中南林业科技大学学报

蝴蝶兰对干旱胁迫的生理响应及其耐旱性评价

PDF下载

司宝华 ¹ , 张丽娟 ¹ , 阿丽米热·吾布力 ² , 吕明皓 ¹ , 马文舒 ¹ , 刘海娟 ¹ , 董飞 ³

中南林业科技大学学报 | 林学 2026,46(8): 120-129

收起

中南林业科技大学学报 |林学 2026 , 46 (8) : 120 -129

蝴蝶兰对干旱胁迫的生理响应及其耐旱性评价

全屏

司宝华¹, 张丽娟¹, 阿丽米热·吾布力², 吕明皓¹, 马文舒¹, 刘海娟¹, 董飞³

作者信息

^1.宁夏农林科学院园艺研究所，宁夏　银川　750021

^2.宁夏大学　林业与草业学院，宁夏　银川　750021

^3.山东省农业科学院休闲农业研究所，山东　济南　250100

通讯作者:

张丽娟（juanzi800219@163.com），硕士，副研究员。

作者简介:

司宝华（729693738@qq.com），硕士研究生，助理研究员。

Physiological response of Phalaenopsis to drought stress and its drought tolerance evaluation

Baohua Si¹, Lijuan Zhang¹, Alimire·Wubuli², Minghao Lyu¹, Wenshu Ma¹, Haijuan Liu¹, Fei Dong³

Affiliations

^1.Institute of Horticulture, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China

^2.College of Forestry and Grassland Science, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, Ningxia, China

^3.Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences Institute of Leisure Agriculture, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China

出版时间: 2026-08-25 doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.012

文章导航

摘要

收起

【目的】

探究蝴蝶兰对干旱胁迫的生理响应，筛选耐旱品种，加速耐旱蝴蝶兰品种的选育进程，满足干旱地区市场需求，提升经济效益。

【方法】

选取11个蝴蝶兰品种，在浇水后自然干旱，研究其光合参数、叶绿素荧光特性及生理指标变化规律，并运用隶属函数法和聚类分析法筛选耐旱品种。

【结果】

随着含水量下降，大部分品种的净光合速率、叶绿素荧光参数和叶绿素含量持续下降，胞间CO₂浓度、电导率、可溶性糖含量和丙二醛含量持续上升，CAT、SOD活性和可溶性蛋白含量呈现先上升后下降的趋势。基于隶属函数法构建的耐旱性评价体系显示，各品种耐旱性表现为‘金公主’>‘迪奥’>‘日升’>‘金叶咖啡’>‘拉斯维加斯’>‘安娜’>‘贝瑞王子’>‘红酒’>‘恭喜发财’>‘满天红’>‘梦幻女郎’。聚类分析结果显示，将11个品种的蝴蝶兰按照耐旱性强弱分为2类：第1类为耐旱品种，分别是‘金公主’‘迪奥’‘日升’‘金叶咖啡’‘拉斯维加斯’和‘安娜’；第2类为一般品种，分别为‘贝瑞王子’‘红酒’‘恭喜发财’‘满天红’和‘梦幻女郎’。

【结论】

‘金公主’‘迪奥’‘日升’‘金叶咖啡’‘拉斯维加斯’和‘安娜’能适应宁夏的干旱气候，适合在宁夏推广种植；‘贝瑞王子’‘红酒’‘恭喜发财’‘满天红’和‘梦幻女郎’在宁夏干旱区可能需要频繁浇水，成本较高，应适当种植。

关键词

蝴蝶兰 / 干旱胁迫 / 生理 / 隶属函数 / 耐旱性评价

Abstract

收起

【Objective】

Exploring the physiological response to drought, to screen drought-resistant varieties, accelerate the breeding of drought-resistant Phalaenopsis varieties, meet the market demand in arid areas, and improve economic benefits.

【Method】

Eleven Phalaenopsis cultivars were selected, and their photosynthetic parameters, chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and physiological indexes were investigated after natural drought following watering, and the drought-resistant varieties were screened out by using membership functions and cluster analysis.

【Result】

As the water content decreases, the net photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and chlorophyll content of most varieties continuously decline, while the intercellular CO₂ concentration, electrical conductivity, soluble sugar content, and malondialdehyde content continuously increase. The contents of CAT, SOD, and soluble proteins show a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The drought tolerance evaluation system constructed based on the membership function method indicates that the drought tolerance ranking of the varieties is as follows: ‘Gold Princess’ > ‘Dior’ > ‘Sunrise’ > ‘Aurea Mocha’ > ‘Las Vegas’ > ‘Anna’ > ‘Prince Berry’ > ‘Bordeaux’ > ‘Gongxi Facai’ > ‘Man Tianhong’ > ‘Dream Lady’. Through cluster analysis, the 11 Phalaenopsis varieties are divided into two categories based on their drought tolerance. The first category consists of six drought-tolerant varieties, namely ‘Gold Princess’ ‘Dior’ ‘Sunrise’ ‘Aurea Mocha’ ‘Las Vegas’ and ‘Anna’, the second category includes five general varieties, namely ‘Prince Berry’ ‘Bordeaux’ ‘Gongxi Facai’ ‘Man Tianhong’ and ‘Dream Lady’.

【Conclusion】

‘Gold Princess’ ‘Dior’ ‘Sunrise’ ‘Aurea Mocha’ ‘Las Vegas’ and ‘Anna’ can adapt to the dry climate of Ningxia and are suitable for planting and popularizing in Ningxia; ‘Prince Berry’ ‘Bordeaux’ ‘Gongxi Facai’ ‘Man Tianhong’ and ‘Dream Lady’ may need frequent watering in the arid area of Ningxia and the cost is high, so they should be planted appropriately.

Key words

Phalaenopsis / drought stress / physiology / membership function / drought tolerance evaluation

引用本文

司宝华, 张丽娟, 阿丽米热·吾布力, 吕明皓, 马文舒, 刘海娟, 董飞. 蝴蝶兰对干旱胁迫的生理响应及其耐旱性评价. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2026 , 46 (8) : 120 -129 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.012

Baohua Si, Lijuan Zhang, Alimire·Wubuli, Minghao Lyu, Wenshu Ma, Haijuan Liu, Fei Dong. Physiological response of Phalaenopsis to drought stress and its drought tolerance evaluation[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026 , 46 (8) : 120 -129 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.012

基金

收起

宁夏回族自治区农业科技自主创新专项科技创新引导项目(NKYG-25-23)
宁夏科技领军人才培养项目(2023GKLRLX09)
东西部科技协作专项（津甘合作、鲁甘合作）(25CXNN010)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

陈之光. 濒危蝴蝶兰属植物繁育系统和超低温保存研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2023: 1.

Chen

Z G

. Breeding system and cryopreservation of endangered Phalaenopsis plants[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2023: 1.

[2]

张智翔. 宁夏银北明灌暗排区土壤水盐运移及模型模拟研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2025: 9.

Zhang

Z X

. Study on soil water-salt transport and model simulation in the open irrigation and subsurface drainage area of Yinbei, Ningxia[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2025: 9.

[3]

艾鑫, 王诗语, 马鑫磊, 等. 不同油酸含量花生品种全生育期耐旱性鉴定指标筛选和综合评价[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2024, 55(5): 513-522.

, Wang

S Y

, Ma

X L

, et al. Selection and comprehensive evaluation of drought tolerance identification indexes during the whole growth period for peanut varieties with different oleic acid contents[J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2024, 55(5): 513-522.

[4]

凌瑞, 戴中武, 代晓雨, 等. 8个绣球品种耐热性综合评价与耐热指标筛选[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(8): 2209-2218.

Ling

, Dai

Z W

, Dai

X Y

, et al. Evaluation of heat tolerance and screening the index for the assessment of heat tolerance in cultivars of Hydrangea[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(8): 2209-2218.

[5]

朱秀红, 马静雨, 张龙冲, 等. 白花泡桐幼苗对铅胁迫的耐受机制与积累特性[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2025, 45(9): 1-11.

Zhu

X H

, Ma

J Y

, Zhang

L C

, et al. The tolerance mechanism and accumulation characteristics of Paulownia fortunei seedlings under lead stress[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2025, 45(9): 1-11.

[6]

韩凯, 刘畅, 王浩楠, 等. 干旱和铜胁迫对早黑宝葡萄幼苗生理特性及ADH基因家族的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2025, 42(9): 1958-1976.

Han

, Liu

, Wang

H N

, et al. Effects of drought and copper stress on the physiological characteristics and ADH gene family in Zaoheibao grape seedlings[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2025, 42(9): 1958-1976.

[7]

宋爽, 蔡宇轩, 梁宇翔, 等. NO₂胁迫对三角梅幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(11): 73-83.

Song

, Cai

Y X

, Liang

Y X

, et al. Effects of NO₂ stress on physiological characteristics of Bougainvillea glabra seedlings[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023, 43(11): 73-83.

[8]

吉子彧. 绒毛白蜡对夜间光照的光合响应和生理生化适应性[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2023: 17-31.

Z Y

. Photosynthetic response and physiological and biochemical adaptability of Fraxinus velutina under nighttime light[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2023: 17-31.

[9]

汤肖玮, 张敬奇, 刘晨, 等. 8个蝴蝶兰品种耐旱性评价[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2025, 53(1): 48-50, 56.

Tang

X W

, Zhang

J Q

, Liu

, et al. Drought tolerance evaluation of eight Phalaenopsis cultivars[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 53(1): 48-50, 56.

[10]

李杰, 匡萍, 王芝娜, 等. 蝴蝶兰抗冷性株系的鉴定与筛选[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35(5): 91-96.

, Kuang

, Wang

Z N

, et al. Identifying and screening cold tolerance genetypes of Phalaenopsis varieties[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(5): 91-96.

[11]

谢振兴, 刘国敏, 陆祖正, 等. 自然低温下22个蝴蝶兰品种的抗寒性评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(23): 58-65.

Xie

Z X

, Liu

G M

, Lu

Z Z

, et al. Evaluation of cold resistance in 22 Phalaenopsis varieties under natural low temperature[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2024(23): 58-65.

[12]

贾民隆, 张晓纲, 梁峥, 等. 20个不同品系萱草的耐旱性筛选与评价[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(6): 90-95.

Jia

M L

, Zhang

X G

, Liang

, et al. Screening and evaluation of drought tolerance of 20 different Hemerocallis lines[J]. Seed, 2021, 40(6): 90-95.

[13]

王琪. 芍药响应干旱胁迫的转录组学分析及相关转录因子的功能研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2020: 19.

Wang

. Transcriptomics analysis of Paeonia lactiflora in response to drought stress and functional study of related transcription factors[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2020: 19.

[14]

蔡德宝, 杨树琼, 马郡妍, 等. 普通菜豆苗期耐旱性鉴定[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2025, 26(7): 1355-1369.

Cai

D B

, Yang

S Q

, Ma

J Y

, et al. Screening of drought tolerant germplasm of common bean at the seedling stage[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2025, 26(7): 1355-1369.

[15]

肖文芳, 李佐, 陈和明, 等. 不同蝴蝶兰品种耐热性比较测定及综合评价[J]. 热带农业科学, 2018, 38(12): 43-48.

Xiao

W F

, Li

, Chen

H M

, et al. Comparative measurement and evaluation of heat tolerance of different Phalaenopsis varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2018, 38(12): 43-48.

[16]

胡肖肖, 唐宇力, 贾梅, 等. 干旱胁迫对13个杜鹃品种生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(6): 101-105.

X X

, Tang

Y L

, Jia

, et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological characteristics of 13 Rhododendron varieties[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(6): 101-105.

[17]

郭豪, 李光宁, 刘涛, 等. 万寿菊幼苗形态及生理生化指标对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(1): 69-75.

Guo

, Li

G N

, Liu

, et al. Responses of morphological characteristics and physiological and biochemical index of marigold seedlings to drought stress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(1): 69-75.

[18]

苏艳娥, 田晓明, 向光锋, 等. 钩藤对干旱胁迫和复水处理的生理响应[J]. 经济林研究, 2026, 44(1): 219-229.

Y E

, Tian

X M

, Xiang

G F

, et al. Physiological responses of Uncaria rhynchophylla to drought stress and rewatering treatment[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2026, 44(1): 219-229.

[19]

李娟霞. 一年生早熟禾对干旱低温复合胁迫的生理响应[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2025: 60-62.

J X

. Physiological response of annual bluegrass to combined drought and cold stress[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2025: 60-62.

[20]

戴文静, 丁彦芬, 赵洢, 等. 干旱胁迫对3种紫堇属植物生理及光合特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(12): 164-174.

Dai

W J

, Ding

Y F

, Zhao

, et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological and photosynthetic characteristics of three species of Corydalis[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 53(12): 164-174.

[21]

汪月霞, 孙国荣, 王建波, 等. NaCl胁迫下星星草幼苗MDA含量与膜透性及叶绿素荧光参数之间的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(1): 122-129.

Wang

Y X

, Sun

G R

, Wang

J B

, et al. Relationships among MDA content, plasma membrane permeability and the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Puccinellia tenuiflora seedlings under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(1): 122-129.

[22]

孙文秀, 邵晨阳, 陈妍妍, 等. 干旱胁迫下2种内生真菌对烟草生理生化指标及NAC基因表达的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2024, 39(1): 113-119.

Sun

W X

, Shao

C Y

, Chen

Y Y

, et al. Effects of two endophytic fungi on physiological and biochemical indexes and NAC gene expression in tobacco under drought stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2024, 39(1): 113-119.

[23]

Yousfi

, Slama

, Ghnaya

, et al. Effects of water deficit stress on growth, water relations and osmolyte accumulation in Medicago truncatula and M. Laciniata populations[J]. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 2010, 333: 205-213.

[24]

陈成升, 谢志霞, 刘小京. 等渗盐分、干旱胁迫下冬小麦叶片部分渗透调节物质的动态变化[J]. 植物研究, 2009, 29(6): 708-713.

Chen

C S

, Xie

Z X

, Liu

X J

. Dynamic transformation of the substances of osmotic adjustment in winter wheat under iso-osmotic salt and drought stresses[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2009, 29(6): 708-713.

[25]

牛欣益, 马瑞. 红砂幼苗叶片生理特性对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 草业科学, 2023, 40(10): 2483-2492.

Niu

X Y

, Ma

. Effects of drought stress on leaf physiology of Reaumuria soongorica seedlings during the growing season[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(10): 2483-2492.

[26]

朱维琴, 吴良欢, 陶勤南. 氮营养对干旱逆境下水稻体内可溶性渗透调节物质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 29(5): 479-484.

Zhu

W Q

, Wu

L H

, Tao

Q N

. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on soluble osmotica in rice plants in response to drought stress[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture & Life Sciences), 2003, 29(5): 479-484.

[27]

屠玲艳, 吴学谦, 许海顺. 水分胁迫对三叶青叶绿体超微结构及黄酮合成关键酶的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2021, 38(3): 577-586.

L Y

, Wu

X Q

, Xu

H S

. Effects of water stress on chloroplast ultrastructure and key enzymes of flavonoid synthesis in Tetrastigma hemsleyanum[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2021, 38(3): 577-586.

[28]

武祥琪, 孙鹂, 俞浙萍, 等. 杨梅MrSPL4在响应干旱和低温胁迫中的作用研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2024, 51(5): 927-938.

X Q

, Sun

, Yu

Z P

, et al. Functional study of MrSPL4 gene in response to drought and low temperature stress in Chinese bayberry[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2024, 51(5): 927-938.

[29]

Huang

D Q

, Wu

W R

, Abrams

S R

, et al. The relationship of drought-related gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana to hormonal and environmental factors[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2008, 59(11): 2991-3007.

[30]

张茹艳. 马铃薯响应干旱-碱性盐复合胁迫机制研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2025: 15-16.

Zhang

R Y

. Mechanisms of potato response to drought-alkaline salt combined stresses[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2025: 15-16.

2026年第46卷第8期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.012

接收时间：2025-07-17
首发时间：2026-10-30
出版时间：2026-08-25

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-07-17
修回日期：2025-09-22

基金

宁夏回族自治区农业科技自主创新专项科技创新引导项目(NKYG-25-23)

宁夏科技领军人才培养项目(2023GKLRLX09)

东西部科技协作专项（津甘合作、鲁甘合作）(25CXNN010)

作者信息

^1.宁夏农林科学院园艺研究所，宁夏　银川　750021

^2.宁夏大学　林业与草业学院，宁夏　银川　750021

^3.山东省农业科学院休闲农业研究所，山东　济南　250100

通讯作者:

张丽娟（juanzi800219@163.com），硕士，副研究员。

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/znlykj/CN/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.08.012

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT