燃料化学学报（中英文）

Data title (V0.1)	A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes
Author’s name	ZHU Bo, LU Xinyu, WANG Chao
Corresponding author’s name	WANG Chao
Data content description	This dataset contains the experimental results of a series of conducting polymers prepared by electropolymerization of aromatic molecules for the electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes. Galvanostatic and potentiostatic methods are adopted during electropolymerization. The energy storage performance of these conducting polymers is evaluated using galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) method at different active material mass-normalized current densities (1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 A/g) in the potential window where no significant electrolyte decomposition happens. Three-electrode setup at room temperature is adopted, and the reference electrode is a saturated calomel electrode. The counter electrode is a graphite rod. The electrolyte is 1 mol/L H₂SO₄, 1 mol/L or 2 mol/L ZnSO₄, 1 mol/L (NH₄)₂SO₄, 1 mol/L KOH, or 2 mol/L Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂. The experimental results of the cyclic voltammetry (CV) and impedance spectroscopy of some conducting polymers are also included.
Data generation time	2022−2025
Data volume	266 MB
Data format	.csv, .bin, .txt, .opj, .par, .psbd, .xlsx
Data source location	https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.33244 https://cstr.cn/31253.11.sciencedb.33244
Citation format of data	ZHU Bo, LU Xinyu, WANG Chao. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemicalenergy storage in aqueous electrolytes[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2026, 54(7): 20250399. WANG Chao. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemicalenergy storage in aqueous electrolytes[DS/OL]. https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.33244. DOI:10.57760/sciencedb.33244.

Data title (V0.1)	A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes
Author’s name	ZHU Bo, LU Xinyu, WANG Chao
Corresponding author’s name	WANG Chao
Data content description	This dataset contains the experimental results of a series of conducting polymers prepared by electropolymerization of aromatic molecules for the electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes. Galvanostatic and potentiostatic methods are adopted during electropolymerization. The energy storage performance of these conducting polymers is evaluated using galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) method at different active material mass-normalized current densities (1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 A/g) in the potential window where no significant electrolyte decomposition happens. Three-electrode setup at room temperature is adopted, and the reference electrode is a saturated calomel electrode. The counter electrode is a graphite rod. The electrolyte is 1 mol/L H₂SO₄, 1 mol/L or 2 mol/L ZnSO₄, 1 mol/L (NH₄)₂SO₄, 1 mol/L KOH, or 2 mol/L Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂. The experimental results of the cyclic voltammetry (CV) and impedance spectroscopy of some conducting polymers are also included.
Data generation time	2022−2025
Data volume	266 MB
Data format	.csv, .bin, .txt, .opj, .par, .psbd, .xlsx
Data source location	https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.33244 https://cstr.cn/31253.11.sciencedb.33244
Citation format of data	ZHU Bo, LU Xinyu, WANG Chao. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemicalenergy storage in aqueous electrolytes[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2026, 54(7): 20250399. WANG Chao. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemicalenergy storage in aqueous electrolytes[DS/OL]. https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.33244. DOI:10.57760/sciencedb.33244.

	Monomer	Loading /(mg·cm⁻²)	Electrolyte^*	C_s/(mA·h·g⁻¹)	C_s Retention /%	∂/Ω·s^−1/2·rad^1/2
*: “M”—mol/L.
1	Phen	1.2	1 M H₂SO₄	91.1	70.5	62.9	57.3	53.4	−	4.0
2	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	111.5	88.9	81.9	77.8	69.4	81.6	2.2
3	Phen	3.6	1 M H₂SO₄	103.2	87.2	80.0	76.7	67.8	−	1.1
4	Phen	5.0	1 M H₂SO₄	93.8	77.7	69.8	59.6	44.7	−	0.4
5	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	95.8	84.2	76.5	65.5	69.7	−	0.8
6	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	62.7	51.4	45.2	39.2	26.5	−	1.6
7	Phen	1.2	1 M KOH	138.0	70.8	54.9	49.5	38.6	−	5.6
8	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	91.7	87.2	82.9	78.1	73.5	75.4	3.0
9	Phen	3.6	1 M KOH	73.1	54.6	50.4	44.2	34.0	−	1.4
10	Phen	5.0	1 M KOH	67.8	50.7	34.5	17.8	3.8	−	0.9
11	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	54.6	48.0	45.6	40.1	34.7	−	4.3
12	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	41.2	30.4	28.2	24.0	10.5	−	6.4
13	Phen	1.2	1 M Na₂SO₄	23.9	21.5	19.1	16.8	13.6	−	−
14	Phen	1.8	1 M Na₂SO₄	44.7	39.6	35.1	29.9	21.6	69.1	−
15	Phen	3.6	1 M Na₂SO₄	33.3	23.2	18.5	13.0	6.3	−	−
16	Phen	5.0	1 M Na₂SO₄	11.7	5.81	3.68	1.76	0.2	−	−
17	ANS	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	34.6	28.1	25.9	20.9	17.7	−	3.8
18	ANS	1.4	1 M H₂SO₄	85.5	72.9	68.6	64.7	60.6	79.9	2.3
19	ANS	2.0	1 M H₂SO₄	66.5	54.6	44.8	38.5	28.7	−	1.1
20	ANS	1.4	1 M ZnSO₄	44.8	37.8	34.7	31.1	24.4	93.9	−
21	ANS	1.4	1 M (NH₄)₂SO₄	38.5	28.2	26.7	24.6	21.7	77.4	−
22	ANS	1.2	1 M H₂SO₄	75.6	67.2	63.6	60.0	56.2	73.9	1.3
23	ANS+oAP	0.8	1 M H₂SO₄	103.2	93.2	90.4	87.6	84.4	84.0	0.9
24	oAP	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	60.8	58.4	56.0	54.4	51.6	80.5	5.6
25	ANS	1.2	1 M ZnSO₄	39.6	36.0	34.2	32.8	29.6	72.9	0.4
26	ANS+oAP	0.8	1 M ZnSO₄	80.0	72.8	70.7	68.0	64.3	80.5	0.3
27	oAP	0.7	1 M ZnSO₄	58.9	51.7	48.1	45.5	42.3	69.7	0.4
28	DAN	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	52.5	47.6	45.5	43.1	39.8	−	−
29	DAN	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	57.6	51.6	49.5	46.4	41.6	81.7	−
30	DAN	1.5	1 M H₂SO₄	28.3	25.5	23.4	21.0	17.7	−	−
31	Triazine	0.2	1 M H₂SO₄	90.5	70.2	62.5	61.8	54.5	−	134.1
32	Triazine	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	101.3	83.5	77.7	75.1	67.8	93.3	77.2
33	Triazine	0.6	1 M H₂SO₄	70.8	58.8	53.0	50.4	46.9	−	76.0
34	Triazine	0.2	1 M ZnSO₄	50.2	46.2	43.9	40.8	33.6	−	76.3
35	Triazine	0.4	1 M ZnSO₄	57.6	49.3	46.3	40.5	31.1	85.5	34.5
36	Triazine	0.6	1 M ZnSO₄	45.4	39.0	33.8	28.5	22.9	−	24.4
37	Triazine	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	83.1	58.4	52.6	47.9	39.4	88.4	70.2
38	Triazine+oAP	1.0	1 M H₂SO₄	101.0	86.5	79.8	71.6	61.7	90.3	40.1
39	oAP	0.3	1 M H₂SO₄	61.3	49.7	44.9	39.6	31.6	77.5	23.2
40	Triazine	0.4	1 M ZnSO₄	46.2	37.6	32.9	25.2	17.4	86.3	20.8
41	Triazine+oAP	1.0	1 M ZnSO₄	74.9	62.3	55.9	47.3	29.4	88.1	26.0
42	oAP	0.3	1 M ZnSO₄	35.6	28.7	26.3	21.7	14.7	77.1	15.1
43	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.2	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	66.5	63.9	64.4	61.9	56.6	−	160.0
44	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.4	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	152.1	146.8	141.5	136.2	130.8	82.8	137.7
45	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.7	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	152.3	144.1	138.8	124.8	110.9	−	204.7
46	TPB	0.2	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	105.4	99.6	96.4	93.2	87.3	−	51.4
47	TPB	0.4	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	189.9	175.9	164.5	155.9	136.3	84.1	52.2
48	TPB	0.7	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	159.8	151.3	145.4	142.3	133.7	−	76.6
49	TAPT	0.3	2 M ZnSO₄	117.2	89.9	64.4	25.1	3.69	−	273.0
50	TAPT	0.7	2 M ZnSO₄	196.3	190.6	182.9	177.3	167.7	91.9	45.5
51	TAPT	1.0	2 M ZnSO₄	131.1	125.5	123.8	118.1	114.4	−	121.8

	Monomer	Loading /(mg·cm⁻²)	Electrolyte^*	C_s/(mA·h·g⁻¹)	C_s Retention /%	∂/Ω·s^−1/2·rad^1/2
*: “M”—mol/L.
1	Phen	1.2	1 M H₂SO₄	91.1	70.5	62.9	57.3	53.4	−	4.0
2	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	111.5	88.9	81.9	77.8	69.4	81.6	2.2
3	Phen	3.6	1 M H₂SO₄	103.2	87.2	80.0	76.7	67.8	−	1.1
4	Phen	5.0	1 M H₂SO₄	93.8	77.7	69.8	59.6	44.7	−	0.4
5	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	95.8	84.2	76.5	65.5	69.7	−	0.8
6	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	62.7	51.4	45.2	39.2	26.5	−	1.6
7	Phen	1.2	1 M KOH	138.0	70.8	54.9	49.5	38.6	−	5.6
8	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	91.7	87.2	82.9	78.1	73.5	75.4	3.0
9	Phen	3.6	1 M KOH	73.1	54.6	50.4	44.2	34.0	−	1.4
10	Phen	5.0	1 M KOH	67.8	50.7	34.5	17.8	3.8	−	0.9
11	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	54.6	48.0	45.6	40.1	34.7	−	4.3
12	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	41.2	30.4	28.2	24.0	10.5	−	6.4
13	Phen	1.2	1 M Na₂SO₄	23.9	21.5	19.1	16.8	13.6	−	−
14	Phen	1.8	1 M Na₂SO₄	44.7	39.6	35.1	29.9	21.6	69.1	−
15	Phen	3.6	1 M Na₂SO₄	33.3	23.2	18.5	13.0	6.3	−	−
16	Phen	5.0	1 M Na₂SO₄	11.7	5.81	3.68	1.76	0.2	−	−
17	ANS	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	34.6	28.1	25.9	20.9	17.7	−	3.8
18	ANS	1.4	1 M H₂SO₄	85.5	72.9	68.6	64.7	60.6	79.9	2.3
19	ANS	2.0	1 M H₂SO₄	66.5	54.6	44.8	38.5	28.7	−	1.1
20	ANS	1.4	1 M ZnSO₄	44.8	37.8	34.7	31.1	24.4	93.9	−
21	ANS	1.4	1 M (NH₄)₂SO₄	38.5	28.2	26.7	24.6	21.7	77.4	−
22	ANS	1.2	1 M H₂SO₄	75.6	67.2	63.6	60.0	56.2	73.9	1.3
23	ANS+oAP	0.8	1 M H₂SO₄	103.2	93.2	90.4	87.6	84.4	84.0	0.9
24	oAP	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	60.8	58.4	56.0	54.4	51.6	80.5	5.6
25	ANS	1.2	1 M ZnSO₄	39.6	36.0	34.2	32.8	29.6	72.9	0.4
26	ANS+oAP	0.8	1 M ZnSO₄	80.0	72.8	70.7	68.0	64.3	80.5	0.3
27	oAP	0.7	1 M ZnSO₄	58.9	51.7	48.1	45.5	42.3	69.7	0.4
28	DAN	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	52.5	47.6	45.5	43.1	39.8	−	−
29	DAN	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	57.6	51.6	49.5	46.4	41.6	81.7	−
30	DAN	1.5	1 M H₂SO₄	28.3	25.5	23.4	21.0	17.7	−	−
31	Triazine	0.2	1 M H₂SO₄	90.5	70.2	62.5	61.8	54.5	−	134.1
32	Triazine	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	101.3	83.5	77.7	75.1	67.8	93.3	77.2
33	Triazine	0.6	1 M H₂SO₄	70.8	58.8	53.0	50.4	46.9	−	76.0
34	Triazine	0.2	1 M ZnSO₄	50.2	46.2	43.9	40.8	33.6	−	76.3
35	Triazine	0.4	1 M ZnSO₄	57.6	49.3	46.3	40.5	31.1	85.5	34.5
36	Triazine	0.6	1 M ZnSO₄	45.4	39.0	33.8	28.5	22.9	−	24.4
37	Triazine	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	83.1	58.4	52.6	47.9	39.4	88.4	70.2
38	Triazine+oAP	1.0	1 M H₂SO₄	101.0	86.5	79.8	71.6	61.7	90.3	40.1
39	oAP	0.3	1 M H₂SO₄	61.3	49.7	44.9	39.6	31.6	77.5	23.2
40	Triazine	0.4	1 M ZnSO₄	46.2	37.6	32.9	25.2	17.4	86.3	20.8
41	Triazine+oAP	1.0	1 M ZnSO₄	74.9	62.3	55.9	47.3	29.4	88.1	26.0
42	oAP	0.3	1 M ZnSO₄	35.6	28.7	26.3	21.7	14.7	77.1	15.1
43	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.2	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	66.5	63.9	64.4	61.9	56.6	−	160.0
44	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.4	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	152.1	146.8	141.5	136.2	130.8	82.8	137.7
45	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.7	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	152.3	144.1	138.8	124.8	110.9	−	204.7
46	TPB	0.2	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	105.4	99.6	96.4	93.2	87.3	−	51.4
47	TPB	0.4	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	189.9	175.9	164.5	155.9	136.3	84.1	52.2
48	TPB	0.7	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	159.8	151.3	145.4	142.3	133.7	−	76.6
49	TAPT	0.3	2 M ZnSO₄	117.2	89.9	64.4	25.1	3.69	−	273.0
50	TAPT	0.7	2 M ZnSO₄	196.3	190.6	182.9	177.3	167.7	91.9	45.5
51	TAPT	1.0	2 M ZnSO₄	131.1	125.5	123.8	118.1	114.4	−	121.8

	Electrolyte^*	Electropolymerization method	Specific method
*: “M”—mol/L.
1	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
2	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
3	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
4	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
5	0.5 M H₃PO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
6	0.5 M p-toluenesulfonic acid + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
7	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
8	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
9	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
10	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
11	0.5 M H₃PO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
12	0.5 M p-toluenesulfonic acid + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
13	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
14	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
15	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
16	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
17	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
18	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
19	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
20	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
21	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
22	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
23	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
24	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
25	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
26	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
27	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
28	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 5 min
29	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 10 min
30	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 20 min
31	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
32	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
33	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 30 min
34	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
35	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
36	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 30 min
37	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
38	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
39	1 M H₂SO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
40	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
41	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
42	1 M H₂SO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
43	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
44	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
45	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min
46	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
47	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
48	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min
49	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
50	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
51	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min

	Electrolyte^*	Electropolymerization method	Specific method
*: “M”—mol/L.
1	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
2	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
3	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
4	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
5	0.5 M H₃PO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
6	0.5 M p-toluenesulfonic acid + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
7	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
8	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
9	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
10	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
11	0.5 M H₃PO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
12	0.5 M p-toluenesulfonic acid + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
13	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
14	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
15	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
16	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
17	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
18	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
19	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
20	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
21	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
22	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
23	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
24	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
25	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
26	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
27	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
28	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 5 min
29	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 10 min
30	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 20 min
31	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
32	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
33	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 30 min
34	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
35	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
36	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 30 min
37	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
38	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
39	1 M H₂SO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
40	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
41	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
42	1 M H₂SO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
43	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
44	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
45	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min
46	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
47	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
48	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min
49	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
50	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
51	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min

电化学聚合制备导电聚合物的水系储能性能数据集

PDF下载

朱波 ¹ , 卢欣宇 ² , 王超 ²^,^*

燃料化学学报（中英文） | 2026,54(7): 20250399-1437-20250399-1444

收起

燃料化学学报（中英文） 2026 , 54 (7) : 20250399-1437 -20250399-1444

电化学聚合制备导电聚合物的水系储能性能数据集

全屏

[Author(id=1309631254761399137, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, orderNo=0, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1309631254828508003, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, authorId=1309631254761399137, language=EN, stringName=Bo ZHU, firstName=Bo, middleName=null, lastName=ZHU, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=¹, address=¹School of Statistics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1309631254895616868, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, authorId=1309631254761399137, language=CN, stringName=朱波, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=¹, address=¹山西财经大学统计学院, 山西太原 030006, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1309631254597821274, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, xref=1, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309631254606209883, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, companyId=1309631254597821274, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=¹School of Statistics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309631254610404188, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, companyId=1309631254597821274, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=¹山西财经大学统计学院, 山西太原 030006)])]), Author(id=1309631254962725734, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, orderNo=1, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1309631255046611816, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, authorId=1309631254962725734, language=EN, stringName=Xinyu LU, firstName=Xinyu, middleName=null, lastName=LU, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=², address=²School of Renewable Energy, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Ordos 017010, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1309631255126303593, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, authorId=1309631254962725734, language=CN, stringName=卢欣宇, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=², address=²内蒙古工业大学新能源学院, 内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017010, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1309631254681707357, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, xref=2, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309631254690095966, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, companyId=1309631254681707357, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=²School of Renewable Energy, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Ordos 017010, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309631254698484575, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, companyId=1309631254681707357, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=²内蒙古工业大学新能源学院, 内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017010)])]), Author(id=1309631255193412459, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, orderNo=2, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=cwang@imut.edu.cn, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=1, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1309631255268909933, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, authorId=1309631255193412459, language=EN, stringName=Chao WANG, firstName=Chao, middleName=null, lastName=WANG, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=²^,^*, address=²School of Renewable Energy, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Ordos 017010, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1309631255369573230, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, authorId=1309631255193412459, language=CN, stringName=王超, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=²^,^*, address=²内蒙古工业大学新能源学院, 内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017010, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1309631254681707357, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, xref=2, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309631254690095966, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, companyId=1309631254681707357, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=²School of Renewable Energy, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Ordos 017010, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309631254698484575, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309631251007497037, companyId=1309631254681707357, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=²内蒙古工业大学新能源学院, 内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017010)])])]

朱波¹, 卢欣宇², 王超²^,^*

作者信息

¹山西财经大学统计学院, 山西太原 030006

²内蒙古工业大学新能源学院, 内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017010

通讯作者:

王超

A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes

Bo ZHU¹, Xinyu LU², Chao WANG²^,^*

Affiliations

¹School of Statistics, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China

²School of Renewable Energy, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Ordos 017010, China

Corresponding Author:

Tel: 15227479902, E-mail: cwang@imut.edu.cn

出版时间: 2026-07-10 doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60674-3

文章导航

摘要

收起

导电聚合物因其高导电性、环境友好性和柔韧性有望应用于水系离子电池。电化学聚合提供了一种在导电基底表面构建具有可控负载、形貌和结构的导电聚合物的便捷有效方法。本数据集比较了部分导电聚合物在水系电解质中的电化学储能性能。用于构建导电聚合物的单体包括1,10-菲咯啉、5-氨基-2-萘磺酸、邻氨基苯酚、1,5-二氨基萘、均三嗪及含多羰基亚氨基的芳香分子。研究其储能性能所用的电解质包含硫酸、硫酸锌、硫酸铵、氢氧化钾和三氟甲烷磺酸锌水溶液。通过活性物质质量归一化电流密度的恒电流充放电法，评估了这些电聚合薄膜的比容量。本数据集总容量为266 MB，包含490个文件，可为未来设计水系离子电池、超级电容器等电化学储能装置的电极材料提供参考。

关键词

导电聚合物 / 电化学聚合 / 水系电解液 / 芳香分子

Abstract

收起

Conducting polymers are promising candidates for aqueous ion batteries, owing to their high conductivity, environmental friendliness, and flexibility. Electropolymerization offers a facile route to construct conducting polymers at the surface of conductive substrates with controlled loading, morphology and structure. This dataset compares the electrochemical energy storage performance of some conducting polymers in aqueous electrolytes. Monomers to construct conducting polymers involve 1,10-phenanthroline, 5-amino-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, o-aminophenol, 1,5-diaminonapthalene, s-triazine, and some aromatic molecules with multiple carbonyl and imino groups. The electrolytes used to investigate the charge storage performance of these conducting polymers include aqueous sulfuric acid, zinc sulfate, ammonium sulfate, potassium hydroxide, and zinc trifluoromethanesulfonate solutions. Galvanostatic charge-discharge method at various active material mass-normalized current densities is used to evaluate the specific capacities of these conducting polymers. The total volume of this dataset is 266 MB with 490 files. This dataset can serve as the reference for the future design of electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage devices including aqueous ion batteries and supercapacitors.

Key words

conducting polymer / electropolymerization / aqueous electrolyte / aromatic molecules

引用本文

朱波, 卢欣宇, 王超. 电化学聚合制备导电聚合物的水系储能性能数据集. 燃料化学学报（中英文）, 2026 , 54 (7) : 20250399-1437 -20250399-1444 . DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60674-3

Bo ZHU, Xinyu LU, Chao WANG. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2026 , 54 (7) : 20250399-1437 -20250399-1444 . DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60674-3

正文

收起

Electrochemical energy storage devices are essential for a sustainable society depending on renewable energy sources. Conducting polymers feature high electron conductivity, structural tunability, flexibility, environmental benignity, and good processability, and are considered as promising candidates as the electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage devices^[1]. As the electrode materials for energy storage, conducting polymers can store charge through double-layer capacitance at the conducting polymer/electrolyte interface, and through the redox processes of the functional groups including amino/imino groups and hydroxyl/carbonyl groups in the structure. Besides, designing suitable functional groups to participate in the redox processes or to interact with ions in the electrolyte is a distinct advantage of conducting polymers compared to other types of electrode materials such as metal oxides and carbonaceous materials^[2]. However, the specific capacity and cycling stability of conducting polymers are lower compared to metal oxides^[3]. Therefore, designing conducting polymers with novel structure is essential in improving their charge storage performance.

Electropolymerization is a powerful tool to construct conducting polymers at the surface of conductive substrates^[4]. During electropolymerization, an external potential is applied to the electrolyte containing monomers, and radicals are generated at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The radicals can couple with another monomer or radical to form an oligomer. Repetitive generation of radicals and oligomers forms conducting polymers that are deposited at the electrode surface. As the rate of radical generation is closely related to the electrochemical method, the rate of polymer growth can be precisely controlled by the potential, current or other electrochemical parameters applied during electropolymerization. Till now, only molecules with aromatic rings can efficiently produce radicals and be electropolymerized.

This dataset reports the charge storage performance of several conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization of aromatic molecules including 1,10-phenanthroline, 5-amino-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, o-aminophenol, 1,5-diaminonaphthalene, s-triazine and some aromatic molecules with multiple carbonyl and imino groups (Figure 1). The data reported in this dataset can serve as the reference for the future design of conducting polymer electrode materials by electropolymerization or other methods.

1　Main part

收起

1.1　Data profile

Table 1 systematically summarizes the basic information of the dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for aqueous electrochemical energy storage, covering author’s information, data description, generation time, file formats, and access sources.

1.2　Data value

The demand for energy storage devices with high safety accelerates the research on the electrode materials that can store charge in aqueous electrolytes. The data provided in this dataset forms a good comparison regarding the conducting polymers for the electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes. Note that the conducting polymers are constructed with novel monomers (Figure 1) rather than the well-known monomers like aniline, thiophene, pyrrole, etc. Therefore, this dataset focuses on the conducting polymers with novel structures, and investigates the influence of active mass loading and monomer structure on the charge storage performance (specific capacity, rate capability and cycling stability, Table 2).

The conducting polymers are all synthesized using the electropolymerization method. Users can use the data to compare the specific capacity, rate performance, and cycling stability of the conducting polymer-based materials with different structures or with different loadings. The format of data includes .bin (original data file generated using CHI software), .opj (Origin project file), .txt (text file), .csv, .xlsx, (spreadsheet file), and .par, .pbsd (original data file generated using PARSTAT software), which can be easily plotted to compare with users’ experimental results. Through charge storage performance comparison, reasons for inferior or superior charge storage performance in aqueous electrolytes can be inferred to aid the design of novel conducing polymers for electrochemical energy storage.

1.3　Data generation method or process

The CHI660E and PARSTAT MC potentiostats are adopted to generate the experimental data, along with the software developed by these companies. The as-acquired experimental data is stored in the format of .bin .par, or .psbd. Electropolymerization is carried out using the galvanostatic method or potentiostatic method. Table 3 summarizes the electropolymerization method for each sample. The electrolyte for electropolymerization usually contains 2−6 mmol/L monomer in aqueous H₂SO₄ or HClO₄. Three-electrode setup is used to carry out the electropolymerization, with a carbon paper or carbon cloth as the working electrode (1 cm² immersed in the electrolyte), a cleaned graphite rod as the counter electrode, and a saturated calomel electrode as the reference electrode. After the electropolymerization process is done, the working electrode is rinsed thoroughly with water and dried in air. The active material loading is acquired by weighing the working electrode before and after the electropolymerization using a laboratory balance, and the mass increase after electropolymerization is determined as the mass of the active material.

The charge storage performance is evaluated using a three-electrode setup, with the electrode with conducting polymers as the working electrode, a cleaned graphite rod as the counter electrode, and a saturated calomel electrode as the reference electrode. The electrolytes used to evaluate the charge storage performance are 1 mol/L H₂SO₄, 1 mol/L or 2 mol/L ZnSO₄, 1 mol/L (NH₄)₂SO₄, 1 mol/L KOH, or 2 mol/L Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂. The energy storage performance is evaluated using GCD method at different active material mass-normalized current densities (1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 A/g) in the potential window where no significant electrolyte decomposition happens. Approximately 1 cm² of the working electrode is immersed in the electrolyte. The specific capacity (C_s, mAh/g) is calculated from the discharge branch of the GCD curve by Equation (1).

$ \mathit{C} _{ \mathrm{s}} \mathrm= \mathit{It} \mathrm{/} \mathit{m} $

(1)

where I (mA) is the discharge current, t (h) is the discharge time, and m (g) is the mass of active material on the electrode. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is recorded in the frequency range of 10⁵ to 0.01 Hz under the potential amplitude of 5 mV at 0 V. The slope of Z’ against the ω^−0.5 (unit: rad^−0.5·s^0.5) gives the Warburg factor (∂), which is related to the impedance of ion diffusion.

1.4　Data sample description

The data provided in this database includes GCD, CV, C_s versus cycle number and electrochemical impedance data. For Samples 1−16, monomer used is Phen. Different loadings of polyPhen are achieved by altering the duration of electropolymerization^[1]. Samples 5 and 11 are prepared by electropolymerization in H₃PO₄, and consequently phosphate ions are likely intercalated into the polyPhen. Samples 6 and 12 are prepared by electrodeposition in p-toluenesulfonic acid, and p-toluenesulfonate ions are expected to be intercalated into the polyPhen. Samples 17 – 21 are synthesized using the monomer ANS with different electropolymerization durations^[2]. Samples 22−27 compare the copolymer synthesized with two monomers during electropolymerization with the homopolymers^[4]. Samples 28−30 are synthesized using monomer DAN with different electropolymerization durations^[3]. Samples 31−42 are synthesized based on s-triazine, and compare the electropolymerization duration and forming copolymer to the charge storage performance^[5−6]. Samples 43−51 deal with the electropolymerization of three aromatic molecules containing multiple carbonyl and amino groups^[7−8].

The electrolytes used to investigate the charge storage performance of these polymers can be divided into acidic, neutral and basic. Most of the conducting polymers are not stable in base, except for polyPhen. Therefore, data acquired in 1 mol/L KOH is provided only for polyPhen (Samples 7−12). For the acidic electrolyte, as the ions from the electrolyte can affect the charge storage performance, electrolytes with different cations are used including H⁺, Zn²⁺ and

${\mathrm{NH}}_4^+ $

. In some cases, the Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂ is selected. This is because that for Samples 43−48, higher charge storage performance is achieved in Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂ compared to ZnSO₄. The exact reason for this phenomenon is unknown, and is probably resulted from the higher ionic conductivity, favorable solvation structure, and improved interfacial kinetics of the Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂ compared to those of ZnSO₄ electrolytes.

The electrochemical method used is mainly galvanostatic method at relatively large current densities. Due to the unique structure of these monomers, usually a high potential is required to generate radicals and to initiate the polymerization process. Also, the kinetics of polymerization process is slow, and using CV cannot generate significant amounts of polymers in a short period. Therefore, galvanostatic method is primarily used in synthesizing these polymers. From Table 2, some preliminary conclusions can be generated regarding the influence of electropolymerization method to charge storage properties. Short electropolymerization duration is insufficient to generate significant amounts of active sites, which leads to relatively low C_s. However, prolonged electropolymerization would generate significant amounts of polymers at the electrode surface, that limit the electron conductivity and ion diffusion, and subsequently entail inferior C_s. Therefore, an optimum galvanostatic polymerization duration exists, depending on the structure of the monomer.

In addition, the cycling stability of some of the conducing polymers is provided. Note that for a series of conducting polymers constructed using the same monomer, the cycling stability data is provided only for the sample with the highest C_s (Samples 2, 8, 14, 18, etc.). For the samples where no stability data is provided, inferior cycling stability is implied.

Conducting polymers exhibit charge storage properties owing to the exposed specific surface area and redox active sites. As the electropolymerization often generates relatively thin and compact layer of conducting film at the electrode surface, the double layer capacitance contribution is small. Therefore, the amounts and the structure of redox active sites contribute to the C_s prevalently. By designing molecules with multiple redox active sites like carbonyl and amino groups, the C_s is expected to increase. This could account for the higher C_s of the polyTAPT, poly(DHPQ-Tetrone), and poly(TPB). For each of these monomers, maximum 8−10 electrons can be transferred from the fully reduced state to the fully oxidized state. Therefore, higher C_s is expected for polyTAPT, poly(DHPQ-Tetrone), and poly(TPB).

Comparison of some samples with literature reported electropolymerized conducting polymers is shown in Figure 2. The comparison is made using the recently reported GCD data at 1 A/g. Monomers used for electropolymerization include 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT)^[9], aniline^[10−11], 2,5-dihydroxy aniline^[12], 8-amino-2-naphthol^[13], menadione^[14], 2,7-diazopyrene-4,5,9,10-tetraone^[15], thionine^[16], DAN^[17], pyrrole^[18] and redox-active quinone-based porous organic polymer (rPOP)^[19]. The samples reported here are among the highest C_s reported to date.

1.5　Data quality

To ensure the reliability and repeatability of sample preparation, all these samples are synthesized at least three times, and the electrochemical data is tested using different batches of samples. The results reported are the average specific capacities of the conducting polymers. Limited by the experimental errors of the electrochemical methods, all data exhibits less than 5% standard deviation. Besides, the optimum samples exhibit less than 3% standard deviation. The reference electrode potential is calibrated against a new saturated calomel electrode before and after each test.

1.6　Data usage methods and suggestion

It is recommended that when using these data, users should identify the synthetic method before making a fair comparison. All the conducting polymers reported in this dataset are synthesized using electropolymerization method, that are strongly adherent to the surface of conductive substrate, and that are often dense and non-porous. Another important synthetic method of conducting polymers is the chemical polymerization, which can generate conducting polymer nanostructures with relatively high specific surface area, and which requires conductive additives and binders to attach to the substrate surface. Also, the loading of the active material should be taken into account when comparing these data. The C_s of the conducting polymers are weakly dependent on the loading till reaching a threshold (usually 4−5 mg/cm²), beyond which a dramatic decrease in C_s is observed, possibly caused by the poor conductivity of thick films. Besides, when comparing data generated from other sources, be careful about the test temperature, electrolyte, and the composition. The data provided in .bin and .par format is directly generated without any post-treatment.

2　Conclusion

收起

A database of the electrochemical energy storage performance of a series of conducting polymers is constructed based on experimental results. The conducting polymers are synthesized using electropolymerization method from monomer-containing electrolytes. Key charge storage parameters can be acquired using the data provided, and are summarized. The influence of conducting polymer structure and electrolyte to the C_s can be inferred from this data set. Also, the rate capability and cycling stability of some conducting polymers are provided. This dataset forms a reference on the electrochemical charge storage in aqueous electrolytes of these conducting polymers with novel structures. This could aid the future design of conducting polymer electrode materials with high C_s and stability for aqueous ion storage.

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

WANG C, ZHOU Z, TIAN Q, et al. Electropolymerized 1, 10-phenanthroline as the electrode material for aqueous supercapacitors[J]. Chem Eng J, 2022, 433: 134483.

TIAN Y, YANG Y, WU Y, et al. Electropolymerization of 5-amino-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid and their application as the electrode material for supercapacitors[J]. J Energy Storage, 2023, 72: 108308.

LAI X, DANG Z, WANG L, et al. Electropolymerization of 1, 5-diaminonaphthalene in water-in-reline electrolyte as supercapacitor electrode material[J]. J Energy Storage, 2024, 91: 112032.

WANG C, YANG Y, ZHOU Z, et al. Electrodeposited poly (5-amino-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid-co-o-aminophenol) as the electrode material for flexible supercapacitor[J]. Small, 2024, 20(8): 2305994.

BAI X, LAN B, LI X, et al. Fabrication of poly (s-triazine-co-o-aminophenol) conducting polymer via electropolymerization and its application in aqueous charge storage[J]. Polymers, 2025, 17(9): 1160.

PEI S, LAN B, BAI X, et al. Electropolymerization of s-triazines and their charge storage performance in aqueous acidic electrolytes[J]. Polymers, 2024, 16(23): 3266.

WANG D, BAI Y-X, ZHOU Z-X, et al. Towards ultra-stable aqueous zinc-ion batteries via electrochemical polymerization of phthalimido-anchored benzoquinone[J]. Green Chem, 2025, 27(20): 5832−5843.

WANG C, BAI Y, CAO W, et al. Electropolymerization of tetraaminophenazine tetraone as the electrode material for aqueous zinc-ion batteries[J]. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2025, 7(17): 11851−11859.

TRAN C B, OTERO T F, TRAVAS-SEJDIC J, et al. A comparison of poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polymerized potentiostatically and galvanostatically[J]. Synth Met, 2023, 299: 117466.

WU W, LIN Z, SHI H-Y, et al. Realizing the leucoemeraldine-emeraldine-pernigraniline redox reactions in polyaniline cathode materials for aqueous zinc-polymer batteries[J]. Chem Eng J, 2022, 427: 131988.

RATHNAYAKE D T, KARUNADASA K S P, WIJEKOON A S K, et al. Polyaniline-conjugated graphite–montmorillonite composite electrode prepared by in situ electropolymerization for supercapacitor applications[J]. Chem Pap, 2023, 77(5): 2923−2928.

RANKA P, CHANDRA V. Mechanistic insights into the nucleation and growth of poly (2, 5-dihydroxy aniline) films shaped by scan rates and its impact on their charge capacity[J]. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 2025, 7(19): 12939−12951.

LI Y, ZHANG M, LU H, et al. Boosting high-performance aqueous zinc-ion hybrid capacitors via organic redox species on laser-induced graphene network[J]. Adv Funct Mater, 2024, 34(34): 2400663.

LI S, ZHANG G, LI Q, et al. A facile self-saturation process enabling the stable cycling of a small molecule menaquinone cathode in aqueous zinc batteries[J]. Chem Sci, 2024, 15(43): 17971−17978.

LI F, ZHA Z, ZHANG W, et al. In-situ electropolymerization constructed super durable and highly adaptable pyrene-4, 5, 9, 10-tetraone-based organic cathode for aqueous zinc-ion batteries [J]. Chem Eng J, 2025: 169103.

ZHAN S, WANG C, ZHONG L, et al. Insight into anionic discrepancies in bipolar poly (thionine) organic cathodes for aqueous zinc ion batteries[J]. Small, 2024, 20(45): 2402767.

PAN K, XIE Y, HU Q, et al. Electropolymerization of 1, 5-naphthalenediamine monomers and redox activity in aqueous zinc batteries[J]. Mater Lett, 2022, 311: 131588.

XIAO L, LI Y, CHEN Q, et al. Cauliflower-like polypyrrole@ stainless steel yarn electrode for fibrous zinc-ion hybrid supercapacitor[J]. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron, 2025, 36(10): 1−11.

BUYUKCAKIR O, YUKSEL R, BEGAR F, et al. Ultralong-life quinone-based porous organic polymer cathode for high-performance aqueous zinc-ion batteries[J]. ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2023, 6(14): 7672−7680.

2026年第54卷第7期

PDF下载

122

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60674-3

接收时间：2025-12-10
首发时间：2026-09-23
出版时间：2026-07-10

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-12-10
修回日期：2026-01-04
录用日期：2026-01-19

基金

作者信息

¹山西财经大学统计学院, 山西太原 030006

²内蒙古工业大学新能源学院, 内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017010

通讯作者:

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rlhxxb/CN/10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60674-3

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Data title (V0.1)	A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes
Author’s name	ZHU Bo, LU Xinyu, WANG Chao
Corresponding author’s name	WANG Chao
Data content description	This dataset contains the experimental results of a series of conducting polymers prepared by electropolymerization of aromatic molecules for the electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes. Galvanostatic and potentiostatic methods are adopted during electropolymerization. The energy storage performance of these conducting polymers is evaluated using galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) method at different active material mass-normalized current densities (1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 A/g) in the potential window where no significant electrolyte decomposition happens. Three-electrode setup at room temperature is adopted, and the reference electrode is a saturated calomel electrode. The counter electrode is a graphite rod. The electrolyte is 1 mol/L H₂SO₄, 1 mol/L or 2 mol/L ZnSO₄, 1 mol/L (NH₄)₂SO₄, 1 mol/L KOH, or 2 mol/L Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂. The experimental results of the cyclic voltammetry (CV) and impedance spectroscopy of some conducting polymers are also included.
Data generation time	2022−2025
Data volume	266 MB
Data format	.csv, .bin, .txt, .opj, .par, .psbd, .xlsx
Data source location	https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.33244 https://cstr.cn/31253.11.sciencedb.33244
Citation format of data	ZHU Bo, LU Xinyu, WANG Chao. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemicalenergy storage in aqueous electrolytes[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2026, 54(7): 20250399. WANG Chao. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemicalenergy storage in aqueous electrolytes[DS/OL]. https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.33244. DOI:10.57760/sciencedb.33244.

Data title (V0.1)

A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes

Author’s name

ZHU Bo, LU Xinyu, WANG Chao

Corresponding author’s name

WANG Chao

Data content description

This dataset contains the experimental results of a series of conducting polymers prepared by electropolymerization of aromatic molecules for the electrochemical energy storage in aqueous electrolytes. Galvanostatic and potentiostatic methods are adopted during electropolymerization. The energy storage performance of these conducting polymers is evaluated using galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD) method at different active material mass-normalized current densities (1, 2, 3, 5 and 10 A/g) in the potential window where no significant electrolyte decomposition happens. Three-electrode setup at room temperature is adopted, and the reference electrode is a saturated calomel electrode. The counter electrode is a graphite rod. The electrolyte is 1 mol/L H₂SO₄, 1 mol/L or 2 mol/L ZnSO₄, 1 mol/L (NH₄)₂SO₄, 1 mol/L KOH, or 2 mol/L Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂. The experimental results of the cyclic voltammetry (CV) and impedance spectroscopy of some conducting polymers are also included.

Data generation time

2022−2025

Data volume

266 MB

Data format

.csv, .bin, .txt, .opj, .par, .psbd, .xlsx

Data source location

https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.33244
https://cstr.cn/31253.11.sciencedb.33244

Citation format of data

ZHU Bo, LU Xinyu, WANG Chao. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemicalenergy storage in aqueous electrolytes[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2026, 54(7): 20250399.
WANG Chao. A dataset of conducting polymers synthesized by electropolymerization for electrochemicalenergy storage in aqueous electrolytes[DS/OL]. https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.33244. DOI:10.57760/sciencedb.33244.

	Monomer	Loading /(mg·cm⁻²)	Electrolyte^*	C_s/(mA·h·g⁻¹)	C_s Retention /%	∂/Ω·s^−1/2·rad^1/2
*: “M”—mol/L.
1	Phen	1.2	1 M H₂SO₄	91.1	70.5	62.9	57.3	53.4	−	4.0
2	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	111.5	88.9	81.9	77.8	69.4	81.6	2.2
3	Phen	3.6	1 M H₂SO₄	103.2	87.2	80.0	76.7	67.8	−	1.1
4	Phen	5.0	1 M H₂SO₄	93.8	77.7	69.8	59.6	44.7	−	0.4
5	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	95.8	84.2	76.5	65.5	69.7	−	0.8
6	Phen	1.8	1 M H₂SO₄	62.7	51.4	45.2	39.2	26.5	−	1.6
7	Phen	1.2	1 M KOH	138.0	70.8	54.9	49.5	38.6	−	5.6
8	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	91.7	87.2	82.9	78.1	73.5	75.4	3.0
9	Phen	3.6	1 M KOH	73.1	54.6	50.4	44.2	34.0	−	1.4
10	Phen	5.0	1 M KOH	67.8	50.7	34.5	17.8	3.8	−	0.9
11	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	54.6	48.0	45.6	40.1	34.7	−	4.3
12	Phen	1.8	1 M KOH	41.2	30.4	28.2	24.0	10.5	−	6.4
13	Phen	1.2	1 M Na₂SO₄	23.9	21.5	19.1	16.8	13.6	−	−
14	Phen	1.8	1 M Na₂SO₄	44.7	39.6	35.1	29.9	21.6	69.1	−
15	Phen	3.6	1 M Na₂SO₄	33.3	23.2	18.5	13.0	6.3	−	−
16	Phen	5.0	1 M Na₂SO₄	11.7	5.81	3.68	1.76	0.2	−	−
17	ANS	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	34.6	28.1	25.9	20.9	17.7	−	3.8
18	ANS	1.4	1 M H₂SO₄	85.5	72.9	68.6	64.7	60.6	79.9	2.3
19	ANS	2.0	1 M H₂SO₄	66.5	54.6	44.8	38.5	28.7	−	1.1
20	ANS	1.4	1 M ZnSO₄	44.8	37.8	34.7	31.1	24.4	93.9	−
21	ANS	1.4	1 M (NH₄)₂SO₄	38.5	28.2	26.7	24.6	21.7	77.4	−
22	ANS	1.2	1 M H₂SO₄	75.6	67.2	63.6	60.0	56.2	73.9	1.3
23	ANS+oAP	0.8	1 M H₂SO₄	103.2	93.2	90.4	87.6	84.4	84.0	0.9
24	oAP	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	60.8	58.4	56.0	54.4	51.6	80.5	5.6
25	ANS	1.2	1 M ZnSO₄	39.6	36.0	34.2	32.8	29.6	72.9	0.4
26	ANS+oAP	0.8	1 M ZnSO₄	80.0	72.8	70.7	68.0	64.3	80.5	0.3
27	oAP	0.7	1 M ZnSO₄	58.9	51.7	48.1	45.5	42.3	69.7	0.4
28	DAN	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	52.5	47.6	45.5	43.1	39.8	−	−
29	DAN	0.7	1 M H₂SO₄	57.6	51.6	49.5	46.4	41.6	81.7	−
30	DAN	1.5	1 M H₂SO₄	28.3	25.5	23.4	21.0	17.7	−	−
31	Triazine	0.2	1 M H₂SO₄	90.5	70.2	62.5	61.8	54.5	−	134.1
32	Triazine	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	101.3	83.5	77.7	75.1	67.8	93.3	77.2
33	Triazine	0.6	1 M H₂SO₄	70.8	58.8	53.0	50.4	46.9	−	76.0
34	Triazine	0.2	1 M ZnSO₄	50.2	46.2	43.9	40.8	33.6	−	76.3
35	Triazine	0.4	1 M ZnSO₄	57.6	49.3	46.3	40.5	31.1	85.5	34.5
36	Triazine	0.6	1 M ZnSO₄	45.4	39.0	33.8	28.5	22.9	−	24.4
37	Triazine	0.4	1 M H₂SO₄	83.1	58.4	52.6	47.9	39.4	88.4	70.2
38	Triazine+oAP	1.0	1 M H₂SO₄	101.0	86.5	79.8	71.6	61.7	90.3	40.1
39	oAP	0.3	1 M H₂SO₄	61.3	49.7	44.9	39.6	31.6	77.5	23.2
40	Triazine	0.4	1 M ZnSO₄	46.2	37.6	32.9	25.2	17.4	86.3	20.8
41	Triazine+oAP	1.0	1 M ZnSO₄	74.9	62.3	55.9	47.3	29.4	88.1	26.0
42	oAP	0.3	1 M ZnSO₄	35.6	28.7	26.3	21.7	14.7	77.1	15.1
43	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.2	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	66.5	63.9	64.4	61.9	56.6	−	160.0
44	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.4	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	152.1	146.8	141.5	136.2	130.8	82.8	137.7
45	DHPQ-Tetrone	0.7	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	152.3	144.1	138.8	124.8	110.9	−	204.7
46	TPB	0.2	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	105.4	99.6	96.4	93.2	87.3	−	51.4
47	TPB	0.4	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	189.9	175.9	164.5	155.9	136.3	84.1	52.2
48	TPB	0.7	2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂	159.8	151.3	145.4	142.3	133.7	−	76.6
49	TAPT	0.3	2 M ZnSO₄	117.2	89.9	64.4	25.1	3.69	−	273.0
50	TAPT	0.7	2 M ZnSO₄	196.3	190.6	182.9	177.3	167.7	91.9	45.5
51	TAPT	1.0	2 M ZnSO₄	131.1	125.5	123.8	118.1	114.4	−	121.8

Monomer

Loading
/(mg·cm⁻²)

Electrolyte^*

C_s/(mA·h·g⁻¹)

C_s Retention
/%

∂/Ω·s^−1/2·rad^1/2

1/(A·g⁻¹)

2/(A·g⁻¹)

3/(A·g⁻¹)

5/(A·g⁻¹)

10/(A·g⁻¹)

*: “M”—mol/L.

Phen

1.2

1 M H₂SO₄

91.1

70.5

62.9

57.3

53.4

−

4.0

Phen

1.8

1 M H₂SO₄

111.5

88.9

81.9

77.8

69.4

81.6

2.2

Phen

3.6

1 M H₂SO₄

103.2

87.2

80.0

76.7

67.8

−

1.1

Phen

5.0

1 M H₂SO₄

93.8

77.7

69.8

59.6

44.7

−

0.4

Phen

1.8

1 M H₂SO₄

95.8

84.2

76.5

65.5

69.7

−

0.8

Phen

1.8

1 M H₂SO₄

62.7

51.4

45.2

39.2

26.5

−

1.6

Phen

1.2

1 M KOH

138.0

70.8

54.9

49.5

38.6

−

5.6

Phen

1.8

1 M KOH

91.7

87.2

82.9

78.1

73.5

75.4

3.0

Phen

3.6

1 M KOH

73.1

54.6

50.4

44.2

34.0

−

1.4

Phen

5.0

1 M KOH

67.8

50.7

34.5

17.8

3.8

−

0.9

Phen

1.8

1 M KOH

54.6

48.0

45.6

40.1

34.7

−

4.3

Phen

1.8

1 M KOH

41.2

30.4

28.2

24.0

10.5

−

6.4

Phen

1.2

1 M Na₂SO₄

23.9

21.5

19.1

16.8

13.6

−

Phen

1.8

1 M Na₂SO₄

44.7

39.6

35.1

29.9

21.6

69.1

−

Phen

3.6

1 M Na₂SO₄

33.3

23.2

18.5

13.0

6.3

−

Phen

5.0

1 M Na₂SO₄

11.7

5.81

3.68

1.76

0.2

−

ANS

0.7

1 M H₂SO₄

34.6

28.1

25.9

20.9

17.7

−

3.8

ANS

1.4

1 M H₂SO₄

85.5

72.9

68.6

64.7

60.6

79.9

2.3

ANS

2.0

1 M H₂SO₄

66.5

54.6

44.8

38.5

28.7

−

1.1

ANS

1.4

1 M ZnSO₄

44.8

37.8

34.7

31.1

24.4

93.9

−

ANS

1.4

1 M (NH₄)₂SO₄

38.5

28.2

26.7

24.6

21.7

77.4

−

ANS

1.2

1 M H₂SO₄

75.6

67.2

63.6

60.0

56.2

73.9

1.3

ANS+oAP

0.8

1 M H₂SO₄

103.2

93.2

90.4

87.6

84.4

84.0

0.9

oAP

0.7

1 M H₂SO₄

60.8

58.4

56.0

54.4

51.6

80.5

5.6

ANS

1.2

1 M ZnSO₄

39.6

36.0

34.2

32.8

29.6

72.9

0.4

ANS+oAP

0.8

1 M ZnSO₄

80.0

72.8

70.7

68.0

64.3

80.5

0.3

oAP

0.7

1 M ZnSO₄

58.9

51.7

48.1

45.5

42.3

69.7

0.4

DAN

0.4

1 M H₂SO₄

52.5

47.6

45.5

43.1

39.8

−

DAN

0.7

1 M H₂SO₄

57.6

51.6

49.5

46.4

41.6

81.7

−

DAN

1.5

1 M H₂SO₄

28.3

25.5

23.4

21.0

17.7

−

Triazine

0.2

1 M H₂SO₄

90.5

70.2

62.5

61.8

54.5

−

134.1

Triazine

0.4

1 M H₂SO₄

101.3

83.5

77.7

75.1

67.8

93.3

77.2

Triazine

0.6

1 M H₂SO₄

70.8

58.8

53.0

50.4

46.9

−

76.0

Triazine

0.2

1 M ZnSO₄

50.2

46.2

43.9

40.8

33.6

−

76.3

Triazine

0.4

1 M ZnSO₄

57.6

49.3

46.3

40.5

31.1

85.5

34.5

Triazine

0.6

1 M ZnSO₄

45.4

39.0

33.8

28.5

22.9

−

24.4

Triazine

0.4

1 M H₂SO₄

83.1

58.4

52.6

47.9

39.4

88.4

70.2

Triazine+oAP

1.0

1 M H₂SO₄

101.0

86.5

79.8

71.6

61.7

90.3

40.1

oAP

0.3

1 M H₂SO₄

61.3

49.7

44.9

39.6

31.6

77.5

23.2

Triazine

0.4

1 M ZnSO₄

46.2

37.6

32.9

25.2

17.4

86.3

20.8

Triazine+oAP

1.0

1 M ZnSO₄

74.9

62.3

55.9

47.3

29.4

88.1

26.0

oAP

0.3

1 M ZnSO₄

35.6

28.7

26.3

21.7

14.7

77.1

15.1

DHPQ-Tetrone

0.2

2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂

66.5

63.9

64.4

61.9

56.6

−

160.0

DHPQ-Tetrone

0.4

2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂

152.1

146.8

141.5

136.2

130.8

82.8

137.7

DHPQ-Tetrone

0.7

2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂

152.3

144.1

138.8

124.8

110.9

−

204.7

TPB

0.2

2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂

105.4

99.6

96.4

93.2

87.3

−

51.4

TPB

0.4

2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂

189.9

175.9

164.5

155.9

136.3

84.1

52.2

TPB

0.7

2 M Zn(CF₃SO₃)₂

159.8

151.3

145.4

142.3

133.7

−

76.6

TAPT

0.3

2 M ZnSO₄

117.2

89.9

64.4

25.1

3.69

−

273.0

TAPT

0.7

2 M ZnSO₄

196.3

190.6

182.9

177.3

167.7

91.9

45.5

TAPT

1.0

2 M ZnSO₄

131.1

125.5

123.8

118.1

114.4

−

121.8

	Electrolyte^*	Electropolymerization method	Specific method
*: “M”—mol/L.
1	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
2	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
3	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
4	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
5	0.5 M H₃PO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
6	0.5 M p-toluenesulfonic acid + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
7	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
8	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
9	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
10	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
11	0.5 M H₃PO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
12	0.5 M p-toluenesulfonic acid + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
13	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
14	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
15	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
16	0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen	Galvanostatic	0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
17	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
18	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
19	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
20	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
21	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
22	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
23	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
24	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
25	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
26	0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
27	0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min
28	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 5 min
29	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 10 min
30	Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O	Potentiostatic	0.8 V vs. SCE for 20 min
31	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
32	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
33	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 30 min
34	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 10 min
35	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min
36	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 30 min
37	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
38	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
39	1 M H₂SO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
40	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
41	1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
42	1 M H₂SO₄ + 2 mM oAP	Galvanostatic	0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min
43	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
44	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
45	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min
46	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
47	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
48	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min
49	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min
50	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min
51	0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT	Galvanostatic	0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min

Electrolyte^*

Electropolymerization method

Specific method

*: “M”—mol/L.

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min

0.5 M H₃PO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

0.5 M p-toluenesulfonic acid + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min

0.5 M H₃PO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

0.5 M p-toluenesulfonic acid + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 10 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.5 M H₂SO₄ + 6 mM Phen

Galvanostatic

0.05 A·cm⁻² for 60 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 60 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM ANS

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS + 2 mM oAP

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM oAP

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 5 mM ANS + 2 mM oAP

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

0.1 M HClO₄ + 2 mM oAP

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 40 min

Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O

Potentiostatic

0.8 V vs. SCE for 5 min

Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O

Potentiostatic

0.8 V vs. SCE for 10 min

Reline + 30 mM DAN + 10% H₂O

Potentiostatic

0.8 V vs. SCE for 20 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 10 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 30 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 10 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 20 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 30 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine + 2 mM oAP

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 2 mM oAP

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM Triazine + 2 mM oAP

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min

1 M H₂SO₄ + 2 mM oAP

Galvanostatic

0.01 A·cm⁻² for 15 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM DHPQ-Tetrone

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TPB

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 60 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 120 min

0.1 M H₂SO₄ + 5 mM TAPT

Galvanostatic

0.02 A·cm⁻² for 180 min