中南林业科技大学学报

湖南省5个油茶主栽品种幼苗对紫色土的适应性

PDF下载

罗晶晶 ^1a^,² , 李建安 ¹^,² , 尹思洁 ^1a^,² , 解子安 ^1a^,² , 郭璞瑞 ^1a^,² , 陈嫣灵 ^1a^,² , 阎晋东 ¹^,²

中南林业科技大学学报 | 林学 2026,46(6): 44-55

收起

中南林业科技大学学报 |林学 2026 , 46 (6) : 44 -55

湖南省5个油茶主栽品种幼苗对紫色土的适应性

全屏

罗晶晶^1a^,², 李建安¹^,², 尹思洁^1a^,², 解子安^1a^,², 郭璞瑞^1a^,², 陈嫣灵^1a^,², 阎晋东¹^,²

作者信息

^1.中南林业科技大学　a. 林学院；b. 本油料资源利用全国重点实验室；c. 济林培育与保护教育部重点实验室，湖南　长沙　410004

^2.岳麓山实验室经济林品种创制中心，湖南　长沙　410004

通讯作者:

李建安（lja0731@126.com），教授，博士，博士研究生导师

阎晋东（yjd0731@outlook.com），讲师，博士，硕士研究生导师。

作者简介:

罗晶晶（3312613973@qq.com），硕士研究生。

Adaptability of seedlings from five predominant Camellia oleifera cultivars to purple soils in Hunan Province

Jingjing LUO^1a^,², Jian'an LI¹^,², Sijie YIN^1a^,², Zi'an XIE^1a^,², Purui GUO^1a^,², Yanling CHEN^1a^,², Jindong YAN¹^,²

Affiliations

^1.a. School of Forestry; b. State Key Laboratory of Utilization of Woody Oil Resource; c. Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Conservation of Non-timber Forest, Ministry of Education, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China

^2.Economic Forest Variety Innovation Center, Yuelushan Laboratory, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China

出版时间: 2026-06-25 doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.06.005

文章导航

摘要

收起

【目的】

探究湖南省5个油茶主栽品种幼苗在酸性紫色土、碱性紫色土及红壤（对照）中的生长与生理特性差异，以期为湖南省紫色土区的油茶适生性评价、品种筛选及土壤定向改良提供理论依据。

【方法】

采用盆栽试验，以红壤为对照，测定‘华硕’@@@‘华金’@@@‘华鑫’@@@‘湘林210’@@@‘衡东大桃2号’@@@3年生幼苗在3种土壤中的生长及生理生化指标，并采用隶属函数法和主成分分析法进行综合评价。

【结果】

酸性紫色土更适宜油茶生长，各品种生长指标隶属函数均值均高于红壤和碱性紫色土。酸性土中，‘华硕’@@@和‘衡东大桃2号’@@@综合表现最优，生长及生理生化指标总体良好，但叶绿素含量较低。碱性土中，‘华硕’@@@与‘华鑫’@@@抗氧化酶活性较高，但前者丙二醛含量最高，细胞膜受损严重，适应性差；‘华鑫’@@@丙二醛含量较低，隶属函数排名靠前，表现出更强的膜稳定性与抗逆性。主成分分析结果表明，所有品种在酸性土中排名均优于其余土壤，‘衡东大桃2号’@@@与‘华鑫’@@@在红壤和酸性紫色土中表现良好，‘华金’@@@与‘华鑫’@@@在碱性土中适应性相对较好。

【结论】

综合各处理指标数据，酸性紫色土最适宜油茶生长，其栽培品种在综合排名前5位中占比达100%。土壤适应性排序为酸性紫色土>红壤>碱性紫色土。酸性紫色土和红壤中‘衡东大桃2号’@@@和‘华鑫’@@@均表现最佳；碱性紫色土中‘华金’@@@和‘华鑫’@@@相对表现优异。综合各油茶品种在3种土壤类型上的表现，‘华鑫’@@@整体上适应性最好。

关键词

油茶 / 紫色土 / 适应性 / 生长指标 / 生理指标

Abstract

收起

【Objective】

This study aimed to investigate the differences in growth and physiological characteristics of seedlings from five predominant Camellia oleifera cultivars in Hunan Province under acidic purple soil, alkaline purple soil, and red soil (control) conditions, so as to provide a theoretical basis for ecological adaptability evaluation, cultivar selection, and targeted soil improvement of C. oleifera in purple soil regions of Hunan.

【Method】

A pot experiment was conducted using red soil as the control. Growth, physiological, and biochemical indices of three-year-old seedlings of five cultivars (‘Huashuo’@@@, ‘Huajin’@@@, ‘Huaxin’@@@, ‘Xianglin 210’@@@, and ‘Hengdong Datao No.2’@@@) were measured across three soil types. The data were comprehensively evaluated using membership function method and principal component analysis.

【Result】

The acidic purple soil was more favorable for the growth of C. oleifera, with the average membership function values of growth indicators for all cultivars being higher than those in the red soil and alkaline purple soil. Under acidic soil conditions, ‘Huashuo’@@@ and ‘Hengdong Datao No.2’@@@ showed the most comprehensive performance, with generally desirable growth, physiological, and biochemical parameters, although their chlorophyll content was comparatively lower. In alkaline soil, both ‘Huashuo’@@@ and ‘Huaxin’@@@ exhibited elevated antioxidant enzyme activities; however, ‘Huashuo’@@@ displayed the highest malondialdehyde (MDA) content, indicating substantial membrane damage and poor adaptability. In contrast, ‘Huaxin’@@@ maintained lower MDA levels and achieved higher membership function rankings, reflecting superior membrane stability and stress tolerance. Principal component analysis revealed that all cultivars performed better in acidic soil than in the other soil types. ‘Hengdong Datao No. 2’@@@ and ‘Huaxin’@@@ performed well in both red soil and acidic purple soil, whereas ‘Huajin’@@@ and ‘Huaxin’@@@ demonstrated relatively better adaptability in alkaline purple soil.

【Conclusion】

Comprehensive analysis of all measured indicators revealed that acidic purple soil was the most suitable for C. oleifera growth, with cultivars grown in this soil type occupying the top five positions in the overall ranking. The order of soil adaptability was determined as: acidic purple soil>red soil>alkaline purple soil. ‘Hengdong Datao No. 2’@@@ and ‘Huaxin’@@@ exhibited the best performance in both acidic purple soil and red soil, while ‘Huajin’@@@ and ‘Huaxin’@@@ showed relatively superior adaptation in alkaline purple soil. Considering the overall performance across all three soil types, ‘Huaxin’@@@ demonstrated the strongest comprehensive adaptability.

Key words

Camellia oleifera / purple soil / adaptability / growth indicator / physiological indicator

引用本文

罗晶晶, 李建安, 尹思洁, 解子安, 郭璞瑞, 陈嫣灵, 阎晋东. 湖南省5个油茶主栽品种幼苗对紫色土的适应性. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2026 , 46 (6) : 44 -55 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.06.005

Jingjing LUO, Jian'an LI, Sijie YIN, Zi'an XIE, Purui GUO, Yanling CHEN, Jindong YAN. Adaptability of seedlings from five predominant Camellia oleifera cultivars to purple soils in Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026 , 46 (6) : 44 -55 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.06.005

基金

收起

国家自然科学基金项目(32371930)
湖南省自然科学基金青年项目(2023JJ41041)
岳麓山实验室种业专项(YLS-2025-ZY04068)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

孟桂元, 韩杰铖, 詹兴国, 等. 我国油茶产业分析与发展对策[J]. 中国油脂, 2021, 46(7): 104-108, 113.

MENG

G Y

, HAN

J C

, ZHAN

X G

, et al. Industry analysis and development strategy of oil-tea camellia in China[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2021, 46(7): 104-108, 113.

[2]

国家油茶科学中心. 油茶高效实用栽培技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.

National Camellia oleifera Research Center. Efficient cultivation techniques of Camellia oleifera[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2010.

[3]

徐新平. 油茶种植现状及高产栽培技术分析[J]. 现代园艺, 2020, 43(15): 81-82.

X P

. Current situation of Camellia oleifera cultivation and analysis of high-yield cultivation techniques[J]. Modern Horticulture, 2020, 43(15): 81-82.

[4]

侯阳. 油茶种植优势及丰产栽培技术探讨[J]. 南方农业, 2019, 13(29): 5-6.

HOU

. Advantages of Camellia oleifera cultivation and discussion on high-yield cultivation techniques[J]. South China Agriculture, 2019, 13(29): 5-6.

[5]

张洋, 严茂林, 葛玮玮, 等. 我国食用植物油供给现状分析及未来发展战略研究[J]. 中国油脂, 2022, 47(4): 1-8.

ZHANG

, YAN

M L

, GE

W W

, et al. Present situation of edible vegetable oil supply in China and its future development strategy[J]. China Oils and Fats, 2022, 47(4): 1-8.

[6]

栾淑丽, 任红艳, 施润和, 等. 中国油茶种植适宜性评价及产能提升建议[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(10): 39-47.

LUAN

S L

, REN

H Y

, SHI

R H

, et al. Evaluation on the suitability of Camellia oleifera planting and suggestions for productivity improvement in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(10): 39-47.

[7]

张菊珠. 种植油茶防治紫色土水土流失的技术和效益分析[J]. 南方农业, 2015, 9(9): 49-50.

ZHANG

J Z

. Techniques and benefit analysis of planting Camellia oleifera for controlling soil erosion in purple soil[J]. South China Agriculture, 2015, 9(9): 49-50.

[8]

何毓蓉, 郑霖, 陈学华, 等. 中国紫色土.下篇[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.

Y R

, ZHENG

, CHEN

X H

, et al. Chinese purple soil (Part II)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2003.

[9]

《湖南森林》编辑委员会. 湖南森林[M]. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 1991.

Editorial Committee of Hunan Forest. Hunan forest[M]. Changsha: Hunan Science and Technology Press, 1991.

[10]

何方. 中国中亚热带荒漠化及其防治[J]. 中国水土保持, 2003(5): 12-14.

. Desertification and its control in the mid-subtropical zone of China[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2003(5): 12-14.

[11]

连旭东, 张璐, 刘思汝, 等. 作物产量对土壤pH的响应差异及其影响因素[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(9): 1618-1629.

LIAN

X D

, ZHANG

, LIU

S R

, et al. Response of crop yield to soil pH and the influencing factors[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2023, 29(9): 1618-1629.

[12]

刘欣, 彭道黎, 邱新彩. 华北落叶松不同林型土壤理化性质差异[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(4): 735-743.

LIU

, PENG

D L

, QIU

X C

. Differences in soil physiochemical properties between different forest types of Larix principis-rupprechtii[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2018, 24(4): 735-743.

[13]

KUMAR

, SHARMA

, ARYA

S S

, et al. The potential of glycine betaine application to combat Cd and As toxicity in wheat plants by altering photosynthetic, physiological, and antioxidant enzyme indices[J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2025, 53: 887-901.

[14]

张杨珠, 周清, 黄运湘, 等. 湖南土壤分类的研究概况与展望[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2014(9): 31-34, 38.

ZHANG

Y Z

, ZHOU

, HUANG

Y X

, et al. General situations and prospects of soil classification in Hunan Province[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2014(9): 31-34, 38.

[15]

魏静, 谭星, 王昌盛, 等. 引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(1): 97-105.

WEI

, TAN

, WANG

C S

, et al. Comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of introduced Acer rubrum in two purple soil[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2024, 48(1): 97-105.

[16]

张文, 李林珂, 吴焦焦, 等. 引种玫瑰营养生长对重庆市3种土壤类型的响应[J]. 重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 37(3): 138-144.

ZHANG

, LI

L K

, WU

J J

, et al. Response of vegetative growth of introduced roses to three soil types in Chongqing[J]. Journal of Chongqing Normal University (Natural Science), 2020, 37(3): 138-144.

[17]

王学奎, 黄见良. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015.

WANG

X K

, HUANG

J L

. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2015.

[18]

保倩倩. 干旱胁迫对黄麻生长和番茄种子萌发的影响研究[D]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2018.

BAO

Q Q

. Effects of drought stress on the growth of jute and the germination of tomato seeds[D]. Kunming: Yunnan University, 2018.

[19]

李合生, 孙群, 赵世杰, 等. 植物生理生化试验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.

H S

, SUN

, ZHAO

S J

, et al. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.

[20]

张亚琴. 油茶叶片生理与小枝发育对林下光环境的响应[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2022.

ZHANG

Y Q

. Responses of leaf physiology and branch development of Camellia oleifera to understory light environment[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2022.

[21]

张雪婷, 杨文雄, 柳娜, 等. 甘肃西部抗旱型玉米品种的综合评价及筛选[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(7): 1281-1290.

ZHANG

X T

, YANG

W X

, LIU

, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and screening of drought-resistant maize varieties in western Gansu[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 32(7): 1281-1290.

[22]

彭惠萍, 蔡宇宇, 詹丽红, 等. 不同遮阴度对红花玉兰‘娇红1号’@@@生长生理及花期特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2025, 45(8): 41-52.

PENG

H P

, CAI

Y Y

, ZHAN

L H

, et al. Effects of different shading degrees on growth physiology and flowering characteristics of Magnolia wufengensis ‘Jiaohong 1’@@@[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2025, 45(8): 41-52.

[23]

谢然, 陶冶, 常顺利. 四种一年生荒漠植物构件形态与生物量间的异速生长关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3): 648-655.

XIE

, TAO

, CHANG

S L

. Allometric relationship between modular morphology and biomass of four annuals in the Gurbantunggut desert, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(3): 648-655.

[24]

曾进, 吴吕奇, 黄梓明, 等. 不同育苗方式对晚松不同种源苗期生长及生物量的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(5): 115-120.

ZENG

, WU

L Q

, HUANG

Z M

, et al. Effect on difference of growth and biomass about Pinus rigida var. serotina in different ways of seeding[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018, 38(5): 115-120.

[25]

王超. 5种土壤类型下美洲黑杨和欧美杨幼树的生长和化学计量特征[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2018.

WANG

. Growth and stoichiometric characteristics of Populus deltoides and Populus×canadensis Moench in five soil types[D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2018.

[26]

方志红, 董宽虎. NaCl胁迫对碱蒿可溶性糖和可溶性蛋白含量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(16): 147-149.

FANG

Z H

, DONG

K H

. Effects of NaCl stress on soluble protein contents and soluble carbohydrate contents of Artemisia cnethifolia[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(16): 147-149.

[27]

王芝权, 喻方圆, 施钦, 等. 中山杉407 ThP5CS和Thδ-OAT的克隆及干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2018, 31(4): 126-134.

WANG

Z Q

, YU

F Y

, SHI

, et al. Cloning and expression analysis of ThP5CS and Thδ-OAT gene in Taxodium hybrid ‘Zhongshanshan 407’@@@ under drought stress[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2018, 31(4): 126-134.

[28]

刘娥娥, 宗会, 郭振飞, 等. 干旱、盐和低温胁迫对水稻幼苗脯氨酸含量的影响[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2000, 8(3): 235-238.

LIU

E E

, ZONG

, GUO

Z F

, et al. Effects of drought, salt and chilling stresses on proline accumulation in shoot of rice seedlings[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2000, 8(3): 235-238.

[29]

刘畅, 孙璐. 盐碱胁迫对玉米苗期生理指标影响的研究进展[J]. 种子科技, 2020, 38(11): 18-19.

LIU

, SUN

. Research progress on effects of saline-alkali stress on physiological indexes of maize at seedling stage[J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2020, 38(11): 18-19.

[30]

WANG

, HU

X C

, WEI

C H

, et al. Effects of Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate on growth, lipid peroxidation and antioxidative enzyme activity in Dunaliella salina[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 804: 042039.

[31]

黄轩, 李琬婷, 黄晓霞, 等. 铅胁迫对中华常春藤叶绿素含量及荧光特性的影响[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(16): 5469-5475.

HUANG

, LI

W T

, HUANG

X X

, et al. Effects of lead stress on chlorophyll content and fluorescence characteristics of Chinese Ivy (Hedera nepalensis var. sinensis)[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 17(16): 5469-5475.

[32]

AUNG

T T

, SHI

F R

, ZHAI

Y N

, et al. Acidic and alkaline conditions affect the growth of tree peony plants via altering photosynthetic characteristics, limiting nutrient assimilation, and impairing ROS balance[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23: 5094.

2026年第46卷第6期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.06.005

接收时间：2025-05-12
首发时间：2026-10-30
出版时间：2026-06-25

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-05-12
修回日期：2025-09-07

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(32371930)

湖南省自然科学基金青年项目(2023JJ41041)

岳麓山实验室种业专项(YLS-2025-ZY04068)

作者信息

^1.中南林业科技大学　a. 林学院；b. 本油料资源利用全国重点实验室；c. 济林培育与保护教育部重点实验室，湖南　长沙　410004

^2.岳麓山实验室经济林品种创制中心，湖南　长沙　410004

通讯作者:

李建安（lja0731@126.com），教授，博士，博士研究生导师

阎晋东（yjd0731@outlook.com），讲师，博士，硕士研究生导师。

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/znlykj/CN/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.06.005

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT