中南林业科技大学学报

高温胁迫对2个油茶品种幼苗的生理影响及耐热性评价

PDF下载

彭兵阳 ¹ , 张盼盼 ¹ , 焦悦 ¹ , 詹文勇 ² , 吕佳斌 ¹

中南林业科技大学学报 | 林学 2026,46(7): 102-110

收起

中南林业科技大学学报 |林学 2026 , 46 (7) : 102 -110

高温胁迫对2个油茶品种幼苗的生理影响及耐热性评价

全屏

彭兵阳¹, 张盼盼¹, 焦悦¹, 詹文勇², 吕佳斌¹

作者信息

^1.安徽农业大学　a. 林学与园林学院；b. 安徽省林木资源培育重点实验室，安徽　合肥　230036

^2.安徽德昌苗木有限公司，安徽　六安　231340

通讯作者:

吕佳斌（lvjiabin@ahau.edu.cn），讲师，博士，硕士研究生导师。

作者简介:

彭兵阳（1520730094@qq.com），硕士研究生。

Physiological effects of high temperature stress on seedlings of two Camellia oleifera cultivars and heat tolerance evaluation

Bingyang Peng¹, Panpan Zhang¹, Yue Jiao¹, Wenyong Zhan², Jiabin Lyu¹

Affiliations

^a.College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture; b. Key Laboratory of Forest Resource Cultivation in Anhui Province, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, Anhui, China

^2.Anhui Dechang Seedling Co., Ltd., Lu'an 231340, Anhui, China

出版时间: 2026-07-25 doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.07.010

文章导航

摘要

收起

【目的】

筛选出耐热性较强的油茶品种，为选育耐热性强的油茶品种提供理论依据。

【方法】

采用智能温室进行高温胁迫的方法对‘大别山1号’‘长林53号’2个品种的油茶幼苗进行盆栽试验。设置0（CK）、4、7、14、21、28、35、42、49 d共9个时间梯度，分别测定其相对含水量、相对电导率和超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化物酶、过氧化氢酶活性，以及丙二醛、过氧化氢、可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白、游离脯氨酸含量共10个生理生化指标。采用各生理指标的平均隶属函数值，对2个油茶品种的耐热性进行综合评价。

【结果】

1）2个油茶品种叶片相对含水量随高温处理时间的延长持续下降：胁迫处理7 d后，叶片相对含水量下降速度加快；胁迫处理49 d后，2个品种的叶片相对含水量均降至最低值，其中‘大别山1号’为71.40%，‘长林53号’为63.32%。相对电导率、丙二醛含量、过氧化氢含量均随高温处理时间的延长持续上升，49 d时达到最大值。2）2个品种叶片的超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化物酶活性呈先上升后下降的趋势。‘大别山1号’叶片过氧化氢酶活性呈持续上升趋势，‘长林53号’在胁迫前期呈上升趋势并在胁迫42 d后开始下降。3）‘大别山1号’叶片脯氨酸、可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白含量持续上升。‘长林53号’叶片脯氨酸、可溶性蛋白含量在胁迫前期持续上升，42 d时上升到最大值，随后下降；其可溶性糖含量在胁迫前期持续上升，35 d时上升到最大值，随后开始下降。4）‘大别山1号’的平均隶属函数值为0.559，‘长林53号’的平均隶属函数值为0.449，‘大别山1号’耐热性优于‘长林53号’。

【结论】

在高温胁迫下，2个油茶品种幼苗的生理响应模式存在差异。综合隶属函数评价结果表明，‘大别山1号’的平均隶属函数值（0.559）高于‘长林53号’（0.449），‘大别山1号’的耐热性优于‘长林53号’。

关键词

油茶 / 高温胁迫 / 耐热性 / 生理影响

Abstract

收起

【Objective】

To screen out Camellia oleifera cultivars with strong heat tolerance and provide a theoretical basis for breeding new heat-tolerant varieties.

【Method】

A pot experiment was conducted using the method of high-temperature stress in an intelligent greenhouse on seedlings of two C. oleifera cultivars, ‘Dabieshan 1’ and ‘Changlin 53’. Nine time gradients were set: 0 (CK), 4, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42 and 49 d. Ten physiological and biochemical indicators were measured, including relative water content, relative electrical conductivity, malondialdehyde content, hydrogen peroxide content, superoxide dismutase activity, peroxidase activity, catalase activity, soluble sugar content, soluble protein content, and free proline content. The heat tolerance of the two C. oleifera cultivars was comprehensively evaluated using the average membership function value of each physiological indicator.

【Result】

1) The leaf relative water content of both cultivars decreased continuously with the extension of high-temperature treatment, and the decline accelerated after 7 days of stress. After 49 days of high-temperature treatment, the leaf relative water content of both cultivars reached its minimum, with ‘Dabieshan 1’ at 71.40% and ‘Changlin 53’ at 63.32%. The relative electrical conductivity, malondialdehyde content, and hydrogen peroxide content increased continuously with the extension of high-temperature treatment and reached their maximum at the 49th day; 2) The activities of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase in the leaves of both cultivars first increased and then decreased. The catalase activity in ‘Dabieshan 1’ leaves showed a continuous upward trend, while that in ‘Changlin 53’ increased in the early stage of stress and began to decrease after 42 d of stress; 3) The proline, soluble sugar, and soluble protein contents in ‘Dabieshan 1’ leaves continued to increase. In ‘Changlin 53’ leaves, proline and soluble protein contents continued to increase in the early stage of stress, reached their maximum at the 42th day, and then decreased; soluble sugar content continued to increase in the early stage of stress, reached its maximum at the 35th day, and then began to decrease; 4) The average membership function value of ‘Dabieshan 1’ was 0.559, and that of ‘Changlin 53’ was 0.449, indicating that the heat tolerance of ‘Dabieshan 1’ was superior to that of ‘Changlin 53’.

【Conclusion】

Under high-temperature stress, the physiological response patterns of the two C. oleifera cultivars seedlings were different. The comprehensive membership function evaluation showed that the average membership function value of ‘Dabieshan 1’ (0.559) was higher than that of ‘Changlin 53’ (0.449). The heat tolerance of ‘Dabieshan 1’ was superior to that of ‘Changlin 53’.

Key words

Camellia oleifera / high-temperature stress / heat tolerance / physiological effects

引用本文

彭兵阳, 张盼盼, 焦悦, 詹文勇, 吕佳斌. 高温胁迫对2个油茶品种幼苗的生理影响及耐热性评价. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2026 , 46 (7) : 102 -110 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.07.010

Bingyang Peng, Panpan Zhang, Yue Jiao, Wenyong Zhan, Jiabin Lyu. Physiological effects of high temperature stress on seedlings of two Camellia oleifera cultivars and heat tolerance evaluation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026 , 46 (7) : 102 -110 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.07.010

基金

收起

安徽省自然科学基金青年项目(2208085QC92)
安徽省高等学校科学研究重点项目(2024AH050484)
校级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(X202410364499)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

杨抑. 中国油茶起源初探[J]. 中国农史, 1992(3): 74-77, 95.

Yang

. Preliminary study on the origin of Camellia oleifera in China[J]. Agricultural History of China, 1992(3): 74-77, 95.

[2]

谭晓风. 油茶分子育种研究进展[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(1): 1-24.

Tan

X F

. Advances in the molecular breeding of Camellia oleifera[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023, 43(1): 1-24.

[3]

张婷, 李建安, 龚玉子, 等. 湖南省5个主推油茶早中熟品种授粉配置技术[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(4): 153-168.

Zhang

, Li

J A

, Gong

Y Z

, et al. Pollination configuration technology of five early-to mid-maturing Camellia oleifera varieties recommended in Hunan Province[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(4): 153-168.

[4]

李小玲, 雒玲玲, 华智锐. 高温胁迫下高山杜鹃的生理生化响应[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(2): 253-259.

X L

, Luo

L L

, Hua

Z R

. Physiological and biochemical responses of Rhododendron lapponicum to heat stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2018, 27(2): 253-259.

[5]

李泽, 谭晓风, 卢锟, 等. 干旱胁迫对两种油桐幼苗生长、气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(5): 1515-1524.

, Tan

X F

, Lu

, et al. Influence of drought stress on the growth, leaf gas exchange, and chlorophyll fluorescence in two varieties of tung tree seedlings[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(5): 1515-1524.

[6]

耿晓东, 岳继飞, 刘英, 等. ‘豫济’山桐子幼苗生长对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 经济林研究, 2025, 43(1): 29-39.

Geng

X D

, Yue

J F

, Liu

, et al. Response of Idesia polycarpa ‘Yuji’ seedling growth to drought stress[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2025, 43(1): 29-39.

[7]

张燕红, 吴永波, 刘璇, 等. 高温和干旱胁迫对杨树幼苗光合性能和抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017, 45(11): 32-38.

Zhang

Y H

, Wu

Y B

, Liu

, et al. Effects of elevated temperature and drought on photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme system of poplar seedlings[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2017, 45(11): 32-38.

[8]

Prior

L D

, Bowman

D M J S

. Big eucalypts grow more slowly in a warm climate: evidence of an interaction between tree size and temperature[J]. Global Change Biology, 2014, 20: 2793-2799.

[9]

王志超, 何之龙, 陈永忠, 等. 油茶‘湘林210’抗干旱特性研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2024, 44(1): 37-48.

Wang

Z C

, He

Z L

, Chen

Y Z

, et al. Study on drought resistance characteristics of ‘Xianglin 210’ Camellia oleifera[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2024, 44(1): 37-48.

[10]

曹永庆, 姚小华, 龙伟. 高温干旱对油茶生长的影响[J]. 林业科技开发, 2014, 28(4): 34-37.

Cao

Y Q

, Yao

X H

, Long

. Temperature and drought stress on growth of oil-tea camellia[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2014, 28(4): 34-37.

[11]

陈永忠, 罗健, 陈隆升, 等. 湖南省油茶旱害及防治对策[J]. 经济林研究, 2014, 32(3): 22-29, 53.

Chen

Y Z

, Luo

, Chen

L S

, et al. Drought injury and countermeasure of Camellia oleifera in Hunan Province[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2014, 32(3): 22-29, 53.

[12]

杨友志, 郭凌曜, 王婷, 等. 油茶含油率影响因素及改善措施[J]. 粮食科技与经济, 2022, 47(1): 21-23.

Yang

Y Z

, Guo

L Y

, Wang

, et al. Influencing factors and solving measures of oil content of Camellia oleifera[J]. Food Science and Technology and Economy, 2022, 47(1): 21-23.

[13]

曾清苹, 晏巧, 李彬, 等. 渝东南极端高温干旱对‘长林’系列油茶生长及果实性状的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2024, 40(4): 39-44.

Zeng

Q P

, Yan

, Li

, et al. Effects of extreme high temperature and drought on growth and fruit characters of ‘Changlin’ series of Camellia oleifera in southeast of Chongqing[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2024, 40(4): 39-44.

[14]

何小三, 王玉娟, 徐林初, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同油茶品种叶片解剖结构的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(10): 1-17.

X S

, Wang

Y J

, Xu

L C

, et al. Effects of drought stress on leaf anatomical structure of different Camellia oleifera cultivars[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2020, 40(10): 1-17.

[15]

白杨. 不同牡丹品种对夏季高温胁迫的生理响应及褪黑素缓解作用研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2023: 10.

Bai

. Study on the physiological response of different tree peony cultivars to high temperature stress in summer and the relieving effect of melatonin[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2023: 10.

[16]

江建成. 高温胁迫对三种杜鹃的生长及生理影响[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2023: 15.

Jiang

J C

. Effects of high temperature stress on the growth and physiology of three Rhododendron species[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023: 15.

[17]

Sharif

, Seyedsalehi

, Paladino

, et al. Effect of drought and salinity stresses on morphological and physiological characteristics of canola[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2018, 15: 1859-1866.

[18]

王飞, 马金玲, 秦丹丹, 等. 小麦耐热及热敏感基因型在高温胁迫下膜透性及膜脂组分的差异[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2013, 21(8): 904-910.

Wang

, Ma

J L

, Qin

D D

, et al. The difference of permeability and membrane lipid composition in heat tolerant and susceptible wheat (Triticum aestivum) under high temperature stress[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2013, 21(8): 904-910.

[19]

Manafi

, Baninasab

, Gholami

, et al. Exogenous melatonin alleviates heat-induced oxidative damage in strawberry (Fragaria×ananassa Duch. cv. Ventana) plant[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 41: 52-64.

[20]

王晓晓. 凤丹对高温胁迫的响应及缓解措施研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2022: 19-20.

Wang

X X

. Study on response and mitigation measures of Paeonia ostii to high temperature stress[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2022: 19-20.

[21]

徐超, 杨再强, 王雨亭, 等. 南丰蜜橘对高温热害的生理响应及耐热性评价模型构建[J]. 果树学报, 2023, 40(12): 2638-2651.

, Yang

Z Q

, Wang

Y T

, et al. Physiological response to high temperature and heat tolerance evaluation of different lines in Nanfeng tangerine[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2023, 40(12): 2638-2651.

[22]

吴永波, 叶波. 高温干旱复合胁迫对构树幼苗抗氧化酶活性和活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(2): 403-410.

Y B

, Ye

. Effects of combined elevated temperature and drought stress on anti-oxidative enzyme activities and reactive oxygen species metabolism of Broussonetia papyrifera seedlings[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(2): 403-410.

[23]

Rao

M J

, Wu

S G

, Duan

M Z

, et al. Antioxidant metabolites in primitive, wild, and cultivated citrus and their role in stress tolerance[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26: 5801.

[24]

Rahman

M A

, Woo

J H

, Song

, et al. Heat shock proteins and antioxidant genes involved in heat combined with drought stress responses in perennial rye grass[J]. Life, 2022, 12: 1426.

[25]

赵晓龙, 沈家怡, 刘涛, 等. 当年和越年生香榧叶片的光合效率及抗氧化特性的季节性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 45-50.

Zhao

X L

, Shen

J Y

, Liu

, et al. Seasonal variations in photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant characteristics of the current and one year-old leaves in Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(2): 45-50.

[26]

傅志强, 张恒, 刘祯, 等. 不同油茶品种苗对高温胁迫的生理响应及耐热性评价[J]. 林业科学研究, 2024, 37(2): 189-200.

Z Q

, Zhang

, Liu

, et al. Evaluation of the physiological response and heat tolerance of seedlings of different Camellia oleifera cultivars to high temperature stress[J]. Forest Research, 2024, 37(2): 189-200.

[27]

孙欧文, 杨倩倩, 章毅, 等. 四个绣球品种对高温干旱复合胁迫的生理响应机制[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(10): 1531-1544.

Sun

O W

, Yang

Q Q

, Zhang

, et al. Physiological response mechanism of four kinds of Hydrangea under high temperature and drought stress[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2019, 55(10): 1531-1544.

[28]

王中雷. 朱顶红高温胁迫生理响应及种质资源耐热性评价[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2024: 16-26.

Wang

Z L

. Physiological response to high temperature stress and heat tolerance evaluation of germplasm resources in Hippeastrum herb[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2024: 16-26.

[29]

钱玥, 李思源, 饶良懿. 盐碱胁迫对菊芋渗透调节及抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(9): 1465-1471.

Qian

, Li

S Y

, Rao

L Y

. Effects of saline-alkali stress on organic osmoregulatory substances and antioxidant enzyme systems of Helianthus tuberosus[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(9): 1465-1471.

[30]

Virková

, Gemperlová

, Dobrá

, et al. Effect of heat stress on polyamine metabolism in proline-over-producing tobacco plants[J]. Plant Science, 2012, 182: 49-58.

[31]

黄淦, 李美婷, 赵艳莉, 等. 不同切花菊品种的高温生理响应及耐热性综合评价[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 56(1): 92-103.

Huang

, Li

M T

, Zhao

Y L

, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of high temperature physiological response and heat tolerance of different cut chrysanthemum cultivars[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 56(1): 92-103.

2026年第46卷第7期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.07.010

接收时间：2025-06-21
首发时间：2026-10-30
出版时间：2026-07-25

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-06-21
修回日期：2025-09-02

基金

安徽省自然科学基金青年项目(2208085QC92)

安徽省高等学校科学研究重点项目(2024AH050484)

校级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(X202410364499)

作者信息

^1.安徽农业大学　a. 林学与园林学院；b. 安徽省林木资源培育重点实验室，安徽　合肥　230036

^2.安徽德昌苗木有限公司，安徽　六安　231340

通讯作者:

吕佳斌（lvjiabin@ahau.edu.cn），讲师，博士，硕士研究生导师。

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/znlykj/CN/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.07.010

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT