]研究表明，益生菌通过调节神经递质水平和神经活性化合物的产生调节肠道运动和敏感性。同时，益生菌通过下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴降低皮质酮等应激激素水平减轻压力对肠道功能的不良影响，最终缓解IBS症状^[53]。

2.3 益生菌缓解IBS典型症状

2.3.1 便秘

IBS-C作为肠易激综合征的常见亚型，结肠动力异常是其核心病理特征，具体表现为患者结肠传输速度显著低于健康人群^[37]。在改善这一病理状态的过程中，相关研究揭示了益生菌发挥作用的多方面规律，且这些规律与5-羟色胺(5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT)信号系统调控、胆汁酸代谢、肠道屏障功能及菌株特性等密切相关。从5-HT信号系统调控来看，其是改善IBS-C结肠动力异常的关键突破口。肠道作为人体最大的神经内分泌器官，肠嗜铬细胞分泌的5-HT占全身总量的95%，该物质兼具刺激局部肠神经反射以增强肠道分泌功能、通过迷走神经调控平滑肌收缩节律的双重作用^[54]。同时，肠嗜铬细胞释放的5-HT存在双向调节机制，既能通过加速肠道运动减少水分重吸收，又能通过增加粪便含水量改善便秘症状，这为益生菌发挥作用提供了重要基础^[55]。益生菌对5-HT信号系统的调控呈现出明确的菌株特异性规律。不同菌株通过不同方式调节5-HT水平及相关功能：植物乳植杆菌AR495通过抑制色氨酸羟化酶-1的过度激活使肠嗜铬细胞密度降低32%，从而将结肠5-HT水平恢复至健康对照组范围^[56]；特定乳杆菌则能提升肠道5-HT生物利用度1.8倍，并增强5-HT转运体(serotonin transporter, SERT)表达效率^[57]；长双歧杆菌NCC3001则通过上调SERT转运体表达使肠腔5-HT再摄取效率提高45%，在促进肠道规律收缩的同时还能避免因过量5-HT产生而引发内脏高敏性^[37]。这些不同菌株的作用方式虽有差异，但最终都指向对肠道动力的改善，表明益生菌在该调控过程中方式多样且目标统一的特性。在胆汁酸代谢层面，存在益生菌可能通过间接路径影响肠道动力的规律。研究发现便秘患者存在特异性胆汁酸合成障碍^[58]，而临床试验已证实，鹅去氧胆酸及回肠胆汁酸转运抑制剂能通过激活Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5)受体及协同释放5-HT、降钙素基因相关肽等机制，有效缩短肠道转运时间^[59-60]。益生菌对肠道屏障功能的修复也呈现出一定规律，既存在共性的作用方向，又因菌株不同而效果有差异。其共性作用主要围绕抑制促炎因子、保护紧密连接蛋白结构及调控黏蛋白产生等方面：动物双歧杆菌乳亚种TY-S01可显著抑制TNF-α、IL-6等促炎因子表达，从而有效保护紧密连接蛋白结构，防止肠道屏障破坏^[61]；丁酸梭菌则通过增加丁酸分泌，不仅使IBS-C患者的结肠转运时间缩短12 h，还能显著提高肠屏障功能标志物紧密连接蛋白(zonula occludens-1, ZO-1)的含量^[62]。在黏蛋白调控上，不同菌株的作用差异明显，VSL#3能通过上调MUC2基因诱导结肠黏蛋白产生，乳杆菌在发挥黏蛋白分泌作用方面与VSL#3效果相当，而双歧杆菌和唾液链球菌的作用则最小^[63]。临床研究结果进一步证实了益生菌疗效具有显著菌株特异性的规律。含乳杆菌和双歧杆菌的复合益生菌制剂可通过增加肠道中SCFAs的浓度，显著改善IBS-C患者的排便频率和粪便稠度^[64]。具体到单一菌株，类干酪乳杆菌(Lactobacillus paracasei) HA-196在增加IBS-C患者的自发排便和自发完全排便次数方面比长双歧杆菌R0175更为有效^[65]。因此，益生菌可能为IBS-C患者提供一种综合的治疗策略。

2.3.2 腹泻

在肠易激综合征腹泻型(IBS-D)的病理机制中毒素作用与代谢异常是两大关键环节。毒素作用的致病规律方面，艰难拟梭菌感染是重要诱因^[64]，其定殖后分泌的TcdA与TcdB毒素存在协同致病特点。具体而言，TcdA通过抑制Wnt信号通路阻碍β-catenin向细胞核转移，进而影响细胞增殖相关基因的表达；TcdB则通过与卷曲同源物(frizzled homolog, FZD)受体及硫酸软骨素蛋白聚糖4 (chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4, CSPG4)蛋白结合，直接造成肠道黏膜组织损伤；二者的协同作用会显著提升肠屏障通透性，引发肠道分泌功能异常，最终导致分泌性腹泻的表型^[66-67]。针对这一机制，益生菌的干预呈现靶向毒素的规律。克劳斯氏嗜碱盐芽孢杆菌(Alkalihalobacillus clausii) O/C可通过分泌碱性丝氨酸M-蛋白酶及细菌素clausin，降低艰难拟梭菌毒素的细胞毒性^[68]。LGG的作用具有双重性，一方面在临床中对32例参与者干预2个月后，84%实现临床痊愈且所有患者症状均有改善，显示出对艰难拟梭菌相关性腹泻的根治潜力^[69]；另一方面还能诱导肠上皮细胞合成热休克蛋白，增强细胞应激保护能力^[70]。SB的干预则体现“中和毒素+修复屏障”的协同性，其构建的四聚体特异性抗体可高效中和TcdA与TcdB，在动物模型中能阻断毒素与宿主细胞结合、抑制酶活性并标记毒素供免疫系统清除^[71]；其CNCM I-745菌株还可通过Rab11A依赖性途径促进内吞的E-钙黏蛋白向细胞质膜传递，从结构层面恢复肠道屏障功能以减少腹泻发作^[72]。代谢异常的致病规律主要体现在2方面：(1) SCFAs异常，不仅会激活黏膜免疫反应，还能通过改变肠道渗透压及神经信号传导加剧腹泻症状^[73]；(2) 产乳酸菌代谢缺陷，IBS-D患者肠道内产乳酸菌(如乳杆菌)丰度显著降低，导致乳酸合成不足，这会削弱肠道防御屏障，增加肠腔渗透负荷，形成恶性循环^[74]。干酪乳酪杆菌可有效抑制志贺氏菌诱导的核因子κB (nuclear factor kappa-B, NF-κB)信号通路活化，显著降低促炎因子、趋化因子和黏附分子的表达水平^[75]。在临床转化中植物乳植杆菌CCFM8610表现出多效性，为期12周的随机双盲安慰剂对照实验显示，其可降低肠易激综合征病情严重程度量表(irritable bowel syndrome severity scoring system, IBS-SSS)总分、提高肠易激综合生活质量量表(irritable bowel syndrome quality of life, IBS-QOL)总分，还能特异性富集产丁酸菌群，其代谢产物丁酸盐通过激活GPR109A及抑制蛋白激酶B (protein kinase B, PKB)和NF-κB p65信号通路改善肠上皮屏障功能障碍^[36,76]。综上所述，益生菌通过靶向相应环节实现干预，为IBS-D治疗提供了相对完整的机制解释与临床依据。

2.3.3 腹痛和腹胀

在IBS患者中腹痛和腹胀是常见症状。研究揭示，肠道菌群及其代谢产物与腹痛、腹胀等症状密切相关。结肠细菌发酵未消化物质产生肠道气体，而肠道菌群失衡会加剧腹胀，如产气能力较强的肠杆菌科和梭状芽孢杆菌过度增殖可加重病症，这提示调节肠道微生物是缓解气体相关症状的关键^[77-78]。多项研究表明，部分益生菌作用存在亚型特异性或广谱性，酿酒酵母I-3856仅在IBS-C亚组中显著降低腹胀评分，长双歧杆菌婴儿亚种(Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis) 35624则对各类IBS亚型的腹胀、胀气等均有疗效，且双歧杆菌能通过调节免疫(增加Treg比例、降低IL-6和TNF-α表达、促进IL-10分泌)来调节肠道菌群，缓解整体症状及改善生活质量^[79]。在腹痛调节上，益生菌可通过信号通路与代谢途径发挥作用。嗜酸乳杆菌NCFM与上皮细胞接触时经NF-κB途径诱导Mu阿片受体(Mu opioid receptors, MOR) 1和CB2表达以调节内脏痛觉感知^[80]；植物乳植杆菌CCFM8610能通过调节菌群(降低甲烷短杆菌丰度、提高产丁酸菌属比例)及代谢产物(丁酸上调GPR43表达影响神经功能)缓解腹胀和腹痛^[36,81]。此外，饮食与益生菌联用存在协同效果，低可发酵的低聚糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇(fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols, FODMAP)饮食结合益生菌可增加双歧杆菌丰度，减少肠道发酵气体及不适感，降低IBS-SSS总分以缓解症状^[82]。益生菌代谢产物也有积极作用，如热处理的长双歧杆菌CECT 7347可缓解腹痛、改善焦虑及生活质量^[83]；Sinn等^[84-85]在随机对照试验中发现，给予2×10⁹ CFU/d嗜酸乳杆菌-sdc 2012、2013时能缓解腹痛，而在LAB4联合研究中益生菌组疼痛天数显著减少。菌株选择上，单一与复合制剂效果存在差异。单一益生菌[如凝结魏茨曼氏菌(Weizmannia coagulans) MTCC 5856、双歧杆菌MIMBb75]可有效缓解IBS症状^[86]。复合益生菌(如含鼠李糖乳酪杆菌NCIMB 30174的Symprove)连续服用12周后可显著降低腹痛严重程度评分及IBS-SSS总分。同时，复合益生菌在改善生活质量、腹胀和腹痛方面均优于单一菌株^[87]。需注意的是，并非所有益生菌均对腹胀患者有缓解作用^[35,88]。研究显示，与安慰剂相比，LGG对以腹部张力下降为主诉的IBS患者无效果^[77]。长双歧杆菌婴儿亚种比唾液宿主关联乳杆菌在减轻腹痛方面更有效^[35]。同样地，植物乳植杆菌与燕麦汤联用方案也未改善腹胀症状^[34]。

2.3.4 益生菌缓解IBS精神症状

肠道与大脑的关联是IBS发病与干预的重要视角，相关理论为其提供了生物学依据，该理论通过内分泌、神经和免疫三大通路实现肠道与中枢神经系统的双向交流，而IBS作为典型脑-肠互动疾病，其临床特征与之相印证^[89]。IBS患者常存在“肠-脑互扰”的情况，约1/3的患者伴随焦虑或抑郁症状，这些精神类疾病不仅影响生活质量，还会形成恶性循环^[90]。从脑功能层面看，IBS患者前额叶皮层(prefrontal cortex, PFC)中GABA浓度与焦虑程度呈正相关，且PFC与前扣带回皮质(anterior cingulate cortex, ACC)的功能连接显著减弱，ACC作为情绪调节中枢，其功能异常可能是患者出现精神症状的重要机制^[91]。在益生菌干预方面，迷走神经是重要调节通路。鼠李糖乳酪杆菌JB-1可通过降低PFC中GABA mRNA的表达，调节迷走神经以缓解焦虑症状^[92]；将抑郁模型动物的菌群移植至健康小鼠，会诱发膈下迷走神经的脑-肠-微生物群轴失调性激活，而益生菌干预能逆转该效应^[93]。抑制炎症因子与菌群调节也是干预的重要途径。联合使用长双歧杆菌35642^®和长双歧杆菌1714^®可恢复皮质醇反应，改善IL-6、CRP和TNF-α等炎症因子水平，进而改善IBS症状并降低抑郁评分^[94]；鼠李糖乳酪杆菌Probio-M9能调节压力大成人肠道菌群的稳定性，影响相关有益代谢物，从而改善其心理和生理生活质量^[95]；gQlab多菌株益生菌可改善IBS-M患者的IBS-QOL评分，能缓解烦躁不安情绪、减轻对自身健康的担忧，还对改善人际关系有显著效果^[96]。然而，益生菌的情绪调节作用存在争议。Asad等^[97]通过20项试验的荟萃分析发现，益生菌缓解焦虑症状的效果优于抑郁症状。含瑞士乳杆菌(Lactobacillus helveticus)和长双歧杆菌的复合制剂干预8周后，患者的抑郁、焦虑自评量表得分无显著改善^[98]。接受干酪乳酪杆菌或菊粉治疗的大鼠，在血浆皮质酮水平测量中表现出更高水平的焦虑行为和压力^[99]。

3 益生菌缓解IBS的挑战和未来方向

收起

尽管益生菌在改善IBS症状方面展现出潜力，但其临床应用仍面临多重挑战。首先，益生菌的疗效具有显著的菌株特异性。不同菌株的代谢活性、免疫调节能力及宿主互作机制差异巨大，导致研究结果难以统一。此外，IBS患者的高度异质性进一步制约疗效。肠道菌群组成、遗传背景(如胆汁酸代谢相关基因多态性)、环境暴露(如饮食模式)及精神心理状态的差异，使得同一种益生菌在不同个体中可能产生截然不同的效果。同时，现有研究在菌株组合、剂量及疗程设计上缺乏标准化，导致不同临床试验的结论难以横向比较。

未来研究需向精准化与个体化治疗方向突破，开展大规模、多中心随机对照试验，明确不同菌株的适应规律及长期安全性。同时，需关注益生菌对IBS精神共病(如焦虑、抑郁)的调节机制，揭示菌群代谢产物(如丁酸、γ-氨基丁酸)通过肠-脑轴影响中枢神经系统的具体路径，推动益生菌从“广谱干预”迈向“精准治疗”，最终为IBS患者提供更高效、个性化的解决方案。

基金

收起

国家自然科学基金(32325040)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

OKA P, PARR

, BARBERIO

, BLACK

, SAVARINO

, FORD

. Global prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome III or IV criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2020, 5(10): 908-917.

[2]

BLACK

, FORD

. Global burden of irritable bowel syndrome: trends, predictions and risk factors[J]. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2020, 17(8): 473-486.

[3]

LACY

, MEARIN

, CHANG

, CHEY

, LEMBO

, SIMREN

, SPILLER

. Bowel disorders[J]. Gastroenterology, 2016, 150(6): 1393-1407.e5.

[4]

GRAD

, DUMITRASCU

. Irritable bowel syndrome subtypes: new names for old medical conditions[J]. Digestive Diseases, 2020, 38(2): 122-127.

[5]

LOVELL

, FORD

. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis[J]. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2012, 10(7): 712-721.e4.

[6]

, WANG

, ZHAO

, YANG

, DONG

, QIN

. GPER-mediated, oestrogen-dependent visceral hypersensitivity in stressed rats is associated with mast cell tryptase and histamine expression[J]. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 2020, 34(4): 433-443.

[7]

CREED

. Review article: the incidence and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome in population-based studies[J]. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2019, 50(5): 507-516.

[8]

PITTAYANON

, LAU

, YUAN

, LEONTIADIS

, TSE F, SURETTE

, MOAYYEDI

. Gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review[J]. Gastroenterology, 2019, 157(1): 97-108.

[9]

STOJANOV

, BERLEC

, ŠTRUKELJ

. The influence of probiotics on the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the treatment of obesity and inflammatory bowel disease[J]. Microorganisms, 2020, 8(11): 1715.

[10]

BOECKXSTAENS

G E

. The emerging role of mast cells in irritable bowel syndrome [J]. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2018, 14(4): 250.

[11]

NG QX, SOH AYS, LOKE

, LIM DY, YEO WS. The role of inflammation in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)[J]. Journal of Inflammation Research, 2018, 11(null): 345-349.

[12]

CHEN

, RUAN

, CHEN

, YING

, LI

, XU

, XIAO

, TIAN

, LV

, PING

, CHENG

, WEI

. Neurotransmitter and intestinal interactions: focus on the microbiota-gut-brain axis in irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2022, 13: 817100.

[13]

RANGAN

, BALLOU

, SHIN

, CAMILLERI

, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center GI Motility Working Group, LEMBO

. Use of treatments for irritable bowel syndrome and patient satisfaction based on the IBS in America survey[J]. Gastroenterology, 2020, 158(3): 786-788.e1.

[14]

GWEE

, BAK YT, GHOSHAL

, GONLACHANVIT

, LEE

, FOCK

, CHUA

ASB

, LU

, GOH KL, KOSITCHAIWAT

, MAKHARIA

, PARK

, CHANG

, FUKUDO

, CHOI

, BHATIA

, KE

, HOU

, HONGO

, Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association. Asian consensus on irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2010, 25(7): 1189-1205.

[15]

RIVIèRE

, SELAK

, LANTIN

, LEROY

, de VUYST

. Bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing colon bacteria: importance and strategies for their stimulation in the human gut[J]. Frontiers in microbiology, 2016, 7: 979

[16]

METCHNIKOFF

I I

. The prolongation of life: optimistic studies[M]. Berlin: Springer Publishing Company, 2004.

[17]

HILL

, GUARNER

, REID

, GIBSON

, MERENSTEIN

, POT B, MORELLI

, CANANI

, FLINT

, SALMINEN

, CALDER

, SANDERS

. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic[J]. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2014, 11(8): 506-514.

[18]

GASBARRINI

, BONVICINI

, GRAMENZI

. Probiotics history[J]. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2016, 50(): S116-S119.

[19]

SOCCOL

, VANDENBERGHE

LPS

, SPIER

, MEDEIROS

ABP

, YAMAGUISHI

, LINDNER

JDD

, PANDEY

, THOMAZ-SOCCOL

. The potential of probiotics: a review[J]. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 2010, 48(4): 413-434.

[20]

ÖHMAN

, SIMRÉN

. Pathogenesis of IBS: role of inflammation, immunity and neuroimmune interactions[J]. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2010, 7(3): 163-173.

[21]

ZHANG

, SUN

, ZHAO

, ZHOU

, LIU

, ZHANG

, YAN

, WANG

, LI

, ZHANG

, WANG

, LI

, PAN

, WANG

, LUO

, LI

, SUN

, ZHAO

, NIE

. Characteristics of gut microbiota determine effects of specific probiotics strains in patients with functional constipation[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2024, 137(1): 120-122.

[22]

GAO

, MUBASHER

, FANG

, REIFER

, MILLER

. Dose-response efficacy of a proprietary probiotic formula of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285 and Lactobacillus casei LBC80R for antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea prophylaxis in adult patients[J]. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, 105(7): 1636-1641.

[23]

ZHANG

, QUAN

, FENG

, ZHANG

, HE

, KWOK

, CHEN

. The Lactobacillus gasseri G098 strain mitigates symptoms of DSS-induced inflammatory bowel disease in mice[J]. Nutrients, 2022, 14(18): 3745.

[24]

, XU

, YE

, WU

, SHI

, FANG

, LIU

, LI

. Efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in treatment of acute pediatric diarrhea: a systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2019, 25(33): 4999-5016.

[25]

SZAJEWSKA

, MRUKOWICZ

. Probiotics in the treatment and prevention of acute infectious diarrhea in infants and children: a systematic review of published randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials[J]. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 2001, 33(): S17-S25.

[26]

YANG

, YUE

, CHEN

, DING

, LI

, WANG

, STANTON

, ROSS

, ZHAO

, ZHANG

, CHEN

. Lactobacillus plantarum CCFM1143 alleviates chronic diarrhea via inflammation regulation and gut microbiota modulation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study[J]. Frontiers in Immunology, 2021, 12: 746585.

[27]

, YANG

, XIE

, LI

, XIAO

, LI

, JIN

, ZHENG

, SUN

, ZUO

, KWOK

, ZHANG

, LU

, LIU

. Effect of the probiotic strain, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9, on chronic constipation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Pharmacological Research, 2023, 191: 106755.

[28]

WANG

, WANG

, TIAN

, WANG

, CUI

, ZHAO

, ZHANG

, QIAN

, WANG

, CHEN

, WANG

. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Bifidobacterium bifidum CCFM16 for manipulation of the gut microbiota and relief from chronic constipation[J]. Food & Function, 2022, 13(3): 1628-1640.

[29]

KOEBNICK

, WAGNER

, LEITZMANN

, STERN

, ZUNFT

. Probiotic beverage containing Lactobacillus casei shirota improves gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with chronic constipation[J]. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2003, 17(11): 654907.

[30]

SABATÉ

, IGLICKI

. Effect of Bifidobacterium longum 35624 on disease severity and quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2022, 28(7): 732-744.

[31]

WOJTYNIAK

, HORVATH

, DZIECHCIARZ

, SZAJEWSKA

. Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus Lcr35 in the management of functional constipation in children: a randomized trial[J]. The Journal of Pediatrics, 2017, 184: 101-105.e1.

[32]

AGRAWAL

, HOUGHTON

, MORRIS

, REILLY

, GUYONNET

, FEUILLERAT

, SCHLUMBERGER

, JAKOB

, WHORWELL

. Clinical trial: the effects of a fermented milk product containing Bifidobacterium lactis DN-173 010 on abdominal distension and gastrointestinal transit in irritable bowel syndrome with constipation[J]. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2009, 29(1): 104-114.

[33]

MARTONI

, SRIVASTAVA

, LEYER

. Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium lactis UABla-12 improve abdominal pain severity and symptomology in irritable bowel syndrome: randomized controlled trial[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(2): 363.

[34]

NOBAEK

, JOHANSSON

, MOLIN

, AHRNÉ

, JEPPSSON

. Alteration of intestinal microflora is associated with reduction in abdominal bloating and pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2000, 95(5): 1231-1238.

[35]

O’MAHONY

, McCARTHY

, KELLY

, HURLEY

, LUO

, CHEN

, O’SULLIVAN

, KIELY

, COLLINS

, SHANAHAN

, QUIGLEY

EMM

. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in irritable bowel syndrome: symptom responses and relationship to cytokine profiles[J]. Gastroenterology, 2005, 128(3): 541-551.

[36]

LIU

, YU

, TIAN

, ZHAO

, ZHANG

, QIAN

, WANG

, XUE

, ZHAI

, CHEN

. Lactobacillus plantarum CCFM8610 alleviates irritable bowel syndrome and prevents gut microbiota dysbiosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot clinical trial[J]. Engineering, 2021, 7(3): 376-385.

[37]

PINTO-SANCHEZ

, HALL

, GHAJAR

, NARDELLI

, BOLINO

, LAU

, MARTIN

, COMINETTI

, WELSH

, RIEDER

, TRAYNOR

, GREGORY

, de PALMA

, PIGRAU

, FORD

, MACRI

, BERGER

, BERGONZELLI

, SURETTE

, COLLINS

, et al. Probiotic Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 reduces depression scores and alters brain activity: a pilot study in patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 153(2): 448-459.e8.

[38]

MAJEED

, NAGABHUSHANAM

, ARUMUGAM

, MAJEED

, ALI F. Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 for the management of major depression with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, multi-centre, pilot clinical study[J]. Food & Nutrition Research, 2018, 62: 62.

[39]

GIORGIO

, QUATRALE

, MENNINI

, PICCIRILLO

, FURIO

, STELLA

, FERRETTI

, PARISI

, EVANGELISTI

, FELICI

, QUITADAMO

, Di NARDO

. Bifidobacterium adolescentis PRL2019 in pediatric irritable bowel syndrome: a multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Microorganisms, 2025, 13(3): 627.

[40]

BAUSERMAN

, MICHAIL

. The use of Lactobacillus GG in irritable bowel syndrome in children: a double-blind randomized control trial[J]. The Journal of Pediatrics, 2005, 147(2): 197-201.

[41]

, MA

, ZHAO

, CHEN

, LIU

, SUN

, CUI

, KWOK

, ZHANG

. Adjunctive treatment with probiotics partially alleviates symptoms and reduces inflammation in patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. European Journal of Nutrition, 2021, 60(5): 2553-2565.

[42]

OH JH, JANG

, KANG

, CHANG

, MIN

. Efficacy and safety of new Lactobacilli probiotics for unconstipated irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Nutrients, 2019, 11(12): 2887.

[43]

SKRZYDŁO-RADOMAŃSKA

, PROZOROW-KRÓL

, CICHOŻ-LACH

, MAJSIAK

, BIERŁA

, KOSIKOWSKI

, SZCZERBIŃSKI

, GANTZEL

, CUKROWSKA

. The effectiveness of synbiotic preparation containing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium probiotic strains and short chain fructooligosaccharides in patients with diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(7): 1999.

[44]

MARKOWIAK

, ŚLIŻEWSKA

. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health[J]. Nutrients, 2017, 9(9): 1021.

[45]

CANDELA

, PERNA

, CARNEVALI

, VITALI

, CIATI

, GIONCHETTI

, RIZZELLO

, CAMPIERI

, BRIGIDI

. Interaction of probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains with human intestinal epithelial cells: adhesion properties, competition against enteropathogens and modulation of IL-8 production[J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 2008, 125(3): 286-292.

[46]

XING

, BIAN

, MA

, YANG

, LIU

, WANG

, FAN

, ZHANG

. In vitro evaluation of probiotic properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus AD125 and antagonism against Escherichia coli O157: H7 adhesion to Caco-2 cell[J]. Food & Function, 2023, 14(5): 2472-2480.

[47]

KWON

, LEE

, SO JS, CHAE

, HWANG

, SAHOO

, NAM JH, RHEE

, HWANG

, IM SH. Generation of regulatory dendritic cells and CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ T cells by probiotics administration suppresses immune disorders[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(5): 2159-2164.

[48]

YUE

, WANG

, XIE

, LV

, ZHOU

, SMITH

, CAO

, ZHANG

, LI

, HUO

, MA

. Bifidobacterium bifidum E3 combined with Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis E4 improves LPS-induced intestinal injury by inhibiting the TLR4/NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways in vivo [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2023, 71(23): 8915-8930.

[49]

CORSETTI

, GOBBETTI

, SMACCHI

. Antibacterial activity of sourdough lactic acid bacteria: isolation of a bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance from Lactobacillus sanfrancisco C57[J]. Food Microbiology, 1996, 13(6): 447-456.

[50]

PEI

, LIU

, HUANG

, IQBAL

, SHEN

. Effects of lactic acid bacteria isolated from equine on Salmonella-infected gut mouse model[J]. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins, 2023, 15(3): 469-478.

[51]

CASTAGLIUOLO

, RIEGLER

, VALENICK

, LaMONT

, POTHOULAKIS

. Saccharomyces boulardii protease inhibits the effects of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in human colonic mucosa[J]. Infection and Immunity, 1999, 67(1): 302-307.

[52]

ELLI

, ZINK

, RYTZ

, RENIERO

, MORELLI

. Iron requirement of Lactobacillus spp. in completely chemically defined growth media[J]. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2000, 88(4): 695-703.

[53]

WANG

, HU

, LIN

, YANG

, LU

, SUN

, LI

, CHEN

. Lactobacillus reuteri or Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG intervention facilitates gut barrier function, decreases corticosterone and ameliorates social behavior in LPS-exposed offspring[J]. Food Research International, 2024, 197: 115212.

[54]

SPILLER

. Recent advances in understanding the role of serotonin in gastrointestinal motility in functional bowel disorders: alterations in 5-HT signalling and metabolism in human disease[J]. Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 2007, 19(s2): 25-31.

[55]

LIU

, SUN

, WANG

, SUN

, HU

, WANG

. The mechanism of secretion and metabolism of gut-derived 5-hydroxytryptamine[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021, 22(15): 7931.

[56]

ZHANG

, XIA

, WANG

, XIONG

, WEI

, LIAO

, QIAN

, CAI

, AI

. Lactobacillus plantarum AR495 improves colonic transport hyperactivity in irritable bowel syndrome through tryptophan metabolism[J]. Food & Function, 2024, 15(14): 7416-7429.

[57]

LUND

, EGEROD

, ENGELSTOFT

, DMYTRIYEVA

, THEODORSSON

, PATEL

, SCHWARTZ

. Enterochromaffin 5-HT cells: a major target for GLP-1 and gut microbial metabolites[J]. Molecular Metabolism, 2018, 11: 70-83.

[58]

ABRAHAMSSON

, ÖSTLUND-LINDQVIST

, NILSSON

, SIMRÉN

, GILLBERG

. Altered bile acid metabolism in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008, 43(12): 1483-1488.

[59]

WONG

, CAMILLERI

, McKINZIE

, BURTON

, GRAFFNER

, ZINSMEISTER

. Effects of A3309, an ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, on colonic transit and symptoms in females with functional constipation[J]. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 106(12): 2154-2164.

[60]

DIMIDI

, CHRISTODOULIDES

, SCOTT

, WHELAN

. Mechanisms of action of probiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota on gut motility and constipation[J]. Advances in Nutrition, 2017, 8(3): 484-494.

[61]

TANG

, WANG

, JIANG

, ZHU

, ZHANG

, WANG

, SHU

, DENG

, ZHANG

. Bifidobacterium lactis TY-S01 prevents loperamide-induced constipation by modulating gut microbiota and its metabolites in mice[J]. Frontiers in Nutrition, 2022, 9: 890314.

[62]

SUN

, LI

, ZHAI

, WANG

, YANG

, GU

, SONG

, LI

, ZUO

, LI

. The effect of Clostridium butyricum on symptoms and fecal microbiota in diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 2964.

[63]

CABALLERO-FRANCO

, KELLER

, de SIMONE

, CHADEE

. The VSL#3 probiotic formula induces mucin gene expression and secretion in colonic epithelial cells[J]. American Journal of Physiology Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 2007, 292(1): G315-G322.

[64]

, ZHU

, CHEN

, TANG

, PAN

, YUAN

, WANG

. Efficacy of probiotic compounds in relieving constipation and their colonization in gut microbiota[J]. Molecules, 2022, 27(3): 666.

[65]

LEWIS

, ANTONY

, CROWLEY

, PIANO

, BHARDWAJ

, TOMPKINS

, EVANS

. Efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 in alleviating symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a randomized, placebo-controlled study[J]. Nutrients, 2020, 12(4): 1159.

[66]

BEZERRA LIMA

, FARIA FONSECA

, Da GRAÇA AMADO

, MOREIRA LIMA

, ALBUQUERQUE RIBEIRO

, GARCIA ABREU

, de CASTRO BRITO

. Clostridium difficile toxin A attenuates Wnt/β-catenin signaling in intestinal epithelial cells[J]. Infection and Immunity, 2014, 82(7): 2680-2687.

[67]

CHANDRASEKARAN

, LACY

. The role of toxins in Clostridium difficile infection[J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2017, 41(6): 723-750.

[68]

RIPERT

, RACEDO

, ELIE

, JACQUOT

, BRESSOLLIER

, URDACI

. Secreted compounds of the probiotic Bacillus clausii strain O/C inhibit the cytotoxic effects induced by Clostridium difficile and Bacillus cereus toxins[J]. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2016, 60(6): 3445-3454.

[69]

BENNETT

, GORBACH

, GOLDIN

, CHANG

, LAUGHON

, GREENOUGH

, BARTLETT

. Treatment of relapsing Clostridium difficile diarrhea with Lactobacillus GG[J]. Nutrition Today, 1996, 31(): 39S.

[70]

NEE J, LEMBO

. Review Article: Current and future treatment approaches for IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) and IBS mixed pattern (IBS-M)[J]. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2021, 54(): S63-S74.

[71]

CHEN

, ZHU

, ZHANG

, HAMZA

, YU

, SAINT FLEUR

, GALEN

, YANG

, FENG

. A probiotic yeast-based immunotherapy against Clostridioides difficile infection[J]. Science Translational Medicine, 2020, 12(567): eaax4905.

[72]

TERCIOLO

, DOBRIC

, OUAISSI

, SIRET

, BREUZARD

, SILVY

, MARCHIORI

, GERMAIN

, BONIER

, HAMA

, OWENS

, LOMBARDO

, RIGOT

, ANDRÉ

. Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 restores intestinal barrier integrity by regulation of E-cadherin recycling[J]. Journal of Crohn’s & Colitis, 2017, 11(8): 999-1010.

[73]

ZHUANG

, TIAN

, LI

, ZENG

, CHEN

, XIONG

. Fecal microbiota alterations associated with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 1600.

[74]

ROKANA

, SINGH

, MALLAPPA

, BATISH

, GROVER

. Modulation of intestinal barrier function to ameliorate Salmonella infection in mice by oral administration of fermented milks produced with Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 5690: a probiotic strain of Indian gut origin[J]. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2016, 65(12): 1482-1493.

[75]

TIEN

, GIRARDIN

, REGNAULT

, Le BOURHIS

, DILLIES

, COPPÉE

, BOURDET-SICARD

, SANSONETTI

, PÉDRON

. Anti-inflammatory effect of Lactobacillus casei on Shigella-infected human intestinal epithelial cells[J]. Journal of Immunology, 2006, 176(2): 1228-1237.

[76]

CHEN

, RAN

, LI

, HE

, HUANG

, FU

, LIU

, WANG

. Sodium butyrate inhibits inflammation and maintains epithelium barrier integrity in a TNBS-induced inflammatory bowel disease mice model[J]. eBioMedicine, 2018, 30: 317-325.

[77]

O’SULLIVAN

, O’MORAIN

. Bacterial supplementation in the irritable bowel syndrome. A randomised doubleblind placebo-controlled crossover study[J]. Digestive and Liver Disease, 2000, 32(4): 294-301.

[78]

KING

, ELIA

, HUNTER

. Abnormal colonic fermentation in irritable bowel syndrome[J]. The Lancet, 1998, 352(9135): 1187-1189.

[79]

ZHOU

, ZHANG

, MAO

, FENG

, WANG

, XU

, LV

, WANG

. Bifico relieves irritable bowel syndrome by regulating gut microbiota dysbiosis and inflammatory cytokines[J]. European Journal of Nutrition, 2023, 62(1): 139-155.

[80]

ROUSSEAUX

, THURU

, GELOT

, BARNICH

, NEUT

, DUBUQUOY

, MEROUR

, GEBOES

, CHAMAILLARD

, OUWEHAND

, LEYER

, CARCANO

, COLOMBEL

, ARDID

, DESREUMAUX

. Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates intestinal pain and induces opioid and cannabinoid receptors[J]. Nature Medicine, 2006, 13(1): 35-37.

[81]

KIBBIE

, DILLON

, THOMPSON

, PURBA

, McCARTER

, WILSON

. Butyrate directly decreases human gut Lamina propria CD4 T cell function through histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition and GPR43 signaling[J]. Immunobiology, 2021, 226(5): 152126.

[82]

STAUDACHER

, LOMER

MCE

, FARQUHARSON

, LOUIS

, FAVA

, FRANCIOSI

, SCHOLZ

, TUOHY

, LINDSAY

, IRVING

, WHELAN

. A diet low in FODMAPs reduces symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and a probiotic restores Bifidobacterium species: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Gastroenterology, 2017, 153(4): 936-947.

[83]

SRIVASTAVA

, BASAK

, NAGHIBI

, VIJAYAKUMAR

, PARIHAR

, PATEL

, JADON

, PANDIT

, DARGAD

, KHANNA

, KUMAR

, DAY

. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of live Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 (ES1) and heat-treated Bifidobacterium longum CECT 7347 (HT-ES1) in participants with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Gut Microbes, 2024, 16(1): 2338322.

[84]

SINN

, SONG

, KIM

, LEE

, SON HJ, CHANG

, KIM

, RHEE

. Therapeutic effect of Lactobacillus acidophilus-SDC 2012, 2013 in patients with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2008, 53(10): 2714-2718.

[85]

WILLIAMS

, STIMPSON

, WANG

, PLUMMER

, GARAIOVA

, BARKER

, CORFE

. Clinical trial: a multistrain probiotic preparation significantly reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome in a double-blind placebo-controlled study[J]. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2009, 29(1): 97-103.

[86]

RUIZ-SÁNCHEZ

, ESCUDERO-LÓPEZ

, FERNÁNDEZ-PACHÓN

. Evaluación de la eficacia de los probióticos Como tratamiento en el síndrome del intestino irritable[J]. Endocrinología, Diabetes y Nutrición, 2024, 71(1): 19-30.

[87]

SISSON

, AYIS

, SHERWOOD

, BJARNASON

. Randomised clinical trial: a liquid multi-strain probiotic vs. placebo in the irritable bowel syndrome: a 12 week double-blind study[J]. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2014, 40(1): 51-62.

[88]

WHORWELL

, ALTRINGER

, MOREL

, BOND

, CHARBONNEAU

, O’MAHONY

, KIELY

, SHANAHAN

, QUIGLEY

EMM

. Efficacy of an encapsulated probiotic Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 in women with irritable bowel syndrome[J]. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, 101(7): 1581-1590.

[89]

MARTIN

, COMINETTI

, BERGER

, COMBREMONT

, MARQUIS

, XIE

, JIA

, PINTO-SANCHEZ

, BERCIK

, BERGONZELLI

. Metabolome-associated psychological comorbidities improvement in irritable bowel syndrome patients receiving a probiotic[J]. Gut Microbes, 2024, 16(1): 2347715.

[90]

STAUDACHER

, BLACK

, TEASDALE

, MIKOCKA-WALUS

, KEEFER

. Irritable bowel syndrome and mental health comorbidity: approach to multidisciplinary management[J]. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2023, 20(9): 582-596.

[91]

ICENHOUR

, TAPPER

, BEDNARSKA

, WITT

, TISELL

, LUNDBERG

, ELSENBRUCH

, WALTER

. Elucidating the putative link between prefrontal neurotransmission, functional connectivity, and affective symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 13590.

[92]

BRAVO

, FORSYTHE

, CHEW

, ESCARAVAGE

, SAVIGNAC

, DINAN

, BIENENSTOCK

, CRYAN

. Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011, 108(38): 16050-16055.

[93]

WANG

, ISHIMA

, QU

, SHAN

, CHANG

, WEI

, ZHANG

, PU

, FUJITA

, TAN

, WANG

, MA

, WAN

, HAMMOCK

, HASHIMOTO

. Ingestion of Faecalibaculum rodentium causes depression-like phenotypes in resilient Ephx2 knock-out mice: a role of brain-gut-microbiota axis via the subdiaphragmatic vagus nerve[J]. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2021, 292: 565-573.

[94]

GROEGER

, MURPHY

, TAN

HTT

, LARSEN

, O’NEILL

, QUIGLEY

EMM

. Interactions between symptoms and psychological status in irritable bowel syndrome: an exploratory study of the impact of a probiotic combination[J]. Neurogastroenterology & Motility, 2023, 35(1): e14477.

[95]

ZHENG

, YU

, ZHANG

, SUN

. Lactobacillus rhamnosus probio-M9 improves the quality of life in stressed adults by gut microbiota[J]. Foods, 2021, 10(10): 2384.

[96]

CHANG

, CHOI

, SHIN

, MOON

, KIM

, YOON

, PARK

, KIM

, LEE

. Efficacy of quadruple-coated probiotics in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study[J]. Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, 2024, 30(1): 73-86.

[97]

ASAD

, KIRK

, ZHU

, DONG

, GAO

. Effects of prebiotics and probiotics on symptoms of depression and anxiety in clinically diagnosed samples: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Nutrition Reviews, 2025, 83(7): e1504-e1520.

[98]

RAO

, BESTED

, BEAULNE

, KATZMAN

, IORIO

, BERARDI

, LOGAN

. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Gut Pathogens, 2009, 1(1): 6.

[99]

BARRERA-BUGUEÑO

, REALINI

, ESCOBAR-LUNA

, SOTOMAYOR-ZÁRATE

, GOTTELAND

, JULIO-PIEPER

, BRAVO

. Anxiogenic effects of a Lactobacillus, inulin and the synbiotic on healthy juvenile rats[J]. Neuroscience, 2017, 359: 18-29.

2026年第66卷第1期

PDF下载

246

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250529

接收时间：2025-07-11
首发时间：2026-01-12
出版时间：2026-01-04

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-07-11
录用日期：2025-08-26

基金

National Natural Science Foundation of China(32325040)

国家自然科学基金(32325040)

作者信息

^1.内蒙古农业大学，乳品生物技术与工程教育部重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特

^2.农业农村部奶制品加工重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特

^3.内蒙古自治区乳品生物技术与工程重点实验室，内蒙古呼和浩特

通讯作者:

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/wswxb/CN/10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20250529

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Strain (dose)	Object	Intervention cycle (d)	Number of subjects	Experimental design	Effect	References
Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (5.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	56	Placebo group (n=25) Probiotic group (n=25)	Randomized controlled trial	The relative abundance of butyric acid producing bacteria↑, IBS-SSS and IBS-QOL scores↓	[36]
Bifidobacterium longum NCC3001 (2.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	42	Placebo group (n=22) Probiotic group (n=22)	Randomized controlled trial	The levels of methylamine and aromatic amino acid metabolites in the urine of patients in the probiotic group↓	[37]
Weizmannia coagulans MTCC5856 (2.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	Adult	90	Placebo group (n=20) Probiotic group (n=20)	Randomized controlled trial	Serum myeloperoxidase content and depression score↓	[38]
Bifidobacterium adolescentis PRL2019 (2.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	4–18 years old	84	Placebo group (n=36) Probiotic group (n=36)	Randomized controlled trial	The frequency of constipation, the intensity of abdominal pain, and the frequency of abdominal pain in children with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation↓	[39]
Lactobacillus GG (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	6–20 years old	42	Placebo group (n=25) Probiotic group (n=25)	Randomized controlled trial	Frequency of abdominal distension↓	[40]
Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABla-12 (1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)	Adult	42	Placebo group (n=107) DDS-1 group (n=107) UABla-12 group (n=105)	Randomized controlled trial	Frequency of abdominal pain↓ Frequency of normalization of stool shape↑	[33]
Lacticaseibacillus casei Zhang (3.00×10⁹ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis V9 (4.00×10⁹ CFU/g) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P-8 (3.00×10⁹ CFU/g)	Adult	28	Placebo group (n=21) Probiotic group (n=24)	Randomized controlled trial	The levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the serum↓ The bacterial genera associated with the deterioration of IBS, such as Bacteroides, Escherichia, and Citrobacter↓	[41]
Lactobacillus paracasei (1.00×10⁸ CFU/g) Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (4.00×10⁸ CFU/g) Ligilactobacillus salivarius (5.00×10⁸ CFU/g)	Adult	28	Placebo group (n=26) Probiotic group (n=24)	Randomized controlled trial	The abdominal pain symptoms of the patients in the probiotic group were significantly relieved	[42]
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (2.94×10⁹ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium longum (2.94×10⁸ CFU/g) Bifidobacterium bifidum (2.94 × 10⁸ CFU/g) Lactobacillus rhamnosus (9.80×10⁸ CFU/g) Lactobacillus acidophilus (4.90×10⁸CFU/g)	Adult	56	Placebo group (n=33) Probiotic group (n=35)	Randomized controlled trial	The observation results showed that the patient’s incomplete defecation, bloating, pain, fecal pressure, and diarrhea symptoms all showed significant improvement	[43]

Strain (dose)

Object

Intervention

cycle (d)

Number of

subjects

Experimental

design

Effect

References

Lactiplantibacillus

plantarum

(5.00×10⁹ CFU/g)

Adult

Placebo group

(n=25)

Probiotic group

(n=25)

Randomized

controlled trial

The relative abundance of

butyric acid producing

bacteria↑, IBS-SSS and

IBS-QOL scores↓

[36]

Bifidobacterium

longum NCC3001

(2.00×10⁹ CFU/g)

Adult

Placebo group

(n=22)

Probiotic group

(n=22)

Randomized

controlled trial

The levels of methylamine

and aromatic amino acid

metabolites in the urine of

patients in the probiotic

group↓

[37]

Weizmannia coagulans

MTCC5856

(2.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)

Adult

Placebo group

(n=20)

Probiotic group

(n=20)

Randomized

controlled trial

Serum myeloperoxidase

content and depression

score↓

[38]

Bifidobacterium

adolescentis

PRL2019

(2.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)

4–18

years

old

Placebo group

(n=36)

Probiotic group

(n=36)

Randomized

controlled trial

The frequency of

constipation, the intensity

of abdominal pain, and the

frequency of abdominal

pain in children with

irritable bowel syndrome

with predominant

constipation↓

[39]

Lactobacillus GG

(1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)

6–20

years

old

Placebo group

(n=25)

Probiotic group

(n=25)

Randomized

controlled trial

Frequency of

abdominal distension↓

[40]

Lactobacillus

acidophilus DDS-1

(1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)

Bifidobacterium

animalis subsp.

lactis UABla-12

(1.00×10¹⁰ CFU/g)

Adult

Placebo group

(n=107)

DDS-1 group

(n=107)

UABla-12 group

(n=105)

Randomized

controlled trial

Frequency of abdominal

pain↓

Frequency of

normalization

of stool shape↑

[33]

Lacticaseibacillus

casei Zhang

(3.00×10⁹ CFU/g)

Bifidobacterium

animalis subsp. lactis V9

(4.00×10⁹ CFU/g)

Lactiplantibacillus

plantarum P-8

(3.00×10⁹ CFU/g)

Adult

Placebo group

(n=21)

Probiotic group

(n=24)

Randomized

controlled trial

The levels of IL-6

and TNF-α in the serum↓

The bacterial genera

associated with the

deterioration of IBS,

such as Bacteroides,

Escherichia, and

Citrobacter↓

[41]

Lactobacillus paracasei

(1.00×10⁸ CFU/g)

Lactiplantibacillus

plantarum (4.00×10⁸ CFU/g)

Ligilactobacillus

salivarius (5.00×10⁸ CFU/g)

Adult

Placebo group

(n=26)

Probiotic group

(n=24)

Randomized

controlled trial

The abdominal pain symptoms of the patients in the probiotic group were significantly relieved

[42]

Bifidobacterium

animalis subsp. lactis

(2.94×10⁹ CFU/g)

Bifidobacterium longum

(2.94×10⁸ CFU/g)

Bifidobacterium bifidum

(2.94 × 10⁸ CFU/g)

Lactobacillus rhamnosus

(9.80×10⁸ CFU/g)

Lactobacillus acidophilus

(4.90×10⁸CFU/g)

Adult

Placebo group

(n=33)

Probiotic group

(n=35)

Randomized

controlled trial

The observation results showed that the patient’s incomplete defecation, bloating, pain, fecal pressure, and diarrhea symptoms all showed significant improvement

[43]