中南林业科技大学学报

黑河中游典型沙化土地治理模式生态服务价值多维评价与优选

PDF下载

赵玉红 ¹ , 贺永岩 ¹ , 陈斌 ¹ , 穆好华 ¹ , 雷军 ¹ , 赵明 ¹ , 武龙庆 ¹ , 马垭杰 ² , 李景潮 ³ , 曾万祺 ¹

中南林业科技大学学报 | 生态学 2026,46(8): 147-158

收起

中南林业科技大学学报 |生态学 2026 , 46 (8) : 147 -158

黑河中游典型沙化土地治理模式生态服务价值多维评价与优选

全屏

赵玉红¹, 贺永岩¹, 陈斌¹, 穆好华¹, 雷军¹, 赵明¹, 武龙庆¹, 马垭杰², 李景潮³, 曾万祺¹

作者信息

^1.甘肃省祁连山水源涵养林研究院，甘肃　张掖　734000

^2.张掖市林业科学研究院，甘肃　张掖　734000

^3.张掖市草原工作站，甘肃　张掖　734000

通讯作者:

贺永岩（646530043@qq.com），工程师。

作者简介:

赵玉红（Zyh670091@163.com），正高级工程师。

Ecological service value multi-dimensional evaluation and optimization of typical sand fixation land governance modes in the middle reaches of the Heihe river

Yuhong Zhao¹, Yongyan He¹, Bin Chen¹, Haohua Mu¹, Jun Lei¹, Ming Zhao¹, Longqing Wu¹, Yajie Ma², Jingchao Li³, Wanqi Zeng¹

Affiliations

^1.Gansu Qilian Mountain Water Source Conservation Forest Research Institute, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China

^2.Zhangye Forestry Science Institute, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China

^3.Zhangye City Grassland Work Station, Zhangye 734000, Gansu, China

出版时间: 2026-08-25 doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.015

文章导航

摘要

收起

【目的】

探究黑河中游典型沙化土地不同治理模式生态服务价值的空间分异规律，揭示6类沙化土地治理模式的适配性特征，为优化区域沙化土地治理模式与空间配置提供科学依据，助力生态恢复效益最大化与区域可持续发展。

【方法】

通过问卷调查、专家打分、文献查阅、野外实地调查、室内检测及数据分析处理等方法，分析不同治理模式的空间分异特征。基于层次分析法（AHP）构建治理模式多层次生态服务价值评价模型，确定评价指标权重；依据评价体系5个维度11个指标的加权量化评分与排序，系统分析并评价研究区域沙化土地治理模式的治理效果、经济效益及生态服务价值，进而完成模式优选。

【结果】

1）各模式生态服务价值特征存在显著差异：葡萄复合模式经济价值突出；梭梭-肉苁蓉模式生态效益表现最优；枸杞复合模式均衡性良好，经济效益与生态效益协调发展特征明显；菊芋复合模式在特殊立地条件下优势显著，其盐碱地改良效果与节水率均最优，但经济产出相对较低；文冠果复合模式各项指标均衡稳定，虽无突出优势，但其耐旱特性与木本油料价值使其成为过渡带的理想选择；生态养殖模式短期效益显著，通过“草-畜-肥”循环实现快速收益，但载畜量需严格控制。2）基于AHP的生态服务价值综合评价显示，6种生态治理模式的综合得分表现为梭梭-肉苁蓉模式（88.9）>葡萄复合模式（85.6）>菊芋复合模式（82.8）>枸杞复合模式（80.5）>生态养殖模式（78.6）>文冠果复合模式（75.2）。

【结论】

不同治理模式的生态服务功能具有显著互补性：梭梭-肉苁蓉模式生态屏障功能突出，葡萄复合模式经济产出领先，菊芋复合模式盐碱改良与节水性能优异，其他模式在特定立地条件下各具适用价值。基于AHP多准则综合评价，筛选出梭梭-肉苁蓉模式、葡萄复合模式及菊芋复合模式为区域最优治理范式，并提出基于生态功能区划的差异化配置方案：过渡带发展梭梭-肉苁蓉生态经济体系，近水区布局节水型葡萄产业，盐碱区推广菊芋-文冠果复合修复模式。

关键词

黑河中游 / 沙化土地治理模式 / 生态服务价值 / 多维评价 / 模式优选

Abstract

收起

【Objective】

To reveal the spatial differentiation law of the ecological service value of typical sand-land governance modes in the middle reaches of the Heihe river, the characteristics of the adaptability of the six sand-land governance modes, and to provide a scientific basis for the optimization of the models and spatial optimization allocation of regional sand-land governance, and to promote the maximization of ecological restoration benefits and regional sustainable development.

【Method】

This study analyzed the spatial differentiation characteristics of different governance modes through the processes of questionnaire survey, expert scoring, literature review, field investigation, indoor detection and data analysis. A multi-level ecological service value assessment mode for governance patterns was constructed based on the principles of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine the weights of evaluation indicators. According to the weighted quantitative scoring and ranking of the 11 indicators in the evaluation system with 5 dimensions, the governance effect, economic benefit, and service value of the land desertification governance modes in the study area are analyzed and evaluated, and the preferred modes are selected.

【Result】

1) The ecological service values of different modes exhibit significant differences: the grape-based integrated mode stands out in economic value; the Haloxylon ammodendron-Cistanche deserticola mode demonstrates the best ecological benefits; the Lycium barbarum complex mode shows good balance, with clear coordinated development of economic and ecological benefits; the Jerusalem artichoke complex mode performs exceptionally well under specific site conditions, achieving the highest soil improvement and water-saving efficiency among all modes, although its economic output is relatively low; the Xanthoceras sorbifolium complex mode maintains balanced and stable performance across all indicators, lacking outstanding advantages but being an ideal choice for transitional zones due to its drought tolerance and woody oilseed potential; the ecological livestock farming mode delivers notable short-term benefits through a “forage-livestock-fertilizer” cycle that enables rapid returns, though carrying capacity must be strictly controlled; 2) Based on the comprehensive evaluation of ecological service value based on AHP, the order of the ecological service value scores of the 6 ecological governance modes is: Haloxylon ammodendron-Cistanche deserticola mode (comprehensive score of 88.9) > grape composite mode (85.6) > Jerusalem artichoke complex mode (82.8) > Lycium barbarum complex mode (80.5) > ecological farming mode (78.6) > X. sorbifolia complex mode (75.2).

【Conclusion】

Different governance modes exhibit significant complementarity in their ecosystem service functions: the Haloxylon ammodendron-Cistanche icola mode excels in ecological barrier function, the grape composite mode leads in economic output, and the Jerusalem artichoke composite mode demonstrates excellent performance in saline-alkali improvement and water conservation, while the remaining modes possess applicable value under specific site conditions. Based on multi-criteria comprehensive evaluation using the AHP, the Haloxylon amodendron-Cistanche deserticola mode, the grape composite mode, and the Jerusalem artichoke composite mode were selected as the optimal regional governance paradigms. Accordingly, a spatial scheme based on ecological functional zoning is proposed: developing a Haloxylon ammodendron-Cistanche deserticola ecological-economic system in the transition, deploying water-saving grape industries in the water-proximal zone, and promoting Jerusalem artichoke-Xanthoceras sorbifolia composite restoration in the salt-alkali zone.

Key words

midstream of the Heihe river / sand governance modes of desertified land / ecosystem service value / multi-dimensional evaluation / mode optimization

引用本文

赵玉红, 贺永岩, 陈斌, 穆好华, 雷军, 赵明, 武龙庆, 马垭杰, 李景潮, 曾万祺. 黑河中游典型沙化土地治理模式生态服务价值多维评价与优选. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2026 , 46 (8) : 147 -158 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.015

Yuhong Zhao, Yongyan He, Bin Chen, Haohua Mu, Jun Lei, Ming Zhao, Longqing Wu, Yajie Ma, Jingchao Li, Wanqi Zeng. Ecological service value multi-dimensional evaluation and optimization of typical sand fixation land governance modes in the middle reaches of the Heihe river[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026 , 46 (8) : 147 -158 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.015

基金

收起

甘肃省科技计划项目(26JRRG017)
甘肃省自然科学基金项目(24JRRG033)
张掖市科技计划项目(ZY2024RC11)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

刘二燕, 赵媛媛, 周蝶, 等. 科尔沁-浑善达克沙地2000—2020年土地沙化时空变化格局[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44(4): 46-56.

Liu

E Y

, Zhao

Y Y

, Zhou

, et al. Spatiotemporal variation patterns of land desertification from 2000 to 2020 in the Horqin-Otindag sandy land[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(4): 46-56.

[2]

李季, 王静. 河西走廊绿洲社会-生态系统韧性时空格局演变特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(10): 1887-1898.

, Wang

. Evolutionary characteristics of spatiotemporal patterns of resilience in oasis social-ecological systems in the Hexi Corridor[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2025, 42(10): 1887-1898.

[3]

焦岩, 闫峰, 卢琦, 等. 西北干旱区绿洲时空变化及驱动力[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(8): 2206-2216.

Jiao

, Yan

, Lu

, et al. Spatiotemporal variation and driving factors of oases in the arid region of northwest China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 35(8): 2206-2216.

[4]

苏付荣, 占玉芳, 鲁延芳, 等. 河西走廊沙地人工梭梭林草本植物种群生态位特征[J]. 江西农业学报, 2025, 37(6): 24-31.

F R

, Zhan

Y F

, Lu

Y F

, et al. Niche characteristics of herbaceous plant community of artificial Haloxylon ammodendron plantation in sandy land of Hexi corridor[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2025, 37(6): 24-31.

[5]

雷军, 程新平, 薛春, 等. 黑河流域中游北部荒漠区植物群落特征与稳定性[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44(6): 187-194.

Lei

, Cheng

X P

, Xue

, et al. The characteristics and stability of plant communities in the northern desert area of the middle reaches of the Heihe river basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(6): 187-194.

[6]

李昊辰, 胡广录, 王涛, 等. 黑河中游砂壤地农田不同灌溉模式土壤水分动态模拟[J]. 干旱区研究, 2025, 42(7): 1333-1347.

H C

, Hu

G L

, Wang

, et al. Soil moisture under different irrigation patterns in sandy loam farmland in the middle reaches of the Heihe river dynamic simulation[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2025, 42(7): 1333-1347.

[7]

Chen

Y T

, Li

Z B

, Li

, et al. Impacts and projections of land use and demographic changes on ecosystem services: a case study in the Guanzhong region, China[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 3003.

[8]

李加林, 张旖芯, 张海涛, 等. 基于“潜力-弹性-稳定性”模型的温州市生态韧性时空变化及影响因素研究[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(8): 3253-3267.

J L

, Zhang

Y X

, Zhang

H T

, et al. The research of spatio-temporal characteristics and influence factors of Wenzhou ecological resilience based on the potential-elastic-stability model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(8): 3253-3267.

[9]

程琳琳, 黄婷, 刘焱序. 基于改进价值当量因子的1992—2015年青藏高原生态系统服务价值演化分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(5): 242-248.

Cheng

L L

, Huang

, Liu

Y X

. Analysis on evolution of ecosystem service value in Qinghai-Xizang Plateau based on improved value equivalent factors from 1992 to 2015[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019, 39(5): 242-248.

[10]

赵瑜, 陈超, 胡振琪. 中国西部生态脆弱区生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J]. 林业经济问题, 2018, 38(4): 91-97, 112.

Zhao

, Chen

, Hu

Z Q

. Research progress on ecosystem service value assessment in ecological fragile areas of western China[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2018, 38(4): 91-97, 112.

[11]

陈端吕, 陈哲夫, 彭保发. 土地利用生态服务价值与经济发展的协调及空间分异：以西洞庭湖区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 37(9): 1692-1703.

Chen

D L

, Chen

Z F

, Peng

B F

. Spatial differentiation and coupling effect between land ecosystem services value and economic development: a case study of west Dongting lake area[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(9): 1692-1703.

[12]

郭旭东, 常青, 刘筱, 等. 基于碳储量视角的城镇土地利用模式与生态效益分异特征[J]. 中国土地科学, 2017, 31(4): 61-70.

Guo

X D

, Chang

, Liu

, et al. Urban land use pattern and its ecological benefit from the perspective of carbon storage[J]. China Land Sciences, 2017, 31(4): 61-70.

[13]

江波, 张路, 欧阳志云. 青海湖湿地生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(10): 3137-3144.

Jiang

, Zhang

, Ouyang

Z Y

. Ecosystem services valuation of Qinghai lake[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(10): 3137-3144.

[14]

宁虎森, 罗青红, 吉小敏, 等. 新疆梭梭林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 生态科学, 2017, 36(3): 74-81.

Ning

H S

, Luo

Q H

, Ji

X M

, et al. Assessment on ecosystem service value of Haloxylon ammodendron forest in Xinjiang[J]. Ecological Science, 2017, 36(3): 74-81.

[15]

张梅, 王利娜, 王姝婧, 等. 基于层次-关联度的新疆骏枣品质性状分析及综合评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(1): 78-85.

Zhang

, Wang

L N

, Wang

S J

, et al. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of Xinjiang Jun jujube quality by hierarchy-relation analysis[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2022, 42(1): 78-85.

[16]

赵玉红, 周玉丽, 王艳霞, 等. 基于AHP的干旱半干旱区丰产型文冠果优良单株选择[J]. 经济林研究, 2024, 42(2): 267-274.

Zhao

Y H

, Zhou

Y L

, Wang

Y X

, et al. Selection of high-yield plus tree Xanthoceras sorbifolia in arid and semi-arid areas based on AHP[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2024, 42(2): 267-274.

[17]

王奕淇, 李国平, 马嫣然. 流域生态服务价值补偿分摊研究：以渭河流域为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(11): 83-88.

Wang

Y Q

, Li

G P

, Ma

Y R

. Study on watershed ecosystem service value compensation apportionment: taking the Weihe watershed as an example[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(11): 83-88.

[18]

夏鹏志, 徐涛, 金磊. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的合肥市生态环境质量评价[J]. 赤峰学院学报(自然科学版), 2023, 39(10): 98-102.

Xia

P Z

, Xu

, Jin

. Evaluation of ecological environment quality in Hefei City based on AHP-TOPSIS[J]. Journal of Chifeng University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 39(10): 98-102.

[19]

麻进. 黑河中游荒漠-绿洲过渡带不同灌丛植物根区土壤水分及其环境影响因素[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2023: 8-9.

. Soil moisture and its environmental factors in the root zone of different shrub plants in the desert-oasis transitional zone in the middle reaches of the Heihe river[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2023: 8-9.

[20]

成彩霞, 赵玉红, 许尔文, 等. 荒漠绿洲过渡带土壤水分特征及其对气候因子的响应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2025, 45(6): 136-146.

Cheng

C X

, Zhao

Y H

, Xu

E W

. et al. Characterization of soil moisture and its response to climatic factors in the transition zone of a desert oasis[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2025, 45(6): 136-146.

[21]

郭金玉, 张忠彬, 孙庆云. 层次分析法的研究与应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2008, 18(5): 148-153.

Guo

J Y

, Zhang

Z B

, Sun

Q Y

. Study and applications of analytic hierarchy process[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2008, 18(5): 148-153.

[22]

李栋栋. 荒漠区梭梭人工接种肉苁蓉技术[J]. 现代园艺, 2025, 48(17): 94-96.

D D

. Artificial inoculation technology of Haloxylon ammodendron with Cistanche deserticola in desert area[J]. Contemporary Horticulture, 2025, 48(17): 94-96.

[23]

储晗. 立足实际作业流程的荒漠肉苁蓉人工栽培技术应用过程探究[J]. 种子世界, 2025(7): 243-245.

Chu

. Study on the application process of artificial cultivation technology of desertliving Cistanche deserticola based on actual operation process[J]. Seed World, 2025(7): 243-245.

[24]

张文凯, 张宇飞, 汪雯雯, 等. 基于遥感评估的生态系统服务价值时空变化研究：以山阴县为例[J]. 环境生态学, 2024, 6(6): 49-58.

Zhang

W K

, Zhang

Y F

, Wang

W W

, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of ecosystem service value in Shanyin County based on remote sensing assessment[J]. Environmental Ecology, 2024, 6(6): 49-58.

[25]

程莉, 李玉霖, 宁志英, 等. 木本植物应对干旱胁迫的响应机制：基于水力学性状视角[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(7): 2688-2705.

Cheng

, Li

Y L

, Ning

Z Y

, et al. Response mechanisms of woody plants to drought stress: a review based on plant hydraulic traits[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(7): 2688-2705.

[26]

吴子晗, 章孙逊, 张帆, 等. 未来气候情景下黑河中游灌溉缺水风险评估[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2025, 44(1): 97-103.

Z H

, Zhang

S X

, Zhang

, et al. Assessing irrigation water shortage in the middle reaches of the Heihe river basin under future climate scenarios[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2025, 44(1): 97-103.

[27]

周梦佳. 耐盐菊芋在不同施氮处理下的地下部微生物群落分析及其内生固氮寡养单胞菌促进菊芋生长的机制研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020: 9-10.

Zhou

M J

. The analysis of underground microbial community in salt-tolerant Jerusalem artichoke and the mechanism of endogenous nitrogen-fixing Stenotrophomonas to promote this growth under different nitrogen treatments[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020: 9-10.

[28]

于贵瑞, 于宗绪, 王秋凤, 等. 宏观生态系统科学理论研究和实践应用知识体系的构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2025, 36(8): 2257-2269.

G R

, Yu

Z X

, Wang

Q F

, et al. Construction of a knowledge system for theoretical research and practical application of macroecosystem science[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2025, 36(8): 2257-2269.

[29]

李维. 为科学放生划定生态红线[J]. 环境经济, 2025(12): 68-72.

. Draw an ecological red line for scientific release[J]. Environmental Economy, 2025(12): 68-72.

[30]

董玉莲. 基于“两山”理论的农村生态与经济协同发展探析[J]. 农业经济, 2023(9): 57-59.

Dong

Y L

. On the coordinated development of rural ecology and economic development based on the theory of “Two Mountains”[J]. Agricultural Economy, 2023(9): 57-59.

[31]

卓静, 朱延年, 李韬, 等. 陕北黄土高原区生态服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(5): 336-342.

Zhuo

, Zhu

Y N

, Li

, et al. Response of ecological service value and quality to land use change in China's Loess Plateau[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 29(5): 336-342.

2026年第46卷第8期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.015

接收时间：2025-07-26
首发时间：2026-10-30
出版时间：2026-08-25

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-07-26
修回日期：2025-09-27

基金

甘肃省科技计划项目(26JRRG017)

甘肃省自然科学基金项目(24JRRG033)

张掖市科技计划项目(ZY2024RC11)

作者信息

^1.甘肃省祁连山水源涵养林研究院，甘肃　张掖　734000

^2.张掖市林业科学研究院，甘肃　张掖　734000

^3.张掖市草原工作站，甘肃　张掖　734000

通讯作者:

贺永岩（646530043@qq.com），工程师。

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/znlykj/CN/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.015

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT