燃料化学学报（中英文）

Sample	x_a/%	x_b/%	d	s_a/%
d=100%×(x_a−x_b/x_a).
PtZn/TS	4.4	0	−	98.5
PtZn/TS-0.05	9.5	1.2	87.4	98.7
PtZn/TS-0.15	34.2	21.7	36.5	99.6
PtZn/TS-0.25	21.8	6.8	68.8	99.3

Sample

x_a/%

x_b/%

s_a/%

d=100%×(x_a−x_b/x_a).

PtZn/TS

4.4

−

98.5

PtZn/TS-0.05

9.5

1.2

87.4

98.7

PtZn/TS-0.15

34.2

21.7

36.5

99.6

PtZn/TS-0.25

21.8

6.8

68.8

99.3

Sample	x_a/%	x_b/%	d	s_a/%
d=100%×(x_a−x_b/x_a).
PtZn/TS	4.4	0	−	98.5
PtZn/TS-0.05	9.5	1.2	87.4	98.7
PtZn/TS-0.15	34.2	21.7	36.5	99.6
PtZn/TS-0.25	21.8	6.8	68.8	99.3

Sample

x_a/%

x_b/%

s_a/%

d=100%×(x_a−x_b/x_a).

PtZn/TS

4.4

−

98.5

PtZn/TS-0.05

9.5

1.2

87.4

98.7

PtZn/TS-0.15

34.2

21.7

36.5

99.6

PtZn/TS-0.25

21.8

6.8

68.8

99.3

Catalyst	t/°C	Feed composition	x_a/%	s_a/%	WHSV/h⁻¹	Active site	Reference
x_a: Initial conversion (%); s_a: Initial selectivity (%).
Pt/Zn-MSN	590	C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶2	51.3	98.7	4.7	Pt	[27]
ZnPt/HZSM-5	525	C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶19	43.0	93.0	2	Pt-Zn synergism	[23]
PtZn/SiO₂	600	C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1	48.5	96.0	4	PtZn₄	[28]
PtZn@S-1-Fin	600	Pure C₃H₈	48.3	97.1	12	Pt-Zn clusters	[29]
PtZn@S-1	600	C₃H₈∶H₂∶N₂=1∶1∶2	46.6	99.0	5.9	Pt-Zn alloy	[24]
PtZn/SP-S-1	580	Pure C₃H₈	40.0	98.5	15	Pt	[18]
PtZn@S-1	550	C₃H₈∶N₂=11∶19	45.3	99.0	6.5	PtZn clusters	[30]
PtZnALD/SiO₂	600	C₃H₈∶He=1∶4	53.0	97.0	23.6	Pt₁Zn₁	[31]
PtZnO/Al₂O₃	600	C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1	35.0	97.0	3	Zn²⁺	[32]
Pt-Zn/TS-0.15	600	C₃H₈∶Ar=4∶6	34.2	99.6	12	Pt	this work

Catalyst

t/°C

Feed composition

x_a/%

s_a/%

WHSV/h⁻¹

Active site

Reference

x_a: Initial conversion (%); s_a: Initial selectivity (%).

Pt/Zn-MSN

590

C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶2

51.3

98.7

4.7

[27]

ZnPt/HZSM-5

525

C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶19

43.0

93.0

Pt-Zn synergism

[23]

PtZn/SiO₂

600

C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1

48.5

96.0

PtZn₄

[28]

PtZn@S-1-Fin

600

Pure C₃H₈

48.3

97.1

Pt-Zn clusters

[29]

PtZn@S-1

600

C₃H₈∶H₂∶N₂=1∶1∶2

46.6

99.0

5.9

Pt-Zn alloy

[24]

PtZn/SP-S-1

580

Pure C₃H₈

40.0

98.5

[18]

PtZn@S-1

550

C₃H₈∶N₂=11∶19

45.3

99.0

6.5

PtZn clusters

[30]

PtZnALD/SiO₂

600

C₃H₈∶He=1∶4

53.0

97.0

23.6

Pt₁Zn₁

[31]

PtZnO/Al₂O₃

600

C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1

35.0

97.0

Zn²⁺

[32]

Pt-Zn/TS-0.15

600

C₃H₈∶Ar=4∶6

34.2

99.6

this work

Catalyst	t/°C	Feed composition	x_a/%	s_a/%	WHSV/h⁻¹	Active site	Reference
x_a: Initial conversion (%); s_a: Initial selectivity (%).
Pt/Zn-MSN	590	C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶2	51.3	98.7	4.7	Pt	[27]
ZnPt/HZSM-5	525	C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶19	43.0	93.0	2	Pt-Zn synergism	[23]
PtZn/SiO₂	600	C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1	48.5	96.0	4	PtZn₄	[28]
PtZn@S-1-Fin	600	Pure C₃H₈	48.3	97.1	12	Pt-Zn clusters	[29]
PtZn@S-1	600	C₃H₈∶H₂∶N₂=1∶1∶2	46.6	99.0	5.9	Pt-Zn alloy	[24]
PtZn/SP-S-1	580	Pure C₃H₈	40.0	98.5	15	Pt	[18]
PtZn@S-1	550	C₃H₈∶N₂=11∶19	45.3	99.0	6.5	PtZn clusters	[30]
PtZnALD/SiO₂	600	C₃H₈∶He=1∶4	53.0	97.0	23.6	Pt₁Zn₁	[31]
PtZnO/Al₂O₃	600	C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1	35.0	97.0	3	Zn²⁺	[32]
Pt-Zn/TS-0.15	600	C₃H₈∶Ar=4∶6	34.2	99.6	12	Pt	this work

Catalyst

t/°C

Feed composition

x_a/%

s_a/%

WHSV/h⁻¹

Active site

Reference

x_a: Initial conversion (%); s_a: Initial selectivity (%).

Pt/Zn-MSN

590

C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶2

51.3

98.7

4.7

[27]

ZnPt/HZSM-5

525

C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶19

43.0

93.0

Pt-Zn synergism

[23]

PtZn/SiO₂

600

C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1

48.5

96.0

PtZn₄

[28]

PtZn@S-1-Fin

600

Pure C₃H₈

48.3

97.1

Pt-Zn clusters

[29]

PtZn@S-1

600

C₃H₈∶H₂∶N₂=1∶1∶2

46.6

99.0

5.9

Pt-Zn alloy

[24]

PtZn/SP-S-1

580

Pure C₃H₈

40.0

98.5

[18]

PtZn@S-1

550

C₃H₈∶N₂=11∶19

45.3

99.0

6.5

PtZn clusters

[30]

PtZnALD/SiO₂

600

C₃H₈∶He=1∶4

53.0

97.0

23.6

Pt₁Zn₁

[31]

PtZnO/Al₂O₃

600

C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1

35.0

97.0

Zn²⁺

[32]

Pt-Zn/TS-0.15

600

C₃H₈∶Ar=4∶6

34.2

99.6

this work

Sample	Pt⁰/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%	Pt²⁺/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%	Dispersion degree of Pt/%
PtZn/TS	91.4	8.6	10.3
PtZn/TS-0.05	92.5	7.5	15.8
PtZn/TS-0.15	96.5	3.5	23.2
PtZn/TS-0.25	93.7	6.3	19.5

Sample

Pt⁰/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%

Pt²⁺/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%

Dispersion degree of Pt/%

PtZn/TS

91.4

8.6

10.3

PtZn/TS-0.05

92.5

7.5

15.8

PtZn/TS-0.15

96.5

3.5

23.2

PtZn/TS-0.25

93.7

6.3

19.5

Sample	Pt⁰/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%	Pt²⁺/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%	Dispersion degree of Pt/%
PtZn/TS	91.4	8.6	10.3
PtZn/TS-0.05	92.5	7.5	15.8
PtZn/TS-0.15	96.5	3.5	23.2
PtZn/TS-0.25	93.7	6.3	19.5

Sample

Pt⁰/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%

Pt²⁺/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%

Dispersion degree of Pt/%

PtZn/TS

91.4

8.6

10.3

PtZn/TS-0.05

92.5

7.5

15.8

PtZn/TS-0.15

96.5

3.5

23.2

PtZn/TS-0.25

93.7

6.3

19.5

羟基巢介导的PtZn/TS-X催化剂构建及其高效催化丙烷脱氢

PDF下载

李佳妮 , 倪泽南 ^* , 杨宣 , 关涵月 , 张启俭

燃料化学学报（中英文） | 研究论文 2026,54(9): 20250403-1838-20250403-1848

收起

燃料化学学报（中英文） |研究论文 2026 , 54 (9) : 20250403-1838 -20250403-1848

羟基巢介导的PtZn/TS-X催化剂构建及其高效催化丙烷脱氢

全屏

[Author(id=1309589087959474275, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, orderNo=0, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1309589088034971749, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589087959474275, language=EN, stringName=Jiani LI, firstName=Jiani, middleName=null, lastName=LI, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1309589088123052134, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589087959474275, language=CN, stringName=李佳妮, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1309589086231421022, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086239809631, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086244003936, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001)])]), Author(id=1309589088190161001, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, orderNo=1, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=hgnzn@lnut.edu.cn, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=1, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1309589088286629995, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589088190161001, language=EN, stringName=Zenan NI, firstName=Zenan, middleName=null, lastName=NI, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=^*, address=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1309589088374710380, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589088190161001, language=CN, stringName=倪泽南, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=^*, address=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1309589086231421022, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086239809631, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086244003936, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001)])]), Author(id=1309589088454402158, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, orderNo=2, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1309589088538288240, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589088454402158, language=EN, stringName=Xuan YANG, firstName=Xuan, middleName=null, lastName=YANG, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1309589088613785713, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589088454402158, language=CN, stringName=杨宣, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1309589086231421022, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086239809631, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086244003936, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001)])]), Author(id=1309589088685088883, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, orderNo=3, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1309589088781557877, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589088685088883, language=EN, stringName=Hanyue GUAN, firstName=Hanyue, middleName=null, lastName=GUAN, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1309589088848666742, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589088685088883, language=CN, stringName=关涵月, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1309589086231421022, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086239809631, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086244003936, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001)])]), Author(id=1309589088915775608, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, orderNo=4, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, nameCn=null, orcid=null, stid=null, country=null, authorPic=null, dead=0, email=null, emailSecond=null, emailThird=null, correspondingAuthor=0, authorType=1, ext={EN=AuthorExt(id=1309589089003855994, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589088915775608, language=EN, stringName=Qijian ZHANG, firstName=Qijian, middleName=null, lastName=ZHANG, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null), CN=AuthorExt(id=1309589089079353467, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, authorId=1309589088915775608, language=CN, stringName=张启俭, firstName=null, middleName=null, lastName=null, prefix=null, suffix=null, authorComment=null, nameInitials=null, affiliation=null, department=null, xref=null, address=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001, bio=null, bioImg=null, bioContent=null, aboutCorrespAuthor=null)}, companyList=[AuthorCompany(id=1309589086231421022, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, xref=null, ext=[AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086239809631, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=EN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China), AuthorCompanyExt(id=1309589086244003936, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1308397254396182630, articleId=1309589081533800507, companyId=1309589086231421022, language=CN, country=null, province=null, city=null, postcode=null, companyName=null, departmentName=null, remark=辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001)])])]

李佳妮, 倪泽南^*, 杨宣, 关涵月, 张启俭

作者信息

辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001

通讯作者:

倪泽南

Construction of PtZn/TS-X catalyst mediated by hydroxyl nests and its high-efficiency catalytic performance for propane dehydrogenation

Jiani LI, Zenan NI^*, Xuan YANG, Hanyue GUAN, Qijian ZHANG

Affiliations

College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou 121001, China

Corresponding Author:

Tel: 18810058532, E-mail: hgnzn@lnut.edu.cn

出版时间: 2026-09-10 doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60682-2

文章导航

摘要

收起

酸刻蚀可以使钛硅分子筛（TS）表面富集大量羟基巢，与PtZn金属协同提升丙烷脱氢（PDH）反应的催化性能，同时为活性组分的负载提供稳定的锚定位点。基于此，本工作通过不同盐酸浓度刻蚀TS载体，并采用共浸渍法制备PtZn/TS系列双金属催化剂，研究了酸浓度对催化剂结构、表面性质及PDH反应性能的影响规律。结合XRD、EDS、Raman、UV-vis、FT-IR、XPS、H₂-TPD、TG等表征分析表明，酸刻蚀使TS载体表面形成富集的羟基巢结构，该羟基巢能作为PtZn的高效锚定位点，显著提升Pt⁰暴露程度，同时降低PDH反应能垒。本研究为设计高效PDH反应催化剂提供了可行思路。

关键词

钛硅分子筛 / PtZn双金属 / 羟基巢 / 丙烷脱氢

Abstract

收起

Acid etching enables the enrichment of abundant hydroxyl nests on the surface of titanium silicalite (TS). These hydroxyl nests offer stable anchoring sites for the immobilization of active components, facilitating synergistic interaction with PtZn bimetallic species and enhancing propane dehydrogenation (PDH) catalytic performance. Based on this concept, in the present work, TS supports were etched using hydrochloric acid with varying concentrations, and a series of PtZn/TS bimetallic catalysts were fabricated via the co-impregnation method. The effects of acid concentration on the catalyst structure, surface properties, and PDH catalytic performance were systematically investigated. Comprehensive characterization results reveal that acid etching induces the formation of surface-enriched hydroxyl nest structures on TS supports. These structures act as efficient anchoring centers for PtZn species, leading to enhanced dispersion and increased exposure of metallic Pt⁰ species, thereby lowering the energy barrier for the PDH reaction. This study thus provides a feasible and rational strategy for the design of high-performance PDH catalysts.

Key words

TS zeolite / PtZn bimetal / hydroxyl nest / propane dehydrogenation

引用本文

李佳妮, 倪泽南, 杨宣, 关涵月, 张启俭. 羟基巢介导的PtZn/TS-X催化剂构建及其高效催化丙烷脱氢. 燃料化学学报（中英文）, 2026 , 54 (9) : 20250403-1838 -20250403-1848 . DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60682-2

Jiani LI, Zenan NI, Xuan YANG, Hanyue GUAN, Qijian ZHANG. Construction of PtZn/TS-X catalyst mediated by hydroxyl nests and its high-efficiency catalytic performance for propane dehydrogenation[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2026 , 54 (9) : 20250403-1838 -20250403-1848 . DOI: 10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60682-2

正文

收起

Propylene is a key platform chemical for the production of value-added products such as polypropylene and propylene oxide, and its global demand has continued to grow in response to the ongoing upgrading of the chemical industry^[1]. Propane dehydrogenation (PDH) technology has emerged as one of the mainstream propylene production routes, owing to its abundant availability of propane feedstocks and high propylene selectivity^[2]. Pt, characterized by high catalytic for C−H bond activation and low selectivity for C−C bond cleavage^[3−4], is widely regarded as an ideal active component for the PDH reaction. However, under high-temperature reaction conditions, Pt particles are prone to agglomeration, accompanied by severe carbon deposition on the catalyst surface, which together result in a rapid catalyst deactivation^[5]. Therefore, developing a synergistic strategy integrating “additive modification” and “support regulation” is of great significance for improving the stability and selectivity of Pt-based PDH catalysts^[6].

In PDH reactions, Pt-based catalysts with small particle sizes exhibit significantly higher activity than that of those with large particle sizes^[7−8]. Constructing bimetallic Pt-based catalysts with additive modification is an effective strategy to inhibit the sintering of small Pt species and promote their dispersion^[9−10]. In terms of additive design, Zn has emerged as an efficient modifying additive for Pt-based catalysts, as it can inhibit Pt sintering through geometric hindrance and facilitate the desorption of carbon deposition species via electronic effects^[11−14]. However, in most reported Pt-Zn bimetallic systems, research has primarily focused on the catalytic performance of Pt, while Zn has been treated merely as a promoter^[15−17]. For example, Song et al.^[18] demonstrated that upon loading the Pt-Zn bimetallic component onto self-pillared Silicalite-1 zeolite nanosheets (SP-S-1), the specific surface area of the support was notably enhanced, and abundant Si−OH groups were introduced. This modification substantially augmented the exposure of Pt active sites on the surface of SP-S-1. Similarly, Zhang et al.^[19] reported that Pt-Zn supported on modified ZSM-5 exhibited superior catalytic performance compared to unmodified ZSM-5, where Zn functioned solely as a promoter through geometric and electronic effects.

The synergistic effect between Pt and Zn is highly dependent on the surface structure of the support, which should provide stable anchoring sites for the bimetallic active components to inhibit the agglomeration of PtZn species at elevated temperatures. MFI-type zeolites (e.g. ZSM-5 and S-1), featuring excellent thermal stability and tunable pore structures, are extensively employed as supports for PDH catalysts^[20−22]. Chen et al.^[23] reported the synthesis of Pt-Zn catalysts supported on high-silica HZSM-5, revealing the presence of two distinct types of active sites: Lewis acid sites associated with framework Zn species and small-sized Pt-Zn particles. Another representative MFI-type zeolite, S-1, was investigated by Zhang et al.^[24], who demonstrated that framework-incorporated Zn in S-1 plays a critical role in facilitating and stabilizing PtZn species for efficient PDH performance. This stabilization is attributed to the synergistic effects of spatial confinement imposed on PtZn particles and lattice confinement provided by framework Zn species.

Titanium-silicon zeolite (TS), a prominent member of the MFI-type zeolite family, exhibits exceptional thermal and chemical stability. Framework-incorporated Ti species can modulate the electronic properties of Pt active sites via coordination interactions, while surface hydroxyl groups serve as anchoring sites for the immobilization of active components^[25]. Li et al.^[26] reported that PtSn bimetallic nanoparticles supported on TS exhibited the highest PDH activity when the TS particles were small. When employed as a PDH catalyst support, the weak acidity and confined pore environment of TS can effectively suppress side reactions, and the synergistic interaction between framework Ti and metal components significantly enhances the catalyst stability during PDH. However, for the Pt-Zn bimetallic system, strategies to optimize Pt-Zn dispersion by tailoring the surface structure of TS (e.g., hydroxyl nests) and further suppress coking-induced deactivation remain largely unexplored.

Based on these considerations, TS was employed as the support in this study. The surface hydroxyl nest density of TS was regulated via acid etching with different concentrations, and a series of PtZn/TS-X catalysts were prepared by a co-impregnation method. The influence of acid concentration on the structural evolution of the TS support was systematically investigated. By combining systematic catalytic evaluation with comprehensive structural and spectroscopic characterizations, this work aims to clarify the role of hydroxyl nests in anchoring PtZn species and modulating the structure-performance relationship in PDH.

1　Experimental

收起

1.1　Catalyst preparation

Commercial TS zeolite (Si/Ti molar ratio=80, Tianjin Yuanli Chemical Co., Ltd.) was employed as the support. Hydrochloric acid (HCl) solutions with concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2 and 0.25 mol/L were prepared separately. For each HCl concentration, the solution was mixed with TS powder at a fixed liquid-to-solid ratio under stirring at 40 °C for 12 h. After etching, the samples were thoroughly washed with deionized water until neutral, followed by drying at 100 °C for 12 h. The dried samples were then calcined at 300 °C with a heating rate of 1 °C/min and maintained for 11 h. The obtained acid-etched supports were denoted as TS-X, where X represents the concentration of the etching HCl solution in mol/L.

The PtZn/TS-X series of catalysts (with a Pt loading of 0.5% and a Zn loading of 2%) were prepared by the co-impregnation method. The specific steps are as follows: A certain amount of hexachloroplatinic acid hexahydrate (H₂PtCl₆·6H₂O, analytical grade, Shanghai Aladdin Bio-Chem Technology Co., Ltd.) and zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO₃)₂·6H₂O, analytical grade, Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory) were weighed and dissolved in 20 mL of deionized water. Then, 1 g of TS-X was added to the above precursor solution, and stirred at room temperature for 2 h, followed by heating to 50 °C under continuous stirring until complete solvent evaporation. The dried solid was placed in a 100 °C air-circulating oven for 12 h, and then transferred to a muffle furnace and heated at a rate of 1 °C/min to 550 °C, calcined in air for 4 h to obtain the target catalyst, which was denoted as PtZn/TS-X. Catalysts with different Zn loadings were prepared following the same procedure.

To explore the individual effects of Pt and Zn, the comparative catalysts 0.5Pt/TS-0.15 and 2Zn/TS-0.15 were prepare dusing the same metal loading and preparation procedures as those of PtZn/TS-0.15.

1.2　Catalyst characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed on a Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) at an operating voltage of 40 kV and current of 40 mA. The diffraction patterns were recorded over a 2θ range of 5° to 50° with a scanning rate of 2(°)/min. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization was conducted using a JEOL JEM-F200 microscope (JEOL Ltd., Japan), coupled with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) detector (JED-2300T) for elemental analysis. Ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (UV-vis DRS) spectra were collected on a Shimadzu UV-3600i Plus spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). Raman spectra were acquired using a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution spectrometer (Horiba Ltd., Japan) within a wavenumber range of 50−600 cm⁻¹. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) experiments were carried out on a Bruker infrared spectrometer. Prior to measurements, background correction was performed at 500 °C using potassium bromide (KBr) pellets. The catalyst sample was then loaded into an in situ reaction cell, pretreated by heating to 500 °C under an argon (Ar) atmosphere for 1 h, and cooled to room temperature. Subsequently, FT-IR spectra were collected at 500 °C under a continuous Ar atmosphere, covering a wavenumber range of 3000−3800 cm⁻¹. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were conducted using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (United States). The excitation source was a monochromatic Al-Kα X-ray, and binding energy values were calibrated against the C 1s peak at 284.8 eV to correct for charge-induced shifts. The dispersion of Pt was quantified via CO pulse titration, employing a BSD-Chem C200 temperature-programmed chemisorption analyzer. For hydrogen temperature-programmed desorption (H₂-TPD) experiments, the procedure was as follows: 100 mg of catalyst was first pretreated by heating to 600 °C for 1 h, followed by reduction in a H₂/N₂ mixture for 1 h. The sample was then cooled to 50 °C to allow complete H₂ adsorption, purged with Ar for 30 min to remove physisorbed species, and subsequently heated from 50 to 650 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C/min. H₂ desorption signals were detected using a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out on a HITACHI STA200 thermogravimetric analyzer (Japan), where samples were heated to 600 °C at 10 °C/min under an air atmosphere.

1.3　Catalyst evaluation

The activity test of PDH under atmospheric pressure was carried out in a fixed-bed quartz reactor (outer diameter: 8 mm). A 0.1 g of catalyst (40−60 mesh) was diluted with quartz sand and loaded into the quartz tube, where the lower end was packed with quartz wool to immobilize the catalyst bed. Prior to the reaction, the catalyst was reduced in a flowing H₂/Ar mixture (12 mL/min, 10% H₂) at 600 °C for 1 h, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. Subsequently, the reaction feed (C₃H₈/Ar = 4∶6) was introduced into the catalyst bed at a total flow rate of 30 mL/min, and the PDH reaction performance was evaluated isothermally at 600 °C. The effluent products were analyzed online in real time using a Hua’ai GC9560 gas chromatograph. The calculations of propane conversion and propylene selectivity were based on the following formulas:

$ x(\% )=n({\mathrm{C}}_{ \mathrm{3}} \mathrm{H}_{ \mathrm{8} \;\mathrm{in}} )-n\mathrm{(C}_{ \mathrm{3}} \mathrm{H}_{ \mathrm{8}\; \mathrm{out}} )/n\mathrm{(C}_{ \mathrm{3}} \mathrm{H}_{ \mathrm{8} \;\mathrm{in}} \mathrm{)\times 100\% } $

(1)

$ s(\% ) = n({\mathrm{C}}_{ \mathrm{3}} \mathrm{H}_{ \mathrm{6} \;\mathrm{out}} )/n\mathrm{(C}_{ \mathrm{3}} \mathrm{H}_{ \mathrm{8} \;\mathrm{in}}) - n \mathrm{(C}_{ \mathrm{3}} \mathrm{H}_{ \mathrm{8} \;\mathrm{out}} \mathrm{)\times 100\% } $

(2)

where x(%) and s(%) denote the propane conversion and propylene selectivity, respectively, while n(C₃H₈) and n(C₃H₆) represent the molar amounts of propane and propylene. The subscripts “in” and “out” refer to the inlet and outlet streams of the reactor.

2　Results and discussion

收起

2.1　Evaluation of catalyst performance

Figure 1(a) shows the effects of different acid concentrations on PDH performance. Compared with catalysts etched at other acid concentrations, PtZn/TS-0.15 exhibits the best catalytic performance, delivering an initial propane conversion rate of 34.2% and a propylene selectivity of 99.6%. Further increasing the acid concentration leads to a gradual decline in conversion rate and propylene selectivity. Based on these results, PtZn/TS-0.05, PtZn/TS-0.15 and PtZn/TS-0.25 were selected as representative catalysts for stability tests. As shown in Figure 1(b), the conversion rate of PtZn/TS-0.15 remained stable at 21.7% after 15 h，whereas PtZn/TS-0.05 exhibits a much lower initial conversion of only 9.5%. The deactivation parameters summarized in Table 1 indicate that catalyst stability follows the order: PtZn/TS-0.15 > PtZn/TS-0.25 > PtZn/TS-0.05. Overall, PtZn/TS-0.15 combines high initial activity and selectivity with a relatively low deactivation rate, demonstrating its favorable performance under the tested conditions. Table 2 further compares the PDH performance of PtZn-based catalysts reported in the literature. Notably, although the propane conversion of PtZn/TS-0.15 is moderate, its propylene selectivity is higher than that of most previously reported catalysts.

Figure 2(a) shows the effect of Zn loading on the PDH performance of PtZn/TS-0.15 catalysts. Propane conversion initially increases and then decreases with increasing Zn content, reaching a maximum of 34.2% at 2% Zn, which is significantly higher than the other loadings (0, 4% and 6%). Propylene selectivity remains above 95% for all Zn loadings, with a maximum of 99.6% at 2% Zn. The optimal performance at 2% Zn may be attributed to the most effective interaction between PtZn species and the TS support, facilitating propane activation^[27]. Figure 2(b) presents the Arrhenius plots (ln r versus 1/T) for 0.5Pt2Zn/TS-0.15, 0.5Pt/TS-0.15 and 2Zn/TS-0.15 catalysts at reaction temperatures of 540, 555, 570, 585 and 600 °C. Compared with the monometallic Pt/TS-0.15 and Zn/TS-0.15 catalysts, PtZn/TS-0.15 exhibits a significantly lower activation energy, indicating that the efficient synergy between Pt, Zn and the support reduces the reaction energy barrier and enhances catalytic activity.

2.2　Catalyst characterization

The effects of different HCl etching concentration on the structure on the PtZn/TS-X catalysts were investigated through a series of characterization techniques. Figure 3 shows XRD patterns of PtZn/TS-X catalysts with different concentrations of HCl. As shown in the figure, the five characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ=7.92°, 9.96°, 23.26°, 24.03° and 24.63° in all catalyst samples are associated with the “five-finger peaks” of the MFI topology^[33−35]. The introduction of PtZn and etching at different acid concentrations did not alter the MFI structure of TS. No characteristic diffraction peaks of PtZn were detected in any catalyst, indicating that PtZn are highly dispersed on the TS zeolite support without noticeable agglomeration or crystallization.

TEM characterization of the PtZn/TS-0.15 catalyst was conducted to examine the morphology and dispersion of metal species. As shown in Figure 4, the Pt-based particles are uniformly dispersed without obvious agglomeration. The lattice spacing of 0.36 nm corresponds to the (101) crystal plane of the anatase type TiO₂, where electrons are confined to the Ti5c site on the surface and are in a shallow capture state, facilitating electron migration^[36].

In addition, to further investigate the microstructure, energy dispersive X-ray elemental spectroscopy (EDS) characterization was performed on the PtZn/TS-0.15 catalyst. As shown in Figure 5, PtZn elements were uniformly distributed, indicating that PtZn was successfully loaded in the sample.

To further verify the effect of acid etching on the evolution of Ti species, ultraviolet-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy was used to investigate the coordination state of Ti in PtZn/TS-X catalysts. The spectra are shown in Figure 6. According to previous reports^[37], the strong absorption peaks of the samples at 200 and 270 nm belong to framework four-coordinated Ti and extra-framework six-coordinated Ti respectively, while the absorption peak at 330 nm is the characteristic absorption peak of anatase TiO₂^[38−39]. It can be seen from the spectra that the intensity of the characteristic absorption peak of Ti⁴⁺ at 200 nm of the catalyst after acid etching is weakened, and the absorption peak shifts towards the longer wavelengths, indicating the transformation of the four-coordinated Ti to the high-coordinated Ti species. This process is likely associated with the partial cleavage of Ti−O bonds, leading to the detachment of framework Ti and the formation of extra-framework Ti species.

Among them, PtZn/TS-0.15 exhibits the most pronounced shift of the Ti coordination-related absorption band, suggesting to the greatest degree of Ti−O bond disruption. Further increasing the acid etching severity results in a continuous increase in free Ti species, which can interact with hydroxyl groups to form hydroxylated Ti species. Subsequent condensation of these hydroxylated Ti species leads to the formation of Ti–O–Ti structures, which may partially cover the originally exposed hydroxyl nest sites.

Raman spectroscopy is widely used to probe atomic vibrations in zeolites^[40]. As shown in Figure 7, the characteristic peak at 150 cm⁻¹ belongs to the vibration of the Ti−O bond^[41], the peak at 385 cm⁻¹ belongs to the vibration signal of platinum oxide^[42], and the absorption peak near 515 cm⁻¹ belongs to the vibration absorption of anatase^[43]. For the PtZn/TS-0.15 catalyst, the extensive cleavage of Ti–O bonds results in a reduced vibrational frequency of the Ti–O linkage, leading to a noticeable red shift of the ~150 cm⁻¹ band. This observation further confirms the process of the transformation from skeleton Ti to extra-framework Ti. When the acid concentration was increased to 0.25 mol/L, hydroxylated Ti condensed to form the Ti−O−Ti (Ti−O) bond structure, which increased the vibration frequency of Ti−O bonds. Consequently, a blue shift at 150 cm⁻¹ was observed. This phenomenon is consistent with the evolution of the Ti coordination environment inferred from ultraviolet-visible spectra.

To deeply explore the types and distribution characteristics of hydroxyl groups on the surface of TS support, FT-IR was used to characterize the hydroxyl vibration of TS-X samples. As shown in Figure 8, there are two characteristic absorption peaks in the hydroxyl vibration region, located at approximately 3710 and 3500 cm⁻¹respectively, belonging to the isolated hydroxyl and hydroxyl nest on the TS-X surface^[44]. By comparison, it was found that the area of the characteristic peak of the hydroxyl nest of the TS-0.15 at 3500 cm⁻¹ was significantly larger than that of the other samples, indicating a significantly higher abundance of hydroxyl nests. In contrast, when the acid concentration increased to 0.25 mol/L, the hydroxyl content decreased. Combined with the aforementioned UV-vis and Raman results, this behavior can be rationalized by the excessive generation of free Ti species at higher acid etching severity. These free Ti preferentially interact with hydroxyl nest sites to form hydroxylated Ti species, which subsequently undergo condensation reactions to generate Ti−O−Ti (Ti−O) bond structure. As a result, the originally exposed hydroxyl nest active sites are progressively covered, leading to a pronounced reduction in detectable hydroxyl groups. These results indicate that the concentration of hydroxyl nests does not monotonically increase with the increase of acid etching concentration.

Figure 9 further compared the evolution of hydroxyl nests of on TS-X support before and after PtZn loading. As shown in Figure 9(a)−(d), the intensity of the characteristic peak corresponding to the isolated hydroxyl group at 3720 cm⁻¹ remains nearly unchanged after metal loading, indicating that PtZn species do not significantly interact with the isolated hydroxyls. In contrast, the intensity of the strong absorption band corresponding to the hydroxyl nest at 3500 cm⁻¹ is markedly attenuated upon PtZn incorporation. This phenomenon indicates that following the introduction of metal components, most hydroxyl nest sites on the TS support are occupied by the introduced metal species, leading to a reduction in the number of hydroxyl nests and a significant decrease in band intensity^[45−46]. Among the acid-etched samples, PtZn/TS-0.15 exhibits the largest decrease in hydroxyl-nest intensity, indicating the strongest interaction between the PtZn bimetallic and TS support treated with 0.15 mol/L HCl. This result demonstrates that the hydroxyl nests serve as effective anchoring sites for PtZn species, consistent with literature reports highlighting their role in stabilizing metal species^[18]. Accordingly, PtZn/TS-0.15 catalyst exhibits optimal PDH performance, which is associated with the formation of stable and highly active metal species on the TS-0.15 support. The Pt dispersion data summarized in Table 3 further support this conclusion. Pt dispersion in PtZn/TS-0.15 is 23.2%, and as the acid concentration increases further, the corresponding Pt dispersion drops to 19.5%, which is lower than that of PtZn/TS-0.15. Combined with FT-IR results, it is known that the dispersion of Pt is closely related to the abundance of hydroxyl nests on the support. An enriched hydroxyl-nest environment provides effective anchoring sites, thereby promoting the dispersion and stabilization of Pt species.

XPS analysis was employed to elucidate the chemical states of Pt species in the PtZn/TS-X catalysts, as shown in Figure 10. The Pt 4f spectra can be deconvoluted into two sets of doublets, corresponding to metallic Pt⁰ and oxidized Pt²⁺ species. Specifically, the 4f_7/2 and 4f_5/2 binding energies of Pt⁰ are approximately 72.0 and 75.5 eV respectively, and the 4f_7/2 and 4f_5/2 binding energies of Pt²⁺ are approximately 73.1 and 76.4 eV respectively^[47−49]. According to previous studies^[50−51], Pt⁰ is generally regarded as the main active center for PDH and a higher fraction of Pt⁰ is beneficial for PDH activity. The relative proportions of Pt⁰ and Pt²⁺ species, summarized in Table 3, show clear differences among the catalysts. The proportions of Pt⁰ species in PtZn/TS, PtZn/TS-0.05, PtZn/TS-0.15 and PtZn/TS-0.25 are 91.4%, 92.5%, 96.5% and 93.7%, respectively. Notably, PtZn/TS-0.15 exhibits the highest proportion of Pt⁰ species, indicating that metallic Pt is the dominant surface species on this catalyst. This result is well consistent with the FT-IR analysis, which demonstrates that the TS-0.15 support is enriched with hydroxyl nests. These hydroxyl nests act as effective anchoring sites for Pt species, facilitating their uniform dispersion and stabilizing Pt in the metallic state,thereby increasing the surface exposure of active Pt⁰ species.

To further investigate the regulation mechanism of acid etching on the PtZn/TS-X catalyst, the H₂ adsorption capacity of the catalyst was determined using H₂-TPD, as shown in Figure 11. All catalysts showed two desorption peaks, among which the low-temperature desorption peak (~150 °C) was attributed to the H₂ desorbed from metallic Pt, and the high-temperature desorption peak (300−450 °C) was attributed to hydrogen spillover from Pt to the support hydrogen overflow^[52−55]. According to the literature reports^[56−58], abundant spillover hydrogen is beneficial for suppressing carbon deposits and thereby improving catalyst stability during PDH. Among the catalysts, PtZn/TS-0.15 has the largest H₂ desorption peak in the high-temperature range, indicating the largest H₂ desorption capacity and the strongest hydrogen spillover effect. This behavior suggests enhanced exposure of metallic Pt⁰ species, which can be attributed to the optimal interaction between PtZn species and the acid-etched TS-0.15 support^[59]. The essence of this phenomenon is that surface hydroxyl groups act as anchoring sites for PtZn species, thereby effectively increasing the exposure of Pt⁰ on the support.

Carbon deposition is a major cause of deactivation of Pt-based catalysts. TG characterization was employed to evaluate carbon deposition on the used catalyst. Figure 12 shows the TG profile of PtZn/TS-0.15 after 15 h of PDH reaction. Two distinct weight-loss regions can be observed. The first weight loss below 300 °C is attributed to the removal of adsorbed water and residual surface species. The second weight loss occurring between 300 and 600 °C corresponds to the combustion of carbonaceous deposits, amounting to 1.18%. The relatively low level of carbon deposition contributes to the improved stability of the catalyst.

Figure 13 shows the XRD pattern of PtZn/TS-0.15 after the reaction. The catalyst still retains the characteristic diffraction peaks of the TS zeolite, with no obvious changes in peak position or intensity, indicating the has excellent structural stability of the TS framework under high-temperature PDH conditions. In addition, no distinct carbon species-characteristic diffraction peaks were detected, indicating a low level of carbon deposition on the catalyst surface. This observation is consistent with the TG characterization results.

3　Conclusions

收起

In this paper, a series of PtZn/TS-X bimetallic catalysts were prepared by regulating the surface structure of TS supports via acid etching, and the relationship between catalyst structure and PDH performance was systematically investigated. Under reaction conditions of 600 °C and WHSV=12 h⁻¹, the initial conversion rate reached 34.2%, with propylene selectivity up to 99.6%. After 15 h of continuous reaction, the conversion rate remained 21.7%, the deactivation parameter was as low as 36.5%, and the carbon deposit on the catalyst surface was only 1.18%. The excellent performance of PtZn/TS-0.15 is attributed to acid etching induced formation of enriched hydroxyl nests on the TS surface. These hydroxyl nests provide efficient anchoring sites for PtZn species, promoting high dispersion and increasing the surface exposure of Pt⁰ to 96.5%, thereby generating abundant highly active sites for the PDH. In addition, the synergistic interaction between hydroxyl nests and PtZn significantly lowers the reaction energy barrier, enhancing both activity and stability. This study not only enriches the preparation and modification methods of zeolite-based catalytic materials, but also provides important theoretical guidance for the efficient catalytic conversion of light alkanes.

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

CHEN S, CHANG X, SUN G, et al. Propane dehydrogenation: Catalyst development, new chemistry, and emerging technologies[J]. Chem Soc, 2021, 50(5): 3315−3354.

ZHANG H, WANG G, SHAN H, et al. Propane dehydrogenation over NiSn-based catalysts[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2017, 45(12): 1529−1536.

SUN S, SUN G, PEI C, et al. Origin of performances of Pt/Cu single-atom alloy catalysts for propane dehydrogenation[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2021, 125(34): 18708−18716.

LI F, YANG H, JU T-Y, et al. Activation of propane CH and CC bonds by gas-phase Pt atom: A theoretical study[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2012, 13(7): 9278−9297.

ZHANG X-Y, WAN H, GAO Y, et al. Effect of propylene in feedstock on the coking behavior of PtSnK/Al₂O₃ catalyst of propane dehydrogenation[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2022, 50(7): 841−848.

LEFTON N G, BELL A T. Effects of structure on the activity, selectivity, and stability of Pt-Sn-DeAlBEA for propane dehydrogenation[J]. ACS Catal, 2024, 14(6): 3986−4000.

ALLEN G, MARTINO S A, KAWOLA Y J S. Novel sol—gel based Pt nanocluster catalysts for propane dehydrogenation[J]. J Catal, 2000, 191(2): 474−479.

LIU J, YUE Y, LIU H, et al. Origin of the robust catalytic performance of nanodiamond–graphene-supported Pt nanoparticles used in the propane dehydrogenation reaction[J]. ACS Catal, 2017, 7(5): 3349−3355.

XIA K, LANG W, LI P, et al. The influences of Mg/Al molar ratio on the properties of PtIn/Mg(Al)O_x catalysts for propane dehydrogenation reaction[J]. Chem Eng J, 2016, 284: 1068−1079.

XIA K, LANG W, LI P, et al. The properties and catalytic performance of PtIn/Mg(Al)O catalysts for the propane dehydrogenation reaction: Effects of pH value in preparing Mg(Al)O supports by the co-precipitation method[J]. J Catal, 2016, 338: 104−114.

DE COLA P L, GLASER R WEITKAMP J. Non-oxidative propane dehydrogenation over Pt-Zn-containing zeolites[J]. Appl Catal A: Gen, 2006, 306: 85−97.

RAMOS R N, GARCIA A, BOTAS J A, et al. Enhanced production of aromatic hydrocarbons by rapeseed oil conversion over Ga and Zn modified ZSM-5 catalysts[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2016, 55(50): 12723−12732.

HU B, KIM W G, SULMONETTI T P, et al. A mesoporous cobalt aluminate spinel catalyst for nonoxidative propane dehydrogenation[J]. ChemCatChem, 2017, 9(17): 3330−3337.

ZHOU W, LIU J, LIN L, et al. Enhanced dehydrogenative aromatization of propane by incorporating Fe and Pt into the Zn/HZSM-5 catalyst[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2018, 57(48): 16246−16256.

YU C, XU H, GE Q, et al. Properties of the metallic phase of zinc-doped platinum catalysts for propane dehydrogenation[J]. J Mol Catal A: Chem, 2007, 266(1-2): 80−87.

KLEY I, TRAA Y. Influence of acid sites on the propene selectivity during propane dehydrogenation on zeolite Pt/Zn-Na-MCM-22[J]. Microporous Mesoporous Mater, 2012, 164: 145−147.

YU C, XU H, CHEN X, et al. Preparation, characterization, and catalytic performance of PtZn-Sn/SBA-15 catalyst for propane dehydrogenation[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2010, 38(3): 308−312.

SONG M, ZHANG B, ZHAI Z, et al. Highly dispersed Pt stabilized by ZnO_x-Si on self-pillared zeolite nanosheets for propane dehydrogenation[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2023, 62(9): 3853−3861.

ZHANG Y, ZHOU Y, HUANG L, et al. Structure and catalytic properties of the Zn-modified ZSM-5 supported platinum catalyst for propane dehydrogenation[J]. Chem Eng J, 2015, 270: 352−361.

FILEK U, GACKOWSKI M, ZIMOWSKA M, et al. Sonochemically prepared hierarchical MFI-type zeolites as active catalysts for catalytic ethanol dehydration[J]. Ultrason Sonochem, 2021, 74: 105581.

GUEFRACHI Y H. Hydrothermal stability of hierarchically-structured two-dimensional MFI zeolite nanosheets[D]. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 2019.

NIU M, SHEN B. Research progress on Cr-based catalysts for the CO₂-assisted catalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of light alkanes to light olefins[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2025, 53(9): 1283−1299.

CHEN C, SUN M, HU Z, et al. New insight into the enhanced catalytic performance of ZnPt/HZSM-5 catalysts for direct dehydrogenation of propane to propylene[J]. Catal Sci Technol, 2019, 9(8): 1979−1988.

ZHANG B, LI G, ZHAI Z, et al. PtZn intermetallic nanoalloy encapsulated in silicalite-1 for propane dehydrogenation[J]. AIChE J, 2021, 67(7): e17295.

HOU W, LIN K, ZHANG X, et al. Highly stable and selective Pt/TS-1 catalysts for the efficient nonoxidative dehydrogenation of propane[J]. Chem Eng J, 2023, 474: 145648.

LI J, LI J, ZHAO Z, et al. Size effect of TS-1 supports on the catalytic performance of PtSn/TS-1 catalysts for propane dehydrogenation[J]. J Catal, 2017, 352: 361−370.

SONG J, SHAN Y, FAN X, et al. Propane dehydrogenation over the catalyst with stable and dispersed Pt clusters on Zn-MSN support[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2025, 64(15): 7700−7711.

CHEN S, ZHAO Z J, MU R, et al. Propane dehydrogenation on single-site [PtZn4] intermetallic catalysts[J]. Chem, 2021, 7(2): 387−405.

ZHANG B, LI G, LIU S, et al. Boosting propane dehydrogenation over PtZn encapsulated in an epitaxial high-crystallized zeolite with a low surface barrier[J]. ACS Catal, 2022, 12(2): 1310−1314.

WANG Y, HU Z P, LU X, et al. Ultrasmall PtZn bimetallic nanoclusters encapsulated in silicalite-1 zeolite with superior performance for propane dehydrogenation[J]. J Catal, 2020, 385: 61−69.

INGALE P, KNEMEYER K, PREIKSCHAS P, et al. Design of PtZn nanoalloy catalysts for propane dehydrogenation through interface tailoring via atomic layer deposition[J]. Catal Sci Technol, 2021, 11(2): 484−493.

LIU G, ZENG L, ZHAO Z J, et al. Platinum-modified ZnO/Al₂O₃ for propane dehydrogenation: Minimized platinum usage and improved catalytic stability[J]. ACS Catal, 2016, 6(4): 2158−2162.

LEE W S, ZHANG R, AKATAY M C, et al. Differences in Catalytic Sites for CO Oxidation and Propylene Epoxidation on Au Nanoparticles[J]. Acs Catalysis, 2011, 1(10): 1327−1330.

SU Y, LI F, ZHOU Z, et al. Acidic-treated TS-1 zeolites with high titanium for cyclohexanone efficient oximation[Z]. Mol Catal, 2022, 533: 112752.

LIU J, HE N, ZHOU W, et al. Isobutane aromatization over a complete Lewis acid Zn/HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst: Performance and mechanism[J]. Catal Sci Technol, 2018, 8(16): 4018−4029.

ZHOU X, WU J, ZHANG J, et al. The effect of surface heterojunction between (001) and (101) facets on photocatalytic performance of anatase TiO₂[J]. Mater Lett, 2017, 205: 173−177.

JORDA E, TUEL A, TEISSIER R, et al. TiF4: An original and very interesting precursor to the synthesis of titanium containing silicalite-1[J]. Zeolites, 1997, 19(4): 238−245.

WEI X, WANG Y, REN T, et al. The synthesis of nano-sized TS-1 zeolites under rotational crystallisation conditions can inhibit anatase formation[J]. RSC Adv, 2020, 10(2): 1015−1020.

LI Y, LI Y, ZHU G, et al. Synthesis of hierarchical TS-1 nanocrystals with controllable grain size and mesoporosity: Enhanced performance for chloropropylene epoxidation[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2020, 59(20): 9364−9371.

FAN F, FENG Z, LI C. UV Raman spectroscopic study on the synthesis mechanism and assembly of molecular sieves[J]. Chem Soc Rev, 2010, 39(12): 4794−4801.

SAHOO S, ARORA A, SRIDHARAN V. Raman line shapes of optical phonons of different symmetries in anatase TiO₂ nanocrystals[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2009, 113(39): 16927−16933.

DONG J, SU M, BRIEGA-MARTOS V, et al. Direct in situ Raman spectroscopic evidence of oxygen reduction reaction intermediates at high-index Pt(hkl) surfaces[J]. JACS, 2019, 142(2): 715−719.

GUO Q, FENG Z, LI G, et al. Finding the “missing components” during the synthesis of TS-1 zeolite by UV resonance Raman spectroscopy[J]. J Phys Chem C, 2013, 117(6): 2844−2848.

BARBERA K, BONINO F, BORDIGA S, et al. Structure–deactivation relationship for ZSM-5 catalysts governed by framework defects[J]. J Catal, 2011, 280(2): 196−205.

ZHAO D, TIAN X, DORONKIN D E, et al. In situ formation of ZnO_x species for efficient propane dehydrogenation[J]. Nature, 2021, 599(7884): 234−238.

QI L, BABUCCI M, ZHANG Y, et al. Propane dehydrogenation catalyzed by isolated Pt atoms in ≡SiOZn–OH nests in dealuminated zeolite beta[J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2021, 143(50): 21364−21378.

PEI W, LIU Y, DENG J, et al. Partially embedding Pt nanoparticles in the skeleton of 3DOM Mn₂O₃: An effective strategy for enhancing catalytic stability in toluene combustion[J]. Appl Catal B: Environ, 2019, 256: 117814.

DING K, GULEC A, JOHNSON A M, et al. Identification of active sites in CO oxidation and water-gas shift over supported Pt catalysts[J]. Science, 2015, 350(6257): 189−192.

LIU D, JIANG F, ZHANG Q, et al. Pt-ZnO_x Interfacial effect on the performance of propane dehydrogenation and mechanism study[J]. ACS Nano, 2024, 18(51): 34671−34682.

SATTLER J J, RUIZ-MARTINEZ J, SANTILLAN JIMENEZ E, et al. Catalytic dehydrogenation of light alkanes on metals and metal oxides[J]. Chem Rev, 2014, 114(20): 10613−10653.

ZHAO Q, CHEN L, MA S, et al. Data-driven discovery of Pt single atom embedded germanosilicate MFI zeolite catalysts for propane dehydrogenation[J]. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(1): 3720.

HE S, SUN C, BAI Z, et al. Dehydrogenation of long chain paraffins over supported Pt-Sn-K/Al₂O₃ catalysts: A study of the alumina support effect[J]. Appl Catal A: Gen, 2009, 356(1): 88−98.

ZHANG Y, ZHOU Y, HUANG L, et al. Sn-modified ZSM-5 as support for platinum catalyst in propane dehydrogenation[J]. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2011, 50(13): 7896−7902.

YUAN M, YANG Y, JIAO J-H, et al. Potassium modification on Al₂O₃ surface and synergistic regulation of propane dehydrogenation PtSn active sites[J]. J Fuel Chem Technol, 2025, 53(11): 1641−1653.

HE S, SUN C, DU H, et al. Effect of carbon addition on the Pt-Sn/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst for long chain paraffin dehydrogenation to olefin[J]. Chem Eng J, 2008, 141(1/3): 284−289.

YU C, GE Q, XU H, et al. Effects of Ce addition on the Pt-Sn/γ-Al₂O₃ catalyst for propane dehydrogenation to propylene[J]. Appl Catal A: Gen, 2006, 315: 58−67.

IM J, SHIN H, JANG H, et al. Maximizing the catalytic function of hydrogen spillover in platinum-encapsulated aluminosilicates with controlled nanostructures[J]. Nat Commun, 2014, 5(1): 3370.

ZHANG W, WANG H, JIANG J, et al. Size dependence of Pt catalysts for propane dehydrogenation: From atomically dispersed to nanoparticles[J]. ACS Catal, 2020, 10(21): 12932−12942.

ZHANG Y, ZHOU Y, TANG M, et al. Effect of La calcination temperature on catalytic performance of PtSnNaLa/ZSM-5 catalyst for propane dehydrogenation[J]. Chem Eng J, 2012, 181: 530−537.

2026年第54卷第9期

PDF下载

243

114

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60682-2

接收时间：2025-12-12
首发时间：2026-09-23
出版时间：2026-09-10

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-12-12
修回日期：2026-01-06
录用日期：2026-01-26

基金

作者信息

辽宁工业大学化学与环境工程学院, 辽宁锦州 121001

通讯作者:

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rlhxxb/CN/10.1016/S1872-5813(26)60682-2

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Sample	x_a/%	x_b/%	d	s_a/%
d=100%×(x_a−x_b/x_a).
PtZn/TS	4.4	0	−	98.5
PtZn/TS-0.05	9.5	1.2	87.4	98.7
PtZn/TS-0.15	34.2	21.7	36.5	99.6
PtZn/TS-0.25	21.8	6.8	68.8	99.3

Sample

x_a/%

x_b/%

s_a/%

d=100%×(x_a−x_b/x_a).

PtZn/TS

4.4

−

98.5

PtZn/TS-0.05

9.5

1.2

87.4

98.7

PtZn/TS-0.15

34.2

21.7

36.5

99.6

PtZn/TS-0.25

21.8

6.8

68.8

99.3

Catalyst	t/°C	Feed composition	x_a/%	s_a/%	WHSV/h⁻¹	Active site	Reference
x_a: Initial conversion (%); s_a: Initial selectivity (%).
Pt/Zn-MSN	590	C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶2	51.3	98.7	4.7	Pt	[27]
ZnPt/HZSM-5	525	C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶19	43.0	93.0	2	Pt-Zn synergism	[23]
PtZn/SiO₂	600	C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1	48.5	96.0	4	PtZn₄	[28]
PtZn@S-1-Fin	600	Pure C₃H₈	48.3	97.1	12	Pt-Zn clusters	[29]
PtZn@S-1	600	C₃H₈∶H₂∶N₂=1∶1∶2	46.6	99.0	5.9	Pt-Zn alloy	[24]
PtZn/SP-S-1	580	Pure C₃H₈	40.0	98.5	15	Pt	[18]
PtZn@S-1	550	C₃H₈∶N₂=11∶19	45.3	99.0	6.5	PtZn clusters	[30]
PtZnALD/SiO₂	600	C₃H₈∶He=1∶4	53.0	97.0	23.6	Pt₁Zn₁	[31]
PtZnO/Al₂O₃	600	C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1	35.0	97.0	3	Zn²⁺	[32]
Pt-Zn/TS-0.15	600	C₃H₈∶Ar=4∶6	34.2	99.6	12	Pt	this work

Catalyst

t/°C

Feed composition

x_a/%

s_a/%

WHSV/h⁻¹

Active site

Reference

x_a: Initial conversion (%); s_a: Initial selectivity (%).

Pt/Zn-MSN

590

C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶2

51.3

98.7

4.7

[27]

ZnPt/HZSM-5

525

C₃H₈∶N₂=1∶19

43.0

93.0

Pt-Zn synergism

[23]

PtZn/SiO₂

600

C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1

48.5

96.0

PtZn₄

[28]

PtZn@S-1-Fin

600

Pure C₃H₈

48.3

97.1

Pt-Zn clusters

[29]

PtZn@S-1

600

C₃H₈∶H₂∶N₂=1∶1∶2

46.6

99.0

5.9

Pt-Zn alloy

[24]

PtZn/SP-S-1

580

Pure C₃H₈

40.0

98.5

[18]

PtZn@S-1

550

C₃H₈∶N₂=11∶19

45.3

99.0

6.5

PtZn clusters

[30]

PtZnALD/SiO₂

600

C₃H₈∶He=1∶4

53.0

97.0

23.6

Pt₁Zn₁

[31]

PtZnO/Al₂O₃

600

C₃H₈∶H₂=1∶1

35.0

97.0

Zn²⁺

[32]

Pt-Zn/TS-0.15

600

C₃H₈∶Ar=4∶6

34.2

99.6

this work

Sample	Pt⁰/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%	Pt²⁺/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%	Dispersion degree of Pt/%
PtZn/TS	91.4	8.6	10.3
PtZn/TS-0.05	92.5	7.5	15.8
PtZn/TS-0.15	96.5	3.5	23.2
PtZn/TS-0.25	93.7	6.3	19.5

Sample

Pt⁰/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%

Pt²⁺/(Pt⁰+Pt²⁺)/%

Dispersion degree of Pt/%

PtZn/TS

91.4

8.6

10.3

PtZn/TS-0.05

92.5

7.5

15.8

PtZn/TS-0.15

96.5

3.5

23.2

PtZn/TS-0.25

93.7

6.3

19.5