中南林业科技大学学报

竹集成材格栅夹芯板面外受压性能

PDF下载

王智丰 ^a^,^d , 耿琳莉 ^a , 李贤军 ^b^,^d , 谢力生 ^a^,^d , 汤舒畅 ^a , 陈建英 ^c , 王达 ^a^,^d

中南林业科技大学学报 | 林业工程 2026,46(10): 220-230

收起

中南林业科技大学学报 |林业工程 2026 , 46 (10) : 220 -230

竹集成材格栅夹芯板面外受压性能

全屏

王智丰^a^,^d, 耿琳莉^a, 李贤军^b^,^d, 谢力生^a^,^d, 汤舒畅^a, 陈建英^c, 王达^a^,^d

作者信息

^a.中南林业科技大学　材料与能源学院，湖南　长沙　410004

^b.中南林业科技大学　化学与化工学院，湖南　长沙　410004

^c.中南林业科技大学　园林与建筑学院，湖南　长沙　410004

^d.中南林业科技大学　现代木结构工程材制造及应用技术湖南省工程实验室，湖南　长沙　410004

通讯作者:

王达（yxwang2006@yeah.net），教授，博士，博士研究生导师。

作者简介:

王智丰（wangzhifeng_1984@163.com），副教授，博士，硕士研究生导师。

Out-of-plane compressive performance of laminated bamboo grid sandwich panels

Zhifeng Wang^a^,^d, Linli Geng^a, Xianjun Li^b^,^d, Lisheng Xie^a^,^d, Shuchang Tang^a, Jianying Chen^c, Da Wang^a^,^d

Affiliations

^a.School of Materials and Energy, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China

^b.School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China

^c.School of Landscape Architecture and Architecture, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China

^d.Hunan Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Engineering Material of Modern Wood Structure Manufacturing and Application Technology, Central South University of Forestry & Technology, Changsha 410004, Hunan, China

出版时间: 2026-10-25 doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.10.020

文章导航

摘要

收起

【目的】

探究竹集成材格栅夹芯板在不同荷载工况下的面外受压性能，为其在现代绿色装配式建筑中的轻量化应用提供理论依据和试验支撑。

【方法】

以湖南省桃江县楠竹制备的平压竹集成材格栅夹芯板为研究对象，设计了轴向顺纹与轴向横纹2种芯体类型的竹集成材格栅夹芯板试件，在集中荷载、线荷载、面荷载3种工况下开展了面外受压试验，每组各制备3块平行试件，共计18块试件，系统探究其破坏机理与力学性能。

【结果】

竹集成材格栅夹芯板在不同荷载工况下的破坏模式存在显著差异，在集中荷载工况下其破坏模式主要表现为面板局部断裂；线荷载工况下，以面板断裂为主；面荷载工况下，则主要表现为腹板屈曲和断裂；轴向顺纹芯体试件在3种荷载工况下的力学性能均优于轴向横纹芯体试件，压缩强度分别提升了33.3%、130.3%和178.0%，压缩模量分别提升了36.4%、16.6%和25.2%，吸能能力分别提升了14.3%、72.5%和186.6%。荷载-位移曲线呈典型非线性特征，轴向顺纹芯体试件表现为刚度高但延性较低，轴向横纹芯体试件表现则相反。

【结论】

不同荷载工况（集中荷载、线荷载、面荷载）下试件的破坏模式存在较大差异。同时，芯体类型对试件的面外受压性能影响显著，具体表现为轴向顺纹芯体试件在压缩强度、压缩模量及吸能能力上明显优于轴向横纹芯体试件。

关键词

竹集成材 / 格栅夹芯板 / 面外受压 / 破坏模式 / 能量吸收

Abstract

收起

【Objective】

To investigate the out-of-plane compressive performance of laminated bamboo grid sandwich panels under different loading conditions, and to provide both theoretical foundations and experimental support for their lightweight applications in modern green prefabricated buildings.

【Method】

This study focused on flat-pressed laminated bamboo grid sandwich panels fabricated from Phyllostachys edulis sourced from Taojiang County, Hunan Province. Two core configurations were designed: axial parallel-to-grain and axial perpendicular-to-grain. A total of 18 specimens were prepared (3 parallel specimens for each of the 2 core types under 3 loading conditions). Out-of-plane compression tests were conducted under concentrated, linear, and planar loads to systematically investigate their failure mechanism and mechanical properties.

【Result】

The laminated bamboo grid sandwich panels exhibited significantly distinct failure modes under different loading conditions. Under concentrated load, failure primarily manifested as localized face-sheet fracture; under linear load, face-sheet fracture dominated; while under planar load, the predominant failure modes were web buckling and fracture. Axial parallel-to-grain core specimens demonstrated superior mechanical performance across all three loading conditions compared to axial perpendicular-to-grain specimens, with compressive strength increasing by 33.3%, 130.3% and 178.0%, compressive modulus increasing by 36.4%, 16.6%, and 25.2%, and energy absorption capacity increasing by 14.3%, 72.5% and 186.6%, respectively. As shown in the results, the load-displacement curves exhibited typical nonlinear characteristics, with axial parallel-to-grain specimens showing higher stiffness but lower ductility, while axial perpendicular-to-grain specimens displayed the opposite behavior.

【Conclusion】

The failure modes of specimens showed significant differences under different loading conditions (concentrated load, linear load, planar load). Meanwhile, the core type significantly affected the out-of-plane compressive performance of specimens, specifically showing that axial parallel-to-grain core specimens exhibited notably higher compressive strength, compressive modulus and energy absorption capacity than axial perpendicular-to-grain core specimens.

Key words

laminated bamboo / grid sandwich panels / out-of-plane compression / failure modes / energy absorption

引用本文

王智丰, 耿琳莉, 李贤军, 谢力生, 汤舒畅, 陈建英, 王达. 竹集成材格栅夹芯板面外受压性能. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2026 , 46 (10) : 220 -230 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.10.020

Zhifeng Wang, Linli Geng, Xianjun Li, Lisheng Xie, Shuchang Tang, Jianying Chen, Da Wang. Out-of-plane compressive performance of laminated bamboo grid sandwich panels[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2026 , 46 (10) : 220 -230 . DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.10.020

基金

收起

国家自然科学基金面上项目(32471984)
湖南省林业生态保护修复及发展资金项目(2025ZCY002)
湖南省重点研发计划项目(2024JK2048)
湖南省自然科学基金面上项目(2024JJ5631)
湖南省教育厅优青项目(25B0305)

参考文献

收起

文献

收起

参考文献引证文献

排序方式：

[1]

郑青. 新型格栅结构设计及力学性能研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2017: 1-3.

Zheng

. Design and mechanical properties of novel lattice structures[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2017: 1-3.

[2]

王智丰, 尹犟, 曹磊, 等. 现代胶合木拱桥结构性能评价[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(4): 107-111.

Wang

Z F

, Yin

, Cao

, et al. Structural performance assessment of a glulam arch bridge[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(4): 107-111.

[3]

Chen

L M

, Zhang

, Du

, et al. Dynamic crushing behavior and energy absorption of graded lattice cylindrical structure under axial impact load[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 127: 333-343.

[4]

Turner

A J

, Al Rifaie

, Mian

, et al. Low-velocity impact behavior of sandwich structures with additively manufactured polymer lattice cores[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2018, 27(5): 2505-2512.

[5]

Yin

, Chen

H Y

, Wu

Y B

, et al. Introducing composite lattice core sandwich structure as an alternative proposal for engine hood[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 201: 131-140.

[6]

Lurie

S A

, Solyaev

Y O

, Koshurina

A A

, et al. Design of the corrugated-core sandwich panel with external active cooling system[J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 188: 278-286.

[7]

范华林, 杨卫. 轻质高强点阵材料及其力学性能研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2007, 37(1): 99-112.

Fan

H L

, Yang

. Development of lattice materials with high specific stiffness and strength[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(1): 99-112.

[8]

范华林, 金丰年, 方岱宁. 格栅结构力学性能研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2008, 38(1): 35-52.

Fan

H L

, Jin

F N

, Fang

D N

. Structural mechanics of lattice grids[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2008, 38(1): 35-52.

[9]

毛林海, 苏丽君, 赵磊, 等. 竹复合材料在建筑中的应用[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2024, 22(1): 109-112, 124.

Mao

L H

, Su

L J

, Zhao

, et al. Application of bamboo composite material in buildings[J]. World Bamboo and Rattan, 2024, 22(1): 109-112, 124.

[10]

李海涛, 张齐生, 吴刚, 等. 竹集成材研究进展[J]. 林业工程学报, 2016, 1(6): 10-16.

H T

, Zhang

Q S

, Wu

, et al. A review on development of laminated bamboo lumber[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2016, 1(6): 10-16.

[11]

冷予冰, 陈玲珠, 王明谦, 等. 工程竹结构建筑：从传统走向现代[J]. 世界科学, 2022(11): 38-41.

Leng

Y B

, Chen

L Z

, Wang

M Q

, et al. Engineered bamboo structures: from tradition to modernity[J]. World Science, 2022(11): 38-41.

[12]

Niu

, Wang

. Directional mechanical properties and wave propagation directionality of Kagome honeycomb structures[J]. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 2016, 57: 45-58.

[13]

仇艳慧, 徐庆林, 尹昌平, 等. 缝合增强泡沫夹芯结构复合材料力学性能研究[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2017(10): 46-52.

Qiu

Y H

, Xu

Q L

, Yin

C P

, et al. Mechanical performance of stitched foam core sandwich composites[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2017(10): 46-52.

[14]

樊子砚, 方海, 庄勇, 等. 格构腹板增强泡沫夹芯复合材料准静态压缩吸能试验[J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2017(1): 5-10.

Fan

Z Y

, Fang

, Zhuang

, et al. Experimental study on energy absorption of the foam sandwich composite enhanced lattice web under quasi-static compression[J]. Fiber Reinforced Plastics/Composites, 2017(1): 5-10.

[15]

郑吉良, 彭明军, 孙勇. 等腰梯形蜂窝芯玻璃钢夹芯板的面外压缩性能[J]. 材料工程, 2017, 45(2): 72-79.

Zheng

J L

, Peng

M J

, Sun

. Out-plane compressive properties for isosceles trapezoid honeycomb core of FRP sandwich panel[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering, 2017, 45(2): 72-79.

[16]

陈领, 刘佳桐, 刘瑞越, 等. 偏心距对胶合木空心柱受压性能的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(2): 166-179.

Chen

, Liu

J T

, Liu

R Y

, et al. Influences of eccentricity on the compressive performance of glulam hollow columns[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2023, 43(2): 166-179.

[17]

Taghizadeh

S A

, Farrokhabadi

, Liaghat

, et al. Characterization of compressive behavior of PVC foam infilled composite sandwich panels with different corrugated core shapes[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 135: 160-172.

[18]

石昌, 王继辉, 朱俊, 等. 梯形格栅结构增强泡沫夹芯复合材料平压性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(2): 590-600.

Shi

, Wang

J H

, Zhu

, et al. Flatwise compression properties of trapezoidal lattice-web reinforced foam core sandwich composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(2): 590-600.

[19]

Sun

S Y M

, Liu

, Sheng

Y L

, et al. Out-of-plane compression of a novel hybrid corrugated core sandwich panel[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 272: 114222.

[20]

李旌豪. 三轴格栅夹芯板结构性能试验研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2012: 43-45.

J H

. Experimental researches on structural performance of tri-axial grids sandwich panels[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2012: 43-45.

[21]

杨冬霞, 胡英成, 范长胜. 木质格栅夹芯胞元结构的平压力学性能[J]. 林业工程学报, 2018, 3(5): 34-40.

Yang

D X

, Hu

Y C

, Fan

C S

. Compression mechanical properties of woody grid sandwich unit cell structure[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2018, 3(5): 34-40.

[22]

魏凯耀, 曾竟成, 杜刚, 等. 整体缝合夹芯结构复合材料压缩性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2016, 33(6): 1234-1241.

Wei

K Y

, Zeng

J C

, Du

, et al. Compression performance of integrated stitched sandwich structure composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2016, 33(6): 1234-1241.

[23]

李静雯, 张博明, 孙义亮, 等. 不同铺层方式下连续玻璃纤维/聚丙烯复合材料波纹夹芯板的力学性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(5): 1074-1082.

J W

, Zhang

B M

, Sun

Y L

, et al. Mechanical properties of continuous glass fiber/polypropylene corrugated sandwich boards under different laminates[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(5): 1074-1082.

[24]

周李承. 新型竹质集成材格栅夹芯板抗弯性能研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2024: 58-60.

Zhou

L C

. Research on bending performance of laminated bamboo sandwich panels with lattice core[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2024: 58-60.

[25]

王智丰, 汤舒畅, 彭熙之, 等. 竹集成材格栅夹芯板轴心受压性能[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(9): 173-183.

Wang

Z F

, Tang

S C

, Peng

X Z

, et al. Axial compression performance of laminated bamboo grid sandwich panels[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(9): 173-183.

[26]

Wang

Z F

, Zhou

L C

, Zhang

Z F

, et al. Study on bending performance of laminated bamboo sandwich panels with different lattice core layers: cleaner production of green material[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 20: e03379.

[27]

GB/T 1453—2022夹层结构或芯子平压性能试验方法[S].

GB/T 1453-2022 Test method for flatwise compression properties of sandwich constructions or cores[S].

[28]

庄勇, 王健, 方海, 等. 空间格构腹板增强泡沫夹芯复合材料试件准静态压缩吸能试验[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2018, 35(5): 70-77.

Zhuang

, Wang

, Fang

, et al. Experiment on energy absorption of foam sandwich composite specimens with spatial reinforced lattice web under quasi-static compression[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2018, 35(5): 70-77.

2026年第46卷第10期

PDF下载

引用本文

BibTeX

文章信息

doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.10.020

接收时间：2025-06-24
首发时间：2026-10-30
出版时间：2026-10-25

补充材料

相关文章

文章信息

作者

出版历史

收稿日期：2025-06-24
修回日期：2025-09-15

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(32471984)

湖南省林业生态保护修复及发展资金项目(2025ZCY002)

湖南省重点研发计划项目(2024JK2048)

湖南省自然科学基金面上项目(2024JJ5631)

湖南省教育厅优青项目(25B0305)

作者信息

^a.中南林业科技大学　材料与能源学院，湖南　长沙　410004

^b.中南林业科技大学　化学与化工学院，湖南　长沙　410004

^c.中南林业科技大学　园林与建筑学院，湖南　长沙　410004

^d.中南林业科技大学　现代木结构工程材制造及应用技术湖南省工程实验室，湖南　长沙　410004

通讯作者:

王达（yxwang2006@yeah.net），教授，博士，博士研究生导师。

参考文献

分享链接

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/znlykj/CN/10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2026.10.020

分享至

全文二维码

扫描看全文

引用本文

BibTeX

本文的引用情况

2种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT