Article(id=1242139413740855374, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146031591421210625, issueId=1242139380912038864, articleNumber=null, orderNo=20, doi=10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.17.013, pmid=null, cstr=null, oa=null, hot=null, price=null, onlineType=0, articleFormat=0, articleType=null, articleTypeStr=null, receivedDate=1572364800000, receivedDateStr=2019-10-30, revisedDate=1583683200000, revisedDateStr=2020-03-09, acceptedDate=null, acceptedDateStr=null, onlineDate=1632386543037, onlineDateStr=2021-09-23, pubDate=1631462400000, pubDateStr=2021-09-13, doiRegisterDate=null, doiRegisterDateStr=null, onlineIssueDate=1632386543037, onlineIssueDateStr=2021-09-23, onlineJustAcceptDate=null, onlineJustAcceptDateStr=null, onlineFirstDate=null, onlineFirstDateStr=null, sourceXml=null, magXml=null, createTime=1774078714067, creator=sys-migrate, updateTime=1774078714067, updator=sys-migrate, issue=Issue{id=1242139380912038864, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146031591421210625, year='2021', volume='39', issue='17', pageStart='1', pageEnd='120', issueExtLink='null', onlineDate='null', pubDate='1631462400000', pubDateStr='2021-09-13', beforeIssueId=null, nextIssueId=null, price=null, status=1, issueComplete=1, articleOrder=3, issueType=-1, specialIssue=null, createTime=1774078706240, creator='sys-migrate', updateTime=1774078706240, updator='sys-migrate', preIssue=null, nextIssue=null, articleTotal=null, ext=null, issueFiles=null, downloadFileDto=null}, startPage=106, endPage=114, ext={EN=ArticleExt(id=1242139416152584687, articleId=1242139413740855374, tenantId=1146029695717560320, journalId=1146031591421210625, language=EN, title=Research and practice on comprehensive quality evaluation of academic conferences, columnId=1150494644690366681, journalTitle=Science & Technology Review, columnName=Papers, runingTitle=null, highlight=null, articleAbstract=Academic conferences play a very important role in the construction of national innovation system, development of disciplines and growth of scientific researchers. In recent years, the overall scale of China's academic conference activities has increased rapidly but problems such as uneven quality and lack of standards have become increasingly obvious. Therefore, conference organizers, managers and participants urgently need an evaluation means to judge the quality of academic conferences. In view of the problems of the traditional academic conference quality evaluation methods, such as lack of prominent academic elements and narrow application fields, this study proposes a quality evaluation framework which comprehensively uses the evaluation information sources including participants' qualitative feedback, quantitative characteristics data of the conference, and social influence big data analysis, and conducts a comprehensive quality evaluation covering more than 700 academic conferences held in China in 2018. The results indicate that the scale of academic conferences in China is increasing continuously, that the quality control of content is stricter and the effect of interactive communication is more prominent, and that the types of outcome and dissemination methods are further enriched. However, there are significant differences in quality among academic conferences of different disciplines and scales. And there are obvious differences in the perception of conference quality among participants of different titles and nationalities. According to the evaluation results, this paper proposes three ways to improve the quality of China's academic conferences, that is, considering the demands of participants, optimizing conference organization, and improving the mechanism of the academic society., authors=TANG Jiahui1,2 , LI Xiaoxuan1,2 , ZHENG Yi1,2 , ZHAI Shenghui3 , authorsList=TANG Jiahui, LI Xiaoxuan, ZHENG Yi, ZHAI Shenghui, authorCompany=1. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;1,2 , 李晓轩1,2 , 郑毅1,2 , 翟胜辉3 , authorsList=唐家蕙, 李晓轩, 郑毅, 翟胜辉, authorCompany=1. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190;
科技导报
| 研究论文 2021, 39(17): 106-114
学术会议质量综合评价研究及实践
全屏
唐家蕙1,2 , 李晓轩1,2 , 郑毅1,2 , 翟胜辉3
作者信息
1. 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 北京 100190;
通讯作者:
郑毅(通信作者),助理研究员,研究方向为评价理论与方法,电子信箱:zhengyi@casisd.cn
Research and practice on comprehensive quality evaluation of academic conferences
Affiliations
出版时间: 2021-09-13
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.17.013
文章导航
学术会议活动在国家创新体系建设、学科交流与发展、科研人员成长过程中扮演着极为重要的角色。针对传统学术会议质量评价方法中存在的学术性要素不突出、适用领域狭窄等问题，提出了一种综合采用参会者定性反馈、会议定量特征分析、会议影响力大数据分析等评价信息源的质量评价框架，并对2018年举办的700余场国内学术会议开展了质量综合评价实践。结果表明，中国学术会议呈规模持续增长、内容质控愈发严格、互动交流效果进一步突出、成果类型及传播方式进一步丰富等趋势，但不同学科、不同规模学术会议间质量差异较为显著，不同职称、不同国籍参会者对会议质量的感知存在明显差别。根据评价结果，从面向参会者诉求、优化会议组织及完善学会机制建设等方面提出了学术会议的质量提升建议。
Academic conferences play a very important role in the construction of national innovation system, development of disciplines and growth of scientific researchers. In recent years, the overall scale of China's academic conference activities has increased rapidly but problems such as uneven quality and lack of standards have become increasingly obvious. Therefore, conference organizers, managers and participants urgently need an evaluation means to judge the quality of academic conferences. In view of the problems of the traditional academic conference quality evaluation methods, such as lack of prominent academic elements and narrow application fields, this study proposes a quality evaluation framework which comprehensively uses the evaluation information sources including participants' qualitative feedback, quantitative characteristics data of the conference, and social influence big data analysis, and conducts a comprehensive quality evaluation covering more than 700 academic conferences held in China in 2018. The results indicate that the scale of academic conferences in China is increasing continuously, that the quality control of content is stricter and the effect of interactive communication is more prominent, and that the types of outcome and dissemination methods are further enriched. However, there are significant differences in quality among academic conferences of different disciplines and scales. And there are obvious differences in the perception of conference quality among participants of different titles and nationalities. According to the evaluation results, this paper proposes three ways to improve the quality of China's academic conferences, that is, considering the demands of participants, optimizing conference organization, and improving the mechanism of the academic society.
academic conference
/
academic conference evaluation
/
quality of academic conference
唐家蕙, 李晓轩, 郑毅, 翟胜辉.
学术会议质量综合评价研究及实践.
科技导报,
2021
, 39
(17)
: 106
-114
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.17.013
TANG Jiahui, LI Xiaoxuan, ZHENG Yi, ZHAI Shenghui.
Research and practice on comprehensive quality evaluation of academic conferences[J].
Science & Technology Review ,
2021
, 39
(17)
: 106
-114
.
DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.17.013
2021年第39卷第17期
PDF下载
258
12
引用本文
BibTeX
文章信息
doi: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.17.013
接收时间：2019-10-30
首发时间：2021-09-23
出版时间：2021-09-13
收稿日期：2019-10-30
修回日期：2020-03-09
通讯作者:
郑毅(通信作者),助理研究员,研究方向为评价理论与方法,电子信箱:zhengyi@casisd.cn
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjdb/CN/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2021.17.013
引用本文
BibTeX
2种不同金属材料的力学参数
科 属数 种数 占总种数比例 属 种数 占总种数比例 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78 小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39 红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87 小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26 光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39 红菇属 Russula 17 8.13 栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT
PDF下载
全屏
258
12
关闭全屏
北京市海淀区学院南路86号
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
